1
|
Moaven O, Mainali BB, Valenzuela CD, Russell G, Cheung T, Corvera CU, Wisneski AD, Cha CH, Stauffer JA, Shen P. Prognostic implications of margin status in association with systemic treatment in a cohort study of patients with resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 39183490 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the impact of margin status after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) resection on outcomes of patients after neoadjuvant treatment versus those who underwent upfront resection. METHODS An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical resection was used. Proportional hazard regression models were created for single and multivariable models to assess the relationship between independent measures and median overall survival (mOS). RESULTS R1 was associated with worse OS in the neoadjuvant group (mOS: 51.8 m for R0 vs. 26.0 m for R1; HR: 2.18). In the patients who underwent upfront surgery, R1 was not associated with OS. (mOS: 46.7 m for R0 vs. 42.6 m for R1). When patients with R1 in each group were stratified by adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the neoadjuvant group, while in the upfront surgery group with R1, adjuvant treatment was associated with significant improvement in OS (mOS: 42.6 m for adjuvant vs. 25.0 m for no adjuvant treatment; HR: 0.21). CONCLUSION R1 is associated with worse outcomes in the patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment with no significant improvement with the addition of adjuvant therapy, likely representing an aggressive tumor biology. R1 did not impact OS in patients with upfront surgery who received postoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omeed Moaven
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- LSU-LCMC Cancer Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Bigyan B Mainali
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gregory Russell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tanto Cheung
- Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Carlos U Corvera
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew D Wisneski
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Charles H Cha
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - John A Stauffer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang L, Yang M, Wang T, Qiu Y, Yang Y, Wang W. Comparison of liver venous deprivation with portal vein embolization alone in patients undergoing major liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)02221-4. [PMID: 39054212 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical efficacy and safety between liver venous deprivation (LVD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to major hepatectomy is still unclear. METHODS Studies comparing LVD and PVE were obtained by systemically searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central databases through 22 December 2023. RESULTS Ten studies including 588 patients were reviewed. Compared with PVE group, LVD group exhibited an increased liver resection rate (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.13-3.15; P = 0.01), a faster KGR (MD, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.31-2.42; P = 0.01), and a shorter time to hepatectomy (MD, -6.66; 95% CI, -8.03 to -5.30; P < 0.0001). The pooled results showed that post-embolization complications (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.66-2.74), overall postoperative complications (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.75), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.14), and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.09) were not significantly different in both groups. LVD group had significantly lower post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) than PVE group (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION LVD outperforms PVE regarding liver resection rate and future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy and shows comparable safety to PVE. In addition, LVD allowed for major hepatectomy with lower incidence of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingpeng Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yiwen Qiu
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller SR, Chang DT. Local-Regional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer J 2024; 30:272-279. [PMID: 39042779 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States as well as a leading cause of cancer-related death. Upward of 30% of patients ultimately develop metastatic disease, most commonly to the liver and lung. Untreated, patients have poor survival. Historically, patients with oligometastatic disease were treated with resection leading to long-term survival; however, there are many patients who are not surgical candidates. Innovations in thermal ablation, hepatic artery infusions, chemoembolization and radioembolization, and stereotactic ablative radiation have led to an expansion of patients eligible for local therapy. This review examines the evidence behind each modality for the most common locations of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R Miller
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pilz da Cunha G, van Delden OM, Kazemier G, Vahrmeijer AL, Bonjer HJ, Meijerink MR, Swijnenburg RJ. Hybrid operating room applications for precision hepatobiliary surgery: A narrative review. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1265-1273. [PMID: 38567691 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the key applications of a hybrid operating room (HOR) in hepatobiliary surgery and explores the advantages, limitations, and future directions of its utilization. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify articles reporting on the utilization of HORs in liver surgery. So far, the HOR has been limitedly applied in hepatobiliary surgery. It can offer an optimal environment for combining radiological and surgical interventions and for performing image-guided surgical navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Knitter S, Sauer L, Hillebrandt KH, Moosburner S, Fehrenbach U, Auer TA, Raschzok N, Lurje G, Krenzien F, Pratschke J, Schöning W. Extended Right Hepatectomy following Clearance of the Left Liver Lobe and Portal Vein Embolization for Curatively Intended Treatment of Extensive Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Single-Center Case Series. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1145-1161. [PMID: 38534918 PMCID: PMC10969123 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two-staged hepatectomy (TSH) including portal vein embolization (PVE) may offer surgical treatment for extensive bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and outcomes of extended right hepatectomy (ERH) within TSH including PVE for patients with extended CRLM. METHODS We retrospectively collected data of patients who underwent TSH for extended CRLM between 2015 and 2021 at our institution. Clearance of the left liver lobe (clear-up, CU) associated with PVE was followed by ERH. RESULTS Minimally invasive (n = 12, 46%, MIH) or open hepatectomy (n = 14, 54%, OH) was performed. Postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality were 54% and 0%. Three-year overall survival was 95%. Baseline characteristics, postoperative and long-term outcomes were comparable between MIH and OH. However, hospital stay was significantly shorter after MIH (8 vs. 15 days, p = 0.008). Additionally, the need for intraoperative transfusions tended to be lower in the MIH group (17% vs. 50%, p = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS ERH following CU and PVE for extended CRLM is feasible and safe in laparoscopic and open approaches. MIH for ERH may result in shorter postoperative hospital stays. Further high-volume, multicenter studies are required to evaluate the potential superiority of MIH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Knitter
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Linda Sauer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl-H. Hillebrandt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Moosburner
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Timo A. Auer
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nathanael Raschzok
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Robinson TJ, Cummins K, Tsung A. Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Perspective and Review of Current Literature. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1079-1090. [PMID: 38392074 PMCID: PMC10887848 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has previously been limited to palliative chemotherapy. Traditionally, the role of liver transplant has not been associated with sufficient survival to justify a patient undergoing a major operation with the associated requirement for postoperative immunosuppression. With improvements in chemotherapy options, a certain subset of patients can experience stable disease for years, which has prompted investigation into the role of liver transplant in these patients. Several recent studies have shown promising results in well-selected patients, with posttransplant survival approaching that of liver transplant recipients for other diseases. Here, we present a review of the data and current protocols for liver transplant for unresectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA; (T.J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nassar A, Tzedakis S, Marchese U, Naveendran G, Sindayigaya R, Gaillard M, Cauchy F, Lesurtel M, Gayet B, Soubrane O, Fuks D. Factors of oncological failure in two stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107267. [PMID: 37988785 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has increased the chance of surgical resections for bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Nevertheless, drop-out between stages and early recurrence rates raise the question of surgical futility in some situations. This study aimed to identify factors of TSH oncological failure. METHODS Patients with bilobar CRLM eligible for TSH in three tertiary centers between 2010 and 2021 were included, and divided in Failure and Success groups. Oncological failure was defined as failure of the second stage hepatectomy for tumor progression or recurrence within 6 months after resection. RESULTS Among 95 patients, 18 (18.9%) had hepatic progression between the two stages, and 7 (7.4%) failed to complete the second stage hepatectomy. After TSH, 31 (32.6%) patients experienced early recurrence. Overall, 38 (40.0%) patients experienced oncological failure (Failure group). The Failure group had lower median DFS (3 vs. 32 months, p < 0.001) and median OS (29 vs. 70 months, p = 0.045) than the Success group. On multivariable analysis, progression between the two stages in the future liver remnant (OR = 15.0 (3.22-113.0), p = 0.002), and maximal tumor size ≥40 mm in the future liver remnant (OR = 13.1 (2.12-117.0), p = 0.009) were independent factors of oncological failure. CONCLUSION Recurrence between the two stages and maximal tumor size ≥40 mm in the future liver remnant were associated with TSH failure for patients with bilobar CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Gaanan Naveendran
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Remy Sindayigaya
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris Cité, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris Cité, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao Q, Zhu GZ, Han CY, Ye XP, Huang HS, Mo ST, Peng T. Dual transformation therapy for giant hepatocellular carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2089-2097. [PMID: 37901744 PMCID: PMC10600767 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.2089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the translational therapy of giant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) after laparoscopic portal vein ligation (PVL) is extremely rare. This is a dual conversion therapy that combines surgery and oncology. Here, we report two cases of successful surgical completion after dual conversion therapy. CASE SUMMARY We report that a 54-year-old man and a 69-year-old woman were diagnosed with primary HCC combined with hepatitis B cirrhosis (case 2 also combined with fatty liver) on physical examination. Due to the insufficient residual liver volume assessed before surgery, laparoscopic right PVL was performed, followed by HAIC combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and TKI. Finally, surgical resection was successfully completed, and pathology confirmed that the tumor was mostly necrotic (90%) in one case, and no live tumor tissue was found in the other case. CONCLUSION In the process of surgical transformation, our treatment plan takes into account the control and transformation of oncology at the same time, which is expected to provide more opportunities for radical hepatectomy and improve the prognosis of patients with large liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Guang-Zhi Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Chuang-Ye Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Xin-Ping Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Hua-Sheng Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Shu-Tian Mo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maki H, Jain AJ, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Chun YS, Vauthey J. Locoregional treatment for colorectal liver metastases aiming for precision medicine. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:543-552. [PMID: 37416742 PMCID: PMC10319606 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), surgery is potentially curative. The use of novel surgical techniques and complementary percutaneous ablation allows for curative-intent treatment even in marginally resectable cases. Resection is used as part of a multidisciplinary approach, which for nearly all patients will include perioperative chemotherapy. Small CLM can be treated with parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) and/or ablation. For small CLM, PSH results in better survival and higher rates of resectability of recurrent CLM than non-PSH. For patients with extensive bilateral distribution of CLM, two-stage hepatectomy or fast-track two-stage hepatectomy is effective. Our increasing knowledge of genetic alterations allows us to use them as prognostic factors alongside traditional risk factors (e.g. tumor diameter and tumor number) to select patients with CLM for resection and guide surveillance after resection. Alteration in RAS family genes (hereafter referred to as "RAS alteration") is an important negative prognostic factor, as are alterations in the TP53, SMAD4, FBXW7, and BRAF genes. However, APC alteration appears to improve prognosis. RAS alteration, increased number and diameter of CLM, and primary lymph node metastasis are well-known risk factors for recurrence after CLM resection. In patients free of recurrence 2 y after CLM resection, only RAS alteration is associated with recurrence. Thus, surveillance intensity can be stratified by RAS alteration status after 2 y. Novel diagnostic instruments and tools, such as circulating tumor DNA, may lead to further evolution of patient selection, prognostication, and treatment algorithms for CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Anish J. Jain
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Du S, Wang Z, Lin D. A bibliometric and visualized analysis of preoperative future liver remnant augmentation techniques from 1997 to 2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1185885. [PMID: 37333827 PMCID: PMC10272555 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The size and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration for both eligibility for treatment and postoperative prognosis when planning surgical hepatectomy. Over time, a variety of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques have been investigated, from the earliest portal vein embolization (PVE) to the more recent Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) procedures. Despite numerous publications on this topic, no bibliometric analysis has yet been conducted. Methods Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched to identify studies related to preoperative FLR augmentation techniques published from 1997 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the CiteSpace [version 6.1.R6 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer [version 1.6.19]. Results A total of 973 academic studies were published by 4431 authors from 920 institutions in 51 countries/regions. The University of Zurich was the most published institution while Japan was the most productive country. Eduardo de Santibanes had the most published articles, and Masato Nagino was the most frequently co-cited author. The most frequently published journal was HPB, and the most cited journal was Ann Surg, with 8088 citations. The main aspects of preoperative FLR augmentation technique is to enhance surgical technology, expand clinical indications, prevent and treat postoperative complications, ensure long-term survival, and evaluate the growth rate of FLR. Recently, hot keywords in this field include ALPPS, LVD, and Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques, offering valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this field.
Collapse
|
13
|
Parmar KL, O'Reilly D, Valle J, Braun M, Malcomson L, Jones RP, Balaa F, Rees M, Welsh FKS, Filobbos R, Renehan AG. Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e059369. [PMID: 36997247 PMCID: PMC10069542 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey:Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria.Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews.Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire.Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey.The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat L Parmar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Derek O'Reilly
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lee Malcomson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fady Balaa
- Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Myrddin Rees
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Fenella K S Welsh
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Rafik Filobbos
- Department of Radiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052072. [PMID: 36902858 PMCID: PMC10004676 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Up to 50% of patients with CRC develop metastatic CRC (mCRC). Surgical and systemic therapy advances can now offer significant survival advantages. Understanding the evolving treatment options is essential for decreasing mCRC mortality. We aim to summarize current evidence and guidelines regarding the management of mCRC to provide utility when making a treatment plan for the heterogenous spectrum of mCRC. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and current guidelines written by major cancer and surgical societies were reviewed. The references of the included studies were screened to identify additional studies that were incorporated as appropriate. (3) Results: The standard of care for mCRC primarily consists of surgical resection and systemic therapy. Complete resection of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases is associated with better disease control and survival. Systemic therapy now includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy options that can be tailored by molecular profiling. Differences between colon and rectal metastasis management exist between major guidelines. (4) Conclusions: With the advances in surgical and systemic therapy, as well as a better understanding of tumor biology and the importance of molecular profiling, more patients can anticipate prolonged survival. We provide a summary of available evidence for the management of mCRC, highlighting the similarities and presenting the difference in available literature. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with mCRC is crucial to selecting the appropriate pathway.
Collapse
|
15
|
Díaz Vico T, Granero Castro P, Alcover Navarro L, Suárez Sánchez A, Mihic Góngora L, Montalvá Orón EM, Maupoey Ibáñez J, Truán Alonso N, González-Pinto Arrillaga I, Granero Trancón JE. Two stage hepatectomy (TSH) versus ALPPS for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:550-559. [PMID: 36424260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although numerous comparisons between conventional Two Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) have been reported, the heterogeneity of malignancies previously compared represents an important source of selection bias. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between TSH and ALPPS to treat patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS Main electronic databases were searched using medical subject headings for CRLM surgically treated with TSH or ALPPS. Patients treated for primary or secondary liver malignancies other than CRLM were excluded. RESULTS A total of 335 patients from 5 studies were included. Postoperative major complications were higher in the ALPPS group (relative risk [RR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.06, I2 = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of perioperative mortality (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.64-3.62, I2 = 0%). ALPPS was associated with higher completion of hepatectomy rates (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.61, I2 = 85%), as well as R0 resection rates (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.30, I2 = 40%). Nevertheless, no significant differences were achieved between groups in terms of overall survival (OS) (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, I2 = 52%) and disease-free survival (DFS) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.47-2.49, I2 = 54%), respectively. CONCLUSION ALPPS and TSH to treat CRLM seem to have comparable operative risks in terms of mortality rates. No definitive conclusions regarding OS and DFS can be drawn from the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Díaz Vico
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Health Research Institute of the Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Spain.
| | - Pablo Granero Castro
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain
| | - Laura Alcover Navarro
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Aida Suárez Sánchez
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Agustín (HUSA), Avilés, Spain
| | - Luka Mihic Góngora
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Eva María Montalvá Orón
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Maupoey Ibáñez
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nuria Truán Alonso
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Ignacio González-Pinto Arrillaga
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain
| | - José Electo Granero Trancón
- Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nassar A, Tzedakis S, Dhote A, Strigalev M, Coriat R, Karoui M, Dohan A, Gaillard M, Marchese U, Fuks D. Multiple Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020435. [PMID: 36672384 PMCID: PMC9856366 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, liver cancer's minimally invasive approach has primarily become as a new standard of oncological care. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are one of the most developed indications of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). CRLM resection is still the best treatment known in terms of survival. As multiple CRLM are found in up to 80% of cases at diagnosis (Manfredi S. and al, Annals of Surgery 2006), a lot of possible technical management approaches are described. With the development of the parenchymal-sparing strategy, multiple concomitant laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are gaining acceptance. However, no recommendation is available regarding its indications and feasibility. Also, laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy is developing for bilobar CRLM, and this also does not have established recommendation. The purpose of this paper was to highlight novelty and updates in the field of multiple minimally invasive liver resections. A review of the international literature was performed. The feasibility of laparoscopic concomitant multiple LLR and two-stage hepatectomy for CRLM as well as their outcomes were discussed. These clarifications could further guide the implementation of minimal resection in multiple colorectal liver metastases therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-58-41-17-24
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alix Dhote
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marie Strigalev
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Department of General Digestive Surgery and Cancerology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aykut B, Lidsky ME. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Multimodal Therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:119-141. [PMID: 36410912 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Despite a steady decline in incidence and mortality rates, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most common cancer diagnosis in women and the third most common in men worldwide. Notably, the liver is recognized as the most common site of CRC metastasis, and metastases to the liver remain the primary driver of disease-specific mortality for patients with CRC. Although hepatic resection is the backbone of curative-intent treatment, management of CRLM has become increasingly multimodal during the last decade and includes the use of downstaging chemotherapy, ablation techniques, and locoregional therapy, each of which are reviewed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berk Aykut
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3966, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, 466G Seeley G. Mudd Building, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/BerkAykutMD
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3966, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, 466G Seeley G. Mudd Building, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tomida H, Notake T, Shimizu A, Kubota K, Umemura K, Kamachi A, Goto T, Yamazaki S, Soejima Y. Rescue percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization after failed associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in a patient with multiple liver metastases of rectal cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2022; 8:132. [PMID: 35831765 PMCID: PMC9279524 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01491-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Liver metastasis is the most common form of distant spread of colorectal cancer. Despite oncological and surgical advances, only about 25% of patients are eligible to undergo resection. As the liver has a limited resectable volume, tumor reduction and remnant liver hypertrophy are of critical importance in treating initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows rapid liver hypertrophy within a short period and has been reported to be useful in recent years. Case presentation A 29-year-old woman complaining of bloody stool was referred to our hospital. She was diagnosed with rectal cancer (Rb) with simultaneous multiple liver and lung metastases. The patient was then initially commenced on chemotherapy and completed it with a satisfactory response. Right trisectionectomy was necessary to achieve hepatic clearance; however, the future liver remnant (FLR) volume was insufficient. Therefore, we decided to perform totally laparoscopic ALPPS to obtain enough FLR volume. However, the FLR increase was slow, and FLR did not attain the required volume for right trisectionectomy. Computed tomography showed that right portal venous blood flow was increased via developed collateral vessels around the portal vein. We attempted to induce further liver growth by blocking portal blood flow using additional percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization (PTPE), and a rapid increase in FLR was obtained. The patient underwent right trisectionectomy and partial resection of S2 with negative margins, and the patient was discharged without postoperative liver failure. Conclusions Resumption of the portal venous blood flow through collateral vessels after ALPPS may have interfered with the planned residual liver hypertrophy. Performing PTPE in addition to ALPPS increased the FLR volume, and radical hepatectomy was completed safely. Remnant portal venous blood flow following ALPPS is an important issue to be considered in surgical planning, and early additional portal vein embolization could be effective.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lopez‐Lopez V, Linecker M, Cruz J, Brusadin R, Lopez‐Conesa A, Machado MA, Hernandez‐Alejandro R, Voskanyan AS, Li J, Balci D, Adam R, Ardiles V, De Santibañes E, Tomassini F, Troisi RI, Lurje G, Truant S, Pruvot F, Björnsson B, Stojanovic M, Montalti R, Cayuela V, Kozyrin I, Cai X, de Vicente E, Rauchfuss F, Lodge P, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Oldhafer KJ, Malago M, Petrowsky H, Clavien P, Robles‐Campos R. Liver growth prediction in ALPPS - A multicenter analysis from the international ALPPS registry. Liver Int 2022; 42:2815-2829. [PMID: 35533020 PMCID: PMC9796398 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While ALPPS triggers a fast liver hypertrophy, it is still unclear which factors matter most to achieve accelerated hypertrophy within a short period of time. The aim of the study was to identify patient-intrinsic factors related to the growth of the future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS This cohort study is composed of data derived from the International ALPPS Registry from November 2011 and October 2018. We analyse the influence of demographic, tumour type and perioperative data on the growth of the FLR. The volume of the FLR was calculated in millilitre and percentage using computed-tomography (CT) scans before and after stage 1, both according to Vauthey formula. RESULTS A total of 734 patients were included from 99 centres. The median sFLR at stage 1 and stage 2 was 0.23 (IQR, 0.18-0.28) and 0.39 (IQR: 0.31-0.46), respectively. The variables associated with a lower increase from sFLR1 to sFLR2 were age˃68 years (p = .02), height ˃1.76 m (p ˂ .01), weight ˃83 kg (p ˂ .01), BMI˃28 (p ˂ .01), male gender (p ˂ .01), antihypertensive therapy (p ˂ .01), operation time ˃370 minutes (p ˂ .01) and hospital stay˃14 days (p ˂ .01). The time required to reach sufficient volume for stage 2, male gender accounts 40.3% in group ˂7 days, compared with 50% of female, and female present 15.3% in group ˃14 days compared with 20.6% of male. CONCLUSIONS Height, weight, FLR size and gender could be the variables that most constantly influence both daily growths, the interstage increase and the standardized FLR before the second stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez‐Lopez
- Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University HospitalDepartament of Surgery and TransplantationIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and TransplantationUniversity Medical Center Schleswig‐HolsteinCampus KielGermany
| | - Juan Cruz
- Group of Applied Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Faculty of Computer ScienceUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University HospitalDepartament of Surgery and TransplantationIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| | - Asuncion Lopez‐Conesa
- Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University HospitalDepartament of Surgery and TransplantationIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| | | | - Roberto Hernandez‐Alejandro
- Division of Transplantation/Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of RochesterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Jun Li
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic SurgeryUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Deniz Balci
- Department of SurgeryAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
| | - René Adam
- Centre Hépato‐BiliaireHôpital Paul BrousseVillejuifFrance
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Liver Transplant Unit, Division of HPB Surgery, Department of SurgeryItalian Hospital Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Eduardo De Santibañes
- Liver Transplant Unit, Division of HPB Surgery, Department of SurgeryItalian Hospital Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Federico Tomassini
- Department of Oncological and Emergency SurgeryPoliclinico CasilinoRomeItaly
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryFederico II University HospitalNaplesItaly
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow‐KlinikumCharité‐Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and TransplantationUniversity HospitalLilleFrance
| | - Francois‐René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and TransplantationUniversity HospitalLilleFrance
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | | | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of HPB Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryFederico II University HospitalNaplesItaly
| | - Valentin Cayuela
- Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University HospitalDepartament of Surgery and TransplantationIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| | - Ivan Kozyrin
- Department of Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery and OncologyClinical Hospital #1 MEDSIMoscowRussia
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
| | | | - Falk Rauchfuss
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryJena University HospitalJenaGermany
| | - Peter Lodge
- HPB and Transplant UnitSt. James's University HospitalLeedsUK
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of SurgeryIRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of MedicineMilanItaly
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of SurgeryIRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, School of MedicineMilanItaly
| | - Karl J. Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Liver‐, Bileduct‐ and Pancreatic SurgeryAsklepios Hospital BarmbekHamburgGermany
| | - Massimo Malago
- Department of HPB‐ and Liver Transplantation SurgeryUniversity College London, Royal Free HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Pierre‐Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Ricardo Robles‐Campos
- Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinic and University HospitalDepartament of Surgery and TransplantationIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heil J, Schiesser M, Schadde E. Current trends in regenerative liver surgery: Novel clinical strategies and experimental approaches. Front Surg 2022; 9:903825. [PMID: 36157407 PMCID: PMC9491020 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver resections are performed to cure patients with hepatobiliary malignancies and metastases to the liver. However, only a small proportion of patients is resectable, largely because only up to 70% of liver tissue is expendable in a resection. If larger resections are performed, there is a risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Regenerative liver surgery addresses this limitation by increasing the future liver remnant to an appropriate size before resection. Since the 1980s, this surgery has evolved from portal vein embolization (PVE) to a multiplicity of methods. This review presents an overview of the available methods and their advantages and disadvantages. The first use of PVE was in patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas. The increase in liver volume induced by PVE equals that of portal vein ligation, but both result only in a moderate volume increase. While awaiting sufficient liver growth, 20%–40% of patients fail to achieve resection, mostly due to the progression of disease. The MD Anderson Cancer Centre group improved the PVE methodology by adding segment 4 embolization (“high-quality PVE”) and demonstrated that oncological results were better than non-surgical approaches in this previously unresectable patient population. In 2012, a novel method of liver regeneration was proposed and called Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). ALPPS accelerated liver regeneration by a factor of 2–3 and increased the resection rate to 95%–100%. However, ALPPS fell short of expectations due to a high mortality rate and a limited utility only in highly selected patients. Accelerated liver regeneration, however, was there to stay. This is evident in the multiplicity of ALPPS modifications like radiofrequency or partial ALPPS. Overall, rapid liver regeneration allowed an expansion of resectability with increased perioperative risk. But, a standardized low-risk approach to rapid hypertrophy has been missing and the techniques used and in use depend on local expertise and preference. Recently, however, simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) appears to offer both rapid hypertrophy and no increased clinical risk. While prospective randomized comparisons are underway, PVE/HVE has the potential to become the future gold standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marc Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- Correspondence: Erik Schadde
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Efficacy and Safety of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02627-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
23
|
The Role of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in HCC Carcinogenesis and Treatment: Harnessing Innate Immunity. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133150. [PMID: 35804922 PMCID: PMC9264914 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) remains a major concern for the public health. The pandemic of metabolic syndrome in the Western societies and the considerable amounts of viral hepatitis in the underdeveloped countries keep fueling s the development of HCC. The hepatotropic viruses evade the NLRP3 inflammasome in order to sustain the chronicity of infection leading to cirrhosis while in the established tumors the activation of NLRP3 promotes several pro-tumorigenic effects. That leads to substantial economic burden for the societies and alternative therapeutic targets should be investigated. Reviewing past and more recent literature it can be deduced that the NLRP3 inflammasome could be an ideal therapeutic effects and it should be studied in more depth. Abstract The HCC constitutes one of the most frequent cancers, with a non-decreasing trend in disease mortality despite advances in systemic therapy and surgery. This trend is fueled by the rise of an obesity wave which is prominent the Western populations and has reshaped the etiologic landscape of HCC. Interest in the nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing (NLR) family member NLRP3 has recently been revived since it would appear that, by generating inflammasomes, it participates in several physiologic processes and its dysfunction leads to disease. The NLRP3 inflammasome has been studied in depth, and its influence in HCC pathogenesis has been extensively documented during the past quinquennial. Since inflammation comprises a major regulator of carcinogenesis, it is of paramount importance an attempt to evaluate the contribution of the NLRP3 inflammasome to the generation and management of HCC. The aim of this review was to examine the literature in order to determine the impact of the NLRP3 inflammasome on, and present a hypothesis about its input in, HCC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Improved Survival over Time After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Clinical Impact of Multigene Alteration Testing in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:583-593. [PMID: 34506029 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05110-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past 20 years have seen advances in colorectal cancer management. We sought to determine whether survival in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has improved in association with three landmark advances: introduction of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens, molecular targeted therapy, and multigene alteration testing. METHODS Patients undergoing CLM resection during 1998-2014 were identified and grouped by resection year. The influence of alterations in RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 was evaluated and validated in an external cohort including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. RESULTS Of 1961 patients, 1599 met the inclusion criteria. Irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens and molecular targeted therapy were used for more than 50% of patients starting in 2001 and starting in 2006, respectively, so patients were grouped as undergoing resection during 1998-2000, 2001-2005, or 2006-2014. Liver resectability indications expanded over time. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in 2006-2014, vs. 2001-2005 (56.5% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.001). RAS alteration was associated with worse 5-year OS than RAS wild-type (44.8% vs. 63.3%, P < 0.001). However, OS did not differ significantly between patients with RAS alteration and wild-type TP53 and SMAD4 and patients with RAS wild-type in our cohort (P = 0.899) or the external cohort (P = 0.932). Of 312 patients with genetic sequencing data, 178 (57.1%) had clinically actionable alterations. CONCLUSION OS after CLM resection has improved with advances in medical therapy and surgical technique. Multigene alteration testing is useful for prognostication and identification of potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
|
25
|
Omichi K, Inoue Y, Mise Y, Oba A, Ono Y, Sato T, Ito H, Takahashi Y, Saiura A. Hepatectomy with Perioperative Chemotherapy for Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases is the Available Option for Prolonged Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3567-3576. [PMID: 35118524 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11345-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic resection combined with perioperative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). However, the optimal surgical strategy for treating advanced CLMs remains unclear. The role of the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy in the management of multiple CLMs remains challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-step hepatectomy (OSH)-treated and TSH-treated patients with multiple CLMs. METHODS This single-institution study included 742 consecutive patients who underwent initial liver resection for histologically confirmed CLMs. The study enrolled patients with 10 or more tumors (n = 106). Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent OSH and those who underwent TSH for 10 or more CLMs. RESULTS The study planned OSH for 67 patients (63%) and TSH for 39 patients (37%). One of the OSH-planned patients and two of the TSH-planned patients underwent a trial laparotomy because of non-curative factors. Five patients (13%) did not progress to the second stage of TSH. In the entire cohort, the cumulative 3-year overall survival rate was 58.4% for the patients who had 10 or more CLMs treated with OSH compared with 61.1% for the patients treated with TSH (P = 0.746). In the curative resection cohort, the cumulative 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 18.2% for the patients treated with OSH and 17.9% for the patients treated with TSH (P = 0.640). CONCLUSIONS Hepatectomy with perioperative chemotherapy for advanced CLMs with 10 or more tumors is feasible and effective. To prolong survival, TSH is a promising option when curative resection with OSH is impossible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyohiko Omichi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Herman P, Fonseca GM, Coelho FF, Kruger JAP, Makdissi FF, Jeismann VB, Carrilho FJ, D'Albuquerque LAC, Nahas SC. Two decades of liver resection with a multidisciplinary approach in a single institution: What has changed? Analysis of 1409 cases. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2022; 77:100088. [PMID: 35901605 PMCID: PMC9326330 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate results of patients undergoing liver resection in a single center over the past two decades with a particular look at Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). METHOD Patients were divided into two eras, from 2000 to 2010 (Era 1) and 2011 to 2020 (Era 2). The most frequent diagnosis was CRLM and HCC, with 738 (52.4%) and 227 (16.1%) cases respectively. An evaluation of all liver resection cases and a subgroup analysis of both CRLM and HCC were performed. Preoperative and per operative variables and long-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS 1409 liver resections were performed. In Era 2 the authors observed higher BMI, more: minimally invasive surgeries, Pringle maneuvers, and minor liver resections; and less transfusion, less ICU necessity, and shorter length of hospital stay. Severe complications were observed in 14.7% of patients, and 90-day mortality was 4.2%. Morbidity and mortality between eras were not different. From 738 CRLM resections, in Era 2 there were significantly more patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bilateral metastases, and smaller sizes with significantly less transfusion, the necessity of ICU, and shorter length of hospital stay. More pedicle clamping, minimally invasive surgeries, and minor resections were also observed. From 227 HCC resections, in Era 2 significantly more minimally invasive surgeries, fewer transfusions, less necessity of ICU, and shorter length of hospital stay were observed. OS was not different between eras for CRLM and HCC. CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection in a multidisciplinary environment remains the cornerstone for the curative treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Herman
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fabio Ferrari Makdissi
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Vagner Birk Jeismann
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Flair José Carrilho
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sergio Carlos Nahas
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Haberman DM, Andriani OC, Segaran NL, Volpacchio MM, Micheli ML, Russi RH, Pérez Fernández IA. Role of CT in Two-Stage Liver Surgery. Radiographics 2022; 42:106-124. [PMID: 34990325 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Complete resection is the only potentially curative treatment for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Improvements in surgical techniques such as conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein embolization and ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) promote hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR), expanding resection criteria to include patients with widespread hepatic disease who were formerly not considered candidates for resection. Radiologists are essential in the multidisciplinary approach required for TSH. In particular, multidetector CT has a critical role throughout the various stages of this surgical process. The aims of CT before the first stage of TSH are to define the feasibility of surgery, assess the number and location of liver tumors in relation to relevant anatomy, and provide a detailed anatomic evaluation, including vascular and biliary variants. Volume calculation with CT is also essential to determine if the FLR is sufficient to avoid posthepatectomy liver failure. The objectives of CT between the first and second stages of TSH are to recalculate liver volumes (ie, assess FLR hypertrophy) and depict expected liver changes and complications that could modify the surgical plan or preclude the second stage of definitive resection. In this review, the importance of CT throughout different stages of TSH is discussed and key observations that contribute to surgical planning are highlighted. In addition, the advantages and limitations of MRI for detection of liver metastases and assessment of complications are briefly described. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego M Haberman
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Oscar C Andriani
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Nicole L Segaran
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Mariano M Volpacchio
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Maria Lucrecia Micheli
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Rodolfo H Russi
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| | - Ignacio A Pérez Fernández
- From the Body Imaging Section, Centro de Diagnóstico Rossi, Esmeralda 141, Buenos Aires C1035ABD, Argentina (D.M.H., M.M.V., M.L.M.); Oncosurgical HPB Unit, Sanatorio de los Arcos, Swiss Medical Group, HPB, Buenos Aires, Argentina (O.C.A., R.H.R., I.A.P.F.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (N.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nagai Y, Kiyomatsu T, Gohda Y, Otani K, Deguchi K, Yamada K. The primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: A focused review on its impact on surgical management. Glob Health Med 2021; 3:386-393. [PMID: 35036620 DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The primary tumor location (PTL) has attracted increasing attention in recent years for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although the underlying mechanisms for differences caused by PTL remain still unclear, right-sided colon (RCC) and left-sided colon (LCC) are now considered as distinct entities because of their different molecular profile and clinical response to surgery and chemotherapy. In this article, we review the influence of PTL particularly on surgical management of primary and metastatic CRC settings. For nonmetastatic CRC, RCC could be a slightly superior prognostic factor after curative resection in stage I-II CRC, while RCC could be an inferior prognostic factor in stage III CRC with worse survival after recurrence, suggesting the oncological aggressiveness of recurrent RCC. For metastatic CRC, RCC could be a predictor of worse survival after hepatectomy of liver metastases from CRC with aggressive recurrence pattern and lower chance of re-resection. In lung metastases from CRC, the role of PTL still remains uncertain because of the limited number of studies. As to the impact of PTL on survival outcome after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases from CRC, a discrepancy exists among studies and further investigation will be needed. The very simple clinical factor of PTL could provide important information for the prediction of the survival outcome after surgery in CRC. Further clinical and basic research will facilitate the clinical application of PTL in a more specified and personalized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzo Nagai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomomichi Kiyomatsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Gohda
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Otani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuya Deguchi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yamada
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nagai Y, Kiyomatsu T, Gohda Y, Otani K, Deguchi K, Yamada K. The primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: A focused review on its impact on surgical management. Glob Health Med 2021. [PMID: 35036620 DOI: 10.3577/ghm.2020.01096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
The primary tumor location (PTL) has attracted increasing attention in recent years for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although the underlying mechanisms for differences caused by PTL remain still unclear, right-sided colon (RCC) and left-sided colon (LCC) are now considered as distinct entities because of their different molecular profile and clinical response to surgery and chemotherapy. In this article, we review the influence of PTL particularly on surgical management of primary and metastatic CRC settings. For nonmetastatic CRC, RCC could be a slightly superior prognostic factor after curative resection in stage I-II CRC, while RCC could be an inferior prognostic factor in stage III CRC with worse survival after recurrence, suggesting the oncological aggressiveness of recurrent RCC. For metastatic CRC, RCC could be a predictor of worse survival after hepatectomy of liver metastases from CRC with aggressive recurrence pattern and lower chance of re-resection. In lung metastases from CRC, the role of PTL still remains uncertain because of the limited number of studies. As to the impact of PTL on survival outcome after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases from CRC, a discrepancy exists among studies and further investigation will be needed. The very simple clinical factor of PTL could provide important information for the prediction of the survival outcome after surgery in CRC. Further clinical and basic research will facilitate the clinical application of PTL in a more specified and personalized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzo Nagai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomomichi Kiyomatsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Gohda
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Otani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuya Deguchi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yamada
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maupoey Ibáñez J, Montalvá Orón EM, Boscà Robledo A, Camacho Ramírez A, Hernando Sanz A, Granero Castro P, Alegre Delgado A, López-Andújar R. From conventional two-stage hepatectomy to ALPPS: Fifteen years of experience in a hepatobiliary surgery unit. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2021; 20:542-550. [PMID: 34465545 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatectomy in patients with large tumor load may result in postoperative liver failure and associated complications due to excessive liver parenchyma removal. Conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique are possible solutions to this problem. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is the most frequent indication, and there is a need to assess outcomes for both techniques to improve surgical and long-term oncological outcomes in these patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was designed to compare TSH with ALPPS in patients with initially unresectable bilateral liver tumors between January 2005 and January 2020. ALPPS was performed from January 2012 onwards as the technique of choice. Long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated as primary outcome in CRLM patients. Postoperative morbidity, mortality and liver growth in all patients were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 38 staged hepatectomies were performed: 17 TSH and 21 ALPPS. Complete resection rate was 76.5% (n = 13) in the TSH group and 85.7% (n = 18) in the ALPPS group (P = 0.426). Overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a) (stage 1 + stage 2) was 41.2% (n = 7) in TSH and 33.3% (n = 7) in ALPPS patients (P = 0.389), and perioperative 90-day mortalities were 11.8% (n = 2) vs. 19.0% (n = 4) in each group, respectively (P = 0.654). Intention-to-treat OS rates at 1 and 5 years in CRLM patients for TSH (n = 15) were 80% and 33%, and for ALPPS (n = 17) 76% and 35%, respectively. DFS rates at 1 and 5 years were 36% and 27% in the TSH group vs. 33% and 27% in the ALPPS group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ALPPS is an effective alternative to TSH in bilateral affecting liver tumors, allowing higher resection rate, but patients must be carefully selected. In CRLM patients similar long-term OS and DFS can be achieved with both techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Maupoey Ibáñez
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Eva María Montalvá Orón
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrea Boscà Robledo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alonso Camacho Ramírez
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Hernando Sanz
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pablo Granero Castro
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Del Basso C, Gaillard M, Lainas P, Zervaki S, Perlemuter G, Chagué P, Rocher L, Voican CS, Dagher I, Tranchart H. Current strategies to induce liver remnant hypertrophy before major liver resection. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1629-1641. [PMID: 34904033 PMCID: PMC8637666 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatic resection is the gold standard for patients affected by primary or metastatic liver tumors but is hampered by the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Despite recent improvements, liver surgery still requires excellent clinical judgement in selecting patients for surgery and, above all, efficient pre-operative strategies to provide adequate future liver remnant. The aim of this article is to review the literature on the rational, the preliminary assessment, the advantages as well as the limits of each existing technique for preparing the liver for major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Del Basso
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Stella Zervaki
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Gabriel Perlemuter
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Pierre Chagué
- Department of Radiology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Department of Radiology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Cosmin Sebastian Voican
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Hadrien Tranchart
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rey Chaves CE, Conde D, Tapias L, Roa I, Sabogal Olarte JC. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS): A two staged procedure, in Bogotá Colombia. Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2021; 89:106560. [PMID: 34808445 PMCID: PMC8607210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction For liver tumors (primary or metastases), surgery combined with neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy is the treatment of choice, offering long term survival time and disease-free time period (Alvarez et al., 2012) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation, or ALPPS, it's a surgical technique that increases the future liver remnant in a short period of time, trying to avoid postoperative liver failure (PLF), and achieving R0 resections in liver malignant tumors (Alvarez et al., 2012). Presentation of the case A 43 years old woman with colorectal liver metastases in both lobes. Colorectal surgical procedure was performed 1 year previous the liver intervention, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Decision of a tri-segmental hepatectomy was made to resolve the metastases. Into the surgical procedure, we evaluated the liver parenchyma, and the future liver remnant tissue was insufficient, for that reason we decided to perform ALPPS procedure. Discussion Colorectal liver metastases (CLRM) are considered the most common indication for ALPPS procedure according to the international registry. Compared with the portal vein ligation, resection rate varies from 50 to 80%, and the non-resectability disease was explained by tumor progression. Postoperative mortality rate was 5.1% in young patients (<60 years old), and 8% in general for CRLM. Oncologic outcomes represent an increased disease-free survival period and overall survival time compared with non-surgical approach. Conclusion The ALPPS procedure it's an interesting approach to patients with not enough liver remnant tissue, with good oncologic results in terms of disease-free survival time, and overall survival. Appropriate selection of the patient, careful postoperative management, and a multidisciplinary approach are related with good postoperative outcomes. ALPPS should be in the surgical armamentarium in liver metastases from colorectal neoplasms, as well hepatocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Multidisciplinary approach in liver metastases impact in postoperative outcomes Adequate selection of patient reflects in postoperative outcomes and prolonged disease-free survival and overall survival period. This case report, it’s the first one published in Colombia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danny Conde
- Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi, Colombia
| | - Laura Tapias
- School of Medicine, Universidad el Rosario, Colombia
| | - Isabella Roa
- School of Medicine, Universidad el Rosario, Colombia
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ettrich TJ, Hüttner FJ, Lisson C, Gani C, Prasad V, Seufferlein T. [Multimodal, interdisciplinary therapeutic concepts for liver metastasized colorectal cancer]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146:1468-1477. [PMID: 34741292 DOI: 10.1055/a-1391-5273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
About half of all patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) develop metastases mainly in the liver during the course of their disease. Metastatic disease is associated with a low 5-year overall survival rate of only 5-7 %, particularly when there is no possibility of local treatment. However, if there is an opportunity to resect the metastases, especially isolated liver metastases, the chance of long-term survival is approximately 15-27 % after both primary resection or secondary resection after neoadjuvant pretreatment. Overall, long-term survival of patients with metastatic CRC has improved significantly in recent years due to a combination of modern systemic therapies, advanced liver surgery and local ablative procedures.Of note, for the vast majority of patients, metastatic resection does not mean cure, but a significant prolongation of overall survival with a good quality of life. Chemotherapy-free intervals after metastasis resection maintain quality of life and can help to reduce toxicity.In this review, we would like to present the "toolbox" for the multidisciplinary treatment of metastatic CRC and give recommendations how the individual modalities should be optimally used, considering tumor-specific characteristics and patient preferences.
Collapse
|
34
|
The evolution of surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A persistent challenge to improve survival. Surgery 2021; 170:1732-1740. [PMID: 34304889 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Only a few decades ago, the opinion that colorectal liver metastases were a palliative diagnosis changed. In fact, previously, the prevailing view was strongly resistant against resecting colorectal liver metastases. Constant technical improvement of liver surgery and, much later, effective chemotherapy allowed for a successful wider application of surgery. The clinical use of portal vein embolization was the starting signal of regenerative liver surgery, where insufficient liver volume can be expanded to an extent where safe resection is possible. Today, a number of these techniques including portal vein ligation, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and bi-embolization (portal and hepatic vein) can be successfully used to address an insufficient future liver remnant in staged resections. It turned out that the road to success is embedding surgery in a well-orchestrated oncological concept of controlling systemic disease. This concept was the prerequisite that meant liver transplantation could enter the treatment strategy for colorectal liver metastases, ending up with a 5-year overall survival of 80% in highly selected cases. In particular, techniques combining principles of 2-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation, such as "resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy" (RAPID) are on the rise. These techniques enable the use of partial liver grafts with primarily insufficient liver volume. All this progress also prompted a number of innovative local therapies to address recurrences ultimately transferring colorectal liver metastases from instantly deadly into a chronic disease in some cases.
Collapse
|
35
|
Procopio F, Cimino M, Viganò L, Colombo AE, Franchi E, Costa G, Donadon M, Del Fabbro D, Torzilli G. Prediction of remnant liver volume using 3D simulation software in patients undergoing R1vasc parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases: reliability, clinical impact, and learning curve. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1084-1094. [PMID: 33353822 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of the future liver remnant (FLR) is routinely performed before major hepatectomy. In R1-vascular one-stage hepatectomy (R1vasc-OSH), given the multiplanar dissection paths, the FLR is not easily predictable. Preoperative 3D-virtual casts may help. We evaluated the predictability of the FLR using the 3D-virtual cast in the R1vasc-OSH for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS Thirty consecutive patients with multiple bilobar CLMs scheduled for R1vasc-OSH were included. Predicted and real-FLRs were compared. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to determine the impact of 3D-virtual cast on postoperative complications. RESULTS Median number of CLM and resection areas were 12 (4-33) and 3 (1-8). Median predicted-FLR was 899 ml (558-1157) and 60% (42-85), while for the real-FLR 915 ml (566-1777) and 63% (43-87). Median discrepancy between predicted and real-FLR was -0.6% (p = 0.504), indicating a slight tendency to underestimate the FLR. The difference was more evident in more than 12 CLMs (p = 0.013). A discrepancy was not evident according to the number of resection areas (p = 0.316). No mortality occurred. Patients in virtual-group had lower major complications compared to nonvirtual-group (0% vs 18%, p-value 0.014). CONCLUSION FLR estimation based on 3D-analysis is feasible, provides a safe surgery and represents a promising method in planning R1vasc-OSH for patients with multiple bilobar CLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Procopio
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Cimino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna E Colombo
- Pathology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Eloisa Franchi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Costa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Del Fabbro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Isoniemi H, Uutela A, Nordin A, Lantto E, Kellokumpu I, Ovissi A, Kosunen J, Kallio R, Soveri LM, Salminen T, Ålgars A, Lamminmäki A, Halonen P, Ristamäki R, Räsänen J, Karjula H, Vaalavuo Y, Lavonius M, Osterlund P. Centralized repeated resectability assessment of patients with colorectal liver metastases during first-line treatment: prospective study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:817-825. [PMID: 33749772 PMCID: PMC10364914 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases. METHODS The prospective RAXO study was a nationwide study in Finland. Patients with treatable metastatic colorectal cancer at any site were eligible. This planned substudy included patients with baseline liver metastases between 2012 and 2018. Resectability was reassessed by the multidisciplinary team at Helsinki tertiary referral centre upfront and twice during first-line systemic therapy. Outcomes were resectability rates, management changes, and survival. RESULTS Of 812 patients included, 301 (37.1 per cent) had liver-only metastases. Of these, tumours were categorized as upfront resectable in 161 (53.5 per cent), and became amenable to surgery during systemic treatment in 63 (20.9 per cent). Some 207 patients (68.7 per cent) eventually underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy in resectability between central and local judgement was noted for 102 patients (33.9 per cent). Median disease-free survival (DFS) after first resection was 20 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 80, 32, and 21 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, and 5-year OS rates were 68, 37, and 9 per cent, respectively. Liver and extrahepatic metastases were present in 511 patients. Of these, tumours in 72 patients (14.1 per cent) were categorized as upfront resectable, and 53 patients (10.4 per cent) became eligible for surgery. Eventually 110 patients (21.5 per cent) underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy between local and central resectability was noted for 116 patients (22.7 per cent). Median DFS from first resection was 7 months and median OS 55 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 79, 42, and 17 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, with 5-year OS rates of 65, 39, and 2 per cent, respectively. CONCLUSION Repeated centralized resectability assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases improved resection and survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Isoniemi
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A Uutela
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Lantto
- Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| | - I Kellokumpu
- Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - A Ovissi
- Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Kosunen
- Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - L M Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Hyvinkää Hospital and Home Care, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - T Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - A Lamminmäki
- Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - P Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - J Räsänen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - H Karjula
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Y Vaalavuo
- Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - M Lavonius
- Department of Surgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Induction of liver hypertrophy for extended liver surgery and partial liver transplantation: State of the art of parenchyma augmentation-assisted liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2201-2215. [PMID: 33740114 PMCID: PMC8578101 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02148-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Liver surgery and transplantation currently represent the only curative treatment options for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Despite the ability of the liver to regenerate after tissue loss, 25–30% future liver remnant is considered the minimum requirement to prevent serious risk for post-hepatectomy liver failure. Purpose The aim of this review is to depict the various interventions for liver parenchyma augmentation–assisting surgery enabling extended liver resections. The article summarizes one- and two-stage procedures with a focus on hypertrophy- and corresponding resection rates. Conclusions To induce liver parenchymal augmentation prior to hepatectomy, most techniques rely on portal vein occlusion, but more recently inclusion of parenchymal splitting, hepatic vein occlusion, and partial liver transplantation has extended the technical armamentarium. Safely accomplishing major and ultimately total hepatectomy by these techniques requires integration into a meaningful oncological concept. The advent of highly effective chemotherapeutic regimen in the neo-adjuvant, interstage, and adjuvant setting has underlined an aggressive surgical approach in the given setting to convert formerly “palliative” disease into a curative and sometimes in a “chronic” disease.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Yoshida R, Ando S, Nakamura K, Kishi T, Nishi T, Nakamura M, Tajima Y. Laparoscopic portal branch ligation of the right caudate lobe concomitant with portal vein embolization for planned right hemihepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:917-926. [PMID: 33710463 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02147-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of ligation of the portal venous branches to the caudate lobe (cPVL) as preparation for planned major hepatectomy is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic cPVL (Lap-cPVL) concomitant with transileocolic portal vein embolization of the right portal venous system (rTIPE), namely, Lap-cPVL/rTIPE, for planned right hemihepatectomy (rHx) in advanced hepatobiliary cancer patients. METHODS Thirty-one patients who underwent rHx after rTIPE with/without Lap-cPVL between March 2013 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. The Lap-cPVL was performed for the portal branches of the right caudate lobe. RESULTS Eight of the 31 patients underwent Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. The degree of hypertrophy was significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (19.3%, range 6.5-25.6%) as compared to rTIPE (7.2%, range - 1.1 to 21.2%) (p=0.027). The functional kinetic growth rate was also significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (5.40%, range 2.17-5.97) than that in rTIPE (1.85%, range - 0.22 to 6.45%) (p=0.046). Postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B occurred in 21.7% of patients in rTIPE, while there was no postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. Mortality rates were zero after rHx in this study. CONCLUSIONS Lap-cPVL/rTIPE is safe and provides an additional effect on liver hypertrophy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasunari Kawabata
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
| | - Hikota Hayashi
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Rika Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Shinji Ando
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Kosuke Nakamura
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Takashi Kishi
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nishi
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Megumi Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Tajima
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
ALPPS Improves Survival Compared With TSH in Patients Affected of CRLM: Survival Analysis From the Randomized Controlled Trial LIGRO. Ann Surg 2021; 273:442-448. [PMID: 32049675 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological outcome for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) randomized to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). BACKGROUND TSH with portal vein occlusion is an established method for patients with CRLM and a low volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). ALPPS is a less established method. The oncological outcome of these methods has not been previously compared in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS One hundred patients with CRLM and standardized FLR (sFLR) <30% were included and randomized to resection by ALPPS or TSH, with the option of rescue ALPPS in the TSH group, if the criteria for volume increase was not met. The first radiological follow-up was performed approximately 4 weeks postoperatively and then after 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months. At all the follow-ups, the remaining/recurrent tumor was noted. After the first follow-up, chemotherapy was administered, if indicated. RESULTS The resection rate, according to the intention-to-treat principle, was 92% (44 patients) for patients randomized to ALPPS compared with 80% (39 patients) for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.091), including rescue ALPPS. At the first postoperative follow-up, 37 patients randomized to ALPPS were assessed as tumor free in the liver, and also 28 patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). The estimated median survival for patients randomized to ALPPS was 46 months compared with 26 months for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS ALPPS seems to improve survival in patients with CRLM and sFLR <30% compared with TSH.
Collapse
|
40
|
Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Real World: Single Center Experience in 1212 Cases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051178. [PMID: 33803257 PMCID: PMC7967178 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant evolution thanks to technical improvements as well as oncological advances, which have been the subject of targeted studies aimed at understanding the details of this heterogeneous disease. The purpose of this study is to put together pieces of this complex scenario by providing an overview of the evolution that has occurred in the context of a single center within a multidisciplinary management approach. METHODS Between 2005 and 2020, 1212 resections for CRLM were performed at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Division of San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. The series was divided into three historical periods, which were compared in terms of disease characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes: Period 1, 2005-2009 (293 cases); Period 2, 2010-2014 (353 cases); Period 3, 2015-2020 (566 cases). The trends for surgical technical complexity, oncological burden of the disease, use of the laparoscopic approach and use of techniques for hepatic hypertrophy were analyzed year by year. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with inclusion to a laparoscopic approach and with long-term prognosis. RESULTS The number of resections performed over the years progressively increased, with an increase in the number of cases with a high Clinical Risk Score and a high profile of technical complexity. The proportion of cases performed laparoscopically increased, but less rapidly compared to other malignant tumors. The risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality was similar in the three analyzed periods. Long-term survival, stratified by Clinical Risk Score, improved in Period 3, while overall survival remained unchanged. CONCLUSION The cultural background, the maturation of technical expertise and the consolidation of the multidisciplinary team have resulted in safe expansion of the possibility to offer a curative opportunity to patients, while continuously implementing into clinical practice evidence provided by the literature.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bong JW, Ju Y, Seo J, Kang SH, Park PJ, Choi SB, Lee SI, Oh SC, Min BW. Effects of the proximity of metastasis to the central vessels of the liver on surgical outcomes and survival in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:E183-E189. [PMID: 33634960 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resectability of liver metastasis is important to establish a treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the distance from metastasis to the centre of the liver on surgical outcomes and survival after hepatectomy. METHODS The clinical data of a total of 155 patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. We measured the minimal length from metastasis to the bifurcation of the portal vein at the primary branch of the Glissonean tree and defined it as 'centrality'. The postoperative outcomes and survival among the patients were then analysed. RESULTS Anatomic resections were more frequently performed, and the operative time was longer in the patients with high centrality (≤1.5 cm) than in the patients with low centrality (>1.5 cm). A size of ≥5 cm for the largest lesion, a number of lesions of ≥3 and centrality of ≤1.5 cm were found to be the independent risk factors of a positive resection margin after hepatectomy. The patients with high centrality showed worse recurrence-free survival than those with low centrality; however, there was no significant difference found in the overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, high centrality was not found to be associated with worse recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION Centrality significantly affected the surgical outcomes and treatment strategy for liver metastasis but did not influence the survival of the patients with colorectal cancer. Active efforts through surgical resections are important to treat liver metastasis of high centrality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Woo Bong
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeonuk Ju
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihyun Seo
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hee Kang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Pyoung-Jae Park
- Division of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sae-Byeol Choi
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Il Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Cheul Oh
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Wook Min
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M. The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:559-568. [PMID: 33537846 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08317-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients, laparoscopic liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) leads to better short-term outcomes and comparable oncologic outcomes in comparison with an open approach. However, its role in two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) remains poorly explored. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the first and second stage of TSH. Demographic data, comorbid factors, perioperative outcomes, and short-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Between September 2011 and May 2020, 23 patients were planned to undergo a TSH. The first stage hepatectomy (FSH) was performed laparoscopically in 22 patients (96%) without need for conversion. The median blood loss was 50 cc (IQR 30-100 cc) and postoperative length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 2.5-5 days). R0 resections were obtained in 18 FSHs (78%), while all others were R1 vascular (22%). Fourteen patients (61%) underwent a second stage hepatectomy (SSH). All SSHs were anatomically major hepatectomies. SSH was performed laparoscopically in 7 patients (50%), with need for conversion in 1 case (14%). The median blood loss was slightly lower in the open liver resection (OLR) group compared to the LLR group (200 cc (IQR 110-375 cc) vs. 240 cc (IQR 150-400 cc), respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3 days shorter in the LLR group compared to the OLR group (4 days (IQR 3.5-4 days) vs. 7 days (IQR 4.5-8.5 days), respectively). CONCLUSIONS The already proven advantages of LLR in the treatment of CRLM favor the role of a laparoscopic approach in TSH for CRLM. In first stage minor or technically major hepatectomy, LLR is progressively becoming the gold standard. Laparoscopic second stage anatomically major hepatectomy is feasible in experienced hands, but should be limited to selected cases and should be performed in expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dixon MEB, Gusani NJ. Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases: Challenges and Opportunities. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:1268-1270. [PMID: 33393022 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09468-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E B Dixon
- Program for Liver, Pancreas, and Foregut Tumors, Division of Surgical Oncology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Niraj J Gusani
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yamamoto Y. Evaluation of Liver Function and the Role of Biliary Drainage before Major Hepatic Resections. Visc Med 2020; 37:10-17. [PMID: 33718480 DOI: 10.1159/000512439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prevention of posthepatectomy liver failure is a prerequisite for improving the postoperative outcome of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. From this perspective, appropriate assessment of future liver remnant (FLR) function and the optimized preparation are mandatory. Summary FLR volume ratio using CT volumetry based on 3-dimensional vascular imaging is the current assessment yardstick and is sufficient for assessing a normal liver. However, in a liver with underling parenchymal disease such as fibrosis or prolonged jaundice, weighing up the degree of liver damage against the FLR volume ratio is necessary to know the real FLR function. For this purpose, the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test, monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) test, liver maximum capacity (LiMAX) test, 99mTc-labeled galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) scintigraphy, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and ALPlat (albumin × platelets) criterion are used. After the optimization of FLR function by means of portal vein embolization or associating liver partition and PVL (portal vein ligation) for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), SPECT scintigraphy with either 99mTc-GSA or 99mTc-mebrofenin compensates for misestimation due to the regional heterogeneity of liver function. The role of preoperative biliary drainage has long been debated, with the associated complications having led to a lack of approval. However, the recent establishment of safety and an improvement in success rates of endoscopic biliary drainage seem to be changing the awareness of the importance of biliary drainage. Key Messages Appropriate selection of an assessment method is of prime importance to predict the FLR function according to the preoperative condition of the liver. Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is gaining support due to the increasing safety and success rate, especially in patients who need optimization of their liver function before hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzo Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:755-772. [PMID: 32681074 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Malignant liver tumours include a wide range of primary and secondary tumours. Although surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment, modern therapies integrate a variety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies and have achieved dramatic improvements in survival. Extensive tumour loads, which have traditionally been considered unresectable, are now amenable to curative treatment through systemic conversion chemotherapies followed by a variety of interventions such as augmentation of the healthy liver through portal vein occlusion, staged surgeries or ablation modalities. Liver transplantation is established in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but is now emerging as a promising option in many other types of tumour such as perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. In this Review, we summarize the available therapies for the treatment of malignant liver tumours, with an emphasis on surgical and ablative approaches and how they align with other therapies such as modern anticancer drugs or radiotherapy. In addition, we describe three complex case studies of patients with malignant liver tumours. Finally, we discuss the outlook for future treatment, including personalized approaches based on molecular tumour subtyping, response to targeted drugs, novel biomarkers and precision surgery adapted to the specific tumour.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lang H. Liver resection is beneficial for patients with colorectal liver metastases and extrahepatic disease. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1122. [PMID: 33240971 PMCID: PMC7576061 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
De Raffele E, Mirarchi M, Cuicchi D, Lecce F, Casadei R, Ricci C, Selva S, Minni F. Simultaneous colorectal and parenchymal-sparing liver resection for advanced colorectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: Between conventional and mini-invasive approaches. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:6529-6555. [PMID: 33268945 PMCID: PMC7673966 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal timing of surgery in case of synchronous presentation of colorectal cancer and liver metastases is still under debate. Staged approach, with initial colorectal resection followed by liver resection (LR), or even the reverse, liver-first approach in specific situations, is traditionally preferred. Simultaneous resections, however, represent an appealing strategy, because may have perioperative risks comparable to staged resections in appropriately selected patients, while avoiding a second surgical procedure. In patients with larger or multiple synchronous presentation of colorectal cancer and liver metastases, simultaneous major hepatectomies may determine worse perioperative outcomes, so that parenchymal-sparing LR should represent the most appropriate option whenever feasible. Mini-invasive colorectal surgery has experienced rapid spread in the last decades, while laparoscopic LR has progressed much slower, and is usually reserved for limited tumours in favourable locations. Moreover, mini-invasive parenchymal-sparing LR is more complex, especially for larger or multiple tumours in difficult locations. It remains to be established if simultaneous resections are presently feasible with mini-invasive approaches or if we need further technological advances and surgical expertise, at least for more complex procedures. This review aims to critically analyze the current status and future perspectives of simultaneous resections, and the present role of the available mini-invasive techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio De Raffele
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Digestive Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Mirarchi
- Dipartimento Strutturale Chirurgico, Ospedale SS Antonio e Margherita, 15057 Tortona (AL), Italy
| | - Dajana Cuicchi
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Digestive Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Lecce
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Digestive Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Saverio Selva
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Digestive Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Minni
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhang J, Steib CJ. New evidence for liver venous deprivation: safety and feasibility for extended liver resections. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1259. [PMID: 33178791 PMCID: PMC7607134 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Zhang
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Liver Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Germany.,Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Christian J Steib
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Liver Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schwarz L, Nicol L, Francois A, Mulder P, Faitot F, Dazza M, Bucur P, Savoye-Collet C, Adam R, Vibert E. Major hepatectomy decreased tumor growth in an experimental model of bilobar liver metastasis. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1480-1489. [PMID: 32156510 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), is associated with a risk of drop-out due to tumoral progression following portal vein occlusion (PVO). We explored the impact of majorhepatectomy on tumor growth by objective radiological measures comparing to PVO and minor hepatectomy, using a model of bilobar colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). METHODS CLM were induced in 48 BDIX rats by injection of DHDK12-cells. 7 days after cells injection, animals were distributed into 4 groups of equal number (n = 12): portal vein ligation (PVL), sham laparotomy (sham), minor (30%Phx) and major (70%Phx) hepatectomy. MR imaging was used for in vivo analysis of tumor implantation, growth and volumes. RESULTS At POD10, tumour volumes were homogeneously distributed among the 4 groups. Lower TV were significantly observed after 70%Phx comparing to PVL at POD17 (0.63 ± 0.14cm3 vs 0.9 ± 0.16cm3, p = 0.008) and to the 3 others groups at POD24: 1.78 ± 0.38cm3 vs 3.2 ± 0.62cm3 (PVL, p = 0.019), 2.41 ± 0.74cm3 (Sham, p = 0.024) and 2.32 ± 0.59cm3 (30%PHx, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION We confirmed in a reproducible model that contrary to PVO, a major hepatectomy decreases the growth of CLM in the remnant liver. This result leads to questioning the usual TSH and justifies exploring alternative strategies. The "major hepatectomy first-approach" should be an option to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Schwarz
- Rouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76031, Rouen Cedex, France; Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, UMR 1245 INSERM, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Genomic and Personalized Medicine in Cancer and Neurological Disorders, F-76000, Rouen, France.
| | - Lionel Nicol
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1096, FHU- REMOD-VHF, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Arnaud Francois
- Rouen University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76031, Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Paul Mulder
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1096, FHU- REMOD-VHF, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - François Faitot
- Strasbourg University Hospital, Hôpital Hautepierre, Department of hepatobiliary and liver transplantation surgery, France
| | - Marie Dazza
- Rouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76031, Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Petru Bucur
- Tours University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, France
| | - Céline Savoye-Collet
- Rouen University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76031, Rouen Cedex, France; Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Quantif-LITIS EA 4108, Rouen University Hospital, France
| | - René Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation - Paul Brousse University Hospital, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation - Paul Brousse University Hospital, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schadde E, Grunhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Krzywon L, Metrakos P. Limitations in resectability of colorectal liver metastases 2020 - A systematic approach for clinicians and patients. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 71:10-20. [PMID: 32980499 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) affect over 50 % of all patients with colorectal cancer, which is the second leading cause of cancer in the western world. Resection of CRLM may provide cure and improves survival over chemotherapy alone. However, resectability of CLRM has to be decided in multidisciplinary tumor boards and is based on oncological factors, technical factors and patient factors. The advances of chemotherapy lead to the abolition of contraindications to resection in favor of technical resectability, but somatic mutations and molecular subtyping may improve selection of patients for resection in the future. Technical factors center around anatomy of the lesions, volume of the remnant liver and quality of the liver parenchymal. Multiple strategies have been developed to overcome volume limitations and they are reviewed here. The least investigated topic is how to select the right patients among an elderly and frail patient population for the large variety of technical options specifically for bi-lobar CRLM to keep 90-day mortality as low as possible. The review is an overview over the current state-of-the art and a systematic guide to the topic of resectability of CRLM for both clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Schadde
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Dirk J Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|