The history and future of radiostereometric analysis

Measuring total hip arthroplasty liner wear using the EOS Imaging System: experimental and clinical results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The low-dose EOS Imaging System is an emerging tool for 3-dimensional measurements in orthopedics. The clinical feasibility for measuring total hip arthroplasty (THA) liner wear has not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using EOS to measure THA liner wear by examining the experimental accuracy using a THA phantom and clinical precision of patients with THA, considering a clinically relevant precision at the 95% repeatability limit to be 0.2 mm.

METHODS

An experimental THA phantom with movable stem and a fixed cup with a plastic liner was constructed to simulate progressive 3D liner wear. Series of 11 pairs of radiographs with 50 μm femoral movement in between were obtained for each 3D axis in EOS. 30 patients with a THA were scanned twice using EOS to assess precision. Model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used for wear measurement.

RESULTS

The mean difference (true minus simulated wear) with standard deviation (SD) and 95% limits of agreement for experimental THA wear were 0.005 (0.037) and [-0.069 to 0.079] mm for the vertical (y) axis. The mean (SD) and 95% repeatability limit for precision for clinical measurement were -0.029 (0.105) and 0.218 mm.

CONCLUSION

Experimental THA liner wear using EOS was within clinically relevant tolerances and without bias. The clinical precision was just outside our defined clinically relevant precision. Compared with conventional RSA, EOS is less accurate and precise but may still be of value for certain clinical applications, provided larger sample size or longer follow-up are available.

Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations

Opening remarks: These guidelines are the result of discussions within a diverse group of RSA researchers. They were approved in December 2023 by the board and selected members of the International Radiostereometry Society to update the guidelines by Valstar et al. [1]. By adhering to these guidelines, RSA studies will become more transparent and consistent in execution, presentation, reporting, and interpretation. Both authors and reviewers of scientific papers using RSA may use these guidelines, summarized in the Checklist, as a reference. Deviations from these guidelines should have the underlying rationale stated.

Phantom validation of a novel RSA-based impingement metric to assess component-on-component impingement risk

Component-on-component impingement in total hip arthroplasty may lead to post-operative complications including dislocation. Despite numerous clinical studies focusing on reducing this risk, assessment methods remain limited to qualitative radiography, finite element analysis, and cadaver studies. There is a need for more precise measurements of impingement in the research setting. We aimed to validate a novel RSA-based impingement metric to measure component-on-component impingement in vivo. A phantom experiment of a standard metal-on-polyethylene total hip system was performed. RSA examinations were performed as typical for a traditional weight-bearing RSA exam for large joints. The phantom was placed in 10 possible impinged positions and one neutral position. Double exposure radiographs were taken to measure repeatability. The closest distance between the skirt of the head and the inner circumference of the acetabular cup liner was measured to assess impingement risk. Distances between the closest point of the hood to the edge of the cup in 10 impinged positions ranged from 0.05 to 1.03 mm, with the average being 0.67 mm. In the neutral position, the distance measured is 11.02 mm. Excellent repeatability was observed, with a standard deviation of 0.03 mm with an r value of 0.09. A validated RSA-based risk metric was established to evaluate in vivo hip impingement. A 1 mm threshold may be proposed to define impingement where distances approaching 1.00 mm are at a greater risk of impingement. This simplified metric holds promise for upcoming clinical studies on component-on-component impingement.

Corroboration of coupled musculoskeletal model and finite element predictions with in vivo RSA migration of an uncemented acetabular component

While finite element (FE) models have been used extensively in orthopedic studies, validation of their outcome metrics has been limited to comparison against ex vivo testing. The aim of this study was to validate FE model predictions of the initial cup mechanical environment against patient-matched in vivo measurements of acetabular cup migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Tailored musculoskeletal and FE models were developed using a combination of three-dimensional (3D) motion capture data and clinical computerized tomography (CT) scans for a cohort of eight individuals who underwent primary total hip replacement and were prospectively enrolled in an RSA study. FE models were developed to calculate the mean modulus of cancellous bone, composite peak micromotion (CPM), composite peak strain (CPS) and percentage area of bone ingrowth. The RSA cup migration at 3 months was used to corroborate the FE output metrics. Qualitatively, all FE-predicted metrics followed a similar rank order as the in vivo RSA 3D migration data. The two cases with the lowest predicted CPM (<20 µm), lowest CPS (<0.0041), and high bone modulus (>917 MPa) were confirmed to have the lowest in vivo RSA 3D migration (<0.14 mm). The two cases with the largest predicted CPM (>80 µm), larger CPS (>0.0119) and lowest bone modulus (<472 MPa) were confirmed to have the largest in vivo RSA 3D migration (>0.78 mm). This study enabled the first corroboration between tailored musculoskeletal and FE model predictions with in vivo RSA cup migration. Investigation of additional patient-matched CT, gait, and RSA examinations may allow further development and validation of FE models.

Acetabular cup fixation with and without screws following primary total hip arthroplasty: migration evaluated by radiostereometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Early cup migration after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is correlated to late revision due to aseptic loosening. However, the use of screws for increased cup stability remains unclear and debated. The purpose of this study is to assess acetabular migration between cups fixated with and without the use of screws.

METHODS

Patients underwent primary THA using either a direct anterior (DA) or a direct lateral (DL) approach. The DA surgeon routinely supplemented cup fixation with 1 or 2 screws while the DL surgeon used no screws. At 7 follow-up visits up to 2 years post operation, patients underwent radiostereometric analysis (RSA) imaging for implant migration tracking. The primary outcome was defined as proximal cup migration measured with model-based RSA.

RESULTS

68 patients were assessed up to 2 years post operation, n = 43 received screws and n = 25 did not. The use of screws had a significant effect on cup migration (p = 0.018). From 2 weeks to 2 years post operation, the total mean migration was 0.403 ± 0.681 mm and 0.129 ± 0.272 mm (p = 0.319) for cups with and without screws, respectively. The number of screws used also had a significant impact, with cups fixated with 1 screw migrating more than cups fixated with 2 (p = 0.013, mean difference 0.712 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular cups fixated with only 1 screw resulted in greater migration than cups with no screws or 2 screws, though the mean magnitude was well under the 1.0 mm threshold for unacceptable migration. However, 3 of the 24 patients who received only 1 screw exceeded the 1.0 mm threshold for unacceptable migration. Ultimately, the results of this study show that the use of 2 screws to supplement cup fixation can provide good implant stability that is equivalent to a secure press-fit component with no screws.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03558217).

Staged Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Radiostereometric Analyses and Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

There are ongoing concerns regarding the use of bone graft following prosthetic joint infection and subsequent implant subsidence. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a cemented stem combined with femoral impaction bone grafting (FIBG) at second stage revision for infection results in stable femoral stem fixation, determined by accurate methods, and good clinical results.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 29 patients underwent staged revision total hip arthroplasty for infection using an interval prosthesis followed by FIBG at the final reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 89 months (range, 8 to 167 months). Femoral implant subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes included the Harris Hip Score, Harris Pain score and Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie activity scores.

RESULTS

At 2-years follow-up the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.36 mm (range, -0.31 to -4.98), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.05 mm (range, 0.36 to -0.73). At 5-years follow-up, the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.89 mm (range, -0.27 to -6.35), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.06 mm (range, 0.44 to -0.55). There were 25 patients who were confirmed infection-free after the second stage revision with FIBG. The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 79 at 5 years (P = .0130), and Harris Pain score from 20 to 40 (P = .0038).

CONCLUSIONS

Stable femoral component fixation can be achieved with FIBG when reconstructing the femur after revision for infection without compromising infection cure rates and patient-reported outcomes.

A low-dose biplanar X-ray imager has RSA level precision in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The low radiation biplanar X-ray imager (EOS imaging, Paris, France) scans patients in a weight-bearing position, provides calibrated images, and limits radiation, an asset for serial radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies. RSA in vivo precision values have not been published for this type of imaging system, thus the goal of this study was to assess the precision of RSA in vivo utilizing a low radiation biplanar imager.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At a mean of 5 years post-surgery (range 1.4-7.5 years), 15 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) participants (mean age 67 years at the time of imaging, 12 female, 3 male) with RSA markers implanted during index surgery were scanned twice at the same visit in the EOS imager. Precision of marker-based analysis was calculated by comparing the position of the implant relative to the underlying bone between the 2 examinations.

RESULTS

The 95% limit of precision was 0.11, 0.04, and 0.15 mm along the x, y, and z axes, respectively and 0.15°, 0.20°, and 0.14° around the same axes.

CONCLUSION

This precision study has shown an in vivo RSA precision of ≤ 0.15 mm and ≤ 0.20°, well within published uniplanar values for conventional arthroplasty RSA, with the added benefit of weight-bearing imaging, a lower radiation dose, and without the need for a reference object during the scan.

Radiostereometric analysis: comparison of radiation dose and precision in digital and computed radiography

BACKGROUND

Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is used to measure fixation of joint prosthesis. This study compared radiation dose and image quality of a digital radiography (DR) RSA system and a computed radiography (CR) RSA system in a clinical setting.

METHODS

RSA recordings of 24 hips and shoulders were analyzed. We compared two systems: (1) Arcoma T0 with ST-VI image plates and Profect CR-IR 363 reader to (2) AdoraRSA with CXDI-70C wireless DR detectors in a clinical uniplanar RSA set-up with a ± 20 degrees tube angulation and 35 cm × 43 cm detectors. Effective dose was calculated using dedicated software. Image quality was evaluated using calibration errors as calculated by the RSA software.

RESULTS

The mean dose for hips was 0.14 (SD 0.04) mSv in the CR system and 0.05 (SD 0.02) mSv in the DR system. The mean dose for shoulders was 0.16 (SD 0.07) mSv in the CR system and 0.09 (SD 0.03) mSv in the DR system. Radiation dose was 64% (p < 0.001) and 43% (p = 0.03) lower in the DR system compared with the CR system for hip and shoulder RSA, respectively. Image quality was better for the DR system with 60-80% less calibration errors compared to the CR system.

CONCLUSION

Owing to highly efficient detectors and added filtration at the x-ray tubes, the DR system considerably reduced radiation dose compared with the CR system without compromising image quality. Based on the findings in this study, we recommend replacing CR RSA systems with DR RSA systems.

REGISTRATION

Patients were selected from clinical studies performed on the two systems and approved by the local ethics committee [20060165, M-20100112, M-20070082, M-20110224, and 20070258] and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00408096, NCT01289834, NCT00913679, NCT02311179, and NCT00679120].

Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs

Aims

The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems.

Methods

In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up.

Results

At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness.

Conclusion

The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness.

How Do Classic (Static) RSA and Patient Motion Artifacts Affect the Assessment of Migration of a TKA Tibial Component? An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Classic (static) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is the current gold standard to assess, in vivo, the migration of total joint arthroplasty components. To prevent potential patient motion artifacts during the acquisition of paired radiostereometric images, images must be taken by simultaneously firing both X-ray tubes. However, the influence of nonsynchronized RSA paired images or patient motion artifacts on the precision of RSA and the assessment of implant migration is not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed (1) the effect of possible patient motion on the precision of RSA and (2) apparent differences in implant migration among axes (in-plane and out-of-plane translations and in-plane and out-of-plane rotations) of possible motion artifacts.

METHODS

Radiographs of two tibial knee arthroplasty components, each fixed in two bone-implant models as a customized phantom, were taken in a uniplanar measurement setup. We evaluated both model-based (implant models from reversed engineering) and marker-based (additional attached implant markers) RSA approaches. Between the simulated reference and follow-up examinations, we used one of the bone-implant models to simulate patient motion and the other to simulate no patient motion in parallel. Two defined protocols were followed for each of the bone-implant models: no-motion and simulated motion protocols. RSA image pairs were analyzed using a model-based RSA software package (MBRSA 4.1, RSA core ). Precision was calculated through repeat examinations, and migration of the two components was assessed for comparison of the components with each other. Measurements were taken along the medial-lateral and posterior-anterior axes for translations and around the cranial-caudal axis for rotations. The maximum total point motion was measured for comparison between the two components.

RESULTS

The effect of simulated patient motion was generally small, except in the cranial-caudal axis, but the induced imprecision associated with motion was larger in model-based RSA than it was in marker-based RSA. The mean ± standard deviation values of precision in model-based RSA were 0.035 ± 0.015 mm, 0.045 ± 0.014 mm, and 0.049 ± 0.036 mm greater than those in marker-based RSA, in accordance with the simulated motion protocol in translations along the medial-lateral axis (0.018 ± 0.004 mm; p = 0.01), along the posterior-anterior axis (0.018 ± 0.007 mm; p = 0.003), and rotations around the cranial-caudal axis (0.017 ± 0.006 mm; p = 0.02). Apparent differences in implant migration were the greatest for the maximum total point motion. The maximum total point motion increased from 0.038 ± 0.007 mm for the no-motion protocol to 1.684 ± 0.038 mm (p < 0.001) for the simulated motion protocol in marker-based RSA, and from 0.101 ± 0.027 mm for the no-motion protocol to 1.973 ± 0.442 mm (p < 0.001) for the simulated motion protocol in model-based RSA, and was the worst-case scenario regarding patient motion artifacts.

CONCLUSION

Patient motion exceeding 1 mm or 1° on nonsynchronized RSA images affects measurement errors regarding the detection of migration of a tibial component. In clinical RSA studies, the effect of patient motion on the assessment of implant migration should be of particular concern, even if clinical RSA systems have acceptable precision. Specially trained radiographers are crucial for correctly acquiring radiographs, especially when simultaneous radiography exposures are not electronically automated. In general, RSA requires synchronized image acquisition, and this should be the state-of-the-art.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In clinical RSA studies, precision assessed by repeat examinations may not be reliable using the current standards that are widely used in radiology departments. When assessing implant migration for reliability, comparison of the maximum total point motion between the tested (simulated motion) implant and baseline (no-motion) implant, as in this study, is advocated because of the accurate detection of patient motion artifacts.

Accuracy of radiostereometric analysis using a motorized Roentgen system in a pilot study for clinical simulation

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is routinely implemented with two paired Roentgen tubes for three-dimensional (3D) implant migration measurements. A conventional set-up of one stationary tube and one mobile could be time-consuming. Utilizing two customized ceiling-mounted tubes is normally associated with investment costs. Thus, a pilot set-up of a motorized system (single Roentgen source) for radiostereometric image acquisition may be a time-saving and space-efficient alternative. RSA using the motorized system is feasible in this study as a non-synchronized image acquisition technique, however, patient motion may occur and influence the assessment of implant migration. The phantom study aimed to assess accuracy of RSA using the motorized Roentgen system in this in vitro study. Accuracy values of translations and rotations were ±0.29 mm and ±0.48° for the single Roentgen source RSA set-up and ±0.26 mm and ±0.48° for the conventional RSA set-up. This study was also performed to simulate potential patient motion during exposure intervals between paired image acquisition. RSA using the motorized system is able to implement RSA with acceptable accuracy. In general, RSA with synchronized image acquisition is the gold standard to access in vivo implant migration with the highest accuracy. Patient motion exists in non-synchronized image acquisition techniques and results in RSA-related motion artifacts. Then we introduced what RSA-related motion artifacts are. The uniplanar calibration cage applied in the study has a few fiducial and control markers, and some of the markers were occluded in radiographs. Whereas, the number of markers in the calibration cage is correlated with accuracy of 3D implant reconstruction.

Efficacy and Safety of Acetabular Cup without Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Adequate initial fixation of the uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty is necessary to achieve long-term survival. Although screw fixation contributes to improved cup stability, there is currently no consensus on the use of this method. This study aimed to assess the existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of cup fixation in total hip arthroplasty without screws. Materials and Methods: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify RCTs published before February 2022. Primary outcomes were reoperation, cup migration, and Harris Hip Score. Secondary outcomes were the presence of a radiolucent line in the acetabular region, translation and rotation movement, and polyethylene wear. We conducted meta-analyses using the random-effects models. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for outcomes of interest; the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to summarize the body of evidence. Results: We included six reports from four studies. Total hip arthroplasty without screw fixation to the acetabular cup had little to no effect on reoperation (pooled relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-6.68; I2 = 0%), cup migration (pooled relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-10.33; I2 = 1%), Harris Hip Score (mean difference, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, -1.31-3.70; I2 = 0%), radiolucent line (pooled relative risk, 5.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-109.35), translation and rotation of all axes, and polyethylene wear (mean difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.01-0.04; I2 = 0%), with very low certainty of evidence on all measures. Conclusions: The efficacy of acetabular cups without screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty remains uncertain, suggesting the need for prudent clinical application. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with low risk of bias are required.

Artificial intelligence for image analysis in total hip and total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review

AIMS

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common orthopaedic procedures requiring postoperative radiographs to confirm implant positioning and identify complications. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis has the potential to automate this postoperative surveillance. The aim of this study was to prepare a scoping review to investigate how AI is being used in the analysis of radiographs following THA and TKA, and how accurate these tools are.

METHODS

The Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed libraries were systematically searched to identify relevant articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley framework were followed. Study quality was assessed using a modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool. AI performance was reported using either the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 455 studies identified, only 12 were suitable for inclusion. Nine reported implant identification and three described predicting risk of implant failure. Of the 12, three studies compared AI performance with orthopaedic surgeons. AI-based implant identification achieved AUC 0.992 to 1, and most algorithms reported an accuracy > 90%, using 550 to 320,000 training radiographs. AI prediction of dislocation risk post-THA, determined after five-year follow-up, was satisfactory (AUC 76.67; 8,500 training radiographs). Diagnosis of hip implant loosening was good (accuracy 88.3%; 420 training radiographs) and measurement of postoperative acetabular angles was comparable to humans (mean absolute difference 1.35° to 1.39°). However, 11 of the 12 studies had several methodological limitations introducing a high risk of bias. None of the studies were externally validated.

CONCLUSION

These studies show that AI is promising. While it already has the ability to analyze images with significant precision, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence to support its widespread clinical use. Further research to design robust studies that follow standard reporting guidelines should be encouraged to develop AI models that could be easily translated into real-world conditions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):929-937.

Implant migration and functional outcome of Reverse Shoulder Lateralized Glenosphere Line Extension System: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inferior scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The most efficient technique to avoid inferior scapular notching has been reported to be lateralization of the glenoid offset. This study aims to compare radiological and functional outcomes of the DELTA Xtend® Reverse Shoulder System Lateralized Glenosphere Line Extension (intervention group) with the Standard DELTA Xtend® Reverse Shoulder System (control group). We hypothesize that the lateralization improves the patient outcome by decreasing the risk of inferior scapular notching without increasing the risk of migration and loosening of glenoid component.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, all Danish citizens with rotator cuff arthropathy or degeneration of the glenohumeral joint with severe posterior wear and allocated for a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at the department of orthopaedic surgery at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, will be considered for participation. The exclusion criteria are as follows: below 50 years of age, cognitive or linguistic impairment, insufficient glenoid bone stock, previous fracture in the upper extremity and autoimmune-mediated inflammatory arthritis. There will be included a total of 122 patients of which 56 will participate in the radiostereometric analysis. This number of patients allows 20% to drop out. The co-primary outcomes are the pattern and magnitude of the migration of the glenoid component assessed by radiostereometric analysis and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index. The secondary outcomes are inferior scapular notching, patient-reported and functional outcomes (Oxford shoulder score, Constant-Murley score and pain), side effects and complications, changes in bone mineral density and economy. The included patients will be examined before the surgery, within 1 week and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after.

DISCUSSION

No previous studies have compared the conventional reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial regarding migration and functional outcome. Furthermore, radiostereometric analysis has not been used to evaluate the migration of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial. This study intends to determine which treatment has the most optimal outcome for the benefit of future patients with an indication for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been notified to Pactius and has approval number P-2021-231. Furthermore, the study will be registered on Clinicaltrials.gov before starting the inclusion.

Future modalities to assess fracture healing

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The literature comparing humeral implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is sparse. With minimal supporting literature, there has been a trend away from standard-length cemented humeral implants to press-fit stems and, recently, to shorter-stem implants. It is known that early implant migration, within the first 2 years postoperatively, is predictive of later implant loosening and possible revision surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and implant migration between cemented standard-length humeral stems and press-fit short stems using model-based radiostereometric analysis.

METHODS

After a power analysis, 41 shoulders were prospectively randomized to receive either a cemented standard-length or press-fit short humeral stem for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between July 2017 and June 2019. Following surgery, participants were imaged with stereo radiographs acquired at 6 weeks (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Migration of the humeral stem at each time point was compared with baseline, with differences in migration between cohorts assessed using a mixed-effects model with the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Patient-reported outcome measures (Subjective Shoulder Value; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; Simple Shoulder Test score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Constant score) were also compared.

RESULTS

At 6 months (P = .025), 1 year (P = .004), and 2 years (P = .001) postoperatively, press-fit short stems migrated significantly more than cemented stems along the superior-inferior translation axis; in addition, they showed greater total translation at 2 years (P = .003). Mean total translation (± standard deviation) at 2 years was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 1.0 ± 1.1 mm for the cemented and press-fit cohorts, respectively. Mean migration between the 1- and 2-year time points was minimal for both stem fixation groups along all axes (<0.1 mm and 0.6°). There was no difference in active range of motion, pain, or validated outcome measures between the cohorts at 2 years (P ≥ .170).

CONCLUSION

This randomized clinical trial shows that press-fit short humeral stems subside substantially more than standard-length cemented stems but ultimately achieve stability from 1 year through 2 years. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between cohorts.

Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation-broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty : a randomized radiostereometric study of 30 total hip arthroplasties in 15 patients operated bilaterally

Aims

Femoral bone preparation using compaction technique has been shown to preserve bone and improve implant fixation in animal models. No long-term clinical outcomes are available. There are no significant long-term differences between compaction and broaching techniques for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of migration, clinical, and radiological outcomes.

Methods

A total of 28 patients received one-stage bilateral primary THA with cementless femoral stems (56 hips). They were randomized to compaction on one femur and broaching on the contralateral femur. Overall, 13 patients were lost to the ten-year follow-up leaving 30 hips to be evaluated in terms of stem migration (using radiostereometry), radiological changes, Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, and complications.

Results

Over a mean follow-up period of 10.6 years, the mean stem subsidence was similar between groups, with a mean of -1.20 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.28 to -0.12) in the broaching group and a mean of -0.73 mm (95% CI -1.65 to 0.20) in the compaction group (p = 0.07). The long-term migration patterns of all stems were similar. The clinical and radiological outcomes were similar between groups. There were two intraoperative fractures in the compaction group that were fixed with cable wire and healed without complications. No stems were revised.

Conclusion

Similar stem subsidence and radiological and clinical outcomes were identified after the use of compaction and broaching techniques of the femur at long-term follow-up. Only the compaction group had intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures, but there were no long-term consequences of these.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1035–1042.

A Parametric Analysis of Embedded Tissue Marker Properties and Their Effect on the Accuracy of Displacement Measurements

Datasets obtained from cadaveric experimentation are broadly used in validating finite element models of head injury. Due to the complexity of such measurements in soft tissues, experimentalists have relied on tissue-embedded radiographic or sonomicrometry tracking markers to resolve tissue motion caused by impulsive loads. Dynamic coupling of markers with the surrounding tissue has been a previous concern, yet a thorough sensitivity investigation of marker influences on tissue deformation has not been broadly discussed. Technological improvements to measurement precision have bolstered confidence in acquired data; however, precision is often conflated with accuracy; the inclusion of markers in the tissue may alter its natural response, resulting in a loss of accuracy associated with an altered displacement field. To gain an understanding of how marker properties may influence the measured response to impact, we prepared a set of nine marker designs using a Taguchi L9 array to investigate marker design choice sensitivity. Each of these designs was cast into a block of tissue simulant and subjected to repeated drop tests. Vertical displacement was measured and compared to the response of the neat material, which contained massless tracking markers. Medium density and medium stiffness markers yielded the least deviation from the neat material response. The results provide some design guidelines indicating the importance of maintaining marker matrix density ratio below 1.75 and marker stiffness below 1.0 MPa. These properties may minimize marker interference in tissue deformation. Overall, embedded marker properties must be considered when measuring the dynamic response of tissue.

Hip prosthetic loosening: A very personal review

Hip prosthetic loosening is often difficult to detect at an early stage, and there has been uncertainty for a long time as to when the loosening occurs and thus to the basic causes. By comparing different diagnostic methods, we found that loosening is best defined as prosthetic migration and measured by radiostereometric analysis. Convincing evidence indicates that poor interlock, poor bone quality, and resorption of a necrotic bone bed may initiate loosening during or shortly after surgery; this forms the basis of the theory of early loosening. Biomechanical factors do affect the subsequent progression of loosening, which may increase subclinically during a long period of time. Eventually, the loosening may be detected on standard radiographs and may be interpreted as late loosening but should to be interpreted as late detection of loosening. The theory of early loosening explains the rapid early migration, the development of periprosthetic osteolysis and granulomas, the causality between wear and loosening, and largely the epidemiology of clinical failure of hip prostheses. Aspects discussed are definition of loosening, the pattern of early migration, the choice of migration threshold, the current understanding of loosening, a less exothermic bone cement, cemented taper-slip stems, a new exciting computed tomography-based technique for simpler implant migration studies, and research suggestions.

Propagation of registration error into maximum total point motion to analyze tibial baseplate stability at six months using marker-based and model-based RSA

Maximum total point motion (MTPM) of a tibial baseplate at 6 months is used to predict long-term aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. However, the propagation of registration error into MTPM for stable baseplates (i.e. baseplates with MTPM < 0.5 mm) manifested as bias (i.e. systematic error) and precision (i.e. random error) has not been quantified and compared to the 6-month stability limit for marker-based and model-based RSA, which have different magnitudes of registration error. To determine the bias and precision in MTPM for stable baseplates, registration errors in six degrees of freedom reported in the literature for marker-based and model-based RSA were applied to an example baseplate using computer simulations. Results revealed that the bias in MTPM for stable baseplates with model-based RSA is three to four times that of marker-based RSA, and that the precision in MTPM for stable baseplates with model-based RSA is double that of marker-based RSA. This assessment of bias and precision in MTPM for stable baseplates led to a method for adjusting the 6-month stability limit for model-based RSA where half the width of the 95% confidence interval on the mean MTPM and the bias in MTPM for marker-based RSA were subtracted from 0.5 mm to compute true MTPM. The bias in MTPM and half the width of the 95% confidence interval on the mean MTPM for model-based RSA were then added to the true MTPM to obtain the adjusted stability limit for model-based RSA which ranged from 0.57 mm to 0.64 mm.

In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry: From Fantasy to Reality?

The orthopedic device industry relies heavily on clinical evaluation to confirm the safety, performance, and clinical benefits of its implants. Limited sample size often prevents these studies from capturing the full spectrum of patient variability and real-life implant use. The device industry is accustomed to simulating benchtop tests with numerical methods and recent developments now enable virtual "in silico clinical trials" (ISCT). In this article, we describe how the advancement of computer modeling has naturally led to ISCT; outline the potential benefits of ISCT to patients, healthcare systems, manufacturers, and regulators; and identify how hurdles associated with ISCT may be overcome. In particular, we highlight a process for defining the relevant patient risks to address with ISCT, the utility of a versatile software pipeline, the necessity to ensure model credibility, and the goal of limiting regulatory uncertainty. By complementing-not replacing-traditional clinical trials with computational evidence, ISCT provides a viable technical and regulatory strategy for characterizing the full spectrum of patients, clinical conditions, and configurations that are embodied in contemporary orthopedic implant systems.

Two-year RSA migration results of symmetrical and asymmetrical tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

The objective of this study was to compare the two-year migration pattern and clinical outcomes of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an asymmetrical tibial design (Persona PS) and a well-proven TKA with a symmetrical tibial design (NexGen LPS).

METHODS

A randomized controlled radiostereometric analysis (RSA) trial was conducted including 75 cemented posterior-stabilized TKAs. Implant migration was measured with RSA. Maximum total point motion (MTPM), translations, rotations, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at one week postoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A linear mixed-effect model using RSA data of 31 asymmetrical and 38 symmetrical TKAs did not show a difference in mean MTPM migration pattern of the tibial or femoral components. Mean tibial component MTPM at two years postoperative of the asymmetrical TKA design was 0.93 mm and 1.00 mm for the symmetrical design. For the femoral component these values were 1.04 mm and 1.14 mm, respectively. No significant differences were observed in other migration parameters or in clinical and PROM measurements.

CONCLUSION

The TKA design with an asymmetrical tibial component has comparable component migration with the proven TKA with a symmetrical tibial component. This suggests the risk of long-term aseptic loosening of the two designs is comparable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):855-863.

Propagation of registration errors into the change in maximum total point motion for determining stability of tibial baseplates

The change in maximum total point motion (ΔMTPM) is used to predict long-term risk of tibial baseplate loosening, however, effects of registration error on ΔMTPM have not been quantified for marker-based and model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Registration errors for marker-based and model-based RSA were applied to a stable tibial baseplate in MATLAB simulations to determine the bias and precision in ΔMTPM and the proportions of baseplates which fell above the continuous migration stability limit. No bias error occurred, however, the precision of ΔMTPM was twice as large for model-based RSA than marker-based RSA, resulting in about 25% of stable baseplates falling above the continuous migration stability limit for model-based RSA. Reseachers should be aware of these limitations when applying this stability limit to assess tibial baseplate stability using model-based RSA.

The effect of femoral stem collar on implant migration and clinical outcomes following direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

The direct anterior (DA) approach has been associated with rapid patient recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) but may be associated with more frequent femoral complications including implant loosening. The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a collar to the femoral stem affects implant migration, patient activity, and patient function following primary THA using the DA approach.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to either a collared (n = 23) or collarless (n = 26) cementless femoral stem implanted using the DA approach. Canal fill ratio (CFR) was measured on the first postoperative radiographs. Patients underwent a supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) exam postoperatively on the day of surgery and at two, four, six, 12, 26, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Mental and Physical Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score) were measured preoperatively and at each post-surgery clinic visit. Activity and function were also measured as the weekly average step count recorded by an activity tracker, and an instrumented timed up-and-go (TUG) test in clinic, respectively.

RESULTS

Comparing the RSA between the day of surgery baseline exam to two weeks postoperatively, subsidence was significantly lower (mean difference 2.23 mm (SD 0.71), p = 0.023) with collared stems, though these patients had a greater CFR (p = 0.048). There was no difference (p = 0.426) in subsidence between stems from a two-week baseline through to one year postoperatively. There were no clinically relevant differences in PROMs; and there was no difference in the change in activity (p = 0.078) or the change in functional capacity (p = 0.664) between the collared stem group and the collarless stem group at any timepoint.

CONCLUSION

Presence of a collar on the femoral stem resulted in reduced subsidence during the first two postoperative weeks following primary THA using the DA approach. However, the clinical implications are unclear, and larger studies examining patient activity and outcomes are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1654-1661.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of survivorship and wear rates of metal and ceramic heads articulating with polyethylene liners in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The major joint registries report better survivorship for ceramic on polyethylene over metal on polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty and it is generally accepted that this is due to a lower polyethylene wear rate. We used evidence synthesis to compare survivorship, polyethylene wear rates and metal ion levels for metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearings. If wear rates are not dissimilar in vivo this difference in revision rate may have another cause. Modular junctions are a potential source of corrosion and it is postulated that this may result in higher revision rates.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the survivorship of MoP and CoP bearings. Odds ratio (95% CI) of revision was calculated. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare secondary outcomes of polyethylene wear and metal ion levels. Meta-analysis was performed with a Mantel-Haenszel Random-Effects Model.

RESULTS

6 randomised controlled trials were included. There was no statistically significant difference between MoP and CoP revision rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.37-2.90, I² = 0%, p = 0.94), linear bearing wear (MD 0.00 mm; 95% CI, -0.05 -0.05, I² = 98%, p = 0.90), nor volumetric bearing wear (MD 33.57 mm³; 95% CI, -215.56-282.70, I² = 98%, p = 0.79). No studies evaluated metal ion levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a difference in revision rates nor linear and volumetric wear between MoP and CoP bearings in the randomised controlled trials currently available. Our study therefore does not advocate the additional cost associated with the use of ceramic heads in combination with polyethylene bearings in order to minimise revision rates. This contrasts the findings of in vitro studies and the major joint registries.

[Early assessment of the risk of later implantloosening using Roentgen Sterophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)]

BACKGROUND

Aseptic implant loosening is the most common cause of implant revisions in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) represents the current gold standard for the in-vivo assessment of implant fixation.

PRESENT SITUATION

Long-term clinical trials have shown that continuous implant migration within the first two postoperative years correlates strongly with a later aseptic loosening. Thus, the implant migration measured with RSA can be regarded as a reliable surrogate marker for later implant loosening. Over the past 40 years, RSA has been continuously further developed, and the model-based RSA approach has reduced the effort involved since markers attached to implant are no longer needed.

PERSPECTIVES

The RSA method is gaining importance in the certification process of new orthopaedic implants-for example, the Dutch Orthopedic Society has recommended phased-introduction and RSA studies for new hip implants. Furthermore, in the context of the new EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), which took effect in May 2017, RSA gained relevance for investigating clinically unproven implants. Critics who associate MDR with hindering innovation can be countered in that the RSA method provides a predictive assessment of implant fixation after only two years of follow-up, which is significantly shorter than standard long-term clinical trials.

Early migration of stemless and stemmed humeral components after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis can, in the most severe cases, require surgery with insertion of a shoulder arthroplasty. A design with a stem in the humeral bone canal is currently regarded as the standard treatment option in patients who have an intact rotator cuff function, but complications related to the stem including humeral fractures can have devastating consequences. By using a stemless humeral component, stem-related complications can be reduced. The aim of this study is to compare the Comprehensive Nano stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (intervention group) with the Comprehensive stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty (control group).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the stemless and the stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty. All Danish citizens with glenohumeral osteoarthritis indicating a total shoulder arthroplasty referred to the orthopedic department at Copenhagen University Hospital in Herlev/Gentofte will be offered participation. The following exclude from participation: below 18 years of age, cognitive or linguistic impairment, insufficient function of the rotator cuff, poor bone quality, and ASA groups 4-5. A total of 122 patients will be included of which 56 will be part of a radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study of humeral component migration. The primary outcomes are magnitude of migration of the humeral component assessed by RSA and patient-reported outcome by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS). The secondary outcomes are additional patient-reported outcomes, functional outcome, readmission, complications, revisions, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal humerus assessed by duel energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and economy (cost-utility analysis). The patients are examined before the operation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperative.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, RSA has never been used to access migration of a stemmed or a stemless humeral component nor has the stemmed and the stemless humeral component been compared with regard to pain relief and shoulder function in a randomized clinical trial. Today, the two designs are considered equal in the treatment of osteoarthritis. The study will provide surgeons and patients with information about shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and assist them in decision-making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04105478 . Registered on 25 September 2019.

Highly Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components Without Ancillary Screws Have Similar Migration to Porous Titanium Acetabular Components With Screws at 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

It is proposed that highly porous coatings on acetabular components, such as a porous tantalum coating, provide adequate fixation without ancillary screw fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, tantalum acetabular components have been associated with higher rates of revision than other uncemented components in national registries. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the early migration of a solid-backed tantalum acetabular component was no greater than that of a titanium acetabular component with ancillary screw fixation that has proven good clinical results.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients aged 40 to 64 years, with osteoarthritis and Charnley grade A or B activity grade and who underwent primary THA, were recruited into the trial. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the tantalum or titanium acetabular component. All patients received the same cemented polished tapered femoral stem, 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral head, and highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. Acetabular component migration was measured using radiostereometric analysis at 4-6 days postoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 and 2 years following THA.

RESULTS

The mean proximal migration at 2 years for the tantalum cohort was 0.17 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.24) which was no greater than that of the titanium cohort which was 0.19 mm (0.07-0.32). Harris hip scores and functional activity scores were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that early stability can be achieved without ancillary screw fixation through the use of a highly porous high friction coating on a solid-backed modular acetabular component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Acetabular Component Migration Measured Using Radiostereometric Analysis Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review

* Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies of acetabular component migration following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have a large variation in their methodology and reporting of results, and, therefore, they may not be directly comparable. Standardization of RSA reporting is recommended. * In our review of RSA studies, there was a trend for cemented acetabular components to have larger amounts of early proximal migration than uncemented acetabular components. Results regarding cemented and uncemented components should be reported separately. * Cohorts that addressed larger acetabular defects were associated with a larger amount of early migration. * Reporting the migration result at 1 and 2 years postoperatively may enable earlier identification of poorly performing implants.

New Implant Introduction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Radiostereometric Analysis: A Cautionary Note

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that the introduction of new hip implant technology in orthopedic surgery be conducted in a more controlled manner in order to properly ensure patient safety and the likelihood of favorable outcomes. This stepwise introduction would first require a prospective randomized study in a small cohort of patients, using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The aim of this study is to determine if the recent literature supports the use of RSA as an early screening tool to accurately predict the long-term outcomes of cementless femoral stems.

METHODS

A review of the recent published literature identified 11 studies that used RSA to predict the long-term stability of a cementless femoral component. These RSA predictive data were compared to the 10-year revision rate reported in the Australian Registry or in the published literature to determine its reliability.

RESULTS

RSA data did not universally predict long-term stem fixation. In 2 of the 11 cases (18%), the RSA study incorrectly predicted the ability of the cementless stem to reliably osseointegrate. Of the 9 stems considered stable in the RSA studies, the 10 year registry and literature data confirmed that 6 implants had a low revision rate and were well performing. One stem has not performed well clinically and has been listed as having a higher than anticipated rate of revision in the registry. Two stems do not have sufficient follow-up. Of the 2 stems RSA predicted to do poorly, 1 is well performing at 10 years, and 1 has a high revision rate at 8 years.

CONCLUSION

In the stepwise introduction of new hip implants, RSA should be best considered as an adjunct tool in deciding whether or not an implant should be evaluated in a larger multicenter clinical studies, rather than the sole criterion.

Similar patient positioning: A key factor in follow-up studies when using model-based radiostereometric analysis of the hip

INTRODUCTION

Despite protocols, patients are not positioned exactly alike at radiostereometric (RSA) follow-up examinations, and it is unknown how much variation is tolerable. We report precision for optimal and extreme position differences from a phantom hip-study, and clinical precision of hip-RSA.

METHODS

A femoral stem with 3 bead-towers was fixed in a saw bone with bone-markers (phantom), and series of RSA examinations within optimal (5 × 5 cm and 5°) and extreme (20 × 30 cm and 30°) phantom positions were obtained. Double-examination RSA of 12 patients with the same femoral stem type were analyzed. Both model-based (CAD) and marker-based (MM) analysis was used. Precision was reported as standard deviation of differences.

RESULTS

Precision for translations in the optimal and extreme phantom position were below 0.06 mm and 0.02 mm for MM analysis, and below 0.05 mm and 0.18 mm for CAD analysis, respectively. Precision for rotations in the optimal and extreme phantom rotation were below 0.18° and 0.26° for MM analysis, and below 0.34° and 0.52° for CAD analysis, respectively. Clinical precision was 0.29 mm and 0.44° for MM analysis, and 0.40 mm and 1.59° for CAD analysis.

CONCLUSION

Extreme differences in patient position during RSA examination negatively affects precision, and CAD model-analysis was more sensitive than MM analysis. Longitudinal translation and rotation about the long stem-axis are the effect parameters which are most affected by position and rotation changes, and also the best indicators of implant loosening.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on our research, we recommend that similar patient positioning between follow-up RSA examinations is debated and prioritized.

Radiostereometric Analysis of Stability and Inducible Micromotion After Locked Lateral Plating of Distal Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate interfragmentary motion over 1 year after distal femoral fracture fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The secondary aim was to assess whether RSA data are consistent with diagnoses of nonunion.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level I urban trauma center.

PATIENTS

Sixteen patients between 22 and 89 years of age with distal femoral fracture (OTA/AO type 33).

INTERVENTION

All fractures were treated with a lateral locking plate, and tantalum markers were inserted into the main proximal and distal fracture fragments. RSA was performed at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Both unloaded and loaded RSA measurements were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Unloaded fracture migration over time and inducible micromotion at the fracture site in the coronal plane were determined at each follow-up interval.

RESULTS

RSA precision in the coronal plane of interfragmentary motion over time and inducible micromotion were 1.2 and 0.9 mm in the coronal plane, respectively. Two cases required revision surgery for nonunion 1 year postoperatively. For cases of union, unloaded fracture migration stopped being detectable between 12 and 18 weeks, and inducible micromotion was no longer detectable by the 12-week visit. For cases of nonunion, both unloaded migration and inducible micromotion were detected throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA may be used to reliably assess distal femoral fracture healing. RSA revealed differences in cases of union and nonunion by 3 months and more consistently than traditional x-rays.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

In vivo wear measurement in a modern total knee arthroplasty with model-based radiostereometric analysis

Aims

A retrospective study was conducted to measure short-term in vivo linear and volumetric wear of polyethylene (PE) inserts in 101 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients using model-based radiostereometric analysis (MBRSA).

Patients and Methods

Nonweightbearing supine RSA exams were performed postoperatively and at six, 12, and 24 months. Weightbearing standing RSA exams were performed on select patients at 12 and 24 months. Wear was measured both linearly (joint space) and volumetrically (digital model overlap) at each available follow-up. Precision of both methods was assessed by comparing double RSA exams. Patient age, sex, body mass index, and Oxford Knee Scores were analyzed for any association with PE wear.

Results

Linear wear occurred at 0.015 mm/year (supine) and 0.220 mm/year (standing). Volumetric wear occurred at 10.3 mm3/year (supine) and 39.3 mm3/year (standing). Wear occurred primarily on the medial side of the joint. Weightbearing imaging greatly improved the reliability of measurement. Clinical precision of volumetric wear was 34 mm3. No significant associations were found between patient demographics or function scores and measured wear.

Conclusion

In vivo volumetric wear of TKAs can be assessed at short-term follow-up using MBRSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1348–1355.

Does migration of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees predict later revision? A prospective 2-year radiostereometric analysis with 5-years clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND

The osseointegrated (OI) prosthesis is a treatment option for transfemoral amputees with a short residual femur and/or difficulties caused by using the prosthetic socket. Implant removal due to aseptic or septic loosening is not uncommon, but the association between implant migration patterns and the need for removal has not previously been studied. We conducted a prospective model-based radiostereometric analysis study to investigate: if the OI implant migration pattern 1) differs between later removed implants and non-removed implants, (2) predicts later implant removal, and (3) if the precision of the method is acceptable.

HYPOTHESIS

Model-based radiostereometric analysis of the OI implant migration pattern can be used to predict later OI implant removal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of 17 consecutive transfemoral amputees suitable for surgery (11 males), mean age 50 (range 32-66) were treated with an OI implant (Integrum AB, Sweden). Postoperative stereoradiographs of the OI implant were obtained during 24-month follow-up. X, Y, and Z translations and total translations were evaluated using CAD-implant models. Implant survival was followed for up to 60 months.

RESULTS

Six total implant removals (fixture and abutment) and four partial removals (abutment) were conducted (10/17 (59%)), and one patient did not use the OI implant. The removed implants group migrated a mean (±standard deviation) 0.55mm±0.75mm (p=0.009) and the non-removed implants group migrated 0.31mm±0.51mm (p=0.22) in total translations from 3 months to last follow-up. Odds ratio for implant removal was 22.5 (95% CI: 1.6 to 314 (p=0.021)) if the OI implants migrated distally.

CONCLUSION

Later removed OI implants migrated from 3 months to last follow-up and more than the non-removed OI implants. Distal implant migration greatly increased the odds of implant removal. Ten out of 17 OI implants were removed within 5 years of follow-up. We advise to use OI implants with caution and close follow-up in consideration of the risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Prospective study.

Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis using elementary geometrical shape models: 10 years results of an uncemented acetabular cup component

Background

Non-cemented acetabular cup components demonstrated different clinical performance depending on their surface texture or bearing couple. However, clinical osseointegration needs to be proved for each total joint arthroplasty (TJA) design. Aim of this study was to detect the in vivo migration pattern of a non-cemented cup design, using model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis with elementary geometrical shape models (EGS-RSA) to calculate early cup migration.

Methods

Interchangeable applicability of the model-based EGS-RSA method next to gold standard marker-based RSA method was assessed by clinical radiographs. Afterwards, in vivo acetabular cup migration for 39 patients in a maximum follow up of 120 months (10 years) was calculated using model-based EGS-RSA.

Results

For the axes with the best predictive capability for acetabular cup loosening, mean (±SD) values were calculated for migration and rotation of the cup. The cup migrated 0.16 (±0.22) mm along the cranio-caudal axis after 24 months and 0.36 (±0.72) mm after 120 months, respectively. It rotated − 0.61 (±0.57) deg. about the medio-lateral axis after 24 months and − 0.53 (±0.67) deg. after 120 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Interchangeable applicability of model-based EGS-RSA next to gold standard marker-based RSA method could be shown. Model-based EGS-RSA enables an in vivo migration measurement without the necessity of TJA specific surface models. Migration of the investigated acetabular cup component indicates significant migration values along all the three axes. However, migration values after the second postoperative year were within the thresholds reported in literature, indicating no risk for later aseptic component loosening of this TJA design.

A pilot study to determine the effect of radiographer training on radiostereometric analysis imaging technique

INTRODUCTION

Producing x-ray images for radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a demanding technique. Suboptimal examinations result in a high percentage of exposure repetition. The aim of this pilot study was to use an experiential training approach to sharpen the skills of radiographers in acquiring images of an optimal quality.

METHODS

A controlled trial using action research strategy was used. The study entailed a two phased approach. Radiographers were purposefully recruited and trained to perform the required investigations. Each phase included 12 examinations of a total knee arthroplasty phantom followed by 10 patient examinations. The quality of all x-ray images performed during the two phases was characterized by measuring the number of visible beads, the center position of the prosthesis (CP) compared to the center of calibration field (CCF). The number of re-exposures used to obtain a usable image during patient examinations was also recorded.

RESULTS

The radiographers undergoing the training resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of images produced and visualization of the beads. That is, the ability to move the CP on average 36.1 mm closer to the CCF (p < 0.001), the number of visible beads increased by 3.1 (p < 0.001) and radiographers needed 2.1-2.9 exposures less to obtain RSA images of sufficient qualities during patient examinations in phase 2 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the value of experiential method of teaching and learning with minimal compromise on patient safety but a significant contribution in terms of establishing quality of RSA images.

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging offers potential for measuring tibial component migration

BACKGROUND

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is used to measure early prosthetic migration and to predict future implant failure. RSA has several disadvantages, such as the need for perioperatively inserted tantalum markers. Therefore, this study evaluates low-field MRI as an alternative to RSA. The use of traditional MRI with prostheses induces disturbing metal artifacts which are reduced by low-field MRI. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility to use low-field (0.25 Tesla) MRI for measuring the precision of zero motion. This was assessed by calculating the virtual prosthetic motion of a zero-motion prosthetic reconstruction in multiple scanning sessions. Furthermore, the effects of different registration methods on these virtual motions were tested.

RESULTS

The precision of zero motion for low-field MRI was between 0.584 mm and 1.974 mm for translation and 0.884° and 3.774° for rotation. The manual registration method seemed most accurate, with μ ≤ 0.13 mm (σ ≤ 0.931 mm) for translation and μ ≤ 0.15° (σ ≤ 1.63°) for rotation.

CONCLUSION

Low-field MRI is not yet as precise as today's golden standard (marker based RSA) as reported in the literature. However, low-field MRI is feasible of measuring the relative position of bone and implant with comparable precision as obtained with marker-free RSA techniques. Of the three registration methods tested, manual registration was most accurate. Before starting clinical validation further research is necessary and should focus on improving scan sequences and registration algorithms.

Early acetabular cartilage wear following hemiarthroplasty: An ovine model

Objectives: Hemiarthroplasty induces degenerative changes in the hip joint, which are difficult to evaluate in vivo. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a radiographic measurement technique that has recently been used to measure acetabular cartilage wear in vivo. The aim of the study was to measure acetabular cartilage wear, using this technique, in an ovine model during the first 14 weeks post-implantation.

Methods: Measurements of three-dimensional femoral head migration, combined with visual assessments at necropsy and safranin O staining for cartilage integrity, were undertaken.

Results: Mean femoral head migration during the first six weeks was 0.525 mm in the medial, 0.144 mm in the cranial, and 0.517 mm in the dorsal direction. The majority of this migration was confirmed to be cartilage wear in the medial and dorsal aspects of the acetabulum at necropsy and with subsequent histological evaluation depicting significant cartilage degeneration.

Clinical significance: Radiostereometric analysis is the current gold standard technique for in vivo assessment of implant migration following total hip replacement. This study has utilized RSA to quantify the amount of early cartilage wear in vivo, which was supported by ex vivo evaluations. Accurately measuring the amount of cartilage wear will allow future studies to compare component material and design characteristics prior to clinical use.

RSA in Spine: A Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of literature.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review was conducted to investigate the accuracy of radiostereometric analysis (RSA), its assessment of spinal motion and disorders, and to investigate the limitations of this technique in spine assessment.

METHODS

Systematic review in all current literature to invesigate the role of RSA in spine.

RESULTS

The results of this review concluded that RSA is a very powerful tool to detect small changes between 2 rigid bodies such as a vertebral segment. The technique is described for animal and human studies for cervical and lumbar spine and can be used to analyze range of motion, inducible displacement, and fusion of segments. However, there are a few disadvantages with the technique; RSA percutaneous procedure needs to be performed to implant the markers (and cannot be used preoperatively), one needs a specific knowledge to handle data and interpret the results, and is relatively time consuming and expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA should be looked at as a very powerful research instrument and there are many questions suitable for RSA studies.

How should new orthopaedic implants be introduced: an example and recommendations for best practice

Continued advancements in orthopaedics have led to the development of many new implants; many of these are being utilized in clinical practice with little or no evidence base for their safety or effectiveness. Highly publicized failures in orthopaedic technology have led to an increased awareness of this issue in both medical and non-medical circles. In most cases, the significant harm caused to the public could have been avoided by the appropriately staged implementation of new implants. This review comments on the current literature regarding the optimal practice for the introduction of new orthopaedic technology. The authors' experience with the failed ESKA Adapter Short-stem/Modular Hip is described; the methodology used for its evaluation is used as a basis to discuss what was successful about the process and also give warning on what could be improved upon. The ideal practice requires new orthopaedic implants to be evaluated by high-volume surgeons in specialist orthopaedic hospitals. These studies should include biomechanical studies, radiostereophotometric analysis, implant retrieval and outcome assessment. Results and complications should be reported early to the appropriate joint registry and regulatory body. Once a suitable evidence base has developed, the implant can be distributed into wider clinical practice or withdrawn. These recommendations aim to protect the patient and public from harm while allowing surgical innovation to still continue.

Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral (AntLat) surgical approach may spare the blood supply to the femoral head and improve the accuracy of cup positioning in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Thereby, potentially lessen complications such as avascular head necrosis, femoral neck narrowing and fracture, improve implant fixation, and lessen periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) loss.

METHODS

Between November 2008 and January 2012, a randomized clinical trial was performed at Aarhus University Hospital. A total of 49 patients (28 males) were allocated to metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty by the AntLat (n = 25) or the posterior (Post; n = 24) surgical approach. Patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis, measurements of periprosthetic BMD, clinical outcome scores of Harris hip score and visual analogue scale, serum metal ions, and conventional radiographs.

RESULTS

At 3 months, cups in the AntLat group had higher total translations of mean 1.00 ± 0.70 mm vs mean 0.64 ± 0.45 mm in the post group (P = .04), and higher total rotations of mean 2.44° ± 1.36° vs mean 1.39° ± 1.17° in the Post group (P = .002). All migrations of cup and stem were similar at 1 and 2 years postoperative (P > .07). At 1 year, periprosthetic BMD since postoperative at the medial side of the stem was reduced to mean 98.45% ± 8.57% in the AntLat group, and increased to mean 105.57% ± 11.07% in the Post group (P = .02), but measurements were comparable at 2 years (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Cups inserted by the AntLat approach migrated more until 3 months postoperative. This illustrates a less good primary cup fixation with the AntLat approach; however, all cups were well-fixed after 3 months' follow-up indicating a good secondary fixation.

Dynamic RSA for the evaluation of inducible micromotion of Oxford UKA during step-up and step-down motion

Background and purpose - Implant inducible micromotions have been suggested to reflect the quality of the fixation interface. We investigated the usability of dynamic RSA for evaluation of inducible micromotions of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) tibial component, and evaluated factors that have been suggested to compromise the fixation, such as fixation method, component alignment, and radiolucent lines (RLLs). Patients and methods - 15 patients (12 men) with a mean age of 69 (55-86) years, with an Oxford UKA (7 cemented), were studied after a mean time in situ of 4.4 (3.6-5.1) years. 4 had tibial RLLs. Each patient was recorded with dynamic RSA (10 frames/second) during a step-up/step-down motion. Inducible micromotions were calculated for the tibial component with respect to the tibia bone. Postoperative component alignment was measured with model-based RSA and RLLs were measured on screened radiographs. Results - All tibial components showed inducible micromotions as a function of the step-cycle motion with a mean subsidence of up to -0.06 mm (95% CI: -0.10 to -0.03). Tibial component inducible micromotions were similar for cemented fixation and cementless fixation. Patients with tibial RLLs had 0.5° (95% CI: 0.18-0.81) greater inducible medio-lateral tilt of the tibial component. There was a correlation between postoperative posterior slope of the tibial plateau and inducible anterior-posterior tilt. Interpretation - All patients had inducible micromotions of the tibial component during step-cycle motion. RLLs and a high posterior slope increased the magnitude of inducible micromotions. This suggests that dynamic RSA is a valuable clinical tool for the evaluation of functional implant fixation.

Preparation of the Femoral Bone Cavity for Cementless Stems: Broaching vs Compaction. A Five-Year Randomized Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorption Study

BACKGROUND

Short-term experimental and animal studies have confirmed superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone.

METHODS

Forty-four hips in 42 patients (19 men) were randomly operated using cementless hydroxyapatite-coated Bi-Metric stems. Patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, 1, 2, and 5 years, and measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density at baseline, 1, 2, and 5 years. Complications during the study period and clinical outcome measures of Harris Hip Score were recorded at mean 7 years (5-8.8) after surgery.

RESULTS

Absolute migrations of medio/lateral translations between the broaching group and the compaction group of mean 0.14 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.10) vs mean 0.30 mm (SD 0.27) (P = .01) at 1 year, and of mean 0.13 mm (SD 0.10) vs 0.34 mm (0.31) (P = .01) at 5 years were different. Absolute valgus/varus rotations of mean 0.12° (SD 0.13°) in the broaching group were less than mean 0.35° (0.45°) in the compaction group (P < .01) at 1 year, but at 5 years no difference was observed (P = .19). Subsidence and retroversion were similar between groups at all follow-ups (P > .13). The compaction group had significantly less bone loss than the broaching group in Gruen zone 3 (distal-lateral to the stem) at 1 and 5 years. No further differences in bone mineral density changes were found between groups up to 5 years after surgery. Complications throughout the period and clinical outcome measures of Harris Hip Score were similar at 7 years (5-8.8) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

We found increased migration when preparing the bone with compaction compared with broaching in cementless femoral stems.

Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature

BACKGROUND

It is not known, whether outcome reporting in trials of total joint arthroplasty in the recent years is adequate or not. Our objective was to assess whether outcomes reported in total joint replacement (TJR) trials fulfil the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed all TJR trials in adults, published in English in 2008 or 2013. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Two authors independently applied the inclusion criteria for the studies, and any disagreement was resolved with a third review author. All outcome measures were abstracted using a pre-piloted standardised data extraction form and assessed for whether they mapped to one of the three OMERACT Filter 2.0 core areas: pathophysiological, life impact, and death.

RESULTS

From 1635 trials identified, we included 70 trials (30 in 2008 and 40 in 2013) meeting the eligibility criteria. Twenty-two (31%) trials reported the three essential OMERACT core areas. Among the 27 hip replacement surgery trials and 39 knee replacement surgery trials included, 11 hip (41%) and nine knee (23%) trials reported all three essential OMERACT core areas. The most common outcome domains/measures were pain (20/27, 74%) and function (23/27, 85%) in hip trials and pain (26/39, 67%) and function (27/39, 69%) in knee trials. Results were similar for shoulder and hand joint replacement trials.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified significant gaps in the measurement of OMERACT core outcome areas in TJR trials, despite the majority reporting outcome domains of pain and function. An international consensus of key stakeholders is needed to develop a core domain set for reporting of TJR trials.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014009216.

Accuracy of methods to measure femoral head penetration within metal-backed acetabular components

A number of different software programs are used to investigate the in vivo wear of polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty. With wear rates below 0.1 mm/year now commonly being reported for highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) components, it is important to identify the accuracy of the methods used to measure such small movements. The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of current software programs used to measure two-dimensional (2D) femoral head penetration (FHP) and to determine whether the accuracy is influenced by larger femoral heads or by different methods of representing the acetabular component within radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A hip phantom was used to compare known movements of the femoral head within a metal-backed acetabular component to FHP measured radiographically using RSA, Hip Analysis Suite (HAS), PolyWare, Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse (EBRA), and Roentgen Monographic Analysis Tool (ROMAN). RSA was significantly more accurate than the HAS, PolyWare, and ROMAN methods when measuring 2D FHP with a 28 mm femoral head. Femoral head size influenced the accuracy of HAS and ROMAN 2D FHP measurements, EBRA proximal measurements, and RSA measurements in the proximal and anterior direction. The use of different acetabular reference segments did not influence accuracy of RSA measurements. The superior accuracy and reduced variability of RSA wear measurements allow much smaller cohorts to be used in RSA clinical wear studies than those utilizing other software programs. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:988-996, 2017.