Recombinant activated factor VII for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery—A retrospective analysis of safety and efficacy

Off-label Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Cardiac Surgical Bleeding

Recombinant activated factor VII has been widely used in an off-label manner for cardiac surgical bleeding. Recent reports have administered recombinant activated factor VII earlier in the course of bleeding and at lower doses than initially reported. This review will discuss the history, mechanism, current recommendations for use, and recent data on the use of recombinant activated factor VII in cardiac surgical bleeding.

Comparison of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate with Activated Factor VII Use for Bleeding Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Children

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the treatment of bleeding complications following surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in children.

DESIGN/METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of a single institution comprising patients aged 0 to 18 years old with congenital heart disease. Patients must have received either PCC or rFVIIa after coming off CPB. Our primary efficacy endpoint is time in the operating room from off-CPB to pediatric intensive care unit admission. Our primary safety endpoint is thrombosis through 30 days.

RESULTS

Our primary efficacy outcome was significantly shorter in the PCC group compared with the rFVIIa group (P < .0001). Similarly, secondary efficacy outcomes of packed red blood cell administration, chest tube output, and transfusion exposures all significantly favored PCC administration. However, CPB time was significantly longer, and body temperatures were significantly lower, in the rFVIIa group. Safety outcomes, including our primary safety outcome of thrombosis through 30 days, were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study questions whether PCC could be favored over rFVIIa for hemostasis in children with congenital heart disease following CPB surgery. In addition, this study has found no difference when comparing PCC and rFVIIa in terms of safety outcomes, particularly thrombosis events. There are several limitations to this study due to the retrospective nature of the design and the differences between the two study groups. Despite the limitations, this study suggests that relatively early administration of PCC could be favored over delayed administration of rFVIIa to control recalcitrant post-CPB bleeding in the operating room.

Outcomes of 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Liver Disease and Nonvitamin K Antagonist-Related Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study

The administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has expanded beyond its Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for the emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the expanded use of 4F-PCC. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 4F-PCC administrations at our university hospital. Of the 159 patients who received 4F-PCC, 76% (n = 121) and 24% (n = 38) received it for the FDA-approved indication in the vitamin K-related coagulopathy (VKA) group and for expanded use in the nonvitamin K-related coagulopathy (nVKA) group, respectively. The expanded use of 4F-PCC was associated with a less robust reduction in the international normalized ratio (INR) (INR of -0.7 ± 1.3 vs INR of -1.6 ± 1.8, P = .002), and fewer patients in the nVKA group achieved a postadministration INR of less than1.5 (11% vs 79%, P = .001) than those in the VKA group. Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the nVKA cohort than in the VKA cohort (42% vs 20%, P = .04). Notably, based on our data, underlying differences in the patient's comorbidities, particularly advanced liver disease, may have contributed to the observed outcome variations, including mortality rate. Therefore, factors, including comorbidities and the underlying etiology of coagulopathy, should be considered when deciding on the expanded use of 4F-PCC. Further research is needed to better understand the potential risks and benefits of 4F-PCC in expanded use scenarios, and the clinical decision to use 4F-PCC outside its FDA-approved indication should be made carefully, considering this information.

Factor eight inhibiting bypass activity for refractory bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding and transfusion have been associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. The use of factor eight inhibiting bypass activity (FEIBA) in managing bleeding after repair of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not previously been evaluated. We report our experience in utilizing FEIBA in ATAAD repair.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent repair of ATAAD between July 2014 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, dependent upon whether or not they received FEIBA intraoperatively: "FEIBA" (n = 112) versus "no FEIBA" (n = 119). From this, 53 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed with respect to transfusion requirements and short-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11.7% (27 deaths), not significantly different between patient groups. Those patients who received FEIBA demonstrated reduced transfusion requirements for all types of blood products in the first 48 h after surgery as compared with the "no FEIBA" cases, including red blood cells, platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in major postoperative morbidity between the two groups. The FEIBA cohort did not demonstrate an increased incidence of thrombotic complications (stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism).

DISCUSSION

When used as rescue therapy for refractory bleeding following repair of ATAAD, FEIBA appears to be effective in decreasing postoperative transfusion requirements whilst not negatively impacting clinical outcomes. These findings should prompt further investigation and validation via larger, multi-center, randomized trials.

Impact of Early, Low-Dose Factor VIIa on Subsequent Transfusions and Length of Stay in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) is used to treat cardiac surgical bleeding in an off-label manner. However, optimal dosing and timing of administration to provide efficacious yet safe outcomes remain unknown.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac surgical patients (N = 214) who received low-dose rFVIIa for cardiac surgical bleeding.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were allocated into one of three groups based on timing of rFVIIa administration during the course of bleeding resuscitation based on the number of hemostatic products given before rFVIIa administration: group one = ≤one products (n = 82); group two = two-to-four products (n = 73); and group three= ≥five products (n = 59).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients who received low-dose rFVIIa later in the course of bleeding resuscitation (group three) had longer intensive care unit stays (p = 0.014) and increased incidence of postoperative renal failure when compared with group one (p = 0.039). Total transfusions were lowest in patients who received rFVIIa early in the course of resuscitation (group one) (median, two [interquartile range (IQR), 1-4.75]) and highest in group three (median, 11 [IQR, 8-14]; p < 0.001). Subsequent blood product transfusions after rFVIIa administration were highest in group two (p = 0.003); however, the median for all three groups was two products. There were no differences in thrombosis, reexplorations, or mortality in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified no differences in adverse outcomes based on timing of administration of low-dose rFVIIa for cardiac surgical bleeding defined by stage of resuscitation, but the benefits of early administration remain unclear.

The Use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity (FEIBA) for the Treatment of Perioperative Hemorrhage in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) can be used to control bleeding following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation without increasing the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome of pump thrombus, ischemic cerebrovascular accidents, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred nineteen consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation (December 1, 2009 to December 30, 2018).

INTERVENTION

FEIBA administered to control perioperative hemorrhage.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 82 patients (25.7%) in the FEIBA cohort had more risk factors for perioperative hemorrhage, such as lower preoperative platelet count (169 ± 66 v 194 ± 68 × 10³/mL, p = 0.004), prior cardiac surgery (36.6% v 21.9%, p = 0.008), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (100.3 v 75.2 minutes, p = 0.001) than the 237 controls. After 16.6 units (95% CI: 14.3-18.9) of blood products were given, 992 units (95% CI: 821-1163) of FEIBA were required to control bleeding in the FEIBA cohort. Compared to the controls, there were no differences in the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome (11.0% v 7.6%, p = 0.343) or mortality rate (3.7% v 1.3%, p = 0.179). Multivariate logistical regression identified preoperative international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.62) and CPB time (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.20) as risk factors for 14-day thrombotic events, but FEIBA usage was not associated with an increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, the use of FEIBA (∼1,000 units, ∼13 units/kg) to control perioperative hemorrhage following LVAD implantation was not associated with increases in mortality or composite thrombotic outcome.

Efficacy, Safety, and Strategies for Recombinant-Activated Factor VII in Cardiac Surgical Bleeding: A Narrative Review

As perioperative bleeding continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery, the search continues for an ideal hemostatic agent for use in this patient population. Transfusion of blood products has been associated both with increased costs and risks, such as infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay, and decreased survival. Recombinant-activated factor VII (rFVIIa) first was approved for the US market in 1999 and since that time has been used in a variety of clinical settings. This review summarizes the existing literature pertaining to perioperative rFVIIa, in addition to society recommendations and current guidelines regarding its use in cardiac surgery.

Antithrombotic and hemostatic stewardship: evaluation of clinical outcomes and adverse events of recombinant factor VIIa (Novoseven®) utilization at a large academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (Novoseven®) is utilized for the reversal of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery. In August 2015, rFVIIa was transferred from the blood bank to the pharmacy at New York University (NYU) Langone Health. Concordantly, an off-label dosing guideline was developed. The objective of this study was to describe utilization and cost of rFVIIa and assess compliance to our dosing guideline.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational review of rFVIIa administrations post-implementation of an off-label dosing guideline. All patients who received rFVIIa between September 2015 and June 2017 were evaluated. For each rFVIIa administration, anticoagulation and laboratory values, indications for use, dosing, ordering and administration times, concomitant blood products, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included venous thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to systemic embolism and mortality. The primary endpoint was the utilization of rFVIIa in accordance with the off-label dosing guideline. Secondary endpoints included hemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa, adverse events, blood products administered, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa transition to pharmacy.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients [pediatric (n = 6), adult (n = 57)] received rFVIIa, with the majority of use for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. The utilization of rVIIa decreased after development of the off-label dosing guideline and transition from blood bank to pharmacy. The total incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days was 19.6%; 17.6% arterial and 2% venous; 70% of patients with an adverse event were over 70 years of age. Use of rFVIIa reduced the median number of units of blood products administered.

CONCLUSION

Administration of rFVIIa for cardiac surgery appears to be effective for hemostasis. Transitioning rFVIIa from the blood bank to pharmacy and implementation of a dosing guideline appears to have reduced utilization. Patients receiving rFVIIa should be monitored for thromboembolic events. Elderly patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolic events.

Vascular Injury and Thrombotic Potential: A Note of Caution About Recombinant Factor VIIa

Postoperative hemorrhage following cardiac surgery increases morbidity, mortality, and costs. Several case reports have described the successful use of recombinant factor VIIa to decrease or stop bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The mechanism of action of recombinant factor VIIa is thought to be increased site-specific thrombin generation by tissue factor—mediated activation of coagulation or from activated platelets. However, there have also been many reports of thrombotic complications after recombinant factor VIIa administration. Randomized clinical trials and further laboratory studies should help better clarify the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and optimal dosing of recombinant factor VIIa in the cardiac surgical setting.

Routine transfusion of platelet concentrates effectively reduces reoperation rate for bleeding and pericardial effusion after elective operations for ascending aortic aneurysm

Patients with ascending aortic aneurysm undergoing complex surgical procedures are at increased risk of early postoperative excessive blood loss. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of routine transfusions of platelet (PLT) concentrates in reduction of hemorrhagic postoperative complications. The study involved 396 consecutive patients (289 males and 107 females) with the mean age of 55.9 ± 13.6 years who underwent elective operations for aortic aneurysms. They were divided retrospectively into two groups, without (group A; n = 123) or with the routine use of PLTs (group B; n = 273). PLTs were transfused intraoperatively just after completion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Twelve patients in group A (9.8%) and 10 (3.7%) in group B required re-thoracotomy due to hemorrhage (p = 0.027). Routine transfusions of PLT concentrates reduced postoperative incidence of excessive pericardial effusion from 24.1% in group A to 2.1% in group B (p = 0.002). In a consequence, significantly less units (p < 0.0001) of red blood concentrates and fresh frozen plasma were transfused in group B than in group A. The rates of other adverse events in the early postoperative period did not differ between groups. Patients with pericardial effusion required 6.3 ± 2.7 additional days of hospitalization due to surgical re-intervention. Neither blood transfusion-related infections nor adverse reactions were noted. In conclusion, routine intraoperative transfusions of PLT concentrates in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms significantly reduced a need for re-intervention due to both early bleeding and late cardiac tamponade.

Recombinant activated factor VII for uncontrolled bleeding postcardiac surgery

A retrospective observational study to review the safety and efficacy of rFVIIa in persistent hemorrhage in post cardiac surgical patients.

Methods

Patients who had bleeding of 3 ml/kg/h or more for 2 consecutive hours after cardiac surgery were arranged into two groups; control group, who received conventional treatment and rFVIIa group, who received conventional treatment and rFVIIa.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic and surgical characteristics of both groups. The chest tube output significantly decreased in the rFVIIa group compared to the other group 4 hours after admission {1.4 (IQR: 1–2.2) ml/kg/h vs 3.9 (IQR: 3.1–5.6) ml/kg/h; p = 0.004} and continues to be significant till 9 hours after CSICU admission {0.6 (IQR: 0.4–1.1) ml/kg/h vs 1.9 (IQR: 1.2–2.2) ml/kg/h; p = 0.04}. The median number of blood products units transfused to rFVIIa group was significantly lower compared to control group in the period from 3–12 hours after CSICU admission. 13 (5.5%) patients in rFVIIa group had Thromboembolic adverse events (TAE) compared to 7 (2.4%) patients in other group p = 0.27. 8 patients in the rFVIIa group needed reexploration compared to 19 patients in the other group, p = 0.01. No significant difference was noticed between the 2 groups regarding: new onset renal failure, median number of mechanical ventilator days, pneumonia, mediastinitis, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, survival at 30 days and at discharge.

Conclusion

In this analysis, rFVIIa succefully reduced the chest tube bleeding and blood products transfused during severe post cardiac surgical bleeding. However, safety of rFVIIa remains unclear. Prospective controlled trials are still needed to confirm the role of rFVIIa.

The Effect of Intravenous Administration of Active Recombinant Factor VII on Postoperative Bleeding in Cardiac Valve Reoperations; A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative bleeding after cardiac reoperations is among the most complicating problems, both for the physicians and for the patients. Many modalities have been used to decrease its adverse effects and the need for blood products administration.

OBJECTIVES

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial of redo cardiac valve surgery in adult, the effect of active recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) on postoperative bleeding was compared with placebo. Chest tube drainage was used for comparison of bleeding between the two groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two groups of 18 patients undergoing redo valve surgeries were treated and compared regarding chest tube drainage, need for blood products, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), hemoglobin and hematocrit, platelet count, and international normalized ratio (INR) in first 24 hours after surgery. Bleeding was assessed at 3rd, 12th, and 24th hour after operation. In rFVIIa group, 40 µg/kg of AryoSeven was administered before end of surgery and same volume of normal saline was administered as placebo in the control group.

RESULTS

Study groups showed no difference regarding baseline variables. Three patients in rFVIIa group (16.67%) and 13 in placebo group (72.23%) received blood products (P < 0.01). Chest tube blood drainage at 24th hour after operation was 315 ± 177 mL in rFVIIa group and 557 ± 168 mL in control group (P = 0.03). At third and 12th hour after operation, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.71 and P = 0.22, respectively). Postoperative ICU stay was not different; while extubation was longer in the placebo group (352 ± 57 vs. 287 ± 46 minutes; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the efficacy of rFVIIa in controlling postoperative bleeding in redo cardiac valve surgeries regarding subsequent blood loss and transfusion requirement; however, outcome results remains to be defined.

Combination use of platelets and recombinant activated factor VII for increased hemostasis during acute type a dissection operations

Background

Refractory blood loss is a common problem in surgeries for acute type A aortic dissections. Significant evidence has supported the benefit of using recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to control of intractable bleeding in patients after cardiac surgery. In this prospective clinical study, we present a novel method to achieve intraoperative hemostasis by using a combination of platelets and rFVIIa during operations for acute type A aortic dissections.

Methods

Between May 2009 and August 2012, 71 patients with acute type A dissections who underwent emergency surgery were prospectively included and allocated to one of the following two intervention groups for hemostasis: 3 units platelets combined with 2.4 mg rFVIIa (n = 25), and conventional methods (n = 46).

Results

The patients who received the combination of platelets and rFVIIa required fewer transfusions of red blood cells (6.2 ± 3.1 units vs 9.8 ± 2.8 units; p < 0.05), fresh frozen plasma (736.9 ± 178.3 ml vs 1264.3 ± 245.2 ml, p < 0.05), platelet concentrates (3 units vs 5.0 ± 1.8 units, p < 0.001), and cryoprecipitate (2.8 ± 0.9 units vs 8.2 ± 2.3 units, p < 0.05). These patients also required less time for sternal closure (76.9 ± 17.2 min vs 102.3 ± 10.7 min, p < 0.05) compared with the conventional therapy patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between these two groups.

Conclusions

Using a combination of platelets and rFVIIa is an effective strategy for achieving hemostasis during acute type A dissection surgery. This hemostatic strategy does not appear to be associated with an increase in postoperative adverse events.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-014-0156-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recombinant activated factor VIIa to treat refractory lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a patient with recently implanted mechanical valve: a case report

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a common complication after cardiac surgery. However, lower gastrointestinal bleeding is not usually associated with this type of surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old man with a history of aortic regurgitation underwent elective mechanical valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. He experienced a complicated intraoperative course involving unexplained cardiac arrest following induction of anesthesia. He also developed two episodes of massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to mucosal ischemia while convalescing in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit. After unsuccessful attempts to control the bleeding, exhaustion of blood products, and consideration of the high risk of mortality associated with surgery and the possibility of early- and long-term surgical complications, the decision was made to administer two successive doses of recombinant activated factor VII at 60 mcg/kg. Hemostasis was achieved without adverse systemic or valvular effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable outcome was achieved after administration of recombinant activated factor VII, which controlled the patient's severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This outcome suggests the need to raise awareness about the use of this drug in dire circumstances when other conventional measures fail or are unsuitable.

A 2014 Update on Coagulation Management for Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Coagulopathy after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is a serious complication that may result in massive bleeding requiring transfusion of significant amounts of blood products, plasma, and platelets. In addition to increased patient morbidity and mortality it is associated with longer hospital stay and increased resource utilization. The current review discusses aspects in cardiopulmonary bypass–induced coagulopathy with emphasis on point-of-care testing and individualized “goal-directed” therapy in patients who develop excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery.

Intraoperative use of low-dose recombinant activated factor VII during thoracic aortic operations

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have supported the effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for the control of bleeding after cardiac procedures; however safety concerns persist. Here we report the novel use of intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa in thoracic aortic operations, a strategy intended to improve safety by minimizing rFVIIa exposure.

METHODS

Between July 2005 and December 2010, 425 consecutive patients at a single referral center underwent thoracic aortic operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); 77 of these patients received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa (≤60 μg/kg) for severe coagulopathy after CPB. Propensity matching produced a cohort of 88 patients (44 received intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa and 44 controls) for comparison.

RESULTS

Matched patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa got an initial median dose of 32 μg/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 16-43 μg/kg) rFVIIa given 51 minutes (42-67 minutes) after separation from CPB. Patients receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa demonstrated improved postoperative coagulation measurements (partial thromboplastin time 28.6 versus 31.5 seconds; p=0.05; international normalized ratio, 0.8 versus 1.2; p<0.0001) and received 50% fewer postoperative blood product transfusions (2.5 versus 5.0 units; p=0.05) compared with control patients. No patient receiving intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa required postoperative rFVIIa administration or reexploration for bleeding. Rates of stroke, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events were equivalent between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative low-dose rFVIIa led to improved postoperative hemostasis with no apparent increase in adverse events. Intraoperative rFVIIa administration in appropriately selected patients may correct coagulopathy early in the course of refractory blood loss and lead to improved safety through the use of smaller rFVIIa doses. Appropriately powered randomized studies are necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Use of Activated Recombinant Factor VII in Severe Bleeding - Evidence for Efficacy and Safety in Trauma, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Cardiac Surgery, and Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled bleeding continues to be a major cause of mortality in trauma, cardiac surgery, postpartum hemorrhage and liver failure. The aim of this paper is to assess the evidence supporting the efficacy of activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) administration in these settings. METHODS: Electronic literature search. RESULTS: Numerous retrospective trials have mostly shown a decrease in blood transfusion requirements with no increase in thromboembolic events (TEE), but major limitations in trial design make generalization difficult. In most retrospective reports rFVIIa has been administered as a last-ditch attempt to control bleeding, when acidosis, hypothermia and coagulation factor depletion may not allow optimal rFVIIa effect. Prospective randomized controlled trials have not shown any effect of rFVIIa on mortality or TEE, although some have shown a reduction in RBC requirement. CONCLUSION: Stipulated transfusion protocols in prospective trials have reduced anticipated mortality among controls and make future trials for mortality effect unlikely in view of large sample size requirements. Establishment of these protocols and rapid hemostasis are likely to have greater benefits than administration of a single agent.

The prophylactic use of recombinant factor VIIa in a patient with DeBakey type III aortic dissection -A case report-

Little is known about the prophylactic use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in patients undergoing surgery for a bleeding aorta employing cardiopulmonary bypass. We report the successful use of rFVIIa in a patient undergoing hypothermic circulatory arrest and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass for repair of a DeBakey type III aortic dissection.

Reducing perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major spine surgery

At present, individual techniques, including intraoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution, use of tranexamic acid, use of intrathecal morphine, proper positioning, and modification of operative techniques, seem most promising for reducing perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major spine surgery. Other techniques including preoperative autologous predonation; mandatory discontinuation of use of antiplatelet agents; intraoperative and postoperative red-blood-cell salvage; use of aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, recombinant factor VIIa, or desmopressin; induced hypotension; avoidance of hypothermia; and minimally invasive operative techniques require additional studies to either establish their effectiveness or address safety considerations.

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII in intractable haemorrhage after cardiovascular surgery: an observational study of practices in 23 French cardiac centres (2005-7)

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to describe French off-label use of rFVIIa for intractable bleeding in major cardiovascular surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective observational analysis of data from 2005 to October 2007 (no formal guidelines were available) was employed. The collect request form was elaborated by a multidisciplinary committee.

RESULTS

Data on 109 patients--37 mechanical cardiac assist devices--were collected, with repeated injection for 24%. Bleeding stopped, decreased or continued in 43%, 37% and 20% of the cases, respectively. For patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), hourly bleeding decreased from 365 ± 212 to 115 ± 106 ml h(-1) (p<0.001). The median number of transfused products was 25 (2-90) before and 6 (0-48) after rFVIIa (p<0.001). Most patients had been well compensated with fibrinogen (>1g.l(-1)) and platelets (>50 G.l(-1)) before rFVIIa. The bleeding outcome (cessation, decrease or no change) was associated with the infused dose (81 ± 31, 71 ± 24, 64 ± 23 μg.kg(-1); p = 0.044) and did not differ whether rFVIIa was administered in the operating room (49%) or ICU (51%). Thrombotic events occurred in 13% of patients without assist devices and in 27% of those with them (but without obvious intra-device clotting). The overall 28-day survival rate was 60% and associated with bleeding outcome (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIa rescue therapy was followed by control of bleeding in a substantial number of the patients with seemingly acceptable safety; however, thrombotic risk remains a matter of concern. Our observational study suggests that the dose to be tested prospectively is at least 80 μg.kg(-1).

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Emergency cardiac surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a review of the evidence and perioperative implications of medical and mechanical therapeutics

Patients with acute coronary syndromes who require emergency cardiac surgery present complex management challenges. The early administration of antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs has improved overall survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but to achieve maximal benefit, these drugs are given before coronary anatomy is known and before the decision to perform percutaneous coronary interventions or surgical revascularization has been made. A major bleeding event secondary to these drugs is associated with a high rate of death in medically treated patients with acute coronary syndrome possibly because of subsequent withholding of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies that otherwise reduce the rate of death, stroke, or recurrent myocardial infarction. Whether the added risk of bleeding and blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients receiving such potent antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy before surgery specifically for acute coronary syndromes affects long-term mortality has not been clearly established. For patients who do proceed to surgery, strategies to minimize bleeding include stopping the anticoagulation therapy and considering platelet and/or coagulation factor transfusion and possibly recombinant-activated factor VIIa administration for refractory bleeding. Mechanical hemodynamic support has emerged as an important option for patients with acute coronary syndromes in cardiogenic shock. For these patients, perioperative considerations include maintaining appropriate anticoagulation, ensuring suitable device flow, and periodically verifying correct device placement. Data supporting the use of these devices are derived from small trials that did not address long-term postoperative outcomes. Future directions of research will seek to optimize the balance between reducing myocardial ischemic risk with antiplatelet and antithrombotics versus the higher rate perioperative bleeding by better risk stratifying surgical candidates and by assessing the effectiveness of newer reversible drugs. The effects of mechanical hemodynamic support on long-term patient outcomes need more stringent analysis.

[Efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII for massive bleeding after cardiac surgery: experience with 32 patients]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to treat massive bleeding refractory to conventional treatment following cardiac surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 32 adults who underwent cardiac surgery and received rFVIIa to treat life-threatening postoperative bleeding after conventional means of correcting coagulopathy had failed.

RESULTS

After administration of rFVIIa (90 microg x kg(-1), coagulation parameters soon became normal and blood loss decreased, with drainage going from a mean (SD) of 463 (321) mL in the hour when rFVIIa was infused to 155 (101) mL in the next hour (P < .001). Blood loss decreased by between 22% and 90% (mean, 66%), and the reduction was over 75% in 45% of the patients. Decreases in the transfusion of packed red blood cells (from 7A.4 [4.1] units to 2.7 [ 2.9] units; P < .001), plasma (from 4.7 [2.9] units to 1.6 [2.0] units; P < .001), and platelets were also noted. Mortality was 25%, although only 1 patient died from hemorrhagic shock. One patient developed thromboembolic complications (ischemic stroke).

CONCLUSION

rFVIIa was effective in treating refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery, reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements and restoring blood parameters to normal.

Use of rFVIIa for critical bleeding in cardiac surgery: dose variation and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is increasingly being used in non-haemophiliac patients for the treatment of severe bleeding refractory to standard interventions. Optimal dosing regimens remain debated in cardiac surgery. Therefore, this study investigated the use of different rFVIIa dosing practices on response to bleeding and patient outcomes in cardiac surgery patients using data from the Haemostasis Registry.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Haemostasis Registry that records cases of off-licence rFVIIa use in participating institutions. Univariate analyses compared patients receiving < or =40 microg/kg, 41-60 microg/kg, 61-80 microg/kg, 81-100 microg/kg and >100 microg/kg of rFVIIa on key parameters. Logistic regression models investigated the relationship between independent variables and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Complete data was available on 804 cardiac surgery patients who received rFVIIa. Of these, 42 (5.2%) were treated with doses < or =40 microg/kg, while the dose group containing the most patients was 81-100 microg/kg (368, 45.77%). Results demonstrated no significant differences in the rate of thromboembolic adverse events, response to bleeding or 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings raise the important question of whether lower doses of rFVIIa may be as effective as higher doses in the treatment of severe bleeding in cardiac surgery patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Activated Factor VII

Background— Blood loss is a common complication of cardiac surgery. Evidence suggests that recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) can decrease intractable bleeding in patients after cardiac surgery. Our objective was to investigate the safety and possible benefits of rFVIIa in patients who bleed after cardiac surgery.

Methods and Results— In this phase II dose-escalation study, patients who had undergone cardiac surgery and were bleeding were randomized to receive placebo (n=68), 40 μg/kg rFVIIa (n=35), or 80 μg/kg rFVIIa (n=69). The primary end points were the number of patients suffering critical serious adverse events. Secondary end points included rates of reoperation, amount of blood loss, and transfusion of allogeneic blood. There were more critical serious adverse events in the rFVIIa groups. These differences did not reach statistical significance (placebo, 7%; 40 μg/kg, 14%; P =0.25; 80 μg/kg, 12%; P =0.43). After randomization, significantly fewer patients in the rFVIIa group underwent a reoperation as a result of bleeding ( P =0.03) or required allogeneic transfusions ( P =0.01).

Conclusions— On the basis of this preliminary evidence, rFVIIa may be beneficial for treating bleeding after cardiac surgery, but caution should be applied and further clinical trials are required because there is an increase in the number of critical serious adverse events, including stroke, in those patients randomized to receive rFVIIa.

[Our experience with recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven) in the high risk cardiosurgical patients with bleeding complication]

Haemorrhagic complications significantly increase mortality and cost of treatment in cardiac surgery. A few years ago recombinant activated factor VII has been introduced to decrease such complications. In our department recombinant activated factor VII has been used in 11 patients between 2004 and 2007. Nine of them underwent a combined (simultaneous CABG and valve replacement) high risk surgery with long aortic cross clamp time and long extracorporeal circulation time. One patient underwent a repeat coronary artery bypass operation and one was operated for aortic dissection. The average dose given was 6.5 mg (2.4-9.6 mg). The average amount of bleeding without NovoSeven given was 5440 ml, however it was only 987 ml when NovoSeven was used. Nine of the patients were completely recovered and discharged from hospital, but two of them died in the postoperative period for delayed use of the recombinant factor VII-a and for severe co-morbidities (bowel ischaemia, cirrhosis of the liver). NovoSeven given in the proper time and dose significantly reduces bleeding following cardiac surgery, even if it cannot be stopped surgically. Using recombinant factor VIIa can save life in case of severe non-surgical diffuse bleeding or in case of suture insufficiency caused by friable soft tissues following high risk combined surgery with extremely long aortic cross clamp time and extracorporeal circulation time. Significant delay in the use of NovoSeven should be avoided because the temporary reduction of bleeding usually does not change fatal outcome.

Recombinant factor VIIa treatment of severe bleeding in cardiac surgery patients: a retrospective analysis of dosing, efficacy, and safety outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To describe rFVIIa dosing and clinical outcomes in cardiovascular surgery patients with refractory bleeding.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of patients receiving rFVIIa from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2005, in the cardiovascular surgery setting.

SETTING

Tertiary care, private teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-three patients who received rFVIIa after cardiovascular surgery for the management of refractory bleeding.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients received an average of 7.6 +/- 6.8 units of red blood cells (RBCs) before rFVIIa dosing (mean dose, 56.2 +/- 26.5 microg/kg). Median and 25th and 75th quartile blood product consumption was significantly reduced 6 hours after rFVIIa versus 6 hours before (RBCs, -3 units, [-1, -7]; cryoprecipitate, -7.5 units [0, -20]; platelet, -3 units [-1, -4]; fresh frozen plasma, -4 units [-2, -7]). Repeated rFVIIa dosing occurred in 10% of patients, with 8 (8.6%) and 2 (2.25%) patients receiving second and third doses, respectively. Subgroup analysis of each rFVIIa dosing quartile >30 microg/kg showed a significant reduction in RBCs; however, no significant differences were found in the magnitude of RBC reduction or percent of patients requiring massive transfusion among the quartiles. No adverse thrombotic episodes were noted, and the observed mortality (22.6%) was not attributed to rFVIIa therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIa effectively reduces blood product use in cardiovascular surgery patients having massive blood loss. Although the optimal dose of rFVIIa for use in cardiovascular surgery remains undetermined, these data provide evidence that dosing regimens using <90 microg/kg are effective in this population and may provide guidance for centers establishing standardized protocols for rFVIIa use in cardiovascular surgery patients.

Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery

This document presents a professional view of evidence-based recommendations around the issues of antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. It was prepared by the Audit and Guidelines Committee of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). We review the following topics: evidence for aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin cessation prior to cardiac surgery; perioperative interventions to reduce bleeding including the use of aprotinin and tranexamic acid; the use of thromboelastography to guide blood product usage; protamine reversal of heparin; the use of factor VIIa to control severe bleeding; anticoagulation after mechanical, tissue valve replacement and mitral valve repair; the use of antiplatelets and clopidogrel after cardiac surgery to improve graft patency and reduce thromboembolic complications and thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period. This guideline is subject to continuous informal review, and when new evidence becomes available. The formal review date will be at 5 years from publication (September 2013).

Dosing factor VIIa (recombinant) in nonhemophiliac patients with bleeding after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

The dosing of factor VIIa (recombinant) in nonhemophiliac patients with cardiac-surgery-associated bleeding (CSAB) is discussed.

SUMMARY

Factor VIIa (recombinant) is a vitamin K-dependent glycoprotein that is FDA-approved for use in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors to factor VIII or IX and for patients with factor VII deficiency. Case reports and observational studies indicate that factor VIIa (recombinant) may be efficacious for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes related to trauma, surgery, and coagulopathies. The use of factor VIIa (recombinant) for CSAB is increasing. No controlled clinical trials have been conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of factor VIIa (recombinant) in the treatment of CSAB; therefore, the appropriate dosing scheme remains unclear. In addition, thromboembolic events associated with factor VIIa (recombinant) have been reported, so the safety of factor VIIa (recombinant) in patients with normal coagulation systems is unclear. Data from one randomized, controlled, clinical trial of the use of factor VIIa (recombinant) in intracerebral hemorrhage showed a dose-related trend toward adverse events when factor VIIa (recombinant) was compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

No particular dose of factor VIIa (recombinant) is strongly supported in the literature for off-label use, and thromboembolic events may be dose dependent. Use of the smallest possible dose is warranted because of the high cost of factor VIIa (recombinant) and the potential for thromboembolic events. A single dose of 2.4 or 4.8 mg or 45 microg/kg should be considered.

Use of activated recombinant factor VII for severe coagulopathy post ventricular assist device or orthotopic heart transplant

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist devices(VAD) implantation/removal is a complex surgical procedure with perioperative bleeding complications occurring in nearly half of the cases. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used off-label to control severe hemorrhage in surgery and trauma. We report here our experience with rFVIIa as a rescue therapy to achieve hemostasis in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) and/or VAD implantation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from Jan 03 to Aug 05 for patients who received rFVIIa for the management of intractable bleeding unresponsive to standard hemostatic blood component therapy. Blood loss and the quantity of blood products, prior to, and for at least 12 hours after, administration of rFVIIa were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 53, (38-64 yrs), mean dose of rFVIIa administered was 78.3 microg/kg (24-189 microg/kg) in 1-3 doses. All patients received the drug either intraoperatively or within 6 hours of arrival in ICU. Mean transfusion requirements and blood loss were significantly reduced after rFVIIa administration (PRBC's; 16.9 +/- 13.3 to 7.1 +/- 6.9 units, FFP; 13.1 +/- 8.2 to 4.1 +/- 4.9 units, platelets; 4.0 +/- 2.8 to 2.1 +/- 2.2 units, p < 0.04 for all). 5 patients expired including 3 with thromboembolic cause. One patient developed a lower extremity arterial thrombus, and another deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

In this review, there was a significant decrease in transfusion requirement and blood loss after rFVIIa administration. Although, 5/17 developed thromboembolic complications, these patients may have been at higher risk based on the multiple modality therapy used to manage intractable bleeding. Nevertheless, the exact role of rFVIIa with respect to development of thromboembolic complications cannot be clearly determined. Further investigation is needed to determine rFVIIa's safety and its effectiveness in improving postoperative morbidity and mortality.

The role of recombinant factor VIIa in on-pump cardiac surgery: Proceedings of the Canadian Consensus Conference

PURPOSE

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is currently not approved by Health Canada or the Food and Drug Administration for treating excessive blood loss in nonhemophiliac patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, but is increasingly being used "off-label" for this indication. A Canadian Consensus Conference was convened to generate recommendations for rFVIIa use in on-pump cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The panel undertook a literature review of the use of rFVIIa in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Appropriateness, timing, and dosage considerations were addressed for three cardiac surgery indications: prophylactic, routine, and rescue uses. Recommendations were based on evidence from the literature and derived by consensus following recognized grading procedures.

RESULTS

The panel recommended against prophylactic or routine use of rFVIIa, as there is no evidence at this time that the benefits of rFVIIa outweigh its potential risks compared with standard hemostatic therapies. On the other hand, the panel made a weak recommendation (grade 2C) for the use of rFVIIa (one to two doses of 35-70 microg.kg(-1)) as rescue therapy for blood loss that is refractory to standard hemostatic therapies, despite the lack of randomized controlled trial data for this indication.

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiac surgery, the risks and benefits of rFVIIa are unclear, but current evidence suggests that its benefits may outweigh its risks for rescue therapy in selected patients. Methodologically rigorous studies are needed to clarify its riskbenefit profile in cardiac surgery patients.