CDX2 Immunostaining as a Gastrointestinal Marker

Diagnostic gastrointestinal markers in primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases

Histopathological diagnosis of pulmonary tumors is essential for treatment decisions. The distinction between primary lung adenocarcinoma and pulmonary metastasis from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may be difficult. Therefore, we compared the diagnostic value of several immunohistochemical markers in pulmonary tumors. Tissue microarrays from 629 resected primary lung cancers and 422 resected pulmonary epithelial metastases from various sites (whereof 275 colorectal cancer) were investigated for the immunohistochemical expression of CDH17, GPA33, MUC2, MUC6, SATB2, and SMAD4, for comparison with CDX2, CK20, CK7, and TTF-1. The most sensitive markers for GI origin were GPA33 (positive in 98%, 60%, and 100% of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other GI adenocarcinomas, respectively), CDX2 (99/40/100%), and CDH17 (99/0/100%). In comparison, SATB2 and CK20 showed higher specificity, with expression in 5% and 10% of mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas and both in 0% of TTF-1-negative non-mucinous primary lung adenocarcinomas (25-50% and 5-16%, respectively, for GPA33/CDX2/CDH17). MUC2 was negative in all primary lung cancers, but positive only in less than half of pulmonary metastases from mucinous adenocarcinomas from other organs. Combining six GI markers did not perfectly separate primary lung cancers from pulmonary metastases including subgroups such as mucinous adenocarcinomas or CK7-positive GI tract metastases. This comprehensive comparison suggests that CDH17, GPA33, and SATB2 may be used as equivalent alternatives to CDX2 and CK20. However, no single or combination of markers can categorically distinguish primary lung cancers from metastatic GI tract cancer.

Cancer of Unknown Primary: Challenges and Progress in Clinical Management

Simple Summary

Patients with cancer of unknown primary site suffer the burden of an uncertain disease, which is characterized by the impossibility to identify the tissue where the tumor has originated. The identification of the primary site of a tumor is of great importance for the patient to have access to site-specific treatments and be enrolled in clinical trials. Therefore, patients with cancer of unknown primary have reduced therapeutic opportunities and poor prognosis. Advancements have been made in the molecular characterization of this tumor, which could be used to infer the tumor site-of-origin and thus broaden the diagnostic outcome. Moreover, we describe here the novel therapeutic opportunities that are based on the genetic and immunophenotypic characterization of the tumor, and thus independent from the tumor type, which could provide most benefit to patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Abstract

Distant metastases are the main cause of cancer-related deaths in patients with advanced tumors. A standard diagnostic workup usually contains the identification of the tissue-of-origin of metastatic tumors, although under certain circumstances, it remains elusive. This disease setting is defined as cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Accounting for approximately 3–5% of all cancer diagnoses, CUPs are characterized by an aggressive clinical behavior and represent a real therapeutic challenge. The lack of determination of a tissue of origin precludes CUP patients from specific evidence-based therapeutic options or access to clinical trial, which significantly impacts their life expectancy. In the era of precision medicine, it is essential to characterize CUP molecular features, including the expression profile of non-coding RNAs, to improve our understanding of CUP biology and identify novel therapeutic strategies. This review article sheds light on this enigmatic disease by summarizing the current knowledge on CUPs focusing on recent discoveries and emerging diagnostic strategies.

Optimization of Immunophenotypic Panel to Differentiate Upper From Lower Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas: Analysis of New and Traditional Markers

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EAC), stomach [gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC)], and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) frequently show similar morphology because upper gastrointestinal tumors (GITs) usually evolve from pathologies involving intestinal metaplasia. Upper and lower GIT may also show overlapping immunophenotypes when using the traditional CK7, CK20, and CDX2 panel, which in patients presenting with metastatic disease of unknown origin may lead to misdirected diagnostic workup and/or therapy. We compared the phenotype of upper and lower GIT using an expanded immunohistochemical panel that included the traditional and newer gastrointestinal markers: SATB2, DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6. The panel was applied to resection specimens from 40 CRC, 40 GAC, and 40 EAC. A panel using SATB2, CK7, and CDX2 provided the best discriminating power for separating upper from lower GIT and was applied to 101 biopsies including 17 EAC, 17 GAC, 19 CRC, 18 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 15 cholangiocarcinomas, and 15 lung adenocarcinomas. The phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was moderately sensitive and highly specific of upper GIT, the phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was highly sensitive and specific for lower GIT, the phenotypes CK7/CDX2/SATB2 and CK7/CDX2/SATB2 favored pancreatobiliary or lung primaries. Less frequent phenotypes showed substantial overlap. Although strong diffuse expression of SATB2 was characteristic of CRC, weak and/or focal expression was present in one third or more of upper gastrointestinal, cholangiocarcinomas, and lung adenocarcinomas. DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 improved specificity, but showed poor sensitivity, suggesting they should be used as second tier markers.

Clinicopathologic Significance of Intestinal-type Molecules' Expression and Different EGFR Gene Status in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

Variant pulmonary adenocarcinoma with intestinal-type molecules shares similar molecular expression with colorectal carcinoma. However, expression of such molecules and their association with survival time with clinicopathologic parameters, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene status in other types of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, has been rarely demonstrated. Sixty patients with resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma were divided into the enteric differentiation group (I group, n=30) and the usual group (U group, n=30). Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Villin, CK20, and caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2). EGFR gene status was examined by Fluorescence Quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn by GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05) in the expression of Villin, CK20, and CDX2, whereas the expression of CEA showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Compared with the U group, patients in the I group were mainly female individuals and in clinical stages III to IV, prone to lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The patients in the I group with CDX2CK20 phenotype (tumor size>5 cm) had a shorter survival time (P<0.05), and EGFR gene status was not associated with median survival time and the expression of CEA, Villin, CK20, and CDX2 (P>0.05). Thus, our research indicates that patients with enteric differentiation have unique clinical characteristics and different prognosis, which may play important roles in diagnosis and choosing therapeutic strategies for pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients in clinical practice.

Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer

Since the 2015 WHO classification was introduced into clinical practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has figured prominently in lung cancer diagnosis. In addition to distinction of small cell versus non-small cell carcinoma, patients' treatment of choice is directly linked to histologic subtypes of non-small cell carcinoma, which pertains to IHC results, particularly for poorly differentiated tumors. The use of IHC has improved diagnostic accuracy in the classification of lung carcinoma, but the interpretation of IHC results remains challenging in some instances. Also, pathologists must be aware of many interpretation pitfalls, and the use of IHC should be efficient to spare the tissue for molecular testing. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee received questions on practical application and interpretation of IHC in lung cancer diagnosis. After discussions in several International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee meetings, the issues and caveats were summarized in terms of 11 key questions covering common and important diagnostic situations in a daily clinical practice with some relevant challenging queries. The questions cover topics such as the best IHC markers for distinguishing NSCLC subtypes, differences in thyroid transcription factor 1 clones, and the utility of IHC in diagnosing uncommon subtypes of lung cancer and distinguishing primary from metastatic tumors. This article provides answers and explanations for the key questions about the use of IHC in diagnosis of lung carcinoma, representing viewpoints of experts in thoracic pathology that should assist the community in the appropriate use of IHC in diagnostic pathology.

Increased frequency of bronchiolar histotypes in lung carcinomas associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

AIMS

The association between lung cancer and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is well known, but the significance of this association is poorly understood. Bronchiolar honeycomb cysts have been proposed as possible precursors for the development of carcinoma, but limited evidence in support of this hypothesis is available. The aim of this study was to investigate this hypothesis analysing a series of carcinomas arising in IPF by immunohistochemistry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-three lung carcinomas arising in patients with IPF were analysed with a panel of immunohistochemical markers. The antibodies included those against pneumocyte markers [thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1), napsin-A, and surfactant protein A], the goblet cell marker mucin 5AC, markers of basal/squamous cell differentiation [cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and ΔN-p63], and markers related to enteric differentiation (CDX2, mucin 2, CK20, and villin). A series of 100 consecutive lung adenocarcinomas arising in smokers without IPF were investigated as controls. All carcinomas arising in IPF patients were peripherally located on imaging analysis. The diagnoses were: eight squamous cell carcinomas, 20 adenocarcinomas, three small-cell carcinomas (including one composite small-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma), and two large-cell carcinomas. Among adenocarcinomas, a 'pneumocyte' profile (TTF1/napsin-A/SPA1-triple-positive) was observed in seven of 20 (35% versus 84% in non-IPF controls, P = 0.0001). The remaining 13 adenocarcinomas (65%) showed rare histotypes: four invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (20% in IPF patients versus 1% in non-IPF controls, P = 0.002), seven tumours (35%) that were characterized by variable expression of markers of enteric differentiation, and two tumours (10%) that showed a peculiar basaloid component.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunohistochemical characterization of carcinomas arising in IPF patients shows striking divergence from that in non-IPF smokers. The prevalence of rare entities showing bronchiole-related markers is in line with the hypothesis that these tumours arise from transformed small airways in honeycomb lung areas where abnormal bronchiolar proliferation takes place.

Dual Immunostain With SATB2 and CK20 Differentiates Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms From Ovarian Mucinous Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the primary site of origin for mucinous neoplasms identified in the peritoneal and/or pelvic cavities may be challenging, with major differential diagnoses including appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) and ovarian mucinous neoplasm (OMN). Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) has been shown to be highly selectively expressed in the lower gastrointestinal tract, including the appendix.

METHODS

We investigated the utility of a dual stain (DS) with SATB2 or caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) or villin in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs. Tissue microarrays with 40 AMNs and 18 OMNs were stained with SATB2 or CDX2 paired with either CK20 or villin.

RESULTS

SATB2 single stain showed a good sensitivity of 83% and the highest specificity of 78% for AMNs over OMNs among all four stains. DS with SATB2 and villin showed an identical sensitivity of 78% but specificity increased to 94%, while DS with SATB2 and CK20 showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100%. In contrast, DS with CDX2 and CK20/villin showed slightly higher sensitivity but much lower specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

DS with SATB2/CK20 shows the greatest potential clinical utility in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs and is superior to DS with CDX2/CK20. Importantly, DS could be helpful for specimens with limited tissues.

Gastric carcinoma in canines and humans, a review

Gastric carcinoma (GC) is the most common neoplasm in the stomach of dogs. Although incidence in the general population is reported to be low, breed-specific GC has a high incidence. Median age at presentation ranges from 8 to approximately 10 years. The disease is mostly located in the lesser curvature and antropyloric region of the stomach. Unfortunately, diagnosis is usually made when the disease is at an advanced stage and, therefore, prognosis is poor. Due to similarities in clinical presentation, diagnosis, histology and prognosis, canine GC may serve as a valuable model for human GC. Extensive pedigrees of canine gastric carcinoma cases could reveal insights for human gastric carcinoma. Putative species differences include the role of Helicobacter in pathogenesis, the wide array of genetic data and screening available for humans, and treatment protocols that are available for human GC.

A Primary Pure Yolk Sac Tumor of the Lung Exhibiting CDX-2 Immunoreactivity and Increased Serum Levels of Alkaline Phosphatase Intestinal Isoenzyme

Malignant extragonadal germ cell tumors primary to the lung are quite uncommon lesions, but pure yolk sac tumor is even more exceptional. This is believed to be the first reported case of yolk sac tumor of the lung in which an intense and diffuse immunoreactivity for CDX2, a marker of intestinal differentiation reportedly expressed also in gonadal yolk sac tumor, was associated with increased serum levels of the alkaline phosphatase intestinal isoform. Nine months after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient is alive and well without evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease and with serum levels of the alkaline phosphatase intestinal isoform within normal limits. The pathologist should be aware of yolk sac tumor arising in the lung and that alkaline phosphatase intestinal isoform could become an additional serum marker for such a tumor.

Urachal Adenocarcinoma in a Dog

An 8-year-old neutered female Labrador retriever was presented with a 3-year history of intermittent haematuria. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the urinary bladder revealed a 2 × 3 × 0.5 cm intraluminal mass arising at the dome. The mass was excised via partial cystectomy. Histopathological examination revealed neoplastic epithelial cells arranged in sheets, irregularly-branching tubules and acini within a fibrovascular stroma. Neoplastic cells were cuboidal to polygonal with abundant foamy amphophilic cytoplasm, typically with a single, large, clear intracytoplasmic vacuole and eccentric nucleus ('signet ring' cells). Neoplastic tubules were often ectatic and contained abundant mucin. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells had weak, cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 7 and rare, but strong, nuclear immunoreactivity for CDX2. Based on the cellular morphology, immunolabelling characteristics and anatomical location, a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of urachal origin was made. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of urachal adenocarcinoma in a dog.

Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site

CONTEXT

-Identification of the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary using immunohistochemistry is a frequent requirement of anatomic pathologists. Diagnostic accuracy is crucial, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies and smaller sample sizes.

OBJECTIVES

-To provide practical guidance and suggestions for classifying carcinoma of unknown primary using both proven and new antibodies, as well as targeting panels based on integration of morphologic and clinical features.

DATA SOURCES

-Literature review, the authors' practice experience, and authors' research.

CONCLUSIONS

-With well-performed and interpreted immunohistochemistry panels, anatomic pathologists can successfully identify the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is crucial to understand not only the diagnostic uses of the many available antibodies but also the potential limits and pitfalls.

Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 Expression in Adenocarcinomas of the Bile Duct

BACKGROUND

The immunoreactivity of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is a very specific marker for lung and thyroid neoplasms; the expression of TTF-1 has also been demonstrated in extrapulmonary carcinomas. We examined the expression of TTF-1 in 15 intestinal-type adenocarcinomas of the extrahepatic bile duct. We then compared the expression to TTF-1 staining with other immunohistochemical markers including cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2), Napsin A, and MUC2. We additionally compared the clinicopathological prognostic factors with the TTF-1 expression status.

RESULTS

Nuclear TTF-1 staining was detected in 2 cases (13.3%), and Napsin A was positive in the same 2 cases (13.3%). All cases were positive for CK20, CDX2, and MUC2; 5 cases were positive for CK7. There was no correlation between TTF-1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid potential pitfalls, TTF-1 should be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical setting, histology, and the results of markers such as CK7, CK20, Napsin A, and CDX2. This report is the first of TTF-1 positivity in adenocarcinomas from the extrahepatic biliary tract.

Intra-Alveolar Intestinal Epithelium: A Reappraisal of the So-Called Mucinous Goblet-Cell Rich Carcinoma Apropos of Two Cases With Prolonged Follow-up and Literature Review

Primary pulmonary mucin-rich lesions with abundant goblet cells growing within alveolar spaces are either classified as mucinous adenocarcinoma (previously called mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma) or colloid carcinoma. Some of these lesions display a morphologic pattern characterized by paucicellular discontinuous patches of nonatypical colonic type epithelium attached to alveolar walls without evidence of invasion. Immunohistochemically, these epithelial patches express an intestinal immunophenotype (CD20+, CDX-2+, CK7-, TTF-1-). None of the lesions so far reported with these histological and immunohistochemical characteristics have recurred or metastasized. Herein we describe 2 patients with this type of intra-alveolar mucinous lesions who have been meticulously followed-up for 9 and 14 years, respectively, without evidence of disease progression. Based on their histologic appearance, immunoreactivity, and on the presence of occasional CDX-2 expressing cells in terminal airways adjacent to the lesions, we propose alternative interpretations of the mucin-producing epithelium. More important, a separate provisional category for these lesions is suggested that eliminates their force inclusion as adenocarcinomas.

A case of gastric adenocarcinoma in a Shih Tzu dog: successful treatment of early gastric cancer

A 9-year-old castrated male Shih Tzu dog was referred to us, because of chronic vomiting. The patient’s hematological, radiographic, ultrasonographic, endoscopic and histological examinations were evaluated for diagnosis. Hematologic analysis indicated moderate anemia and azotemia. Based on the imaging studies, an oval-shaped mass was identified in the gastric pylorus area. A proliferative mass was found on endoscopic examination, and we performed biopsy using grasping forceps. The histopathological findings of the biopsy specimens indicated hypertrophic gastritis, and Y-U pyloroplasty was performed. However, histopathological examination of the surgically resected mass revealed tubular adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Then, carboplatin chemotherapy was performed 4 times for 13 weeks. Clinical signs, such as vomiting, were resolved gradually after surgery and chemotherapy, and the patient’s condition was managed favorably until recently (30 months after surgery). This case report describes clinical features, imaging studies, endoscopic characteristics and histopathological and immunohistochemical features of gastric tubular adenocarcinoma as early gastric cancer in a dog.

Napsin-A, TTF-1, EGFR, and ALK Status Determination in Lung Primary and Metastatic Mucin-Producing Adenocarcinomas

Pulmonary mucin-producing adenocarcinomas may be indistinguishable on conventional histology from a metastasis, as thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression often is lacking and KRAS mutations are widely present even in extrapulmonary sites. Few data have been reported on the diagnostic role of napsin-A and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene alterations in this challenging differential diagnosis. Seventy-seven surgically resected cases, including 53 primary and 24 metastatic tumors from different sites, were evaluated for napsin-A, TTF-1, and ALK by immunohistochemistry and for EGFR mutations by direct sequencing. Overall, napsin-A expression in primary lung mucin-producing adenocarcinomas was 36% (8% mucinous, 17% colloid, 87.5% solid, and 100% signet ring cell) and TTF-1 expression reached an overall figure of 42% (12.5% mucinous, 33% colloid, 87.5% solid, and 100% signet ring cell). Metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas did not react with napsin-A or with TTF-1. All primary and metastatic tumors lacked EGFR mutations, while a single case of signet ring cell lung adenocarcinoma showed ALK expression and rearrangement at fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. Napsin-A has a lower sensitivity compared with TTF-1 in primary mucin-producing adenocarcinomas of the lung. However, both antibodies have an absolute specificity, being always negative in metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas. EGFR mutations and ALK translocation or expression are exceedingly rare in mucin-producing adenocarcinomas of the lung, resulting unnecessary as diagnostic tool in this setting.

TTF-1 and napsin A do not differentiate metastatic lung adenocarcinomas from primary esophageal adenocarcinomas: proposal of a novel staining panel

CONTEXT

When adenocarcinomas arise within the esophagus, particularly when located away from the gastroesophageal junction, it may be important in some patients to differentiate between a primary esophageal adenocarcinoma and metastasis from another site. Lung adenocarcinoma is one tumor that has been reported to frequently metastasize to the esophagus.

OBJECTIVES

To create a panel of immunohistochemical markers that can reliably distinguish between an esophageal and pulmonary primary; within the gastrointestinal pathology literature, including published articles and textbooks, common lung immunohistochemical markers, such as TTF-1, are assumed to be negative in esophageal adenocarcinoma, yet, to our knowledge, no study has yet investigated the veracity of that presumption.

DESIGN

In this study, 24 cases each of pulmonary and esophageal adenocarcinomas were stained with TTF-1, napsin A, CDX2, 34βE12, N-cadherin, and IMP3 in an attempt to define an optimal panel for differentiation. Esophageal adenocarcinomas occurring at the gastroesophageal junction were excluded in this study because a gastric primary tumor cannot be excluded in those cases.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, TTF-1 and napsin A were positive in similar proportions of tumors from both sites. Those markers that differentiated statistically between esophageal and pulmonary adenocarcinoma were IMP3, CDX2, and N-cadherin.

CONCLUSIONS

When differentiating the origin of a tumor as either esophageal or pulmonary, an immunohistochemical panel consisting of IMP3, CDX2, and N-cadherin is superior to either TTF-1 or napsin A.

Columnar cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a study of 10 cases with emphasis on CDX2 expression

BACKGROUND

Columnar cell variant is a recognized rare variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) that has an uncertain clinical course. This variant has two subvariants, and one is regarded as a more aggressive form in comparison to the more common classical and follicular variants. These tumors have morphological resemblance with endometrial or colonic adenocarcinoma. CDX2, a transcription factor of the caudal homeobox family, plays a key role in intestinal development and differentiation, and it is widely used as a marker to detect adenocarcinomas of intestinal and colonic origin. CDX2 has been rarely reported in PTC.

METHODS

We studied 10 cases of columnar cell variant of PTC (CCV-PTC). The histological, architectural, and cytological features fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of the CCV-PTC, as defined by the current World Health Organization classification. Ten patients (six men and four women) ranging in age from 32 to 90 years (mean, 58.3 years) presented with tumors classified as indolent (four cases) or aggressive (six cases); three harbored a BRAF(V600E) mutation. All cases were β-catenin negative. The Ki-67 proliferative index was up to 50%. All cases were thyroid transcription factor-1-positive. Using paraffin-embedded blocks, immunohistochemistry for CDX2 was performed to evaluate the reactivity of this antibody to this variant of PTC.

RESULTS

Nuclear positivity for CDX2 was detected in one out of the 10 cases studied (10%); the other nine cases did not express CDX2.

CONCLUSION

Only one of our cases showed nuclear positivity for CDX2. Therefore, our study failed to confirm it as a marker for CCV-PTC. The absence of CDX2 in the majority of the cases does not support the theory of CDX2 playing a role in the intestinal phenotype of these tumors.

Demonstration of CDX2 is highly antibody dependant

OBJECTS

CDX2 is a widely used immunohistochemical marker for intestinal differentiation in neoplasms. In the Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control external quality assessment scheme, only 45% of the laboratories participating in the CDX2 challenge in 2009 produced sufficient staining. A major cause of insufficient staining results appeared to be less successful primary antibody (Ab) clones. To evaluate the Ab performance in a standardized way, a comparative study was carried out.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue microarrays containing 309 non-neoplastic tissues and tumor samples with expected high, low, and no CDX2 expression were used. Five Abs were selected for comparison: EPR2764Y concentrated (Conc), EPR2764Y in a ready-to-use format, and DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88, all Conc. The CDX2 stains were scored blindly using the H-score method. Tissue/tumor samples with a maximum H-score of 150 to 300 (on the basis of the staining giving the highest score) were classified as CDX2 high expressors, samples with a maximum H-score of 10 to 149 as low expressors, and samples with a maximum H-score <10 as negative.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 106 tumors were CDX2 positive with at least one of the Abs. For 56 high-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with EPR2764Y Conc, EPR2764Y ready-to-use, DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88 were 262, 236, 234, 167, and 149, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 100, 100, 100, 98, and 93, respectively. For 50 low-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with the same Abs were 59, 26, 28, 7, and 5, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 98, 58, 64, 18, and 14, respectively. With EPR2764Y Conc, CDX2 was demonstrated in 5/19 (26%) urothelial carcinomas, 7/64 (11%) lung adenocarcinomas, 5/30 (17%) large cell/sarcomatoid lung carcinomas, and 4/19 (21%) esophagus squamous cell carcinomas. In-house optimized protocols gave for all 4 Conc Abs better staining results than the vendors' recommended protocols. The sensitivity of CDX2 Abs and protocols must be taken into consideration when classifying neoplasms of unknown origin.

The Role of KRAS Mutational Analysis to Determine the Site of Origin of Metastatic Carcinoma to the Lung: A Case Report

Metastatic carcinomas involving the lung are a common specimen encountered in surgical pathology. These metastases may have different morphologic, and architectural patterns and may mimic primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma, especially the intra-alveolar (lepidic) pattern of spread which may simulate a primary pulmonary bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (adenocarcinoma in situ). We present the case of a metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that morphologically mimicked bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung in that the tumor had an exclusive intra-alveolar pattern of spread and had an immunophenotype that was noninformative as to the site of origin (cytokeratin 7+, cytokeratin 20−, TTF-1−). In this case, we used KRAS gene mutation analysis to support that the lung carcinoma represented a metastatic pancreatic carcinoma as they both possessed identical codon 12 KRAS mutations. We show that this method may be a useful way to prove site of origin of metastatic carcinoma—particularly if standard morphologic or immunohistochemical analysis is not definitive.

Metastases to and from the Breast

Breast cancer is a common source of systemic metastatic disease. Distinguishing metastatic breast cancer from other types of malignancies can be diagnostically challenging but is important for correct treatment and prognosis. Nonmammary tumors can also metastasize to the breast, although this is a rare phenomenon. Differentiating a metastasis to the breast from a primary breast cancer can likewise be difficult. Knowledge of the clinical history and careful morphologic evaluation are the cornerstones of diagnosis. A panel of immunohistochemical stains tailored to the differential diagnosis at hand can provide helpful information in ambiguous cases.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas

Although thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) immunoreactivity is considered as a specific marker of lung and thyroid neoplasms, it may be positive in a proportion of extrapulmonary adenocarcinomas. This study examined the expression of TTF-1 in 555 colorectal adenocarcinomas using three commercial monoclonal antibodies: clone SPT24 (Novocastra) and 8G7G3/1 (Dako and Cell Marque), and compared the TTF-1 staining with other immunohistochemical markers, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK 20, caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2), and MUC2. The clinicopathological prognostic factors were compared with the TTF-1 expression status. Nuclear TTF-1 staining was detected in 24 cases (4.3%) with the SPT24 antibody and 18 cases (3.2%) with the 8G7G3/1 antibody. All cases positive for 8G7G3/1 were also positive for SPT24. CDX2 was expressed constantly in all 24 TTF-1-positive colorectal cancers, whereas CK7, CK20, and MUC2 were detected in 2 (8.3%), 23 (95.8%), and 8 (33.3%) cases, respectively. There was no correlation between TTF-1 expression and clinicopathological significance. To avoid potential pitfalls, TTF-1 should be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical setting, histological features, and the results of other markers, such as CK7, CK20, and CDX2. MUC2 can be used as supplementary information to confirm difficult cases.

Expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 in colorectal carcinoma

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is a member of the homeodomain transcription family expressed in epithelial cells of the thyroid and lung. Although nuclear TTF-1 is generally considered a specific marker for lung and thyroid neoplasms, it has been reported to be positive in other types of tumors including colorectal carcinoma (CRC). During metastatic adenocarcinoma workup for patients who had a history of CRC, we identified 4 positive TTF-1 cases using clone 8G7G3/1. Three of the 4 corresponding primary carcinomas were also positive for TTF-1. Therefore, we sought to retrospectively investigate the expression of TTF-1 in 100 CRC cases constructed in tissue microarray blocks and whole tissue sections of the 4 primary tumors corresponding to the 4 positive metastases. In tissue microarray cases, all cases had negative nuclear staining. Our results suggest that during immunohistochemical workup for adenocarcinoma, especially when the differential diagnosis includes the lung and CRC, TTF-1 results should be interpreted with caution as a small percentage of CRC expresses this marker. Positive nuclear TTF-1 in a metastatic carcinoma does not rule out CRC primary. Clinicopathologic correlation, tumor morphology, and a panel of immunohistochemical markers are essential to render the correct diagnosis.

Mixed Adenocarcinomas of the Lung: Place in New Proposals in Classification, Mandatory for Target Therapy

Context.—Lung cancer is one of the most frequent and lethal malignant neoplasms, but knowledge regarding the molecular basis of its pathogenesis is far from complete due to the striking diversity of different forms. The current lung cancer classification (World Health Organization 2004) can efficiently distinguish clinically relevant major subtypes (small cell and non–small cell carcinomas), but its results are partly inadequate when facing prognostic and therapeutic decisions for non–small cell carcinomas, especially for the group of tumors classified as adenocarcinoma. Lung adenocarcinoma comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by diverse morphologic features and molecular pathogenesis. The category of mixed adenocarcinomas includes most adenocarcinomas (approximately 80%) and, according to World Health Organization criteria, is defined by the occurrence of a mixed array of different patterns (acinar, papillary, bronchioloalveolar, solid with mucin). The histologic recognition of mixed adenocarcinoma is subjective and cannot consistently discriminate between responders and nonresponders to new targeted therapies (eg, tyrosine kinase inhibitors). Diagnostic problems are mainly related to the poor reproducibility of histologic criteria, especially when applied in small biopsies and cytology, and to the difficulty in assigning each form to a precisely defined entity, as needed by updated therapeutic approaches. In this evolving scenario, pathologists face new challenging diagnostic roles that include not only the precise morphologic definition of carcinoma subtypes but also their molecular characterization.

Objective.—To use a comprehensive critical analysis reconciling the overwhelming variety of biologic, morphologic, molecular, and clinical data to define new classification schemes for lung adenocarcinoma.

Data Sources.—Scientific literature and personal data were used.

Conclusions.—A new classification approach should redefine lung adenocarcinoma heterogeneity reconciling classic morphology, immunophenotypic and molecular features of neoplastic cells, and also relevant information provided by stem cell biology. This approach, which has been already successfully applied in World Health Organization classification of other tumors, could improve the recognition of new reproducible profiles for adenocarcinomas, more closely and reproducibly related to clinical features and response to specific therapies, limiting the use of “wastebasket” categories such as mixed adenocarcinoma.

Differential diagnostic and functional role of the multi-marker phenotype CDX2/CK20/CK7 in colorectal cancer stratified by mismatch repair status

The differentiation of colorectal cancer from primary tumors at other sites can be challenging. Often a panel of immunohistochemical protein markers is needed to distinguish between these entities. Protein expression differs significantly in colorectal cancer depending on mismatch repair status and is also heterogeneous among mismatch repair-proficient or -deficient tumors. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the diagnostic and prognostic role of the commonly used multi-marker phenotype CK20/CK7/CDX2 on a large series of colorectal cancers stratified by mismatch repair status. The immunohistochemical analysis of CK20, CK7 and CDX2 was performed on 1197 mismatch repair-proficient and 223 mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers using a tissue microarray. Multi-marker combinations of CK20/CK7/CDX2 were explored. Univariate and multivariable analysis of the markers was evaluated for their association with several clinico-pathological end points namely T stage, N stage, tumor grade, vascular invasion, intratumoral lymphocytes and survival. Multi-marker phenotypes with CK20 and CDX2 negativity were more frequently found in mismatch repair-deficient than in mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer (19.3 vs 7.5% and 21.6 vs 6.7%, respectively; P<0.001). In both colorectal cancer subsets loss of CK20 was associated with higher tumor grade (P<0.001) and with presence of intratumoral lymphocytes (P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively). In the proficient mismatch repair subset CK20 overexpression was an independent adverse prognostic factor (P=0.041) and CDX2 underexpression was linked to tumor progression. Loss of CDX2 and CK20 is more frequently encountered in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer, which should be taken into consideration to differentiate between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer in daily practice. Although associated with lower tumor grade, CK20 overexpression is an independent adverse prognostic factor in mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer.

Aberrant expression of an "intestinal marker" Cdx2 in pyloric gland adenoma of the gallbladder

The aim of this study was to survey Cdx2 expression in pyloric gland adenoma (PGA) of the gallbladder. We reviewed 29 PGA cases, ten (34.4%) and seven (24.1%) of which showed intestinal metaplasia (IM) and squamous morule (SM), respectively. The immunostaining for Cdx2, beta-catenin, MUC5AC, MUC2, MUC6, and M-GGMC-1 was performed and scored (0 = negative, 1+ = <10%, 2+ = 10% to <30%, 3+ = 30% to <50%, 4+ = 50% to <70%, 5+ = 70-100%). Although its scores were relatively low (1+ or 2+), Cdx2 was frequently expressed in 27 cases (93.1%). Not only goblet and/or Paneth cells were positive but also non-IM cells in PGAs, as opposed to the lack of staining in the background mucosa. Cdx2 scores were not correlated with those of IM (p = 0.485) and MUC2 (p = 0.868). Of note, Cdx2 was positive in foci of SM in all seven cases, and there was a significant difference in Cdx2 scores between PGAs with and without SM. Furthermore, the p value of scores between Cdx2 and beta-catenin was 0.051, and both mean labeling indices (LIs) were correlated (r = 0.736). With Cdx2, higher morular LIs than glandular LIs were observed (p = 0.001). Finally, we concluded that aberrant Cdx2 expression in PGAs is closely associated with nuclear beta-catenin expression and SM in contrast with IM.

Aberrant Cdx2 expression in endometrial lesions with squamous differentiation: important role of Cdx2 in squamous morula formation

Only a few reports have described Cdx2 expression in endometrial lesions of the uterus. Our aim was to determine whether Cdx2 expression is related to squamous differentiation in endometrial lesions. Furthermore, we examined whether there is any correlation between Cdx2 and beta-catenin, a well-known marker of aberrant nuclear accumulation in endometrial squamous foci secondary to mutation. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of 225 cases (29 normal endometrium, 28 nonproliferative conditions, 21 polyps, 46 hyperplasias, and 101 endometrioid carcinomas) that included 72 cases (4 polyps, 16 hyperplasias, and 52 carcinomas) showing morular or keratinizing squamous differentiation (SD(+)). Normal endometrium and nonproliferative conditions showed no staining for Cdx2. Whereas there was a low rate of Cdx2 positivity in SD(-) polyps (5.9%) and hyperplasias (10%), all SD(+) lesions expressed Cdx2 (P < .001). Thirty-eight (73%) of the SD(+) carcinomas were positive for Cdx2, whereas only 6 SD(-) cases (14.0%) were positive (P < .001). Furthermore, the larger the number of squamous foci, the greater the number of Cdx2-positive cells that was found. The labeling indices of Cdx2 were significantly higher in morular components than in keratinizing or glandular ones (P < .001). There was a strong correlation of the labeling indices of Cdx2 and beta-catenin in squamous foci of hyperplasias and carcinomas. Using immunofluorescence, we confirmed the coexpression of the 2 markers. The Cdx2 protein is expressed frequently in endometrial lesions with squamous differentiation, especially morular-type differentiation, and correlates strongly with nuclear beta-catenin expression. These facts suggest that Cdx2 plays an important role in squamous morula formation.

Islet 1 (Isl1) expression is a reliable marker for pancreatic endocrine tumors and their metastases

BACKGROUND

Tracing the origin of a metastasis of a neuroendocrine carcinoma is a challenge. The transcription factors Cdx2 and TTF1 have been found to be helpful in identifying well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of gastrointestinal and pulmonary origin, respectively. So far, such a marker is lacking for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PETs) and metastases thereof. Islet1 (Isl1) is a transcription factor expressed in pancreatic islet cells. The aim of this study was (1) to test the specificity and sensitivity of Isl1 as a marker of PETs, and (2) to test the specificity and sensitivity of a panel of markers, including Isl1, Cdx2, and TTF1, for the localization of the primary.

DESIGN

One hundred eighty-eight primary gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary endocrine tumors and 49 metastases thereof were examined. Immunohistochemistry using antibodies directed against Isl1, Cdx2, and TTF1 was performed and the staining results were scored semiquantitatively.

RESULTS

Isl1 proved to be a highly specific marker for pancreatic endocrine tumors. In 84 primary PET its specificity was 78.4% (sensitivity 74.3%) and in 18 metastases of PET the specificity reached 100% (sensitivity 77.8%). Strong Cdx2 staining showed a specificity for gastrointestinal origin of 83.9% (sensitivity 82%) in primary tumors and of 100% (sensitivity 40%) in metastases. Including weakly positive tumors lead to a decreased specificity but an increased sensitivity. TTF1 expression was detected in 2 PET and 1 ileal primary tumor only and was absent in all metastases of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Isl1 is a reliable marker of pancreatic endocrine tumors and metastases thereof. It shows a comparable sensitivity and specificity as Cdx2 as a marker of ileal and appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors and their metastases. TTF1 is very rarely expressed in well-differentiated gastroentero-PETs. Therefore, the panel of Isl1, Cdx2, and TTF1 seems useful for examining metastases of well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas of unknown origin.

Expression analysis of pluripotency factors in the undifferentiated porcine inner cell mass and epiblast during in vitro culture

Limited understanding of the importance of known pluripotency factors in pig embryonic stem cells (ESC) impedes the establishment and validation of porcine ESC lines. This study evaluated the expression of known mouse ESC and human ESC (hESC) pluripotency markers in in vivo inner cell mass (ICM) and in vitro-cultured undifferentiated porcine epiblast cells isolated from 8-day porcine blastocysts, primary cultures of epiblast-derived neuroprogenitor cells, and endoderm cells. The expression profile of common pluripotency markers (POU domain 5 transcript factor 1, SRY-box containing gene 2, and Nanog homeobox), species-specific markers, ESC-associated factors, and differentiation markers was evaluated. The mRNA of uncultured ICMs, cultured epiblast cells, epiblast-derived neuroprogenitor cells, and endoderm cells was amplified prior to expression analysis of candidate genes by real-time RT-PCR. ESC factors whose expression correlated best with the undifferentiated epiblast state were identified by comparative mRNA expression analysis between porcine epiblast-derived somatic cell lines, fetal fibroblasts, and adult tissues. Across tissue types Nanog homeobox exhibited ubiquitous expression, whereas POU domain 5 transcript factor 1, teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1, and RNA exonuclease homolog 1 transcript expression was restricted primarily to undifferentiated epiblasts. Our results suggested that expression of pluripotency markers in undifferentiated pig epiblast cells more closely resembled that observed in hESC. Expression alterations of ESC-associated factors in epiblast cells were also observed during in vitro culture. Our data demonstrate the potential use of some pluripotency factors as markers of porcine epiblast stem cells and indicate that the in vitro environment may influence the cultured epiblast's developmental state.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the relative risk of antigen expression being detected immunohistochemically in ovarian and gastric carcinoma aggregated from studies performed for diagnostic purposes, with the relative risks of their expression in all patients in the English literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both types of series indicated that cytokeratin (CK) 7 expression was greater and that of CK20 and carcinoembryonic antigen less in ovarian than in gastric carcinoma (P < 0.05). Synthesis of all data available for MUC-2 suggested it was more commonly expressed in ovarian carcinoma, whereas the relative risk in papers that directly compared its expression suggested that it was more common in the gastric carcinoma (P = 0.2, NS). Aggregating all possible data suggested villin was more likely to be expressed in ovarian cancers, whereas studies in which its expression was compared directly in both tumours suggested the opposite. Although statistically significant, patient numbers were small.

CONCLUSION

Provided sufficient numbers of cases are studied, analysis of studies comparing antigen expression for diagnostic purposes in tumours from two body sites is likely to be supported in the wider literature. The design of such comparative studies is informed by aggregating data from single tumour studies.

Utility of tissue-specific transcription factors thyroid transcription factor 1 and Cdx2 in determining the primary site of metastatic adenocarcinomas to the brain

CONTEXT

Brain metastases of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary pose a diagnostic dilemma to the surgical pathologist. Although the most common source in these cases is the lung, determining a primary source is difficult on routinely stained slides. Immunohistochemical stain panels including differential cytokeratins, hormone receptors, and breast-specific proteins are commonly used in these cases. Recently, attention has turned to tissue-specific transcription factors, such as thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and Cdx2, in the appraisal of metastatic adenocarcinomas.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the previously unpublished immunohistochemical expression of the relatively new tissue-specific transcription factor Cdx2 in metastatic adenocarcinomas to the brain.

DESIGN

We reviewed the surgical pathology files of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla, and retrieved 38 consecutive cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma (22 pulmonary, 10 breast, 6 gastrointestinal [2 esophagus/gastroesophageal junction, 4 colorectal]) to the brain with confirmation of the primary site by chart review and histologic evaluation. Sections were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to TTF-1, Cdx2, and cytokeratins 7 and 20 by standard methods.

RESULTS

Specificities and positive predictive values for Cdx2 and TTF-1 equaled 100% for metastatic gastrointestinal and pulmonary adenocarcinomas, respectively. The negative predictive value of Cdx2 was also very high at 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cdx2 is a specific and valuable tool for the surgical pathologist when faced with the common problem of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. In conjunction with TTF-1, cytokeratin 7, and cytokeratin 20, Cdx2 can accurately differentiate the most common sources of metastatic adenocarcinoma to the brain.

[Contribution of immunohistochemistry to the management of lung cancer: from morphology to diagnosis and treatment]

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an indispensable tool in pathology. For proper interpretation, results must be read with knowledge of the diagnostic, clinical, and morphological circumstances. We detail here the contribution of IHC to the classification of lung cancer: small-cell lung cancer and other neuroendocrine tumors, basaloid carcinoma, large-cell carcinoma. Using IHC techniques, pathologists can now determine with certainty that an intrathoracic adenocarcinoma is primary or secondary. The distinction is less clear for large-cell carcinoma or squamous-cell carcinoma, or for tumors with a pleural or mediastinal presentation. IHC is also useful as a diagnostic aid for rare entities: carcinomas with an unusual morphology (alpha-fetoproetin secretors or beta-HCG secretors), melanomas, lymphomas, sarcomas. By demonstrating the presence of carcinomatous cells within the neighboring structures (pleura) or lymph nodes, IHC contributes to lung cancer staging, particularly when there are few of these elements morphologically difficult to distinguish. Finally, IHC contributes to prognosis (proliferation markers, differentiation markers) or prediction of therapeutic response (chemotherapy or targeted therapies). IHC studies may also be requested in a forensic setting, for example to demonstrate that the lung cancer observed in a patient exposed to asbestosis is primary. In light of these different situations, a wide panel of antibodies is required. Other morphological techniques such as hybridization in situ or molecular biology techniques will further complete the histological diagnosis in the future.

Metastatic esophageal carcinoma masquerading as inflammatory breast carcinoma

A 50-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of esophageal adenocarcinoma presented with a 3-week history of right breast swelling and progressive erythema. Twenty-two months prior to presentation, she had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (T3,N1,M1a) and underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. On physical examination, the right breast was red, swollen (40% larger than the contralateral breast), tender to palpation, and warm to the touch (Fig. 1). No mass was palpable. On the basis of the clinical findings, inflammatory breast carcinoma was suspected. A punch biopsy revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with extensive involvement of dermal lymphatics (Fig. 2). The clinical and histologic differential diagnosis included inflammatory breast carcinoma vs. metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma to the skin of the breast. To resolve this question, immunohistochemical stains for estrogen and progesterone receptors and CDX-2 (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA) were performed. CDX-2 is an intestinal homeobox gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium and gastrointestinal tumors. The tumor nuclei were positive for CDX-2 but negative for both steroid receptors (Fig. 3), confirming the diagnosis of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7

Recent studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the value of CDX2 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastatic mucinous carcinomas in the ovary. Utility of coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 is restricted to distinction of ovarian mucinous tumors from lower gastrointestinal tract metastases and data comparing coordinate expression of all three markers is limited. Immunohistochemical studies were performed to compare expression of CDX2 and cytokeratin 20, both markers of intestinal differentiation, in conjunction with coordinate expression of cytokeratin 7, in 90 mucinous tumors involving the ovary: 42 primary ovarian mucinous tumors (31 atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors (gastrointestinal type), 11 mucinous carcinomas) and 48 metastatic mucinous carcinomas of upper (pancreaticobiliary tract: 14; stomach: five) and lower (colon and rectum: 25; appendix: four) gastrointestinal tract origin. Primary ovarian tumors expressed CDX2 (40%) less frequently than cytokeratin 20 (83%) (P<0.0001). CDX2 expression in primary ovarian tumors (40%) was lower than CDX2 expression in metastatic carcinomas of both upper (74%; P=0.016) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (90%; P<0.0001). Cytokeratin 20 expression was similar in primary ovarian tumors (83%) and metastases of upper (89%; P=0.071) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (93%; P=0.29). Thus, as a single marker CDX2 offers some advantage over cytokeratin 20 because it is less frequently positive in primary ovarian tumors. In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-positive primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin, CDX2 coordinate expression was less common in primary ovarian tumors (36%) than in metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (63%) (P=0.022) whereas cytokeratin 20 coordinate expression was identical in both tumor types (79%). In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-negative metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin, coordinate expression of CDX2 (83%) and cytokeratin 20 (86%) were equivalent (P=1.00). CDX2 was comparable to cytokeratin 20 in distinguishing metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-negative and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 positive) from primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-positive and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 variable). CDX2 provided some advantage over cytokeratin 20 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastases of upper but not lower gastrointestinal tract origin; however, the advantage in the former was limited due to the occurrence of shared coordinate expression profiles in both tumor types. Cytokeratin 7 provides the predominant discriminatory value among these markers yet is limited to distinction of primary ovarian tumors from metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin.

Expression of CDX2 in benign tissue and adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Numerous studies have claimed that CDX2 is relatively specific and sensitive in establishing a gastrointestinal origin in metastatic tumors of unknown origin. We have recently seen 2 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) on needle biopsies with diffuse strong nuclear staining for CDX2 sent for consultation. One case was a prostatic duct adenocarcinoma in a man with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of 327 ng/mL, and the other was a PCa with a Gleason score (GS) of 4 + 4 = 8 in a man with a PSA value of 15 ng/mL. An adenocarcinoma with GS 3 + 3 = 6 from the contralateral side did not express CDX2. Because documented examples of this phenomenon are rare, we investigated the immunoexpression of CDX2, using tissue microarrays (TMAs). Three slides of TMAs were used to stain 708 tissue samples (0.6 mm in diameter) containing either benign or malignant prostate tissue, as well as control tissues from various anatomical sites including colon. In total, 195 samples of primary PCa with GS of 6 (n = 41), 7 (n = 21), and 8 (n = 8); 195 samples of benign prostate tissue; and 185 samples of metastatic PCa were studied. Of 70 radical prostatectomy specimens examined for PCa in TMAs, 4 (5.7%) were positive for CDX2, showing Gleason score of 6 (n = 3) and Gleason score of 7 (n = 1). Focal moderate positive staining was seen in benign prostate tissue in 7 (11.7%) of 60 radical prostatectomy specimens. None of the metastatic PCa expressed CDX2. CDX2 may uncommonly be focally expressed in benign prostatic glands. Staining in PCa is less common and appears independent of GS and is usually patchy and focal and of lesser intensity than in colonic tissue. However, rarely strong and diffuse staining may be seen. Positive CDX2 staining in high-grade prostate cancer (ductal, cribriform, and solid) may be confused with secondary carcinoma of colonic origin. Routine histopathology, positive PSA immunostaining, and clinical findings can help confirm the correct diagnosis.

Low meprin alpha expression differentiates primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma from gastrointestinal cancers that commonly metastasise to the ovaries

BACKGROUND

Currently, no specific immunohistochemical markers are available to differentiate primary mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (MOC) from adenocarcinomas originating at other sites that have metastasised to the ovary, which may have an impact on patient management and prognosis.

AIM

To investigate the expression of two intestinal markers, galectin 4 and meprin alpha, in mucinous carcinomas of the ovary and gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemical analysis, the expression of galectin 4 and meprin alpha was investigated in 10 MOCs and in 38 mucinous adenocarcinomas of colon, pancreas, stomach and appendix, the most common sites of origin of ovarian metastases.

RESULTS

Total cytoplasmic galectin 4 expression was relatively consistent between the different carcinomas. Membranous meprin alpha expression was significantly lower in MOCs compared with gastrointestinal carcinomas. Moreover, meprin alpha expression showed greater discrimination between the ovarian and gastrointestinal carcinomas than the cytokeratins CK7 and CK20, the current standard immunohistochemical markers used to determine the tissue origin of mucinous carcinomas involving the ovaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Meprin alpha is a useful additional marker in differentiating primary from secondary mucinous adenocarcinomas of the ovary.

Comparison of the immunophenotypes of signet-ring cell carcinoma, solid adenocarcinoma with mucin production, and mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung characterized by the presence of cytoplasmic mucin

The latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification divides adenocarcinoma mainly into adenocarcinoma mixed subtypes, acinar adenocarcinoma, papillary adenocarcinoma, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, and solid adenocarcinoma with mucin production, and it mentions several variants, including fetal adenocarcinoma, mucinous ("colloid") adenocarcinoma, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, signet-ring adenocarcinoma, and clear cell adenocarcinoma. In general, the mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the lung comprises signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), solid adenocarcinoma with mucin production (SA), and mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (m-BAC), mucinous ("colloid") adenocarcinomas and/or mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma. As SRCC, SA, and m-BAC exhibit distinct clinical features, it is important to identify differences in their immunohistochemical characteristics to better understand their histogenesis. In this study we analysed SRCC, SA, m-BAC, normal lung, and foregut-related secretory tissue for immunohistochemical differences using tissue microarrays. SRCC and SA showed high expression of MUC1 (97.4% and 100%, respectively), cytokeratin (CK) 7 (both 100%), and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) (81.1% and 100%, respectively). They also showed low expression of MUC5AC (25.5% and 21.1%, respectively) and MUC6 (18.3% and 10.5%, respectively), whereas m-BAC showed high expression of MUC5AC (97.5%), MUC6 (75.0%), and CK7 (94.7%), but low expression of MUC1 (57.5%), and TTF-1 (27.5%). Hierarchical clustering showed that the immunophenotypes of SRCC and SA belong to the same category as alveolar lining cells, whereas m-BAC clustered onto another branch with gastric foveolar cells and bronchial goblet cells. These immunohistochemical findings support the results of our previous clinicopathological analysis of SRCC of the lung showing that SRCC occurs anatomically in the peripheral portion of the lung rather than in the bronchial gland-bearing portion.

CDX2 Is a Useful Marker of Intestinal-Type Differentiation: A Tissue Microarray–Based Study of 629 Tumors From Various Sites

Context.—CDX2, a critical nuclear transcription factor for intestinal development, is expressed in intestinal epithelium and adenocarcinomas.

Objectives.—To determine if CDX2 is a useful marker for intestinal-type differentiation and to correlate tumor histology with CDX2 staining in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Design.—Tissue microarrays from 71 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 31 hepatocellular carcinomas, 47 lung adenocarcinomas, 55 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung, 69 neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and 43 of the pancreas, 57 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and 256 endometrial adenocarcinomas were stained with antibody against CDX2.

Results.—CDX2 staining was positive in 51 (71.8%) of 71 colorectal cancers, including 38 (74.5%) of 51 well- or moderately differentiated tumors and 13 (65.0%) of 20 high-grade tumors. Of the high-grade tumors, 5 (71.4%) of 7 mucinous, 3 (100%) of 3 signet ring cell, and 5 (50.0%) of 10 poorly differentiated tumors were positive. Other tumors showing occasional CDX2 staining included 1 of 30 well- or moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and 2 of 43 from the pancreas, 1 of 47 lung adenocarcinomas, 3 of 57 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and 15 of 256 endometrial carcinomas. Hepatocellular, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung were not immunoreactive for CDX2.

Conclusions.—CDX2 is a useful marker for intestinal-type differentiation, is rarely seen in tumors from the other sites evaluated, and may be useful in determining the site of origin for some metastatic tumors. However, CDX2 is not a sensitive marker for poorly differentiated colorectal carcinoma.