Improved Renal Function after Conversion from Tacrolimus/Sirolimus to Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Early alteration of kidney function in nonuremic type 1 diabetic islet transplant recipients under tacrolimus-mycophenolate therapy

BACKGROUND

Transplant patients on tacrolimus therapy exhibit a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The type of graft and immune treatment protocol may influence the extent and reversibility of this side effect.

METHODS

The present single-center study is conducted in 48 nonuremic type 1 diabetic recipients of an intraportal islet-cell graft under maintenance immunosuppression (IS) with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Estimated GFR (eGFR) and albuminuria were followed up to 5 years posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Mean eGFR values decreased by 19 mL/min/1.73 m after 1 to 2 weeks of IS (P<0.0001) and then remained stable throughout the complete treatment period. The decrease was related to predose trough tacrolimus concentrations or doses and disappeared upon its discontinuation; it was also associated with the presence of albuminuria at the time of transplantation. Tacrolimus treatment resulted in a reduction of albuminuria; its discontinuation restored albuminuria to the initial levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of tacrolimus in our islet-cell transplant protocol caused an initial 20% reduction in eGFR, which was reversible following its discontinuation, at least within the 5-year follow-up period. The associated reduction in albuminuria was also reversible, compatible with a tacrolimus-induced preglomerular vasoconstriction. These observations support further use of our tacrolimus regimen in this patient population.

Mycophenolate mofetil enhances the negative effects of sirolimus and tacrolimus on rat kidney cell metabolism

Background and Purpose

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) per se is not known to have negative effects on the kidney. MMF alone or in combination with sirolimus, can be the basis of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free, kidney sparing drug protocols. However, long-term outcomes in patients on MMF/SRL seem to be inferior to those treated with regimens that include the CNI tacrolimus (TAC) due to an increased risk of allo-immune reactions. Interestingly, potential enhancement of the negative effects of SRL and TAC on the kidney by MMF has never been considered.

Experimental Approach

It was our aim to study the effects of TAC, SRL and MMF alone and evaluate their interactions when combined on the rat kidney. For this purpose we used a comprehensive molecular marker approach including measurements of urinary 8-isoprostane concentrations (oxidative stress marker) and changes of urinary metabolite patterns (¹H-NMR spectroscopy) and comparing these markers to renal function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)) and morphologic alterations (histology).

Key Results

While MMF alone did not impact GFR, its interaction with SRL and TAC led to a significant decrease of rats’ renal function. The decline went in parallel with a significant increase in urinary isoprostane concentrations and an enhancement of negative effects on urinary metabolite patterns.

Conclusions

In broad summary, the present study showed that MMF may enhance the negative effects of TAC on kidney function and may even display nephrotoxic properties when combined with SRL.

Past, present, and future prospects for inducing donor-specific transplantation tolerance for composite tissue allotransplantation

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is among the most immunologically complex and newest transplant fields. Although the field has made considerable advances, there are still concerns that these procedures are performed to enhance quality-of-life issues and are not lifesaving procedures that restore physiologic function. Two challenges limit the widespread application of CTA; the first is chronic rejection, the most prevailing cause of organ allograft failure after transplantation; the second barrier is the numerous health complications associated with lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. Several tolerance-inducing strategies, including costimulatory blockade, T-cell depletion, mixed chimerism, and gene targeting of transplanted organs, have the potential to induce lifelong tolerance to organ allografts without chronic immunosuppression. Effective clinical tolerance protocols that improve CTA acceptance and offer an alternative to the requirement for chronic immunosuppressive therapy could be a major advance in the field. Tolerance would allow allotransplantation to provide a currently unmet need for reconstruction of large tissue defects. This article reviews the history of CTA, current challenges and complications, and offers future directions for CTA research in strategies to induce tolerance.

Comparable Renal Function at 6 Months with Tacrolimus Combined with Fixed-Dose Sirolimus or MMF: Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial in Renal Transplantation

In a multicenter trial, renal transplant recipients were randomized to tacrolimus with fixed-dose sirolimus (Tac/SRL, N = 318) or tacrolimus with MMF (Tac/MMF, N = 316). Targeted tacrolimus trough levels were lower in the Tac/SRL group after day 14. The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months using creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) and was comparable at 66.4 mL/min (SE 1.4) with Tac/SRL and at 65.2mL/min (SE 1.3) with Tac/MMF (completers). Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 15.1% (Tac/SRL) and 12.3% (Tac/MMF). In both groups, graft survival was 93% and patient survival was 99.0%. Premature withdrawal due to an adverse event was twice as high in the Tac/SRL group, 15.1% versus 6.3%. Hypercholesterolemia incidence was higher with Tac/SRL (P < .05) while CMV, leukopenia, and diarrhea incidences were higher with Tac/MMF (P < .05). The incidence of any antidiabetic treatment for >30 consecutive days in previously nondiabetic patients was 17.8%, Tac/SRL, and 24.8%, Tac/MMF. Evaluation at 6 months showed comparable renal function using tacrolimus/sirolimus and tacrolimus/MMF regimens.

Tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate in kidney transplantation: improved 3-year graft and patient survival in recent era

BACKGROUND

Registry analyses suggest that tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate (MPA) immunosuppression is associated with superior kidney graft survival versus TAC/sirolimus (SRL). Large single-center experience can assist in clarifying these findings, by examining outcomes related to specific utilization practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 518 consecutive first renal transplants at a single center treated with TAC/SRL (n=307) or TAC/MPA (n=211) with prednisone. Graft and patient survival, acute rejection, and 1-year glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were analyzed by era of transplant (2000-2002 vs. 2003-2006). Changes in TAC/SRL utilization between eras included elimination of the SRL loading dose and a reduction in TAC target trough concentrations.

RESULTS

Three-year graft survival with TAC/SRL was lower when first used (2000-2002) because of a higher incidence of patient death, primarily due to cardiovascular causes. Survival improved from 85.3% to 95.9% between 2000 to 2002 and 2003 to 2006 (P=0.001), with comparable graft and patient survival between TAC/SRL and TAC/MPA cohorts, confirmed following multivariable analysis controlling for donor and recipient factors. Rates of BK virus and acute rejection were comparable, but a higher incidence of hyperlipidemia, anemia, posttransplant diabetes, and a lower 1-year GFR (57.6 vs. 63.1 mL/min, P=0.008) was noted in the TAC/SRL cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, as the largest long-term single-center report comparing TAC/SRL with TAC/MPA in kidney transplantation, demonstrate worse patient survival initially with TAC/SRL, with improved outcomes in a later era that were temporally associated with reduced TAC exposure. Differences in cardiovascular risk factors and 1-year GFR highlight the need for further investigation of the optimal utilization of SRL in kidney transplantation.

Therapeutic effect of Tripterygium wilfordii on proteinuria associated with sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used to prevent acute allograft rejection after renal transplantation. Nevertheless, the occurrence of proteinuria has recently been recognized among patients on SRL-based therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F. (T II) on proteinuria associated with SRL in renal transplant recipients. According to accepting T II, 36 recipients were divided into 2 groups: T II group (n = 21) and valsartan group (n = 15). The T II group was administered 1 mg/kg/d, and the valsartan group, 80 mg twice per day for 12 months. Efficiency was then evaluated. Complete remission: proteinuria decreased by >50%; partial remission: proteinuria decreased by 20% to 50%; ineffective: proteinuria decreased by <20%. Upon 12-month follow-up, the total effective rates in the T II group and the valsartan group were 95.2% and 86.7% (P < .05), respectively. Twenty of 21 patients with proteinuria in the T II group were negative at 3-month follow-up with disappearance of edema. There were some adverse events that had greater incidence rates in the valsartan group compared with the T II group, such as hyperkalemia (26.7% vs 4.8%). We concluded that the application of T II markedly reduced proteinuria associated with SRL in renal transplant patients.

The role of tacrolimus in renal transplantation

Tacrolimus gained FDA approval for use in liver transplantation in 1994 and, approximately 3 years later, was approved for the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplantation. Over the last decade tacrolimus has become the calcineurin inhibitor of choice for the prevention of rejection in renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to provide a review and update of the literature on the use of tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Numerous clinical trials have shown tacrolimus to be superior to cyclosporine in the prevention of acute rejection and recent trials have demonstrated superiority of tacrolimus over cyclosporine in terms of allograft survival. Post-transplant diabetes remains more common with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, despite lower doses of both tacrolimus and corticosteroids. A novel once-daily dosage form of tacrolimus has recently been developed and is approved for use in Europe. Tacrolimus remains an important immunosuppressant for the prevention of acute rejection. The prolonged-release formulation may improve compliance and possibly long-term outcomes.

The effect of medical therapy and islet cell transplantation on diabetic nephropathy: an interim report

BACKGROUND

The effect of islet cell transplantation (ICT) on renal function in type 1 diabetes is uncertain and some recent studies report a significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and worsening of albuminuria.

METHODS

We are conducting a prospective crossover study comparing medical treatment with islet transplantation on the progression of diabetic complications, including renal function. The primary endpoint is change in GFR measured by Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate with secondary endpoints including estimated GFR and albumin excretion.

RESULTS

We have followed 21 patients after islet transplantation a median of 29 months (range 13-45) and compared their results with medically treated patients followed a median 29.5 months (range 13-56). There is no difference in the rate of decline in measured GFR between medically treated patients (-0.35+/-0.89; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.13 mL/min/month/1.73 m) and those after ICT (-0.31+/-1.18; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.01) and neither is significantly different from that expected for the general population. The rate of decline in our estimated GFR results is lower than that reported in other studies and we did not find any worsening of albuminuria.

CONCLUSIONS

We do not find evidence of worsening of renal function after islet transplantation compared with medically treated patients.

Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen to everolimus in renal transplant recipients: effect on renal function and proteinuria

New immunosuppressive agents are being actively researched to avoid complications of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, and posttransplantation cancer. The family of mTOR inhibitors offers a unique immunosuppressive opportunity to avoid CNI toxicity and reduce the incidence of malignancy. Nevertheless, increasing data have demonstrated that sirolimus (SRL), the first mTOR introduced in the treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, induces proteinuria, an adverse event that could produce deterioration of long-term renal function. In this short-term study of patients followed for 1 to 16 months, we examined changes in renal function and proteinuria among renal transplant recipients converted from a CNI-based regimen to an everolimus (EVL)-based one, a recently introduced mTOR inhibitor. Our data showed that renal function can be optimized after conversion to EVL by up to 42% in recipients showing CAN grade 1 or 2, or CNI nephrotoxicity. Importantly, patients who improved their creatinine clearance did not show increased proteinuria measured in a voided specimen as the ratio of urinary protein and creatinine concentration (P/C). These results, if confirmed with long-term follow-up and a larger number of patients, would allow us to consider EVL as a promising agent for maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors for the nephrologist

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the backbone of immunosuppression for most kidney transplant recipients. Despite many years of experience, protocols that optimize efficacy with minimal toxicity remain a subject of debate. Nevertheless, studies of the pharmacokinetic properties of the CNI, particularly cyclosporine, have led to improved dosing strategies. The purpose of this article is to review the current understanding of CNI pharmacokinetics and its relevance to proper dosing and monitoring of these medications. This article also reviews the trials that have helped to define the optimal dosages and discusses the effect of adjunctive immunosuppressive agents on CNI pharmacokinetics and dosing.