Iodine 125 Versus Palladium 103 Implants for Prostate Cancer

Relevance of Oxocyclam from Palladium(II) Coordination to Radiopharmaceutical Development

We provide a comprehensive study of the coordination of oxocyclam with palladium(II), including presentation of a novel bifunctional analogue, p-H2N-Bn-oxocyclam, bearing an aniline pendant. The complexation of palladium(II) with oxocyclam was examined by various techniques, including NMR analysis and potentiometric titrations which revealed that the Pd(II) complex can adopt different configurations such as trans-I and trans-III. In addition, oxocyclam forms a thermodynamically stable palladium(II) complex, the stabilization being attributed to the deprotonation of the amide function. The crystal structures of [Pd(H-1oxocyclam)]+ and [Pd(oxocyclam)]2+ were obtained, revealing the structural details previously anticipated, including, in the second case, the presence of the proton on the carbonyl oxygen atom. Additionally, the study explored the redox behavior of the Pd(II)-oxocyclam complex through reduction and oxidation voltammograms at different pH values. Successful 109Pd-labeling of oxocyclam and p-H2N-Bn-oxocyclam at pH 3.5 demonstrated high labeling efficiencies, whatever the species formed. The stability of the radiocomplexes was assessed and moderate transchelation toward EDTA was observed. Overall, oxocyclam displayed favorable properties for Pd(II) coordination and radiolabeling, suggesting its potential as a chelating agent for this metal in palladium-based applications.

Dosimetric outcomes of preoperative treatment planning with intraoperative optimization using stranded seeds in prostate brachytherapy

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) based on treatment-related dosimetric outcomes. Data of 100 patients treated using LDR BT with stranded seeds from November 2012 to November 2017 were collected. The prescription dose for the prostate was 145 Gy. The dose constraints for the preoperative plan were: V100% ≥ 95%, V150% ≤ 60%, V200% ≤ 20% for the prostate; V100% for rectum, ≤ 1 cc; and V200 Gy for urethra, 0.0 cc. Intraoperative real-time dose calculation and postoperative dose distribution analysis on days 0 and 30 were performed. Median dosimetric outcomes on days 0 and 30 respective were: V100% 92.28% and 92.23%, V200% 18.63% and 25.02%, and D90% 150.88 Gy and 151.46 Gy for the prostate; V100% for the rectum, 0.11 cc and 0.22 cc; and V200 Gy for the urethra, 0.00 cc and 0.00 cc, respectively. Twenty patients underwent additional seed implantation to compensate for insufficient dose coverage of the prostate. No loss or substantial migration of seeds or severe toxicity was reported. With stranded seed implantation and intraoperative optimization, appropriate dose delivery to the prostate without excessive dose to the organs at risk could be achieved.

I-125 or Pd-103 for brachytherapy boost in men with high-risk prostate cancer: A comparison of survival and morbidity outcomes

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy boost improves biochemical recurrence rates in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Few data are available on whether one isotope is superior to another. We compared the oncologic and morbidity outcomes of I-125 and Pd-103 in men with HRPC receiving brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 797 patients with HRPC, 190 (23.8%) received I-125 or 607 received Pd-103 with a median of 45 Gy of external beam irradiation. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastases (FFMs), cause-specific survival (CSS), and morbidity were compared for the two isotopes by the ANOVA and the χ² test with survival determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Men treated with I-125 had a higher stage (p < 0.001), biological equivalent dose (BED) (p < 0.001), and longer hormone therapy (neoadjuvant hormone therapy, p < 0.001), where men treated with Pd-103 had a higher Gleason score (GS, p < 0.001) and longer followup (median 8.3 vs. 5.3 years, p < 0.001). Ten-year FFBF, FFM, and CSS for I-125 vs. Pd-103 were 77.5 vs. 80.2% (p = 0.897), 94.7 vs. 91.9% (p = 0.017), and 95.4 vs. 91.8% (p = 0.346), respectively. Men with T3 had superior CSS (94.1 vs. 79.5%, p = 0.001) with I-125. Significant covariates by Cox regression for FFBF were prostate specific antigen (PSA), the GS, and the BED (p < 0.001), for FFM PSA (p < 0.001) and GS (p = 0.029), and for CSS PSA, the GS (p < 0.001) and the BED (p = 0.022). Prostate cancer mortality was 7/62 (15.6%) for BED ≤ 150 Gy, 18/229 (7.9%) for BED >150-200 Gy, and 20/470 (5.9%) for BED >200 Gy (p = 0.029). Long-term morbidity was not different for the two isotopes.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy boost with I-125 and Pd-103 appears equally effective yielding 10-year CSS of over 90%. I-125 may have an advantage in T3 disease. Higher doses yield the most favorable survival.

The 100 most cited articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the 100 most cited research articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy (PCB) and to review the characteristics of these citation.

Material and methods

The Web of Science Core Collection was used to identify the 100 most cited articles in PCB as of December 31^st, 2019. The following important information was extracted: year and month of publication, title, journal, country of origin, authors, type of article, treatment modality, and topics.

Results

The 100 most cited articles in PCB were published between 1999 and 2018, and the number of citations ranged from 455 to 54; these articles had collectively been cited 10,331 times at the time of search. These articles were from 11 countries, with most publications being from the United States (n = 61), followed by Canada (n = 10), the United Kingdom (n = 8), and Germany (n = 5). The “International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics” published the most articles (n = 47), followed by the “Journal of Urology” (n = 11), “Radiotherapy and Oncology” (n = 10), “Cancer” (n = 7), and “Urology” (n = 6). Permanent interstitial brachytherapy (n = 52) was the most widely used treatment modality, followed by temporary brachytherapy (n = 45). Disease control (n = 51) was the most common topic, followed by side effects (n = 44) and quality of life (n = 27).

Conclusions

The bibliometric analysis presents a detailed list of the 100 most cited articles in prostate cancer brachytherapy. There are clear recommendations for treatment with prostate cancer brachytherapy. The goal of prostate cancer brachytherapy is to improve long-term outcomes and quality of life.

Modern Brachytherapy

Brachytherapy involves the placement of radioactive sources within or very close to the tumor. This placement allows a high dose of radiotherapy to be delivered to the tumor while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. The delivery of brachytherapy has changed markedly over the years, with newer radioactive sources making delivery safer, image guidance techniques allowing more accurate placement of sources, and advanced planning systems allowing brachytherapy to be truly adaptive. This article explores the most modern techniques and current uses of brachytherapy in the treatment of gynecological, prostate, breast, rectal, and skin cancers.

Reducing seed migration to near zero with stranded-seed implants: Comparison of seed migration rates to the chest in 1000 permanent prostate brachytherapy patients undergoing implants with loose or stranded seeds

PURPOSE

Pulmonary seed emboli to the chest may occur after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB). The purpose of this study is to analyze factors associated with seed migration to the chest in a large series of PPB patients from a single institution undergoing implant with either loose seeds (LS), mixed loose and stranded seeds (MS), or exclusively stranded seeds in an absorbable vicryl suture (VS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1998 and July 2015, a total of 1000 consecutive PPB patients with postoperative diagnostic chest x-rays at 4 months after implant were analyzed for seed migration. Patients were grouped based on seed implant technique: LS = 391 (39.1%), MS = 43 (4.3%), or VS = 566 (56.6%). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine predictors of seed migration.

RESULTS

Overall, 18.8% of patients experienced seed migration to the chest. The incidence of seed migration per patient was 45.5%, 11.6%, and 0.9% (p < 0.0001), for patients receiving LS, MS, or VS PPB, respectively. The right and left lower lobes were the most frequent sites of pulmonary seed migration. On multivariable analysis, planimetry volume (p = 0.0002; HR = 0.7 per 10 cc [0.6-0.8]), number of seeds implanted (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.4 per 25 seeds [1.7-3.4]), LS implant (p < 0.0001, HR = 15.9 [5.9-42.1]), and MS implant (p = 0.001, HR = 7.9 [2.3-28.1]) were associated with seed migration to the chest.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series, significantly higher rates of seed migration to the chest are observed in implants using any LS with observed hazard ratios of 15.9 and 7.9 for LS and MS respectively, as compared with implants using solely stranded seeds.

Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

Low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an evidence based radiation technique with excellent oncologic outcomes. By utilizing direct image guidance for radioactive source placement, LDR brachytherapy provides superior radiation dose escalation and conformality compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). With this level of precision, late grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity rates are typically between 1% and 4%. Furthermore, when performed as a same day surgical procedure, this technique provides a cost effective and convenient strategy. A large body of literature with robust follow-up has led multiple expert consensus groups to endorse the use of LDR brachytherapy as an appropriate management option for all risk groups of non-metastatic prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy is often effective when delivered as a monotherapy, although for some patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, optimal outcome are achieved in combination with supplemental EBRT and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In addition to reviewing technical aspects and reported clinical outcomes of LDR prostate brachytherapy, this article will focus on the considerations related to appropriate patient selection and other aspects of its use in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Patient-reported health-related quality of life for men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy with 125-iodine, 103-palladium, or 131-cesium: Results of a prospective phase II study

PURPOSE

To compare quality of life (QoL) after brachytherapy with one of the three approved radioactive isotopes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with mostly favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated on this prospective phase II trial with brachytherapy as monotherapy, without hormonal therapy. QoL was recorded at baseline and each follow-up by using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instrument. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as half the standard deviation of the baseline score for each domain. Mixed effect models were used to compare the different isotopes, and time-driven activity-based costing was used to compute costs.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2013, 300 patients were treated with iodine-125 (I-125, n = 98, prescribed dose [PD] = 145 Gy), palladium-103 (Pd-103, n = 102, PD = 125 Gy), or cesium-131 (Cs-131, n = 100, PD = 115 Gy). Median age was 64.9 years. Median follow-up time was 5.1 years for the entire cohort, and 7.1, 4.8 and 3.3 years for I-125, Pd-103, and Cs-131 groups, respectively. All three isotope groups showed an initial drop in QoL at first follow-up, which gradually improved over the first 2 years for urinary and bowel domains. QoL profiles were similar between I-125 and Pd-103, whereas Cs-131 showed a statistically significant decrease in QoL regarding bowel and sexual function at 12 months compared with Pd-103. However, these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Compared with I-125, the use of Pd-103 or Cs-131 resulted in cost increases of 18% and 34% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The three different isotopes produced a similar QoL profile. Statistically significant differences favored Pd-103/I-125 over Cs-131 for bowel and sexual QoL, but this did not reach clinical significance.

Prostate cancer high dose-rate brachytherapy: review of evidence and current perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Patients with intermediate to high risk disease (prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10, Gleason score ≥ 7, or clinical stage ≥ T2b) suffer from poorer long-term biochemical control (freedom from an increasing prostate specific antigen level) when treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) alone. In order to improve biochemical control while limiting long-term complications, brachytherapy has been incorporated into radiotherapy treatment, either alone or in combination with EBRT.

AREAS COVERED

Current literature regarding the use of high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer, including as a boost and monotherapy. The efficacy and toxicities of various approaches are evaluated including comparisons to low dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Prostate HDR brachytherapy has higher conformality than EBRT, potentially improving the therapeutic ratio by allowing higher doses per fraction to tumor cells. The improved biochemical control shown in trials have resulted in EBRT plus brachytherapy to be included as a standard treatment option supported by the NCCN and ASCO guidance documents for intermediate to high risk prostate cancer.

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.

Theranostic Nanoseeds for Efficacious Internal Radiation Therapy of Unresectable Solid Tumors

Malignant tumors are considered “unresectable” if they are adhere to vital structures or the surgery would cause irreversible damages to the patients. Though a variety of cytotoxic drugs and radiation therapies are currently available in clinical practice to treat such tumor masses, these therapeutic modalities are always associated with substantial side effects. Here, we report an injectable nanoparticle-based internal radiation source that potentially offers more efficacious treatment of unresectable solid tumors without significant adverse side effects. Using a highly efficient incorporation procedure, palladium-103, a brachytherapy radioisotope in clinical practice, was coated to monodispersed hollow gold nanoparticles with a diameter about 120 nm, to form ¹⁰³Pd@Au nanoseeds. The therapeutic efficacy of ¹⁰³Pd@Au nanoseeds were assessed when intratumorally injected into a prostate cancer xenograft model. Five weeks after a single-dose treatment, a significant tumor burden reduction (>80%) was observed without noticeable side effects on the liver, spleen and other organs. Impressively, >95% nanoseeds were retained inside the tumors as monitored by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) with the gamma emissions of ¹⁰³Pd. These findings show that this nanoseed-based brachytherapy has the potential to provide a theranostic solution to unresectable solid tumors.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy using high V150

PURPOSE

Prostate brachytherapy sometimes requires the volume receiving >150% of the prescribed dose (V150) to be >50% to obtain satisfactory coverage. There has been concern expressed that high V150 may be associated with higher rates of urinary retention and morbidity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 207 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy treated with palladium 103 ((103)Pd; n = 140) or iodine 125 ((125)I; n = 67). Prescribed doses for (103)Pd monotherapy and boost were 124 and 90 Gy, respectively; for (125)I, the corresponding doses were 160 and 120 Gy. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Median follow-up at the time of analysis was 18 months. For (103)Pd, the mean intraoperative volume and V150 were 30.3 cm(3) and 72%, respectively; corresponding values for (125)I were 38.3 cm(3) and 59%, respectively. Two of the patients treated with iodine and 9 treated with palladium experienced acute urinary retention, which was not statistically significant (P = .48). The rectal V100 for (103)Pd was significantly less than that for (125)I (P < .001). The mean baseline, 1-month, and 12-month American Urologic Association (AUA) scores for (103)Pd were 8.5, 19.7, and 8.2, respectively; for (125)I, the values were 7.4, 17.1, and 13.4, respectively. At 12 months, the AUA scores returned to baseline in the (103)Pd-treated patients, whereas scores in (125)I-treated patients remained elevated (P = .005). High V150 did not appear to cause undue risk of urinary retention or morbidity based on logistic regression analysis of patients treated with monotherapy performed with either isotope.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of urinary retention was low, despite high V150 values for both isotopes. In patients treated with brachytherapy alone, no significant increase in urinary morbidity was seen in relation to V150. AUA scores returned to baseline in (103)Pd-treated patients at 1 year, whereas (125)I-treated patients demonstrated continued elevation.

Brachytherapy in Men with Prostate Cancer: Update on Indications and Outcomes

Brachytherapy (BT), using either a low-dose-rate (LDR) or mostly high-dose-rate (HDR) technique, is the device able to deliver the highest dose-rate in the most conformal way It is used as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). LDR-BT is mostly used as monotherapy; HDR-BT is combined with EBRT +/– adjuvant hormone therapy In patients with low-risk disease and in selected intermediate-risk patients, LDR-BT ensures long-term good disease control rates and HDR-BT shows similar results, even if with shorter follow-up. In patients with intermediate/high risk disease the combination therapy (EBRT + HDR-BT) provides better oncological outcomes compared to EBRT monotherapy, even if the role of adjuvant hormone therapy is still unclear. Literature shows variable efficacy of BT in case of local recurrence after EBRT and radical prostatectomy even if few cases have been reported with short follow-up. Side effects are acceptable (urogenital toxicity, urinary incontinence, sexual function) and comparable with the other treatment modalities. So far, randomized controlled trials comparing the different treatment modalities are necessary to clarify indications and real efficacy.

A comparison of the impact of isotope ((125)I vs. (103)Pd) on toxicity and biochemical outcome after interstitial brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare biochemical outcomes and morbidity associated with iodine-125 ((125)I) and palladium-103 ((103)Pd) brachytherapy as part of combined modality therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 2002 and December 2008, 259 patients underwent prostate brachytherapy ((125)I prescription dose, 110Gy: n=199; (103)Pd prescription dose, 100Gy: n=60) followed by external beam radiotherapy (median dose, 50.4Gy). Eighty-seven patients also received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Toxicities were recorded with CTCAE v 3.0, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires.

RESULTS

Overall, acute Grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 21% and 30% of patients treated with (125)I and (103)Pd, respectively (p=0.16). There were no significant differences in IPSS change or urinary quality-of-life scores between the isotopes at 4, 6, or 12 months (p=0.20, 0.21, and 1.0, respectively). IPSS resolution occurred at a median of 11 and 6 months for (125)I and (103)Pd patients, respectively (p=0.03). On multivariate analysis, only the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was predictive of time to IPSS resolution (p=0.046). Late Grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 7% of (125)I patients and 6% of patients treated with (103)Pd. Of 129 potent patients at baseline, there was better erectile function in patients who received (103)Pd (p=0.02); however, the followup was shorter for these patients. The 5-year prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival for (125)I and (103)Pd patients was 95.2% and 98.2% (p=0.73), respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in acute or long-term genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity between (125)I and (103)Pd in combined modality therapy for prostate cancer. There may be less erectile toxicity with the use of (103)Pd; however, additional followup of these patients is needed. There was no significant difference in 5-year prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival between (103)Pd and (125)I.

Low-dose rate brachytherapy for men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Localized prostate cancer is a slow growing tumor for many years for the majority of affected men. Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is short-distance radiotherapy using low-energy radioactive sources. LDR-BT has been recommended for men with low risk localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and harm of LDR-BT compared to radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and no primary therapy (NPT) in men with localized prostatic cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1950), and EMBASE (from 1980) were searched in June 2010 as well as online trials registers and reference lists of reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing LDR-BT versus RP, EBRT, and NPT in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on study methods, participants, treatment regimens, observation period and outcomes were recorded by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified only one RCT (N = 200; mean follow up 68 months). This trial compared LDR-BT and RP. The risk of bias was deemed high. Primary outcomes (overall survival, cause-specific mortality, or metastatic-free survival) were not reported. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years follow up was not significantly different between LDR-BT (78/85 (91.8%)) and RP (81/89 (91.0%)); P = 0.875; relative risk 0.92 (95% CI: 0.35 to 2.42).For severe adverse events reported at 6 months follow up, results favored LDR-BT for urinary incontinence (LDR-BT 0/85 (0.0%) versus RP 16/89 (18.0%); P < 0.001; relative risk 0) and favored RP for urinary irritation (LDR-BT 68/85 (80.0%) versus RP 4/89 (4.5%); P < 0.001; relative risk 17.80, 95% CI 6.79 to 46.66). The occurrence of urinary stricture did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (LDR-BT 2/85 (2.4%) versus RP 6/89 (6.7%); P = 0.221; relative risk 0.35, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.68). Long-term information was not available.We did not identify significant differences of mean scores between treatment groups for patient-reported outcomes function and bother as well as generic health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rate brachytherapy did not reduce biochemical recurrence-free survival versus radical prostatectomy at 5 years. For short-term severe adverse events, low-dose rate brachytherapy was significantly more favorable for urinary incontinence, but radical prostatectomy was significantly more favorable for urinary irritation. Evidence is based on one RCT with high risk of bias.

Dosimetric study of Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103 seeds for permanent prostate brachytherapy

As a well-established single-modality approach for early-stage prostate cancer, transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) has gained increasing popularity due to its favorable clinical results. Currently, three isotopes, namely Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103, are commercially available for TIPPB. This is the first study to systematically explore the dosimetric difference of these three isotopes for TIPPB. In total, 25 patients with T1-T2c prostate cancer previously implanted with I-125 seeds were randomly selected and replanned with Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103 seeds to the prescription doses of 115, 145, and 125 Gy, respectively. The planning goals attempted were prostate V(p)100 approximately 95%, D(p)90 >or= 100%, and prostatic urethra D(u)10 <or= 150%. The dosimetric parameters, as well as the number of seeds and needles required, were analyzed and compared. The mean homogeneity index (HI) was 0.59, 0.56, and 0.46 for Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103 plans, respectively. The average D(u)10 was 124.6%, 125.7%, and 129.7%, respectively. The average rectum V(r)100 was 0.19, 0.22, and 0.31 cc, respectively. In addition, the average number of seeds was 57.9, 63.0, and 63.7, and the average number of needles required was 31.6, 32.9, and 33.6 for Cs-131, I-125, and Pd-103 seeds, respectively. This study demonstrates that TIPPB, utilizing Cs-131 seeds, allows for better dose homogeneity, while providing comparable prostate coverage and sparing of the urethra and rectum, with a comparable number of, or fewer, seeds and needles required, compared to I-125 or Pd-103 seeds. Further biological and clinical studies associated with Cs-131 are warranted.

Technology Insight: Combined external-beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the management of prostate cancer

External-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with brachytherapy is an attractive treatment option for selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. This therapeutic strategy offers dosimetric coverage if local-regional microscopic disease is present and provides a highly conformal boost of radiation to the prostate and immediate surrounding tissues. Either low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent brachytherapy or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary brachytherapy can be combined with EBRT; such combined-modality therapy (CMT) is typically used to treat patients with intermediate-risk to high-risk, clinically localized disease. Controversy persists with regard to indications for CMT, choice of LDR or HDR boost, isotope selection for LDR, and integration of EBRT and brachytherapy. Initial findings from prospective, multicenter trials of CMT support the feasibility of this strategy. Updated results from these trials as well as those of ongoing and new phase III trials should help to define the role of CMT in the management of prostate cancer. In the meantime, long-term expectations for outcomes of CMT are based largely on the experience of single institutions, which demonstrate that CMT with EBRT and either LDR or HDR brachytherapy can provide freedom from disease recurrence with acceptable toxicity.

A Phase II study of high-dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy as monotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

A Phase II dose escalation study has been undertaken to evaluate high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) monotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 110 patients have been entered, all with locally advanced cancer. Three dose levels have been used; 34 Gy in four fractions, 36 Gy in four fractions, and 31.5 Gy in three fractions. These equate to 226Gy(1.5), 252Gy(1.5), and 252Gy(1.5), respectively. Thirty patients have received 34 Gy, 25 received 36 Gy, and 55 patients received 31.5 Gy. Acute and late toxicity was analyzed using the International Prostate Symptom Score, and urologic and rectal events were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Common Terminology Criteria scoring systems.

RESULTS

Seven patients required urethral catheterization at 2 weeks; 3 receiving 34 Gy, 1 receiving 36 Gy, and 3 receiving 31.5 Gy. Only 3 patients remained catheterized at 12 weeks. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1 and 2 gastrointestinal toxicity at 2 weeks was seen in 61%, 68%, and 77%, respectively. Grade 3 bladder toxicity was seen in 2 patients at 6 months, 1 each from the 36 Gy and 31.5 Gy arms. One patient from the 31.5-Gy cohort reported Grade 2 bowel toxicity at 6 months. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), stratified for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and no-ADT patients ranged from 16.1-22.9 microg/L and 11.1-12.5 microg/L, respectively. This fell at 12 months to 0.2-0.6 microg/L and 0.5-1.4 microg/L, respectively. No PSA relapses have yet been seen with a median follow-up of 30 months (34 Gy), 18 months (36 Gy), and 11.8 months (31.5 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

Early results suggest an excellent biochemical response with no differences seen in acute and late toxicity between doses of 34 Gy/four fractions, 36 Gy/four fractions, or 31.5 Gy/three fractions.

Surgery Versus Implant for Early Prostate Cancer: Results From a Single Institution, 1992–2005

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the biochemical disease-free survival rates for radical prostatectomy versus transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate implant for patients with early prostate cancer treated at a single institution from 1992 through 2005.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of 741 patients with early prostate cancer (350 implant and 391 surgery) treated from 1992 through 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgery patients were treated by members of the academic Urology Section at Yale University School of Medicine. Implant patients were treated by a combined team from the Urology Section and the Department of Therapeutic Radiology at Yale Medical School. For the 350 implant patients, 35% were treated with iodine-125 and 65% with palladium-103. Of the implant patients 92% were treated with an implant alone and 8% with combined external beam radiation therapy plus an implant and 25% received short-term hormone therapy to downsize the prostate before the implant. Both surgery and implant patients were analyzed based on a group with favorable cancers (clinical stage T1c or T2, prostate-specific antigen <10, and Gleason score <7), an intermediate group (any 1 factor increased compared with the favorable group), and a poor group (any 2 factors increased compared with the favorable group). The follow-up time varied from 12 to 120 months with a mean/median follow-up time of 44 months/42 months for implant patients and 42 months/40 months for surgery patients. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence for surgery was defined as any detectable prostate-specific antigen after surgery. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence for implant was defined as the prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL after implant. The biochemical disease-free survival rates were calculated using the life-table method.

RESULTS

The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates for radical prostatectomy versus implant were identical for the favorable group (93% versus 92%), intermediate group (70% versus 70%), and poor group (50% versus 52%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

From 1992 through 2005, implant therapy produced equivalent 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates compared with surgery in patients with early prostate cancer treated at a single institution.

AAPM TG-43U1 formalism adaptation and Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations of multiple-radionuclide brachytherapy sources

This paper presents a preliminary study on multiple-radionuclide sources for brachytherapy. An adaptation of the AAPM TG-43U1 formalism is proposed in order to derive the dosimetry parameters of multiple-radionuclide sources from mono-radionuclides. The adapted formalism is applied to a bi-radionuclide case with the help of Monte Carlo calculations (MCNPX 2.5.0). InterSource seed loaded with 103Pd and 125I was chosen. This combination promotes a higher dose rate than InterSource125 (loaded with 125I) and deeper tissue penetration than InterSource103 (loaded with 103Pd) while reducing the dose at long distance (beyond 2.5 cm) relative to InterSource125. In conclusion, this work shows the benefits of combining different radionuclides inside the same seed and proposes an adaptation of the AAPM TG-43U1 formalism for the implementation of multiple-radionuclide sources in current treatment planning systems.

Estimating the risk of long-term erectile, urinary and bowel symptoms resulting from prostate cancer treatment

Reports on long-term complications resulting from treatment for localized prostate cancer are very inconsistent. In order to estimate the risks of long-term erectile dysfunction, urine symptoms and bowel symptoms following prostatectomy (RP), external conventional or conformal beam radiation (ERT or CRT) and brachytherapy (BRT), 98 papers from the PubMed and Cochrane Clinical Trial databases were selected, reviewed and critically evaluated. The majority of papers were institution-based retrospective and prospective follow-up studies; only two of these studies measured the risk of developing more than one treatment complication. Due to differences in study designs and populations, it is difficult to directly compare studies and not meaningful to calculate summary estimates. In addition to focusing on randomized clinical trials and well-designed population based studies, future research should adopt standardized methodologies and should measure the risk of developing more than one treatment complication.

I-125 Versus Pd-103 for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that the shorter half-life of Pd-103 versus I-125 results in different late radiation-related morbidities following prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS

As of June 14th, 2002, 352 of a planned total of 600 patients with 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage T1c-T2a prostatic carcinoma (Gleason grade 2-6, PSA 4-10 ng/mL) had been randomized to implantation with I-125 (144 Gy, TG-43) or Pd-103 (125 Gy, NIST-99). Treatment-related morbidity was monitored by questionnaires based on standard American Urologic Association (AUA) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria that were mailed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after implant. The use of alpha-blockers to relieve obstructive symptoms was not controlled for but was noted at each follow-up point. All patients reported here had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Dosimetric parameters analyzed included the V100, which was defined as the percentage of the postimplant prostate volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose. Rectal doses were expressed as the R100, defined as the rectal volume (cc) that received at least 100% of the prescription dose. Statistical comparisons were by Student's unpaired t-test at specified follow-up times.

RESULTS

The AUA scores peaked at the 1-month postimplant time point for both isotopes and gradually declined. The difference in AUA scores between patients who received I-125 versus those who received Pd-103 was greatest at 1 and 6 months following implantation. At 1 month, I-125 patients had a mean AUA score of 14.8 (+/-9.5) compared with 18.6 (+/-9.8) for the Pd-103 patients (P = 0.0009). By 6 months, mean AUA scores for the I-125 patients had decreased to 12.0 (+/-9.1) compared with 9.9 (+/-8.7) for the Pd-103 patients (P = 0.04). The use of alpha-blockers was similar between groups at all time points. Radiation proctitis (persistent bleeding) occurred in 29 of 314 patients (9%). There was an overall trend toward more proctitis in I-125 patients (P = 0.21). However, only four of the 163 patients (2%) with an R100 below the recommended 1.0 cc developed bleeding, which did not differ between isotopes (P = 0.49).

DISCUSSION

Patients treated with Pd-103 had more intense radiation prostatitis in the first month after implantation, but they recovered from their radiation-related symptoms sooner than I-125 patients, consistent with palladium's shorter half-life. The trend toward more proctitis in the I-125 patient group likely reflects their higher R100 values due to less rapid dose fall-off that can be overcome with judicious treatment planning and implant execution.