Probiotics in the critically ill: handle with care!

Microbial cell components induced tolerance to flagellin-stimulated inflammation through Toll-like receptor pathways in intestinal epithelial cells

In the intestine, bacterial components activate innate responses that protect the host. We hypothesize that bacterial components reduce Interleukin-8 (IL-8) production in intestinal epithelial cells stimulated by flagellin via the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway. Caco-2 cells were pretreated with various doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoteichoic acid (LTA), or low-dose flagellin (LDFL) for 24h. Cells were then treated with flagellin (FL) 500 ng/ml (HDFL) for another 48 h. IL-8 production was measured in the cell culture medium by ELISA. Eighty-four genes in the TLR pathway were evaluated by RT Profiler PCR Array. Pathway Studio 8.0 software was used for altered pathway analysis. HDFL induced IL-8 production by 19-fold (p<0.01). Pretreatment with LDFL at 20, 10 or 1 ng/ml reduced HDFL-induced IL-8 production by 61%, 52% and 40%, respectively (p<0.05). LPS at 50 μg/ml decreased HDFL-induced IL-8 production by 38% (p<0.05). HDFL up-regulated CXCL10, IL1B, IL-8, IRAK2, NF-κB1 and I-κB (all p<0.05). Pathway Studio analysis showed that HDFL induced cell processes including inflammation, cell death and apoptosis. Pretreatment with LDFL at 10 ng/ml down-regulated FADD, FOS, MAP4K4, MyD88, TLR2, TLR3 and TNFERSF1A compared to HDFL (all p<0.05). These down-regulated genes are integral for numerous cell functions including inflammatory response, cell death, apoptosis and infection. These results demonstrate that LPS and LDFL provoke tolerance to HDFL-induced IL-8 production. This tolerance effect was accompanied by a complex interaction of multiple genes related to inflammatory as well as other responses in the TLR pathway rather than a single gene alteration.

Probiotic microbes: do they need to be alive to be beneficial?

An essential symbiotic relationship exists between intestinal cells and commensal bacteria within the human gastrointestinal tract. Alteration or absence of this interaction may play a role in the development of human disease. Use of probiotic organisms has yielded improvement of certain medical conditions, such as inflammatory and infectious gastrointestinal disease, although the mechanisms of benefit remain poorly defined. The administration of live organisms is not without risk, both potential and realized, particularly in certain populations. Therefore, it is of considerable interest to determine if the health benefits of probiotics can be attained without the risks associated with administration of a live organism. Reviewed here is the evidence that heat-killed, ultraviolet-inactivated, and even components of these agents may be just as effective and considerably safer for the host.

Helping patients make informed choices about probiotics: a need for research

Applications of probiotics in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders are gaining acceptance among patients, despite evidence that probiotics can present substantial health risks, particularly for patients who are immunocompromised or seriously ill. Patients will likely formulate their attitudes and beliefs about probiotic therapies with reference to interpretive frameworks that compare probiotics with more familiar therapeutic modalities, including complementary and alternative medicines, pharmacological therapies, and gene-transfer technologies. Each of these frameworks highlights a different set of benefit-to-risk considerations regarding probiotic usage and reinforces extreme characterizations of both the therapeutic promise and peril of probiotics. Considerable effort may be required to help patients make informed choices about probiotic therapies.

Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Infectious complications and associated mortality are a major concern in acute pancreatitis. Enteral administration of probiotics could prevent infectious complications, but convincing evidence is scarce. Our aim was to assess the effects of probiotic prophylaxis in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

In this multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 298 patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE II] score > or =8, Imrie score > or =3, or C-reactive protein >150 mg/L) were randomly assigned within 72 h of onset of symptoms to receive a multispecies probiotic preparation (n=153) or placebo (n=145), administered enterally twice daily for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the composite of infectious complications--ie, infected pancreatic necrosis, bacteraemia, pneumonia, urosepsis, or infected ascites--during admission and 90-day follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN38327949.

FINDINGS

One person in each group was excluded from analyses because of incorrect diagnoses of pancreatitis; thus, 152 individuals in the probiotics group and 144 in the placebo group were analysed. Groups were much the same at baseline in terms of patients' characteristics and disease severity. Infectious complications occurred in 46 (30%) patients in the probiotics group and 41 (28%) of those in the placebo group (relative risk 1.06, 95% CI 0.75-1.51). 24 (16%) patients in the probiotics group died, compared with nine (6%) in the placebo group (relative risk 2.53, 95% CI 1.22-5.25). Nine patients in the probiotics group developed bowel ischaemia (eight with fatal outcome), compared with none in the placebo group (p=0.004).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis, probiotic prophylaxis with this combination of probiotic strains did not reduce the risk of infectious complications and was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Probiotic prophylaxis should therefore not be administered in this category of patients.