Nitric oxide and oxidative stress in atherosclerotic renovascular hypertension: effect of endovascular treatment

Kidney Intrinsic Mechanisms as Novel Targets in Renovascular Hypertension

Almost a hundred years have passed since obstruction of the renal artery has been recognized to raise blood pressure. By now chronic renovascular disease (RVD) due to renal artery stenosis is recognized as a major source of renovascular hypertension and renal disease. In some patients, RVD unaccompanied by noteworthy renal dysfunction or blood pressure elevation may be incidentally identified during peripheral angiography. Nevertheless, in others, RVD might present as a progressive disease associated with diffuse atherosclerosis, leading to loss of renal function, renovascular hypertension, hemodynamic compromise, and a magnified risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Atherosclerotic RVD leads to renal atrophy, inflammation, and hypoxia but represents a potentially treatable cause of chronic renal failure because until severe fibrosis sets in the ischemic kidney, it retains a robust potential for vascular and tubular regeneration. This remarkable recovery capacity of the kidney begs for early diagnosis and treatment. However, accumulating evidence from both animal studies and randomized clinical trials has convincingly established the inadequate efficacy of renal artery revascularization to fully restore renal function or blood pressure control and has illuminated the potential of therapies targeted to the ischemic renal parenchyma to instigate renal regeneration. Some of the injurious mechanisms identified as potential therapeutic targets included oxidative stress, microvascular disease, inflammation, mitochondrial injury, and cellular senescence. This review recapitulates the intrinsic mechanisms that orchestrate renal damage and recovery in RVD and can be harnessed to introduce remedial opportunities.

An Outline of Renal Artery Stenosis Pathophysiology-A Narrative Review

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is conditioned mainly by two disturbances: fibromuscular dysplasia or atherosclerosis of the renal artery. RAS is an example of renovascular disease, with complex pathophysiology and consequences. There are multiple pathophysiological mechanisms triggered in response to significant renal artery stenosis, including disturbances within endothelin, kinin-kallikrein and sympathetic nervous systems, with angiotensin II and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) playing a central and key role in the pathogenesis of RAS. The increased oxidative stress and the release of pro-inflammatory mediators contributing to pathological tissue remodelling and renal fibrosis are also important pathogenetic elements of RAS. This review briefly summarises these pathophysiological issues, focusing on renovascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy as major clinical manifestations of RAS. The activation of RAAS and its haemodynamic consequences is the primary and key element in the pathophysiological cascade triggered in response to renal artery stenosis. However, the pathomechanism of RAS is more complex and also includes other disturbances that ultimately contribute to the development of the diseases mentioned above. To sum up, RAS is characterised by different clinical pictures, including asymptomatic disorders diagnosed in kidney imaging, renovascular hypertension, usually characterised by severe course, and chronic ischemic nephropathy, described by pathological remodelling of kidney tissue, ultimately leading to kidney injury and chronic kidney disease.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis--diagnosis and treatment

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is characterized by a heterogeneous group of pathophysiologic entities, of which fibromuscular dysplasia and atherosclerotic RAS (ARAS) are the most common. Whether and which patients should undergo revascularization for ARAS is controversial. The general consensus is that all patients with ARAS should receive intensive medical treatment. The latest randomized clinical trials have increased confusion regarding recommendations for revascularization for ARAS. Although revascularization is not indicated in all patients with ARAS, experts agree that it should be considered in some patients, especially those with unstable angina, unexplained pulmonary edema, and hemodynamically significant ARAS with either worsening renal function or with difficult to control hypertension. A search of the literature was performed using PubMed and entering the search terms renal artery stenosis, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, and renal artery stenosis AND hypertension to retrieve the most recent publications on diagnosis and treatment of ARAS. In this review, we analyze the pathways related to hypertension in ARAS, the optimal invasive and noninvasive modalities for evaluating the renal arteries, and the available therapies for ARAS and assess future tools and algorithms that may prove useful in evaluating patients for renal revascularization therapy.

Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects about 27 million people in North America and Europe, accounting for up to 413,000 hospitalizations per year with 88,000 hospitalizations involving the lower extremities and 28,000 involving embolectomy or thrombectomy of lower limb arteries. Many patients are asymptomatic and, among symptomatic patients, atypical symptoms are more common than classic claudication. Peripheral arterial disease also correlates strongly with risk of major cardiovascular events, and patients with PAD have a high prevalence of coexistent coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Because the prevalence of PAD increases progressively with age, PAD is a growing clinical problem due to the increasingly aged population in the United States and other developed countries. Until recently, vascular surgical procedures were the only alternative to medical therapy in such patients. Today, endovascular practice, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting, is used far more frequently for all types of lower extremity occlusive lesions, reflecting the continuing advances in imaging techniques, angioplasty equipment, and endovascular expertise. The role of endovascular intervention in the treatment of limb-threatening ischemia is also expanding, and its promise of limb salvage and symptom relief with reduced morbidity and mortality makes percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting an attractive alternative to surgery and, as most endovascular interventions are performed on an outpatient basis, hospital costs are cut considerably. In this monograph we discuss current endovascular intervention for treatment of occlusive PAD, aneurysmal arterial disease, and venous occlusive disease.

The role of percutaneous revascularization for renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is usually caused by atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia. RAS leads to activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and may result in hypertension, ischemic nephropathy, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure. Management options include medical therapy and revascularization procedures. Recent studies have shown angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) to be highly effective in treating the hypertension associated with RAS and in reducing cardiovascular events; however, they do not correct the underlying RAS and loss of renal mass may continue. Renal artery angioplasty was first performed by Gruntzig in 1978. The routine use of stents has increased technical success rates compared with angioplasty, and surgery is now only rarely performed. Although numerous case series claimed benefit in terms of blood pressure control, no adequately powered randomized, controlled, prospective study of renal artery interventions has reported their effect on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. The CORAL trial, an ongoing study of renal artery stent placement and optimal medical therapy (OMT) funded by the National Institutes of Health, is the first study to attempt to do so. Until the CORAL trial results are in, physicians will continue to be faced with difficult choices when determining the optimal management for RAS patients and deciding which, if any, patients should be offered revascularization.

Effects of losartan and enalapril on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and total antioxidant in renal transplant recipients with Renin-Angiotensin system polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

As renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity may affect the severity of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers, we assessed the effects of enalapril (E) and/or losartan (L) on these markers in renal transplant recipients with RAS polymorphisms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After determination by PCR of RAS genotypes, consisting of the angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE I/D), angiotensinogens (AGT M235T) and angiotensin II type 1 receptors (ATR1 A1166C), 76 recipients were recruited randomly and assigned 4 groups. The first (n = 17) and second (n = 24) groups were treated with E (E(+): 10 mg/d) and L (L(+): 50 mg/d) alone, respectively. The third positive control group (n = 17) received E + L (E(+)L(+): 10 mg/d + 50 mg/d) and the fourth negative control group (n = 18) received no medication (E(-):L(-)). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and total antioxidant (TA) inflammatory and antioxidative markers were measured after 2 months. After a 2-week washout period, the E(+) group was changed to L(+) and vice versa in a crossover design. They were followed for another 8 weeks before retesting hs-CRP and TA. A value of P < or = .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

After 2 and 4 months of treatment with the drug regimen, hs-CRP and TA levels were significantly decreased and consequently increased among the E(+)L(+), L(+) and E(+) groups (P < .05). On analyzing the relationship between RAS polymorphisms and baseline hs-CRP or TA levels, CC genotype of ATR1 showed lower hs-CRP levels (P = .04). However, none of the RAS polymorphisms predicted the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory response rates to the drugs (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Although hs-CRP was lower in the CC genotype patients of ATR1 polymorphisms E and/or L reduced hs-CRP and increased TA regardless of the RAS genotype.

Enalapril and losartan affect lipid peroxidation in renal transplant recipients with renin–angiotensin system polymorphisms

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the effect of enalapril (E) and/or losartan (L) on lipid peroxidation (LPO) is studied in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with regard to polymorphisms of renin-angiotensin system (RAS).

DESIGN AND METHODS

After determination of genotypes of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE I/D), angiotensinogen (AGT M235T) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR1 A1166C) by PCR, sixty-four RTRs recruited to four groups randomly: first (13 patients) and second (20 patients) groups were treated with enalapril (E(+): 10 mg/day) and losartan (L(+): 50 mg/day) alone for 2 months, respectively. After 2 weeks as washout period, E group changed to L and vice versa as a cross-over design and they were treated for another 2 months. The third group (13 patients) as positive control received enalapril+losartan (E(+)L(+): 10 mg/day+50 mg/day) for 16 weeks, and the forth group (18 patients) as negative control received no medication (E(-)L(-)). Malondialdehyde (MDA) as LPO marker was measured before and after treatment. In this study, P<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, MDA level significantly decreased in all of the groups except the E(-)L(-). MDA level in pre- vs. post-intervention for the E(+)L(+), E(+), L(+) and E(-)L(-) groups were as follows: 5.81+/-2.13 nmol/mL vs. 1.61+/-0.80 nmol/mL (P=0.001), 5.10+/-2.05 nmol/mL vs. 1.68+/-1.01 nmol/mL (P=0.003), 5.20+/-1.61 nmol/mL vs. 1.22+/-0.27 nmol/mL (P=0.000) and 5.27+/-2.12 nmol/mL vs. 5.07+/-2.03 nmol/mL (P=0.52), respectively. Also, the same results were found in the end of 16th week. Although patients with DD genotype of ACE had higher MDA (P=0.01) levels, RAS polymorphisms could not predict the antioxidative response rate to the drugs (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

E and/or L reduce MDA regardless of the RAS genotypes.

Renal artery stenosis and accelerated atherosclerosis: which comes first?

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is usually observed in hypertensive patients with extensive atherosclerosis. There is some evidence that in these patients the atherosclerotic process and the consequent target-organ damage is more severe than in hypertensive patients without RAS. In this review we will entertain the hypothesis that some of the humoral factors that are activated by RAS may contribute to accelerate the progression of atherosclerosis. Several studies identified RAS as a predictor of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients, although in most cases the contribution of blood pressure per se to the progression of vascular lesions could not be determined. As a result of experimental RAS, hypertension and increased oxidative stress are stimuli for atherosclerosis as well as cardiac and renal damage. In the presence of RAS, the renin-angiotensin system is stimulated, and it has been shown that angiotensin II exerts proinflammatory, pro-oxidant and procoagulant activities in experimental models and humans. The potential contribution of reactive oxygen species to the prohypertensive and proatherosclerotic effects of RAS is supported by evidence that nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form oxidase is specifically stimulated by angiotensin II, an activity not shared by epinephrine. Moreover, angiotensin II triggers the release of aldosterone, endothelin 1, thromboxane A2 and other derivatives of the arachidonic acid metabolism, all of which can further and independently aggravate cardiovascular damage. Epidemiological and experimental evidence so far available suggests that accelerated atherosclerosis can be both the cause and the consequence of RAS.

Renovascular hypertension update

Hypertension detected in patients with renovascular disease poses a major clinical challenge. The rapid expansion of noninvasive imaging, effective antihypertensive drug therapy, and endovascular interventional procedures combine to make optimal management a moving target. Renal arterial disease accelerates the development of hypertension associated with activation of multiple pressor systems and accelerated target organ injury. Younger individuals with fibromuscular lesions often respond well to renal revascularization with minor associated risks. Care must be taken in cases of complex vascular anomalies, such as renal artery aneurysms. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is detected more commonly than ever before and affects more than 85% of patients referred for revascularization. Most are older patients with long-standing hypertension, diabetes, and pre-existing complications of vascular disease. The benefits of extensive workup and intervention in this group of patients are controversial. Antihypertensive drug therapy is most effectively achieved with drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system, but most require multiple agents. Selection of patients for renal revascularization in this group is far more controversial than with fibromuscular disease. Several small trials failed to identify major benefits with renal artery angioplasty as compared to closely monitored drug therapy, although crossover rates from medical to interventional arms were high. The Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) seeks to randomly assign subjects with proven, high-grade renal artery lesions to optimal medical management with and without stenting. This important trial employs distal embolic protection to prevent deterioration of renal function. Understanding the optimal role for renal revascularization depends heavily upon the successful conduct of such trials.

Renovascular Hypertension: Current Concepts

Hypertension produced by renal artery occlusive disease is an important secondary form of hypertension. Clinicians commonly encounter forms of renal arterial disease of varying severity, many of which are of little hemodynamic significance when first detected. Experimental studies emphasize that transient activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is necessary for initiation of renovascular hypertension. At some point, angiotensin II activates additional mechanisms responsible for sustained increased blood pressure including sodium retention, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction related to production of reactive oxygen species. Widespread application of agents that block the renin-angiotensin system, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers, render many patients with unilateral renal arterial disease manageable primarily by medical means for many years. In the setting of high a priori likelihood of renovascular disease, recognizing the potential for disease progression during medical therapy and individually evaluating the risks and benefits of renal revascularization are important tasks. Recent prospective studies show limited, but real, benefit regarding blood pressure control for patients with atherosclerotic disease. Whether earlier renal revascularization offers benefits regarding improved morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular end point reduction is an important question to be addressed in multicenter, prospective, randomized trials. Our paradigm stresses the fact that patients with renovascular hypertension require intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk factor intervention, both before and after revascularization. Hence, management of such patients requires close attention and periodic review regarding restenosis and progression of vascular disease.

Effect of systemic vitamin C on free fatty acid-induced lipid peroxidation

OBJECTIVES

Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), a reactive product of lipid peroxidation, may be influenced by anti-oxidant therapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate if elevated MDA as induced by increased free fatty acids (FFA) correlates with endothelial function and is affected by high doses of vitamin C.

METHODS

The study design was randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind, 2-way cross over. Plasma MDA concentrations and forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to intra-arterial acetylcholine (ACh) and glyceryl trinitrate were assessed during co-administration of vitamin C or placebo in the presence of increased plasma FFA by Intralipid/heparin infusion in 10 healthy male subjects.

RESULTS

The seven-fold rise in plasma FFA was associated with an increase in plasma MDA concentrations (r=0.7, p<0.001) and decreased FBF responses to ACh (r=-0.4, p<0.01). Co-administration of vitamin C restored the impaired reactivity of FBF to ACh but had no effect on elevated MDA concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-oxidant vitamin C improves lipid-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, but does not alter MDA formation or breakdown.

Cortical microvascular remodeling in the stenotic kidney: role of increased oxidative stress

OBJECTIVE

Mechanisms of renal injury distal to renal artery stenosis (RAS) remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that it involves microvascular remodeling consequent to increased oxidative stress.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three groups of pigs (n=6 each) were studied after 12 weeks of RAS, RAS+antioxidant supplementation (100 IU/kg vitamin E and 1 g vitamin C daily), or controls. The spatial density and tortuousity of renal microvessels (<500 microm) were tomographically determined by 3D microcomputed tomography. The in situ production of superoxide anion and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptor VEGFR-2, hypoxia-inducible-factor (HIF)-1alpha, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein, and NAD(P)H oxidase (p47phox and p67phox subunits) were determined in cortical tissue. RAS and RAS+antioxidant groups had similar degrees of stenosis and hypertension. The RAS group showed a decrease in spatial density of cortical microvessels, which was normalized in the RAS+antioxidant group, as was arteriolar tortuousity. RAS kidneys also showed tissue fibrosis (by trichrome and Sirius red staining), increased superoxide anion abundance, NAD(P)H oxidase, VHL protein, and HIF-1alpha mRNA expression. In contrast, expression of HIF-1alpha, VEGF, and VEGFR-2 protein was downregulated. These were all significantly improved by antioxidant intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased oxidative stress in the stenotic kidney alters growth factor activity and plays an important role in renal microvascular remodeling, which can be prevented by chronic antioxidant intervention.