Fotemustine given simultaneously with total brain irradiation in multiple brain metastases of malignant melanoma: report on a pilot study

Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Recurrent or progressive brain metastases after initial treatment represent a common clinical entity mainly due to increased survival of cancer patients. From the various available treatment modalities, salvage stereotactic radiosurgery seems to be the most commonly used. Many clinical studies of class of evidence III have demonstrated satisfied results concerning the local brain control and survival of patients with relapsing brain disease. Also stereotactic radiosurgery is considered a relatively safe modality with low incidence of brain toxicity side effects. It is obvious that well-designed, randomized, prospective studies are necessary for the evaluation of the stereotactic radiosurgery as salvage treatment and for the establishment of guidelines for the selection of patients most suitable for this treatment option. The increasing number of patients with relapsing brain metastatic disease will act as a pressure to this direction.

Surgery of recurrent brain metastases: retrospective analysis of 67 patients

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastasis is one of the major challenges in neurooncology. Commonly, WBRT was applied after or as the initial treatment. Many patients received radiosurgery or their lesions were operated on. The question arises of what treatment modalities are appropriate and can be offered to the patients. In our retrospective analysis, we evaluated whether re-operation might be a useful measurement for the patients with respect to overall survival and quality of life.

METHODS

We included 67 patients who were treated between 1993 and 2008 in our department. The median age was 59 years. Metastases of 11 different primaries were diagnosed. The median OST was 7.5 months.

RESULTS

Statistically significant prognostic factors for OS were single lesions, completeness of resection, and time to recurrence, which was significantly influenced by WBRT after first operation. The one year survival rate correlated with the RPA classification: class I: 53.3 %, class II: 26.9 %, class III: 12.5 %. In 31.3 %, a second recurrence occurred which was treated by repeated surgery. Six patients survived as long-term survivors (25.7-132.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Surgery of recurrent brain metastasis is an important therapeutic option. A subgroup of patients, defined by prognostic factors, will profit with improvement of symptoms and prolongation of the overall survival time. Even long-term survivors can be expected.

Chemotherapy in the management of brain metastases: the emerging role of fotemustine for patients with melanoma and NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

An estimated 20 - 40% of cancer patients will develop brain metastases that are the most common intracranial tumors in adults. Patients with cerebral metastases represent a variegate group where selection of the most appropriate treatment depends on many patient- and disease-related factors. The impact of therapeutic option on overall survival is lacking and it is important to consider quality of life (QOL) when treating patients with brain metastases.

AREAS COVERED

A considerable proportion of patients are treated with palliative approaches such as whole-brain radiotherapy. The role of chemotherapy was limited in the past. Recently, several chemotherapeutic agents have been identified as potentially useful. This article examines the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and tolerability of fotemustine (FTM) for the management of patients with cerebral metastasis from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERT OPINION

FTM is a third-generation nitrosourea that has proved its efficacy on brain metastases of melanoma and showed promising results for the treatment of brain metastasis of NSCLC because of its ability to pass the blood-brain barrier.

The role of emerging and investigational therapies for metastatic brain tumors: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline of selected topics

QUESTION

What evidence is available regarding the emerging and investigational therapies for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with brain metastases.

RECOMMENDATIONS

New radiation sensitizers Level 2 A subgroup analysis of a large prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggested a prolongation of time to neurological progression with the early use of motexafin-gadolinium (MGd). Nonetheless this was not borne out in the overall study population and therefore an unequivocal recommendation to use the currently available radiation sensitizers, motexafin-gadolinium and efaproxiral (RSR 13) cannot be provided. Interstitial modalities There is no evidence to support the routine use of new or existing interstitial radiation, interstitial chemotherapy and or other interstitial modalities outside of approved clinical trials. New chemotherapeutic agents Level 2 Treatment of melanoma brain metastases with whole brain radiation therapy and temozolomide is reasonable based on one class II study. Level 3 Depending on individual circumstances there may be patients who benefit from the use of temozolomide or fotemustine in the therapy of their brain metastases. Molecular targeted agents Level 3 The use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors may be of use in the management of brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma.

The role of retreatment in the management of recurrent/progressive brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

QUESTION

What evidence is available regarding the use of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), surgical resection or chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent/progressive brain metastases?

TARGET POPULATION

This recommendation applies to adults with recurrent/progressive brain metastases who have previously been treated with WBRT, surgical resection and/or radiosurgery. Recurrent/progressive brain metastases are defined as metastases that recur/progress anywhere in the brain (original and/or non-original sites) after initial therapy.

RECOMMENDATION

Level 3 Since there is insufficient evidence to make definitive treatment recommendations in patients with recurrent/progressive brain metastases, treatment should be individualized based on a patient's functional status, extent of disease, volume/number of metastases, recurrence or progression at original versus non-original site, previous treatment and type of primary cancer, and enrollment in clinical trials is encouraged. In this context, the following can be recommended depending on a patient's specific condition: no further treatment (supportive care), re-irradiation (either WBRT and/or SRS), surgical excision or, to a lesser extent, chemotherapy. Question If WBRT is used in the setting of recurrent/progressive brain metastases, what impact does tumor histopathology have on treatment outcomes? No studies were identified that met the eligibility criteria for this question.

Temozolomide in advanced malignant melanoma with small brain metastases: can we withhold cranial irradiation?

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) in patients who have brain metastases from melanoma is limited. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of treatment with temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma, including small brain metastases, who did not require immediate RT and investigated the feasibility of deferring RT.

METHODS

Patients with brain metastasis were identified from 3 prospective studies of temozolomide (with or without immunotherapy) for metastatic melanoma. Patients with brain metastasis that measured >2 cm, extensive edema, and localization in the brain stem were excluded from the study. For the current analysis, patients with leptomeningeal metastasis and patients who received previous stereotactic RT were excluded. In patients who achieved a systemic response or stabilization to temozolomide, the response of brain metastasis and the necessity for palliative cranial RT were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 179 patients who received temozolomide for advanced melanoma, 52 patients with brain metastasis were evaluable. Stabilization of systemic metastasis was noted in 7 of 52 patients (13%), and there were 6 responses (5 partial responses and 1 complete response; 11%); thus, in those 13 patients, 6 had stabilization of brain metastasis (11%) and 5 had a response (2 partial responses and 3 complete responses; 9%). Immunotherapy did not influence the neurologic response. The median time to neurologic progression was 7 months (range 2-15, months). RT for cerebral recurrence was required in 2 patients. The median survival of patients with brain metastases was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.4-6.8 months). Intracranial hemorrhagic complications were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that it is feasible to treat patients who have advanced melanoma and small brain metastasis with temozolomide as the single treatment. The small subset of patients with systemic response usually showed durable stabilization or a response of brain metastasis. With this approach, neurologic disease can be controlled, and cranial irradiation may be deferred and even withheld in most of patients.

Brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Systemic cancer is the second most common cause of death for adults in the United States. Twenty percent of these patients develop neurologic symptoms sometime during their illness. An apparent increase in the incidence of both systemic cancers and resulting brain metastases are posing an increasing challenge to health care providers. Neurologic complications lead to significant morbidity and mortality in these patients. Therefore, it is important to understand the current concepts of diagnosis and treatment of patients with brain metastases.

REVIEW SUMMARY

This review summarizes the epidemiology, clinical features, pathophysiology, and diagnostic evaluation of brain metastases. The section on current treatments is presented from the perspective of the three most common primary tumor locations along with the treatment approach to other metastatic tumors. This review includes a thorough evaluation of the literature, highlights controversies over treatment options, and provides insight into novel approaches currently under investigation. Clinical studies needed for further study are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

A clearer understanding of the pathophysiology of metastatic tumors and advances in diagnostic technology have paved the road to a better approach to treatment of brain metastases. Although no curative treatments are available to date, significant improvement in a patient's quality of life and life expectancy can be achieved with the available therapy. A better understanding of different primary cancers leading to brain metastases leads to a more effective treatment. More studies are needed to critically analyze the clear benefit of these treatment options in selected patients.

Management of brain metastases in patients with melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Melanoma is the third most common metastatic brain tumor in the United States and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The development of more effective therapies for melanoma brain metastases is a major unmet clinical need and is summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Management strategies include symptomatic treatment with corticosteroids and anticonvulsants, and definitive therapy in the form of whole-brain radiation therapy, surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and systemic therapy. The data on whole-brain radiation therapy show little impact on survival, but there is evidence that it may improve neurologic deficits. Surgery may provide a survival advantage in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy in the management of a single brain melanoma metastasis, compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone. Stereotactic radiosurgery may offer a survival advantage (in a select group of patients with limited disease) when used alone or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy, compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone. Fotemustine, temozolomide, and thalidomide are three agents with high central nervous system penetration that are being actively investigated as part of systemic therapy.

SUMMARY

The currently available therapeutic options offer palliative relief of symptoms in most patients and a survival advantage in selected patients with melanoma and brain metastases. An urgent need exists to further define these treatments in the context of randomized trials, several of which are under way in the United States and abroad.

A prospective randomized multicentre phase III trial of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in cerebral metastases of malignant melanoma

The main objective of this prospective multicentre randomized phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation with fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma cerebral metastases. Seventy-six patients were randomized to receive either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5 week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at a total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/day on days 1-5 for three consecutive weeks). Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in cerebral response (arm A, 7.4%, arm B, 10.0%) or control rates (objective responses plus stable disease) after 7 weeks (arm A, 30%; arm B, 47%) or in overall survival (arm A, 86 days; arm B, 105 days). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to cerebral progression (P = 0.028, Wilcoxon test). In conclusion, fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to cerebral progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared with fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.

[Randomised phase III trial of fotemustine versus fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation in cerebral metastases of melanoma]

PURPOSE

The main objective of this prospective multicenter randomised phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients (instead of the 106 planned patients; study was stopped after the interim analysis) were randomised receiving either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine and whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg m(-2) on day 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5-week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, a concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at the total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/d(-1), days 1-5, 3 consecutive weeks).

RESULTS

Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in brain response (arm A: 7.4%, B: 10.0%) or control rates (objective response plus stable disease) after seven weeks (arm A: 30%, B: 47%) and overall survival (arm A: 86d, B: 105d). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to brain progression (p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test).

CONCLUSION

Fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to brain progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared to fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.

The treatment of brain metastases from malignant melanoma

Metastasis to the CNS develops in nearly half of patients with advanced melanoma; in 15% to 20% of these patients, the CNS is the first site of relapse. While systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma produces objective responses in 15% to 50% of patients, the available drugs do not penetrate well into the CNS, and these patients rarely benefit from systemic therapy. Although brain metastasis may be treated with surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when disease is limited to approximately one to three lesions, treatment for patients with large or multiple metastases is limited to whole brain irradiation (WBRT). While formal response and survival analyses of the impact of WBRT in melanoma have not been reported, the estimated median survival time for unselected patients with CNS metastases is only 2 to 4 months, with 1-year survival rates of less than 13%. In a selected population of patients with limited CNS involvement, surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT appears to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports of patients with melanoma CNS metastases, treatment with surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT has been demonstrated to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports, patients with CNS metastases from melanoma treated with a combination of WBRT plus SRS or SRS alone had median survivals and rates of control in the CNS superior to published reports for traditional WBRT. Most of these patients died from progressive extracranial disease with locally controlled CNS disease. Investigation of the contribution of newer systemic agents to the control of melanoma metastatic to the CNS has been based on the identification of drugs that have antitumor activity and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Fotemustine is a nitrosourea that produced similar activity in CNS metastasis as in systemic disease, with a response rate of about 25%. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that acts via the same mechanism as dacarbazine (DTIC), the most active single agent in melanoma. TMZ, which is highly active in brain tumors, has also been associated with activity in systemic and CNS metastases in melanoma patients, also in the 25% range. Efforts are underway to assess the additive benefit of TMZ and other drugs to WBRT or focused radiotherapy in this disease.

Gamma surgery for melanoma metastases in the brain

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and limitations of gamma surgery (GS) in the treatment of brain metastases from melanoma.

METHODS

Imaging and clinical outcomes in 45 patients treated for 92 brain metastases from melanoma between October 1989 and October 1999 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up imaging studies were available in 35 patients with 66 treated lesions. Twenty-four percent of the lesions disappeared, 35% shrank, 23% remained unchanged, and 18% increased in size. No undue radiation-induced changes were observed in the surrounding brain. Clinical data were available in all patients. No deaths or neurological morbidity related to GS was observed. The median survival time, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 10.4 months from the time of GS. In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, a single brain lesion and lack of visceral metastases were statistically predictive of a better prognosis. Six of eight patients with solitary metastasis (that is, a single brain metastasis with no primary visceral tumor) were still alive at the close of the study, none of them with disease progression, with a follow-up period ranging between 14 and 82 months. Sixteen patients in this series received adjunctive whole-brain radiation therapy, which had no impact on their survival time or local and distant control of the brain disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma surgery is effective in treating melanoma metastases in the brain. It appears that the radiobiology of a single high dose overcomes the radioresistance barrier, yielding better results than fractionated radiation.

Sequential interferon-alpha2b, interleukin-2 and fotemustine for patients with metastatic melanoma

The aim of this study was the evaluation of both the antitumour activity and toxicity of an immunochemotherapeutic regimen consisting of interferon-alpha2b and interleukin-2 in combination with fotemustine for patients with metastatic melanoma. To improve the penetration of fotemustine into the brain, it was given immediately after immunotherapy, when the blood-brain barrier is still disturbed. Of the 19 patients treated, three complete remissions (CRs) and one partial remission (PR) were induced, giving an objective response rate of 21% (95% confidence interval 6-46%). The durations of the CRs were 9, 19 and 44 months; the PR lasted for 59+ months. The overall survival times for the patients with CR were 21, 25 and 70+ months, and 59+ months for the PR. For nine patients (47%, 95% confidence interval 24-71%) disease was stabilized for a median period of 8 months (range 2-18 months), resulting in a median survival of 18 months (range 10-41+ months). No haematological toxicity of World Health Organization grade 3 or more was observed and in general toxicity was low. In summary, this immunochemotherapy regimen led to long-term survival in occasional patients, and about half of the patients achieved stable disease, with prolonged treatment- and progression-free survival compared with nonresponding patients. The occurrence of brain metastases, however, was not prevented, and in fact was the site of recurrence in those patients achieving a CR. Due to its low toxicity, this protocol can be applied at a community hospital level.

Management of cerebral metastases from malignant melanoma: results of a combined, simultaneous treatment with fotemustine and irradiation

We report results of a conservative treatment for brain metastases from malignant melanoma with a combination of irradiation and chemotherapy (fotemustine and/or DTIC). To date, 12 patients have been treated. There was a complete remission of the brain metastases in four patients. In two patients a partial remission was observed. The mean survival of the responder was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval 3.8-12.6 months). The most common side effects were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and alopecia. Altogether, the treatment was well tolerated. As the outcome of patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma is generally poor, this combined chemo- and radiation therapy may provide improved care for such patients.

[Managing cutaneous melanoma]

Cutaneous melanoma represents the main cause of death among skin cancers. Early diagnosis gives, for the time being, the only possibility for high rate of curative treatment. Diagnosis is based on pathological findings, and at primary tumor stage. Breslow thickness of the lesion is the best prognostic index. At local stage of the disease, treatment is precisely codified by international recommendations and consensus conferences. Follow-up after surgical treatment is also well codified. Treatment of lymph node invasion or metastatic disease is, on the other hand, less codified. Despite recent advances, especially in immunotherapy, treatment of advanced stages of melanoma remains difficult.