Withdrawal of steroid therapy in African American kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus

A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Early Steroid Withdrawal in Black Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is continued debate whether early steroid withdrawal is safe to use in high-immunologic risk patients, such as blacks. The goal of this study was to use comparative effectiveness methodology to elucidate the safety of early steroid withdrawal in blacks with kidney transplants.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Our cohort study used United Network of Organ Sharing data including all adult black kidney transplant recipients from 2000 to 2009 followed through 2014. Propensity score matching was used to equalize baseline risk between continued steroid and early steroid withdrawal groups. Interaction terms were used to assess if the effect of early steroid withdrawal on outcomes varied by baseline and post-transplant factors. Of 26,582 eligible black patients with kidney transplants (5825 [21.9%] with early steroid withdrawal), 5565 patients with early steroid withdrawal were matched to 5565 blacks on continued steroid use.

RESULTS

Black patients with early steroid withdrawal had similar risk of graft loss (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.04; P=0.42) and lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 0.99; P=0.02), primarily driven by a late mortality advantage (>4 years post-transplant). Delayed graft function, cytolytic induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate significantly modified the effect of early steroid withdrawal on outcomes (P<0.05). Acute rejection rates were slightly higher in the continued steroid group (13.0% versus 11.3%, respectively; P<0.01), but this was not associated with graft or patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, early steroid withdrawal in black kidney transplant recipients was not associated with graft loss but seemed to be associated with better long-term patient survival. Early steroid withdrawal in blacks not receiving cytolytic induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate or those with delayed graft function was associated with higher risk of graft loss and death.

Twenty years of evolving trends in racial disparities for adult kidney transplant recipients

Disparities in outcomes for African American (AA) kidney transplant recipients have persisted for 40 years without a comprehensive analysis of evolving trends in the risks associated with this disparity. Here we analyzed U.S. transplant registry data, which included adult Caucasian or AA solitary kidney recipients undergoing transplantation between 1990 and 2009 comprising 202,085 transplantations. During this 20-year period, the estimated rate of 5-year graft loss decreased from 27.6% to 12.8%. Notable trends in baseline characteristics that significantly differed by race over time included the following: increased prevalence of diabetes from 2001 to 2009 in AAs (5-year slope difference: 3.4%), longer time on the waiting list (76.5 more days per 5 years in AAs), fewer living donors in AAs from 2003 to 2009 (5-year slope difference: -3.36%), more circulatory death donors in AAs from 2000-09 (5-year slope difference: 1.78%), and a slower decline in delayed graft function in AAs (5-year slope difference: 0.85%). The absolute risk difference between AAs and Caucasians for 5-year graft loss significantly declined over time (-0.92% decrease per 5 years), whereas the relative risk difference actually significantly increased (3.4% increase per 5 years). These results provide a mixed picture of both promising and concerning trends in disparities for AA kidney transplant recipients. Thus, although the disparity for graft loss has significantly improved, equity is still far off, and other disparities, including living donation rates and delayed graft function rates, have widened during this time.

Immunosuppression Minimization and Avoidance Protocols: When Less Is Not More

Kidney transplantation is well established as the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease. It confers not only a better quality of life but also a significant survival advantage compared to dialysis. However, despite significant improvement in short-term kidney transplant graft survival over the past three decades, long-term graft survival remains suboptimal. Concerns about the possible contribution of chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity to late allograft failure and other serious adverse effects of currently used immunosuppressive agents (especially corticosteroids) have led to increasing interest in developing regimens which may better preserve kidney allograft function and minimize other immunosuppression-related problems without increasing the risk of rejection. The availability of newer immunosuppressive agents has provided the opportunity to formulate such regimens. Approaches to this end include minimization, withdrawal, or avoidance of corticosteroids and CNIs. Currently, replacement of a CNI with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor while continuing mycophenolate and discontinuation of corticosteroids within the first post-transplant week is being increasingly utilized. Belatacept-based, CNI-free immunosuppression is an emerging alternative approach to avoiding CNI-mediated nephrotoxicity. We also discuss the evolution, results, and pros and cons of corticosteroid- and CNI minimization protocols. Recent studies suggest that chronic alloimmune damage rather than chronic CNI nephrotoxicity is the major contributor to late kidney allograft failure. The implications of this finding for the use of CNI minimization protocols are also discussed.

African-American race modifies the influence of tacrolimus concentrations on acute rejection and toxicity in kidney transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of tacrolimus trough concentrations on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation, while assessing if African-American (AA) race modifies these associations.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of solitary adult kidney transplants.

SETTING

Large tertiary care transplant center.

PATIENTS

Adult solitary kidney transplant recipients (n=1078) who were AA (n=567) or non-AA (n=511).

EXPOSURE

Mean and regressed slope of tacrolimus trough concentrations. Subtherapeutic concentrations were lower than 8 ng/ml.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

AA patients were 1.7 times less likely than non-AA patients to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations (8 ng/ml or higher) during the first year after kidney transplant (35% vs 21%, respectively, p<0.001). AAs not achieving therapeutic concentrations were 2.4 times more likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) as compared with AAs achieving therapeutic concentrations (20.8% vs 8.5%, respectively, p<0.01) and 2.5 times more likely to have antibody-mediated rejection (AMR; 8.9% vs 3.6%, respectively, p<0.01). Rates of ACR (8.3% vs 6.7%) and AMR (2.0% vs 0.9% p=0.131) were similar in non-AAs compared across tacrolimus concentration groups. Multivariate modeling confirmed these findings and demonstrated that AAs with low tacrolimus exposure experienced a mild protective effect for the development of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA; hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.32) with the opposite demonstrated in non-AAs (HR 2.2, 95% CI 0.90-5.1).

CONCLUSION

In contradistinction to non-AAs, AAs who achieve therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations have substantially lower acute rejection rates but are at risk of developing IF/TA. These findings may reflect modifiable time-dependent racial differences in the concentration-effect relationship of tacrolimus. Achievement of therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations, potentially through genotyping and more aggressive dosing and monitoring, is essential to minimize the risk of acute rejection in AA kidney transplant recipients.

Initial experience of dual maintenance immunosuppression with steroid withdrawal in vascular composite tissue allotransplantation

Current immunosuppression in VCA is largely based on the experience in solid organ transplantation. It remains unclear if steroids can be reduced safely in VCA recipients. We report on five VCA recipients who were weaned off maintenance steroids after a median of 2 months (mean: 4.8 months, range 2-12 months). Patients were kept subsequently on a low dose, dual maintenance consisting of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenloic acid with a mean follow-up of 43.6 months (median = 40 months, range 34-64 months). Early and late acute rejections responded well to temporarily augmented maintenance, topical immunosuppression, and/or steroid bolus treatment. One late steroid-resistant acute rejection required treatment with thymoglobulin. All patients have been gradually weaned off steroids subsequent to the treatment of acute rejections. Low levels of tacrolimus (<5 ng/mL) appeared as a risk for acute rejections. Although further experience and a cautious approach are warranted, dual-steroid free maintenance immunosuppression appears feasible in a series of five VCA recipients.

Steroid withdrawal in kidney allograft recipients

This review highlights the aggregate of knowledge obtained from the temporal trend of kidney transplant immune suppression. We will discuss the burden of steroid side effects and their impact on quality of life in kidney allograft recipients, which have led to minimizing steroid exposure. Issues arising since the inception of the concept of steroid withdrawal will be discussed, along with how they have continually led to a shift in research focus on this subject matter. The usefulness of surveillance biopsies and how further elucidation of the pathophysiology of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy could contribute to improving long-term allograft outcomes will also be discussed. We will elaborate on the role of calcineurin inhibitor minimization alongside steroid withdrawal in improving long-term graft survival. Future expectations of subsequent studies with a view to improving overall kidney allograft outcomes by eliminating attendant problems associated with steroids will also be covered.

An analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings--an update of the UNOS database

INTRODUCTION

Previously, increasing age has been a part of the exclusion criteria used when determining eligibility for a pancreas transplant. However, the analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings has largely been based on single-center reports.

METHODS

A UNOS database review of all adult pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on age categories: 18-29 (n = 1823), 30-39 (n = 7624), 40-49 (n = 7967), 50-59 (n = 3160), and ≥60 (n = 280). We compared survival outcomes and demographic variables between each age grouping.

RESULTS

Of the 20 854 pancreas transplants, 3440 of the recipients were 50 yr of age or above. Graft survival was consistently the greatest in adults 40-49 yr of age. Graft survival was least in adults age 18-29 at one-, three-, and five-yr intervals. At 10- and 15-yr intervals, graft survival was the poorest in adults >60 yr old. Patient survival and age were found to be inversely proportional; as the patient population's age increased, survival decreased.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplants performed in patients of increasing age demonstrate decreased patient and graft survival when compared to pancreas transplants in patients <50 yr of age.

Transplant immunology for non-immunologist

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney, heart, lung, and liver disease. Short-term outcomes in solid-organ transplantation are excellent, but long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Advances in immune suppression and human leukocyte antigen matching techniques have reduced the acute rejection rate to <10%. Chronic allograft injury remains problematic and is in part immune-mediated. This injury is orchestrated by a complex adaptive and innate immune system that has evolved to protect the organism from infection, but, in the context of transplantation, could result in allograft rejection. Such chronic injury is partially mediated by anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Severe rejections have largely been avoided by the development of tissue-typing techniques and crossmatch testing, which are discussed in detail. Further advances in the understanding of T- and B-cell immunology have led to the development of new immunomodulatory therapies directed at prolonging allograft survival, including those that decrease antibody production as well as those that remove antibodies from circulation. Further application of these immunomodulatory therapies has allowed expansion of the donor pool in some cases by permitting ABO-incompatible transplantation and transplantation in patients with preformed antibodies. Although vast improvements have been made in allograft survival, patients must remain on lifetime immunosuppression. Withdrawal of immunosuppression almost always ultimately leads to allograft rejection. The ultimate dream of transplant biologists is the induction of tolerance, where immune function remains intact but the allograft is not rejected in the face of withdrawn immunosuppression. This, however, has remained a significant challenge in human studies.

Nonimmune complications after transplantation

As posttransplant longevity has increased, nonimmune complications related to the transplant and posttransplant course have emerged as important factors in defining long-term outcomes. The incidence of, and risk factors for these complications may vary by transplanted organ based on immunosuppressive protocols and preexisting risk factors. This article discusses the relevant nonimmune complications associated with posttransplant care, with a focus on risk factors and management strategies.

Immunosuppression in high-risk transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasingly, transplant clinicians are faced with providing candidates with increased risks for poorer outcome with donor grafts that also carry higher risks of failure. Understanding the role of immunosuppressive management in these combinations of higher risks remains important for optimizing results.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few immunosuppressive protocols have been rigorously tested in the high-risk renal transplant setting. The two main risk categories accounted for in the trials are those ones that confer increased risks to renal function, usually carried by the donor organs, and those protocols defined by increased risk for immunological failure, mostly determined by recipient characteristics. The studied protocols generally involve reduction or avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs in the first case and use of lymphocyte-depleting agents in the case of increased immunological risk. In both scenarios, acceptable short-term results have been achieved. However, long-term results for high-risk transplants defined either by donor or recipient factors have yet to be reported.

SUMMARY

The lack of long-term data for optimizing the right immunosuppressive regimen for a given donor/recipient risk profile remains an ongoing challenge for researchers and clinicians alike.

African American kidney transplantation survival: the ability of immunosuppression to balance the inherent pre- and post-transplant risk factors

Among organ transplant recipients, the African American population historically has received special attention. This is because secondary to their disposition to certain disease states, for example hypertension, an African American patient has a propensity to reach end-stage renal disease and require renal replacement earlier than a Caucasian patient. Regardless of the initiative to replace dialysis therapy with organ transplantation, the African American patient has many barriers to kidney transplantation, thus extending their time on dialysis and waiting time on the organ transplant list. These factors are among the many negative causes of decreased kidney graft survival, realized before kidney transplantation. Unfortunately, once the African American recipient receives a kidney graft, the literature documents that many post-transplant barriers exist which limit successful outcomes. The primary post-transplant barrier relates to designing proper immunosuppression protocols. The difficulty in designing protocols revolves around (i) altered genetic metabolism/lower absorption, (ii) increased immuno-active cytokines and (iii) detrimental effects of noncompliance. Based on the literature, dosing of immunosuppression must be aggressive and requires a diligent practitioner. Research has indicated that, despite some success with proven levels of immunosuppression, the African American recipient usually requires a higher 'dose per weight' regimen. However, even with aggressive immunosuppressant dosing, African Americans still have worse outcomes than Caucasian recipients. Additionally, many of the targeted sites of action that immunosuppression exerts its effects on have been found to be amplified in the African American population. Finally, noncompliance is the most discouraging inhibitor of long-term success in organ transplantation. The consequences of noncompliance are biased by ethnicity and affect the African American population more severely. All of these factors are discussed further in this review in the hope of identifying an ideal healthcare model for caring for the African American transplant recipient, from diagnosing chronic kidney disease through to successful kidney graft outcomes. An indepth review of the literature is described and organized in a fashion that highlights all of the issues affecting success in African Americans. The compilation of the literature in this review will enable the reader to get closer to understanding the caveats of kidney transplantation in the African American patient, but falls short of delivering an actual 'equation' for post-transplant care in an African American kidney recipient.

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: is it time to consider it as a standard therapy?

Steroid-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation has been gaining popularity over the past decade, as documented by a continuous and steady rise in the number of kidney transplant patients discharged on steroid-free regimens. This increased interest in steroid-free immunosuppression is fueled by the recognition that half of transplant loss is related to patient death due to cardiovascular disease and/or infectious complications and that the long-term use of steroids contributes to such elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The availability of newer and more potent immunosuppressive agents has furthered such interest. Many clinical trials over the past two decades have demonstrated the feasibility of steroid-free regimens, at the expense of a slight increase in the rate of acute rejection, which is an important end point in any clinical trial of relatively short duration. The largest epidemiological study to date has reassured the transplant community that the selective use of steroid-free immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients provides no inferior outcome in patient and graft survival at intermediate term. Steroid-free regimens have the potential to improve cardiovascular risk profile. The challenges that remain are to identify the subset of kidney transplant patients who may not benefit from steroid-free immunosuppression and to demonstrate the survival advantage of steroid-free immunosuppresion in suitable kidney transplant candidates.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Minimization of steroids in kidney transplantation

The goal of steroid minimization trials has been to minimize or eliminate steroid-related side-effects while simultaneously not increasing the rate of acute rejection (AR) and chronic graft loss. Early trials of late steroid withdrawal (> or =3 months post-transplant) were associated with significantly increased AR rates and late graft loss. More recent trials of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) (< or =7 days post-transplant) have been associated with little or no increase in AR rates and no difference in graft survival (versus maintenance prednisone). Of note, induction therapy appears to be important for success; however, it is not clear if any single maintenance protocol is superior. Intermediate-term follow-up (5-7 years) is now available for some randomized and nonrandomized trials; graft survival and renal function remain excellent. Most of these trials have been done in low immunologic risk recipients, but there are reports of success of RDP in children, black recipients, sensitized recipients, recipients with potentially recurring disease, and kidney-pancreas recipients. Of critical importance, steroid-related side-effects have been minimized. Steroid minimization protocols can clearly be recommended for low-risk patients; additional trials are necessary for those at higher risk. Additional research is also necessary on integrating calcineurin inhibitor minimization with steroid minimization.

Steroid elimination-who, when, how?

Steroids have numerous side effects, many occurring early posttransplantation with relatively low prednisone doses. Consequently, investigators have attempted steroid minimization or withdrawal. The first attempts at steroid minimization used early low-dose steroids and were associated with an increased rate of acute rejection episodes, late graft dysfunction, and graft loss. Subsequent studies, with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, attempted steroid withdrawal late posttransplantation (>3 months) in highly selected, clinically well, and immunologically low-risk recipients. Again, steroid withdrawal was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection episodes and these episodes were associated with graft dysfunction and increased graft loss. The development of new powerful immunosuppressive agents has led to renewed attempts at late prednisone withdrawal. These also have been associated with increased late rejection risk. A more exciting innovation has been the attempts at rapid discontinuation ( Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects
• Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use
• Clinical Trials as Topic
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Drug Therapy, Combination
• Graft Rejection/epidemiology
• Graft Rejection/prevention & control
• Graft Survival/drug effects
• Graft Survival/physiology
• Humans
• Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
• Kidney Transplantation/immunology
• Prednisone/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants

• P01 DK013083 NIDDK NIH HHS
• DK 13083 NIDDK NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

A J Matas Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Collapse

Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols with or without long-term steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients are variable and are transplant center-specific. The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study was to compare 5-year outcomes in kidney recipients maintained on 4 different calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy. Two hundred consenting patients who received kidney transplants between June 2000 and October 2004 were enrolled in 4 immunosuppression protocol groups, with 50 patients in each group: cyclosporine (CSA)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CSA/sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC)/MMF, and TAC/SRL. Induction therapy was done with basiliximab and methylprednisolone. Steroids were withdrawn on post-transplant day 2, and long-term steroid therapy was not used. Demographic characteristics among the four groups were comparable; approximately 50% of the recipients were African American and > or =80% of the kidneys transplanted were from deceased donors. Clinical acute rejection (CAR) was confirmed by biopsy and treated with intravenous pulse steroid therapy. Steroid-unresponsive CAR was treated with Thymoglobulin. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR), chronic allograft injury (CAI), and other pathological changes per the Banff 2005 schema. The primary end point was CAR, and secondary end points were 5-year patient and graft survival rates, renal function, SCAR, CAI, and adverse events. In the first year post-transplant, the incidence of CAR was 18% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 14% in the TAC/MMF group, and 4% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. TAC/SRL; p=0.05). The incidence of SCAR was 22% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 16% in the TAC/MMF group, and 6% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.05). After the first year, the incidences of CAR and SCAR decreased and were comparable in all 4 groups. At 5 years post-transplant, cumulative CAI due to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), hypertension (HTN), and chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity was observed in 54%, 48%, and 8% of the CSA/MMF group vs. 16%, 36%, and 12% of the CSA/SRL group vs. 38%, 24% and 6% of the TAC/MMF group vs. 14%, 25% and 12% of the TAC/SLR group (IF/TA: CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.04, HTN: CSA/MMF vs. TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL; p=0.05, CNI toxicity: TAC/SRL and CSA/SRL vs. TAC/MMF; p=0.05). Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 82% and 60% in the CSA/MMF group, 82% and 60% in the CSA/SRL group, 84% and 62% in the TAC/MMF group, and 82% and 64% in the TAC/SRL group (p=0.9). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances at 5 years were comparable among the groups. Our data show that the rates of CAR and SCAR in the first year post-transplant were significantly lower in the CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL groups and that cumulative CAI rates due to IF/TA and HTN at 5 years were significantly lower in the TAC/MMF, TAC/SRL, and CSA/SRL groups than in the CSA/MMF group. Despite significant differences in the incidences of CAR and SCAR and prevalence of different types of CAI at 5 years, renal function and patient and graft survival rates at 5 years were comparable among kidney recipients maintained on 4 different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy.

Long-term outcome of early steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation in African American recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy

Generally chronic steroid therapy is standard care for African American (AA) kidney recipients because of their higher incidence of rejections and lower long-term graft survival. This prospective study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) in AA recipients. A total of 206 recipients were studied; 103 AA and 103 non-AA recipients monitored by serial surveillance biopsies from 1 to 60 months posttransplantation to evaluate subclinical acute rejections (SCAR) and chronic allograft injury (CAI). Biopsy-proven clinical acute rejections (BPAR) and SCAR were treated. Primary end point was BPAR and secondary end points were 5-year SCAR, CAI and survival. Incidences of BPAR was 16% versus 14% (p = 1.0), prevalence of CAI due to hypertension was 48% versus 30% (p = 0.05) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was 47% versus 32% (p = 0.05) and the mean serum creatinine levels were 2.1 versus 1.8 mg/dL (p = 0.05) at 5-years in AA versus non-AA recipients. The incidence of SCAR was 23% versus 11% at 1 month (p = 0.04), 12% versus 3% at 3 years (p = 0.04) and 10% versus 1% at 5 years (p = 0.04) in AA and non-AA recipients, respectively. Five-year patient survivals were 81% and 88% (p = 0.09) and graft survivals were 71% and 73%(p = 0.19) in AA and non-AA groups, respectively. After early steroid withdrawal AA kidney recipients have significantly lower renal function and higher SCAR and CAI but 5-year graft survival are comparable to non-AA recipients.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Campath-1H induction therapy in African American and Hispanic first renal transplant recipients: 3-year actuarial follow-up

BACKGROUND

In a retrospective study of the first 75 primary renal transplant patients given alemtuzumab induction at our center, 20 were African American (27%), 32 were Hispanic (43%), and 23 were non-African American, non-Hispanic (31%).

METHODS

Alemtuzumab was given intraoperatively and 4 days later (0.3 mg/kg), with planned low-dose maintenance mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg twice daily) and tacrolimus (targeted trough levels of 5 to 7 ng/ml) and no corticosteroid therapy after the first week. Median follow-up among ongoing survivors with a functioning graft was 45 months.

RESULTS

Three-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 95% and 85% in African Americans, 89% and 78% in Hispanics, and 96% and 96% in non-African Americans, non-Hispanics, respectively (not significant). Bioavailability of tacrolimus was significantly lower among African Americans in comparison with the other patient subgroups (P

CONCLUSIONS

This immunosuppressive protocol appears reasonably safe for 3 years after renal transplantation but suggests higher incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection, chronic allograft dysfunction, and borderline poorer renal function among African Americans in comparison with the other patient subgroups.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Alemtuzumab
• Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
• Antibodies, Neoplasm/therapeutic use
• Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
• Black People
• Cause of Death
• Female
• Follow-Up Studies
• Graft Rejection/drug therapy
• Graft Rejection/epidemiology
• Graft Survival
• Hispanic or Latino
• Histocompatibility Testing
• Humans
• Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
• Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects
• Kidney Transplantation/immunology
• Kidney Transplantation/mortality
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Organ Preservation
• Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
• Retrospective Studies
• Survival Analysis
• Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data
• Black or African American

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Gaetano Ciancio Lillian Jean Kaplan Renal Transplant Center, Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101, USA.
George W Burke
Jeffrey J Gaynor
Junichiro Sageshima
Eva Herrada
Lissett Tueros
David Roth
Warren Kupin
Anne Rosen
Violet Esquenazi
Joshua Miller

Collapse

Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients

AIM

As sirolimus has been implicated in impaired wound healing, the aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for wound complications after renal transplantation in patients treated with this drug de novo.

METHODS

This single center retrospective review of wound complications included 194 renal transplant recipients, all of whom received sirolimus immunosuppression in combination with reduced doses of cyclosporine (CsA) and corticosteroids de novo. A wound complication was defined as an infection, incisional hernia, or lymphocele.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of wound complications within the first year post-transplantation was 36% (n = 70) including infection in 12% (n = 23), lymphocele formation in 18% (n = 34), and incisional hernia in 18% (n = 34) of patients. Seventeen patients suffered more than one wound complication. A multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for the development of wound complications were recipients over the age of 40 yr (odds ratio 2.536, p = 0.011), subjects with body mass index (BMI) >26 (odds ratio 2.498, p = 0.027) and especially BMI >30 (odds ratio 3.738, p = 0.007), the use of thymoglobulin for induction immunosuppression (odds ratio 3.627, p = 0.002), and a cumulative dose of sirolimus of at least 35 mg by post-transplant day 4 (odds ratio 2.694, p = 0.023). African-American (odds ratio 0.139, p < 0.001) or Hispanic recipients (odds ratio 0.337, p = 0.014) were less likely to experience a wound problem than Caucasian recipients.

CONCLUSION

A number of potentially modifiable risk factors independently increase the incidence of wound complications among renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppression de novo.

Corticosteroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation: the present status

Corticosteroids (CS) have played a vital role in organ transplantation, both for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. However, the use of CS is associated with a wide range of adverse effects. With advances in immunosuppressive drug therapy, attempts have been made to minimize the use of CS to avoid or alleviate their side effects. Withdrawal of CS months after transplantation has transitioned to days. In low to intermediate risk renal allograft recipients, use of induction therapy and modern maintenance drug combinations allows safe withdrawal of CS within the first week of transplantation. In other groups, existing potent maintenance agents permit tapering of CS to low doses over the first few months. Withdrawal of these small doses may not add to the benefits.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Long-term graft outcomes after steroid withdrawal in African American kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

We previously reported excellent short-term outcomes in African American kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus/sirolimus and withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy three months after transplantation. We now report the long-term outcomes of patients subjected to this protocol.

METHODS

In all, 47 African American kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in an uncontrolled trial in which they were initially treated with sirolimus, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids, without antibody induction therapy. Eligible patients were withdrawn from prednisone between three and five months posttransplant, and followed for acute rejection and changes in renal function. Outcomes (group 1, n=32) were compared to those of patients deemed not to be candidates for steroid withdrawal (group 2, n=15).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 48.5 months, 13 of 32 patients (41%) in group 1 developed acute rejection; only 13 patients (41%) remain steroid-free. Nine of 13 rejection episodes were associated with noncompliance. Graft loss occurred in 8 of 32 patients (25%) in group 1 and in 5 of 15 patients (33%) in group 2 (P=NS). Serum creatinine rose from 1.4+/-0.41 to 2.45+/-1.7 mg/dL in group 1 (P=0.004) and from 2.1+/-0.45 to 2.62+/-1.2 mg/dL (P=NS) in group 2. Among 13 patients in group 1 who remain steroid-free, creatinine concentration has risen from 1.28+/-.0.37 prior to steroid withdrawal to 1.64+0.54 at last follow-up (P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Late noncompliance and/or rejection in African Americans withdrawn from steroids have a negative impact on long-term graft function and survival. Steroid withdrawal may be associated with long-term deterioration of renal function, even in the absence of overt acute rejection.

Drug Insight: maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, in part because of ongoing efforts towards improving immunosuppressive strategies. Although calcineurin inhibitors remain the mainstay of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients, within this class of drug there has been a shift from use of ciclosporin to use of tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil and mycophenolate sodium are now the antimetabolites of choice. A new class of drugs (inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin) that includes sirolimus is being increasingly used in stable kidney transplant recipients. New data, however, indicate that a more cautious approach to the use of this drug is warranted. Many transplant centers are now using steroid avoidance, minimization and withdrawal protocols. The impact of these different drugs and therapeutic strategies on outcomes has to be weighed against their immunosuppressive benefit. As more and more community-based nephrologists and primary care physicians are becoming involved in the care of stable kidney transplant recipients, it is important for these clinicians to familiarize themselves with novel immunosuppressive drugs and their pharmacokinetic properties.

Sirolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor co-therapy

We have previously reported sirolimus (SRL) pharmacokinetics (PK) in pediatric renal transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free protocol. We now report pediatric SRL PK in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving SRL + CNI. SRL was dosed to achieve target trough levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL. We performed 49 SRL PK profiles in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving SRL in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; 25 profiles), or tacrolimus (TCL; 24 profiles). Ten of the SRL + TCL profiles were obtained from children receiving SRL on a b.i.d. dosing regimen. All other SRL profiles were q.d. regimens. We calculated, the maximum concentration (C(max)), AUC, apparent clearance (aCL; dose/AUC) for dose in mg/m(2), and mean residence time (MRT). SRL levels were measured at 6 and 7 time points for b.i.d. and q.d. dosing, respectively. Regression analysis of SRL trough values vs. AUC showed good correlation in the SRL q.d. + CsA, SRL q.d. + TCL, and SRL b.i.d. + TCL groups (r(2) = 0.95, 0.68, and 0.44, respectively). SRL aCL corrected for body surface area was higher in children aged 0-5 yr receiving SRL with either CsA or TCL. SRL dosing schedule should be tailored to each patient. Higher SRL aCL may be present in younger children when administered with CNI.

Corticosteroid-sparing strategies in renal transplantation: are we still balancing rejection risk with improved tolerability?

Chronic allograft nephropathy and death with a functioning graft (mainly due to cardiovascular causes) are the most common causes of graft loss after the first year of renal transplantation. Immunosuppressants, and corticosteroids among them, contribute to an increase in cardiovascular risk because of their significant adverse effects, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and hyperglycaemia. Thus, corticosteroid discontinuation or avoidance has become a priority among the transplant community in order to enhance long-term graft and patient survival. Nevertheless, corticosteroid-sparing strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic rejection and, thus, worsen the prognosis of transplant recipients. Initial attempts during the azathioprine epoch did not provide satisfactory results, as they were associated with high acute rejection rates, emphasising the risk of under-immunosuppression. The advent of new immunosuppressants, such as mycophenolate mofetil, mTOR inhibitors and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies, have renewed the interest in corticosteroid-sparing protocols, and the results of new trials suggest that these corticosteroid-sparing strategies, even at an early stage after transplantation, are safe enough in view of the stable renal function and low rates of acute rejection reported. However, immunological risk factors, such as African American ethnicity, the presence of panel-reactive anti-HLA antibodies (even at low rates), and a history of previous acute rejection episodes should be taken into account and corticosteroid withdrawal strategies should be undertaken with caution. Long-term follow-up studies must be performed to confirm the encouraging short-term data.

Efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive therapy in related and unrelated living renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The application of antibody induction therapy in adult living-related kidney transplantation remains under discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of living-related (LRT) and unrelated renal transplant recipients (LURT) using standardized immunosuppressive protocols. From October 2000 to October 2004, 72 adult LRT (TX) were performed at our institution. Thirty-nine LRT (group A) and 33 LURT (group B) recipients received a standardized immunosuppressive therapy consisting of tacrolimus (Tac), steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without antibody induction therapy. This prolective analysis included immediate graft function, rejection rate and loss of the transplanted organ. The incidence of post-operative good graft function (>90%) was similar for both groups, as well as the rejection rate showed 57.8% for patients of group A and 58.8% for patients of group B (p < 0.5). However, the number of rejections (>1 rejection) was significantly higher in group B (11.8%) compared to patients in group A (4.4%). No difference concerning loss of transplanted kidney was observed for both groups. Conventional Tac, MMF and steroid-based immunosuppression therapy is equivalent in efficacy of therapy in living-related and unrelated renal transplants. In our opinion, induction therapy in patients without immunologic risk factors has no favourable effect.

Maintenance immunosuppression regimens: conversion, minimization, withdrawal, and avoidance

A wide choice of drug combinations is available to clinicians for immunosuppression regimens for their kidney transplant patients. Although many protocols have minimized early graft loss, the optimal long-term regimen is unknown. Recent studies clearly showed that cardiovascular death is now the leading cause of graft loss. Strategies must be developed that address this risk while keeping immunologic events low. Transplant physicians have focused on exploring regimens that minimize or avoid the use of corticosteroids. Studies also have started to explore protocols that minimize calcineurin inhibitor therapy.

Steroid-free immunosuppression regime reduces both long-term cardiovascular morbidity and patient mortality in renal transplant recipients

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of steroid therapy on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and patient mortality, in 486 on-CsA renal transplant recipients, with a follow-up of 9.5 +/- 4.3 yr. Two hundred and one patients had their steroids permanently withdrawn at sixth month after transplantation (G1); 285 patients did not (G2) as they were unable (acute rejection after suspension) or unsuitable (because of clinical criteria or immunosuppressive protocols). The CVD considered were coronary artery disease diagnosed by angiography and myocardial infarction. G1 and G2 patients were well-matched regarding CVD risk factors, except for age (G1: 44 +/- 14 yr; G2: 40 +/- 12 yr; p < 0.003), incidence of male (G1: 62%; G2: 72%, p < 0.02) incidence of acute rejection (G1: 39%; G2: 83%, p < 0.0001). Both CVD and deaths occurring during the first year of transplantation were excluded from the analysis. At 20 yr, the cumulative probability of developing a CVD, was 3.8% in G1; 23.8% in G2 (p < 0.0005). Patient survival rate was 95% in G1; 62% in G2 (p < 0.003). Mortality caused by CVD was higher in G2 (4.2% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.03). The Cox analysis identified in steroid therapy the main independent risk factors for both CVD (hazard ratio 9.56 p < 0.0001) and patient mortality (hazard ratio 5.99, p < 0.0001). At 10th and 15th year after transplantation, the mean-daily dose of steroids was 4.2 mg. In the long-term, steroid therapy, even in low-doses, increases significantly both the rate of CVD and patient mortality. This retrospective study suggests that steroid-free regime should always be recommended for the prevention of post-transplant CVD. This relevant statement should be followed by a long-term prospective study.

Steroid Sparing in Kidney Transplantation: Changing Paradigms, Improving Outcomes, and Remaining Questions

The widely known adverse effects of long-term therapy with corticosteroids have motivated increasing interest in steroid-free immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Results from recent trials that used newer immunosuppressants to facilitate elimination of steroids suggest better short-term results than were achieved in an earlier era. However, the best results have been reported in uncontrolled trials of low-risk patients or in randomized trials with relatively short periods of follow-up. Increasingly, the therapeutic paradigm has shifted from late withdrawal of steroids to very early withdrawal after transplantation or even complete avoidance. Induction antibody therapy has been used routinely in the most successful trials that involved early steroid withdrawal or avoidance. Although the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who are treated with steroid-free immunosuppression are improving steadily, there still is room for concern in recommending this strategy as a standard of practice.

Immunosuppression and immune monitoring after renal transplantation

Monitoring of immunosuppression therapy in renal transplant recipients is essential for good patient and graft survival. Monitoring includes frequent laboratory assays of serum immunosuppression levels, patient visits to assess and treat side effects, and vigilance for medication interactions. We review the various immunosuppression medications commonly used in renal transplantation, including usual dosing and side effects. Monitoring assays are discussed, as well as the frequency of monitoring and patient visits. Finally, we discuss several common clinical scenarios that often require adjustment of immunosuppression medications or regimens.

Cardiovascular complications of immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients

Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events are the most important cause of graft loss in patients with a functioning graft following transplantation. The available data indicate that transplant patients have a high prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation. The aetiology and pathogenesis of post-transplant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes are multifactorial. In addition, disease of the native kidney and recurrence of renal disease can contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease in transplant recipients. Most transplant patients are at risk of clinically important drug-drug interactions involving immunosuppressive agents. Adverse reactions and drug-drug interactions should not be neglected when selecting an agent for treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in transplant recipients.

Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study

BACKGROUND

The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy.

METHODS

This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147).

RESULTS

The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits.

Recipient age and mycophenolate mofetil as the main determinants of outcome after steroid withdrawal: analysis of long-term follow-up in renal transplantation

The long-term benefit of steroid withdrawal on patient and graft survival is unproven. Steroids were stopped within the first year after kidney transplantation in 223 consecutive low-risk patients initially treated with thymoglobulin and triple-drug therapy. The 15-year actuarial graft survival rate was 83.9%. Risk factors for graft loss were: proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.96, P = 0.0003), creatinine >130 micromol/L (HR: 3.37, P = 0.01), recipient age <35 years (HR: 5.31, P = 0.001), and no mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment (HR: 8.83, P = 0.04). Interestingly, recipient age and no MMF treatment were not risk factors in higher-risk patients in whom steroids were continued. The 2-year incidence of acute rejection following steroid withdrawal was 12.1%; the graft survival rate was lower in this group (71.1%). Our findings indicate that late steroid withdrawal results in excellent long-term outcome in most low-risk patients, but it should be attempted with caution in younger patients and when MMF is not used.

Preliminary results with early corticosteroid withdrawal in African American renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding the use of steroid-avoidance immunosuppression (SAI) in African American (AA) renal allograft recipients, traditionally considered a high-risk subgroup of patients with higher reported rates of acute rejection and graft loss.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of 27 AA renal allograft recipients receiving SAI (SA group; mean follow-up period, 12 +/- 3 mo) with those of 20 patients receiving a steroid taper (ST group; 24 +/- 11 mo). In both groups, thymoglobulin was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were used for maintenance. Four doses of methylprednisolone were given on days 0 to 3. In the SA group no further steroids were given, whereas in the ST group a prednisone taper was continued thereafter.

RESULTS

ST patients were more likely to have current panel reactive antibody titers greater than 10%, undergo retransplantation, and receive more doses of thymoglobulin. There were no significant differences between the SA and ST groups with regard to patient survival (96% vs 95%), graft survival (96% vs 90%), acute rejection (11% vs 14%), cytomegalovirus infection (7% vs 10%), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (11% vs 24%), or mean serum creatinine concentration at 6 months (1.6 vs 1.5 mg/dL), respectively, with a trend toward less percent weight gain in SA patients at 6 months (5% vs 11%, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

SAI can produce excellent short-term results in AA kidney transplant patients when compared with a conventional ST protocol. Our results will need to be verified in larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up evaluation.

Concentration-controlled use of sirolimus associated with reduced exposure of cyclosporine in black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors: 12-month results

AIM

This study was designed to identify optimal therapeutic sirolimus (SRL) concentrations in black kidney transplant recipients on reduced cyclosporine (CsA) exposure and prednisone.

METHODS

Seventy patients (64 living/six deceased) received CsA (8-10 mg/kg/d), prednisone, and 15 mg loading dose followed by 5-mg fixed doses of SRL till day 7 when they were randomized to maintain SRL trough concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography) of 8-12 (GI = 34) or 15-20 (GII = 36) ng/mL.

RESULTS

Mean CsA concentrations were 109 +/- 53 vs. 89 +/- 41 ng/mL and 75 +/- 54 vs. 60 +/- 35 ng/mL (ns) at 2 and 6 months. Accordingly, mean SRL trough concentrations were 12.4 +/- 6.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001) and 10.8 +/- 5.8 vs. 18.0 +/- 6.1 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection [13% (GI: 18% vs. GII: 8%, ns)], graft loss or death was 16% (GI: 21% vs. GII: 11%, ns]. There were no deaths and three graft losses (GI = 1; GII = 2). Creatinine clearance was higher in GI (64.5 +/- 17 vs. 54.4 +/- 14.7 mL/min, p = 0.011). The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 13% and no CMV disease was observed.

CONCLUSION

In black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors reduced CsA exposure and SRL concentration-controlled regimens produced low incidences of acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and CMV disease, with no significant impairment in graft function.

Guidelines for the treatment and management of new-onset diabetes after transplantation

Although graft and patient survival after solid organ transplantation have improved markedly in recent years, transplant recipients continue to experience an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with the general population. A number of factors are known to impact on the increased risk of CVD in this population, including hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. Of these factors, new-onset diabetes after transplantation has been identified as one of the most important, being associated with reduced graft function and patient survival, and increased risk of graft loss. In 2003, International Consensus Guidelines on New-onset Diabetes after Transplantation were published, which aimed to establish a precise definition and diagnosis of the condition and recommend management strategies to reduce its occurrence and impact. These updated 2004 guidelines, developed in consultation with the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), extend the recommendations of the previous guidelines and encompass new-onset diabetes after kidney, liver and heart transplantation. It is hoped that adoption of these management approaches pre- and post-transplant will reduce individuals' risk of developing new-onset diabetes after transplantation as well as ameliorating the long-term impact of this serious complication.