Cytokine and cytotoxic molecule gene expression determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the diagnosis of acute renal rejection

Establishing Biomarkers in Transplant Medicine: A Critical Review of Current Approaches

Although the management of kidney transplant recipients has greatly improved over recent decades, the assessment of individual risks remains highly imperfect. Individualized strategies are necessary to recognize and prevent immune complications early and to fine-tune immunosuppression, with the overall goal to improve patient and graft outcomes. This review discusses current biomarkers and their limitations, and recent advancements in the field of noninvasive biomarker discovery. A wealth of noninvasive monitoring tools has been suggested that use easily accessible biological fluids such as urine and blood, allowing frequent and sequential assessments of recipient's immune status. This includes functional cell-based assays and the evaluation of molecular expression on a wide spectrum of platforms. Nevertheless, the translation and validation of exploratory findings and their implementation into standard clinical practice remain challenging. This requires dedicated prospective interventional trials demonstrating that the use of these biomarkers avoids invasive procedures and improves patient or transplant outcomes.

T-Cell Cytokines as Predictive Markers of the Risk of Allograft Rejection

Over the last decade, several biomarkers and surrogate markers have surfaced as promising predictive markers of risk of rejection in solid organ transplantation. The monitoring of these markers can help to improve graft and recipient care by personalizing immunomodulatory therapies. The complex immune system response against an implanted graft can change during long-term follow-up, and the dynamic balance between effector and regulatory T-cell populations is a crucial factor in antidonor response, risk of rejection, and immunosuppression requirements. Therefore, at any time before and after transplantation, T-effector activity, which is associated with increased production and release of proinflammatory cytokines, can be a surrogate marker of the risk of rejection and need for immunosuppression. In addition, immunosuppressive drugs may have a different effect in each individual patient. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs show high interpatient variability, and pharmacodynamic markers, strongly associated with the specific mechanism of action, can potentially be used to measure individual susceptibility to a specific immunosuppressive agent. The monitoring of a panel of valid biomarkers can improve patient stratification and the selection of immunosuppressive drugs. After transplantation, therapy can be adjusted based on the prediction of rejection episodes (maintained alloreactivity), the prognosis of allograft damage, and the individual's response to the drugs. This review will focus on current data indicating that changes in the T-cell production of the intracellular cytokines interferon-γ and interleukin-2 could be used to predict the risk of rejection and to guide immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Diagnostic Performance of Fas Ligand mRNA Expression for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The value of Fas ligand (FASL) as a diagnostic immune marker for acute renal rejection is controversial; this meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of FASL in acute renal rejection.

Methods

The relevant literature was included by systematic searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Accuracy data for acute rejection (AR) and potential confounding variables (the year of publication, area, sample source, quantitative techniques, housekeeping genes, fluorescence staining, sample collection time post-renal transplantation, and clinical classification of AR) were extracted after carefully reviewing the studies. Data were analyzed by Meta-DiSc 1.4, RevMan 5.0, and the Midas module in Stata 11.0 software.

Results

Twelve relevant studies involving 496 subjects were included. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio, together with the 95% CI were 0.64 (0.57–0.70), 0.90 (0.85–0.93), 5.66 (3.51–9.11), 0.30 (0.16–0.54), and 30.63 (14.67–63.92), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9389. Fagan’s nomogram showed that the probability of AR episodes in the kidney transplant recipient increased from 15% to 69% when FASL was positive, and was reduced to 4% when FASL was negative. No threshold effect, sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses based on the potential variables had a significant statistical change for heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests the diagnostic potential for FASL mRNA detection as a reliable immune marker for AR in renal allograft recipients. Further large, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate the power of this test marker in the non-invasive diagnosis of AR after renal transplantation.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

Differential gene expression pattern in biopsies with renal allograft pyelonephritis and allograft rejection

Differentiating acute pyelonephritis (APN) from acute rejection (AR) in renal allograft biopsies can sometimes be difficult because of overlapping clinical and histologic features, lack of positive urine cultures,and variable response to antibiotics. We wanted to study differential gene expression between AR and APN using biopsy tissue. Thirty-three biopsies were analyzed using NanoString multiplex platform and PCR (6 transplant baseline biopsies, 8 AR, 15 APN [8 culture positive, 7 culture negative], and 4 native pyelonephritis [NP]). Additional 22 biopsies were tested by PCR to validate the results. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IDO1 were the top differentially expressed genes, upregulated in AR. Lactoferrin (LTF) and CXCL1 were higher in APN and NP. No statistically significant difference in transcript levels was seen between culture-positive and culture-negative APN biopsies. Comparing the overall mRNA signature using Ingenuity pathway analysis, interferon-gamma emerged as the dominant upstream regulator in AR and allograft APN, but not in NP (which clustered separately). Our study suggests that chemokine pathways in graft APN may differ from NP and in fact resemble AR, due to a component of alloreactivity, resulting in variable response to antibiotic treatment. Therefore, cautious addition of steroids might help in resistant cases of graft APN.

A Meta-analysis of the Significance of Granzyme B and Perforin in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin (PRF) could serve as noninvasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplant. Yet, their noninvasive diagnostic value in clinical practice is still unknown.

METHODS

To assess the noninvasive diagnostic performance of GZMB and PRF for AR, we performed a systematic search. After reviewing published studies in which both GZMB and PRF were detected, data on the diagnostic accuracy of separate and combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF were pooled.

RESULTS

Across 16 studies (680 subjects), summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For overall GZMB analysis, the indices were 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.58 (3.36-6.25), and 0.32 (0.22-0.47), respectively. For overall PRF analysis, the indices were 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.82 (3.66-6.35), and 0.26 (0.18-0.37), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results compared to overall study analyses. In analyses of combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF, the above indices were 0.65 (0.53-0.76), 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 12.66 (5.83-27.50), and 0.40 (0.23-0.69), respectively, when both markers were positive. The probability of developing AR in kidney transplant recipients increased from 15% to 73% when both GZMB and PRF tests were positive and was reduced to 2% if that were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, neither GZMB nor PRF, if evaluated alone, could be a convincing noninvasive diagnostic marker for AR in clinical practice. Combined use of PRF and GZMB post-kidney transplant may be a better choice in AR evaluation to direct allograft biopsy execution and earlier therapeutic intervention.

Genomic and proteomic fingerprints of acute rejection in peripheral blood and urine

Acute dysfunction of a kidney transplant can be the result of many different etiologies and an allograft biopsy is frequently necessary to diagnose acute rejection. This invasive procedure, while generally safe, is time consuming, costly and inconvenient. We summarize recent advances in genomic and proteomic techniques using peripheral blood and urine for the diagnosis of acute rejection. While much progress has been made, validation of these new molecular tests in the clinical setting is still required.

Array-based methods for diagnosis and prevention of transplant rejection

DNA microarray is a microhybridization-based assay that is used to simultaneously study the expression of thousands of genes, thus providing a global view of gene expression in a tissue sample. This powerful technique has been adopted by many biomedical disciplines and will likely have a profound impact on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of human diseases. This review article presents an overview of the application of microarray technology to the field of solid-organ transplantation.

Effector mechanisms of rejection

Organ transplantation appears today to be the best alternative to replace the loss of vital organs induced by various diseases. Transplants can, however, also be rejected by the recipient. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and the cells/molecules involved in acute and chronic rejections. T cells and B cells mainly control the antigen-specific rejection and act either as effector, regulatory, or memory cells. On the other hand, nonspecific cells such as endothelial cells, NK cells, macrophages, or polymorphonuclear cells are also crucial actors of transplant rejection. Last, beyond cells, the high contribution of antibodies, chemokines, and complement molecules in graft rejection is discussed in this article. The understanding of the different components involved in graft rejection is essential as some of them are used in the clinic as biomarkers to detect and quantify the level of rejection.

Performance of polymerase chain reaction techniques detecting perforin in the diagnosis of acute renal rejection: a meta-analysis

Background

Studies in the past have shown that perforin expression is up-regulated during acute renal rejection, which provided hopes for a non-invasive and reliable diagnostic method to identify acute rejection. However, a systematic assessment of the value of perforin as a diagnostic marker of acute renal rejection has not been performed. We conducted this meta-analysis to document the diagnostic performance of perforin mRNA detection and to identify potential variables that may affect the performance.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Relevant materials that reported the diagnostic performance of perforin mRNA detection in acute renal rejection patients were extracted from electronic databases. After careful evaluation of the studies included in this analysis, the numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative cases of acute renal rejection identified by perforin mRNA detection were gathered from each data set. The publication year, sample origin, mRNA quantification method and housekeeping gene were also extracted as potential confounding variables. Fourteen studies with a total of 501 renal transplant subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The overall performance of perforin mRNA detection was: pooled sensitivity, 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.78 to 0.88); pooled specificity, 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.90); diagnostic odds ratio, 28.79 (95% confidence interval: 16.26 to 50.97); and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves value, 0.9107±0.0174. The univariate analysis of potential variables showed some changes in the diagnostic performance, but none of the differences reached statistical significance.

Conclusions/Significance

Despite inter-study variability, the test performance of perforin mRNA detected by polymerase chain reaction was consistent under circumstances of methodological changes and demonstrated both sensitivity and specificity in detecting acute renal rejection. These results suggest a great diagnostic potential for perforin mRNA detection as a reliable marker of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

Cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during acute renal allograft rejection

Many studies have explored the participation of cytokines and their genes in renal allograft rejection by using biopsy tissues. To screen for rejection, a biopsy is too invasive to perform without a clinical clue. Therefore, we studied the expression of cytokines that contribute to the early phase of allograft rejection by analyzing mRNA transcripts in sequential blood samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) 120 of 6 among patients transplanted before diagnosis of rejection. for comparison with 6 control recipients. The relative expression amount of cytokine genes encoding interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-15, and interferon-γ were assessed using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions. IL-2, IL-4, and IL-15 mRNA expressions in clinically stable prerejection phase of the rejection group were significantly higher than those of the control group. In the prerejection samples, the expression of mRNA encoding IL-10 negatively correlated with the expressions of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-15 mRNAs, which were not different from the positive correlations in the postoperative samples from the control group. The expression patterns of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-15 genes in PBMCs after transplantation may help to identify acute rejection episodes before clinical deterioration to monitor the efficacy of immunosuppressive treatment.

Serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) as a marker of acute rejection in renal transplant children

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not serum levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) predict acute rejection in pediatric recipients. We studied 51 pediatric renal transplant recipients divided into three groups: Group 1) Biopsy-proven cellular acute rejection (n = 19), Group 2) Graft dysfunction with histological diagnosis other than acute rejection (n = 8) and Group 3) Patients with stable graft function, no biopsy (n = 24). Serum samples for sIL-2R measurement by sandwich ELISA were obtained at the time of renal transplant and at the time of renal biopsy due to graft dysfunction (Groups 1 and 2) or at six months post-transplant in the case of Group 3. The mean ± s.e. serum values of sIL-2R were higher in patients during acute rejection (6539 ± 1802 pg/mL) compared to patients with other causes of graft dysfunction (2217 ± 256 pg/mL) or stable graft function at six months (2183 ± 283 pg/mL) (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.004). When the sIL2-R levels at the time of transplant were compared to those at the time of biopsy (Groups 1 and 2) or at six months post-transplant in Group 3, there was no significant difference between baseline and biopsy in the acute rejection group (paired t-test = 0.07), whereas there was a significant reduction in Groups 2 and 3.

Sequential monitoring of TIM-3 gene expression in peripheral blood for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of acute rejection in renal graft recipients

BACKGROUND

TIM-3 is expressed on primary T effector cells, including th1, ctl, and Th17, which play essential roles in acute allograft rejection (AR). In this study we monitored sequential changes of TIM-3 gene expression among peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) from renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study consisted of an AR group (n=24), a no AR group (n=20), and a stable group (n=18). Prospective serial blood samples were collected after allotransplantation and during AR episodes. The mRNA encoding for TIM-3 was quantified using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Statistical analyses were performed to correlate gene transcript measurements with clinical events.

RESULTS

TIM-3 mRNA in PBL showed significantly higher expression in the AR compared with the no AR and stable groups: 286.72±86.28 vs 126.10±28.31 vs 96.91±17.88, respectively (P=.00). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 87.5% for the utility of TIM-3 for rejection diagnosis. Antirejection therapy decreased TIM-3 mRNA expression in all AR patients. There was a positive correlation between TIM-3 mRNA expression and serum creatinine (r2=0.716; P=.00).

CONCLUSIONS

TIM-3 mRNA quantification by RT-PCR in PBL may be a promising tool for a noninvasive diagnosis of AR. But the utility for predicting the prognosis of AR after antirejection treatment was limited, owing to the great variations of TIM-3 mRNA expression during AR episodes.

Interleukin-10-1082G/A polymorphism and acute liver graft rejection: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the association between interleukin (IL)-10-1082 (G/A) promoter polymorphism and acute rejection (AR) in liver transplant (LT) recipients.

METHODS: Two investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Databases. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for IL-10-1082 G/A polymorphism and AR were calculated in a fixed- and a random-effects model as appropriate.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis included seven case-control studies, which comprised 652 cases of LT recipients in which 241 cases developed AR and 411 cases did not develop AR. Overall, the variant A allele was not associated with AR risk when compared with the wild-type G allele (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.64-1.39). Moreover, similar results were observed when the AA genotype was compared with the AG/GG genotype (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.55-2.02). When stratifying for ethnicity, no significant association was observed among either Caucasians or Asians. Because only one study was performed in Asian patients, the result of subgroup analysis by ethnicity would not be reliable for Asians. Limiting the analysis to the studies with controls in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the results were persistent and robust. No publication bias was found in the present study.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that IL-10-1082 G/A polymorphism may be not associated with AR risk in LT recipients among Caucasians.

Peripheral blood sampling for the detection of allograft rejection: biomarker identification and validation

Currently, acute allograft rejection can only be detected reliably by deterioration of graft function confirmed by allograft biopsy. A huge drawback of this method of diagnosis is that substantial organ damage has already taken place at the time that rejection is diagnosed. Discovering and validating noninvasive biomarkers that predict acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction, is of great importance. Many studies have investigated changes in the peripheral blood in an attempt to find biomarkers that reflect changes in the graft directly or indirectly. Herein, we will review the promises and limitations of the peripheral blood biomarkers that have been described in the literature so far.

Alternatively Expressed Genes Identified in the CD4+ T Cells of Allograft Rejection Mice

Allograft rejection is a leading cause for the failure of allotransplantation. CD4+ T cells play critical roles in this process. The identification of genes that alternatively expressed in CD4+ T cells during allograft rejection will provide critical information for studying the mechanism of allograft rejection, finding specific gene markers for monitoring, predicting allograft rejection, and opening new ways to regulate and prevent allograft rejection. Here, we established allograft and isograft transplantation models by adoptively transferring wild-type BALB/c mouse CD4+ T cells into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice with a C57BL/6 or BALB/c mouse skin graft. Using the whole transcriptome sequencing-based serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) technology, we identified 97 increasingly and 88 decreasingly expressed genes that may play important roles in allograft rejection and tolerance. Functional classification of these genes shows that apoptosis, transcription regulation, cell growth and maintenance, and signal transduction are among the frequently changed functional groups. This study provides a genome-wide view for the candidate genes of CD4+ T cells related to allotransplantation, and this report is a good resource for further microarray studies and for identifying the specific markers that are associated with clinical organ transplantations.

Immunologic basis of graft rejection and tolerance following transplantation of liver or other solid organs

Transplantation of organs between genetically different individuals of the same species causes a T cell-mediated immune response that, if left unchecked, results in rejection and graft destruction. The potency of the alloimmune response is determined by the antigenic disparity that usually exists between donors and recipients and by intragraft expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the early period after transplantation. Studies in animal models have identified many molecules that, when targeted, inhibit T-cell activation. In addition, some of these studies have shown that certain immunologic interventions induce transplantation tolerance, a state in which the allograft is specifically accepted without the need for chronic immunosuppression. Tolerance is an important aspect of liver transplantation, because livers have a unique microenvironment that promotes tolerance rather than immunity. In contrast to the progress achieved in inducing tolerance in animal models, patients who receive transplanted organs still require nonspecific immunosuppressant drugs. The development of calcineurin inhibitors has reduced the acute rejection rate and improved short-term, but not long-term, graft survival. However, long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs leads to nephrotoxicity and metabolic disorders, as well as manifestations of overimmunosuppression such as opportunistic infections and cancers. The status of pharmacologic immunosuppression in the clinic is therefore not ideal. We review recently developed therapeutic strategies to promote tolerance to transplanted livers and other organs and diagnostic tools that might be used to identify patients most likely to accept or reject allografts.

Association of IL-6 promoter and IFN-γ gene polymorphisms with acute rejection of liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is one of the most important therapies for end-stage liver diseases and is associated with major problems including infections and acute rejection. The outcome of transplantation can be determined by immune responses as a key role in response to the graft. Inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators especially cytokines influence the graft microenvironment. Th1 and Th2 immune responses in contrast to regulatory responses cause acute rejection or help graft survival. In this study, we evaluated the gene polymorphisms of IL-6 G-174C, TGF-β T + 869C, IL-4 C-590T, and IFN-γ T + 874A cytokines in liver transplant patients. ARMS-PCR method was used to characterize IL-6 G-174C, TGF-β T + 869C and IFN-γ T + 874A polymorphisms and PCR-RFLP using AvaII restriction enzyme was done for IL-4 C-590T characterization in 70 liver transplant patients. Acute rejection episodes were diagnosed according to standard criteria. The analysis of the results showed that IL-6-174 GG genotype ( P = 0.009, OR = 4.333, 95% CI = 1.043-18.000), IL-6-174G allele (P = 0.011, OR = 5.273, 95% CI = 1.454-19.127) was more frequent and IFN-γ +874 TT genotype was less frequent (P = 0.043, OR = 0.143, 95% CI = 0.0118-1.190) in acute rejection than in non-rejection patients. TGF-β T + 869C and IL-4 C-590T frequencies were not significantly different (P > 0.05). According to the results, it can be conclude that IL-6 G-174C and IFN-γ T + 874A gene polymorphisms have predictive values for acute rejection after liver transplantation. High producer genotype of IL-6 is a genetic risk factor and IFN-γ is a protective factor for acute rejection development.

Comparative transcriptional and phenotypic peripheral blood analysis of kidney recipients under cyclosporin A or sirolimus monotherapy

Due to its low level of nephrotoxicity and capacity to harness tolerogenic pathways, sirolimus (SRL) has been proposed as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors in transplantation. The exact mechanisms underlying its unique immunosuppressive profile in humans, however, are still not well understood. In the current study, we aimed to depict the in vivo effects of SRL in comparison with cyclosporin A (CSA) by employing gene expression profiling and multiparameter flow cytometry on blood cells collected from stable kidney recipients under immunosuppressant monotherapy. SRL recipients displayed an increased frequency of CD4 + CD25highFoxp3 + T cells. However, this was accompanied by an increased number of effector memory T cells and by enrichment in NFkB-related pro-inflammatory expression pathways and monocyte and NK cell lineage-specific transcripts. Furthermore, measurement of a transcriptional signature characteristic of operationally tolerant kidney recipients failed to detect differences between SRL and CSA-treated recipients. In conclusion, we show here that the blood transcriptional profile induced by SRL monotherapy in vivo does not resemble that of operationally tolerant recipients and is dominated by innate immune cells and NFkB-related pro-inflammatory events. These data provide novel insights on the complex effects of SLR on the immune system in clinical transplantation.

Noninvasive diagnosis of acute rejection of renal allografts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute rejection is an immune process that begins with the recognition of the allograft as nonself and ends in graft destruction. Histological features of the allograft biopsy are currently used for the differential diagnosis of allograft dysfunction. In view of the safety and the opportunity for repetitive sampling, development of noninvasive biomarkers of allograft status is an important objective in transplantation. Herein, we review some of the progress towards the development of noninvasive biomarkers of human allograft status.

RECENT FINDINGS

Urinary cell and peripheral blood cell mRNA profiles have been associated with acute rejection of human renal allografts. Emerging data support the idea that development of noninvasive biomarkers predictive of antibody-mediated rejection is feasible. The demonstration that intragraft microRNA expression predicts renal allograft status suggests that noninvasively ascertained microRNA profiles may be of value.

SUMMARY

We are pleased with the progress to date, and anticipate clinical trials investigating the hypotheses that noninvasively ascertained mRNA profiles will minimize the need for invasive biopsy procedures, predict the development of acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy, facilitate preemptive therapy capable of preserving graft function, and facilitate personalization of immunosuppressive therapy for the allograft recipient.

Genotypic variation and phenotypic characterization of granzyme B gene polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Granzyme B has been associated with allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the granzyme B gene might impact its expression. The aims of this study were (1) to establish the frequency of two granzyme B SNPs (A-295G; Q-55R) in pediatric heart transplant (PHTx) recipients and (2) to determine their phenotypic expression in healthy individuals.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-six PHTx patients (245 white non-Hispanic, 49 black non-Hispanic, 82 Hispanics, and 20 others) and 52 healthy controls were screened for Q-55R and A-295G. For the control samples, we assessed the frequency of granzyme B positive cells by ELISPOT assay after mitogen stimulation.

RESULTS

Among the PHTx recipients, 57% percent of the population carried the Q/Q genotype, whereas 6% were R/R homozygotes. Seven of 49 (14%) black non-Hispanics were R/R homozygotes, whereas 13 of 245 (5%) of white non-Hispanics and 5 of 82 (6%) Hispanics carried the R/R genotype (P=0.02). The A allele frequency of granzyme B A-295G (49.6%) was similar to that of the G allele (50.4%). However, 80% of Black non-Hispanics were A allele carriers compared with 68% of White non-Hispanics (P<0.0001). After mitogen stimulation, the frequency of granzyme B positive cells was higher in the Q/Q homozygotes compared with R/R carriers (P=0.006), whereas a similar frequency of granzyme B positive cells was noticed among the genotypes of A-295G SNP.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that 55 Q/Q genotype is associated with increased in vitro expression of granzyme B.

Noninvasive prediction of organ graft rejection and outcome using gene expression patterns

Development of predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic biomarkers of allograft status and outcome is important and challenging, and may be rewarded with individualized therapy for the organ graft recipient. Herein, we summarize noninvasive messenger RNA profiling studies for ascertaining allograft status and outcome. Nucleic acid-based biomarkers of allograft status have been developed by several laboratories, but the studies have primarily been single center investigations. Ongoing multicenter trials including the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (https://www.ctotstudies.org) should help further to define the clinical utility of noninvasively developed messenger RNA profiles as biomarkers of allograft status and outcome.

Polymorphisms in cytokine genes and their association with acute rejection and recurrence of hepatitis B in Chinese liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are the two major complications leading to chronic graft dysfunction. Genomic polymorphisms in interleukin (IL)-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha and transforming growth factor (TGF)beta1 genes have been found to affect the susceptibility to certain diseases. However, the relationship between cytokine gene polymorphisms and risk of AR as well as HBV recurrence after LT in Han Chinese has not been reported. The objective of the present study was to investigate the association of polymorphisms within these cytokine genes with the risk of AR as well as HBV recurrence.

METHODS

One hundred eighty six Chinese LT recipients in which 41 patients developed AR and 29 patients experienced HBV recurrence were enrolled; 151 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals were selected as controls. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at loci of IL-10 -1082, -819, -592, and TNFalpha -308, -238, as well as TGFbeta1 -988, -800, -509, +869, and +915 were determined by using DNA sequencing and then confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Analyses of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype frequency were performed using Haploview program.

RESULTS

The -819 and -592 polymorphisms in the IL-10 gene were in complete linkage (r(2) = 1). Another linkage was found at -509 and +869 in the TGFbeta1 gene (r(2) = 0.66). A significant difference was observed in the distribution of allelic frequencies at position -819 and -592 in the IL-10 gene between ARs and non-ARs (p = 0.036, OR = 1.134, 95% CI 0.999-1.287 and p = 0.036, OR = 1.134, 95% CI 0.999-1.287, respectively). After adjustment for a Bonferroni correction, there was no significant difference between the polymorphism and AR (p >0.05). Furthermore, the overall genotype distribution between HBV recurrence patients and non-HBV recurrence patients was also not significantly different (p >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that gene polymorphisms of IL10, TNFalpha, and TGFbeta1 do not have a major independent role in AR and HBV recurrence after LT and may not be risk factors of AR and HBV recurrence after LT in Chinese liver transplant recipients.

Evaluation of gene panel mRNAs in urine samples of kidney transplant recipients as a non-invasive tool of graft function

Non-invasive monitoring may be useful after kidney transplantation (KT), particularly for predicting acute rejection (AR). It is less clear whether chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is also associated with changes in urine cells. To identify non-invasive markers of allograft function in kidney transplant patients (KTP), mRNA levels of AGT, TGF-beta1, EGFR, IFN-gamma, TSP-1, and IL-10 in urine (Ur) samples were studied using QRT-PCR. Ninety-five KTP and 111 Ur samples were evaluated. Patients (Pts) were divided as, within six months (N = 31), and with more than six months post-KT (N = 64). KTP with more than six months post-KT were classified as KTP with stable kidney function (SKF) (N = 32), KTP with SKF (creatinine < 2 mg/dL) and proteinuria > 500 mg/24 h (N = 18), and KTP with biopsy proven CAN (N = 14). F-test was used to test for equality of variances between groups. IL-10 mRNA was decreased in Ur samples from KTP with less than six months post-KT (P = 0.005). For KTR groups with more than six months post-KT, AGT and EGFR mRNA were statistically different among KTP with SKF, KTP with SKF and proteinuria, and CAN Pts (P = 0.003, and P = 0.01), with KTP with SKF having higher mean expression. TSP-1 mRNA levels also were significantly different among these three groups (P = 0.04), with higher expression observed in CAN Pts. Using the random forest algorithm, AGT, EGFR, and TGF-beta1 were identified as predictors of CAN, SKF, SKF with proteinuria. A characteristic pattern of mRNA levels in the different KTP groups was observed indicating that the mRNA levels in Ur cells might reflect allograft function.

Renal transplant rejection markers

Acute rejection is one of the key factors which determine long-term graft function and survival in renal transplant patients. Timely detection and treatment of rejection is therefore, an important goal in the post-transplant surveillance. The standard care with serum creatinine measurements and biopsy upon allograft dysfunction implies that acute rejection is detected in an advanced stage. Therefore, non-invasive monitoring for acute rejection by markers in blood and urine has been tried over the past decades. This review describes the requirements that should be met by non-invasive markers. The experience with single biomarkers and with newer approaches--mRNA expression analysis, metabolomics, and proteomics--will be discussed, including future directions of necessary research.

Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring Kidney Transplant Recipients

Recent advancements in immunobiology have introduced several new diagnostic tools for monitoring kidney transplant recipients. These have been added to more established tests that, although imperfect, remain important benchmarks of diagnostic utility. Both new and old tests can be characterized with regard to their practicality, and as to whether they detect aberrant function or define the cause of dysfunction. Unfortunately, no current test is both practical and specific to a particular disease entity. Accordingly, the diagnosis of graft dysfunction remains dependent on the proper use and interpretation of many studies. This article reviews the current assays that have been evaluated in the clinic for the diagnosis of renal allograft-related diseases. These are limited to assays based on routinely obtainable samples such as blood, biopsy tissue, and urine. Newer studies are presented, along with more mundane assays, to highlight the practical use of studies regardless of their degree of mechanistic sophistication.

Evaluation of gene panel mRNAs in urine samples of kidney transplant recipients as a non-invasive tool of graft function

Non-invasive monitoring may be useful after kidney transplantation (KT), particularly for predicting acute rejection (AR). It is less clear whether chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is also associated with changes in urine cells. To identify non-invasive markers of allograft function in kidney transplant patients (KTP), mRNA levels of AGT, TGF-beta1, EGFR, IFN-gamma, TSP-1, and IL-10 in urine (Ur) samples were studied using QRT-PCR. Ninety-five KTP and 111 Ur samples were evaluated. Patients (Pts) were divided as, within six months (N = 31), and with more than six months post-KT (N = 64). KTP with more than six months post-KT were classified as KTP with stable kidney function (SKF) (N = 32), KTP with SKF (creatinine < 2 mg/dL) and proteinuria > 500 mg/24 h (N = 18), and KTP with biopsy proven CAN (N = 14). F-test was used to test for equality of variances between groups. IL-10 mRNA was decreased in Ur samples from KTP with less than six months post-KT (P = 0.005). For KTR groups with more than six months post-KT, AGT and EGFR mRNA were statistically different among KTP with SKF, KTP with SKF and proteinuria, and CAN Pts (P = 0.003, and P = 0.01), with KTP with SKF having higher mean expression. TSP-1 mRNA levels also were significantly different among these three groups (P = 0.04), with higher expression observed in CAN Pts. Using the random forest algorithm, AGT, EGFR, and TGF-beta1 were identified as predictors of CAN, SKF, SKF with proteinuria. A characteristic pattern of mRNA levels in the different KTP groups was observed indicating that the mRNA levels in Ur cells might reflect allograft function.

Diagnosis of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by Analyzing Whole Blood mRNA Expression of Lymphocyte Marker Molecules

BACKGROUND

Currently, the diagnosis of acute rejection after kidney transplantation is based on a kidney biopsy taken after clinical rejection suspicion. A robust, noninvasive diagnostic method would allow easier and more frequent monitoring of the patient and the graft. Potentially, a straightforward method would be the analysis of lymphocyte marker molecule expression from whole blood samples.

METHODS

Whole blood samples were collected prospectively in a single kidney transplantation center from 50 adult kidney recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005. The mRNA expression of granzyme B, perforin, FasL, granulysin, CD154, ICOS, CTLA4 and PD-1 were analyzed with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The expression of ICOS and CD154 were significantly lower in rejection patients than in control patients (P<0.001). Both genes gave statistically significant area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.87, 0.88) with 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CD154 and 76% and 86% for ICOS, respectively. In paired rejection and postrejection therapy samples, the expression of both genes significantly increased during rejection therapy (P<0.001). When rejection patients were compared to patients biopsied because of other reasons of graft dysfunction, both CD154 and ICOS were lower in rejection patients but only CD154 was statistically significant (P=0.028, AUC=0.740, sensitivity 52%, specificity 90%). The other studied genes gave no consistent statistically significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole blood gene expression quantities of costimulatory molecules CD154 and ICOS reasonably robustly differentiated rejection patients from control patients. The clinical use of the analysis is limited by poor capability to differentiate patients with rejection from patients with other causes of graft dysfunction.

Exogenous IL-10 overexpression reduces perforin production by activated allogenic CD8+cells and prolongs cardiac allograft survival

Perforin is a cytolytic mediator produced by cytotoxic T cells (CD8+cells) and natural killer cells. We previously reported that ex vivo IL-10 gene therapy induced apoptosis of allogenic infiltrative CD8+cells and significantly prolonged cardiac allograft survival. To further test the hypothesis that localized IL-10 overexpression in cardiac allografts may also effect the alloreactive CD8+T cell function by downregulating its perforin production, we used a rabbit functional heterotopic allograft heart transplant model. Human recombinant IL-10 gene complexed with liposome was intracoronary delivered into the cardiac allografts ex vivo. The percentage of apoptotic infiltrative CD8+cells in cardiac allografts was increased 6-fold in the gene therapy group vs. the control group, whereas the percentage of perforin-positive CD8+cells was decreased 2.9-fold ( P < 0.01). Perforin expression level in the allograft myocardium of the gene therapy group was deceased 3.2-fold ( P < 0.01). The amount of infiltrative perforin-positive CD8+cells and perforin expression level were inversely correlated with IL-10 transgene and protein expression level in the myocardium of cardiac allografts ( P < 0.01), the percentage of apoptotic cardiac myocytes ( P < 0.01), and the peak left ventricular systolic pressure of cardiac allografts ( P < 0.01) but significantly correlated with the infiltrative T cell cytotoxicity ( P < 0.01) and allograft rejection score ( P < 0.01). These results suggest that localized IL-10 gene therapy prolongs cardiac allograft survival, at least in part, through downregulation of perforin production by activated allogenic CD8+T cells. Reduction of cytolytic function of cytotoxic effector cells prevents the apoptosis of cardiac myocytes.

Serial Peripheral Blood Cytotoxic Lymphocyte Gene Expression Measurements for Prediction of Pancreas Transplant Rejection

Acute rejection after pancreas transplantation remains a significant problem and contributes to immunological graft loss. No clinical markers of pancreas rejection have been universally accepted. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of genetic markers; granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA in the peripheral blood of pancreas transplant recipients. These genes have been identified in renal and islet cell transplant recipients as noninvasive tools to predict acute rejection. Blood samples were collected weekly for up to 1 year posttransplant. Surveillance biopsies of the pancreas were scheduled at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 as part of the typical posttransplant protocol for patients with pancreas alone or pancreas after kidney transplantation. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of biopsy-proven chronic rejection alone, pancreatitis, or kidney rejection within 2 months after pancreas biopsy. Gene expression levels of granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA were compared in patients with (n = 7) and without biopsy proven acute rejection (n = 7). Recipients with acute rejection showed increased expression of granzyme B, HLA-DRA, as well as perforin genes compared to patients without biopsy-proven rejection. In addition, we observed that elevation of these genes occurred as early as 4 weeks before the traditional biopsy diagnosis, while the recipients with no rejection showed no change in gene expression. Our data indicated that serial measurements of peripheral blood granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA gene expression can be a useful tool to predict pancreas rejection in its earliest stage.

Noninvasive immune monitoring assessed by flow cytometry and real time RT-PCR in urine of renal transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

Monitoring recipient's alloreactivity has shown to be critical for limiting overimmunosuppression besides allowing preemptive treatment of acute rejection (AR).

METHODS

Flow cytometry and real time RT-PCR were performed in urine of kidney transplant recipients with AR (n = 13) and compared with pyelonephritis (n = 10), chronic allograft nephropathy (n = 13), acute tubular necrosis (n = 13) and stable graft function (n = 11). Expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, HLA-DR, Fas-L, ICAM-1 and CD25 were assessed using flow cytometry. mRNA of perforin, granzyme B and Fas-L were quantified by real time RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Frequencies of CD3+, HLA-DR+, Fas-L+, ICAM-1+ and CD25+ cells were significantly higher in AR group (p < 0.05). ROC curves showed sensitivity from 70% to 91% and specificity from 30% to 100%, whereas the highest sensitivity and specificity was 91% and 100% respectively, for Fas-L+ cells. Levels of mRNA of perforin, granzyme B and Fas-L were significantly augmented in AR, while the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 85% to 88% and from 55% to 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of immune activation markers by flow cytometry and real time RT-PCR are equally useful for noninvasive monitoring kidney allografts.

In vitro evaluation of the effects of candidate immunosuppressive drugs: flow cytometry and quantitative real-time PCR as two independent and correlated read-outs

BACKGROUND

Immune monitoring may use flow cytometry or molecular biology techniques. Flow cytometry assays cells that are phenotypically characterized, whereas TaqMan RT-PCR starts with RNA extraction from unfractionated heterogeneous cell populations. We therefore wondered how the effects of immunosuppressive drugs on cytokine production in stimulated whole blood, as determined by flow cytometry, would correlate with those obtained with quantitative real-time PCR (TaqMan RT-PCR).

METHODS

Blood drawn from naive cynomolgus monkeys was exposed to incremental amounts of cyclosporine (CsA; 300, 600, 900 and 1200 ng/ml) or tacrolimus (TRL; 8, 20, 40 and 80 ng/ml) before lectin stimulation in vitro. Blood was then either stained for CD3, IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, and TNF-alpha and analyzed on a flow cytometer with various gating strategies, or submitted to RNA extraction for analysis of the above mentioned cytokines mRNA transcripts using TaqMan RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Both methods revealed a parallel dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine production in stimulated blood. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)'s) ranged from 511-771 ng/ml (CsA) and 15-29 ng/ml (TRL) with flow cytometry, and from 275-529 ng/ml (CsA) and 11-48 ng/ml (TRL) with TaqMan RT-PCR for T-helper 1 cytokines. Both assays correlated well with a Pearson product moment correlation of 0.76. Extending gating from a CD3(+) gate to a lymphocyte gate improved correlation (r = 0.85) for all cytokines investigated (except IL-2; unchanged) whereas further extending gating resulted, to the contrary, in lower correlations. Independent of gating strategy a high correlation (r = 0.97) was observed when drug IC(50)'s were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow cytometry and TaqMan RT-PCR may be used interchangeably to monitor the effects of candidate immunosuppressive drugs on cytokine mRNA production in lectin-stimulated whole blood.

Molecular approaches to chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The progression of chronic kidney disease to terminal renal failure remains a major challenge in nephrology. Definition of the dynamic differences in gene regulation, protein interaction and protein function in this process might allow the development of rationally designed management strategies for the individual patient. Current approaches to identifying the molecular markers required to implement this 'personalized medicine' concept in progressive renal failure will be presented in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

In small populations, molecular fingerprints derived from renal biopsies have allowed the definition of distinct patient subgroups. These parameters could be shown to correlate with the response to available therapies and, in chronic transplant failure, with the therapeutic toxicity of cyclosporine. Urine analysis for mRNA and protein markers is rapidly evolving as a non-invasive approach for molecular patient monitoring. As only a small fraction of these fingerprints have been evaluated in independent populations, studies to test marker sets in diverse cohorts for their clinical applicability are warranted.

SUMMARY

The genome-wide tools discussed in this review might define the molecular mechanism active in each single patient with progressive kidney disease. Reflecting the individuality of the disease process could result in a tailored therapy for the unique human being, contrasting with the 'one-size-fits-all' therapies currently employed in nephrology.

Two Years’ Experience of Acute Rejection Monitoring of Intestinal Transplant Recipients by Real-Time PCR Assessment of Granzyme B and Perforin Up-Regulation: Considerations on Diagnostic Accuracy

Granzyme B (GrB) and perforin are promising immunological markers to predict acute rejection of transplanted organs. Based on 2 years of experience with molecular monitoring on peripheral blood samples, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of GrB/perforin gene up-regulation using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for prediction of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in intestinal transplantation recipients. Histology used as the reference standard. According to our definition of disease positivity (anything other than ACR score 0), GrB/perforin up-regulation showed 84% specificity but only 49% sensitivity. However, among the 26 false-negatives, 12 (46%) had an ACR score 1, which is indeterminate for rejection and no associated clinical manifestations; a further 10 (39%) had a score of 2 following rejection therapy (a confounder for GrB/perforin analysis). Thus only 4 (15%) false-negatives were actually associated with the onset of robust acute rejection. These data suggest that real-time PCR analysis for GrB/perforin up-regulation might play a role along with clinical criteria for detection of presymptomatic acute rejection episodes in intestinal recipients who require immediate endoscopy and pathological examination, especially during long-term follow-up.

Results of clinical renal transplantation in 15 dogs using triple drug immunosuppressive therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcome of renal transplantation in dogs administered cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone immunosuppression.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

Fifteen dogs with chronic renal failure.

RESULTS

Nine dogs died within 1 month of surgery; 5 died from complications associated with generalized thromboembolism. Three dogs survived for 6-25 months. Three dogs alive at the time of this report have survived 22-48 months; however, all 3 dogs have had bacterial infections that responded to antibiotic therapy. There was no biochemical evidence of acute allograft rejection in any dog. Perioperative use of enoxaparin may have prevented thromboembolism in 5 dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple drug immunosuppressive therapy used in this study prevented acute renal allograft rejection in 6 dogs that survived >4 weeks; however, immunosuppression was excessive, resulting in an unacceptable frequency of infection and other drug-related complications. Perioperative anticoagulation therapy seem to be warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Survival time and quality of life for this group of dogs was poor; however, there was no evidence of acute rejection in the dogs surviving >4 weeks. This protocol should only be used if the degree of immunosuppression is reduced, and early evidence of allograft rejection is monitored by renal biopsy or markers of lymphocyte activation.

Beyond histology: novel tools to diagnose allograft dysfunction

Kidney biopsy is the gold standard procedure for the assessment of allograft dysfunction. The differential diagnosis for both acute and chronic dysfunction can encompass a number of different causes, and a biopsy frequently can suggest a specific cause. However, many of these causes are difficult to distinguish on morphologic basis alone, and the information that is obtained from a biopsy is limited with regard to functional and prognostic importance. Additional methods therefore are needed to guide the diagnosis and the treatment of allograft dysfunction, and numerous methods have been studied. Potential markers include protein and gene expression profiles in the peripheral blood, the urine, and the graft itself, all compartments that are relevant to the alloimmune response. Recent comprehensive sequencing of the human genome has led to an unprecedented opportunity to develop these genetic and proteomic techniques, and ongoing evaluations of potential tests have led to an improved understanding of the complexity of immune responses. The future challenge for promising tests is validation in larger patient populations to facilitate their addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.

Peripheral blood cytotoxic lymphocyte gene transcript levels differ in patients with long-term type 1 diabetes compared to normal controls

The purpose of this study was to compare mRNA levels of the cytotoxic lymphocyte (CL) gene products: granzyme B (GB), perforin (P), and fas ligand (FasL) in patients with long-term type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. The objective was to utilize this information to follow patients as they undergo islet cell transplantation at our center and to determine if changes in CL gene transcript levels correlate with graft status. We have measured mRNA levels for CL genes in peripheral blood samples from 65 long-term (>5 years) type 1 diabetes patients and 29 healthy controls. Total RNA was extracted from EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood samples and reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA using SuperScript II reverse Transcriptase. Quantitative, real-time PCR was utilized to determine CL gene transcript levels. mRNA levels of P and FasL genes were found to be significantly lower for patients with type 1 diabetes compared to normal controls (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference for GB mRNA levels between patients and controls (p > 0.05). The decreased expression of P and FasL in patients with long-term type 1 diabetes might contribute to the inability to maintain normal levels of peripheral tolerance, which is essential for protection from autoimmune disease.

Potential of Real-Time PCR Assessment of Granzyme B and Perforin Up-Regulation for Rejection Monitoring in Intestinal Transplant Recipients

Granzyme B (GrB) and perforin are promising markers to predict acute rejection episodes of transplanted organs. Having recently reported that immunohistochemical expression of GrB/perforin correlates with histologically assessed acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes in intestinal transplantation recipients, herein we have additionally explored the potential of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assessment of GrB/perforin gene up-regulation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Both immunohistochemical evaluation of GrB/perforin expression and real-time PCR assessment of up-regulation, which was defined as a 2-fold increase with respect to "basal" levels during maintenance immunosuppressive protocols, were performed among a population of 23 intestinal transplant recipients under routine surveillance, in addition to histological analysis of ACR. The ACR scores showed direct relationships both with GrB/perforin immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores (P < .001) and with gene up-regulation by real-time PCR (P = .004). Furthermore, real-time PCR upregulation was associated with the IHC score (P < .001). A preliminary analysis of diagnostic accuracy-performed to gain information to plan future studies-indicated that when using histological assessment as the reference technique, our current definition of PCR up-regulation provided good specificity (84%) but insufficient sensitivity (44%) for a noninvasive prediction of ACR. The results of this pilot study suggested that real-time PCR analysis of GrB/perforin upregulation may help therapeutic decision making, and have the potential for detection of presymptomatic rejection. More extensive studies must investigate strategies to improve the sensitivity of the analyses of GrB/perforin up-regulation.

Detection of acute tubulointerstitial rejection by proteomic analysis of urinary samples in renal transplant recipients

This study investigates proteomic analysis of urinary samples as a non-invasive method to detect acute rejection of renal allografts. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) was used to analyze urinary samples in 19 patients with different grades of subclinical or clinical acute rejection (BANFF Ia to IIb), 10 patients with urinary tract infection and 29 patients without evidence of rejection or infection. A distinct urinary polypeptide pattern identified 16 out of 17 cases of acute tubolointerstitial rejection, but was absent in two cases of vascular rejection. Urinary tract infection resulted in a different polypeptide pattern that allowed to differentiate between infection and acute rejection in all cases. Potentially confounding variables such as acute tubular lesions, tubular atrophy, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, proteinuria, hematuria, allograft function and different immunosuppressive regimens did not interfere with test results. Blinded analysis of samples with and without rejection showed correct diagnosis by CE-MS in the majority of cases. Detection of acute rejection by CE-MS offers a promising non-invasive tool for the surveillance of renal allograft recipients. Further investigation is needed to establish polypeptide patterns in vascular rejection and to explore whether changes in the urinary proteome occur before the onset of histologically discernible rejection.