The Analgesic Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents (NSAIDs) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Deliveries: A Meta-Analysis

Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Postoperative Care (Part 10)

The following review focuses on routine postoperative care after cesarean delivery (CD), including specific Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAS) recommendations as well as important postpartum counseling points. Following CD, there is insufficient evidence to support administration of prophylactic multi-dose antibiotics to all patients. Additional antibiotic doses are indicated for the following scenarios: patients with obesity, CD lasting ≥ 4 hours since prophylactic dose, blood loss >1,500 mL, or those with an intra-amniotic infection. An oxytocin infusion for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage should be continued post-CD. While initial measures to prevent postoperative pain occur in the intraoperative period, with the consideration of 1g intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and IV or intramuscular (IM) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (e.g., 30mg IV ketorolac), the focus postoperatively continues with this multimodal approach with scheduled acetaminophen per os (PO, 650mg every 6 hours) and non-steroidal agents (ketorolac 30mg IV every 6 hours for 4 doses followed by ibuprofen 600mg PO every 6 hours) being recommended. Short-acting opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. Low-risk patients should receive mechanical thromboprophylaxis until ambulation with chemoprophylaxis being reserved for patients with additional risk factors. When an indwelling bladder catheter was placed intraoperatively for scheduled CD, it should be removed immediately postoperatively. Chewing gum to aid in return of bowel function and early oral intake of solid food can occur immediately after CD and within 2 hours, respectively. For prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, administration of 5HT3 antagonists in recommended with the addition of either a dopamine antagonist or a corticosteroid as needed based on non-cesarean data. Early ambulation after CD starting 4 hours postoperatively is encouraged and should be incentivized by pedometer. For patients that receive a dressing over the CD skin incision, there is limited evidence regarding when best to remove it. Adjunct non-pharmacologic interventions for postoperative recovery discussed in this review are acupressure, acupuncture, aromatherapy, coffee, ginger, massage, reiki and TENS. In the low-risk patient, hospital discharge may occur as early as 24-28 hours if close (i.e., 1-2 days) outpatient neonatal follow up is available due to the potential for neonatal jaundice; otherwise, patients should be discharged at 48-72 hours postoperatively. Upon discharge, the multimodal pain control recommendations of acetaminophen and ibuprofen should be continued. If short-acting opioids are necessary, the prescribing practices should be individualized based upon the inpatient opioid requirements. Other portions of postoperative/postpartum counseling during the inpatient stay include the optimal interpregnancy interval of 18 to 23 months, encouraging exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months, quick resumption of physical activity and vaginal intercourse guidance as tolerated. Patients should also be counseled pre-CD on the option of immediate postpartum IUD insertion, intraoperative salpingectomy or placement of long acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period. Implementation of such evidence-based postoperative care protocols decrease length of stay, surgical site infection rates, and improve patient satisfaction and breastfeeding rates.

Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid-use disorder (OUD) requires a balance between risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement between the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) provides a framework for pain management in obstetric patients with OUD. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to health care providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia, and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for OUD (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing, and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, as well as a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and complications associated with OUD in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with OUD in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Pharmacological differences in postoperative cutaneous sensitivity, pain at rest, and movement-induced pain in laparotomized mice

Postoperative pain management is challenging. We used mice with a transverse laparotomy to study tactile allodynia measured by the von Frey test, pain at rest measured by facial pain expressions detected by an artificial intelligence algorithm, and movement-induced pain measured by reductions in exploratory activity. The standard analgesics morphine and ibuprofen induced distinct patterns of outcome-dependent effects. Whereas morphine was more effective in reversing pain at rest compared to tactile allodynia, it was unable to alter movement-induced pain. Ibuprofen showed comparable effects across the three outcomes. Administered together, the compounds induced synergistic effects in the three aspects of postoperative pain, mirroring the known advantages of multimodal analgesia used in clinical practice. We explored the impact of neuroimmune interactions using a neutrophil depletion strategy. This reversed pain at rest and movement-induced pain, but did not alter cutaneous sensitivity. Non-peptidergic (IB4+) and peptidergic (CGRP+) nociceptors are segregated neuronal populations in the mouse. We tested the effects of gefapixant, an antitussive drug targeting non-peptidergic nociceptors through P2X3 antagonism, and olcegepant, an antimigraine drug acting as a CGRP antagonist. Both compounds reversed tactile allodynia, while only gefapixant reversed pain at rest, and none of them reversed movement-induced pain. In conclusion, tactile allodynia, pain at rest, and movement-induced pain after surgery have different pharmacological profiles, and none of the three aspects of postoperative pain can predict the effects of a given intervention on the other two. Combining these measures provides a more realistic view of postoperative pain and has the potential to benefit analgesic development.

Risk of short-term cardiovascular disease in relation to the mode of delivery in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing in prevalence and affects up to 4% of pregnancies in otherwise healthy persons. The specific factors that drive the development of CVD in pregnant people are poorly characterised. This study aimed to determine whether the mode of delivery in singletons affects the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality within one year in patients without prior CVD.

Methods

We designed a retrospective cohort study utilising the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify singleton delivery hospitalisations in the United States from Jan 1, 2010 to Nov 30, 2018. International Classification of Disease (ICD) versions 9 and 10 codes were used to identify patients with readmission for CVD within the calendar year of index delivery. Patients aged 15-54 who underwent a singleton vaginal or caesarean delivery were included. Patients with pre-existing CVD hospitalisations before or during delivery, ectopic pregnancies, or abortive outcomes were excluded. Participant data was retrieved from the NRD database. The primary outcome was hospital readmission, defined by ICD 9 and 10 codes for fatal or non-fatal CVD in the same calendar year as delivery. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to adjust for confounders. These included maternal age, hospital bed size, hospital type, hospital teaching status, income quartile, insurance, and year of delivery. Additional sub-analyses were performed adjusting for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and diabetes mellitus.

Findings

Of the 14,179,299 singleton deliveries, 32% (n = 4,553,492) underwent a caesarean. CVD readmissions occurred in 255.2 per 100,000 (n = 11,710) caesarean deliveries compared with 133.9 per 100,000 (n = 12,507) vaginal deliveries (rate difference [RD], 121.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 114.8-127.9; hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for all confounders including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and diabetes mellitus was 1.42, 95% CI 1.35-1.50). This association was highest in the first 0-29 days following delivery (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.59-1.78). The risk of readmission for CVD persisted for one year.

Interpretation

These findings suggest that caesarean delivery of singletons is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity in patients without pre-existing CVD. This risk was highest in the first month but remained elevated for one year after delivery. These findings add to the accumulating evidence that undergoing caesarean delivery may have long-standing health implications and support the extension of the post-partum surveillance period. Limitations of this study include the lack of adjustment for body mass index, race, and parity. We were also unable to determine the reason for the caesarean delivery.

Funding

None.

The crosstalk between subjective fibromyalgia, mental health symptoms and the use of over-the-counter analgesics in female Syrian refugees: a cross-sectional web-based study

Suboptimal fibromyalgia management with over-the-counter analgesics leads to deteriorated outcomes for pain and mental health symptoms especially in low-income countries hosting refugees. To examine the association between the over-the-counter analgesics and the severity of fibromyalgia, depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms in a cohort of Syrian refugees. This is a cross-sectional study. Fibromyalgia was assessed using the patient self-report survey for the assessment of fibromyalgia. Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, insomnia severity was measured using the insomnia severity index (ISI-A), and PTSD was assessed using the Davidson trauma scale (DTS)-DSM-IV. Data were analyzed from 291. Among them, 221 (75.9%) reported using acetaminophen, 79 (27.1%) reported using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 56 (19.2%) reported receiving a prescription for centrally acting medications (CAMs). Fibromyalgia screening was significantly associated with using NSAIDs (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.58-5.80, p = 0.001). Severe depression was significantly associated with using NSAIDs (OR 2.07, 95% CI 2.18-3.81, p = 0.02) and CAMs (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.30-5.76, p = 0.008). Severe insomnia was significantly associated with the use of CAMs (OR 3.90, 95% CI 2.04-5.61, p < 0.001). PTSD symptoms were associated with the use of CAMs (β = 8.99, p = 0.001) and NSAIDs (β = 10.39, p < 0.001). Improper analgesics are associated with poor fibromyalgia and mental health outcomes, prompt awareness efforts are required to address this challenge for the refugees and health care providers.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug "allergy" labeling is associated with increased postpartum opioid utilization

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to postpartum pain management, beginning with acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with opioids added only if needed. Report of a prior NSAID-induced adverse drug reaction (ADR) may preclude use of first-line analgesics, despite evidence that many patients with this allergy label may safely tolerate NSAIDs.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the association between reported NSAID ADRs and postpartum opioid utilization.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of birthing people who delivered within an integrated health system (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020). Study outcomes were postpartum inpatient opioid administrations and opioid prescriptions at discharge. Statistical analysis was performed on a propensity score-matched sample, which was generated with the goal of matching to the covariate distributions from individuals with NSAID ADRs.

RESULTS

Of 38,927 eligible participants, there were 883 (2.3%) with an NSAID ADR. Among individuals with reported NSAID ADRs, 49.5% received inpatient opioids in the postpartum period, compared to 34.5% of those with no NSAID ADRs (difference = 15.0%, 95% confidence interval 11.4-18.6%). For patients who received postpartum inpatient opioids, those with NSAID ADRs received a higher total cumulative dose between delivery and hospital discharge (median 30.0 vs 22.5 morphine milligram equivalents [MME] for vaginal deliveries; median 104.4 vs 75.0 MME for cesarean deliveries). The overall proportion of patients receiving an opioid prescription at the time of hospital discharge was higher for patients with NSAID ADRs compared to patients with no NSAID ADRs (39.3% vs 27.2%; difference = 12.1%, 95% confidence interval 8.6-15.6%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with reported NSAID ADRs had higher postpartum inpatient opioid utilization and more frequently received opioid prescriptions at hospital discharge compared to those without NSAID ADRs, regardless of mode of delivery.

The evaluation of the efficacy of etofenamate spray in postoperative cesarean pain: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to investigate the effect of etofenamate spray to be applied around the postoperative incision on pain control in cesarean section in this trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. 187 patients (93 cases and 94 controls) were recruited for the study. In the trial group, we applied the etofenamate spray (Doline® 50 ml) after closing the cesarean skin incision and go on four times a day on the skin incision for 24 h. In the control group, we applied a placebo. All patients received paracetamol IV (Paracerol®) as standard analgesic doses. If analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (Contramal®) 50 mg IV doses were added and recorded. A visually analog pain scale (VAS) was performed on both groups at 6-12-18-24th hours. Independent t-tests were performed for data showing normal distributions.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean of differences VAS scores between the two groups at 6-12, and 6-18 h. However, a significant difference was obtained in the mean of differences VAS score at the 6-24th hour (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of additional paracetamol need, a significant difference was found again (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tramadol need.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative administration of etofenamate spray provided an analgesic effect at 24 h and additional analgesic usage decreased. Postoperative analgesia can also be used by administering NSAIDs around the cesarean section incision. In this way, the side effects of other systemic analgesics are avoided.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

PACTR201811864509898. CLINICAL TRIAL WEB LINK: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=5745.

Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cesarean section is the most frequent surgical intervention, and pain following cesarean delivery unfortunately remains a common issue. The purpose of this article is to highlight the most effective and efficient options for postcesarean analgesia and to summarize current guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most effective form of postoperative analgesia is through neuraxial morphine. With adequate dosing, clinically relevant respiratory depression is extremely rare. It is important to identify women with increased risk of respiratory depression, as they might require more intensive postoperative monitoring. If neuraxial morphine cannot be used, abdominal wall block or surgical wound infiltration are very valuable alternatives. A multimodal regimen with intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone, fixed doses of paracetamol/acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce postcesarean opioid use. As the use of postoperative lumbar epidural analgesia impairs mobilization, double epidural catheters with lower thoracic epidural analgesia are a possible alternative.

SUMMARY

Adequate analgesia following cesarean delivery is still underused. Simple measures, such as multimodal analgesia regimens should be standardized according to institutional circumstances and defined as part of a treatment plan. Neuraxial morphine should be used whenever possible. If it cannot be used, abdominal wall blocks or surgical wound infiltration are good alternatives.

Increased Scheduled Intravenous Ketorolac After Cesarean Delivery and Its Effect on Opioid Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of scheduled ketorolac in reducing opioid use after cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial to assess pain management after cesarean delivery with scheduled ketorolac compared with placebo. All patients undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia received two doses of 30 mg intravenous ketorolac postoperatively and then were randomized to receive four doses of 30 mg of intravenous ketorolac or placebo every 6 hours. Additional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were held until 6 hours after the last study dose. The primary outcome was total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used in the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients who used no opioid postoperatively, postoperative pain scores, postoperative change in hematocrit and serum creatinine, and postoperative satisfaction with inpatient care and pain management. A sample size of 74 per group (n=148) provided 80% power to detect a population mean difference in MME of 32.4, with an SD for both groups of 68.7 after accounting for protocol noncompliance.

RESULTS

From May 2019 to January 2022, 245 patients were screened and 148 patients were randomized (74 per group). Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The median (quartile 1-3) MME from arrival in the recovery room until postoperative hour 72 was 30.0 (0.0-67.5) for the ketorolac group and 60.0 (30.0-112.5) for the placebo group (Hodges-Lehmann median difference -30.0, 95% CI -45.0 to -15.0, P <.001). In addition, participants who received placebo were more likely to have numeric rating scale pain scores higher than 3 out of 10 ( P= .005). The mean±SD decrease from baseline hematocrit to postoperative day 1 was 5.5±2.6% for the ketorolac group and 5.4±3.5% for the placebo group ( P =.94). The mean±SD postoperative day 2 creatinine was 0.61±0.06 mg/dL in the ketorolac group and 0.62±0.08 mg/dL in the placebo group ( P =.26). Participant satisfaction with inpatient pain control and postoperative care was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo, scheduled intravenous ketorolac significantly decreased opioid use after cesarean delivery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03678675.

Clinical characteristics and sequelae of intrapartum hypertension - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In a significant proportion of pregnant women, elevated blood pressure may first present during the intrapartum period. This phenomenon, intrapartum hypertension, is often overlooked as blood pressure during delivery is attributed to labour pain, analgesic agents and haemodynamic changes. Thus the true prevalence and clinical significance of intrapartum hypertension remains unknown. This study sought to define the prevalence of intrapartum hypertension in previously normotensive women, identify associated clinical characteristics, and its impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, all available partograms were reviewed over a 1-month period at an outer metropolitan hospital in Sydney (Campbelltown Hospital). Women with diagnosed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy during the incident pregnancy were excluded. A total of 229 deliveries were included in the final analysis. Intrapatum hypertension (IH) was defined as two or more systolic blood pressure (SBP)⩾140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP)⩾90 mmHg during the intrapartum. Demographic data at the time of the first antenatal visit for the incident pregnancy as well as final maternal outcomes (intrapartum and post-partum) and fetal outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSSv27 with adjustments for baseline variables.

RESULTS

Amongst 229 deliveries, 32 women (14%) had intrapartum hypertension. Older maternal age (p = 0.02), higher body mass index (p < 0.01) and higher diastolic blood pressure at the first antenatal visit (p = 0.03) were associated with intrapartum hypertension. A longer second stage of labour (p = 0.03), intrapartum non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (p < 0.01) and epidural anaesthesia (p = 0.03) were associated with intrapartum hypertension, while IV syntocin for labour induction was not. Women with intrapartum hypertension had a longer inpatient admission following delivery (p < 0.01), and elevated postpartum BP (p = 0.02) with discharge on antihypertensive medications (p < 0.01). Intrapartum hypertension was not associated with poor fetal outcomes, though subgroup analyses showed that women who had at least a single elevated blood pressure reading during the intrapartum experienced poorer fetal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In previously normotensive women, 14% developed intrapartum hypertension during delivery. This was associated with postpartum hypertension, longer maternal admission and discharge with antihypertensive medications. There was no difference in fetal outcomes.

Comparison of 2 anesthetic protocols and surgical timing during cesarean section on neonatal vitality and umbilical cord blood parameters

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the mode of anesthesia, the time form the induction to the extraction of a puppy and the immediate postnatal vitality and umbilical cord blood gases parameters in cesarean section derived-puppies. Two different anesthetic protocols were used: inhalation using isoflurane (ISO) and combined-inhalation and epidural (EPI) with propofol being the induction agent.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in ISO group in pH values, pCO2 levels and Apgar scores between puppies at different extraction times (< 30 vs. ≥ 30 min). In ISO group puppies extracted later were more acidic (7.16 vs. 7.22), had higher levels of pCO2 (69 vs. 57 mmHg) and lower Apgar scores at birth (1.2 vs. 2.5). On the contrary, in EPI group no differences were observed between the delivery time, umbilical blood gas parameters and puppies' vitality. Furthermore, the dams from the EPI group required lower concentrations of isoflurane (MAC 1.11 ± 0.19 vs.1.37 ± 0.16, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple pregnancies frequent in dogs lead to significant differences in extraction times between the first and the last puppy during cesarean section. Obtained results showed that the mode of anesthesia and the surgical time would influence the neonatal outcome during cesarean section in dogs. The higher concentration of isoflurane with the longer time of exposure had a negative effect on the initial newborn vitality as well as the umbilical cord blood gas parameters. Therefore, when performing CS in giant dog breeds or expecting many puppies in the litter, it is worth considering epidural component that allow for lower concentrations of inhalant agents, which may contribute to a better clinical condition of newborns.

Analgesic outcomes of tramadol alone and in combination with Butorphanol or Flurbiprofen Axetil after cesarean section: a retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommends a multimodal analgesia regimen for cesarean delivery analgesia. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of tramadol alone and combined with butorphanol or flurbiprofen axetil after a cesarean section.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis based on the electronic medical records of a teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to January 2020. We collected data on demographic characteristics, anesthesia, analgesia strategy, and pain intensity postoperatively during the first 48 hours. Inadequate postoperative analgesia during this period was defined as an NRS score ≥ 4. We also collected data regarding off-bed activity and intestinal function recovery. Participants were classified into three groups according to analgesia regimens. Groups T, TF, and TB received tramadol, a mixture of tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil, and a combination of tramadol and butorphanol, respectively. Analgesic outcomes were compared using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 2323 cases of caesarean section were included in the analysis, and 521 pairs were matched in each group according to their propensity score. Compared with group T, The inadequate analgesia on pain at rest and pain at movement was lower in group TF (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36-0.49, P = 0.001 and RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69, P < 0.001, respectively),and the incidence of inadequate control of pain at movement was higher in group TB (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22-1.55, P < 0.001). Additionally, the percentage of off-bed activity at 2 days postoperatively was higher in group TB than in groups TF and T (78.7% vs. 68.5 and 78.7% vs. 64.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). The incidence of intestinal function recovery 2 days after cesarean delivery in group TB was higher than that in group TF (73.3% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil could enhance the analgesic effect and be safely used for analgesia after a cesarean section. However, combining tramadol and butorphanol may produce an antagonistic effect.

Cesarean delivery using an ERAS-CD process for nonopioid anesthesia and analgesia drug/medication management

Cesarean delivery (CD) is a surgical delivery of a neonate with surgical access through the maternal abdominal and uterine structures. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a standardized perioperative care program and surgery quality improvement process that has had global spread across numerous surgical disciplines. The medical and surgical use of opioids for pain management and the nonmedical opioid use, over the last three decades, have significantly increased the prevalence of abuse and addiction to opioids. This review summarizes pain, pregnancy substance use, and ERAS-directed analgesia and anesthesia for opioid use reduction or elimination in the operative and postoperative periods. Enhanced recovery (quality and safety) in the surgical CD context requires collaboration, consensus, and appropriate clinical prioritization to allow for the identification of 'the right patient, in the right clinical situation, with the right informed consent, and the right clinical care team and health system'.

Placenta accreta spectrum part I: anesthesia considerations based on an extended review of the literature

"Placenta accreta spectrum" (PAS) describes abnormal placental adherence to the uterine wall without spontaneous separation at delivery. Though relatively rare, PAS presents a particular challenge to anesthesiologists, as it is associated with massive peripartum hemorrhage and high maternal morbidity and mortality. Standardized evidence-based PAS management strategies are currently evolving and emphasize: "PAS centers of excellence", multidisciplinary teams, novel diagnostics/pharmaceuticals (especially regarding hemostasis, hemostatic agents, point-of-care diagnostics), and novel operative/interventional approaches (expectant management, balloon occlusion, embolization). Though available data are heterogeneous, these developments affect anesthetic management and must be considered in planed anesthetic approaches. This two-part review provides a critical overview of the current evidence and offers structured evidence-based recommendations to help anesthesiologists improve outcomes for women with PAS. This first part discusses PAS management in centers of excellence, multidisciplinary care team, anesthetic approach and monitoring, surgical approaches, patient safety checklists, temperature management, interventional radiology, postoperative care and pain therapy. The diagnosis and treatment of hemostatic disturbances and preoperative prepartum anemia, blood loss, transfusion management and postpartum venous thromboembolism will be addressed in the second part of this series.

Variation by default: cesarean section discharge opioid prescription patterns and outcomes in Military Health System hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Background

To examine factors associated with post-Cesarean section analgesic prescription variation at hospital discharge in patients who are opioid naïve; and examine relationships between pre-Cesarean section patient and care-level factors and discharge morphine equivalent dose (MED) on outcomes (e.g., probability of opioid refill within 30 days) across a large healthcare system.

Methods

The Walter Reed Institutional Review Board provided an exempt determination, waiver of consent, and waiver of HIPAA authorization for research use in the present retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Patient records were included in analyses if: sex assigned in the medical record was “female,” age was 18 years of age or older, the Cesarean section occurred between January 2016 to December 2019 in the Military Health System, the listed TRICARE sponsor was an active duty service member, hospitalization began no more than three days prior to the Cesarean section, and the patient was discharged to home < 4 days after the Cesarean section.

Results

Across 57 facilities, 32,757 adult patients had a single documented Cesarean section procedure in the study period; 24,538 met inclusion criteria and were used in analyses. Post-Cesarean section discharge MED varied by facility, with a median MED of 225 mg and median 5-day supply. Age, active duty status, hospitalization duration, mental health diagnosis, pain diagnosis, substance use disorder, alcohol use disorder, gestational diabetes, discharge opioid type (combined vs. opioid-only medication), concurrent tubal ligation procedure, single (vs. multiple) births, and discharge morphine equivalent dose were associated with the probability of an opioid prescription refill in bivariate analyses, and therefore were included as covariates in a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM). Generalized additive mixed model results indicated that non-active duty beneficiaries, those with mental health and pain conditions, those who received an opioid/non-opioid combination medication, those with multiple births, and older patients were more likely to obtain an opioid refill, relative to their counterparts.

Conclusion

Significant variation in discharge pain medication prescriptions, as well as the lack of association between discharge opioid MED and probability of refill, indicates that efforts are needed to optimize opioid prescribing and reduce unnecessary healthcare variation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01765-8.

Post-cesarean section analgesia

Worldwide, the most performed surgical intervention is cesarean section. Hence, post-cesarean pain is a common problem with significant health and economic impact on the individual patient and society. Adequate treatment of post-cesarean pain is necessary to facilitate enhanced recovery, improve neonatal outcome by improving breastfeeding success and bonding between mother and child, and reduce pain-induced side effects. Therefore, optimal pain relief is important, but in the obstetric population, this is often complex due to the interplay of mother and neonate. To facilitate recovery and temper the side effects of potent analgesic drugs such as opioids, multimodal analgesia is currently advocated, and clear international guidelines and recommendations have recently been described. In the present overview, we will discuss the most recent guidelines and evaluate various analgesic interventions.

Opioids in acute pain: Towards getting the right balance

Misuse of prescription opioids forced an inevitable response from authorities to intervene with consequences felt by all.In the Australian community one person will die for approximately every 3600 adults prescribed opioids, while in the hospital setting a postoperative patient managed primarily with opioids, as opposed to epidural analgesia, has an additional risk of death as high as between one in 56 to 477.Opioids maintain a valid role in acute pain management when use is reasoned and with full awareness of the harms and how they are to be avoided, such as in those at risk of ongoing use, the opioid naïve, and when opioid-induced ventilatory impairment may occur.Clinicians managing acute pain can focus on assessing pain versus nociception, strategically apply antinociceptive medications and neural blockade when indicated, assess pain with an emphasis on the degree of bothersomeness and functional impairment and, finally, optimise the use of framing and placebo-enhancing communication to minimise reliance on medications.

The Current Consideration, Approach, and Management in Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control: A Narrative Review

Optimal postoperative analgesia has a significant impact on patient recovery and outcomes after cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia is the core principle for cesarean delivery and pain management. For a standard analgesic regimen, the use of long-acting neuraxial opioids (e.g., morphine) and adjunct drugs, such as scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is recommended unless contraindicated. Oral or intravenous opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. In addition to the aforementioned use of multimodal analgesia, preoperative evaluation is critical to individualize the analgesic regimen according to the patient requirements. Risk factors for severe postoperative pain or analgesia-related adverse effects will require modifications to the standard analgesic regimen (e.g., the use of ketamine, gabapentinoids, or regional anesthetic techniques). Further investigation is required to determine analgesic drugs or dose alterations based on preoperative predictions for patients at risk of severe pain. Outcomes beyond pain and analgesic use, such as functional recovery, should be determined to evaluate analgesic treatment protocols.

PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

Caesarean section is associated with moderate‐to‐severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction as well as breastfeeding success and mother‐child bonding. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after elective caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia. A systematic review utilising procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language between 1 May 2014 and 22 October 2020 evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating pain management for emergency or unplanned operative deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia were excluded. A total of 145 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients undergoing elective caesarean section performed under neuraxial anaesthesia, recommendations include intrathecal morphine 50–100 µg or diamorphine 300 µg administered pre‐operatively; paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone administered after delivery. If intrathecal opioid was not administered, single‐injection local anaesthetic wound infiltration; continuous wound local anaesthetic infusion; and/or fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane or quadratus lumborum blocks are recommended. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs with opioids used for rescue. The surgical technique should include a Joel‐Cohen incision; non‐closure of the peritoneum; and abdominal binders. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation could be used as analgesic adjunct. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations. Some interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence. Of note, these recommendations may not be applicable to unplanned deliveries or caesarean section performed under general anaesthesia.

Management of postsurgical pain in the community

Following surgery there is often a need for ongoing pain management after the patient is discharged from hospital. This can be made easier if the patient has an appropriate discussion before leaving hospital about what pain they can expect, and they are given a management plan Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are suitable for most patients. Drugs with a short half-life, such as ibuprofen, may need to be taken regularly Short-acting opioids can have a short-term role, providing guidelines are followed. There is a predictable period of time after surgery when the benefit of an opioid is expected to be maximised before harmful adverse effects will dominate Gabapentinoids are useful for neuropathic pain, but have a limited role in nociceptive pain. Like opioids, they have a risk of misuse The surgeon should be consulted if the patient develops new pain or the postoperative pain becomes more severe Most postsurgical pain will resolve within three months. If not, it is deemed persistent pain that may warrant specialist assessment

The comparison of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for blood pressure in preeclampsia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Introduction: The comparison of ibuprofen with acetaminophen for blood pressure (BP) in preeclampsia remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the impact of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen on BP for preeclampsia.Methods: We search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen on BP for preeclampsia. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.Results: Four RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall in preeclampsia patients, ibuprofen and acetaminophen show similar systolic BP (SBP) (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.26-0.34; p= .81), diastolic BP (DBP) (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI = -0.18-0.48; p  = 0.38), mean BP (MAP) (SMD = 0.02; 95% CI = -0.29-0.33; p = .91), severe range BP (SMD = -0.10; 95% CI = -0.40-0.19; p = .50), severe hypertension (SMD = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.85-1.62; p = .32), and satisfaction level (SMD = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.95-1.53; p = .13).Conclusions: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen may have no significant influence on BP for preeclampsia.

Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery

PURPOSE

Although cesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure in the United States, postoperative opioid prescribing varies greatly. We hypothesized that patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, or both would be associated with high vs low opioid use after discharge. This information could help individualize prescriptions.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we quantified opioid use for 4 weeks following hospital discharge after cesarean delivery. Predischarge characteristics were obtained from health records, and patients self-reported total opioid use postdischarge on weekly questionnaires. Opioid use was quantified in milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs). Binomial and Poisson regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of opioid use after discharge.

RESULTS

Of the 233 patients starting the study, 203 (87.1%) completed at least 1 questionnaire and were included in analyses (86.3% completed all 4 questionnaires). A total of 113 patients were high users (>75 MMEs) and 90 patients were low users (≤75 MMEs) of opioids postdischarge. The group reporting low opioid use received on average 44% fewer opioids in the 24 hours before discharge compared with the group reporting high opioid use (mean = 33.0 vs 59.3 MMEs, P <.001). Only a minority of patients (11.4% to 15.8%) stored leftover opioids in a locked location, and just 31 patients disposed of leftover opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of predischarge opioid use can be useful as a tool to inform individualized opioid prescriptions, help optimize nonopioid analgesia, and reduce opioid use. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of implementing such measures on prescribing practices, pain, and functional outcomes.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pain in cancer patients: a systematic review and reappraisal of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Emerging data highlights the potential role of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors in the primary prevention of malignancy, reducing metastatic spread and improving overall mortality. Despite nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) forming a key component of the WHO analgesic ladder, their use in cancer pain management remains relatively low. This review re-appraises the current evidence regarding the efficacy of COX inhibitors as analgesics in cancer pain, providing a succinct resource to aid clinicians' decision making when determining treatment strategies.

METHODS

Medline® and Embase® databases were searched for publications up to November 2018. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and double-blind controlled studies considering the use of NSAIDs for management of cancer-related pain in adults were included. Animal studies, case reports, and retrospective observational data were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty studies investigating the use of NSAIDs in cancer pain management were identified. There is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the analgesic efficacy of NSAIDs in cancer pain, with short study durations and heterogeneity in outcome measures limiting the ability to draw meaningful conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the renewed interest in these cost-effective, well-established medications in cancer treatment outcomes, there is a paucity of data from the past 15 yr regarding their efficacy in cancer pain management. However, when analgesic strategies in the cancer population are being formulated, it is important that the potential benefits of this class of drug are considered. Further work investigating the role of NSAIDs in cancer pain management is undoubtedly warranted.

Effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for adult surgical patients: an umbrella review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for decreasing perioperative morphine equivalents and acute postoperative pain scores in adult surgical patients.

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are commonly administered during anesthesia to dull the senses, relieve pain and induce sleep. However, there are significant adverse effects associated with intraoperative opioid use. Anesthesia providers can impact the current opioid epidemic by administering non-opioid-centric anesthetic medications. A large-scale evidence-based review is needed to inform a standardized non-opioid pain treatment strategy in the perioperative period.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider studies of adults 19 years or older who are undergoing surgical procedures and receiving non-opioid oral or intravenous perioperative analgesic medications administered by the anesthesia team. Studies that include patients who receive non-opioid medication as a local infiltrate by the surgical team will be excluded, as will studies with patients who receive regional or neuraxial opioid-sparing techniques. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English after 2007 will be considered.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase will be searched, as well as two trial registers and two sources of unpublished reviews. Titles and abstracts will be screened to identify potentially relevant papers. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42019135852.

Anesthesia considerations and post-operative pain management in pregnant women with chronic opioid use

The prevalence of opioid use disorder in pregnancy has escalated markedly in recent years. Chronic opioid use during pregnancy poses several challenges for providing adequate analgesia and anesthesia in the peripartum period. These challenges include the potential for withdrawal, opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Here we discuss alterations in analgesic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that are associated with chronic opioid use. In addition, when treating pain in patients with opioid use disorder it is important to distinguish between different subgroups. In this review, we will discuss practical management strategies for parturients with (1) untreated opioid use disorder, (2) parturients on medication-assisted treatment (methadone, buprenorphine) and (3) patients recovering from opioid use disorder that are currently abstinent. Finally, we offer an overview of non-opioid strategies that may be utilized as part of a multimodal approach to providing optimal analgesia in this patient population.

A Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Principles Used for Scheduled Caesarean Delivery

There is an increasing body of evidence to support the success of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for a wide range of surgical procedures. There has been little formalized application, however, of ERAS principles in obstetrical surgery. The aim of this review was to examine the evidence base of perioperative care for patients undergoing Caesarean delivery (CD) and to determine the feasibility of developing an ERAS Society guideline for this obstetrical care plan. The literature on enhanced recovery programs was reviewed, including fast-track surgery and perioperative care components in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of CD. These studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, non-RCT studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, reviews, and case studies. This is not a systematic review because each ERAS topic area would require a new question. Certain ERAS elements have the potential to benefit patients undergoing CD. These elements include patient education, preoperative optimization, prophylaxis against thromboembolism, antimicrobial prophylaxis, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, hypothermia prevention, perioperative fluid management, postoperative analgesia, ileus prevention, breastfeeding promotion, and early mobilization. ERAS has the potential to be successfully implemented in CD on the basis of the evidence obtained from this review. Knowledge transfer and implementation will require multidisciplinary coordination in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases and the development of a formalized ERAS guideline.

Topic anaesthesia with a eutectic mixture of lidocaine/prilocaine cream after elective caesarean section: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

Aim of the study was to investigate the topical application of a eutectic mixture of lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA^®) cream after caesarean section (CS) and its effect on postoperative pain, time to mobilisation, and time to discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 189 pregnant women were enrolled; full data sets were available for 139 of them, who were prospectively randomised to receive either placebo (control group) or EMLA^® cream (study group) on the CS lesion directly as well as 24 h after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed 24 and 48 h after surgery using the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Additional analgesic pain medication on demand was assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 62 women were allocated randomly to the study and 77 patients to the control group before primary CS. There were no statistically significant differences regarding demographic and surgical parameters comparing both collectives. In addition, the postoperative total pain scores after 24 h [McGill total: 38.5 (0-102) vs. 50 (0-120) p = 0.0889] as well as after 48 h [24 (0-79) vs. 30.5 (0-92); p = 0.1455] showed no significant differences. Furthermore, time to mobilisation (hours) [9.68 (2.18-51.38) vs. 9.47 (4.18-41.77); p = 0.5919] and time to discharge (hours) [98.6 (54.08-170.15) vs. 98.2 (43.45-195.87); p = 0.5331] were comparable.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative application of EMLA^® cream after CS did not reduce postoperative pain or time to mobilisation or discharge, so that its use in this context has to be seen critically.