Laparoscopic left hepatectomy in a goat as a training model for laparoscopic anatomic liver resection: results of training courses with a total of 70 goats

BACKGROUND

To create a suitable animal model for the training of laparoscopic anatomic liver resection, we performed left hepatectomy using a goat and found its suitability. We have since started using goats for wet-lab training and have gradually standardized the relevant procedures. Herein, we report our standardized training procedures using a goat and discuss its feasibility as a novel training model.

METHODS

The standardized wet-lab training courses of laparoscopic liver resection conducted on 62 tables with a total of 70 goats were reviewed. The training course began by encircling the hepatoduodenal ligament for the Pringle maneuver, which was repeated during the parenchymal dissection. Following partial liver resection of the left lateral section, left hepatectomy was performed by a standardized procedure for humans in which the liver was split, exposing the entire length of the middle hepatic vein trunk from the dorsal side after extrahepatic transection of the left Glissonean pedicle. If a goat deceased before initiating left hepatectomy, the training was restarted with a new goat. The surgical procedures were performed by surgeons of varying skill levels.

RESULTS

A total of 184 surgeons including 10 surgical residents participated in the training. Partial liver resection was initiated in 62 tables, with 8 (13%) dying during or after the procedure of partial liver resection. Subsequently, left hepatectomy was initiated in 61 and completed in 59 tables (98%), regardless of whether the goat survived or deceased, and was not completed in 2 tables (3%) due to time limitation. In 14 tables (23%), the goats deceased during the procedure, however, the procedure was completed. The causes of death were multifactorial, including massive bleeding, reperfusion injury after the Pringle maneuver, and carbon dioxide gas embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Left hepatectomy in a goat is useful as a training model for laparoscopic anatomic liver resection.

The feasibility of combined resection and subsequent reconstruction of the right hepatic artery in left hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined resection of the right hepatic artery (RHA) is sometimes required to achieve complete resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of combined resection and subsequent reconstruction by continuous suture of the RHA during left hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the outcomes after left hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction for cholangiocarcinoma between patients with and without RHA resection and reconstruction.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients who underwent left hepatectomy combined with biliary reconstruction, eight patients (32%) underwent combined resection and reconstruction of the RHA (AR group). The demographic characteristics were not different between the AR and non-AR groups. The amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in patients with AR (2350 mL vs. 900 mL, p = 0.017). The prevalence of early complications above grade III in Clavien-Dindo classification and late complications were not significantly different between the AR and non-AR groups. In the AR group, complications directly associated with AR, such as thrombosis or reanastomosis, were not observed. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, recurrence-free survival (p = 0.618) and overall survival (p = 0.803) were comparable between the two groups despite the advanced T stages in the AR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined resection and subsequent reconstruction of the RHA during left-sided hepatectomy is a feasible treatment alternative for cholangiocarcinoma.

Clinical and oncological benefits of left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to clarify whether the postoperative prognosis differs between right and left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Preoperative images of 195 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were reexamined. Patients with Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma without a difference in extraductal tumor invasion between the right and left sides of the hepatic portal region were classified into those undergoing left (L group) or right (R group) hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (11.8%) were classified into the L group and 33 (16.9%) into the R group. All eight patients with pTis/1 belonged to the L group. The L group had significantly less liver failure than the R group (p = 0.001). One patient (4.3%) in the L group and four patients (12.1%) in the R group died from postoperative complications. Among 48 patients with pT2, the L group tended to have better overall survival (median, 12.2 vs. 5.6 years; p = 0.072), but not recurrence-free survival (median, 9.1 vs. 3.6 years; p = 0.477), in comparison to the R group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative survival after left hepatectomy for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is expected to be as long as that after right hepatectomy.

Concomitant hilar cholangiocarcinoma with choledochal cyst and cholelithiasis in an asymptomatic patient: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Choledochal cyst is an important risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma. Concomitant hilar cholangiocarcinoma with choledochal cyst with cholelithiasis is a rare finding.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old male presented with non-specific complaints of generalized weakness for 3 months. Transabdominal ultrasound showed dilated common bile duct with hyperechoic mass at hilar region; further evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced computer tomography of abdomen and pelvis revealed concomitant intraductal hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth Corlette type 1) with Choledochal cyst (type IVa) with cholelithiasis. After optimization patient underwent left hepatectomy with common bile duct excision with cholecystectomy with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Histopathological examination confirmed it to be well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, intestinal type at the hilar confluence.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

An asymptomatic male patient with the concomitant finding of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth Corlette type I) with choledochal cyst type IVa with cholelithiasis is a rare finding. The patient was managed with surgical excision of the common bile duct with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and cholecystectomy. Diagnostic evaluation should be proper not to miss or overlook such a synchronous lesion.

CONCLUSION

Incidental finding of concomitant perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with the choledochal cyst is rare. Proper evaluation of the patient with CECT abdomen and pelvis and MRCP is necessary for the diagnosis. Proper surgical resection with adequate lymph node removal is important for surgical clearance.

Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after living donor left hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is uncomfortable complication after left hepatectomy. The aim of this study is to show our strategy to prevent DGE after living donor left hepatectomy.

METHODS

The cases were divided into 3 groups as without any prevention (control group), prevented DGE with putting omentum between the liver and pylorus (O group), and with putting a Seprafilm (S group). The incidence of DGE and the CT finding 1 month after surgery were retrospectively compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGE was significantly decreased in O and S group than control group (P < 0.05, Fisher's test). In S group, fluid collection along the cutting surface of the liver was observed on CT significantly more than other groups, but the incidence of bile leakage was adversely less in S groups than other groups, meaning that collected fluid in S group were presumed as the ascites without bile.

CONCLUSION

Omentum patching and Seprafilm were equally effective to prevent DGE after living donor left hepatectomy, and Seprafilm might be better because it is more physiologic.

Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations - a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers

INTRODUCTION

A stronger evidence level is needed to confirm the benefits and limits of laparoscopic hemihepatectomies.

METHODS

Laparoscopic and open hemihepatectomies from nine European referral centers were compared after propensity score matching (right and left hemihepatectomies separately, and benign and malignant diseases sub-analyses).

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-five laparoscopic hemihepatectomies were compared with 545 open. Laparoscopy was associated with reduced blood loss (P < 0.001), postoperative stay (P < 0.001) and minor morbidity (P = 0.002), supported by a lower Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (P = 0.035). Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomies were associated with lower ascites (P = 0.016), bile leak (P = 0.001) and wound infections (P = 0.009). Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomies exhibited a lower incidence of bile leak and cardiovascular complications (P = 0.024; P = 0.041), lower minor and major morbidity (P = 0.003; P = 0.044) and reduced CCI (P = 0.002). Laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LMH) for benign disease were associated with lower blood loss (P = 0.001) and bile leaks (P = 0.037) and shorter total stay (P < 0.001). LMH for malignancy were associated with lower blood loss (P < 0.001) and minor morbidity (P = 0.027) supported by a lower CCI (P = 0.021) and shorter stay (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter study confirms some associated advantages of laparoscopic left and right hemihepatectomies in malignant and benign conditions highlighting the need for realistic expectations of the minimally invasive approach based on the resected hemiliver and the patients treated.

Comparison analysis of left-side versus right-side resection in bismuth type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Backgrounds/Aims

Several studies report worse prognosis after left-side compared to right-side liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. In this study, we compared outcomes of left-side and right-side resections for Bismuth type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed factors affecting survival.

Methods

From May 1995 to December 2012, 179 patients underwent surgery at Samsung Medical Center for type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Among these patients, 138 received hepatectomies for adenocarcinoma with curative intent: 103 had right-side resections (IIIa group) and 35 had left-side resections (IIIb group). Perioperative demographics, morbidity, mortality, and overall and disease-free survival rates were compared between the groups.

Results

BMI was higher in the IIIa group (24±2.6 kg/m² versus 22.7±2.8 kg/m²; p=0.012). Preoperative portal vein embolization was done in 23.3% of patients in the IIIa group and none in the IIIb group. R0 rate was 82.5% in the IIIa group and 85.7% in the IIIb group (p=0.796) and 3a complications by Clavien-Dindo classification were significantly different between groups (10.7% for IIIa versus 23.3% for IIIb; p=0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate was 33% in the IIIa group and 35% in the IIIb group (p=0.983). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 28% in the IIIa group and 29% in the IIIb group (p=0.706). Advanced T-stages 3 and 4 and LN metastasis were independent prognostic factors for survival and recurrence by multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

No significant differences were seen in outcomes by lesion side in patients receiving curative surgery for Bismuth type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Usefulness of the Ligamentum Venosum as an Anatomical Landmark for Safe Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy (How I Do It)

Anatomical landmarks are commonly utilized in surgical practice to help surgeons to maintain an anatomical orientation. The ligamentum venosum (LV) is an anatomical landmark that is utilized during left hepatectomy via both the open and the laparoscopic approaches. We describe the usefulness of the LV as an anatomical landmark in performing a safe laparoscopic left hepatectomy. The key characteristic of our technique is that the LV is divided at the end of the surgery. Our technique involves identification and dissection of the LV, but we do not divide it during liver mobilization. The LV marks the boundary for safe vascular inflow control of the left hemiliver. Following exposure of the middle hepatic vein, hepatic parenchymal transection is curved toward the LV, which serves as a landmark to guide surgeons to achieve an optimal plane of transection in the late stages. A suitable transection point of the left bile duct is determined based on the location of the LV. Between February 2013 and September 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent pure laparoscopic left hepatectomy. The median operation time was 240 min (range 180-350 min), and the median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 200 ml (range 80-600 ml). Major postoperative complications occurred in one patient (4.8%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-15 days). This systematic approach using the LV as an anatomical landmark may serve as a safe and effective technique to perform a laparoscopic left hepatectomy.

Preliminary trial of augmented reality performed on a laparoscopic left hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver surgery is seldom performed, mainly because of the risk of hepatic vein bleeding or incomplete resection of the tumour. This risk may be reduced by means of an augmented reality guidance system (ARGS), which have the potential to aid one in finding the position of intrahepatic tumours and hepatic veins and thus in facilitating the oncological resection and in limiting the risk of operative bleeding.

METHODS

We report the case of an 81-year-old man who was diagnosed with a hepatocellular carcinoma after an intraabdominal bleeding. The preoperative CT scan did not show metastases. We describe our preferred approach for laparoscopic left hepatectomy with initial control of the left hepatic vein and preliminary results of our novel ARGS achieved postoperatively. In our ARGS, a 3D virtual anatomical model is created from the abdominal CT scan and manually registered to selected laparoscopic images. For this patient, the virtual model was composed of the segmented left liver, right liver, tumour and median hepatic vein.

RESULTS

The patient's operating time was summed up to 205 min where a blood loss of 300 cc was recorded. The postoperative course was simple. Histopathological analysis revealed the presence of a hepatocellular carcinoma with free margins. Our results of intrahepatic visualization suggest that ARGS can be beneficial in detecting the tumour, transection plane and medial hepatic vein prior to parenchymal transection, where it does not work due to the substantial changes to the liver's shape.

CONCLUSIONS

As of today, we have performed eight similar left hepatectomies, with good results. Our ARGS has shown promising results and should now be attempted intraoperatively.

Left hepatectomy after right paramedian sectoriectomy

Repeat hepatectomy is beneficial for selected patients with recurrence of liver malignancies. However, the operative procedure becomes technically demanding when the previous hepatectomy was complex, with hepatic veins and stump of portal pedicles exposed on the liver transection surface. We performed left hepatectomy after right paramedian sectoriectomy (RPMS) for three patients. Here, we describe our surgical technique and the postoperative outcomes achieved. This procedure allowed for safe adhesiolysis between the middle and right hepatic veins by following a fibrous plane. The mean operative time was 8.7 h, including 4.9 h of adhesiolysis. The mean remnant liver volume (right lateral sector and the caudate lobe) was calculated as 704 ml, being 62% of total liver volume. There was no postoperative liver failure or mortality. In conclusion, left hepatectomy after RPMS is a feasible procedure for patients with sufficient remnant liver volume, even though the middle and right hepatic veins run side by side after liver regeneration.

Laparoscopic left liver resections: how far can we go?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomies of the left liver segments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicentre study including all patients operated on laparoscopically divided into unisegmentectomy of 2, 3 or 4 (Group 1), left lobectomy (or left lateral sectionectomy LLS) (Group 2), left hepatectomy (Group 3) and extended left hepatectomy (Group 4) between 2000 and 2016. These four groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 190 selected patients, the groups 1, 2, 3, 4 included 25 (13.2%), 116 (61.0%), 27 (14.2%) and 22 (11.6%) patients, respectively. The cohorts were comparable except for the number of lesions (p = 0.001) and tumour diameter (p = 0.004). The operative time, blood loss and the use of vascular clamping were more frequent in the Groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.0001), as is the rate of conversion to laparotomy (p = 0.001). Total morbidity was 23.3%, and major complications were more frequent in Group 4 (p = 0.0001). The prevalence of hepatic complications (11.6%), intra-abdominal collections (7.4%) and respiratory complications (3.7%) was proportionally correlated to the hepatectomy extension (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

All laparoscopic left liver resections seem safe and feasible even though extended hepatectomy is associated with a significant morbidity.

Left hepatectomy with simultaneous hepatic artery and portal vein reconstructions in the operation for cholangiocarcinoma: the surgical techniques comprised of step-by-step established procedures

Hepatectomy needing simultaneous reconstruction of the hepatic artery and the portal vein in the operation for cholangiocarcinoma is a challenging procedure. We experienced three cases of left hepatectomy with simultaneous reconstructions of the right hepatic artery (RHA) and the right portal vein (RPV) in all of which the surgical procedures were performed in the same manner. At the initial step of the procedure, we confirmed that the RHA and the RPV at the porta hepatis as well as the proper hepatic artery and the main portal vein (MPV) proximal to the cancer involvement could be controlled by tapes, which meant the cancer could be resected by means of vascular reconstructions. All the vascular reconstructions were performed under loupe magnification. The mean periods of portal and arterial ischemic time of the remnant liver were 14 min. 32 sec. and 35 min. 58 sec., respectively. The mean operative time and the intraoperative blood loss were 627 min. and 804 mL, respectively. No serious postoperative complication occurred. By performing step-by-step well-established procedures, this complicated and challenging operation could be safely completed.

An unusual case of left hepatectomy for Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH) linked to the use of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AASs)

INTRODUCTION

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign tumor of the liver. Clinically FNH is asymptomatic and discovered incidentally . The pathogenesis is unclear; FNH is usually asymptomatic. When the tumor is large, it may be painful. Surgery is recommended only in the case of complications such as compression of adjacent organs, lesion progression with tumor size >5cm and presence of symptoms.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 30 years old man, was evaluated during a routine visit, for diffuse abdominal pain and weight loss; Abdominal ultrasound showed no evidence of biliary obstruction but the US shows a hypoechoic, well defined focal lesion in the left liver. For a more accurate diagnosis a Magnetic Resonance detected a focal area about 14×9 cm in diameter, hypointense. Liver biopsy was not done.We could not diagnose it definitively as FNH from the results of imaging studies; so for the size of symptomatic lesion, the undefined diagnosis of FNH ,and due to the great increase in the size of the mass located in the left lobe, during such a short period , the surgery was been recommended.

DISCUSSION

FNH is the second most common hepatic lesion, but clinically relevant cases of FNH are rare with a reported prevalence in US studies of 0,03%. In our case the young patient was taking dietary supplements including anabolic androgenic steroids (AASs), carnitine and l-arginine.

CONCLUSION

The particularity of our case is the increasing of the lesion in two years in which the patient made use of anabolic steroids. under use of . This could be the explanation for increasing of nodule.

Combined radiologic and endoscopic treatment (using the “rendezvous technique”) of a biliary fistula following left hepatectomy

Despite the ongoing decrease in the frequency of complications after hepatectomy, biliary fistulas still occur and are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Here, we report on an unusual technique for managing biliary fistula following left hepatectomy in a patient in whom the right posterior segmental duct joined the left hepatic duct. The biliary fistula was treated with a combined radiologic and endoscopic procedure based on the “rendezvous technique”. The clinical outcome was good, and reoperation was not required.

Left hepatectomy combined with hepatic artery resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy of our technique and policy on left hepatectomy (LH) with hepatic artery resection but without arterial reconstruction (HAR) in selected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

From May 2005 to May 2012, 61 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent left hepatectomy. These patients were divided into two groups: the LH with HAR group (n = 26) and the LH alone group (n = 35), based on whether hepatic artery resection was performed. We evaluated the serum total and direct bilirubin on postoperative day 7, length of hospital stay after surgery, postoperative complications, long-term postoperative survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The improvement in jaundice after surgery was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.837). There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications or mortality between the LH with HAR group and the LH group (P = 0.654 and no assessment, respectively). The cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 61.5%, 49%, 40.8% and 30.6% and 71.4%, 58.7%, 51.3% and 38.5%, respectively, in the LH with HAR group and the LH group (P = 0.383, including perioperative deaths). The cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 61.9%, 41.6%, 29.7% and 14.8% and 58.2%, 50.7%, 44.3% and 23.6% in the LH with HAR group and the LH group, respectively (P = 0.695, including perioperative deaths). The postoperative complication rate was higher in patients with severe jaundice than those with non-severe jaundice, but no significant difference was detected (56.3% (9/16) vs. 46.7% (46.7%), P = 0.804). Similarly, 18.8% (3/16) postoperative mortality was found in patients with severe jaundice, compared to 4.4% (2/45) in those with non-severe jaundice. The difference was not significant (P = 0.139). For the cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival and cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates, patients with severe jaundice had poorer outcomes than those with non-severe jaundice (56.3%, 43.8%, 35% and 26.3% vs. 66.7%, 58.8%, 52.2% and 41.8%, P = 0.317; 50%, 42.9%, 35.7% and 13.4% vs. 63.8%, 54%, 35.6% and 21.3%, P = 0.753).

CONCLUSION

Left hepatectomy combined with hepatic artery resection and no reconstruction for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is recommended when the following conditions are satisfied: 1) Bismuth-Corlette I, II, or IIIb hilar cholangiocarcinoma; 2) the tumor has infiltrated the hepatic artery with disappearance or markedly reduced arterial flow as detected by intraoperative ultrasound; 3) the color of the liver by visual observation does not change when the hepatic artery has been blocked for 5 min; and 4) removal of the tumor-infiltrated hepatic artery increases the probability of R0 resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. For obstructive jaundice from hilar cholangiocarcinoma, we recommend bile duct drainage before resection in patients with elevated preoperative serum TB.

International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection

Although minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) appear as standardized procedures, major LLRs are still limited to few expert teams. The aim of this study was to report the combined data of 18 international centers performing major LLR. Variables evaluated were number and type of LLR, surgical indications, number of synchronous colorectal resections, details on technical points, conversion rates, operative time, blood loss and surgical margins. From 1996 to 2014, a total of 5388 LLR were carried out including 1184 major LLRs. The most frequent indication for laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) was colorectal liver metastases (37.0%). Seven centers used hand assistance or hybrid approach selectively for LRH mostly at the beginning of their experience. Seven centers apply Pringle's maneuver routinely. The conversion rate for all major LLRs was 10% and mean operative time was 291 min. Mean estimated blood loss for all major LLR was 327 ml and negative surgical margin rate was 96.5%. Major LLRs still remain challenging procedures requiring important experience in both laparoscopy and liver surgery. Stimulating the younger generation to learn and accomplish these techniques is the better way to guarantee further development of this surgical field.

A comparative study regarding the effect of an intraperitoneal anti-adhesive agent application in left-liver living donors

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

After left-sided hepatectomy due to a living donor, the stomach can become adhered to the hepatic cut surface. An unwanted gastric stasis can occur. For prevention of such gastric adhesion and laparotomy-associated adhesive ileus, some anti-adhesive agents have been developed for intra-abdominal application. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an intraperitoneal anti-adhesive agent application compared with a historical control group.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 220 consecutive living donors who donated a left-liver graft during the time period between January 2006 and December 2011. The anti-adhesive agent which was used was composed of sodium hyaluronate and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. The historical control group which used no anti-adhesive agent included 220 consecutive left-liver donors during the time period between January 1998 and December 2004.

RESULTS

An overt gastric stasis which required fasting was observed in 5 subjects (2.3%) in the study group and in 7 subjects (3.2%) in the control group (p=0.77). An additional work-up to determine gastric stasis or prolonged ileus was performed in 17 (7.7%) and 22 (10%) donors, respectively (p=0.51). Only one donor in the control group underwent a laparotomy for an intestinal obstruction. No clinical factors such as patient age, sex, body mass index, remnant right liver proportion, shape of skin incision, and duration of surgery were significant risk factors of gastric stasis or prolonged ileus. No harmful side-effects of the anti-adhesive agent were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of this study, the application of an anti-adhesive agent could not be proved as to be effective for prevention of gastric stasis and postoperative ileus. A further randomized and controlled study will be required to demonstrate the real benefits of an anti-adhesive application in left-liver living donors.