Quadruple tacrolimus-based induction therapy including azathioprine and ALG does not significantly improve outcome after liver transplantation when compared with standard induction with tacrolimus and steroids: results of a prospective, randomized trial

Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As part of liver transplantation, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections resulting from the immune response of the body against transplanted organ or tissues from a different person whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until October 2016 to identify randomised clinical trials on immunosuppression for liver transplantation.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adult participants undergoing liver transplantation (or liver retransplantation) for any reason. We excluded trials in which participants had undergone multivisceral transplantation or participants with established graft rejections. We considered any of the various maintenance immunosuppressive regimens compared with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 26 trials (3842 participants) in the review, and 23 trials (3693 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The vast majority of the participants underwent primary liver transplantation. All of the trials were at high risk of bias, and all of the evidence was of low or very low quality. In addition, because of sparse data involving trials at high risk of bias, it is not possible to entirely rely on the results of the network meta-analysis. The trials included mainly participants undergoing primary liver transplantation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 3 to 144 months. The most common maintenance immunosuppression used as a control was tacrolimus. There was no evidence of difference in mortality (21 trials; 3492 participants) or graft loss (15 trials; 2961 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based on the network meta-analysis. In the direct comparison, based on a single trial including 222 participants, tacrolimus plus sirolimus had increased mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CrI 1.30 to 6.69) and graft loss (HR 2.34, 95% CrI 1.28 to 4.61) at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (1 trial; 719 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (2 trials; 940 participants), renal impairment (8 trials; 2233 participants), chronic kidney disease (1 trial; 100 participants), graft rejections (any) (16 trials; 2726 participants), and graft rejections requiring treatment (5 trials; 1025 participants) between the different immunosuppressive regimens. The network meta-analysis showed that the number of adverse events was lower with cyclosporine A than with many other immunosuppressive regimens (12 trials; 1748 participants), and the risk of retransplantation (13 trials; 1994 participants) was higher with cyclosporine A than with tacrolimus (HR 3.08, 95% CrI 1.13 to 9.90). None of the trials reported number of serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, or costs.

FUNDING

14 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies who would benefit from the results of the trial; two trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 10 trials did not report the source of funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-quality evidence from a single small trial from direct comparison, tacrolimus plus sirolimus increases mortality and graft loss at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. Based on very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis, we found no evidence of difference between different immunosuppressive regimens. We found very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis and low-quality evidence from direct comparison that cyclosporine A causes more retransplantation compared with tacrolimus. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid postrandomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft loss, renal impairment, chronic kidney disease, and retransplantation. Such trials should use tacrolimus as one of the control groups. Moreover, such trials ought to be designed in such a way as to ensure low risk of bias and low risks of random errors.

Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for end-stage liver failure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the use of immunosuppressive T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction of immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for prevention of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 30 September 2013 together with reference checking, citation searching, contact with trial authors and pharmaceutical companies to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials assessing immunosuppression with T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in liver transplant recipients. Our inclusion criteria stated that participants within each included trial should have received the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used RevMan for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of systematic errors (bias) using bias risk domains with definitions. We used trial sequential analysis to control for random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 randomised trials with a total of 1589 liver transplant recipients, which studied the use of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction. All trials were with high risk of bias. We compared any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in 10 trials with 1589 participants, including interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction versus corticosteroid induction in nine trials with 1470 participants, and polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in one trial with 119 participants.Our analyses showed no significant differences regarding mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43), graft loss (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.53) and acute rejection (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00), infection (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09), hepatitis C virus recurrence (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.00), malignancy (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.73), and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.38) when any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (all low-quality evidence). Cytomegalovirus infection was less frequent in patients receiving any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.75; low-quality evidence). This was also observed when interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83; low-quality evidence), and when polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.70; low-quality evidence). However, when trial sequential analysis regarding cytomegalovirus infection was applied, the required information size was not reached. Furthermore, diabetes mellitus occurred less frequently when T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.60; low-quality evidence), when interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; low-quality evidence), and when polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.95; low-quality evidence). When trial sequential analysis was applied, the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit was crossed. We found no subgroup differences for type of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (basiliximab versus daclizumab). Four trials reported on adverse events. However, no differences between trial groups were noted. Limited data were available for meta-analysis on drug-specific adverse events such as haematological adverse events for antithymocyte globulin. No data were available on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Because of the low quality of the evidence, the effects of T-cell antibody induction remain uncertain. T-cell specific antibody induction seems to reduce diabetes mellitus and may reduce cytomegalovirus infection when compared with corticosteroid induction. No other clear benefits or harms were associated with the use of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction. For some analyses, the number of trials investigating the use of T-cell specific antibody induction after liver transplantation is small, and the numbers of participants and outcomes in these randomised trials are limited. Furthermore, the included trials are heterogeneous in nature and have applied different types of T-cell specific antibody induction therapy. All trials were at high risk of bias. Hence, additional randomised clinical trials are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic error and of random error.

Risk of serious opportunistic infections after solid organ transplantation: interleukin-2 receptor antagonists versus polyclonal antibodies. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate and quantify the risk of serious opportunistic infections after induction with polyclonal antibodies versus IL-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RAs) in randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed and random-effects models were performed.

RESULTS

70 randomized clinical trials (10,106 patients) were selected: 36 polyclonal antibodies (n = 3377), and 34 IL-2RAs (n = 6729). Compared to controls, polyclonal antibodies showed higher risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.34-2.80; p < 0.0001); IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.94; p = 0.009). Polyclonal antibodies were associated with higher risk of bacterial (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.00-2.50; p = 0.049) and viral infections (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.60-3.49; p < 0.0001), while IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97; p = 0.032). Adjusted indirect comparison: compared to polyclonal antibodies, IL-2RAs were associated with lower risk of serious opportunistic infections (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.34-0.49; p < 0.0001), bacterial infections (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67; p < 0.0001) and CMV disease (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.98; p = 0.043). Results remained consistent across allografts.

CONCLUSION

The risk of serious opportunistic infections, bacterial infections and CMV disease were all significantly decreased with IL-2RAs compared to polyclonal antibodies.

Thymoglobulin induction in liver transplant recipients with a tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid immunosuppressive regimen: a five-year randomized prospective study

This randomized, comparative study assessed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of thymoglobulin (TMG) induction in 93 liver transplant patients with an initial regimen of tacrolimus (Tac), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Forty-four patients were randomly allocated to the TMG+ group, and 49 patients were randomly allocated to the TMG- group. In both groups, Tac was given orally at the initial daily dose of 0.075 mg/kg twice daily, and MMF was given at the initial daily dose of 2 g/day. Steroid withdrawal was planned at 3 months after liver transplantation. The results were evaluated with respect to acute rejection incidence, patient and graft survival, graft function, and medical complications until 5 years or death for all patients. No significant differences were found between groups for the incidence of acute rejection at 5 years (11.4% versus 14.3%), 5-year patient survival (77.3% versus 87.8%), graft function, or postoperative renal function. One patient in the TMG- group underwent retransplantation. There was no difference between groups with respect to the incidence of medical complications, excepted for a higher rate of leukopenia in the TMG+ group, during the 5-year follow-up. In conclusion, the results of this prospective randomized study suggest that the addition of TMG to a triple immunosuppressive regimen (Tac, MMF, and steroids) did not modify the incidence of acute rejection episodes or long-term survival and was responsible for increased leukopenia rates.

New directions for induction immunosuppression strategy in solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant centers are increasingly using induction immunosuppression strategies. Induction immunosuppression involves the use of intense therapy at the time of transplantation with the goal of preventing acute rejection and ultimately inducing a tolerogenic state. The objective of this review is to examine specialized induction agents currently in clinical use and highlight novel therapeutics on the horizon for induction immunosuppression.

METHODS

A literature search using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases identified salient basic science and clinical research articles on induction immunosuppression for solid organ transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

While current induction immunosuppression agents have reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the goal of transplant tolerance has not been realized. Furthermore, the long-term allograft survival rate is not clearly influenced by the practice of induction immunosuppression. New approaches to tolerance induction, such as costimulatory-based therapy, mixed chimerism, and adoptive cellular transfer, hold promise for more effective induction immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation.

Short-term induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed use of calcineurin inhibitors in orthotopic liver transplantation

The appropriate time point for starting immunosuppressive treatment with calcineurin inhibitors after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy on rejection, renal function, infection, tumor rate, and survival. We retrospectively analyzed 391 patients after OLT who had either received calcineurin inhibitors immediately after OLT (n = 129) or after an initial short-term Thymoglobulin induction therapy (n = 262). The 1-year acute rejection rate was 14.5% vs. 31.8% in favor of ATG (P = 0.0008). Rejection grades and the need for treatment also differed significantly (7.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.001). Serum creatinine at transplantation was similar in both groups (1.14 mg/dL vs.1.18 mg/dL; P = NS). Postoperative hemofiltration was less frequently seen after induction therapy (P < 0.05). Reduced renal function at 1 year was commonly observed, but serum creatinine (1.26 mg/dL vs. 1.37mg/dL; P = 0.015) and glomerular filtration rate (81 mL/min vs. 75 mL/min; P = 0.02) were far better in the ATG group. Undesired side effects occurred at a similar rate in both groups. Five-year patient survival was also similar in the 2 groups (70.1% and 74.3%; P > 0.05). Short-term ATG induction therapy with delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors led to a more favorable rejection rate and an improved clinical course in case of a rejection episode. It has beneficial effects on renal function immediately after OLT as well as later, and no additional harmful effects.

Induction immunosuppression

Induction immunosuppression is intense, prophylactic therapy used at the time of transplantation based on the empiric observation that more powerful immunosuppression is required to prevent acute rejection early. In the past decade, there has been a growing trend towards the use of specialized agents such as antibody therapies for induction. In general, these agents have been shown to reduce the rate of acute rejection. However, their use has not been clearly shown to improve long-term transplant outcomes. This overview will review the biological basis for induction immunosuppression and the mechanisms of action of those specialized induction agents currently in clinical use. Clinical trials investigating induction regimens will be evaluated, and an individualized approach to the use of induction immunosuppressants will be presented.

Indications of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is approved for prophylaxis of acute rejection after kidney, heart, and liver transplantation as well as for pediatric patients after kidney transplantation. MMF, a noncompetitive inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), blocks de novo purine synthesis which leads to an effective inhibition of proliferation selectively in T and B lymphocytes, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts. MMF shows additional effects with inhibition of the expression of activating and adhesion molecules on the surface of lymphocytes. The beneficial safety profile with distinct side effects compared to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) enable efficacious combination with ciclosporin or tacrolimus as de novo therapy after liver transplantation. Furthermore, recent studies show the possibility to reduce CNI induced toxicities by adding MMF to primary immunosuppression. MMF is also used to enable early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation. MMF can increase efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy and thereby support the treatment of steroid resistant acute rejections, chronic rejections and chronic graft dysfunction.

Immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy

Effective immunosuppression is an essential pre-requisite for successful organ transplantation and improvements in outcome after transplantation have to a large extent been dependent on developments in immunosuppressive therapy. Here we provide an overview of the different immunosuppressive agents currently used in solid organ transplantation. A historical perspective on the development of immunosuppression for organ transplantation is followed by a review of the individual agents, with a focus on their mechanism of action and efficacy. Steroids, anti-proliferative agents (azathioprine and mycophenolate), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) and TOR inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) are discussed along with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibody preparations. Many of the key clinical trials that underpin current clinical usage of these agents are described and side-effects of the different agents are highlighted. Finally, a number of newer agents still in various stages of clinical development are briefly considered.

Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus after liver transplantation: 12-years follow-up

The early safety and efficacy of tacrolimus after liver transplantation has been shown in two multicenter trials. Herein, we report our single-center long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. As part of a European multicenter trial, 121 patients entered the study at our institution and were randomly assigned to receive either tacrolimus and steroids (n=61) or a quadruple protocol (n=60) using ciclosporin A, steroids, azathioprine, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Twelve-year figures of patient survival were 74% in the tacrolimus group and 66% in the cyclosporine-based group. Graft survival after 12 years was 69% in the tacrolimus group compared to 56% in the cyclosporin-based group (not significant, p=0.15). The total rate of graft loss and retransplantation decreased significantly in the tacrolimus arm (p<0.05). De novo malignancies increased significantly in the ciclosporin-based group and dominated as single cause of death beyond 5 years posttransplant. The use of tacrolimus after liver transplantation resulted in a decreased rate of graft loss over the long-term. An increased number of de novo malignancies in the ciclosporin-based group may be attributable to the use of ATG as induction therapy.

OKT3 and ganciclovir treatments are possibly related to the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in serum after liver transplantation

The development of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is related to EBV genome numbers in serum or plasma and B-cells, and the level of immunosuppression. EBV DNA viremia, defined as presence of EBV genomes in serum or plasma, is common in immunodeficiency. This survey of EBV viremia was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on consecutive serum samples of 21 patients with acute (n = 3) or chronic liver disease (n = 18) during the first year after liver transplantation (LTX). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA was analyzed with PCR in serum or leukocytes. The levels of EBV and CMV viremia were related to PTLD and the effect of different anti-rejection regimens. All patients were EBV-seropositive pre-LTX. In total, 24 of 152 (16%) samples from 10 of 21 (48%) individuals were EBV positive [five of 11 cyclosporin A (CsA); five of 10 tacrolimus treated cases]. EBV viremia was demonstrated in five of seven patients with OKT3 therapy. The number of EBV DNA positive samples was highest (26%) at 14 days after LTX. In the OKT3 treated groups, the medians of EBV DNA copy numbers were 1600/ml (range 230-7200) and 380/ml (range 120-860) in the CsA and tacrolimus patients, respectively (P < 0.02). One patient developed EBV lymphoma and another one EBV hepatitis 13 months and 24 days post-LTX, respectively. Both patients had received OKT3. Their EBV genome load was not significantly different from what was found in other patients. After ganciclovir therapy, EBV DNA was eradicated from serum in four of five patients for several months. EBV DNA load was not affected by CMV infection or disease. We conclude that presence of EBV in serum is a possible marker of an active infection and an early ganciclovir therapy may be beneficial. Quantification of EBV load offers the potential to implement pre-emptive interventions.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation

Extensive clinical use has confirmed that tacrolimus (Prograf) is a key option for immunosuppression after transplantation. In large, prospective, randomised, multicentre trials in adults and children receiving solid organ transplants, tacrolimus was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure rates and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. Notably, the lower incidence of rejection episodes after renal transplantation in tacrolimus recipients was reflected in improved cost effectiveness. In bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the incidence of tacrolimus grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease was significantly lower with tacrolimus than cyclosporin treatment. Efficacy was maintained in renal and liver transplant recipients after total withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy from tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the incidence of acute rejection episodes at up to 2 years' follow-up being similar with or without corticosteroids. Tacrolimus provided effective rescue therapy in transplant recipients with persistent acute or chronic allograft rejection or drug-related toxicity associated with cyclosporin treatment. Typically, conversion to tacrolimus reversed rejection episodes and/or improved the tolerability profile, particularly in terms of reduced hyperlipidaemia. In lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, conversion to tacrolimus reduced the decline in and/or improved lung function in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Tolerability issues may be a factor when choosing a calcineurin inhibitor. Cyclosporin tends to be associated with a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hirsutism, gingivitis and gum hyperplasia, whereas the incidence of some types of neurotoxicity, disturbances in glucose metabolism, diarrhoea, pruritus and alopecia may be higher with tacrolimus treatment. Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, was better in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients at up to 5 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Recent well designed trials have consolidated the place of tacrolimus as an important choice for primary immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and in BMT. Notably, in adults and children receiving transplants, tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion treatment in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure and the incidence of acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. The reduced incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus translated into a better cost effectiveness relative to cyclosporin microemulsion treatment. The optimal immunosuppression regimen is ultimately dependent on balancing such factors as the efficacy of the individual drugs, their tolerability, potential for drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic issues.

CMV hepatitis after liver transplantation: incidence, clinical course, and long-term follow-up

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) hepatitis is described as the most frequent manifestation of CMV tissue invasive disease after liver transplantation. Its correlation with HLA-matching, hepatic artery thrombosis, and chronic rejection is still controversial. Risk factors, incidence, clinical course, and complications of CMV hepatitis were retrospectively analyzed in a 12-year series of 1,146 consecutive liver transplantations in 1,054 patients. All patients received only low-dose acyclovir but no gancyclovir prophylaxis. CMV infection was diagnosed by viral culture, pp65 antigenemia, or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CMV hepatitis was proven by liver biopsy. Treatment of CMV disease consisted of intravenous ganciclovir for a minimum of 14 days. Long-term follow-up of patients included monthly routine laboratory values and routine liver biopsies 1, 3 and 5 years after transplantation. CMV hepatitis was a rare event after liver transplantation, with a total incidence of 2.1% (24 cases). It was significantly more frequent in CMV seronegative (5.2%) than in seropositive recipients (0.7%). The leading indication in patients with CMV hepatitis was HCV cirrhosis (n = 8). The maximum number of pp65 positive white blood cells was 82 +/- 23 per 10,000 cells. Most courses manifested as isolated hepatitis; only 2 patients had disseminated disease. Nine of 24 patients had received OKT3 monoclonal antibodies because of steroid-resistant rejection before CMV hepatitis. In seronegative patients with CMV hepatitis, 71% revealed 1 or 2 HLA DR matches, in contrast to 32% in patients without CMV hepatitis. One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival was 78%, 65%, and 59% in patients with CMV hepatitis compared with 88%, 81%, and 79% in patients without. Chronic rejection was observed in one patient, but already before onset of CMV hepatitis. Beneath D+R-constellation and OKT3 treatment as risk factors, HLA DR-matched grafts and HCV seem to favor manifestation of CMV hepatitis after liver transplantation. Long-term complications of CMV hepatitis were not observed, and especially no correlation with chronic rejection was found.

Liver transplantation

Continued discussion over organ allocation and distribution remained a focal point in the field of liver transplantation in the year 2000. Despite the ongoing debate, no significant changes were implemented in the current allocation system. By far, the most widely discussed topic in liver transplantation this year was live donor adult-to-adult liver transplantation. Several authors reported on their initial experience, with both recipient and donor outcomes appearing excellent. As the number of transplant centers performing this procedure increases we look forward to further studies regarding the safety and long-term outcome of this innovative procedure. Studies on viral hepatitis after liver transplantation again focused on the problem of recurrent hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Several small studies found benefit in patients with hepatitis B treated with intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after transplantation. Although breakthrough replication remains a problem in some patients, these studies offer hope that combination therapy for hepatitis B may provide improved long-term graft survival in these patients. In patients with hepatitis C, several studies focused on identifying risk factors to predict graft recurrence of the virus after liver transplantation. Both cellular rejection and level of viral replication may be important predictors of recurrent hepatitis C virus in the graft. Early treatment reports using interferon and ribavirin suggest that some patients may have a viral response during therapy; however, it is short lived, and tolerance of medication is difficult. Certainly, we look forward to further studies looking at means of prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis in patients undergoing liver transplantation.