National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) levels

[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) combined with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus, and to explore the feasibility of partial nephrectomy and thrombectomy in this series of patients.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients diagnosed with RAML combined with IVC tumor thrombus in the Department of Urology of the Peking University Third Hospital from April 2014 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and demographic and perioperative data of RAML patients with IVC tumor thrombus were recorded and collected from Electronic Medical Record System, including age, gender, surgical methods, and follow-up time, etc. The clinical characteristics between classic angiomyolipoma (CAML) patients with IVC tumor thrombus and epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) patients with IVC tumor thrombus were compared to determine the clinical characteristics of these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients were included in this study, including 7 patients with CAML with IVC tumor thrombus and 4 patients with EAML with IVC tumor thrombus. There were 9 females (9/11, 81.8%) and 2 males (2/11, 18.2%), with an average age of (44.0±17.1) years. 9 patients (9/11, 81.8%) experienced clinical symptoms, including local symptoms including abdominal pain, hematuria, abdominal masses, and systemic symptoms including weight loss and fever; 2 patients (2/11, 18.2%) with RAML and IVC tumor thrombus did not show clinical symptoms, which were discovered by physical examination. Among the 11 patients, 10 underwent radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy, of whom, 3 underwent open surgery (3/10, 30.0%), 2 underwent laparoscopic surgery (2/10, 20.0%), and 5 underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (5/10, 50.0%). In addition, 1 patient underwent open partial nephrectomy and thrombectomy. The patients with EAML combined with IVC tumor thrombus had a higher proportion of systemic clinical symptoms (100% vs. 0%, P=0.003), more intraoperative bleeding [400 (240, 3 050) mL vs. 50 (50, 300) mL, P =0.036], and a higher proportion of tumor necrosis (75% vs. 0%, P=0.024) compared to the patients with CAML combined with IVC tumor thrombus. However, there was no statistically significant difference in operation time [(415.8±201.2) min vs. (226.0±87.3) min, P=0.053] between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the patients with CAML and IVC tumor thrombus, the patients with EAML and IVC tumor thrombus had a higher rate of systemic symptoms and tumor necrosis. In addition, in the selected patients with CAML with IVC tumor thrombus, partial nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy could be performed to better preserve renal function.

Local versus general anesthesia for stapes surgery: a prospective study of comfort and results on 100 ears

AIMS

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of perioperative comfort in patients undergoing otosclerosis surgery under local anesthesia versus general anesthesia and to compare audiometric results, quality of life and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective non-interventional study was performed. Patients undergoing otosclerosis surgery between January 2019 and March 2021 at the University Hospital of Rennes were included consecutively. Perioperative comfort of LA versus GA (at ward admission, surgery, recovery and 48 h following surgery) was measured on a visual analogue scale at 10 days postoperatively and quality of life by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory at 3 months. Complications and audiometric results were also assessed. To demonstrate the non-inferiority of LA versus GA with a margin of 1.5 points on the comfort VAS, a power of 80% and a first-order risk of 5, 100 patients were included and statistical analyses were performed in accordance with CONSORT2010 statement.

RESULTS

One hundred ears were analyzed, 46% operated under local anesthesia and 54% under general anesthesia. The two groups were similar in terms of demographic and pathological characteristics. Local anesthesia was non-inferior to general anesthesia in terms of comfort with a comfort VAS of 8.74 ± 1.55 and 9.08 ± 0.93 respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in rates of complications, audiometric results and quality of life between local and general anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthesia is non-inferior to general anesthesia in terms of perioperative patient comfort with similar audiometric results, postoperative quality of life and complication rates.

Comparison of NLP machine learning models with human physicians for ASA Physical Status classification

The American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification system assesses comorbidities before sedation and analgesia, but inconsistencies among raters have hindered its objective use. This study aimed to develop natural language processing (NLP) models to classify ASA-PS using pre-anesthesia evaluation summaries, comparing their performance to human physicians. Data from 717,389 surgical cases in a tertiary hospital (October 2004-May 2023) was split into training, tuning, and test datasets. Board-certified anesthesiologists created reference labels for tuning and test datasets. The NLP models, including ClinicalBigBird, BioClinicalBERT, and Generative Pretrained Transformer 4, were validated against anesthesiologists. The ClinicalBigBird model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.915. It outperformed board-certified anesthesiologists with a specificity of 0.901 vs. 0.897, precision of 0.732 vs. 0.715, and F1-score of 0.716 vs. 0.713 (all p <0.01). This approach will facilitate automatic and objective ASA-PS classification, thereby streamlining the clinical workflow.

Surgical outcomes and prognosis of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching study

This study compared the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis of intracorporeal and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer patients. In total 228 clinical stage I gastric cancer patients undergoing LTG were enrolled from January 2012 and December 2022. Each case in the totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) group was 1:1 propensity score-matched to control cases in the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group. In total, 95 and 93 LATG and TLTG patients were included after propensity score matching (PSM). Clinicopathological features, surgical outcomes, and survival variables were compared, and risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the LATG and TLTG groups after PSM. The TLTG group showed less blood loss, decreased frequency of analgesic use, and shorter duration of analgesic use. The TLTG group had significantly lower rates of intestinal obstruction and surgical site infection. Larger tumor size and advanced pTNM stage were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). Compared with LATG, TLTG was associated with better surgical outcomes and fewer postoperative surgical complications in gastric cancer patients although there was no significant difference in OS.

Factors Affecting 30-Day Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nontraumatic Upper Extremity Amputation: A Retrospective Descriptive Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Current literature concerning upper extremity amputations (UEAs) is very sparse. In this study, we conducted the first multicenter retrospective analysis aiming to identify risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing nontraumatic UEAs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult patients who underwent nontraumatic UEAs between 2005 and 2021 were divided into two cohorts based on whether they experienced 30-day major morbidity (MM). Thereafter, multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors of MM.

RESULTS

From a total of 2984 cases, MM was observed in 8.7% of patients. Factors associated with MM included American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 3 (odds ratio [OR], 2.974 [1.862 to 4.748]) and 4 (OR, 4.736 [2.857 to 7.848]), being underweight (OR, 2.370 [1.251 to 4.491]), and suffering from insulin-dependent diabetes (OR, 1.390 [1.018 to 1.898]). In addition, an infectious surgical indication was associated with an increased risk of MM compared with having a benign (OR, 0.648 [0.488 to 0.682]) or malignant (OR, 0.205 [0.091 to 0.462]) indication. Moreover, patients undergoing shoulder amputations were at an increased risk of MM compared with those undergoing amputations of the forearm/wrist (OR, 0.243 [0.072 to 0.819]) and hands/fingers (OR, 0.286 [0.095 to 0.861]).

CONCLUSION

The risk factors identified for MM after nontraumatic UEAs should guide surgeons toward appropriately identifying high-risk patients and adequately counseling them preoperatively.

How can we approach preoperative frailty and related factors in patients with cancer? A scoping review

AIM

To identify factors related to preoperative frailty in patients with cancer and map the tools that measure frailty.

DESIGN

A Scoping review.

METHODS

This scoping review based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Articles from CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases published between January 2011 and April 2021. The searched keywords were concepts related to 'cancer', 'frailty' and 'measurement'.

RESULTS

While 728 records were initially identified, 24 studies were eventually selected. Research on frailty was actively conducted between 2020 and 2021. Factors related to preoperative frailty were age (22.9%), sex (11.4%), body mass index (11.4%) and physical status indicators (54.3%). The most common result of preoperative frailty was postoperative complications (35.0%). 24 instruments were used to measure frailty.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Selecting an appropriate preoperative frailty screening tool can help improve patient postoperative treatment outcomes.

IMPACT

There are many instruments for assessing preoperative frailty, each evaluating a multi-dimensional feature. We identified the frailty screening tools used today, organized the factors that affect frailty, and explored the impact of frailty. Identifying and organizing frailty measurement tools will enable appropriate evaluation.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA-ScR.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

CT prognostic signs of postoperative complications in emergency surgery for acute obstructive colonic cancer

PURPOSE

To identify CT prognostic signs of poor outcomes in acute obstructive colonic cancer (AOCC).

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological and surgical data of 65 consecutive patients with AOCC who underwent emergency surgery were analyzed. CT exams were reviewed to assess diameters of cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid proximal to the tumor; colon segments' CD/L1-VD ratios, continence of the ileocecal valve, small bowel overdistension, presence of small bowel feces sign and cecal pneumatosis. Post Operative complications (PO), according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Gender, age and location of the tumor were not predictive factors of complications. Among laboratory exams, CRP was the most important predictive value of PO (OR 8.23). A cecum distension ≥ 9 cm represented the critical diameter beyond which perforation and cecal necrosis were found at surgery. Cecal pneumatosis at CT was correlated with cecal necrosis at surgery in < 50% of patients. Pre-operative transverse colon CD/L1-VD ratio ≥ 1.43 and descending colon CD/L1-VD ratio ≥ 1.31 were associated with the development of PO (grade ≥ III-V). PO (grade ≥ III-V) occurred in 18/65 patients.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications in emergency surgery of AOCC were not related to the age, sex and tumor's location. Preoperative PCR values (≥ 2.17) predict the development of postoperative complications. CT resulted a valid diagnostic tool to identify patients at higher risk of complications: a CD/L1-VD ratios with cut-off values of 1.43 (transverse) and 1.31 (descending) predicted major complications (grade ≥ III-V) and a cecum distension ≥ 9 cm represented the critical diameter beyond which perforation occurred in > 84% of patients.

Are frailty scores superior to the ASA score in predicting complications, hospital stay, and readmissions in total knee replacement? A comparative study between octogenarian and septuagenarian patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Frailty scores have not been standardized for the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, the Charlson comorbidity index (ICC) and the simple frailty score (SSF) in predicting complications, hospital stay, readmissions and mortality after elective TKR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 448 patients who underwent TKR for osteoarthritis at our institution between 2016 and 2019. They were divided into two groups: Group A (263 patients, <80 years) and Group B (185 patients, >80 years).). All were classified by ASA, ICC and SSF scores.

RESULTS

The ICC was higher in Group B (median 5 [RI: 4-6] vs. 4 [RI: 3-5]; P<.001); however, it was not associated with a higher number of complications. When performing a logistic regression analysis we found, for complications: OR SSF=0.67, ICC=1.11; ASA 3 & 4=0.89 and age=1.04; while for readmissions: OR SSF=2.09; ICC=1.01; ASA 3 & 4=0.79 and age=1.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICC and SSF scales showed no differences to the ASA scale in the prediction of readmissions, complications and hospital stay. However, the SSF seems to have a better correlation in predicting unplanned readmission.

[Translated article] Are frailty scores superior to the ASA score in predicting complications, hospital stay, and readmissions in total knee replacement? A comparative study between octogenarian and septuagenarian patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Frailty scores have not been standardised for the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, the Charlson comorbidity index (ICC) and the simple frailty score (SSF) in predicting complications, hospital stay, readmissions and mortality after elective TKR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 448 patients who underwent TKR for osteoarthritis at our institution between 2016 and 2019. They were divided into two groups: Group A (263 patients, <80 years) and Group B (185 patients, >80 years).). All were classified by ASA, ICC and SSF scores.

RESULTS

The ICC was higher in Group B (median 5 [RI: 4-6] vs. 4 [RI: 3-5]; p<.001); however, it was not associated with a higher number of complications. When performing a logistic regression analysis we found, for complications: OR SSF=0.67; ICC=1.11; ASA 3 & 4=0.89 and age=1.04; while for readmissions: OR SSF=2.09; ICC=1.01; ASA 3 & 4=0.79 and age=1.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICC and SSF scales showed no differences to the ASA scale in the prediction of readmissions, complications and hospital stay. However, the SSF seems to have a better correlation in predicting unplanned readmission.

Predictors of Extended Length of Stay Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures

Purpose

An extended length of stay following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) is associated with increased patient morbidity and health care costs. The primary purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for an extended length of stay following ORIF for PHF.

Methods

All patients who underwent ORIF for PHF between 2015 and 2021 were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and postoperative complications within 30 days of procedure were collected. Extended length of stay (eLOS) was defined by ≥ 3 days from operation to discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of eLOS following ORIF.

Results

Characteristics of patients significantly associated with eLOS included age ≥ 75 years (p < .001), male gender (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 (P = .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 3 (P < .001), dependent functional status (P < .001), noninsulin-dependent diabetes (P = .037), insulin-dependent diabetes (P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .001), congestive heart failure (CHF) (P < .001), hypertension (P < 0.001), dialysis (P < .013), disseminated cancer (P < 0.001), chronic steroid use (P = .004), and bleeding disorder (P < .001). Independent predictors of eLOS were age ≥ 75 years (OR = 2.69; P < .001), BMI < 18.5 (OR = 1.70; P = .016), ASA ≥ 3 (OR = 2.70; P < .001), dependent functional status (OR = 2.30; P < .001), CHF (OR = 3.57; P < .001), disseminated cancer (OR = 7.62; P < .001), and bleeding disorder (OR = 2.68; P < .001).

Conclusion

Age ≥ 75, BMI < 18.5, ASA ≥ 3, functional dependence, CHF, disseminated cancer, and bleeding disorder were independently associated with eLOS.

Clinical Relevance

Assessing specific patient factors prior to ORIF for PHF can assist in managing perioperative risks and decreasing expenses related to eLOS.

Level of Evidence

Prognosis III.

Impact of a dietitian-led very low calorie diet clinic on perioperative risk for patients with obesity awaiting elective, non-bariatric surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite a lack of evidence that intentional weight loss reduces the risk of postoperative complications, adults with obesity are commonly asked to lose weight before elective surgery. We hypothesized that patients undertaking dietitian-led preoperative, very low calorie diet treatment could reduce perioperative surgery risks, as per validated risk scoring systems. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a dietitian-led preoperative very low calorie diet clinic on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator scores for patients with obesity awaiting non-bariatric elective surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients referred to the preoperative dietitian-led very low calorie diet clinic before elective surgical procedures over a 2-year-9-month period. The dietitian prescribed individualized, very low calorie diet-based treatment. Primary outcomes were changes in the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Surgical Risk Calculator scores from pretreatment until surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 141 eligible participants (48 ± 13.4 years, 76% women, body mass index 41.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2) demonstrated clinically significant weight loss (mean 7.1 ± 6.1kg, 5.2% body weight, P < .001). Median treatment duration was 13 weeks (interquartile range 6.2-19.2 weeks). Five participants (3.5%) avoided surgery due to weight loss-related improvements in their condition. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores improved for 16% (n = 22/141) of participants. Overall, the median surgical risk calculator estimated risk of 'serious' and 'any' postoperative complication reduced from 4.8% to 3.9% (P < .001) and 6% to 5.1% (P < .001), respectively. Reduction in all Surgical Risk Calculator scores occurred, including surgical site infection, re-admission, and cardiac events (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The dietitian-led preoperative, very low calorie diet clinic improved American Society of Anesthesiologists and Surgical Risk Calculator scores for non-bariatric elective surgery patients with obesity. Randomized controlled trials comparing this approach with a control group are warranted.

Combined pre-operative risk score predicts pancreatic leak after pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication following pancreatectomy and is currently difficult to predict pre-operatively. This study aims to validate pre-operative risk factors and develop a novel combined score for the prediction of POPF in the pre-operative setting.

METHODS

Data were collected from 2016 to 2021 for radiologic main pancreatic duct diameter (MPD), body mass index (BMI), physical status classified by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), polypharmacy, mean platelet ratio (MPR), comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS), and a novel Combined Pancreatic Leak Prediction Score (CPLPS) (derived from MPD diameter, BMI, and CPS) were obtained from pre-operative data and analyzed for their independent association with POPF occurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 166 patients who underwent pancreatectomy with pancreatic leak (Grade A, B, and C) occurring in 51(30.7%) of patients. Pre-operative radiologic MPD diameter < 4 mm (p < 0.001), < 5 mm (p < 0.001), < 6 mm (p = 0.001), BMI ≥ 25 (p = 0.009), and ≥ 30 (p = 0.017) were independently associated with the occurrence of pancreatic leak. CPLPS was also predictive of pancreatic leak following pancreatectomy on univariate (p = 0.005) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

MPD and BMI were independent risk factors predictive for the development of pancreatic leak. CPLPS, was an independent predictor of pancreatic leak following pancreatectomy and could be used to help guide surgical decision making and patient counseling.

Machine learning-based model for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Few evidence-based prediction models have been developed for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients aged 65 years or older undergoing noncardiac surgery. In this study, we aimed to analyze the risk factors for perioperative MACCE in patients aged 65 years or older undergoing noncardiac surgery and construct a prediction model.

METHODS

In this nested case-control study, a total of 342 Chinese patients who were aged ≥ 65 years and underwent medium- or high-risk noncardiac surgery in our hospital were included. There were 84 cases with MACCE (the MACCE group) and 258 without MACCE (the control group). Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for MACCE. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to screen the variables. Nomogram was constructed using the selected variables. Machine learning methods, including Decision Tree, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, K-nearest Neighbor, and Neural network, was used to establish, validate, and compare the performance of different prediction models.

RESULTS

A prediction model based on nine variables, including age ≥ 85 years, history of ischemic chest pain, symptoms of decompensated heart failure, high-risk surgery, intraoperative minimum systolic blood pressure, postoperative systolic blood pressure, Cr levels over 2.0 mg/dL, left ventricular ejection fraction, and perioperative blood transfusion, was constructed. This LASSO logistic regression model showed good discriminatory ability to predict MACCE (area under the curve = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.818 - 0.963) and fit to the test set (Hosmer-Lemeshow, χ2 = 7.4053, P = 0.4936). The decision curve analysis showed a positive net benefit of the new model. Compared with logistic regression model, the XGBoost model showed better prediction ability (area under the curve = 0.903). A preoperative prediction model based on five variables, including age ≥ 85 years, symptoms of decompensated heart failure, ischemic chest pain, high-risk type of surgery and Cr levels over 2.0 mg/dL was also constructed. This model showed good discriminatory ability to predict MACCE before surgery (area under the curve = 0.720 [95% CI, 0.591-0.848]. Both models compared with the modified RCRI score had improvement in reclassification.

CONCLUSION

By analyzing Chinese patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing medium- or high-risk noncardiac surgery, the risk factors for perioperative MACCE were identified. Then, simple prediction models were constructed and validated, which showed good prediction performance and may be used as a decision-making assistant tool for clinicians. These findings provide a basis for preventing and improving the perioperative management of MACCE.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the trauma-specific frailty index (TSFI) for geriatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Pre-traumatic frailty in geriatric trauma patients has caught attention from emergency medical workers and the assessment of it thus become one of the important aspects of risk management. Several tools are available to identify frailty, but limited tools have been validated for geriatric trauma patients in China to assess pre-traumatic frailty.The aim of this study is to translate the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index(TSFI) into Chinese, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated version in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The TSFI was translated with using the Brislin model, that included forward and backward translation. A total of 184 geriatric trauma patients were recruited by a convenience sampling between October and December 2020 in Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan. Using reliability or internal consistency tests assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability. Content validity and construct validity analysis were both performed. Sensitivity, specificity and maximum Youden index(YI) were used to determine the optimal cut-off value. The screening performance was examined by Kappa value.

RESULTS

The total study population included 184 subjects, of which 8 participants were excluded, resulting in a study sample size of 176 elderly trauma patients (the completion rate was 95.7%). The Chinese version of Trauma-Specific Frailty Index(C-TSFI) have 15 items with 5 dimensions. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the C-TSFI was 0.861, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of dimensions ranged from 0.837 to 0.875, the split-half reliability of the C-TSFI were 0.894 and 0.880 respectively, test-retest reliability ranged from 0.692 to 0.862. The correlation coefficient between items and the C-TSFI ranged from 0.439 to 0.761. The content validity index for items (I-CVI) of the C-TSFI scale was 0.86~1.00, and the scale of content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.93. The area under curve (AUC) of the C-TSFI was 0.932 (95%CI 0.904-0.96, P < 0.05), the maximum YI was 0.725, the sensitivity was 80.2%, the specificity was 92.3%, and the critical value was 0.31. Kappa value was 0.682 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of TSFI could be used as a general assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients, and both its reliability and validity have been demonstrated.

Preoperative evaluation of the elderly patient

Nowadays, the pre-operative evaluation of older patients is a critical step in the decision-making process. Clinical assessment and care planning should be considered a whole process rather than separate issues. Clinicians should use validated tools for pre-operative risk assessment of older patients to minimize surgery-related morbidity and mortality and enhance care quality. Traditional pre-operative consultation often fails to capture the pathophysiological and functional profiles of older patients. The elderly's pre-operative evaluation should be focused on determining the patient's functional reserve and reducing any possible peri-operative risk. Therefore, older adults may benefit from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) that allows clinicians to evaluate several aspects of elderly life, such as depression and cognitive disorders, social status, multi-morbidity, frailty, geriatric syndromes, nutritional status, and polypharmacy. Despite the recognized challenges in applying the CGA, it may provide a realistic risk assessment for post-operative complications and suggest a tailored peri-operative treatment plan for older adults, including pre-operative optimization strategies. The older adults' pre-operative examination should not be considered a mere stand-alone, that is, an independent stage of the surgical pathway, but rather a vital step toward a personalized therapeutic approach that may involve professionals from different clinical fields. The aim of this review is to revise the evidence from the literature and highlight the most important items to be implemented in the pre-operative evaluation process in order to identify better all elderly patients' needs.

Time-Dependent Changes in Stiffness-Related Functional Disability After Long Segmental Fusion in Elderly Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity-Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Results

BACKGROUND

Although several studies were performed to measure stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) after long segmental fusion for adult spinal deformity, the evaluation of SRFD was done at a single point in time. We do not know whether the disability will stay the same, worsen, or improve over time.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the time-dependent changes of SRFD and any factors affecting these changes.

METHODS

Patients who had ≥4-segment fusion with the sacrum were reviewed retrospectively. Specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI), consisting of a 12-item tool with 4 categories (sitting on the floor, sanitation activities, lower body activities, and moving activities), was used to assess the severity of SRFD. The SFDI taken at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively and at the last follow-up were used for evaluating the changes in SRFD. The presumed factors affecting these changes were analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 116 patients. Total SFDI scores significantly improved from 3-month to the last follow-up. Among the 4-category of SFDI, sitting on the floor showed the highest scores followed by lower body activities, sanitation activities, and moving activities at all time points. All categories except for sitting on the floor showed significant improvement from 3 months until the last follow-up. This improvement was most pronounced between 3 months and 1 year. American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade was identified as the only factor affecting time-dependent changes.

CONCLUSION

SRFD was highest at 3 months, but it improved over time except for sitting on the floor. The improvement was observed greatest between 3 months and 1 year. Patients with less American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade experienced more improvement in SRFD.

Revisiting the Importance of the Pre-Operative Assessment - A Case Report

Introduction

The available literature underscores the importance of optimizing surgical outcomes through a pre-operative checklist, which includes a review of the medical records and recent test results, changes in medical history, and a physical examination of the cardiovascular system, pulmonary system, and airway.

Case Report

We report a case of a 47-year-old man who decompensated during an outpatient wrist procedure and needed to remain intubated requiring transfer to a hospital. On follow-up with the patient, laboratory work revealed a positive HIV test and CD4 count of 11 cells/mm3, along with a pneumonia consistent with pneumocystis pneumonia, which was unbeknownst to the surgical team before the procedure.

Conclusion

This case emphasizes the importance of a thorough history and physical update and pre-operative assessment before operating.

Implication of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) on tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical status classification (ASA-PS) is a simple categorization of a patient's physiological status during the perioperative period. The role of ASA-PS in predicting operative risk and complications following tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy (T ± A) has not been studied. The objective of the study was to identify the association of the pre-operative ASA-PS with 30-day complication rates and adverse events following T ± A.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS NSQIP) of patients aged 16 years or older who underwent T ± A between 2005 and 2016. Patients were stratified into ASA-PS Classes I/II and III/IV. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, pre-operative laboratory values, operation-specific variables, and postoperative outcomes in the 30-day period following surgery were compared between the two subsets of ASA-PS groups.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, patients with ASA class III and IV were more likely to experience an unplanned readmission (OR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.09-1.76; p = 0.007), overall complications (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.28-1.72; p < 0.001), major complications (OR 1.52, 95 % CI 1.31-1.77, p ≤ 0.001), reoperation (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.04-1.69; p = 0.022), and extended length of stay >1 day (OR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.41-2.25; p < 0.001) following a T ± A.

CONCLUSION

Higher ASA-PS classification is an independent predictor of complications following T ± A. Surgeons should aim to optimize the systemic medical conditions of ASA-PS classes III and IV patients prior to T ± A and implement post-operative management protocols specific to these patients to decrease morbidity, complications, and overall health care cost.

Development and validation of a machine learning ASA-score to identify candidates for comprehensive preoperative screening and risk stratification

OBJECTIVE

The ASA physical status (ASA-PS) is determined by an anesthesia provider or surgeon to communicate co-morbidities relevant to perioperative risk. Assigning an ASA-PS is a clinical decision and there is substantial provider-dependent variability. We developed and externally validated a machine learning-derived algorithm to determine ASA-PS (ML-PS) based on data available in the medical record.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter hospital registry study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital networks.

PATIENTS

Patients who received anesthesia at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, training [n = 361,602] and internal validation cohorts [n = 90,400]) and Montefiore Medical Center (Bronx, NY, external validation cohort [n = 254,412]).

MEASUREMENTS

The ML-PS was created using a supervised random forest model with 35 preoperatively available variables. Its predictive ability for 30-day mortality, postoperative ICU admission, and adverse discharge were determined by logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS

The anesthesiologist ASA-PS and ML-PS were in agreement in 57.2% of the cases (moderate inter-rater agreement). Compared with anesthesiologist rating, ML-PS assigned more patients into extreme ASA-PS (I and IV), (p < 0.01), and less patients in ASA II and III (p < 0.01). ML-PS and anesthesiologist ASA-PS had excellent predictive values for 30-day mortality, and good predictive values for postoperative ICU admission and adverse discharge. Among the 3594 patients who died within 30 days after surgery, net reclassification improvement analysis revealed that using the ML-PS, 1281 (35.6%) patients were reclassified into the higher clinical risk category compared with anesthesiologist rating. However, in a subgroup of multiple co-morbidity patients, anesthesiologist ASA-PS had a better predictive accuracy than ML-PS.

CONCLUSIONS

We created and validated a machine learning physical status based on preoperatively available data. The ability to identify patients at high risk early in the preoperative process independent of the provider's decision is a part of the process we use to standardize the stratified preoperative evaluation of patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

Enhanced recovery program - Impact of ASA grade on length of hospital stay in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties

INTRODUCTION

Total hip and knee arthroplasties are two of the most quality of life enhancing orthopedic procedures performed. Enhanced recovery (ER) programs have been implemented in orthopedic surgery and have helped optimize preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors to reduce the physiological and psychological stress of surgery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification system is now the most widely collected system for measuring physical health status by hip and knee arthroplasty registries worldwide. The aim of the study is to determine whether the ASA score is a predictive of length of hospital stay in patients undergoing hip and knee surgeries in elective setting.

METHODS

Retrospective data is collected from a consecutive series of 441 charts and Irish National Orthopedics Register (INOR) for patients who underwent elective primary hip & knee replacements from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 in Our Lady's Hospital, Navan. All these patients were assigned either ASA Class 2 or 3 in preoperative assessment.

RESULTS

Total 441 patients were included. Patients with ASA 2 (319 patients of the total patient for the same period), average length of hospital stay was 4.8 ± 1.2 days, whereas for patients with ASA 3 (122 patients of the total), length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 2.3 with mean difference between two groups was 1.7 days (95% confidence interval of this difference).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ASA 2 stayed shorter in the hospital compared to patients with ASA 3. Therefore, we recommend that pre-operative patients' optimization to downgrade a patient from an ASA 3 to ASA 2, but prospective analysis would be beneficial to examine the resource implications of such an initiative as well as patient outcomes with longer term follow up.

Postoperative Overtriage to an Intensive Care Unit Is Associated With Low Value of Care

OBJECTIVE

We test the hypothesis that for low-acuity surgical patients, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission is associated with lower value of care compared with ward admission.

BACKGROUND

Overtriaging low-acuity patients to ICU consumes valuable resources and may not confer better patient outcomes. Associations among postoperative overtriage, patient outcomes, costs, and value of care have not been previously reported.

METHODS

In this longitudinal cohort study, postoperative ICU admissions were classified as overtriaged or appropriately triaged according to machine learning-based patient acuity assessments and requirements for immediate postoperative mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support. The nearest neighbors algorithm identified risk-matched control ward admissions. The primary outcome was value of care, calculated as inverse observed-to-expected mortality ratios divided by total costs.

RESULTS

Acuity assessments had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 in generating predictions for triage classifications. Of 8592 postoperative ICU admissions, 423 (4.9%) were overtriaged. These were matched with 2155 control ward admissions with similar comorbidities, incidence of emergent surgery, immediate postoperative vital signs, and do not resuscitate order placement and rescindment patterns. Compared with controls, overtraiged admissions did not have a lower incidence of any measured complications. Total costs for admission were $16.4K for overtriage and $15.9K for controls ( P =0.03). Value of care was lower for overtriaged admissions [2.9 (2.0-4.0)] compared with controls [24.2 (14.1-34.5), P <0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Low-acuity postoperative patients who were overtriaged to ICUs had increased total costs, no improvements in outcomes, and received low-value care.

Frailty, Age, ASA Classification, and BMI on Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Fracture ORIF

OBJECTIVE

To assess how traditional, simple markers of health independently affect postoperative morbidity of mandibular fracture open reduction-internal fixations (ORIFs).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Database.

METHODS

The 2005 to 2017 NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent mandibular ORIF. To control for the severity of the trauma, an additional "concurrent surgery" variable was created. A modified 5-item frailty index was calculated based on the following: presurgery-dependent functional status, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of congestive heart failure.

RESULTS

Among 1806 patients with mandibular ORIFs (mean age 34.8 ± 15.4 years), modified frailty index (mFI) was associated with 30-day medical complications (p < .001), reoperation (p < .001), and readmission (p = .005) on univariate analysis. Increased age was associated with prolonged hospitalization (p < .001) and medical complications (p < .001). The increased American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was associated with all endpoints (p ≤ .003), while increased body mass index (BMI) was associated with none. On multivariate analysis, only increased ASA was associated with any adverse event (reference: ASA 1; ASA 2, odds ratio [OR]: 2.17 [95% confidence interval, CI: 2.17-3.71], p = .004; ASA 3-4, OR: 3.63 [95% CI: 1.91-6.91], p < .001). Similarly, mFI and BMI were not independently associated with prolonged hospitalization (≥2 days) (p ≥ .015), but 65+ age (reference: 18-49; OR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.40-3.86], p = .001) and ASA 3 to 4 groups (reference: ASA 1; OR: 3.26 [95% CI: 2.06-5.14], p < .001) were.

CONCLUSION

ASA status and age are more useful modalities than mFI or BMI in predicting poor postoperative morbidity in mandibular ORIF. These simple metrics can assist with managing surgeons' expectations for mandibular ORIF patients.

Update on preoperative evaluation and optimisation

The patients presenting for surgery today often belong to the extremes of age, have multiple co-morbidities, and undergo complex surgeries. This makes them more prone to morbidity and mortality. A detailed preoperative evaluation of the patient can contribute to reducing this mortality and morbidity. There are various risk indices and validated scoring systems and many of them need to be calculated using preoperative parameters. Their key objective is to identify patients vulnerable to complications and to return them to desirable functional activity as soon as possible. Any individual undergoing surgery should be optimised preoperatively, but special considerations should be given to patients with comorbidity, on multiple drugs, and undergoing high-risk surgery. The objective of this review is to put forth the latest trends in the preoperative evaluation and optimisation of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and emphasise the importance of risk stratification in these patients.

[Older patients in abdominal surgery]

BACKGROUND

The aging society imposes special challenges on operative medicine.

OBJECTIVE

Characteristics in the perioperative treatment of older patients. Consequences for the daily practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation and summary of existing literature including recommendations for the (peri)operative management of older patients.

RESULTS

Despite the growing relevance there are only few studies focusing on older patients. The altered (patho)physiology and comorbidities are challenging and can lead to complications.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of the indications for surgery should meticulously take the improvement to be expected into account by weighing up the individual wishes of patients and special risks. The adequate perioperative care including early mobilization and sufficient analgesia are decisive.

30-Day Postoperative Outcomes in Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Upper Airway Surgery

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic disorder of the upper airway. OSA surgery has oftentimes been researched based on the outcomes of single-institutional facilities. We retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional national database to investigate the outcomes of OSA surgery and identify risk factors for complications. Methods: We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2008−2020) to identify patients who underwent OSA surgery. The postoperative outcomes of interest included 30-day surgical and medical complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality. Additionally, we assessed risk-associated factors for complications, including comorbidities and preoperative blood values. Results: The study population included 4662 patients. Obesity (n = 2909; 63%) and hypertension (n = 1435; 31%) were the most frequent comorbidities. While two (0.04%) deaths were reported within the 30-day postoperative period, the total complication rate was 6.3% (n = 292). Increased BMI (p = 0.01), male sex (p = 0.03), history of diabetes (p = 0.002), hypertension requiring treatment (p = 0.03), inpatient setting (p < 0.0001), and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification scores ≥ 4 (p < 0.0001) were identified as risk-associated factors for any postoperative complications. Increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was identified as a risk-associated factor for the occurrence of any complications (p = 0.02) and medical complications (p = 0.001). Conclusions: OSA surgery outcomes were analyzed at the national level, with complications shown to depend on AP levels, male gender, extreme BMI, and diabetes mellitus. While OSA surgery has demonstrated an overall positive safety profile, the implementation of these novel risk-associated variables into the perioperative workflow may further enhance patient care.

Influence of anesthetic technique on survival after tumor debulking surgery of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: Results of a retrospective cohort study

Epidural analgesia could influence the postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with specific types of non-metastatic solid neoplasms. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of anesthetic technique on survival in elderly patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The records of all women with OC older than 60 years of age undergoing tumor debulking surgery at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Mainz, Germany) between January 2008 and December 2019 were obtained. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the use of perioperative epidural anesthesia or not. First, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic influence of anesthetic technique on survival. Second, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted for multiple conventional prognostic factors concerning three main categories: i) Current clinical-pathological tumor characteristics; ii) anesthesiologic parameters, including mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Status and preexisting comorbidities summarized in the Charlson Comorbidity Index; and iii) oncological and surgical parameters such as oncological radicality and Surgical complexity Score. A total of 110 patients were included in the study and 71 (64.5%) of them received epidural analgesia. The median survival time was 26.0 months from primary debulking surgery and no significant differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were noted between the 'Epidural' and 'non-Epidural' cohorts. After adjustment for the selected risk factors from the three categories, the effects of epidural analgesia on PFS and OS remained non-significant [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.26; 95% CI, 0.66-2.39; and OS: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45-1.40]. The present results did not support the independent association between epidural-supplemented anesthesia and improved PFS or OS in elderly patients with standardized ovarian cancer debulking surgery.

Diagnosis and treatment strategies for intraoperative pulmonary embolism caused by renal tumor thrombus shedding

AIM

To provide an overview of techniques for prevention, immediate diagnosis, and treatment strategies of intraoperative pulmonary embolism caused by renal tumor thrombus shedding.

METHODS

A total of 290 patients admitted into our medical center from March 2015 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy. Six patients were diagnosed as pulmonary embolism during the perioperative period, of which two patients had tumor thrombus shedding. One patient underwent thoracotomy and thrombectomy, one patient underwent interventional thrombectomy, and four patients underwent conservative treatment. All patients have gone through our diagnosis and strategy flow chart. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, tumor thrombus characteristics, and follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

In the preoperative risk factor assessment, of the 253 patients who entered the follow-up, 163 were women, 48 were older than 60 years old, and 83 had a duration of more than 2 months. In addition, 27 patients had tumor thrombus with bland thrombus, and 43 patients had floating tumor thrombus. 78 patients underwent postoperative anticoagulation after evaluation. The average follow-up time was 23.3  ± $\pm $  8.6 months (range, 7-31 months). All patients were alive during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

For acute pulmonary embolism during nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy, management strategies can be used to deal with intraoperative emergencies and provide reference.

Factors Affecting Stiffness-Related Functional Disability After Long Segmental Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

In general, stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) is expected to increase as longer fusion length, but there have been no studies on factors affecting SRFD besides fusion length.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors affecting SRFD after long segmental fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent ≥4-segment fusion including sacrum for ASD. The severity of SRFD was evaluated using the Specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI) consisting of 12 items with 4 categories as follows: sitting on the floor, sanitation activity, lower body activity, and moving activity. Each category contains 3 items which was given a maximum of 4 points. The presumed factors affecting SFDI were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were included in the study with their mean age of 67.3 years. The mean fusion length was 6.4 segments. The mean score of each SFDI category was highest in sitting on the floor (9.9), followed by lower body activities (7.6), sanitation activities (6.0), and moving activities (5.9). The total sum was 29.3 points. In multivariate analysis, total sum of SFDI was significantly higher in female sex, patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiology grade, and longer fusion length. However, the sagittal parameters did not show a significant correlation with SRFD, except pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis which correlated with only one category (lower body activities).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that female sex, higher American Society of Anesthesiology grades, and longer fusion length influenced SRFD after long segmental fusion for ASD. Sagittal parameters related to the degree of deformity correction did not significantly affect SRFD.

Tackling Surgical Morbidity and Mortality through Modifiable Risk Factors in Cancer Patients

Despite advances in surgical techniques, surgical morbidity and mortality remain important public health problems. Postoperative complications often lead to greater morbidity and mortality, as well as increased length of hospital stay and medical costs. Therefore, a reduction in postoperative complications is particularly important with regard to positive long-term outcomes in patients with cancer. To improve patients' postoperative prognosis, it is necessary to screen for and focus on modifiable risk factors and their subsequent resolution. Recently, it was reported that nutritional status, inflammation and surgical approaches are related to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in this review article, we describe the current evidence regarding modifiable risk factors influencing surgical morbidity and mortality as well as future directions for improved postoperative management in cancer patients.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Length of Hospital Stay in Hip Fracture Patients: A Single Centre Study

Background

Hip fracture is a debilitating injury, especially in older individuals, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent decades, there has been a great focus on early rehabilitation and discharge after hip fractures. The aim of such efforts is to minimize the financial and clinical burden of this condition. We conducted our study during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared the length of hospital stay (LOS) in 2020 to the LOS in 2019. Additionally, we studied the factors which may impact the LOS, such as premorbid status according to established scoring systems, the type of fracture, an operation performed, and time to surgery.

Methods

We collected the data regarding the length of stay (in days) for all hip fracture patients admitted to our unit from 1^st January 2019 until 31^st December 2020. We then compared the mean LOS for both years using the t-test. We calculated the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scores for patients admitted in 2020 and calculated the correlation between increasing values of these scores and the LOS. We also compared the mean LOS for patients admitted in 2020 based on the type of fracture and type of management. We studied the correlation between the time to surgery and the LOS for patients admitted in 2020.

Results

Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were admitted with hip fractures in 2020, and 452 were admitted in 2019. LOS in 2020 was significantly lower (23.39 days) compared to 2019 (31.36 days) with p<0.01. While evaluating data from 2019, it was noted that there was a small positive correlation between LOS and NHFS (r=0.231, p<0.001) and LOS and ASA (r=0.18, p<0.001). The mean LOS for intracapsular fractures was noted to be lower than that of extracapsular fractures, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.17). An ANOVA test showed that the mean LOS for patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, dynamic hip screws (DHS), and intramedullary nails (IMN) was significantly longer than for patients managed with total hip replacement or patients managed non-operatively (F=3.551, p<0.01).

Conclusion

Hip fracture patients admitted to our department were discharged quicker during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The LOS for hip fractures increases with an increase in their NHFS or ASA scores. Extracapsular and intracapsular fractures lead to roughly the same periods of inpatient stay. Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, DHS, or IMN stay longer in the hospital compared to other treatment modalities.

Results of emergency colectomy in nonagenarians and octogenarians previously labeled as prohibitive surgical risk

PURPOSE

There are no standardized criteria for what constitutes prohibitive risk for emergency abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed comparing two groups of patients having emergent colectomy. One group had previously been labeled as being prohibitive surgical risk and the other was a contemporary, non-prohibitive risk group also requiring emergency colectomy. All operations were performed by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 27 prohibitive risk patients and 81 non-prohibitive risk (control group) patients. The average age of the prohibitive risk group was 85 years (range 78-99) compared to the control group mean age of 52 years (18-79, p < 0.00001). Prohibitive risk was due to extremes of age combined with congestive heart failure in 44%, followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with heart failure in 19%. The groups were closely matched by the type of colectomy performed. The total complication rate was much higher in the prohibitive risk group compared to the non-prohibitive risk patients (81% versus 48%, p 0.005). But the 30-day mortality rate was similar between groups (7% versus 4%, p 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are labeled as prohibitive surgical risk may be inaccurately assessed in the majority of cases. Additional research will need to be performed to evaluate the presence of quantifiable high-risk physiological conditions, and not just comorbidities, that place a patient at high risk of death after abdominal surgery. Until then, elderly patients should not be denied colectomy based upon comorbidities alone.

Outcomes in patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission after emergency laparotomy - a retrospective study

Purpose

Outcomes after emergency laparotomy (EL) are poor. These patients are often admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). This study explored outcomes in patients who were admitted to an ICU within 48 h after EL.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective single‐center registry study included all patients over 16 years of age that underwent an EL and were admitted to an ICU within 48 h after surgery in Oulu University Hospital, Finland between January 2005 and May 2015. Survival was followed until the end of 2019.

Results

We included 525 patients. Hospital mortality was 13.3%, 30‐day mortality was 17.3%, 90‐day mortality was 24.2%, 1‐year mortality was 33.0%, and 5‐year mortality was 59.4%. Survivors were younger (57 [45–70] years) than the non‐survivors (73 [62–80] years; p < .001). According to the Cox regression model, death during the follow‐up was associated with age, APACHE II‐score, lower postoperative CRP levels and platelet count of the first postoperative day, and the admission from the post‐anesthesia care unit (PACU) to the ICU instead of direct ICU admission.

Conclusion

Age, high APACHE II‐score, low CRP and platelet count, and admission from the PACU to the ICU associated with mortality after EL in patients admitted to an ICU within 48 h after EL.

The Development and Concurrent Validity of a Multi-Sensor-Based Frailty Toolkit for In-Home Frailty Assessment

Early identification of frailty is crucial to prevent or reverse its progression but faces challenges due to frailty’s insidious onset. Monitoring behavioral changes in real life may offer opportunities for the early identification of frailty before clinical visits. This study presented a sensor-based system that used heterogeneous sensors and cloud technologies to monitor behavioral and physical signs of frailty from home settings. We aimed to validate the concurrent validity of the sensor measurements. The sensor system consisted of multiple types of ambient sensors, a smart speaker, and a smart weight scale. The selection of these sensors was based on behavioral and physical signs associated with frailty. Older adults’ perspectives were also included in the system design. The sensor system prototype was tested in a simulated home lab environment with nine young, healthy participants. Cohen’s Kappa and Bland−Altman Plot were used to evaluate the agreements between the sensor and ground truth measurements. Excellent concurrent validity was achieved for all sensors except for the smart weight scale. The bivariate correlation between the smart and traditional weight scales showed a strong, positive correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.942, n = 24, p < 0.001). Overall, this work showed that the Frailty Toolkit (FT) is reliable for monitoring physical and behavioral signs of frailty in home settings.

Discordant American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification between anesthesiologists and surgeons and its correlation with adverse patient outcomes

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) is used for communication of patient health status, risk scoring, benchmarking and financial claims. Prior studies using hypothetical scenarios have shown poor concordance of ASA classification among healthcare providers. There is a paucity of studies using clinical data, and of clinical factors or patient outcomes associated with discordant classification. The study aims to assess ASA classification concordance between surgeons and anesthesiologists, factors surrounding discordance and its impact on patient outcomes. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary medical center on 46,284 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. The ASA class showed moderate concordance (weighted Cohen’s κ 0.53) between surgeons and anesthesiologists. We found significant associations between discordant classification and patient comorbidities, age and race. Patients with discordant classification had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52–2.62, p < 0.0001), 1-year mortality (OR 1.53, 95% CI = 1.38–1.69, p < 0.0001), and Intensive Care Unit admission > 24 h (OR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.47–1.94, p < 0.0001). Hence, there is a need for improved standardization of ASA scoring and cross-specialty review in ASA-discordant cases.

Development and validation of risk stratification tool for prediction of increased dependence using preoperative frailty after hepatopancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite the known association between frailty and postoperative morbidity, the use of preoperative frailty in surgical practice remains limited. We sought to develop a risk tool to predict postoperative increase in functional dependence.

METHODS

Patients of ≥65 years in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database who had a primary hepatopancreatic surgery between 2015 and 2019 were used to identify predictors of increased dependence and development of a simplified tool to calculate the risk stratification score for increased discharge care level (https://ktsahara.shinyapps.io/care_discharge/).

RESULTS

Among 31,338 patients who underwent primary hepatopancreatic surgery, 4,259 (13.6%) had an increased level of care at discharge compared to their preadmission care. Patients with increased discharge care had a higher proportion of patients with a modified frailty index of at least 2 (n = 1496; 35.1%) compared with individuals with unchanged care (n = 6,760; 25.0%). In addition, 12.3% (n = 3,858) were discharged to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Of note, the odds of increased care at discharge were increased by 1.41 (95% confidence interval: 1.32-1.50), 1.11 (95% confidence interval :1.11-1.12), and 1.95 (95% confidence interval:1.86-2.04) times with every unit increase in modified frailty index, age beyond 65 years, and the number of in-hospital complications, respectively. Area under receiver operative curve for the parsimonious model used to develop the risk calculator was 0.7486 (95% confidence interval: 0.7405-0.7566) (all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Approximately, 1 in 7 patients required an increased level of care at the time of discharge compared with their preadmission status. A simplified web-based risk tool can be used in clinical practice as a surgical decision aid in post-discharge planning after complex elective surgery.

A Nomogram for Predicting In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardio- and Cerebro-Vascular Events in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Large-Scale Nested Case-Control Study

Purpose

Few evidence-based predictive tools are available to evaluate major adverse cardio- and cerebro-vascular events (MACCEs) before major noncardiac surgery. We sought to develop a new simple but effective tool for estimating surgical risk.

Patients and Methods

Using a nested case-control study design, we recruited 105 patients who experienced MACCEs and 481 patients without MACCEs during hospitalization from 10,507 patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery in Beijing Chaoyang hospital. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and likelihood ratio were applied to screen 401 potential features for logistic regression. A nomogram was constructed using the selected variables.

Results

Chronic heart failure, valvular heart disease, preoperative serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, ASA class, neutrophil count and age were most associated with in-hospital MACCEs among all the factors. A new prediction model established based on these showed a good discriminatory ability (AUC, 0.758 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.708–0.808] and a well-performed calibration curve (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ² = 7.549, p = 0.479), which upheld in the 10-fold cross-validation (AUC, 0.742 [95% CI, 0.718–0.767]. This model also demonstrated an improved performance in comparison to the modified Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score (increase in AUC by 0.119 [95% CI, 0.056–0.180]; NRI, 0.445 [95% CI, 0.237–0.653]; IDI, 0.133 [95% CI, 0.087–0.178]. The decision curve analysis showed a positive net benefit of our new model.

Conclusion

Our nomogram, which relies upon simple clinical characteristics and laboratory tests, is able to predict MACCEs in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. This prediction shows better discrimination than the standardized modified RCRI score, laying a promising foundation for further large-scale validation.

Outcomes in Pediatric Thyroidectomy: Results From a Multinational, Multi-institutional Database

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, data regarding thyroidectomy were extracted from billing databases, but information may be missed. In this study, a multi-institutional pediatric thyroidectomy database was used to evaluate recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury and hypoparathyroidism.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric hospital systems throughout North America.

METHODS

Data were individually collected for thyroidectomies, then entered into a centralized database and analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 1025 thyroidectomies from 10 institutions were included. Average age was 13.9 years, and 77.8% were female. Average hospital stay was 1.9 nights and 13.5% of patients spent at least 1 night in the pediatric intensive care unit. The most frequent pathology was papillary thyroid carcinoma (42%), followed by Graves' disease (20.1%) and follicular adenoma (18.2%). Overall, 1.1% of patients experienced RLN injury (0.8% permanent), and 7.2% experienced hypoparathyroidism (3.3% permanent). Lower institutional volume (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% CI, 1.72-7.14) and concurrent hypoparathyroidism (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.64-7.53) correlated with RLN injury on multivariable analysis. Graves' disease (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.35-3.80), Hashimoto's thyroiditis (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 2.39-9.09), central neck dissection (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.36-5.49), and total vs partial thyroidectomy (OR, 7.14; 95% CI, 4.55-11.11) correlated with hypoparathyroidism.

CONCLUSION

These data present thyroidectomy information and complications pertinent to surgeons, along with preoperative risk factor assessment. Multivariable analysis showed institutional volume and hypoparathyroidism associated with RLN injury, while hypoparathyroidism associated with surgical indication, central neck dissection, and extent of surgery. Low complication rates support the safety of thyroidectomy in pediatric tertiary care centers.

SEVE project (Surgical Expertise Validity Evaluation) risk adjusted quality by standard data

The SEVE project (Surgical Expertise Validity Evaluation) is a collaborative effort of the AEC (Spanish Association of Surgeons) and the Section of Surgery of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) that aims to develop a model and an on line application that can be used to evaluate surgical complications. The aim is to identify the optimal results that can be obtained in each intervention, in order to present them as a reference for our usual practice (benchmarking).

Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. Methods: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. Results: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). Conclusion: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient’s outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming.

Combining ALT/AST Values with Surgical APGAR Score Improves Prediction of Major Complications after Hepatectomy

Hepatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Early prediction/prevention of major complications is highly valuable for patient care. Surgical APGAR score (SAS) has been validated to predict post-surgical complications (PCs). We aimed to define a simple complications classification following hepatectomy based on a therapy-oriented severity Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). 119 patients undergoing liver resection were included. PCs were determined at follow-up based on CDC. Clinicopathological factors were used to calculate SAS. A receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated the predictive value of SAS for PCs. Circulating markers levels of liver injury were analyzed as critical elements on PCs. SAS (P=0.008), estimated blood-loss (P=0.018) and operation time (P=0.0008) were associated with PCs. SAS was reduced in patients with (+) compared to those without (-) complications (6.64±1.84 vs 5.70±1.79, P=0.0079). The area-under-the-curve was 0.646 by ROC, indicating an acceptable discrimination with 65% possibility to distinguish (-) and (+) groups (P=0.004). Best cutoff value for SAS was ≤6/≥7, at which sensitivity and specificity were maximal. ALT/ASL levels were significantly different within the group with 9-10 SAS points (P=0.01 and 0.02). In conclusion, SAS provides accurate risk stratification for major PCs after hepatectomy, and might help improving the overall patient outcome.

The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system celebrates its 80th anniversary in 2021. Its simplicity represents its greatest strength as well as a limitation in a world of comprehensive multisystem tools. It was developed for statistical purposes and not as a surgical risk predictor. However, since it correlates well with multiple outcomes, it is widely used-appropriately or not-for risk prediction and many other purposes. It is timely to review the history and development of the system. The authors describe the controversies surrounding the ASA Physical Status classification, including the problems of interrater reliability and its limitations as a risk predictor. Last, the authors reflect on the current status and potential future of the ASA Physical Status system.

The Predictive Capacity of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score in Burn Patients

Advances in burn care continues to improve survival rates and patient outcomes. There are several burn prognostic tools used to predict mortality and outcomes; however, none include patient comorbidities. We used the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as a surrogate measure for comorbidities, and evaluated its role in predicting mortality and outcomes in adult burn patients undergoing surgery. A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from a single burn center in the United States, which was comprised of 183 patients. We evaluated the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as an independent predictor of mortality and outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, mechanical ventilator (MV) days, and complications. We compared the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score to other prognostic models which included the revised Baux score, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index. Our results demonstrated that the revised Baux and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores could be used to determine the mortality risk in adult burn patients. The revised Baux was the best predictor of mortality, ICU LOS, and MV days, while the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index was the best predictor of total LOS.

Impact of frailty on clinical outcomes and resource use following emergency general surgery in the United States

Background

Frailty has been recognized as an independent risk factor for inferior outcomes, but its effect on emergency general surgery (EGS) is understudied.

Objective

The purpose of the present study was to define the impact of frailty on risk-adjusted mortality, non-home discharge, and readmission following EGS operations.

Methods

Adults undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small bowel resection, large bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, or laparotomy within two days of an urgent admission were identified in the 2016–2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was defined using diagnosis codes corresponding to the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable regression was used to study in-hospital mortality and non-home discharge by operation, and Kaplan Meier analysis to study freedom from unplanned readmission at up to 90-days follow-up.

Results

Among 655,817 patients, 11.9% were considered frail. Frail patients most commonly underwent large bowel resection (37.3%) and cholecystectomy (29.2%). After adjustment, frail patients had higher mortality rates for all operations compared to nonfrail, including those most commonly performed (11.9% [95% CI 11.4–12.5%] vs 6.0% [95% CI 5.8–6.3%] for large bowel resection; 2.3% [95% CI 2.0–2.6%] vs 0.2% [95% CI 0.2–0.2%] for cholecystectomy). Adjusted non-home discharge rates were higher for frail compared to nonfrail patients following all operations, including large bowel resection (68.1% [95% CI 67.1–69.0%] vs 25.9% [95% CI 25.2–26.5%]) and cholecystectomy (33.7% [95% CI 32.7–34.7%] vs 2.9% [95% CI 2.8–3.0%]). Adjusted hospitalization costs were nearly twice as high for frail patients. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, frail patients had greater unplanned readmissions (log rank P<0.001), with 1 in 4 rehospitalized within 90 days.

Conclusions

Frail patients have inferior clinical outcomes and greater resource use following EGS, with the greatest absolute differences following complex operations. Simple frailty assessments may inform expectations, identify patients at risk of poor outcomes, and guide the need for more intensive postoperative care.

Safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients with severe comorbidities - A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is nowadays considered as the standard of care for various liver malignancies. However, studies focusing on perioperative outcome after LH in patients with severe comorbidities are still sparse.

METHODS

247 patients, who underwent LH between January 2016 and March 2020 at European surgical center Aachen Maastricht (ESCAM) were retrospectively analyzed regarding surgical outcome. All patients were categorized according to the ASA guidelines and a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare patients with severe comorbidities with patients with minor or no comorbidities.

RESULTS

After PSM, no statistically significant differences regarding clinical characteristics were observed. We performed major resections in 26.4% of h-ASA (ASA > 2) patients and 19.4% of l-ASA (ASA≤2) patients, respectively (P = .322). Overall morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥1) was observed more frequently in the h-ASA group (h-ASA: 25.0% vs. l-ASA: 8.3%; P = .007) while analysis of major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥3b) showed a non-significant tendency for more complications in h-ASA patients (h-ASA: 8.3% vs. l-ASA: 1.4%; P = .053). A subgroup analysis identified major resection (HR = 5.05; P = .006) as an independent risk factor for the occurrence of any postoperative complication and chronic kidney disease (HR = 22.59; P = .030) and liver fibrosis (HR = 30.16; P = .031) as risk factors for the occurrence of major complications in h-ASA patients.

CONCLUSION

LH in patients with severe systemic comorbidities shows a strong tendency towards an increased rate of major complications. Careful patient selection with respect to the planned extent of resection and the presence of chronic kidney disease and liver fibrosis should be performed to improve perioperative results.

Surgical and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer by propensity score matching: a retrospective comparative study

PURPOSE

The application of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for resectable gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial compared with open total gastrectomy (OTG), especially for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients according to the inconsistent results demonstrated in the previous studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes between LATG and OTG in a population with more than 80% AGC patients by applying propensity score matching (PSM) method.

METHODS

The data of 365 clinical stage I-III GC cases who underwent total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were retrospectively collected from January 2011 to April 2018 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV of Peking University Cancer Hospital. Propensity scores were generated through taking all covariates into consideration and 131 pairs of patients receiving either LATG or OTG were matched. Intraoperative, postoperative, and survival parameters were compared in the matched groups accordingly. Risk factors for postoperative complications and overall survival were further analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics in the LATG and OTG groups were well balanced after PSM. LATG showed advantages with respect to shorter time to ambulation, first flatus, and first whole liquid diet intake. No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to postoperative complications as well as overall survival in terms of different pathological stage. Older age was found as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications, and pathological stage for overall survival as well.

CONCLUSION

LATG appears to have comparable surgical and oncological safety with OTG by experienced surgeons.

Subjective Cognitive Decline May Be Associated With Post-operative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: The PNDABLE Study

Objective: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is associated with an increased risk of clinical cognitive disorders. Post-operative delirium (POD) is a common complication after total hip replacement. We aimed to investigate the relationship between SCD and POD in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Methods: Our study recruited 214 cognitively intact individuals from the Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder And Biomarker Lifestyle (PNDABLE) study in the final analysis. SCD was diagnosed with Subjective Cognitive Decline Scale (SCDS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The incidence of POD was evaluated by using Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and POD severity was measured by using the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ40, Aβ42, T-tau, and P-tau levels were measured by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Overall, the incidence of POD was 26.64% (57/214), including 32.43% (36/111) in the SCD group and 20.39% (21/103) in the NC group. With the increase of age, the incidence of POD in all age groups increased (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for SCD, Aβ42, Aβ40, P-tau, and T-tau, SCD (OR 2.32, CI 1.18-4.55, P = 0.01) and the increased CSF level of P-tau (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.06, P < 0.001) were risk factors for POD, while the level of aβ42 (OR 0.99, CI 0.99-1.00, P < 0.001) was a protective factor for POD. Conclusion: SCD is one of the preoperative risk factors for POD. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered at China Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr200033439).

Association between preoperative evaluation with lung ultrasound and outcome in frail elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for hip fractures: study protocol for an Italian multicenter observational prospective study (LUSHIP)

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture is one of the most common orthopedic causes of hospital admission in frail elderly patients. Hip fracture fixation in this class of patients is considered a high-risk procedure. Preoperative physical examination, plasma natriuretic peptide levels (BNP, Pro-BNP), and cardiovascular scoring systems (ASA-PS, RCRI, NSQIP-MICA) have all been demonstrated to underestimate the risk of postoperative complications. We designed a prospective multicenter observational study to assess whether preoperative lung ultrasound examination can predict better postoperative events thanks to the additional information they provide in the form of "indirect" and "direct" cardiac and pulmonary lung ultrasound signs.

METHODS

LUSHIP is an Italian multicenter prospective observational study. Patients will be recruited on a nation-wide scale in the 12 participating centers. Patients aged  >  65 years undergoing spinal anesthesia for hip fracture fixation will be enrolled. A lung ultrasound score (LUS) will be generated based on the examination of six areas of each lung and ascribing to each area one of the four recognized aeration patterns-each of which is assigned a subscore of 0, 1, 2, or 3. Thus, the total score will have the potential to range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36. The association between 30-day postoperative complications of cardiac and/or pulmonary origin and the overall mortality will be studied. Considering the fact that cardiac complications in patients undergoing hip surgery occur in approx. 30% of cases, to achieve 80% statistical power, we will need a sample size of 877 patients considering a relative risk of 1.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung ultrasound (LU), as a tool within the anesthesiologist's armamentarium, is becoming increasingly widespread, and its use in the preoperative setting is also starting to become more common. Should the study demonstrate the ability of LU to predict postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications in hip fracture patients, a randomized clinical trial will be designed with the scope of improving patient outcome. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04074876. Registered on August 30, 2019.

Risk factors associated with prolonged intensive care unit stay after posterior spinal fusion for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND

The perioperative complication rate for spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) remains high and sometimes prolonged perioperative intensive care is needed. We investigated preoperative and intraoperative risk factors associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay after posterior spinal fusion.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 49 consecutive DMD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion. Instrumentation was performed from T4 to L5 (46 cases) or to the ilium (3 cases). We recorded the preoperative Cobb angle and perioperative clinical data from patient records. Patients were divided into two groups (ICU stay 0 or 1 day, 2 days or longer). Chi-square and t tests were used for univariate analysis. Factors with p < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multilevel logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The average age of patients at surgery was 14.2 years (range 11-20 years). Their preoperative Cobb angle was 79.2° (range 40°-154°). Average operative time was 325.3 min (range 225-507 min). The average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 1673.0 ml (range 500-3785 ml). Eight patients stayed in the ICU for 2 days or longer for postoperative monitoring and treatment. Univariate analysis found statistical difference between the two groups in preoperative Cobb angle, Thoracolumbar kyphosis, %VC, operation time, and EBL during surgery. After multiple logistic regression analysis, Cobb angle and EBL was identified as an independent factor. The patients with a larger Cobb angle and greater EBL had a higher rate of prolonged ICU stay in interquartile range-based comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests the preoperative Cobb angle and intraoperative EBL could be predictors for postoperative course in posterior spinal fusion for DMD patients.