Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

Synergistic impact of pre-sensitization and delayed graft function on allograft rejection in deceased donor kidney transplantation

The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not delayed graft function (DGF) and pre-transplant sensitization have synergistic adverse effects on allograft outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database, the nationwide prospective cohort. The study included 1359 cases between May 2014 and June 2019. The cases were divided into 4 subgroups according to pre-sensitization and the development of DGF post-transplant [non-pre-sensitized-DGF(−) (n = 1097), non-pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 127), pre-sensitized-DGF(−) (n = 116), and pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 19)]. We compared the incidence of biopsy-proven allograft rejection (BPAR), time-related change in allograft function, allograft or patient survival, and post-transplant complications across 4 subgroups. The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was significantly higher in the pre-sensitized-DGF(+) subgroup than in other 3 subgroups. In addition, multivariable cox regression analysis demonstrated that pre-sensitization combined with DGF is an independent risk factor for the development of acute ABMR (hazard ratio 4.855, 95% confidence interval 1.499–15.727). Moreover, DGF and pre-sensitization showed significant interaction (p-value for interaction = 0.008). Pre-sensitization combined with DGF did not show significant impact on allograft function, and allograft or patient survival. In conclusion, the combination of pre-sensitization and DGF showed significant synergistic interaction on the development of allograft rejection after DDKT.

Kidney transplant from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death donors maintained by nECMO has long-term outcomes comparable to standard criteria donation after brain death

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) increases organ availability for kidney transplant (KT) with short-term outcomes similar to those obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, heterogeneous results in the long term have been reported. We compared 10-year outcomes between 237 KT recipients from uDCD donors maintained by normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nECMO) and 237 patients undergoing KT from standard criteria DBD donors during the same period at our institution. We further analyzed risk factors for death-censored graft survival in the uDCD group. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common in the uDCD group (73.4% vs 46.4%; P < .01), although glomerular filtration rates at the end of follow-up were similar in the 2 groups. uDCD and DBD groups had similar rates for 10-year death-censored graft (82.1% vs 80.4%; P = .623) and recipient survival (86.2% vs 87.6%; P = .454). Donor age >50 years was associated with graft loss in the uDCD group (hazard ratio: 1.91; P = .058), whereas the occurrence of DGF showed no significant effect. uDCD KT under nECMO support resulted in similar graft function and long-term outcomes compared with KT from standard criteria DBD donors. Increased donor age could negatively affect graft survival after uDCD donation.

[Focusing on kidney transplantation in the elderly]

Due to the increase in life expectancy and the ageing of end-stage renal disease patients, the number of patients older than 65 years receiving a kidney transplant has been continuously growing over the last fifteen years. The benefits of renal transplantation compared to dialysis in terms of survival and quality of life have been shown in selected recipients over 65, or 70 years. However, the age remains the main limiting factor for the access to the waiting list, and the reluctance of the clinicians can be explained by the multiple comorbidities of these candidates, their limited life expectancy or the shortage of grafts. The challenge is to select the candidates who can benefit from renal transplantation, thanks to rigorous cardiovascular and neoplastic evaluation before enrolment and by taking into account the specific characteristics of elderly patients. The living donor appears to be the ideal option for elderly recipients, the alternative being the extended criteria donor, allowing waiting times to be limited. The choice of immunosuppressive therapy is also crucial in these patients at high risk of infectious and cardiovascular complications in whom the occurrence of acute rejection can have severe consequences. There are currently no specific recommendations for immunosuppression in elderly recipients, and we would need large-scale randomized studies to improve the prognosis of renal transplantation in this population.

Delayed graft function and its management in children

Delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first 7 days following renal transplantation. The major underlying mechanism is related to ischaemia/reperfusion injury, which includes microvascular inflammation and cell death and apoptosis, and to the regeneration processes. Several clinical factors related to donor, recipient and organ procurement/transplantation procedures may increase the risk of DGF, including donor cardiovascular instability, older donor age, donor creatinine concentration, long cold ischaemia time and marked body mass index of both the donor and recipient. Some of these parameters have been used in specific predictive formulas created to assess the risk of DGF. A variety of other pre-, intra- and post-transplant clinical factors may also increase the risk of DGF, such as potential drug nephrotoxicity, surgical problems and/or hyperimmunization of the recipient. DGF may decrease the long-term graft function, but data on this effect are inconsistent, partially due to the many different types of organ donation. Relevant management strategies may be classified into the classic clinical approach, which has the aim of minimizing the individual risk factors of DGF, and specific pharmacologic strategies, which are designed to prevent or treat ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Both strategies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

Immunosuppression in the elderly renal allograft recipient: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Elderly are the fastest growing part of kidney transplant recipients. The best immunosuppressive strategy is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials and observational studies focused on safety and efficacy of different immunosuppression strategies in elderly kidney recipients. Data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were systematically performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included: 2 randomized clinical trials and 8 observational. A marginal benefit was found for early renal function with delayed tacrolimus or complete tacrolimus avoidance using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Observational cohort studies looked at different antibody induction strategies, calcineurin-inhibitors based maintenance immunosuppression, calcineurin-inhibitor-free sirolimus-based therapy and use of MMF versus azathioprine. Treatment with interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction, calcineurin-inhibitor minimization with MMF and steroid minimization is advisable in the low immunologic risk elderly recipient, considering the increased risk of toxicities, infection and malignancies. In the high immunologic risk elderly recipient, taking into account the morbid consequences of acute rejection in the elderly, observational studies support antibody induction with depletive antibodies, calcineurin-inhibitor, MMF and steroids; calcineurin-inhibitor-minimization is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very limited evidence for the benefits and harms of different immunosuppression strategies in the elderly. Most of the published literature are observational studies, and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed.

Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression?

The growing gap between demand and supply for kidney transplants has led to renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys in an effort to increase the donor pool. Although most studies of ECD kidney transplantation confirm lower allograft survival rates and, generally, worse outcomes than standard criteria donor kidneys, recipients of ECD kidneys generally have improved survival compared with wait-listed dialysis patients, thus encouraging the pursuit of this type of kidney transplantation. The relative benefits of transplantation using kidneys from ECDs are dependent on patient characteristics and the waiting time on dialysis. Because of the increased risk of poor graft function, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity, increased incidence of infections, cardiovascular risk, and malignancies, elderly recipients of an ECD kidney transplant are a special population that requires a tailored immunosuppressive regimen. Recipients of ECD kidneys often are excluded from transplant trials and, therefore, the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for them is not known. Approaches are largely center specific and based upon expert opinion. Some data suggest that antithymocyte globulin might be the preferred induction agent for elderly recipients of ECD kidneys. Maintenance regimens that spare CNIs have been advocated, especially for older recipients of ECD kidneys. CNI-free regimens are not universally accepted due to occasionally high rejection rates. However, reduced CNI exposure and CNI-free regimens based on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have shown acceptable outcomes in appropriately selected ECD transplant recipients.

Polyclonal versus monoclonal induction therapy in a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: a comparison of efficacy and costs

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.

A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study)

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT-EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors) is a 3-year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The co-primary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4-7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine-treated patients.

A systematic approach to minimizing wound problems for de novo sirolimus-treated kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Wound healing problems and lymphoceles have been reported with greater frequency in kidney recipients given de novo sirolimus. This problem has led to increased patient morbidity and cost; and has been an impediment to the completion of randomized controlled trials in which wound problems have necessitated premature discontinuation of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.

METHODS

We developed a systematic program to reduce these problems based on patient selection (body mass index [BMI] <32 kg/m2), the use of closed suction drains, modifications of surgical technique, and avoidance of a loading dose of sirolimus. Consecutive series of adult kidney-only recipients given antibody induction followed by de novo sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids were compared; group 1: 204 patients transplanted with few restrictions and group 2: 103 patients transplanted using the above program.

RESULTS

This approach resulted in a significant reduction (group 2 vs. group 1) in cumulative wound complications (7.8% vs. 19.6%, P=0.007), and nonoperative wound complications (2.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001). In addition, the incidence of lymphoceles detected (22.3% vs. 47.1%, P<0.0001), treated (4.8% vs. 24.5%, P<0.0001), or needing surgical intervention (1.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001) was significantly reduced. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a BMI more than 30 to 32 kg/m2 was the most significant variable related to delayed wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 0.02) or surgical repair (OR 8.05, P=0.0001), whereas BMI (OR 1.54, P=0.038) and acute rejections (OR 1.34, P=0.03) were most associated with lymphocele treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic program of wound care using de novo sirolimus can produce wound healing complications comparable with that reported with other agents.

A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors

BACKGROUND

During the past few years, there has been renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) for kidney transplantation to increase the numbers of deceased donor kidneys available. More kidney transplants would result in shorter waiting times and limit the morbidity and mortality associated with long-term dialysis therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

SETTING & POPULATION

Kidney transplantation population.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Studies were identified by using a comprehensive search through MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials assessing kidney transplantation in adult recipients using ECDs.

PREDICTOR

A special focus was given to studies comparing the evolution of kidney transplantation between standard criteria donors (defined as a donor who does not meet criteria for donation after cardiac death or ECD) and ECDs (defined as any brain-dead donor aged > 60 years or a donor aged > 50 years with 2 of the following conditions: history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine level >or= 1.5 mg/dL, or death resulting from a cerebrovascular accident).

OUTCOMES

Criteria used to define and select ECDs, practice patterns, long-term outcomes, early complications, and some patient issues, such as selection criteria and immunosuppressive management.

RESULTS

ECD kidneys have worse long-term survival than standard criteria donor kidneys. The optimal ECD kidney for donation depends on adequate glomerular filtration rate and acceptable donor kidney histological characteristics, albeit the usefulness of biopsy is debated.

LIMITATIONS

This review is based mainly on data from observational studies, and varying amounts of bias could be present. We did not attempt to quantitatively analyze the effect of ECD kidneys on kidney transplantation because of the huge heterogeneity found in study designs and definitions of ECD.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, we conclude that patients younger than 40 years or scheduled for kidney retransplantation should not receive an ECD kidney. Patients 40 years or older, especially with diabetic nephropathy or nondiabetic disease, but a long expected waiting time for kidney transplantation, show better survival receiving an ECD kidney than remaining on dialysis therapy.