Determinants of non-compliance to recommendations on breast cancer screening among women participating in the French E3N cohort study

Educational level and characteristics of invasive breast cancer: findings from a French prospective cohort

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) characteristics are known to influence patients survival. Social differences have been reported by previous studies for those characteristics but questions persist because of inconsistent conclusions. We aimed to investigate the impact of education on BC stage, grade, and hormone receptor (HR) status, while adjusting for potential confounders including a broad set of health behaviors, anthropometric measures, and reproductive factors.

METHODS

In the French E3N cohort, 5236 women developed a primary invasive BC for which there was available information on stage, grade, and HR status. No multivariate analyses was performed for BC stage based on the lack of association in bivariate analyses. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models for BC grade or binomial logistic regression models for HR status of BC.

RESULTS

Women with a lower education were diagnosed with higher grade BC compared to women with a higher education (1.32 [1.12; 1.57]). This association was slightly attenuated after adjustment for covariates independently and more strongly affected in the fully adjusted model (1.20 [0.99; 1.45]). A significant association was observed between lower education and HR- status of BC (1.20 [1.02; 1.42]) attenuated after adjustment for age at first childbirth (1.12 [0.95; 1.33]).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, education was associated with BC grade and HR status but not stage at diagnosis. The link between education and BC grade was not entirely explained by the different adjustments. A specific mechanism could be at play and deserves further investigations.

Reasons for Non-Attendance in the German National Mammography Screening Program: Which Barriers Can Be Overcome Using Telephone Counseling?-A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Germany has established a national mammography screening program (MSP). Despite extensive awareness campaigns, the participation rate is only 54%, which is considerably below the European guidelines' recommendation of at least 70%. Several reasons why women do not participate are already known. Telephone consultations along with invitation letters have improved the participation rate. Here, we analyzed the reasons for non-participation and offered barrier-specific counseling to examine which impediments can be overcome to improve participation.

STUDY DESIGN

In a randomized controlled trial, women who had not attended their proposed screening appointment in the MSP after a written invitation were contacted by telephone and asked why they did not attend. Barrier-specific counseling via telephone was then offered. Participation in the MSP was rechecked 3 months after counseling.

SETTING

1772 women, aged 50-69 years, who had not scheduled a mammography screening after a written invitation were contacted by telephone and asked for their reasons for non-participation.

INTERVENTION

The reasons were recorded by the calling consultant and categorized either during the call or later based on their recorded statements. Afterward, the women received counseling specific to their statements and were given general information about the MSP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We categorized the reasons given, calculated their frequency, and analyzed the probabilities to which they could be successfully addressed in individual counseling. Participation rates were determined post-consultation according to the reason(s) indicated.

RESULTS

The data were analyzed in 2022. After exclusions, 1494 records were analyzed. Allowing for multiple reasons to be stated by every individual 3280 reasons for not attending were abstracted. The most frequent reason was participation in "gray screening" (51.5%), which included various breast cancer prevention measures outside the national MSP. Time problems (26.6%) and health reasons (17.3%) were also important. Counseling was most effective when women had not participated for scheduling reasons.

CONCLUSION

Several reasons prevented women from participating in the MSP. Some reasons, such as time-related issues, could be overcome by telephone counseling, but others, like barriers resulting from fear of the examination procedure or its result, could not.

Self-selection for mammography screening according to use of hormone replacement therapy: A systematic literature review

Mammography screening participation may be influenced by the awareness of an increase in breast cancer risk due to hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which received particular attention upon publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial results in 2002. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on a potential self-selection for mammography screening according to HRT use. We systematically searched the literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL) for studies reporting on the association between HRT use and mammography screening participation. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Overall, 2018 studies were identified. Of these, 32 studies from nine countries, predominantly from North America (50%) and Europe (28%), were included. In studies from all countries and 94% of all studies, higher mammography screening uptake among HRT users compared to non-users was reported. In all 21 studies reporting an odds ratio, the association was positive, and in about 70% of these studies, this association was ≥2. This also held true for studies exclusively using data collected before publication of the WHI findings in 2002 (63% of all studies). The association was not restricted to certain types of screening (organized vs. opportunistic) or certain types of HRT (combined vs. estrogen-only). We found a consistent and relevant association between mammography screening uptake and HRT use. This is of considerable relevance for the design and interpretation of studies investigating risk factors or evaluating preventive measures for breast cancer.

Health and health belief factors associated with screening and help-seeking behaviours for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the European evidence

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to identify health or health belief factors associated with mammography attendance or with self-initiated medical help-seeking for breast cancer symptoms among women in Europe.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for articles published between 2005 and 2018. Meta-analyses were conducted for 13 factors related to screening attendance and two factors associated with help-seeking behaviour. Where there were too few studies to include in the meta-analysis, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies were included. Never having had cervical screening (d = -.72, p < .001) and higher perceived barriers to mammography (d = -.40, p < .001) were associated with lower levels of screening attendance. Possessing health insurance (d = .49, p < .001), greater perceived benefits (d = .31, p < .001) and motivation (d = .36, p = .003) towards screening, and higher perceived seriousness (d = .24, p = .019) and susceptibility (d = .20, p = .024) towards breast cancer were associated with a higher level of screening attendance. Presenting with a non-lump symptom was associated with a longer time to presentation (d = .32, p < .001). The narrative synthesis revealed that previous benign breast disease was associated with a higher level of screening attendance but with a longer time to presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The review identified key similarities in factors associated with screening and help-seeking behaviours which offer scope for combined interventions aimed at women that target both behaviours. Furthermore, the review highlighted that fewer studies have focused on help-seeking behaviour, despite two thirds of breast cancer cases being self-detected. Future research should further examine predictors of help-seeking behaviour including a focus on modifiable factors, such as BMI, and physical activity.

The impact of a cervical dysplasia diagnosis on individual cancer prevention habits over time: a bicentric case-control study

PURPOSE

Annual cervical cancer screening is recommended in Germany as a part of the statutory preventive care. Abnormal results can provoke psychological distress and anxiety, compromising women's adherence. Little is known about how a cervical dysplasia impacts adherence follow-up visits and prevention habits over time. To optimize care strategies, this study aims to identify women at risk for nonadherence to follow-up visits after a screening event.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and May 2017, participants with an abnormal Pap smear at the Heidelberg and Leipzig University Hospitals received a four-part questionnaire (sociodemographic data, PHQ-D, self-designed fear and prevention habit questions) at the first consultation (T1) and subsequently after 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months; healthy controls completed the questionnaire at T1.

RESULTS

132 women with an abnormal Pap smear [with conization: S1 (n = 68, 51.5%), without intervention: S2 (n = 64, 48.5%)] and healthy controls (K, n = 101) generally adhered to gynecological checkups, except S1 6 months after the first diagnosis (S1/T3 - 0.47, signed rank p < 0.0005). Knowledge of primary prevention information, i.e., HPV vaccination, was significantly higher among K (K 58%, S1 29%, S2 44%, Chi-squared p = 0.01) as was vaccine uptake (K 39% versus S1/S2 7% and 17%, respectively, Chi-squared p = 0.0004). Fear of upcoming Pap smears rose significantly over time (S1/T1-S1/T2-S1/T3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test p < 0.001) and was higher among those with conization at T2 (Chi-square test, p = 0.01) and partially accompanied by panic disorders at T1 (Chi-square test p = 0.035). Realization of general preventive habits rose significantly among women without an operative procedure (S2) over the study.

CONCLUSION

This study advances the understanding of non-participation in follow-up visits after a dysplasia diagnosis, identifying post-conization women as a special risk group for decreased adherence.

Factors associated with the utilization of mammographic screening in Greece

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in women and the primary cause of death by cancer in women globally. Early diagnosis and treatment can be achieved through screening, mainly mammographic; however, international experience has shown that women do not attend mammographic screening adequately. The aim of the present study was to investigate and assess the factors that affect demand for mammography by women to improve and enhance the use of mammography by women in Greece, especially those in the 50-70 age group. The data used in the analysis were extracted from the National Health Survey of 2009, conducted by the Hellenic Statistical Authority. The sample for the analysis included 2294 women aged 30-70 years. To investigate the factors that affect mammography use, binary logistic regression models were constructed for women in the 30-39, 40-49 and 50-70 age groups. 61.70% of the sample had ever undergone a mammogram, 46.80% of which were during the last 12 months. Factors associated with mammography use in at least one of the binary logistic regression models were pap-test, blood cholesterol test, level of education, income level and country of birth. In the 50-70 age group, income level [odds ratio (OR)=1.164; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.038, 1.305], blood cholesterol test ever (OR=6.096; 95% CI=2.498, 14.872) and pap-test (OR=20.148; 95% CI=11.264, 36.040) were found to be statistically significant predictors of mammography uptake. As mammography utilization in Greece is mostly opportunistic, it is necessary to organize screening provision to cover the majority of the population through nationally organized screening programmes, with a focus on women 50-70 years of age.

Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women

Background

A better understanding of the factors that influence mammography screening attendance is needed to improve the effectiveness of these screening programs. The objective of the study was to examine whether psychosocial factors predicted attendance at a population-based invitational mammography screening program.

Methods

Data on cohabitation, social network/support, sense of control, and stress were obtained from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Cohort Study and linked to the Malmö mammography register in Sweden. We analyzed 11,409 women (age 44 to 72) who were free of breast cancer at study entry (1992 to 1996). Mammography attendance was followed from cohort entry to December 31, 2009. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to account for repeated measures within subjects. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

Results

Among 69,746 screening opportunities there were 5,552 (8%) cases of non-attendance. Higher odds of non-attendance were found among women who lived alone (OR = 1.47 (1.33-1.63)) or with children only (OR = 1.52 (1.29-1.81)), had one childbirth (OR = 1.12 (1.01-1.24)) or three or more childbirths (OR = 1.34 (1.21-1.48)), had low social participation (OR= 1.21 (1.10-1.31)), low sense of control (OR = 1.12 (1.02-1.23)), and experienced greater stress (OR = 1.24 (1.13-1.36)).

Conclusions

Public health campaigns designed to optimize mammography screening attendance may benefit from giving more consideration of how to engage with women who are less socially involved.

Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used

In this article, we discuss the most common epidemiological methods used for evaluating the ability of mammography screening to decrease the risk of breast cancer death in general populations (effectiveness). Case-control studies usually find substantial effectiveness. However when breast cancer mortality decreases for reasons unrelated to screening, the case-control design may attribute to screening mortality reductions due to other causes. Studies based on incidence-based mortality have obtained contrasted results compatible with modest to considerable effectiveness, probably because of differences in study design and statistical analysis. In areas where screening has been widespread for a long time, the incidence of advanced breast cancer should be decreasing, which in turn would translate into reduced mortality. However, no or modest declines in the incidence of advanced breast cancer has been observed in these areas. Breast cancer mortality should decrease more rapidly in areas with early introduction of screening than in areas with late introduction of screening. Nonetheless, no difference in breast mortality trends has been observed between areas with early or late screening start. When effectiveness is assessed using incidence-based mortality studies, or the monitoring of advanced cancer incidence, or trends in mortality, the ecological bias is an inherent limitation that is not easy to control. Minimization of this bias requires data over long periods of time, careful selection of populations being compared and availability of data on major confounding factors. If case-control studies seem apparently more adequate for evaluating screening effectiveness, this design has its own limitations and results must be viewed with caution.See related Opinion article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/106 and Commentary http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/164.

A population-based breast cancer screening programme: conducting a comprehensive survey to explore adherence determinants

This research examines several important individual and environmental variables that can predict breast cancer screening practices among Portuguese women aged 45-69 years old, under a population-based programme. A cross-sectional study was conducted to a convenience sample with 805 women in Aveiro municipality. Survey interviews were applied to adherents and non-adherents in two different settings (health centre, home places). A combination of bivariate (chi-squared test) and multivariate analysis [decision tree by the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm] was performed to determine differences between the groups and predict the variables. Findings showed that there is a significant association between almost all 29 indicators with adherence and non-adherence. Younger women (<50 years) with 'concordant' Behaviour Profile to the guidelines are those who adhere more in comparison with the other age groups. On the other hand, those with non-adherent behaviour need to have a 'good' attendance of healthcare providers for becoming adherents to the screening programme. Multiple strategies that combine enhancing primary health care access, individual behaviour and knowledge must be addressed to uptake adherence. In this way, the health teams must act in accordance with the guidelines, targeting more effective health education practices to achieve the goals of the breast cancer screening.

Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the burden could be reduced by evidence-based strategies for the primary prevention of cancer, the early detection of malignancies and more adequate treatment of cancer patients. Previous research has shown that lifestyle factors are associated with common cancers and that several cancer screening programmes are cost-effective in reducing cancer-specific mortality. But, some recent studies reported that participants of screening programs might unintentionally change their lifestyle. Cancer screening might be a teachable moment or, on the other hand, have a false health certificate effect. Despite that the evidence is scarce, cancer screening might have opportunities for lifestyle improvements, although a possible health certificate effect still remains. Integrated approaches to combine primary and secondary prevention have the potential to optimise the efforts to improve cancer prevention and survival. More research is warranted to investigate evidence-based approaches.

Serum cholesterol level, use of a cholesterol-lowering drug, and breast cancer: results from the prospective E3N cohort

Metabolic syndrome, including low HDL cholesterol, has been associated with an increased breast cancer risk, whereas little is known of the relationship with total cholesterol. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the association between self-reported total serum cholesterol, cholesterol-lowering drugs, and risk of breast cancer in 69 088 women from the French E3N cohort study. A total of 2932 cases of primary invasive breast cancer were reported during 12 years of follow-up. Compared with women with low/normal serum cholesterol (<6.6 mol/l), users of cholesterol-lowering drugs had a significantly decreased breast cancer risk [hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68, 0.93]. There was no variation in HRs according to the menopausal status. In strata defined by the hormone receptor status of the tumor, the risk reached statistical significance only for the estrogen-positive and progesterone-positive receptor subtype (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.82). A high cholesterol without cholesterol-lowering drug use was not associated with breast cancer risk (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.15) in the entire population. Our result concerning cholesterol-lowering drugs is consistent with studies showing that hypolipidemic molecules are effective in inhibiting cancer cell growth proliferation. Further studies should investigate whether these findings apply to all classes of cholesterol-lowering drugs.

Does educational level determine screening participation?

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that nonparticipation in organized mammography screening is due to insufficient understanding of the information in the invitation letter by relating educational level to user pattern. Data from two Danish mammography screening programmes in Copenhagen, 1991-1999, and Funen, 1993-2001 were taken for this study. The Danish Central Population Register was used to define target groups; screened participation data were provided by the health authority, and data on highest obtained education came from Statistics Denmark. Data on all breast imaging in 2000 outside organized screening were provided by radiology clinics. Included were all women eligible for at least three screens, and participation was classified into four mutually exclusive user groups. Organized mammography screening programmes in Copenhagen and Funen, Denmark were used as field of this study. Main outcome measures were age-adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 'never use' versus 'always use' of screening by educational level, using women with secretarial/sales education as baseline. The RR of 'never use' was 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37-1.99) in Copenhagen and 1.93 (95% CI: 1.42-2.62) in Funen for academics, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.48-1.73) in Copenhagen and 1.26 (95% CI: 1.14-1.39) Funen for women with lower primary educational level. Taking other breast imaging into account, the RR was 1.60 (95% CI: 1.32-1.95) for academics in Copenhagen, and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.75-2.07) for women with lower primary education. In conclusion, our results did not support the hypothesis that lack of understanding the information in the invitation letter explains nonparticipation. 'Never use' was not inversely associated with the level of education, but showed a U-shaped association, even when use of breast imaging outside organized screening was taken into account.

Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening

Our objective was to use individual data on socio-demographic characteristics to identify predictors of participation in mammography screening and control to what extent they can explain the regional difference. We used data from mammography screening programmes in Copenhagen, 1991-1999, and Funen, 1993-2001, Denmark. Target groups were identified from the Population Register, screening data came from the health authority, and socio-demographic data from Statistics Denmark. Included were women eligible for at least 3 screens. The crude RR of never use versus always use was 3.21 (95%CI, 3.07-3.35) for Copenhagen versus Funen, and the adjusted RR was 2.55 (95%CI, 2.43-2.67). The adjusted RR for never use among women without contact to a primary care physician was 2.50 (95% CI, 2.31-2.71) and 2.89 (95% CI, 2.66-3.14), and for women without dental care 2.94 (95% CI, 2.77-3.12) and 2.88 (95% CI, 2.68-3.10) for Copenhagen and Funen, respectively. Other important predictive factors for nonparticipation were not being married and not being Danish. In conclusion, to enhance participation in mammography screening programmes special attention needs to be given to women not using other primary health care services. All women in Copenhagen, irrespective of their socio-demographic characteristics, had low participation. Screening programmes have to find ways to handle this urbanity factor.