1
|
Eubank BHF, Sheps DM, Dennett L, Connick A, Bouliane M, Panu A, Harding G, Beaupre LA. A scoping review and best evidence synthesis for treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e126-e152. [PMID: 38103720 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rotator cuff disorders include a broad spectrum of pathological conditions including partial-thickness and full-thickness tears. Studies have shown partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) prevalence to be twice that of full-thickness tears. In the working population, PTRCTs are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and often result in occupational disability due to pain, stiffness, and loss of shoulder function. Treatment of PTRCTs remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to consolidate the existing high-quality evidence on best management approaches in treating PTRCTs using both nonoperative and operative approaches. METHODS A scoping review with best evidence synthesis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), PubMed Central, and Science Direct were searched from 2000 to March 3, 2023. Level 1 studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included level 1 and 2 studies, were included. RESULTS The search yielded 8276 articles. A total of 3930 articles were screened after removing 4346 duplicates. Application of inclusion criteria resulted in 662 articles that were selected for full-text review. Twenty-eight level 1 studies, 1 systematic review, 4 meta-analyses, and 1 network meta-analyses were included in the best evidence synthesis. Nonoperative strategies included injections (ie, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroid, prolotherapy, sodium hyaluronate, anesthetic, and atelocollagen), exercise therapy, and physical agents. Operative interventions consisted of débridement, shaving of the tendon and footprint, transtendon repair, and traditional suture anchor repair techniques with and without tear completion. Both nonoperative and operative strategies demonstrated effectiveness at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. The evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical intervention in treating PTRCTs regardless of arthroscopic technique. CONCLUSION The results of this scoping review do not support superiority of operative over nonoperative management and suggest that both strategies can be effective at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. Surgery, however, is the most invasive and costly approach, with the highest risk of complications such as infection. Other variables such as patient expectation, treating practitioner bias, or preference may change which modalities are offered and in what sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breda H F Eubank
- Faculty of Health, Community, and Education, Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - David M Sheps
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Liz Dennett
- Health Sciences Librarian, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Abbie Connick
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Martin Bouliane
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anukul Panu
- Division of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Graeme Harding
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lauren A Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu H, Shearer H, Taylor-Vaisey A, Mior S, Verville L, Connell G, Côté P. Methodological flaws on "manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review" by Prevost et al. (2019). BMC Complement Med Ther 2021; 21:4. [PMID: 33402106 PMCID: PMC7786940 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03145-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Prevost et al. published a systematic review evaluating the use of manual therapy for clinical conditions in the pediatric population in 2019. However, several methodological flaws in the conduct of the review limit the internal validity of its conclusions. We caution readers about the validity of the recommendations and suggest that the review not be used to inform the clinical management of pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hainan Yu
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - Heather Shearer
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - Leslie Verville
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
| | - Gaelan Connell
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7L7 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardenas A, Nikolopoulos M, Musselman K, Fehlings D. The effect of stationary rehabilitative cycling after lower extremity musculoskeletal surgical procedures on gross motor related activities of daily living, lower extremity pain and body structure and function outcomes: a systematic review. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1833275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Analyssa Cardenas
- Department of Paediatrics, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marina Nikolopoulos
- Department of Paediatrics, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristin Musselman
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darcy Fehlings
- Department of Paediatrics, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagner SL, White N, Fyfe T, Matthews LR, Randall C, Regehr C, White M, Alden LE, Buys N, Carey MG, Corneil W, Fraess‐Phillips A, Krutop E, Fleischmann MH. Systematic review of posttraumatic stress disorder in police officers following routine work-related critical incident exposure. Am J Ind Med 2020; 63:600-615. [PMID: 32419181 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of PTSD in police officers has been the subject of a large and highly variable empirical literature. The present systematic review evaluates the extant literature on PTSD in police officers using an international dataset. METHODS We employed best-evidence narrative synthesis to evaluate whether PTSD prevalence in police is elevated in comparison to the general population of Canada (8%), which itself has a higher lifetime PTSD prevalence than many other regions and thus serves as a conservative standard of comparison. RESULTS PTSD prevalence in police varied considerably across studies from 0% - 44% (M = 14.87%, Median = 9.2%). Despite this variability, strong evidence exists to suggest PTSD prevalence is elevated in police officers. Examination of possible sources of variability in prevalence outcomes highlighted substantial variability in outcomes due to the selection of measurement tool for assessing PTSD (e.g., DSM vs. IES). Examination of commonly-assessed predictive factors for PTSD risk across the literature showed that individual-difference factors (e.g., age, years of service) bear weak-to-nonexistent relationships with PTSD risk, while incident-specific factors (e.g., severity of exposure) are more strongly and consistently associated with PTSD prevalence. Organizational factors (e.g., low support from supervisor) are at present understudied but important possible contributors to PTSD risk. CONCLUSIONS PTSD prevalence is elevated in police officers and appears most strongly related to workplace exposure. Measurement variability remains a critical source of inconsistencies across the literature with drastic implications for accurate detection of officers in need of mental health intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon L. Wagner
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Arts, Social, and Health SciencesUniversity of Northern British Columbia Prince George Canada
| | - Nicole White
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Arts, Social, and Health SciencesUniversity of Northern British Columbia Prince George Canada
| | - Trina Fyfe
- Northern Medical ProgramUniversity of Northern British Columbia Prince George Canada
| | | | - Christine Randall
- Menzies Health Institute of QueenslandGriffith University Gold Coast Campus Southport Australia
| | - Cheryl Regehr
- Department of Social WorkUniversity of Toronto Toronto Canada
| | - Marc White
- Department of Family PracticeUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
| | - Lynn E. Alden
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
| | - Nicholas Buys
- Menzies Health Institute of QueenslandGriffith University Gold Coast Campus Southport Australia
| | - Mary G. Carey
- School of NursingUniversity of Rochester New York New York
| | - Wayne Corneil
- Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of Ottawa Ottawa Canada
| | - Alex Fraess‐Phillips
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Arts, Social, and Health SciencesUniversity of Northern British Columbia Prince George Canada
| | - Elyssa Krutop
- The Centre for Response‐Based Practice Kamloops Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corso M, Cancelliere C, Mior S, Taylor-Vaisey A, Côté P. The safety of spinal manipulative therapy in children under 10 years: a rapid review. Chiropr Man Therap 2020; 28:12. [PMID: 32093727 PMCID: PMC7041232 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-0299-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in children is controversial. We were mandated by the College of Chiropractors of British Columbia to review the evidence on this issue. OBJECTIVES We conducted a rapid review of the safety of SMT in children (< 10 years). We aimed to: 1) describe adverse events; 2) report the incidence of adverse events; and 3) determine whether SMT increases the risk of adverse events compared to other interventions. EVIDENCE REVIEW We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature from January 1, 1990 to August 1, 2019. We used rapid review methodology recommended by the World Health Organization. Eligible studies (case reports/series, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) were critically appraised. Studies of high and acceptable methodological quality were included. The lead author extracted data. Data extraction was independently validated by a second reviewer. We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the evidence. FINDINGS Most adverse events are mild (e.g., increased crying, soreness). One case report describes a severe adverse event (rib fracture in a 21-day-old) and another an indirect harm in a 4-month-old. The incidence of mild adverse events ranges from 0.3% (95% CI: 0.06, 1.82) to 22.22% (95% CI: 6.32, 54.74). Whether SMT increases the risk of adverse events in children is unknown. CONCLUSION The risk of moderate and severe adverse events is unknown in children treated with SMT. It is unclear whether SMT increases the risk of adverse events in children < 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Corso
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and CMCC, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada
| | - Carol Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and CMCC, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and CMCC, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and CMCC, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and CMCC, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dee M, Lennon O, O'Sullivan C. A systematic review of physical rehabilitation interventions for stroke in low and lower-middle income countries. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 42:473-501. [PMID: 30508495 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1501617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Approximately 70% of strokes occur in low and middle income countries, yet the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation in these contexts remains undetermined. This systematic review identifies and summarises the current evidence supporting physical rehabilitation interventions post-stroke in low and lower-middle income countries.Methods: Five databases were comprehensively searched (April 2017) for randomised controlled trials, clinical controlled trials, and cohort studies testing rehabilitation interventions post-stroke in these countries. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Tool assessed quality of included studies.Results: Sixty-two studies (2115 participants) were included. Interventions addressed upper limb (n = 26), lower limb (n = 22), and other (n = 14) outcomes. Seven studies were rated as strong in quality, 16 moderate and 39 rated as weak. Overall, in addition to usual care, physical rehabilitation interventions improved outcomes for stroke survivors. Best evidence synthesis provides level I (b) evidence supporting constraint induced movement therapy and mirror therapy to improve upper limb functional outcomes. Level I (b) evidence supports multimodal interventions that include lower limb motor imagery to improve gait parameters. Level II (b) evidence supports sit-to-stand training to improve balance outcomes.Conclusions: Exercise-based and brain training interventions improved functional outcomes post-stroke in low and lower-middle income countries. Further high-quality studies including participation outcomes are required.Implications for RehabilitationLow-cost physical rehabilitation interventions requiring minimal resources can improve functional outcomes after stroke in low and lower-middle income countries.Exercise-based interventions can improve upper limb, lower limb, gait, and balance outcomes after stroke.Brain training paradigms such as mirror therapy and motor imagery, when included in therapy packages, can improve upper limb and gait outcomes.The proven efficacy for rehabilitation interventions in improving stroke outcomes in low and lower-middle income countries supports the need to strengthen the rehabilitation workforce in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muireann Dee
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Olive Lennon
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cliona O'Sullivan
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Are Passive Physical Modalities Effective for the Management of Common Soft Tissue Injuries of the Elbow?: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Clin J Pain 2017; 33:71-86. [PMID: 27022675 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of passive physical modalities for the management of soft tissue injuries of the elbow. METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Studies meeting our selection criteria were eligible for critical appraisal. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We included studies with a low risk of bias in our best evidence synthesis. RESULTS We screened 6618 articles; 21 were eligible for critical appraisal and 9 (reporting on 8 randomized controlled trials) had a low risk of bias. All randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias focused on lateral epicondylitis. We found that adding transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to primary care does not improve the outcome of patients with lateral epicondylitis. We found inconclusive evidence for the effectiveness of: (1) an elbow brace for managing lateral epicondylitis of variable duration; and (2) shockwave therapy or low-level laser therapy for persistent lateral epicondylitis. DISCUSSION Our review suggests that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provides no added benefit to patients with lateral epicondylitis. The effectiveness of an elbow brace, shockwave therapy, or low-level laser therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis is inconclusive. We found little evidence to inform the use of passive physical modalities for the management of elbow soft tissue injuries.
Collapse
|
8
|
Levy J, Prigent H, Bensmail D. Respiratory rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A narrative review of rehabilitation techniques. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 61:38-45. [PMID: 29128525 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory disorders in multiple sclerosis (MS) are an important issue. They can occur early during the course of the disease, are associated with the neurological impairment, and can lead to pneumonia and respiratory failure, which are the main causes of death in advanced MS. Prevailing impaired expiratory muscles and cough abilities has been demonstrated in this population and might constitute a specific target for rehabilitation interventions. However, international guidelines lack recommendations regarding respiratory rehabilitation in MS. Here we performed a systematic review of the published literature related to respiratory rehabilitation in MS. METHODS We searched the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, PEDro and Cochrane Library for English or French reports of clinical trials and well-designed cohorts published up to December 2016 with no restriction on start date by using the search terms "multiple sclerosis", "respiratory rehabilitation", "respiratory muscle training", "lung volume recruitment", "cough assistance", and "mechanical in-exsufflation". Literature reviews, case reports and physiological studies were excluded. The Maastricht criteria were used to assess the quality of clinical trials. We followed the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines to determine level of evidence and grade of recommendations. RESULTS Among the 21 reports of studies initially selected, 11 were retained for review. Seven studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 were non-RCTs, and 2 were observational studies. Respiratory muscle training (inspiratory and/or expiratory) by use of a portable resistive mouthpiece was the most frequently evaluated technique, with 2 level-1 RCTs. Another level-1 RCT evaluated deep-breathing exercises. All reviewed studies evaluated home-based rehabilitation programs and focused on spirometric outcomes. The disparities in outcome measures among published studies did not allow for a meta-analysis and cough assistance devices were not evaluated in this population. CONCLUSION Although respiratory muscle training can improve maximal respiratory pressure in MS and lung volume recruitment can slow the decline in vital capacity, evidence is lacking to recommend specific respiratory rehabilitation programs adapted to the level of disability induced by the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Levy
- Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Raymond-Poincaré university hospital, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France; UMR 1179, Inserm, university of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
| | - H Prigent
- Department of physiology, Raymond-Poincaré university hospital, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France; UMR 1179, Inserm, university of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
| | - D Bensmail
- Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Raymond-Poincaré university hospital, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France; UMR 1179, Inserm, university of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goldgrub R, Côté P, Sutton D, Wong JJ, Yu H, Randhawa K, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, Mior S, Shearer HM, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Chung CL, Abdulla S, Balogh R, Dogra S, Nordin M, Taylor-Vaisey A. The Effectiveness of Multimodal Care for the Management of Soft Tissue Injuries of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017; 39:121-139.e1. [PMID: 26976375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of soft tissue injuries of the shoulder. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Two independent reviewers critically appraised studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We used best evidence synthesis to synthesize evidence from studies with low risk of bias. RESULTS We screened 5885 articles, and 19 were eligible for critical appraisal. Ten randomized controlled trials had low risk of bias. For persistent subacromial impingement syndrome, multimodal care leads to similar outcomes as sham therapy, radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, or surgery. For subacromial impingement syndrome, multimodal care may be associated with small and nonclinically important improvement in pain and function compared with corticosteroid injections. For rotator cuff tendinitis, dietary-based multimodal care may be more effective than conventional multimodal care (exercise, soft tissue and manual therapy, and placebo tablets). For nonspecific shoulder pain, multimodal care may be more effective than wait list or usual care by a general practitioner, but it leads to similar outcomes as exercise or corticosteroid injections. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence suggests that combining multiple interventions into 1 program of care does not lead to superior outcomes for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome or nonspecific shoulder pain. One randomized controlled trial suggested that dietary-based multimodal care (dietary advice, acupuncture, and enzyme tablets) may provide better outcomes over conventional multimodal care. However, these results need to be replicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Goldgrub
- Graduate Student, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, ON, Canada; Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Director, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Deborah Sutton
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica J Wong
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Associate Clinical Research Scientist, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Instructor, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- Research Coordinator, Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Professor, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Heather M Shearer
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Clinical Research Manager, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Senior Clinical Research Scientist, Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig Jacobs
- Director, Clinical Education and Patient Care, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada; Postdoctoral Fellow, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chadwick L Chung
- Assistant to the Director, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sean Abdulla
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Balogh
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shilpa Dogra
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kinesiology, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Does structured patient education improve the recovery and clinical outcomes of patients with neck pain? A systematic review from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1524-1540. [PMID: 24704678 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 03/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In 2008, the Bone and Joint Decade 2000 to 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders recommended patient education for the management of neck pain. However, the effectiveness of education interventions has recently been challenged. PURPOSE To update the findings of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000 to 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders and evaluate the effectiveness of structured patient education for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) or neck pain and associated disorders (NAD). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review of the literature and best-evidence synthesis. PATIENT SAMPLE Randomized controlled trials that compared structured patient education with other conservative interventions. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-rated recovery, functional recovery (eg, disability, return to activities, work, or school), pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes such as depression or fear, or adverse effects. METHODS We systematically searched eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, DARE, PubMed, and ICL) from 2000 to 2012. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies meeting our selection criteria were eligible for critical appraisal. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Scientifically admissible studies were summarized in evidence tables and synthesized following best-evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We retrieved 4,477 articles. Of those, nine were eligible for critical appraisal and six were scientifically admissible. Four admissible articles investigated patients with WAD and two targeted patients with NAD. All structured patient education interventions included advice on activation or exercises delivered orally combined with written information or as written information alone. Overall, as a therapeutic intervention, structured patient education was equal or less effective than other conservative treatments including massage, supervised exercise, and physiotherapy. However, structured patient education may provide small benefits when combined with physiotherapy. Either mode of delivery (ie, oral or written education) provides similar results in patients with recent WAD. CONCLUSIONS This review adds to the Bone and Joint Decade 2000 to 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by defining more specifically the role of structured patient education in the management of WAD and NAD. Results suggest that structured patient education alone cannot be expected to yield large benefits in clinical effectiveness compared with other conservative interventions for patients with WAD or NAD. Moreover, structured patient education may be of benefit during the recovery of patients with WAD when used as an adjunct therapy to physiotherapy or emergency room care. These benefits are small and short lived.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sutton DA, Côté P, Wong JJ, Varatharajan S, Randhawa KA, Yu H, Southerst D, Shearer HM, van der Velde GM, Nordin MC, Carroll LJ, Mior SA, Taylor-Vaisey AL, Stupar M. Is multimodal care effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1541-1565. [PMID: 25014556 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2013] [Revised: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Little is known about the effectiveness of multimodal care for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) and neck pain and associated disorders (NAD). PURPOSE To update findings of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders and evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of patients with WAD or NAD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. PATIENT SAMPLE We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-rated recovery, functional recovery (eg, disability, return to activities, work, or school), pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes (eg, depression, fear), or adverse events. METHODS We systematically searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 2000 to 2013. RCTs, cohort, and case-control studies meeting our selection criteria were eligible for critical appraisal. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Scientifically admissible studies were summarized using evidence tables and synthesized following best-evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We retrieved 2,187 articles, and 23 articles were eligible for critical appraisal. Of those, 18 articles from 14 different RCTs were scientifically admissible. There were a total of 31 treatment arms, including 27 unique multimodal programs of care. Overall, the evidence suggests that multimodal care that includes manual therapy, education, and exercise may benefit patients with grades I and II WAD and NAD. General practitioner care that includes reassurance, advice to stay active, and resumption of regular activities may be an option for the early management of WAD grades I and II. Our synthesis suggests that patients receiving high-intensity health care tend to experience poorer outcomes than those who receive fewer treatments for WAD and NAD. CONCLUSIONS Multimodal care can benefit patients with WAD and NAD with early or persistent symptoms. The evidence does not indicate that one multimodal care package is superior to another. Clinicians should avoid high utilization of care for patients with WAD and NAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1.
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St N, Science Building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Kristi A Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Gabrielle M van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Faculty of Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 2nd Floor, 144 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Ave, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2E9
| | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, USA, 10014; Department of Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, USA, 10014
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Alberta Centre for Injury Prevention and Research, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 RTG, 8308-114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St N, Science Building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne L Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Southerst D, Nordin MC, Côté P, Shearer HM, Varatharajan S, Yu H, Wong JJ, Sutton DA, Randhawa KA, van der Velde GM, Mior SA, Carroll LJ, Jacobs CL, Taylor-Vaisey AL. Is exercise effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders or whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1503-1523. [PMID: 24534390 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In 2008, the Neck Pain Task Force (NPTF) recommended exercise for the management of neck pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). However, no evidence was available on the effectiveness of exercise for Grade III neck pain or WAD. Moreover, limited evidence was available to contrast the effectiveness of various types of exercises. PURPOSE To update the findings of the NPTF on the effectiveness of exercise for the management of neck pain and WAD grades I to III. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review and best evidence synthesis. SAMPLE Studies comparing the effectiveness of exercise to other conservative interventions or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes of interest included self-rated recovery, functional recovery, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, and/or adverse events. METHODS We searched eight electronic databases from 2000 to 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. The results of scientifically admissible studies were synthesized following best-evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We retrieved 4,761 articles, and 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were critically appraised. Ten RCTs were scientifically admissible: nine investigated neck pain and one addressed WAD. For the management of recent neck pain Grade I/II, unsupervised range-of-motion exercises, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, or manual therapy lead to similar outcomes. For recent neck pain Grade III, supervised graded strengthening is more effective than advice but leads to similar short-term outcomes as a cervical collar. For persistent neck pain and WAD Grade I/II, supervised qigong and combined strengthening, range-of-motion, and flexibility exercises are more effective than wait list. Additionally, supervised Iyengar yoga is more effective than home exercise. Finally, supervised high-dose strengthening is not superior to home exercises or advice. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence that supervised qigong, Iyengar yoga, and combined programs including strengthening, range of motion, and flexibility are effective for the management of persistent neck pain. We did not find evidence that one supervised exercise program is superior to another. Overall, most studies reported small effect sizes suggesting that a small clinical effect can be expected with the use of exercise alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1.
| | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, New York, USA, 10014
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 7K4
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Deborah A Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Kristi A Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Gabrielle M van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3M2; Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2E9
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 7K4; Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Alberta Centre for Injury Prevention and Research, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 RTF, 8308-114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1
| | - Craig L Jacobs
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1; Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| | - Anne L Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Mior S, Jacobs C, Côté P, Randhawa K, Yu H, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Ameis A, Ammendolia C, Brison R, Nordin M, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A. Are manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the OPTIMa collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16:1598-1630. [PMID: 26707074 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Revised: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In 2008, the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) found limited evidence on the effectiveness of manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture for the management of whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) or neck pain and associated disorders (NAD). PURPOSE This review aimed to update the findings of the Neck Pain Task Force, which examined the effectiveness of manual therapies, passive physical modalities, and acupuncture for the management of WAD or NAD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. SAMPLE The sample includes randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture with other interventions, placebo or sham, or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were self-rated or functional recovery, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, or adverse events. METHODS We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2014. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were stratified by the intervention's stage of development (exploratory vs. evaluation) and synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. Funding was provided by the Ministry of Finance. RESULTS We screened 8,551 citations, and 38 studies were relevant and 22 had a low risk of bias. Evidence from seven exploratory studies suggests that (1) for recent but not persistent NAD grades I-II, thoracic manipulation offers short-term benefits; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, technical parameters of cervical mobilization (eg, direction or site of manual contact) do not impact outcomes, whereas one session of cervical manipulation is similar to Kinesio Taping; and (3) for NAD grades I-II, strain-counterstrain treatment is no better than placebo. Evidence from 15 evaluation studies suggests that (1) for recent NAD grades I-II, cervical and thoracic manipulation provides no additional benefit to high-dose supervised exercises, and Swedish or clinical massage adds benefit to self-care advice; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, home-based cupping massage has similar outcomes to home-based muscle relaxation, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not offer benefits, Western acupuncture provides similar outcomes to non-penetrating placebo electroacupuncture, and needle acupuncture provides similar outcomes to sham-penetrating acupuncture; (3) for WAD grades I-II, needle electroacupuncture offers similar outcomes as simulated electroacupuncture; and (4) for recent NAD grades III, a semi-rigid cervical collar with rest and graded strengthening exercises lead to similar outcomes, and LLLT does not offer benefits. CONCLUSIONS Our review adds new evidence to the Neck Pain Task Force and suggests that mobilization, manipulation, and clinical massage are effective interventions for the management of neck pain. It also suggests that electroacupuncture, strain-counterstrain, relaxation massage, and some passive physical modalities (heat, cold, diathermy, hydrotherapy, and ultrasound) are not effective and should not be used to manage neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Silvano Mior
- Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Craig Jacobs
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT); Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC); Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada
| | - Gabrielle van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto; Institute for Work and Health
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research and School of Public Health, University of Alberta
| | - Arthur Ameis
- Certification Program in Insurance Medicine and Medico-legal Expertise, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Institute for Work and Health; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| | - Robert Brison
- Clinical Research, Kingston General Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bussières AE, Stewart G, Al-Zoubi F, Decina P, Descarreaux M, Hayden J, Hendrickson B, Hincapié C, Pagé I, Passmore S, Srbely J, Stupar M, Weisberg J, Ornelas J. The Treatment of Neck Pain–Associated Disorders and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39:523-564.e27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
15
|
Murray DA, Meldrum D, Lennon O. Can vestibular rehabilitation exercises help patients with concussion? A systematic review of efficacy, prescription and progression patterns. Br J Sports Med 2016; 51:442-451. [DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
Study Design Systematic review. Background Soft tissue injuries to the lower limb bring a substantial health and economic burden to society. Physical agents are commonly used to treat these injuries. However, the effectiveness of many such physical agents is not clearly established in the literature. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of physical agents for soft tissue injuries of the lower limb. Methods We searched 5 databases from 1990 to 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies. Paired reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature and appraised relevant studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a high risk of bias were excluded. We synthesized low-risk-of-bias studies according to principles of best-evidence synthesis. Results We screened 10261 articles. Of 43 RCTs identified, 20 had a high risk of bias and were excluded from the analysis, and 23 RCTs had a low risk of bias and were included in the analysis. The available higher-quality evidence suggests that patients with persistent plantar fasciitis may benefit from ultrasound or foot orthoses, while those with persistent midportion Achilles tendinopathy may benefit from shockwave therapy. However, the current evidence does not support the use of shockwave therapy for recent plantar fasciitis, low-Dye taping for persistent plantar fasciitis, low-level laser therapy for recent ankle sprains, or splints for persistent midportion Achilles tendinopathy. Finally, evidence on the effectiveness of the following interventions is not established in the current literature: (1) shockwave therapy for persistent plantar fasciitis, (2) cryotherapy or assistive devices for recent ankle sprains, (3) braces for persistent midportion Achilles tendinopathy, and (4) taping or electric muscle stimulation for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Conclusion Almost half the identified RCTs that evaluated the effectiveness of physical agents for the management of lower-limb soft tissue injuries had a high risk of bias. High-quality RCTs are still needed to assess the effectiveness of physical agents for managing the broad range of lower-limb soft tissue injuries. The effectiveness of most interventions remains unclear. Level of Evidence Therapy, 1a. Protocol registered July 10, 2014 with PROSPERO (CRD42014010621). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(7):523-554. Epub 6 Jun 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6521.
Collapse
|
17
|
Effectiveness of Acupuncture Therapies to Manage Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Extremities: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46:409-29. [PMID: 27117725 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Study Design Systematic review. Background Little is known about the effectiveness of acupuncture therapies for musculoskeletal disorders. Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture therapies for musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015 for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. Eligible studies were appraised with Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. A best-evidence synthesis was performed to synthesize results from included studies with a low risk of bias. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the impact of excluding studies with a high risk of bias. Results The search revealed 5180 articles; 15 were included (10 with a low risk of bias, 5 with a high risk of bias). The studies with a low risk of bias suggested that (1) traditional needle acupuncture was superior to oral steroids (1 RCT, n = 77) and may be superior to vitamin B1/B6 supplements (1 RCT, n = 64) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and was superior to exercise for Achilles tendinopathy (1 RCT, n = 64). Traditional needle acupuncture did not provide important benefit over placebo for upper extremity pain (1 RCT, n = 128), or no intervention for patellofemoral pain (1 RCT, n = 75), and was inconclusive for shoulder pain (2 RCTs, n = 849), suggesting no important benefit; (2) electroacupuncture may be superior to placebo for shoulder injuries (1 RCT, n = 130) and may not be superior to night splinting for persistent CTS (1 RCT, n = 78); and (3) dry needling may be superior to placebo for plantar fasciitis (1 RCT, n = 84). Sensitivity analysis suggests that including studies with a high risk of bias might have impacted the evidence synthesis in support of managing shoulder pain with traditional needle acupuncture, and that would suggest traditional needle acupuncture may be effective for lateral epicondylitis and piriformis syndrome. Conclusion Evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture for musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities was inconsistent. Traditional needle acupuncture may be beneficial for CTS and Achilles tendinopathy, but not for nonspecific upper extremity pain and patellofemoral syndrome. Electroacupuncture may be effective for shoulder injuries and may show similar effectiveness to that of night wrist splinting for CTS. The effectiveness of dry needling for plantar fasciitis is equivocal. Level of Evidence Therapy, 1a-. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(6):409-429. Epub 26 Apr 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6270.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sutton D, Gross DP, Côté P, Randhawa K, Yu H, Wong JJ, Stern P, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, Shearer HM, Stupar M, Goldgrub R, van der Velde G, Nordin M, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. Multimodal care for the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist and hand: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:8. [PMID: 26955466 PMCID: PMC4780149 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0089-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist and hand are associated with pain, functional impairment and decreased productivity in the general population. Combining several interventions in a multimodal program of care is reflective of current clinical practice; however there is limited evidence to support its effectiveness. The purpose of our review was to investigate the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist and hand on self-rated recovery, functional recovery, or clinical outcomes in adults or children. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature and best evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1990 to March 2015. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies were eligible. Random pairs of independent reviewers screened studies for relevance and critically appraised relevant studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We screened 5989 articles, and critically appraised eleven articles. Of those, seven had a low risk of bias; one addressed carpal tunnel syndrome and six addressed lateral epicondylitis. Our search did not identify any low risk of bias studies examining the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of other musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist or hand. The evidence suggests that multimodal care for the management of lateral epicondylitis may include education, exercise (strengthening, stretching, occupational exercise), manual therapy (manipulation) and soft tissue therapy (massage). The evidence does not support the use of multimodal care for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence on the effectiveness of multimodal care for musculoskeletal disorders of the elbow, forearm, wrist and hand is limited. The available evidence suggests that there may be a role for multimodal care in the management of patients with persistent lateral epicondylitis. Future research is needed to examine the effectiveness of multimodal care and guide clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42014009093.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Douglas P Gross
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, 8205 114 St, 3-28 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2G4 ; Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Alberta, 8205 114 St, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2G4
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7L7 ; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7L7
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Paula Stern
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education Program, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, 60 Murray Street, 2nd Floor (Main), Toronto, Ontario Canada M5T 3L9
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Rachel Goldgrub
- Graduate Student, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, L1H 7L7 Ontario Canada
| | - Gabrielle van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 3M2 ; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 3M2 ; Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5G 2E9
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Linda J Carroll
- School of Public Health and Injury Prevention Centre, University of Alberta, 3-300 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6G 1C9
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Varatharajan S, Ferguson B, Chrobak K, Shergill Y, Côté P, Wong JJ, Yu H, Shearer HM, Southerst D, Sutton D, Randhawa K, Jacobs C, Abdulla S, Woitzik E, Marchand AA, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Ammendolia C, Mior S, Ameis A, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A. Are non-invasive interventions effective for the management of headaches associated with neck pain? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2016; 25:1971-99. [PMID: 26851953 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4376-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Revised: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To update findings of the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders and evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of patients with headaches associated with neck pain (i.e., tension-type, cervicogenic, or whiplash-related headaches). METHODS We searched five databases from 1990 to 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing non-invasive interventions with other interventions, placebo/sham, or no interventions. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to determine scientific admissibility. Studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We screened 17,236 citations, 15 studies were relevant, and 10 had a low risk of bias. The evidence suggests that episodic tension-type headaches should be managed with low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises. Patients with chronic tension-type headaches may also benefit from low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises; relaxation training with stress coping therapy; or multimodal care that includes spinal mobilization, craniocervical exercises, and postural correction. For cervicogenic headaches, low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises; or manual therapy (manipulation with or without mobilization) to the cervical and thoracic spine may also be helpful. CONCLUSIONS The management of headaches associated with neck pain should include exercise. Patients who suffer from chronic tension-type headaches may also benefit from relaxation training with stress coping therapy or multimodal care. Patients with cervicogenic headache may also benefit from a course of manual therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Brad Ferguson
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Karen Chrobak
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Yaadwinder Shergill
- University of Ottawa Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd, Box 249-B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. .,Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1H 7L7, Canada. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1H 7L7, Canada.
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, 60 Murray Street, 2nd Floor (Main), Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Craig Jacobs
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Sean Abdulla
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Erin Woitzik
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Département d'anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 Boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QUÉBEC, G9A 5H7, Canada
| | - Gabrielle van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3M2, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3M2, Canada.,Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Injury Prevention Centre and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-300 ECHA, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Margareta Nordin
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1H 7L7, Canada.,Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Flodior, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, L1H 7L7, Canada
| | - Arthur Ameis
- Certification Program in Insurance Medicine and Medico-legal Expertise, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, N-414, Roger-Gaudry Building, 2900, Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The Effectiveness of Exercise on Recovery and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Soft Tissue Injuries of the Hip, Thigh, or Knee: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39:110-120.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
21
|
Sutton DA, Nordin M, Côté P, Randhawa K, Yu H, Wong JJ, Stern P, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, Shearer HM, Stupar M, Chung C, Goldgrub R, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. The Effectiveness of Multimodal Care for Soft Tissue Injuries of the Lower Extremity: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39:95-109.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
22
|
Southerst D, Yu H, Randhawa K, Côté P, D'Angelo K, Shearer HM, Wong JJ, Sutton D, Varatharajan S, Goldgrub R, Dion S, Cox J, Menta R, Brown CK, Stern PJ, Stupar M, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. The effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper and lower extremities: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Chiropr Man Therap 2015; 23:30. [PMID: 26512315 PMCID: PMC4623271 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-015-0075-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) of the upper and lower extremities are common in the general population and place a significant burden on the health care system. Manual therapy is recommended by clinical practice guidelines for the management of these injuries; however, there is limited evidence to support its effectiveness. The purpose of our review was to investigate the effectiveness of manual therapy in adults or children with MSDs of the upper or lower extremity. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the effectiveness of manual therapy were eligible. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Paired reviewers screened studies for relevance and critically appraised relevant studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with low risk of bias were synthesized following best-evidence synthesis principles. Where available, we computed mean changes between groups, relative risks and 95 % CI. RESULTS We screened 6047 articles. Seven RCTs were critically appraised and three had low risk of bias. For adults with nonspecific shoulder pain of variable duration, cervicothoracic spinal manipulation and mobilization in addition to usual care may improve self-perceived recovery compared to usual care alone. For adults with subacromial impingement syndrome of variable duration, neck mobilization in addition to a multimodal shoulder program of care provides no added benefit. Finally, for adults with grade I-II ankle sprains of variable duration, lower extremity mobilization in addition to home exercise and advice provides greater short-term improvements in activities and function over home exercise and advice alone. No studies were included that evaluated the effectiveness of manual therapy in children or for the management of other extremity injuries in adults. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence on the effectiveness of manual therapy for MSDs of the upper and lower extremities is limited. The available evidence supports the use of manual therapy for non-specific shoulder pain and ankle sprains, but not for subacromial impingement syndrome in adults. Future research is needed to determine the effectiveness of manual therapy and guide clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42014009899.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Southerst
- Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5G 1X5
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Pierre Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St N, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 ; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St N, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4 ; UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Kevin D'Angelo
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Rachel Goldgrub
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St N, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario Canada L1H 7K4
| | - Sarah Dion
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Jocelyn Cox
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Roger Menta
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Courtney K Brown
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Paula J Stern
- Graduate Education Program, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Maja Stupar
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1 ; Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Injury Prevention Centre and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 Research Transition Facility, 8308-114 St, Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6G 2E1
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Is exercise effective for the management of subacromial impingement syndrome and other soft tissue injuries of the shoulder? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 20:646-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Revised: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
24
|
Woitzik E, Jacobs C, Wong JJ, Côté P, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Sutton D, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Brison RJ, Yu H, van der Velde G, Stern PJ, Taylor-Vaisey A, Stupar M, Mior S, Carroll LJ. The effectiveness of exercise on recovery and clinical outcomes of soft tissue injuries of the leg, ankle, and foot: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 20:633-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2014] [Revised: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
25
|
D’Angelo K, Sutton D, Côté P, Dion S, Wong JJ, Yu H, Randhawa K, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Cox (Dresser) J, Brown C, Menta R, Nordin M, Shearer HM, Ameis A, Stupar M, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. The Effectiveness of Passive Physical Modalities for the Management of Soft Tissue Injuries and Neuropathies of the Wrist and Hand: A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38:493-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Revised: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
26
|
Piper S, Shearer HM, Côté P, Wong JJ, Yu H, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, Randhawa KA, Sutton DA, Stupar M, Nordin MC, Mior SA, van der Velde GM, Taylor-Vaisey AL. The effectiveness of soft-tissue therapy for the management of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the upper and lower extremities: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 21:18-34. [PMID: 26386912 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft-tissue therapy is commonly used to manage musculoskeletal injuries. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of soft-tissue therapy for the management of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the upper and lower extremities. DESIGN Systematic Review. METHODS We searched six databases from 1990 to 2015 and critically appraised eligible articles using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Evidence from studies with low risk of bias was synthesized using best-evidence synthesis methodology. RESULTS We screened 9869 articles and critically appraised seven; six had low risk of bias. Localized relaxation massage provides added benefits to multimodal care immediately post-intervention for carpal tunnel syndrome. Movement re-education (contraction/passive stretching) provides better long-term benefit than one corticosteroid injection for lateral epicondylitis. Myofascial release improves outcomes compared to sham ultrasound for lateral epicondylitis. Diacutaneous fibrolysis (DF) or sham DF leads to similar outcomes in pain intensity for subacromial impingement syndrome. Trigger point therapy may provide limited or no additional benefit when combined with self-stretching for plantar fasciitis; however, myofascial release to the gastrocnemius, soleus and plantar fascia is effective. CONCLUSION Our review clarifies the role of soft-tissue therapy for the management of upper and lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders and injuries. Myofascial release therapy was effective for treating lateral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis. Movement re-education was also effective for managing lateral epicondylitis. Localized relaxation massage combined with multimodal care may provide short-term benefit for treating carpal tunnel syndrome. More high quality research is needed to study the appropriateness and comparative effectiveness of this widely utilized form of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Piper
- Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Heather M Shearer
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1.
| | - Pierre Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4; UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Jessica J Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Hainan Yu
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Danielle Southerst
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Kristi A Randhawa
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Deborah A Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Maja Stupar
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY 10014, USA; Department of Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York University, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY 10014, USA
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4
| | - Gabrielle M van der Velde
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, Room 658, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3M2; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Leslie Dan Pharmacy Building, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3M2; Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2E9
| | - Anne L Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2H 3J1
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Southerst D, Marchand AA, Côté P, Shearer HM, Wong JJ, Varatharajan S, Randhawa K, Sutton D, Yu H, Gross DP, Jacobs C, Goldgrub R, Stupar M, Mior S, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. The effectiveness of noninvasive interventions for musculoskeletal thoracic spine and chest wall pain: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38:521-31. [PMID: 26141077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to critically appraise and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of noninvasive interventions, excluding pharmacological treatments, for musculoskeletal thoracic pain. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the effectiveness of noninvasive interventions were eligible. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials accessed through Ovid Technologies, Inc, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text accessed through EBSCOhost from 1990 to 2015. Our search strategies combined controlled vocabulary relevant to each database (eg, MeSH for MEDLINE) and text words relevant to our research question and the inclusion criteria. Random pairs of independent reviewers screened studies for relevance and critically appraised relevant studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. RESULTS We screened 6988 articles and critically appraised 2 studies. Both studies had a low risk of bias and were included in our synthesis. One RCT compared thoracic spinal manipulation, needle acupuncture, and placebo electrotherapy for recent thoracic spine pain. There were statistically significant but clinically nonimportant short-term reductions in pain favoring manipulation. There were no differences between acupuncture and placebo electrotherapy. Another RCT compared a multimodal program of care and a session of education for recent musculoskeletal chest wall pain. The multimodal care resulted in statistically significant but clinically nonimportant short-term reductions in pain over education. However, participants receiving multimodal care were more likely to report important improvements in chest pain. CONCLUSIONS Quality evidence on the management of musculoskeletal thoracic pain is sparse. The current evidence suggests that compared to placebo, spinal manipulation is associated with a small and clinically nonimportant reduction in pain intensity and that acupuncture leads to similar outcomes as placebo. Furthermore, a multimodal program of care (ie, manual therapy, soft tissue therapy, exercises, heat/ice, and advice) and a single education session lead to similar pain reduction for recent-onset musculoskeletal chest wall pain. However, patients who receive multimodal care are more likely to report pain improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Southerst
- Research Coordinator, Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), North York, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, ON, Canada; Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Director, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Heather M Shearer
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Clinical Research Manager, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica J Wong
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Instructor, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Douglas P Gross
- Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Director, Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Craig Jacobs
- Assistant Clinical Professor, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Director, Division of Clinical Education and Patient Care, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Goldgrub
- Graduate Student, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Postdoctoral Fellow, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Professor, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, North York, ON, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Linda J Carroll
- Professor, Injury Prevention Centre and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Menta R, Randhawa K, Côté P, Wong JJ, Yu H, Sutton D, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, D'Angelo K, Cox J, Brown C, Dion S, Mior S, Stupar M, Shearer HM, Lindsay GM, Jacobs C, Taylor-Vaisey A. The effectiveness of exercise for the management of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand: a systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38:507-20. [PMID: 26130104 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared to other interventions, placebo/sham intervention, or no intervention in improving self-rated recovery, functional recovery, clinical, and/or administrative outcomes in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Paired reviewers independently screened studies for relevance and assessed the risk of bias using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We synthesized the evidence using the best evidence synthesis methodology. RESULTS We identified 5 studies with a low risk of bias. Our review suggests that, for patients with persistent lateral epicondylitis, (1) adding concentric or eccentric strengthening exercises to home stretching exercises provides no additional benefits; (2) a home program of either eccentric or concentric strengthening exercises leads to similar outcomes; (3) home wrist extensor strengthening exercises lead to greater short-term improvements in pain reduction compared to "wait and see"; and (4) clinic-based, supervised exercise may be more beneficial than home exercises with minimal improvements in pain and function. For hand pain of variable duration, supervised progressive strength training added to advice to continue normal physical activity provides no additional benefits. CONCLUSION The relative effectiveness of stretching vs strengthening for the wrist extensors remains unknown for the management of persistent lateral epicondylitis. The current evidence shows that the addition of supervised progressive strength training does not provide further benefits over advice to continue normal physical activity for hand pain of variable duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Menta
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristi Randhawa
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Pierre Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Director, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica J Wong
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instructor, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hainan Yu
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Sutton
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharanya Varatharajan
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instructor, Division of Undergraduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Southerst
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Research Coordinator, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin D'Angelo
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Cox
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Courtney Brown
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Dion
- Graduate Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Professor, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maja Stupar
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Postdoctoral Fellow, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather M Shearer
- Adjunct Professor, Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Clinical Research Manager, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail M Lindsay
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Jacobs
- Assistant Clinical Professor, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Director, Division of Clinical Education and Patient Care, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Research Associate, UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Effectiveness of passive physical modalities for shoulder pain: systematic review by the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management collaboration. Phys Ther 2015; 95:306-18. [PMID: 25394425 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal condition in the general population. Passive physical modalities are commonly used to treat shoulder pain. However, previous systematic reviews reported conflicting results. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of passive physical modalities for the management of soft tissue injuries of the shoulder. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1, 1990, to April 18, 2013. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and case-control studies were eligible. Random pairs of independent reviewers screened 1,470 of 1,760 retrieved articles after removing 290 duplicates. Twenty-two articles were eligible for critical appraisal. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Of those, 11 studies had a low risk of bias. DATA EXTRACTION The lead author extracted data from low risk of bias studies and built evidence tables. A second reviewer independently checked the extracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS The findings of studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized according to principles of best evidence synthesis. Pretensioned tape, ultrasound, and interferential current were found to be noneffective for managing shoulder pain. However, diathermy and corticosteroid injections led to similar outcomes. Low-level laser therapy provided short-term pain reduction for subacromial impingement syndrome. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy was not effective for subacromial impingement syndrome but provided benefits for persistent shoulder calcific tendinitis. LIMITATIONS Non-English studies were excluded. CONCLUSIONS Most passive physical modalities do not benefit patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. However, low-level laser therapy is more effective than placebo or ultrasound for subacromial impingement syndrome. Similarly, shock-wave therapy is more effective than sham therapy for persistent shoulder calcific tendinitis.
Collapse
|
30
|
Varatharajan S, Côté P, Shearer HM, Loisel P, Wong JJ, Southerst D, Yu H, Randhawa K, Sutton D, van der Velde G, Mior S, Carroll LJ, Jacobs C, Taylor-Vaisey A. Are work disability prevention interventions effective for the management of neck pain or upper extremity disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2014; 24:692-708. [PMID: 24522460 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise and synthesize literature on the effectiveness of work disability prevention (WDP) interventions in workers with neck pain, whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), or upper extremity disorders. METHODS We searched electronic databases from 1990 to 2012. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Scientifically admissible studies were summarized and synthesized following best-evidence synthesis methodology. RESULTS Of the 6,359 articles retrieved, 16 randomized controlled trials were eligible for critical appraisal and five were admissible. We found that a return-to-work coordination program (including workplace-based work hardening) was superior to clinic-based work hardening for persistent rotator cuff tendinitis. Workplace high-intensity strength training and workplace advice had similar outcomes for neck and shoulder pain. Mensendieck/Cesar postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises had similar outcomes for non-specific work-related upper limb complaints. Adding a brief job stress education program to a workplace ergonomic intervention was not beneficial for persistent upper extremity symptoms. Adding computer-prompted work breaks to ergonomic adjustments and workplace education benefited workers' recovery from recent work-related neck and upper extremity complaints. CONCLUSIONS At present, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of WDP interventions for managing neck pain, WAD, and upper extremity disorders. Our review suggests a return-to-work coordination program is more effective than clinic-based work hardening. Also, adding computer-prompted breaks to ergonomic and workplace interventions benefits workers' recovery. The current quality of evidence does not allow for a definitive evaluation of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharanya Varatharajan
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gebremariam L, Hay EM, van der Sande R, Rinkel WD, Koes BW, Huisstede BMA. Subacromial impingement syndrome--effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy. Br J Sports Med 2013; 48:1202-8. [PMID: 24217037 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) includes the rotator cuff syndrome, tendonitis and bursitis of the shoulder. Treatment includes surgical and non-surgical modalities. Non-surgical treatment is used to reduce pain, to decrease the subacromial inflammation, to heal the compromised rotator cuff and to restore satisfactory function of the shoulder. To select the most appropriate non-surgical intervention and to identify gaps in scientific knowledge, we explored the effectiveness of the interventions used, concentrating on the effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy. METHODS The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro and CINAHL were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was used to summarise the results. RESULTS Two reviews and 10 RCTs were included. One RCT studied manual therapy as an add-on therapy to self-training. All other studies studied the effect of physiotherapy: effectiveness of exercise therapy, mobilisation as an add-on therapy to exercises, ultrasound, laser and pulsed electromagnetic field. Moderate evidence was found for the effectiveness of hyperthermia compared to exercise therapy or ultrasound in the short term. Hyperthermia and exercise therapy were more effective in comparison to controls or placebo in the short term (moderate evidence). For the effectiveness of hyperthermia, no midterm or long-term results were studied. In the midterm, exercise therapy gave the best results (moderate evidence) compared to placebo or controls. For other interventions, conflicting, limited or no evidence was found. CONCLUSIONS Some physiotherapeutic treatments seem to be promising (moderate evidence) to treat SIS, but more research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Gebremariam
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elaine M Hay
- Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Renske van der Sande
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem D Rinkel
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bionka M A Huisstede
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shamliyan TA, Kane RL, Ramakrishnan R, Taylor FR. Episodic migraines in children: limited evidence on preventive pharmacological treatments. J Child Neurol 2013; 28:1320-41. [PMID: 23752070 DOI: 10.1177/0883073813488659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The authors conducted a systematic literature review of preventive pharmacological treatments for episodic childhood migraines searching several databases through May 20, 2012. Episodic migraine prevention was examined in 24 publications of randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1578 children in 16 nonrandomized studies. Single randomized controlled trials provided low-strength evidence that propranolol would result in complete cessation of migraine attacks in 713 per 1000 children treated (95% confidence interval, 452-974); trazodone and nimodipine decreased migraine days, while topiramate, divalproex, and clonidine were no more effective than placebo in preventing migraines. Migraine prevention with multidisciplinary drug management was not sustained at 6 months. Divalproex resulted in treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects, and topiramate increased the risk of paresthesia, upper respiratory tract infection, and weight loss. Long-term preventive benefits and improvement in disability and quality of life are unknown. No studies examined quality of life or provided evidence for individualized treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana A Shamliyan
- 1Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shamliyan TA, Choi JY, Ramakrishnan R, Miller JB, Wang SY, Taylor FR, Kane RL. Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28:1225-37. [PMID: 23592242 PMCID: PMC3744311 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2433-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 03/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Systematic review of preventive pharmacologic treatments for community-dwelling adults with episodic migraine. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases through May 20, 2012. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of preventive drugs compared to placebo or active treatments examining rates of ≥50 % reduction in monthly migraine frequency or improvement in quality of life. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS We assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence and conducted random effects meta-analyses of absolute risk differences and Bayesian network meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 5,244 retrieved references, 215 publications of RCTs provided mostly low-strength evidence because of the risk of bias and imprecision. RCTs examined 59 drugs from 14 drug classes. All approved drugs, including topiramate (9 RCTs), divalproex (3 RCTs), timolol (3 RCTs), and propranolol (4 RCTs); off-label beta blockers metoprolol (4 RCTs), atenolol (1 RCT), nadolol (1 RCT), and acebutolol (1 RCT); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril (1 RCT) and lisinopril (1 RCT); and angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan (1 RCT), outperformed placebo in reducing monthly migraine frequency by ≥50 % in 200-400 patients per 1,000 treated. Adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation (68 RCTs) were greater with topiramate, off-label antiepileptics, and antidepressants than with placebo. Limited direct evidence as well as frequentist and exploratory network Bayesian meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in benefits between approved drugs. Off-label angiotensin-inhibiting drugs and beta-blockers were most effective and tolerable for episodic migraine prevention. LIMITATIONS We did not quantify reporting bias or contact principal investigators regarding unpublished trials. CONCLUSIONS Approved drugs prevented episodic migraine frequency by ≥50 % with no statistically significant difference between them. Exploratory network meta-analysis suggested that off-label angiotensin-inhibiting drugs and beta-blockers had favorable benefit-to-harm ratios. Evidence is lacking for long-term effects of drug treatments (i.e., trials of more than 3 months duration), especially for quality of life.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lopez-Olivo MA, Shah NA, Pratt G, Risser JM, Symanski E, Suarez-Almazor ME. Bisphosphonates in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and metastatic bone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20:2985-98. [PMID: 22956190 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1563-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Accepted: 07/31/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bisphosphonates are known to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) in advanced breast cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of bisphosphonates in preventing SREs, controlling pain, and overall survival in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases through November 10, 2011 for controlled trials that included lung cancer patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates. Two reviewers independently extracted data on pain control, survival, and SREs and evaluated the quality of each study. Meta-analyses were performed when there were two or more trials with similar outcomes. RESULTS Twelve trials met our inclusion criteria and included 1,767 patients. Studies were placebo-controlled, or had compared bisphosphonates with other modalities (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or radioisotope therapy), or had used different bisphosphonates as active controls. Randomized controlled trials did not report adequate descriptions of randomization procedures, allocation concealment, and blinding, resulting in low-quality scores. Patients treated with zoledronic acid + chemotherapy had fewer SREs than those receiving chemotherapy alone (relative risk (RR) 0.81, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.97). Pain control improved when a bisphosphonate was added to another treatment modality (chemotherapy or radiation; RR 1.18, 95 %CI 1.0-1.4). Bisphosphonate therapy improved survival compared to controls, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (mean of 72 days, 95 %CI -8.9 to 152.9). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with bisphosphonates reduced SREs, improved pain control, and showed a trend to increased survival. Bisphosphonates should be used in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Lopez-Olivo
- Department of General Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1499, Houston, TX 77030-3722, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Complexities in understanding the role of compensation-related factors on recovery from whiplash-associated disorders: discussion paper 2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:S316-21. [PMID: 22020606 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182388739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Focused discussion. OBJECTIVE To present some of the complexities in conducting research on the role of compensation and compensation-related factors in recovery from whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) and to suggest directions for future research. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is divergence of opinion, primary research findings, and systematic reviews on the role of compensation and/or compensation-related factors in WAD recovery. METHODS The topic of research of compensation/compensation-related factors was discussed at an international summit meeting of 21 researchers from diverse fields of scientific enquiry. This article summarizes the main points raised in that discussion. RESULTS Traffic injury compensation is a complex sociopolitical construct, which varies widely across jurisdictions. This leads to conceptual and methodological challenges in conducting and interpreting research in this area. It is important that researchers and their audiences be clear about what aspect of the compensation system is being addressed, what compensation-related variables are being studied, and what social/economic environment the compensation system exists in. In addition, summit participants also recommended that nontraditional, sophisticated study designs and analysis strategies be employed to clarify the complex causal pathways and mechanisms of effects. CONCLUSION Care must be taken by both researchers and their audiences not to overgeneralize or confuse different aspects of WAD compensation. In considering the role of compensation/compensation-related factors on WAD and WAD recovery, it is important to retain a broad-based conceptualization of the range of biological, psychological, social, and economic factors that combine and interact to define and determine how people recover from WAD.
Collapse
|
36
|
Disordered Eating, Menstrual Disturbances, and Low Bone Mineral Density in Dancers: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91:1777-1789.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2010] [Revised: 07/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
37
|
Lajeunesse MJ. Achieving synthesis with meta-analysis by combining and comparing all available studies. Ecology 2010; 91:2561-4. [DOI: 10.1890/09-1530.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Warnock FF, Castral TC, Brant R, Sekilian M, Leite AM, de la Presa Owens S, Scochi CG. Brief Report: Maternal Kangaroo Care for Neonatal Pain Relief: A Systematic Narrative Review. J Pediatr Psychol 2009; 35:975-84. [DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
39
|
Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S97-S107. [PMID: 19251080 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Best evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVE To perform a best evidence synthesis on the course and prognostic factors for neck pain and its associated disorders in Grades I-III whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Knowledge of the course of recovery of WAD guides expectations for recovery. Identifying prognostic factors assists in planning management and intervention strategies and effective compensation policies to decrease the burden of WAD. METHODS The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) conducted a critical review of the literature published between 1980 and 2006 to assemble the best evidence on neck pain and its associated disorders. Studies meeting criteria for scientific validity were included in a best evidence synthesis. RESULTS We found 226 articles related to course and prognostic factors in neck pain and its associated disorders. After a critical review, 70 (31%) were accepted on scientific merit; 47 of these studies related to course and prognostic factors in WAD. The evidence suggests that approximately 50% of those with WAD will report neck pain symptoms 1 year after their injuries. Greater initial pain, more symptoms, and greater initial disability predicted slower recovery. Few factors related to the collision itself (for example, direction of the collision, headrest type) were prognostic; however, postinjury psychological factors such as passive coping style, depressed mood, and fear of movement were prognostic for slower or less complete recovery. There is also preliminary evidence that the prevailing compensation system is prognostic for recovery in WAD. CONCLUSION The Neck Pain Task Force undertook a best evidence synthesis to establish a baseline of the current best evidence on the course and prognosis for WAD. Recovery of WAD seems to be multifactorial.
Collapse
|
40
|
Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Haldeman S, Nordin M, Hurwitz EL, Guzman J, Peloso PM. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S70-86. [PMID: 19251078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and best evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence and incidence of neck pain and disability in workers; to identify risk factors for neck pain in workers; to propose an etiological diagram; and to make recommendations for future research. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous reviews of the etiology of neck pain in workers relied on cross-sectional evidence. Recently published cohorts and randomized trials warrant a re-analysis of this body of research. METHODS We systematically searched Medline for literature published from 1980-2006. Retrieved articles were reviewed for relevance. Relevant articles were critically appraised. Articles judged to have adequate internal validity were included in our best evidence synthesis. RESULTS One hundred and nine papers on the burden and determinants of neck pain in workers were scientifically admissible. The annual prevalence of neck pain varied from 27.1% in Norway to 47.8% in Québec, Canada. Each year, between 11% and 14.1% of workers were limited in their activities because of neck pain. Risk factors associated with neck pain in workers include age, previous musculoskeletal pain, high quantitative job demands, low social support at work, job insecurity, low physical capacity, poor computer workstation design and work posture, sedentary work position, repetitive work and precision work. We found preliminary evidence that gender, occupation, headaches, emotional problems, smoking, poor job satisfaction, awkward work postures, poor physical work environment, and workers' ethnicity may be associated with neck pain. There is evidence that interventions aimed at modifying workstations and worker posture are not effective in reducing the incidence of neck pain in workers. CONCLUSION Neck disorders are a significant source of pain and activity limitations in workers. Most neck pain results from complex relationships between individual and workplace risk factors. No prevention strategies have been shown to reduce the incidence of neck pain in workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Côté
- Centre of Research Expertise in Improved Disability Outcomes, University Health Network Rehabilitation Solutions, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Peloso PM, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Nordin M, Haldeman S. Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in Workers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S108-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
42
|
Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Haldeman S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Côté P, Nordin M, Peloso PM, Guzman J, Cassidy JD. Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in the General Population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S87-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
43
|
Guzman J, Haldeman S, Carroll LJ, Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Peloso P, Nordin M, Cassidy JD, Holm LW, Côté P, van der Velde G, Hogg-Johnson S. Clinical Practice Implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S227-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
44
|
Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, Peloso PM, Holm LW, Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S. Treatment of Neck Pain: Noninvasive Interventions. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S141-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, Giles-Smith L, Cheng CS, Greenhalgh SW, Haldeman S, van der Velde G, Hurwitz EL, Côté P, Nordin M, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Guzman J, Carragee EJ. Methods for the Best Evidence Synthesis on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S39-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Guzman J, Peloso P, Nordin M, Hurwitz E, van der Velde G, Carragee E, Haldeman S. The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in Whiplash-Associated Disorders After Traffic Collisions. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32:S61-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
47
|
Chou R. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. PAIN MEDICINE 2008; 9:531-41. [PMID: 18346061 DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_2.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines are useful tools for bringing evidence into pain practice. However, even when their conclusions or recommendations appear valid, interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines in everyday practice is not always straightforward. Judging external validity or applicability of findings requires careful consideration of factors related to patient selection, clinical setting, feasibility, costs, and availability of interventions. Clinicians should also consider whether effects on clinically relevant outcomes are large enough to warrant use of the intervention in question. Other challenges to using systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines in pain practice include the need to make decisions about pain interventions when evidence is weak or inconclusive, and the increasing and confusing presence of discordant systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. This article discusses how to evaluate applicability and clinical relevance of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines, and provides a framework for approaching clinical decisions when evidence is weak or conflicting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Chou
- Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Is it time for a population health approach to neck pain? J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008; 31:442-6. [PMID: 18722199 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2008] [Revised: 06/06/2008] [Accepted: 06/12/2008] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neck pain and its associated disorders (NPAD) cause significant health burden in the general population and after road traffic and occupational injury. Individual-level health care treatments have been well studied, but population-health approaches to this problem have not. We used a best-evidence synthesis to examine population-level approaches to the prevention and control of NPAD. METHODS The systematic review examined studies published between 1980 and 2006 that addressed the incidence, prevalence, risk factors, prevention, cost, assessment and classification, interventions, and course and prognostic factors for NPAD. Citations were screened for relevance, scientifically reviewed, and synthesized. Valid studies addressing public policies or population-level approaches to the prevention and control of NPAD were identified and used in the evidence synthesis. RESULTS Only 8 of the 552 scientifically admissible studies were considered relevant to a public or population health approach to preventing and controlling the burden of NPAD. For whiplash-associated disorders, active head restraints and seat backs were protective in rear-end collisions; insurance policies affected the incidence and recovery; government funding of multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs did not benefit recovery; and early intensive health care delayed recovery. In the workplace, 2 randomized trials failed to show any preventive effect for ergonomic interventions or physical training and stress management. One study documented the societal cost of neck pain. CONCLUSIONS There is little evidence on which to make public or population-level recommendations, despite the important public health burden and costs of NPAD. Population-level approaches to preventing and controlling NPAD should be investigated.
Collapse
|
49
|
A comparative analysis of four clinical guidelines for hypertension management. J Hum Hypertens 2008; 22:829-37. [DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
50
|
Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in Workers. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|