Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema

Management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients: Review of real-world clinical data

The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.

Global research trends and future directions in diabetic macular edema research: A bibliometric and visualized analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) significantly impairs vision in diabetics, with varied patient responses to current treatments like anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy underscoring the necessity for continued research into more effective strategies. This study aims to evaluate global research trends and identify emerging frontiers in DME to guide future research and clinical management.

METHODS

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of publications related to diabetic macular edema retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) between its inception and September 4, 2023, was conducted. Microsoft Excel, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, Bibliometrix Package, and Tableau were used for the bibliometric analysis and visualization. This encompasses an examination of the overall distribution of annual output, major countries, regions, institutions, authors, core journals, co-cited references, and keyword analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 5624 publications were analyzed, indicating an increasing trend in DME research. The United States was identified as the leading country in DME research, with the highest h-index of 135 and 91,841 citations. Francesco Bandello emerged as the most prolific author with 97 publications. Neil M. Bressler has the highest h-index and highest total citation count of 46 and 9692, respectively. The journals "Retina - the Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases" and "Ophthalmology" were highlighted as the most prominent in this field. "Retina" leads with 354 publications, a citation count of 11,872, and an h-index of 59. Meanwhile, "Ophthalmology" stands out with the highest overall citation count of 31,558 and the highest h-index of 90. The primary research focal points in diabetic macular edema included "prevalence and risk factors," "pathological mechanisms," "imaging modalities," "treatment strategies," and "clinical trials." Emerging research areas encompassed "deep learning and artificial intelligence," "novel treatment modalities," and "biomarkers."

CONCLUSION

Our bibliometric analysis delineates the leading role of the United States in DME research. We identified current research hotspots, including epidemiological studies, pathophysiological mechanisms, imaging advancements, and treatment innovations. Emerging trends, such as the integration of artificial intelligence and novel therapeutic approaches, highlight future directions. These insights underscore the importance of collaborative and interdisciplinary approaches in advancing DME research and clinical management.

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab on diabetic macular oedema in an African population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection on visual outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate 39 eyes of thirty-nine patients (mean age ± SD: 61.4 ± 15.0 years) that received intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25 mg in 0.05 ml) as treatment for diabetic macular oedema between January 2014 and July 2019 in Ghana. Data on visual acuity and central macular thickness before treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment were collected and analysed using paired t-test. Ordinary least squares linear regression analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness after treatment and other predictor variables.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD visual acuity (LogMAR-equivalent of Snellen) of patients with diabetic macular oedema significantly improved from 0.84 ± 0.58 LogMAR before treatment to 0.69 ± 0.58 LogMAR at 6 weeks post-treatment (mean difference: 0.15 ± 0.32 LogMAR; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.01). Mean macular thickness ± SD on the other hand, reduced significantly (p < 0.001) from 316.54 ± 75.35 μm before treatment to 275.54 ± 57.43 μm after treatment. While age and worse pre-treatment visual acuity predicted improvement in visual acuity after treatment, a higher central macular thickness before treatment predicted an improvement in central macular thickness after intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection produces short-term improvement in vision and reduction in central macular thickness in African patients with diabetic macular oedema.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

BACKGROUND

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is an advanced complication of diabetic retinopathy that can cause blindness. It consists of the presence of new vessels in the retina and vitreous haemorrhage. Although panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the treatment of choice for PDR, it has secondary effects that can affect vision. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), which produces an inhibition of vascular proliferation, could improve the vision of people with PDR.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGFs for PDR and summarise any relevant economic evaluations of their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP. We did not use any date or language restrictions. We last searched the electronic databases on 1 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGFs to another active treatment, sham treatment, or no treatment for people with PDR. We also included studies that assessed the combination of anti-VEGFs with other treatments. We excluded studies that used anti-VEGFs in people undergoing vitrectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB) for all included trials. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or the mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 new studies in this update, bringing the total to 23 RCTs with 1755 participants (2334 eyes). Forty-five per cent of participants were women and 55% were men, with a mean age of 56 years (range 48 to 77 years). The mean glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb1Ac) was 8.45% for the PRP group and 8.25% for people receiving anti-VEGFs alone or in combination. Twelve studies included people with PDR, and participants in 11 studies had high-risk PDR (HRPDR). Twelve studies were of bevacizumab, seven of ranibizumab, one of conbercept, two of pegaptanib, and one of aflibercept. The mean number of participants per RCT was 76 (ranging from 15 to 305). Most studies had an unclear or high RoB, mainly in the blinding of interventions and outcome assessors. A few studies had selective reporting and attrition bias. No study reported loss or gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity (VA) at 12 months. Anti-VEGFs ± PRP probably increase VA compared with PRP alone (mean difference (MD) -0.08 logMAR, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.04; I2 = 28%; 10 RCTS, 1172 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may increase regression of new vessels (MD -4.14 mm2, 95% CI -6.84 to -1.43; I2 = 75%; 4 RCTS, 189 eyes; low-certainty evidence) and probably increase a complete regression of new vessels (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.24; I2 = 46%; 5 RCTS, 405 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP probably reduce vitreous haemorrhage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90; I2 = 0%; 6 RCTS, 1008 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may reduce the need for vitrectomy compared with eyes that received PRP alone (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93; I2 = 43%; 8 RCTs, 1248 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may result in little to no difference in the quality of life compared with PRP alone (MD 0.62, 95% CI -3.99 to 5.23; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 382 participants; low-certainty evidence). We do not know if anti-VEGFs ± PRP compared with PRP alone had an impact on adverse events (very low-certainty evidence). We did not find differences in visual acuity in subgroup analyses comparing the type of anti-VEGFs, the severity of the disease (PDR versus HRPDR), time to follow-up (< 12 months versus 12 or more months), and treatment with anti-VEGFs + PRP versus anti-VEGFs alone. The main reasons for downgrading the certainty of evidence included a high RoB, imprecision, and inconsistency of effect estimates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGFs ± PRP compared with PRP alone probably increase visual acuity, but the degree of improvement is not clinically meaningful. Regarding secondary outcomes, anti-VEGFs ± PRP produce a regression of new vessels, reduce vitreous haemorrhage, and may reduce the need for vitrectomy compared with eyes that received PRP alone. We do not know if anti-VEGFs ± PRP have an impact on the incidence of adverse events and they may have little or no effect on patients' quality of life. Carefully designed and conducted clinical trials are required, assessing the optimal schedule of anti-VEGFs alone compared with PRP, and with a longer follow-up.

VEGF-targeting drugs for the treatment of retinal neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microangiopathic complication of diabetes mellitus, representing a major cause of visual impairment in developed countries. Proliferative DR (PDR) represents the last stage of this extremely complex retinal disease, characterized by the development of neovascularization induced by the abnormal production and release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The term VEGF includes different isoforms; VEGF-A represents one of the most important pathogenic factors of DR. Anti-VEGF intravitreal therapies radically changed the outcome of DR, due to combined anti-angiogenic and anti-edematous activities. Nowadays, several anti-VEGF molecules exist, characterized by different pharmacological features and duration. With respect to PDR, although anti-VEGF treatments represented a fundamental step forward in the management of this dramatic complication, a big debate is present in the literature regarding the role of anti-VEGF as substitute of panretinal photocoagulation or if these two approaches may be used in combination. In the present review, we provided an update on VEGF isoforms and their role in DR pathogenesis, on current anti-VEGF molecules and emerging new drugs, and on the current management strategies of PDR. There is an overall agreement regarding the relative advantage provided by anti-VEGF, especially looking at the management of PDR patients requiring vitrectomy, with respect to laser. Based on the current data, laser approaches might be avoided when a perfectly planned anti-VEGF therapeutic strategy can be adopted. Conversely, laser treatment may have a role for those patients unable to guarantee enough compliance to anti-VEGF injections.Key messagesVEGF increased production, stimulated by retinal hypoperfusion and ischaemia, is a major pathogenic factor of neovascular complication onset in diabetic retinopathy and of DR stages progression.Nowadays, several anti-VEGF molecules are available in clinical practice and other molecules are currently under investigation. Each anti-VEGF molecule is characterized by different targets and may interact with multiple biochemical pathways within the eye.All the data agreed in considering anti-VEGF molecules as a first line choice for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Laser treatments may have a role in selected advanced cases and for those patients unable to guarantee enough compliance to intravitreal treatments schemes.

Relationship Between Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-VEGF Therapy: Systematic Review

Purpose:

To examine the relationship between central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity (VA) in patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment.

Methods:

Peer-reviewed articles from 2016 to 2020 reporting intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept that provided data on pretreatment (baseline) and final retinal thickness (CMT) and visual acuity (VA) were identified. The relationship between relative changes was assessed via a linear random-effects regression model controlling for treatment group.

Results:

No significant association between the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA and CMT was found in 41 eligible studies evaluating 2667 eyes. The observed effect estimate was a 0.12 increase (95% CI, −0.124 to 2.47) in logMAR VA per 100 µm reduction in CMT after treatment change. There were no significant differences in logMAR VA between the anti-VEGF treatment groups.

Conclusions:

There was no statistically significant relationship between the change in logMAR VA and change in CMT as well as no significant effect of the type of anti-VEGF treatment on the change in logMAR VA. Although OCT analysis, including measurements of CMT, will continue to be an integral part of the management of DME, further exploration is needed on additional anatomic factors that might contribute to visual outcomes.

Response to Initial Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Diabetic Macular Edema Is Significantly Correlated with Response to Third Consecutive Monthly Injection

Purpose: To determine whether the response to the initial anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection to treat diabetic macular edema (DME) is significantly correlated with the response to the third consecutive monthly injection of the same anti-VEGF agent. Methods: Seventy eyes with DME that were treated with an anti-VEGF agent (16 eyes with 1.25-mg bevacizumab, 35 eyes with 0.5-mg ranibizumab, and 19 eyes with 2.0-mg aflibercept) were studied. They were treated with three consecutive monthly injections of one of the three anti-VEGF agents. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR units) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at the baseline, 1 week after the initial injection, and 1 month after the third consecutive monthly injection. The changes of both values from the baseline 1 week after the initial injection (day 7) and 1 month after the third monthly injection were determined. The significance of the correlations between the BCVA and the CMT was determined. Results: The mean BCVA improved significantly for all three agents (0.38 ± 0.22 logMAR units at the baseline to 0.27 ± 0.25 logMAR units) after the three monthly injections (p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA). For all cases, a moderate but significant correlation was found between the BCVA at day 7 and 1 month after the third injection (r = 0.58, p < 0.01; Spearman’s rank correlation). No significant correlation was found for bevacizumab (r = 0.09, p = 0.73), moderate correlation was found for ranibizumab (r = 0.42, p < 0.05), and a strong correlation was found for aflibercept (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) between the BCVA at day 7 and at 1 month after the third injection. The mean CMT improved significantly for all three agents (481.9 ± 96.3 μm at the baseline to 364.1 ± 116.0 μm after the three monthly injections, p < 0.05), and a moderate correlation was found for the three agents between CMT at day 7 to that at one month after the third anti-VEGF injection (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). A moderate correlation was found for all three agents between CMT at day 7 to that at one month after the third anti-VEGF injection (r = 0.68 for bevacizumab, r = 0.41 for ranibizumab and r = 0.53 for aflibercept, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The significant correlations between the results on day 7 to that one month after the third anti-VEGF treatment for DME indicates that the long-term effects of anti-VEGF therapy can be predicted by the short-term response. In addition, the results indicate that there may be differences in the effectiveness between the three anti-VEGF agents.

Progress of Diabetic Macular Edema after Loading Injection of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents in Real-World Cases

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the recurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) after loading an injection of anti-VEGF agents by a pro re nata (PRN) protocol using central retinal thickness (CRT) as a re-injection criterion. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, observational single-center study. DME patients with a central retinal thickness (CRT) over 350 μm received a PRN injection of anti-VEGF agents following one to three consecutive monthly loading injections (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) for 6 months from January 2012 to June 2019. Results: We enrolled a total of 72 eyes for loading injections and the mean CRT improved from 434.04 ± 139.4 μm (before treatment) to 362.9 ± 125.0 μm after the loading injection. One week after injection, 36 eyes (50%) obtained a CRT of ≤350 μm. Fourteen eyes (19.4%) remained with a CRT of ≤350 μm for 6 months without additional injections. A total of 22 eyes (30.6%) had a CRT of >350 μm at 6 months. Fifteen eyes did not receive additional injections because of visual improvement. Conclusions: About 20% of DME patients can be maintained at a CRT of ≤350 μm for 6 months with only a loading injection. However, there is a tendency to delay additional injections for patients with recurrences using PRN protocol.

A Rare Case of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Optic Nerve Head

Purpose: To report a case of metastatic breast cancer to the optic nerve with a favorable response to an increased dose of intravitreal bevacizumab injection.Case summary: A 60-year-old female presented to our clinic with blurred vision in her left eye for 3 weeks. The patient had a history of intraductal breast cancer carcinoma, metastasized to the mediastinum lymph nodes, liver, and bone and had received palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy for 16 months. At her first presentation, best-corrected visual acuity of the left eye was 20/50 and the intraocular pressure was 11 mmHg. A yellowish elevated mass with hemorrhage at the optic disc with peripapillary swelling was observed in the left eye. Fluid at the subperipapillary and subfoveal areas and choroidal thickening with folds were observed with optic coherence tomography. The patient was diagnosed as having breast cancer metastasis to the optic nerve head. Three monthly intravitreal bevacizumab injections (0.05 mL, 1.25 mg) were administered, but showed limited effect. Two more intravitreal bevacizumab injections having twice the concentration of the previous dose (0.1 mL, 2.50 mg) were given. Tumor infiltration of the optic nerve head decreased, and serous retinal detachment subsided. No malignant cancer cells were detected in the anterior chamber.Conclusions: We report a rare case of breast cancer metastasis to the optic nerve. Administering intravitreal bevacizumab injections with twice the dosage concentration could be an alternative treatment option, to alleviate exudative retinal detachment associated with metastatic tumor progression to the optic nerve head.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients receiving intravitreal injections

We analyzed the economic benefits versus safety risks of sharing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) vials during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This single-center retrospective study analyzed the data of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) who received anti- VEGF between January 2016 and July 2021 at Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, China. Costs were compared of the two protocols of intravitreal injections (IVIs) of ranibizumab, aflibercept and conbercept after (i) splitting the vial content for use in two patients and after (ii) disposal of the remaining vial content after use in a single patient, with the COVID-19 outbreak considered as the demarcation point. The incidence rates of post-injection endophthalmitis (PIE) pre- and post-outbreak were analyzed. The mean cost of a single IVI increased by 33.3%, from 3917.67?71.69 to 5222.67?84.98 Chinese Yuan during the pandemic. The incidences of IVI-related culture-positive PIE were 0.0134% (3 in 22448) and 0.0223% (1 in 4479), respectively, before and after the pandemic (P=0.6532). We conclude that vial sharing of IVIs in a large clinical institution is not associated with increased PIE risk and can significantly reduce the cost of therapy.

Effectiveness of microperimetry in evaluating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively good vision: A retrospective observational study

No studies have evaluated the retinal sensitivity (RS) for diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with good vision. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of microperimetry in evaluating the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for DME patients with relatively good vision.Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients (mean age, 61.3 ± 11.2 years) with DME and decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥0.6 were studied. All patients received 3 consecutive monthly injections of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. The BCVA, central subfield macular thickness (CMT), and RS were evaluated by microperimetry (MAIA) within the 10 degree of the foveal center. To determine significant differences between the values, we used paired t tests.Patients were evaluated at baseline and 4 weeks after the third injection. The BCVA improved significantly from 0.18 ± 0.06 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units to 0.13 ± 0.13 logMAR units (P = .002; paired t test). The CMT decreased significantly from 464.3 ± 91.8 μm to 393.4 ± 129.0 μm (P = .005), and the RS also improved significantly from 21.8 ± 3.1 dB to 24.1 ± 2.8 dB at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .006). Among the patients with a decimal BCVA of 0.7 or better at baseline, there was no significant improvement in the BCVA (P = .28). However, the CMT decreased significantly from 479.5 ± 79.1 μm to 394.0 ± 99.8 μm at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .007). The RS also improved significantly from 22.0 ± 2.4 dB to 24.0 ± 3.1 dB at 4 weeks after treatment (P = .004).Measuring RS by microperimetry is a good option for evaluating the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatment for DME patients with a relatively good BCVA.

Correlation of response to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between the first and second treated eyes in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether outcome of bevacizumab treatment in the first treated eye can guide the selection of compound for the second treated eye in patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and optical coherence tomography data were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent bevacizumab therapy for bilateral diabetic macular edema. Change in central subfield thickness and visual acuity were evaluated and compared between the first treated eye and second treated eye.

RESULTS

A total of 66 eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 13 ± 5 months. The mean ± SD central subfield thickness at baseline was 464 ± 30 μm in the first treated eye and 461 ± 29 μm in the second treated eye (p = 0.91). Final central subfield thickness was reduced to 392 ± 27 μm in the first treated eye (p = 0.01 compared with baseline) and 416 ± 25 μm in the second treated eye (p = 0.03 compared with baseline). Using ≥5% or ≥10% reduction of central subfield thickness as diagnostic criteria to predict similar magnitude of thickness reduction in the first treated eye yielded a positive and negative predictive value ranging from 46% to 81%, and sensitivity and specificity ranging from 54% to 84%. Regression models did not show correlation between central subfield thickness reduction in first treated eye and the second treated eye at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab therapy reduced macular thickness in both eyes in bilateral diabetic macular edema. Treatment outcome of the first treated eye could not predict the outcome of the second treated eye. Particularly, failure to reduce central subfield thickness in the first treated eye does not preclude a favorable response to bevacizumab therapy in the second eye.

Detecting Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy Using Fundus Perimetry

Fundus perimetry is a new technique for evaluating the light sense in the retina in a point-to-point manner. Light sense is fundamentally different from visual acuity, which measures the threshold for discriminating and perceiving two points or lines, called the minimum cognoscible. The quality of measurement of retinal sensitivity has dramatically increased in the last decade, and the use of fundus perimetry is now gaining popularity. The latest model of fundus perimetry, MP-3, can be used for a wide range of measurements and has an advanced eye tracking system. High background illumination enables accurate measurement of mesopic retail sensitivity. Recent investigations have shown that neuronal damage precedes vascular abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy. The loss of retinal function has also been reported prior to morphological changes in the retina. In this review, the importance of measuring retinal sensitivity to evaluate visual function in the early stages of diabetic retinopathy was discussed. The usefulness of retinal sensitivity as an outcome measure in clinical trials for treatment modalities is also presented. The importance of fundus perimetry is promising and should be considered by both diabetes researchers and clinical ophthalmologists.

Intraocular Pressure Changes after Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab Injection: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To determine intraocular pressure (IOP) changes after intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab injection administered for various retinal disorders.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 796 eyes of 574 patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) and/or bevacizumab (1.25 mg) injection for different retinal diseases from March 2009 to December 2016 was performed. Ocular hypertension (OHT) was defined as IOP >21 mmHg or an increase in IOP of >5 mmHg from the baseline. IOP at the baseline and at various time periods after the injection was evaluated in the injected eyes and fellow control eyes.

Results

One hundred and thirty-one eyes received either a single dose of bevacizumab or ranibizumab intravitreal injection unilaterally, 222 patients received single injection in both the eyes (n = 444 eyes), and 221 eyes received multiple doses of the injection. OHT was noted in 11 eyes (1.38%), of which 3 eyes (0.38%) had transient OHT and 8 eyes (1%) had delayed and sustained OHT and among them, 3 eyes (0.4%) progressed to glaucoma. Preinjection IOP was significantly higher in the treated eyes when compared to the control untreated eyes (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Incidence of delayed and sustained OHT is low after a single or multiple intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections. Clinicians should be aware of possibility of OHT or glaucoma after the procedure.

Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update

Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or corticosteroids therapies), and surgical removal are currently available. Although laser has been considered as the gold standard for many years, over the past several years vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) have become first-line therapy. However, many patients do not adequately respond to them. With the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices, steroids have gained a presence in the management of the DME. We review and update the role of anti-VEGF and intravitreal sustained-release corticosteroid management of DME. According to the currently available scientific evidence, the choice of one anti-VEGF over another critically depends on the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While aflibercept may be the drug of choice in low baseline BCVA, the three anti-VEGFs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) provided similar functional outcomes when the baseline BCVA was higher. DEX implants are a valuable option for treating DME, although they are usually seen as a second choice, particularly in those eyes that have an insufficient response to anti-VEGF. The new evidence suggested that, in eyes that did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to a DEX implant at the time to 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections provided better functional outcomes.

Evaluation of the Safety of Bilateral Same-Day Intravitreal Injections of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents: Experience of a Large Korean Retina Center

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term ophthalmic side effects of bilateral same-day intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept injections in both eyes on the same day between January 2014 and June 2019. The patients were followed up for 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the injections.

Results

A total of 323 patients (646 eyes) received 1418 bilateral same-day intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The patients' mean age was 62.47 ± 13.97 years. The most common cause of bilateral injection was age-related macular degeneration (54.80%), followed by complications due to diabetic retinopathy (35.33%), retinal vein occlusion (2.40%), and central serious chorioretinopathy (1.27%). There were 22 cases of subconjunctival hemorrhage, 17 cases of temporary elevation of intraocular pressure, and no case of endophthalmitis. Twenty-one patients showed acute intraocular inflammation after the bilateral injection. All patients showed complete improvement within 2 weeks after the injection.

Conclusion

Bilateral same-day intravitreal anti-VEGF injection is a well-tolerated procedure on short-term follow-up. It is one of the more convenient approaches for both the patient and ophthalmologist.

Comparison of 2-Year Outcomes between Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema with "Treat-and-Extend" Regimen-Its Usefulness and Problems

BACKGROUND

To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) performed with the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 125 eyes of 125 treatment-naïve DME patients who received anti-VEGF injections at three consecutive monthly intervals as the loading phase. The changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS), and total injection numbers were compared between the two anti-VEGF agents.

RESULTS

Among 125 eyes, 26 eyes completed the treatment with the TAE regimen for 24 months (20.8%). Thirteen eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 70.9 ± 6.0 years) received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, and 13 eyes of 13 patients (65.9 ± 8.6 years) received 2 mg aflibercept. No significant differences were detected in the baseline demographics. At 24 months, BCVA was significantly improved in both groups; from 0.31 ± 0.19 to 0.10 ± 0.12 logMAR units for IVR and 0.41 ± 0.19 to 0.16 ± 0.28 logMAR units for IVA (p = 1.29 × 10^-9). CRT was significantly reduced in both groups; 440.9 ± 69.3 to 307.5 ± 66.4 μm for IVR and 473.9 ± 71.5 to 317.8 ± 71.2 μm for IVA (p = 3.55 × 10^-9). No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA, CRT in both groups, and the total injection numbers for 24 months (11.0 ± 1.2 for the IVA group and 12.0 ± 1.0 the IVR group). DRSS was significantly improved in both groups (p = 0.0004 for IVR and p = 0.009 for IVA).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA or CRT and injection numbers between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen. These results indicate that the results of the treatment with both agents with the TAE regimen were equally effective, but only 20.8% of patients completed 24 months of continuous treatment with the TAE regimen. Synopsis: There are no significant differences regarding effectiveness between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen for DME eyes.

Macular microvascular changes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in diabetic macular edema

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the changes in retinal capillary plexus and the choriocapillaris after a single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in eyes with diabetic macular edema using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients having diabetes with centre-involving diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional case series, eyes with centre-involving diabetic macular edema were enrolled. Vascular density (VD), vascular diameter index (VDI), vascular length density (VLD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and foveal density (FD)-300 were measured using en face OCTA images before and 1 month after administration of intravitreal bevacizumab. VD and VDI measurements were performed in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep retinal capillary plexus (DCP) and in the choriocapillaris. Additionally, capillary nonperfusion area (CNPA) was detected automatically based on vessel distance map in 4 concentric rings around the foveal centre. The segmentation error was manually corrected, and the measurements were performed by 2 expert graders.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eyes of 19 patients with a mean age of 62.76 ± 6.88 years were included. There were no significant changes in the FAZ area, FD-300, or in the VD of the foveal and parafoveal SCP and DCP. Also, VLD and VDI of the SCP and DCP remained unchanged. The change in the CNPA was not statistically significant. The VD of choriocapillaris increased significantly after injections (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

FAZ area and VD of the retinal capillary plexus remained stable in the short-term period after intravitreal bevacizumab. In addition, the choriocapillaris blood flow improved after bevacizumab injection.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy of diabetic macular edema

Introduction: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a sight threatening disease and a major cause for blindness for people in working age. The pathogenesis is multifactorial and complex. The pharmacotherapy of DME addresses both the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitors and inflammatory processes by the intravitreal application of steroids. Several trials have been published reporting on the efficacy and safety of these treatments.Areas covered: This review discusses original research articles including basic science and clinical studies as well as review articles focusing on the role of inflammation and VEGF expression in DME. It discusses newly published clinical trials on intravitreal pharmacotherapy for DME. The literature was searched using Medline/PubMed and was selected given its relevance for the topic to be discussed.Expert opinion: Our knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of diabetic macular edema has significantly increased. Some of these insights have been successfully transferred into current treatment strategies already including VEGF suppression or anti-inflammatory treatments using steroids. The identification of additional pathophysiological aspects and their relevance as potential treatment targets will be a future challenge in the treatment of DME. A better knowledge on the complex pathophysiology will also help to establish combination strategies.

Correlation of Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity in DME Treated by Two Doses of Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept Versus Bevacizumab: Analysis of a Randomized, Three-Armed Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To report the correlation of central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 1-year treatment by two doses (2.5 mg or 1.25 mg) of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) versus bevacizumab (IVB) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, the correlation of CMT and BCVA changes of the eyes enrolled in a previous clinical trial of 123 eyes were re-evaluated. The correlation of BCVA and CMT changes at each visit was evaluated in the three study arms individually. Then, the eyes in each of the arms were classified at each follow-up visit into three subgroups based on their CMT changes related to the baseline CMT: CMT decrease of 30% or more of baseline CMT, between 10% to 29% of baseline CMT, and less than 9% of baseline CMT or CMT increase.

RESULTS

BCVA and CMT changes were correlated significantly (P < .05) in all and in half of the follow-up visits, respectively, in the eyes treated by IVZ 1.25 mg and IVB (r = 0.554 and r = 0.617 at 1 year, respectively). Nevertheless, such a significant correlation was not detected in the eyes treated by IVZ 2.5 mg in any of the follow-up visits (r = 0.202 at 1 year; P = .259). In the IVZ 2.5 mg group, BCVA improvement was observed in all subgroups with each level of CMT reductions.

CONCLUSION

Ziv-aflibercept 2.5 mg might have a beneficial effect on DME beyond thickness reduction. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:684-690.].

Factors Predicting Treatment Response in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema Patients Treated with Intravitreal Bevacizumab

Purpose: To identify factors that affect the therapeutic response of intravitreal bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema (DMO) and explore the correlation between the functional and anatomical outcomes observed. Methods: A retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series design was used. Baseline imaging data and clinical records of 65 eyes with DMO, secondary to type II diabetes mellitus, which received intravitreal bevacizumab for the first time in 2016, were analyzed. The central macular thickness (CMT), macular volume, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), following the initial 3 injection loading phase were recorded. Outcomes were compared to multiple variables including glycemic control, diabetic retinopathy grade, DMO subtype on optical coherence tomography, and use of past macular laser therapy. Results: The participants' age ranged from 46 to 84 of which 63% were men and 37% were women. The mean baseline CMT was 443.21 μm. A mean reduction of 11.23% (P < 0.0005) in CMT was observed following the loading phase. Women exhibited a greater reduction in CMT (P = 0.032). Participants with diffuse retinal thickening (DRT) and with cystoid macular edema (CMO) showed a net reduction in CMT of 17.39% (P = 0.047) and 8.24% (P = 0.04) respectively. Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy demonstrated a mean gain in CMT of 16.86% (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Female patients and DRT demonstrated a positive anatomical response. Patients with CMO and proliferative diabetic retinopathy displayed a negative therapeutic response. Such observations may be considered in clinical decision-making when opting for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for DMO.

Primary outcomes of the VIDI study: phase 2, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled study of ASP8232 for diabetic macular edema

Background

ASP8232 is a potent and specific small molecule vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) inhibitor. This study evaluated the effect of ASP8232 on excess retinal thickness when given alone or in combination with ranibizumab in patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME).

Methods

This was a phase 2a, placebo and sham-injection controlled, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Participants were patients with CI-DME and central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 375 µm in the study eye as assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Eligible patients were randomized to (1) daily oral ASP8232 40 mg monotherapy; (2) combination therapy of daily oral ASP8232 40 mg and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 mg; or (3) monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 mg monotherapy. The treatment period was 12 weeks. CST and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were assessed at baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. The primary outcome was the mean percent change from baseline in excess CST at Week 12. Secondary outcomes were BCVA, safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ASP8232.

Results

After 12 weeks, the mean (95% confidence interval) percent change in excess CST was 11.4% (− 15.0%, 37.8%) in the ASP8232 group, − 61.7% (− 86.1%, − 37.2%) in the ASP8232/ranibizumab group, and − 75.3% (− 94.8%, − 55.8%) in the ranibizumab group. The change from baseline in the two ranibizumab arms was statistically significant (P < 0.001) as was the difference between the ranibizumab groups and the ASP8232 group (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) increase in BCVA score from baseline was 3.1 (7.3) in the ASP8232 group, 5.2 (7.1) in the ASP8232/ranibizumab group, and 8.2 (9.5) in the ranibizumab group. The increase from baseline in BCVA score was statistically and clinically significant in the ranibizumab group compared with the ASP8232 group (P = 0.015). ASP8232 resulted in near complete inhibition of plasma VAP-1 activity whilst ranibizumab had no effect.

Conclusions

Near complete inhibition of plasma VAP-1 activity with ASP8232 had no effect on CST in patients with CI-DME. Furthermore, combination therapy did not provide additional benefit to treatment with ranibizumab alone, which significantly reduced CST and improved BCVA.

Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02302079. Registered on November 26, 2014

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40942-019-0178-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Two-year analysis of changes in the optic nerve and retina following anti-VEGF treatments in diabetic macular edema patients

Purpose: To evaluate long-term structural and functional changes that happen to the optic nerve and retina following ranibizumab (Lucentis) injections in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. Methods: Patients with clinically significant DME requiring anti-VEGF injections underwent pre-injection baseline, 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up tests. The tests performed were optical coherence tomography (OCT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and visual field (VF). Wide-field fluorescein angiogram (IVFA) was performed to monitor the progression of diabetic ischemia. Results: A total of 30 patients requiring anti-VEGF injections and 21 control patients not requiring anti-VEGF injections were enrolled in the study. From baseline, the average macular thickness significantly decreased (p<0.0002) over the 24-month time period. Mean perfused ratio significantly increased (p<0.0005) at 6, 12, and 24 months. Cup volume and vertical cup-to-disk ratio significantly increased (p<0.0014) over the study period. This was verified by masked independent grading of patient optic nerve stereo-photographs by glaucoma specialists. BCVA significantly (p<0.0006) improved over the study period. VFs showed a non-significant trend of deteriorating peripheral vision at 12 and 24 months. Conclusion: Clinically, anti-VEGF therapy appears to affect the optic nerve by increasing cup volume and increasing vertical cup/disk ratio over time. The results provide a cautionary note to monitor both the retina and optic nerve status in patients undergoing frequent injections.

Multiple Effects of Intravitreal Aflibercept on Microvascular Regression in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) on the number of microaneurysms and sizes of nonperfused areas (NPAs) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Interventional, prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five eyes of 25 DME patients (average age, 64.0±8.8 years) were treated with 3 consecutive monthly IVA injections.

METHODS

Fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT were performed before the IVA injections (baseline) and at 1 week after the IVA treatment. The number of microaneurysms and the ischemic index (ISI), a measure of NPA, were determined. The correlations between central retinal thickness (CRT) and number of microaneurysms and the ISI were also determined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mean number of microaneurysms and NPA evaluated as the ISI.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean CRT was 485.7±90.6 μm. After treatment, the mean CRT was reduced significantly to 376.9±81.6 μm (P = 0.1 × 10^-5, repeated analysis of variance). The mean number of microaneurysms was decreased significantly from 49.6±33.2 at baseline to 24.8±18.1 at 3 months after the initial treatment. This was a 50.4±21.2% reduction (P = 0.3 × 10^-5, paired t test). The mean ISI was also decreased significantly from 55.5±20.4% at baseline to 28.8±16.8% after treatment (P = 0.3 × 10^-5, paired t test). This was a reduction of 43.3±28.5%. A significant correlation was found between the CRT and number of microaneurysms at both baseline (r = 0.56; P = 0.004) and after treatment (r = 0.53; P = 0.006). A significant correlation was found between CRT and ISI at baseline (r = -0.39; P = 0.03) but not after treatment (r = -0.06; P = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in the number of microaneurysms was correlated with reduction in CRT.

Generation of single-chain Fv antibody fragments against Mu-2-related death-inducing gene in Escherichia coli

Mu-2-related death-inducing (MuD) gene is involved in apoptosis in tumor cells. Although we have previously produced mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that specifically recognize human MuD, the application scope of MuD MAbs was restricted due to their mouse origin. Therefore, we attempted the generation of single-chain variable fragment (scFv) against MuD. The heavy- and light-chain variable region genes from two MuD hybridomas were isolated by PCR and joined by DNA encoding a (Gly₄Ser₁)₃ linker. These scFv fragments were cloned into a phagemid vector and expressed as E-tagged fusion proteins in Escherichia coli HB2151. The reactivity of selected Abs was evaluated using ELISA. Selected MuDscFv Abs specifically recognized human MuD, retaining ~ 50% potency of the parent MAbs. MuDscFv-M3H9 recognized the middle region of MuD, while MuDscFv-C22B3 recognized a broad region. Intracellular expression of MuDscFvs-C22B3 protected cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis. These MuDscFv Abs may help in the study of intracellular signaling pathway centered on MuD and of drug use target and points.

Prefilled syringes for intravitreal drug delivery

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications play an increasingly critical role in numerous retinal vascular diseases. Initially, anti-VEGF medications came in vials that had to be drawn up by the physician into a syringe for administration. In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved the ranibizumab 0.3 mg prefilled syringe (PFS), and in October 2016, the US FDA approved the ranibizumab 0.5 mg PFS. This article discusses the advantages of the PFS, including reduced injection time, possible reduced risk of endophthalmitis, reduction in intraocular air bubbles and silicone oil droplets, and improved precision in the volume and dose of intravitreal ranibizumab administered, along with possible disadvantages. Implications of the innovation of the PFS on intravitreal injection technique and clinical practice pattern are discussed and reviewed.

Current and Future Pharmacologic Therapies for Diabetic Retinopathy

Background:

Currently, diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of permanent visual loss in workingage adults in industrialized nations. The chronic microangiopathic changes associated with diabetic retinopathy lead to the most common causes of severe permanent visual loss: diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Multiple studies have evaluated different pharmacotherapies for different levels of retinopathy.

Methods:

A review of the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy and current and emerging pharmacotherapies for diabetic retinopathy.

Results:

Historically, DME has been the primary focus of treatment in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Due to the rapidly increasing number of agents and treatment options, management algorithms for DME have become increasingly complex. Furthermore, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) has allowed unparalleled sensitivity and specificity for detecting macular edema. All available intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of patients with DME and PDR. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide has also proven beneficial in diabetic retinopathy. Most recently, various corticosteroids have been designed as sustained-release intraocular implants in order to reduce the burden and risks associated with retreatment. Current research is focused on providing new agents that target alternate pathways and signaling molecules to provide patients with additional therapeutic tools, especially in patients who have an incomplete response to the current medications.

Conclusion:

Anti-VEGF therapy has revolutionized the medical management of diabetic retinopathy. The most important existing challenges in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy are improving visual outcomes and decreasing the treatment burden associated with repeated intravitreal injections. Combination therapy with anti-VEGF and corticosteroids with other previously available treatments, such as panretinal photocoagulation, may be a reasonable clinical strategy to reduce the intravitreal injections burden. Many exciting novel drugs that target newly discovered pathways hold clinical promise. The results of ongoing randomized clinical trials will answer the important concerns surrounding new drugs and delivery devices: safety and visual outcomes.

Clinical preferences and trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments for diabetic macular edema in Japan

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To determine the current clinical preferences of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment protocols for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Answers to a questionnaire consisting of 16 questions were obtained from 176 of 278 (63.3%) surveyed ophthalmologists.

RESULTS

The results showed that 81.2% preferred intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF antibodies as the first-line therapy. The most important indicators for beginning anti-VEGF therapy were: the best-corrected visual acuity in 44.3% and the retinal thickness in 30.7%. In the loading phase, 53.4% preferred a single injection, and in the maintenance phase, 75.0% preferred the pro re nata regimen. Financial limitation (85.8%) was reported as the most important difficulty in the treatment. For combination therapy with anti-VEGF treatment, panretinal photocoagulation, focal photocoagulations and a sub-Tenon steroid injection were preferred. The contraindications for anti-VEGF therapy were: prior cerebral infarction (72.7%). Regarding the use of both approved anti-VEGF agents in Japan, ranibizumab and aflibercept, 39.8% doctors used them appropriately.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results present the current clinical preferences of anti-VEGF treatment for DME in Japan. The best-corrected visual acuity and the retinal thickness are important indicators to institute this therapy. The majority of the ophthalmologists use anti-VEGF treatment as first-line therapy and prefer the 1 + pro re nata regimen.

Short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in contrast sensitivity of patients with diabetic macular edema and optimizing glycemic control

AIMS

To analyze contrast sensitivity of intravitreal bevacizumab injections with optimizing glycemic control versus optimizing glycemic control (in combination with sham injections) in eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional, masked, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Forty-one eyes of 34 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DME with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 11% received either intravitreal bevacizumab injection (Group 1) or sham injection (Group 2) at 0 and 6 weeks along with optimizing glycemic control. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured by central macular thickness (CMT) were compared and correlated at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The study showed a mean CS improved in group 1 from 1.14 ± 0.36 logCS to 1.32 ± 0.24 logCS and also in group 2 from 1.11 ± 0.29 logCS to 1.18 ± 0.29 logCS at 12 weeks (P = 0.12). CS and CMT promptly decreased in group 1 compared to group 2 at 2 weeks (ΔCS = 0.15 ± 0.25 vs. 0.03 ± 0.15 logCS; P = 0.04; ΔCMT = 116 ± 115 vs. 17 ± 71 μm; P = 0.01). There was a mean reduction of approximately 0.5% in HbA1c levels in both groups at 12 weeks (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The use of bevacizumab in combination with optimizing glycemic control results in earlier improvement of contrast sensitivity in type 2 diabetes patients with DME. However, the optimizing glycemic control itself has shown also to be effective at 12 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02308644.

Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy with an increasing prevalence tied to the global epidemic in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its pathophysiology starts with decreased retinal oxygen tension that manifests as retinal capillary hyperpermeability and increased intravascular pressure mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulation and retinal vascular autoregulation, respectively. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is the cornerstone of clinical assessment of DME. The foundation of treatment is metabolic control of hyperglycemia and blood pressure. Specific ophthalmic treatments include intravitreal anti-VEGF drug injections, intravitreal corticosteroid injections, focal laser photocoagulation, and vitrectomy, but a substantial fraction of eyes respond incompletely to all of these modalities resulting in visual loss and disordered retinal structure and vasculature visible on SD-OCT and OCT angiography. Efforts to close the gap between the results of interventions within randomized clinical trials and in real-world contexts, and to reduce the cost of care increasingly occupy innovation in the social organization of ophthalmic care of DME. Pharmacologic research is exploring other biochemical pathways involved in retinal vascular homeostasis that may provide new points of intervention effective in those cases unresponsive to current treatments.

Specialized Pro-resolving Lipid Mediators: Modulation of Diabetes-Associated Cardio-, Reno-, and Retino-Vascular Complications

Diabetes and its associated chronic complications present a healthcare challenge on a global scale. Despite improvements in the management of chronic complications of the micro-/macro-vasculature, their growing prevalence and incidence highlights the scale of the problem. It is currently estimated that diabetes affects 425 million people globally and it is anticipated that this figure will rise by 2025 to 700 million people. The vascular complications of diabetes including diabetes-associated atherosclerosis and kidney disease present a particular challenge. Diabetes is the leading cause of end stage renal disease, reflecting fibrosis leading to organ failure. Moreover, diabetes associated states of inflammation, neo-vascularization, apoptosis and hypercoagulability contribute to also exacerbate atherosclerosis, from the metabolic syndrome to advanced disease, plaque rupture and coronary thrombosis. Current therapeutic interventions focus on regulating blood glucose, glomerular and peripheral hypertension and can at best slow the progression of diabetes complications. Recently advanced knowledge of the pathogenesis underlying diabetes and associated complications revealed common mechanisms, including the inflammatory response, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. The major role that inflammation plays in many chronic diseases has led to the development of new strategies aiming to promote the restoration of homeostasis through the "resolution of inflammation." These strategies aim to mimic the spontaneous activities of the 'specialized pro-resolving mediators' (SPMs), including endogenous molecules and their synthetic mimetics. This review aims to discuss the effect of SPMs [with particular attention to lipoxins (LXs) and resolvins (Rvs)] on inflammatory responses in a series of experimental models, as well as evidence from human studies, in the context of cardio- and reno-vascular diabetic complications, with a brief mention to diabetic retinopathy (DR). These data collectively support the hypothesis that endogenously generated SPMs or synthetic mimetics of their activities may represent lead molecules in a new discipline, namely the 'resolution pharmacology,' offering hope for new therapeutic strategies to prevent and treat, specifically, diabetes-associated atherosclerosis, nephropathy and retinopathy.

Effects of subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation on treating patients with refractory diabetic macular edema

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation on treating patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods

This randomized clinical trial recruited patients with DME in both eyes that were resistant to treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). The eyes were randomly divided into two groups who received laser therapy and IVB, or IVB alone. Subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation and IVB injection were administered in one eye, and an IVB injection was administered in the second eye. IVB injections were repeated in both eyes within one month and two months after the first injection. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured before, within a month, and three months after start of intervention.

Results

In this study, 42 eyes of 21 patients were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 60.86 ± 8.57 years. Ten patients (47.6%) were male. Within-group analysis showed a significant decreased in BCVA logMAR in the laser + IVB group reflecting improvement in visual acuity (VA) (P < 0.001); it increased in the control group during study reflecting more vision loss (P = 0.01). In the laser + IVB group, a significant decrease in mean ± standard deviation (SD) CMT at 3 months compared to baseline was observed (baseline: 513 ± 126.29 vs. three months: 408.1 ± 95.28; P < 0.001). The mean ± SD CMT was significantly lower in the laser + IVB group of eyes than in the control group three months after intervention (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Using subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation in combination with IVB can significantly reduce CMT and improve BCVA in patients with refractory DME.

Factors Influencing Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Treatment in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors associated with response to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 88 patients diagnosed with DME were enrolled in this retrospective chart review. Group 1 included eyes that showed good response to IVB. Group 2 included eyes that did not respond to IVB but responded to IVTA. Group 3 included eyes that responded to neither. Clinical factors, HbA1c, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings including patterns of macular edema were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 44, 27, and 20 eyes were included in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. HbA1c was higher in group 3 than in the other groups. Proportion of full (combination of all patterns) type edema was higher in group 3 than in the other 2 groups. In group 1, the proportion of sponge-like diffuse retinal thickening type was higher and cystoid macular edema type was lower than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of diabetic control and morphologic subtypes with OCT should be considered to better predict the prognosis after treatment in DME.

Effect of Intravitreal Bevacizumab with or without Macular Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the possible benefits of macular photocoagulation (MPC) as an additional treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

The studies were identified from three databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The main outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), differences in central macular thickness (CMT), and adverse events within the follow-up period. The results were pooled using weight mean difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A fixed or random effects model was employed, depending on the heterogeneity of the inclusion trials.

RESULTS

Finally, three randomized controlled trial and two high-quality retrospective studies were identified and included. Changes in CMT at 1, 3, and 6 months did not vary significantly between the IVB-alone group and the IVB with MPC group (P = 0.26, 0.06, and 0.65, respectively). Similarly, changes in BCVA at 1, 3, and 6 months also did not vary significantly between the two groups (P = 0.20, 0.91, and 0.70, respectively). Whereas substantial heterogeneity was detected in the CMT results among these studies, the sensitivity analyses showed Solaiman's study was probably the source of the heterogeneity. No publication bias was detected by funnel plots in this study.

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis showed that the treatments with IVB alone and combined IVB and MPC were similarly effective in improving BCVA and reducing CMT. However, more evidence is needed to evaluate their effects in the long-term periods.

Adipose stem cells and their paracrine factors are therapeutic for early retinal complications of diabetes in the Ins2Akita mouse

BACKGROUND

Early-stage diabetic retinopathy (DR) is characterized by neurovascular defects. In this study, we hypothesized that human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) positive for the pericyte marker CD140b, or their secreted paracrine factors, therapeutically rescue early-stage DR features in an Ins2Akita mouse model.

METHODS

Ins2Akita mice at 24 weeks of age received intravitreal injections of CD140b-positive ASCs (1000 cells/1 μL) or 20× conditioned media from cytokine-primed ASCs (ASC-CM, 1 μL). Age-matched wildtype mice that received saline served as controls. Visual function experiments and histological analyses were performed 3 weeks post intravitreal injection. Biochemical and molecular analyses assessed the ASC-CM composition and its biological effects.

RESULTS

Three weeks post-injection, Ins2Akita mice that received ASCs had ameliorated decreased b-wave amplitudes and vascular leakage but failed to improve visual acuity, whereas Ins2Akita mice that received ASC-CM demonstrated amelioration of all aforementioned visual deficits. The ASC-CM group demonstrated partial amelioration of retinal GFAP immunoreactivity and DR-related gene expression but the ASC group did not. While Ins2Akita mice that received ASCs exhibited occasional (1 in 8) hemorrhagic retinas, mice that received ASC-CM had no adverse complications. In vitro, ASC-CM protected against TNFα-induced retinal endothelial permeability as measured by transendothelial electrical resistance. Biochemical and molecular analyses demonstrated several anti-inflammatory proteins including TSG-6 being highly expressed in cytokine-primed ASC-CM.

CONCLUSIONS

ASCs or their secreted factors mitigate retinal complications of diabetes in the Ins2Akita model. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether ASCs or their secreted factors are safe and effective therapeutic modalities long-term as current locally delivered therapies fail to effectively mitigate the progression of early-stage DR. Nonetheless, our study sheds new light on the therapeutic mechanisms of adult stem cells, with implications for assessing relative risks/benefits of experimental regenerative therapies for vision loss.

Optical coherence tomography findings predictive of response to treatment in diabetic macular edema

Objective

To evaluate the short-term efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injections (PSTI) on the basis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) patterns in diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 73 eyes of 73 patients with DME. Based on the presence of serous retinal detachment (SRD), eyes were categorized into two groups, and either IVB or PSTI treatment was performed. Central macular thickness (CMT) and the degree of SRD were assessed preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. The severity of intraretinal edema was approximated based on the distance from the external limiting membrane to the internal limiting membrane.

Results

In eyes with SRD, reduction of SRD was greater with IVB than with PSTI. Moreover, reduction of intraretinal edema was greater with PSTI than with IVB. In eyes without SRD, PSTI achieved greater CMT reduction, compared with IVB.

Conclusions

In DME patients with SRD, IVB achieved greater reduction of SRD, compared with PSTI; however, intraretinal edema responded more favorably to PSTI, regardless of the presence of SRD. Our results suggest that the classification of DME based on OCT findings may be useful to predict responses to IVB or PSTI treatments.

TREATMENT PATTERNS AND 2-YEAR VISION OUTCOMES WITH BEVACIZUMAB IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: An Analysis From a Large U.S. Integrated Health Care System

PURPOSE

To assess health care utilization and vision outcomes over 2 years in patients receiving bevacizumab treatment in clinical practice for diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed diabetic macular edema who received an intravitreal bevacizumab injection within 12 months of initial diagnosis were identified from Kaiser Permanente's 350,000 patients with diabetes mellitus treated between 2008 and 2013. Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of intravitreal injections, and patient characteristics were abstracted from the electronic record. The main outcome measure was change in BCVA.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine patients met the inclusion criteria and had 2 years of follow-up after their first bevacizumab injection. These patients had a mean of 3.1 injections (range, 1-17) during the 2-year follow-up. Mean BCVA improvement was 5.4 letters at 12 months and 5.3 letters at 24 months. Only 29.8% of patients demonstrated ≥3 lines of vision improvement from baseline, whereas 12.3% had ≥3 lines of vision loss from baseline at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest U.S. clinical practice-based study of bevacizumab use in diabetic macular edema. Consistent with national studies, the frequency of injection was low. Average BCVA improvement was lower than in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor trials. Significant BCVA improvement was achieved in approximately 30% of patients with newly diagnosed diabetic macular edema.

Evaluation of systemic risk factors in different optical coherence tomographic patterns of diabetic macular edema

AIM

To elucidate the relationship between systemic risk factors and different patterns of diabetic macular edema (DME) determined with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, DME was classified by OCT as diffuse retinal thickness (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME) and serous retinal detachment (SRD) and the relationship between the systemic risk factors and DME patterns was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients with DME, 21 (36.8%) had DRT, 24 (42.1%) had CME and 12 (21.0%) had SRD. Micro- or macro-albuminuria was significantly higher in the DRT pattern (61.9%) compared with the SRD (50.0%) and CME patterns (25.0%; P=0.040). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was significantly higher and patients were younger in the DRT pattern group (P=0.034, P=0.032). Best corrected visual acuity was the worst and central macular thickness was the thickest in the CME pattern group.

CONCLUSION

Micro- or macro-albuminuria may be more frequent and HbA1c level may be higher in patients with DRT. These patients are also seen to be younger than patients with non-DRT.

Intravitreal Injection of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Ocular Vascular Diseases: Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide the clinical recommendations for the administration of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs especially bavacizumab for ocular vascular diseases including diabetic macular edema, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, myopic choroidal neovascularization, retinal vein occlusion and central serous chorioretinopathy.

METHODS

Twenty clinical questions were developed by the guideline technical committee. Relevant websites and databases were searched to find out the pertinent clinical practice guidelines to answer the questions. The technical committee provided possible answers (scenarios) according to the available evidences for each question. All scenarios along with their levels of evidence and the supported articles were sent to the experts for external review. If the experts did not agree on any of the scenarios for one particular clinical question, the technical committee reviewed all scenarios and their pertinent evidences and made the necessary decision. After that, the experts were asked to score them again. All confirmed scenarios were gathered as the final recommendations.

RESULTS

All the experts agreed on at least one of the scenarios. The technical committee extracted the agreed scenario for each clinical question as the final recommendation. Finally, 56 recommendations were developed for the procedure of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection and their applications in the management of ocular vascular diseases.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of this guideline can standardize the management of the common ocular vascular diseases by intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents. It can lead to better policy-making and evidence-based clinical decision by ophthalmologists and optimal evidence based eye care for patients.

The efficacy of conbercept or ranibizumab intravitreal injection combined with laser therapy for Coats' disease

PURPOSE

The current treatment approaches for Coats' disease by intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents (ranibizumab or conbercept) combined with laser therapy were evaluated for the efficacy during the treatment.

METHODS

The medical records of 28 patients diagnosed with Coats' disease followed by the treatment with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents and laser therapies at Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital and Hebei Eye Hospital during July 2012 and October 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical outcomes were recorded with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The patients were divided into ranibizumab- and conbercept-treated groups, as well as based on age: pediatric and adult groups.

RESULT

Twenty-eight patients were involved in this study. The average number of the injections was 2.82 ± 0.98. Laser photocoagulation was conducted in all patients, and the average number of lasers was 2.63 ± 0.74. The average follow-up period was 24.29 ± 9.85 months. Fourteen patients (50%) were stable, 12 (43%) patients were improved, and 2 patients (7%) showed recurred subretinal fluid and exudation. The final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increased markedly after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or conbercept combined with laser therapy (p = 0.029, p = 0.009, respectively). The number of injections and lasers between conbercept and ranibizumab groups did not vary significantly (p = 0.160, p = 0.573, respectively). Nine patients (60%) in the ranibizumab-treated group and five (38%) in the conbercept-treated group reached a stable phase, and five (33%) and seven (54%) patients got the vision improved after treated with ranibizumab or conbercept, respectively. In pediatric and adult groups, the initial and final BCVA differed significantly (p = 0.03, p = 0.008, respectively). However, the injection number was remarkably different (p = 0.02), while the laser numbers did not have any markedly difference (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or conbercept combined with laser therapy is an effective therapeutic option in Coats' disease. Moreover, the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or conbercept had no significant adverse effects and appeared to offer visual improvement in Coats' disease.

Association between characteristics of foveal cystoid spaces and short-term responsiveness to ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between the characteristics of foveal cystoid spaces and short-term responsiveness to ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) at 3 months from the initial injection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 66 eyes of 61 patients with center-involved DME who received three consecutive ranibizumab injections and following as-needed administrations. We evaluated the relationship between visual improvement at 3 months and the preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters including hyperreflective foci, heterogeneous OCT reflectivity, mean levels of OCT reflectivity and height of foveal cystoid spaces.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eyes without preoperative hyperreflective foci in the foveal cystoid spaces had significantly greater improvement in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) at 3 months than 43 eyes with foci (P = 0.006). That was similar to the greater reduction in CSF thickness in eyes without lesions after treatment at the same time point (P < 0.001). VA improvement at 3 months was not associated with the height (R = 0.215, P = 0.083) or the reflectivity levels (R = -0.079, P = 0.538) of foveal cystoid spaces. There were no differences in VA changes between eyes with and without heterogeneous reflectivity in foveal cystoid spaces (P = 0.297). Multivariate analyses showed that logMAR VA and the absence of hyperreflective foci in foveal cystoid spaces were associated with VA improvement at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Hyperreflective foci in foveal cystoid spaces at baseline predict poorer short-term responsiveness to ranibizumab injections for DME.

Intravitreal Bevacizumab as an Adjunct Treatment for Neovascular Glaucoma

Purpose

To assess the effect of adjunctive intravitreal bevacizumab treatment on neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods

The medical records of all consecutive patients with NVG treated with intravitreal bevacizumab at our center from May 2006 to February 2008 were reviewed. The data collected included background features, findings on full ophthalmologic examination (including visual acuity, gonioscopy, and intraocular pressure), glaucoma medications prescribed, and additional procedures for glaucoma performed before and after bevacizumab injection. The interval between the diagnosis of NVG and intravitreal bevacizumab treatment was calculated.

Results

Eighteen patients (6 male, 12 female; mean age 63±13.2 years) met the study criteria. Causes of NVG were proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=14), central retinal vein occlusion (n=2), occlusive vasculitis (n=1), and panuveitis (n=1). The mean duration of follow-up was 52 (±12) weeks. Mean intraocular pressure decreased from 32.3 (±4.99) to 18 (±6.1) mmHg (p<0.0001) and mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.16 (±1.2) to 2.55 (±1.46) (p=0.1938). An interval of less than 6 months between the start of bevacizumab treatment and diagnosis was associated with better final visual acuity than delayed treatment (0.82±0.4 logMAR vs 1.88±1.1 logMAR, p=0.002) and a better regression of iris neovascularization (22% vs 89%; p=0.015).

Conclusions

Intravitreal bevacizumab is beneficial for the treatment of anterior segment neovascularization and NVG when used as an adjunct, making the administration of additional treatment for the underlying cause possible. Bevacizumab should be instituted promptly after diagnosis, before irreversible anatomic and functional damage occurs.

Experience with Intravitreal Bevacizumab as a Preoperative Adjunct in 23-G Vitrectomy for Advanced Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab before vitrectomy in advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial was performed on 40 eyes of 40 patients. Inclusion criteria were advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy with fractional retinal detachment and HbA1c <7%. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Patients in one group had an intravitreal injection (1.25 mg) of bevacizumab 48 hours before 23-G pars plana vitrectomy surgery was performed, whereas the other group did not. Best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and fundus photographs were taken prior to surgery 1 week and 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Effective vitrectomy time was 8.05 minutes in the bevacizumab group vs 16.8 minutes in the non-bevacizumab group. Statistically significant differences were observed in visual acuity at 1 week and 3 and 6 months follow-up between the 2 groups (p<0.05 for each visit). Also, there was less bleeding intraoperatively in the bevacizumab group. Mean final visual acuity in the bevacizumab group was 0.82 logMAR and 2.01 logMAR in the non-bevacizumab group.

Conclusions

Adjuvant intravitreal injection of bevacizumab prior to vitrectomy in diabetic retinopathy with fractional retinal detachment significantly eases the procedure, diminishing intraoperative complications, and leads to a better visual outcome.