Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Risks of Acute Rejection and Delayed Graft Function after Kidney Transplantation

The role of hyperleptinaemia and low values of interleukin 10 in de novo DSA production after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

White adipose tissue secretes a number of peptide hormones. The aim of this paper was to determine the role of leptin, adiponectin and interleukin-10 and interleukin-6 on the development of graft rejection in protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In a prospective analysis (n = 104), we monitored the values of leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, and IL-10 prior to the transplantation and in the 3rd month after the transplantation. The protocol biopsy of the graft was performed in the 3rd month after the transplantation. The group was divided into the following according to the biopsy result: negative result, IFTA 1, borderline, and DSA positive.

RESULTS

After adjusting for the differences in the baseline recipient and donor characteristics, we identified the hyperleptinaemia baseline (HR = 2.0444, P = 0.0341) and month 3 (HR = 49.8043, P < 0.0001) as independent risk factors for borderline changes in the protocol biopsy. The hyperleptinaemia baseline (HR = 7.4979, P = 0.0071) and month 3 (HR = 9.7432, P = 0.0057) are independent risk factors for de novo DSA positivity. A low value of IL-10 month 3 is a risk factor for de novo DSA positivity (HR = 3.0746, P = 0.0388).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher leptin levels and low values of IL-10 might play a role in rejection and de novo DSA production.

TNF-α -308A/G SNP association with kidney allograft rejection in Algerian population: A retrospective case-control study

No consensus has been reached regarding the association beween the -308A/G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the tumor necrosis factor-α gene (TNFA) and kidney allograft rejection (KAR). Our retrospective case-control study aimed to assess the association of the SNP with KAR in Algerian patients who underwent kidney transplantation. The study enrolled 313 Algerian patients: 58 kidney-transplant recipients without rejection events (PWoR); 58 kidney-transplant recipients with at least one rejection event, with or without graft loss (PWR); and 197 healthy individuals (HI). The TNFA -308A/G SNP was genotyped using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. The results demonstrated that, the frequencies of TNFA -308A allele and AA genotype were higher in the PWR than in the HI groups (p = 0.001, OR = 2.26, CI = 1.33-3.77 and p = 0.0004, OR = 5.53, CI-1.89-16.6, respectively). Furthermore, the frequencies were higher among the PWR than among the PWoR groups (p = 0.001, OR = 3.29, CI = 1.56-7.21 and p = 0.0006, OR = 28.26, CI = 1.62-493.2, respectively), particularly among PWR patients with de novo anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies (PG-a-HLA-Ab). However, the frequency of TNFA -308G allele was lower in the PWR group than in the PWoR group (p = 0.001, OR = 0.3, CI = 0.1-0.64) and the HI group (p = 0.001, OR = 0.44, CI = 0.27-0.44). Our results suggest an association of the TNFA -308A/G alleles with KAR in Algerian patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Carriers of TNFA -308A allele who have PG-a-HLA-Ab might have a higher risk, whereas TNFA -308G allele carriers could have a lower risk of KAR. Thus, therapeutic strategies can be adapted to minimize KAR risk in patients who have a genetic proclivity for increased pro-inflammatory TNF-α activity.

Donor genetic variants in interleukin-6 and interleukin-6 receptor associate with biopsy-proven rejection following kidney transplantation

Rejection after kidney transplantation remains an important cause of allograft failure that markedly impacts morbidity. Cytokines are a major player in rejection, and we, therefore, explored the impact of interleukin-6 (IL6) and IL-6 receptor (IL6R) gene polymorphisms on the occurrence of rejection after renal transplantation. We performed an observational cohort study analyzing both donor and recipient DNA in 1271 renal transplant‐pairs from the University Medical Center Groningen in The Netherlands and associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with biopsy-proven rejection after kidney transplantation. The C-allele of the IL6R SNP (Asp358Ala; rs2228145 A > C, formerly rs8192284) in donor kidneys conferred a reduced risk of rejection following renal transplantation (HR 0.78 per C-allele; 95%-CI 0.67–0.90; P = 0.001). On the other hand, the C-allele of the IL6 SNP (at position-174 in the promoter; rs1800795 G > C) in donor kidneys was associated with an increased risk of rejection for male organ donors (HR per C-allele 1.31; 95%-CI 1.08–1.58; P = 0.0006), but not female organ donors (P = 0.33). In contrast, neither the IL6 nor IL6R SNP in the recipient showed an association with renal transplant rejection. In conclusion, donor IL6 and IL6R genotypes but not recipient genotypes represent an independent prognostic marker for biopsy-proven renal allograft rejection.

Precision Medicine in Kidney Transplantation: Just Hype or a Realistic Hope?

Desirable outcomes including rejection- and infection-free kidney transplantation are not guaranteed despite current strategies for immunosuppression and using prophylactic antimicrobial medications. Graft survival depends on factors beyond human leukocyte antigen matching such as the level of immunosuppression, infections, and management of other comorbidities. Risk stratification of transplant patients based on predisposing genetic modifiers and applying precision pharmacotherapy may help improving the transplant outcomes. Unlike certain fields such as oncology in which consistent attempts are being carried out to move away from the "error and trial approach," transplant medicine is lagging behind in implementing personalized immunosuppressive therapy. The need for maintaining a precarious balance between underimmunosuppression and overimmunosuppression coupled with adverse effects of medications calls for a gene-based guidance for precision pharmacotherapy in transplantation. Technologic advances in molecular genetics have led to increased accessibility of genetic tests at a reduced cost and have set the stage for widespread use of gene-based therapies in clinical care. Evidence-based guidelines available for precision pharmacotherapy have been proposed, including guidelines from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, and the US Food and Drug Administration. In this review, we discuss the implications of pharmacogenetics and potential role for genetic variants-based risk stratification in kidney transplantation. A single score that provides overall genetic risk, a polygenic risk score, can be achieved by combining of allograft rejection/loss-associated variants carried by an individual and integrated into practice after clinical validation.

Analysis of 75 Candidate SNPs Associated With Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Validation of rs2910164 in MicroRNA MIR146A

BACKGROUND

Identifying kidney allograft recipients who are predisposed to acute rejection (AR) could allow for optimization of clinical treatment to avoid rejection and prolong graft survival. It has been hypothesized that a part of this predisposition is caused by the inheritance of specific genetic variants. There are many publications reporting a statistically significant association between a genetic variant, usually in the form of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and AR. However, there are additional publications reporting a lack of this association when a different cohort of recipients is analyzed for the same single-nucleotide polymorphism.

METHODS

In this report, we attempted to validate 75 common genetic variants, which have been previously reported to be associated with AR, using a large kidney allograft recipient cohort of 2390 European Americans and 482 African Americans.

RESULTS

Of those variants tested, only 1 variant, rs2910164, which alters the expression of the microRNA MIR146A, was found to exhibit a significant association within the African American cohort. Suggestive variants were found in the genes CTLA and TLR4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that most variants previously reported to be associated with AR were not validated in our cohort. This shows the importance of validation when reporting the associations with complex clinical outcomes such as AR. Additional work will need to be done to understand the role of MIR146A in the risk of AR in kidney allograft recipients.

AGT haplotype in ITGA4 gene is related to antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant patients

Introduction

One of the main problems involved in heart transplantation (HT) is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Many aspects of AMR are still unresolved, including its etiology, diagnosis and treatment. In this project, we hypothesize that variants in genes involved in B-cell biology in HT patients can yield diagnostic and prognostic information about AMR.

Methods

Genetic variants in 61 genes related to B-cell biology were analyzed by next generation sequencing in 46 HT patients, 23 with and 23 without AMR.

Results

We identified 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms in ITGA4 gene (c.1845G>A, c.2633A>G, and c.2883C>T) that conformed the haplotype AGT-ITGA4. This haplotype is associated with the development of AMR. Moreover, AMR patients with the haplotype AGT-ITGA4 present lower levels of integrin α-4 in serum samples compared to the reference GAC haplotype in control patients.

Conclusion

We can conclude that polymorphisms in genes related to the biology of B-cells could have an important role in the development of AMR. In fact, the AGT haplotype in ITGA4 gene could potentially increase the risk of AMR.

Relationship between TGF-β1 + 869 T/C and + 915 G/C gene polymorphism and risk of acute rejection in renal transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) + 869 T/C gene polymorphism, + 915 G/C gene polymorphism, and the susceptibility of acute rejection in the recipients with renal transplantation.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched and identified from the Cochrane Library and PubMed, and eligible investigations were recruited and data were calculated by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, we found no relationship between either TGF-β1 + 869 T/C or TGF-β1 + 915 G/C gene polymorphism and acute rejection susceptibility in patients with renal transplantation. No association between either gene polymorphism and acute rejection susceptibility in patients with renal transplantation in Caucasian, Asian, or African populations individually was found.

CONCLUSION

The TGF-β1 + 869 T/C and + 915 G/C gene polymorphisms are not associated with acute rejection susceptibility in recipients with renal transplantation.

Genetic Polymorphism in Cytokines and Costimulatory Molecules in Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplantation

There is growing evidence supporting the genetic variability outside of HLA system that is contributing to the variation in transplant outcomes. Determining novel predictors could help to identify patients at risk and tailor their immunosuppressive regimens. This article discusses the various single nucleotide polymorphisms in costimulatory molecules and cytokines that have been evaluated for their effect on transplantation. An overview of how gene polymorphism studies are conducted and factors to consider in the experimental design to ensure meaningful data can be concluded are discussed.

A porcine model to study the effect of brain death on kidney genomic responses

Introduction

A majority of transplanted organs come from donors after brain death (BD). Renal grafts from these donors have higher delayed graft function and lower long-term survival rates compared to living donors. We designed a novel porcine BD model to better delineate the incompletely understood inflammatory response to BD, hypothesizing that adhesion molecule pathways would be upregulated in BD.

Methods

Animals were anesthetized and instrumented with monitors and a balloon catheter, then randomized to control and BD groups. BD was induced by inflating the balloon catheter and animals were maintained for 6 hours. RNA was extracted from kidneys, and gene expression pattern was determined.

Results

In total, 902 gene pairs were differently expressed between groups. Eleven selected pathways were upregulated after BD, including cell adhesion molecules.

Conclusions

These results should be confirmed in human organ donors. Treatment strategies should target involved pathways and lessen the negative effects of BD on transplantable organs.

Genome-wide association studies in kidney transplantation: Advantages and constraints

Since the discovery of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, the role of HLA molecules in the field of transplantation has been appreciated: better matching leads to better graft function. Since then, the association of other genetic polymorphisms with clinical outcome has been investigated in many studies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent a powerful tool to identify causal genetic variants, by simultaneously analyzing millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms scattered across the genome. GWAS in transplantation may indeed be useful to reveal novel markers that may potentially be involved in the mechanism of allograft rejection and graft failure. However, the relevance of GWAS for risk stratification or donor selection for an individual patient is limited as is already reflected by the fact that many parameters, significant in one study, cannot be confirmed in another one.

Genetics of acute rejection after kidney transplantation

Treatment of acute rejection (AR) following kidney transplantation has improved in recent years, but there are still limitations to successful outcomes. This review article covers literature in regard to recipient and donor genetics of AR kidney and secondarily of liver allografts. Many candidate gene and some genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been conducted for AR in kidney transplantation. Genetic associations with AR in kidney and liver are mostly weak, and in most cases, the associations have not been reproducible. A limitation in the study of AR is the lack of sufficiently large populations that account for population stratification to study the AR phenotype which in this era occurs in <10% of transplants. Furthermore, the AR phenotype has been difficult to define and the definitions of classifications have evolved over time. Literature related to the pharmacogenomics of tacrolimus is robust and has been validated in many studies. Associations between gene expression and AR are emerging as markers of outcomes and AR classification. In the future, combinations of pretransplant genotype for AR risk prediction, genotype-based immune suppressant dosing, and pharmacogenomic markers to select AR maintenance or treatment and expression markers from biopsies may provide valuable clinical tools for guiding treatment.

Genetic predictors of long-term graft function in kidney and pancreas transplant patients

Kidney and pancreas transplantation have helped transform the lives of people with end-stage renal failure and individuals with type 1 diabetes who have poor glycaemic control/severe secondary complications, respectively. Despite an improvement in immunosuppressive regimes, operative techniques and decreased initial rejection rates, there has been little improvement in long-term graft survival rates over the past decade. Whilst limited progress has been made in establishing clinical markers of graft function, several genetic markers of long-term graft function have been identified. These genetic markers have the potential to (i) assist in selecting marginal donor organs for transplantation, (ii) provide better understanding of the mechanisms behind graft loss enabling identification of new, or repurposing, current treatments to extend graft function and (iii) provide a window of opportunity to identify and treat individuals before graft failure has occurred. This review will discuss the different genetic variants screened for a role in predicting transplant longevity, examine their findings and limitations and introduce where the future of genetic research within the transplantation field lies.

Association Between Cytokines and Their Receptor Antagonist Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical Risk Factors and Acute Rejection Following Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND Acute rejection (AR) after renal transplantation affects both patient and graft survival. There is growing evidence of the genetic association between cytokine or its receptor antagonist and AR in solid organ transplantation. The objectives of this study were to investigate the role of recipient TNF β, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra) gene polymorphism, as well as traditional clinical variables such as panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels, donor type, and HLA mismatches in AR following renal transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS TNF β (+252A/G), IL-10 (-592A/C), IL-1β (-511C/T) and IL-1ra (86 bp VNTR) gene polymorphisms were determined in 195 renal allograft recipients with and without AR, using PCR. Both these genotypic variants and clinical risk factors were investigated for correlation with AR within the first year after renal transplantation. RESULTS Patients with increased pre-transplant PRA levels (P<0.001) and donor type (P=0.012) were prone to the development of AR. After adjusting for all variables of P<0.2, a PRA level >10% (OR=4.515, 95% confidence intervals=1.738-11.727, P=0.002) and the receipt of a graft from a donation after cardiac death (DCD) donor (OR=2.437, 95% confidence intervals=1.047-5.673, P=0.039) remained significantly associated with AR in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. No correlation could be found between recipients with an episode and absence of acute rejection and the gene polymorphisms of these cytokines investigated in the present study. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the presence of increased pre-transplant levels of PRA and the receipt of a graft from DCD donor other than cytokine gene polymorphisms are significant risk factors for AR in renal transplantation. To reduce the occurrence of AR, clinicians should take necessary measures to lower the PRA levels and pay more attention to patients who received a graft from a DCD donor.

The Polymorphism -308G/A of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Gene Modulates the Effect of Immunosuppressive Treatment in First Kidney Transplant Subjects Who Suffer an Acute Rejection

The -308G/A SNP of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) gene affects TNF-α production. As its impact on transplant outcome remains open to debate, we decided to genotype it in a cohort of transplant subjects. A retrospective analysis of 439 first kidney recipients randomly divided into two subgroups (discovery and validation cohorts) was performed to identify the best predictors of acute rejection (AR). The effect on transplant outcome was analyzed by an adjusted logistic regression model. Carriers of the A allele, associated with elevated TNF-α production, presented a higher risk of AR (OR = 2.78; 95% CI = 1.40-5.51). Logistic regression analyses for AR showed an interaction between the polymorphism and treatment with thymoglobulin (p-interaction = 0.03). In recipients who did not receive thymoglobulin, carriers of A allele had higher risk of AR (OR = 4.05; 95% CI = 1.76-9.28). Moreover, carriers of A allele not treated with thymoglobulin presented higher risk of AR than those who received thymoglobulin (OR = 13.74; 95% CI = 1.59-118.7). The AUC of the model in the discovery cohort was 0.70 and in the validation cohort was 0.69. Our findings indicate that the -308G/A TNF-α polymorphism is associated with AR risk and it modulates the effectiveness of thymoglobulin treatment. This pharmacogenetic effect lets us propose this SNP as a useful predictor biomarker to tailor immunosuppressive regimens.

Monitoring alloimmune response in kidney transplantation

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is generally performed by protocols and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients are likely to receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. Developing reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival. Emerging data indicate that many assays, likely used in panels rather than single assays, have potential to be diagnostic and predictive of short and also long-term outcome. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Of note, some prospective, randomized, multicenter biomarker-driven studies are currently on-going aiming at confirming such preliminary data. These works as well as other future studies are highly warranted to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 gene polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to adverse long-term allograft outcomes in non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients

Although the genetic polymorphism of Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 (SDF-1) is associated with higher mortality of liver allograft recipients, the role of SDF-1 in the modulation of renal allograft outcomes is unclear. Between March 2000 and January 2008, we recruited 252 non-diabetic renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Baseline characteristics and blood chemistry were recorded. Genomic DNA extraction with polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was utilized to analyze the genetic polymorphisms of SDF-1 (rs1801157). The influence of SDF-1 on an adverse renal allograft outcome, defined as either a doubling of serum creatinine, graft failure, or patient death was evaluated. Sixteen patients with the SDF-1 AA/AG genotype and nine with the SDF-1 GG genotype reached an adverse outcome. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients carrying the SDF-1 AA/AG genotype or A allele showed a significantly higher risk of reaching an adverse outcome than those carrying the SDF-1 GG genotype or G allele (p=0.041; p=0.0051, respectively; log rank test). Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis revealed that patients carrying the SDF-1 AA/AG genotype and A allele had a 2.742-fold (95% CI. 1.106-6.799, p=0.03) and 2.306-fold (95% CI. 1.254-4.24, p=0.008) risk of experiencing an adverse outcome. The SDF-1 AA/AG genotype and A allele have a detrimental impact on the long-term outcome of RTRs.

Association between transforming growth factor beta-1 +869T/C polymorphism and acute rejection of solid organ allograft: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Transforming growth factor beta-1(TGFB1) is involved in the acute rejection (AR) episodes of solid organ transplant recipients. However, results from published studies on the association between donor/recipient TGFB1 +869T/C polymorphism and AR risk are conflicting and inconclusive.

METHODS

PUBMED, EMBASE, CNKI and Wanfang Database were searched to identify eligible studies investigating the association between donor/recipient TGFB1 +869T/C polymorphism and AR risk. Statistical analysis was performed by using STATA 10.0.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included. Overall, the donor TGFB1 +869T/C polymorphism was significantly associated with AR risk in heterozygote comparison (CT vs. TT: OR = 1.67, 95%CI, 1.17-2.39; P heterogeneity=0.285) and dominant model (CC vs.

TC/TT

OR = 1.47, 95%CI, 1.05-2.06; P heterogeneity=0.445). In addition, subgroup analysis revealed that CT variant (CT vs. TT: OR = 1.97, 95%CI, 1.20-3.25; P heterogeneity = 0.777) and CC/CT genotype (CC/CT vs. TT: OR = 1.72, 95%CI, 1.07, 2.78; P heterogeneity = 0.619) within donors contributed to higher risk of AR in recipients administrated with CsA or FK506, compared with those applied only CsA. On the other hand, no significant association between recipient TGFB1 +869T/C polymorphism and AR was detected in all genetic models.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis and systematic review suggested that donor TGFB1 +869T/C polymorphism was significantly associated with AR of solid organ transplant recipients, and especially among patients in CsA/FK 506 group compared with those in CsA group.

Noninvasive methods to assess the risk of kidney transplant rejection

In current clinical practice, immune reactivity of kidney transplant recipients is estimated by monitoring the levels of immunosuppressive drugs, and by functional and/or histological evaluation of the allograft. The availability of assays that could directly quantify the extent of the recipient's immune response towards the allograft would help clinicians to customize the prescription of immunosuppressive drugs to individual patients. Importantly, these assays might provide a more in-depth understanding of the complex mechanisms of acute rejection, chronic injury, and tolerance in organ transplantation, allowing the design of new and potentially more effective strategies for the minimization of immunosuppression, or even for the induction of immunological tolerance. The purpose of this review is to summarize results from recent studies in this field.

Increased resistin in brain dead organ donors is associated with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Resistin increases during several inflammatory diseases and after intracerebral bleeding or head trauma. Resistin activates the endothelium and may initiate an inflammatory response. No data are available on resistin in brain dead donors (DBD) that regularly manifest a pronounced inflammatory state.

METHODS

We analyzed plasma resistin in 63 DBDs and correlated results with donor variables and the postoperative course following kidney transplantation using organs from these donors. Endocan and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 were also studied. Twenty-six live kidney donors (LD) and the corresponding kidney transplantations were used as controls.

RESULTS

DBDs had higher resistin (median/range 30.75 ng/ml, 5.41-173.6) than LD (7.71 ng/ml, 2.41-15.74, p < 0.0001). Resistin in DBD correlated with delayed graft function (DGF) in the kidney recipients (r = 0.321, p < 0.01); receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an area under the curve of 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.648-0.881, p < 0.01) and a cut-off value for resistin of 25 ng/ml; MCP-1 and endocan were higher in DBDs (p < 0.0001) but did not correlate with DGF or acute rejection. No relationship was found between the studied molecules and the postoperative course of LD kidney transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

High resistin levels in the DBD before organ retrieval are associated with DGF after kidney transplantation. The resistin increase seems related to the inflammatory state after brain death but not to the cause of death.

Association between interferon gamma +874 T>A polymorphism and acute renal allograft rejection: evidence from published studies

Interferon gamma is involved in the acute rejection (AR) episodes of transplant recipients. However, results from published studies on the association of interferon gamma (IFNG) +874 T>A (rs2430561) polymorphism with AR of renal allograft are conflicting. To investigate the association between IFNG +874 T>A polymorphism with AR after renal transplantation, relevant studies were selected from PUBMED, EMBASE, Wanfang database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure until March 1st 2013. According the predesigned selection criteria, a total of 525 AR cases and 1,126 non-AR cases from 13 case-control studies were included to identify the strength of association with odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). Overall, a significant correlation between IFNG +874 T>A polymorphism and susceptibility to AR was detected (T allele vs. A allele: OR = 1.19, 95 % CI 1.02-1.38; TT/AT vs. AA: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.07-1.73; TT vs. AA: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.05-1.93; AT vs. AA: OR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.01-1.68). In addition, ethnicity subgroup analysis revealed that high produce genotype (TT/AT) was associated with an increased risk of AR for Caucasians (TT/AT vs. AA: OR = 1.56, 95 % CI 1.14-2.12; TT vs. AA: OR = 1.64, 95 % CI 1.18-2.26). Furthermore, donor source subgroup analysis observed an increased risk for patients undergoing cadaveric kidney transplantation (TT/AT vs. AA: OR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.12-3.24; TA vs. AA: OR = 2.16, 95 % CI 1.24-3.74). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that IFNG +874 T>A polymorphism was associated with AR of renal transplant recipients, especially among Caucasians and those receiving cadaveric renal allograft. Additional well-designed studies with large sample size are warranted to validate our conclusion.

Genetic Predisposition and Renal Allograft Failure

Renal allograft rejection or dysfunction often results in graft failure, and remains the major obstacle in the success of renal transplantation. Various immunological and nonimmunological factors are involved in allograft rejection. In addition to human leukocyte antigen loci, several genetically controlled molecules have been identified in recent years as playing important roles in the process of rejection. Genetic variants in genes encoding different T-helper (Th) type 1 and Th2 cytokines, chemokines and their receptors, growth factors, molecules of the renin-angiotensin system, enzymes of the homocysteine pathway, and proteins acting as substrates of immunosuppressive drugs impact on the success of engraftment and highlight the concept of genetic predisposition to allograft rejection. This review evaluates specific genetic variants and their functional roles in graft failure, with an emphasis on the latest methodologies available for genotyping, and appropriate strategies to enable them to become a tool of predictive and individualized medicine to ensure better transplant outcome.

Introduction to genetic processes in transplantation

Recent investigations have explored how analyses of genetic DNA from organ donors and recipients may be helpful during organ allocation so as to reduce graft rejection or improve dosing of immunosuppressive medications. This discussion reviews those data and the processes by which genetic coding controls the production of protein that is important in cellular structure and function during donor and recipient care. Changes in gene structure (polymorphisms or mutations) may occur spontaneously or as a result of cell interactions with environmental factors, and may be associated with recognized diseases or, potentially, could reduce or worsen graft rejection.

Association between IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism and acute rejection of renal allograft: evidence from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Results from published studies on the association of donor or recipient IL-6 -174G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism with acute rejection (AR) of renal allograft are conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the possible association.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching PUBMED and EMBASE until July 1, 2011. Meta-analysis was performed in a fixed/random effects model using Revman 5.0.25 and STATA10.0.

RESULTS

Seven studies addressing the association between donor high producer genotype (G/G and G/C) of IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism and acute rejection of renal allograft were identified. Pooled OR based on 341 cases (whose recipient developed acute rejection) and 702 controls (whose recipient did not develop acute rejection) was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.26-1.33; p=0.20), with a strong between-study heterogeneity. No association was observed in the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity. 13 studies evaluating the association between recipient IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism and acute rejection were identified. Pooled OR based on 451 cases (patients did not develop acute rejection) and 848 controls was 1.00 (95% CI=0.72-1.37; p=0.98), with a weak between-study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor high producer genotype (G/G and G/C) of IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism had a tendency of decreased risk for acute rejection, although it was not statistically significant. Recipient high producer genotype was not associated with acute rejection of renal allograft. Additional well designed studies with larger sample size are needed to support our findings, especially for the association between donor high producer genotype (G/G and G/C) of IL-6 -174G/C polymorphism and acute renal allograft rejection.

Validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients using a large multi-center cohort

There have been numerous reports proposing a statistically significant association between a genetic variant, usually in the form of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and acute rejection (AR). Unfortunately, there are additional publications reporting a lack of association with AR when a different cohort of recipients was analyzed for the same SNP. The objective of this report was to attempt replication of these published finding in our own kidney allograft recipient cohort. We analyzed 23 genetic variants, previously reported to have a significant association with AR, using a cohort of 969 clinically well-defined kidney transplant recipients. Only one SNP, rs6025 (Leiden mutation), within the coagulation factor V gene, showed a significant association with a P-value of 0.011 in a race-adjusted analysis and a P-value of 0.0003 in multiple variable analysis. An additional SNP, rs11706052 in IMPDH2, gave a modest P-value of 0.044 using multiple variable analysis, which is not significant when multiple testing is taken into consideration. Our results suggest that careful validation of previously reported associations with AR is necessary, and different strategies other than candidate gene studies can help to identify causative genetic variants associated with AR.

Biological modulation of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biological modulation of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury holds the potential to reduce the incidence of early graft dysfunction and to safely expand the donor pool with kidneys that have suffered prolonged ischemic injury before organ recovery.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the current review, we will discuss clinical studies that compare kidney transplant recipients with and without early graft dysfunction in order to elucidate the pathophysiology of ischemic acute allograft injury. We will specifically review the mechanisms leading to depression of the glomerular filtration rate and activation of the innate immune system in response to tissue injury.

SUMMARY

We conclude that the pathophysiology of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation is complex and shares broad similarity with rodent models of ischemic acute kidney injury. Given the lack of specific therapies to prevent delayed graft function in transplant recipients, comprehensive efforts should be initiated to translate the promising findings obtained in small animal models into clinical interventions that attenuate ischemic acute kidney injury after transplantation.

Monitoring the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A fundamental goal in transplantation is the establishment of allograft function without ongoing immunosuppression. Robust allograft tolerance has been established in experimental transplantation models, whereas clinical operational tolerance has been described most frequently following human liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical assessment of tolerance has been limited to laboratory evaluation of organ function. Additional tools include graft monitoring through biopsy and blood sampling for biomarker analysis. Current biomarkers under assessment in recent years include dendritic cell subsets, regulatory T cells, antidonor antibodies, and gene polymorphisms. Emerging microarray analysis that is being prospectively validated will also be reviewed. A further tool in the characterization of the tolerant patient will be the accurate enrollment of such patients into a multicenter registry that will prospectively follow the natural history of the patient withdrawn from immunosuppression and help facilitate the entry of interested patients to mechanistic and immune monitoring trials. The International Solid Organ Transplant Tolerance Registry (www.transplant-tolerance.org) will be briefly described.

SUMMARY

Effective biomarker characterization of the operationally tolerant liver allograft recipient would allow earlier, well tolerated, prospective drug withdrawal with the goal of extending the potential benefits of drug minimization to an increasing number of patients in a more predictable fashion.

Immunogenetic characteristics of patients with autoimmune gastritis

AIM: To explore whether predisposition to autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is found in human leukocyte antigen (HLA), cytokine or killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene variations.

METHODS: Twelve Finnish patients with autoimmune-type severe atrophy of the gastric corpus were included. The patients’ serum was analyzed for pepsinogen I and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibodies. DNA was separated and the patients were genotyped for HLA-A, B, Cw, DRB1 and DQB1 antigens, and studied for single nucleotide polymorphisms for the following cytokines: interleukin (IL)-1 gene cluster, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, interferon γ, transforming growth factor β, and tumor necrosis factor α. Variation in KIR genes was also explored. The results were compared with prevalence of the polymorphisms in Finnish or European populations.

RESULTS: All patients had pepsinogen I levels below normal (mean: 11 μg/L, range: < 5 to 25 μg/L). Three patients had elevated H. pylori IgG antibodies, while H. pylori serology was negative in the rest of the patients. AIG patients carried significantly more often HLA-DRB1*04 (58%) and DQB1*03 (83%) than the general Finnish population did (28% and 51%, respectively; P = 0.045 and 0.034 by the Fisher’s exact test). No patient was positive for HLA-B8-DRB1*03, a well-established autoimmune marker. Neither cytokine polymorphisms nor KIR gene variation showed association with AIG.

CONCLUSION: As explored with modern DNA-based methods, HLA-DRB1*04 and DQB1*03 alleles, but not HLA-B8-DRB1*03, may predispose to AIG.

Association of pro/anti-inflammatory cytokine gene variants in renal transplant patients with allograft outcome and cyclosporine immunosuppressant levels

T-helper (Th) type 1/Th2 cytokines are key mediators in induction/effecter phases of all immune and inflammatory responses playing role in acute/chronic renal allograft rejection. Association studies lead to identification of patient risk profiles enabling individualization of level of immunosuppressions. We investigated the association of allograft rejection with interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) −308, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (C-del, codon 10 and 25) gene variants in 184 renal transplant recipients and 180 controls. These cytokine genotypes were also evaluated with cyclosporine levels (C2) at one month in 135 stable recipients. High producing genotypes B1B1 of IL-4 and AA of TNF-α α308 showed significant association with rejection of allograft. The dose-adjusted C2 levels were significantly lower in patients with the high producing genotype T/T of IL-2 and heterozygous G/C of TGF-β codon 25 (P = 0.012 and 0.010, respectively). Haplotype frequencies were comparable in subjects for TGF-β codon-10 and 25. Combined inter-gene interaction showed high risk for rejection in recipients with high producing genotype B1B1 of IL-4 and AA of TNF-α and high TNF-α (AA) with low TGF-β (CC or Pro/Pro). In conclusion, association of IL-4 VNTR and TNF-α −308 suggested the involvement of these cytokines contributing to pathogenesis of allograft rejection. Recipients with TT genotype of IL-2 and GC of TGF-β codon 25 having low C2 levels may require higher cyclosporine dosage. Combined analysis of gene-gene interaction demonstrated synergistic effect of cytokines increasing risk for rejection. Thus, this information may help in pre-assessment of allograft outcome and to optimize cyclosporine therapy in post-transplant patients.

Immunoregulatory role of TNFalpha in inflammatory kidney diseases

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), a pleiotropic cytokine, plays important inflammatory roles in renal diseases such as lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis and renal allograft rejection. However, TNFalpha also plays critical immunoregulatory roles that are required to maintain immune homeostasis. These complex biological functions of TNFalpha are orchestrated by its two receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2. For example, TNFR2 promotes leukocyte infiltration and tissue injury in an animal model of immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis. On the other hand, TNFR1 plays an immunoregulatory function in a murine lupus model with a deficiency in this receptor that leads to more severe autoimmune symptoms. In humans, proinflammatory and immunoregulatory roles for TNFalpha are strikingly illustrated in patients on anti-TNFalpha medications: These treatments are greatly beneficial in certain inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis but, on the other hand, are also associated with the induction of autoimmune lupus-like syndromes and enhanced autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis patients. The indication for anti-TNFalpha treatments in renal inflammatory diseases is still under discussion. Ongoing clinical trials may help to clarify the potential benefit of such treatments in lupus nephritis and ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Overall, the complex biology of TNFalpha is not fully understood. A greater understanding of the function of its receptors may provide a framework to understand its contrasting proinflammatory and immunoregulatory functions. This may lead the development of new, more specific anti-inflammatory drugs.

The impact of immune gene polymorphisms in kidney and liver transplantation

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, it has become clear that genetic variation exists among individuals that can affect functional gene expression. This finding raises the possibility that differences in genetic phenotypes may account for the interindividual responses seen in the context of the alloimmune response. This review highlights studies examining the relative role of immunologic gene polymorphism in the context of renal and liver transplant outcomes (eg, acute rejection and graft survival). Furthermore, it examines the limitations and pitfalls in the study designs and concludes with the potential of single nucleotide polymorphism analysis in the future care of transplant recipients.

Genetic prediction of renal transplant outcome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the present study, we reviewed recent publications regarding potential genetic predictors of transplant outcome, including acute rejection, metabolism of immunosuppressive medications, long-term transplant outcome, and posttransplant complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies are based on the candidate gene analysis; specifically, cytokine genes and innate immune response molecules present popular targets for studies of acute rejection and long-term outcome. Pharmacogenomic studies are mostly focused on the genes of drug targets or the corresponding enzymes metabolizing the drug. Posttransplant complications (i.e. infections, diabetes, and malignancies) are associated with a variety of genes of different pathways. Most of the studies are based on just recipient, but not donor, genotype analysis. Positive results are balanced by reports of no association when evaluating the same genetic polymorphisms. Some of the reports might be affected by insufficient study design, including small sample size, lack of adjustment for potential confounders, and multiple comparisons.

SUMMARY

The field remains controversial because of differences in populations, study design, and statistical methods. Studies are based on candidate gene analysis; however, genome-wide association studies are lacking. Future research should be directed at better designed studies, larger sample size, evaluating both recipients and donors, and implementation of genome-wide association studies.

Association of C-509T and T869C polymorphisms of transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with chronic allograft nephropathy and graft survival in Korean renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) has been associated with the promotion of renal allograft interstitial fibrosis and thereby chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The literature on TGF-beta1 polymorphisms and their importance in graft survival and CAN is not conclusive.

METHODS

TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms (C-509T and T869C) were examined in a group of 207 Korean renal transplant recipients using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. The CAN group (n = 18) was defined by a typical biopsy confirming CAN or chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. The rest of the patients were classified into the No CAN group (n = 189).

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the genotype distributions of both C-509T and T869 polymorphisms between the two groups. Allele frequencies and age-, sex-, HLA mismatch-adjusted odds ratio of each genotype as assessed by logistic regression analysis were also not significantly different between the two groups. Linkage disequilibrium coefficients between polymorphisms indicated that investigated polymorphisms of TGF-beta1 (D' = 0.98) were in tight linkage. However, there were no significant differences in the frequencies of the reconstructed haplotypes between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests did not indicate any statistically significant effects of TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms on graft survival.

CONCLUSION

TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms (C-509T, T869C) are not significantly associated with an increased risk of development of CAN and graft survival in Korean renal transplant recipients.

Influence of cytokine and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 gene polymorphisms on acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation

Immune response regulation by cytokines is a key to understanding AGR. The influence of the functional polymorphisms in genes coding for TNF-alpha (-308G > A), IL-10 (-819C > T, and -1082A > G), IFN-gamma [(CA)n], TGF-beta1 (+869T > C), and iCAM-1 (R241G and E469K), in addition to HLA and gender matching on the presentation of AGR in 51 pediatric renal recipients during a 36-month post-transplantation follow-up were analyzed. Also, donors and a control group were genotyped. All groups were within Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for all polymorphisms except IL-10-819C > T and TNF-alpha (p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively) in recipients. Transplants with gender mismatch showed a higher risk for AGR than those between individuals with gender match (OR, 4.227; p = 0.010). Recipients with a high-production compared with low-production TNF-alpha allele experienced earlier AGR (p = 0.030), and those with high-production alleles of both TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma showed a further increased risk (OR = 11.129, p = 0.024). These findings support the notion that a single genotype cannot by itself explain an event as complex as AGR. The sum or combination of different specific alleles of these genes could better account for the immune response to an allograft.

Genetic polymorphisms and the fate of the transplanted organ

There has been an abundance of publications describing genetic variability in molecules affecting innate and adaptive immunity, pharmacogenetics, and other nonimmunological factors like the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system, coagulation, and fibrosis markers. Studies indicated some associations between polymorphisms in these candidate genes with outcomes in organ transplantation and underlined a potential role of genetic variability in transplantation. To be clinically applicable, large prospective studies must be performed to better define the potential benefits of genotyping on these genetic markers and clinical outcomes. The purposes of this review are to summarize recent data describing associations of polymorphisms in both immunological and nonimmunological molecules with transplant outcomes, with a particular emphasis on renal transplantation, and discuss limitations and clinical implications.

Association of four DNA polymorphisms with acute rejection after kidney transplantation

Renal transplant outcomes exhibit large inter-individual variability, possibly on account of genetic variation in immune-response mediators and genes influencing the pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants. We examined 21 polymorphisms from 10 genes in 237 de novo renal transplant recipients participating in an open-label, multicenter study [Cyclosporine Avoidance Eliminates Serious Adverse Renal-toxicity (CAESAR)] investigating renal function and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) with different cyclosporine A regimens and mycophenolate mofetil. Genes were selected for their immune response and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic relevance and were tested for association with BPAR. Four polymorphisms were significantly associated with BPAR. The ABCB1 2677T allele tripled the odds of developing BPAR (OR: 3.16, 95% CI [1.50-6.67]; P=0.003), as did the presence of at least one IMPDH2 3757C allele (OR: 3.39, 95% CI [1.42-8.09]; P=0.006). BPAR was almost fivefold more likely in patients homozygous for IL-10 -592A (OR: 4.71, 95% CI [1.52-14.55]; P=0.007) and twice as likely in patients with at least one A allele of TNF-alpha G-308A (OR: 2.18, 95% CI [1.08-4.41]; P=0.029). There were no statistically significant interactions between polymorphisms, or the different treatment regimens. Variation in genes of immune response and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic relevance may be important in understanding acute rejection after renal transplant.