Persistence of Low Levels of Alloantibody after Desensitization in Crossmatch-Positive Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Rebound and overshoot of donor-specific antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) during desensitization with plasma exchanges in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to HLA have been associated with graft loss in hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation. Limited data associate therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with desensitization and successful engraftment. We report an attempt of desensitization and observed overshooting of DSA during transplantation.

CASE REPORT AND RESULTS

A 27-year-old female with cutaneous T cell lymphoma was scheduled for HPC transplantation from her HLA-haploidentical half-sister, who carried the HLA-DRB1*13:03:01 allele. The patient had the corresponding DSA. Lacking an alternative donor option at the time, we attempted a desensitization approach by immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Unexpectedly, DSA increased from a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 1835 on day -63 to 9008 on day -7. The MFI increased further during 3 TPE procedures and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) until day -1. After transplantation, the DSA remained elevated despite 2 more TPE/IVIG procedures and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with high-dose cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and MMF. Flow cytometric crossmatch, initially negative, turned positive after transplantation. Primary graft failure occurred and was attributed to antibody-mediated rejection. A second transplantation from a 7/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor, not carrying DRB1*13:03 allele, resulted in successful engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Unexpected and rapid increases of a DSA can occur despite the use of current desensitization approaches. This is problematic when conditioning has already started, as such increases are unlikely to be overcome by TPE or other interventions for desensitization. Overshoot of DSA in HPC transplantation has rarely been reported. Its cause remains unclear and can include underlying disease, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or TPE.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Successful long-term outcome of pediatric liver-kidney transplantation: a single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Liver-kidney transplantation is a rare procedure in children, with just ten to 30 cases performed annually worldwide. The main indications are autosomal recessive polycystic liver-kidney disease and primary hyperoxaluria. This study aimed to report outcomes of liver-kidney transplantation in a cohort of pediatric patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all pediatric liver-kidney transplantations performed in our center between September 2000 and August 2015. Patient data were obtained by reviewing inpatient and outpatient medical records and our transplant database.

RESULTS

A total of 14 liver-kidney transplants were performed during the study period, with a median patient age and weight at transplant of 144.4 months (131.0-147.7) and 27.3 kg (12.0-45.1), respectively. The indications for liver-kidney transplants were autosomal recessive polycystic liver-kidney disease (8/14), primary hyperoxaluria -1 (5/14), and idiopathic portal hypertension with end-stage renal disease (1/14). Median time on waiting list was 8.5 months (5.7-17.3). All but two liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously. Patients with primary hyperoxaluria-1 tended to present a delayed recovery of renal function compared with patients transplanted for other indications (62.5 vs 6.5 days, respectively, P 0.076). Patients with liver-kidney transplants tended to present a lower risk of acute kidney rejection than patients transplanted with an isolated kidney transplant (7.2% vs 32.7%, respectively; P < 0.07). Patient and graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100%, 91.7%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, 83.3%, 83.3%, respectively. No other grafts were lost.

CONCLUSION

Long-term results of liver-kidney transplants in children are encouraging, being comparable with those obtained in isolated liver transplantation.

Correlation of Pretransplant Donor-specific Antibody Assay Using Luminex Crossmatch with Graft Outcome in Renal Transplant Patients

The significance of pretransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody levels that are detectable by more sensitive platforms (including the Luminex platform) yet undetected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of the donor-specific antibody (DSA) assay Luminex crossmatch and its impact on short-term renal graft outcome such as acute rejections, graft survival, and graft function. The results of pretransplant DSA-lymphocyte crossmatching (LCXM) assay in 126 renal allograft recipients whose CDCs crossmatches were negative were retrospectively analyzed for correlation with posttransplant outcomes. Of the 126 recipients, 32 (25.4%) had pretransplant DSA positive. Statistically significant association was found between DSA-LCXM positivity with 14^th day estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = 0.05), DSA Class I with 3^rd (P = 0.014) and 6^th month (P = 0.02) eGFR, DSA Class II with 14^th day (P = 0.06) and 1^st month (P = 0.10) eGFR, mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) DSA with 7^th day (P = 0.08) and 14^th day (P = 0.09) eGFR, and maximum MFI DSA with 7^th day eGFR (P = 0.09). The posttransplant eGFR was higher at various time intervals in DSA-LCXM-negative patients as compared to DSA-positive patients. However, pretransplant DSA-LCXM results did not predict the rejection episodes, graft loss, and 1-year posttransplant 24 h urine protein. Pretransplant DSA detected by LCXM in patients with a negative CDC does not predict adverse short-term outcomes. However, the difference in posttransplant eGFR supports further investigation in long-term effects.

Effect of ABO incompatibility on T-cell flow cytometry cross-match results prior to living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Due to its high sensitivity, the flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM) has been described as valuable tool for identifying an optimal donor. We here focused on the impact of ABO incompatibility on FCXM results.

METHODS

We analyzed 29 ABO incompatible and 89 ABO compatible donor-recipient pairs (73 and 175 datasets, respectively) prior to living donor kidney transplantation. In all patients, lymphocytotoxic cross-matches for B and T cells were negative.

RESULTS

Recipients with blood group O (A to O and B to O) displayed significantly (P < 0.05) higher T-FCXM results than those with blood group A and B (A to B, B to A and AB to A), respectively. Donor-specific T-FCXM responses (ΔMFI values) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ABO incompatible vs. compatible pairs (ABO incompatible recipients with blood group O: 32 ± 6; with blood group A: 19 ± 7; with blood group B: 7 ± 4; recipients with ABO compatibility: 3 ± 2, respectively, data represent mean ± SEM). Consistent with the T-FCXM results donor-specific isohemagglutinins (IgG titers) were significantly higher in recipients with blood group O vs. A, both prior to rituximab treatment and plasmapheresis/immune adsorption (P = 0.004) and immediately prior to transplantation, i.e., after rituximab and antibody-depleting therapies (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatibility was associated with higher T-FCXM responses, especially in recipients with blood group O. This finding has major impact on the interpretation of flow cross-match results. Current cut-off values need to be reassessed in the ABO incompatible setting. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Differences in chronic intragraft inflammation between positive crossmatch and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations (ABOiKTxs) seem to have better long-term outcomes than positive crossmatch kidney transplantations (+XMKTxs).

METHODS

This study aimed to assess the differences in chronic injury on histologic findings on 1- and 5-year surveillance biopsies and the clinical outcomes in living-donor kidney transplantations performed between May 1999 and November 2006 including 102 +XMKTxs, 73 ABOiKTxs, and 652 conventional KTxs.

RESULTS

Although 5-year patient survival was similar between groups, graft loss between 1 and 5 years was similar in ABOiKTx (2.6% per year) and conventional KTx (1.7% per yr), and both were lower than that of +XMKTx (5.8% per year). At 5 years, renal function was similar in ABOiKTx and conventional KTx, and both were higher than that of +XMKTx, which had higher rates of inflammation and chronic glomerulopathy on both 1- and 5-year biopsies. Despite having evidence of less chronic injury, ABOiKTx showed a higher rate of intragraft complement activation (C4d deposition) at 5 years compared with +XMKTx (77.8% vs. 18.9%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that +XMKTxs have high rates of chronic inflammation at 1 and 5 years after transplantation, which may explain the higher rates of graft loss and lower renal function compared with other factors such as anti-donor antibody or intragraft complement deposition.

The role of donor-specific antibodies in acute cardiac allograft dysfunction in the absence of cellular rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute allograft dysfunction (AAD) is an important cause of morbidity among heart transplant recipients. The role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in AAD, with the increasing use of single antigen bead (SAB) assays that have improved the ability to detect DSA, remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 329 heart transplant recipients followed up at our institution. AAD was defined as an acute decline in left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50% and a decrement of 10% or higher compared to baseline in the absence of cellular rejection. Patients with AAD were compared with matched 30 heart transplant controls.

RESULTS

There were 10 (3%) patients with AAD, 4 (40%) had DSA detectable by SAB assay compared to 16 (53%) controls (P=0.43). Peak DSA mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) levels were significantly higher at baseline (class I and class II) in AAD compared to controls. DSA MFI values increased at the time of AAD and returned to baseline values during follow-up for these patients with AAD (P<0.05) but remained unchanged over time for controls. Six (60%) patients with AAD and 1 (3%) control had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) by endomyocardial biopsy (P<0.01). There were 4 (40%) patients with AAD with no DSA or AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

AAD after heart transplant is a heterogeneous process characterized by 1) AMR and DSA, 2) AMR but no DSA, and 3) no AMR or DSA. The presence of DSA is not associated with AAD, but the quantity assessed by MFI levels may play a role.

A closer look at rituximab induction on HLA antibody rebound following HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation

Rituximab has been used to increase the efficacy of desensitization protocols for HLA incompatible kidney transplantation, however, controlled comparisons have not been reported. Here we examined 256 post-transplant HLA antibody levels in 25 recipients desensitized with or 25 without rituximab induction, to determine the impact of B cell depletion. We found significantly less HLA antibody rebound in the rituximab-treated patients (7% of donor specific antibodies (DSAs) and 33% of non-DSAs) compared to a control cohort desensitized and transplanted without rituximab (32% DSAs and 55% non-DSAs). The magnitude of the increase was significantly larger among patients who did not receive rituximab. Interestingly, in rituximab treated patients, of the 39 HLA antibodies that increased post-transplant, 34 were specific for HLA mismatches present in previous allografts or pregnancies, implying limited efficacy in memory B cell depletion. Compared to controls, rituximab-treated patients had a significantly greater mean reduction in DSA (−2505 versus −292 mean fluorescence intensity), but a similar rate of DSA persistence (52% in rituximab treated and 40% in non-treated recipients). Thus, rituximab induction in HLA incompatible recipients reduced the incidence and magnitude of HLA antibody rebound, but did not impact DSA elimination, antibody mediated rejection, or 5 year allograft survival when compared to recipients desensitized and transplanted without rituximab.

LVAD implant as a bridge to heart transplantation is associated with allosensitization as measured by single antigen bead assay

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as a bridge (BTT) to heart transplantation (HTX) may be limited by the formation of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Whether sensitization occurs with continuous axial flow LVAD implant as assessed by single antigen bead (SAB) assay is unknown.

METHODS

Cytotoxic panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and SAB assays were analyzed in HTX recipients undergoing LVAD implant as a BTT. Sensitization was defined as peak anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody values of more than 2000 mean fluorescence intensity because these values have been found to correlate with flow cytometric crossmatch results.

RESULTS

LVADs were implanted as BTT in 30 patients. There were 7% (2 of 30) of patients before LVAD implant and no patients after LVAD implant with PRA more than 10%. However, 20% (6 of 30) of patients before LVAD and 53% (16 of 30) after LVAD were sensitized as measured by SAB (P=0.024). At HTX, 47% (14 of 30) of patients remained sensitized. A positive virtual crossmatch was observed in 28% (4 of 14) of the sensitized patients at HTX. There was no difference between the sensitized and nonsensitized groups (P>0.4 for all) in usage of blood products (6411 vs. 6339 units) and time to HTX (28,663 vs. 25,748 days), and 1 year after HTX, there were no differences in rejection (total rejection score 0.30 vs. 0.37) and survival (93% vs. 88%).

CONCLUSION

Allosensitization after LVAD is common despite cytotoxic PRA being negative. One year after HTX, this sensitization does not translate into increased acute cellular or antibody-mediated rejection or reduced survival.

Desensitization for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Desensitization protocols are being used worldwide to enable kidney transplantation across immunologic barriers, i.e. antibody to donor HLA or ABO antigens, which were once thought to be absolute contraindications to transplantation. Desensitization protocols are also being applied to permit transplantation of HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cells to patients with antibody to donor HLA, to enhance the opportunity for transplantation of non-renal organs, and to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Although desensitization for organ transplantation carries an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, ultimately these transplants extend and enhance the quality of life for solid organ recipients, and desensitization that permits transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is life saving for patients with limited donor options. Complex patient factors and variability in treatment protocols have made it difficult to identify, precisely, the mechanisms underlying the downregulation of donor-specific antibodies. The mechanisms underlying desensitization may differ among the various protocols in use, although there are likely to be some common features. However, it is likely that desensitization achieves a sort of immune detente by first reducing the immunologic barrier and then by creating an environment in which an autoregulatory process restricts the immune response to the allograft.

Allosensitization in heart transplantation: an overview

Transplant candidates might manifest circulating antibodies against human leukocyte antigens and nonhuman leukocyte antigens, a condition termed allosensitization. The presence of these antibodies decreases a given candidate's possible donor pool, thereby prolonging the time to transplantation. They are also associated with poorer posttransplant outcomes including increased morbidity and mortality. With the increasing use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation, the prevalence of allosensitized transplant candidates has increased. This has implications for transplant programs in terms of donor-recipient matching and managing transplant-related complications, which are more common in this high risk cohort. Controversy exists as to the best approach in managing sensitized patients, before and after transplantation. Transplant centres have used various strategies to reduce antibody loads with mixed results being reported; moreover, it remains unclear as to whether attempts at desensitization translate into better posttransplant outcomes. As an alternative management approach, some centres participate in large organ sharing strategies and allocate organs based on the probability of finding a successful donor-recipient match. In this article, the immunological basis of allosensitization, its causes, implications, and therapeutic strategies to manage sensitized patients are reviewed. The literature in relation to desensitization therapies in heart transplant candidates is also reviewed.

The mechanisms of action of plasma exchange

The initial description of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in an animal model was published almost 100 years ago. Since that time, this treatment has been applied to a wide variety of diseases but limited research has been published examining the mechanisms of action of TPE. The therapeutic effects of TPE could include the removal of pathological substances from the blood, such as monoclonal paraproteins and autoantibodies, as well as the replacement of deficient plasma components when plasma is used as a replacement fluid. Beyond these potential mechanisms, other possible mechanisms include possible alterations in lymphocyte proliferation and function that could sensitize these cells to immunosuppressant and chemotherapeutic agents and alterations in the immune system including changes in B and T cell numbers and activation, increased T suppressor function, and alteration in T-helper cell type 1/2 (Th1/Th2) ratio. Much remains unknown about the mechanisms of action of TPE, indicating a need for basic research into this therapy.

Analysis of anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates subjected to desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab

BACKGROUND

Preexisting donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens are major risk factors for acute antibody-mediated and chronic rejection of kidney transplant grafts. Immunomodulation (desensitization) protocols may reduce antibody concentration and improve the success of transplant. We investigated the effect of desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab on the antibody profile in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

METHODS

In 31 transplant candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA], 34%-99%), desensitization included intravenous immunoglobulin on days 0 and 30 and a single dose of rituximab on day 15. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were analyzed before and after desensitization.

RESULTS

Reduction of cPRA from 25% to 50% was noted for anti-class I (5 patients, within 20-60 days) and anti-class II (3 patients, within 10-20 days) antibodies. After initial reduction of cPRA, the cPRA increased within 120 days. In 24 patients, decrease in mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies by more than 50% was noted at follow-up, but there was no reduction of cPRA. Rebound occurred in 65% patients for anti-class I antibodies at 350 days and anti-class II antibodies at 101 to 200 days. Probability of rebound effect was higher in patients with mean fluorescence intensity of more than 10,700 before desensitization, anti-class II antibodies, and history of previous transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

The desensitization protocol had limited efficacy in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate because of the short period with antibody reduction and high frequency of rebound effect.

Prevalence, course and impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation in the first year

The presence of preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in liver transplant recipients is increasingly recognized; however, the prevalence of DSA and their impact on early allograft function remains unknown. We prospectively followed serum DSA levels of 90 consecutive liver transplant recipients from baseline to 4 months. Twenty recipients (22.2%) had preformed DSA. No antibody-targeting treatments were undertaken. Seven days after transplantation, DSA levels decreased markedly in all but three patients. Day 7 protocol biopsies showed diffuse C4d deposition along the portal stroma, central vein, subendothelial and stromal space in the patients with persistent high DSA levels. The rate of acute cellular rejection was not significantly different in patients with DSA. The transaminase and bilirubin levels remained comparable during the first year despite the presence of DSA. The three patients with persistently high DSA levels continue to have normal allograft function. We conclude that in most cases, DSA disappear after liver transplant, however in rare instances where they persist, there is evidence of complement activation in the liver allograft, without significant clinical impact in the first year.

Banff 2011 Meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection

The 11th Banff meeting was held in Paris, France, from June 5 to 10, 2011, with a focus on refining diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The major outcome was the acknowledgment of C4d-negative ABMR in kidney transplants. Diagnostic criteria for ABMR have also been revisited in other types of transplants. It was recognized that ABMR is associated with heterogeneous phenotypes even within the same type of transplant. This highlights the necessity of further refining the respective diagnostic criteria, and is of particular significance for the design of randomized clinical trials. A reliable phenotyping will allow for definition of robust end-points. To address this unmet need and to allow for an evidence-based refinement of the Banff classification, Banff Working Groups presented multicenter data regarding the reproducibility of features relevant to the diagnosis of ABMR. However, the consensus was that more data are necessary and further Banff Working Group activities were initiated. A new Banff working group was created to define diagnostic criteria for ABMR in kidneys independent of C4d. Results are expected to be presented at the 12th Banff meeting to be held in 2013 in Brazil. No change to the Banff classification occurred in 2011.

Prevention and treatment of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is commonly caused by preformed and/or de novo HLA alloantibodies, has evolved as a leading cause of early and late kidney allograft injury. In recent years, effective treatment strategies have been established to counteract the deleterious effects of humoral alloreactivity. One major therapeutic challenge is the barrier of a positive pretransplant lymphocytotoxic crossmatch. Several apheresis- and/or IVIG-based protocols have been shown to enable successful crossmatch conversion, including a strategy of peritransplant immunoadsorption for rapid crossmatch conversion immediately before deceased donor transplantation. While such protocols may increase transplant rates and allow for acceptable graft survival, at least in the short-term, it has become evident that, despite intense treatment, many patients still experience clinical or subclinical AMR. This reinforces the need for innovative strategies, such as complementary allocation programs to improve transplant outcomes. For acute AMR, various studies have suggested efficiency of plasmapheresis- or immunoadsorption-based protocols. There is, however, no established treatment for chronic AMR and the development of strategies to reverse or at least halt chronic active rejection remains a big challenge. Major improvements can be expected from studies evaluating innovative therapeutic concepts, such as proteasome inhibition or complement blocking agents.

Desensitization: achieving immune detente

Antibodies to donor HLA (human leukocyte antigen) and/or ABO antigens were a contraindication to transplantation of most organs for decades. Desensitization protocols have shown the ability to produce reduction of such antibodies sufficient to achieve a successful transplantation. The two major protocols in use are high-dose IVIg or plasmapheresis with low-dose IVIg. The protocols differ in the basic treatment and, to some degree, in their application, but both use standard immunosuppressive agents as well as more recently developed adjunctive agents such as cell-depleting antibodies. Graft and patient survival with both types of protocol are comparable to that of non-sensitized patients, although desensitized patients do have a higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Antibodies to donor antigens may persist after transplantation, and while the initial antibody titer represents the level of difficulty for successful desensitization, the strength of antibodies that persist after transplantation reflects the risk of AMR. Current protocols do not eliminate B cell clones specific for donor HLA; therefore, desensitized patients remain at an increased risk of antibody rebound if patients experience pro-inflammatory events. Therefore, ongoing antibody monitoring is crucial for early detection of antibody-mediated graft injury. Importantly, the results of numerous programs show that ABOi- and HLA-positive crossmatch renal transplantation, with proper desensitization, can be performed successfully. Further, in addition to increasing the rate of transplantation among sensitized patients, desensitization is providing insight into immunoregulatory processes and may provide information useful in diseases involving immune dysfunction.

Desensitization protocols and their outcome

In the last decade, transplantation across previously incompatible barriers has increasingly become popular because of organ donor shortage, availability of better methods of detecting and characterizing anti-HLA antibodies, ease of diagnosis, better understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, and the availability of effective regimens. This review summarizes all manuscripts published since the first publication in 2000 on desensitized patients and discusses clinical outcomes including acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection rate, the new agents available, kidney paired exchange programs, and the future directions in sensitized patients. There were 21 studies published between 2000 and 2010, involving 725 patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) who underwent kidney transplantation with different desensitization protocols. All studies were single center and retrospective. The patient and graft survival were 95% and 86%, respectively, at a 2-year median follow-up. Despite acceptable short-term patient and graft survivals, acute rejection rate was 36% and acute antibody-mediated rejection rate was 28%, which is significantly higher than in nonsensitized patients. Recent studies with longer follow-up of those patients raised concerns about long-term success of desensitization protocols. The studies utilizing protocol biopsies in desensitized patients also reported higher subclinical and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. An association between the strength of DSAs determined by median fluorescence intensity values of Luminex single-antigen beads and risk of rejection was observed. Two new agents, bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and eculizumab, an anti-complement C5 antibody, were recently introduced to desensitization protocols. An alternative intervention is kidney paired exchange, which should be considered first for sensitized patients.

Desensitization for renal transplantation: depletion of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, preservation of memory antibodies, and clinical risks

Desensitization protocols reduce donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and enable renal transplantation in patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic cross-match (CDC-CXM). The effect of this treatment on protective antibody and immunoglobulin levels is unknown. Thirteen patients with end-stage renal disease, DSA and positive CDC-CXM underwent desensitization. Sera collected pre- and post-transplantation were analysed for anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and IgG subclasses and were compared to healthy controls and contemporaneous renal transplant recipients treated with standard immunosuppression alone. Ten patients developed negative CDC-CXM and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and underwent successful transplantation. Eight recipients achieved good graft function without antibody-mediated or late rejection, BK virus or cytomegalovirus infection. One patient had primary non-function due to recurrent oxalosis, and one patient with immediate graft function died from septicaemia. Seven recipients required post-operative transfusion and three developed septicaemia. DSA remained negative by ELISA at 12 months, but were detectable by Luminex(®) . Anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total Ig and IgG subclasses were below the normal range but comparable to levels in renal transplant recipients who had not undergone desensitization. Desensitization protocols effectively reduce DSA and allow successful transplantation. Post-operative bleeding and short-term infectious risk is increased. Protective antibody and serum immunoglobulin levels are relatively preserved.

Double filtration plasmapheresis in antibody-incompatible kidney transplantation

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was used in preference to plasma exchange in our program of antibody-incompatible transplantation, to treat higher volumes of plasma. Forty-two patients had 259 sessions of DFPP, 201 pre-transplant and 58 post-transplant. At the first treatment session, the mean plasma volume treated was 3.81 L (range 3-6 L), 55.5 mL/kg (range 36.2-83.6 mL/kg). Serum IgG fell by mean 59.4% (SD 10.2%), and IgM by 69.3% (SD 16.1%). Nine patients did not require increases in plasma volumes treated, and six did not tolerate higher plasma volumes. In the remaining patients, the mean maximum plasma volume treated pre-transplant was 6.67 L (range 4-15 L), 96.1 mL/kg (range 60.2-208.9 mL/kg). The complement dependent cytotoxic crossmatch was positive in 14 cases pre-treatment, and remained positive in six (42.8%) cases. The flow cytometric crossmatch was positive in 29 cases pre-treatment, and in 21 (72.4%) after DFPP. Post-transplant, DFPP was ineffective at reducing donor specific antibody levels during periods of rapid donor specific antibody synthesis. Post-transplant, the one year graft survival rate was 94%, although there was a high rate of early rejection. In summary, DFPP enabled the treatment of plasma volumes that were almost double those that would have been feasible with plasma exchange. Despite this, most patients were transplanted with a positive crossmatch, and DFPP post-transplant was unable to control rising antibody levels.

Baseline donor-specific antibody levels and outcomes in positive crossmatch kidney transplantation

Renal transplant candidates with donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) have increased risk of antibody-mediated allograft injury. The goal of this study was to correlate the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), transplant glomerulopathy (TG) and graft survival with the baseline DSA level (prior to initiation of pretransplant conditioning). These analyses include 119 positive crossmatch (+XM) compared to 70 negative crossmatch (-XM) transplants performed between April 2000 and July 2007. Using a combination of cell-based crossmatch tests, DSA level was stratified into very high +XM, high +XM, low +XM and -XM groups. In +XM transplants, increasing DSA level was associated with increased risk for AMR (HR = 1.76 [1.51, 2.07], p = 0.0001) but not TG (p = 0.18). We found an increased risk for both early and late allograft loss associated with very high DSA (HR = 7.71 [2.95, 20.1], p = 0.0001). Although lower DSA recipients commonly developed AMR and TG, allograft survival was similar to that of -XM patients (p = 0.31). We conclude that the baseline DSA level correlates with risk of early and late alloantibody-mediated allograft injury. With current protocols, very high baseline DSA patients have high rates of AMR and poor long-term allograft survival highlighting the need for improved therapy for these candidates.

Renal transplantation across HLA and ABO antibody barriers: integrating paired donation into desensitization protocols

The field of desensitization and incompatible transplantation has made great gains over the past decade. There are now several options and effective therapies for many patients who face antibody barriers. Kidney paired donation (KPD) and desensitization have traditionally been considered competing strategies and patients have been offered one or the other without regard for the probability of a successful outcome. It is now possible to predict which donor/recipient phenotypes will benefit from each of these modalities. KPD should be favored among patients with immunologic phenotypes that are likely to match without prolonged waiting times. However, as many as 50% of patients with incompatible donors will fail to find a match in a KPD pool and many of these patients could be desensitized to their donor. Positive crossmatch and ABO incompatible transplantation has been accomplished in selective cases without the need for heavy immunosuppression or B-cell ablative therapy. Patients who are both difficult-to-match due to broad sensitization and hard-to-desensitize because of strong donor reactivity can often be successfully transplanted through a combination of desensitization and KPD. Using these various modalities it is estimated that most patients with incompatible live donors can undergo successful renal transplantation.

Virtual crossmatch by identification of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies by solid-phase immunoassay: a 30-month analysis in living donor kidney transplantation

Selection of donors for kidney transplantation depends on accurate prediction of risk factors for immunologic rejection. Historically, cytotoxicity crossmatch (CXM) examining lysis of donor cells by preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (Abs) has been considered the best predictor of immunologic rejection. However, there is much interest in defining anti-HLA Ab specificity in recipient sera by immunoassay to predict crossmatch results and aid in donor selection. Current immunoassays for anti-HLA Abs are highly sensitive, though correlation between Abs detected by immunoassay and their functional relevance in CXM and subsequent transplantation is not well defined. In this study, we retrospectively examined the predictive value of detection of donor-specific anti-HLA Abs (DSA) by Luminex Single Antigen assay from 149 consecutive living donor kidney transplant recipients. We demonstrate that detection of DSA by immunoassay accurately predicted negative crossmatch and graft survival. However, this approach had limited sensitivity for predicting positive crossmatch, attributable to either limited typing of donor HLA-DQ and -DP alleles or due to non-HLA Abs. False-positive prediction of CXM correlated with detection of "weak" Abs with low mean fluorescence intensity (MFI < 2000). Furthermore, we found that a ratio of the MFI of the DSA bead to the MFI of the positive control bead was a better method for identifying weak DSA that did not result in CXM-positive reactions. Interestingly, patients with weak DSA and negative CXM had equivalent graft survival over an 18 month follow-up period, suggesting that weak DSA may not preclude transplantation.

De novo donor-specific antibody at the time of kidney transplant biopsy associates with microvascular pathology and late graft failure

We studied whether de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in sera from patients undergoing kidney transplant biopsies associate with specific histologic lesions in the biopsy and prognosis. DSA were assessed in 145 patients at the time of biopsy between 7 days to 31 years posttransplant. DSA was detected in 54 patients (37%), of which 32 represented de novo DSA. De novo DSA was more frequent in patients having late biopsies (34%) versus early biopsies (4%), and was usually either against class II alone or class I and II but rarely against class I alone. Microcirculation inflammation (glomerulitis, capillaritis) and damage (glomuerulopathy, capillary basement membrane multilayering), and C4d staining were associated with de novo DSA. However, the degree of scarring, arterial fibrosis and tubulo-interstitial inflammation did not correlate with the presence of de novo DSA. De novo DSA correlated with reduced graft survival after the biopsy. Thus, de novo DSA at the time of a late biopsy for clinical indication is primarily against class II, and associates with microcirculation changes in the biopsy and subsequent graft failure. We propose careful assessment of de novo DSA, particularly against class II, be performed in all late kidney transplant biopsies.

Perception versus reality?: Virtual crossmatch--how to overcome some of the technical and logistic limitations

The goal of this work was to evaluate concordance between (a) actual flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) that is performed by the OPO laboratory servicing our transplant center and (b) virtual XM (vXM) prediction based on antibody identification by solid-phase methods performed in our laboratory. A total of 1586 FCXM, performed between June 2007 and September 2008, between all potential deceased donors in our region and sera from patients awaiting kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant, listed at Northwestern Memorial Hospital were evaluated. A key finding of this analysis was the understanding that a thorough vXM cannot be performed in some donor/recipient pairs due to the lack of certain antibody profile data specific to the donor in question. Obtaining more in depth and stringent information regarding antibody specificities, we demonstrate an excellent sensitivity and specificity of the vXM assays- 86.1% and 96.8%, respectively, with a positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratios of 26.9 and 0.14, respectively. The vXM can serve as an outstanding tool to predict HLA compatibility between donor and recipient, with the caveat that the presence/absence of all antibodies against the potential donor and their strength have been thoroughly investigated.

Rises and falls in donor-specific and third-party HLA antibody levels after antibody incompatible transplantation

BACKGROUND

After human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody-incompatible transplantation, donor specific and third party HLA antibodies may be found, and their levels fall in a donor-specific manner during the first month. However, these changes have not been previously described in detail.

METHODS

Donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) and third-party HLA antibody (TPA) levels were measured using the microbead method in 44 presensitized patients who had renal transplantation.

RESULTS

DSA+TPA fell in the first 4 days after transplantation, and greater falls in DSA indicated absorption by the graft. This occurred for class I (57.8% fall compared with 20.2% for TPA, P<0.0005), HLA DR (63.0% vs. 24.3%, P<0.0004), and for HLA DP/DQ/DRB3-4 (34% vs. 17.5%, P=0.014). Peak DSA levels occurred at a mean of 13 days posttransplant, and they were higher than pretreatment in 25 (57%) patients and lower in 19 (43%) patients (P=ns). The risk of rejection was associated with peak DSA levels; 15 of 25 (60%) patients with DSA at median fluorescence intensity (MFI) more than 7000U experienced rejection, compared with 4 of 7 (57%) patients with peak DSA MFI 2000 to 7000U, and 2 of 12 (17%) patients with peak DSA MFI less than 2000U (P<0.02). DSA levels subsequently fell in a donor specific manner compared to TPA.

CONCLUSION

DSA levels may change markedly in the first month after antibody incompatible transplantation, and the risk of rejection was associated with higher pretreatment and peak levels.

Mechanisms of alloantibody production in sensitized renal allograft recipients

While clinical protocols have been developed to allow for successful kidney transplantation in patients with high levels of donor-specific alloantibody (DSA), significant limitations still exist including high rates of early humoral rejection and decreased long-term graft survival compared to conventional transplants. A better understanding of the mechanisms of alloantibody production at baseline and at various phases posttransplant would be an important step toward the development of improved therapeutic approaches. The goal of this review is to outline recent studies regarding antibody production in general and specific studies that illustrate what is known about alloantibody production in sensitized patients.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection in living ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: long-term impact and risk factors

The impact of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) on the long-term outcome on ABO-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplantation is not well understood. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term impact of AAMR and risk factors for AAMR in 57 consecutive recipients performed between 1999 and 2004. Nineteen patients (33%) who developed AAMR within 3 months posttransplantation constituted of the AMR group. The graft survival rate was significantly lower in the AMR group (AMR vs. non-AMR, respectively; 5 years: 84% vs. 95%; 8 years: 45% vs. 95%; p = 0.009). The prevalence of transplant glomerulopathy at 1 year posttransplantation was significantly higher in the AMR group (AMR 64% vs. non-AMR 3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anti-blood group IgG antibody titers of 1:32 at the time of transplantation (OR, 9.52; p = 0.041) and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSHA) detected by Luminex single bead method (OR, 5.68; p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for AAMR regardless of baseline anti-blood group IgG antibody titers. Our results indicate that AAMR has a heavy impact on the long-term outcome and preoperative DSHA appears to have a more significant association with poor graft outcomes than anti-blood group antibodies, even in ABOI kidney transplantation.

Poor graft outcome in recipients with de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after living related kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now widely recognized as a major problem in organ transplantation. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between newly developing anti-HLA antibodies post-transplantation (de novo Abs) and the outcome of living related kidney transplantation (LRKT). The subjects included 87 patients who had received living donor kidney allografts at our institution. Panel reactive Ab assay (Flow-PRA) and graft biopsies were performed in all the recipients before and 6 months after the LRKT. The incidence of AMR, the donor specificity and time of appearance of the de novo Abs were retrospectively studied. Among the 87 LRKT recipients, 47 (54%) showed negative/negative (N/N) results, 15 (17%) showed positive/positive (P/P) results, 12 (14%) showed positive/negative results (P/N), and 13 (15%) showed negative/positive (N/P) results (de novo Abs) in the pre-/post-transplant Flow-PRA analysis. Among the 13 cases with de novo Abs, 5 (38%) had donor-specific Abs (DSA) and the remaining 8 (62%) had nondonor-specific Abs, as determined by LAB single antigen analysis. Eighty percent of the recipients with DSA showed evidence of AMR in the graft biopsies. The 5-year graft survival rate of the recipients with de novo Abs (N/P) was 69%, as compared with 96% in the N/N, 88% in the P/N and 93% in the P/P recipient groups (P = 0.009). LRKT recipients developing de novo Abs, especially those with DSA, showed a much higher incidence of AMR and a worse prognosis. Cautious monitoring for the appearance of anti-HLA Abs should be adopted after transplantation, even in patients without anti-HLA Abs prior to the transplantation.