Effects of butorphanol on morphine-induced itch and analgesia in primates

Mechanisms and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus: Peripheral and central pathways

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pruritus (also known as itch) is defined as an unpleasant and irritating sensation of the skin that provokes an urge to scratch or rub. It is well known that opioid administration can cause pruritus, which is paradoxical as itch and pain share overlapping sensory pathways. Because opioids inhibit pain but can cause itching. Significant progress has been made to improve our understanding of the fundamental neurobiology of itch; however, much remains unknown about the mechanisms of opioid-induced pruritus. The prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus remains a challenge in the field of pain management. The objective of this narrative review is to present and discuss the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying opioid-induced pruritus, and its relationship to analgesia, and possible treatment options.

RESULTS

The incidence of opioid-induced pruritus differs with different opioids and routes of administration, and the various mechanisms can be broadly divided into peripheral and central. Especially central mechanisms are intricate, even at the level of the spinal dorsal horn. There is evidence that opioid receptor antagonists and mixed agonist and antagonists, especially μ-opioid antagonists and κ-opioid agonists, are effective in relieving opioid-induced pruritus. Various treatments have been used for opioid-induced pruritus; however, most of them are controversial and have conflicting results.

CONCLUSION

The use of a multimodal analgesic treatment regimen combined with a mixed antagonist and κ agonists, especially μ-opioid antagonists, and κ-opioid agonists, seems to be the current best treatment modality for the management of opioid-induced pruritus and pain.

SIGNIFICANCE

Opioids remain the gold standard for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain as well as cancer pain. It is well known that opioid-induced pruritus often does not respond to regular antipruritic treatment, thereby posing a challenge to clinicians in the field of pain management. We believe that our review makes a significant contribution to the literature, as studies on the mechanisms of opioid-induced pruritus and effective management strategies are crucial for the management of these patients.

The Delta-Opioid Receptor Bidirectionally Modulates Itch

Opioid signaling has been shown to be critically important in the neuromodulation of sensory circuits in the superficial spinal cord. Agonists of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) elicit itch, whereas agonists of the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) have been shown to inhibit itch. Despite the clear roles of MOR and KOR for the modulation itch, whether the delta-opioid receptor (DOR) is involved in the regulation of itch remained unknown. Here, we show that intrathecal administration of DOR agonists suppresses chemical itch and that intrathecal application of DOR antagonists is sufficient to evoke itch. We identify that spinal enkephalin neurons co-express neuropeptide Y (NPY), a peptide previously implicated in the inhibition of itch. In the spinal cord, DOR overlapped with both the NPY receptor (NPY1R) and KOR, suggesting that DOR neurons represent a site for convergent itch information in the dorsal horn. Lastly, we found that neurons co-expressing DOR and KOR showed significant Fos induction following pruritogen-evoked itch. These results uncover a role for DOR in the modulation of itch in the superficial dorsal horn. PERSPECTIVE: This article reveals the role of the delta-opioid receptor in itch. Intrathecal administration of delta agonists suppresses itch whereas the administration of delta antagonists is sufficient to induce itch. These studies highlight the importance of delta-opioid signaling for the modulation of itch behaviors, which may represent new targets for the management of itch disorders.

Drosophila as a Model to Study the Mechanism of Nociception

Nociception refers to the process of encoding and processing noxious stimuli, which allow animals to detect and avoid potentially harmful stimuli. Several types of stimuli can trigger nociceptive sensory transduction, including thermal, noxious chemicals, and harsh mechanical stimulation that depend on the corresponding nociceptors. In view of the high evolutionary conservation of the mechanisms that govern nociception from Drosophila melanogaster to mammals, investigation in the fruit fly Drosophila help us understand how the sensory nervous system works and what happen in nociception. Here, we present an overview of currently identified conserved genetics of nociception, the nociceptive sensory neurons responsible for detecting noxious stimuli, and various assays for evaluating different nociception. Finally, we cover development of anti-pain drug using fly model. These comparisons illustrate the value of using Drosophila as model for uncovering nociception mechanisms, which are essential for identifying new treatment goals and developing novel analgesics that are applicable to human health.

Pleiotropic Effects of Kappa Opioid Receptor-Related Ligands in Non-human Primates

The kappa opioid receptor (KOR)-related ligands have been demonstrated in preclinical studies for several therapeutic potentials. This chapter highlights (1) how non-human primates (NHP) studies facilitate the research and development of ligands targeting the KOR, (2) effects of the endogenous opioid peptide, dynorphin A-(1-17), and its analogs in NHP, and (3) pleiotropic effects and therapeutic applications of KOR-related ligands. In particular, synthetic ligands targeting the KOR have been extensively studied in NHP in three therapeutic areas, i.e., the treatment for itch, pain, and substance use disorders. As the KORs are widely expressed in the peripheral and central nervous systems, pleiotropic effects of KOR-related ligands, such as discriminative stimulus effects, neuroendocrine effects (e.g., prolactin release and stimulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), and diuresis, in NHP are discussed. Centrally acting KOR agonists are known to produce adverse effects including dysphoria, hallucination, and sedation. Nonetheless, with strategic advances in medicinal chemistry, three classes of KOR-related agonists, i.e., peripherally restricted KOR agonists, mixed KOR/mu opioid receptor partial agonists, and G protein-biased KOR agonists, warrant additional NHP studies to improve our understanding of their functional efficacy, selectivity, and tolerability. Pharmacological studies in NHP which carry high translational significance will facilitate future development of KOR-based medications.

Evaluation of Therapies for Peripheral and Neuraxial Opioid-induced Pruritus based on Molecular and Cellular Discoveries

Opioids are a mainstay of treatment for pain worldwide. Pruritus, a common side effect of opioids, is a patient dissatisfier that limits their use in many clinical settings. Both parenteral and neuraxial administration of opioids frequently evoke pruritus. The ability of opioids to suppress pain while causing itch continues to perplex clinicians and researchers alike. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how opioids can give rise to pruritus, but specific knowledge gaps perpetuate debate. This review summarizes the clinical burden of opioid-induced pruritus and emphasizes recent discoveries of peripheral and central mechanisms for opioid-induced pruritus, particularly with respect to scientific and conceptual advances in spinal cord circuitry and mast cell biology. The mechanisms and effectiveness of existing medications used for clinical management of pruritus will be evaluated, and we will highlight the emerging preclinical utility of selective κ-opioid receptor agonists, such as nalfurafine, for the management of opioid-induced pruritus.

Morphine acts on spinal dynorphin neurons to cause itch through disinhibition

Morphine-induced itch is a very common and debilitating side effect that occurs in laboring women who receive epidural analgesia and in patients who receive spinal morphine for relief of perioperative pain. Although antihistamines are still widely prescribed for the treatment of morphine-induced itch, their use is controversial because the cellular basis for morphine-induced itch remains unclear. Here, we used animal models and show that neuraxial morphine causes itch through neurons and not mast cells. In particular, we found that spinal dynorphin (Pdyn) neurons are both necessary and sufficient for morphine-induced itch in mice. Agonism of the kappa-opioid receptor alleviated morphine-induced itch in mice and nonhuman primates. Thus, our findings not only reveal that morphine causes itch through a mechanism of disinhibition but also challenge the long-standing use of antihistamines, thereby informing the treatment of millions worldwide.

Translational value of non-human primates in opioid research

Preclinical opioid research using animal models not only provides mechanistic insights into the modulation of opioid analgesia and its associated side effects, but also validates drug candidates for improved treatment options for opioid use disorder. Non-human primates (NHPs) have served as a surrogate species for humans in opioid research for more than five decades. The translational value of NHP models is supported by the documented species differences between rodents and primates regarding their behavioral and physiological responses to opioid-related ligands and that NHP studies have provided more concordant results with human studies. This review highlights the utilization of NHP models in five aspects of opioid research, i.e., analgesia, abuse liability, respiratory depression, physical dependence, and pruritus. Recent NHP studies have found that (1) mixed mu opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor partial agonists appear to be safe, non-addictive analgesics and (2) mu opioid receptor- and mixed opioid receptor subtype-based medications remain the only two classes of drugs that are effective in alleviating opioid-induced adverse effects. Given the recent advances in pharmaceutical sciences and discoveries of novel targets, NHP studies are posed to identify the translational gap and validate therapeutic targets for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Pharmacological studies using NHPs along with multiple outcome measures (e.g., behavior, physiologic function, and neuroimaging) will continue to facilitate the research and development of improved medications to curb the opioid epidemic.

Antinociceptive, reinforcing, and pruritic effects of the G-protein signalling-biased mu opioid receptor agonist PZM21 in non-human primates

BACKGROUND

A novel G-protein signalling-biased mu opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonist, PZM21, was recently developed with a distinct chemical structure. It is a potent G_i/o activator with minimal β-arrestin-2 recruitment. Despite intriguing activity in rodent models, PZM21 function in non-human primates is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate PZM21 actions after systemic or intrathecal administration in primates.

METHODS

Antinociceptive, reinforcing, and pruritic effects of PZM21 were compared with those of the clinically used MOP receptor agonists oxycodone and morphine in assays of acute thermal nociception, capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia, itch scratching responses, and drug self-administration in gonadally intact, adult rhesus macaques (10 males, six females).

RESULTS

After subcutaneous administration, PZM21 (1.0-6.0 mg kg^-1) and oxycodone (0.1-0.6 mg kg^-1) induced dose-dependent thermal antinociceptive effects (P<0.05); PZM21 was 10 times less potent than oxycodone. PZM21 exerted oxycodone-like reinforcing effects and strength as determined by two operant schedules of reinforcement in the intravenous drug self-administration assay. After intrathecal administration, PZM21 (0.03-0.3 mg) dose-dependently attenuated capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia (P<0.05). Although intrathecal PZM21 and morphine induced MOP receptor-mediated antiallodynic effects, both compounds induced robust, long-lasting itch scratching.

CONCLUSIONS

PZM21 induced antinociceptive, reinforcing, and pruritic effects similar to clinically used MOP receptor agonists in primates. Although structure-based discovery of PZM21 identified a novel avenue for studying G-protein signalling-biased ligands, biasing an agonist towards G-protein signalling pathways did not determine or alter reinforcing (i.e. abuse potential) or pruritic effects of MOP receptor agonists in a translationally relevant non-human primate model.

Butorphanol protects PC12 cells against OGD/R-induced inflammation and apoptosis

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of butorphanol on neural injury in an oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) model using PC12 cells, and to investigate whether mitochondrial apoptosis was involved in these effects. To establish the OGD/R model, PC12 cells were cultured under hypoxia and low glucose conditions. Expression levels of inflammatory cytokines were evaluated by detecting the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Oxidative stress was evaluated by measuring the levels of reactive oxygen species, lactate dehydrogenase activity and myeloperoxidase concentration. Apoptosis, protein expression and cell viability were determined by flow cytometry, western blotting and by using a Cell Counting Kit-8, respectively. Compared with the control group, cell viability, expression of inflammatory factors and oxidative stress were all decreased in the OGD/R group. All the above changes could be mitigated by treatment with butorphanol. In addition, butorphanol treatment resulted in a significant upregulation of Bax, and downregulation of Bcl-2, activated caspase-3, caspase-9 and poly ADP-ribose polymerase, increased the expression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein and enhanced ATP activity. To conclude, these results suggested that the protective effects of butorphanol are associated with the inhibition of OGD/R-induced inflammation and apoptosis injury, and may be partially associated with the inhibition of mitochondrial apoptosis.

Synergistic interaction between butorphanol and dexmedetomidine in antinociception

Opioid analgesics and the α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) agonists are found to produce synergistic antinociception when administered in combination. In this study interactions between butorphanol and dexmedetomidine were investigated in the thermal pain and autonomous locomotor activity. Butorphanol and dexmedetomidine were administered subcutaneously alone and in combination in a fixed-dose ratio (3:1) to assess the antinociceptive and sedative responses. Butorphanol produced antinociception in the hot-plate test via three major opioid receptor subtypes, i.e. MORs, KORs and DORs, while in the tail-immersion test the antinociception was produced by MORs and KORs, whereas dexmedetomidine exhibited antinociception by α2ARs in both tests. They exhibited dose- and time-dependent antinociception and inhibition of locomotor activity when administered alone, while their combination displayed enhanced therapeutic effects. Isobolographic analysis revealed that combined butorphanol and dexmedetomidine produced synergistic interactions in the hot-plate, tail-immersion and locomotor activity tests. Furthermore, the analgesic synergy was also approved to be modulated by MORs, KORs, DORs and α2ARs. Hence we concluded from this study that combined butorphanol and dexmedetomidine produced synergistic antinociception that may be helpful in facilitating clinical management of acute nociceptive pain.

BU10038 as a safe opioid analgesic with fewer side-effects after systemic and intrathecal administration in primates

BACKGROUND

The marked increase in mis-use of prescription opioids has greatly affected our society. One potential solution is to develop improved analgesics which have agonist action at both mu opioid peptide (MOP) and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors. BU10038 is a recently identified bifunctional MOP/NOP partial agonist. The aim of this study was to determine the functional profile of systemic or spinal delivery of BU10038 in primates after acute and chronic administration.

METHODS

A series of behavioural and physiological assays have been established specifically to reflect the therapeutic (analgesia) and side-effects (abuse potential, respiratory depression, itch, physical dependence, and tolerance) of opioid analgesics in rhesus monkeys.

RESULTS

After systemic administration, BU10038 (0.001-0.01 mg kg^-1) dose-dependently produced long-lasting antinociceptive and antihypersensitive effects. Unlike the MOP agonist oxycodone, BU10038 lacked reinforcing effects (i.e. little or no abuse liability), and BU10038 did not compromise the physiological functions of primates including respiration, cardiovascular activities, and body temperature at antinociceptive doses and a 10-30-fold higher dose (0.01-0.1 mg kg^-1). After intrathecal administration, BU10038 (3 μg) exerted morphine-comparable antinociception and antihypersensitivity without itch scratching responses. Unlike morphine, BU10038 did not cause the development of physical dependence and tolerance after repeated and chronic administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These in vivo findings demonstrate the translational potential of bifunctional MOP/NOP receptor agonists such as BU10038 as a safe, non-addictive analgesic with fewer side-effects in primates. This study strongly supports that bifunctional MOP/NOP agonists may provide improved analgesics and an alternative solution for the ongoing prescription opioid crisis.

A bifunctional nociceptin and mu opioid receptor agonist is analgesic without opioid side effects in nonhuman primates

Misuse of prescription opioids, opioid addiction, and overdose underscore the urgent need for developing addiction-free effective medications for treating severe pain. Mu opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonists provide very effective pain relief. However, severe side effects limit their use in the clinical setting. Agonists of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor have been shown to modulate the antinociceptive and reinforcing effects of MOP agonists. We report the discovery and development of a bifunctional NOP/MOP receptor agonist, AT-121, which has partial agonist activity at both NOP and MOP receptors. AT-121 suppressed oxycodone's reinforcing effects and exerted morphine-like analgesic effects in nonhuman primates. AT-121 treatment did not induce side effects commonly associated with opioids, such as respiratory depression, abuse potential, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and physical dependence. Our results in nonhuman primates suggest that bifunctional NOP/MOP agonists with the appropriate balance of NOP and MOP agonist activity may provide a dual therapeutic action for safe and effective pain relief and treating prescription opioid abuse.

Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to non-human primates undergoing experimental surgical procedure: 2010-2015

BACKGROUND

The use of non-human primates (NHPs) in research remains a major societal concern with public expectations that appropriate anaesthetics and analgesics are used to minimize any pain or distress caused to animals undergoing invasive procedures. A literature review was conducted to examine the reporting of anaesthesia and analgesia methods used in non-human primates undergoing surgical procedures, with recovery from anaesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 397 papers from peer-review journals published between 2010 and 2015 were examined.

RESULTS

Only 25.9% of papers reported the analgesic regimen used, with carprofen and buprenorphine the 2 most widely used agents. Reporting of the anaesthetic regimens was included in 49.9% of papers. Ketamine and isoflurane were the most frequently used anaesthetic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaesthetic and analgesic regimens administered to NHPs remain poorly reported. This lack of detailed descriptions of protocols does little to reassure the public or regulatory authorities that appropriate high standards of perioperative care are employed.

Neuraxial opioid-induced itch and its pharmacological antagonism

Given its profound analgesic nature, neuraxial opioids are frequently used for pain management. Unfortunately, the high incident rate of itch/pruritus after spinal administration of opioid analgesics reported in postoperative and obstetric patients greatly diminishes patient satisfaction and thus the value of the analgesics. Many endeavors to solve the mystery behind neuraxial opioid-induced itch had not been successful, as the pharmacological antagonism other than the blockade of mu opioid receptors remains elusive. Nevertheless, as the characteristics of all opioid receptor subtypes have become more understood, more studies have shed light on the potential effective treatments. This review discusses the mechanisms underlying neuraxial opioid-induced itch and compares pharmacological evidence in nonhuman primates with clinical findings across diverse drugs. Both nonhuman primate and human studies corroborate that mixed mu/kappa opioid partial agonists seem to be the most effective drugs in ameliorating neuraxial opioid-induced itch while retaining neuraxial opioid-induced analgesia.

Distinct functions of opioid-related peptides and gastrin-releasing peptide in regulating itch and pain in the spinal cord of primates

How neuropeptides in the primate spinal cord regulate itch and pain is largely unknown. Here we elucidate the sensory functions of spinal opioid-related peptides and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) in awake, behaving monkeys. Following intrathecal administration, β-endorphin (10-100 nmol) and GRP (1-10 nmol) dose-dependently elicit the same degree of robust itch scratching, which can be inhibited by mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor and GRP receptor (BB2) antagonists, respectively. Unlike β-endorphin, which produces itch and attenuates inflammatory pain, GRP only elicits itch without affecting pain. In contrast, enkephalins (100-1000 nmol) and nociceptin-orphanin FQ (3-30 nmol) only inhibit pain without eliciting itch. More intriguingly, dynorphin A(1-17) (10-100 nmol) dose-dependently attenuates both β-endorphin- and GRP-elicited robust scratching without affecting pain processing. The anti-itch effects of dynorphin A can be reversed by a kappa-opioid peptide (KOP) receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine. These nonhuman primate behavioral models with spinal delivery of ligands advance our understanding of distinct functions of neuropeptides for modulating itch and pain. In particular, we demonstrate causal links for itch-eliciting effects by β-endorphin-MOP receptor and GRP-BB2 receptor systems and itch-inhibiting effects by the dynorphin A-KOP receptor system. These studies will facilitate transforming discoveries of novel ligand-receptor systems into future therapies as antipruritics and/or analgesics in humans.

Targeting Itch with Ligands Selective for κ Opioid Receptors

Several chemically diverse pruritogens, including bombesin, compound 48/80, norbinaltorphimine, and 5'-GNTI, cause rodents to scratch excessively in a stable, uniform manner and consequently provide convenient animal models of itch against which potential antipruritics may be evaluated, structure-activity relationships established, and the nature of spontaneous, repetitive behavior itself analyzed. Decreasing the number of scratching bouts in these apparently simple models has been the requisite first step in the progress of kappa opioid agonists such as nalbuphine, asimadoline, and CR845 toward clinical testing as antipruritics. Nalfurafine is the prime example of a kappa agonist spanning the developmental divide between scratching mice models and commercialization within 10 years. Patients undergoing hemodialysis and suffering from the itching associated with uremic pruritus, and potentially those inflicted with atopic dermatitis, are the beneficiaries.

Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update

Pruritus is a troublesome side-effect of neuraxial (epidural and intrathecal) opioids. Sometimes it may be more unpleasant than pain itself. The prevention and treatment still remains a challenge. A variety of medications with different mechanisms of action have been used for the prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, with mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and the pharmacological therapies available to manage opioid-induced pruritus. The literature source of this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 2012. The search results were limited to the randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and non-systemic reviews.

Cucurbit[n]uril type hosts for the reversal of steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents

The ideal neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) is regarded as being a non-depolarizing equivalent of succinylcholine, having a rapid onset and short duration of action, with minimal side effects. In the absence of a single drug, the administration of an aminosteroid NMBA, such as rocuronium, followed by reversal using an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, such as neostigmine, is commonly employed. A different and safer approach to rapidly reversing the action of the NMBA, by encapsulating it with a macrocyclic or acyclic host molecule, such as the cyclodextrin sugammadex or more recently, cucurbituril-type hosts such as cyclic cucurbit[7]uril and the acyclic glycoluril tetramer calabadion 1, is described.

Investigational drugs for pruritus

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pruritus (CP), defined as itch lasting for > 6 weeks, is a burdensome symptom of several different diseases, dermatological and systemic, with a high negative impact on the quality of life of patients. Given the manifold aetiologies of CP, therapy is often difficult. In recent years, however, novel substances have been developed for treatment of certain CP entities and identified targets.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors present a survey of targets currently believed to be promising (H4R, IL-31, MOR, KOR, GRPR, NGF, NK-1R, TRP channels) and related investigational drugs that are in the preclinical or clinical stage of development. Some substances have already undergone clinical testing, but only one of them (nalfurafine) has been licensed so far. Many of them are most likely to exert their effects on the skin and interfere there with the cutaneous neurobiology of CP.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, the most promising candidates for new therapeutic agents in CP are neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and substances targeting the kappa- or mu-opioid receptor, or both. They have the potential to target the neuronal pathway of CP and are thus of interest for several CP entities. The goal for the coming years is to validate these concepts and move forward in developing new drugs for the therapy of CP.

The therapeutic potential of nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor agonists as analgesics without abuse liability

Although mu opioid (MOP) receptor agonists are the most commonly used analgesics for the treatment of moderate to severe pain in the clinic, the side effects of MOP agonists such as abuse liability limit their value as a medication. Research to identify novel analgesics without adverse effects is pivotal to advance the health care of humans. The nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor, the fourth opioid receptor subtype, mediates distinctive actions in nonhuman primates which suggests the possibility that activity at this receptor may result in strong analgesia in the absence of virtually all of the side effects associated with MOP agonists. The present review highlights the recent progress of pharmacological studies of NOP-related ligands in primates. Selective NOP agonists, either peptidic or nonpeptidic, produce full analgesia in various assays in primates, when delivered systemically or intrathecally. Yet small molecule NOP agonists do not serve as reinforcers, indicating a lack of abuse liability. Given that NOP agonists have low abuse liability and that coactivation of NOP and MOP receptors produces synergistic antinociception, it is worth developing bifunctional NOP/MOP ligands. The outcomes of these studies and recent developments provide new perspectives to establish a translational bridge for understanding the biobehavioral functions of NOP receptors in primates and for facilitating the development of NOP-related ligands as a new generation of analgesics without abuse liability in humans.

Immunohistochemistry detection of kappa-opioid receptors in human skin

The imbalance of p- and kappa-opioid receptors in the skin or central nervous system is currently deemed to be one of the reasons of chronic pruritus. A number of studies demonstrated a positive effect of system agonists of kappa-opioid receptors in the treatment of uremic pruritus, nodular pruritus, paraneoplastic and cholestatic pruritus. This research demonstrates an expression of kappa-opioid receptors in human skin (basal keratinocytes, dendritic cells, epidermal melanocytes and fibroblasts of the upper dermis) detected with the use of different immunochemistry methods.

Roles of μ-opioid receptors and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptors in buprenorphine-induced physiological responses in primates

Buprenorphine is known as a μ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonist, but its antinociception is compromised by the activation of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors in rodents. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of MOP and NOP receptors in regulating buprenorphine-induced physiological responses in primates (rhesus monkeys). The effects of MOP antagonist (naltrexone), NOP antagonist [(±)-1-[(3R*,4R*)-1-(cyclooctylmethyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one (J-113397)], and NOP agonists [(1S,3aS)-8-(2,3,3a,4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triaza-spiro[4.5] decan-4-one (Ro 64-6198) and 3-endo-8-[bis(2-methylphenyl)methyl]-3-phenyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-ol (SCH 221510)] on buprenorphine were studied in three functional assays for measuring analgesia, respiratory depression, and itch in primates. Over the dose range of 0.01 to 0.1 mg/kg, buprenorphine dose-dependently produced antinociception, respiratory depression, and itch/scratching responses, and there was a ceiling effect at higher doses (0.1-1 mg/kg). Naltrexone (0.03 mg/kg) produced similar degrees of rightward shifts of buprenorphine's dose-response curves for all three endpoints. Mean pK(B) values of naltrexone (8.1-8.3) confirmed that MOP receptors mediated mainly buprenorphine-induced antinociception, respiratory depression, and itch/scratching. In contrast, J-113397 (0.1 mg/kg) did not change buprenorphine-induced physiological responses, indicating that there were no functional NOP receptors in buprenorphine-induced effects. More importantly, both NOP agonists, Ro 64-6198 and SCH 221510, enhanced buprenorphine-induced antinociception without respiratory depression and itch/ scratching. The dose-addition analysis revealed that buprenorphine in combination with the NOP agonist synergistically produced antinociceptive effects. These findings provided functional evidence that the activation of NOP receptors did not attenuate buprenorphine-induced antinociception in primates; instead, the coactivation of MOP and NOP receptors produced synergistic antinociception without other side effects. This study strongly supports the therapeutic potential of mixed MOP/NOP agonists as innovative analgesics.

Severe pruritus and myoclonus following intrathecal morphine administration in a dog

During epidural needle placement in a 32-kg dog the subarachnoid space was punctured and half the intended dose of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and morphine was injected. After recovery from anesthesia the dog showed signs of severe pruritus of the tail base and limbs and myoclonus of the tail and hind limbs. Methadone, acepromazine, ketamine, buprenorphine, and butorphanol were administered to control myoclonus and pruritus, but were unsuccessful. Diazepam was used to control myoclonus until the effects of morphine abated. During epidural needle placement in a 32-kg dog the subarachnoid space was punctured and half the intended dose of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and morphine was injected. After recovery from anesthesia the dog showed signs of severe pruritus of the tail base and limbs and myoclonus of the tail and hind limbs. Methadone, acepromazine, ketamine, buprenorphine, and butorphanol were administered to control myoclonus and pruritus, but were unsuccessful. Diazepam was used to control myoclonus until the effects of morphine abated.

Intravenous butorphanol administration reduces intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

Pruritus associated with intrathecal opioid administration is a common side effect. There is evidence that κ-opioid receptor agonists have antipruritic activity. Butorphanol has agonist actions at both κ-opioid and μ-opioid receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the antipruritic efficacy of butorphanol after intrathecal morphine administration in the setting of a randomized, double-blind study of parturients undergoing cesarean section.

METHODS

Ninety-one women who received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with 1.2 ml 0.5 % isobaric bupivacaine and 0.1 mg preservative-free morphine were included in this study. After delivery of the baby, the parturients were randomly allocated to two groups: butorphanol group (n = 46) and physiological saline group (n = 45). In the butorphanol group, parturients received an intravenous loading dose of 1 mg butorphanol followed by infusion of 0.2 mg/h butorphanol. The physiological saline group received an infusion of the same volume of physiological saline. The presence of pruritus, visual analog scores for pain, sedation scores, and adverse effects were recorded 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after intrathecal morphine administration.

RESULTS

The incidence of pruritus at 24 h was significantly more frequent in the physiological saline group than in the butorphanol group (48.9 vs. 13.0 %, P < 0.001). The severity of pruritus was significantly greater in the saline group than in the butorphanol group 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 h after intrathecal morphine injection (P = 0.004, 0.001, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively). The visual analog scale scores at 24 h were significantly lower in the butorphanol group than in physiological saline group (P < 0.001). The Ramsay sedation score in the butorphanol group was significantly higher than that in the physiological saline group after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in nausea/vomiting and other adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Administration of intravenous butorphanol after delivery of the baby can reduce pruritus that has been induced by intrathecal morphine administration in cesarean delivery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Role of spinal neurotransmitter receptors in itch: new insights into therapies and drug development

Targets for antipruritic therapies are now expanding from the skin to the central nervous system. Recent studies demonstrate that various neuronal receptors in the spinal cord are involved in pruritus. The spinal opioid receptor is one of the best-known examples. Spinal administration of morphine is frequently accompanied by segmental pruritus. In addition to μ-opioid receptor antagonists, κ-opioid receptor agonists have recently come into usage as novel antipruritic drugs, and are expected to suppress certain subtypes of itch such as hemodialysis- and cholestasis-associated itch that are difficult to treat with antihistamines. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord has also received recent attention as a novel pathway of itch-selective neural transmission. The NMDA glutamate receptor appears to be another potential target for the treatment of itch, especially in terms of central sensitization. The development of NMDA receptor antagonists with less undesirable side effects on the central nervous system might be beneficial for antipruritic therapies. Drugs suppressing presynaptic glutamate-release such as gabapentin and pregabalin also reportedly inhibit certain subtypes of itch such as brachioradial pruritus. Spinal receptors of other neuromediators such as bradykinin, substance P, serotonin, and histamine may also be potential targets for antipruritic therapies, given that most of these molecules interfere not only with pain, but also with itch transmission or regulation. Thus, the identification of itch-specific receptors and understanding itch-related circuits in the spinal cord may be innovative strategies for the development of novel antipruritic drugs.

Update on pruritic mechanisms of hypertrophic scars in postburn patients: the potential role of opioids and their receptors

Although itching (or pruritus) in a scar is a very common and distressing symptom and is increasingly being recognized as a significant obstacle in burn rehabilitation, the exact mechanisms underlying this symptom have not been elucidated; hence, a reliable therapy has not been established. Recent findings have suggested that itching caused by inflammatory dermatosis can be reduced by antihistamines, but histamine antagonists cannot block all types of pruritus (eg, neuropathic itch). This indicates the presence of a histamine-independent pathway for itch. Itch or pruritus may also be evoked by direct activation of opioid receptors, which have recently been identified in the skin. This article aims to assess the current state of knowledge regarding the role of opioids in the generation of itch in hypertrophic scars in postburn patients. To this end, the authors have reviewed the relevant literature and present some clinical data. The authors hope that this review will form the basis for future research to elucidate the mechanism and treatment of itch.

Anatomy and neurophysiology of pruritus

Itch has been described for many years as an unpleasant sensation that evokes the urgent desire to scratch. Studies of the neurobiology, neurophysiology, and cellular biology of itch have gradually been clarifying the mechanism of itch both peripherally and centrally. The discussion has been focused on which nerves and neuroreceptors play major roles in itch induction. The "intensity theory" hypothesizes that signal transduction on the same nerves leads to either pain (high intensity) or itch (low intensity), depending on the signal intensity. The "labeled-line coding theory" hypothesizes the complete separation of pain and itch pathways. Itch sensitization must also be considered in discussions of itch. This review highlights anatomical and functional properties of itch pathways and their relation to understanding itch perception and pruritic diseases.

Itch: Cells, Molecules, and Circuits

The itch field has made great advances in recent years, building upon earlier work to form a clearer picture of the biology behind this important sensory modality. Models for how itch is encoded have emerged that fit with physiological, molecular, and behavioral data. The molecular mechanisms of itch, both peripherally and centrally, are being revealed with the aid of newer animal models. Future work must address shortcomings in our current understanding of itch including limitations of current experimental methods. Here we review what is known about the cells, molecules, and circuits involved in itch and highlight key questions that remain to be answered.

Antipruritic treatment with systemic μ-opioid receptor antagonists: a review

During the past two decades, systemic μ-opioid receptor antagonists (MORA) have been used in the treatment of various forms of chronic pruritus. In a number of case reports, case series, and controlled trials, treatment with MORA has demonstrated considerable antipruritic effects. In double-blind controlled studies, significant antipruritic relief has been achieved by MORA in cholestatic pruritus, chronic urticaria, and atopic dermatitis. In case reports and case series, antipruritic efficacy of MORA has been reported in prurigo nodularis, mycosis fungoides, postburn pruritus, aquagenic pruritus, hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus, and pruritus of unknown origin. However, most of the evidence remains anecdotal, the design of these trials varies, and comparison of results is difficult. In this review we aim to present an overview of these reports and to assess the evidence for the antipruritic action of the drugs naloxone, nalmefene, and naltrexone, which are currently in use for the treatment of chronic pruritus of different origins. We will also evaluate recommendations for the use of MORA in daily medical practice.

Long-lasting antinociceptive spinal effects in primates of the novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor agonist UFP-112

Chemical modifications of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide that result in increased potency and resistance to degradation have recently lead to the discovery of [(pF)Phe(4)Aib(7)Arg(14)Lys(15)]N/OFQ-NH(2) (UFP-112), a novel N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor agonist. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacological profile of intrathecally administered UFP-112 in monkeys under different behavioral assays. Intrathecal UFP-112 (1-10 nmol) dose-dependently produced antinociception against an acute noxious stimulus (50 degrees C water) and capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia. Intrathecal UFP-112-induced antinociception could be reversed by a NOP receptor antagonist, J-113397 (0.1mg/kg), but not by a classic opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone (0.03 mg/kg). Like intrathecal morphine, UFP-112 produced antinociception in two primate pain models with a similar magnitude of effectiveness and a similar duration of action that last for 4-5h. Unlike intrathecal morphine, UFP-112 did not produce itch/scratching responses. In addition, intrathecal inactive doses of UFP-112 and morphine produced significant antinociceptive effects when given in combination without increasing scratching responses. These results demonstrated that intrathecal UFP-112 produced long-lasting morphine-comparable antinociceptive effects without potential itch side effect. This study is the first to provide functional evidence that selective NOP receptor agonists such as UFP-112 alone or in conjunction with morphine may improve the quality of spinal analgesia.

Antinociceptive effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ administered intrathecally in monkeys

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous peptide for the NOP receptors. Depending on the doses, intrathecal administration of N/OFQ has dual actions (ie, hyperalgesia and antinociception) in rodents. However, the pharmacological profile of intrathecal N/OFQ is not fully known in primates. The aim of this study was to investigate behavioral effects of intrathecal N/OFQ over a wide dose range and to compare its effects with ligands known to produce hyperalgesia or antinociception in monkeys. Intrathecal N/OFQ from 1 fmol to 1 nmol did not produce any hyperalgesic or scratching responses. In contrast, intrathecal substance P 100 nmol produced hyperalgesia, and intrathecal DAMGO 10 nmol produced antinociception. At the dose range between 10 nmol and 1 micromol, intrathecal N/OFQ dose-dependently produced thermal antinociception against a noxious stimulus in 2 intensities. More importantly, N/OFQ in combined with intrathecal morphine dose-dependently potentiated morphine-induced antinociception without inhibiting morphine-induced itch/scratching. Taken together, this study is the first to provide a unique functional profile of intrathecal N/OFQ over a wide dose range in primates. Intrathecal N/OFQ produces thermal antinociception without anti-morphine actions or scratching responses, indicating that N/OFQ or NOP receptor agonists represent a promising target as spinal analgesics.

PERSPECTIVE

Intrathecal administration of N/OFQ only produced thermal antinociception, not hyperalgesia, in monkeys. In addition, intrathecal N/OFQ does not have anti-morphine actions or itch/scratching responses. This study strongly supports the therapeutic potential of N/OFQ or NOP receptor agonists as spinal analgesics for clinical trials.

[Opioid-induced pruritus. Mechanisms and treatment regimens]

Substantial progress has been achieved in recent years in research on the interaction between pain and pruritus. Over and above the known inhibition of pruritus by painful stimuli (e.g. scratching), a foundation for the explanation of opioid-induced pruritus was laid through the discovery of pruritus-specific neuronal processing channels. Although traditionally the degranulating effect of opioids on mast cells was assumed to be the essential mechanism, it is now clear that opioids can also induce itching at the spinal level. Neurons of the dorsal horn of the pain system inhibit spinal itch neurons. If this inhibition is weakened by opioids, the disinhibited itch neurons become active and mediate itching, without stimulation of the primary afferent peripheral nerves. Spinal triggering of itching is observed in particular by activation of mu-opioid receptors (mu-OR), while kappa-OR surprisingly suppress itch. The therapeutic implications of this interaction will be described.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2007

This paper is the thirtieth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2007 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.

Effects of atypical kappa-opioid receptor agonists on intrathecal morphine-induced itch and analgesia in primates

Itch/pruritus is the most common side effect associated with spinal administration of morphine given to humans for analgesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists with diverse chemical structures as antipruritics and to elucidate the receptor mechanism underlying the antipruritic effect in monkeys. In particular, previously proposed non-KOR-1 agonists, including nalfurafine [TRK-820, 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14 beta-dihydroxy-4,5 alpha-epoxy-6 beta-[N-methyl-trans-3-(3-furyl)acrylamido]morphinan], bremazocine [(+/-)-6-ethyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-3-[(1-hydroxycyclopropy)-methyl]-11,11-dimethyl-2,6-methano-3-benzazocin-8-ol], and GR 89696 [4-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)acetyl]-3-(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-1-piperazinecarboxylic acid methyl ester] were studied in various behavioral assays for measuring itch/scratching, analgesia, and respiratory depression. Systemic administration of nalfurafine (0.1-1 microg/kg), bremazocine (0.1-1 microg/kg), or GR 89696 (0.01-0.1 microg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated intrathecal morphine (0.03 mg)-induced scratching responses without affecting morphine antinociception. The combination of intrathecal morphine with these KOR agonists did not cause sedation. In addition, pretreatment with effective antiscratching doses of nalfurafine, bremazocine, or GR 89696 did not antagonize systemic morphine-induced antinociception and respiratory depression. The dose-addition analysis revealed that there is no subadditivity for nalfurafine in combination with morphine in the antinociceptive effect. Furthermore, the KOR antagonist study revealed that antiscratching effects of both nalfurafine and a prototypical KOR-1 agonist, U-50488H [trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide], could be blocked completely by a selective KOR antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (3 mg/kg). These findings suggest that the agonist action on KOR mainly contributes to the effectiveness of these atypical KOR agonists as antipruritics, and there is no evidence for KOR subtypes or mu-opioid antagonist action underlying the effects of these KOR agonists. This mechanism-based study further supports the clinical potential of KOR agonists as antipruritics under the context of spinal opioid analgesia.

Effects of mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptor agonists on the function of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in monkeys

Opioids can modulate neuroendocrine function. Less is known about the involvement of opioid receptor subtypes in the stimulatory effects of opioids on the primate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The aim of this study was to investigate the stimulatory effects of opioids selective for each receptor subtype on plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels in both male and female monkeys. The blood collection procedure was conducted in home-caged and unanesthetized rhesus monkeys that showed low and stable basal ACTH and cortisol levels. Three opioid receptor agonists, fentanyl, U-50488H, and SNC80, were used in behaviorally active doses; they are highly selective for mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptors, respectively. Plasma samples were collected at multiple time points before and after IV administration of each compound and were quantified by radioimmunoassay. Neither fentanyl (0.0003-0.02mg/kg) nor SNC80 (0.03-0.3mg/kg) changed either ACTH or cortisol basal levels. In contrast, U-50488H (0.01-1mg/kg) dose-dependently stimulated ACTH and cortisol release in both male and female monkeys. Importantly, the stimulatory effects of U-50488H on the secretion of ACTH were blocked by a selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, nor-Binaltorphimine. The antagonist effect of nor-binaltorphimine lasted up to 20 weeks. These results indicate that only synthetic kappa, but not mu or delta opioid receptor agonists stimulate HPA axis activity after acute administration in primates.