Removal of bile acids by two different extracorporeal liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure

Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison

ExtraCorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) systems were developed with the aim of supporting the liver in its detoxification function by clearing the blood from hepatic toxic molecules. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis on patients presenting with liver failure who were treated with different extracorporeal techniques in our intensive care unit to evaluate and compare their detoxification abilities. To verify the effectiveness of the techniques, mass balance (MB) and adsorption per hour were calculated for total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), and bile acids (BA) from the concentrations measured. MB represents the total amount (mg or mcMol) of a molecule removed from a solution and is the only representative parameter to verify the purification effectiveness of one system as it is not affected by the continuous production of the molecules, released in the circulation from the tissues, as it is the case for the reduction rate (RR). The total adsorption per hour is calculated by the ratio between MB and the time duration and shows the adsorption ability in an hour. Our comparative study shows the superior adsorption capability of CytoSorb system regarding TB, DB, and BA, evaluated through the MB and adsorption per hour, in comparison with CPFA, MARS, Prometheus, and PAP. In conclusion, as extracorporeal purification in liver failure could be considered useful for therapeutic purposes, Cytosorb, being more performing than other systems considered, could represent the device of first choice.

Comparative metabolome analysis reveals higher potential of haemoperfusion adsorption in providing favourable outcome in ACLF patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a serious illness associated with altered metabolome, organ failure and high mortality. Need for therapies to improve the metabolic milieu and support liver regeneration are urgently needed.

METHODS

We investigated the ability of haemoperfusion adsorption (HA) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in improving the metabolic profile and survival in ACLF patients. Altogether, 45 ACLF patients were randomized into three groups: standard medical therapy (SMT), HA and TPE groups. Plasma metabolomics was performed at baseline, post-HA and TPE sessions on days 7 and 14 using high-resolution mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The baseline clinical/metabolic profiles of study groups were comparable. We identified 477 metabolites. Of these, 256 metabolites were significantly altered post 7 days of HA therapy (p < .05, FC > 1.5) and significantly reduced metabolites linked to purine (12 metabolites), tryptophan (7 metabolites), primary bile acid (6 metabolites) and arginine-proline metabolism (6 metabolites) and microbial metabolism respectively (p < .05). Metabolites linked to taurine-hypotaurine and histidine metabolism were reduced and temporal increase in metabolites linked to phenylalanine and tryptophan metabolism was observed post-TPE therapy (p < .05). Finally, weighted metabolite correlation network analysis (WMCNA) along with inter/intragroup analysis confirmed significant reduction in inflammatory (tryptophan, arachidonic acid and bile acid metabolism) and secondary energy metabolic pathways post-HA therapy compared to TPE and SMT (p < .05). Higher baseline plasma level of 11-deoxycorticosterone (C03205; AUROC > 0.90, HR > 3.2) correlated with severity (r2 > 0.5, p < .05) and mortality (log-rank-p < .05). Notably, 51 of the 64 metabolite signatures (ACLF non-survivor) were reversed post-HA treatment compared to TPE and SMT(p < .05).

CONCLUSION

HA more potentially (~80%) improves plasma milieu compared to TPE and SMT. High baseline plasma 11-deoxycorticosterone level correlates with early mortality in ACLF patients.

Liver-Support Therapies in Critical Illness-A Comparative Analysis of Procedural Characteristics and Safety

Extracorporeal liver-support therapies remain controversial in critically ill patients, as most studies have failed to show an improvement in outcomes. However, heterogeneous timing and inclusion criteria, an insufficient number of treatments, and the lack of a situation-dependent selection of available liver-support modalities may have contributed to negative study results. We retrospectively investigated the procedural characteristics and safety of the three liver-support therapies CytoSorb, Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Whereas TPE had its strengths in a shorter treatment duration, in clearing larger molecules, affecting platelet numbers less, and improving systemic coagulation and hemodynamics, CytoSorb and MARS were associated with a superior reduction in particularly small protein-bound and water-soluble substances. The clearance magnitude was concentration-dependent for all three therapies, but additionally related to the molecular weight for CytoSorb and MARS therapy. Severe complications did not appear. In conclusion, a better characterization of disease-driving as well as beneficial molecules in critically ill patients with acute liver dysfunction is crucial to improve the use of liver-support therapy in critically ill patients. TPE may be beneficial in patients at high risk for bleeding complications and impaired liver synthesis and hemodynamics, while CytoSorb and MARS may be considered for patients in whom the elimination of smaller toxic compounds is a primary objective.

Superior Dialytic Removal of Bilirubin and Bile Acids by Free Fatty Acid Displacement and Its Synergy With Albumin-Based Dialysis

One of the cardinal features of any liver replacement therapy is the ability to remove accumulated metabolites. However, an unsolved problem is the low dialyzability of lipophilic toxins. This study aimed to explore whether bilirubin and bile acids removal can be increased by free fatty acid (FFA) displacement and its synergy with albumin dialysis. First, we found that the protein binding of both bilirubin and bile acids decreased significantly with increasing FFA concentrations when co-incubated directly. Then, in vitro dialysis showed that fatty acid mixtures infusion prefilter effectively increased the fractional removals of bilirubin and bile acids, showing higher efficiency compared with albumin-based hemodialysis (HD); in vivo dialysis in liver failure rats showed that lipid emulsion administration resulted in higher reduction ratios and more total solute removals for bilirubin and bile acids after 4 h HD compared with control, which were also superior to albumin-based HD. Finally, the highest dialysis efficacy was always observed by their synergy whether in vitro or in vivo . These findings highlight that FFA displacement-based HD could efficiently improve the dialytic removal of bilirubin and bile acids, which might even be more efficient than albumin-based HD. Their synergy may represent a promising strategy to maximize the removal of circulating bilirubin and bile acids accumulated in liver failure.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in liver failure

The multi-organ failure syndrome associated with acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is thought to be mediated by overwhelming systemic inflammation triggered by both microbial and non-microbial factors. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been proven to be an efficacious therapy in autoimmune conditions and altered immunity, with more recent data supporting its use in the management of liver failure. Few therapies have been shown to improve survival in critically ill patients with liver failure who are not expected to survive until liver transplantation (LT), who are ineligible for LT or who have no access to LT. TPE has been shown to reduce the levels of inflammatory cytokines, modulate adaptive immunity with the potential to lessen the susceptibility to infections, and reduce the levels of albumin-bound and water-bound toxins in liver failure. In patients with acute liver failure, high volume TPE has been shown to reduce the vasopressor requirement and improve survival, particularly in patients not eligible for LT. Standard volume TPE has also been shown to reduce mortality in certain sub-populations of patients with ACLF. TPE may be most favorably employed as a bridge to LT in patients with ACLF. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and technical considerations of TPE in both acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Uncertainty in the impact of liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of artificial and bioartificial liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is still controversial. We aimed to perform the first network meta-analysis comparing and ranking different liver support systems and standard medical therapy (SMT) in patients with ACLF.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020155850). A systematic search was conducted in five databases. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of artificial or bioartificial liver support systems on survival in patients with ACLF. Ranking was performed by calculating the surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values. The RoB2 tool and a modified GRADE approach were used for the assessment of the risk of bias and quality of evidence (QE).

RESULTS

In the quantitative synthesis 16 trials were included, using MARS®, Prometheus®, ELAD®, plasma exchange (PE) and BioLogic-DT®. Overall (OS) and transplant-free (TFS) survival were assessed at 1 and 3 months. PE significantly improved 3-month OS compared to SMT (RR 0.74, CrI: 0.6-0.94) and ranked first on the cumulative ranking curves for both OS outcomes (SUCRA: 86% at 3 months; 77% at 1 month) and 3-month TFS (SUCRA: 87%) and second after ELAD for 1-month TFS (SUCRA: 76%). Other comparisons did not reach statistical significance. QE was moderate for PE concerning 1-month OS and both TFS outcomes. Other results were of very low certainty.

CONCLUSION

PE seems to be the best currently available liver support therapy in ACLF regarding 3-month OS. Based on the low QE, randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings for already existing options and to introduce new devices.

MARS: Should I Use It?

Severe liver failure, including acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, is associated with high mortality, and many patients die despite aggressive medical therapy. While liver transplantation is a viable treatment option for liver failure patients, a large proportion of these patients die given the shortage in the liver donation and the severity of illness, leading to death while waiting for a liver transplant. Extracorporeal liver support devices, including molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), have been developed as bridge to transplantation (bridge for patients who are decompensating while waiting for liver transplantation) and bridge to recovery (for whom recovery is deemed reasonable). In addition to its uses in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, the MARS system has also been applied in various clinical settings, such as drug overdosing and poisoning and intractable cholestatic pruritus refractory to pharmacological treatment. This review aims to discuss the controversies, potential benefits, practicalities, and disadvantages of using MARS in clinical practice.

Comparison of albumin dialysis devices molecular adsorbent recirculating system and ADVanced Organ Support system in critically ill patients with liver failure-A retrospective analysis

Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) represents a supplemental therapy for patients with liver failure. Most experience was gained with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). However, the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system was recently introduced. This study aims to compare effects of MARS and ADVOS on biochemical and clinical parameters in critically ill patients with liver failure using a retrospective analysis of ECAD at Jena University Hospital. Laboratory parameters, health scoring values, and need for transfusion were recorded before and after treatment. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for repeated measurements of multiple ECAD cycles per patient. Between 2012 and 2017, n = 75 MARS and n = 58 ADVOS cycles were evaluated. Although ADVOS runs significantly longer, both devices provided comparable reduction rates of bilirubin (MARS: -48 [-80.5 to -18.5] μmol/L vs ADVOS: -35 [-87.8 to -2.0] μmol/L, P = .194), a surrogate for detoxification capacity, while urea and lactate levels were more significantly lowered by the ADVOS system. In cycles with similar treatment times, both systems provided comparable reduction rates for bilirubin, renal replacement, coagulation, and metabolic parameters. Citrate was the preferred anticoagulant in case of bleeding. Neither bleeding tendency nor fibrinogen levels or platelets were altered by the type of anticoagulation. No adverse events were reported, but two sessions (one MARS and one ADVOS) were terminated early due to filter clotting. Experience is needed in the application of ADVOS and more prospective trials comparing the detoxification capacity of ECAD devices are needed to support and enlarge the findings of the current evaluation.

An evaluation of the usefulness of extracorporeal liver support techniques in patients with severe liver dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

The mortality rate in patients with severe liver dysfunction with no option of transplantation is unacceptably high. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of applying extracorporeal liver support (ECLS) techniques in this group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from hospital admissions of 101 patients with severe liver dysfunction who were admitted to the department of Anaesthesiology and intensive therapy between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. The study group was divided into two subgroups. Standard Medical therapy (SMT) was a subgroup of patients receiving standard Medical therapy, and SMT + ECLS was a subgroup containing patients receiving standard medical therapy complemented by at least one extracorporeal liver support procedure.

RESULTS

Significantly lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and 30-day mortality rates were found in the SMT + ECLS subgroup (p = 0.0138 and p = 0.0238 respectively). No difference in 3-month mortality was identified between the two groups. In a multivariate model, independent risk factors for ICU mortality proved to be the SOFA score and prothrombin time. The highest discriminatory power for ICU mortality was demonstrated for the SOFA score, followed by APACHE II, SAPS II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores. For 30-day mortality, however, the best discriminatory power was shown for the SAPS II score, followed by SOFA, APACHE II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to assess the contribution of non-biological extracorporeal liver support procedures to a decrease in mortality rates in the population of patients with severe liver dysfunction.

Prometheus therapy for the treatment of acute liver failure in patients after cardiac surgery

Introduction

Acute liver failure usually develops in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and significantly increases the mortality risk in patients after cardiac surgery.

Aim

To assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal liver support in patients with acute liver failure after cardiac surgery.

Material and methods

We studied 39 adult patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and acute liver failure as postoperative complication, treated with Prometheus therapy. Inclusion criteria comprised clinical and laboratory signs of acute liver failure. Criteria to start Prometheus therapies were: serum bilirubin above 180 µmol/l (reference values: 3-17 µmol/l), hepatocyte cytolysis syndrome (at least 2-fold increase in aspartate aminotranspherase and alanine aminotranspherase concentrations; reference values 10-40 U/l) and decrease in plasma cholinesterase (reference values 4490-13 320 U/l).

Results

Extracorporeal therapy provided stabilization of hemodynamics, decrease in serum total bilirubin and unconjugated bilirubin levels, decrease in cytolysis syndrome severity and positive effect on the synthetic function of the liver. The 28-day survival rate in the group treated with Prometheus therapy was 23%.

Conclusions

Prometheus procedures could be recommended as a part of combined intensive care in patients with acute liver failure after cardiac and major vessel surgery. The efficiency of this method could be improved by a multi-factor evaluation of patient condition in order to determine indications for its use.

Extracorporeal liver support devices for listed patients

An alternative to liver transplantation for patients with liver failure remains an unmet need. In acute liver failure, the ideal extracorporeal liver support device (ELSD) would replace the functions of the failing liver in order to permit spontaneous recovery, given the incredible regenerative potential of the liver, negating the need for transplantation. In acute-on-chronic liver failure, an ELSD would ideally support hepatic function until a recovery to liver function before acute decompensation or until liver transplantation. In decompensated cirrhosis, an ELSD could again be used to support hepatic function until transplant. In addition, ELSDs may have the potential to treat the multiorgan failure that accompanies liver failure including hepatic encephalopathy, renal failure, and immune dysfunction or indeed potential to promote liver regeneration. Creation of an extracorporeal bioartificial liver able to completely replace liver function remains an unmet need. This review will describe a number of technologies suitable for clinical trials in humans, which have resulted from decades of engineering and biological research to develop a bioreactor able to adequately sustain functional hepatocytes. In addition, this review will describe artificial liver support devices that are primarily designed to replace the detoxifying functions of the liver and will consider the current data available or studies required to support their use in liver failure patients on the transplant waiting list. Liver Transplantation 22 839-848 2016 AASLD.

Peritoneal Albumin Dialysis as a Novel Approach for Liver Support: Study in a Porcine Model of Acute Hepatic Failure

Artificial liver support gained considerable interest in recent years due to the development of various albumin dialysis systems, which prolong survival of some patients with acute liver failure (ALF). Τhis study aims to examine the role of peritoneal albumin dialysis in a postoperative ALF model. ALF was induced in 14 female Landrace pigs by a combination of major liver resection (70-75% of total parenchyma) and ischemic-reperfusion injury on the liver remnant. Animals were randomly divided in two groups (n = 7 each). Both were monitored for 12 h of reperfusion and received peritoneal dialysis for 6 h, beginning 6 h after reperfusion. The albumin group received an albumin-rich solution and the control group received albumin-free solution. The control group gradually developed intracranial hypertension, whereas, in the albumin group, rise in the intracranial pressure was substantially attenuated (P < 0.01, t = 12 h). Albumin-treated animals had significantly lower levels of ammonia (P < 0.01), total bile acids (P < 0.01), free fatty acids (P < 0.05), lactate (P < 0.01), and total bilirubin (P < 0.05). Liver malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl were significantly reduced (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001 at t = 12 h) after albumin dialysis. Results suggest that this method may become a useful adjunct in the management of ALF, thus, justifying further study.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system and single-pass albumin dialysis in liver failure--a prospective, randomised crossover study

Background

The aim of extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) is to reduce endogenous toxins accumulating in liver failure. To date, ECAD is conducted mainly with the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS). However, single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the two devices with a prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority crossover study design with particular focus on reduction of bilirubin levels (primary endpoint) and influence on paraclinical and clinical parameters (secondary endpoints) associated with liver failure.

Methods

Patients presenting with liver failure were screened for eligibility and after inclusion were randomly assigned to be started on either conventional MARS or SPAD (with 4 % albumin and a dialysis flow rate of 700 ml/h). Statistical analyses were based on a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

Sixty-nine crossover cycles of ECAD in 32 patients were completed. Both systems significantly reduced plasma bilirubin levels to a similar extent (MARS: median −68 μmol/L, interquartile range [IQR] −107.5 to −33.5, p = 0.001; SPAD: −59 μmol/L, −84.5 to +36.5, p = 0.001). However, bile acids (MARS: −39 μmol/L, −105.6 to −8.3, p < 0.001; SPAD: −9 μmol/L, −36.9 to +11.4, p = 0.131), creatinine (MARS: −24 μmol/L, −46.5 to −8.0, p < 0.001; SPAD: −2 μmol/L, −9.0 to +7.0/L, p = 0.314) and urea (MARS: −0.9 mmol/L, −1.93 to −0.10, p = 0.024; SPAD: −0.1 mmol/L, −1.0 to +0.68, p = 0.523) were reduced and albumin-binding capacity was increased (MARS: +10 %, −0.8 to +20.9 %, p < 0.001; SPAD: +7 %, −7.5 to +15.5 %, p = 0.137) only by MARS. Cytokine levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 and hepatic encephalopathy were altered by neither MARS nor SPAD.

Conclusions

Both procedures were safe for temporary extracorporeal liver support. While in clinical practice routinely assessed plasma bilirubin levels were reduced by both systems, only MARS affected other paraclinical parameters (i.e., serum bile acids, albumin-binding capacity, and creatinine and urea levels). Caution should be taken with regard to metabolic derangements and electrolyte disturbances, particularly in SPAD using regional citrate anti-coagulation.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (www.drks.de) DRKS00000371. Registered 8 April 2010.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1159-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Liver depurative techniques: a single liver transplantation center experience

BACKGROUND

In a liver transplant (LT) center, treatments with Prometheus were evaluated. The main outcome considered was 1 and 6 months survival.

METHODS

During the study period, 74 patients underwent treatment with Prometheus; 64 were enrolled, with a mean age of 51 ± 13 years; 47 men underwent 212 treatments (mean, 3.02 per patient). The parameters evaluated were age, sex, laboratorial (liver enzymes, ammonia) and clinical (model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score) data.

RESULTS

Death was verified in 23 patients (35.9%) during the hospitalization period, 20 patients (31.3%) were submitted to liver transplantation, and 21 were discharged. LT was performed in 4 patients with acute liver failure (ALF, 23.7%), in 7 patients with acute on chronic liver failure (AoCLF, 43.7%), and in 6 patients with liver disease after LT (30%). Seven patients who underwent LT died (35%). In the multivariate analysis, older age (P = .015), higher international normalized ratio (INR) (P = .019), and acute liver failure (P = .039) were independently associated with an adverse 1-month clinical outcome. On the other hand, older age (P = .011) and acute kidney injury (P = .031) at presentation were both related to worse 6-month outcome. For patients with ALF and AoCLF we did not observe the same differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, older age was the most important parameter defining 1- and 6-month survival, although higher INR and presence of ALF were important for 1-month survival and AKI for 6-month survival. No difference was observed between patients who underwent LT or did not have LT.

Available extracorporeal treatments for poisoning: overview and limitations

Poisoning is a significant public health problem. In severe cases, extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) may be required to prevent or reverse major toxicity. Available ECTRs include intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis, intermittent hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration, continuous renal replacement therapy, hemoperfusion, therapeutic plasma exchange, exchange transfusion, peritoneal dialysis, albumin dialysis, cerebrospinal fluid exchange, and extracorporeal life support. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the technical aspects, as well as the potential indications and limitations of the different ECTRs used for poisoned patients.

Development of high-efficiency molecular adsorbent recirculating system: preliminary report

Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) is a liver support system widely employed in the treatment of liver failure. The method is normally well tolerated. To develop a liver support system combining high efficiency and tolerability, we modified the MARS albumin circuit with the insertion of double adsorption units in parallel. Four patients have been treated with this modified method (high-efficiency MARS, HE MARS): two had very high serum bilirubin and two had very high total bile acids. After a single MARS session bilirubin was reduced more with HE MARS than standard MARS (from 27.6 to 52.3% in patient A and from 27.9 to 49.1% in patient B), and bile acid reduction increased from 40 to 59.8% in patient C and from 39.9 to 60% in patient D. The results of this preliminary investigation in only a very small number of patients do support the possibility of developing a liver support system that combines good tolerability and high efficacy.

Extracorporeal detoxification for hepatic failure using molecular adsorbent recirculating system: depurative efficiency and clinical results in a long-term follow-up

Acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure still show a poor prognosis. The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) has been extensively used as the most promising detoxifying therapy for patients with these conditions. Sixty-four patients with life-threatening liver failure were selected, and 269 MARS treatments were carried out as a bridge for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or for liver function recovery. All patients were grouped according to the aim of MARS therapy. Group A consisted of 47 patients treated for liver function recovery (median age 59 years, range 23-82). Group B consisted of 11 patients on the waiting list who underwent OLT (median age 47 years, range 32-62). Group C consisted of 6 patients on the waiting list who did not undergo OLT (median age 45.5 years, range 36-54, P = 0.001). MARS depurative efficiency in terms of liver toxins, cytokines, and growth factors was assessed together with the clinical outcome of the patients during a 1-year follow-up. Total bilirubin reduction rate per session (RRs) for each MARS session was 23% (range 17-29); direct bilirubin RRs was 28% (21-35), and indirect bilirubin RRs was 8% (3-21). Ammonia RRs was 34% (12-86). Conjugated cholic acid RRs was 58% (48-61); chenodeoxycholic acid RRs was 34% (18-48). No differences were found between groups. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) values on starting MARS were 4.1 ng/mL (1.9-7.9) versus 7.9 ng/mL (3.2-14.1) at MARS end (P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis to determine the risk factors predicting patient outcomes showed that age, male gender, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (but not Model for End-stage Liver Disease score) were factors predicting death, whereas the number of MARS sessions and the ΔHGF proved protective factors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also used; after 12 months, 21.3% of patients in Group A survived, while 90.9% were alive in Group B and 16.7% in Group C (log rank = 0.002). In conclusion, MARS was clinically well tolerated by all patients and significantly reduced hepatic toxins. Better survival rates were linked to an OLT program, but patients' clinical characteristics on starting MARS therapy were the main factors predicting survival. The role of HGF should be evaluated in larger clinical trials.

Long-term therapy of a patient with summerskill-walshe-tygstrup syndrome by applying prometheus® liver dialysis: a case report

Summerskill-Walshe-Tygstrup syndrome is a rare benign chronic liver disease characterized by recurring cholestasis with jaundice and severe pruritus. Due to insufficient conservative treatment, liver dialysis by Prometheus^® was applied to a 45-year-old female patient with resistant pruritus. Initially, other possible liver diseases were excluded and the patient was treated symptomatically since the diagnosis of Summerskill-Walshe-Tygstrup was stated in 1998. As conservative and endoscopic methods progressively failed to relieve the patient's suffering, Prometheus^® liver dialysis was performed regularly since 2006 at 3-month intervals and successfully led to a decrease in the patient's symptoms. Cholestatic liver enzymes and also serum bile acids could be lowered significantly from an average of 22.5 ± 2.7 to 7.3 ± 1.7 µmol/l. Consequently, Prometheus^® liver dialysis may be a beneficial option for patients with benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis suffering from therapy-resistant symptoms and may be used as well as other extracorporeal liver support devices which have already been reported to improve cholestatic pruritus.

Clearing of toxic substances: are there differences between the available liver support devices?

Toxins accumulating in liver failure split into water solved (e.g. ammonia) and albumin bound substances (e.g. bilirubin). Because the latter cannot be removed by conventional haemodialysis, special liver support systems have been developed. The majority of data concerning elimination efficiency exist for the cell-free devices Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and Prometheus, as they have been commercially available in Europe since many years. Overall, Prometheus provides higher clearances for most liver toxins, especially if they are tightly albumin bound. However, for bile acids and cytokines no such differences could be found. Single pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) can be assumed to be equally effective as MARS. None of the bioartificial liver support systems being developed is on the market today and published clearance data are scarce. In general, clearance efficiency for albumin bound substances is relatively low in all systems currently available. Besides optimizing biocompatibility and selectivity, future technologies should also focus on improved detoxification efficiency of liver support devices.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: extracorporeal liver assist devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a syndrome precipitated by acute liver injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, is associated with multiorgan dysfunction and high rates of mortality. Liver support systems have been developed in an attempt to improve survival of patients with ACLF by providing a bridge until recovery of the native liver function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nonbiological devices such as molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus) are effective in improving severe hepatic encephalopathy and cholestasis, have good safety and tolerability profiles and are frequently employed in patients with ACLD; however, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) failed to show improvement in survival. Biologic devices that incorporate hepatic cells in bioreactors are also under development. Recent data from pilot studies suggested improvement in survival rates in some groups of patients with ACLF; however, their effect on patient survival in RCT is still unknown.

SUMMARY

Liver support systems are safe and well tolerated when used in management of patients with ACLF. Their use should continue in controlled clinical trials to explore their role in bridging patients to liver transplantation or recovery in well defined patient groups.

[Evaluation of extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure. A systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to June 2009 in the Medline, Embase, HTA, DARE, NHSEED, Cochrane Library Plus, Clinical Trials Registry and HSRPROJ databases. Study selection was based on a series of previously established inclusion criteria related to the study design, population, type of intervention, language, and outcome measures.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients with acute liver failure or acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure treated with the MARS or Prometheus systems.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on safety, long-term survival, clinical effects and biochemical and hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

We selected 22 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus systems. Adequate evaluation of these techniques was hampered by the heterogeneity of the studies and their methodological limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal liver support systems are able to purify both hydrosoluble and protein-bound substances. However, current data show that only the MARS system reduces mortality in acute liver failure and in acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure, although this reduction is non-significant. These techniques can be considered safe, with adverse effects similar to those of the control group. Their main indication is severe liver failure, for short periods while the liver recovers or a liver transplant becomes available.

What clinical alternatives to whole liver transplantation? Current status of artificial devices and hepatocyte transplantation

Shortage of organ donors limits the number of possible liver transplantations. Alternative therapies for treatment of liver failure are currently being developed: (i) extracorporeal artificial liver devices; (ii) bioartificial liver devices using hepatocytes; and (iii) hepatocyte transplantation. The objective of these strategies is to bridge patients with liver failure until a suitable liver allograft is obtained for transplantation or the patient's own liver regenerates sufficiently to resume normal function. In this review, we discuss these strategies and summarize the current status of clinical experience.

Thermodynamic considerations in solid adsorption of bound solutes for patient support in liver failure

New detoxification modes of treatment for liver failure that use solid adsorbents to remove toxins bound to albumin in the patient bloodstream are entering clinical evaluations, frequently in head-to-head competition. While generally effective in reducing toxin concentration beyond that obtainable by conventional dialysis procedures, the solid adsorbent processes are largely the result of heuristic development. Understanding the principles and limitations inherent in competitive toxin binding, albumin versus solid adsorbent, will enhance the design process and, possibly, improve detoxification performance. An equilibrium thermodynamic analysis is presented for both the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and fractionated plasma separation, adsorption, and dialysis system (Prometheus), two advanced systems with distinctly different operating modes but with similar equilibrium limitations. The Prometheus analysis also applies to two newer approaches: sorbent suspension reactor and microsphere-based detoxification system. Primary results from the thermodynamic analysis are that: (i) the solute-albumin binding constant is of minor importance to equilibrium once it exceeds about 10(5) L/mol; (ii) the Prometheus approach requires larger solid adsorbent columns than calculated by adsorbent solute capacity alone; and (iii) the albumin-containing recycle stream in the MARS approach is a major reservoir of removed toxin. A survey of published results indicates that MARS is operating under mass transfer control dictated by solute-albumin equilibrium in the recycle stream, and Prometheus is approaching equilibrium limits under current clinical protocols.

The future of extracorporeal support

Extracorporeal therapy has expanded significantly over the past few decades from solely artificial renal replacement therapy. In patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, it becomes necessary to provide multiple organ support therapy. Technological advances have opened the door to a multifaceted intervention directed at supporting the function of multiple organs through the treatment of blood. Indications for "old" therapies such as hemofiltration and adsorption have been expanded, and using these therapies in combination further enhances blood detoxification capabilities. Furthermore, new devices are constantly in development. Nanotechnology allows us to refine membrane characteristics and design innovative monitoring/biofeedback devices. Miniaturization is leading down the path of wearable/implantable devices. With the incorporation of viable cells within medical devices, these instruments become capable not only of detoxification but synthetic functions as well, bringing us closer to the holy grail of complete replacement of organ function. This article provides a brief overview of current and future direction in extracorporeal support in the critical care setting.

Liver support devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver support devices are used either as a bridge to liver transplantation or liver recovery in patients with acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure. The review analyzes the recent literature and asks if the current enthusiasm for these devices is justified.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many liver support devices exist and are discussed. Clinical data on artificial devices are rapidly emerging, especially on the molecular adsorbents recirculating system, and fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus). While hepatic encephalopathy is improved by the molecular adsorbents recirculating system and probably Prometheus too, neither system has been shown to improve survival. Less clinical data exist for bioartificial support devices. These may use human hepatocytes, such as the extracorporeal liver assist device, although most devices use porcine hepatocytes, such as HepatAssist.

SUMMARY

Enthusiasm in liver support devices is justified as many nonrandomized studies have suggested some biochemical and clinical benefits. The results of several ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trials are anxiously awaited. Meanwhile, because mortality without liver transplantation remains high despite the use of liver support devices, these devices should only be used in the research setting or by experts proficient in their use and as a bridge to liver transplantation rather than liver recovery.

Effect of extracorporeal liver support by MARS and Prometheus on serum cytokines in acute-on-chronic liver failure

Introduction

Cytokines are believed to play an important role in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Extracorporeal liver support systems may exert beneficial effects in ACLF via removal of cytokines. At present, two systems are commercially available, the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS™) and Fractionated Plasma Separation, Adsorption and Dialysis (Prometheus™). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MARS and Prometheus treatments on serum cytokine levels and their clearances.

Methods

Eight patients with ACLF underwent alternating treatments with either MARS or Prometheus in a randomized cross-over design. Thirty-four treatments (17 MARS, 17 Prometheus) were available for analysis. Serum cytokines were measured before and after each treatment, and cytokine clearance was calculated from paired arterial and venous samples and effective plasma flow one hour after the start of treatment.

Results

Baseline serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and soluble TNF-α receptor 1 were significantly elevated in patients with ACLF. Measurable plasma clearances were detected for all cytokines tested, but no significant changes in serum levels of any cytokine were found after treatments with MARS or Prometheus. In MARS treatments, IL-10 was cleared from plasma more efficiently than IL-6. Clearance of IL-10 was higher in Prometheus than in MARS treatments.

Conclusion

Cytokines are cleared from plasma by both MARS and Prometheus, but neither system is able to change serum cytokine levels. This discrepancy is probably due to a high rate of cytokine production in patients with ACLF.