Human polyoma virus-associated interstitial nephritis in the allograft kidney

Identification of RNA-binding protein genes associated with renal rejection and graft survival

Rejection is one of the major factors affecting the long-term prognosis of kidney transplantation, and timely recognition and aggressive treatment of rejection is essential to prevent disease progression. RBPs are proteins that bind to RNA to form ribonucleoprotein complexes, thereby affecting RNA stability, processing, splicing, localization, transport, and translation, which play a key role in post-transcriptional gene regulation. However, their role in renal transplant rejection and long-term graft survival is unclear. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the expression of RPBs in renal rejection and use it to construct a robust prediction strategy for long-term graft survival. The microarray expression profiles used in this study were obtained from GEO database. In this study, a total of eight hub RBPs were identified, all of which were upregulated in renal rejection samples. Based on these RBPs, the renal rejection samples could be categorized into two different clusters (cluster A and cluster B). Inflammatory activation in cluster B and functional enrichment analysis showed a strong association with rejection-related pathways. The diagnostic prediction model had a high diagnostic accuracy for T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) in renal grafts (area under the curve = 0.86). The prognostic prediction model effectively predicts the prognosis and survival of renal grafts (p < .001) and applies to both rejection and non-rejection situations. Finally, we validated the expression of hub genes, and patient prognosis in clinical samples, respectively, and the results were consistent with the above analysis.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Impact of BK Polyomavirus NCCR variations in post kidney transplant outcomes

The human BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a DNA virus that is prevalent in 80 % of the population. Infection with this virus may begin in childhood, followed by asymptomatic persistence in the urinary tract. However, in immunocompromised individuals, especially kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), heightened replication of BKPyV can lead to severe complications. The genome of this virus is divided into three parts; the early and late region, and the non-coding control region (NCCR). Mutations in the NCCR can change the archetype strain to the rearranged strain, and NCCR rearrangements play a significant in virus pathogenesis. Interestingly, diverse types of NCCR block rearrangement result in significant differences in conversion potential and host cell viability in the infected cells. A correlation has been detected between increased viral replication potential and pathogenesis in BKPyV-infected KTRs with specific NCCR rearrangements. The objective of this review study was to examine the disease-causing and clinical consequences of variations in the NCCR in BKPyV-infected KTRs such as virus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN).

Characterization of Herpesviridae Family Members, BK Virus, and Adenovirus in Children and Adolescents with Nephrotic Syndrome

Since the significance of viral infections in children and adolescents with nephrotic syndrome (NS) is yet to be defined, this study intended to estimate the occurrence, pattern, and outcomes of some DNA viral infections in children with NS.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted to determine the genome identification of the viruses Epstein-Barr (EBV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6 type A and type B) and 7 (HHV-7), polyomavirus (BKV), and human adenovirus (HAdV) in plasma and urine samples of pediatric patients with NS.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients aged 1 to 18 years with NS and under immunosuppressant drugs participated in the study. Plasma and urine samples were collected at regular intervals during a median follow-up of 266 days (range 133-595), and DNA was analyzed to detect the selected DNA viruses. Eleven patients (31.4%) had active virus infections, and patterns were classified as coinfection, recurrent, and consecutive. Of these, six patients (54.5%) presented viral coinfection, six (54.5%) viral recurrence, and seven patients (63.3%) had viral consecutive infection. Ten of the eleven patients with active infection had a proteinuria relapse (91%) and eight (72.7%) were hospitalized (p = 0.0022). Active HCMV infection was the most frequent infection and was observed in six patients (54.5%), three of the eleven patients (27.2%) had suspected HCMV disease in the gastrointestinal tract, and one had HHV-7 coinfection. The frequency of other infections was: 9% for HHV-6, 45.5% for BKV, 27.3% for HHV-7, 18.2% for EBV, and 18.2% for HAdV.

CONCLUSION

viral infections, especially HCMV, can be an important cause of morbidity and nephrotic syndrome relapse in children.

A Rare Cause of Encephalopathy Post Renal Transplant: BK Polyoma Virus Encephalitis

BK polyoma virus (BKV) belongs to Polyomaviridae family. It is a double-stranded DNA virus. Only a few cases of BKV-associated neurological disease in renal transplant recipients have been reported. BKV related central nervous system (CNS) infection may often remain unrecognized in immunocompromised patients. Here, we are reporting a case of BKV encephalitis post renal transplantation for the awareness of all physicians regarding this entity.

Recurrent C3 Glomerulonephritis along with BK-Virus-Associated Nephropathy after Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report

C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) is a rare cause of end-stage kidney disease and frequently recurrent in allografts following kidney transplantation (KT). Herein, we describe the case of a kidney transplant recipient who developed recurrent C3GN along with BK-virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) following KT. A 33-year-old man diagnosed with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 17 years ago underwent preemptive KT with a donor kidney from his aunt. Proteinuria gradually increased after 3 months following KT, and graft biopsy was performed 30 months after KT. Histopathological examination revealed recurrent C3GN. The dosages of triple immunosuppressive maintenance therapy agents were increased. Subsequently, serum C3 levels recovered to normal levels. However, at 33 months following KT, the BK viral load increased and graft function gradually deteriorated; a second graft biopsy was performed at 46 months following KT, which revealed BKVAN and decreased C3GN activity. The dosages of immunosuppressive agents were decreased; subsequently, BKVAN improved and graft function was maintained with normal serum C3 levels at 49 months following KT. This case indicates that C3GN is highly prone to recurrence following KT and that immunosuppressive therapy for C3GN increases the risk of BKVAN.

IVIg therapy in the management of BK virus infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) induces kidney allograft dysfunction. Although decreasing immunosuppression is the standard for managing BK virus (BKPyV) infection, this strategy is not always effective. The use of polyvalent immunoglobulins (IVIg) may be of interest in this setting. We performed a retrospective single-center evaluation of the management of BKPyV infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients. Among the 171 patients who underwent transplantation between January 2010 and December 2019, 54 patients were excluded (combined transplant n = 15, follow-up in another center n = 35, early postoperative graft loss n= 4). Thus, 117 patients (120 transplants) were included. Overall, 34 (28%) and 15 (13%) transplant recipients displayed positive BKPyV viruria and viremia, respectively. Three had biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN. The pre-transplant prevalence of CAKUT and HLA antibodies was higher among BKPyV-positive patients compared to non-infected patients. After the detection of BKPyV replication and/or BKPyVAN, the immunosuppressive regimen was modified in 13 (87%) patients: either by decreasing or changing the calcineurin inhibitors (n = 13) and/or switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mTor inhibitors (n = 10). Starting IVIg therapy was based on graft dysfunction or an increase in the viral load despite reduced immunosuppressive regimen. Seven of 15(46%) patients received IVIg. These patients had a higher viral load (5.4 [5.0-6.8]log vs. 3.5 [3.3-3.8]log). In total, 13 of 15 (86%) achieved viral load reduction, five of seven after IVIg therapy. As long as specific antivirals are not available for the management of BKPyV infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients, polyvalent IVIg may be discussed for the management of severe BKPyV viremia, in combination with decreased immunosuppression.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

Introduction

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is associated with graft dysfunction and loss; however, knowledge of immunosuppression reduction strategies and long-term graft, and patient outcomes across the disease spectrum is lacking.

Methods

This cohort study included 14,697 kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand (2005-2019), followed for 91,306 person years.

Results

BKPyVAN occurred in 460 recipients (3%) at a median posttransplant time of 4.8 months (interquartile range, 3.1-10.8). Graft loss (35% vs. 21%, P < 0.001), rejection (42% vs. 25%, P < 0.001), and death (18% vs. 13%, P = 0.002) were more common in the BKPyVAN group. The most frequent changes in immunosuppression after BKPyVAN were reduction (≤50%) in tacrolimus (172, 51%) and mycophenolate doses (134, 40%), followed by the conversion of mycophenolate to leflunomide (62, 19%) and tacrolimus to ciclosporin (20, 6%). Factors associated with the development of BKPyVAN included (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval) male sex (1.66; 1.34-2.05), recipient age (≥70 vs. <20 [2.46; 1.30-4.65]), recipient blood group (A vs. B [2.00; 1.19-3.34]), donor age (≥70 vs. <20 [2.99; 1.71-5.22]), earlier era (1.74; 1.35-2.25), donor/recipient ethnic mismatch (1.52; 1.23-1.87), tacrolimus use (1.46; 1.11-1.91), and transplantation at a lower-volume transplant center (1.61; 1.24-2.09). The development of BKPyVAN was associated with an increased risk of all-cause (1.75; 1.46-2.09) and death-censored graft loss (2.49; 1.99-3.11), but not mortality (1.15; 0.91-1.45).

Conclusions

BKPyVAN is associated with an increased risk of all-cause and death-censored graft loss, but not death. Interventional trials are urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction and novel strategies to minimize the adverse outcomes associated with BKPyVAN.

The role of the DE and EF loop of BKPyV VP1 in the serological cross-reactivity between subtypes

BK virus (BKPyV) is a causative agent of BKPyV-associated nephropathy and graft rejections in kidney transplant patients. It establishes persistent infection in the kidneys, which can lead to reactivation in an immunosuppressed state or transmission to kidney recipients. Complications in the case of donor-derived infections can be caused by differences between the four known BKPyV subtypes, as prior infection with one subtype does not guarantee protection against de novo infection with other subtypes. The recipient and donor pretransplant serotyping is not routinely performed since simple ELISA tests employing antigens derived from the major viral capsid protein 1 (VP1) are hindered by the high cross-reactivity of anti-VP1 antibodies against all subtypes. Identifying subtype-specific epitopes in VP1 could lead to the design of specific antigens and the improvement of serodiagnostics for kidney transplantation. We aimed to study the surface residues responsible for the interactions with the subtype-specific antibodies by focusing on the DE and EF loops of VP1, which have only a small number of distinct amino acid differences between the most common subtypes, BKPyV-I and BKPyV-IV. We designed two mutant virus-like particles (VLPs): we introduced BKPyV-I characteristic amino acid residues (either H139N in the DE loop or D175E and I178V changes in the EF loop) into the base sequence of a BKPyV-IV VP1. This way, we created BKPyV-IV mutant VLPs with the sequence of either the BKPyV-I DE loop or the BKPyV-I EF loop. These mutants were then used as competing antigens in an antigen competition assay with a panel of patient sera, and changes in antibody reactivity were assessed by ELISA. We found that the changes introduced into the BKPyV-IV VP1 EF loop restrict antibody recognition in most samples and that converting the BKPyV-IV DE loop into its BKPyV-I equivalent attracts anti-VP1 BKPyV-I antibodies. Although our results did not lead to the discovery of a subtype-specific epitope on the VP1, they suggested that the arrangement of the EF loop in VP1 might dictate the mode of interaction between virus and anti-VP1 antibodies in general and that the interactions between the antibodies and the viral capsid might be very complex. Consequently, an antigen competition assay as an assay to distinguish between BKPyV serotypes might prove difficult to interpret.

In silico design and evaluation of a novel mRNA vaccine against BK virus: a reverse vaccinology approach

Human polyomavirus type 1, or BK virus (BKV), is a ubiquitous pathogen belonging to the polyomaviridae family mostly known for causing BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) following the immunosuppression regimens recommended in these patients. Reduction of the immunosuppression level and anti-viral agents are the usual approaches for BKV clearance, which have not met a desired outcome yet. There are also debating matters such as the effect of this pathogen on emerging various comorbidities and the related malignancies in the human population. In this study, a reverse vaccinology approach was implemented to design a mRNA vaccine against BKV by identifying the most antigenic proteins of this pathogen. Potential immunogenic T and B lymphocyte epitopes were predicted through various immunoinformatic tools. The final epitopes were selected according to antigenicity, toxicity, allergenicity, and cytokine inducibility scores. According to the obtained results, the designed vaccine was antigenic, neutral at the physiological pH, non-toxic, and non-allergenic with a world population coverage of 93.77%. Since the mRNA codon optimization ensures the efficient expression of the vaccine in a host cell, evaluation of different parameters showed our designed mRNA vaccine has a stable structure. Moreover, it had strong interactions with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) according to the molecular dynamic simulation studies. The in silico immune simulation analyses revealed an overall increase in the immune responses following repeated exposure to the designed vaccine. Based on our findings, the vaccine candidate is ready to be tested as a promising novel mRNA therapeutic vaccine against BKV.

A Nomogram for Predicting BK Virus Activation in Kidney Transplantation Recipients Using Clinical Risk Factors

BK virus is a common opportunistic viral infection that could cause BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data associated with a higher risk of BK virus activation from 195 renal transplant recipients by the multivariate logistic regression analysis and performed the external validation. Results showed that patients with BK virus active infection were associated with a deceased donor, had lower direct bilirubin levels, a higher proportion of albumin in serum protein electrophoresis, and lower red blood cells and neutrophil counts. The multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the living donor, direct bilirubin, and neutrophil counts were significantly associated with BK virus activation. The logistic regression model displayed a modest discriminability with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689 (95% CI: 0.607–0.771; P < 0.01) and also demonstrated a good performance in the external validation dataset (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.699, 95% CI: 0.5899–0.8081). The novel predictive nomogram achieved a good prediction of BK virus activation in kidney transplant recipients.

Clinical Significance of Renal Allograft Urothelial Thickening Identified by Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

To assess the etiology and clinical implications of ultrasound (US)-diagnosed urothelial thickening (UT) in renal transplants.

METHODS

Patients with renal transplants who had UT diagnosed by US from January 2000 to December 2018 were retrospectively identified and compared to patients with transplants without UT scanned during the study period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, US findings, pathologic results, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes and compared between groups by Fisher exact and t tests.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients with UT and 128 controls comprised our cohorts. The patient age in the UT group versus controls (mean ± SD, 50.2 ± 16.5 versus 51.2 ± 15.3 years) and the time since transplant (2.9 ± 4.2 versus 2.4 ± 5.8 years) were similar. Patients with UT were more likely to be female than controls (76 of 143 [53.1%] versus 53 of 128 [41.4%]; P = .07), but the difference was not statistically significant, and patients with UT were more likely to have indwelling stents (31 of 143 [21.7%] versus 9 of 128 [7.0%]; P = .001) and hydronephrosis (25 of 143 [17.4%] versus 11 of 128 [8.6%]; P = .03). At biopsy, rejection and vascular sclerosis were more likely in patients with UT compared to controls (24 of 25 [49.0%] versus 11 of 43 [25.6%]; P = .031; 42 of 49 [85.7%] versus 22 of 43 [51.2%]; P = .0005, respectively), whereas acute tubular necrosis was similar. The sensitivity (50.0%) and specificity (74.4%) of UT for rejection were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Urothelial thickening correlates with US findings of urinary obstruction and indwelling stents, suggesting a possible mechanical component to UT's etiology. Although transplant rejection and vascular sclerosis were more frequent at biopsy in the UT group than controls, UT had low sensitivity and specificity for rejection.

The impact of pre-graft serology on the risk of BKPyV infection post-renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy, is a troublesome disease induced by BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in immunocompromised renal graft recipients with no effective available treatment, making immunosuppression reduction the only management option. Thus, pre-graft predictive BKPyV replication markers are needed for high-risk viremia patient identification.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study to assess the correlation between the BKPyV pre-transplant serostatus and post-transplant BKPyV infection incidence. Sera from 329 recipients and 222 matched donors were tested for anti-BKV antibodies against BKPyV serotypes I and IV by a VLPs-based IgG ELISA, and BKPyV DNA load was monitored for at least 1 year post transplantation.

RESULTS

80 recipients were viruric and 59 recipients were viremic post transplantation. In the post-transplant period, the probability of developing viremia for serotype I was increasing from 4.3% for the D-/R + group to 12.1% for the D+/R + group and climbing to 37.5% for the D+/R- group (p < 0.05). When calculating the recipient mean titers for serotypes I and IV, we observed a clear difference in the proportions of viremia passing from 50% for mean titers < 400 to 13.5% for titers ≥ 400 (p < 0.001) with also a higher proportion of presumptive nephropathy (50% vs 23.1%, p < 0.05). In univariate analysis this parameter has an odds ratio of 6.41 for the risk of developing post-transplant BKPyV viremia (95% CI: 3.16-13.07; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both donor and recipient BKPyV seropositivity determination before transplantation and antibody titer may serve as a predictive tool to manage clinical BKPyV infection by identification of patients at high risk.

Incidence and risk factors of kidney allograft loss due to BK nephropathy in the pediatric population: A retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database

BACKGROUND

BK virus infection can lead to graft dysfunction and loss in kidney transplant recipients. Risk factors for BKV and BKVN have been inadequately studied in children. Here, we evaluate the incidence and risk factors of allograft loss due to BKVN in the pediatric population of the UNOS data set.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the UNOS database and identified all pediatric recipients of kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2018. We compared donor and recipient characteristics, including cause of ESRD, among patients who lost their graft due to BKVN or other causes, and those with functioning allograft. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients (0.47%) suffered graft failure from BKVN. Older age, male gender, HLA mismatch, and rejection at 1 year were significantly associated with BKVN graft failure, compared to recipients with functioning allograft. In comparison with graft loss due to other causes, male gender, higher HLA mismatch, rejection in 1st year and tacrolimus use at discharge were significantly associated with BKVN graft loss. Recipients who received mycophenolate at time of discharge were at reduced risk for BKVN graft failure. Compared to graft failure from other causes, BKVN graft failure had shorter death censored graft survival [P = .001]. ESRD due to urologic causes and Alport syndrome had higher rate of BKVN graft failure.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of graft loss from BKVN in the pediatric population was 10.2 per 10 000 patient-years in this study. BKVN is associated with early allograft failure in the pediatric population, compared to other causes of graft loss. Male gender, HLA mismatch, rejection in 1st year, and urological cause of ESRD are risk factors for graft failure from BKVN in children.

Chk1 and the Host Cell DNA Damage Response as a Potential Antiviral Target in BK Polyomavirus Infection

The human BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is latent in the kidneys of most adults, but can be reactivated in immunosuppressed states, such as following renal transplantation. If left unchecked, BK polyomavirus nephropathy (PyVAN) and possible graft loss may result from viral destruction of tubular epithelial cells and interstitial fibrosis. When coupled with regular post-transplant screening, immunosuppression reduction has been effective in limiting BKPyV viremia and the development of PyVAN. Antiviral drugs that are safe and effective in combating BKPyV have not been identified but would be a benefit in complementing or replacing immunosuppression reduction. The present study explores inhibition of the host DNA damage response (DDR) as an antiviral strategy. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent analyses of PyVAN biopsies provide evidence for stimulation of a DDR in vivo. DDR pathways were also stimulated in vitro following BKPyV infection of low-passage human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells. The role of Chk1, a protein kinase known to be involved in the replication stress-induced DDR, was examined by inhibition with the small molecule LY2603618 and by siRNA-mediated knockdown. Inhibition of Chk1 resulted in decreased replication of BKPyV DNA and viral spread. Activation of mitotic pathways was associated with the reduction in BKPyV replication. Chk1 inhibitors that are found to be safe and effective in clinical trials for cancer should also be evaluated for antiviral activity against BKPyV.

Acitretin and Retinoic Acid Derivatives Inhibit BK Polyomavirus Replication in Primary Human Proximal Renal Tubular Epithelial and Urothelial Cells

Small-molecule drugs inhibiting BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) represent a significant unmet clinical need in view of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy or hemorrhagic cystitis, which complicate 5% to 25% of kidney and hematopoietic cell transplantations. We characterized the inhibitory activity of acitretin on BKPyV replication in primary human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (RPTECs). Effective inhibitory concentrations of 50% (EC₅₀) and 90% (EC₉₀) were determined in dilution series measuring BKPyV loads, transcripts, and protein expression, using cell proliferation, metabolic activity, and viability to estimate cytotoxic concentrations and selectivity indices (SI). The acitretin EC₅₀ and EC₉₀ in RPTECs were 0.64 (SI₅₀, 250) and 3.25 μM (SI₉₀, 49.2), respectively. Acitretin effectively inhibited BKPyV replication until 72 h postinfection when added 24 h before infection until 12 h after infection, but decreased to <50% at later time points. Acitretin did not interfere with nuclear delivery of BKPyV genomes, but it decreased large T-antigen transcription and protein expression. Acitretin did not inhibit the initial round of BKPyV replication following transfection of full-length viral genomes, but it affected subsequent rounds of reinfection. Acitretin also inhibited BKPyV replication in human urothelial cells and in Vero cells, but not in COS-7 cells constitutively expressing Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen. Retinoic acid agonists (all-trans retinoic acid, 9-cis retinoic acid [9-cis-RA], 13-cis-RA, bexarotene, and tamibarotene) and the RAR/RXR antagonist RO41-5253 also inhibited BKPyV replication, pointing to an as-yet-undefined mechanism. IMPORTANCE Acitretin selectively inhibits BKPyV replication in primary human cell culture models of nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis. Since acitretin is an approved drug in clinical use reaching BKPyV-inhibiting concentrations in systemically treated patients, further studies are warranted to provide data for clinical repurposing of retinoids for treatment and prevention of replicative BKPyV-diseases.

Antivirals against human polyomaviruses: Leaving no stone unturned

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) encompass more than 10 species infecting 30%-90% of the human population without significant illness. Proven HPyV diseases with documented histopathology affect primarily immunocompromised hosts with manifestations in brain, skin and renourinary tract such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN), polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis (PyVHC), polyomavirus-associated urothelial cancer (PyVUC), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), Trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS) and pruritic hyperproliferative keratinopathy. Although virus-specific immune control is the eventual goal of therapy and lasting cure, antiviral treatments are urgently needed in order to reduce or prevent HPyV diseases and thereby bridging the time needed to establish virus-specific immunity. However, the small dsDNA genome of only 5 kb of the non-enveloped HPyVs only encodes 5-7 viral proteins. Thus, HPyV replication relies heavily on host cell factors, thereby limiting both, number and type of specific virus-encoded antiviral targets. Lack of cost-effective high-throughput screening systems and relevant small animal models complicates the preclinical development. Current clinical studies are limited by small case numbers, poorly efficacious compounds and absence of proper randomized trial design. Here, we review preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated small molecules with presumed antiviral activity against HPyVs and provide an outlook regarding potential new antiviral strategies.

Detection of polyomavirus microRNA-5p expression in saliva shortly after kidney transplantation

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) of polyomavirus (PyV) are present in several biological fluids and are suggested to be relevant viral factors for monitoring its persistence. Aim: To evaluate the effect of an immunosuppressive regimen on the status of PyV-miRNA-5p in the oral cavity. Materials and Methods: The JCPyV, BKPyV, MCPyV miRNA-5p were investigated in paired saliva and plasma samples obtained from 23 patients before and shortly after renal-transplantation by using real-time RT-PCR. Results: Overall, within a short-time after transplantation, patients exhibited decreased numbers of leukocyte and lymphocyte as well as low levels of creatinine. During the clinical management of the patients, a significant amount of saliva samples were positive for JCPyV and BKPyV miRNA-5p (range: 26%-91%) compared to paired plasma samples (range: 9%-35%). Among the two polyomaviruses showing positive expression of miRNA-5p, BKPyV presented the highest positivity in saliva (91%) and MCPyV-miRNA-5p was constantly negative in both saliva and plasma samples. Compared to the time before transplantation, a significant reduction in the expression of JCPyV-miRNA-5p was observed in saliva samples obtained after transplantation. Conclusions: Altogether, these data suggest that additional investigations of polyomavirus miRNA-5p in saliva should be performed shortly after renal-transplantation to evaluate the potential role in early viral reactivation.

Non-permissive human conventional CD1c+ dendritic cells enable trans-infection of human primary renal tubular epithelial cells and protect BK polyomavirus from neutralization

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous human virus that persists in the renourinary epithelium. Immunosuppression can lead to BKPyV reactivation in the first year post-transplantation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. In KTRs, persistent DNAemia has been correlated to the occurrence of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) that can lead to graft loss if not properly controlled. Based on recent observations that conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) specifically infiltrate PVAN lesions, we hypothesized that those cells could play a role in BKPyV infection. We first demonstrated that monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), an in vitro model for mDCs, captured BKPyV particles through an unconventional GRAF-1 endocytic pathway. Neither BKPyV particles nor BKPyV-infected cells were shown to activate MDDCs. Endocytosed virions were efficiently transmitted to permissive cells and protected from the antibody-mediated neutralization. Finally, we demonstrated that freshly isolated CD1c⁺ mDCs from the blood and kidney parenchyma behaved similarly to MDDCs thus extending our results to cells of clinical relevance. This study sheds light on a potential unprecedented CD1c⁺ mDC involvement in the BKPyV infection as a promoter of viral spreading.

Dr Sylvia Gardner first discovered the BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) in the urine of a kidney-transplant recipient in 1970. In the 1990’s, the widespread use of potent immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil led to the emergence of BKPyV nephropathy. Recently, various studies reported a specific influx of myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) in the renal tissue of kidney-transplant patients who were diagnosed with a BKPyV nephropathy. MDCs are immune cells both residing in tissues and migrating to other organs or compartments like the blood when changes in their environment occur. Their main functions are the detection of danger signals such as pathogens or tumors and the processing of antigens to prime naïve specific effectors of the adaptive immune response. Although anti-BKPyV cellular immune responses have been investigated in post-transplant recipients as well as healthy individuals, supporting an active role of mDCs little is known about how mDCs and BKPyV interact with each other. Our study provides the basis to understand the role played by mDCs in virus capture through an unprecedented endocytic mechanism and possibly in viral protection from neutralization by specific antibodies. Moreover, we showed that mDCs are unable to sense BKPyV particles or BKPyV-infected dying cells as a danger signal, supporting the view that other DC subsets might act as the true antigen presenting cells that promote the adaptive immune response against BKPyV infection.

BK virus infection and outcome following kidney transplantation in childhood

BK virus associated nephropathy (BKN) is an important cause of kidney allograft failure. In a cohort of paediatric kidney transplant recipients, we aimed to understand the incidence and clinical outcome associated with BKN, as well as identify risk factors for BKN and BK viraemia development. We retrospectively analysed all patients who received a kidney transplant and received follow up care in our centre between 2009-2019. Among 106 patients included in the study (mean follow up 4.5 years), 32/106 (30.2%) patients experienced BK viraemia. The incidence of BKN was 7/106 (6.6%). The median time of BK viraemia development post-transplant was 279.5 days compared to 90.0 days for BKN. Development of BKN was associated with younger age at transplantation (p = 0.013). Development of BK viraemia was associated with negative recipient serology for cytomegalovirus (CMV) at time of transplantation (p = 0.012) and a higher net level of immunosuppression (p = 0.039). There was no difference in graft function at latest follow up between those who experienced BKN and those without BKN. This study demonstrates that BK virus infection is associated with younger age at transplantation, CMV negative recipient serostatus and higher levels of immunosuppression. Judicious monitoring of BK viraemia in paediatric transplant recipients, coupled with timely clinical intervention can result in similar long-term outcomes for BKN patients compared to controls.

Validation of a noninvasive prognostic signature for allograft failure following BK virus associated nephropathy

Identifying kidney transplant recipients at risk for graft failure following BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) may allow personalization of therapy. We have reported that a noninvasive composite signature of urinary cell level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1(PAI-1) mRNA and serum creatinine level, measured at the time of BKVN diagnosis, is prognostic of graft failure. In this investigation, we determined whether the composite signature is prognostic of graft failure in an independent cohort of 25 patients with BKVN. Of the 25 patients, 8 developed graft failure and 17 did not. We measured urinary cell levels of PAI-1 mRNA, 18S rRNA, and BKV VP1 mRNA at the time of BKVN diagnosis and evaluated clinical parameters including Banff pathology scores, acute rejection, and graft function. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the noninvasive composite signature was 0.95 (P < .001) for prognosticating graft failure. The previously reported threshold of -0.858 predicted graft failure with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 94%. Our current study validates the use of composite signature and the threshold of -0.858 to identify those at risk for graft failure following BKVN diagnosis, and supports future studies utilizing the composite signature score to personalize treatment of BKVN.

Advances in BK Virus Complications in Organ Transplantation and Beyond

Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) remains a dreaded complication in immunosuppressed states. Conventionally, BKV is known as a cause for BKV-associated nephropathy and allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. However, emerging studies have shown its negative impact on native kidney function and patient survival in other transplants and its potential role in diseases such as cancer. Because BKV-associated nephropathy is driven by immunosuppression, reduction in the latter is a convenient standard of care. However, this strategy is risk prone due to the development of donor-specific antibodies affecting long-term allograft survival. Despite its pathogenic role, there is a distinct lack of effective anti-BKV therapeutics. This limitation combined with increased morbidity and health care cost of BKV-associated diseases add to the complexity of BKV management. While summarizing recent advances in the pathogenesis of BKV-associated nephropathy and its reactivation in other organ transplants, this review illustrates the limitations of current and emerging therapeutic options and provides a compelling argument for an effective targeted anti-BKV drug.

Care of the Renal Transplant Patient

Renal transplant has become a mainstay of treatment of patients with chronic renal failure. With improving survival outcomes, primary care physicians should be informed of the nuances that come with the ongoing care of this population and feel empowered to take part in the multidisciplinary care of these patients. This article provides an overview of the renal transplant process from initial evaluation through surgery and then focuses on long-term issues that renal transplant patients face in the primary care setting.

Renal Allograft Biopsies with Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy: Turin Transplant Center, 2015-19

Background: In kidney transplant patients, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) represents a serious complication; the key factor for the development of PVAN is immunosuppression level and modulation of anti-rejection treatment represents the first line of intervention. Allograft biopsy and histology remain the criterion standard for diagnosing PVAN. Methods: All consecutive renal biopsies with the diagnosis of PVAN carried out at the University Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin over a five-years period were studied. Renal allograft biopsy was performed due to renal function alterations associated to medium-high polyomavirus BK (BKV)-DNA levels on plasma specimen. Results: A total of 21 patients underwent a first biopsy to diagnose a possible BKV nephropathy, in 18, a second biopsy was made, in eight, a third biopsy, and finally, three underwent the fourth renal biopsy; following the results of each biopsies, immunosuppressant agents dosages were modified in order to reduce the effect of PVAN. Conclusions: In this study, the clinical and histological features of 21 kidney transplant recipients with BKV reactivation and development of PVAN are described. To date, the only treatment for PVAN consists in the reduction of immunosuppressive agents, constantly monitoring viral load.

Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Is Involved in Interferon Gamma's Anti-BKPyV Activity in Renal Cells

Reactivation of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is frequently increasing in transplant recipients treated with potent immunosuppressants and highlights the importance of immune system components in controlling viral reactivation. However, the immune response to BKPyV in general and the role of antiviral cytokines in infection control in particular are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the efficacy of interferons (IFN) alpha, lambda and gamma with regard to the BKPyV multiplication in Vero cells. Treatment with IFN-gamma inhibited the expression of the viral protein VP1 in a dose-dependent manner and decreased the expression of early and late viral transcripts. Viral inhibition by IFN-gamma was confirmed in human cells (Caki-1 cells and renal proximal tubular epithelial cells). One of the IFN-stimulated genes most strongly induced by IFN-gamma was the coding for the enzyme indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO), which is known to limit viral replication and regulates the host immune system. The antiviral activity induced by IFN-gamma could be reversed by the addition of an IDO inhibitor, indicating that IDO has a specific role in anti-BKPyV activity. A better understanding of the action mechanism of these IFN-gamma-induced antiviral proteins might facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for BK Polyomavirus Replication and Nephropathy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: An International CERTAIN Registry Study

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) constitutes a serious cause of kidney allograft failure, but large-scale data in pediatric renal transplant recipients and a comprehensive analysis of specific risk factors are lacking.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 313 patients in the Cooperative European Pediatric Renal Transplant Initiative Registry, with an observation period of 3.3 years (range, 1-5). The net state of immunosuppressive therapy was assessed by the modified Vasudev score.

RESULTS

Presumptive BKPyVAN (defined as sustained [>3 wk] high-level BK viremia >10 copies/mL) within 5 years posttransplant occurred in 49 (15.8%) of 311 patients, and biopsy-proven BKPyVAN in 14 (4.5%) of 313. BKPyV viremia was observed in 115 (36.7%) of 311 patients, of whom 11 (9.6%) of 115 developed viremia late, that is, after the second year posttransplant. In 6 (12.5%) of 48 patients with high-level viremia and in 3 (21.4%) of 14 with BKPyVAN, this respective event occurred late. According to multivariable analysis, BKPyV viremia and/or BKPyVAN were associated not only with a higher net state of immunosuppression (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; P < 0.01) and with tacrolimus-based versus ciclosporin-based immunosuppression (OR, 3.6; P < 0.01) but also with younger recipient age (OR, 1.1 per y younger; P < 0.001) and obstructive uropathy (OR, 12.4; P < 0.01) as primary renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled BKPyV replication affects a significant proportion of pediatric renal transplant recipients and is associated with unique features of epidemiology and risk factors, such as young recipient age, obstructive uropathy, and overall intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. BKPyV surveillance should be considered beyond 2 years posttransplant in pediatric patients at higher risk.

Non-invasive urinary sediment double-immunostaining predicts BK polyomavirus associated-nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients

Background

The positive predictive value (PPV) of urinary decoy cells for diagnosing BK polyomavirus associated-nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is low. This study was designed to increase the PPV of urinary decoy cells for diagnosing BKPyVAN in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

A total of 105 urine sediment samples from 105 patients with positive BK viruria and decoy cells were evaluated by automatic double-immunostaining with anti-HGD (a renal tubular marker) antibody + anti-SV40-T antibody or anti-S100P (an urothelial marker) antibody + anti-SV40-T antibody.

Results

Of the 105 patients, 76 (72.4%) had both HGD(+)/SV40-T(+) cells and S100P(+)/SV40-T(+) cells (group A), 24 (22.9%) had only S100P(+)/SV40-T(+) cells (group B), and 5 (4.6%) had only S100P(-)/HGD(-)/SV40-T(+) cells (group C). Seventy patients in group A (92.1%), 3 patients in group B (12.5%), and no patients in group C were diagnosed with BKPyVAN. The area under the ROC curve of predicting BKPyVAN by decoy cells was 0.531 (0.431-0.630), with an optimal cut-off value of 29 (per 10 high power field), a sensitivity of 45.8% (95% CI: 34.0-58.0%), and a specificity of 68.8% (95% CI: 50.0-83.9%). Besides, the area under the ROC curve of predicting BKPyVAN by plasma BKPyV load was 0.735 (95% CI: 0.632-0.822), with an optimal cut-off value of 1,000 copies/mL, a sensitivity of 61.1% (95% CI: 48.9-72.4%) and a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI: 60.4-96.6%). In contrast, the PPV, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of HGD(+)/SV40-T(+) cells for diagnosing BKPyVAN were 92.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 83.0-96.7%], 89.7% (95% CI: 71.5-97.3%), 95.9% (95% CI: 87.7-98.9%), and 81.3% (95% CI: 63.0-92.1%) respectively.

Conclusions

Double-immunostaining with anti-HGD or anti-S100P and anti-SV40-T antibodies helps to identify the origin of decoy cells and diagnose BKPyVAN.

Pathogenicity of BK virus on the urinary system

Introduction

The polyomaviruses are omnipresent in nature. The major sites of BK virus appearance are the kidney tubular epithelial cells and urinary bladder surface transitional cells.

Material and methods

A literature search according to PRISMA guidelines within the Medline database was conducted in July 2019 for articles presenting data about BK virus in urologic aspect without setting time limits, using the terms ‘BK virus’ in conjunction with transplantation, nephropathy, stenosis, cancer, bladder, prostate, kidney.

Results

The BK virus usually stays latent, however, its replication may become active in various clinical situations of impaired immunocompetence such as solid organ transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, AIDS, pregnancy, multiple sclerosis, administration of chemotherapy or biologic therapy. BK virus is associated with two main complications after transplantation: polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant patients and polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Conclusions

The aim of this article was to present available data on urologic aspects of BK virus infection, its detection methods and available treatment.

Deep Sequencing of Urine Specimens Detects Two BK Polyomavirus Genotypes in a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an important pathogen in transplant recipients. We report four draft BKPyV genomes, three of BKPyV genotype I (subtype I-b2) (AUS-105, AUS-106, and AUS-108) and one of genotype II (AUS-107). These draft genomes were identified in longitudinal urine samples collected from a single hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an important pathogen in transplant recipients. We report four draft BKPyV genomes, three of BKPyV genotype I (subtype I-b2) (AUS-105, AUS-106, and AUS-108) and one of genotype II (AUS-107). These draft genomes were identified in longitudinal urine samples collected from a single hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient.

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) remains a relevant complication following kidney transplantation with allograft loss rates of up to 50%. Reduction in overall immunosuppression is a cornerstone of therapy, whereas no specific antiviral regimen has shown conclusive benefit to date. The present case series demonstrates the efficacy of a dual therapeutic approach with low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in PVAN.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven PVAN having received low-dose cidofovir (0.25 mg/kg) according to the Tübingen Cidofovir Protocol and been converted to mTOR-based immunosuppression were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with a median follow-up of 2.24 [IQR 1.55-5.01] years were included in the analysis. Median time to PVAN diagnosis was 268 [IQR 153-869] days after transplantation. Polyomavirus clearance from plasma was achieved in 78% of patients after a median of 118 [IQR 76-293] days. Of the 23 patients, nine patients (39%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, but only three of these (13%) due to PVAN. Fourteen patients (61%) stabilized or improved allograft function. The cidofovir protocol allowed for specific antiviral therapy without adverse nephrotoxicity, even in patients with low allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression allow for effective virus clearance and preservation of allograft function in a high proportion of patients with PVAN and progressive allograft dysfunction and may prolong allograft survival in these patients.

Comparing Urine and Blood Screening Methods to Detect BK Virus After Renal Transplant

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus can infect healthy individuals; however, in renal transplant recipients, it can cause nephropathy, which can lead to renal allograftfailure. There are currently no effective antiviral agents against BK polyomavirus. Surveillance after kidney transplant for BK polyomavirus is the only means to prevent allograft failure. Transplant centers routinely screen for BK polyomavirus in either urine or blood. If BK polyomavirus replication occurs, itis usually detected first in urine, which is followed by detection in blood in a subset of cases. Screening for BK polyomavirus in urine has the potential for earlier detection of viralreactivation.However, not all patients with BK polyomavirus in urine will progress to BK viremia. Therefore, adding urine screening could increase the cost oftests without a clear clinical benefit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an analysis of BK polyomavirus screening methods at 2 different centers and compared their clinical outcomes and efficiency of testing.

RESULTS

We analyzed 209 patientswith BK polyomavirus reactivation after kidney transplant at 2 different institutions from 2008 to 2018. BK polyomavirus reactivation in blood was detected earlierifthe patient was screened by urine screening protocol. However, measurable clinical outcomes were similarin all groups with different screening methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Although screening for BK polyomavirus in urine did detect viralreactivation earlier,there were no differences in graft or clinical outcomes when either the urine or blood screening method was used.

BK Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy managed by screening policy in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is an important complication after kidney transplantation. Prevalence ranges from 1% to 10%, and graft loss occurs in approximately 50% of the cases. There is no effective treatment, so early viral detection with immunosuppression tapering is the current strategy to prevent PyVAN.

AIMS

To verify the frequency of PyVAN in a single center and evaluate the response to immunosuppressive adjustments through graft survival analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven PyVAN, compared with no-PyVAN patients regarding clinical aspects, immunosuppression, and graft survival over at least 2 years.

RESULTS

There were 1404 kidney transplants analyzed in the study period, 58 with biopsy-proven PyVAN. Cumulative incidence was 4.1%. Median time from transplantation to PyVAN diagnosis was 6 (1-41) months. PyVAN was associated with recipient male gender (P = .041) and deceased donation (P = .005). Graft survival was inferior for PyVAN compared to no-PyVAN patients, 81.8% vs 75.2%, P = .019. Thirteen (22.4%) PyVAN patients lost their grafts, nine (15.5%) losses attributed to BKPyV infection. Three patients with BKPyV-associated graft losses were submitted to a successful second kidney transplant, with no evidence of viral replication during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PyVAN still is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Even though implementing active vigilance and immunosuppressive adjustment, this real-life single-center study demonstrated inferior graft survival in PyVAN patients compared to non-PyVAN.

Reducing calcineurin inhibitor first for treating BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation: long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reducing immunosuppression is the mainstay of treating BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viraemia after kidney transplantation, but the best approach, efficacy and impact are undefined. We established a standard operating procedure (SOP) treating BKPyV viraemia based on first reducing calcineurin inhibitor ('CNI first'). The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes in 644 consecutive transplantations using this SOP.

METHODS

Patients were monitored for active BKPyV infection by urinary decoy cells and, if positive, by BKPyV viraemia. In case of sustained BKPyV viraemia >1000 copies/mL, immunosuppression was reduced stepwise according to the SOP. Patients were classified as 'no decoy cells' [n = 432 (66%)], 'decoy cells/no viraemia' [n = 107 (17%)] and 'viraemia' [n = 105 (17%)].

RESULTS

At 6-years post-transplant, graft survival was ∼84%, the clinical rejection rate was ∼25% and they were not different among the three groups (P = 0.14; P = 0.91). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at the last follow-up was similar (range 49-53 mL/min, P = 0.08). Of 105 viraemic patients, 101 (96%) cleared BKPyV viraemia. In 39% of patients, viraemia clearance followed a tacrolimus reduction. A reduction of mycophenolic acid was required in 43% and discontinuation in 3%. No short-term graft loss was directly attributable to BKPyV-associated nephropathy. After a median follow-up of 5 years after clearance of BKPyV viraemia, 11/101 patients (11%) developed clinical rejection: 7 (7%) T-cell-mediated rejection and 4 (4%) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression reduction based on 'CNI first' leads to similar long-term outcomes in patients with/without BKPyV viraemia and is associated with a low risk for ABMR after clearance of BKPyV viraemia. Randomized trials are needed to compare the risks and benefits of immunosuppression reduction strategies in kidney transplant patients with BKPyV viraemia.

Do Antithymocyte Globulin-Free Acute Rejection Therapies Increase the Risk of Polyoma Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients?

INTRODUCTION

BK virus nephropathy is a serious complication that can lead to allograft kidney loss. Excessive immunosuppression increases the risk. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an increased risk of BK viremia and nephropathy in patients who underwent high-dose immunosuppression because of the development of acute rejection in the early period after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed between April 2015 and March 2016. Twenty-nine patients who had biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 3 months were evaluated for BK viremia and nephropathy. Thirty patients who had transplantations at the same period were the control group. Plasma BK-DNA values were examined at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the rejection treatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months in the control group. Presence of polyoma nephropathy was examined with surveillance biopsies at the 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Acute rejection treatment was started on the 12th day after transplantation (2-37 days). Seventeen cellular rejections and 12 humoral rejections were reported by biopsy. Two of the 12 humoral rejections were suspicious. Only pulse steroid (PS) (n = 18); PS, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 8); PS and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 2); and PS and plasmapheresis (n = 1) treatments were performed. In 21 patients in the rejection group and 25 patients in the control group, BK-DNA was not positive at all. Two patients had graft loss at 11 and 36 months in the rejection group. Graft losses were secondary to rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with antithymocyte globulin-free regimens after acute rejection episodes did not lead to an increase in BK viremia.

Non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective way to decrease the high morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, KT does not completely reverse the damage done by years of decreased kidney function and dialysis. Furthermore, new offending agents (in particular, immunosuppression) added in the post-transplant period increase the risk of complications. Cardiovascular (CV) disease, the leading cause of death in KT recipients, warrants pre-transplant screening based on risk factors. Nevertheless, the screening methods currently used have many shortcomings and a perfect screening modality does not exist. Risk factor modification in the pre- and post-transplant periods is of paramount importance to decrease the rate of CV complications post-transplant, either by lifestyle modification (for example, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) or by pharmacological means (for example, statins, anti-hyperglycemics, and so on). Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major contributor to mortality in this patient population. Although tacrolimus is a major contributor to PTDM development, changes in immunosuppression are limited by the higher risk of rejection with other agents. Immunosuppression has also been implicated in higher risk of malignancy; therefore, proper cancer screening is needed. Cancer immunotherapy is drastically changing the way certain types of cancer are treated in the general population; however, its use post-transplant is limited by the risk of allograft rejection. As expected, higher risk of infections is also encountered in transplant recipients. When caring for KT recipients, special attention is needed in screening methods, preventive measures, and treatment of infection with BK virus and cytomegalovirus. Hepatitis C virus infection is common in transplant candidates and in the deceased donor pool; however, newly developed direct-acting antivirals have been proven safe and effective in the pre- and post-transplant periods. The most important and recent developments on complications following KT are reviewed in this article.

Management of BK Polyomavirus Infection in Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients: A Review Article

BK virus (BKV) can cause graft dysfunction or failure in kidney transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) emerged as a common complication in the late 1990s, probably due to the introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents. BKVAN occurred in up to 5% of kidney transplant recipients, with graft failure in up to 70%. Since universal implementation of effective screening and treatment strategies, BKV is no longer a common cause of graft failure; reported graft loss is only 0% to 5%. This article briefly describes BK virology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

ECIL guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Objectives

To define guidelines for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated haemorrhagic cystitis (BKPyV-HC) after paediatric and adult HSCT.

Methods

Review of English literature and evidence-based recommendations by expert consensus.

Results

BKPyV-HC occurs in 8%-25% of paediatric and 7%-54% of adult recipients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Diagnosis requires the triad of cystitis, macro-haematuria and high urine BKPyV loads >7 log10 copies/mL, and exclusion of other relevant aetiologies. BKPyV viraemia is frequent and may serve as a more specific semiquantitative follow-up marker. No randomized controlled trials are available to inform antiviral prophylaxis or treatment. However, hyper-hydration and/or bladder irrigation showed limited prophylactic value. Fluoroquinolones are not effective for prophylaxis or treatment, but rather increase antibiotic resistance. Hyperbaric oxygen or fibrin glue is marginally effective based on small case series from correspondingly equipped centres. Although cidofovir has been reported to improve and/or reduce BKPyV viraemia or viruria, the current data do not support its regular use.

Conclusions

BKPyV-HC remains a disabling unmet clinical need in HSCT that requires novel approaches supported by proper clinical trials.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of late-onset BK virus nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and typically occurs within 1 year of transplant. Guidelines vary in recommendations for BKPyV screening beyond 1 year. A systematic characterization of risk factors and outcomes of late-onset (>1 year) BKPyVAN has not previously been reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared characteristics and outcomes of early- (<1 year) and late-onset BKPyVAN (definitive [biopsy-confirmed] or presumptive [plasma BKPyV >10 000 copies/mL]) in a cohort of 671 KTR and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients between 2008 and 2013 at a single US transplant center. Proportions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test with P < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

BKPyVAN was diagnosed in 96 (14.3%) patients (proven 16.7%, presumptive 83.3%): 79 (82.3%) early- and 17 (17.7%) late-onset. The proportion with late-onset BKPyVAN was significantly higher among SPK than KTR (4 of 7 [57.1%] vs 13 of 89 [14.6%], P = .017). Late-onset represented "de novo" infection (no BKPyV detection within the first year) in 14 (82.4%) and progression of earlier lower grade BKPyV reactivation in 3 (17.6%). Clinical outcomes were similar for early- and late-onset BKPyVAN (P > .05 all comparisons). In a pooled analysis of prior studies of BKPyVAN in SPK recipients, 62.9% (17 of 27) were late-onset.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of BKPyVAN is late-onset, especially among SPK recipients, and supports a longer duration of BKPyV monitoring for SPK recipients than recommended in some guidelines.

BK Virus: A Cause for Concern in Thoracic Transplantation?

Human BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is poorly documented in heart and lung transplant patients. BK viruria and viremia have been estimated to affect 19% and 5% of heart transplant recipients, respectively. Data are limited, especially for lung transplantation, but the proportion of patients progressing from BK viruria to viremia or BKV-related nephropathy (BKVN) appears lower than in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, a number of cases of BKVN have been reported in heart and lung transplant patients, typically with late diagnosis and generally poor outcomes. Risk factors for BKV infection or BKVN in this setting are unclear but may include cytomegalovirus infection and anti-rejection treatment. The relative infrequency of BKVN or other BK-related complications means that routine BKV surveillance in thoracic transplantation is not warranted, but a diagnostic workup for BKV infection may be justified for progressive renal dysfunction with no readily-identifiable cause; after anti-rejection therapy; and for renal dysfunction in patients with cytomegalovirus infection or hypogammaglobulinemia. Treatment strategies in heart or lung transplant recipients rely on protocols developed in kidney transplantation, with reductions in immunosuppression tailored to match the higher risk status of thoracic transplant patients.

BK virus: microbiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment

Background: BK virus infection is common but is usually asymptomatic. However, it can become life threatening as severe hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) or the polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) particularly in immune compromised and transplant recipients. Some investigators have studied the pathophysiology and there are anecdotal and uncontrolled studies of therapy with few conclusions allowing treatment guidelines. Objectives: Summarize literature review of current knowledge concerning the nature, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of this common virus infection. Results: HC is a not uncommon and often misdiagnosed infection from BK virus. It is usually self limited but can become life threatening in immune compromised patients. PVAN threatens survival of transplanted kidneys and is difficult to differentiate from rejection without sophisticated molecular diagnostic technology. We have sufficient information for making a diagnosis of BK virus disease by using clinical, serological and molecular technology. Studies using manipulation of immunosuppression and a variety of antiviral agents, including cidofovir, leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, vidarabine, fluroquinolones, have been published but most were uncontrolled reports of few cases. Cidofovir offers some promise but more must be learned before there is hope for evidence-based treatment guidelines.

De novo donor-specific antibody following BK nephropathy: The incidence and association with antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development following BK viremia (BKV) or nephropathy (BKN) after kidney transplant remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among dnDSA, BKV (BK blood PCR > 15 000 copies), BKN, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and allograft loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 904 solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 10/2007 and 5/2014. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariates were used to assess the relationships among BKN, isolated BKV, dnDSA, and the subsequent risk of AMR and allograft loss.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, we observed that BKN, but not BKV was a risk factor for dnDSA (HR, 3.18, P = .008). Of the patients with BK nephropathy, 14.0% (6/43) developed dnDSA, which occurred within 14 months of BK diagnosis. DnDSA in this setting remains a risk factor for subsequent AMR (HR 4.75, P = .0001) and allograft loss (HR 2.63, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

BKN is an independent risk factor for development of dnDSA. Improved understanding of the characteristics of patients with BKN who are at highest risk for development of dnDSA would be valuable to customize immunosuppression reduction in this population.

Fatal SV40-associated pneumonia and nephropathy following renal allotransplantation in rhesus macaque

Recrudescence of latent and dormant viruses may lead to overwhelming viremia in immunosuppressed hosts. In immunocompromised hosts, Simian virus 40 (SV40) reactivation is known to cause nephritis and demyelinating central nervous system disease. Here, we report SV40 viremia leading to fatal interstitial pneumonia in an immunosuppressed host following renal allotransplantation.

The Banff Working Group Classification of Definitive Polyomavirus Nephropathy: Morphologic Definitions and Clinical Correlations

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a common viral infection of renal allografts, with biopsy-proven incidence of approximately 5%. A generally accepted morphologic classification of definitive PVN that groups histologic changes, reflects clinical presentation, and facilitates comparative outcome analyses is lacking. Here, we report a morphologic classification scheme for definitive PVN from the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy, comprising nine transplant centers in the United States and Europe. This study represents the largest systematic analysis of definitive PVN undertaken thus far. In a retrospective fashion, clinical data were collected from 192 patients and correlated with morphologic findings from index biopsies at the time of initial PVN diagnosis. Histologic features were centrally scored according to Banff guidelines, including additional semiquantitative histologic assessment of intrarenal polyomavirus replication/load levels. In-depth statistical analyses, including mixed effects repeated measures models and logistic regression, revealed two independent histologic variables to be most significantly associated with clinical presentation: intrarenal polyomavirus load levels and Banff interstitial fibrosis ci scores. These two statistically determined histologic variables formed the basis for the definition of three PVN classes that correlated strongest with three clinical parameters: presentation at time of index biopsy, serum creatinine levels/renal function over 24 months of follow-up, and graft failure. The PVN classes 1-3 as described here can easily be recognized in routine renal biopsy specimens. We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, especially at the time of index diagnosis, and in scientific studies to improve comparative data analysis.

BK virus replication in renal transplant recipients: Analysis of potential risk factors may contribute in reactivation

BACKGROUND

Considering the increasing problem of BK virus infection during post renal transplant surveillance, it is necessary to distinguish the main risk factors leading to reactivation of latent BK virus. Up to now, some probable risk factors have been investigated in some studies, but the results have been confusing and contradictory.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the present study was to determine the frequency and potential risk factors that may play a role in BK polyomavirus reactivation and nephropathy.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, 110 patients, who underwent consecutive transplantation between 2010 and 2013, were enrolled without preliminary screening. Urine and blood samples were taken, and quantitative Real-time PCR assay was used to detect and measure the viral load. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients who had BK viremia and/or viruria were documented.

RESULTS

Among 110 cases of renal transplant recipients, BK viruria and viremia were found in 54 (49%) and 22 people (20%) respectively. The pre-transplant durations of dialysis among patients with BK viruia were found longer in comparison to BK negative patients. Treatment with Tacrolimus (p=0.03) was found to be a risk factor for development of BK viruria. In patients with viruria and viremia the median creatinine levels were 1.45mg/dl and 1.35mg/dl respectively, which were higher than those in the patients with negative results for BK viruria (p=0.002) and viremia (p=0.02). Also, treatment with Cyclosporine could significantly increase the incidence of BK virus shedding in both urine and blood among patients who received it (p=0.01). Significant relation between reactivation of BK virus and other factors such as age, sex, acute rejection and diabetes was not found.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, the main potential risk factors for shedding of BK virus into urine in renal transplant recipients were prolonged pre-transplant dialysis and Tacrolimus regimen. Cyclosporine regimens could be considered as risk factor for both BK viruria and viremia. A significant correlation between BK virus replication and elevated creatinine level was seen among our patients.

BK Virus Nephropathy: Histological Evolution by Sequential Pathology

Reactivation of BK virus in renal allografts causes a destructive chronic infection. This single-center retrospective cohort study describes the evolution of BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) from 63 kidneys (from 61 patients) using sequential histopathology (454 biopsies, averaging 7.8 ± 2.6 per kidney) followed for 60.1 mo. Uninfected protocol biopsies formulated time-matched control Banff scores (n = 975). Interstitial inflammation occurred in 73% at diagnosis, correlating with viral histopathology (r = 0.413, p = 0.008) and amplifying early injury with accelerated interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA, p = 0.017) by 3 mo. Prodromal simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40T)-negative inflammation with viremia preceded the histological diagnosis in 23.8%. Persistent subacute injury from viral cytopathic effect was associated with acute tubular necrosis and ongoing interstitial inflammation, culminating in IF/TA in 86.9%. Overall, cellular interstitial infiltration mitigated the intensity of subsequent tubular injury, SV40T, and tissue viral load, assessed by sequential paired histology (p < 0.001). Graft loss was predicted by high-level viremia (hazard ratio [HR] 4.996, 95% CI 2.19-11.396, p < 0.001), deceased donor (HR 3.201, 95% CI 1.149-8.915, p = 0.026), and late acute rejection (HR 3.124, 95% CI 1.037-9.413, p = 0.043). Transplant failure occurred in 38.1%, with uncontrolled infection (58.3%) and SV40T-negative chronic rejection (41.7%) causing losses. BKVAN is characterized by subacute virus-induced tubular injury, inflammation, and progressive nephron destruction. Effective antiviral therapy remains an unmet clinical need.

BK polyomavirus: a review of the virology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, and treatment

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a non-enveloped, circular dsDNA virus with a genome of approximately 5100 base pairs. It can be divided into four major genotypes, but the effects of different genotypes on clinical disease are uncertain. Primary BKPyV infection is generally acquired asymptomatically in childhood. It establishes low-level persistence in many tissues, particularly the genitourinary tract. Reactivation can lead to severe disease including BKPyV-associated nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy, hemorrhagic cystitis and meningoencephalitis. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood and urine is the main diagnostic and prognostic test for BKPyV infection. The treatment of BKPyV infection has concentrated on reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Recent studies suggest that antiviral drugs have demonstrated only modest benefit, but adoptive T-cell therapies offer potential advances.