Effective treatment of fracture-dislocations of the olecranon requires a stable trochlear notch

Orthogonal plating for complex olecranon fractures: retrospective case series with patient-reported outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Treatment for complex olecranon fractures with metaphyseal comminution can be challenging. To improve reduction maneuvers and augment stability, we apply a small medial and/or lateral locking compression plate (LCP) prior to placing a posterior contoured 3.5 mm-2.7 mm LCP. The aim is to describe our technique and outcomes of this "orthogonal" plating technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

26 patients were treated with orthogonal plating. Clinical outcome variables were available for all patients at a median of 27 months (IQR 6-54), and patient-reported outcomes (Q-DASH and MEPS) for 23 patients at 38 months (IQR 18-71).

RESULTS

All fractures healed at a median of 2.0 months (IQR 1.5-3.8). The median elbow flexion was 120°, extension-deficit 15°, pronation 88°, and supination 85°. The median Q-DASH was 9 (IQR 0-22) and the median MEPS was 90 (IQR 80-100). Hardware was electively removed in seven patients. One patient had a late superficial infection that resolved with hardware removal and antibiotics, and one patient had two consecutive re-fractures after two hardware removals; and healed after the second revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Orthogonal plating with a posterior LCP and a small medial and/or lateral LCP is a safe technique that leads to excellent healing rates, and good clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Reproducibility of the Mayo and Schatzker classification systems in proximal ulna fractures

INTRODUCTION

A fracture classification system should provide a reliable and reproducible means of communication between different parties. It should be logical and understandable, with few categories to memorize. The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems for the assessment of proximal ulna fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intra- and interobserver reliability studies were conducted on 39 X-rays of injured elbows drawn randomly from 74 cases previously used in a series on predictors of ulnohumeral osteoarthritis in proximal ulna fractures. Ten observers independently reviewed these X-rays on 2 separate occasions 3 months apart. The fracture type was assessed according to the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems during each reading session. Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa were used to measure the intra- and interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

The Schatzker classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Schatzker R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.394) and second (Schatzker R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.351) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Schatzker classification was rated as substantial (0.61). The Mayo classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Mayo R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.278) and second (Mayo R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.292) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Mayo classification was rated as fair (0.52).

DISCUSSION

The classification systems for proximal ulna fractures showed poor reproducibility between the different observers since they had low interobserver agreement values. Nevertheless, their use remained reliable since the measured intraobserver agreement value was deemed substantial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective.

Trans-ulnar fracture dislocations of the elbow: a systematic review and clarification of classification systems

BACKGROUND

Complex elbow dislocations in which the dorsal cortex of the ulna is fractured can be difficult to classify and therefore treat. These have variably been described as either Monteggia variant injuries or trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Additionally, O'Driscoll et al classified coronoid fractures that exit the dorsal cortex of the ulna as "basal coronoid, subtype 2" fractures. The Mayo classification of trans-ulnar fracture dislocations categorizes these injuries in 3 types according to what the coronoid remains attached to: trans-olecranon fracture dislocations, Monteggia variant fracture dislocations, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these injury patterns as reported in the literature. Our hypothesis was that trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations would have a worse prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify studies with trans-ulnar fracture dislocations that had documentation of associated coronoid injuries. A literature search identified 16 qualifying studies with 296 fractures. Elbows presenting with basal subtype 2 or Regan/Morrey III coronoid fractures and Jupiter IIA and IID injuries were classified as trans-ulnar basal coronoid fractures. Patients with trans-olecranon or Monteggia fractures were classified as such if the coronoid was not fractured or an associated coronoid fracture had been classified as O'Driscoll tip, anteromedial facet, basal subtype I, or Regan Morrey I/II.

RESULTS

The 296 fractures reviewed were classified as trans-olecranon in 44 elbows, Monteggia variant in 82 elbows, and trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations in 170 elbows. Higher rates of complications and reoperations were reported for trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries (40%, 25%) compared to trans-olecranon (11%, 18%) and Monteggia variant injuries (25%, 13%). The mean flexion-extension arc for basal coronoid fractures was 106° compared to 117° for Monteggia (P < .01) and 121° for trans-olecranon injuries (P = .02). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 84 points for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, 91 for Monteggia (P < .01), and 93 for trans-olecranon fracture dislocations (P < .05). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 22 and 80 for trans-ulnar basal coronoid, respectively, compared to 23 and 89 for trans-olecranon fractures. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons was not available for any Monteggia injuries, but the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 13.

DISCUSSION

Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture dislocations are associated with inferior patient reported outcome measures, decreased range of motion, and increased complication rates compared to trans-olecranon or Monteggia variant fracture dislocations. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate treatment for this difficult injury pattern.

Reliability of the CURL classification for proximal ulna fracture-dislocations of the elbow

Background

Proximal ulna fracture-dislocations are challenging injuries with a myriad of existing classification systems. The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification (CURL) is a simple framework designed to focus attention on the key components affecting outcome and guide surgical management. This study evaluates interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification.

Methods

Four observers independently reviewed plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. Each observer scored the Coronoid (C), proximal Ulna (U), and Radius (R) components for each fracture on 2 occasions. The osseous components were subclassified as 'intact', 'simple', or 'complex'. The Ligament component (L) was not rated as this requires intraoperative classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficients. X-ray and CT were compared for patients with both imaging modalities. The Landis and Koch criteria were used to interpret the strength of the kappa statistics.

Results

One hundred seventy seven patients had plain X-rays; 58 patients had both X-ray and CT scans. Overall, in the X-ray only cohort, there was 'almost perfect' interobserver reliability for the radial head (k = 0.94) and coronoid (k = 0.83), and 'substantial' reliability (k = 0.68) for the proximal ulna. For the X-ray and CT cohort, interobserver reliability was 'almost perfect' across both modalities for the radial head (k = 0.88 and k = 0.93, respectively) and 'moderate' for the proximal ulna (k = 0.48 and k = 0.52, respectively). For the coronoid, interobserver reliability for X-ray interpretation was 'substantial' (k = 0.74) and for CT was 'almost perfect' (k = 0.89). Intraobserver reliability was 'almost perfect' for all components, other than CT assessment of the proximal ulna which demonstrated 'substantial' reliability (k = 0.74).

Conclusion

The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification demonstrates strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, supporting use of the classification for proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. CT is recommended for improved characterization of any fracture with a coronoid component.

"How the Wrightington classification of traumatic elbow instability can simplify the algorithm for treatment"

There are numerous injury patterns of elbow-fracture dislocation that can lead to confusion about the best surgical management. The Wrightington classification aims to provide a simple categorization based on the injury to the coronoid process and the three column concept of the elbow osseous stability that describes a medial column consisting of the anteromedial coronoid facet and sublime tubercle, the middlecolumn is the anterolateral coronoid facet, and the lateral column is the radial head and lateral ligament complex with a fulcrum for varus/valgus stability between the two coronoid facets. Injuries are classified as type A (anteromedial facet/medial-column), B (bifacet/ medial and middle-columns), B+ (bifacet with radial head/all three columns), C (combined radial head and anterolateral facet/middle and lateral-columns), D (distal to coronoid where coronoid is in continuity with olecranon process), and D+ (distal to coronoid with radial head fracture). With each bony injury pattern, we can anticipate which soft tissue constraints are likely to be involved and the importance of their repair to restore stability, and thereby develop algorithms for management. The Wrightington classification has been shown to be reliable and valid. A consecutive series of 60 patients with elbow-fracture dislocation managed according to the surgical algorithms of the Wrightington classification have been reported to have excellent outcomes with a median Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 100 (interquartile 85-100) and flexion/extension arc of movement of 123° (interquartile 101°-130°). In conclusion, the Wrightington classification of elbow-fracture dislocation is a comprehensive, reliable, and valid classification with treatment algorithms that are associated with good functional outcomes.

Predicting the need for collateral ligament repair in transolecranon fractures of the elbow: a traffic light model

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies have shown that translation of the proximal radius relative to the capitellum in the sagittal plane can predict integrity of the collateral ligaments in a transolecranon fracture model; no studies have examined this in clinical practice.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen consecutive transolecranon fracture dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture classifications, surgical management, and failure with instability. Distance between the center of the radial head and the center of the capitellum was measured on initial radiographs by 2 independent raters on 3 separate occasions. Statistical analysis was used to compare the median displacement between patients who required collateral ligament repair for stability and those who did not.

RESULTS

Sixteen cases with a mean age of 57 years (range 32-85) were analyzed with an inter-rater Pearson coefficient of 0.89 for displacement measurement. Median displacement where collateral ligament repair was needed and performed was 17.13 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 10.43-23.88) compared with 4.63 mm (IQR = 2.68-6.58) where collateral ligament repair was not performed and not required (P = .002). In 4 cases, ligament repair was not performed initially but deemed necessary based on clinical outcome and postoperative and intraoperative images. Of these, the median displacement was 15.59 mm (IQR = 10.09-21.20), and 2 of these required revision fixation.

DISCUSSION

Where displacement on initial radiographs exceeded 10 mm, lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair was required in all cases (red group). If less than 5 mm, ligament repair was not required in any case (green group). Between 5 and 10 mm, following fracture fixation, the elbow must be screened carefully to assess for any instability and a low threshold set for LUCL repair to prevent posterolateral rotatory instability (amber group). Using these findings, we propose a traffic light model to predict the need for collateral ligament repair in transolecranon fractures and dislocation.

Posterior Olecranon Fracture Dislocations in Adults: A Systematic Review

Posterior olecranon fracture dislocations (POFDs) were considered posterior Monteggia lesions, which were less described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic review of the diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and complications of POFDs in adults. A systematic review was performed to identify all relevant studies on the POFDs in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. The methodological quality of the studies was scored using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). A total of 117 patients were identified in the nine studies selected. The high-energy injuries accounted for 42.7% of the included studies. The rates of concomitant coronoid process, radial head fractures, and lateral collateral ligament injury were 84.6% (99/117), 87.2% (102/117), and 5% (6/117), respectively. The procedure was performed with a dorsal mid longitudinal approach to reconstruct all injury components. The postoperative clinical scores included the Broberg/Morrey rating, with a mean rating of excellent or good at 66%, the mean DASH score was 20.6, and the mean ASES score was 83. The flexion and extension arc and forearm rotation arcs were 100° and 134°, respectively. Complications included arthrosis in 28.2% (33/117) of cases, fracture nonunion or delayed union in 9.4% (11/117) of cases, heterotopic ossification in 7% (8/117) of cases, and the re-operation rate was 16% (19/117). There was nearly no postoperative ulnohumeral instability. The main characteristics of POFDs were disruptions of the trochlear notch, including the olecranon and coronoid processes, and severe radial head fractures, while the lateral collateral ligament was spared. Although the POFDs had a low frequency of instability, the prognosis was relatively poor. The POFDs should be considered independently.

Comparison of different treatment approaches for coronoid process fracture in terrible triad injury: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare the functional results of different treatment approaches for the fracture of the coronoid process in terrible triad injury (TTI).

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial included participants from seven level-1 trauma centres in China. All patients were randomly assigned to three groups, wherein different approaches were applied to treat coronoid fracture: group A) internal fixation of the coronoid process without external fixation or splint (ORIF group), B) external fixation using a hinged fixator without internal fixation (Exfix group), and C) long-arm plaster for two to three weeks postoperatively without internal fixation of coronoid process (Plaster group). Early active motion exercises within the limits of pain were started immediately after surgery under the supervision of a physical therapist. Outcomes were evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (22 patients in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 22 in Group C) were included in this trial from January 2016 to January 2019. The average arc of elbow motion was 114.1° ± 8.92°. The average flexion and flexion contracture were 126.4° ± 11.2° and 12.3° ± 7.7°, respectively. The arcs of forearm rotation of the elbow for each group were 145.41° ± 9.36°, 143.38° ± 9.79°, and 143.86° ± 10.95°, respectively. The MEPS for each group were 86.82 ± 9.7, 86.67 ± 9.92, and 85.23 ± 8.66, respectively. The DASH score for each group were 18.26 ± 19.31, 18.85 ± 15.02, and 20.19 ± 13.59, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All three approaches in our trial showed similar functional results in the long-term survey. Patients treated with external fixation without internal fixation of the coronoid process showed less pain during early mobilization and acquired maximum flexion within a short duration after surgery.

Anteromedial coronoid facet fractures and associated ligament lesions: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Varus posteromedial rotational injury mechanisms lead to fractures of the coronoids process' anteromedial facet. As these fractures are often unstable, rapid fracture treatment is vital to prevent progressive osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with a fracture of the anteromedial facet treated surgically were enrolled in the study. Computed tomography images were used to classify the fractures according to the system by O'Driscoll et al. Clinical follow-up included each patient's medical record, surgical treatment algorithm, all complications encountered during the follow-up period, Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score, subjective elbow value, and pain.

RESULTS

A total of 8 men (66.7%) and 4 women (33.3%) were treated surgically and followed-up after a mean period of 45 ± 23 months. The mean DASH score was 11.9 ± 12.9 points. One patient complained of transient neuropathy in the innervation area of the ulnar nerve, however, this existed already pre-operatively and resolved after less than three months.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented patient cohort shows that AMF fracture of the coronoid process are unstable lesions according to the bony instability and the frequently ruptured collateral ligament complexes which need to be addressed. The MCL seems to be affected more frequently than previously appreciated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation: a novel type of elbow injury

BACKGROUND

Based on our experiences, we found that a kind of elbow injury is characterized by an olecranon fracture accompanied by elbow joint posterior dislocation with the proximal radioulnar joint intact. The aim of this study was to better define this kind of severe elbow instability, which has not been previously reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with olecranon fractures who were treated at our institution from January 2013 to April 2021. Data on these patient demographics, injury characteristics, preoperative and postoperative imaging, surgical management, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. We also made the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients were diagnosed olecranon fractures in our institution, and ten patients met the inclusion criteria, 9 males and 1 female, with an average age of 40.6 ± 12.7 years (26-68 years). Eight patients (80%) were comminuted, and two were oblique olecranon fracture. Nine patients (90%) suffered coronoid process fractures, eight fractures were type III, and one was type II. Eight patients (80%) suffered radial head fractures, seven fractures were type II, and one was type III. All patients suffered lateral collateral ligament complex injury. All patients underwent surgical management and were followed up on average for 15.8 ± 3.2 months (12-20 months). The motion of the elbow and functional outcome were evaluated with several methods. The mean arc of the elbow movement was 131.6° ± 6.0° (124°-140°), and the mean arc of the forearm rotation was 158.5° ± 17.8° (128°-180°). Nine patients' functional results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were excellent with a mean score of 96.5 ± 5.3 points (85-100 points), and another was good. The mean score according to the Broberg and Morrey functional rating index was 98.8 ± 2.5 points (92-100 points), nine patients were excellent, and another was good. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score was 0.75 ± 1.2 points (0-3.3 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation is a rare injury and has unique characteristics, and it is a kind of complex elbow instability involving the coronoid process and radial head fractures. After bony structure is restored, the repairment of lateral collateral ligament complex is also important to the stability of the elbow joint. Correct understanding of this kind of injury and reasonable treatment plan can achieve good function.

Morphological Characteristics of Proximal Ulna Fractures: A Proposal for a New Classification and Agreement for Validation

Historically, proximal ulna fractures have been simplistically diagnosed and treated as simple olecranon fractures, leading to an unacceptable number of complications. Our hypothesis was that the recognition of lateral, intermediate, and medial stabilizers of the proximal ulna and ulnohumeral and proximal radioulnar joints would facilitate decision-making, including the choice of approach and type of fixation. The primary aim was to propose a new classification for complex fractures of the proximal ulna based on morphological characteristics seen on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). The secondary aim was to validate the proposed classification regarding its intra- and inter-rater agreement. Three raters with different levels of experience analyzed 39 cases of complex fractures of the proximal ulna using radiographs and 3D CT scans. We presented the proposed classification (divided into four types with subtypes) to the raters. In this classification, the medial column of the ulna involves the sublime tubercle and is where the anterior medial collateral ligament is inserted, the lateral column contains the supinator crest and is where the lateral ulnar collateral ligament is inserted, and the intermediate column involves the coronoid process of the ulna, olecranon, and anterior capsule of the elbow. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was analyzed for two different rounds, and the results were evaluated according to Fleiss kappa, Cohen kappa, and Kendall coefficient. Intra- and inter-rater agreement values were very good (0.82 and 0.77, respectively). Good intra- and inter-rater agreement attested to the stability of the proposed classification among the raters, regardless of the level of experience of each one. The new classification proved to be easy to understand and had very good intra- and inter-rater agreement, regardless of the level of experience of each rater.

TRANSOLECRANON FRACTURE-DISLOCATION: CONCEPTS AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the functional results of the treatment protocol for the treatment of transolecranon fracture-dislocation, by surgical reduction and osteosynthesis with plate and screws, in patients attended at a referral hospital for orthopedic trauma, with a minimum follow-up period of six months.

Methods

Twenty-five individuals treated surgically from January 2014 to November 2018 were selected for a primary observational longitudinal study using questionnaires to assess upper limb and elbow function (DASH and MEPS), quality of life (SF-12), pain (visual analog scale - VAS), and radiographic evaluation in anteroposterior and lateral views of the elbow.

Results

Fifteen patients were male, and the mean age was 46.8 years. All participants had their fractures consolidated, with no radiolgraphic signs of implant failure, or degenerative arthritis. Mean range of motion was reduced relative to the contralateral limb: 102.6º for flexion-extension and 132.8º for pronation-supination. The mean MEPS and DASH scores were 89.6 and 16.5 respectively. There was no residual pain in 84% of the cases according to the VAS.

Conclusion

The surgical treatment proposed for transolecranon fracture-dislocations showed satisfactory results according to MEPS, DASH scores and quality of life measures. Evidence Level IV; Retrospective observational study.

Does an Internal Joint Stabilizer and Standardized Protocol Prevent Recurrent Instability in Complex Persistent Elbow Instability?

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex persistent elbow instability after trauma is challenging. Previous studies on treatments have reported varied surgical techniques, which makes it difficult to establish a therapeutic algorithm. Furthermore, the surgical procedures may not sufficiently restore elbow stability, even with an additional device, and a noted high rate of arthritis progression.While a recently developed internal joint stabilizer effectively treats elbow instability, its clinical application for complex persistent elbow instability is limited and the standardized protocol is not well described. Additionally, we want to know whether the arthritis progression will cause a negative impact on the functional outcomes of complex persistent elbow instability.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does treatment of complex persistent elbow instability with a hinged internal joint stabilizer and a standardized protocol prevent recurrent instability and other complications? (2) What are the pre- to postoperative improvements in pain, disability, elbow performance, and ROM? (3) Is the development of post-traumatic arthritis associated with worse pain, disability, elbow performance, and ROM?

METHODS

Between September 2014 and October 2019, we treated 22 patients for persistent dislocation or subluxation after initial treatment of traumatic elbow fracture-dislocations. Of those, we considered patients who were at least 20 years of age, with an interval of 6 weeks or more between the injury (initial treatment) and the index reconstructive procedure, which had been performed at our institute, as potentially eligible. During that time, we used an internal joint stabilizer with a standardized protocol for posttraumatic complex persistent elbow instability. We performed total elbow replacements in patients older than 50 years who had advanced elbow arthritis. Based on that, 82% (18 of 22) of patients were eligible; 14% (3 of 22) were excluded because total elbow replacements was undertaken, and another 5% (1 of 22) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 1 year (median 24 months [range 12 to 63]), leaving 64% (14 of 22) for analysis in this retrospective study. We treated 14 patients (14 elbows) with posttraumatic complex persistent elbow instability with an internal joint stabilizer and a standardized protocol that comprised debridement arthroplasty with ulnar neurolysis, restoration of bony and ligamentous (reattachment) structures, application of an internal joint stabilizer, and early rehabilitation. There were eight men and six women in this study, with a median (range) age of 44 years (21 to 68). The initial elbow fracture-dislocation injury pattern was a terrible triad injury in seven patients, a posterolateral rotatory injury in four patients, and a posterior Monteggia fracture in three patients. Preoperative and follow-up radiographs were reviewed for evidence of recurrent instability and arthritis. Complications such as wound infection, seroma, neurovascular injury, and hardware complications were ascertained through chart review. Preoperative and postoperative VAS score for pain, DASH, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS) were collected and compared. Furthermore, extension-flexion and supination-pronation arcs were collected by chart review. We divided the patients into two groups according to whether or not they developed posttraumatic arthritis. We then presented the differences between pain, disability, elbow performance, and ROM. The hinged internal joint stabilizer was removed using another open procedure under general anesthesia 6 to 8 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no recurrent instability during and after device removal. Seven patients developed complications, including wound infection, seroma, neurovascular injury, hardware complications, and heterotopic ossification. Two patients had complications related to internal joint stabilizers and three had complications linked to radial head prostheses. Median (range) preoperative to postoperative changes included decreased pain (VAS 5 [2 to 9] to 0 [0 to 3], difference of medians -5; p < 0.001), decreased disability (DASH 41 [16 to 66] to 7 [0 to 46], difference of medians -34; p < 0.001), improved function (MEPS 60 [25 to 70] to 95 [65 to 100], difference of medians 35; p < 0.001), improved extension-flexion arc (40° [10° to 70°] to 113° [75° to 140°], difference of medians 73°; p < 0.001), and supination-pronation arc (78° [30° to 165°] to 148° [70° to 175°], difference of medians 70°; p < 0.001). Between patients with and without development of post-traumatic arthritis, there were no differences in postoperative pain (VAS 0 [0 to 3] to 0 [0 to 1], difference of medians 0; p = 0.17), disability (DASH 7 [0 to 46] to 7 [0 to 18], difference of medians 0; p = 0.40), function (MEPS 80 [65 to 100] to 95 [75 to 100], difference of medians 15; p = 0.79), extension-flexion arc (105° [75° to 140°] to 115° [80° to 125°], difference of medians 10°; p = 0.40), and supination-pronation arc (155° [125° to 175°] to 135° [70° to 160°], difference of medians -20°; p < 0.18).

CONCLUSION

In this small, retrospective study, we found that an internal joint stabilizer with a standardized treatment protocol could maintain concentric reduction while allowing early functional motion, and that it could improve clinical outcomes for patients with complex persistent elbow instability. However, patients must be counseled that the complications related to the radial head prostheses may occur, and that the benefits of early motion must compensate for an additional removal procedure and the risk of seroma formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The characteristics and treatment strategy for transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow in children: a retrospective study

Background

Transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow is rarely seen in children. The purpose of this retrospective study was to discuss the pathological characteristics and treatment strategy for this injury in children.

Methods

From October 2016 to March 2019, 15 patients seen and treated at our institutions for transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow were identified, and their medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. There were 11 boys and 4 girls, with an average age of 8.3 years (from 5 to 14 years). The left arm was involved in 10 cases, and the right arm was involved in 5 cases. Type I (simple fracture) was found in 11 cases, and type II (comminuted fracture) was found in 4 cases, 3 of which with coronoid process involved. Closed reduction was successful under local anaesthesia in 14 cases but failed in 1 case. In 11 patients with type I fractures, 10 received fixation of Kirschner wire and tension band, and one patient underwent bone plate fixation. In 4 patients with comminuted fractures (type II), internal fixation was performed with Kirschner wires combined with reconstruction plates.

Results

The 15 patients were followed up for 24 to 48 months (average, 30.2 months). The final evaluation showed fine anatomical relationship of the elbow in all with no complications observed. Failure of internal fixation did not occur in any patient. The fractures acquired bony union in all patients after 8 to 12 weeks (average, 9.6 weeks). The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated at the final follow-up by the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) as excellent in 11 cases, good in 3 cases and fair in one case.

Conclusions

As a type of complicated fracture-dislocation of the elbow, the transolecranon fracture-dislocation is rare in children. The fracture is mainly simple type. Treatment options depend on the type of fracture-dislocation. Only anatomical reduction of the olecranon fracture and restoration of a normal trochlear notch can lead to a stable humeroradial joint and good clinical efficacy.

Biomechanical significance of the collateral ligaments in transolecranon fracture-dislocations

BACKGROUND

It is widely accepted that transolecranon fracture-dislocations are not associated with collateral ligament disruption. The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of the collateral ligaments in transolecranon fractures.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric elbows with a mean age of 46.3 years were used. All soft tissue was dissected to the level of the capsule, leaving the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) intact. A standardized, oblique osteotomy starting from the distal margin of the cartilage bare area of the ulna was made. The elbows were loaded with an inferiorly directed force of 5 and 10 N in the intact, MCL cut, LCL cut, and both ligaments cut states. All measurements were recorded on lateral calibrated radiographs.

RESULTS

The mean inferior translation with intact ligaments (n = 20) when the humerus was loaded with 5 and 10 N was 1.52 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.02) and 2.23 mm (95% CI, 1.61-2.85), respectively. When the LCL was cut first (n = 10), the inferior translation with 5 and 10 N load was 4.11 mm (95% CI, 0.95-7.26) and 4.82 mm (95% CI, 1.91-7.72), respectively. When the MCL was cut first (n = 10), the inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N was 3.94 mm (95% CI, 0.796-7.08) and 5.68 mm (95% CI, 3.03-8.33), respectively. The inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N and both ligaments cut was 15.65 mm (95% CI, 12.59-18.79) and 17.50 mm (95% CI, 14.86-20.13), respectively. There was a statistical difference between the intact and MCL cut first at 10 N and when both ligaments were cut at 5 and 10 N.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that collateral ligament disruption is a prerequisite for a transolecranon fracture-dislocation. An inferior translation of more than 3 mm suggests that at least one of the collateral ligaments is disrupted, and more than 7.5 mm indicates that both collateral ligaments are disrupted.

The treatment of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process are caused by a varus posteromedial rotational injury force, leading to instability in the ulnohumeral joint. AMF fractures are usually accompanied by avulsion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). O'Driscoll's description and classification of AMF coronoid fractures has increased awareness and interest in this injury, but the optimal treatment has yet to be decided.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and Embase. The primary objective was to determine outcome scores but also complication and revision rates depending on the fracture and its therapy in order to gain a more comprehensive picture. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

Initially, 304 publications were identified. Finally, 10 studies were left for inclusion, all of them retrospective in design, comprising 128 patients; the majority of them were male (75.7%). A total of 114 patients (89.1%) were treated surgically and 14 patients (10.9%) were treated conservatively. Among the surgically treated patients, 70.2% were treated with LUCL refixation. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the surgically treated patients was 91.5 points. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the conservatively treated patients was 91.4 points. A total of 10 patients (7.8%) required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of AMF fractures leads to a satisfactory functional outcome in the vast majority of patients independent of the subtype. An algorithm for LUCL fixation is still pending. Conservative treatment may be considered under strict preconditions, especially for nondisplaced subtype 1 and 2 fractures, as these fractures show satisfactory functional outcomes when treated nonoperatively.

Results of standardized treatment of elbow fracture dislocations as per their injury pattern: a retrospective cohort of 89 patients

Background

Elbow fracture dislocations represent difficult injuries to treat, with a high percentage of complications. Classically, they are divided into posterolateral, posteromedial and transulnar pattern. It is essential to distinguish them to guide intraoperative treatment to achieve an anatomic and stable reduction that allows early mobility.

Methods

A retrospective study of 89 adult patients diagnosed with elbow fracture dislocations who underwent a standardized surgery between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Demographic data, characteristics of the injury, and associated procedures were collected. Patients were evaluated with functional scores (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey score) and ranges of movement at the end of the follow-up.

Results

The mean age was 41 ± 12 years, mostly men (82%), with an average follow-up of 29 months. We present 42 patients with posterolateral fracture dislocation (47%), 21 posteromedial (24%) and 26 transulnar (29%). The average range of motion at the end of follow-up was −12 ± 11° extension, 124 ± 20° flexion, 76 ± 16° pronation, and 73 ± 20° supination, with a Mayo elbow performance score of 88.7 ± 12 points and 87.2 ± 12 points in the Broberg and Morrey scale. Reoperation rate was 23%, with no infection or heterotopic ossification cases. Transulnar fracture dislocations have significantly worse extension and supination. As per the functional result (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey scale), there are no significant differences between the different patterns.

Conclusion

Proper injury pattern recognition and a standardized surgical management lead to a stable joint and good results in range of motion. Functional results are encouraging at least at short term, despite the high reoperations rate.

A Peculiar Case of Open Complex Elbow Injury with Critical Bone Loss, Triceps Reinsertion, and Scar Tissue might Provide for Elbow Stability?

Background

Complex elbow injuries (CEIs) are severe and rare lesions, difficult to treat correctly due to the different patterns of clinical presentations. Standard methods cannot often be applied. The main goals of the treatment are performing a stable osteosynthesis of all fractures, obtaining a concentric and stable reduction of the elbow by repairing the soft tissue constraint lesions, and allowing early motion. Since the introduction of virtual reality (VR) approaches in clinical practice, three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and 3D printing have revolutionised orthopaedic surgeries, thus helping to understand the anatomy and the pathology of complex cases.

Case description

We discussed a case of CEI, characterised by an extended soft tissue (IIIB Gustilo classification) and neurovascular lesions associated with bone loss in a young female patient. Olecranon fracture was type IIIB according to Mayo classification. We outlined the steps of a pluri-tissue reconstructive approach and stressed the importance of 3D printing in the preoperative planning for such cases. Finally, peculiar final functional patient outcomes were reported.

Conclusion

In this case, we found out that triceps reinsertion and scar process may provide for the joint stability in a low-demanding patient. 3D printing and VR approaches in clinical practice can be useful in the management of CEIs associated with an important bone and soft tissue loss.

How to cite this article

Facco G, Politano R, Marchesini A, et al. A Peculiar Case of Open Complex Elbow Injury with Critical Bone Loss, Triceps Reinsertion, and Scar Tissue might Provide for Elbow Stability? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):53-59.

Trans-Olecranon Fracture-Dislocations of the Elbow: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of the definition, ideal surgical method, complications, and prognosis of trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases. The eligibility criteria included retrospective clinical study and review article in subjects older than 18 years with trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Trans-olecranon fracture dislocations are defined as fractures in which the stability of the ulnohumeral joint is lost due to the intra-articular fracture of the olecranon without disruption of the proximal radioulnar joint. The seven papers were included that met the eligibility criteria for the quantitative synthesis. Findings indicate that a pre-contoured plate was used in 88.3% of cases (68 of 77 reports), with no reports of complications, suggesting that the pre-contoured 3.5 mm plate is the first choice of treatment. Postoperative mean elbow range of motion for the flexion–extension arc was 121.1° and 146.5° for the pronation-supination arc. Methods for postoperative clinical scores included the Broberg/Morrey rating with a result of excellent or good in 82.9% of cases, the ASES score with a mean of 88.7, and the DASH score with a mean of 11.75. Complications included heterotopic ossification in 21.9% (23/105) of cases, arthrosis in 25.7% (27/105) of cases, nerve damage in 18.1% (19/105) of cases, and osteoarthritis in 14.3% (15/105). With better understanding of the mechanism of injury and proper diagnosis and treatment, findings of the current review suggest a positive outcome. PROSPERO registration No.: CRD42019126568.

Elbow Fracture-Dislocations: Determining Treatment Strategies

Elbow dislocations represent common injuries. A quarter of these injuries involve at least 1 fracture. The sequel of elbow fracture-dislocations can be fraught with complications, including recurrent instability, posttraumatic arthritis, elbow contracture, and poor functional results. The 3 main patterns of injury are valgus posterolateral rotatory instability, varus posteromedial rotatory instability, and transolecranon fracture-dislocation. This article discusses each pattern individually, including the anatomy, the typical injury pattern, and treatment strategies. It also discusses common complications that can occur.

Olecranon fractures: do they lead to osteoarthritis? Long-term outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

To report radiologic, functional outcomes, and complications with a long-term follow-up in acute olecranon fractures treated with osteosynthesis and, secondly, to determine the predisposing factors to arthritis.

METHODS

Forty-two patients treated with osteosynthesis for acute olecranon fractures were reviewed, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Radiological and clinical evaluations including DASH, MEPS, active range of motion, pain, arthritis, associated lesions, and complications were recorded. Arthritis was classified according to Broberg-Morrey scale. A logistic regression model was estimated to determine risk factors to develop ulnohumeral arthritis. The association between the types of fractures according to Mayo classification and MEPS, and the association between the type of fracture and the presence of pain were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was of 43.64 months. The flexion-extension average range was 135.6°, and the mean MEPS was 89.45; the DASH was 25.26. Eighteen cases (42.86%) were fixed with pre-contoured locking plates, 21 with tension band wiring (50%), and 3 with cannulated screws of 7 mm (7.14%). Six cases (14.29%) needed hardware removal. All fractures healed. Ulnohumeral osteoarthritis was observed in 14 cases (33.3%). We did not find a significant association among the MEPS, pain, and the fracture type, according to Mayo (p > 0.1 for both values). A significant association was found (p < 0.05) between fracture type and the osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

In olecranon fractures, good functional and radiological results with low complications are predictable. The osteoarthritis is possible in more complex fractures and with other associated fractures.

Therapeutic "Tool" in Reconstruction and Regeneration of Tissue Engineering for Osteochondral Repair

Repairing osteochondral defects to restore joint function is a major challenge in regenerative medicine. However, with recent advances in tissue engineering, the development of potential treatments is promising. In recent years, in addition to single-layer scaffolds, double-layer or multilayer scaffolds have been prepared to mimic the structure of articular cartilage and subchondral bone for osteochondral repair. Although there are a range of different cells such as umbilical cord stem cells, bone marrow mesenchyml stem cell, and others that can be used, the availability, ease of preparation, and the osteogenic and chondrogenic capacity of these cells are important factors that will influence its selection for tissue engineering. Furthermore, appropriate cell proliferation and differentiation of these cells is also key for the optimal repair of osteochondral defects. The development of bioreactors has enhanced methods to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of cells. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in tissue engineering, including the development of layered scaffolds, cells, and bioreactors that have changed the approach towards the development of novel treatments for osteochondral repair.

Clinical and radiological evaluation of surgical management in olecranon fracture-dislocations

PURPOSE

The treatment of olecranon fracture-dislocations (OFDs) remains challenging. OFDs are often misdiagnosed as Monteggia lesions, and the real frequency is actually higher. However, studies on OFDs are limited. This study aimed to report on the surgical management of OFDs and to highlight the importance of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) evaluation in the treatment of OFDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants included 18 patients (11 men, 7 women, mean age 44 years (range 24-78) with OFDs. Each patient's medical records, radiographs, and 3D CT scans were reviewed for demographics, injury details, operative findings, and information about radiological and functional outcomes. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the direction of the dislocation: the posterior dislocation group (group 1, 7 patients) and anterior dislocation group (group 2, 11 patients). The clinical evaluation was performed according to Broberg-Morrey and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow (ASES-E) scoring systems.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 39 months (range 25-62 months). The Broberg-Morrey results were excellent in 4, good in 9, fair in 3, and poor in 2 patients. The mean ASES-E score was 84.83 (range 48-100) points. There were signs of ulna-humeral arthrosis in 5 elbows. Arthrosis was graded as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 in 3, 1, and 1 elbows, respectively. Partial sensory recovery was observed in one patient with postoperative ulnar neuropathy at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

OFDs are complex injuries of the proximal ulna and may involve the radial head, coronoid process, and lateral collateral ligament. The effective treatment of OFDs begins with the proper identification of the injury with 3D CT. A secure fixation including the coronoid process is mandatory for the elbow joint stability. Insufficient restoration of the trochlear notch may lead to problems with loss of motion and arthrosis. Although an application of a pre-contoured locking anatomical olecranon plate can simplify the fixation procedure in most cases, the surgeons' equipment should also include radial head implant, coronoid plates, headless screws, small cannulated screw system, suture anchors, fluoroscopy, and articulated external fixator.

Fracture-pattern-related therapy concepts in distal humeral fractures

Around one third of humeral fractures and 2–6% of all fractures occur to the distal part of the humerus. There is a bimodal distribution differentiating between young male patients with high-energy and elderly female patients with low-energy trauma related to osteoporosis. The AO classification and Dubberley subclassification are used in daily routine. Most fractures are diagnosed on radiographs. For further evaluation, three-dimensional computed tomography is recommended, especially for comminuted or complex fractures. Owing to the long immobilization and resultant poor functional outcome, conservative treatment is followed for inoperable patients. The operative approach and osteosynthesis depend on the fracture pattern. In A1 avulsion fractures, open reduction and screw fixation are recommended. In A2/A3 fractures, a triceps-sparing approach following a 90° double-plate construction (radial dorsal/ulnar lateral) with locking plates is favored. Partial articular B1/B2 fractures are exposed via a medial or lateral approach using unilateral locking plates to stabilize the medial/lateral column. Coronal shear fractures (B3) are classified after Dubberley and are treated via an extended Kocher approach and headless compression screws in anteroposterior direction. If there is a further posterior comminution or a lateral column fragment, stabilization is needed for the lateral/medial column with a precontoured locking plate. In solely articular fracture patterns, a dorsal approach with either a 90° or 180° double-plate construction is advised. If a reconstruction is not possible owing to fracture complexity or bone quality, total elbow arthroplasty is a viable option. However, lifelong limitation in weight-bearing up to 5 kg, limited longevity, and the potential for complicated revision surgery should be considered.

Complex Elbow Dislocations and the "Terrible Triad" Injury

Background:

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint in adults and up to 20% of dislocations are associated with a fracture. These injuries can be categorised into groups according to their mechanism and the structures injured.

Methods:

This review includes a literature search of the current evidence and personal experiences of the authors in managing these injuries.

Results:

All injuries are initially managed with closed reduction of the ulno-humeral joint and splinting before clinical examination and radiological evaluation. Dislocations with radial head fractures should be treated by restoring stability, with treatment choice depending on the type and size of radial head fracture. Terrible triad injuries necessitate operative treatment in almost all cases. Traditionally the LCL, MCL, coronoid and radial head were reconstructed, but there is recent evidence to support repairing of the coronoid and MCL only if the elbow is unstable after reconstruction of lateral structures. Surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries carries a high risk of complications with an average reoperation rate of 22%. Varus posteromedial rotational instability fracture-dislocations have only recently been described as having the potential to cause severe long-term problems. Cadaveric studies have reinforced the need to obtain post-reduction CT scans as the size of the coronoid fragment influences the long-term stability of the elbow. Anterior dislocation with olecranon fracture has the same treatment aims as other complex dislocations with the added need to restore the extensor mechanism.

Conclusion:

Complex elbow dislocations are injuries with significant risk of long-term disability. There are several case-series in the literature but few studies with sufficient patient numbers to provide evidence over level IV.

Primary Hinged External Fixation of Terrible Triad Injuries and Olecranon Fracture-Dislocations of the Elbow

This study aimed to introduce a new treatment that apples primary hinged external fixation for complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow in 12 cases. We retrospectively assessed the functional outcomes of eight patients with terrible triad injuries and three patients with an olecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow, who were treated at our hospital using a primary hinged external fixator between June 2012 and December 2014. Ten patients underwent repair or replacement of the radial head, while three underwent repair of the olecranon. In principle, they were treated without reconstruction of the coronoid fracture and collateral ligament injury. The patients were evaluated for a mean follow-up period of 16 months after the initial surgery. Early mobilization was encouraged while the hinged external fixator was in place. At the follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 93 points; the results were "excellent" in six cases and "good" in five. No patients had recurrent elbow instability. Only one patient needed an additional procedure after the initial operation. These results suggested that primary hinged external fixation without repair of the ligament and soft tissue is an effective minimally invasive surgery for the management of terrible triad injuries and olecranon fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

Complex instability of the elbow

Injuries to the elbow are commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice. They range from low energy, simple isolated fractures, to high energy complex fracture dislocations with severe ligamentous disruption. Recognising the precise pattern of injury is critical in restoring elbow function and preventing chronic instability, pain and weakness. This article discusses the important osseous and ligamentous stabilisers of the elbow joint and provides management protocols for the common patterns of complex injury encountered by the practising surgeon.

Arthroscopic fixation of coronoid process fractures through coronoid tunnelling and capsular plication

PURPOSE

the purpose of this study is to describe a new arthroscopic technique for reduction and fixation of coronoid process fractures (CPFs) and report clinical and functional results in 4 patients after a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

four patients underwent arthroscopic reduction and fixation of isolated CPFs (acute or non-unions, type I or type II according to the Regan-Morrey classification) performed using a new technique based on coronoid tunnelling and capsular plication. The patients were evaluated 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH), the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), and a visual analog scale (VAS); elbow range of motion (ROM) and joint stability were also evaluated and the rate of complications was reported.

RESULTS

all 4 patients completed the follow-up. At 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively, they recorded mean DASH scores of 22, 14 and 7, mean MEPI scores of 74, 82 and 94, and mean VAS scores of 4, 2 and 1. The mean ROM increased in all directions (at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively: flexion: 112°, 125°, 144°; extension: 3°, 5°, 6°; pronation: 76°, 84°, 91°; supination: 78°, 82°, 86°). No signs of instability were observed and no complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

the new all-arthroscopic coronoid tunnelling and capsular plication technique here proposed can restore elbow function, ROM and stability and allows anatomical reconstruction of the joint after type I or type II CPFs. If performed by an experienced arthroscopist, it is a valid alternative to open reduction and external fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Coronoid reconstruction with an osteochondral radial head graft

BACKGROUND

Chronic coronoid deficiency can occur subsequent to coronoid fracture malunion/nonunion or to coronoid hypoplasia or dysplasia resulting from injury during development. Several surgical options have been described to treat this difficult condition, but results are equivocal. We hypothesized that a modified coronoid reconstruction using a radial head osteochondral graft could restore elbow stability and congruity and that a technique involving rigid internal fixation would promote graft union.

METHODS

The coronoid was reconstructed using an osteochondral fragment from a frozen allograft radial head in 3 young women affected by complex post-traumatic elbow instability and incongruity resulting from coronoid deficiency. To promote bone healing, the fragment was kept as large as could be fitted in place, the cut surface compressed onto the remaining coronoid was as large as possible, the medial portion of the radial head (containing dense bone) was used, and 3 lag screws were inserted in different directions.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 26 months, all 3 patients achieved a painless, congruent stable joint with a functional range of motion. Computed tomography scans performed 3 months after surgery showed complete union of the graft in all the patients. Each patient rated herself as "almost normal" or "greatly improved" on the Summary Outcome Determination scale.

CONCLUSION

Coronoid reconstruction with a radial head osteochondral allograft was successful in restoring stability and function in chronically unstable elbows with coronoid deficiency. Strong fixation using a large segment of the medial radial head achieved rapid graft healing.

Complex coronoid and proximal ulna fractures are we getting better at fixing these?

Technological advances and improved understanding of functional anatomy about the elbow have lead an evolution regarding operative reconstruction of complex proximal ulnar and coronoid fractures. When treating these complex and challenging fractures, goals of anatomic articular restoration along with balanced soft tissue stability can lead to early range of motion and thus, desired functional outcome. The purpose of this review is to outline and provide tips and pearls to achieve desired results, with a comprehensive update on the most recent literature to support the latest fixation methods and techniques.

Fracture mapping of displaced partial articular fractures of the radial head

BACKGROUND

Recognition of patterns of traumatic elbow instability helps anticipate specific fracture characteristics and associated injuries. The objective of this study was to assess the association of fracture line distribution and location of displaced partial articular radial head fractures with specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability using fracture mapping techniques.

METHODS

Fracture line distribution and location of 66 acute displaced partial articular radial head fractures were identified using quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions that allowed reduction of fracture fragments and a standardized method to divide the radial head into quadrants with forearm in neutral position. Based on qualitative and quantitative assessment of fracture maps, the association between fracture characteristics of displaced partial articular radial head fractures and specific elbow fracture patterns was determined.

RESULTS

In partial articular radial head fractures, the highest fracture line intensity was located in the anterolateral quadrant near the center of the radial head. Fracture location corresponded with fracture line distribution; most fractures involved the anterolateral quadrant (n = 65; 98%), whereas parts of the posteromedial quadrant were involved in a minority of the fractures (n = 10; 15%). The association of fracture line distribution and location with overall fracture patterns of the elbow, as depicted on fracture maps, was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Fracture maps demonstrated no association between fracture line distribution and location of displaced partial articular fractures of the radial head and overall specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability, suggesting a common fracture mechanism that involves the anterolateral part of the radial head in most patients.

Reconstruction of Monteggia-like proximal ulna fractures using different fixation devices: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Comminuted proximal ulna fractures are rare and reconstruction of these fractures is discussed controversially. The aim of this study was to test three currently available plate devices in a standardized comminuted four-part fracture model created in proximal ulna sawbones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A standardized four-part fracture of the proximal ulna was created in 80 sawbones. Reconstruction was performed by five experienced test surgeons according to a standardized reconstruction protocol. Each surgeon reconstructed 4 fractures with a 3.5mm eight-hole reconstruction plate, 4 fractures with seven-hole third-tubular double plates and 4 fractures with a 3.5mm anatomical seven-hole locked angle proximal ulna plate. 4 more fractures were reconstructed with simple K-wires as a reference construct for further experiments. Outcome measurements were time for reconstruction, quality of reconstruction and stability of the reconstruction. Stability testing was done in 90° and 30° flexion of the elbow. Testing in 30° flexion was done to test the anteroposterior stability regarding the fixed coronoid process.

RESULTS

Time for reconstruction was significantly less for K-wire fixation than for the plate devices. Time for reconstruction plating and locked angle plating was significantly lower than for double plating (p<0.005). Quality of reduction did not differ between the three plate systems (p<0.05). K-wire fixation showed the best quality of reduction (p<0.005). In 90° of elbow flexion the anatomic locked angle olecranon plate showed a significantly higher stability compared to the other devices. Furthermore the tubular double plating was significantly more stable than reconstruction plating or K-wire fixation (p<0.05). In anteroposterior loading at 30°, the stability did not differ between the 4 different fixation techniques (p>0.05). For all devices the testing in 30° flexion showed a significantly higher rigidity compared to 90° flexion.

CONCLUSION

The locked angle plate system showed the highest stability in 90° of elbow flexion. Each implant was more stable in 30° flexion than in 90° flexion. Testing of the anterior stability of the elbow did not show any differences between the different implants. Because of the superior stability of this device, we conclude that locked angle plating should be preferred for reconstruction of monteggia like complex proximal ulna fractures.

Type IIA Monteggia Fracture Dislocation with Ipsilateral Distal Radius Fracture in Adult - A Rare Association

Monteggia fracture constitutes about 5-10% of the forearm fractures. Monteggia fracture by definition is proximal ulnar fracture with disruption of proximal radioulnar joint. Bado classified Monteggia fracture dislocation into four types and Jupiter subclassified type II Bado's fractures into four types. The associated injury in the form of distal radial fractures and distal humerus fractures are rare though many cases of distal radial physeal injuries have been reported in paediatric population. Hereby we report a rare association of type IIA Monteggia fracture dislocation with ipsilateral distal radius fracture in an adult patient. This case report also highlights on proper examination and full length radiographs of forearm to avoid missing injury at wrist in cases of elbow injuries. Management of such complex injuries included open reduction and internal fixation of olecronon fracture, distal radius fracture and radial head resection. Functional outcome at six months was good at wrist whereas at elbow, stiffness was a major concern with elbow range of movement from 40°-110°.

Treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations

Successful management of complex elbow fracture-dislocations requires, in part, recognition of the overall injury pattern, which can aid in the identification of concomitant bony and soft tissue injuries. Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations are best treated surgically with stable anatomic restoration of the trochlear notch. Terrible triad elbow injuries are believed to be caused by a valgus posterolateral force. Although select terrible triad injuries can be managed non-operatively, the majority of injuries are treated with stable surgical repair to allow early elbow motion. Unlike terrible triads, varus posteromedial forces are theorized to cause anteromedial coronoid fractures. These are usually associated with LCL disruptions, but do not have concomitant MCL or radial head injuries. A subset of anteromedial coronoid fractures can also be managed non-operatively. Internal fixation is recommended for injuries associated with large fracture fragments or elbow instability preventing early motion.

Adult Monteggia and Olecranon Fracture Dislocations of the Elbow

Monteggia fractures and olecranon fracture dislocations represent complex injuries with distinct patterns of bony and soft tissue involvement. Fractures of the proximal ulna and olecranon process may lead to disruption of the proximal radioulnar joint and/or ulnohumeral joint. The keys to treatment are recognition of the pattern of injury and formation of an algorithmic surgical plan to address all components of the injury process. Complications are common and may be related to the injury spectrum itself and/or inadequate fracture alignment or fixation.

Management of complex elbow dislocations: a mechanistic approach

Complex elbow dislocations (ie, fracture-dislocations) are challenging injuries to treat and may result in significant patient morbidity. Chronic instability, posttraumatic arthrosis, and poor functional outcomes are frequent. Orthopaedic surgeons should strive to optimize elbow function through restoration of articular congruity and stability coupled with early rehabilitation. Although most of these injuries require surgical management, not all complex elbow dislocations are equivalent. Understanding elbow biomechanics and the injury mechanism provides valuable insight into the variations of pathology that may be observed. Identifying the particular fracture pattern, such as an axial loading, valgus posterolateral rotatory, or varus posteromedial rotatory injury mechanism, helps guide appropriate treatment.

Critical analysis of olecranon fracture management by pre-contoured locking plates

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the proximal ulna are rare and usually managed surgically. Strong fixation of the harware is essential to obtain good outcomes. We report our experience with pre-contoured locking plate fixation of complex olecranon fractures and present a critical appraisal of the outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

Pre-contoured locking plates provide good outcomes, but their clinical tolerance may be limited in some instances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2009 to December 2011, 28 patients were managed using a pre-contoured locking compression plate (LCP(®)). Among them, 6 were excluded because of missing data, which left 22 patients (11 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 55.7 years, including 12 who were employed. The fracture was on the dominant side in 11 patients. According to the Mayo Clinic classification, 15 fractures were type II and 7 type III. In addition to the ulnar fracture, a radial head fracture was present in 9 patients and a coronoid process fracture in 5 patients. Functional recovery was assessed using the Broberg-Morrey score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Radiographs were obtained to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction and fracture healing, as well as to look for ossifications and osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 20 months. Flexion was 131°, extension loss was 9.5°, pronation was 79°, and supination was 80.5°. The mean Broberg-Morrey score was 96.7 and the mean MEPS score 96.6. Fracture healing occurred in all patients, within a mean of 10.6 weeks. Evidence of early osteoarthritis was found in 6 patients, ossifications in 3 patients, and synostosis in 1 patient. An infection was successfully treated with lavage and antibiotic therapy in 1 patient. The fixation hardware was removed in 6 patients. No prognostic factors were identified.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Our hypothesis was confirmed. The outcomes are encouraging and comparable to those reported in the literature. The critical issue is the limited clinical tolerance of the plate with a high rate of posterior impingement requiring plate removal (27%). Rigorous technique is essential during plate implantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography measurements of coronoid fractures

PURPOSE

Using quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography (Q3DCT) modeling, we tested the null hypothesis that there was no difference in fracture fragment volume, articular surface involvement, and number of fracture fragments between coronoid fracture types and patterns of traumatic elbow instability.

METHODS

We studied 82 patients with a computed tomography scan of a coronoid fracture using Q3DCT modeling. Fracture fragments were identified and fragment volume and articular surface involvement were measured within fracture types and injury patterns. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the Q3DCT data of the coronoid fractures.

RESULTS

Fractures of the coronoid tip (n = 45) were less fragmented and had the smallest fragment volume and articular surface area involvement compared with anteromedial facet fractures (n = 20) and base fractures (n = 17). Anteromedial facet and base fractures were more fragmented than tip fractures, and base fractures had the largest fragment volume and articular surface area involvement compared with tip and anteromedial facet fractures. We found similar differences between fracture types described by Regan and Morrey. Furthermore, fractures associated with terrible triad fracture dislocation (n = 42) had the smallest fragment volume, and fractures associated with olecranon fracture dislocations (n = 17) had the largest fragment volume and articular surface area involvement compared with the other injury patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing fractures of the coronoid using Q3DCT modeling demonstrated that fracture fragment characteristics differ significantly between fracture types and injury patterns. Detailed knowledge of fracture characteristics and their association with specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability may assist decision making and preoperative planning.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Quantitative 3DCT modeling can provide a more detailed understanding of fracture morphology, which might guide decision making and implant development.

Proximal ulnar fractures in adults: a review of 163 cases

The aim of this study was to report the epidemiological characteristics and the experience of 5 departments of trauma, in France, in the management of fractures of the proximal ulna. 163 patients with fractures of the proximal ulna with a mean age of 49.9 years (range 16-97) were managed. The most common mode of injury was a motor vehicle collision (48%). 18% sustained associated injuries to the ipsilateral limb. Open fractures were present in 42 patients (25%). A total of 109 patients had a fracture of the olecranon, with the Mayo 2A and B types most frequently seen (66%). The patients were invited for clinical examination at a mean duration of 16 months, retrospectively. Validated patient-oriented assessment scores involving the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Broberg and Morrey score were evaluated. All patients had follow-up radiographs. The mean arc of elbow motion was 130° (70-150°). The mean MEPI was 91 (20-100) with good results in 23% and excellent results in 52% of the patients. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 90 after isolated olecranon fracture, and decreased with the complexity of the lesion. 117 fractures (72%) healed with ulnohumeral congruity. 9 fracture non-unions occurred (6%). Although the fracture of the proximal ulna can be described in several classifications, none of them accommodate it satisfactorily, because of the complexity of the lesion. The coronoid process is the keystone for the stability of the elbow. It forms the anterior buttress with the radial head. Tension band wire fixation is by far the commonest technique of internal fixation used for the treatment of non-comminuted olecranon fractures. Dorsal plate fixation is a useful option by providing improved fixation of complex comminuted fractures and fracture-dislocations. The radiocapitellar joint has to be restored appropriately, preserving the radial head when possible and replacing it with a prosthesis otherwise. The lateral collateral ligament complex is commonly disrupted and usually can be reattached to its origin from the lateral epicondyle. In addition, a brief period of hinged external fixation should be considered.

Distribution of coronoid fracture lines by specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability

PURPOSE

To determine if specific coronoid fractures relate to specific overall traumatic elbow instability injury patterns and to depict any relationship on fracture maps and heat maps.

METHODS

We collected 110 computed tomography (CT) studies from patients with coronoid fractures. Fracture types and pattern of injury were characterized based on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, 2- and 3-dimensional CT scans, and intraoperative findings as described in operative reports. Using quantitative 3-dimensional CT techniques we were able to reconstruct the coronoid and reduce fracture fragments. Based on these reconstructions, fracture lines were identified and graphically superimposed onto a standard template in order to create 2-dimensional fracture maps. To further emphasize the fracture maps, the initial diagrams were converted into fracture heat maps following arbitrary units of measure. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the association between coronoid fracture types and elbow fracture-dislocation patterns.

RESULTS

Forty-seven coronoid fractures were associated with a terrible triad fracture dislocation, 30 with a varus posteromedial rotational injury, 1 with a anterior olecranon fracture dislocation, 22 with a posterior olecranon fracture dislocation, and 7 with a posterior Monteggia injury associated with terrible triad fracture dislocation of the elbow. The association between coronoid fracture types and elbow fracture-dislocation patterns, as shown on 2-dimensional fracture and heat maps, was strongly significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our fracture maps and heat maps support the observation that specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability have correspondingly specific coronoid fracture patterns. Knowledge of these patterns is useful for planning management because it directs exposure and fixation and helps identify associated ligament injuries and fractures that might benefit from treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Two-dimensional fracture and heat mapping techniques may help surgeons to predict the distribution of coronoid fracture lines associated with specific injury patterns.

Strategic approach to O'Driscoll type 2 anteromedial coronoid facet fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to suggest a strategic approach to the management of anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture that is related to posteromedial rotational instability of the elbow through investigation of the surgical outcome of diverse combinations, including internal fixation of AMCF fractures and repair of collateral ligament injury.

METHODS

The study enrolled 18 patients. On the basis of the size of the coronoid fracture and the degree of the soft tissue injuries that were evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and varus stress test under anesthesia, these fractures were managed differently. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale score, modified Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Plain radiographs were used to evaluate the degree of arthrosis.

RESULTS

There were 2 cases of O'Driscoll type 2, subtype 1 fractures; 14 cases of type 2, subtype 2 fractures; and 2 cases of type 2, subtype 3 fractures. Seven cases were managed with only AMCF fracture fixation, 4 cases with only lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair, 6 cases with concomitant repair of the LUCL and AMCF fracture, and 1 case with a conservative method. There were no significant differences among O'Driscoll types and among the subgroups of type 2-2 (P > .05). When the elbow showed instability on the varus stress test after AMCF fracture fixation, the soft tissue injuries of the lateral elbow were more severe (P =. 015). Arthrosis was not correlated with the patient's symptoms (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

AMCF fracture can be treated by only AMCF fracture fixation, only LUCL repair, or a combination of these techniques, depending on the size of the AMCF fracture fragment and the degree of the lateral soft tissue injuries.

The effect of a coronoid prosthesis on restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

The coronoid process has been recognized as a critical component in maintaining elbow stability. In the case of comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, a prosthesis may be beneficial in restoring the osseous integrity of the elbow joint. The hypothesis of this in vitro biomechanical study was that a coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

METHODS

An anatomically shaped metallic coronoid prosthesis was designed and developed based on computed tomography-derived measurements and optimized to account for average cartilage thickness. Elbow kinematics and stability were determined for 8 cadaveric arms in active and passive elbow flexion in the varus, valgus, horizontal, and vertical positions using an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus angulation and internal-external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified in the intact state, after collateral ligament sectioning and repair (control state), after a simulated 40% transverse coronoid fracture, and after implantation of the coronoid prosthesis.

RESULTS

Internal rotation of the ulna increased with a 40% coronoid fracture in the horizontal and varus positions. Increases in varus angulation after coronoid fracture were also observed in the horizontal and varus positions, during active and passive flexion, respectively. Following implantation of the coronoid prosthesis, elbow kinematics were restored similar to control levels in all elbow positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support our hypothesis that an anatomically shaped coronoid prosthesis would be effective in restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence that the use of an anatomical implant restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow and rationale for further study and development of this method. For comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, our research indicates that a prosthesis may be a feasible treatment option.

Diagnosis of elbow fracture patterns on radiographs: interobserver reliability and diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Studies of traumatic elbow instability suggest that recognition of a pattern in the combination and character of the fractures and joint displacements helps predict soft tissue injury and guide the treatment of traumatic elbow instability, but there is no evidence that patterns can be identified reliably.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined (1) the interobserver reliability of identifying specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability on radiographs for subgroups of orthopaedic surgeons; and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic diagnosis.

METHODS

Seventy-three orthopaedic surgeons evaluated 53 sets of radiographs and diagnosed one of five common patterns of traumatic elbow instability by using a web-based survey. The interobserver reliability was analyzed using Cohen's multirater kappa. Intraoperative diagnosis was the reference for fracture pattern in calculations of the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive and negative predictive values of radiographic diagnosis.

RESULTS

The overall interobserver reliability for patterns of traumatic elbow instability on radiographs was κ=0.41. Treatment of greater than five such injuries a year was associated with greater interobserver agreement, but years in practice were not. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 76% to 93% and was lowest for the terrible triad pattern of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability can be diagnosed with moderate interobserver reliability and reasonable accuracy on radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reconstruction of the coronoid using an extended prosthesis: an in vitro biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to determine whether a coronoid implant with an extended tip would improve elbow stability compared with an anatomic prosthesis in the setting of collateral ligament insufficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Passive elbow extension was performed in 7 cadaveric arms in the varus and valgus positions and active and passive extension in the horizontal position by use of an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus was quantified with a tracking system with a native coronoid, a 40% coronoid deficiency, an anatomic prosthesis, and an extended prosthesis, with the collateral ligaments sectioned and repaired.

RESULTS

Laxity significantly increased after a 40% coronoid deficiency with both repaired and sectioned collateral ligaments (P ≤ .01). With the ligaments repaired, there was no significant difference in laxity between the native coronoid, the anatomic implant, or the extended implant. Ligament sectioning alone produced severe instability, with a mean laxity of 42.75° ± 11.54° (P < .01). With insufficient ligaments, the anatomic prosthesis produced no change in laxity compared with the native coronoid, whereas the extended implant significantly reduced laxity by 21.56° ± 17.70° (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomic coronoid implant with ligament repair restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow to intact levels. In the setting of ligament insufficiency, an extended implant improves stability relative to an anatomic implant, but the elbow remains significantly less stable than an intact elbow. Studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of these designs.

Fractures of the ulnar coronoid process

The ulnar coronoid process plays a central role in elbow stability due to its unique anatomic characteristics. A fracture of the coronoid, although uncommon, represents a serious injury that can adversely affect functional outcome if not treated appropriately. Several surgical interventions addressing different fracture patterns are being increasingly recognised as effective treatment options even for smaller fragments. A review of the literature was performed in order to evaluate different treatment strategies applied to clearly defined fracture configurations. 14 articles reporting data for the management of 236 coronoid fractures met our inclusion criteria and were subjected to critical analysis. The data suggest that recognition of specific coronoid fracture patterns, use of appropriate classification systems and application of staged surgical protocols can stabilise the elbow effectively and lead to favourable outcomes.

Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius in adults: a comprehensive classification

BACKGROUND

Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius include multiple anatomic lesions, the management of which is known to be demanding. Although several classifications have been proposed, none appear to be exhaustive, and most of them have neither therapeutic nor prognostic value. The purpose of this study was to design a comprehensive classification that may provide a guide for the operative management of these injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The classification is aimed at identifying definite anatomic lesions, called the "main lesions," the presence of which can affect the prognosis and require peculiar treatments. The main lesions include (1) ulnar fracture (including its location with respect to the insertion of collateral ligaments and coronoid fracture), (2) radiohumeral dislocation, (3) proximal radioulnar dislocation, (4) radial fracture, (5) distal radioulnar joint and interosseous membrane lesion, and (6) humeral-ulnar dislocation. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed in 25 complex fracture-dislocations. Standard radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed by 3 independent observers.

RESULTS

The main lesions were labeled by an alphanumeric system. Numbers 1 through 6 identified the type of ulnar fracture, and letters A through E indicated the dislocated joint or presence of a radial fracture. The direction of dislocation and the type of radial fracture were identified by Roman numerals, from I to III, placed after the letter. A κ value of 0.873 or greater resulted from intraobserver and interobserver evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We created a comprehensive classification of complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow. The classification appeared to be reproducible and may represent a useful tool for the management of such difficult injuries.

Treatment of persistent instability after posterior fracture-dislocation of the elbow: restoring stability and mobility by internal fixation and hinged external fixation

BACKGROUND

Long-term results after the treatment of fracture-dislocations of the elbow have often been disappointing, because of post-traumatic instability, stiffness, and early arthritis. We present the results after surgical restoration of stability in complex fracture-dislocations of the elbow using early postoperative mobilization with a hinged external fixator after internal reconstruction of the static stabilizers.

METHODS

Twenty patients with persistent instability after fracture-dislocation of the elbow were treated at a mean of 11 weeks after injury. We evaluated 17 elbows in 16 patients (mean age, 44 years) at a mean of 44 months after the definitive surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 of 17 elbows had a good or excellent result. The mean range of motion was 96° (SD, 23°). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 74 (SD, 18), and the mean Functional Elbow Score was 68 (SD, 21). Patients treated within 6 weeks after the trauma had significantly better scores, with a mean MEPS of 81 (SD, 18), than patients treated after a delay, with a mean MEPS of 62 (SD, 13). No patients had recurrent dislocation. Secondary arthritis was mainly found in the delayed-treatment group. Of 17 elbows, 7 (41%) had complications.

CONCLUSION

Surgical restoration of the static stabilizers in combination with hinged external fixation leads to satisfactory results when performed within the first 6 weeks after injury. When definite surgical stabilization is delayed more than 6 weeks, the procedure can still restore stability but the functional results are often disappointing.