Molecular diagnosis of renal-allograft rejection: correlation with histopathologic evaluation and antirejection-therapy resistance

Imaging and monitoring of granzyme B in the immune response

Significant progress has been made in tumor immunotherapy that uses the human immune response to kill and remove tumor cells. However, overreactive immune response could lead to various autoimmune diseases and acute rejection. Accurate and specific monitoring of immune responses in these processes could help select appropriate therapies and regimens for the patient and could reduce the risk of side effects. Granzyme B (GzmB) is an ideal biomarker for immune response, and its peptide substrate could be coupled with fluorescent dyes or contrast agents for the synthesis of imaging probes activated by GzmB. These small molecules and nanoprobes based on PET, bioluminescence imaging, or fluorescence imaging have proved to be highly GzmB specific and accuracy. This review summarizes the design of different GzmB-responsive imaging probes and their applications in monitoring of tumor immunotherapy and overreactive immune response. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging.

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs) and Kidney Transplantation: An Overview

Involvement of T lymphocytes in kidney transplantation is a well-developed topic; however, most of the scientific interest focused on the different type of CD4+ lymphocyte subpopulations. Few authors, instead, investigated the role of CD8+ T cells in renal transplantation and how deleterious they can be to long-term allograft survival. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the CD8+ T cells involvement in the transplantation field with the aim to investigate the immunological mechanisms underlying the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and their biological functions in human kidney allografts. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the role of allo-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) CD8⁺ subset in allograft kidney recipients and their related clinical complications.

Molecular Analysis of Renal Allograft Biopsies: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?

A renal core biopsy for histological evaluation is the gold standard for diagnosing renal transplant pathology. However, renal biopsy interpretation is subjective and can render insufficient precision, making it difficult to apply a targeted therapeutic regimen for the individual patient. This warrants a need for additional methods assessing disease state in the renal transplant. Significant research activity has been focused on the role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection. The identification of specific molecular expression patterns in allograft biopsies related to different types of allograft injury could provide valuable information about the processes underlying renal transplant dysfunction and can be used for the development of molecular classifier scores, which could improve our diagnostic and prognostic ability and could guide treatment. Molecular profiling has the potential to be more precise and objective than histological evaluation and may identify injury even before it becomes visible on histology, making it possible to start treatment at the earliest time possible. Combining conventional diagnostics (histology, serology, and clinical data) and molecular evaluation will most likely offer the best diagnostic approach. We believe that the use of state-of-the-art molecular analysis will have a significant impact in diagnostics after renal transplantation. In this review, we elaborate on the molecular phenotype of both acute and chronic T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection and discuss the additive value of molecular profiling in the setting of diagnosing renal allograft rejection and how this will improve transplant patient care.

Liposomal Delivery Improves the Efficacy of Prednisolone to Attenuate Renal Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Systemic exposure to high-dose corticosteroids effectively combats acute rejection after kidney transplantation, but at the cost of substantial side effects. In this study, a murine acute renal allograft rejection model was used to investigate whether liposomal-encapsulated prednisolone (LP) facilitates local exposure to enhance its therapeutic effect.

Methods.

Male BalbC recipients received renal allografts from male C57BL/6J donors. Recipients were injected daily with 5 mg/kg cyclosporine A and received either 10 mg/kg prednisolone (P), or LP intravenously on day 0, 3, and 6, or no additional treatment. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed on day 6 to study allograft perfusion and organs were retrieved on day 7 for further analysis.

Results.

Staining of polyethylene-glycol-labeled liposomes and high performance liquid chromatography analysis revealed accumulation in the LP treated allograft. LP treatment induced the expression of glucocorticoid responsive gene Fkbp5 in the allograft. Flow-cytometry of allografts revealed liposome presence in CD45⁺ cells, and reduced numbers of F4/80⁺ macrophages, and CD3⁺ T-lymphocytes upon LP treatment. Banff scoring showed reduced interstitial inflammation and tubulitis and fMRI analysis revealed improved allograft perfusion in LP versus NA mice.

Conclusions.

Liposomal delivery of prednisolone improved renal bio-availability, increased perfusion and reduced cellular infiltrate in the allograft, when compared with conventional prednisolone. Clinical studies should reveal if treatment with LP results in improved efficacy and reduced side effects in patients with renal allograft rejection.

Transcriptome Analysis in Renal Transplant Biopsies Not Fulfilling Rejection Criteria

The clinical significance of renal transplant biopsies displaying borderline changes suspicious for T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) or interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) with interstitial inflammation has not been well defined. Molecular profiling to evaluate renal transplant biopsies using microarrays has been shown to be an objective measurement that adds precision to conventional histology. We review the contribution of transcriptomic analysis in surveillance and indication biopsies with borderline changes and IFTA associated with variable degrees of inflammation. Transcriptome analysis applied to biopsies with borderline changes allows to distinguish patients with rejection from those in whom mild inflammation mainly represents a response to injury. Biopsies with IFTA and inflammation occurring in unscarred tissue display a molecular pattern similar to TCMR while biopsies with IFTA and inflammation in scarred tissue, apart from T-cell activation, also express B cell, immunoglobulin and mast cell-related genes. Additionally, patients at risk for IFTA progression can be identified by genes mainly reflecting fibroblast dysregulation and immune activation. At present, it is not well established whether the expression of rejection gene transcripts in patients with fibrosis and inflammation is the consequence of an alloimmune response, tissue damage or a combination of both.

A novel approach reveals that HLA class 1 single antigen bead-signatures provide a means of high-accuracy pre-transplant risk assessment of acute cellular rejection in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is associated with complications after kidney transplantation, such as graft dysfunction and graft loss. Early risk assessment is therefore critical for the improvement of transplantation outcomes. In this work, we retrospectively analyzed a pre-transplant HLA antigen bead assay data set that was acquired by the e:KID consortium as part of a systems medicine approach.

RESULTS

The data set included single antigen bead (SAB) reactivity profiles of 52 low-risk graft recipients (negative complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, PRA < 30%) who showed detectable pre-transplant anti-HLA 1 antibodies. To assess whether the reactivity profiles provide a means for ACR risk assessment, we established a novel approach which differs from standard approaches in two aspects: the use of quantitative continuous data and the use of a multiparameter classification method. Remarkably, it achieved significant prediction of the 38 graft recipients who experienced ACR with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (sensitivity = 76.5%, specificity = 88.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The resultant classifier achieved one of the highest prediction accuracies in the literature for pre-transplant risk assessment of ACR. Importantly, it can facilitate risk assessment in non-sensitized patients who lack donor-specific antibodies. As the classifier is based on continuous data and includes weak signals, our results emphasize that not only strong but also weak binding interactions of antibodies and HLA 1 antigens contain predictive information.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00724022 . Retrospectively registered July 2008.

Histopathological analysis of infiltrating T cell subsets in acute T cell-mediated rejection in the kidney transplant

AIM

To compare the differential immune T cell subset composition in patients with acute T cell-mediated rejection in the kidney transplant with subset composition in the absence of rejection, and to explore the association of their respective immune profiles with kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS

A pilot cross-sectional histopathological analysis of the immune infiltrate was performed using immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 14 patients with acute T cell-mediated rejection in the kidney transplant and 7 kidney transplant patients with no rejection subjected to biopsy to investigate acute kidney transplant dysfunction. All patients were recruited consecutively from 2012 to 2014 at the Singapore General Hospital. Association of the immune infiltrates with kidney transplant outcomes at up to 54 mo of follow up was also explored prospectively.

RESULTS

In comparison to the absence of rejection, acute T cell-mediated rejection in the kidney transplant was characterised by numerical dominance of cytotoxic T lymphocytes over Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells, but did not reach statistical significance owing to the small sample size in our pilot study. There was no obvious difference in absolute numbers of infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells and Th17 cells between the two patient groups when quantified separately. Our exploratory analysis on associations of T cell subset quantifications with kidney transplant outcomes revealed that the degree of Th17 cell infiltration was significantly associated with shorter time to doubling of creatinine and shorter time to transplant loss.

CONCLUSION

Although this was a small pilot study, results support our suspicion that in kidney transplant patients the immune balance in acute T cell-mediated rejection is tilted towards the pro-rejection forces and prompt larger and more sophisticated studies.

Subclinical Rejection in Renal Transplantation: Reappraised

Short-term outcomes in renal transplantation have improved significantly in the past few years. However, the improvement in long-term outcomes has been modest. The reasons for graft failure beyond the first year of transplantation have been attributed to several different factors. We believe that subclinical rejection (SCR) may be 1 of the factors that contribute to graft loss in the long run. We also believe that there are data to suggest that SCR leads to progressive fibrosis and loss of graft function. This has been demonstrated even in patients who have mild degrees of subclinical inflammation. This review outlines the major studies that have been published on this important topic. It also outlines potential risk factors for the development of SCR. The current approach and diagnostic methods are discussed as well as their pros and cons. Newer noninvasive methods of diagnosis as well as molecular diagnostics and their merits and shortcomings are also discussed in some depth. Thus, the proposed state of the art review on SCR will create a renewed interest at all levels including transplant clinicians, transplant researchers, pharmaceutical industries as well as regulatory organizations.

Diagnostic Performance of Fas Ligand mRNA Expression for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The value of Fas ligand (FASL) as a diagnostic immune marker for acute renal rejection is controversial; this meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of FASL in acute renal rejection.

Methods

The relevant literature was included by systematic searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Accuracy data for acute rejection (AR) and potential confounding variables (the year of publication, area, sample source, quantitative techniques, housekeeping genes, fluorescence staining, sample collection time post-renal transplantation, and clinical classification of AR) were extracted after carefully reviewing the studies. Data were analyzed by Meta-DiSc 1.4, RevMan 5.0, and the Midas module in Stata 11.0 software.

Results

Twelve relevant studies involving 496 subjects were included. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio, together with the 95% CI were 0.64 (0.57–0.70), 0.90 (0.85–0.93), 5.66 (3.51–9.11), 0.30 (0.16–0.54), and 30.63 (14.67–63.92), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9389. Fagan’s nomogram showed that the probability of AR episodes in the kidney transplant recipient increased from 15% to 69% when FASL was positive, and was reduced to 4% when FASL was negative. No threshold effect, sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses based on the potential variables had a significant statistical change for heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests the diagnostic potential for FASL mRNA detection as a reliable immune marker for AR in renal allograft recipients. Further large, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate the power of this test marker in the non-invasive diagnosis of AR after renal transplantation.

A Meta-analysis of the Significance of Granzyme B and Perforin in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin (PRF) could serve as noninvasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplant. Yet, their noninvasive diagnostic value in clinical practice is still unknown.

METHODS

To assess the noninvasive diagnostic performance of GZMB and PRF for AR, we performed a systematic search. After reviewing published studies in which both GZMB and PRF were detected, data on the diagnostic accuracy of separate and combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF were pooled.

RESULTS

Across 16 studies (680 subjects), summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For overall GZMB analysis, the indices were 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.58 (3.36-6.25), and 0.32 (0.22-0.47), respectively. For overall PRF analysis, the indices were 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.82 (3.66-6.35), and 0.26 (0.18-0.37), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results compared to overall study analyses. In analyses of combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF, the above indices were 0.65 (0.53-0.76), 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 12.66 (5.83-27.50), and 0.40 (0.23-0.69), respectively, when both markers were positive. The probability of developing AR in kidney transplant recipients increased from 15% to 73% when both GZMB and PRF tests were positive and was reduced to 2% if that were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, neither GZMB nor PRF, if evaluated alone, could be a convincing noninvasive diagnostic marker for AR in clinical practice. Combined use of PRF and GZMB post-kidney transplant may be a better choice in AR evaluation to direct allograft biopsy execution and earlier therapeutic intervention.

Fas/Fas Ligand pathways gene polymorphisms in pediatric renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

An essential milestone in pediatric transplantation is to find noninvasive biomarkers to monitor acute rejection (AR). In this retrospective (Case-control) study, we examined the role of Fas -670A/G and Fas Ligand (FasL) -843C/T gene polymorphisms in allograft nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

In 47 pediatric kidney transplant recipients and 20 healthy controls, Fas -670A/G and FasL -843C/T gene polymorphisms as well as serum soluble Fas Ligand level (sFasL) were measured.

RESULTS

Serum sFasL levels were significantly higher in transplant recipients children than that in controls (548.25±298.64pg/ml vs 143.17±44.55pg/ml, p=0.0001). There was no significant difference between patients with AR and those without AR in regards to serum sFasL levels (567.70±279.87pg/ml vs 507.85±342.80pg/ml, p=0.56). Fas -670A/G genotypes or alleles were not significantly different between controls and transplant recipients and among transplant recipients with and without AR. (P>0.05 for all). FasL -843C/T genotypes were not different between transplant recipients and controls and among transplant recipients with and without AR (P>0.05 for all). However, Frequency of C allele in transplant patients was significantly higher than that in the control group (44.68% vs 25%, P=0.03). FasL -843C/T alleles were significantly different between patients with and without AR (P=0.03). The percentages of C allele were higher in children with AR (58.82% vs 36.67%). We found that serum FasL and serum creatinine were variables that were independently associated with AR.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that FasL gene polymorphisms in peripheral blood might be accurate in detecting cellular AR.

Transplant biopsy beyond light microscopy

Despite its long-standing status as the diagnostic "gold standard", the renal transplant biopsy is limited by a fundamental dependence on descriptive, empirically-derived consensus classification. The recent shift towards personalized medicine has resulted in an increased demand for precise, mechanism-based diagnoses, which is not fully met by the contemporary transplantation pathology standard of care. The expectation is that molecular techniques will provide novel pathogenetic insights that will allow for the identification of more accurate diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets. Here we review the current state of molecular renal transplantation pathology. Despite significant research activity and progress within the field, routine adoption of clinical molecular testing has not yet been achieved. The recent development of novel molecular platforms suitable for use with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue will offer potential solution for the major barriers to implementation. The recent incorporation of molecular diagnostic criteria into the 2013 Banff classification is a reflection of progress made and future directions in the area of molecular transplantation pathology. Transcripts related to endothelial injury and NK cell activation have consistently been shown to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection. Prospective multicenter validation and implementation of molecular diagnostics for major entities remains an unmet clinical need in transplantation. It is expected that an integrated system of transplantation pathology diagnosis comprising molecular, morphological, serological, and clinical variables will ultimately provide the greatest diagnostic precision.

Circulating biomarkers of tolerance

On the basis of reviewed literature here we describe models of tolerance and summarize the evidence of circulating biomarkers suitable for the assessment of immunological risk in organ transplantation. We focused on results of evaluation of specific peripheral immune cell populations and transcripts in peripheral blood of operationally tolerant liver and kidney transplant recipients. Validation of described markers to define potentially tolerant patients before their use in clinical trials is critical.

Renalomics: Molecular Pathology in Kidney Biopsies

In this article, various omics technologies and their applications in renal pathology (native and transplant biopsies) are reviewed and discussed. Despite significant progress and novel insights derived from these applications, extensive adoption of molecular diagnostics in renal pathology has not been accomplished. Further validation of specific applications leading to increased diagnostic precision in a clinically relevant way is ongoing.

Array-based methods for diagnosis and prevention of transplant rejection

DNA microarray is a microhybridization-based assay that is used to simultaneously study the expression of thousands of genes, thus providing a global view of gene expression in a tissue sample. This powerful technique has been adopted by many biomedical disciplines and will likely have a profound impact on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of human diseases. This review article presents an overview of the application of microarray technology to the field of solid-organ transplantation.

Gene expression analysis by qPCR in clinical kidney transplantation

Patients with a kidney transplant may encounter chronic dysfunction of their graft. Once damage in the graft has established, therapeutic intervention is less efficient. Clinical parameters and morphologic evaluation of biopsies are used for determining diagnosis and prognosis of the patient. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) may be integrated in clinical practice to facilitate routine diagnostics, risk assessment with respect to graft outcome, and determination of the response to therapy by the patient. The success of qPCR assays is highly dependent on the adequacy of the methodological procedures performed. Here, we describe tips and tricks for processing patient material, RNA analysis, and qPCR primer design and gene expression analyses.

Molecular markers of rejection and tolerance: lessons from clinical research

In terms of finding specific molecular markers associated with graft outcome, attempts have been made to study whole genome transcripts using microarray assays or to study the effect of number of genes of interest using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Using these techniques, molecular phenotypes of rejection have been characterized, and the variability of the clinical outcome besides similar morphology explained in part. Recently, several specific transcripts including naïve B cell regulation have been identified in the peripheral blood of operationally tolerant kidney transplant recipients. The decrease in immature B cell-related transcripts in the peripheral blood in patients with immunosuppression was shown to be associated with acute rejection. Similarly, tolerance-associated antigen 1 transcripts were identified in biopsies and regulatory T cell transcripts in urine and biopsies in patients without rejection. Better understanding of molecular processes associated with allograft rejection or alloantigen hyporesponsiveness/tolerance may help to improve our knowledge about graft pathology and identify novel markers suitable for future monitoring and guided therapy and finally improve the outcome of kidney transplantation.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction profiling of immunomarkers in rejecting kidney allografts for predicting response to steroid treatment

BACKGROUND

Steroid-resistant acute rejection is a risk factor for inferior renal allograft outcome.

METHODS

From 873 kidney transplant recipients (1995-2005), 108 patients with a first rejection episode were selected for study using strict inclusion criteria and clinical endpoint definition. We aimed to predict response to corticosteroid treatment using gene expression of 65 transcripts. These reflect cytokines, chemokines, and surface and activation markers of various cell types including T cells, macrophages, B cells, and granulocytes. Steroid resistance (40% of the patients) was defined as requirement for antithymocyte globulin treatment within 2 weeks after corticosteroid treatment.

RESULTS

None of the clinical and histomorphologic parameters showed a significant association with response to treatment. Univariate logistic regression analysis resulted in 11 messenger RNA markers, including T-cell-related transcripts CD25, lymphocyte activation gene-3, Granzyme B, and interleukin-10, and macrophage-specific transcripts mannose receptor and S100 calcium-binding protein A9, which significantly discriminated steroid resistant from steroid-responsive rejections (P<0.05). In multivariate logistic regression, the combination of T-cell activation markers CD25:CD3e ratio (odds ratio, 8.7; confidence interval, 2.4-31.2) and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (odds ratio, 3.3; confidence interval, 1.4-7.7) represented the best predictive model for steroid response (P<0.0001). Specificity and sensitivity were 78% and 60%, respectively. After internal stratified 10-fold cross-validation, the model remained significant. Inclusion of clinical variables into the model with molecular variables did not enhance prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in intragraft expression profiles reflect variability in the response to antirejection treatment. In acute rejection, molecular markers, particularly those reflecting T-cell activation, offer superior prognostic value compared with conventional parameters.

Identifying biomarkers as diagnostic tools in kidney transplantation

There is a critical need for biomarkers for early diagnosis, treatment response, and surrogate end point and outcome prediction in organ transplantation, leading to a tailored and individualized treatment. Genomic and proteomic platforms have provided multiple promising new biomarkers during the last few years. However, there is still no routine application of any of these markers in clinical transplantation. This article will discuss the existing gap between biomarker discovery and clinical application in the kidney transplant setting. Approaches to implementing biomarker monitoring into clinical practice will also be discussed.

Role of T cells in graft rejection and transplantation tolerance

Transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage organ failure, but organ survival is limited by immune rejection and the side effects of immunosuppressive regimens. T cells are central to the process of transplant rejection through allorecognition of foreign antigens leading to their activation, and the orchestration of an effector response that results in organ damage. Long-term transplant acceptance in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy remains the ultimate goal in the field of transplantation and many studies are exploring potential therapies. One promising cellular therapy is the use of regulatory T cells to induce a state of donor-specific tolerance to the transplant. This article first discusses the role of T cells in transplant rejection, with a focus on the mechanisms of allorecognition and the alloresponse. This is followed by a detailed review of the current progress in the field of regulatory T-cell therapy in transplantation and the translation of this therapy to the clinical setting.

Recent developments in kidney transplantation--a critical assessment

Rapid advances have been made in decreasing acute rejection rates and improving short-term graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. Whether these advances ultimately will lead to a commensurate improvement in long-term survival is not yet known. In recent years, greater attention has been placed on defining the precise etiology of graft loss, determining how far and with what agents we can minimize immunosuppression, and delineating the nature of both T-cell-mediated as well as antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, with the growing disparity of available organs and patients in need of a transplant, greater attention has been placed on optimizing allocation. In this minireview, we will focus on developments over the last couple of years, paying particular attention to insights, studies and observations that may attempt to elucidate some of these open questions.

Intragraft mRNA cytotoxic molecule expression in renal allograft recipients

The gene expression of the cytotoxic T-cell molecules perforin, granzyme B and Fas ligand are associated with acute rejection in renal allograft recipients. Several immune mechanisms are linked to severe systemic inflammation in brain-dead organ donors. We examined the mRNA expression of these T-cell activation biomarkers in donor kidney biopsies to evaluate if they could separate living from deceased donors and primary graft function from delayed graft function or acute rejection in the early post transplantation period. We obtained 139 cadaveric and 19 living donor kidney core biopsies post reperfusion and 78 renal allograft biopsies taken because of graft dysfunction. RNA was isolated from tissue samples and mRNA encoding perforin, granzyme B or Fas ligand and a constitutively expressed cyclophilin B, a reference gene, was measured with the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay, and the levels of expression was correlated with allograft status. We did not find statistically significant differences in gene expression of perforin, granzyme B or Fas ligand among deceased and living donor kidneys and the mRNA expression of these cytotoxic molecules in donor kidney biopsies did not distinguish primary allograft function or early acute rejection. Significant differences were found between acute rejection (n=17) and zero-hour samples and acute rejection and non-rejection (n=41) samples for all 3 measured transcripts. No significant difference was found between acute borderline rejection (n=16) and non-rejection samples. In conclusion, effector molecules secreted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes were not activated in deceased donor kidneys and the genes did not classify the post-transplant course.

Intragraft levels of Foxp3 mRNA predict progression in renal transplants with borderline change

The optimal therapeutic management of borderline lymphocytic infiltrates in renal allografts, described by Banff criteria, is unknown, largely because of the inability to predict clinical outcome in these cases. For determination of molecular factors that may predict outcome in cases of borderline change histology, mRNA levels of Foxp3, Granzyme B, IFN-gamma, IL-23, and RORgammat were measured in renal tissue from 46 untreated patients. Twenty-five patients were considered "nonprogressive," defined by a serum creatinine that remained <110% of baseline during the 40 d after biopsy. Twenty-one patients were considered "progressive," defined by an increase in serum creatinine >110% from baseline and by repeat histologic examination within 40 d showing progression toward acute rejection. Only Foxp3 mRNA levels were significantly higher in nonprogressors than in progressors (P = 0.001). Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that the outcome for patients with biopsies showing borderline change could be predicted with 90% sensitivity and 79.1% specificity using the optimal Foxp3 mRNA cutoff value. Our findings suggest that the measurement of Foxp3 mRNA offers a means of improving prediction of outcome of borderline change.

Kidney transplantation: mechanisms of rejection and acceptance

We describe the molecular and cellular mechanisms believed to be responsible for the rejection of renal allografts, including acute T cell-mediated rejection, acute antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection, rejection mediated by the innate immune system, and chronic rejection. We present mechanisms of graft acceptance, including accommodation, regulation, and tolerance. Studies in animals have replicated many pathologic features of acute and chronic rejection. We illuminate the pathogenesis of human pathology by reflection from experimental models.

Non-invasive diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplants with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) often occurs in kidney transplants from deceased donors. We wanted to provide studies giving more accurate non-invasive tests for acute rejection (AR). Using real-time PCR, we examined the expression of cytolytic molecules such as perforin, granzyme B, and fas-ligand along with serpin proteinase inhibitor-9. We also measured the expression of FOXP3, a characteristic gene of T-regulatory cells known to be involved in AR. These studies were conducted on peripheral blood monocytes, urinary cells, and 48 surveillance kidney biopsies taken from a total of 35 patients with DGF. Of these patients, 20 had a histopathological diagnosis of AR, whereas other 28 had characteristics of acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Expression of cytolytic and apoptotic-associated genes in the biopsy tissue, peripheral blood leukocytes, and urinary cells was significantly higher in patients with AR than that in patients with ATN. Diagnostic parameters associated with FOXP3 gene expression were most accurate in peripheral blood leukocytes and urine cells with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy between 94 and 100%. Our study shows that quantification of selected genes in peripheral blood leukocytes and urinary cells from renal transplant patients with DGF may provide a useful and accurate non-invasive diagnosis of AR.

Tim-3 expression in human kidney allografts

BACKGROUND

Tim-3 was recently described as a Th1-specific molecule, participating in the regulation of immune responses and in the induction of allograft tolerance. Here, we studied Tim-3 mRNA expression together with molecular markers of T-cell activation and cytotoxicity, in rejected human kidney grafts.

METHODS

Twenty human kidney grafts that had undergone nephrectomy due to an irreversible acute rejection episode were studied. We quantified intragraft expression of Tim-3, granzyme B, perforin, IFN-gamma and Fas-ligand mRNA by real-time RT-PCR, with probes and primers TaqMan. Protocol biopsies were studied as controls. Statistical analyses were performed to compare groups, and to investigate the potential association with gene transcripts measures and rejection.

RESULTS

All molecules studied were up-regulated in the rejection group compared with controls (p<0.001). Acute rejection type III (Banff 97) profiles were associated with higher values, where granzyme B and perforin presented the highest (5672.51+/-9002.16 and 1866.59+/-2426.38, respectively) and Tim-3 had the lowest ones (166.62+/-174.94). Tim-3 had also a lower expression in those patients that did not respond to anti-rejection therapy. There was a positive correlation between Tim-3 and IFN-gamma mRNA expression levels (r(2)=0.73; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results corroborate the concept that acute rejection is an active process, where inflammatory as well as regulatory factors have their roles. Severe episodes of acute rejection were associated with higher expression of cytotoxic molecules and lower expression of potential regulatory molecule.

The Regulatory/Cytotoxic Graft-Infiltrating T Cells Differentiate Renal Allograft Borderline Change From Acute Rejection

The interpretation of cellular infiltrate from renal transplant recipients with borderline (BL) changes is still a challenging problem. To analyze the immune phenotype of such infiltrate, we quantified the mRNA expression of Foxp3 and interleukinL-10 and granzyme B (GB) in 15 kidney biopsies with BL changes. Controls were patients presenting type IA acute rejection and nonrejecting patients. Only levels of GB mRNA correlated significantly with response to antirejection therapy. Levels of Foxp3 mRNA in BL changes were intermediate between type IA acute rejection and nonrejecting controls. To determine the balance of alloagressive to graft-protecting T cells, we quantified the Foxp3/GB ratio. BL changes T cells infiltrate expressed a significantly higher Foxp3/GB ratio than that in IA acute rejection. These results suggest that T cell infiltrate from BL change exhibit a tolerogenic rather than a cytotoxic phenotype.

Tolerance in Heart Transplantation: The Holy Grail, or an Attainable Goal?

The father of cardiac transplantation, Norman Shumway, famously predicted that tolerance was the future of the field, and always would be. Although his prediction remains true to date, significant progress has been made toward this goal, the "Holy Grail" for transplant clinicians. Current efforts are fueled by disappointing long-term outcomes associated with chronic immunosuppression, and the promise that partial or complete tolerance will impact long-term results favorably. This article provides a clinical definition of tolerance primarily based on lessons learned from animal heart allograft models. It reviews several promising strategies for inducing tolerance and detecting its presence through the use of biomarkers in peripheral blood or the graft, and outlines a possible path toward making this vision a clinical reality.

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Cellular and Antibody-Mediated Rejection by Perforin and Granzyme B in Renal Allografts

A major milestone in transplantation would be the use of biomarkers to monitor rejection. We examined the association between perforin and granzyme-B gene expression detected in the peripheral blood of renal allograft recipients with cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. Furthermore, we judged the appropriateness of assigning negative rejection statuses to persons without a biopsy whose grafts were functioning well clinically. Of the 46 patients who completed the study, recipients with cellular rejection had higher perforin and granzyme-B levels compared with nonrejectors (p = 0.006). Interestingly, recipients with antibody-mediated rejection also had higher perforin and granzyme-B levels compared with nonrejectors (p = 0.04). Patients with high levels of granzyme B had a probability of rejecting that was 26.7 times greater than those patients with low levels of granzyme B. Perforin and granzyme B had sensitivities of 50% and specificities of 95% in predicting rejection (cutoff value = 140). Assigning negative rejection statuses to recipients without a biopsy whose grafts were functioning well did not have a major effect on the direction or significance of covariate values. This study suggests that perforin and granzyme-B gene expressions in peripheral blood are accurate in detecting both cellular and antibody-mediated rejection.

Molecular approaches to chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The progression of chronic kidney disease to terminal renal failure remains a major challenge in nephrology. Definition of the dynamic differences in gene regulation, protein interaction and protein function in this process might allow the development of rationally designed management strategies for the individual patient. Current approaches to identifying the molecular markers required to implement this 'personalized medicine' concept in progressive renal failure will be presented in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

In small populations, molecular fingerprints derived from renal biopsies have allowed the definition of distinct patient subgroups. These parameters could be shown to correlate with the response to available therapies and, in chronic transplant failure, with the therapeutic toxicity of cyclosporine. Urine analysis for mRNA and protein markers is rapidly evolving as a non-invasive approach for molecular patient monitoring. As only a small fraction of these fingerprints have been evaluated in independent populations, studies to test marker sets in diverse cohorts for their clinical applicability are warranted.

SUMMARY

The genome-wide tools discussed in this review might define the molecular mechanism active in each single patient with progressive kidney disease. Reflecting the individuality of the disease process could result in a tailored therapy for the unique human being, contrasting with the 'one-size-fits-all' therapies currently employed in nephrology.

Renal allograft biopsies with borderline changes: predictive factors of clinical outcome

The clinical outcome and appropriate management for patients showing 'borderline changes' on allograft biopsy after renal transplantation is still controversial. In an attempt to identify predictive factors of clinical outcome of patients with such lesions, we reviewed the clinical course of 91 patients with borderline changes. Multivariate analysis revealed significant and independent effects of histological stage (i + t < or = or > 2) and time to borderline changes (< or = or > 3 months after transplant) on serum creatinine levels at 1 year from borderline changes episodes (respectively, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02) and only a significant effect of time to borderline changes on serum creatinine levels at 2 years (p = 0.005). Renal function at 1 year and 2 years as 5- and 8-year graft survival were not significantly different in the group of patients treated with antirejection therapy (T group, n = 49) compared with the untreated group (UT group, n = 42). This study strongly suggests that borderline changes with histological score (i + t) > 2 and late episodes of borderline changes should be considered to be of poor prognosis.

Perforin, Granzyme B, and fas ligand for molecular diagnosis of acute renal-allograft rejection: analyses on serial biopsies suggest methodological issues

BACKGROUND

The Perforin-Granzyme B and Fas/Fas Ligand apoptotic mechanisms are involved in the development of acute renal rejection (AR). We describe our experience of analyzing the expression of cytotoxic T-lymphotoxins (CTL) in biopsies and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) for the diagnosis of AR.

METHODS

We analyzed Perforin (P), Granzyme B (GB) and Fas Ligand (FL) expression in 68 renal biopsies and 64 PBL using comparative kinetic RT-PCR and, for GAPDH and FL, we also replicated with real-time RT-PCR. The levels of expression were measured in different groups, such as T0 (biopsies before reperfusion and PBL in recipient before the transplant [Tx]), Td (biopsies and PBL collected for clinical purposes) and Tp (biopsies and PBL two months after Tx).

RESULTS

A higher CTL expression was seen in non-rejecting (NR) biopsies in the first 2 months after Tx. P and FL were significantly more expressed during AR in all biopsies and in Td, while P remained upregulated in Tp. In PBL, there was no significant increase in CTL transcription during AR. A variable expression of CTL emerged in all T0 biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Two lytic pathways are activated in biopsies when AR occurs shortly after Tx, whereas the P/GB mechanism prevails if it occurs later on. Only P and FL in biopsies might be able to predict AR diagnosis, but with a considerable variability in each sample, possibly due to the small portion of tissue core, which may be inadequate for molecular diagnosis. CTL expression in PBL does not correlate with histological AR.