U.S. hospital care for HIV-infected persons and the role of public, private, and Veterans Administration hospitals

The association of hospital, clinic and provider volume with HIV/AIDS care and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the association between hospital, clinic and provider patient volumes on HIV/AIDS patient outcomes including mortality, antiretroviral (ARV) use and proportion of patients on indicated opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis. We searched MEDLINE and nine other electronic databases from 1 January 1980 through 29 May 2009. Experimental and controlled observational studies of persons with HIV/AIDS were included. Studies examined the volume or concentration of patients with HIV/AIDS in hospitals, clinics or individual providers. Outcomes included mortality, ARV use and proportion of patients on indicated OI prophylaxis. We reviewed 22,692 titles and/or abstracts. Patient characteristics, study design, volume measures, medical outcomes and study confounders were abstracted. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Twenty-two studies were included in the final review. High volume hospital care was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.90 p = 0.004) and lower mortality 30 days from admission (pooled OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.81 p = 0.0004). Higher volume provider care was associated with significantly higher ARV use (pooled OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.70-7.18 p<0.00001). Differences in volume definitions and controlling for confounding variables did not appreciably alter the results. Higher volume hospitals, clinics and providers were associated with significantly decreased mortality for people living with HIV/AIDS and higher volume providers and clinics had higher ARV use. Heterogeneity of volume thresholds and absence of studies from resource-limited settings are major limitations.

The impact of integrated HIV care on patient health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Control of viral replication through combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) improves patient health outcomes. Yet many HIV-infected patients have comorbidities that pose social and clinical barriers to achieving viral suppression. Integration of subspecialty services into HIV primary care may overcome such barriers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effect of integrated HIV care (IHC) on suppression of HIV replication.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of HIV patients from 5 Veterans Affairs healthcare facilities 2000 to 2006.

SUBJECTS

Patients with >3 months of follow-up, sufficient baseline HIV severity, on cART.

MEASURES

We measured and ranked Integrated Care at the facilities. These rankings were applied to patient visits to form an index of IHC utilization. We evaluated effect of IHC utilization on likelihood of achieving viral suppression while on cART, controlling for demographic and clinical factors using survival analysis.

RESULTS

: The 1018 HIV-infected patients eligible for analysis had substantial barriers to responding to cART: 93% had comorbidities with mean 3.2 comorbidities per patient (SD = 2.0); 52% achieved viral suppression in median 231 days (SD = 411.6). Patients visiting clinics that offered hepatitis, psychiatric, psychologic, and social services in addition to HIV primary care were 3.1 times more likely to achieve viral suppression than patients visiting clinics which offered only HIV primary care (hazard ratio = 3.1, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who visited IHC clinics were more likely to achieve viral suppression while on cART. Future research should investigate which elements of Integrated Care are most associated with viral control and what role provider experience plays in this association.

Setting and organization of care for persons living with HIV/AIDS

BACKGROUND

Treating the world's 40.3 million persons currently infected with HIV/AIDS is an international responsibility that involves unprecedented organizational challenges. Key issues include whether care should be concentrated or decentralized, what type and mix of health workers are needed, and which interventions and mix of programs are best. High volume centres, case management and multi-disciplinary care have been shown to be effective for some chronic illnesses. Application of these findings to HIV/AIDS is less well understood.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the association between the setting and organization of care and outcomes for people living with HIV/AIDS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Computerized searches from January 1, 1980 to December 31, 2002 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI), CINAHL, HealthStar, PsychInfo, PsychLit, Social Sciences Abstracts, and Sociological Abstracts as well as searches of meeting abstracts and relevant journals and bibliographies in articles that met inclusion criteria. Searches included articles published in English and other languages.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles were considered for inclusion if they were observational or experimental studies with contemporaneous comparison groups of adults and/or children currently infected with HIV/AIDS that examined the impact of the setting and/or organization of care on outcomes of mortality, opportunistic infections, use of HAART and prophylaxis, quality of life, health care utilization, and costs for patient with HIV/AIDS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened abstracts to determine relevance. Full paper copies were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. The findings were extracted by both authors and compared. The 28 studies that met inclusion criteria were too disparate with respect to populations, interventions and outcomes to warrant meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included involving 39,776 study subjects. The studies indicated that case management strategies and higher hospital and ward volume of HIV-positive patients were associated with decreased mortality. Case management was also associated with increased receipt of ARVs. The results for multidisciplinary teams or multi-faceted treatment varied. None of the studies examined quality of life or immunological or virological outcomes. Healthcare utilization outcomes were mixed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Certain settings of care (i.e. high volume of HIV positive patients) and models of care (i.e. case management) may improve patient mortality and other outcomes. More detailed descriptions of care models, consistent definition of terms, and studies on innovative models suitable for developing countries are needed. There is not yet enough evidence to guide policy and clinical care in this area.

Theoretical and methodological issues in conducting research related to health care utilization among individuals with HIV infection

Although empirical information on resource use during HIV infection is vital to improving quality of care, the issues involved in conducting research on resource use have received little attention in the medical literature. The purpose of this paper is to review the theoretical and methodological issues of conducting research on health care utilization patterns among persons with HIV/AIDS. Conceptual definitions of utilization are compared and contrasted. Three theoretical frameworks, the Andersen Behavioral Model, the Health Belief Model, and the Biopsychosocial Model are described to illustrate their applicability in future research studies. Research designs, measurement considerations, sampling approaches, and existing data sources on utilization are reviewed. Recommendations for health care utilization research are summarized and highlight the importance of designing studies and generating data for investigation of the factors facilitating patients' use of an optimal array of services including prevention, long-term, and rehabilitation care.

US hospital care for patients with HIV infection and pneumonia: the role of public, private, and Veterans Affairs hospitals in the early highly active antiretroviral therapy era

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We evaluated differences in processes and outcomes of HIV-related pneumonia care among patients in Veterans Affairs (VA), public, and for-profit and not-for-profit private hospitals in the United States. We compared the results of our current study (1995 to 1997) with those of our previous study that included a sample of patients receiving care during the years 1987 to 1990 to determine how HIV-related pneumonia care had evolved over the last decade.

SETTING/PATIENTS

The sample consisted of 1,231 patients with HIV infection who received care for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and 750 patients with HIV infection who received care for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) during the years 1995 to 1997.

MEASUREMENT

We conducted a retrospective medical record review and evaluated patient and hospital characteristics, HIV-related processes of care (timely use of anti-PCP medications, adjunctive corticosteroids), non-HIV-related processes of care (timely use of CAP treatment medications, diagnostic testing, ICU utilization, rates of endotracheal ventilation, placement on respiratory isolation), length of inpatient hospital stay, and inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Rates of timely use of antibiotics and adjunctive corticosteroids for treating PCP were high and improved dramatically from the prior decade. However, compliance with consensus guidelines that recommend < 8 h as the optimal time window for initiation of antibiotics to treat CAP was lower. For both PCP and CAP, variations in processes of care and lengths of in-hospital stays, but not mortality rates, were noted at VA, public, private not-for-profit hospitals, and for-profit hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first overview of HIV-related pneumonia care in the early highly active antiretroviral therapy era, and contrasts current findings with those of a similarly conducted study from a decade earlier. Quality of care for patients with PCP improved, but further efforts are needed to facilitate the appropriate management of CAP. In the third decade of the epidemic, it will be important to monitor whether variations in processes of care for various HIV-related clinical diagnoses among different types of hospitals persist.

Relationship between health insurance and medical care for patients hospitalized with human immunodeficiency virus-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, 1995-1997: Medicaid, bronchoscopy, and survival

In the late 1980s, Medicaid-insured human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) were 40% less likely to undergo diagnostic bronchoscopy and 75% more likely to die than were privately insured patients, whereas rates of use of other, less resource-intensive aspects of PCP care were similar. We reviewed 1395 medical records at 59 hospitals in 6 cities for the period 1995-1997 to examine the impact of insurance status on PCP-related care. Medicaid patients were only one-half as likely to undergo diagnostic bronchoscopy as were privately insured patients, yet we found no evidence that mortality was greater among patients who received empirical treatment. The bronchoscopy rates were primarily related to patients' personal insurance status. A weaker hospital-level effect was seen that was related to hospitals' Medicaid/private insurance case mix ratios. The situation has evolved from one in which Medicaid coverage was associated with underuse of bronchoscopy and poorer survival among empirically treated persons with HIV-related PCP to one in which empirical therapy is effective in treating this disease and expensive diagnostic procedures may be overused for privately insured patients.

Analysis of a population-based Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia index as an outcome measure of access and quality of care for the treatment of HIV disease

OBJECTIVES

A population-based Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) Index was developed in New York City to identify geographic areas and subpopulations at increased risk for PCP.

METHODS

A zip code-level PCP Index was created from AIDS surveillance and hospital discharge records and defined as (number of PCP-related hospitalizations)/(number of persons living with AIDS).

RESULTS

In 1997, there were 2262 hospitalizations for PCP among 39 740 persons living with AIDS in New York City (PCP Index =.05691). PCP Index values varied widely across neighborhoods with high AIDS prevalence (West Village =.02532 vs Central Harlem =.08696). Some neighborhoods with moderate AIDS prevalence had strikingly high rates (Staten Island =.14035; northern Manhattan =.08756).

CONCLUSIONS

The PCP Index highlights communities in particular need of public health interventions to improve HIV-related service delivery.

Clinical course, prognostic factors, and outcome prediction for HIV patients in the ICU. The PIP (Pulmonary complications, ICU support, and prognostic factors in hospitalized patients with HIV) study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical course and prognostic factors in patients with HIV admitted to the ICU.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational.

SETTING

A university-affiliated medical center.

METHODS

: We included 169 consecutive ICU admissions, from April 1995 through March 1999, of 141 adults with HIV. Data collected included APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score, CD4(+) lymphocyte count, serum albumin level, in-hospital mortality, and the development of organ failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and ARDS.

RESULTS

The ICU admission rate of hospitalized patients with HIV infection was 12%. The most common reason for ICU admission was respiratory failure, occurring in 65 patient admissions. Mechanical ventilation was required in 91 admissions (54%), ARDS developed in 37 admissions (22%), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia was diagnosed in 24 admissions (14%), and SIRS developed in 126 admissions (75%). One or more organ failures developed in 131 admissions (78%). The actual and predicted mortality rates were 29.6% and 45.2%, respectively, with a standardized mortality ratio of 0.65. The most frequent immediate cause of death was bacterial infection. The CD4(+) lymphocyte count (median, 27.5 cells/microL vs 59 cells/microL; p = 0.0310) and serum albumin level (median 2.2 g/dL vs 2.6 g/dL; p = 0.0355) of nonsurvivors were lower and the APACHE II score (median, 30 vs 21; p < 0.0001) was higher, compared to those of survivors. A higher APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 1.16) and a transfer from another hospital ward (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.20 to 7.68) were independently associated with increased mortality. The median number of organ failures that developed in survivors was one, compared to four in nonsurvivors (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU has improved over the years. The CD4 count does not correlate with in-hospital mortality. Higher APACHE II scores and a transfer from another hospital ward are associated with a poor outcome.

Characteristics of hospitalizations of HIV-infected patients: an analysis of data from the 1994 healthcare cost and utilization project

Hospitals are significant resources for care of HIV/AIDS patients. Previous studies that have attempted to identify and track the characteristics of these patients and their hospitalizations have been limited in their ability to produce national estimates of patient use of such resources. This study, using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-3) attempted to characterize and estimate the cost of hospital usage by HIV/AIDS patients. We estimate that in 1994 approximately 188,506 admissions of HIV/AIDS patients occurred with an average charge of $19,244 U.S. per admission, for an estimated total cost of $3.63 billion. Compared with non-HIV-infected patients, HIV/AIDS patients tended to be male (75.83% versus 41.49%), a member of a minority group (53.51% versus 20.77%), hospitalized in a private, nonprofit, urban teaching hospital with a longer average length of stay (10.27 versus 5.52 days), and to have a higher in-hospital mortality (11.45% versus 2.58%). Approximately half of the hospital charges (47%) for these admissions were absorbed by Medicaid, and 25% by private insurance. The remainder of the charges were borne by the patients themselves. The results presented here for 1994 predate the widespread use of protease inhibitor/ highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), thus making this study an important benchmark for the delineation of the effects of HAART and any other future developments in HIV therapy on the characteristics of HIV/AIDS patient resource use on a national level. This study further demonstrates that HCUP is a powerful tool for the estimation and costing of hospital resource use.

The relation between physician experience and patterns of care for patients with AIDS-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: results from a survey of 1,500 physicians in the United States

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether physician experience and specialty influence the approach to care of AIDS patients with pneumonia, we surveyed physicians about their management of possible Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) infection.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

A postal survey was sent to a random sample of 1,500 internists and family physicians in the United States drawn from the American Medical Association master file who were identified by a pharmaceutical marketing company as having written prescriptions for AIDS-related agents in the previous year.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The survey had a 53% response rate. Physicians more experienced in AIDS care were more likely to advocate diagnostic bronchoscopy over initiation of empiric anti-PCP therapy for HIV-infected patients with undiagnosed pulmonary infiltrates (odds ratio [OR], 1.4 for a patient with mild severity of illness [p = 0.02]; OR, 1.7 for a severely ill patient [p < 0.001]). Physician specialty and fee-for-service reimbursement were independently associated with higher rates of bronchoscopy, with internists favoring bronchoscopy more frequently than family physicians. High-experience providers and internists also predicted better clinical outcomes for the hypothetical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings extend the observations about HIV experience and PCP prophylaxis to the setting of diagnosis and treatment. Physicians with higher levels of experience with AIDS, internists, and physicians reimbursed as fee-for-service providers are more likely to support diagnostic confirmation of PCP than empiric treatment approaches.