A Report of the Lisbon Conference on the Care of the Kidney Transplant Recipient

The EKFC equation outperforms the CKD-EPI and CKiD equations for GFR estimation in adolescent and young adult kidney transplant patients

AIM

This study evaluated the bias and accuracy of the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations compared with the reference exogenous tracer-based assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in adult and pediatric patients according to their renal transplant status.

METHODS

We assessed the bias and P30 accuracy of the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations compared with iohexol-based GFR measurement.

RESULTS

In the overall population (n = 59), the median age was 29 years (IQR, 16.0-46.0) and the median measured GFR was 73.9 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 57.3-84.6). Among non-kidney transplant patients, the median was 77.7 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 59.3-86.5), while among kidney transplant patients, it was 60.5 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 54.2-66.8). The bias associated with the EKFC and CKD-EPI/CKiD equations was significantly higher among kidney transplant patients than among non-kidney transplant patients, with a difference between medians (Hodges-Lehmann) of +10.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI, 2.2-18.9; p = .02) for the EKFC and +12.1 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI, 4.2-21.4; p = .006) for the CKD-EPI/CKiD equations. In multivariable analysis, kidney transplant status emerged as an independent factor associated with a bias of >3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.4-43.3; p = .02) for the EKFC equation and a bias of >13.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (odds ratio, 15.0; 95% CI, 2.6-85.7; p = .002) for the CKD-EPI/CKiD equations.

CONCLUSION

In our study, which included adolescent and young adult kidney transplant patients, both the CKD-EPI/CKiD and EKFC equations tended to overestimate the measured glomerular filtration rate, with the EKFC equation exhibiting less bias. Renal transplant status significantly influenced the degree of estimation bias.

Ensemble of machine learning techniques to predict survival in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients face a high cardiovascular risk, which is a leading cause of death in this patient group. This article proposes the application of clustering techniques and feature selection to predict the survival outcomes of kidney transplant recipients based on machine learning techniques and mainstream statistical methods. First, feature selection techniques (Boruta, Random Survival Forest and Elastic Net) are used to detect the most relevant variables. Subsequently, each set of variables obtained by each feature selection technique is used as input for the clustering algorithms used (Consensus Clustering, Self-Organizing Map and Agglomerative Clustering) to determine which combination of feature selection, clustering algorithm and number of clusters maximizes intercluster variability. Next, the mechanism called False Clustering Discovery Reduction is applied to obtain the minimum number of statistically differentiable populations after applying a control metric. This metric is based on a variance test to confirm that reducing the number of clusters does not generate significant losses in the heterogeneity obtained. This approach was applied to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network medical dataset (n = 11,332). The combination of Random Survival Forest and consensus clustering yielded the optimal result of 4 clusters starting from 8 initial ones. Finally, for each population, Kaplan-Meier survival curves are generated to predict the survival of new patients based on the predictions of the XGBoost classifier, with an overall multi-class AUC of 98.11%.

Characterization of preoperative cardiovascular status and association with outcome following feline renal allograft transplantation: 166 cases

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate preoperative historical, biochemical, and cardiovascular screening data for predictors of survival to discharge and long-term survival in feline renal allograft recipients from 1 institution.

ANIMALS

166 cats that underwent renal transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania between 1998 and 2018.

PROCEDURES

Medical records were reviewed for preoperative historical information, biochemical data, and cardiac assessment including auscultation findings, pre- and postoperative systolic blood pressure measurements, thoracic radiographic evaluation, and echocardiographic measurements. The need for hemodialysis, the number of surgical procedures, native kidney biopsy diagnosis and survival time was also recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate survival plots and estimate median survival times with a 95% CI. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine variables that were independently associated with survival to discharge and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The patient population primarily consisted of adult male DSH cats (70%) diagnosed with IRIS stage 4 CKD (66.3%). Abnormalities identified on preoperative cardiac assessment, including hypertension, the presence of a murmur, echocardiographic changes, and radiographic signs of congestive heart failure, were not associated with survival to discharge or long-term survival. Age was the only single significant variable associated with survival, and the risk of death increased by 11% (95% CI, 6% to 17%) for every 1 year in patient age.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presence of cardiac abnormalities identified during the screening process of cats presenting for transplantation should not immediately exclude a potential candidate for the procedure. Owners considering transplantation should be educated on the impact of age on survival following surgery.

Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation

Cardiac risk assessment before kidney transplantation has become widely accepted. However, the optimal patient selection and screening tool for cardiac assessment remain controversial. Clinicians face several challenges in this process, including the ever-growing pre-transplant population, aging transplant candidates, increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease, and scarcity of donor organs. Optimizing the cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant candidates is necessary to better appropriate limited donor organs and improve patient outcomes. Increasing waiting times from the initial evaluation for transplant candidacy to the actual transplant raises questions regarding re-testing and re-stratification of risk. In this review, we summarize and discuss the current literature on cardiac evaluation prior to kidney transplantation. We also propose simple evidence-based evaluation algorithms for initial and follow-up CAD surveillance in patients being wait-listed for kidney transplantation.

Kidney Transplant List Status and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease frequently undergo preemptive revascularization before kidney transplant listing.

OBJECTIVES

In this post hoc analysis from ISCHEMIA-CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness of Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease), we compared outcomes of patients not listed versus those listed according to management strategy.

METHODS

In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial (n = 777), 194 patients (25%) with chronic coronary syndromes and at least moderate ischemia were listed for transplant. The primary (all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and secondary (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke) outcomes were analyzed using Cox multivariable modeling. Heterogeneity of randomized treatment effect between listed versus not listed groups was assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with those not listed, listed patients were younger (60 years vs 65 years), were less likely to be of Asian race (15% vs 29%), were more likely to be on dialysis (83% vs 44%), had fewer anginal symptoms, and were more likely to have coronary angiography and coronary revascularization irrespective of treatment assignment. Among patients assigned to an invasive strategy versus conservative strategy, the adjusted hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.54) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78-1.37) for those listed and not listed, respectively (pinteraction= 0.68). Adjusted hazard ratios for secondary outcomes were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.55-1.46) in listed and 1.17 (95% CI: 0.89-1.53) in those not listed (pinteraction = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

In ISCHEMIA-CKD, an invasive strategy in kidney transplant candidates did not improve outcomes compared with conservative management. These data do not support routine coronary angiography or revascularization in patients with advanced CKD and chronic coronary syndromes listed for transplant. (ISCHEMIA-Chronic Kidney Disease Trial [ISCHEMIA-CKD]; NCT01985360).

Predictors of postoperative cardiovascular complications up to 3 months after kidney transplantation

Background

Renal transplant patients have a high peri-operative risk for cardiovascular events. Pre-operative screening for cardiac ischaemia might lower this risk, but there are no specific guidelines.

Methods

We conducted a chart review for all renal transplants performed between January 2010 and December 2013. We collected data about patient characteristics, pre-operative cardiac evaluation before referral, diagnostic tests and interventions. Logistic regression analyses were then applied to relate these factors to the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation or admission for heart failure within 3 months after transplantation.

Results

A total of 770 kidney transplants were performed in 751 patients. In 750 cases (97%) a referral to the cardiologist was made. Non-invasive ischaemia detection by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, exercise stress test or dobutamine stress echocardiography was carried out in 631 cases (82%). Coronary angiography was performed in 85 cases, which revealed significant coronary artery disease in 19 cases. Prophylactic revascularisation was done in 7 cases. The incidence of the study endpoint was 8.6%. In multivariable regression analysis, age at transplantation, pre-transplant myocardial infarction or heart failure, post-operative decrease in haemoglobin and positive non-invasive ischaemia testing were significantly associated with the study endpoint. However, when analysed separately, none of the different non-invasive ischaemia detection modalities were related to the study endpoint.

Conclusion

Especially those renal transplant candidates with a cardiac history carry a high risk for a cardiovascular event post-transplantation. Uniformity in cardiac screening of renal transplant candidates and better pre-operative preparation might lower this post-operative risk. Besides, post-transplant anaemia should be prevented.

Assessing cardiovascular risk in the prerenal transplant population: Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary angiography with risk factor stratification

INTRODUCTION

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, it is crucial to evaluate CAD before renal transplantation. This study compares the utility of pharmacologic single-photon emission computed-tomography (SPECT) imaging directly to coronary angiography for diagnosis of CAD with correlation to cardiovascular risk factors.

METHOD

Retrospective review of asymptomatic renal failure patients who underwent both SPECT and coronary angiography to identify obstructive CAD between the years 2008-2016. Ninety-four ESRD subjects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Myocardial perfusion SPECT study found, when compared to coronary angiography demonstrated for CAD, the sensitivity of 93.3% with a specificity of 73.4%. Importantly, the negative predictive value for coronary artery disease was 96%. With seven or more cardiac risk factors, 66.7% of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. Among all the risk factors examined, patients with a previous history of coronary artery disease had a 68% risk of obstructive coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSION

Comparing myocardial perfusion imaging SPECT findings with coronary angiography in patients with ESRD, a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 73% were observed. Of all the risk factors examined, patient with the previous history of CAD was the single most significant risk factor for CAD in 68% of cases.

Cardiac risk assessment for end-stage renal disease patients on the renal transplant waiting list

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality and is becoming more prevalent as the population ages and risk factors increase. This is most apparent in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient population. In part, this is due to cofactors such as diabetes and hypertension commonly predisposing to progressive renal disease, as well as being a direct consequence of having renal failure. Of all major organ failures, kidney failure is the most likely to be managed chronically using renal replacement therapy and, ultimately, transplant. However, lack of transplant organs and a large renal failure cohort means waiting lists are often quite long and may extend to 5-10 years. Due to the cardiac risk factors inherent in patients awaiting transplant, many succumb to cardiac issues while waiting and present an increased per-procedural cardiac risk that extends into the post-transplant period. We aim to review the epidemiology of coronary artery disease in this population and the etiology as it relates to ESRD and its associated co-factors. We also will review the current approaches, recommendations and evidence for management of these patients as it relates to transplant waiting lists before and after the surgery. Recommendations on how to best manage patients in this cohort revolve around the available evidence and are best customized to the institution and the structure of the program. It is not clear whether the revascularization of patients without symptoms and with a good functional status yields any improvement in outcomes. Therefore, each individual case should be considered based on the risk factors, symptoms and functional status, and approached as part of a multi-disciplinary assessment program.

Cardiac Risk Assessment in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Clinical Usefulness of Different Guidelines

Although cardiovascular (CV) assessment is recommended to minimize perioperative risk in all potential kidney transplant recipients, the utility and reliability of various assessment methods are not well established. In this study, we investigated the CV evaluations and outcomes of standardized CV assessment protocols (Lisbon and American Society of Transplantation [AST]) in potential kidney transplant recipients. Data were analyzed for 266 end-stage renal disease patients (mean age 45.4 ± 13 years, female-to-male ratio 126:140) accepted for kidney transplantation wait-listing. Patients were classified as low and high cardiac risk according to their first cardiac evaluation. Major cardiovascular events (CVEs) and deaths were recorded. At the end of follow-up (median 639 days), 72 (27.1%) patients underwent kidney transplantation. A total of 49 patients (18.4%) had CVEs and 42 (15.8%) patients died. Being over 45 years of age and having dialysis vintage over 1 year were found to be independent risk factors for CVEs. Forty-eight out of 60 high-risk patients evaluated with noninvasive tests had negative results. Twelve out of these 48 patients had a CVE in due course. Among 10 patients who underwent coronary angiography, 1 had a CVE and 1 died. The sensitivity and specificity of the AST guidelines (area under the curve = 0.647, P = .005, sensitivity 83%, specificity 54%) were higher than Lisbon. In conclusion, the predictive risk factors for CVEs were age over 45 years and dialysis vintage over a year. Our results also suggest that exercise electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for cardiac evaluation are less sensitive in CVE prediction. We recommend clinicians to use the AST guidelines and to prioritize coronary angiography in pretransplant CV assessment.

Validation of a clinical pathway to assess asymptomatic renal transplant candidates using myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

An AHA/ACCF scientific statement proposed 8 risk factors to assess the need for noninvasive coronary artery disease (CAD) surveillance in asymptomatic patients undergoing evaluation for kidney transplantation. The clinical application of these risk factors and the role of noninvasive testing in this context have not been defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively followed a cohort of 581 consecutive kidney transplant recipients of whom 401 had pre-transplant radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and 90 had pre-transplant coronary angiography. The sum of pre-transplant AHA/ACCF risk factors (age >60 years, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, smoking, dialysis >1 year, left ventricular hypertrophy) was calculated. MPI scans were analyzed by a "blinded" reader. Patients were followed for a mean of 3.7 ± 2.3 years post-transplant for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. The sum of risk factors was associated with modest discriminatory capacity for obstructive angiographic CAD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70; P = 0.004), 30-day post-operative MACE (AUC, 0.60; P = 0.036), and long-term MACE (AUC, 0.63; P < 0.001). A threshold of ≥3 risk factors was optimal for identifying patients at risk. MPI provided incremental predictive value for obstructive CAD (P = 0.02) and long-term MACE (P = 0.04) but not post-operative MACE (P = 0.56). MPI was best predictive of long-term MACE in intermediate risk (3-4 risk factors) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates with ≥3 AHA/ACCF risk factors are at increased cardiac risk, and should be considered for noninvasive CAD surveillance. Intermediate risk patients (3-4 factors) benefit the most from pre-transplant MPI to define long-term MACE risk.

EPURE Transplant (Eplerenone in Patients Undergoing Renal Transplant) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, kidney graft survival has failed to improve during the last decades. Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is one of the main pathophysiological mechanisms underlying delayed graft function, which is associated with poor long-term graft survival. Due to organ shortage, the proportion of grafts from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) is ever growing. These grafts may particularly benefit from IRI prevention. In preclinical models, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to efficiently prevent IRI. This study aims to assess the effect of MRA administration in the early phase of kidney transplantation (KT) among recipients of ECD grafts on mid-term graft function.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Patients on hemodialysis and undergoing a single or a dual KT from an ECD will be eligible for inclusion. We plan to randomize 132 patients. Included patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either eplerenone 25 mg every 12 h during 4 days (the first dose being administered just prior to KT) or placebo. The primary outcome is graft function at 3 months, assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR, in mL/min/1.73m²) measured using iohexol clearance. Secondary outcomes include (1) proportion of patients with either dialysis dependency or a GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m² at 3 months, (2) proportion of patients with immediate, slow, or delayed graft function, (3) proteinuria at 3 months, (4) occurrence of hyperkalemia during the first week following KT, (5) length of hospital stay for the KT, and (6) occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 3 months following KT. Estimated GFR, graft, and patient survival will also be collected at 1, 3, and 10 years via the national database of organ recipients.

DISCUSSION

Improvement of ECD grafts is a public health priority, since better ECD outcomes could eventually limit organ shortage. MRA administration in the early phase of KT may prevent IRI and subsequently improve mid-term graft function. The trial will also assess the safety of MRA administration in this population, primarily the absence of threatening hyperkalemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02490904 . Registered on 1 July 2015.

The utility of myocardial perfusion imaging before renal transplantation: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation (RT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal failure. Myocardial perfusion imaging provides prognostic information in patients with renal failure, but its role before transplantation remains unclear. We performed a retrospective review assessing the prognostic value of technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging at a tertiary UK centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included scans performed between 2005 and 2012. Available scans were reanalysed to calculate the semiquantitative summed scores: sum rest score (SRS), sum stress score (SSS), sum difference score and sum motion score (SMS). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates assessed all-cause mortality and cardiac events according to scan findings, transplant decision and SSS. Cox-proportional hazards tested for an association between clinical/scan variables and all-cause mortality, and combined all-cause mortality/cardiovascular (CV) events.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight scans were identified with complete follow-up. During a median 40.4-month follow-up, 21 patients died, with 11 nonfatal CV events. There was no significant difference between groups according to scan findings for mortality (log-rank P=0.17) or mortality/CV events (P=0.06). An SSS greater than 8 was associated with higher mortality and CV events combined (P=0.028). An abnormal baseline ECG [hazard ratio (HR): 16.1] and higher SRS (HR: 2.3) were associated independently with higher mortality; an abnormal ECG (HR: 3.4) also predicted higher cardiac events/mortality.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to severe perfusion defects by SSS were associated with higher mortality and CV events. Higher SRS was associated independently with increased mortality on multivariable analysis, highlighting a key role for semiquantitative analysis methods for risk stratification. An abnormal ECG was associated strongly with both endpoints, and may be a useful screening tool to select patients for further investigation.

Myocardial Perfusion Scans and Mortality in Asymptomatic Patients Awaiting Renal Transplantation

Cardiac risk assessment for asymptomatic patients awaiting renal transplantation is controversial. Patients awaiting renal transplantation in Southern Saskatchewan from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent cardiac risk stratification with stress myocardial perfusion scan. Baseline clinical characteristics, nuclear scan results, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events were analyzed. Abnormal scans were defined as studies with reversible defects, wall motion abnormalities, lung uptake, or transient ischemic dilation. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were calculated. Charts from 285 consecutive patients with 608 nuclear scans were analyzed. Mean age was 55.2 ± 11.7 years and 34.7% were female. Forty-three (15.1%) patients were transplanted and 99 (40.9%) patients died while awaiting renal transplantation. One hundred fifty-three patients (63.2%) had at least one abnormal scan. The mean follow-up period was 5.47 ± 3.11 years. An abnormal scan was not associated with decreased survival and/or coronary events (hazard ratio: 0.94, P = .77; 95% confidence intervals: 0.62 to 1.43). Patients awaiting renal transplantation in Saskatchewan with abnormal myocardial perfusion scans were not at greater risk of death or coronary events.

Cancer evaluation in the assessment of solid organ transplant candidates: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Active malignancies are a contraindication to transplantation, as immunosuppression can lead to worse cancer outcomes; therefore, ensuring transplant candidates are free of malignancy before transplantation is essential. This systematic review assesses the availability, quality, and consistency of recommended cancer evaluation prior to transplantation in Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for the selection of solid organ transplant candidates.

METHODS

We systematically searched for CPGs for the assessment of transplant candidates. The characteristics of included CPGs, strength of recommendations and supporting evidence were extracted. A quality assessment of the CPGs was conducted using the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

We identified 52 CPG for the selection of solid organ transplant candidates. Only 13 (25%) included recommendations for cancer evaluation as part of the assessment of transplant candidates. Most recommended age and sex appropriate cancer screening as per the general population guidelines. Recommendations to evaluate for other malignancies and for high-risk candidates were variable. Most recommendations were based on expert opinion and only two CPGs provided an explicit link between the recommendations and supporting evidence.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of clear and consistent recommendations for pretransplant cancer evaluation in existing CPGs. Although there is some consensus regarding the indication to screen for cancer as per the recommendations for the general population, these recommendations are not an appropriate risk reduction strategy for transplant candidates. Standardized protocols to ensure transplant candidates are cancer free prior to transplantation are needed.

Cancer and the kidney: dangereoux liasons or price paid for the progress in medicine?

A long time ago, the links between renal disease and malignancy were observed, however, quite recently, their importance was recognized and 'new' subspecialty in nephrology, namely 'onconephrology' was established. In the XXI century, patients with malignancy make up the most growing number of the subjects seen for nephrology consult and/or critical care nephrology services. A plethora of renal problems may be found in patients with malignancy. They may influence not only their short-term outcomes but also the adequate therapy of the underlying oncological problem. Thus, all these kidney-related issues pose an important challenge for both specialities: oncology and nephrology. In the review a spectrum of acute and chronic renal injury caused by the malignancy is presented as well as the associations between renal disease and cancer. Assessment of kidney function and its importance in patients with malignancy is also discussed as medical oncologists should check the appropriate dose of chemotherapeutic drugs in relation to the actual renal function before prescribing them to the patients. Moreover, effects of kidney function on outcomes in oncology is presented. In addition, nephrology services should better understand both the biology of malignancy with its treatment to become a valuable part treating team to yield the best possible outcome. It is important for nephrology services to be acknowledged and to take an active participation in care of oncology patients.

Anesthesia for Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

Kidney transplants are the most common solid organ abdominal transplant and are occasionally performed simultaneously with pancreas transplants in diabetic patients. Preoperative evaluation of potential transplant recipients should focus on the potential for occult cardiovascular disease while also screening for other signs of end-organ dysfunction. Intraoperatively, it is of utmost importance to ensure adequate graft perfusion to limit the risk of postoperative graft dysfunction or rejection. Postoperative care of the kidney or pancreas transplant patient should focus on ensuring normalization of volume status, electrolyte concentrations, and glycemic control.

The Short-Term Impact of Dietary Counseling on Sodium Intake and Blood Pressure in Renal Allograft Recipients

Background:

Sodium retention causes posttransplant hypertension, and sodium restriction is recommended in kidney allograft recipients. However, there have been few studies on the impact of dietary counseling on sodium intake and blood pressure (BP) in this population.

Objective:

To determine the effect of dietary counseling on sodium intake and consequent BP control in kidney allograft recipients.

Design, Setting, and Participants:

A prospective single-arm study to determine the effect of dietary counseling on sodium intake. Enrolled were renal allograft recipients with sodium intake >100 mEq/d, BP >130/80, antihypertensive use, or body mass index >25 kg/m2. Of 53 renal transplant recipients who met the criteria, 48 participated in the present study. Sodium intake was estimated based on 24-hour urinary sodium excretion before and after 3 sessions of dietary counseling by a board-certified dietitian.

Results:

Sodium intake was significantly decreased after dietary counseling (158.7 vs 129.6 mEq/d; P = .005). Systolic BP was significantly decreased from 124 mm Hg (interquartile range: 122-134) before counseling to 121 mm Hg (interquartile range: 117-128) after counseling ( P < .001). The number of patients with systolic BP >130 mm Hg was decreased by 30% (n = 19-13; P = .07). Among 34 patients on antihypertensive medications, 8 (23.5%) ceased or reduced their drugs due to improvement in BP, whereas 2 increased or changed the drugs due to poor control of BP.

Conclusion:

Dietary counseling showed a short-term efficacy of reducing sodium intake and clinically relevant BP improvement in renal allograft recipients.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management in Prerenal Transplantation Candidates

Cardiovascular (CV) assessment in prerenal transplant patients varies by center. Current guidelines recommend stress testing for candidates if ≥ 3 CV risk factors exist. We evaluated the CV assessment and management in 685 patients referred for kidney transplant over a 7-year period. All patients had CV risk factors, and the most common cause of end-stage renal disease was diabetes. Thirty-three percent (n = 229) underwent coronary angiography. The sensitivity of stress testing to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was poor (0.26). Patients who had no CAD, nonobstructive CAD, or CAD with intervention had significantly higher event-free survival compared with patients with obstructive CAD without intervention. There were no adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and graft failure) within 30 days post-transplant in patients who had preoperative angiography (n = 77). Of the transplanted patients who did not have an angiogram (n = 289), there were 8 clinical events (6 myocardial infarctions) in the first 30 days. In conclusion, our results indicate that stress testing and usual risk factors were poor predictors of obstructive CAD and that revascularization may prove beneficial in these patients.

Current practices in coronary artery disease evaluation of renal transplant candidates prior to renal transplantation

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients and candidates awaiting transplant. Pre-transplant coronary artery disease evaluation can aid in determining transplant candidacy, identifying patients who may benefit from pre-operative cardiac intervention, and implementing measures to reduce perioperative and post-transplant cardiovascular events. However, the choice of investigations and approach in evaluation has yet to be well defined. This article aims to review the evidence for the use of non-invasive investigations and coronary angiography in prognostication, as well as the evidence for revascularization in reducing future cardiac events. The article will also summarize international recommendations and describe the local practice in coronary artery disease evaluation prior to transplant.

Prevalence and predictors of early cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation: evaluation of pre-transplant cardiovascular work-up

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality after renal transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze cardiovascular risk factors at transplantation, occurrence of cardiovascular events in the first year after transplantation and evaluate pre-transplant work-up.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In total, 244 renal transplant recipients older than 50 years were included. The results of pre-transplant work-up, including clinical evaluation, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion testing and coronary angiography were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients had multiple risk factors at inclusion on renal transplantation waiting list as high blood pressure (94.7%), dyslipidemia (81.1%), smoking (45.3%), diabetes (23.6%), past history of cardiovascular disease (21.3%) and obesity (12.7%). Following transplantation, 15.5% (n = 38) of patients experienced a cardiovascular event, including 2.8% (n = 7) acute coronary syndrome, 5.8% (n = 14) isolated increase in troponin level and 5.3% (n = 13) new onset atrial fibrillation. The pre-transplant parameters associated with a cardiovascular event were a past medical history of cardiovascular disease (HR = 2.06 [1.06-4.03], p = 0.03), echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (HR = 2.04 [1.04-3.98], p = 0.037) and abnormal myocardial perfusion testing (HR = 2.25 [1.09 -5.96], p = 0.03). Pre-transplantation evaluation allowed the diagnosis of unknown coronary artery lesions in 8.9% of patients.

Screening and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in end-stage renal disease

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing global health problem with major health and economic implications. Cardiovascular complication is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Clustering of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, such as diabetes, systemic inflammation, and altered mineral metabolism, contributes to enhanced systemic atherosclerosis in patients with ESRD. Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary angiography exceeds 50% in this population. Despite having extensive CAD and vascular disease, patients with ESRD often do not present with classic symptoms because of impaired exercise capacity and diabetes. Furthermore, clinical trial data are exceedingly lacking in this population, resulting in considerable clinical equipoise regarding the optimal approach to the identification and subsequent management of CAD in these patients. Traditional clinical screening tools, including conventional risk prediction models, are significantly limited in their predictive accuracy for cardiovascular events in patients with ESRD. Noninvasive cardiac stress imaging modalities, such as nuclear perfusion and echocardiography, have been shown to improve the traditional clinical model in identifying the presence of CAD. Furthermore, they add incremental prognostic information to angiographic data. Novel imaging techniques and biomarker assays hold significant promise in further improving the ability to identify and risk-stratify for CAD. This review focuses on the current understanding of the clinical risk profile of asymptomatic patients with ESRD with an emphasis on the strengths and limitations of various noninvasive cardiovascular imaging modalities, including the role of novel methods in refining risk prediction. In addition, issues and challenges pertaining to the optimal timing of initial risk assessment ("screening") and possible repeat screening ("surveillance") are addressed. We also summarize the current data on the approach to the patient with ESRD being evaluated for transplantation in the context of recent guidelines and position statements by various professional societies.

Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney or liver transplantation

Cardiac risk assessment prior to kidney and liver transplantation is controversial. Given the paucity of available organs, selecting appropriate recipients with favorable short- and long-term cardiovascular risk profile is crucial. Using noninvasive cardiac imaging tools to guide cardiovascular risk assessment and management can also be challenging and controversial. In this article, we address the burden of coronary artery disease among kidney and liver transplant candidates and review the literature pertaining to the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic value of noninvasive cardiac imaging techniques in this population.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in kidney transplantation

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most common cause of death after kidney transplantation worldwide, with the highest event rate in the early postoperative period. In an attempt to address this issue, screening for CVD prior to transplant is common, but the clinical utility of screening asymptomatic transplant candidates remains unclear. A large degree of variation exists among both transplant center practice patterns and clinical practice guidelines regarding who should be screened, and opinions are based on mixed observational data with great potential for bias. In this review, we discuss the potential risks, benefits, and evidence for screening for CVD in kidney transplant candidates, and also the next steps to better evaluate and treat asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates.

Evaluation of solid organ transplant candidates for coronary artery disease

Solid organ transplantation has increased in frequency in the United States, having evolved from an area of experimentation into accepted therapy for end-organ failure. As organ transplantation has become more common, the average age of transplant recipients has increased, thus increasing the potential for multiple comorbidities including coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD has been shown to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney, lung and liver transplant recipients. Identification of CAD in solid organ transplant candidates allows for stratification of short- and long-term risk, ensuring proper use of valuable allograft resources while guiding further patient management. Assessment of asymptomatic transplant candidates for CAD is difficult. Many patients undergo stress echocardiography or nuclear imaging, which have demonstrated inconsistent rates of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD in these patient populations. Cardiac computed tomography is a potential tool for detecting CAD in these populations, but has questionable utility at this time. Coronary angiography has an important role in detecting CAD in high-risk transplant candidates, affecting their long-term management and risk.

Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for transplant surgery

Candidates for abdominal transplant undergo a pretransplant evaluation to identify associated conditions that may require intervention or that may influence a patient's candidacy for transplant. Coronary artery disease is prevalent in candidates for abdominal organ transplantation. The optimal approach to identify and manage coronary artery disease in the peri-transplant period is currently unclear. In liver transplant candidates portopulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome should be screened for. Identification of the patient who is too sick to benefit from transplant is problematic; with no good evidence available decisions should be individualized and made after multidisciplinary discussion.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes--an update

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) was founded in 2003 to fulfill a need for international cooperation and consolidation in the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. KDIGO has experienced a rapid growth in the development of guidelines, producing three guidelines in its first 6 years and another six in the last 3 years. In addition, it has held 12 global conferences on important issues in kidney disease and its treatment. A major effort is under way to support the dissemination and implementation of KDIGO guidelines through various channels, including an Implementation Task Force with official representatives in 86 countries. KDIGO is now under its own management and remains committed to the development of evidence-based guidelines. Future challenges include finding adequate sources of funding and building stronger links with other organizations involved in guideline development and implementation.

Blood disorders after kidney transplantation

Post transplant anemia (PTA) is a common issue in kidney transplant recipients. Most importantly it is associated with an impaired allograft function. Other important factors associated with PTA are immunosuppressive drugs (MPA, AZA and SRL), iron deficiency, infections (Parvo B19), older donor age, rejection episodes, an increased inflammatory state, and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. As there are no adequately powered RCTs in the kidney transplant population on anemia treatment with ESA, we have to rely on what we know from the large RCTs in the CKD population. The recently published KDIGO guidelines do not recommend treatment with ESA if Hb is >10 g/dl. Repletion of iron stores is emphasized. Post transplant leukopenia (PTL) and thrombocytopenia (PTT) are frequent complications especially in the first six months after kidney transplantation. Myelosuppression caused by immunosuppressive agents (MPA, AZA, SRL, rATG), antimicrobial drugs (VGCV), and CMV infection is the predominant cause. There are no widely accepted guidelines on treatment strategies, but most often dose reduction or discontinuation of causative medication is done. Most clinicians tend to decrease MPA dose, but this is eventually associated with an increase in acute rejection episodes. VGCV dose reduction (preemptive treatment instead of CMV prophylaxis) may be a successful strategy. In severe cases G-CSF treatment is an important management option and seems to be safe.

Routine determination of GFR in renal transplant recipients by HPLC quantification of plasma iohexol concentrations and comparison with estimated GFR

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) methods are not sufficiently reliable in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and should be replaced by iohexol plasma clearance measurement. However, this method has poor availability in health centers. The aim of our study was to develop a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for plasma iohexol measurement in routine practice and to evaluate its plasma clearance as a reference of GFR. We developed an HPLC method using UV detection. We evaluated sample storage conditions to provide recommendations for routine practice. Then, we compared GFRbased on plasma iohexol clearance (GFR-iohexol) to eGFR using modification of diet in renal disease, Cockcroft and Gault, and CDK-EPIequations in 40 RTR. The method was validated over a concentration range of 15-300 μg/l. Excellent linearity (r > 0.998), inter- and intraday precision (CV < 3.3%), and accuracy (>96.8%) were complied with ICH guidelines. We also demonstrated excellent samples stability (9 days). Although eGFR methods are not references in RTR, we found a correct concordance between eGFR and GFR-iohexol in our population. To conclude, our method is simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable for routine clinical and research use especially in RTR.

Clinical practice guidelines on wait-listing for kidney transplantation: consistent and equitable?

BACKGROUND

Apparent variability in wait-listing criteria globally has raised concern about inequitable access to kidney transplantation. This study aimed to compare the quality, the scope, and the consistency of international guidelines on wait-listing for kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Electronic databases and guideline registries were searched to December 2011. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument and textual synthesis was used to assess and compare recommendations.

RESULTS

Fifteen guidelines published from 2001 to 2011 were included. Methodological rigor and scope were variable. We identified 4 major criteria across guidelines: recipient age and life expectancy, medical criteria, social and lifestyle circumstances, and psychosocial considerations. Whereas some recommendations were consistent, there were differences in age cutoffs, estimated life expectancy (2-5 years), and glomerular filtration rate at listing (15-20 mL/min/1.73 m). Cardiovascular contraindications were broadly defined. Recommended cancer-free periods also varied substantially, and whereas uncontrolled infections were universally contraindicated, human immunodeficiency virus thresholds and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy were inconsistent. Most guidelines recommended psychological screening but were not augmented with specific clinical assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Wait-listing recommendations in current guidelines are based on life expectancy, comorbidities, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors. Some recommendations are different across guidelines or broadly defined. There is a case for developing comprehensive, methodologically robust, and regularly updated guidelines on wait-listing for kidney transplantation.

Understanding renal posttransplantation anemia in the pediatric population

Advances in renal transplantation management have proven to be beneficial in improving graft and patient survival. One of the properties of a well-functioning renal allograft is the secretion of adequate amounts of the hormone erythropoietin to stimulate erythropoiesis. Posttransplantation anemia (PTA) may occur at any point in time following transplantation, and the cause is multifactoral. Much of our understanding of PTA is based on studies of adult transplant recipients. The limited number of studies that have been reported on pediatric renal transplant patients appear to indicate that PTA is prevalent in this patient population. Erythropoietin deficiency or resistance is commonly associated with iron deficiency. An understanding of the risk factors, pathophysiology and management of PTA in the pediatric renal transplant population may provide guidelines for clinicians and researchers in the pursuit of larger prospective randomized control studies aimed at improving our limited knowledge of PTA. Recognition of PTA through regular screening and evaluation of the multiple factors that may contribute to its development are recommended after transplantation.

Anemia and erythrocytosis in patients after kidney transplantation

Anemia is a highly prevalent disorder in recipients of renal allografts. Despite its frequent occurrence, there is still uncertainty with regard to treatment targets and treatment options. This includes questions on appropriate iron management, the choice and dosage of erythropoietin stimulating agents, criteria for the timing of treatment initiation and the targeted hemoglobin values. The review summarizes available data on recent therapeutic strategies for post transplant anemia, as well as for post transplant erythrocytosis, another hematological disorder, that has decreased in recent years.

[Kidney transplantation in childhood: from milimeter to centimeters]

Graft survival is worse in recipient aged less than 5 years due to the greater risk of vascular thrombosis. Thrombosis may be prevented by the choice of the donor, method of surgery, perioperative hemodynamic optimisation and preventive anti-coagulation. Normal growth is a major objective of the management of transplanted children. The mean final height increased during the 20 last years to be between -1.63 and -0.92 SDS depending on age and period of the transplantation.

A call to action: variability in guidelines for cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Candidates for renal transplantation are at increased risk for complications related to cardiovascular disease; however, the optimal strategy to reduce this risk is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability among existing guidelines for preoperative cardiac evaluation of renal transplant candidates.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A consecutive series of renal transplant candidates (n=204) were identified, and four prominent preoperative cardiac evaluation guidelines, pertaining to this population, were retrospectively applied to determine the rate at which each guideline recommended cardiac stress testing.

RESULTS

The rate of pretransplant cardiac stress testing would have ranged from 20 to 100% depending on which guideline was applied. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (ACC/AHA) guideline resulted in the lowest rate of testing (20%). In our population, 178 study subjects underwent stress testing: 17 were found to have ischemia and 10 underwent revascularization. The ACC/AHA approach would have decreased the number of noninvasive tests from 178 to 39; it would have identified only 4 of the 10 patients who underwent revascularization. The three other guidelines (renal transplant-specific guidelines) recommended widespread pretransplant cardiac testing and thus identified nearly all patients who had ischemia on stress testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACC/AHA perioperative guideline may be inadequate for identifying renal transplant candidates with coronary disease; however, renal transplant-specific guidelines may provoke significant overtesting. An intermediate approach based on risk factors specific to the ESRD population may optimize detection of coronary disease and limit testing.

Screening and management of pretransplant cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. Hence, accurate cardiac risk assessment in potential candidates is an important issue. The purpose of this review is to examine the existing research on the screening and management of pretransplant cardiovascular disease, with an emphasis on defining the optimal approach for asymptomatic high-risk candidates.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population demonstrate that prophylactic revascularization in stable patients prior to major noncardiac surgery does not reduce cardiac events or improve survival postoperatively. The benefit of noninvasive stress testing in this population is doubtful based on smaller RCTs and observational studies. Perioperative beta-blockade in intermediate-risk or high-risk candidates appears to be beneficial but acute administration is harmful.

SUMMARY

Investigation for coronary artery disease is warranted for kidney transplant candidates with symptoms of myocardial ischemia. However, there is insufficient evidence to support routine cardiovascular screening in asymptomatic candidates regardless of their cardiac risk factor status. RCTs specifically looking at this issue in renal transplant candidates are a research priority.

Ineligibility for renal transplantation: prevalence, causes and survival in a consecutive cohort of 445 patients

Little is known about the proportion of renal transplant candidates who are considered ineligible by the transplant center, the reasons of their ineligibility and their survival during dialysis. In this retrospective, single-center study of 445 adult patients referred between 2001 and 2006, 36 (8%) were deemed ineligible for medical contraindications. The leading reason was cardiovascular (CV) (75%), specifically aorto-iliac, and/or limb vessels atheromatosis or calcifications; ischemic heart disease; or a combination thereof. Nine patients had other contraindications that were absolute for three of them; six patients displayed a combination of relative contraindications. When compared to eligible patients (N = 409), those ineligible were significantly older (60 yr vs. 48), more often diabetics (50% vs. 15%), obese (39% vs. 17%) suffering from coronary artery disease (53% vs. 11%) and peripheral arterial disease (86% vs. 11%). Their primary nephropathy was more often diabetic and/or hypertensive/nephroangiosclerosis (61% vs. 23%), and their median dialysis vintage prior to evaluation was longer (29 months vs. 10, p < 0.0001). The actuarial survival of ineligible patients was significantly lower than that of eligible patients (at five yr: 53% vs. 88%). Adequate control of CV risk factors before dialysis and early referral for transplantation might help to improve eligibility of renal transplant candidates.

KDOQI US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

In response to recently published KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines for the care of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) organized a working group of transplant nephrologists and surgeons to review these guidelines and comment on their relevance and applicability for US KTRs. The following commentaries on the KDIGO guidelines represent the consensus of our work group. The KDIGO transplant guidelines concentrated on aspects of transplant care most important to this population in the posttransplant period, such as immunosuppression, infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular care. Our KDOQI work group concurred with many of the KDIGO recommendations except in some important areas related to immunosuppression, in which decisions in the United States are largely made by transplant centers and are dependent in part on the specific patient population served. Most, but not all, KDIGO guidelines are relevant to US patients. However, implementation of many may remain a major challenge because of issues of limitation in resources needed to assist in the tasks of educating, counseling, and implementing and maintaining lifestyle changes. Although very few of the guidelines are based on evidence that is strong enough to justify their being used as the basis of policy or performance measures, they offer an excellent road map to navigate the complex care of KTRs.

KDIGO guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients will be resource challenged

The Executive Summary of the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients is presented in this issue of Kidney International. This guideline will require careful attention for implementation in the context of available resources within each country, especially those with underdeveloped economies.