Metabolic bone disease in adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Bone health in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease characterized by the presence of systemic inflammation, manifesting not only as gastrointestinal symptoms but also as extraintestinal bone complications, including osteopenia and osteoporosis. However, the association between IBD and osteoporosis is complex, and the presence of multifactorial participants in the development of osteoporosis is increasingly recognized. Unlike in adults, delayed puberty and growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis abnormalities are essential risk factors for osteoporosis in pediatric patients with IBD.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the potential pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to osteoporosis in adult and pediatric patients with IBD and provides evidence for effective prevention and treatment, focusing on pediatric patients with IBD. A search was performed from PubMed and Web of Science inception to February 2023 to identify articles on IBD, osteoporosis, pediatric, and fracture risk.

EXPERT OPINION

A comprehensive treatment pattern based on individualized principles can be used to manage pediatric IBD-related osteoporosis.

The Historical Role and Contemporary Use of Corticosteroids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The use of corticosteroids to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has been the bedrock of IBD therapeutics since the pioneering work of Truelove and Witts in the UK in the 1950s and subsequent large cohort studies in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, although effective for induction of remission, these agents do not maintain remission and are associated with a long list of recognised side effects, including a risk of increased mortality. With the arrival of an increasing number of therapies for patients with IBD, the question arises as to whether we are using these agents appropriately in contemporary practice. This review discusses the historical background to steroid usage in IBD, and also provides a brief review of the literature on side effects of corticosteroid treatment as relevant to IBD patients. Data on licensed medications are presented with specific reference to the achievement of corticosteroid-free remission. We review available international data on the incidence of corticosteroid exposure and excess, and discuss some of the observations we and others have made concerning health care and patient-level factors associated with the risk of corticosteroid exposure, including identification of 'at-risk' populations.

Mycobacterial infection influences bone biomarker levels in patients with Crohn's disease

Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have higher risk for osteoporosis following decreased level of osteocalcin. We hypothesize that active inflammation following Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infection results in elevation of undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) and downregulation of active osteocalcin in CD patients and cow-disease model (Johne's disease). In this study, we measured ucOC, active osteocalcin, and calcium levels in sera from 42 cattle (21 infected with MAP and 21 healthy cattle), 18 CD patients, and 20 controls. The level of ucOC in MAP⁺ bovine samples was higher than that in MAP^- controls (318 ± 57.2 nmol/mL vs. 289 ± 95.8 nmol/mL, P > 0.05). Consequently, mean calcium level in bovine MAP⁺ was significantly higher than that in bovine-MAP^- samples (9.98 ± 0.998 mg/dL vs. 7.65 ± 2.12 mg/dL, P < 0.05). Also, the level of ucOC was higher in CD-MAP⁺ than in CD-MAP^- (561 ± 23.7 nmol/mL vs. 285 ± 19.6 nmol/mL, P < 0.05). Interestingly, the mean osteocalcin level in MAP⁺ bovine was lower than that in MAP^- bovine (797 ± 162 pg/mL vs. 1190 ± 43 pg/mL) and it was lower in CD-MAP⁺ than in CD-MAP^- infection (1.89 ± 0.184 ng/mL vs. 2.19 ± 0.763 ng/mL) (P < 0.05). The correlation between MAP infection and elevation of sera ucOC, reduction of active osteocalcin and increased calcium supports MAP infection role in CD and complications with osteoporosis.

Review article: integrating budesonide-MMX into treatment algorithms for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are first-line treatment for mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). When 5-ASAs fail, systemic corticosteroids have been the standard next step. Due to the significant side effect profile of systemic corticosteroids, alternative options in the treatment algorithm after 5-ASA failures are needed. Budesonide-Multi-Matrix System (MMX) is a novel oral formulation of budesonide that uses colonic release MMX technology to extend release of the drug to the colon. Now that budesonide-MMX has been approved for use in some countries, and pending in others we need to understand its position in the treatment algorithm for UC.

AIM

To review the available literature for budesonide-MMX and incorporate it into the treatment algorithm for mild-moderate UC.

METHODS

The available efficacy and safety literature regarding budesonide-MMX was reviewed, and compared to 5-ASAs and systemic corticosteroids.

RESULTS

In two large studies referred to as CORE (Colonic Release Budesonide trial), budesonide-MMX 9 mg daily was significantly more effective in achieving a combined end point of clinical and endoscopic remission than placebo in patients with mild-moderately active UC. Safety data are reassuring, with no clinically relevant differences between budesonide-MMX and placebo, including steroid-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide-MMX 9 mg daily is an effective and safe treatment for induction in patients with mild-moderately active UC. At the current time, it should be considered in patients after 5-ASA failure and before systemic corticosteroids. Data are still needed to understand its role and dose beyond 8 weeks, and if it should be considered first line before 5-ASAs.

Enteral nutrition in Crohn's disease: an underused therapy

This paper reviews the literature on the history, efficacy, and putative mechanism of action of enteral nutrition for inflammatory bowel disease in both paediatric and adult patients. It also analyses the reasoning behind the low popularity of exclusive enteral nutrition in clinical practice despite the benefits and safety profile.

Erythrocytes-mediated delivery of dexamethasone 21-phosphate in steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind Sham-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of erythrocyte-mediated delivery of dexamethasone 21-phosphate in patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis were randomized to infusions of dexamethasone 21-phosphate encapsulated into autologous erythrocytes (n = 19) or to sham infusions (n = 18). Each infusion was given monthly for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients able to discontinue oral corticosteroids during treatment while maintaining clinical remission or stable disease. Secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disappearance of steroid-related adverse events.

RESULTS

At each infusion, a mean of 9.8 ± 4.6 mg dexamethasone 21-phosphate was administered at each infusion, which allowed steady-state plasma levels of 8 ng/mL for the following 28 days. Thirteen patients in the dexamethasone 21-phosphate group and 4 sham-treated patients attained the primary outcome of the study, i.e., maintaining a stable condition despite oral steroids withdrawal (P = 0.008). In the remaining patients (6 and 15 in the 2 experimental groups, respectively), the treatment was prematurely withdrawn because of clinical deterioration while tapering oral steroids. At endoscopy, mucosal healing was ascertained in 4 patients and 1 patient of the 2 experimental groups, respectively (P = 0.339). At inclusion, 14 and 13 patients in the 2 experimental groups complained of steroid-related adverse events; at end of the treatment, events were still present in 5 and 13 patients, respectively (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, 6-month therapy with low dose of dexamethasone 21-phosphate allowed the withdrawal of oral steroids and the reversal of steroid-related adverse events in most patients while maintaining clinical remission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01171807).

Increased fracture risk and osteoporosis not associated with vitamin D levels in Malaysian patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are well-recognized complications of inflammatory bowel disease. Previous studies have suggested that vitamin D deficiency is an important risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. We hypothesized that low vitamin D levels is the main reason for reduced bone mineral density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to study its potential role in Malaysia, which is a tropical country with 3 large ethnic groups. We also sought to examine the relationship between fracture risk and bone mineral density in this group.

METHODOLOGY

Relevant history as well as 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (vitamin D) levels and bone mineral density were obtained. Normal, inadequate, and low vitamin D levels were defined as 61-160 nmol/L (24-64 ng/mL), 30-60 nmol/L (12-24 ng/mL), and less than 30 nmol/L (<12 ng/mL), respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were recruited. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis, respectively, were 58% and 17% in the spine and 51% and 14% in the hip. Mean vitamin D level in the group was low at 45.12 ± 17.4 nmol/L (18.05 ± 6.96 ng/mL), but there was no significant association between bone mineral density and vitamin D level. Twelve patients (16.7%) had a fragility fracture after the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The cumulative fracture incidence was 10% at 5 years and 35% at 10 years. There was a statistically significant association between osteoporosis of hip and a history of fracture (odds ratio 5.889; 95% confidence interval 1.41-24.53, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is prevalent among Malaysian patients with inflammatory bowel disease and is associated with a 6-fold increased risk of fractures. Most inflammatory bowel disease patients had inadequate or low vitamin D levels, but there was no association between vitamin D levels and BMD.

Risk factors for metabolic bone disease in Crohn's disease patients

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate the presence of metabolic bone disease (MBD) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and to identify potential etiologic factors.

METHODS

The case-control study included 99 patients with CD and 56 controls with a similar age and gender distribution. Both groups had dual-energy x-ray absorptionmetry and a nutritional evaluation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms at the IL1, TNF-α, LTα, and IL-6 genes were analyzed in patients only. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MBD was significantly higher in patients (P = 0.006). CD patients with osteoporosis were older (P < 0.005), small bowel involvement and surgical resections were more frequent (P < 0.005), they more often exhibited a penetrating or stricturing phenotype (P < 0.05), duration of disease over 15 years (P < 0.005), and body mass index (BMI) under 18.5 kg/m(2) (P < 0.01) were more often found. No association was found with steroid use. Patients with a Z-score < -2.0 more frequently had chronic active disease (P < 0.05). With regard to diet, low vitamin K intake was more frequent (P = 0.03) and intake of total, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fat was higher in patients with Z-score < -2.0 (P < 0.05). With respect to genetics, carriage of the polymorphic allele for LTα252 A/G was associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis (P = 0.02). Regression analysis showed that age over 40 years, chronic active disease, and previous colonic resections were independently associated with the risk of developing MBD.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MBD was significantly higher in CD patients. Besides the usual risk factors, we observed that factors related to chronic active and long-lasting disease increased the risk of MBD.

Alendronate improves low bone mineral density induced by steroid therapy in Crohn's disease

AIM

We investigated whether steroid therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) patients influences bone mineral density (BMD), and whether alendronate is effective for improving this loss of BMD.

METHODS

We recruited 16 outpatients with CD. The BMD of the whole body, the lumbar spine, and the proximal femoral neck was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptimetry. The BMD was expressed as a T score. Some CD patients with low BMD values had been given vitamin K2 or alendronate for one year.

RESULTS

In the steroid-dependent group, the mean dose of prednisolone was 968 mg per year and 2.7 mg per day. Although the duration of the disease was not related to the T score, the amount of total steroids was negatively correlated with the T score among patients taking no preventative drugs. The T score in the vitamin K2 group after one year did was not altered in the 3 areas examined. On the other hand, the T score in the alendronate group increased by 2.8% for the whole body, 4.5% in the lumbar spine, and 3.4% in the proximal femoral neck.

CONCLUSION

The BMD of Japanese CD patients was decreased depending on the total amount of steroid administered, and oral alendronate improved the loss of BMD.

Nutrition and Crohn's disease: an update of print and Web-based guidance

This article reviews the role of nutrition in Crohn's disease, one of the inflammatory bowel diseases. In addition to presenting a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-evidence on nutritional risks and nutritional therapies in Crohn's disease, and making specific nutrient recommendations, this article includes a list of Web-based resources, including websites, blogs, newsletters, and multimedia podcasts that can be utilized by patients and healthcare providers alike to learn more about the etiology, pathophysiology, and nutritional management of Crohn's disease.

Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are a well-established treatment for active Crohn's disease and have been widely used for decades. It has become apparent, however, that a proportion of patients either fails to respond to corticosteroids or is unable to withdraw from them without relapsing. Furthermore, their use is associated with a range of side effects, such that long-term treatment carries unacceptable risk.

AIM

To review the evidence regarding the appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease, along with their side effects, safety and alternatives.

METHODS

To collect relevant articles, a PubMed search was performed from 1966 to November 2006 using the terms 'steroid', 'corticosteroid', 'glucocorticoid', 'prednisolone', 'prednisone', 'methylprednisolone', 'hydrocortisone', 'dexamethasone' and 'budesonide' in combination with 'Crohn(s) disease'. Relevant articles were reviewed, as were their reference lists to identify further articles.

RESULTS

When used correctly, corticosteroids are a highly effective, well tolerated, cheap and generally safe treatment for active Crohn' disease. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of recipients will either fail to respond (steroid-resistant) or will be steroid dependent at 1 year. Newer alternatives to corticosteroids are not, however, without risk themselves and, moreover, are not necessarily available universally.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are used widely to treat Crohn's disease, a situation that is unlikely to change in the near future. Accordingly, efforts should be made to ensure that they are used correctly and that their side effects are minimized. Reference is made to recently published guidelines and a simplified 'users guide' is presented.

[Bone mineral density evaluation in inflammatory bowel disease patients]

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease patients have shown greater reduction of the bone mineral density compared to healthy people.

AIM

To evaluate the bone mineral density in a population of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Ninety patients from 20 to 50 years old, of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ambulatory of the Gastroenterology Service of the Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, were selected for the evaluation. From those, 76 completed all the stages of the evaluation. The densitometry was made from lumbar column and right femur with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologyc QDR 1000/W) device.

RESULTS

The inflammatory bowel disease patients had a significant reduction of the bone mineral density in all the evaluated parts, femur neck, total femur and lumbar column. The analysed variables, disease activity index, usage of corticoids, the lack of physical activities, the index body mass and previous surgeries did not have influence in the results.

CONCLUSION

Reduced bone mineral density was founded in inflammatory bowel disease patients of the Clinics Hospital, mainly in the Crohn's disease patients, as described in literature. None analyzed variables had significant correlation to the bone mineral density.

Treatment with infliximab is associated with increased markers of bone formation in patients with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Glucocorticoid use and detrimental effects of inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) can lead to osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of treatment with the TNF-alpha antagonist infliximab to increase bone formation as measured by surrogate markers of bone turnover in patients with active CD.

METHODS

Sera from 38 prospectively enrolled CD patients were examined for levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), immunoreactive parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium, and pro-inflammatory cytokines at baseline and 4 weeks following infliximab infusion. Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and glucocorticoid dose also were collected.

RESULTS

In this cohort, CDAI and IBDQ scores were significantly improved at week 4 (P<0.001). Infliximab therapy was associated with an increase in BAP, a marker of bone formation (P=0.010), whereas NTX, a marker of bone resorption, was not increased (P=0.801). Among 22 patients who were taking glucocorticoids, mean glucocorticoid dose decreased 36% (P<0.001; -7.9 mg).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with infliximab was associated with increased markers of bone formation (BAP) without increasing bone resorption (NTX). This effect may be due to a beneficial effect of TNF-alpha blockade on bone turnover, a beneficial effect on CD activity resulting in decreased glucocorticoid dose, or both. Studies of longer duration are needed to assess the effect of infliximab on bone mineral density.

Maintenance infliximab treatment is associated with improved bone mineral density in Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

Diminished bone mineral density (BMD) is a recognized complication of Crohn's disease (CD). The mechanisms underlying bone loss are unclear but may include a direct effect of inflammatory cytokines related to disease activity. Because tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of CD inflammation, we evaluated the effect on BMD of maintenance treatment with infliximab in patients with CD.

METHODS

BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal left femur (neck and trochanter) were measured at baseline and 1 yr in 46 CD patients treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg) at 6-8 wk intervals for 1 yr. Thirteen patients received concurrent prednisone at a mean dose of 10 mg/day (range: 5-15).

RESULTS

At baseline, reduced BMD (T-score <or= 1) occurred in 43% of patients at the lumbar spine and 46% at the left femur. Between baseline and 1 yr, mean BMD increased at the lumbar spine by 2.4%+/- 0.7% (p= 0.002), at the femoral trochanter by 2.8%+/- 1.2% (p= 0.03), and at the femoral neck by 2.6%+/- 0.7% (p= 0.001). BMD gain at the lumbar spine and the left femur between the groups without and with osteopenia were not different. Changes in BMD were not correlated with concurrent corticosteroid therapy, calcium supplementation, or changes in C-reactive protein (CRP).

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with infliximab improves BMD in patients with CD and this effect is independent of corticosteroid administration. The BMD response after infliximab suggests that TNF-alpha plays a role in the bone loss associated with CD.

[Lactose malabsorption in ulcerative colitis. A case-control study]

BACKGROUND

The role of lactose malabsorption in ulcerative colitis is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in a group of ulcerative colitis patients and a control group and to modify lactose consumption in view of the results.

METHODS

Lactose malabsorption was studied using the hydrogen breath test in 52 patients with ulcerative colitis and 34 controls after ingestion of 25 g of lactose. A questionnaire on ingestion of milk products was also administered.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients with ulcerative colitis, 13 (25%) presented lactose malabsorption compared with 11 of the 34 (32%) controls (p = 0.45). Twenty-four patients (46%) had been advised to completely eliminate lactose from their diets. Twenty-seven of the 39 patients without malabsorption had reduced or eliminated lactose consumption after being diagnosed with ulcerative colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the prevalence of lactose malabsorption was found between patients with ulcerative colitis and controls. We believe that systematic elimination of lactose from the diets of these patients is erroneous. In our environment, we recommend the hydrogen breath test only in patients with symptoms of lactose intolerance.

Effect of systemic glucocorticoid therapy on bone metabolism and the osteoprotegerin system in patients with active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Osteoporosis may occur in 25-30% of patients with Crohn's disease. Its pathogenesis is not completely understood. Both systemic inflammation in acute disease and treatment with systemic glucocorticoids have been implicated. The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism before and during a 3-month period of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment for acute flare-up of Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with active Crohn's disease requiring systemic glucocorticoid treatment (prednisolone, 60 mg/day) were investigated. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral densitometry was performed at baseline and again after 3 months. Clinical examinations including evaluation of the Crohn's disease activity index and measurement of the biochemical markers osteocalcin, deoxypyridinoline, osteoprotegerin and the soluble receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand were performed prior to, and at 1, 2 and 12 weeks following steroid administration. RESULTS Median lumbar bone mineral density decreased significantly during the observation period by 1.04% from -0.84 (t score; range, -2.8 to +0.57) to -0.95 (range, -3.1 to +0.40; P = 0.022), while bone density of the total femur decreased by 2.9% from -0.83 (range, -2.61 to +1.86) to -0.90 (range, -2.65 to +0.19; P = 0.01). Serum levels of osteocalcin, a bone formation marker, and osteoprotegerin, an anti-resorptive cytokine produced by osteoblasts, decreased after the first 2 weeks of treatment and reached baseline levels after 3 months. No significant change was found for the bone resorption marker deoxypyridinoline, while soluble receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand, a cytokine promoting bone resorption, tended to increase during steroid treatment.

CONCLUSION

A decrease in bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease appears to result, at least in part, from a short-term effect of systemic glucocorticoid. Modulation of osteoclastogenesis by the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand/osteoprotegerin cytokine system and decreased osteoblastic function may be the underlying molecular basis.

Corticosteroid-sparing treatments in patients with Crohn's disease

Conventional corticosteroid therapy effectively induces remission of Crohn's disease (CD) across a range of disease severity. However, alternative treatments are needed for patients with disease unresponsive to corticosteroids, patients requiring maintenance therapy (for which corticosteroids are ineffective), corticosteroid-dependent patients, and patients with corticosteroid-related toxicities. Thus, corticosteroid-sparing effects are an important clinical endpoint for treatments of CD. Budesonide offers comparable efficacy with less short-term toxicity than conventional corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone); this agent has also demonstrated short-term remission maintenance efficacy, while potentially enabling withdrawal of more toxic corticosteroids in corticosteroid-dependent patients. However, budesonide has not shown long-term maintenance benefit in clinical studies, and the risk for and implications of budesonide dependency need further evaluation. The immunomodulators, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, are most effective for maintenance of remission in quiescent disease, but may be useful in conjunction with other therapies in inducing remission in active CD; methotrexate may be considered an alternative because of its efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission. In clinical trials, treatment with azathioprine/6-methotrexate has enabled corticosteroid withdrawal in 55% of patients, and methotrexate, in 39% of patients with corticosteroid-dependent CD, while maintaining clinical response. Monitoring for infrequent hematological or hepatic toxicity is recommended during use of these immunomodulators. Infliximab is effective for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with refractory CD participating in randomized placebo-controlled studies and, in open-label experience, has enabled corticosteroid withdrawal in approximately three quarters of patients. This biological agent is generally well tolerated. Infusion reactions are the most commonly occurring side effects; such reactions may require adjustment of infusion rate and/or treatment with an antihistamine or acetaminophen. The investigational biological agent CDP-571 has also shown corticosteroid-sparing efficacy in patients with CD. In conclusion, recent research has helped identify corticosteroid-sparing treatments that can provide benefit in patients with corticosteroid-dependent and/or corticosteroid-refractory CD or patients at risk for corticosteroid-induced toxicities.

Bone mineral density in Crohn's disease: a longitudinal study of budesonide, prednisone, and nonsteroid therapy

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids may contribute to the bone loss associated with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the effect on bone mineral density (BMD) of treatment with budesonide, a steroid with low systemic activity, and compared the outcome with prednisone and nonsteroid therapy in patients with CD.

METHODS

Prospective annual BMDs of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were measured for 2 yr in 138 patients with quiescent CD treated with mean daily doses of 8.5 mg of budesonide (n = 48), 10.5 mg of prednisone (n = 45), or nonsteroid drugs (n = 45).

RESULTS

Between baseline and 1 yr, the mean LS BMD decreased 2.36% in the budesonide group (p < 0.001), 0.61% in the prednisone group (ns), and 0.09% in the nonsteroid group (ns). The difference between budesonide and nonsteroid groups was significant (p = 0.003). In the 2nd yr, LS BMD did not change in the three groups. After 2 yr, FN BMD decreased 2.94% in the budesonide group (p < 0.01), 0.36% in the prednisone group (ns), and 1.05% in the nonsteroid group (ns); the differences among groups were not significant. The proportion of patients with bone loss of >2% per annum at the LS and FN was higher in the budesonide group than in the nonsteroid group (p < 0.001) and prednisone group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CD receiving maintenance treatment for 2 yr with prednisone show little change in BMD, whereas treatment with budesonide may be associated with LS and FN bone loss. Budesonide does not confer an advantage over low-dose prednisone for the preservation of BMD.

Review article: the limitations of corticosteroid therapy in Crohn's disease

Corticosteroids are highly effective in inducing clinical remission in patients with active Crohn's disease. However, the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of this disease is primarily ameliorative because they are ineffective in maintaining remission or healing mucosal lesions. Nearly half of the patients who initially respond to corticosteroid therapy develop a dependency on corticosteroids or have a relapse within 1 year. In addition, use of these agents is often limited by a relatively high risk of serious adverse effects that can involve nearly every major body system. These effects include: bone loss, which can develop with even short-term and low-dose corticosteroid therapy; metabolic complications such as glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus; increased intraocular pressure and glaucoma; and potentially lethal infections. To minimize the risk of toxicity, corticosteroids are increasingly recommended for short-term use only at the lowest effective dose to induce remission in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Corticosteroid formulations with low systemic bioavailability, such as controlled-release budesonide, may be associated with a lower rate of dermatologic adverse effects but appear to be somewhat less effective than conventional corticosteroids in inducing remission in patients with active Crohn's disease. Immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate have demonstrated corticosteroid-sparing effects, facilitating the withdrawal of corticosteroids when initiated as maintenance therapy. Infliximab can be used as an alternative to corticosteroids.

Conventional treatment of Crohn's disease: objectives and outcomes

Despite conventional medical and/or surgical intervention, endoscopic and symptomatic relapse is common among individuals with Crohn's disease (CD). Treatment goals have therefore been refocused to include achieving control of active disease and maintaining remission with agents associated with a minimum of toxic adverse effects. Conventional treatment regimens have been used with varying success in regard to these therapeutic goals. Traditionally, aminosalicylates have been considered effective in inducing a response in some patients with mild-to-moderate CD but have demonstrated little or no long-term benefit in controlled clinical trials. Glucocorticosteroid therapy is associated with higher rates of response in patients with active CD; however, clinical benefits are frequently offset by the common occurrence of corticosteroid-related toxicity. Oral controlled-release budesonide has demonstrated comparable efficacy to prednisolone with less risk for adverse effects, although many questions remain regarding the long-term use of this agent. Response to standard immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in patients with active disease may require 3 to 6 months from initiation of treatment. These agents are therefore considered most valuable as maintenance therapy, providing consistent long-term benefit in patients with chronic refractory or corticosteroid-dependent disease. Although the incidence of allergic adverse effects is relatively low with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, more serious adverse effects, including bone marrow suppression, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and infectious complications, can occur. Limited success in the treatment of perianal disease has been achieved with antibiotics such as metronidazole and the immunosuppressives cyclosporine and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine. Although broader use of immunosuppressive agents has allowed improvement in the maintenance of remission in patients with CD, long-term safety data with these agents are lacking, concerns about toxicity and the potential risk for neoplasia remain, and attenuation of response with chronic immunosuppressive use can occur. Therefore, innovative therapeutic approaches are needed to meet key treatment goals often not addressed by conventional therapies.

All patients with inflammatory bowel disease should have bone density assessment: pro

Bone loss is a common problem for individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. Corticosteroids play an important role in the development of osteoporosis in these patients; however, active disease and longer disease duration also appear to increase the risk of osteoporosis. Given the current burden of osteoporosis, bone mineral density is recommended.

Metabolic bone disease in IBD

A substantial number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will manifest extra-intestinal complications. Metabolic bone disease and arthropathies are among the most debilitating of these. Decreased bone mineral density and increased fracture risk may occur in relation to the underlying disease itself or result from vitamin, mineral, and hormonal deficiencies; medications used to treat the underlying disease; lifestyle; and perhaps other factors. In many cases, the factors remain unidentified. Options for the treating clinician include correction of these deficiencies, treatment of the underlying disease, and use of medication to promote bone formation and decrease bone resorption.

Calcitonin for the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is a cause of morbidity in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, and rheumatologic disorders. Corticosteroid treatment causes bone loss by a variety of complex mechanisms. It has been shown that bone mineral loss at the hip averages 14% in the first year after starting corticosteroid therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To review the efficacy of calcitonin (subcutaneous or nasal) for the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We conducted a search of Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Embase using the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group search strategy for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to May 1998. We also searched bibliographic references and consulted content experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two independent reviewers selected RCTs which met predetermined inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data using predetermined forms and assessed methodological quality of randomization, blinding and dropouts. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risks (RR) were calculated. For continuous data, weighted mean differences (WMD) of the percent change from baseline were calculated. We decided a priori to use random effects models for all outcomes, because of uncertainty about whether a consistent true effect exists in such different populations.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials met the inclusion criteria, including 221 patients randomized to calcitonin and 220 to placebo. The median methodologic quality was two out of a maximum of five points. Calcitonin was more effective than placebo at preserving bone mass at the lumbar spine after six and 12 months of therapy with a WMD of 2.8% (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.3) and 3.2% (95% CI: 0.3 to 6.1). At 24 months, lumbar spine BMD was not statistically different between groups: WMD 4.5% (95% CI: -0.6 to 9.5)]. Bone density at the distal radius was also higher with calcitonin after six months of therapy, but bone density at the femoral neck was not different between placebo and calcitonin treated groups. The relative risk of fractures was not significantly different between calcitonin and placebo with a relative risk (RR) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.26 to 1.89) for vertebral and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.14 to 1.96) for nonvertebral fractures. The subgroup analyses of methodological quality and duration of corticosteroid therapy were confounded. Trials of patients who had been taking steroids for greater than three months (which were of low methodologic quality) demonstrated a larger effect of calcitonin on spine bone density (about 6%) than prevention trials (about 1%). There was no consistent effect of different dosages (50-100 IU compared to 200-400 IU). However, subcutaneous calcitonin showed substantially greater prevention of bone loss. Withdrawals due to side effects were higher in the calcitonin-treated groups: RR 3.19 (95%CI: 0.66 to 15.47). Important side effects included nausea and facial flushing.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Calcitonin appears to preserve bone mass in the first year of glucocorticoid therapy at the lumbar spine by about 3% compared to placebo, but not at the femoral neck. Our analysis suggests that the protective effect on bone mass may be greater for the treatment of patients who have been taking corticosteroids for more than three months. Efficacy of calcitonin for fracture prevention in steroid-induced osteoporosis remains to be established.