Subclinical rejection and borderline changes in early protocol biopsy specimens after renal transplantation

The Value of Protocol Biopsy in Kidney Transplantation on Monitoring Transplant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a great debate about the role of biopsies per protocol in kidney transplant recipients, and the published studies show contradictory results. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of protocol biopsies in kidney transplant recipients in improving short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted searches until July of 2023 to identify all randomized clinical trials (RCT). Studies were identified through search strategies for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by 2 authors; 2 authors independently assessed retrieved abstracts and the full text. Assessment of risk of bias was carried out using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The outcomes of interest were: Acute rejection, graft loss, mortality, glomerular filtration rate, and safety outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed for variables of interest when appropriate. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

We screened 5,695 records. Four trials met all eligibility criteria. No benefit of protocol biopsy was found in detecting acute rejection (3 studies RR: 2.0, 95% CI: 0.68-5.85, p = .2) or preventing graft loss at 12 months (2 studies, RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.06-1.72, p = .19). No differences were found between the groups in the glomerular filtration rate at 6 months post-transplantation (2 studies, MD 2.97, 95% CI 1.4-7.3, p = .18). A total of 23 safety events were present in the biopsy group compared to six in the control group.

CONCLUSION

No benefit was found in performing protocol biopsy following kidney transplantation.

Immune monitoring of allograft status in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant patients require careful management of immunosuppression to avoid rejection while minimizing the risk of infection and malignancy for the best long-term outcome. The gold standard for monitoring allograft status and immunosuppression adequacy is a kidney biopsy, but this is invasive and costly. Conventional methods of allograft monitoring, such as serum creatinine level, are non-specific. Although they alert physicians to the need to evaluate graft dysfunction, by the time there is a clinical abnormality, allograft damage may have already occurred. The development of novel and non-invasive methods of evaluating allograft status are important to improving graft outcomes. This review summarizes the available conventional and novel methods for monitoring allograft status after kidney transplant. Novel and less invasive methods include gene expression, cell-free DNA, urinary biomarkers, and the use of artificial intelligence. The optimal method to manage patients after kidney transplant is still being investigated. The development of less invasive methods to assess allograft function has the potential to improve patient outcomes and allow for a more personalized approach to immunosuppression management.

Pathophysiology of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation has been the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease for almost 70 years, with increasing frequency over this period. Despite the prevalence of the procedure, allograft rejection continues to impact transplant recipients, with consequences ranging from hospitalization to allograft failure. Rates of rejection have declined over time, which has been largely attributed to developments in immunosuppressive therapy, understanding of the immune system, and monitoring. Developments in these therapies, as well as an improved understanding of rejection risk and the epidemiology of rejection, are dependent on a foundational understanding of the pathophysiology of rejection. This review explains the interconnected mechanisms behind antibody-mediated and T-cell-mediated rejection and highlights how these processes contribute to outcomes and can inform future progress.

Early versus late acute graft pyelonephritis: A retrospective analysis of graft and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) is thought to affect graft and patient survival among renal transplant recipients. The objective was to compare outcomes among early AGPN (<6 months from transplant) versus late AGPN (>6 months from transplant).

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed 150 patients with AGPN dividing them into early and late AGPN from 2008 to 2016. Predictors of graft loss and mortality were compared using logistic regression analysis. Graft survival and patient survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meyer survival plots.

RESULTS

55.3% (n = 83) had early AGPN and 44.7% (n = 67) had late AGPN. In an early AGPN group, 13.3% had CMV disease on the follow-up, compared to only 3% in the late AGPN group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, 38.6% had prolonged DJ stent in-situ (> 2 weeks) following transplant surgery in the early AGPN compared to only 19.4% in the late AGPN group (p < 0.05). Recurrent GPN was more common in the late AGPN group - (35.8% versus 18.1%). The presence of renal abscess was predictive of graft loss in Univariate analysis (HR-6.12, p < 0.004). There was decreased death-censored graft survival in the early AGPN group (p = 0.035), without a significant difference in the patient survival among the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of early AGPN had a significant impact on long-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients, with no significant effect on patient survival. This study underlines the paramount importance of the prevention of urinary tract infection (UTI) in renal transplant recipients.

Non-Invasive Monitoring for Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients After SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination

Introduction

Studies have shown reduced antiviral responses in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, but data on post-vaccination alloimmune responses and antiviral responses against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant are limited.

Materials and methods

To address this issue, we conducted a prospective, multi-center study of 58 adult KTRs receiving mRNA-BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines. We used multiple complementary non-invasive biomarkers for rejection monitoring including serum creatinine, proteinuria, donor-derived cell-free DNA, peripheral blood gene expression profile (PBGEP), urinary CXCL9 mRNA and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Secondary outcomes included development of anti-viral immune responses against the wild-type and Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2.

Results

At a median of 85 days, no KTRs developed de novo DSAs and only one patient developed acute rejection following recent conversion to belatacept, which was associated with increased creatinine and urinary CXCL9 levels. During follow-up, there were no significant changes in proteinuria, donor-derived cell-free DNA levels or PBGEP. 36% of KTRs in our cohort developed anti-wild-type spike antibodies, 75% and 55% of whom had neutralizing responses against wild-type and Delta variants respectively. A cellular response against wild-type S1, measured by interferon-γ-ELISpot assay, developed in 38% of KTRs. Cellular responses did not differ in KTRs with or without antibody responses.

Conclusions

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in KTRs did not elicit a significant alloimmune response. About half of KTRs who develop anti-wild-type spike antibodies after two mRNA vaccine doses have neutralizing responses against the Delta variant. There was no association between anti-viral humoral and cellular responses.

Urinary Cell mRNA Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status

Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney biopsy procedure, the diagnostic tool of choice, has become safer and the biopsy classification more refined. Nevertheless, biopsy-associated complications, interobserver variability in biopsy specimen scoring, and costs continue to be significant concerns. The dynamics of the immune repertoire make frequent assessments of allograft status necessary, but repeat biopsies of the kidney are neither practical nor safe. To address the existing challenges, we developed urinary cell mRNA profiling and investigated the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy of absolute levels of a hypothesis-based panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins. Enabled by our refinements of the PCR assay and by investigating mechanistic hypotheses, our single-center studies identified urinary cell mRNAs associated with T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and BK virus nephropathy. In the multicenter National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04, we discovered and validated a urinary cell three-gene signature of T-cell CD3 ε chain mRNA, interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18s ribosomal RNA that is diagnostic of subclinical acute cellular rejection and acute cellular rejection and prognostic of acute cellular rejection and graft function. The trajectory of the signature score remained flat and below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the patients with no rejection biopsy specimens, whereas a sharp rise was observed during the weeks before the biopsy specimen that showed acute cellular rejection. Our RNA sequencing and bioinformatics identified kidney allograft biopsy specimen gene signatures of acute rejection to be enriched in urinary cells matched to acute rejection biopsy specimens. The urinary cellular landscape was more diverse and more enriched for immune cell types compared with kidney allograft biopsy specimens. Urinary cell mRNA profile-guided clinical trials are needed to evaluate their value compared with current standard of care.

Three-month course of intragraft transcriptional changes in kidney allografts with early histological minimal injury - a cohort study

The tubulitis with/without interstitial inflammation not meeting criteria for T-cell-mediated rejection (minimal allograft injury) is the most frequent histological findings in early transplant biopsies. The course of transcriptional changes in sequential kidney graft biopsies has not been studied yet. Molecular phenotypes were analyzed using the Molecular Microscope^® Diagnostic System (MMDx) in 46 indication biopsies (median 13 postoperative days) diagnosed as minimal allograft injury and in corresponding follow-up biopsies at 3 months. All 46 patients with minimal injury in early biopsy received steroid pulses. MMDx interpreted indication biopsies as no-rejection in 34/46 (74%), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 4/46 (9%), antibody-mediated rejection in 6/46 (13%), and mixed rejection in 2/46 (4%) cases. Follow-up biopsies were interpreted by MMDx in 37/46 (80%) cases as no-rejection, in 4/46 (9%) as TCMR, and in 5/46 (11%) as mixed rejection. Follow-up biopsies showed a decrease in MMDx-assessed acute kidney injury (P = 0.001) and an increase of atrophy-fibrosis (P = 0.002). The most significant predictor of MMDx rejection scores in follow-up biopsies was the tubulitis classifier score in initial biopsies (AUC = 0.84, P = 0.002), confirmed in multivariate binary regression (OR = 16, P = 0.016). Molecular tubulitis score at initial biopsy has the potential to discriminate patients at risk for molecular rejection score at follow-up biopsy.

Clinical and Pathological Analyses of Borderline Changes Cases after Kidney Transplantation

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> We aimed to perform a clinicopathological analysis of cases presenting with borderline changes (BC) after renal transplantation and discuss whether BC might be clinically or pathologically important. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> BC was diagnosed in 22 renal allograft biopsy specimens obtained from 20 renal transplant recipients between April 2010 and March 2019 after follow-up at the Department of Transplant Surgery, Kidney Center, Toda Chuo General Hospital. <b><i>Results:</i></b> BC was diagnosed at a median of 500 days following transplantation. Among the 22 renal allograft biopsy specimens showing evidence of BC, tubulitis was observed in all specimens. Interstitial inflammation was present in 18 specimens (82%), peritubular capillaritis in 14 (64%), interstitial fibrosis (ci) and tubular atrophy (ct) in 4 (18%), and C4d deposition in the peritubular capillary was present in 6 specimens (27%). Glomerulitis and intimal arteritis were not observed. There was no renal graft loss during the observation period, but deterioration of renal allograft function after biopsy occurred in 9 patients (45%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In BC, tubulitis and interstitial inflammation were the main constituents. Because glomerulitis was not observed in our study, we suspect that BC contributes to acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Although BC did not lead to renal graft loss, renal graft function deterioration was seen in nearly half of the patients after the renal graft biopsy. We conclude that BC is important clinically and pathologically and needs to be monitored and treated appropriately.

Discovery and cross-validation of peripheral blood and renal biopsy gene expression signatures from ethnically diverse kidney transplant populations

We determined peripheral blood (PB) and biopsy (Bx) RNA expression signatures in a Brazilian and US cohort of kidney transplant patients. Phenotypes assigned by precise histology were: acute rejection (AR), interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy/chronic rejection (CR), excellent functioning transplants (TX), and glomerulonephritis recurrence (GN). Samples were analyzed on microarrays and profiles from each cohort were cross-validated on the other cohort with similar phenotypes. We discovered signatures for each tissue: (1) AR vs TX, (2) CR vs TX, and (3) GN vs TX using the Random Forests algorithm. We validated biopsies signatures of AR vs TX (area under the curve [AUC] 0.97) and CR vs TX (AUC 0.87). We also validated both PB and Bx signatures of AR vs TX and CR vs TX with varying degrees of accuracy. Several biological pathways were shared between AR and CR, suggesting similar rejection mechanisms in these 2 clinical phenotypes. Thus, we identified gene expression signatures for AR and CR in transplant patients and validated them in independent cohorts of significantly different racial/ethnic backgrounds. These results reveal that there are strong unifying immune mechanisms driving transplant diseases and identified in the signatures discovered in each cohort, suggesting that molecular diagnostics across populations are feasible despite ethnic and environmental differences.

Assessment of 19 Genes and Validation of CRM Gene Panel for Quantitative Transcriptional Analysis of Molecular Rejection and Inflammation in Archival Kidney Transplant Biopsies

Background: There is an urgent need to develop and implement low cost, high-throughput standardized methods for routine molecular assessment of transplant biopsies. Given the vast archive of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks in transplant centers, a reliable protocol for utilizing this tissue bank for clinical validation of target molecules as predictors of graft outcome over time, would be of great value.

Methods: We designed and optimized assays to quantify 19 target genes, including previously reported set of tissue common rejection module (tCRM) genes. We interrogated their performance for their clinical utility for detection of graft rejection and inflammation by analyzing gene expression microarrays analysis of 163 renal allograft biopsies, and subsequently validated in 40 independent FFPE archived kidney transplant biopsies at a single center.

Results: A QPCR (Fluidigm) and a barcoded oligo-based (NanoString) gene expression platform were compared for evaluation of amplification of gene expression signal for 19 genes from degraded RNA extracted from FFPE biopsy sections by a set protocol. Increased expression of the selected 19 genes, that reflect a combination of specific cellular infiltrates (8/19 genes) and a graft inflammation score (11/19 genes which computes the tCRM score allowed for segregation of kidney transplant biopsies with stable allograft function and normal histology from those with histologically confirmed acute rejection (AR; p = 0.0022, QPCR; p = 0.0036, barcoded assay) and many cases of histological borderline inflammation (BL). Serial biopsy shaves used for gene expression were also processed for in-situ hybridization (ISH) for a subset of genes. ISH confirmed a high degree of correlation of signal amplification and tissue localization.

Conclusions: Target gene expression amplification across a custom set of genes can identify AR independent of histology, and quantify inflammation from archival kidney transplant biopsy tissue, providing a new tool for clinical correlation and outcome analysis of kidney allografts, without the need for prospective kidney biopsy biobanking efforts.

Clinical Significance of Renal Allograft Protocol Biopsies: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in Malaysia

Background

The role of protocol renal allograft biopsy in kidney transplantation is controversial due to the concern with procedural-related complications; however, its role is slowly evolving. Recent evidence suggests that protocol biopsy is useful in detecting subclinical renal pathology. Early recognition and treatment of renal pathologies can improve long-term outcomes of renal allografts.

Methodology

A total of 362 renal allograft protocol biopsies were performed in adult recipients of kidney transplantation between 2012 and 2017. After excluding those with poor quality or those performed with a baseline serum creatinine level >200 umol/L, we analyzed 334 (92.3%) biopsies. Histology reports were reviewed and categorized into histoimmunological and nonimmunological changes. The immunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) no acute rejection (NR), (2) borderline changes (BC), and (3) subclinical rejection (SCR). Nonimmunological changes were subcategorized into the following: (1) chronicity including interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA), chronic T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), unspecified chronic lesions, and arterionephrosclerosis, (2) de novo glomerulopathy/recurrence of primary disease (RP), and (3) other clinically unsuspected lesions (acute pyelonephritis, calcineurin inhibitors toxicity, postinfective glomerulonephritis, and BK virus nephropathy). Risk factors associated with SCR were assessed.

Results

For the histoimmunological changes, 161 (48.2%) showed NR, 145 (43.4%) were BC, and 28 (8.4%) were SCR. These clinical events were more pronounced for the first 5 years; our data showed BC accounted for 59 (36.4%), 64 (54.2%), and 22 (40.7%) biopsies within <1 year, 1-5 years, and > 5 years, respectively (p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence for SCR was 6 (3.7%) biopsies in <1 year, 18 (15.3%) in 1-5 years, and 4 (7.4%) in >5 years after transplantation (p=0.003). For the nonimmunological changes, chronicity, de novo glomerulopathy/RP, and other clinically unsuspected lesions were seen in 40 (12%), 10 (3%), and 12 (3.6%) biopsies, respectively. Living-related donor recipients were associated with decreased SCR (p=0.007).

Conclusions

Despite having a stable renal function, our transplant recipients had a significant number of subclinical rejection on renal allograft biopsies.

The clinical and pathological significance of borderline T cell-mediated rejection

The pathological diagnosis of borderline rejection (BL-R) denotes possible T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), but its clinical significance is uncertain. This single-center, cross-sectional cohort study compared the functional and histological outcomes of consecutive BL-R diagnoses (n = 146) against normal controls (n = 826) and acute TCMR (n = 55) from 551 renal transplant recipients. BL-R was associated with the following: contemporaneous renal dysfunction, acute tubular necrosis, and chronic tubular atrophy (P < .001); progressive tubular injury with fibrosis by longitudinal sequential histology (45.3% at 1 year); increased subsequent acute rejection (39.4%), allograft failure (P < .001), and patient mortality (P = .007). BL-R detected by biopsy indicated for impaired function was followed by suboptimal functional recovery (46.3%), persistent inflammation (27.2%), and acute rejection episodes (50.0%) despite antirejection treatment in 83.3%. By 1 year after BL-R, the incidence of new-onset microvascular inflammation (9.3%), C4d staining (22.3%), transplant glomerulopathy (13.3%), and de novo donor-specific antibodies (31.5%) exceeded normal controls (P < .05-.001). BL-R inflammation in protocol biopsy persisted in 28.0% and progressed to acute rejection in 32.6%; however, it resolved in 61.6% of the untreated cases. In summary, BL-R is a heterogeneous diagnostic grouping, ranging from mild inconsequential inflammation to clinically significant TCMR, which is capable of immune-mediated tubular injury resulting in inferior functional, immunological, and histological consequences.

Increased risk of rejection after basiliximab induction in sensitized kidney transplant recipients without pre-existing donor-specific antibodies - a retrospective study

Depleting induction therapy is recommended in sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), though the detrimental effect of nondonor-specific anti-HLA antibodies is not undeniable. We compared the efficacy and safety of basiliximab and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in sensitized KTRs without pre-existing donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). This monocentric retrospective study involved all sensitized KTR adults without pre-existing DSAs (n = 218) who underwent transplantation after June 2007. Patients with basiliximab and rATG therapy were compared for risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss and death) by univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients with basiliximab (n = 60) had lower mean calculated panel reactive antibody than those with rATG (n = 158; 23.7 ± 24.2 vs. 63.8 ± 32.3, P < 0.0001) and more often received a first graft (88% vs. 54%, P < 0.0001) and a transplant from a living donor (13% vs. 2%, P = 0.002). Risks of BPAR and of reaching the composite endpoint were greater with basiliximab than rATG [HR = 3.63 (1.70-7.77), P = 0.0009 and HR = 1.60 (0.99-2.59), P = 0.050, respectively]. Several adjustments did not change those risks [BPAR: 3.36 (1.23-9.16), P = 0.018; composite endpoint: 1.83 (0.99-3.39), P = 0.053]. Infections and malignancies were similar in both groups. rATG remains the first-line treatment in sensitized KTR, even in the absence of pre-existing DSAs.

Long-term results of protocol kidney biopsy directing steroid withdrawal in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine whether protocol biopsies could be used to guide treatment and improve outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) patients.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2013, protocol biopsies were performed on SPK patients at 3-6 months and one year post-transplant. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor, anti-proliferative agent, and corticosteroid. Corticosteroid was withdrawn in negative early biopsies, maintained in subclinical/ borderline biopsies, and increased if Banff IB or greater rejection was identified. Endpoints included presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on biopsy at one year (IF/TA), rejection episodes, and renal and pancreas function at five years' followup.

RESULTS

Forty-one SPK transplant patients were reviewed and a total of 75 protocol biopsies were identified. On early biopsy, 51% had negative biopsies, 44% had borderline rejection, and 5% had subclinical rejection. Renal and pancreas function were not significantly different at one, two, and five years post-transplant between negative vs. borderline early biopsy patients. No difference in the degree of IF/TA was found between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate protocol biopsies as an investigative tool prior to steroid withdrawal in SPK patients. Our study suggests that there are no detrimental functional or histological effects at five years post-transplant, despite weaning steroids in the negative biopsy group.

Utility of Serial Protocol Biopsies Performed After 1 Year in Predicting Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function According to Histologic Phenotype

OBJECTIVES

Prognostic implications of early protocol biopsies have been studied; however, the value of late protocol biopsy in predicting graft outcome has not been well defined. Here, we compared the effects of early and late protocol biopsy histologic findings in stable kidney allografts and aimed to understand the significance of "borderline" rejection on allograft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 261 biopsies from 159 renal transplant recipients who were on a steroid-free, calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil regimen and who received transplants between 2004 and 2012 with mean follow-up of 5 years. Early (between 3 and 9 mo) and subsequent late (between 12 and 24 mo) protocol biopsies were performed. Biopsies were classified as normal, interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy, subclinical acute rejection with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy, and borderline rejection with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine the effects of early and late protocol biopsies on estimated glomerular filtration rate changes, with baseline time for estimated glomerular filtration rate fixed at 12 months.

RESULTS

The adjusted model showed that estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months, donor age, delayed graft function, and early protocol biopsies were associated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate changes over time were associated with findings of interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy at early biopsy and subclinical acute rejection and borderline rejection at late biopsy. At last follow-up, final estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy at early biopsy and with subclinical acute rejection at late biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early protocol biopsy predicted baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, late biopsy was important for predicting changes in function over time. In addition, a diagnosis of "borderline" rejection on protocol biopsies predicted long-term graft function.

Single center experience of subclinical rejections and BK nephropathies by kidney allografts' surveillance biopsies

PURPOSE

Acute rejection of the kidney allograft remains the most important factor affecting the long-term graft outcome and is a major predictor of development of chronic damage and graft loss. Several studies have shown that early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection episodes may be beneficial for the graft outcome. The role of protocol (surveillance) biopsies and the value of donor specific antibodies (DSA) monitoring are still debatable.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study involving seventeen kidney recipients transplanted in north-eastern part of Poland who underwent "zero", 3-month and 12-month allograft biopsies as well as DSA assessment.

RESULTS

Histologic analysis of the biopsies showed subclinical acute cellular rejection in 17.6% of patients (two tubulointerstitial, one vascular) at 3-months post transplantation, and additional case of borderline rejection at the 12-month point. Moreover, two cases (11.8%) of polyomavirus BK nephropathy were diagnosed (one at 3 and one at 12 month point). None of the patients developed de novo DSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our protocol biopsies allowed us to detect significant proportion of patients with subclinical, but histologically relevant acute cellular rejection and BK nephropathy. Early therapeutic intervention had beneficial effects in a 4-year follow up.

Decreased Kidney Graft Survival in Low Immunological Risk Patients Showing Inflammation in Normal Protocol Biopsies

INTRODUCTION

The pros and cons for implementing protocol biopsies (PB) after kidney transplantation are still a matter of debate. We aimed to address the frequency of pathological findings in PB, to analyze their impact on long-term graft survival (GS) and to analyze the risk factors predicting an abnormal histology.

METHODS

We analyzed 946 kidney PB obtained at a median time of 6.5 (±2.9) months after transplantation. Statistics included comparison between groups, Kaplan-Meier and multinomial logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

PB diagnosis were: 53.4% normal; 46% IFTA; 12.3% borderline and 4.9% had subclinical acute rejection (SCAR). Inflammation had the strongest negative impact on GS. Therefore we split the cases into: "normal without inflammation", "normal with inflammation", "IFTA without inflammation", "IFTA with inflammation" and "rejection" (including SCAR and borderline). 15-year GS in PB diagnosed normal with inflammation was significantly decreased in a similar fashion as in rejection cases. Among normal biopsies, inflammation increased significantly the risk of 15-y graft loss (P = 0.01). Variables that predicted an abnormal biopsy were proteinuria, previous AR and DR-mismatch.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that inflammation in normal PB is associated with a significantly lower 15-y GS, comparable to rejection or IFTA with inflammation.

Total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies does not predict progression of fibrosis at one year post-transplant

INTRODUCTION

There is an uncertainty whether total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies is associated with fibrosis progression. We investigated whether total inflammation, both in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas, at week 6 would predict fibrosis progression at one yr post-transplant.

METHODS

We included 156 single adult ABO compatible kidney recipients with adequate week 6 and one yr transplant protocol biopsies (312 biopsies). Biopsies were scored according to the current Banff criteria. In addition, fibrosis and inflammation in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas were scored in a 10-grade semi-quantitative eyeballing system from 0% to 100%.

RESULTS

Fibrosis increased significantly from week 6 to one yr both by the 10-grade scoring system from 0.69 ± 1.07 to 1.45 ± 1.86, (mean ± SD), p < 0.001 and by Banff interstitial fibrosis (ci) scoring 0.81 ± 0.65 to 1.13 ± 0.87, p < 0.001. The 10-grade scoring system detected a larger proportion of fibrosis progressors than the Banff scoring 40.4% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001. No significant positive association was found between inflammation at week 6 and progression of fibrosis in either of the scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Total inflammation in kidney transplant biopsies at week 6 did not predict progression of fibrosis at one yr post-transplant.

Role for urinary biomarkers in diagnosis of acute rejection in the transplanted kidney

Despite the introduction of potent immunosuppressive medications within recent decades, acute rejection still accounts for up to 12% of all graft losses, and is generally associated with an increased risk of late graft failure. Current detection of acute rejection relies on frequent monitoring of the serum creatinine followed by a diagnostic renal biopsy. This strategy is flawed since an alteration in the serum creatinine is a late clinical event and significant irreversible histologic damage has often already occurred. Furthermore, biopsies are invasive procedures that carry their own inherent risk. The discovery of non-invasive urinary biomarkers to help diagnose acute rejection has been the subject of a significant amount of investigation. We review the literature on urinary biomarkers here, focusing on specific markers perforin and granzyme B mRNAs, FOXP3 mRNA, CXCL9/CXCL10 and miRNAs. These and other biomarkers are not yet widely used in clinical settings, but our review of the literature suggests that biomarkers may correlate with biopsy findings and provide an important early indicator of rejection, allowing more rapid treatment and better graft survival.

Is microdialysis useful for early detection of acute rejection after kidney transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

Acute rejection following kidney transplantation (KTx) is still one of the challenging complications leading to chronic allograft failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of microdialysis (MD) in the early detection of acute graft rejection factor following KTx in porcine model.

METHODS

Sixteen pigs were randomized after KTx into case (n = 8, without immunosuppressant) and control groups (n = 8, with immunosuppressant). The rejection diagnosis in our groups was confirmed by histopathological evidences as "acute borderline rejection". Using MD, we monitored the interstitial concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol in the transplanted grafts after reperfusion.

RESULTS

In the early post-reperfusion phase the lactate level in our case group was significantly higher comparing to the control group and remained in higher levels until the end of monitoring. The lactate to pyruvate ratio showed a considerable increase in the case group during the post-reperfusion phase. The other metabolites (glucose, glycerol, glutamate) were nearly at the same levels at the end of our monitoring in both study groups.

CONCLUSION

The increase in lactate and lactate to pyruvate ratios seems to be an indicator for early detection of acute rejection after KTx. Therefore, MD as a minimally invasive measurement tool may help to identify the need to immunosuppression adjustment in the early KTx phase before the clinical manifestation of the rejection.

Chronic allograft injury by subclinical borderline change: evidence from serial protocol biopsies in kidney transplantation

Purpose

This study investigated the impact of subclinical borderline changes on the development of chronic allograft injury in patients using a modern immunosuppression protocol.

Methods

Seventy patients with stable renal allograft function and who underwent protocol biopsies at implantation, 10 days and 1 year after transplantation were included and classified based on biopsy findings at day 10. The no rejection (NR) group included 33 patients with no acute rejection. The treatment (Tx) group included 21 patients with borderline changes following steroid pulse therapy, and the nontreatment (NTx) group included 16 patients with borderline changes nontreated.

Results

The Banff Chronicity Score (BChS) and modified BChS (MBChS) were not different among the three groups at implantation (P = 0.48) or on day 10 (P = 0.96). Surprisingly, the NTx group had more prominent chronic scores at the 1-year biopsy, including BChS (3.07 ± 1.33, P = 0.005) and MBChS (3.14 ± 1.41, P = 0.008) than those in the Tx and NR group, and deterioration of BChS was more noticeable in the NTx group (P = 0.037), although renal function was stable (P = 0.66). No difference in chronic injury scores was observed between the Tx and NR groups at the 1-year biopsy.

Conclusion

Subclinical borderline changes can be a risk factor for chronic allograft injury and should be considered for antirejection therapy.

Surveillance biopsies in children post-kidney transplant

Surveillance biopsies are increasingly used in the post-transplant monitoring of pediatric renal allograft recipients. The main justification for this procedure is to diagnose early and presumably modifiable acute and chronic renal allograft injury. Pediatric recipients are theoretically at increased risk for subclinical renal allograft injury due to their relatively large adult-sized kidneys and their higher degree of immunological responsiveness. The safety profile of this procedure has been well investigated. Patient morbidity is low, with macroscopic hematuria being the most common adverse event. No patient deaths have been attributed to this procedure. Longitudinal surveillance biopsy studies have revealed a substantial burden of subclinical immunological and non-immunological injury, including acute cellular rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, microvascular lesions and transplant glomerulopathy. The main impediment to the implementation of surveillance biopsies as the standard of care is the lack of demonstrable benefit of early histological detection on long-term outcome. The considerable debate surrounding this issue highlights the need for multicenter, prospective, and randomized studies.

Early subclinical rejection as a risk factor for late chronic humoral rejection

BACKGROUND

Subclinical rejection and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in protocol biopsies are associated with outcome. We study the relationship between histologic lesions in early protocol biopsies and histologic diagnoses in late biopsies for cause.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Renal transplants with a protocol biopsy performed within the first 6 months posttransplant between 1988 and 2006 were reviewed. Biopsies were evaluated according to Banff criteria, and C4d staining was available in biopsies for cause.

RESULTS

Of the 517 renal transplants with a protocol biopsy, 109 had a subsequent biopsy for cause which showed the following histological diagnoses: chronic humoral rejection (CHR) (n=44), IF/TA (n=42), recurrence of the primary disease (n=11), de novo glomerulonephritis (n=7), T-cell-mediated rejection (n=4), and polyoma virus nephropathy (n=1). The proportion of retransplants (15.9% vs. 2.3%, P=0.058) and the prevalence of subclinical rejection were higher in patients with CHR than in patients with IF/TA (52.3% vs. 28.6%, P=0.0253). Demographic donor and recipient characteristics and clinical data at the time of protocol biopsy were not different between groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that subclinical rejection (relative risk, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.3; P=0.047) but not retransplantation (relative risk, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-58.8; P=0.085) was associated with CHR.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical rejection in early protocol biopsies is associated with late appearance of CHR.

Protocol biopsy of a transplanted kidney as a tool for monitoring adequacy of immunosuppressive therapy: 10 years of experience from a single transplant center

BACKGROUND

The aims of this prospective study were to determine the prevalence of clinically silent rejection changes and of nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors among repeated protocol biopsies of transplanted kidneys and to assess their impacts on chronic graft function and damage at the end of 1 year.

METHODS

We performed 424 protocol biopsies among 158 patients over the first year after transplantation. We monitored parameters of graft function and progression of chronic changes among subjects with clinically silent rejection or toxicity for comparison with a control cohort showing normal histological findings. The results of statistical tests were considered to be significant at a level of P < .05.

RESULTS

At 3 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months, there were normal histological findings among 30 (19%), 21 (14.8%), and 14 (11.3%) patients, respectively; subclinical rejection changes occurred in 49 (31%), 36 (25.4%), and 20 (16.2%) grafts, respectively. At the third week, histological signs of toxicity occurred in 33 (20.9%) patients with significant persistence despite reductions in calcineurin inhibitor doses. At the end of 1 year of follow-up, both subclinical and toxic changes produced similar increases in chronic changes as quantified by the Banff score and were significantly different from the control group (P < .05). Serum creatinine concentrations and glomerular filtration rates did not accurately reflect the degree of graft damage in the early posttransplantation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical rejection and toxic changes among a significant proportion of grafts are associated with progression of chronic changes already over the first year following transplantation. Hence they represent independent risk factors for the development of irreversible graft damage. Protocol biopsy seems to be an important method to monitor immunosuppressive therapy.

Long-term impact of subclinical inflammation diagnosed by protocol biopsy one year after renal transplantation

The long-term impact of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) on renal graft function remains poorly understood. Furthermore, the interpretation of borderline lesions is difficult and their incidence is variable. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of subclinical inflammation (SCI) in protocol biopsies performed 1-year after renal transplantation. SCI was defined as the presence of borderline lesions or SCAR according to the Banff 2005 classification. The patients included were a subpopulation of the CONCEPT study in which patients were randomized 3 months after transplantation to receive either sirolimus (SRL) or cyclosporine A (CsA) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. At 1 year, we observed SCI in 37 of the 121 patients observed with an evaluable biopsy. The incidence was more frequent in the SRL group (SRL 45.2% vs. CsA 15.3%). At 30 months , SCI was associated with a significantly lower level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean MDRD 50.8 [±13.3] vs. 57.7 [±16.3] mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.035). In conclusion, SCI at 1-year posttransplantation is associated with worsening renal function and is more frequent in SRL-treated patients. Therefore, evaluation of SCI may be a valuable tool to allow the optimization of immunosuppressive regimens.

Borderline rejection after renal transplantation--to treat or not to treat

According to the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology, the category borderline changes defines changes insufficient for a diagnosis of acute rejection. The relationship between borderline changes and acute renal allograft rejection still remains unclear. The appropriate clinical management for patients showing such changes is controversial. One possible interpretation of the high incidence of subacute tubulitis is that these changes in the absence of graft dysfunction are of no consequence and that treatment with intensified immunosuppression is unnecessary and perhaps harmful. Another view, consistent with the high incidence of CAN in late protocol biopsy studies, is that immunosuppression has become so powerful, that rejection may not even be manifested by a rising serum creatinine. Borderline changes should be used as part of an algorithm, but not as the only criterion, for therapeutic decision making. Based on the weak evidence of existing studies, in our patients with clinical borderline rejection, we have to weigh the individual immunological risk against the potential side effects of increased immunosuppression. Even in the knowledge that a majority of patients with borderline infiltrates will not progress into rejection, in many transplant centers, borderline rejection is treated with additional steroids or augmentation of maintenance immunosuppression.

Prevalence of clinical rejection after surveillance biopsies in pediatric renal transplants: does early subclinical rejection predispose to subsequent rejection episodes?

We analyzed rates of both SCR and CR in children receiving SB at three months post-transplant to determine if SCR predisposed patients to acute CR. Acute rejection was defined according to Banff criteria to include borderline classification or higher. All cases of SCR and CR were treated with anti-rejection protocols. Between October 2004 and July 2008, 89 SB were performed at three months post-transplant. Twenty-six cases of SCR were detected (29%). Sixteen patients experienced 22 episodes of biopsy-proven CR occurring after SB, including seven episodes following SCR and 15 after normal SB. The onset of CR varied from one to 27 months after SB and occurred at similar intervals for cases with SCR and normal SB. The percentage of patients remaining free of CR at 30 months post-transplant was similar in patients with SCR and normal SB. Renal function and graft survival at 30 months also were no different between patients with SCR and those with normal SB. Early-SCR, when treated with rejection protocols, is not a prognostic indicator for subsequent CR episodes.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

[Screening biopsies in kidney transplantation: from subclinical acute rejection to chronic allograft lesions]

Kidney biopsies for screening purposes have the advantage of revealing the early appearance of lesions having a poor prognosis before kidney function is altered. Early screening of subclinical rejections allows preventive treatment of kidney transplantation in patients taking cyclosporine or azathioprine, thus improving their renal function and reducing the incidence of chronic histological lesions. However, this benefit has yet to be demonstrated in patients taking tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid. As for interstitial fibrosis lesions and tubular atrophy, biopsies can screen subclinical immunological lesions or those related to nephrotoxicity of anticalcineurins, which have a negative prognostic value in terms of graft survival. In addition, detection of these lesions could be a very useful criterion of efficacy in clinical studies. Moreover, they could help decide on modifying immunosuppressor treatment and evaluate the therapeutic strategies in patients at risk for humoral rejection. Finally, given the cost of biopsies and the inconvenience for the patient, the question of the timing and the number of screening biopsies is crucial. However, interventional studies evaluating notably immunosuppressor treatment modifications based on histological data are necessary to justify the daily use of screening biopsies.

Immunosuppressive drug therapy and subclinical acute renal allograft rejection: impact and effect

The incidence of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) varies between 5% and 15% with current maintenance immunosuppressive drug regimens. Despite many similarities between SCAR and clinical acute rejection exist, the inflammatory activated cell infiltrates are not completely identical while graft cytokine profiles and counteractive immune responses are characterized by subtle differences that could explain why SCAR is not accompanied by immediate graft dysfunction. Evidence that SCAR contributes to chronic allograft damage (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) and negatively affects graft outcome is counterbalanced by the scarcity of controlled data proving the beneficial effect of SCAR treatment. The development of sensitive and specific noninvasive methods to monitor the immune status of the graft by using mRNA determinations, gene expression analysis (microarrays), proteomic analysis, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, can help to ultimately replace protocol biopsies and also contribute to the further unraveling of the complex underlying immunological mechanisms responsible for SCAR. The latter would enable clinicians to preemptively make strategic adjustments to immunosuppressive therapy in an attempt to further improve renal allograft survival and clinical care of the transplant patient.

Presence of FoxP3+ regulatory T Cells predicts outcome of subclinical rejection of renal allografts

Subclinical rejection (SCR) of renal allografts refers to histologic patterns of acute rejection despite stable renal function. The clinical approach to SCR is controversial; it would be helpful to identify biomarkers that could determine whether the identified cellular infiltrates were detrimental. For investigation of whether the presence of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) could help determine the functional importance of tubulointerstitial infiltrates observed in 6-mo protocol biopsies, 37 cases of SCR were evaluated. The presence of FoxP3+ Treg discriminated harmless from injurious infiltrates, evidenced by independently predicting better graft function 2 and 3 yr after transplantation. Furthermore, the FoxP3+ Treg/CD3+ T cell ratio positively correlated with graft function at 2 yr after transplantation, suggesting that an increasing proportion of Treg within the global T cell infiltrate may facilitate renal engraftment; therefore, immunostaining for FoxP3+ Treg in patients with SCR on protocol biopsies may ultimately be useful to identify patients who may require alterations in their immunosuppressive regimens.

The utility of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled study

Identification of pathological events in the renal allograft using protocol biopsies at predetermined time intervals may yield useful information and improve outcomes. We examined the influence of decisions taken on the basis of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies findings on 1-year renal allograft function in a prospective randomized study. Out of 102 living-donor allograft recipients, 52 were randomized to undergo protocol biopsies and 50 controls had only indicated biopsies. All acute rejection (AR) episodes (clinical and subclinical) were treated. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose adjustments were made on clinical judgment. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, immunosuppressive drug usage, HLA matches and 2-h cyclosporine levels were similar in both groups. At 1 and 3 months, protocol biopsies revealed borderline (BL) changes in 11.5% and 14% patients, AR in 17.3% and 12% and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 3.8% and 10%. The incidence of clinically evident AR episodes was similar in the two groups, but biopsy group had lower serum creatinine at 6 months (p = 0.0003) and 1 year (p < 0.0001). The renal functions were similar in those with normal histology and BL changes. Protocol biopsies are helpful in detecting subclinical histological changes in the graft and improving short-term renal allograft function.

Timing and value of protocol biopsies in well-matched kidney transplant recipients – a clinical and histopathologic analysis

The role and timing of protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation are controversial. We changed our protocol biopsy policy and compared the predictive value of biopsies at different time-points. Protocol biopsies at 6 months (n = 45) were obtained during 2001-2004, and at 3 and 12 months from 2004 (n = 41). Donor biopsy was available from 70 patients. Histopathologic changes were described with chronic allograft damage index (CADI) and Banff 1997. Follow-up was for 18 months. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was present in 12%, 51%, and 34% and borderline or subclinical rejection in 9.8%, 8.9%, and 7.3% of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months. CAN at 6 and 12 months was associated with reduced graft function (P = 0.001). Semiquantitative CADI scores at all time-points significantly correlated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 18 months. Strongest correlation existed with CADI at 12 months (P < 0.001). Change in CADI between 0-6 and 0-12 months, but not between 0-3 and 3-12 months, correlated with GFR at 18 months (P = 0.03, P = 0.01). Subclinical rejections were rare and chronic changes mild at 3 months. In our well-matched population, the predictive value of a biopsy at 3 months was inferior to biopsies at 6 or 12 months, both of which were effective in predicting long-term graft function.

Surveillance renal transplant biopsies and subclinical rejection at three months post-transplant in pediatric recipients

Subclinical acute rejection (SCR) has been increasingly recognized in adult renal transplant recipients with the advent of surveillance biopsies. However, in children, surveillance biopsies are not routinely performed at most centers. Therefore, the incidence, predisposing factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes of SCR remain unclear in children. From August 2004 to December 2005, we performed 36 protocol biopsies at three months post-transplantation. All patients had received induction therapy with basiliximab and were maintained on prednisone, MMF, and tacrolimus. Sixteen cases of SCR were detected by biopsy (44%). Age, gender, race, donor source, or serum creatinine did not discriminate between children with SCR and those with normal biopsies. All cases of SCR were treated with high doses of methylprednisolone. At one yr post-transplant, renal function was similar in children with SCR to those with normal surveillance biopsies (p = 0.62). Because of the high incidence of SCR, the maintenance dose of MMF was increased by 50% in 20 children transplanted after December 2005. This resulted in a significant decline in the incidence of SCR from 44 to 15% (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of polyomavirus (BK) viremia also increased significantly in these children (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of SCR was found on surveillance biopsies at three months post-transplant and could not be predicted by age, gender, race, donor source, or serum creatinine. The occurrence of SCR declined significantly by increasing the dose of MMF, but resulted in an increase in BK viremia. We conclude that surveillance biopsies provide valuable information in the management of pediatric renal transplant recipients. Increasing immunosuppression to avoid SCR should be weighed against the risk for infection.

Protocol biopsies in renal transplantation: prognostic value of structural monitoring

The natural history of renal allograft damage has been characterized in serial protocol biopsies. The prevalence of subclinical rejection (SCR) is maximal during the first months and it is associated with the progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and a decreased graft survival. IF/TA rapidly progress during the first months and constitutes an independent predictor of graft survival. IF/TA associated with transplant vasculopathy, SCR, or transplant glomerulopathy implies a poorer prognosis than IF/TA without additional lesions. These observations suggest that protocol biopsies could be considered a surrogate of graft survival. Preliminary data suggest that the predictive value of protocol biopsies is not inferior to acute rejection or renal function. Additionally, protocol biopsies have been employed as a secondary efficacy variable in clinical trials. This strategy has been useful to demonstrate a decrease in the progression of IF/TA in some calcineurin-free regimens. Quantification of renal damage is associated with graft survival suggesting that quantitative parameters might improve the predictive value of protocol biopsies. Validation of protocol biopsies as a surrogate of graft survival is actively pursued, as the utility of classical surrogates of graft outcome such as acute rejection has become less useful because of its decreased prevalence with actual immunosuppression.

Why hasn't eliminating acute rejection improved graft survival?

Although patients with end-stage renal disease can be maintained with dialysis therapy, the superiority of patient survival with renal transplantation makes transplantation the preferred method of renal replacement. Potent immunosuppressive therapies, particularly calcineurin inhibitors, have greatly reduced the incidence of acute rejection. However, long-term allograft survival remains limited. We discuss the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft survival and discuss other factors leading to late allograft loss, including calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, chronic allograft nephropathy, and BK virus nephropathy, as well as donor and recipient factors associated with long-term allograft loss.

Clinical significance of protocol biopsy at one month posttransplantation in deceased-donor renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Protocol biopsy was used to detect pathologic changes in recipients with stable allograft function. With our 5-year practice, we reviewed protocol biopsies performed at 1 month posttransplantation in Chinese renal transplantation to analyze the impact of pathologic changes on allograft survival and to evaluate the clinical significance of protocol biopsy.

METHODS

227 patients who received biopsy at 1 month posttransplantation during Aug 2000 to Feb 2005 with stable graft function were enrolled. Patients were divided into normal group (NM), borderline change group (BL) and subclinical rejection group (SCR) based on pathology in protocol biopsy. Their clinical data were all reviewed.

RESULTS

In the 227 patients with stable graft function, there were 173 patients (76.2%), 37 patients (16.3%) and 17 patients (7.5%) in the NM, BL, SCR group respectively. The incidence of acute rejection in the following period was significantly higher in the BL and SCR groups than that in the NM group (21.6%, 29.4% vs 7.5%, P<0.01). There was a significant difference of graft survival between the BL, SCR group and NM group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline changes and subclinical rejection detected in protocol biopsy were associated with poor allograft survival. Protocol biopsy performed at 1 month posttransplantation is of great significance and can predict graft survival.

Immunohistochemical Detection of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Human Renal Allograft Biopsies

Although it generally is accepted that renal hypoxia may occur in various situations after renal transplantation, direct evidence for such hypoxia is lacking, and possible implications on graft pathophysiology remain obscure. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) are regulated at the protein level by oxygen-dependent enzymes and, hence, allow for tissue hypoxia detection. With the use of high-amplification HIF-1alpha immunohistochemistry in renal biopsies, hypoxia is shown at specific time points after transplantation with clinicohistologic correlations. Immediately after engraftment, in primarily functioning grafts, abundant HIF-1alpha is present and correlates with cold ischemic time >15 h and/or graft age >50 yr (P < 0.04). In contrast, a low HIF-1alpha score correlates with primary nonfunction, likely reflecting loss of oxygen consumption for tubular transport. Protocol biopsies at 2 wk show widespread HIF-1alpha induction, irrespective of histology. Beyond 3 mo, both protocol biopsies and indicated biopsies are virtually void of HIF-1alpha, with the only exception being clinical/subclinical rejection. HIF-derived transcriptional adaptation to hypoxia may counterbalance, at least partly, the negative impact of cold preservation and warm reflow injury. Transient hypoxia at 2 wk may be induced by hyperfiltration, hypertrophy, calcineurin inhibitor-induced toxicity, or a combination of these. Lack of detectable HIF-1alpha at 3 mo and beyond suggests that at this time point, graft oxygen homeostasis occurs. The strong correlation between hypoxia and clinical/subclinical rejection in long-term grafts suggests that hypoxia is involved in such graft dysfunction, and HIF-1alpha immunohistochemistry could enhance the specific diagnosis of acute rejection.