Elderly trauma patients with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia

Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis of Human Rib Biomechanics: A Framework for Improved Generalizability

In dynamic impact events, thoracic injuries often involve rib fractures, which are closely related to injury severity. Previous studies have investigated the behavior of isolated ribs under impact loading conditions, but often neglected the variability in anatomical shape and tissue material properties. In this study, we used probabilistic finite element analysis and statistical shape modeling to investigate the effect of population-wide variability in rib cortical bone tissue mechanical properties and rib shape on the biomechanical response of the rib to impact loading. Using the probabilistic finite element analysis results, a response surface model was generated to rapidly investigate the biomechanical response of an isolated rib under dynamic anterior-posterior load given the variability in rib morphometry and tissue material properties. The response surface was used to generate pre-fracture force-displacement computational corridors for the overall population and a population sub-group of older mid-sized males. When compared to the experimental data, the computational mean response had a RMSE of 4.28N (peak force 94N) and 6.11N (peak force 116N) for the overall population and sub-group respectively, whereas the normalized area metric when comparing the experimental and computational corridors ranged from 3.32% to 22.65% for the population and 10.90% to 32.81% for the sub-group. Furthermore, probabilistic sensitivities were computed in which the contribution of uncertainty and variability of the parameters of interest was quantified. The study found that rib cortical bone elastic modulus, rib morphometry and cortical thickness are the random variables that produce the largest variability in the predicted force-displacement response. The proposed framework offers a novel approach for accounting biological variability in a representative population and has the potential to improve the generalizability of findings in biomechanical studies.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in the geriatric trauma population is associated with equivalent outcomes to a younger cohort: A propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in chest wall trauma. Geriatric patients are particularly vulnerable to poor outcomes; yet, this population is often excluded from SSRF studies. Further delineating patient outcomes by age is necessary to optimize care for the aging trauma population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining outcomes among patients aged 40+ for whom an SSRF consult was placed between 2017 and 2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were categorized into geriatric (65+) and adult (40-64), as well as 80 years and older (80+) and 79 and younger (40-79). Patient outcomes were assessed comparing non-operative and operative management of chest wall trauma. Propensity matched analysis was performed to evaluate mortality differences between adult and geriatric patients who did and did not undergo SSRF.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients had an SSRF consult. Of these, 227 were 65+, and 73 were 80+. A total of 129 patients underwent SSRF (24 %). The percentage of patients undergoing SSRF did not vary between 40 and 64 and 65+ (23.7 % and 23.6 %, respectively, p = 0.97) or 40-79 and 80+ (24.0 vs 21.9, p = 0.69). Patients undergoing SSRF had higher chest injury burden and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and ICU level care on admission. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6 %. Among patients who underwent SSRF, mortality rate did not significantly differ between 65+ and 40-64 (7.8% vs 2.7 %, p = 0.18) or 80+ and 40-79 (6.3% vs 4.6 %, p = 0.77). This remained true in propensity matched analysis.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric and octogenarian patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF at similar rates and achieved equivalent outcomes to their younger counterparts. SSRF did not differentially affect mortality outcomes based on age group in propensity matched analysis. SSRF is safe for geriatric patients including octogenarians.

Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks for Early Rib Fracture Pain Management: The SABRE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Rib fractures secondary to blunt thoracic trauma typically result in severe pain that is notoriously difficult to manage. The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a regional anesthesia technique that provides analgesia to most of the hemithorax; however, SAPB has limited evidence for analgesic benefits in rib fractures.

Objective

To determine whether the addition of an SAPB to protocolized care bundles increases the likelihood of early favorable analgesic outcomes and reduces opioid requirements in patients with rib fractures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 emergency departments across metropolitan and regional New South Wales, Australia, between April 12, 2021, and January 22, 2022. Patients aged 16 years or older with clinically suspected or radiologically proven rib fractures were included in the study. Participants were excluded if they were intubated, transferred for urgent surgical intervention, or had a major concomitant nonthoracic injury. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to July 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an SAPB in addition to usual rib fracture management or standard care alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite pain score measured 4 hours after enrollment. Patients met the primary outcome if they had a pain score reduction of 2 or more points and an absolute pain score of less than 4 out of 10 points.

Results

A total of 588 patients were screened, of whom 210 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [55-84] years; 131 [62%] male) were enrolled, with 105 patients randomized to receive an SAPB plus standard care and 105 patients randomized to standard care alone. In the complete-case intention-to-treat primary outcome analysis, the composite pain score outcome was reached in 38 of 92 patients (41%) in the SAPB group and 18 of 92 patients (19.6%) in the control group (relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89; P = .001). There was a clinically significant reduction in overall opioid consumption in the SAPB group compared with the control group (eg, median [IQR] total opioid requirement at 24 hours: 45 [19-118] vs 91 [34-155] milligram morphine equivalents). Rates of pneumonia (6 patients [10%] vs 7 patients [11%]), length of stay (eg, median [IQR] hospital stay, 4.2 [2.2-7.7] vs 5 [3-7.3] days), and 30-day mortality (1 patient [1%] vs 3 patients [4%]) were similar between the SAPB and control groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that the addition of an SAPB to standard rib fracture care significantly increased the proportion of patients who experienced a meaningful reduction in their pain score while also reducing in-hospital opioid requirements.

Trial Registration

http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12621000040864.

The effect of thoracic trauma scoring system in thoracic trauma patients with rib fracture

OBJECTIVE

Rib fractures are common in thoracic trauma patients. There are various factors, including flail chest, pulmonary contusion, and accompanying conditions, affecting morbidity and mortality. The study aimed to identify high-risk patients for morbidity and mortality with a scoring system that the authors created.

METHODS

Cases over the age of 18 admitted due to trauma and diagnosed with rib fractures between 1 January 2019 and 1 March 2023, were included. Trauma scores were determined by applying the new trauma scoring system. Trauma scores and other variables regarding morbidity and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1023 cases were included in the study. The total trauma scores were higher in bilateral and multiple fractures. In those without respiratory failure, the total score was statistically significantly lower than in the groups with respiratory failure. The total score was significantly higher in those who needed surgery, those who were hospitalized, and those who needed intensive care compared to the non-surgical groups. However, there was no correlation between intensive care unit stay and total score. Trauma mechanism, presence of additional extrathoracic pathology, and thoracic trauma-age score were independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the number of rib fractures and the presence of pulmonary contusion did not have an effect on mortality and morbidity. The presence of extrathoracic pathology and age significantly affect survival.

The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients

BACKGROUND

The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures.

METHODS

Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023.

RESULTS

The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.

Nonoperative treatment of multiple rib fractures, the results to beat: International multicenter prospective cohort study among 845 patients

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment (i.e., nonoperative or operative) for patients with multiple rib fractures remains debated. Studies that compare treatments are rationalized by the alleged poor outcomes of nonoperative treatment.

METHODS

The aim of this prospective international multicenter cohort study (between January 2018 and March 2021) with 1-year follow-up, was to report contemporary outcomes of nonoperatively treated patients with multiple rib fractures. Including 845 patients with three or more rib fractures. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (HLOS), (pulmonary) complications, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Mean age was 57.7 ± 17.0 years, median Injury Severity Score was 17 (13-22) and the median number of rib fractures was 6 (4-8). In-hospital mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 13), 112 (13.3%) patients had pneumonia and four (0.5%) patients developed a symptomatic nonunion. The median HLOS was 7 days (4-13 days), and median intensive care unit length of stay was 2 days (1-5 days). Mean 5-Level Quality of Life Questionnaire index value was 0.83 ± 0.18 1 year after trauma. Polytrauma patients had a median HLOS of 10 days (6-18 days), a pneumonia rate of 17.6% (n = 77) and mortality rate of 1.7% (n = 7). Elderly patients (≥65 years) had a median HLOS of 9 days (5-15 days), a pneumonia rate of 19.7% (n = 57) and mortality rate of 4.1% (n = 12).

CONCLUSION

Overall, nonoperative treatment of patients with multiple rib fractures shows low mortality and morbidity rate and good quality of life after 1 year. Future studies evaluating the benefit of operative stabilization should use contemporary outcomes to establish the therapeutic margin of rib fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Radiographic rib fracture nonunion and association with fracture classification in adults with multiple rib fractures without flail segment: A multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Rib fracture nonunion is a probable cause of chronic pain following chest trauma, although its prevalence remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine rib fracture nonunion prevalence following nonoperative management and to determine if presence of nonunion was associated with the number of rib fractures, or the rib fracture classification of anatomical location, type, and displacement.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study included trauma patients with three or more fractured ribs but without a flail segment, who participated in the nonoperative management group of the FixCon trial between January 2019 and June 2022. The number and classification of rib fractures were assessed on trauma chest CT. Chest CTs conducted six months post-trauma were evaluated for the presence of nonunion. Radiological characteristics of nonunions were compared with normally healed rib fractures using the Mann-Whitney U, χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A generalized linear model adjusted for multiple observations per patient when assessing the associations between nonunion and fracture characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included with 561 post-traumatic fractures in 429 ribs. Chest CT after six months revealed nonunions in 67 (12 %) rib fractures in 29 (43 %) patients with a median of 2 (P25-P75 1-3) nonunions per patient. Nonunion was most commonly observed in ribs seven to 10 (20-23 %, p < 0.001, adjusted p = 0.006). Nonunion occurred in 14 (5 %) undisplaced, 22 (19 %) offset, and 20 (23 %) displaced rib fractures (p < 0.001). No statistically significant association between rib fracture type and nonunion was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-three percent of patients with multiple rib fractures had radiographic nonunion six months after trauma. Fractures in ribs seven to 10 and dislocated fractures had an increased risk of rib fracture nonunion.

External validation of novel Revised Intensity Battle Score and comparison of static rib fracture scoring systems

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare and externally validate the previously developed Revised Intensity Battle Score (RIBS) against other proposed scores for predicting poor outcomes after rib fractures.

METHODS

An external validation set was assembled retrospectively, comprising 1,493 adult patients with one or more rib fractures admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2022. The following rib fracture scores were calculated for each patient: RIBS, Injury Severity Score, Rib Fracture Score, Chest Trauma Score, and Battle score. Each was investigated to assess utility in predicting mortality, intensive care unit upgrade, unplanned intubation and ventilator days. Performance was measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 1,493 patients who met inclusion criteria, 239 patients (16%) experienced one of more of the investigated outcomes. Generally, scores performed best at predicting mortality and ventilator days. The RIBS stood out as best predicting "any complication" (AUC = 0.735) and ">7 ventilator days" (AUC = 0.771).

CONCLUSION

The RIBS represents an externally validated triage score in patients with rib fractures and compares favorably to other static scoring systems. Use of this score as a triage tool may allow stratifying patients who may benefit from direct intensive care unit admission, neuraxial anesthesia and aggressive respiratory care. Next steps include prospective investigation of how pairing these interventions with score directed triage impacts outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Predictors of adverse outcomes in elders hospitalised for isolated orthopaedic trauma: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients >64 years of age now represent more than 51% of injury hospitalisations in Canada. The tools used to identify older patients who could benefit the most from an interdisciplinary approach include complex parameters difficult to collect in the ED, which suggests that better tools with higher accuracy and using items that can be derived from routinely collected data are needed. We aimed to identify variables that are associated with adverse outcomes in older patients admitted to a trauma centre for an isolated orthopaedic injury.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2019 on older patients hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of isolated orthopaedic injury (n=19 928). Data were extracted from the provincial trauma registry (Registre des traumatismes du Québec). We used multilevel logistic regression to estimate the associations between potential predictors and adverse outcomes (extended length of stay, mortality, complications, unplanned readmission and adverse discharge destination).

RESULTS

Increasing age, male sex, specific comorbidities, type of orthopaedic injuries, increasing number of comorbidities, severe orthopaedic injury, head injuries and admission in the year before the injury were all significant predictors of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We identified eight predictors of adverse outcomes in patients >64 years of age admitted to a trauma centre for orthopaedic injury. These variables could eventually be used to develop a clinical decision rule to identify elders who may benefit the most from interdisciplinary care.

Investigating the link between frailty and outcomes in geriatric patients with isolated rib fractures

Background

Studies have shown an increased risk of morbidity in elderly patients suffering rib fractures from blunt trauma. The association between frailty and rib fractures on adverse outcomes is still ill-defined. In the current investigation, we sought to delineate the association between frailty, measured using the Orthopedic Frailty Score (OFS), and outcomes in geriatric patients with isolated rib fractures.

Methods

All geriatric (aged 65 years or older) patients registered in the 2013-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement database with a conservatively managed isolated rib fracture were considered for inclusion. An isolated rib fracture was defined as the presence of ≥1 rib fracture, a thorax Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) between 1 and 5, an AIS ≤1 in all other regions, as well as the absence of pneumothorax, hemothorax, or pulmonary contusion. Based on patients' OFS, patients were classified as non-frail (OFS 0), pre-frail (OFS 1), or frail (OFS ≥2). The prevalence ratio (PR) of composite complications, in-hospital mortality, failure-to-rescue (FTR), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission between the OFS groups was determined using Poisson regression models to adjust for potential confounding.

Results

A total of 65 375 patients met the study's inclusion criteria of whom 60% were non-frail, 29% were pre-frail, and 11% were frail. There was a stepwise increased risk of complications, in-hospital mortality, and FTR from non-frail to pre-frail and frail. Compared with non-frail patients, frail patients exhibited a 87% increased risk of in-hospital mortality [adjusted PR (95% CI): 1.87 (1.52-2.31), p<0.001], a 44% increased risk of complications [adjusted PR (95% CI): 1.44 (1.23-1.67), p<0.001], a doubling in the risk of FTR [adjusted PR (95% CI): 2.08 (1.45-2.98), p<0.001], and a 17% increased risk of ICU admission [adjusted PR (95% CI): 1.17 (1.11-1.23), p<0.001].

Conclusion

There is a strong association between frailty, measured using the OFS, and adverse outcomes in geriatric patients managed conservatively for rib fractures.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Versus Multimodal Pain Management for Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs) are frequently utilized when treating patients with multiple rib fractures. While previous work has demonstrated the efficacy of ESPB as an adequate method of pain control, there has been no work comparing a continuous ESPB to "best practice" multimodal pain control. We hypothesize that a continuous ESPB catheter combined with a multimodal pain regimen may be associated with a decrease in opioid requirements when compared to a multimodal pain regimen alone.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study at a level 1 trauma center from September 2016 through September 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 y or older with at least three unilateral rib fractures who were not mechanically ventilated during admission. The primary outcome was the total morphine equivalents utilized throughout the index admission.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included in this study, 71 in each cohort. Patients included had a mean age of 52.5 y, and 18% were female. Demographic data including injury severity score, total number of rib fractures, and length of stay were similar. While there was a trend toward a decrease in morphine equivalents in the patient cohort undergoing ESPB catheter placement, this was not found to be statistically significant (284.3 ± 244.8 versus 412.6 ± 622.2, P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

While ESPB catheters are frequently utilized for analgesia in the setting of multiple rib fractures, there was no decrease in total opioid usage when compared with patients who were managed with a multimodal pain regimen alone. Further assessment comparing ESPB catheters to best practice multimodal pain control regimens through a prospective, multicenter trial is required to further validate these findings.

Regional anesthesia and POCUS in the intensive care unit

This chapter focuses on resident recruitment and recent US National Resident Matching Program changes and the impact in the evaluation and ranking of applicants within the specialty of anesthesiology. Recruitment challenges are examined as well as program strategies and potential future directions. Also discussed are DEI initiatives within the recruitment process.

Better late than never-a single-center review of delayed rib fixation for symptomatic rib fractures and nonunions

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) has become an emerging therapy for treatment of patients with rib fractures. More commonly, it is used in the acute setting; however, delayed SSRF can be utilized for symptomatic rib fracture nonunions. Here, we describe our institution's experience with delayed SSRF, hypothesizing it is safe and resolves patient symptoms.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients presenting to our Level I trauma center to undergo delayed SSRF for symptomatic nonunions from January 2017 to September 2022. Delayed SSRF was defined as SSRF over 2 weeks in the outpatient setting. Basic demographics were obtained. Outcomes of interest included mean pain score (preoperatively and postoperatively), intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), and resolution of preoperative symptoms, specifically chest wall instability, with return to activities of daily living (ADLs).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria with a total of 156 symptomatic nonunion rib fractures that received delayed SSRF. The average age was 59.2 ± 11.9 years and median number of days from injury to SSRF was 172.5 (interquartile range, 27.5-200). The average number rib fractures plated per patient 3.5 ± 1.8. Only three patients required ICU admission postoperatively for no longer than 2 days. Median hospital LOS was 2 days (interquartile range 1-3 days). Average preoperative and postoperative pain score was 6.8 ± 1.9 and 2.02 ± 1.5, respectively ( p < 0.001). Chest wall instability and preoperative symptoms resolved in 93.2% of patients postoperatively ( p < 0.001). Two patients (4.5%) had postoperative complications that resolved after additional surgical intervention. Rib fracture healing was demonstrated on radiographic imaging during postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Delayed SSRF is safe and demonstrates significant resolution of preoperative symptoms by decreasing pain, improving chest wall stability, and allowing patients to return to activities of daily living.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Single-Center Experience in Cases With Rib Fractures: When To Be Alert?

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate rib fracture-related complications in blunt chest traumas.

METHODOLOGY

The study included a cohort of 132 male and 42 female patients, aged between 22 and 89 years, all diagnosed with rib fractures subsequent to blunt chest trauma. The data collection period extended from November 2017 to November 2019. Pulmonary complications, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, flail chest, and the need for mechanical ventilator support, were retrospectively evaluated based on age, gender, trauma history, bilateral fractures, the number of fractured ribs, and concomitant traumas in other systems. Patients with one or two fractured ribs were included in Group 1, while those with three or more rib fractures were in Goup 2.

RESULTS

Patients in Group 2 (n=82) had a significantly higher mean age and complication rate compared to patients in Group 1 (56.24 vs. 51.08; p: 0.033; p=0.000). Falls from height were the most common trauma history. The most frequently broken ribs were the fifth right (n=35) and the ninth right ribs (n=35), followed by the seventh right (n=33) and the seventh left rib (n=32) in order. Pneumothorax was diagnosed in 60 patients (34.4%), hemothorax in 48 patients (27.5%), and pulmonary contusion in 22 patients (12.6%). Seven patients had a flail chest (4.0%) and four required mechanical ventilation support. The number of male patients was significantly higher (p=0.000). Motor vehicle accidents were most correlated with complications in trauma history (p=0.002). Elderly age, bilateral fractures, three or more fractured ribs, and the mechanism of trauma were significantly correlated with complications (p < 0.05). The mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSION

Three or more fractured ribs, bilateral fractures, and high-energy traumas are important risk factors, particularly in the elderly population. For patients meeting these criteria, hospitalization and careful observation are recommended.

Perioperative considerations for patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A narrative review

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF.

[Bilateral thoracic trauma-"double the trouble"?]

BACKGROUND

Thoracic trauma is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Assessing the risk for complications is essential for planning the further treatment strategies and managing resources in thoracic trauma.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze concomitant injuries in unilateral and bilateral rib fractures and pulmonary contusions and evaluate differences in complication rates between the two.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, data from all patients diagnosed with thoracic trauma at a level I trauma center were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate analysis were used to examine an association of unilateral or bilateral rib fractures, serial rib fractures, and pulmonary contusions with multiple injuries and outcomes. In addition, multivariate regression analysis was utilized to determine the impact of age, gender and additional injuries on outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 714 patients were included in the analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 19. Patients with an additional thoracic spine injury had a significantly higher incidence of bilateral rib fractures. Pulmonary contusions were associated with younger age. Abdominal injuries were predictors for bilateral pulmonary contusions. Complications occurred in 36% of the patients. Bilateral injuries increased the complication rate up to 70%. Pelvic and abdominal injuries as well as the need for a chest drain were significant risk factors for complications. The mortality rate was 10%, with higher age, head and pelvic injuries as predictors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with bilateral chest trauma had an increased incidence of complications and a higher mortality rate. Bilateral injuries and significant risk factors must therefore be considered. Injury of the thoracic spine should be excluded in those patients.

Incidence and outcomes of major trauma patients with thoracic injuries and rib fractures in Aotearoa New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic trauma represents a significant burden of disease in Aotearoa, New Zealand (AoNZ). To date, no study has examined the incidence or outcomes of patients suffering major thoracic trauma, or major trauma and rib fractures in AoNZ.

METHODS

A 6 year retrospective study of all major trauma (Injury Severity Score >12) patients in AoNZ was performed. The National Trauma Registry was searched to identify patients. The National Minimum Data Set was searched for all ICD-10 codes associated with surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF). Poisson regression was used to determine the change in incidence rate over the study period adjusted for age with the logarithm of population size as the offset variable. The incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

RESULTS

12,218 patients sustained major trauma. 7,059 (57.8%) of these patients sustained thoracic injuries. Of these patients, 5,585 (79.1%) sustained rib fractures, and 180 (3.2%) proceeded to SSRF. A flail segment was observed in 16% of patients with rib fractures. Transport was the mechanism of injury in 53% of patients. During the study the incidence (cases per 100,000 people per year) of major trauma increased from 39.5 to 49.3 (IRR 1.05, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.07, <0.001), the incidence of thoracic injuries from 21.3 to 28.7 (1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.08, <0.001) and the incidence of rib fractures from 16.0 to 22.9 (1.08, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.09, <0.001). SSRF was performed in 3.2% of patients with rib fractures and increased from 0.2 to 0.8 cases per 100,000 people per year (1.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.41, <0.001) during the study.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the incidence of major trauma patients with thoracic injury, major trauma patients with rib fractures and the incidence of SSRF in AoNZ. Transport related injuries are the predominant mechanism of injury. The incidence of SSRF was low across AoNZ. To improve the quality of care in AoNZ for major trauma patients with rib fractures, consideration should be made to create national guidelines and robust referral pathways to specialist centres that provide multidisciplinary care including performing SSRF.

Evaluation of injury threshold from the number of rib fracture for predicting pulmonary injuries in blunt chest trauma

Background

Blunt chest trauma is a common presentation in emergency departments. The relationship between bone fractures and organ injuries has not been studied in detail. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree of external force represented by the number of rib fractures that causes lung injury in blunt chest trauma.

Patients and methods

This study was performed retrospectively using trauma patients who received medical examinations in a single university hospital emergency center between April 2015 and March 2020. We examined the association between the number of rib fractures and pulmonary damage using multivariable regression analysis and considered the relationship between rib fracture location and each type of lung injury.

Results

A total of 317 patients were included. The mean age was 63.1 years, 65.0% were male, and traffic accidents were the most common mechanism of injury (55.8%). The number of mean rib fractures was 4.0, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 11.3. The number of rib fractures was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary injuries: pulmonary contusion (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.48, p < 0.05); hemothorax (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.38, p < 0.05); pneumothorax (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30, p < 0.05); and hemopneumothorax (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p < 0.05). In addition, bilateral rib fractures were associated with fractures of the superior ribs more often and more severely, but were not associated with the occurrence of each type of lung injury.

Conclusion

The number of rib fractures was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary injuries. In addition, the type of pulmonary injury could be predicted from the number of rib fractures in blunt chest trauma.

Age as a Barrier to Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Patients with Flail Chest

INTRODUCTION

Although randomized trials demonstrate a benefit to surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), SSRF is rarely performed. We hypothesized older patients were less likely to receive SSRF nationally.

METHODS

The 2016 National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adults with flail chest. Comorbidities and receipt of SSRF were categorized by ICD-10 code. Univariable testing and Multivariable regression were performed to determine the association of demographic characteristics and comorbidities to receipt of SSRF.

RESULTS

1021 patients with flail chest were identified, including 244 (23.9%) who received SSRF. Patients ≥70 years were less likely to receive SSRF. (<70 yrs 201/774 [26.0%] vs ≥70 43/247 [17.4%], P = .006) and had higher risk of death (<70 yrs 39/774 [5.0%] vs ≥70 33/247 [13.4%], P < .001) In multivariable modeling, only age ≥70 years was associated with SSRF (OR .591, P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Despite guideline-based support of SSRF in flail chest, SSRF is performed in <25% of patients. Age ≥70 years is associated with lower rate of SSRF and higher risk of death. Future study should examine barriers to SSRF in older patients.

Comparison of surgical stabilization of rib fractures vs epidural analgesia on in-hospital outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves functional outcomes compared to controls, partly due to reduction in pain. We investigated the impact of early SSRF on pulmonary complications, mortality, and length of stay compared to non-operative analgesia with epidural analgesia (EA).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) 2017 dataset for adults with rib fractures, excluding those with traumatic brain injury or death within twenty-four hours. Early SSRF and EA occurred within 72 h, and we excluded those who received both or neither intervention. Our primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Additional outcomes included unplanned endotracheal intubation, in-hospital mortality, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) for those surviving to discharge. Multiple logistic and linear regressions were controlled for variables including age, sex, flail chest (FC), injury severity, additional procedures, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

We included 1,024 and 1,109 patients undergoing early SSRF and EA, respectively. SSRF patients were more severely injured with higher rates of FC (42.8 vs 13.3%, p<0.001), Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16 (56.9 vs 36.1%, p<0.001), and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) Thorax > 3 (33.3 vs 12.2%, p<0.001). Overall, 49 (2.3%) of patients developed ARDS or VAP, 111 (5.2%) required unplanned intubation, and 58 (2.7%) expired prior to discharge. On multivariable analysis, SSRF was not associated with the primary composite outcome (OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 0.85-3.21). Early SSRF significantly predicted decreased risk of unplanned intubation (OR:0.59, 95%CI: 0.38-0.92) compared with early EA alone, however, was not a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.27, 95%CI: 0.68-2.39). SSRF was associated with significantly longer hospital (Exp(β): 1.06, 95%CI: 1.00-1.12, p = 0.047) and ICU LOS (Exp(β): 1.17, 95%CI: 1.08-1.27, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aside from unplanned intubation, we observed no statistically significant difference in the adjusted odds of in-hospital pulmonary morbidity or mortality for patients undergoing early SSRF compared with early EA. Chest wall injury patients may benefit from referral to trauma centers where both interventions are available and appropriate surgical candidates may receive timely intervention.

Interobserver agreement for the Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy of rib fractures using computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

In 2020, a universal nomenclature for rib fractures was proposed by the international Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy collaboration. The purpose of this study is to validate this taxonomy. We hypothesized that there would be at least moderate agreement, regardless of the observers' background.

METHODS

An international group of independent observers evaluated axial, coronal, and sagittal computed tomography images on an online platform from 11 rib fractures for location (anterior, lateral, or posterior), type (simple, wedge, or complex), and displacement (undisplaced, offset, or displaced) of rib fractures. The multirater κ and Gwet's first agreement coefficient (AC1) were calculated to estimate agreement among the observers.

RESULTS

A total of 90 observers participated, with 76 complete responses (84%). Strong agreement was found for the classification of fracture location ( κ = 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.97]; AC1, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.81-0.88]), moderate for fracture type ( κ = 0.46 [95% CI, 0.32-0.59]; AC1, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]), and fair for rib fracture displacement ( κ = 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.54], AC1, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.34-0.42]).

CONCLUSION

Agreement on rib fracture location was strong and moderate for fracture type. Agreement on displacement was lower than expected. Evaluating strategies such as comprehensive education, additional imaging techniques, or further specification of the definitions will be needed to increase agreement on the classification of rib fracture type and displacement as defined by the Chest Wall Injury Society taxonomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level IV.

Tailored Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Matters More Than the Number of Fractured Ribs

BACKGROUND

Patients sustaining multiple rib fractures have a significant risk of developing morbidity and mortality. More evidence is emerging that the indication of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) should expand beyond flail chest. Nevertheless, little is known about factors associated with poor outcomes after surgical fixation. We reviewed patients with rib fractures to further explore the role of SSRF; we matched two groups by propensity score (PS).

METHOD

A comparison of patients with blunt thoracic trauma treated with SSRF between 2010 and 2020 was compared with those who received conservative treatment for rib fractures. Risk factors for poor outcomes were analyzed by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

After tailored SSRF, the number of fractured ribs was not associated with longer ventilator days (p = 0.617), ICU stay (p = 0.478), hospital stay (p = 0.706), and increased nonprocedure-related pulmonary complications (NPRCs) (p = 0.226) despite having experienced much more severe trauma. In the multivariate regression models, lower GCS, delayed surgery, thoracotomy, and flail chest requiring mechanical ventilation were factors associated with prolonged ventilator days. Lower GCS, higher ISS, delayed surgery, and flail chest requiring mechanical ventilation were factors associated with longer ICU stays. Lower GCS and older age were factors associated with increased NPRCs. In the PS model, NPRCs risk was reduced by SSRF.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of NPRCs was reduced once ribs were surgically fixed through an algorithmic approach, and poor consciousness and aging were independent risk factors for NPRCs.

Age as the Impact on Mortality Rate in Trauma Patients

Background

Globally, the fastest-growing population is that of older adults. Geriatric trauma patients pose a unique challenge to trauma teams because the aging process reduces their physiologic reserve. To date, no agreed-upon definition exists for the geriatric trauma patients, and the appropriate age cut point to consider patients at increased risk of mortality is unclear.

Objectives

To determine the age cut point at which age impacts the mortality rate in trauma patients in Thailand.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort and prognostic analysis study conducted in trauma patients ≥40 years. Patient data were retrieved from the trauma registry database and hospital information system in Songklanagarind Hospital. The estimated sample size of 1,509 patients was calculated based on the trauma registry data. The age with the maximum mortality rate was used as the cut point to define the elderly population. Hospital cost, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, gender, precomorbidity, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), and trauma and injury severity score were analyzed for any correlation with mortality, and whether or not they were associated with elderly trauma patients.

Results

A total of 1,523 trauma patients ≥40 years were included in the study. The median age in both the survival and death groups was 61 years, with gender in both groups being similar (p value = 0.259). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) showed that increasing age was significantly associated with mortality (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.07; p value <0.001). In the age group of 70 to 79 years and >80 years, the odds of mortality were significantly increased (OR 3.29, 95% CI, 1.24–8.68; p value = 0.016 and OR 3.29, 95% CI, 1.27–12.24; p value = 0.018, respectively).

Conclusion

Age is a significant risk factor for mortality in trauma patients. The mortality significantly increased at the age of 70 and higher.

Risk factors that predict mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years, research has highlighted emerging potential risk factors for poor outcomes following blunt chest wall trauma. The aim was to update a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for mortality in blunt chest wall trauma patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to March 2022 was completed. Broad search terms and inclusion criteria were used. All observational studies were included if they investigated estimates of association between a risk factor and mortality for blunt chest wall trauma patients. Where sufficient data were available, ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

73 studies were identified which were of variable quality (including 29 from original review). Identified risk factors for mortality following blunt chest wall trauma were: age 65 years or more (OR: 2.11; 95% CI 1.85 to 2.41), three or more rib fractures (OR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.26) and presence of pre-existing disease (OR: 2.86; 95% CI 1.34 to 6.09). Other new risk factors identified were: increasing Injury Severity Score, need for mechanical ventilation, extremes of body mass index and smoking status. Meta-analysis was not possible for these variables due to insufficient studies and high levels of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this updated review suggest that despite a change in demographics of trauma patients and subsequent emerging evidence over the last 10 years, the main risk factors for mortality in patients sustaining blunt chest wall trauma remained largely unchanged. A number of new risk factors however have been reported that need consideration when updating current risk prediction models used in the ED.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021242063. Date registered: 29 March 2021. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/%23recordDetails.

Management and outcomes of rib fractures in patients with isolated blunt thoracic trauma: Results of the Aotearoa New Zealand RiBZ study

AIM

Rib fractures are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is limited literature on patient care and outcomes in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). The aim of this study is to describe key clinical outcomes and management interventions for patients with rib fractures across AoNZ.

METHODS

A national prospective multicenter observational cohort study was performed. Patients admitted between 1 December 2020 and 28 February 2021 with one or more radiologically proven rib fractures and an Abbreviated Injury Score of the head or abdomen of less than 3 were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of thirty-day pneumonia, re-presentation and mortality. The secondary outcomes of interest were rate of surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) and pain management of patients with rib fractures. Binomial logistic regression was performed for the primary outcomes and funnel plots were created of the inter-hospital variation in pneumonia.

RESULTS

Fourteen AoNZ hospitals and 407 patients were included. Mean age was 57.4 (SD 18.7), 28% were female, 15% Māori and 85% non-Māori. The median number of rib fractures was 4. The rate of pneumonia, re-presentation and mortality was 11%, 8% and 2%, respectively. Logistic regression found the odds of pneumonia increased with each additional rib fracture (OR 1.15 95% CI 1.05-1.25) and the odds of re-presentation increased with age (OR 1.028 95% CI 1.005-1.051) and Māori ethnicity (OR 2.754 95% CI 1.077-7.045). The funnel plot of inter-hospital variation in pneumonia rate adjusted for clinically plausible variables found no centre lay outside the 95% confidence interval. SSRF was performed in 2% of patients. 58% of patients had a pain team review and 23% a regional block.

CONCLUSION

This study describes clinical outcomes for patients with isolated rib fractures from multiple hospitals in AoNZ. A moderate pneumonia rate of 11% was found which is likely amendable to reduction with quality improvement initiatives. Consideration should be given to further resource and improve the access to SSRF and regional analgesia given the low utilization found across AoNZ. A higher re-presentation rate in Māori and elderly patients was found which needs further investigation.

Effect of an intervention for patients 65 years and older with blunt chest injury: Patient and health service outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Blunt chest injury in older adults, aged 65 years and older, leads to significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary chest injury care bundle (ChIP) on patient and health service outcomes in older adults with blunt chest injury.

METHODS

ChIP comprised multidimensional implementation guidance in three key pillars of care for blunt chest injury: respiratory support, analgesia, and complication prevention. Implementation was guided using the Behaviour Change Wheel. This proof-of-concept controlled pre- and post-test study with two intervention and two control sites in Australia was conducted from July 2015 to June 2019. The primary outcomes were non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use, unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were health service and costing outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 1122 patients included in the analysis, with 673 at intervention sites (331 pre-test and 342 post-test) and 449 at control sites (256 pre-test and 193 post-test). ChIP was associated with unplanned ICU admissions and in NIV use with a reduction of the odds in the post vs the pre periods in the intervention sites when compared to the controls (ratio of OR=0.13, 95%CI=0.03-0.55) and (ratio of OR=0.14, 95%CI=0.02-0.98) respectively. There was no significant change in mortality. Implementing ChIP was also associated with health service team reviews with an increased odds in the post vs pre periods in the intervention sites in comparison to the controls for surgical review (ratio of OR =6.93, 95%CI=4.70-10.28), ICU doctor (ratio of OR =5.06, 95%CI=2.26-9.25), ICU liaison (ratio of OR =14.14, 95%CI=3.15-63.31), and pain (ratio of OR =5.59, 95%CI=3.25-9.29). ChIP was also related to incentive spirometry (ratio of OR=6.35, 95%CI= 3.15-12.82) and overall costs (ratio of mean ratio=1.34, 95%CI=1.09-1.66) with a higher ratio for intervention sites.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of ChIP using the Behaviour Change Wheel was associated with reduced unplanned ICU admissions and NIV use and improved health care delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR: ACTRN12618001548224, approved 17/09/2018.

Is it Necessary to Stabilize Every Fracture in Patients with Serial Rib Fractures in Blunt Force Trauma?

Introduction

Management of traumatic rib fractures is subject of controversial discussions. Rib fractures are common, especially after traffic accidents and falls. There is no consensus on whether and how many rib fractures need reconstruction. Not every rib fracture needs to be stabilized, but conservative treatment by internal splinting and analgesia is not effective for all patients. Deformities of the chest wall with reduced thoracic volume and restrictive ventilation disorders must be avoided. Intraoperative assessment of fractures and chest stability plays a central role.

Material and methods

From 07/2016 to 07/2021, a total of 121 chest wall stabilizations were performed (m:f = 2:1, age 65 ± 14.5 a). Indications for surgery were the following criteria: (1) palpatory instability of the chest wall, (2) dislocated fracture endings, (3) concomitant injuries, (4) uncontrollable pain symptoms. In all patients, a computed tomography scan of the thorax was performed before the osteosynthetic treatment to assess dislocation of the fracture endings and possible concomitant injuries of intrathoracic organs.

Results

Video-assisted thoracoscopy was performed in all patients. Hemothorax and concomitant injuries of the lung, diaphragm and mediastinum could be assessed. This was followed by an intraoperative assessment of the rib fractures, in particular penetration of fracture endings and resulting instability and deformity. Relevant fractures could be identified and subsequent incisions for rib osteosynthesis precisely defined. 6.3 (±2.7) rib fractures were detected, but 2.4 (±1.2) ribs treated osteosynthetically. Bilateral rib fractures were present in 26 patients (21.5%). Post-operative bleeding occurred in seven patients (5.8%), a breakage of the osteosynthetic material in two patients (1.7%).

Discussion

Intraoperative assessment of relevant fractures and dislocation is the decisive criterium for osteosynthesis. Thoracoscopy is mandatory for this purpose - also to identify accompanying injuries. Not every fracture has to be approached osteosynthetically. Even with serial rib fractures or multiple fractures in a single rib, the thoracic contour can be restored by stabilizing only relevant fractures. Intraoperative palpation can adequately assess the stability and thus the result of the osteosynthesis. Even after surgical treatment of thoracic trauma, adequate analgesia and respiratory therapy are important to the healing process.

Prospective validation of the Rib Injury Guidelines for traumatic rib fractures

INTRODUCTION

The Rib Injury Guidelines (RIG) were developed to guide triage of traumatic rib fracture patients to home, regular floor, or intensive care unit (ICU) and standardize care. The RIG score is based on patient history, physical examination, and imaging findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate triage effectiveness and health care resources utilization following RIG implementation.

METHODS

This is a prospective analysis at a level I trauma center from October 2017 to January 2020. Adult (18 years or older) blunt trauma patients with a diagnosis of at least one rib fracture on computed tomography imaging were included. Patients before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of RIG were compared. In the POST group, patients were divided into RIG 1, RIG 2, and RIG 3 based on their RIG score. Outcomes were readmission for RIG 1 patients, unplanned ICU admission for RIG 2 patients, and overall ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,100 patients were identified (PRE, 754; POST, 346). Mean ± SD age was 56 ± 19 years, 788 (71.6%) were male, and median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range, 10-22). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (554 [50.3%]), 253 patients (22.9%) had ≥5 rib fractures, and 53 patients (4.8%) had a flail chest. In the POST group, 74 patients (21.1%) were RIG 1; 121 (35.2%), RIG 2; and 151 (43.7%), RIG 3. No patient in RIG 1 was readmitted following initial discharge, and two patients (1.6%) in RIG 2 had an unplanned ICU admission (both for alcohol withdrawal syndrome). Patients after implementation of RIG had shorter hospital LOS (3 [1-6] vs. 4 [1-7] days; p = 0.019) and no difference in mortality (5.8% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.252). On multivariate analysis, RIG implementation was associated with decreased ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [0.36-0.82]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Rib Injury Guidelines are safe and effectively define triage of rib fracture patients with an overall reduction in ICU admissions, shorter hospital LOS, and no readmissions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Prospective, Interventional Study

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures are present in 10% of all trauma patients and 30% of patients with significant chest trauma. Pain from rib fractures results in decreased respiratory effort which can lead to atelectasis and potentially pneumonia and death. Pain control is therefore of utmost importance in preventing the complications of rib fractures by improving respiratory function. Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) have been effectively used in elective surgery with subjective and objective improvements in pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We sought to evaluate subjective pain and objective evaluation of respiratory effort by way of incentive spirometry levels after administration of an ESPB for patients with rib fractures. Our trauma service applied ESPB over 2 years in patients with rib fractures. Ultrasound guidance was used to administer 50cc of a long-acting local anesthetic at the transverse process underneath the erector spinae muscle group. Evaluation of pain scores and incentive spirometry levels were measured prior to and after the ESPB.

RESULTS

In total, we obtained data from 45 patients. Mean pre-pain scores were 7.93 with post-pain scores of 4.47 (p < 0.001). Mean pre-block incentive spirometry volumes were 1160 cc with post-block IS of 1495cc (p 0.035). There were no associated complications.

DISCUSSION

ESPBs are safe and significantly reduce pain scores and increased incentive spirometry volumes after administration. They are easy to perform and can be done by the trauma service, including trainees. ESPB has the potential to reduce pulmonary complications of rib fractures, as well as subjectively improving pain experienced by our trauma patients. Based on our results, we recommend this block as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia for patients with rib fractures.

Outcomes After Operative Reconstruction of Symptomatic Rib Nonunions

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of patients after rib nonunion reconstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Between January 2007 and August 2019, 25 consecutive patients with 51 nonunions with disabling pain or chronic instability were treated for nonunited rib fractures.

INTERVENTION

Rib nonunion reconstructions performed using plate and screw fixation, recannalizing the medullary canal and augmented with autogenous iliac crest bone graft.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, number of rib nonunions, and postoperative radiographs were assessed. Satisfaction, patient-reported complications, return to occupation and activity, and general health measures were captured using patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

In 25 patients, 51 painful rib nonunions were surgically treated. The average length from injury to surgical rib reconstruction was 25.1 months (range = 3-118 months; median = 12 months). Follow-up was obtained in 18 of 25 patients (72%) with a mean of 46.1 months (range = 13-139 months). All ribs achieved radiographic union at an average of 12.3 weeks (range = 8-24 weeks) after surgery. Sixteen of 18 patients (89%) reported satisfaction with surgery and 15 patients (83%) reported mild to no pain at final follow-up. Five patients had complications that all resolved after subsequent treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of symptomatic rib nonunion is possible using rib plates in conjunction with bone grafting and has high union rates, satisfactory results, and limited complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Isolated Rib Fractures in Elderly Falls: Not As Deadly As We Think

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures in elderly patients have been associated with high morbidity and mortality; however, many of these patients had substantial mechanisms of injury, which may have contributed to these high rates.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with isolated rib fractures who fell from standing.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study was conducted in a Level I trauma center using the trauma registry and a separate elderly fall from standing database. Admitted patients 65 years or older who presented with rib fractures after a fall from January 2013 to June 2017 were included. Patients with a nonthoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale score greater than 2 were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients with isolated rib fracture, 94% (n = 121) had comorbidities and 71% (n = 92) had two or more comorbidities. Almost half (41.9%; n = 54) were taking antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, 78.3% (n = 101) were caused by a mechanical fall, and 7% (n = 9) were caused by syncope. Data showed 72.9% (n = 94) had three or more rib fractures. The mortality rate of patients was 3.9% (n = 5). Three patients had dementia at death, four had do-not-resuscitate order, and only two deaths were directly related to pulmonary status. Patients who developed pneumonia (14.7%; n = 19) and required mechanical ventilation for a median of 11 days (3.9%; n = 5) were fewer than those in in previous studies.

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality associated with rib fractures are significantly less than reported in the literature when additional injuries are excluded.

Patient-reported outcomes 6 to 12 months after isolated rib fractures: A nontrivial injury pattern

BACKGROUND

Despite the ubiquity of rib fractures in patients with blunt chest trauma, long-term outcomes for patients with this injury pattern are not well described.

METHODS

The Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) project has established a multicenter prospective registry with 6- to 12-month follow-up for trauma patients treated at participating centers. We combined the FORTE registry with a detailed retrospective chart review investigating admission variables and injury characteristics. All trauma survivors with complete FORTE data and isolated chest trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≤1 in all other regions) with rib fractures were included. Outcomes included chronic pain, limitation in activities of daily living, physical limitations, exercise limitations, return to work, and both inpatient and discharge pain control modalities. Multivariable logistic regression models were built for each outcome using clinically relevant demographic and injury characteristic univariate predictors.

RESULTS

We identified 279 patients with isolated rib fractures. The median age of the cohort was 68 years (interquartile range, 56-78 years), 59% were male, and 84% were White. Functional and quality of life limitations were common among survivors of isolated rib fractures even 6 to 12 months after injury. Forty-three percent of patients without a preexisting pain disorder reported new daily pain, and new chronic pain was associated with low resilience. Limitations in physical functioning and exercise capacity were reported in 56% and 51% of patients, respectively. Of those working preinjury, 28% had not returned to work. New limitations in activities of daily living were reported in 29% of patients older than 65 years. Older age, higher number of rib fractures, and intensive care unit admission were independently associated with higher odds of receiving regional anesthesia. Receiving a regional nerve block did not have a statistically significant association with any patient-reported outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Isolated rib fractures are a nontrivial trauma burden associated with functional impairment and chronic pain even 6 to 12 months after injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic, level III.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Internal Rib Fixation

Rib fractures result in serious morbidity and mortality after trauma. Although there is ongoing debate about surgical rib fixation, it is increasingly important for some patients. Minimally invasive techniques for rib fixation are gaining traction within the trauma community. We present an observational experience at our level 1 trauma center with our first 10 cases of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) internal rib fixation. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery internal plates are especially helpful for rib fractures under the scapula, which are difficult to access traditionally. This technique is also excellent at reducing complex segmental fractures as the bridge can span across multiple fractures with a single post on either side. They also work well for posterior fractures where multiple screws cannot be placed. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery internal rib fixation is a viable and exciting option for surgical fixation. The plates work particularly well for certain fracture patterns.

Chest wall injuries due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the effect on in-hospital outcomes in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of chest wall injuries due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and to compare in-hospital outcomes in patients with versus without chest wall injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for OHCA between January 1, 2007, and December 2019 was performed. The primary outcome was the occurrence of chest wall injuries, as diagnosed on chest computed tomography. Chest wall injury characteristics such as rib fracture location, type, and dislocation were collected. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital outcomes and subgroup analysis of patients with good neurological recovery to identify those who could possibly benefit from the surgical stabilization of rib fractures.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-four patients were included, of which 291 (85%) sustained chest wall injury. Patients with chest wall injury had a median of 8 fractured ribs (P25-P75, 4-10 ribs), which were most often undisplaced (on chest computed tomography) (n = 1,574 [72.1%]), simple (n = 1,948 [89.2%]), and anterior (n = 1,785 [77.6%]) rib fractures of ribs 2 to 7. Eight patients (2.3%) had a flail segment, and 136 patients (39.5%) had an anterior flail segment. Patients with chest wall injury had fewer ventilator-free days (0 days [P25-P75, 0-16 days] vs. 13 days [P25-P75, 2-22 days]; p = 0.006) and a higher mortality rate (n = 102 [54.0%] vs. n = 8 [22.2%]; p < 0.001) than those without chest wall injury. For the subgroup of patients with good neurological recovery, the presence of six or more rib fractures or a single displaced rib fracture was associated with longer hospital and ICU length of stay, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related chest wall injuries in survivors of OHCA and especially rib fractures are common. Patients with chest wall injury had fewer ventilator-free days and a higher mortality rate. Patients with good neurological recovery might represent a subgroup of patients who could benefit from surgical stabilization of rib fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level IV; Epidemiological, Level IV.

Rib Fracture Frailty Index: A risk stratification tool for geriatric patients with multiple rib fractures

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures are consequential injuries for geriatric patients (age, ≥65 years). Although age and injury patterns drive many rib fracture management decisions, the impact of frailty-which baseline conditions affect rib fracture-specific outcomes-remains unclear for geriatric patients. We aimed to develop and validate the Rib Fracture Frailty (RFF) Index, a practical risk stratification tool specific for geriatric patients with rib fractures. We hypothesized that a compact list of frailty markers can accurately risk stratify clinical outcomes after rib fractures.

METHODS

We queried nationwide US admission encounters of geriatric patients admitted with multiple rib fractures from 2016 to 2017. Partitioning around medoids clustering identified a development subcohort with previously validated frailty characteristics. Ridge regression with penalty for multicollinearity aggregated baseline conditions most prevalent in this frail subcohort into RFF scores. Regression models with adjustment for injury severity, sex, and age assessed associations between frailty risk categories (low, medium, and high) and inpatient outcomes among validation cohorts (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]). We report results according to Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis guidelines.

RESULTS

Development cohort (n = 55,540) cluster analysis delineated 13 baseline conditions constituting the RFF Index. Among external validation cohort (n = 77,710), increasing frailty risk (low [reference group], moderate, high) was associated with stepwise worsening adjusted odds of mortality (1.5 [1.2-1.7], 3.5 [3.0-4.0]), intubation (2.4 [1.5-3.9], 4.7 [3.1-7.5]), hospitalization ≥5 days (1.4 [1.3-1.5], 1.8 [1.7-2.0]), and disposition to home (0.6 [0.5-0.6], 0.4 [0.3-0.4]). Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing showed correlations between increasing RFF scores and worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The RFF Index is a practical frailty risk stratification tool for geriatric patients with multiple rib fractures. The mobile app we developed may facilitate rapid implementation and further validation of RFF Index at the bedside.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level III.

Readmission for pleural space complications after chest wall injury: Who is at risk?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about patient characteristics predicting postdischarge pleural space complications (PDPSCs) after thoracic trauma. We sought to analyze the patient population who required unplanned hospital readmission for PDPSC.

METHODS

Retrospective review of adult patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center with a chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 2 or greater between January 2015 and August 2020. Those readmitted within 30 days of index hospitalization discharge for PDPSC were compared with those not readmitted. Demographics, injury characteristics, surgical procedures, imaging, and readmission data were retrieved.

RESULTS

Out of 17,192 trauma evaluations, 3,412 (19.8%) suffered a chest AIS score of 2 or greater injury and 155 experienced an unplanned 30-day hospital readmission. Of those, 49 (1.4%) were readmitted for the management of PDPSC (readmit PDPSC) and were compared with patients who were not readmitted (no readmit, n = 3,257). The readmit PDPSC group was significantly older age, heavier, comprised of fewer men, and suffered a higher mean chest AIS score. The readmit PDPSC group had a significantly higher incidence of rib fractures, flail chest, pneumothorax, hemothorax, scapula fractures, and a higher rate of tube thoracostomy placement during index admission. The discharge chest X-ray in the readmit PDPSC group demonstrated a pleural space abnormality in 36 (73%) of patients. Mean time to readmission was 10.2 (7.2) days, and hospital length of stay on readmission was 5.8 (3.7) days. Pleural effusion was the most common readmission diagnosis (44 [90%]), and 42 (86%) required tube thoracostomy.

CONCLUSION

We describe the subset of chest wall injury patients who require hospital readmission for PDPSC. Characteristics from index hospitalization associated with PDPSC include older age, female sex, heavier weight, presence of rib fractures, pleural space abnormality, scapular fracture, and chest tube placement. Further studies are needed to characterize this at-risk chest wall injury population, and to determine what interventions can facilitate outpatient management of postdischarge pleural space complications and mitigate readmission risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiologic, Level IV; Care management, Level V.

A survey of current practice in UK emergency department management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma not requiring admission to hospital

INTRODUCTION

There is no universal agreement or supporting evidence for the content or format of a standardised guidance document for patients with blunt chest wall trauma. The aim of this study is to investigate current UK Emergency Medicine practice of the management of patients with blunt chest wall trauma, who do not require admission to hospital.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey study, with mixed quantitative / qualitative analysis methods. A convenience sample of all professions working in the Emergency Departments / Urgent Care Centres in the UK was used. A combination of closed and open-ended questions were included, covering demographics and current practice in the respondent's main place of work. Themes explored included management strategies for safe discharge home, risk prediction and variables considered relevant for inclusion in patient guidance.

RESULTS

A total of 113 clinicians responded from all UK trauma networks, including all devolved nations. A total of 20 different risk prediction tools / pathways were reported to be used when assessing whether a patient is safe for discharge home, with over 35 different variables listed by respondents as being important to highlight to patients. Qualitative analysis revealed that a small number of respondents believe patients can be better managed through the improvement of the following; identification of the high-risk patient, initial assessment and current management strategies used in the ED / UCC.

DISCUSSION

The wide variation in practice highlighted in this study may be due in part to a lack of national consensus guidelines on how to manage this complex patient group. Further research is needed into whether structured national guidelines for the assessment and management of such patients could potentially lead to an overall improvement in outcomes. Such guidelines should be developed by not only expert clinicians and researchers, but also and more importantly by those service-users who have lived experience of blunt chest wall trauma.

What is the optimal timing to perform surgical stabilization of rib fractures?

The practice of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) for severe chest wall injury has exponentially increased over the last decade due to improved outcomes as compared to nonoperative management. However, regarding in-hospital outcomes, the ideal time from injury to SSRF remains a matter of debate. This review aims to evaluate and summarize currently available literature related to timing of SSRF. Nine studies on the effect of time to SSRF were identified. All were retrospective comparative studies with no detailed information on why patients underwent early or later SSRF. Patients underwent SSRF most often for a flail chest or ≥3 displaced rib fractures. Early SSRF (≤48-72 hours after admission) was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (HLOS and ICU-LOS, respectively), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), and lower rates of pneumonia, and tracheostomy as well as lower hospitalization costs. No difference between early or late SSRF was demonstrated for mortality rate. As compared to nonoperative management, late SSRF (>3 days after admission), was associated with similar or worse in-hospital outcomes. The optimal time to perform SSRF in patients with severe chest wall injury is early (≤48-72 hours after admission) and associated with improved in-hospital outcomes as compared to either late salvage or nonoperative management. These data must however be cautiously interpreted due the retrospective nature of the studies and potential selection and attrition bias. Future research should focus on both factors and pathways that allow patients to undergo early SSRF.

Mechanism of injury, injury patterns and associated injuries in patients operated for chest wall trauma

PURPOSE

Chest wall injuries are common in blunt trauma and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the most common mechanisms of injury (MOI), injury patterns, and associated injuries in patients who undergo surgery for chest wall trauma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of trauma patients with multiple rib fractures and unstable thoracic cage injuries who were managed surgically at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during the period September 2010-September 2017. The MOI, injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), thoracic and associated injuries were recorded. Patients were categorized according to age (years): groups I (15‒44), II (45‒64) and III ( > 64). Unstable thoracic cage injuries were classified as sternal, anterior, lateral and posterior flail chest.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eleven trauma patients with a mean age (years) of 58.2 ± 15.6, mean ISS 23.6 ± 11.0, and mean NISS 34.1 ± 10.6 were included in the study. Traffic accidents were the most common MOI in Group I (62%) and falls in Group III (59%). The most common flail segments were lateral and posterior. Sternal and anterior flail segments were more common with bilateral injuries and traffic accidents, particularly frontal collisions. Injuries in at least three body regions were also more associated with traffic accidents. Diaphragmatic injury was seen in 18% of patients who underwent thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The MOI associated with multiple rib fractures differs according to the age of the patient and is associated with different chest wall injury patterns and extra-thoracic injuries.

The financial burden of rib fractures: National estimates 2007 to 2016

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to define the cost of rib fracture hospitalization by single, multiple, and flail type using a nationally representative sample.

METHODS

The national inpatient sample (NIS) was used to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of rib fracture hospitalization 2007-2016. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were used to characterize patients as having single, multiple, or flail chest rib fractures. Patients with only trauma related diagnosis groups (DRG) at the time discharge were included in the final sample. The cost of hospitalization was obtained by converting reported charges into cost using the all-payer inpatient cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) for all hospitals in the NIS data. The log of cost was modeled using multivariate linear regression. The rib fracture type was the primary predictor in the model.

RESULTS

There were 373,053 rib fracture admissions during 2007-2016. The average cost per hospitalization was $10,169 (95%Confidence Interval [CI]: 9,942-10,395), which translated into a national expenditure of $3.64 billion over 10 years. The cost of rib fracture hospitalization increased from $209 million in 2007 to $469 million in 2016. Compared to single rib fracture patients, the cost of hospitalization for multiple rib fractures and flail chest was 3% (p = 0.001) and 5% (p=0.02) higher, respectively. Higher injury severity score, total number of body regions injured and longer length of stay were associated with higher rib fracture hospitalization cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Rib fractures affect ~22,000-45,000 people per year in the United States. The cost of rib fractures is over $469 million per year and is increasing over time. Multiple rib fractures and flail chest rib fractures are associated with increased cost. Pathways to improve care in patients with rib fractures should consider the cost of treatment.

Are We Underestimating the Morbidity of Single Rib Fractures?

PURPOSE

Previous studies suggest that patients with multiple rib fractures have poor outcomes, but it is unknown how isolated single rib fractures (SRF) are associated with morbidity or mortality. We hypothesized that patients with poor outcomes after SRF can be identified by demographics and comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to model adverse outcome after single rib fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the 2016 National Inpatient Sample to identify patients with SRF associated with blunt trauma using ICD-10 coding. Comorbidities and abbreviated injury score (AIS) were also extracted. Patients with non-chest trauma were excluded. The primary outcome was an adverse composite outcome of death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or hospitalization longer than twelve days. One-third of the cohort was reserved for validation. Backward selection multivariable modeling identified factors associated with adverse composite outcome. The model was used to create a nomogram to predict adverse composite outcome. The nomogram was then tested using the validation cohort.

RESULTS

2,398 patients with isolated SRF were divided into training (n = 1,598) and validation sets (n = 800). The average age was 69 and the majority were male (66%) and received care at academic institutions (61.6%). The adverse composite outcome occurred in 20.8%: 61 deaths (2.5%), 67 tracheostomies (2.8%), 319 pneumonias (13.3%), and 165 patients with hospital length of stay greater than twelve days (6.9%). Results of stepwise multivariable modeling had a C-statistic of 0.700. The multivariable model was used to create a nomogram which had a c-statistic of 0.672 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

20% of isolated SRF patients had an adverse outcome. Demographics and comorbidities can be used to identify and triage high-risk patients for specialized care and proper counseling.

Retrospective study on rib fractures: smoking and alcohol matter for mortality and complications

Background

Rib fractures and substance use are both common in trauma patients, but there is little data on how smoking and alcohol use may be associated with outcomes in these patients. We assessed the association between smoking or alcohol use disorder (AUD) and outcomes in patients with rib fractures.

Methods

We used institutional databases to conduct a retrospective review of patients with rib fractures at the only American College of Surgeons-verified adult level 1 trauma center in a rural state between 2015 and 2019. The key exposure variables were smoking and AUD. The key outcome variables were mortality and pulmonary complications (pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumothorax). We used multivariable regression for analysis and directed acyclic graphs to identify variables for adjustment.

Results

We identified 1880 eligible patients with rib fractures, including 693 (37%) who were smokers and 204 (11%) who had AUD. Compared with non-smokers, smokers were younger, more often male, and had lower mortality rates. Regression showed that smokers had a lower likelihood of mortality (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.87; p=014). Likelihood of pneumonia, ARDS, and pneumothorax was not different between smokers and non-smokers. Compared with patients without AUD, patients with AUD were older, more often male, and had higher likelihood of pneumonia and lower likelihood of pneumothorax. Regression showed that patients with AUD had higher likelihood of pneumonia (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.68; p=0.002) and lower likelihood of pneumothorax (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.75; p=0.002).

Discussion

In trauma patients with rib fractures treated at a level 1 trauma center over 5 years, smoking was associated with decreased risk of mortality. These findings have implications for risk stratification and clinical decision-making for patients with rib fractures.

Level of evidence

III

The Chest Wall Injury Society Recommendations for Reporting Studies of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

BACKGROUND

Publications investigating the efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) have increased exponentially. However, there is currently no standardized reporting structure for these studies, rendering both comparisons and extrapolation problematic.

METHODS

A subject matter expert group was formed by the Chest Wall Injury Society. This group conducted a review of the SSRF investigational literature and identified variable reporting within several general categories of relevant parameters. A compliment of guidelines was then generated.

RESULTS

The reporting guidelines consist of 26 recommendations in the categories of: (1) study type, (2) patient and injury characteristics, (3) patient treatments, (4) outcomes, and (5) statistical considerations.

CONCLUSION

Our review identified inconsistencies in reporting within the investigational SSRF literature. In response to these inconsistencies, we propose a set of recommendations to standardize reporting of original investigations into the efficacy of SSRF.

Multiple rib fractures: does flail chest matter?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported significant morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple rib fractures, even without flail chest. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and incidence of associated chest injuries between patients with and without flail chest, with three or more rib fractures.

METHODS

This study included patients with blunt trauma with at least three rib fractures, hospitalised during 2010-2019 in the Hillel Yaffe Medical Center in central Israel (level II trauma centre). Patients with and without radiologically defined flail chest were compared with regard to demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), GCS, systolic blood pressure (SBP) on admission, radiological evidence of flail chest, associated chest injuries, length of stay in intensive care unit, length of hospitalisation and mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 407 patients, of which 79 (19.4%) had flail chest. Overall, pneumothorax and haemothorax were more common among patients with flail chest (p<0.05). When comparing patients with three to five rib fractures, there was no difference in length of intensive care and length of hospitalisation or mortality; however, there was a higher incidence of pneumothorax (24.6% vs 50.0%, p<0.05). When comparing patients with six or more rib fractures, no difference was found between patients with and without flail chest.

CONCLUSION

In patients with three to five rib fractures, pneumothorax is more common among patients with flail chest. Clinical significance of flail chest in patients with more than six rib fractures is questionable and flail chest may not be a reliable marker for severity of chest injury in patients with more than six fractures.