Assessment and implication of the allergic sensitivity to a single dose of recombinant human hyaluronidase injection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

The Use of Hyaluronidase in Aesthetic Practice: A Comparative Study of Practitioner Usage in Elective and Emergency Situations

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acids (HAs) continue to be the fillers of choice worldwide and their popularity is growing. Adverse events (AEs) are able to be resolved through the use of hyaluronidase (HYAL). However, routine HYAL use has been at issue due to perceived safety issues.

OBJECTIVES

There are currently no guidelines on the use of HYAL in aesthetic practice, leading to variability in storage, preparation, skin testing, and beliefs concerning AEs. This manuscript interrogated the use of this agent in daily practice.

METHODS

A 39-question survey concerning HYAL practice was completed by 264 healthcare practitioners: 244 from interrogated databases and 20 from the consensus panel. Answers from those in the database were compared to those of the consensus panel.

RESULTS

Compared to the database group, the consensus group was more confident in the preparation of HYAL, kept reconstituted HYAL for longer, and was less likely to skin test for HYAL sensitivity and more likely to treat with HYAL in an emergency, even in those with a wasp or bee sting anaphylactic history. Ninety-two percent of all respondents had never observed an acute reaction to HYAL. Just over 1% of respondents had ever observed anaphylaxis. Five percent of practitioners reported longer-term adverse effects, including 3 respondents who reported loss of deep tissues. Consent before injecting HA for the possible requirement of HYAL was always obtained by 74% of practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyaluronidase would appear to be an essential agent for anyone injecting hyaluronic acid filler. However, there is an absence of evidence-based recommendations with respect to the concentration, dosing, and treatment intervals of HYAL, and these should ideally be available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5

Use of Minimal Amounts of Hyaluronidase in the Ultrasound-Guided Treatment of Acute Vascular Occlusion by Hyaluronic Acid: A Preliminary Report

Background

Complications from hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are increasingly frequent, given the very high number of treatments performed every day worldwide. They are routinely treated with high doses of hyaluronidase, which can cause significant local and general unwanted effects.

Objectives

The aim of our work is to demonstrate that when the origin of the complication is precisely identified and treated under ultrasound guidance, a few hyaluronidase units are enough to treat it effectively.

Methods

Five young female patients came to our observation for vascular lesions from injection of HA fillers performed in the immediately preceding days, in 4 cases, and a few weeks earlier in the fifth case. All lesions were accurately identified by ultrasound and treated with hyaluronidase.

Results

The 4 promptly treated patients fully recovered with a hyaluronidase dose of 87 ± 44 IU (range, 30-150 IU). The fifth patient, treated later, markedly improved regarding clinical picture and symptoms. No early or late side effects have been reported from this hyaluronidase dosage.

Conclusions

Our data confirm that if the lesion at the origin of the skin damage is precisely localized with ultrasound examination and treated under ultrasound guidance, a few units of hyaluronidase, injected directly into the HA accumulation, effectively resolve the skin damage. At the doses we used, which were much lower than those usually recommended, hyaluronidase proved to be not only effective but also free of any side effects.

Level of Evidence 5

Allergic Complications of Hyaluronidase Injection: Risk Factors, Treatment Strategies, and Recommendations for Management

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronidase is used as a reversal agent for hyaluronic acid fillers and to increase the diffusion of other medications after infiltration. Cases of hyaluronidase allergy have been described in the literature since 1984. However, it is still frequently misdiagnosed. This review aims to summarize the current literature to describe the clinical picture of hyaluronidase allergy and identify any risk factors associated with its development, as well as provide recommendations for management in plastic surgery.

METHODS

A digital search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases was performed by two reviewers following the PRISMA guidelines. This search identified 247 articles.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-seven articles were identified, and 37 of them met the eligibility criteria. One hundred six patients with a mean age of 54.2 years were included in these studies. History of allergy to other substances (timothy grass, egg white, horse serum, penicillin, insect bites, wasp venom, thimerosal, potassium, histamine, phenylmercuric acetate, and nickel) and allergic diseases (asthma, dermatitis, atopy, rhinitis) was reported. A large portion of the patients with a history of repeated exposure (2-4) experienced the symptoms with their second injection. Nonetheless, there was no significant association between time to allergy development and the number of exposures (P = 0.3). Treatment with steroids +/- antihistamines resulted in the rapid and predominantly complete reversal of the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior injections or sensitization by insect/wasp venom might be the primary factor associated with hyaluronidase allergy development. The time between the repeated injections is not a likely contributor to the presentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Risk Factors, Hyaluronidase Expression, and Clinical Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase PH20, an Enzyme Enabling Subcutaneous Drug Administration

Multiple FDA-approved and clinical-development stage therapeutics include recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) to facilitate subcutaneous administration. As rHuPH20-reactive antibodies potentially interact with endogenous PH20, we investigated rHuPH20 immunogenicity risk through hyaluronidase tissue expression, predicted B cell epitopes, CD4+ T cell stimulation indices and related these to observed clinical immunogenicity profiles from 18 clinical studies. Endogenous hyaluronidase PH20 expression in humans/mice was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative RT-PCR, and deep RNA-Seq. rHuPH20 potential T cell epitopes were evaluated in silico and confirmed in vitro. Potential B cell epitopes were predicted for rHuPH20 sequence in silico, and binding of polyclonal antibodies from various species tested on a rHuPH20 peptide microarray. Clinical immunogenicity data were collected from 2643 subjects. From 57 human adult and fetal tissues previously screened by RT-PCR, 22 tissue types were analyzed by deep RNA-Seq. Hyaluronidase PH20 messenger RNA expression was detected in adult human testes. In silico analyses of the rHuPH20 sequence revealed nine T cell epitope clusters with immunogenic potential, one cluster was homologous to human leukocyte antigen. rHuPH20 induced T cell activation in 6-10% of peripheral blood mononuclear cell donors. Fifteen epitopes in the rHuPH20 sequence had the potential to cross-react with B cells. The cumulative treatment-induced incidence of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies across clinical studies was 8.8%. Hyaluronidase PH20 expression occurs primarily in adult testes. Low CD4+ T cell activation and B cell cross-reactivity by rHuPH20 suggest weak rHuPH20 immunogenicity potential. Restricted expression patterns of endogenous PH20 indicate low immunogenicity risk of subcutaneous rHuPH20.

Hyaluronidase for Treating Complications Related to HA Fillers: A National Plastic Surgeon Survey

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have become a popular modality to address changes in the ageing face. There are many described indications of hyaluronidases in aesthetic medicine which include their use in the management of HA-associated complications. To better understand the current practice patterns, we surveyed Canadian plastic surgeons on their use of hyaluronidases. Methods: With the approval of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, an electronic survey was emailed to members. A total of 350 surveys were distributed and 98 surveys were completed for a response rate of 28%. Results: Approximately half (48%) of the survey respondents used HA fillers in their practice. Skin testing for hypersensitivity reactions was performed by less than 10% of hyaluronidase users. Nearly all respondents used hyaluronidase for filler over-correction (95.5%) and asymmetry (86.4%). Over half of the respondents have used hyaluronidase for inflammatory or infectious nodules and the Tyndall effect. Other reported applications included restoration of vascular compromise, and one respondent reported using hyaluronidase for assisting with haematoma resolution. When compared with the most recent guidelines, there was a wide range of doses used for common side effects and complications. Twenty-four percent of the respondents reported that their hyaluronidase formulation was prepared by a compounding pharmacy, and 20% of respondents who inject HA fillers did not stock hyaluronidase. Conclusion: There are many indications for hyaluronidase in aesthetic plastic surgery. Plastic surgeons should stock hyaluronidase and develop a specific plan in anticipation of adverse events. Although hyaluronidase is commonly used by plastic surgeons for over-correction and asymmetry, the dosages used in aesthetic practice is rather diverse and heterogeneous. When possible, plastic surgeons should perform allergy testing before hyaluronidase use.

Safety of recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 for subcutaneous drug delivery

INTRODUCTION

The glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan forms a gel-like substance, which presents a barrier to bulk fluid flow in the subcutaneous (SC) space, limiting SC drug delivery volume and administration rates. Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) acts locally to temporarily remove this barrier, facilitating rapid SC delivery of large volumes and/or high doses of sequentially or co-administered therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED

An extensive clinical and post-marketing dataset of safety and immunogenicity of rHuPH20 in its current applications with approved therapeutics demonstrates that rHuPH20 acts locally, without measurable systemic absorption at the SC doses used in the approved products, and is well tolerated in combination with several co-administered therapeutic agents across diverse patient groups. The immunogenicity profile demonstrates no adverse effects associated with treatment-emergent rHuPH20 antibody responses. Immunogenicity to monoclonal antibodies co-formulated with rHuPH20 shows no clinical difference between SC and intravenous administration. Safety assessments of patient subsets for special populations, including children, elderly patients, and pregnant women, raise no additional safety concerns.

EXPERT OPINION

The benefits of SC administration for patients and healthcare systems often outweigh those of intravenous administration, driving future initiation of SC-only drug development programs. Injection devices allowing large-volume SC administration could be facilitated by incorporating co-formulated biologics containing rHuPH20.

Dispersive effects and focused biodistribution of recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20: A locally acting and transiently active permeation enhancer

Background

Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) facilitates the dispersion and absorption of subcutaneously administered therapeutic agents. This study aimed to characterize the transient, local action of rHuPH20 in the subcutaneous (SC) space using focused biodistribution and dye dispersion studies conducted in mice.

Materials and methods

To evaluate the biodistribution of rHuPH20, mice were intradermally administered rHuPH20 (80 U). The enzymatic activity of rHuPH20 was analyzed in the skin, lymph nodes, and plasma. Animal model sensitivity was determined by intravenous administration of rHuPH20 (80 U) to the tail vein. To evaluate local dispersion, mice received an intradermal injection of rHuPH20 followed by an intradermal injection of Trypan Blue dye at a contralateral site 45 minutes later. Dye dispersion was measured using a digital caliper.

Results

After intradermal rHuPH20 injection, enzymatic activity was detected within the skin near the injection site with levels decreasing rapidly after 15 minutes. There was no clear evidence of systemic exposure after administration of rHuPH20, and no discernible rHuPH20 activity was observed in lymph or plasma as a function of time after dosing. In the dye dispersion study, delivery of rHuPH20 at one site did not impact dye dispersion at a distal skin site.

Conclusion

These observations support the classification of rHuPH20 as a transiently active and locally acting permeation enhancer.

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology Supports the Bridging from i.v. Dosing and Approval of s.c. Rituximab in B-Cell Hematological Malignancies

A fixed-dose subcutaneous (s.c.) formulation of the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, has been developed to address safety, infusion time, and patient comfort concerns relating to intravenous (i.v.) dosing, and has been approved based upon a pharmacokinetic (PK)-clinical bridging strategy, which demonstrated noninferiority of s.c. vs. i.v. dosing in malignancies, including follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A clinical development plan was undertaken to identify rituximab s.c. doses achieving noninferior exposure to rituximab i.v., and to confirm PK-clinical bridging, with the same efficacy and similar safety. This drew upon data from 1,579 patients with FL, CLL, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 5 clinical studies, and showed minimum steady-state serum concentration (C_trough ) as the most appropriate exposure bridging measure. Population PK models were developed, simulations were run using covariates and PK parameters from clinical studies, and exposure-efficacy and -safety analyses performed. Population PKs showed a two-compartment model with time-dependent and -independent clearances. Clearance and volume were predominantly influenced by body surface area; disposition and elimination were similar for the s.c. and i.v. formulations. After s.c. administration, patients with FL and CLL achieved noninferior exposures to i.v. dosing. Overall, rituximab exposure and route of administration did not influence clinical responses in patients with FL or CLL, and there was no association between exposure and safety events. C_trough was shown to be an effective pharmacologic-clinical bridging parameter for rituximab in patients with FL or CLL. Clinically effective exposures are achieved with either s.c. or i.v. dosing.

Use of computed tomography to assess subcutaneous drug dispersion with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in a swine model

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of therapeutics with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) are currently approved across various disease indications. The rHuPH20-mediated enzymatic degradation of SC hyaluronan (HA) facilitates bulk fluid flow and dispersion of co-administered therapeutics. However, current methods of quantifying dispersion in the SC space are limited. Here, a novel method is outlined to quantify and follow rapid SC volumetric dispersion of a representative therapeutic fluid in the presence of rHuPH20 using computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Ten Yucatan miniature swine were randomized to three groups. Animals received simultaneous infusions of contrast agent (CA) alone (left side of the animal) or in combination with rHuPH20 (right side) at infusion rates of 2.5, 5, or 10 mL/min. Spiral CT scans (1.5 mm thickness) were conducted before and after the infusion and at regular time intervals throughout. Scans were used to create three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the fluid pockets and analyze surface area, volume, and sphericity.

RESULTS

3D reconstruction showed increased dispersion of CA with rHuPH20 compared with CA alone, with fenestration and increased dispersion in the craniocaudal and lateromedial directions. The CA with rHuPH20 fluid pockets showed an average increase of 46% in surface area (p = 0.001), a 35% increase in volume (p = 0.001) and a 17% decrease in sphericity post-infusion compared with CA alone at 30 min post-infusion.

DISCUSSION

This exploratory study confirms the value of CT imaging as a non-invasive method of assessing real-time spatial and temporal behavior of SC-administered fluids. This technique could help to assess the dispersion pattern of novel rHuPH20 SC co-formulations.

Clinical Practice Experience with HyQvia in Adults Using Alternative Dosing Regimens and Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

HyQvia (Immune Globulin Infusion 10% [Human] with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase) was developed to combine the advantages of intravenous and subcutaneous immune globulin (SCIG), allowing administration of larger volumes at a single subcutaneous site with less frequent dosing when compared to other SCIG products. Current US prescribing guidelines for HyQvia are limited to adults and do not encompass the flexibility required to achieve success in all patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID).

Methods

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical experience of treating patients with PID with HyQvia regimens outside of package insert recommendations as well as in pediatric patients. Data were abstracted from 38 patient records (317 HyQvia infusions), including five patients less than 16 years of age, from seven US immunology clinics.

Results

Among 37 patients receiving HyQvia regimens differing from prescribing guidelines, the most notable variations included shorter ramp-up periods, use of two rather than one infusion site, and slower than maximal infusion rates to mitigate local adverse events (AEs). The medication volume infused for single site doses ranged from 75 to 200 mL and doses split between two sites ranged from 100 to 750 mL. The most common type of regimen variation was a condensed ramp-up phase (shorter schedule, higher doses), and 96% (24/25) of patients managed in this way completed ramp-up. The most common ramp-up schedule was three infusions (one at 25–45%, another at 50–75%, and the final at 100% of target dose) spread over 2–4 weeks.

Conclusions

A shorter ramp-up schedule did not appear to increase the number of AEs compared to standard ramp-up schedules. For patients with AEs, slower infusion rates and the use of two sites may improve medication tolerability. Four of five pediatric patients reported no AEs, and only one discontinued, stating a fear of needles. HyQvia may be tailored to adults requiring alternative rates, ramp-up, and/or dosing regimens and may be especially well-suited to children.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01264-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical Applications of Hyaluronidase

Hyaluronidases are enzymes that degrade hyaluronic acid, which constitutes an essential part of the extracellular matrix. Initially discovered in bacteria, hyaluronidases are known to be widely distributed in nature and have been found in many classes including insects, snakes, fish and mammals. In the human, six different hyaluronidases, HYAL1-4, HYAL-P1 and PH-20, have been identified. PH-20 exerts the strongest biologic activity, is found in high concentrations in the testicles and can be localized on the head and the acrosome of human spermatozoa. Today, animal-derived bovine or ovine testicular hyaluronidases as well as synthetic hyaluronidases are clinically applied as adjuncts to increase the bioavailability of drugs, for the therapy of extravasations, or for the management of complications associated with the aesthetic injection of hyaluronic acid-based fillers. Further applications in the fields of surgery, aesthetic medicine, immunology, oncology, and many others can be expected for years to come. Here, we give an overview over the molecular and cellular mode of action of hyaluronidase and the hyaluronic acid metabolism, as well as over current and potential future clinical applications of hyaluronidase.

ENHANZE® drug delivery technology: a novel approach to subcutaneous administration using recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20

ENHANZE^® drug delivery technology is based on the proprietary recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 enzyme (rHuPH20; Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.) that facilitates the subcutaneous (SC) delivery of co‐administered therapeutics. rHuPH20 works by degrading the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan (HA), which plays a role in resistance to bulk fluid flow in the SC space, limiting large volume SC drug delivery, dispersion, and absorption. Co-administration of rHuPH20 with partner therapies can overcome administration time and volume barriers associated with existing SC therapeutic formulations, and has been shown to reduce the burden on patients and healthcare providers compared with intravenous formulations. rHuPH20 (as HYLENEX^® recombinant) is currently FDA-approved for subcutaneous fluid administration for achieving hydration, to increase the dispersion and absorption of other injected drugs, and in subcutaneous urography for improving resorption of radiopaque agents. rHuPH20 is also co-formulated with two anticancer therapies, trastuzumab (i.e. Herceptin^® SC) and rituximab (i.e. RITUXAN HYCELA^®/RITUXAN^® SC/MabThera^® SC) and dosed sequentially with human immunoglobin to treat primary immunodeficiency (i.e. HyQvia^®/HYQVIA^®). This article reviews pharmaceutical properties of rHuPH20, its current applications with approved therapeutics, and the potential for future developments.

Collagenase-Encapsulated pH-Responsive Nanoscale Coordination Polymers for Tumor Microenvironment Modulation and Enhanced Photodynamic Nanomedicine

The abundant tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) could result in insufficient tumor retention and ineffective intratumor penetration of therapeutic agents as well as an acidic and hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes for many types of therapies. Therefore, developing strategies to modulate the TME by selectively degrading the condensed ECM may be helpful to improve existing cancer therapies. Herein, collagenase (CLG)-encapsulated nanoscale coordination polymers (NCPs) are synthesized based on Mn²⁺ and an acid-sensitive benzoic-imine organic linker and then modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG). Upon intravenous (iv) injection, these CLG@NCP-PEG nanoparticles show efficient accumulation within the tumor, in which CLG would be released because of the collapse of NCP structures within the acidic TME. The released CLG enzyme could then specifically degrade collagens, the major component of ECM, leading to a loosened ECM structure, enhanced tumor perfusion, and relieved hypoxia. As a result, the second wave of nanoparticles, chlorin e6 (Ce6)-loaded liposomes (liposome@Ce6), would exhibit enhanced retention and penetration within the tumor. Such phenomena together with relieved tumor hypoxia could then lead to greatly enhanced photodynamic therapeutic effect of liposome@Ce6 for mice pretreated with CLG@NCP-PEG. Our work thus presents a unique strategy for TME modulation using pH-responsive NCPs as smart enzyme carriers.

Subcutaneous rituximab with recombinant human hyaluronidase in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (MabThera^®/Rituxan^®) has been proven to improve outcomes in a range of B-cell malignancies. Initially developed as a formulation for intravenous infusion, administration times for rituximab can be prolonged and associated with infusion-related reactions, prompting a combined clinical development program investigating subcutaneous delivery in combination with recombinant human hyaluronidase. As this program comes to fruition, this article reviews the evidence demonstrating subcutaneous rituximab to have noninferior pharmacokinetics when delivered at a fixed-dose as well as equivalent clinical outcomes in the treatment of follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This mode of delivery is more preferable to patients and healthcare professionals and is associated with time and cost savings.

Hyaluronidase allergy mimicking orbital cellulitis

PURPOSE

Hyaluronidase enzyme is a common additive with local anesthetic agent to facilitate faster permeation of the anesthetic in periocular tissues during ophthalmic surgery. We report a series of five subjects presenting with clinical features mimicking orbital cellulitis following peribulbar anesthesia and consequently diagnosed with hyaluronidase hypersensitivity.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary eye care center in Southern India.

DESIGN

It was a retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the case records of patients diagnosed as and treated for hyaluronidase allergy from 2011 to 2015. The presenting features included periocular edema, proptosis, and restriction of ocular movements. The symptoms appeared immediately after the injection to as late as 6 days after the surgery. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, relevant investigations, and dermal allergy tests. All five patients tested positive for hyaluronidase. Patients were treated with antihistaminics, systemic steroids, and emergency orbital decompression, when required. In majority of the patients, symptoms resolved in 3-5 days. Clinically, hyaluronidase allergy may mimic orbital cellulitis, which in the context of a recent intraocular surgery may be alarming for both the patient and the surgeon. However, with prompt intervention, the prognosis is extremely favorable in cases of hyaluronidase allergy. It is important for ophthalmic surgeons and anesthetists to recognize and differentiate this entity from the more serious vision threatening conditions.

Subcutaneous Rituximab for the Treatment of B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies: A Review of the Scientific Rationale and Clinical Development

Rituximab (MabThera®/Rituxan®), a chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane antigen CD20, was the first therapeutic antibody to enter clinical practice for the treatment of cancer. As monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, rituximab has been shown to prolong progression-free survival and, in some indications overall survival, in patients with various B-cell malignancies, while having a well-established and manageable safety profile and a wide therapeutic window. As a result, rituximab is considered to have revolutionized treatment practices for patients with B-cell malignancies. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of rituximab has been developed, comprising the same monoclonal antibody as the originally marketed formulation [rituximab concentrate for solution for intravenous (IV) infusion], and has undergone a detailed, sequential clinical development program. This program demonstrated that, at fixed doses, rituximab SC achieves non-inferior serum trough concentrations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, with comparable efficacy and safety relative to the IV formulation. The added benefit of rituximab SC was demonstrated in dedicated studies showing that rituximab SC allows for simplified and shortened drug preparation and administration times resulting in a reduced treatment burden for patients as well as improved resource utilization (efficiency) at the treatment facility. The improved efficiency of delivering rituximab's benefit to patients may broaden patient access to rituximab therapy in areas with low levels of healthcare resources, including IV-chair capacity constraints. This article is a companion paper to G. Salles, et al., which is also published in this issue.

FUNDING

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion in primary immunodeficiency diseases

Most primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) resulting in antibody deficiency require intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIG) replacement therapy. The flow and distribution of SCIG to the vasculature is impeded by the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan in the extracellular matrix, which limits the infusion rate and volume per site, necessitating frequent infusions and multiple infusion sites. Hyaluronidase depolymerizes hyaluronan and is a spreading factor for injectable biologics. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) increases SCIG absorption and dispersion. In patients with PIDD, SCIG facilitated with rHuPH20 (IGHy) has been shown to prevent infections, be well-tolerated and reduce infusion frequency and number of infusion sites as compared with conventional SCIG. This article reviews IGHy clinical studies and real-world practice data in patients with PIDD.

Long-Term Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Infusion of Human Immunoglobulin for Primary Immunodeficiency

Purpose

Treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) with subcutaneous (SC) infusions of IgG preceded by injection of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) (IGHy) to increase SC tissue permeability was evaluated in two consecutive, prospective, non-controlled, multi-center studies.

Methods

Subjects >4 years of age received SC IgG replacement at a weekly dose equivalent of 108 % of their previous intravenous (IV) dose, facilitated by prior injection of 75 U/g IgG of rHuPH20. Starting with weekly SC infusions, the interval was increased (ramped-up) to a 3- or 4-week schedule.

Results

Eighty-three subjects (24 < 18 years; 59 ≥ 18 years) received 2729 infusions (excluding ramp-up) at a mean dose of 0.155 g/kg/week in the pivotal and 0.156 g/kg/week in the extension study. IGHy exposure exceeded 30 months in 48 subjects.

During 187.7 subject-years of IGHy exposure, 2005 adverse events (AEs) (10.68 per subject-year) occurred. The rate of related systemic AEs during consecutive 1-year periods remained low; the rate of related local AEs decreased from 3.68/subject-year in months 1–12 to approximately 1.50/subject-year after 30 months of treatment. Fifteen subjects transiently developed anti-rHuPH20 binding antibody. There was no difference in AE rates in these subjects before and after the first titer increase to ≥1:160.

The rate of infections during IGHy exposure was 2.99 per subject-year and did not increase during the studies. Annual infection rates were 3.02 in subjects <18 years and 2.98 in subjects ≥18 years.

Conclusions

Long-term replacement therapy with IGHy was safe and effective in 83 pediatric and adult subjects with PIDD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10875-016-0298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Orchestrating the Tumor Microenvironment to Improve Survival for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Normalization, Not Destruction

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The microenvironment of pancreatic cancer could be one of the "perfect storms" that support the growth of a cancer. Indeed, pancreatic cancer may be the poster child of a problem with the microenvironment. In this article, we review the rationale and attempts to date on modifying or targeting structural proteins in the microenvironment including hyaluronan (HA) (in primary and metastases), collagen, and SPARC (secreted protein, acidic, and rich in cysteine). Indeed, working in this area has produced a regimen that improves survival for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine). In addition, in initial clinical trials, PEGylated hyaluronidase appears promising. We also review a new approach that is different than targeting/destroying the microenvironment and that is orchestrating, reengineering, reprogramming, or normalizing the microenvironment (including normalizing structural proteins, normalizing an immunologically tumor-friendly environment to a less friendly environment, reversing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and so on). We believe this will be most effectively done by agents that have global effects on transcription. There is initial evidence that this can be done by agents such as vitamin D derivatives and other new agents. There is no doubt these opportunities can now be tried in the clinic with hopefully beneficial effects.

Complications in the Cosmetic Dermatology Patient: A Review and Our Experience (Part 1)

BACKGROUND

Over recent decades, the options available to patients for cosmetic rejuvenation have expanded dramatically. The range of options commonly available to patients now includes neuromodulators, fillers, sclerotherapy, chemical peels, liposculpture, lasers, and lights and other energy devices and continues to grow. As with all therapeutic interventions, these cosmetic dermatologic procedures are not without risk. Timely recognition of complications and intervention are paramount for optimal patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Part 1 of this review will focus on the common complications of injectable cosmetic procedures, such as neuromodulators, fillers, and sclerotherapy. The second part will discuss the complications of chemical peels, lasers, light and energy devices, and fat removal procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed on cosmetic dermatology complications from 1989 to 2015, and results are summarized. Practical considerations of these complications are also provided.

RESULTS

Reports of complications after neuromodulator, injectable hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid, polymethylmethacrylate, sclerotherapy, fat transfer, liposuction, cryolipolysis, chemical peels, lasers, and light sources, such as Q-switched laser, intense pulsed light, nonablative and ablative resurfacing lasers, were found.

CONCLUSION

Review of the literature revealed multiple management options for potential complications of the multitude of cosmetic dermatology procedures now available to patients.

Arthropod venom Hyaluronidases: biochemical properties and potential applications in medicine and biotechnology

Hyaluronidases are enzymes that mainly degrade hyaluronan, the major glycosaminoglycan of the interstitial matrix. They are involved in several pathological and physiological activities including fertilization, wound healing, embryogenesis, angiogenesis, diffusion of toxins and drugs, metastasis, pneumonia, sepsis, bacteremia, meningitis, inflammation and allergy, among others. Hyaluronidases are widely distributed in nature and the enzymes from mammalian spermatozoa, lysosomes and animal venoms belong to the subclass EC 3.2.1.35. To date, only five three-dimensional structures for arthropod venom hyaluronidases (Apis mellifera and Vespula vulgaris) were determined. Additionally, there are four molecular models for hyaluronidases from Mesobuthus martensii, Polybia paulista and Tityus serrulatus venoms. These enzymes are employed as adjuvants to increase the absorption and dispersion of other drugs and have been used in various off-label clinical conditions to reduce tissue edema. Moreover, a PEGylated form of a recombinant human hyaluronidase is currently under clinical trials for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. This review focuses on the arthropod venom hyaluronidases and provides an overview of their biochemical properties, role in the envenoming, structure/activity relationship, and potential medical and biotechnological applications.

Subcutaneous fluid and drug delivery: safe, efficient and inexpensive

Patients with difficult venous access or oral intolerance and clinical situations with inadequate response to oral therapy have generated the need for alternative routes of delivery for drugs and fluids.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review examining the evidence for subcutaneous (SC) administration of drugs and/or fluids.

We used a broad search strategy using electronic databases CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane library, key terms and ‘Medical Subject Headings’ (MeSH) such as ‘subcutaneous route’, ‘hypodermoclysis’ and the name/group of the most used drugs via this route (e.g. ‘ketorolac, morphine, ceftriaxone’, ‘analgesics, opioids, antibiotics’).

We conclude that the SC route is an effective alternative for rehydration in patients with mild–moderate dehydration and offers a number of potential advantages in appropriately selected scenarios. Experience of administering drugs by this route suggests that it is well tolerated and is associated with minimal side-effects.

Modulation of extracellular matrix in cancer is associated with enhanced tumor cell targeting by bacteriophage vectors

Background

Gene therapy has been an attractive paradigm for cancer treatment. However, cancer gene therapy has been challenged by the inherent limitation of vectors that are able to deliver therapeutic genes to tumors specifically and efficiently following systemic administration. Bacteriophage (phage) are viruses that have shown promise for targeted systemic gene delivery. Yet, they are considered poor vectors for gene transfer. Recently, we generated a tumor-targeted phage named adeno-associated virus/phage (AAVP), which is a filamentous phage particle whose genome contains the adeno-associated virus genome. Its effectiveness in delivering therapeutic genes to tumors specifically both in vitro and in vivo has been shown in numerous studies. Despite being a clinically useful vector, a multitude of barriers impede gene transduction to tumor cells. We hypothesized that one such factor is the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM).

Methods

We used a number of tumor cell lines from different species and histological types in 2D monolayers or 3D multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) models. To assess whether the ECM is a barrier to tumor cell targeting by AAVP, we depleted the ECM using collagenase, hyaluronidase, or combination of both. We employed multiple techniques to investigate and quantify the effect of ECM depletion on ECM composition (including collagen type I, hyaluronic acid, fibronectin and laminin), and how AAVP adsorption, internalisation, gene expression and therapeutic efficacy are subsequently affected. Data were analyzed using a student’s t test when comparing two groups or one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests when using more than two groups.

Results

We demonstrate that collagenase and hyaluronidase-mediated degradation of tumor ECM affects the composition of collagen, hyaluronic acid and fibronectin. Consequently, AAVP diffusion, internalisation, gene expression and tumor cell killing were enhanced after enzymatic treatment. Our data suggest that enhancement of gene transfer by the AAVP is solely attributed to ECM depletion. We provide substantial evidence that ECM modulation is relevant in clinically applicable settings by using 3D MCTS, which simulates in vivo environments more accurately.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that ECM depletion is an effective strategy to enhance the efficiency of viral vector-guided gene therapy.

Identification of highly concentrated dextrose solution (50% dextrose) extravasation and treatment--a clinical report

Treatment for significant hypoglycemia includes administration of dextrose containing agents, including 50% dextrose (D50%W) intravenously. Significant extravasation of D50%W can lead to complications, including skin and soft tissue injury, loss of limb, or death. The aim of this case report, using an interdisciplinary team approach, explores extravasation protocols as well as literature review, is to provide information about the proper use of hyaluronidase in patients with D50%W extravasations. A 46-year-old African American man presented to the emergency department (ED) after blood glucose level was initially 13 mg/dL. Emergency medical service established a large bore intravenous (IV) line in the right antecubital vein and administered a total of 50 g of D50%W. Upon arrival to the ED, the patient's level of consciousness had significantly improved. After arrival to the ED, the patient started complaining of pain in his right arm, near the site of the IV line insertion. On inspection, the IV site was grossly infiltrated. Hospital protocols for hyperosmolar infiltration were used. Extravasation is a common medical complication of infused medications and needs to be properly identified and treated. The multitude of skills from nursing, medicine, and pharmacy ensures that extravasation is managed appropriately and effectively to ensure safety to patients. Recognition, communication, and awareness of the institutional guidelines on how to treat infiltration and extravasation should be encouraged in all ED and intensive care unit medical personnel who deal with a variety of infusions and IV medications that have serious implications if not treated correctly.

Subcutaneous trastuzumab: development of a new formulation for treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). HER2 is amplified or overexpressed in about 15% of breast cancers and is associated with aggressive disease. Clinical benefits of trastuzumab have been established in the treatment of both early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer have to be treated with trastuzumab for one year in combination with and sequentially after chemotherapy. This requires that trastuzumab is intravenously infused over 30–90 minutes every 3 weeks for one year which is time-consuming for both the patient and the health care provider. Consequently, a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab using a recombinant human hyaluronidase has been developed. Recombinant human hyaluronidase transiently increases absorption and dispersion in the subcutaneous space of large therapeutic proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies, allowing subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab in about 5 minutes. Thus, subcutaneous trastuzumab could represent a new treatment option that could have benefit to both the patient and the health care system. This review focuses on the development of the subcutaneous trastuzumab formulation and analyzes clinical trials assessing the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of this new formulation.

Targeting the tumor microenvironment in cancer: why hyaluronidase deserves a second look

Increased extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition is a characteristic observed in many solid tumors. Increased levels of one ECM component-namely, hyaluronan (HA)-leads to reduced elasticity of tumor tissue and increased interstitial fluid pressure. Multiple initial reports showed that the addition of hyaluronidase (HYAL) to chemotherapeutic regimens could greatly improve efficacy. Unfortunately, the bovine HYAL used in those studies was limited therapeutically by immunologic responses to treatment. Newly developed recombinant human HYAL has recently been introduced into clinical trials. In this article, we describe the role of HA in cancer, methods of targeting HA, and clinical studies performed to date, and we propose that targeting HA could now be an effective treatment option for patients with many different types of solid tumors.

Extravasation of contrast media managed with recombinant human hyaluronidase

In minor cases, contrast extravasation may cause pain, swelling, and localized erythema. However, in more severe cases, extensive tissue and skin necrosis, ulceration, and compartment syndrome may occur, often necessitating a surgical consultation. Hyaluronidase has been used successfully in the management of extravasated contrast media in several reports. In addition, recombinant human hyaluronidase is approved for use as an adjunct in subcutaneous urography for improving resorption of radiopaque agents. In this case, a 57-year-old white female admitted for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation with pneumonitis and hypoxic respiratory failure experienced contrast extravasation during a computed tomographic scan of her chest. Approximately 100 mL of iodinated contrast extravasated into the right antecubital fossa, infiltrating approximately the distal two-thirds of the upper arm. Five 150-U vials of recombinant human hyaluronidase were injected in 150-U aliquots in a circle around the extravasation site using a 27-gauge needle 1 hour after the extravasation occurred. In a follow-up 4 hours later, marked improvement was observed. Sixteen hours after hyaluronidase treatment, the tissue had reverted to a near-normal state with no pain, erythema, swelling, or tenderness noted. Hyaluronidase successfully treated this extravasation of a large volume of iodinated contrast and appears to be a reasonable treatment option for more extensive subcutaneous contrast media extravasations.

Recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous infusion of human immunoglobulins for primary immunodeficiency

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IGSC) replacement therapy for primary immunodeficiency (PI) is equally efficacious to intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV), induces fewer systemic reactions, and may be self-infused. Limited SC infusion volumes and reduced bioavailability, however, necessitate multiple infusion sites, more frequent treatment, and dose adjustment to achieve pharmacokinetic equivalence. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) increases SC tissue permeability and facilitates dispersion and absorption, enabling administration of monthly doses in one site.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of rHuPH20-facilitated IGSC (IGHy) in patients with PI.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter phase III study, 87 patients with PI aged ≥2 years received 10% IGIV for 3 months, then IGHy (n = 83) for approximately 14 to 18 months at 108% of the IGIV dose. IGHy infusions began weekly, increasing to 3- or 4-week intervals.

RESULTS

The majority (94.0%) of IGHy infusions were administered every 3 or 4 weeks, using one site (median, 1.09/month), with a mean volume of 292.2 mL. The bioavailability of IGHy measured by area under the concentration versus time curve was 93.3% of IGIV, which is pharmacokinetically equivalent. Systemic reactions were less frequent with IGHy than with IGIV (8.3% vs 25.0% of infusions). Local reactions to IGHy were generally mild to moderate, with a rate of 0.203 per infusion. The acute serious bacterial infection rate per subject-year for IGHy was low (0.025; upper 99% CI limit, 0.046). Overall infection rates per subject-year were 2.97 for IGHy and 4.51 for IGIV.

CONCLUSION

IGHy was effective, safe, and pharmacokinetically equivalent to IGIV at the same administration intervals, but it caused fewer systemic reactions. Tolerability was good despite high infusion volumes and rates.

Accelerating and improving the consistency of rapid-acting analog insulin absorption and action for both subcutaneous injection and continuous subcutaneous infusion using recombinant human hyaluronidase

Rapid-acting insulin analogs were introduced to the market in the 1990s, and these products have improved treatment of diabetes by shortening the optimum delay time between injections and meals. Compared with regular human insulin, rapid-acting insulin formulations also reduce postprandial glycemic excursions while decreasing risk of hypoglycemia. However, the current prandial products are not fast enough for optimum convenience or control. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) has been used to increase the dispersion and absorption of other injected drugs, and in the case of prandial insulin analogs, it confers both ultrafast absorption and action profiles. Animal toxicology studies have demonstrated excellent tolerability of rHuPH20, and human studies, involving over 60,000 injections of prandial insulin + rHuPH20 to date, have similarly shown excellent safety and tolerability. Studies using rapid-acting analog insulin with rHuPH20 have included clinic-based pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic euglycemic glucose clamp studies, test meal studies, and take-home treatment studies. Administration methods have included subcutaneous injection of coformulations of rapid-acting insulin + rHuPH20 as well as continuous subcutaneous infusion of coformulations or use of pretreatment of newly inserted infusion sets with rHuPH20 followed by standard continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. These studies have demonstrated acceleration of insulin absorption and action along with improvement in postprandial glycemic excursions and reduction in hypoglycemia risks. Further, rHuPH20 reduces intrasubject variability of insulin absorption and action and provides greater consistency in absorption and action profiles over wear time of an infusion set. Further studies of rHuPH20 in the take-home treatment setting are underway.

Anaphylactic shock caused by the epidurally-administered hyalurinidase

Hyaluronidase is an enzyme that has temporary and reversible enzymatic effects on the matrix of connective tissue. When added to local anesthetics in pain treatments, it enhances their infiltration and dispersal into tissues. It is widely used in anesthesia for ocular, dental, and plastic surgery. Reports of drug hypersensitivity to hyaluronidase are rare and are usually confined to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia during ophthalmic surgery. However, few reports exist on adverse drug reaction after epidural injection. We have observed two patients experiencing anaphylactic shock caused by hyaluronidase following epidural injection. Most of the patients with a hypersensitivity to hyaluronidase had one previous uneventful injection containing hyaluronidase, implying that sensitization had taken place. However, hypersensitivity occurring at the first administration is possible. A positive skin test can help establish the diagnosis. Although rare, the possibility of an allergic reaction to hyaluronidase should be considered even in patients with no known previous exposure.

Subcutaneous rehydration: updating a traditional technique

Subcutaneous (SC) rehydration therapy (SCRT), originally referred to as "hypodermoclysis," shows promise as an alternative to intravenous (IV) fluid administration for treatment of dehydration. A simple, safe, and effective technique, SCRT is indicated for treatment of mild-to-moderate dehydration. Augmentation of SCRT with administration of a recombinant human formulation of the hyaluronidase enzyme at the infusion site gives rise to SC fluid administration rates up to 5-fold faster than those achieved without the enzyme, making the technique more clinically practical. Unlike older, animal-derived forms of hyaluronidase, recombinant human hyaluronidase has a lower chance of allergic reactions with repeated dosing. Clinical trials have demonstrated that recombinant human hyaluronidase effectively and safely facilitates fluid delivery in adults and children and is well accepted by parents and clinicians. In the emergency department setting, SCRT may be an appropriate alternative to IV fluid administration in certain situations because it is less invasive and generally less painful, while still permitting administration of appropriate volumes of rehydration fluids. Subcutaneous rehydration therapy appears to be particularly useful in patients who present with mild-to-moderate dehydration and have had failed attempts at oral rehydration. The SC route also provides benefits in patients with small, collapsed, or difficult-to-visualize veins or in those who may be agitated or distressed by IV catheterization. Continued research will further clarify the role of recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated SCRT in the rehydration treatment algorithm.

Alternatives to intravenous rehydration in dehydrated pediatric patients with difficult venous access

Intravenous (IV) catheter placement in the pediatric patient population can be challenging. Many health care providers automatically choose IV fluid administration to treat dehydration, often not considering other routes. This article reviews the available literature on difficulties in obtaining IV access in the pediatric population and discusses alternative methods for fluid replacement, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and place in therapy.

Review of the mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of recombinant human hyaluronidase coadministration with current prandial insulin formulations

For patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, achieving good glycemic control is critical for successful treatment outcomes. As many patients remain unable to reach glycemic goals with currently available rapid-acting analog insulins, ultrafast insulin products are being developed that provide an even faster pharmacokinetic profile compared with current rapid prandial insulin products. The overall strategy of these ultrafast insulin products is to better mimic the normal physiologic response to insulin that occurs in healthy individuals to further improve glycemic control. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) is a genetically engineered soluble hyaluronidase approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an adjuvant to increase the absorption and dispersion of other injected drugs; mammalian hyaluronidases as a class have over 6 decades of clinical use supporting the safety and/or efficacy of hyaluronidase coadministration. Clinical findings have demonstrated that coadministration of rHuPH20 with insulin or an insulin analog achieved faster systemic absorption, reduced inter- and intrapatient variability of insulin absorption, and achieved faster metabolic effects compared with injection of either insulin formulation alone. The magnitude of this acceleration is similar to the incrementally faster absorption of prandial insulin analogs as compared with regular insulin. In addition, coadministration of rHuPH20 with regular insulin or insulin analog also improved the achievement of prandial glycemic targets. Thus, rHuPH20 coadministration shows promise as a method of establishing a more rapid insulin profile to prandial insulin in patients with diabetes and has the potential to yield substantial improvements in postprandial glycemic excursion.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ceftriaxone administered with or without recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To compare pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous (SC) ceftriaxone administration versus SC ceftriaxone preceded by SC saline placebo or intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone administration.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This Phase I, two-part, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 54 healthy volunteers. In Part 1 (N = 24), subjects received 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 USP units) or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) SC, followed by 1 or 2 g ceftriaxone (10-350 mg/mL). In Part 2 (N = 30), subjects received 1 g ceftriaxone at the Part 1 maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) administered either SC - preceded by SC rHuPH20 or placebo - or IV. Subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs); blood samples were obtained (Part 2 only) during 48 hours post-dosing for ceftriaxone bioanalysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Part 1 primary endpoint was the SC ceftriaxone (with or without rHuPH20) MTC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in Part 2. Bioequivalence was based on maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The highest SC ceftriaxone concentration tested in Part 1 (350 mg/mL) was selected as the Part 2 MTC. In Part 2, median time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was 1 hour earlier (P < 0.0001), and C(max) was 12% higher (P < 0.0001) for ceftriaxone (350 mg/mL) administered via rHuPH20-facilitated SC versus SC preceded by placebo. IV ceftriaxone led to higher C(max) and shorter t(max) values than either SC treatment. Ceftriaxone exposure (AUC) was comparable among all three treatments. At least 1 AE was experienced by 100% of subjects after SC ceftriaxone and 76% after IV; most commonly reported AEs were infusion-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftriaxone AUC did not differ significantly between the three administration routes. C(max) was higher and t(max) shorter with rHuPH20-facilitated SC than SC preceded by placebo. rHuPH20-facilitated SC ceftriaxone was generally well tolerated. This study is limited by evaluation of healthy adults and absence of repeated-dose groups.

A systematic data review of the cost of rehydration therapy

Dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is a commonly encountered condition among patients presenting to physicians' offices and hospital EDs. Treatment options consist of oral rehydration therapy (ORT), intravenous rehydration therapy (IVRT) and subcutaneous rehydration therapy (SCRT). Although most patients with dehydration can be effectively treated in an outpatient setting, hospitalization is frequently warranted, with estimated annual inpatient costs for dehydration therapy exceeding $US1 billion in the US in 1999 for elderly patients alone. Although most treatment guidelines recommend ORT as first-line treatment for mild to moderate dehydration, IVRT remains the predominant route of administration for rehydration fluids in the acute care setting in the US. To evaluate the current state of the literature examining costs associated with dehydration therapy, a systematic review of articles published on MEDLINE from 2000 to 2009 was conducted. A total of 20 reports containing pharmacoeconomic data on rehydration therapy were evaluated. Findings suggest that ORT and SCRT may be less costly than IVRT in the treatment of mild to moderate dehydration; however, variability in cost parameters examined or data collection methods described in the literature precluded a comprehensive comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options. Future pharmacoeconomic analyses of rehydration therapy should incorporate time-motion analyses comprising a consistent set of variables to determine the most cost-effective treatment modality for patients with mild to moderate dehydration.

Comparison of the tolerability of recombinant human hyaluronidase + normal saline and recombinant human hyaluronidase + lactated ringer's solution administered subcutaneously: A phase IV, double-blind, randomized pilot study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) (150 U) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to facilitate subcutaneous fluid administration in adults and children.

OBJECTIVE

This Phase IV, double-blind, randomized pilot study was designed to compare the tolerability, flow rate, and safety profile of subcutaneous infusions of normal saline (NS) and lactated Ringer's (LR) solutions following subcutaneous administration of rHuPH20.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers received 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 U) in each thigh, followed by simultaneous gravity-driven subcutaneous infusions of 500 mL of LR solution into 1 thigh and NS solution into the contralateral thigh. Subjects rated infusion-site discomfort in each thigh using a 100-mm (0 = no pain to 100 = most severe pain) visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline (ie, after catheter placement/ rHuPH20 injection and just prior to the start of the infusions) and at the following times: after infusion of 250 mL, after infusion of 500 mL (end of infusion), and when thigh circumference returned to within 5% of baseline. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. The primary tolerability end point was the maximal increase from baseline in infusion-site discomfort on the VAS. Secondary end points included infusion flow rate, change in thigh circumference, subject preference for leftversus right-thigh infusion, and safety profile measures.

RESULTS

Fifteen subjects (14 women, 1 man; mean age, 41 years [range, 20-60 years]) were included in the study. Mean (SD) maximal increase from baseline VAS pain score was significantly greater with NS solution than with LR solution (20.0 [19.4] vs 9.4 [18.3] mm, respectively; P = 0.005). Mean infusion flow rate was not significantly different between the NS and LR solutions (384.1 [118.1] vs 395.8 [132.8] mL/h). No significant differences between solutions were observed in mean maximal change in thigh circumference (5.2% [1.6%] vs 5.3% [1.5%]). All subjects expressed global preference for LR infusion over NS infusion. All subjects experienced ≥1 AE; the majority of AEs were mild, localized infusion-site reactions. Of all AEs (regardless of their relationship to study drug or procedure), 81% were mild injectionsite reactions that were similar in nature for the NS and LR solutions. Although the types of mild local AEs were similar for the 2 infusions, they were numerically more common with NS infusions (15 subjects [100%]) than with LR infusions (9 subjects [60%]). For the NS and LR solutions, the most frequent infusion-site AEs were pain (67% vs 40%, respectively), erythema (47% vs 13%), and irritation (27% vs 20%).

CONCLUSIONS

This small pilot study found that the mean maximal increase from baseline in self-assessed pain VAS scores was statistically significantly higher with NS solution than LR solution. In addition, all subjects preferred LR solution to NS solution, and the incidence of some infusion-site AEs was numerically greater with NS solution. Although the VAS score indicated a statistically significant difference in tolerability favoring LR, the modest changes from baseline suggest both solutions were generally well tolerated and support the use of both NS and LR, as appropriate, for rHuPH20-facilitated subcutaneous isotonic fluid infusion in healthy adults. These results need to be confirmed in larger, controlled clinical studies.

Recombinant human hyaluronidase-enabled subcutaneous pediatric rehydration

OBJECTIVES

The Increased Flow Utilizing Subcutaneously-Enabled (INFUSE)-Pediatric Rehydration Study was designed to assess efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous rehydration in children 2 months to 10 years of age.

METHODS

Patients with mild/moderate dehydration requiring parenteral treatment in US emergency departments were eligible for this phase IV, multicenter, single-arm study. They received subcutaneous injection of 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 U), followed by subcutaneous infusion of 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid over the first hour. Subcutaneous rehydration was continued as needed for up to 72 hours. Rehydration was deemed successful if it was attributed by the investigator primarily to subcutaneous fluid infusion and the child was discharged without requiring an alternative method of rehydration.

RESULTS

Efficacy was evaluated in 51 patients (mean age: 1.9 years; mean weight: 11.2 kg). Initial subcutaneous catheter placement was achieved with 1 attempt for 46/51 (90.2%) of patients. Rehydration was successful for 43/51 (84.3%) of patients. Five patients (9.8%) were hospitalized but deemed to be rehydrated primarily through subcutaneous therapy, for a total of 48/51 (94.1%) of patients. No treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported, but 1 serious adverse event occurred (cellulitis at infusion site). Investigators found the procedure easy to perform for 96% of patients (49/51 patients), and 90% of parents (43/48 parents) were satisfied or very satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

rHuPH20-facilitated subcutaneous hydration seems to be safe and effective for young children with mild/moderate dehydration. Subcutaneous access is achieved easily, and the procedure is well accepted by clinicians and parents.

The INFUSE-Morphine IIB study: use of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) to enhance the absorption of subcutaneous morphine in healthy volunteers

Morphine is usually given intravenously (IV) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain, but subcutaneous (SC) administration is a viable alternative for parenteral delivery. The pharmacokinetics of SC morphine may be enhanced by coadministration with a hyaluronidase product. In this Phase IV, double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 18 healthy adults received a single dose of 2mg morphine SC with 150U of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), SC with 0.9% normal saline, or IV on three consecutive days. The primary endpoint was time to maximum plasma morphine concentration (T(max)) for SC injection with rHuPH20 vs. SC injection without rHuPH20. Safety and tolerability were assessed each study day, the day after the last injection, and 28 days after the last injection. After SC dosing, morphine mean T(max) was significantly shorter with rHuPH20 than without it. Mean maximum plasma morphine concentration (C(max)) after SC dosing was 29% greater with rHuPH20 than without rHuPH20 (P=0.023), although the extent of exposure of morphine was similar. T(max) was shortest and C(max) was highest with IV administration. For the major active metabolite of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, mean T(max) after SC morphine was significantly shorter with rHuPH20 than without rHuPH20 (a difference of approximately 17.5 minutes; P=0.0169). Coadministration of morphine with rHuPH20 appeared safe and well tolerated. Compared with SC morphine alone, rHuPH20 shortens morphine T(max) and raises C(max) in healthy adults, without changing the extent of exposure.

Human recombinant hyaluronidase (Cumulase) improves intracytoplasmic sperm injection survival and fertilization rates

The cumulus-corona-oocyte complex, composed of cumulus granulosa cells embedded in a matrix of hyaluronan oligosaccharide chains cross-linked by hyaluronan binding proteins and proteoglycans, surrounds each oocyte and must be removed prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This is traditionally achieved using enzymatic digestion of the matrix with a bovine-derived hyaluronidase followed by mechanical denudation through pipetting. A human recombinant hyaluronidase (Cumulase) has been developed with the intent of circumventing the problems and concerns associated with the animal origin and lack of purity of the bovine-derived form of the enzyme. In order to compare the effect of Cumulase with that of the bovine enzyme on the rates of normal fertilization and oocyte damage, a retrospective study using four experienced practitioners was performed. In 2006, using Cumulase, a significantly increased rate of normal fertilization (P = 0.0003) and a significantly decreased rate of oocyte damage (P < 0.0001) were observed compared with 2005, during which time bovine-derived hyaluronidase was predominantly used. This study indicates that Cumulase is safe and effective for use in the removal of the cumulus-corona-oocyte complex prior to ICSI, and may have several distinct advantages over the animal-derived form of the enzyme in terms of safety and efficacy.

[Hyaluronidase: Here we go again]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the benefits and lateral effects of hyaluronidase (H) use in ophthalmologic anaesthesia and to address its unavailability in current practice in France.

DATA SOURCES

The Medline data bank and the Cochrane database were consulted. The keywords employed separately or in combination were: H, regional anaesthesia, ophthalmologic surgery, local aneasthetics myotoxicity, diplopia.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles since 1949 were selected. We also selected isolated clinical cases according to their relevance compared with the existing literature.

DATA SYNTHESIS

H is a "spreading factor" of animal origin used as an adjuvant in ophthalmic anaesthesia for more than half a century. It allows a moderate better block quality with a slightly quicker onset. It also limits the acute intraocular pressure increase secondary to periocular injection and seems to have a protective effect against local anaesthetics myotoxicity resulting in postoperative strabismus. However, during these last 50 years, numerous studies often ended in divergent results.

CONCLUSION

H seems to be a useful adjuvant in ophthalmologic anaesthesia in spite of his current unavailability in France. Recombinant H could be the solution in the near future.

Accelerated pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of prandial insulins injected with recombinant human hyaluronidase

BACKGROUND

This phase 1 study investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and glucodynamics of insulin lispro (Humalog; Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) or regular human insulin (Humulin R; Eli Lilly and Co.) administered with or without (+/-) recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20).

METHODS

Healthy male volunteers (n = 26), 18-55 years old with body mass index 18-28 kg/m(2), weight >70 kg, and normal fasting glucose, were randomized to a crossover sequence of two subcutaneous injections, each followed by a 6-h euglycemic clamp targeting glucose 90-110 mg/dL: Cohort 1 received 20 U of Humalog +/- 300 U of rHuPH20 (11.3 microg/mL), whereas Cohort 2 received 20 U of Humulin R +/- 240 U of rHuPH20 (10 microg/mL). Pharmacokinetic parameters included peak serum insulin concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)), and area under the curve (AUC) of serum concentration versus time. Glucodynamic parameters included time to maximal glucose infusion rate (tGIR(max)) and area under the GIR-versus-time curve (G).

RESULTS

For Humalog and Humulin R, respectively, rHuPH20 co-administration reduced t(max) by 51% (P = 0.0006) and 58% (P = 0.0002), increased C(max) by 90% (P = 0.0003) and 142% (P < 0.0001), increased early exposure (AUC(0-2h)) by 85% (P < 0.0001) and 211% (P < 0.0001), and reduced late exposure (AUC(4-6h)) by 41% (P < 0.0001) and 48% (P < 0.0001). Similarly, rHuPH20 reduced tGIR(max) by 41% (P = 0.006) and 35% (P = 0.01), increased early metabolism (G(0-2h)) by 52% (P = 0.001) and 127% (P < 0.0001), and reduced late metabolism (G(4-6h)) by 29% (P = 0.002) and 26% (P = 0.03) for Humalog and Humulin R, respectively. Injections were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of rHuPH20 accelerated the PK and glucodynamics of both insulin formulations. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical relevance of these findings in patients with diabetes.