The severity of acute cellular rejection defined by Banff classification is associated with kidney allograft outcomes

Suspicious of Acute Kidney Graft Rejection: Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics Under Methylprednisolone Therapy

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection remains one of the main complications in the first months after transplantation and may influence long-term outcomes. Tacrolimus has proven its usefulness in solid organ transplants and its monitoring through the application of pharmacokinetic concepts to optimize individual drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This research proposes to evaluate the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters in patients suspected of acute kidney graft rejection under methylprednisolone pulse therapy.

METHODS

Eleven adult tacrolimus-treated renal recipients were selected from a prospective, single-arm, single-center cohort study, with suspicion of acute rejection although in use of methylprednisolone pulses therapy. They were followed up for three months posttransplantation, being tacrolimus trough serum concentrations determined using a chemiluminescent magnetic immunoassay, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by using a nonlinear mixed-effects model implemented by Monolix 2020R1. A tacrolimus trough serum concentration range of 8 to 12 ng.mL-1 was considered therapeutic.

RESULTS

Six patients showed acute cellular rejection, and two of them in addition had an antibody- mediated rejection. Tacrolimus trough serum concentration was below the reference range in eight patients. Most patients showed a high tacrolimus concentration intrapatient and pharmacokinetic parameters variability.

CONCLUSION

The obtained pharmacokinetics parameters helped in understanding the kidney recipient patients' tacrolimus behavior, assisting in the improvement of individual drug therapy and reducing the risk of acute rejection episodes.

Anti-thymocyte globulin for treatment of T-cell-mediated allograft rejection

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is a pivotal immunosuppressive therapy utilized in the management of T-cell-mediated rejection and steroid-resistant rejection among renal transplant recipients. Commercially available as Thymoglobulin (rabbit-derived, Sanofi, United States), ATG-Fresenius S (rabbit-derived), and ATGAM (equine-derived, Pfizer, United States), these formulations share a common mechanism of action centered on their interaction with cell surface markers of immune cells, imparting immunosuppressive effects. Although the prevailing mechanism predominantly involves T-cell depletion via the com plement-mediated pathway, alternate mechanisms have been elucidated. Optimal dosing and treatment duration of ATG have exhibited variance across ran domised trials and clinical reports, rendering the establishment of standardized guidelines a challenge. The spectrum of risks associated with ATG administration spans from transient adverse effects such as fever, chills, and skin rash in the acute phase to long-term concerns related to immunosuppression, including susceptibility to infections and malignancies. This comprehensive review aims to provide a thorough exploration of the current understanding of ATG, encom passing its mechanism of action, clinical utility in the treatment of acute renal graft rejections, specifically steroid-resistant cases, efficacy in rejection episode reversal, and a synthesis of findings from different eras of maintenance immunosuppression. Additionally, it delves into the adverse effects associated with ATG therapy and its impact on long-term graft function. Furthermore, the review underscores the existing gaps in evidence, particularly in the context of the Banff classification of rejections, and highlights the challenges faced by clinicians when navigating the available literature to strike the optimal balance between the risks and benefits of ATG utilization in renal transplantation.

An Immune Atlas of T Cells in Transplant Rejection: Pathways and Therapeutic Opportunities

Short-term outcomes in allotransplantation are excellent due to technical and pharmacological advances; however, improvement in long-term outcomes has been limited. Recurrent episodes of acute cellular rejection, a primarily T cell-mediated response to transplanted tissue, have been implicated in the development of chronic allograft dysfunction and loss. Although it is well established that acute cellular rejection is primarily a CD4 + and CD8 + T cell mediated response, significant heterogeneity exists within these cell compartments. During immune responses, naïve CD4 + T cells are activated and subsequently differentiate into specific T helper subsets under the influence of the local cytokine milieu. These subsets have distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics, with reported differences in their contribution to rejection responses specifically. Of particular relevance are the regulatory subsets and their potential to promote tolerance of allografts. Unraveling the specific contributions of these cell subsets in the context of transplantation is complex, but may reveal new avenues of therapeutic intervention for the prevention of rejection.

Multidrug resistant 1 (MDR1) C3435T and G2677T gene polymorphism: impact on the risk of acute rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is the backbone drug in kidney transplantation. Single nucleotide polymorphism of Multidrug resistant 1 gene can affect tacrolimus metabolism consequently it can affect tacrolimus trough level and incidence of acute rejection. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of Multidrug resistant 1 gene, C3435T and G2677T Single nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and on the risk of acute rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Typing of Multidrug resistant 1 gene, C3435T and G2677T gene polymorphism was done using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) for 83 pediatric kidney transplant recipients and 80 matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

In Multidrug resistant 1 gene (C3435T), CC, CT genotypes and C allele were significantly associated with risk of acute rejection when compared to none acute rejection group (P = 0.008, 0.001 and 0.01 respectively). The required tacrolimus doses to achieve trough level were significantly higher among CC than CT than TT genotypes through the 1st 6 months after kidney transplantation. While, in Multidrug resistant 1 gene (G2677T), GT, TT genotypes and T allele were associated with acute rejection when compared to none acute rejection (P = 0.023, 0.033 and 0.028 respectively). The required tacrolimus doses to achieve trough level were significantly higher among TT than GT than GG genotypes through the 1st 6 months after kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The C allele, CC and CT genotypes of Multidrug resistant 1 gene (C3435T) and the T allele, GT and TT genotypes of Multidrug resistant 1 gene (G2677T) gene polymorphism may be risk factors for acute rejection and this can be attributed to their effect on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Tacrolimus therapy may be tailored according to the recipient genotype for better outcome.

The Histological Spectrum and Clinical Significance of T Cell-mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) remains a significant cause of long-term kidney allograft loss, either indirectly through induction of donor-specific anti-HLA alloantibodies or directly through chronic active TCMR. Whether found by indication or protocol biopsy, Banff defined acute TCMR should be treated with antirejection therapy and maximized maintenance immunosuppression. Neither isolated interstitial inflammation in the absence of tubulitis nor isolated tubulitis in the absence of interstitial inflammation results in adverse outcomes, and neither requires antirejection treatment. RNA gene expression analysis of biopsy material may supplement conventional histology, especially in ambiguous cases. Lesser degrees of tubular and interstitial inflammation (Banff borderline) may portend adverse outcomes and should be treated when found on an indication biopsy. Borderline lesions on protocol biopsies may resolve spontaneously but require close follow-up if untreated. Following antirejection therapy of acute TCMR, surveillance protocol biopsies should be considered. Minimally invasive blood-borne assays (donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene expression profiling) are being increasingly studied as a means of following stable patients in lieu of biopsy. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness require confirmation in randomized controlled trials. Treatment of acute TCMR is not standardized but involves bolus corticosteroids with lymphocyte depleting antibodies for severe, refractory, or relapsing cases. Arteritis may be found with acute TCMR, active antibody-mediated rejection, or mixed rejections and should be treated accordingly. The optimal treatment ofchronic active TCMR is uncertain. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to optimally define therapy.

Targeting inflammatory monocytes by immune-modifying nanoparticles prevents acute kidney allograft rejection

Inflammatory monocytes are a major component of the cellular infiltrate in acutely rejecting human kidney allografts. Since immune-modifying nanoparticles (IMPs) bind to circulating inflammatory monocytes via the specific scavenger receptor MARCO, causing diversion to the spleen and subsequent apoptosis, we investigated the therapeutic potential of negatively charged, 500-nm diameter polystyrene IMPs to prevent kidney allograft rejection. Kidney transplants were performed from BALB/c (H2^d) to C57BL/6 (H2^b) mice in two groups: controls (allo) and allo mice infused with IMPs. Groups were studied for 14 (acute rejection) or 100 (chronic rejection) days. Allo mice receiving IMPs exhibited superior survival and markedly less acute rejection, with better kidney function, less tubulitis, and diminished inflammatory cell density, cytokine and cytotoxic molecule expression in the allograft and lower titers of donor-specific IgG2c antibody in serum at day 14, as compared to allo mice. Cells isolated from kidneys from allo mice receiving IMPs showed reduced Ly6C^hi monocytes, CD11b⁺ cells and NKT⁺ cells compared to allo mice. IMPs predominantly bound CD11b⁺ cells in the bloodstream and CD11b⁺ and CD11c-B220⁺ marginal zone B cells in the spleen. In the spleen, IMPs were found predominantly in red pulp, colocalized with MARCO and expression of cleaved caspase-3. At day 100, allo mice receiving IMPs exhibited reduced macrophage M1 responses but were not protected from chronic rejection. IMPs afforded significant protection from acute rejection, inhibiting both innate and adaptive alloimmunity. Thus, our current experimental findings, coupled with our earlier demonstration of IMP-induced protection in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury, identify IMPs as a potential induction agent in kidney transplantation.

Shifting Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation: The Rise of Composite Endpoints and Machine Learning to Refine Prognostication

The measurement of outcomes in kidney transplantation has been more accurately documented than almost any other surgical procedure result in recent decades. With significant improvements in short- and long-term outcomes related to optimized immunosuppression, outcomes have gradually shifted away from conventional clinical endpoints (ie, patient and graft survival) to surrogate and composite endpoints. This article reviews how outcomes measurements have evolved in the past 2 decades in the setting of increased data collection and summarizes recent advances in outcomes measurements pertaining to clinical, histopathological, and immune outcomes. Finally, we discuss the use of composite endpoints and Bayesian concepts, specifically focusing on the integrative box risk prediction score, in conjunction with machine learning to refine prognostication.

Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation

The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability—and ambiguity—in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.

Study protocol: the TRAnsplant BIOpsies (TRABIO) study - a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study to assess the treatment of kidney graft rejections

INTRODUCTION

Despite continued efforts, long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation remain unsatisfactory. Kidney graft rejections are independent risk factors for graft failure. At the participating centres of the TRAnsplant BIOpsies study group, a common therapeutic standard has previously been defined for the treatment of graft rejections. The outcomes of this strategy will be assessed in a prospective, observational cohort study.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A total of 800 kidney transplantation patients will be enrolled who undergo a graft biopsy because of deteriorating kidney function. Patients will be stratified according to the Banff classification, and the influence of the treatment strategy on end points will be assessed using regression analysis. Primary end points will be all-cause mortality and graft survival. Secondary end points will be worsening of kidney function (≥30% decline of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [eGFR] or new-onset large proteinuria), recurrence of graft rejection and treatment response. Baseline data and detailed histopathology data will be entered into an electronic database on enrolment. During a first follow-up period (within 14 days) and subsequent yearly follow-ups (for 5 years), treatment strategies and clinical course will be recorded. Recruitment at the four participating centres started in September 2016. As of August 2020, 495 patients have been included.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from the ethics committee of Kiel (AZ B 278/16) and was confirmed by the committees of Munich, Mainz and Stuttgart. The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal, according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology criteria.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN78772632; Pre-results.

How Should Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplants Be Treated: Importance of Follow-up Biopsy

Background.

Limited published data exist to guide patient monitoring after the treatment of T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) of kidney allografts.

Methods.

We reviewed the kidney function and histological outcomes after treatment of 163 first episodes of biopsy-proven TCMR between January 1‚ 2015‚ and July 31‚ 2020.

Results.

Of the 146 patients treated with steroid pulse alone, complete histological response was seen in 83% of patients with borderline rejection, 82.5% with grade 1A, 67% with grade 1B, and 50% with grade IIA. Of the 17 patients treated with steroids plus antithymocyte globulin, the complete histological response rate was 100% with grade 1A, 75% with grade 1B, 100% with grade IIA, and 57% with grade IIB. Among the patients with complete response as assessed by kidney function, 14% only had a partial or no response histologically. Among patients with no kidney function response, 68% had a complete response histologically.

Conclusion.

We thus find that responses based on kidney function alone do not correlate well with histological responses. If further treatment had been based solely on changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate, a significant number of patients would have been subsequently undertreated or overtreated. These results support the use of protocol follow-up biopsies after the treatment of TCMR.

The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era

The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.

Biomarkers of alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation

Alloimmune events such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are the primary contributors to kidney transplant failure in children. For decades, a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has been the non-invasive gold standard biomarker for detecting clinically significant alloimmune events, but it suffers from low sensitivity and specificity, especially in smaller children and older allografts. Many clinically "stable" children (based on creatinine) will have alloimmune events known as "subclinical acute rejection" (based on biopsy) that merely reflect the inadequacy of creatinine-based estimates for alloimmune injury rather than a distinct phenotype from clinical rejection with allograft dysfunction. The poor biomarker performance of creatinine leads to many unnecessary surveillance and for-cause biopsies that could be avoided by integrating non-invasive biomarkers with superior sensitivity and specificity into current clinical paradigms. In this review article, we will present and appraise the current state-of-the-art in monitoring for alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation. We will first discuss the current clinical standards for assessing the presence of alloimmune injury and predicting long-term outcomes. We will review principles of biomarker medicine and the application of comprehensive metrics to assess the performance of a given biomarker against the current gold standard. We will then highlight novel blood- and urine-based biomarkers (with special emphasis on pediatric biomarker studies) that have shown superior diagnostic and prognostic performance to the current clinical standards including creatinine-based eGFR. Finally, we will review some of the barriers to translating this research and implementing emerging biomarkers into common clinical practice, and present a transformative approach to using multiple biomarker platforms at different times to optimize the detection and management of critical alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Histopathologic Features of Antibody Mediated Rejection: The Banff Classification and Beyond

Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) in the kidney can show a wide range of clinical presentations and histopathologic patterns. The Banff 2019 classification currently recognizes four diagnostic categories: 1. Active ABMR, 2. Chronic active ABMR, 3. Chronic (inactive) ABMR, and 4. C4d staining without evidence of rejection. This categorization is limited in that it does not adequately represent the spectrum of antibody associated injury in allograft, it is based on biopsy findings without incorporating clinical features (e.g., time post-transplant, de novo versus preformed DSA, protocol versus indication biopsy, complement inhibitor drugs), the scoring is not adequately reproducible, and the terminology is confusing. These limitations are particularly relevant in patients undergoing desensitization or positive crossmatch kidney transplantation. In this article, I discuss Banff criteria for these ABMR categories, with a focus on patients with pre-transplant DSA, and offer a framework for considering the continuum of allograft injury associated with donor specific antibody in these patients.

Pure T-cell mediated rejection following kidney transplant according to response to treatment

The focus of studies on kidney transplantation (KT) has largely shifted from T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, there are still cases of pure acute TCMR in histological reports, even after a long time following transplant. We thus evaluated the impact of pure TCMR on graft survival (GS) according to treatment response. We also performed molecular diagnosis using a molecular microscope diagnostic system on a separate group of 23 patients. A total of 63 patients were divided into non-responders (N = 22) and responders (N = 44). Non-response to rejection treatment was significantly associated with the following factors: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at biopsy, ΔGFR, TCMR within one year, t score, and IF/TA score. We also found that non-responder vs. responder (OR = 3.31; P = 0.036) and lower GFR at biopsy (OR = 0.56; P = 0.026) were independent risk factors of graft failure. The responders had a significantly superior overall GS rate compared with the non-responders (P = 0.004). Molecular assessment showed a good correlation with histologic diagnosis in ABMR, but not in TCMR. Solitary TCMR was a significant risk factor of graft failure in patients who did not respond to rejection treatment.

Are borderline changes real rejection? Current viewpoints

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical significance and treatment of borderline changes are controversial. The lowest detectable margin for rejection on histology is unclear. We review recent evidence about borderline changes and related biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Borderline change (Banff ≥ t1i1) is associated with progressive fibrosis, a greater propensity to form de-novo DSA, and reduced graft survival. Isolated tubulitis appears to have similar kidney allograft outcomes with normal controls, but this finding should be validated in a larger, diverse population. When borderline change was treated, a higher chance of kidney function recovery and better clinical outcomes were observed. However, spontaneous borderline changes resolution without treatment was also observed. Various noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers have been developed to diagnose subclinical acute rejection, including borderline changes and ≥ Banff 1A TCMR. Biomarkers using gene expression and donor-derived cell-free DNA, and HLA DR/DQ eplet mismatch show potential to diagnose subclinical acute rejection (borderline change and ≥Banff 1A TCMR), to avoid surveillance biopsy, or to predict poor kidney allograft outcomes.

SUMMARY

Borderline changes are associated with poor kidney allograft outcomes, but it remains unclear if all cases of borderline changes should be treated. Novel biomarkers may inform physicians to aid in the diagnosis and treatment.

Exploring the Complexity of Death-Censored Kidney Allograft Failure

BACKGROUND

Few studies have thoroughly investigated the causes of kidney graft loss (GL), despite its importance.

METHODS

A novel approach assigns each persistent and relevant decline in renal function over the lifetime of a renal allograft to a standardized category, hypothesizing that singular or multiple events finally lead to GL. An adjudication committee of three physicians retrospectively evaluated indication biopsies, laboratory testing, and medical history of all 303 GLs among all 1642 recipients of transplants between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2017 at a large university hospital to assign primary and/or secondary causes of GL.

RESULTS

In 51.2% of the patients, more than one cause contributed to GL. The most frequent primary or secondary causes leading to graft failure were intercurrent medical events in 36.3% of graft failures followed by T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 34% and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in 30.7%. In 77.9%, a primary cause could be attributed to GL, of which ABMR was most frequent (21.5%). Many causes for GL were identified, and predominant causes for GL varied over time.

CONCLUSIONS

GL is often multifactorial and more complex than previously thought.

Clinical Relevance of Corticosteroid Withdrawal on Graft Histological Lesions in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients

The impact of corticosteroid withdrawal on medium-term graft histological changes in kidney transplant (KT) recipients under standard immunosuppression is uncertain. As part of an open-label, multicenter, prospective, phase IV, 24-month clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02284464) in low-immunological-risk KT recipients, 105 patients were randomized, after a protocol-biopsy at 3 months, to corticosteroid continuation (CSC, n = 52) or corticosteroid withdrawal (CSW, n = 53). Both groups received tacrolimus and MMF and had another protocol-biopsy at 24 months. The acute rejection rate, including subclinical inflammation (SCI), was comparable between groups (21.2 vs. 24.5%). No patients developed dnDSA. Inflammatory and chronicity scores increased from 3 to 24 months in patients with, at baseline, no inflammation (NI) or SCI, regardless of treatment. CSW patients with SCI at 3 months had a significantly increased chronicity score at 24 months. HbA1c levels were lower in CSW patients (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.7 ± 0.6%; p = 0.013) at 24 months, as was systolic blood pressure (134.2 ± 14.9 vs. 125.7 ± 15.3 mmHg; p = 0.016). Allograft function was comparable between groups and no patients died or lost their graft. An increase in chronicity scores at 2-years post-transplantation was observed in low-immunological-risk KT recipients with initial NI or SCI, but CSW may accelerate chronicity changes, especially in patients with early SCI. This strategy did, however, improve the cardiovascular profiles of patients.

Acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation: Retrospective study of epidemiology, risk factors, and impact on renal function

AR is a major relevant and challenging topic in pediatric kidney transplantation. Our objective was to evaluate cumulative incidence of AR in pediatric kidney transplant patient, risk factors for this outcome, and impact on allograft function and survival. A retrospective cohort including pediatric patients that underwent kidney transplantation between 2011 and 2015 was designed. Risk factors for AR were tested by competing risk analysis. To estimate its impact, graft survival and difference in GFR were evaluated. Two hundred thirty patients were included. As a whole, the incidence of AR episodes was 0.16 (95% CI = 0.12-0.20) per person-year of follow-up. And cumulative incidence of AR was 23% in 1 year and 39% in 5 years. Risk factors for AR were number of MM (SHR 1.36 CI 1.14-1.63 P = .001); ISS with CSA, PRED, and AZA (SHR 2.22 CI 1.14-4.33 P = .018); DGF (SHR 2.49 CI 1.57-3.93 P < .001); CMV infection (SHR 5.52 CI 2.27-11.0 P < .001); and poor adherence (SHR 2.28 CI 1.70-4.66 P < .001). Death-censored graft survival in 1 and 5 years was 92.5% and 72.1%. Risk factors for graft loss were number of MM (HR 1.51 CI 1.07-2.13 P = .01), >12 years (HR 2.66 CI 1.07-6.59 P = .03), and PRA 1%-50% (HR 2.67 CI 1.24-5.73 P = .01). Although occurrence of AR did not influence 5-year graft survival, it negatively impacted GFR. AR was frequent in patients assessed and associated with number of MM, ISS regimen, DGF, CMV infection, and poor adherence, and had deleterious effect on GFR.

Risk factors for death in kidney transplant patients: analysis from a large protocol biopsy registry

BACKGROUND

Identification and quantification of the relevant factors for death can improve patients' individual risk assessment and decision-making. We used a well-documented patient cohort (n = 892) in a renal transplant programme with protocol biopsies to establish multivariable Cox models for risk assessment at 3 and 12 months post-transplantation.

METHODS

Patients transplanted between 2000 and 2007 were observed up to 11 years (total observation 5227 patient-years; median 5.9 years). Loss to follow-up was negligible (n = 15). A total of 2251 protocol biopsies and 1214 biopsies for cause were performed. All rejections and clinical borderline rejections in protocol biopsies were treated.

RESULTS

Overall 10-year patient survival was 78%, with inferior survival of patients with graft loss and superior survival of patients with living-donor transplantation. Eight factors were common in the models at 3 and 12 months, including age, pre-transplant heart failure and a score of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, post-transplant urinary tract infection, treatment of rejection, new-onset heart failure, coronary events and malignancies. Additional variables of the model at 3 months included deceased donor transplantation, transplant lymphocele, BK virus nephropathy and severe infections. Graft function and graft loss were significant factors of the model at 12 months. Internal validation and validation with a separate cohort of patients (n = 349) demonstrated good discrimination of the models.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified factors indicate the important areas that need special attention in the pre- and post-transplant care of renal transplant patients. On the basis of these models, we provide nomograms as a tool to weigh individual risks that may contribute to decreased survival.

BTLA suppress acute rejection via regulating TCR downstream signals and cytokines production in kidney transplantation and prolonged allografts survival

Acute rejection is a major risk for renal transplant failure. During this adverse process, activated T cells are considered the main effectors. Recently, B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), a member of the CD28 family receptor, was reported to be a novel inhibitory regulator of T cell activation in heart and pancreatic allograft rejection. Due to the similarity of acute rejection pathways among different organs, we hypothesized that BTLA might play a role in acute rejection of kidney transplant. In renal transplant patients, we observed that BTLA expression was significantly decreased in peripheral CD3+ T lymphocytes of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) recipients compared with control patients with stable transplanted kidney functions. Remarkably, overexpression of BTLA in the rat model was found to significantly inhibit the process of acute rejection, regulate the postoperative immune status, and prolong allograft survival. BTLA overexpression significantly suppressed IL-2 and IFN-γ production and increased IL-4 and IL-10 production both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, vital factors in T-cell signaling pathways, including mitogen-associated protein kinases (MAPK), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), were also significantly repressed by BTLA overexpression. Therefore, BTLA can suppress acute rejection and regulate allogeneic responses of kidney transplant by regulating TCR downstream signals and inflammatory cytokines production to improve allografts outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes after Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An ANZDATA Analysis

BACKGROUND

Declining rates of acute rejection (AR) and the high rate of 1-year graft survival among patients with AR have prompted re-examination of AR as an outcome in the clinic and in trials. Yet AR and its treatment may directly or indirectly affect longer-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

To understand the long-term effect of AR on outcomes, we analyzed data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, including 13,614 recipients of a primary kidney-only transplant between 1997 and 2017 with at least 6 months of graft function. The associations between AR within 6 months post-transplant and subsequent cause-specific graft loss and death were determined using Cox models adjusted for baseline donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics.

RESULTS

AR occurred in 2906 recipients (21.4%) and was associated with graft loss attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.56) and recurrent AR beyond month 6 (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46). Early AR was also associated with death with a functioning graft (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.36), and with death due to cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.53) and cancer (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.64). Sensitivity analyses restricted to subgroups with either biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated, or vascular rejection, or stratified by treatment response produced similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

AR is associated with increased risks of longer-term graft failure and death, particularly death from cardiovascular disease and cancer. The results suggest AR remains an important short-term outcome to monitor in kidney transplantation and clinical trials.

iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential early diagnostic markers in serum of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment method for advanced stage liver disease but acute cellular rejection (ACR) seriously affects the prognosis of LT. To discover novel diagnostic biomarkers of ACR after LT, Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ)-based mass spectrometry was performed to characterize alterations of serum proteins among patients validated to be pathologically ACR or pathologically no-ACR after LT and healthy controls. As a result, 10 differentially expressed proteins were found out between the ACR group and the No-ACR group; 88 differentially expressed proteins were found out between the ACR group and the Healthy Control group; 39 differentially expressed proteins were found out between No-ACR group and Healthy Control group. After analysis and ELISA validation, the results showed that CFHR1, CFHR5 and CFH could be candidate protein biomarkers for the early diagnosis of ACR after LT.

Early isolated V-lesion may not truly represent rejection of the kidney allograft

Intimal arteritis is known to be a negative prognostic factor for kidney allograft survival. Isolated v-lesion (IV) is defined as intimal arteritis with minimal tubulointerstitial inflammation (TI). Although the Banff classification assesses IV as T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), clinical, and prognostic significance of early IV (early IV, eIV) with negative C4d and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) remains unclear. To help resolve if such eIV truly represents acute rejection, a molecular study was performed. The transcriptome of eIV (n=6), T cell-mediated vascular rejection with rich TI (T cell-mediated vascular rejection, TCMRV, n=4) and non-rejection histologic findings (n=8) was compared using microarrays. A total of 310 genes were identified to be deregulated in TCMRV compared with eIV. Gene enrichment analysis categorized deregulated genes to be associated primarily with T-cells associated biological processes involved in an innate and adaptive immune and inflammatory response. Comparison of deregulated gene lists between the study groups and controls showed only a 1.7% gene overlap. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis revealed clear distinction of eIV from TCMRV and showed similarity with a control group. Up-regulation of immune response genes in TCMRV was validated using RT-qPCR in a different set of eIV (n=12) and TCMRV (n=8) samples. The transcriptome of early IV (< 1 month) with negative C4d and DSA is associated with a weak immune signature compared with TCMRV and shows similarity with normal findings. Such eIV may feature non-rejection origin and reflect an injury distinct from an alloimmune response. The present study supports use of molecular methods when interpreting kidney allograft biopsy findings.

Severe Phlebitis Accompanying Vascular Rejection Type Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplantation

PURPOSE

Renal transplant patients with vascular rejection type acute T cell-mediated rejection (ATCMR) grade II have a poor prognosis. Vascular lesions in those cases are thought to randomly occur, thus we searched for a novel pathological marker related to vascular rejection in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We determined pathological characteristics in 14 ATCMR grade II patients treated during an acute phase from 2004 to 2013. We then examined whether those findings appeared in transplant kidney biopsy specimens, except for cases of vascular rejection, in patients examined from 2010 to 2014.

RESULTS

In 9 of the 14 ATCMR grade II patients, phlebitis was accompanied by inflammatory cells that formed polypoid projections in the venous lumen and partial disappearance of vascular endothelium. Further investigation showed those inflammatory cells to be T cells and macrophages. Histological findings revealed coexisting phlebitis in 2 of 13 patients with ATCMR grade I, 3 of 24 with borderline changes, and none with normal findings. Phlebitis occurred at a significantly greater rate than the other findings in cases of vascular rejection (P < .05). However, there was no significant difference in regard to graft survival between patients with and without phlebitis (P = .1829).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest severe phlebitis as a novel finding associated with the pathology of vascular rejection in patients with a renal allograft.

The Efficacy of Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection in Patients Using Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Immunosuppressive Therapy

Background

T cell depleting antibody therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) is the treatment of choice for glucocorticoid-resistant acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) and is used as first-line therapy in severe AR. Almost all studies investigating the effectiveness of rATG for this indication were conducted at the time when cyclosporine A and azathioprine were the standard of care. Here, the long-term outcome of rATG for AR in patients using the current standard immunosuppressive therapy (i.e., tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil) is described.

Material/Methods

Between 2002 to 2012, 108 patients were treated with rATG for AR. Data on kidney function in the year following rATG and long-term outcomes were collected.

Results

Overall survival after rATG was comparable to overall survival of all kidney transplantation patients (P=0.10). Serum creatinine 1 year after rATG was 179 μmol/L (interquartile range (IQR) 136–234 μmol/L) and was comparable to baseline serum creatinine (P=0.22). Early AR showed better allograft survival than late AR (P=0.0007). In addition, 1 year after AR, serum creatinine was lower in early AR (157 mol/L; IQR 131–203) compared to late AR (216 mol/L; IQR 165–269; P<0.05). The Banff grade of rejection, kidney function at the moment of rejection, and reason for rATG (severe or glucocorticoid resistant AR) did not influence the allograft survival.

Conclusions

Treatment of AR with rATG is effective in patients using current standard immunosuppressive therapy, even in patients with poor allograft function. Early identification of AR followed by T cell depleting treatment leads to better allograft outcomes.

Isolated vascular "v" lesions in liver allografts: How to approach this unusual finding

According to the Banff criteria for kidney allografts, isolated vascular or "v" lesions are defined as intimal inflammation, age-inappropriate fibro-intimal hyperplasia, or both, without the presence of associated interstitial T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In general, these lesions portend a worse outcome for kidney allografts, particularly in those where the "v" lesions are identified in patients with coexistent donor specific antibodies (DSA) or later after transplantation. Although affected arteries are rarely sampled in liver allograft biopsies, we identified nine patients at a mean of 1805 days posttransplantation and compared these to matched controls. Almost half (4 of 9) of the study patient biopsies showed inflammatory arteritis associated with focal or diffuse C4d positivity, which was not observed in matched controls. One "v" lesion patient progressed to rejection-related graft failure and two developed moderate/severe TCMR in subsequent biopsies, whereas only one rejection episode occurred in follow-up biopsies, and no rejection-related deaths or graft failures were detected in controls. In conclusion, patients with liver allograft isolated "v" lesions should undergo further evaluation and closer follow-up for impending TCMR and/or underlying co-existent chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

Isolated v-lesion in kidney transplant recipients: Characteristics, association with DSA, and histological follow-up

Isolated v-lesion (IvL) represents a rare and challenging situation in renal allograft biopsies because it is unknown whether IvL truly represents rejection, antibody- or T cell-mediated, or not. This multicentric retrospective study describes the clinicopathological features of IvL with an emphasis on the donor-specific antibody (DSA) status, histological follow-up, and graft survival. Inclusion criteria were the presence of v-lesion with minimal interstitial (i ≤ 1) and microvascular inflammation (g + ptc≤1). C4d-positive biopsies were excluded. We retrospectively found 33 IvL biopsies in 33 patients, mainly performed in the early posttransplantation period (median time 27 days) and clinically indicated in 66.7%. A minority of recipients (5/33, 15.2%) had DSA at the time of biopsy. IvL was treated by anti-rejection therapy in 21 cases (63.6%), whereas 12 (36.4%) were untreated. Seventy percent of untreated patients and 66% of treated patients showed favorable histological evolution on subsequent biopsy. Kidney graft survival in IvL was significantly higher than in a matched cohort of antibody-mediated rejection with arteritis. In conclusion, IvL is not primarily antibody-mediated and may show a favorable evolution. The heterogeneity of IvL pathophysiology on early biopsies should prompt DSA testing as well as close clinical and histological follow-up in all patients with IvL.

The clinicopathological relevance of pretransplant anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in renal transplantation

Background

Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been suggested as a risk factor for graft failure and acute rejection (AR). However, the prevalence and clinical significance of pretransplant AT1R-Abs have seldom been evaluated in Asia.

Methods

In this multicenter, observational cohort study, we tested the AT1R-Abs in pretransplant serum samples obtained from 166 kidney transplant recipients. Statistical analysis was used to set a threshold AT1R-Abs level at 9.05 U/mL.

Results

Pretransplant AT1R-Abs were detected in 98/166 (59.0%) of the analyzed recipients. No graft loss or patient death was reported during the study period. AT1R-Abs (+) patients had a significantly higher incidence of biopsy-proven AR than AT1R-Abs (-) patients (27.6 versus 10.3%, P = 0.007). Recipients with pretransplant AT1R-Abs had a 3.2-fold higher risk of AR within a year of transplantation (P = 0.006). Five study subjects developed microcirculation inflammation (score ≥2). Four of them were presensitized to AT1R-Abs. In particular, three patients had a high titer of anti-AT1R-Abs (>22.7 U/mL).

Conclusions

Pretransplant AT1R-Abs is an independent risk factor for AR, especially acute cellular rejection, and is possibly associated with the risk of antibody-mediated injury. Pretransplant assessment of AT1R-Abs may be useful for stratifying immunologic risks.

Bowman capsulitis predicts poor kidney allograft outcome in T cell-mediated rejection

Acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is an important cause of renal allograft loss. The Banff classification for tubulointerstitial (type I) rejection is based on the extent of both interstitial inflammation and tubulitis. Lymphocytes may also be present between parietal epithelial cells and Bowman capsules in this setting, which we have termed "capsulitis." We conducted this study to determine the clinical significance of capsulitis. We identified 42 patients from the pathology archives at The University of Chicago with isolated Banff type I TCMR from 2010 to 2015. Patient demographic data, Banff classification, and graft outcome measurements were compared between capsulitis and noncapsulitis groups using Mann-Whitney U test. Capsulitis was present in 26 (62%) and was more frequently seen in Banff IB than in IA TCMR (88% versus 44%, P = .01). Patients with capsulitis had a higher serum creatinine at biopsy (4.6 versus 2.9 mg/dL, P = .04) and were more likely to progress to dialysis (42% versus 13%, P = .06), with fewer recovering their baseline serum creatinine (12% versus 38%, P = .08). Patients with both Banff IA TCMR and capsulitis have clinical outcomes similar to or possibly worse than Banff IB TCMR compared with those with Banff IA and an absence of capsulitis. Capsulitis is an important pathologic parameter in the evaluation of kidney transplant biopsies with potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications in the setting of TCMR.

Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient

These guidelines cover the care of patients from the period following kidney transplantation until the transplant is no longer working or the patient dies. During the early phase prevention of acute rejection and infection are the priority. After around 3-6 months, the priorities change to preservation of transplant function and avoiding the long-term complications of immunosuppressive medication (the medication used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection). The topics discussed include organization of outpatient follow up, immunosuppressive medication, treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and prevention of complications. The potential complications discussed include heart disease, infection, cancer, bone disease and blood disorders. There is also a section on contraception and reproductive issues.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and AD depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Six-Month Urinary CCL2 and CXCL10 Levels Predict Long-term Renal Allograft Outcome

BACKGROUND

Early prognostic markers that identify high-risk patients could lead to increased surveillance, personalized immunosuppression, and improved long-term outcomes. The goal of this study was to validate 6-month urinary chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) as a noninvasive predictor of long-term outcomes and compare it with 6-month urinary CXCL10.

METHODS

A prospective, observational renal transplant cohort (n = 185; minimum, 5-year follow-up) was evaluated. The primary composite outcome included 1 or more: allograft loss, renal function decline (>20% decrease estimated glomerular filtration rate between 6 months and last follow-up), and biopsy-proven rejection after 6 months. CCL2/CXCL10 are reported in relation to urine creatinine (ng/mmol).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (52/185, 28%) reached the primary outcome at a median 6.0 years, and their urinary CCL2:Cr was significantly higher compared with patients with stable allograft function (median [interquartile range], 38.6 ng/mmol [19.7-72.5] vs 25.9 ng/mmol [16.1-45.8], P = 0.009). Low urinary CCL2:Cr (≤70.0 ng/mmol) was associated with 88% 5-year event-free survival compared with 50% with high urinary CCL2:Cr (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate Cox-regression model, the only independent predictors of the primary outcome were high CCL2:Cr (hazard ratio [HR], 2.86; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.33-5.73) and CXCL10:Cr (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.23-4.88; both P = 0.009). Urinary CCL2:Cr/CXCL10:Cr area under the curves were 0.62 (P = 0.001)/0.63 (P = 0.03), respectively. Time-to-endpoint analysis according to combined high or low urinary chemokines demonstrates that endpoint-free survival depends on the overall early chemokine burden.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that urinary CCL2:Cr is an independent predictor of long-term allograft outcomes. Urinary CCL2:Cr/CXCL10:Cr alone have similar prognostic performance, but when both are elevated, this suggests a worse prognosis. Therefore, urinary chemokines may be a useful tool for timely identification of high-risk patients.

The Presence of Anti-Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antibodies Adversely Affect Kidney Graft Outcomes

The aim of this study was to determine whether anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) are related to acute rejection (AR) and kidney graft failure in renal transplantation. We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the ISI Web of Science databases for all studies on the association between anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies and kidney allograft outcomes updated to November 2016. Reference lists from included articles were also reviewed. The pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted or calculated using a random-effects model. The potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias were estimated. Nine studies enrolling 1771 subjects were retrieved in the meta-analysis. AT1R-Abs showed significant associations with increased risk of AR (RR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23–2.09). In addition, a significant relationship was found between AT1R-Abs and kidney graft failure compared with AR (RR = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.77–4.26). The results were essentially consistent among subgroups stratified by participant characteristics. These results demonstrated that the AT1R-Abs were associated with an elevated risk of kidney allograft outcomes, especially with kidney graft failure. Large-scale studies are still required to further verify these findings.

Current status of pediatric renal transplant pathology

Histopathology is still an indispensable tool for the diagnosis of kidney transplant dysfunction in adult and pediatric patients. This review presents consolidated knowledge, recent developments and future prospects on the biopsy procedure, the diagnostic work-up, classification schemes, the histopathology of rejection, including antibody-mediated forms, ABO-incompatible transplants, protocol biopsies, recurrent and de novo disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, infectious complications and drug-induced toxicity. It is acknowledged that frequently the correct diagnosis can only be reached in consensus with clinical, serological, immunogenetical, bacteriological and virological findings. This review shall enhance the understanding of the pediatric nephrologist for the thought processes of nephropathologists with the aim to facilitate teamwork between these specialist groups for the benefit of the patient.

Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis

Background

Besides ‘definitive rejection’, the Banff classification includes categories for ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and phenotypes of rejection episodes in 316 consecutive renal transplants from 2009 to 2014 grouped into patients without/with pretransplant HLA-DSA (ptDSA_neg, n = 251; ptDSA_pos, n = 65).

Methods

All adequate indication (n = 125) and surveillance biopsies (n = 538) performed within the first year posttransplant were classified according to the current Banff criteria.

Results

‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were 3 times more common than ‘definitive rejection’ phenotypes in biopsies from ptDSA_neg patients (35% vs 11%) and equally common in biopsies from ptDSA_pos patients (25% vs 27%). In both groups, ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were more frequent in surveillance than in indication biopsies (28% vs 16% in ptDSA_neg patients, and 37% vs 29% in ptDSA_pos patients). ‘Borderline changes: ‘Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection’ (91%) were the dominant ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotype in ptDSA_neg patients, whereas ‘borderline changes’ (58%) and ‘suspicious for acute/active antibody-mediated rejection’ (42%) were equally frequent in biopsies from ptDSA_pos patients. Inclusion of ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes increased the 1-year incidence of clinical (ptDSA_neg patients: 18% vs 8%, P = 0.0005; ptDSA_pos patients: 24% vs 18%, P = 0.31) and (sub)clinical rejection (ptDSA_neg patients: 59% vs 22%, P < 0.0001; ptDSA_pos patients: 68% vs 40%, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes are very common in the current era and outnumber the frequency of ‘definitive rejection’ within the first year posttransplant.

Successful Treatment of Plasma Cell-Rich Acute Rejection Using Pulse Steroid Therapy Alone: A Case Report

Despite the recent development of immunosuppressive agents, plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR) has remained refractory to treatment. Herein, we report an unusual case of PCAR that responded well to pulse steroid therapy alone. A 47-year-old man was admitted for a protocol biopsy three months after kidney transplantation, with a stable serum creatinine level of 1.6 mg/dL. Histological examination showed focal aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration of predominantly polyclonal mature plasma cells, leading to our diagnosis of PCAR. Three months following three consecutive days of high-dose methylprednisolone (mPSL) therapy, an allograft biopsy performed for therapy evaluation showed persistent PCAR. We readministered mPSL therapy and successfully resolved the PCAR. Although PCAR generally develops more than six months after transplantation, we diagnosed this case early, at three months after transplantation, with focally infiltrated PCAR. This case demonstrates the importance of early diagnosis and prompt treatment of PCAR to manage the development and severity of allograft rejection.

Efficacy of Acute Cellular Rejection Treatment According to Banff Score in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

The poor prognosis classically associated with Banff grade 2 acute cell-mediated rejection (CMR) may be due to unrecognized antibody-mediated damage. We thus performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the rate of response to treatment in kidney transplant recipients with pure CMR, stratified by Banff class.

Methods

In addition to a manual search, databases interrogated included Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) databases, Central, PubMed and CINAHL. Studies providing functional and/or histological response rates to the treatment of CMR rejection by Banff class (1997 or more recent) were included.

Results

Among the 746 articles identified, 5 articles were included in the final review. Two studies excluded some, and 2 excluded all features of antibody-mediated rejection, while providing data on functional recovery. The absence of functional recovery was reported in 4% of borderline, 15% for Banff grade 1A and IB pooled, 0% to 25% of Banff grade 1B alone, 11% to 20% of Banff grade 2A, and 38% of Banff grade 2B rejections.

Conclusions

The rate of functional recovery of pure Banff IIA CMR overlapped with that of Banff grade 1 CMR, whereas Banff grade 2B showed worse prognosis. There was important heterogeneity in the definition of response to treatment and paucity of data describing the histological response to treatment stratified by Banff class. There is a pressing need to standardize outcome metrics for the reversibility of rejection in kidney transplant recipients in order to design high-quality trials for novel therapeutic alternatives.

Diagnostic Performance of Fas Ligand mRNA Expression for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The value of Fas ligand (FASL) as a diagnostic immune marker for acute renal rejection is controversial; this meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of FASL in acute renal rejection.

Methods

The relevant literature was included by systematic searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Accuracy data for acute rejection (AR) and potential confounding variables (the year of publication, area, sample source, quantitative techniques, housekeeping genes, fluorescence staining, sample collection time post-renal transplantation, and clinical classification of AR) were extracted after carefully reviewing the studies. Data were analyzed by Meta-DiSc 1.4, RevMan 5.0, and the Midas module in Stata 11.0 software.

Results

Twelve relevant studies involving 496 subjects were included. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio, together with the 95% CI were 0.64 (0.57–0.70), 0.90 (0.85–0.93), 5.66 (3.51–9.11), 0.30 (0.16–0.54), and 30.63 (14.67–63.92), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9389. Fagan’s nomogram showed that the probability of AR episodes in the kidney transplant recipient increased from 15% to 69% when FASL was positive, and was reduced to 4% when FASL was negative. No threshold effect, sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses based on the potential variables had a significant statistical change for heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests the diagnostic potential for FASL mRNA detection as a reliable immune marker for AR in renal allograft recipients. Further large, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate the power of this test marker in the non-invasive diagnosis of AR after renal transplantation.

Precision Subtypes of T Cell-Mediated Rejection Identified by Molecular Profiles

Among kidney transplant recipients, the treatment of choice for acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with pulse steroids or antibody protocols has variable outcomes. Some rejection episodes are resistant to an initial steroid pulse, but respond to subsequent antibody protocols. The biological mechanisms causing the different therapeutic responses are not currently understood. Histological examination of the renal allograft is considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of acute rejection. The Banff Classification System was established to standardize the histopathological diagnosis and to direct therapy. Although widely used, it shows variability among pathologists and lacks criteria to guide precision individualized therapy. The analysis of the transcriptome in allograft biopsies, which we analyzed in this study, provides a strategy to develop molecular diagnoses that would have increased diagnostic precision and assist the development of individualized treatment. Our hypothesis is that the histological classification of TCMR contains multiple subtypes of rejection. Using R language algorithms to determine statistical significance, multidimensional scaling, and hierarchical, we analyzed differential gene expression based on microarray data from biopsies classified as TCMR. Next, we identified KEGG functions, protein–protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks, and predicted therapeutic targets using the integrated database ConsesnsusPathDB (CPDB). Based on our analysis, two distinct clusters of biopsies termed TCMR01 and TCMR02 were identified. Despite having the same Banff classification, we identified 1933 differentially expressed genes between the two clusters. These genes were further divided into three major groups: a core group contained within both the TCMR01 and TCMR02 subtypes, as well as genes unique to TCMR01 or TCMR02. The subtypes of TCMR utilized different biological pathways, different regulatory networks and were predicted to respond to different therapeutic agents. Our results suggest approaches to identify more precise molecular diagnoses of TCMR, which could form the basis for personalized treatments.

Belatacept-based, ATG-Fresenius-induction regimen for kidney transplant recipients: a proof-of-concept study

Belatacept provides effective immunosuppression while avoiding the nephrotoxicities associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). However, existing belatacept-based regimens still have high rates of acute rejection. We hypothesized that therapy with belatacept, mycophenolic acid (MMA), steroids and induction therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin Fresenius (ATGF), rejection rate could be reduced. Prospective, single center, proof-of-concept study including males and females aged ≥18years, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive recipients of a first, HLA non-identical, live or deceased donor kidney allograft. Only patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody score of 0% were included. Three donors were positive for Chagas disease. Six of twelve patients had at least one infection and five were readmitted to the hospital for treatment. One patient had a Trypanosoma cruzi infection via the graft treated successfully. Median cold ischemia time for the transplant patients with a deceased donor was 21.5h. Mean serum creatinine levels at 1, 3 and 6months were 1.76±0.59, 1.55±0.60 and 1.49±0.60mg/dl, respectively. Two of twelve patients experienced clinical, biopsy-proven rejection, successfully treated with methylprednisolone. No patient developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) or any other malignancy and no patient lost their graft or died during follow-up. The potential of this approach makes it worthy of further investigation.