Use of polyclonal immunoglobulins as adjunctive therapy for sepsis or septic shock*:

A new hope? Possibilities of therapeutic IgA antibodies in the treatment of inflammatory lung diseases

Inflammatory lung diseases represent a persistent burden for patients and the global healthcare system. The combination of high morbidity, (partially) high mortality and limited innovations in the last decades, have resulted in a great demand for new therapeutics. Are therapeutic IgA antibodies possibly a new hope in the treatment of inflammatory lung diseases? Current research increasingly unravels the elementary functions of IgA as protector against infections and as modulator of overwhelming inflammation. With a focus on IgA, this review describes the pathological alterations in mucosal immunity and how they contribute to chronic inflammation in the most common inflammatory lung diseases. The current knowledge of IgA functions in the circulation, and particularly in the respiratory mucosa, are summarized. The interplay between neutrophils and IgA seems to be key in control of inflammation. In addition, the hurdles and benefits of therapeutic IgA antibodies, as well as the currently known clinically used IgA preparations are described. The data highlighted here, together with upcoming research strategies aiming at circumventing the current pitfalls in IgA research may pave the way for this promising antibody class in the application of inflammatory lung diseases.

IgM-enriched immunoglobulin improves colistin efficacy in a pneumonia model by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Using polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IgM-IG) as adjuvant therapy to colistin appears useful in the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa.

We evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime or colistin in combination with polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IgM-IG), in an experimental pneumonia model (C57BL/6J male mice) using two multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, both ceftazidime-susceptible and one colistin-resistant. Pharmacodynamically optimised antimicrobials were administered for 72 h, and intravenous IgM-IG was given as a single dose. Bacterial tissues count and the mortality were analysed. Ceftazidime was more effective than colistin for both strains. In mice infected with the colistin-susceptible strain, ceftazidime reduced the bacterial concentration in the lungs and blood (−2.42 and −3.87 log₁₀ CFU/ml) compared with colistin (−0.55 and −1.23 log₁₀ CFU/ml, respectively) and with the controls. Colistin plus IgM-IG reduced the bacterial lung concentrations of both colistin-susceptible and resistant strains (−2.91 and −1.73 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively) and the bacteraemia rate of the colistin-resistant strain (−44%). These results suggest that IgM-IG might be useful as an adjuvant to colistin in the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Precision medicine in sepsis and septic shock: From omics to clinical tools

Sepsis is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical course and several clinical phenotypes. As it is associated with an increased risk of death, patients with this condition are candidates for receipt of a very well-structured and protocolized treatment. All patients should receive the fundamental pillars of sepsis management, which are infection control, initial resuscitation, and multiorgan support. However, specific subgroups of patients may benefit from a personalized approach with interventions targeted towards specific pathophysiological mechanisms. Herein, we will review the framework for identifying subpopulations of patients with sepsis, septic shock, and multiorgan dysfunction who may benefit from specific therapies. Some of these approaches are still in the early stages of research, while others are already in routine use in clinical practice, but together will help in the effective generation and safe implementation of precision medicine in sepsis.

Adjunctive IgM-enriched immunoglobulin therapy with a personalised dose based on serum IgM-titres versus standard dose in the treatment of septic shock: a randomised controlled trial (IgM-fat trial)

INTRODUCTION

In patients with septic shock, low levels of circulating immunoglobulins are common and their kinetics appear to be related to clinical outcome. The pivotal role of immunoglobulins in the host immune response to infection suggests that additional therapy with polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins may be a promising option in patients with septic shock. Immunoglobulin preparations enriched with the IgM component have largely been used in sepsis, mostly at standard dosages (250 mg/kg per day), regardless of clinical severity and without any dose adjustment based on immunoglobulin serum titres or other biomarkers. We hypothesised that a personalised dose of IgM enriched preparation based on patient IgM titres and aimed to achieve a specific threshold of IgM titre is more effective in decreasing mortality than a standard dose.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is designed as a multicentre, interventional, randomised, single-blinded, prospective, investigator sponsored, two-armed study. Patients with septic shock and IgM titres <60 mg/dL will be randomly assigned to an IgM titre-based treatment or a standard treatment group in a ratio of 1:1. The study will involve 12 Italian intensive care units and 356 patients will be enrolled. Patients assigned to the IgM titre-based treatment will receive a personalised daily dose based on an IgM serum titre aimed at achieving serum titres above 100 mg/dL up to discontinuation of vasoactive drugs or day 7 after enrolment. Patients assigned to the IgM standard treatment group will receive IgM enriched preparation daily for three consecutive days at the standard dose of 250 mg/kg. The primary endpoint will be all-cause mortality at 28 days.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the coordinating centre (Comitato Etico dell'Area Vasta Emilia Nord) and collaborating centres. The results of the trial will be published within 12 months from the end of the study and the steering committee has the right to present them at public symposia and conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS

The trial protocol and information documents have received a favourable opinion from the Area Vasta Emilia Nord Ethical Committee on 12 September 2019. The trial protocol has been registered on EudraCT (2018-001613-33) on 18 April 2018 and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04182737) on 2 December 2019.

An update on endotoxin neutralization strategies in Gram-negative bacterial infections

INTRODUCTION

Gram-negative bacterial infections represent still a severe problem of human health care, regarding the increase in multi-resistance against classical antibiotics and the lack of newly developed antimicrobials. For the fight against these germs, anti-infective agents must overcome and/or bind to the Gram-negative outer membrane consisting of a lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin) outer leaflet and an inner leaflet from phospholipids, with additional peripheral or integral membrane proteins (OMP's).

AREAS COVERED

The current article reviews data of existing therapeutic options and summarizes newer approaches for targeting and neutralizing endotoxins, ranging from in vitro over in vivo animal data to clinical applications by using databases such as Medline.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional antibiotic treatment of the bacteria leads to their killing, but not necessary LPS neutralization, which may be a severe problem in particular for the systemic pathway. This is the reason why there is an increasing number of therapeutic approaches, which - besides combating whole bacteria - at the same time try to neutralize endotoxin within or outside the bacterial cells mainly responsible for the high inflammation induction in Gram-negative species.

Effect of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange on Immunoglobulin Deficiency in Early and Severe Septic Shock

BACKGROUND

Deficiency of immunoglobulins of the classes IgG, IgG1, IgA and IgM is associated with severity of disease and mortality in sepsis and septic shock. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) has recently gained attention as an adjunctive therapeutic option in early septic shock. We hypothesized that TPE might modulate immunoglobulin deficiencies besides sole elimination of circulating injurious molecules.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective single center study with TPE in 33 patients with early septic shock (onset < 12 h) requiring high doses of norepinephrine (NE > 0.4μg/kg/min). Clinical and biochemical data, including measurement of immunoglobulin subgroups IgG, IgG1, IgM and IgA were obtained before and after TPE. The following immunoglobulin cut-off values were used to analyze subgroups with low immunoglobulin concentrations at baseline (IgG ≤ 6.5, IgG1 ≤ 3, IgM ≤ 1.5 and IgA ≤ 0.35 g/L).

RESULTS

At inclusion, median (IQR) SOFA score was 18 (15-20) and NE dose was 0.8 (0.6-1.2) μg/kg/min. The majority of patients demonstrated profound reductions in immunoglobulins levels of all classes. Globally, immunoglobulin levels were not significantly changed after a single TPE session. However, in patients with low baseline immunoglobulin levels a significant increase in all classes was observed (IgG 1.92 (0.96-3) g/L (+41%), IgG1 2.1 (1.46-2.32) g/L (+96%), IgA 0.44 (0.12-0.62) g/L (59%) and IgM 0.18 (0.14-0.34) g/L (+55%), p < 0.001 for comparison to patients above cut-off).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of early and severe septic shock patients had reduced immunoglobulin levels and a single TPE could attenuate immunoglobulin deficiencies of all classes. The clinical relevance of this observation has to be investigated in a proper designed trial.

Quality assessment of meta-analyses evaluating randomized clinical trials to improve the prognosis of septic shock: an overview of systematic reviews

Objective: Clinical guidelines for the treatment of septic shock are based on the studies with the best scientific evidence, which are meta-analyses of clinical trials. However, these meta-analyses may have methodological limitations that prevent their conclusions from being extrapolated to routine clinical practice. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the quality of these meta-analyses through a systematic review.Methods: In this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE from inception to May 2019. We selected meta-analyses from clinical trials that determined the effectiveness of an intervention in reducing the incidence of mortality in patients with septic shock. All items were extracted from the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), which collects information from both systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Results: A total of 34 studies were included. Most elements of the OQAQ were conducted satisfactorily, although 35.3% of meta-analyses did not use a quality assessment of the studies included in other analyses. In 52.9% of meta-analyses, the quality of the studies was high or very high.Conclusions: The methods used to obtain the results should be taken into account when recommending an intervention to treat septic shock if the evidence comes from a meta-analysis of the analyzed characteristics.

Clinical, laboratory features and prognosis of children receiving IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (3 days vs. 5 days) as adjuvant treatment for serious infectious disease in pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective single-center experience (PIGMENT study)

Introduction

Although there are studies about sepsis treatment in different age groups, data on immunoglobulin-M (IgM)-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin use in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and prognoses of children receiving IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin to treat sepsis, septic shock, and multi-organ failure.

Method

We extracted data from the medical records of 254 children who received IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin infusion (104 children for 3 days, 150 children for 5 days) in addition to standard treatment between 2010 and 2017.

Results

When the 5-day vs. 3-day IgM-enriched immunoglobulin treatments were compared, the mortality rate was shown to be lower in patients who received the longer duration of treatment (p < .001). Better outcomes were observed among children with septic shock (p < .01).

Conclusion

Our clinical work with 5-days IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin may reveal a survival benefit of this treatment for children with septic shock.

Targeting the Blood-Brain Barrier to Prevent Sepsis-Associated Cognitive Impairment

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory disease resulting from an infection. This disorder affects 750 000 people annually in the United States and has a 62% rehospitalization rate. Septic symptoms range from typical flu-like symptoms (eg, headache, fever) to a multifactorial syndrome known as sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). Patients with SAE exhibit an acute altered mental status and often have higher mortality and morbidity. In addition, many sepsis survivors are also burdened with long-term cognitive impairment. The mechanisms through which sepsis initiates SAE and promotes long-term cognitive impairment in septic survivors are poorly understood. Due to its unique role as an interface between the brain and the periphery, numerous studies support a regulatory role for the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in the progression of acute and chronic brain dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the current body of literature which supports the BBB as a nexus which integrates signals from the brain and the periphery in sepsis. We highlight key insights on the mechanisms that contribute to the BBB's role in sepsis which include neuroinflammation, increased barrier permeability, immune cell infiltration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and a potential barrier role for tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP). Finally, we address current drug treatments (eg, antimicrobials and intravenous immunoglobulins) for sepsis and their potential outcomes on brain function. A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms may enable clinicians to target specific aspects of BBB function as a therapeutic tool to limit long-term cognitive impairment in sepsis survivors.

Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches

Sepsis and septic shock are common life-threatening pathologies associated with high mortality and substantial costs for healthcare system. Clinical guidelines and bundles for the management of patients with sepsis have recently been updated. Herein, we review the history of sepsis and related conditions definitions from the first consensus conference in 1991 to nowadays, the epidemiologic data resulting from worldwide studies on incidence and mortality, the diagnostic approaches including the microbiological assessment of infection and the use of several prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers and finally we review the main therapeutic measures as the intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and the administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment to provide patients with sepsis a favourable outcome in the antibiotic-resistance era.

Use of human immunoglobulins as an anti-infective treatment: the experience so far and their possible re-emerging role

INTRODUCTION

Pooled human immunoglobulins (IGs) are prepared from plasma obtained from healthy donors as a concentrated antibody-containing solution. In addition, high-titer IGs (hyperimmune) against a specific pathogen can be obtained from vaccinated or convalescing donors. Currently, IGs can be used for the treatment of a variety of infections for which no specific therapy exists or that remain difficult to treat. Moreover, the recent pathogen outbreaks for which there is no approved treatment have renewed attention to the role of convalescent plasma and IGs. Areas covered: In this review, a historical perspective of the use of sera and IGs in humans as anti-infective agents (any viral, bacterial, parasitic infection), excluding immunodeficient patients, is presented from early development to the latest clinical studies. A Medline search was conducted to examine the peer-reviewed literature, with no date limits. Expert commentary: Human pooled plasma-derived IG products benefit from the polyclonal response of every individual donor and from the interindividual variability in such response. The trend to increased availability of vaccines for infectious diseases also opens new potential applications of hyperimmune IGs for emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases (e.g.: Ebola, Zika, Dengue), for the prevention and treatment in the general population, healthcare personnel and caregivers.

Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference

This paper reports on the consensus conference on the management of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) which was held on July 23, 2016, in Dublin, Ireland, as a part of the annual World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) meeting. This document covers all aspects of the management of IAIs. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendation is used, and this document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference findings.

The protective association of endogenous immunoglobulins against sepsis mortality is restricted to patients with moderate organ failure

Background

Pre-evaluation of endogenous immunoglobulin levels is a potential strategy to improve the results of intravenous immunoglobulins in sepsis, but more work has to be done to identify those patients who could benefit the most from this treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of endogenous immunoglobulins on the mortality risk in sepsis depending on disease severity.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study including 278 patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis fulfilling the SEPSIS-3 criteria, coming from the Spanish GRECIA and ABISS-EDUSEPSIS cohorts. Patients were distributed into two groups depending on their Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at ICU admission (SOFA < 8, n = 122 and SOFA ≥ 8, n = 156), and the association between immunoglobulin levels at ICU admission with mortality was studied in each group by Kaplan–Meier and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

ICU/hospital mortality in the SOFA < 8 group was 14.8/23.0%, compared to 30.1/35.3% in the SOFA ≥ 8 group. In the group with SOFA < 8, the simultaneous presence of total IgG < 407 mg/dl, IgM < 43 mg/dl and IgA < 219 mg/dl was associated with a reduction in the survival mean time of 6.6 days in the first 28 days and was a robust predictor of mortality risk either during the acute or during the post-acute phase of the disease (OR for ICU mortality: 13.79; OR for hospital mortality: 7.98). This predictive ability remained in the absence of prior immunosuppression (OR for ICU mortality: 17.53; OR for hospital mortality: 5.63). Total IgG < 407 mg/dl or IgG1 < 332 mg/dl was also an independent predictor of ICU mortality in this group. In contrast, in the SOFA ≥ 8 group, we found no immunoglobulin thresholds associated with neither ICU nor hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Endogenous immunoglobulin levels may have a different impact on the mortality risk of sepsis patients based on their severity. In patients with moderate organ failure, the simultaneous presence of low levels of IgG, IgA and IgM was a consistent predictor of both acute and post-acute mortalities.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0268-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Management and Novel Adjuncts of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) have been recognized for millennia and continue to impose considerable burden on both patient and society in terms of morbidity, death, and the allocation of resources. With improvements in the delivery of critical care, outcomes have improved, although disease-specific therapies are lacking. The basic principles of early diagnosis, of prompt and broad antimicrobial therapy, and of aggressive debridement have remained unchanged. Clearly novel and new therapeutics are needed to combat this persistently lethal disease. This review emphasizes the pillars of NSTI management and then summarizes the contemporary evidence supporting the incorporation of novel adjuncts to the pharmacologic and operative foundations of managing this disease.

Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria: Risk Factors and Impact of Sepsis Treatments

BACKGROUND:

Patients with septic shock by multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganism maybe considered a specific population of critical patients at very high risk of death in whom the effects of standard sepsis treatment has never been assessed. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the risk factors for 30-day mortality and the impact of sepsis management in patients with septic shock caused by MDR bacteria.

METHODS:

Patients with septic shock by MDR bacteria admitted to the mixed intensive care unit (ICU) of Modena University Hospital during a 6-year period were studied. The clinical and microbiological characteristics and sepsis treatments provided were analyzed and compared between survivors (S) and nonsurvivors (NS) at 30 days after septic shock appearance.

RESULTS:

Ninety-four patients were studied. All therapeutic interventions applied to patients during their ICU stay did not show statistical significance between S and NS groups, except for administration of immunoglobulin M (IgM) preparation which were provided more frequently in S group ( P < .05). At the multivariate adjusted analysis, preexisting cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 2.965) and Acinetobacter baumannii infections (OR = 3.197) were independently correlated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, whereas treatment with IgM preparation was protective (OR = 0.283).

CONCLUSIONS:

This retrospective study showed that in patients with septic shock caused by MDR bacteria, history of cancer and infection sustained by A baumannii increase the risk of mortality and that standard sepsis treatments do not seem to provide any protective effect. Adjunctive therapy with IgM preparation seems to be beneficial, but further appropriate studies are needed to confirm the results observed.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012".

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS

The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

RESULTS

The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

Serum IgG levels and mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock : The SBITS data

BACKGROUND

The role of intravenous immune globulin (Ig) therapy in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock is discussed controversially. Low initial IgG levels could help to identify those patients who might benefit from an adjunctive Ig treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of initial serum IgG levels on 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of the SBITS trial data, 543 patients were allocated to four groups (quartiles) depending on their initial serum IgG levels (1: IgG ≤ 6.1 g/l; 2: IgG 6.2-8.4 g/l; 3: IgG 8.5-11.9 g/l; 4: IgG > 11.9 g/l). The third quartile was taken as the reference quartile. For the applied logistic regression model clinically relevant confounders were defined and integrated into further risk-adjusted calculations.

RESULTS

Patients with the lowest IgG levels had a mortality rate similar to those patients with initial IgG levels in the second and third quartile, representing the physiological IgG range in healthy people. Surprisingly, patients with the highest IgG levels even showed a significantly higher mortality in a risk-adjusted calculation compared to the reference quartile (OR 1.69, CI 1.01-2.81, p = 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that initial IgG levels were of no prognostic value in patients presenting with vasopressor-dependent septic shock on admission as well as in patients with either gram-positive or gram-negative sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Initially low IgG levels do not discriminate between survival and nonsurvival in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Therefore, low IgG cannot help to identify those patients who might benefit from an adjunctive IgG sepsis therapy. Whether a high initial IgG serum level is an independent mortality risk factor needs to be investigated prospectively.

Immunotherapy of Sepsis: Blind Alley or Call for Personalized Assessment?

Sepsis is the most frequent cause of death in noncoronary intensive care units. In the past 10 years, progress has been made in the early identification of septic patients and their treatment. These improvements in support and therapy mean that mortality is gradually decreasing, however, the rate of death from sepsis remains unacceptably high. Immunotherapy is not currently part of the routine treatment of sepsis. Despite experimental successes, the administration of agents to block the effect of sepsis mediators failed to show evidence for improved outcome in a multitude of clinical trials. The following survey summarizes the current knowledge and results of clinical trials on the immunotherapy of sepsis and describes the limitations of our knowledge of the pathogenesis of sepsis. Administration of immunomodulatory drugs should be linked to the current immune status assessed by both clinical and molecular patterns. Thus, a careful daily review of the patient's immune status needs to be introduced into routine clinical practice giving the opportunity for effective and tailored use of immunomodulatory therapy.

Bioartificial Therapy of Sepsis: Changes of Norepinephrine-Dosage in Patients and Influence on Dynamic and Cell Based Liver Tests during Extracorporeal Treatments

Purpose. Granulocyte transfusions have been used to treat immune cell dysfunction in sepsis. A granulocyte bioreactor for the extracorporeal treatment of sepsis was tested in a prospective clinical study focusing on the dosage of norepinephrine in patients and influence on dynamic and cell based liver tests during extracorporeal therapies. Methods and Patients. Ten patients with severe sepsis were treated twice within 72 h with the system containing granulocytes from healthy donors. Survival, physiologic parameters, extended hemodynamic measurement, and the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (PDR) were monitored. Plasma of patients before and after extracorporeal treatments were tested with a cell based biosensor for analysis of hepatotoxicity. Results. The observed mortality rate was 50% during stay in hospital. During the treatments, the norepinephrine-dosage could be significantly reduced while mean arterial pressure was stable. In the cell based analysis of hepatotoxicity, the viability and function of sensor-cells increased significantly during extracorporeal treatment in all patients and the PDR-values increased significantly between day 1 and day 7 only in survivors. Conclusion. The extracorporeal treatment with donor granulocytes showed promising effects on dosage of norepinephrine in patients, liver cell function, and viability in a cell based biosensor. Further studies with this approach are encouraged.

IV Immunoglobulin for Acute Lung Injury and Bacteremia in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Virulent and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes a lethal pneumonia, especially in patients who are artificially ventilated. It has been reported that the virulence mechanism used by P. aeruginosa, which is linked to acute lung injury, is strongly associated with the type III secretion system, and specific antibodies targeting this system have shown a protective effect in both experimental and clinical settings. We investigated the effect of administering IV immunoglobulins on P. aeruginosa pneumonia, including its associated bacteremia and mortality, although focusing especially on type III secretion system-associated P. aeruginosa virulence.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized and controlled animal study.

SETTING

University laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Male ICR mice.

INTERVENTIONS

Mice were infected intratracheally with a lethal dose of the virulent P. aeruginosa PA103 strain. IV immunoglobulin administration was examined in three different settings: 1) premixed; 2) pre-IV, prophylactic administration before bacterial infection; and 3) post-IV, therapeutic administration after bacterial infection. The effect of specific antigen titer depletion of IV immunoglobulins was also examined.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Survival and body temperature were monitored for 24 hours. Bacteremia, cytokine concentration, myeloperoxidase activity, WBC counts in the blood, and lung bacterial load were evaluated. Survival improved significantly in mice that received IV immunoglobulins (p < 0.05). Lung edema, lung bacteriologic load, and bacteremia decreased significantly in the IV immunoglobulin-treated mice (p < 0.05). The mechanism of protection was associated with the presence of antibodies against both PcrV and some bacterial surface antigens in the IV immunoglobulins.

CONCLUSIONS

IV immunoglobulin administration had a significantly protective effect against lethal infection from virulent P. aeruginosa. Prophylactic IV immunoglobulin administration at the highest dose was comparable with that achieved by administrating a specific anti-PcrV polyclonal IgG into the mice. The mechanism of protection is likely to involve the synergic action of anti-PcrV titers and antibodies against some surface antigen(s) that block the type III secretion system-associated virulence of P. aeruginosa.

IgM-enriched solution BT086 improves host defense capacity and energy store preservation in a rabbit model of endotoxemia

Introduction

The therapeutic value of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as an adjuvant therapy in sepsis remains debatable. We hypothesized that intravenous administration of BT086, a predominantly IgM IVIG solution, would improve host defense in an established rabbit model of endotoxemia and systemic sepsis.

Methods

New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into the following four groups: (1) the negative control group without lipopolysaccharide (LPS, control), (2) the positive control group with LPS infusion (LPS group), (3) the albumin‐treated LPS group (ALB+LPS group), and (4) the BT086‐treated LPS group (BT086 + LPS group). A standardized amount of E. coli was intravenously injected into all of the animals. The vital parameters, the concentration of E. coli in the blood and other organs, the residual granulocyte phagocytosis activity, and the levels of the inflammatory mediators were measured. Histological changes in the lung and liver tissue were examined following autopsy.

Results

The elimination of E. coli from the bloodstream was expedited in the BT086‐treated group compared with the LPS‐ and albumin‐treated groups. The BT086 + LPS group exhibited higher phagocytic activity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) than the control and ALB+LPS groups. The liver energy stores were higher in the BT086 + LPS group than in the other groups.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the IgM‐enriched IVIG has the potential to improve host defense in a rabbit model of endotoxemia. Studies using different animal models and dosages are necessary to further explore the potential benefits of IgM‐enriched IVIG solutions.

Comparison of prophylactic use of intravenous immunoglobulin versus Pentaglobin® in pediatric patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

There are few studies evaluating the use of IgM-enriched IVIG (Pentaglobin(®) ) in HSCT recipients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic use of IVIG versus prophylactic use of Pentaglobin(®) within the first 100 days after allogeneic HSCT. We performed a prospective, randomized study of the use of prophylactic IVIG versus prophylactic use of Pentaglobin(®) in patients after allogeneic HSCT. The first dose of IVIG or Pentaglobin(®) was given before conditioning regimen and after transplant was given on day +1, +8, +15, and +22. And then, it was given if IgG level was below 400 mg/dL. Twenty-seven patients in IVIG group and 32 patients in Pentaglobin(®) group were included in the study. There were no significant differences in the duration of neutropenia, hospitalization, fever, and in the number of pyrexial episode, septicemia, bacteremia, local infection, CMV infection, acute GVHD, VOD, and adverse events between the IVIG group and Pentaglobin(®) group. Randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to conclude that utilization of IVIG or Pentaglobin(®) has no beneficial effect in HSCT.

Improving outcomes of severe infections by multidrug-resistant pathogens with polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulins

The emergence of infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, which is accompanied by considerable mortality due to inappropriate therapy, led to the investigation of whether adjunctive treatment with one polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation (IgGAM) would improve outcomes. One hundred patients in Greece with microbiologically confirmed severe infections by MDR Gram-negative bacteria acquired after admission to the Intensive Care Unit and treated with IgGAM were retrospectively analysed from a large prospective multicentre cohort. A similar number of patient comparators well-matched for stage of sepsis, source of infection, appropriateness of antimicrobials and co-morbidities coming from the same cohort were selected. All-cause 28-day mortality was the primary end point; mortality by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens and time to breakthrough bacteraemia were the secondary end points. Fifty-eight of the comparators and 39 of the IgGAM-treated cases died by day 28 (p 0.011). The OR for death under IgGAM treatment was 0.46 (95% CI 0.26-0.85). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that IgGAM was associated with favourable outcome whereas acute coagulopathy, cardiovascular failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic renal disease were associated with unfavourable outcome. Thirty-nine of 62 comparators (62.9%) were infected by XDR Gram-negative bacteria and died by day 28 compared with 25 of 65 cases treated with IgGAM (38.5%) (p 0.008). Median times to breakthrough bacteraemia were 4 days and 10 days, respectively (p <0.0001). Results favour the use of IgGAM as an adjunct to antimicrobial treatment for the management of septic shock caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Influence of the serum levels of immunoglobulins on clinical outcomes in medical intensive-care patients

INTRODUCTION

Endogenous immunoglobulins (Igs) are of fundamental importance in the host defense after microbial infections. However, the therapeutic administration of intravenous IgG (IVIgG) has not yet been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients suffering from sepsis, and in the case of IgM-containing preparations (IVIgGMA) the positive evidence is only weak. Recently published studies implicate that Ig levels on admission could have an impact on the patient's response to IVIg treatment and on outcomes of critically ill patients.

METHODS

In this noninterventional study, the serum levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA were determined in 340 medical patients on ICU admission, and clinical outcomes were prospectively recorded (ICU mortality, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), need for mechanical ventilation, substitution of coagulation factors, and amount of red cell transfusions). Patients were prospectively grouped according to their main reason for ICU admission (sepsis, respiratory failure, cardiovascular diseases, acute renal failure, postoperative condition, state after cardiopulmonal resuscitation, gastrointestinal diseases, and others).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was no correlation between the Ig levels on admission and ICU mortality neither in the total cohort of medical ICU patients nor in any prespecified subgroup. However, in a logistic regression model that was adjusted for APACHE II score on admission, an increase in serum IgG was associated with a reduced need for mechanical ventilation in patients suffering from cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, in patients suffering from sepsis, an increased level of IgM was linked to an increased administration of coagulation factors.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support the hypothesis that serum levels of immunoglobulins are linked to mortality in medical ICU patients.

Endogenous immunoglobulins and sepsis: New perspectives for guiding replacement therapies

The recently emerging concept of immunosuppression developing in the field of severe sepsis generated the need to measure circulating immunoglobulins as part of the necessary tests to evaluate immunocompetence status in patients suffering from this condition. Serum concentrations can be used as a surrogate marker of the final outcome and as a biomarker to explore the need for supplementation of the host with intravenous immunoglobulin preparations. Available evidence from recent clinical studies pinpoints the main observations. The first is that circulating IgM is a phenomenon associated with progression from severe sepsis to septic shock. Deficient kinetics of circulating IgM during the first 7 days following the start of vasopressors is linked with unfavourable outcome. The second is the development of immunoscores using low levels of IgM, IgG1 and IgA. These immunoscores can predict 28-day mortality with an odds ratio ranging between 3 and 5. Novel techniques for evaluating patient's immune status are shedding new light on the development of modern therapeutics where immunoglobulin replacement may be part of a personalised therapeutic approach.

The role of intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are beneficial and safe for various diseases other than primary immunodeficiencies. Over the years, IVIG has been given for autoimmune diseases as an off-label adjunct therapy. While other biologic agents are indicated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), IVIG may have a role for specific subgroups of RA patients where anti-cytokine blockers or rituximab may be unwarranted. Such subgroups may include patients with vasculitis, overlap rhupus syndrome, severe infections with active disease, and pregnancy. In addition, IVIG may be considered for juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) and adult Still's disease. We review the literature for IVIG treatment in RA patients and for these subgroups.

Intravenous immunoglobulin use in septic shock patients after emergency laparotomy

OBJECTIVES

The role of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as an adjunctive treatment for abdominal sepsis remains controversial.

METHODS

Mechanically ventilated septic shock patients following emergency laparotomy for perforation of the lower intestinal tract were identified in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2013. The effect of IVIG use on 28-day mortality was evaluated using propensity score and instrumental variable analyses.

RESULTS

Eligible patients (n = 4919) treated at 845 hospitals were divided into IVIG (n = 2085) and control (n = 2834) groups. Propensity score matching created a matched cohort of 1081pairs with and without IVIG treatment. Although significant mortality differences existed between the IVIG and control groups in the unmatched analysis (20.6% vs. 18.3%; difference, 2.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-4.5), there were no significant differences in the propensity score-matched analysis (20.4% vs. 19.3%; difference, 1.1%; 95% CI, -2.3-4.5). Analysis employing the pattern of hospital IVIG use as an instrumental variable showed that IVIG use was not associated with reduced mortality (difference -2.5; 95% CI, -6.5-1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

There may be no significant association between IVIG use and mortality in mechanically ventilated septic shock patients after emergency laparotomy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin improves sepsis-induced coagulopathy: A retrospective, single-center observational study

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation and coagulation are closely interrelated processes in the pathogenesis of sepsis. This study aimed to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could improve the hyperinflammatory state and coagulation/fibrinolysis abnormalities in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with sepsis were included. Nineteen patients were treated with IVIg (IVIg group; 5.0 g daily for 3 days within 2 days after hospitalization), and 22 patients were not (non-IVIg group). Inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis molecular markers, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation score, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were evaluated in each group.

RESULTS

On admission, patients in the IVIg group had a significantly more severe condition. In the IVIg group, after treatment, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 levels significantly decreased relative to values on admission. Also, compared with admission, the various coagulation/fibrinolysis molecular markers decreased after treatment. Moreover, the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation score and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score also significantly decreased after treatment. In contrast, in the non-IVIg group, only interleukin-6 level and thrombin-antithrombin complex levels significantly decreased. The 28-day mortality rate of the IVIg group was approximately one third of the value of the non-IVIg group (IVIg: 5.3% vs non-IVIg: 18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment significantly improved hemostatic abnormalities along with the hyperinflammatory state in patients with sepsis. Accordingly, IVIg treatment should be classified as an adjunctive therapy for patients complicated with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.

Accounting for Heterogeneity in Relative Treatment Effects for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models and Value-of-Information Analyses

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) models are routinely used to inform health care policy. Key model inputs include relative effectiveness of competing treatments, typically informed by meta-analysis. Heterogeneity is ubiquitous in meta-analysis, and random effects models are usually used when there is variability in effects across studies. In the absence of observed treatment effect modifiers, various summaries from the random effects distribution (random effects mean, predictive distribution, random effects distribution, or study-specific estimate [shrunken or independent of other studies]) can be used depending on the relationship between the setting for the decision (population characteristics, treatment definitions, and other contextual factors) and the included studies. If covariates have been measured that could potentially explain the heterogeneity, then these can be included in a meta-regression model. We describe how covariates can be included in a network meta-analysis model and how the output from such an analysis can be used in a CEA model. We outline a model selection procedure to help choose between competing models and stress the importance of clinical input. We illustrate the approach with a health technology assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin for the management of adult patients with severe sepsis in an intensive care setting, which exemplifies how risk of bias information can be incorporated into CEA models. We show that the results of the CEA and value-of-information analyses are sensitive to the model and highlight the importance of sensitivity analyses when conducting CEA in the presence of heterogeneity. The methods presented extend naturally to heterogeneity in other model inputs, such as baseline risk.

The management of severe community acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit

Severe CAP (SCAP), accounting for 6% of admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) needs early diagnosis and aggressive interventions at the most proximal point of disease presentation. The prognostic scores as the ATS/IDSA rule, the systolic blood pressure, multilobar infiltrates, albumin, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygen and pH or SCAP system are appropriate in early identification of eligible patients requiring admission to ICU. Then the recommended initial resuscitation in SCAP in the ICU consists of fluid volume intake titrated to specific goals after a fluid challenge and hemodynamic optimization. The first selection of antimicrobial therapy should be started in the first hour and would be broad enough to cover all likely pathogens. Combination therapy may be useful in patients with non refractory septic shock and severe sepsis pneumococcal bacteremia as well. After 6 hours the patient would be reevaluated in terms of hemodynamic stability and antibiotic and therapy. Future developments will focus on sepsis biomarkers, molecular diagnostic techniques and the development of novel therapeutic immunomodulaty agents.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for severe sepsis and septic shock: clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and value of a further randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Prior to investing in a large, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT), the National Institute for Health Research in the UK called for an evaluation of the feasibility and value for money of undertaking a trial on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as an adjuvant therapy for severe sepsis/septic shock.

Methods

In response to this call, this study assessed the clinical and cost-effectiveness of IVIG (using a decision model), and evaluated the value of conducting an RCT (using expected value of information (EVI) analysis). The evidence informing such assessments was obtained through a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Further primary data analyses were also undertaken using the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database, and a Scottish Intensive Care Society research study.

Results

We found a large degree of statistical heterogeneity in the clinical evidence on treatment effect, and the source of such heterogeneity was unclear. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of IVIG is within the borderline region of estimates considered to represent value for money, but results appear highly sensitive to the choice of model used for clinical effectiveness. This was also the case with EVI estimates, with maximum payoffs from conducting a further clinical trial between £137 and £1,011 million.

Conclusions

Our analyses suggest that there is a need for a further RCT. Results on the value of conducting such research, however, were sensitive to the clinical effectiveness model used, reflecting the high level of heterogeneity in the evidence base.

Catheter-related Candida bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients: a subgroup analysis of the China-SCAN study

Background

In patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU), Candida infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. However, previous studies reported confused risk factors for catheter-related Candida bloodstream infection (CRCBSI). The objective was to describe the risk factors, microbiology, management and outcomes of CRCBSI in the China-SCAN population.

Methods

Patients with ≥1 Candida-positive peripheral blood culture were selected from the China-SCAN study. Peripheral and catheter blood samples were collected for Candida isolation. Patients with the same strain of Candida in peripheral and catheter blood samples were considered as being with CRCBSI, while patients with Candida-positive peripheral blood cultures only or different strains were considered as non-CRCBSI. Data were collected from the China-SCAN study.

Results

CRCBSI incidence in ICU was 0.03% (29/96,060), accounting for 9.86% of all candidemia observed in ICU (29/294). The proportion of CRCBSI due to Candida parapsilosis reached 33.3%, more than that of Candida albicans (28.6%). In univariate analyses, older age (P = 0.028) and lower body weight (P = 0.037) were associated with CRCBSI. Multivariate analysis showed that the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was independently associated with CRCBSI (odds ratio (OR) = 1.142, 95% confidence interval = 1.049-1.244, P = 0.002). Catheter removal and immune enhancement therapy were often used for CRCBSI treatment.

Conclusions

In China, CRCBSI was more likely to occur in old patients with low body weight. SOFA score was independently associated with CRCBSI. Candida parapsilosis accounted for a high proportion of CRCBSI, but the difference from non-CRCBSI was not significant.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0594-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in critically ill patients

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been suggested for the treatment of many ailments due to its ability to modulate the immune system and to provide passive immunity to commonly circulating pathogens. Its use as primary and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of conditions affecting critically ill patients is an attractive option, especially when alternative therapy does not exist. The body of literature on the use of IVIG for the treatment of several serious conditions, including sepsis, toxic shock syndrome, acute myocarditis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and H1N1 influenza, were reviewed. Despite advances in treatment of these conditions since they were first described, there remains a paucity of well-designed studies on the use of IVIG for their treatment. Therefore, the use of IVIG for treatment of these conditions remains controversial.

[Adjuvant treatment of sepsis: what is known?]

BACKGROUND

Recent decades have been characterized by a large number of trials for registration of new drugs or indication approvals in the field of sepsis. Modern anti-inflammatory drugs or interventions are intended to correct the overwhelming dysregulation of inflammatory and coagulation pathways seen particularly in the early phase of sepsis. Immunostimulatory therapies are also being studied in order to correct immunoparalysis, which develops later in the course of sepsis as a compensatory mechanism.

CURRENT STUDY RESULTS

Recombinant activated protein C, drotrecogin α, was conditionally approved and later withdrawn from the market by the producer because the initially observed beneficial effect could not be confirmed. The efficacy and safety of antithrombin, which, like drotrecogin α, also modulates inflammation and coagulation as an endogenous anticoagulant could not be confirmed when used for treating sepsis. As sepsis leads to disseminated intravascular coagulation which may be counteracted by antithrombin, new guidelines recommend antithrombin as a treatment option in this subgroup of sepsis patients. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, enteral administration of immunomodulating substances as immunonutrition, and the substitution of selenium, all showed some effectiveness in small heterogeneous studies, but their efficacy was not confirmed in large high-quality trials. Intensive glycemic control, which was temporarily recommended for acutely ill patients, increased the risk for adverse hypoglycemia in several clinical trials so that blood glucose target levels have been redefined and guidelines now no longer ask for normalization of blood glucose values with insulin.

CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

None of the new drugs, however, has successfully become established as a new standard of care. In the future, studies of novel sepsis therapies may succeed better if suitable biomarkers allow for patient selection, reflecting key pathophysiologic mechanisms that are targeted by the innovative drugs.

Early therapy with IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulin in patients with septic shock

PURPOSE

To determine whether there was an association between adjunctive therapy with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IgM) and the 30-day mortality rate in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

In 2008 we introduced IgM as a possible adjunctive therapy to be provided within 24 h after shock onset in the management protocol for patients with septic shock. In this retrospective study we included the adult patients suitable for IgM therapy admitted to our ICU from January 2008 to December 2011. An unadjusted comparison between patients who did or did not receive IgM therapy, a multivariate logistic model adjusted for confounders and propensity score-based matching were used to evaluate the association between early IgM treatment and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in the study. Of these, 92 (54.8%) received IgM therapy. Patients who did or did not receive IgM were similar with regards to infection characteristics, severity scores and sepsis treatment bundle compliance. Patients who received IgM were more likely to have blood cultures before antibiotics and to attain a plateau inspiratory pressure less than 30 cmH2O (p < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was reduced by 21.1% (p < 0.05) in the group that received IgM compared to the group that did not. The multivariate adjusted regression model (OR 0.17; CI 95% 0.06-0.49; p = 0.001) and the propensity score-based analysis (OR 0.35; CI 95% 0.14-0.85; p = 0.021) confirmed that IgM therapy was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days after the onset of septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience indicates that early adjunctive treatment with IgM may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with septic shock. However, additional studies are needed to better evaluate the role of IgM therapy in the early phases of septic shock.

Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin: an important additional strategy in sepsis?

Sepsis syndrome is characterized by a systemic inflammatory response to infection potentially leading to acute organ failure and rapid decline to death. Polyclonal intravenous immune globulin, a blood product derived from human donor blood, in addition to antiinfective activities, also exerts a broad antiinflammatory and immunomodulating effect. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proposed as adjuvant therapy for sepsis even though the clinical studies demonstrating their efficacy and safety are relatively small. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in sepsis have been performed. As a result of heterogeneity across studies and inconsistencies in results, the majority have concluded that more evidence, coming from large, well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs), is required. Moreover the appropriate timing of administration and the identification of specific clinical settings represent a key factor to maximizing their beneficial effect. The authors, in this revision, review the basic mechanisms of action of IVIg, the rationale for their use, and their clinical applications.

Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: 2014 updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO)

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality during the neutropenic phase after intensive cytotoxic therapies for malignancies. Improved management of sepsis during neutropenia may reduce the mortality of cancer therapies. Clinical guidelines on sepsis treatment have been published by others. However, optimal management may differ between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Our aim is to give evidence-based recommendations for haematologist, oncologists and intensive care physicians on how to manage adult patients with neutropenia and sepsis.

The expanding role of therapeutic antibodies

Therapeutic antibodies have been used since the end of nineteenth century, but their use is progressively increased and recently, with the availability of monoclonal antibodies, they are successfully employed in a large disease spectrum, which transversally covers different fields of medicine. Hyperimmune polyclonal immune globulin has been used against infectious diseases, in a period in which anti-microbial drugs were not yet available, and it still maintains a relevant place in prophylaxis/therapy. Although immune globulin should be considered life-saving as replacement therapy in humoral immunodeficiencies, its place in the immune-modulating treatment is not usually first-choice, but it should be considered as support to standard approved treatments. Despite therapeutic monoclonal antibodies have been lastly introduced in therapy, their extreme potentiality is reflected by the large number of approved molecules, addressed toward different immunological targets and able to heavily influence the prognosis and quality of life of a wide range of different diseases.

Dose-related regulatory effect of intravenous immunoglobulin on dendritic cells-mediated immune response

CONTEXT

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been successfully applied in immune-related diseases of adults and neonates, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the distinct impacts of IVIG on cultured dendritic cells (DCs) from newborn and healthy adult.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples were collected from eight full-term newborns and eight healthy adult volunteers. DCs from cord blood and peripheral blood were both cultured in the RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 50 ng/ml granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and 10 ng/ml recombinant human interleukin-4 (rhIL-4) for 5 d with therapeutic IVIG (20 mg/ml) or physiological IVIG (10 mg/ml). Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs, 1 μg/ml) were added on the fifth day to induce the maturation of immature DCs. The phagocytosis of monocytes, expression of MR (mannose receptor), CD14, CD1a, CD80, CD83, CD86 and MHC II were examined by flow cytometry. The expression of IL-4 mRNA was detected by RT-PCR, while IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-10 were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) commercial kits.

RESULTS

IVIG of therapeutic dose inhibited the phagocytosis, differentiation and maturation of DCs, whereas physiological dose exhibited an accelerated role in vitro, especially on DCs from neonates, but aroused different effects on cytokine secretion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The different responses are generally due to immature immune system of neonate, which has a limit capacity to maintain immunity homeostasis. Modulation of DCs phagocytosis, differentiation, maturation and cytokine secretion by IVIG is of potential relevance to its dosage and immune status of patients.

Efficacy of single-dose intravenous immunoglobulin administration for severe sepsis and septic shock

Background

Although some studies conducted outside of Japan have addressed the effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in treating infections, the dosing regimens and amounts used in Japan are very different from those reported. Here, we investigate the effectiveness of single-dose administration of IVIG in sepsis patients in Japan.

Methods

We analyzed 79 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care institution due to severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients were randomly divided into a group that was administered standard divided doses of IVIG (5 g/day for 3 days, designated the S group) or a group that was administered a standard single dose of IVIG (15 g/day for 1 day, H group); freeze-dried sulfonated human IVIG was used. The longitudinal assessment of procalcitonin (PCT) levels, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell count, blood lactate levels, IL-6 levels, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) was conducted. We also assessed mechanical ventilation duration (days), ICU stay (days), 28-day survival rate, and 90-day survival rate.

Results

The study showed no significant differences in PCT levels, CRP levels, 28-day survival rate, and 90-day survival rate between the two groups. However, patients in the H group showed improvements in the various SIRS diagnostic criteria, IL-6 levels, and blood lactate levels in the early stages after IVIG administration. In light of the non-recommendation of IVIG therapy in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012, our findings of significant early post-administration improvements are noteworthy. IVIG's anti-inflammatory effects may account for the early reduction in IL-6 levels after treatment, and the accompanying improvements in microcirculation may improve blood lactate levels and reduce SOFA scores. However, the low dosages of IVIG in Japan may limit the anti-cytokine effects of this treatment. Further studies are needed to determine appropriate treatment regimens of single-dose IVIG.

Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of single-dose IVIG treatment in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Although there were no significant effects on patient prognoses, patients who were administered single-dose IVIG showed significantly improved IL-6 levels, blood lactate levels, and disease severity scores.