Obstacles to Needle Exchange Participation in Rhode Island:

Uptake of needle and syringe program services in the Kyrgyz Republic: Key barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND

In Kyrgyzstan, injection drug use accounts for the majority of HIV infections. Needle and syringe programs (NSPs) are one of three core HIV interventions for people who inject drugs (PWID). However, in Kyrgyzstan all persons diagnosed with drug dependence are subject to compulsory registration for governmental drug dependence treatment services, which creates barriers for PWID to access any health services, including NSPs.

METHODS

In 2015, we conducted an assessment at 19 NSP sites in six cities to identify barriers and facilitators that affect PWID uptake of NSP services in Kyrgyzstan. The study involved the conduct of 10 focus groups with 99 PWID (62 males/37 females) and individual interviews with 24 full-time NSP staff.

RESULTS

We found that access of PWID to NSPs was limited by stigma and discrimination around drug use, fear of police encounters, inconvenient hours of operation, lack of information and motivation from PWID to use NSP services and a limited menu of available injection supplies. At the same time, availability of outreach services and additional health services were highly valued by PWID.

CONCLUSIONS

Stigma and discrimination, combined with the criminalization of drug use and the requirement for official registration of PWID remain key barriers to effective NSP utilization. Law enforcement and health care providers need to be sensitized about the unique context and needs of PWID.

The Health Benefits of Secondary Syringe Exchange

From a process evaluation, participants in San Francisco's syringe exchange program (SEP) are described. Three groups, primary, secondary, and nonexchangers, were interviewed for a total of 244 study participants recruited from eight needle exchange sessions. Fifty percent of all primary exchangers exchanged for one or more injecting drug user(s) (IDUs). Three general routes of syringe distribution were identified between primary and secondary exchangers: between close friends and lovers; for people who lived in close proximity to them; and with customers who bought drugs from them. Focusing on why some go to SEPs and why some rely on others to go for them, findings are summarized primarily as the barriers for not attending SEPs, including exposure, legal status, illness, drug lifestyle, and conflicts with service provision. The secondary exchangers had similar risk reduction profiles to the SEP users that overall were better than the nonexchangers. For example, they shared syringes and cookers significantly fewer times than nonexchangers. The results demonstrate that these client-provided exchanges enable the SEP to overcome injection drug users' obstacles to program attendance, thereby reaching even hard to access members of IDU populations. We found the effects of these client-provided services to be positive for the larger IDU population.

A GIS-based methodology for improving needle exchange service delivery

BACKGROUND

A variety of legal, social and logistical factors can prevent individuals from accessing formal needle exchange programmes. One common solution to this problem is satellite exchange, which involves collaborating with people who already use an exchange to deliver needles and other supplies to those unable to access the exchange. While this approach can be very successful, one potential problem is that those most willing to deliver needles to their peers are often members of social networks that are already well connected with the needle exchange, leading to duplication of effort. In this paper we describe a simple and novel method for identifying groups of people who are demonstrably in need of improved access to needles, and for re-targeting efforts to meet the needs of those people. The method described was piloted at the Homeless Youth Alliance, San Francisco, USA, and further refined at Clean Needles Now, Los Angeles, USA.

METHODS

People accessing needle exchange sites were asked to participate in a survey with two questions: "where were you and what time was it last time someone borrowed a needle from you?" and "where were you and what time was it last time you had to borrow a needle from someone else?" Responses were geocoded, and maps produced showing 'hotspots' where people were frequently finding themselves without needles.

RESULTS

Satellite needle exchange was refined from an ad-hoc activity into one which focused on delivering needles to those with empirically demonstrable need. Maps produced in the process also proved valuable in discussions with local officials and other agencies about funding, as well as needle provision policy and practices.

CONCLUSION

We describe a method for rapidly assessing, describing, and responding to unmet and under-met need among injecting drug users. The method is particularly well-suited to organizations with extremely limited resources.

NIMBY localism and national inequitable exclusion alliances: The case of syringe exchange programs in the United States

Syringe exchange programs (SEPs) aim to reduce the harm associated with injection drug use (IDU). Although they have been accepted as critical components of HIV prevention in many parts of the world, they are often unwelcome and difficult to set up and maintain, even in communities hardest hit by IDU-related HIV transmission. This research examines socio-cultural and political processes that shape community and institutional resistance toward establishing and maintaining SEPs. These processes are configured and reinforced through the socio-spatial stigmatizing of IDUs, and legal and public policy against SEPs. Overarching themes the paper considers are: (1) institutional and/or political opposition based on (a) political and law enforcement issues associated with state drug paraphernalia laws and local syringe laws; (b) harassment of drug users and resistance to services for drug users by local politicians and police; and (c) state and local government (in)action or opposition; and (2) the stigmatization of drug users and location of SEPs in local neighborhoods and business districts. Rather than be explained by "not in my back yard" localism, this pattern seems best conceptualized as an "inequitable exclusion alliance" (IEA) that institutionalizes national and local stigmatizing of drug users and other vulnerable populations.

Syringe Disposal Among Injection Drug Users in Harlem and the Bronx During the New York State Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program

Effective January 1, 2001, New York State enacted the Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program (ESAP), allowing syringes to be sold in pharmacies without a prescription or dispensed through doctors, hospitals, and clinics to adults. A concern in the assessment of ESAP is its effects on syringe disposal practices. Syringe use data regarding the last injection episode were combined from three projects ( N = 1,030) recruiting injection drug users. Disposal of syringes by methods known to be safe decreased significantly over time after the implementation of ESAP. Syringes obtained either from syringe exchange programs or ESAP sources were more likely to be disposed of safely than syringes obtained from other sources. Efforts to enlist pharmacists and others involved in ESAP implementation to encourage safe disposal are needed. More detailed information on disposal practices is needed to capture the continuum from least to most safe practices and variation within individuals.