Angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Risk of angioedema and thrombolytic therapy among stroke patients: An analysis of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

The angioedema risk may vary among stroke patients receiving different thrombolytic agents. This study aimed to investigate the angioedema risk associated with different thrombolytic agents and to identify associated risk factors. We conducted a large-scale retrospective pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Stroke patients receiving thrombolytic therapy (i.e., alteplase or tenecteplase) were identified, and the associations with angioedema were explored using disproportionality analysis and time-to-onset analysis. Additionally, we used adapted Bradford Hill criteria to confirm these associations. Risk factors for angioedema were explored using stepwise logistic regression. A total of 17,776 stroke patients were included, with 2973 receiving alteplase and 278 receiving tenecteplase. Disproportionality analysis revealed that angioedema might be associated with alteplase (adjusted ROR [aROR] 5.13 [95 ​% CI, 4.55-5.79]) or tenecteplase (aROR 2.72 [95 ​% CI, 1.98-3.67]). The adapted Bradford Hill criteria suggested a probable causal relationship between alteplase and angioedema, whereas there was insufficient evidence of a probable causal relationship with tenecteplase. Multivariate analysis revealed that ACE-inhibitors use (aROR 9.73 [95 ​% CI, 7.29-12.98]), female sex (aROR 1.38 [95 ​% CI, 1.13-1.67]) and hypertension (aROR 2.11 [95 ​% CI, 1.52-2.92]) were significant risk factors for angioedema among alteplase-treated stroke patients. Our study suggested that alteplase is associated with a greater risk of angioedema among stroke patients, but there is insufficient evidence to support an association between tenecteplase and angioedema. Clinicians should be vigilant for this potentially life-threatening complication, particularly in patients with identified risk factors. It is also prudent to consider tenecteplase as an alternative, if available.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema in an African American Male With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Angioedema is a condition characterized by non-pitting swelling of the subcutaneous or submucosal tissues in particular the face, lips, and oral cavity. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to contribute to the development of angioedema by increasing the levels of bradykinin and its active metabolites. Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is hypothesized to contribute to the development of angioedema by modifying ACE II levels and further increasing the level of bradykinin in patients taking ACE inhibitors. African Americans may be at particular risk of developing angioedema with concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection and ACE inhibitor use. This case involves a 31-year-old African American male diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who developed angioedema while taking an ACE inhibitor.

Bradykinin Metabolism and Drug-Induced Angioedema

Bradykinin (BK) metabolism and its receptors play a central role in drug-induced angioedema (AE) without urticaria through increased vascular permeability. Many cardiovascular and diabetic drugs may cause BK-mediated AE. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and neprilysin inhibitors impair BK catabolism. Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors reduce the breakdown of BK and substance P (SP). Moreover, angiotensin receptor blockers, thrombolytic agents, and statins may also induce BK-mediated AE. Understanding pathophysiological mechanisms is crucial for preventing and treating drug-induced AE.

The Role of Sex and Gender in Dermatology - From Pathogenesis to Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Sex and gender have increasingly been recognized as significant risk factors for many diseases, including dermatological conditions. Historically, sex and gender have often been grouped together as a single risk factor in the scientific literature. However, both may have a distinct impact on disease incidence, prevalence, clinical presentation, severity, therapeutic response, and associated psychological distress.

OBJECTIVES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The mechanisms that underlie differences in skin diseases between males, females, men, and women remain largely unknown. The specific objectives of this review paper are:To highlight the biological differences between males and females (sex), as well as the sociocultural differences between men and women (gender) and how they impact the integumentary system.To perform a literature review to identify important sex- and gender-related epidemiological and clinical differences for various skin conditions belonging to a range of disease categories and to discuss possible biological and sociocultural factors that could explain the observed differences.To discuss dermatological skin conditions and gender-affirming treatments within the transgender community, a population of individuals who have a gender identity which is different than the gender identity they were assigned at birth.

FUTURE IMPACT

With the rising number of individuals that identify as non-binary or transgender within our increasingly diverse communities, it is imperative to recognize gender identity, gender, and sex as distinct entities. By doing so, clinicians will be able to better risk-stratify their patients and select treatments that are most aligned with their values. To our knowledge, very few studies have separated sex and gender as two distinct risk factors within the dermatology literature. Our article also has the potential to help guide future prevention strategies that are patient-tailored rather than using a universal approach.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema With Resultant Airway Obstruction Following Endotracheal Intubation

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)-induced angioedema is a consequence of excessive levels of bradykinin and accounts for nearly a third of angioedema cases when patients present to emergency rooms. While rare, patients can present with swelling in the face, tongue, and airways making it a life-threatening emergency. To secure an airway, endotracheal intubation may be conducted; however, tracheal stenosis is a known complication. In this report, we present a 61-year-old female with a history of ACEi-induced angioedema care in which she was intubated with facial swelling. Upon a repeat hospitalization, the patient developed stridor with respiratory distress. Bronchoscopy revealed severe tracheal stenosis with multilevel damage to tracheal rings, warranting urgent tracheostomy. One month after discharge, the patient was seen by an ENT specialist who performed a transnasal laryngoscopy revealing near total subglottic and tracheal stenosis of 3 cm stenosis length, presumed secondary to traumatic intubation for prior angioedema management. This case highlights the importance of careful intubation practices in patients with suspected airway edema.

A Case of Refractory Angioedema

Angioedema is an acute disorder that affects mucous membranes and the deepest layers of the skin along with underlying tissue, marked by rapid swelling, large welts, and pain. There are 3 major subtypes of angioedema: mast-cell mediated, bradykinin-mediated, and multifactorial or unclear mechanism subtype. The most common subtype of bradykinin-mediated angioedema is ACE-inhibitor induced, which disproportionately affects African-Americans. It is most often self-limiting and usually responds to the withdrawal of the offending agent. The prolonged duration of angioedema is uncommon in the absence of a persistent stimulus, though it is more likely when there is an abnormality of the metabolic pathways, such as in hereditary angioedema or other gene polymorphisms affecting the complement system. We present a case of severe angioedema that persisted for over a month and required a tracheostomy to manage the airway.

Pharmacovigilance study of the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and angioedema using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) plays a minor role in degrading vasoactive peptides that cause angioedema when angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is present and fully functional. This study investigated the association between DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) and angioedema, including cases where the concomitant use of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) was absent. We obtained data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and performed a disproportionality analysis, using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) for signal detection in patients aged ≥ 40 years, stratified by age group and sex. No signal was detected for DPP-4Is when the entire dataset was analyzed. However, a signal was detected for the entire female subset group, the three stratified female groups aged ≥ 60 years, and males in their 40 s. After excluding the data of concomitant ACEI users, most ROR and IC values were lower and significant only for females in their 60 s and males aged ≥ 80 years. Regarding individual DPP-4Is signals, those detected for saxagliptin and sitagliptin in some age groups disappeared after excluding the data of ACEI users. Notably, linagliptin was the only DPP-4I where signals were detected in most female groups, regardless of age and without concomitant ACEI use. Our findings suggest that some DPP-4Is were associated with a higher reporting of angioedema as per age and sex, even in the absence of concomitant ACEI use.

Initial characteristics and follow-up of patients with a diagnosis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema

Background: A differential diagnosis between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) angioedema (AE) and histaminergic AE (hAE) might be challenging. Follow-up data may help discriminate these conditions but are scarcely reported. Objective: To report on the follow-up of patients with suspected ACEi-AE and to describe the baseline characteristics of AE attacks in patients with a diagnosis of ACEi-AE after follow-up. Methods: Sixty-four patients with suspected ACEi-AE (i.e., with exposure to ACEi before the first attack, no urticaria associated, and normal C1-inhibitor levels) and at least one follow-up visit were included. Data were retrospectively collected at baseline and during the follow-up. Results: After the follow-up, the diagnosis of ACEi-AE was probable in only 30 patients. The remaining patients were reclassified as having probable hAE (21 patients) or undetermined-mechanism AE (13 patients). Patients with ACEi-AE were mostly men (61%), with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] ±17 years), with a highly variable delay from ACEi introduction (median: 23 months; interquartile range: 103 months). Attacks preferentially involved lips (50%), tongue (47%), and throat (30%). Interestingly, patients with probable ACEi-AE after a follow-up also frequently presented with a history of allergy and atopic conditions (20%), attacks with preferential evening onset (25%), and spontaneous resolution in < 24 hours (26%), which are usually considered as suggestive of hAE. ACEi-AE attacks responded to icatibant in 79% of the patients. Conclusion: Patients with probable ACEi-AE were mostly men with facial involvement. A third of the patients with an initial suspected diagnosis of ACEi-AE had a final diagnosis of probable hAE. Although a follow-up of all patients should be a standard of care, it is critical to the correct diagnosis in the case of suspected bradykinin-associated AE, which may actually be due to histamine.

Angioedema associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, also known as gliptins, are a class of oral antidiabetic agents. Postmarketing reports have documented the occurrence of angioedema in patients treated with gliptins and it was found that these drugs increased the risk of angioedema in patients concurrently treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). The aim of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the risk of angioedema associated with gliptins.

METHODS

The keywords used for the literature search in the PubMed database included "angioedema" and "dipeptidyl peptidase", "gliptins", or the name of each DPP-IV inhibitor. Articles in English published up to December 2020 were taken into consideration.

RESULTS

The available data appear to rule out a higher risk of angioedema associated with gliptin monotherapy and have revealed an increased susceptibility in patients simultaneously treated with gliptins and ACEIs. However, one single multicenter phase IV trial and case reports, even if very limited in number, have shown that angioedema can also occur during treatment with DPP-IV inhibitors without the concomitant use of ACEIs. The involvement of other drugs and drug interactions has occasionally been suggested. In a few patients, deficiency of enzymes involved in bradykinin catabolism was detected and this finding can constitute a risk factor for angioedema exacerbated by treatment with DPP-IV inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

This risk of angioedema associated with the use of gliptins has mostly been related to the concurrent administration of ACEIs, and has been considered rare, but it might be underestimated and underreported. The role of additional risk factors or drug interactions deserves further investigations. Caution should be taken when considering the use of DPP-IV inhibitors in patients treated with ACEIs or presenting with other known risk factors for angioedema.

Managing Chronic Urticaria and Recurrent Angioedema Differently with Advancing Age

Angioedema and urticaria affect people of all ages. Accurate diagnosis and optimum management is essential for healthy aging. Older people continue to experience mast cell-mediated urticaria and angioedema, with a higher prevalence of autoimmune and a lower prevalence of autoallergic disease. Bradykinin-mediated angioedemas are more common in the elderly because of their association with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) treatment. Acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency, another bradykinin-mediated angioedema, occurs predominantly in older people, whereas hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency continues to cause symptoms, even in old age. Drug-induced angioedemas disproportionately affect older people, the most frequent users of ACEIs, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment prevent unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Second-generation antihistamines with omalizumab if required are effective and well tolerated in older people with mast cell-mediated urticaria. For bradykinin-mediated angioedemas, these drugs are ineffective. C1-inhibitor replacement or blockade of kallikrein or the bradykinin B2 receptor of the contact pathway is required to treat hereditary angioedema and may be considered in other bradykinin-mediated angioedemas, if supportive treatment is insufficient. For aspirin-related angioedema and urticaria, alternative medications or, exceptionally, desensitization may be required.

Angioedemas associated with renin-angiotensin system blocking drugs: Comparative analysis of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports

INTRODUCTION

Angioedema is a subcutaneous swelling typically affecting the face, larynx or pharynx. It is a known adverse drug reaction (ADR) of ACE inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin-II-receptor blockers (ARBs) and aliskiren (renin inhibitor). Several studies have reported pathophysiological mechanisms and risk factors of ACEi-associated angioedemas, whereas little is known for ARBs and aliskiren. The aim of the study was to analyze comparatively ACEi versus ARBs and aliskiren angioedema reports contained in the European ADR database EudraVigilance with regard to reported risk factors and clinical phenotypes.

METHODS

All spontaneous angioedema reports received between 01/2010-06/2017 reporting either an ACEi, ARB, or aliskiren as "suspected/interacting" drug were identified using the Standardized MedDRA Query "angioedema (narrow)". In order to perform a comparative analysis, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for angioedema reports of ACEi (n = 3.194) versus ARBs (n = 687) and aliskiren (n = 162).

RESULTS

More patients with a history of allergy were included in angioedema reports of ARBs (6.8%) and aliskiren (13.6%) versus ACEi (4.3%). "Urticaria" as an ADR was reported more frequently in angioedema reports of ARBs (18.5%) and aliskiren (9.0%) versus ACEi (5.0%). ACEi-associated angioedemas were more often designated as "life-threatening" compared to ARBs (OR 2.2 [1.6-2.9]) and aliskiren-associated angioedemas (OR 14.2 (3.5-57.4). Concomitant therapy with mTOR inhibitors (OR 4.3 [1.0-17.9]) and fibrinolytics (OR 7.8 [1.1-57.2]) was reported more often in ACEi versus ARBs angioedema reports.

CONCLUSION

The reported clinical phenotypes differed between ACEi versus ARBs and aliskiren angioedema reports. Differences between the patient populations as observed in our study or differences with regard to underlying pathomechanisms could account for this finding. Due to the methodological limitations of spontaneous reporting systems, we cannot draw a firm conclusion in this regard. Hence, further research is necessary to confirm our observation and elucidate the underyling causes.

A Case of Prolonged Angioedema After Cardiac Surgery

Angioedema (AE) is a transient capillary leak syndrome, caused by either histamine or bradykinin, that presents as an acute nonpitting swelling of the skin, subcutaneous tissues, and mucous membranes of the face, lips, tongue, upper airways, and gastrointestinal tract, with or without a rash. A lack of response to antihistamines, steroids, and epinephrine suggests a bradykinin-mediated AE. Bradykinin-AE may be inherited, acquired, or drug related. Mechanism of increased bradykinin can include decreased C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) levels or activity, increased bradykinin production, or decreased bradykinin breakdown, the latter occurring during angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). A 65-year-old woman had coronary artery bypass grafting, which was complicated by prolonged bradykinin-AE owing to ACEi, requiring prolonged endotracheal tube intubation. Treatment with a C1-esterase inhibitor (Berinert) on postoperative day 7 resulted in a dramatic improvement in airway edema and tongue swelling within 7 hours, and the patient was subsequently extubated. The case is unusual because of the prolonged course of AE and the benefit of late administration of C1-INH concentrate.

The rash that presents as a red swollen face

A red swollen face can be a skin sign of a potentially life-threatening condition. We present in detail the main clinical presentations, diagnostic tests, and management of some of the most severe conditions that can frequently present as a red and swollen face: acute or recurrent angioedema, mast cell-driven or bradykinin-mediated angioedema, nonhereditary and hereditary angioedema, allergic or photoallergic facial contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, severe adverse drug reactions (particularly drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms [DRESS]), skin infections (erysipelas, cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis), and autoimmune diseases (dermatomyositis). There are many other conditions that also have to be considered in the differential diagnosis of a red swollen face.

[Drug-induced angioedema : Focus on bradykinin]

On a pathophysiological level, angioedema can be differentiated into histamine- and bradykinin-mediated types. The prototype drug-associated, bradykinin-mediated form of angioedema is angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-induced angioedema. The hypothesized cause is a decrease in bradykinin degradation via ACE inhibition. In this scenario, other bradykinin-degrading enzymes assume major importance. When the effect of these enzymes is also diminished, e. g., due to genetic variants or external factors, compensation for the inhibition of ACE may be insufficient. An increased risk of angioedema has also been reported for other drugs, particularly when prescribed in combination with ACE inhibitors. Here, the suspected cause also relates to the degradation of bradykinin. When angioedema arises within the context of concomitant ACE inhibitor use, additive bradykinin degradation effects may be implicated.

Treatment of Life-Threatening ACE-Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema

Incidence of angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) has been estimated at 0.1%-2.2% of patients receiving treatment. Despite the potential severity of this disease state, standardized treatment is lacking. Traditional pharmacotherapy options include medications that target inflammatory mediators and the angiotensin pathway. However, because ACE-I-induced angioedema is caused by accumulation of bradykinin, these medications fail to target the underlying pathophysiology. Recently, novel therapies that target the kallikrein-bradykinin pathway have been studied. These include icatibant, ecallantide, C1 esterase inhibitors, and fresh-frozen plasma. Recent randomized controlled trials exhibit contradictory results with the use of icatibant. This is a focused review on traditional and novel treatment strategies for ACE-I-induced angioedema.

Isolated angioedema: An overview of clinical features and etiology

Angioedema can occur in isolation, accompanied by urticaria, or as a feature of anaphylaxis in mast cell-mediated disorders, bradykinin-mediated disorders, as well as in others with unknown mechanisms, such as infections, rare disorders, or idiopathic angioedema. In mast cell-mediated angioedema, other signs and symptoms of mast cell-mediator release are frequently seen. However, clear evidence of mast cell degranulation may be absent in histaminergic angioedema. Bradykinin-induced angioedema is not associated with urticaria or other symptoms of type I hypersensitivity reactions. For many of the known triggers of angioedema, the mechanism is unclear. While mast cell and bradykinin-mediated angioedema are relatively well defined in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic approach, angioedema with unknown mechanisms represents a challenge for patients and clinicians alike. Elucidating the clinical pattern and the possible causes of isolated angioedema is the key to a correct diagnosis. This review summarizes the causes, and clinical features of angioedema, with a focus on isolated angioedema.

Ensuring Patient Safety During the Transition to ESRD

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk for complications both inherent to the disease and as a consequence of its treatment. The dangers that CKD patients face change across the spectrum of the disease. Providers who are well-versed in these safety threats are best poised to safeguard patients as their CKD progresses.

Epidemiology of ACE Inhibitor Angioedema Utilizing a Large Electronic Health Record

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are a common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Most epidemiologic ACEI angioedema data are from large multicenter clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of and risk factors for ACEI angioedema using a large integrated electronic health record (EHR).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ACEI prescriptions in the outpatient setting of a large academic center between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2008. We determined frequency, timing, and risk factors for ACEI angioedema within 5 years of prescription. All data were derived from EHR sources, with angioedema defined by EHR reactions of angioedema, swelling, edema, or lip, eye, face, tongue, throat or mouth swelling.

RESULTS

Among 134,945 patients prescribed an ACEI, 0.7% (n = 888) developed angioedema during the subsequent 5 years. Sex was similar but patients who developed ACEI angioedema were younger (61.5 vs 62.7 years, P = .007). Patients with ACEI angioedema were more likely to have a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy compared with patients who did not develop angioedema (7.1% vs 4.2%, P < .001). We identified a 0.07% incidence of ACEI angioedema within 1 month of prescription and a 0.23% incidence during the first year. Incidence of angioedema was relatively constant annually over the subsequent 4 years (0.10% to 0.12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ACEI angioedema within a large EHR is consistent with large clinical trial data. We observed a persistent and relatively constant annual risk; however, angioedema risk factors and underlying genetic and pathophysiological mechanisms require further study.

Angioedema Phenotypes: Disease Expression and Classification

Due to marked heterogeneity of clinical presentations, comprehensive knowledge of angioedema phenotypes is crucial for correct diagnosis and choosing the appropriate therapeutic approach. One of the ways to a meaningful clinical distinction can be made between forms of angioedema occurring "with or without wheals." Angioedema with wheals (rash) is a hallmark of urticaria, either acute or chronic, spontaneous or inducible. Angioedema without wheals may still be manifested in about 10 % of patients with urticaria, but it may also occur as a separate entity. Several classifications of angioedema as part of urticaria were published over time, while a latest one, released in 2014 (HAWK group consensus, see below), provided a classification of all forms of "angioedema without wheals" distinct from urticaria, which will be the focus of the present review. At this time, the HAWK consensus classification is the best in terms of covering the pathophysiology, mediators involved, angioedema triggers, and clinical expression. According to this classification, three types of hereditary angioedema (genetic C1-INH deficiency, normal C1-INH with factor XII mutations, and unknown origin) and four types of acquired angioedema (C1-INH deficiency, related to ACE inhibitors intake, idiopathic histaminergic, and idiopathic non-histaminergic) are presented. We will review the distinctive clinical features of each phenotype in details.

Recurrent angioedema associated with pharmacological inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV

Angioedema (AE) of the upper airways is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition. The incidence has been increasing in the past two decades, primarily due to increased use of medications inhibiting the degradation of vasoactive peptides. Acquired angioedema related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI-AAE) is well known, but other pharmaceutical agents also affect the degradation of bradykinin and substance P. We present a middle-aged man with recurrent episodes of severe AE of the oral cavity, hypopharynx and larynx due to pharmacological inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV.

The burden of angioedema on United States emergency departments: 2006-2010

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Angioedema (AE) is a condition that may prompt a visit to an emergency department (ED), and can quickly progress to airway obstruction. To optimize treatment of AE, it is necessary to understand epidemiology and practice patterns. This study measured the magnitude of AE ED visits and characterized demographics, management, frequency of airway interventions, and mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of two national data sets.

METHODS

From the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we identified all patients presenting from 2006 to 2010 with a primary diagnosis of AE, characterized by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification code 995.1. The discharges were weighted and stratified by comorbidities, age, treatments, and region. χ² , t test, and linear regression were employed for comparisons.

RESULTS

Total discharges increased from 87,481 (29.3 of 100,000 people) to 111,116 (35.8 of 100,000 people). More females were afflicted (57%), and 41.1% were African American. The majority (83%) of patients were discharged from the ED. Twelve percent of cases were attributed to antihypertensive adverse reaction, and these patients were older (P < .0001, odds ratio [OR] = 1.02), and had more comorbidities (P < .0001, OR = 5.66), hospital admissions (P < .0001, OR = 4.83), and intubations (P < .03, OR = 2.07). Overall, patients required intubation infrequently (<1%) and mortality was low (0.08%).

CONCLUSIONS

The AE burden on EDs has increased over time. Patients with adverse reactions to antihypertensives are older, have more comorbidities, and require admission and intubation more frequently. Further investigation is needed to better delineate causation and outcome predictors, and to understand regional practice variance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c. Laryngoscope, 127:828-834, 2017.

Determinants of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) intolerance and angioedema in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

AIM

The aim of the present study was to describe the occurrence and determinants of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEI) intolerance and angioedema (AE) among patients initiating ACEI therapy in a real-world primary care population.

METHODS

Two nested case-control studies were conducted in a cohort of 276 977 patients aged ≥45 years initiating ACEIs from 2007 to 2014 in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Cases of AE occurring for the first time during ACEI therapy (n = 416) were matched with AE-free controls (n = 4335) on the duration of ACEI treatment. Documented switches to angiotensin-II receptor blockers in the prescription records were used to identify ACEI-intolerance cases (n = 24 709), and these were matched with continuous ACEI users (n = 84 238) on the duration of ACEI therapy. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the associations of demographic factors, comorbidities and comedication with AE and ACEI intolerance.

RESULTS

AE during ACEI therapy was associated with age over 65 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07, 1.73], history of allergy (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19, 1.96), use of calcium channel blockers (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.23; 2.01), use of antihistamines (OR 21.25, 95% CI 16.44, 27.46) and use of systemic corticosteroids (OR 4.52, 95% CI 3.26, 6.27). ACEI intolerance was significantly associated with more comorbidities and comedication compared with AE, including allergy (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.96, 2.09), use of antiasthmatic drugs (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.42, 1.61) and use of antihistamines (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43, 1.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Among ACEI users developing AE or ACEI intolerance, several comorbidities and comedication classes were significantly more prevalent compared with ACEI users not developing these adverse reactions.

Isolated Visceral Angioedema Induced by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor

Visceral angioedema is a rare complication of therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Clinical presentation includes nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Early detection of this entity can prevent recurrent episodes and unnecessary invasive procedures, including surgery.

This article describes a 46-year-old-woman who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, associated with nausea and vomiting. She had been taking ramipril for 15 days.

A computed tomography was performed which revealed thickening of a jejunal segment, with submucosal edema.

ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema was suspected and the medication was discontinued, with resolution of symptoms in 48 h.

After 7 months of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic.

Despite of its rarity, ACE inhibitor-induced small-bowel angioedema should be included in the differential diagnosis when patients receiving ACE inhibitor therapy present with abdominal complaints.

Emerging Novel Therapies for Heart Failure

Heart function fails when the organ is unable to pump blood at a rate proportional to the body’s need for oxygen or when this function leads to elevated cardiac chamber filling pressures (cardiogenic pulmonary edema). Despite our sophisticated knowledge of heart failure, even so-called ejection fraction-preserved heart failure has high rates of mortality and morbidity. So, novel therapies are sorely needed. This review discusses current standard therapies for heart failure and launches an exploration into emerging novel treatments on the heels of recently-approved sacubitril and ivbradine. For example, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) is protective of the heart, so in the absence of VIP, VIP knockout mice have dysregulation in key heart failure genes: 1) Force Generation and Propagation; 2) Energy Production and Regulation; 3) Ca⁺² Cycling; 4) Transcriptional Regulators. VIP administration leads to coronary dilation in human subjects. In heart failure patients, VIP levels are elevated as a plausible endogenous protective effect. With the development of elastin polymers to stabilize VIP and prevent its degradation, VIP may therefore have a chance to satisfy the unmet need as a potential treatment for acute heart failure.

Presentation, diagnosis and treatment of angioedema without wheals: a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 1058 patients

BACKGROUND

The first classification of angioedema without wheals was recently reported and comprises different forms of the disease distinguished by aetiology, mediator of oedema and inheritance.

METHODS

In total, 1725 consecutive patients with angioedema without wheals were examined at our centre between 1993 and 2012. We excluded from the analysis 667 patients because of incomplete data or because angioedema was related to a specific factor.

RESULTS

According to the new classification of angioedema, the 1058 patients included in this analysis were diagnosed with hereditary (HAE; n = 377) or acquired angioedema (AAE; n = 681). The former group included HAE with C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (C1-INH-HAE; n = 353) and HAE with normal C1-INH levels (n = 24), of which six had a factor XII mutation (FXII-HAE) and 18 had disease of unknown origin (U-HAE). The AAE group included disease with C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-AAE; n = 49), AAE related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment (n = 183), idiopathic histaminergic (IH-AAE; n = 379) and idiopathic nonhistaminergic angioedema (InH-AAE; n = 70). We compared hereditary and AAE with uncertain aetiopathogenesis: the FXII-HAE and U-HAE groups pooled (FXII/U-HAE) versus InH-AAE. The median age at onset of FXII/U-HAE and InH-AAE was 26 and 38 years, respectively. In addition, 56% of patients with FXII/U-HAE and 81% of those with InH-AAE reported more than five attacks per year (median duration of 48 h). The location of angioedema in patients with FXII/U-HAE versus those with InH-AAE was the following: face, 70% versus 86%; tongue, oral cavity or larynx, 55% versus 68%; limbs, 70% versus 56%; and gastrointestinal mucosa, 50% versus 20%. Prophylaxis with tranexamic acid was effective in all six patients with U-HAE and in 37 of 38 with InH-AAE who were started on this treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings in this cohort of patients with angioedema provide new information on the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Distinct conditions support a novel classification for bradykinin-mediated angio-oedema

BACKGROUND

Angio-oedema (AO) can be attributable to bradykinin (BK) accumulation, as is the case for prototypical hereditary AO (HAO) due to C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency. However, our clinical experience in a reference centre has shown that some patients display a clinical history suggestive of HAO, but exhibit normal C1-INH function, have no mutation in the causative genes associated with HAO (SERPING1, F12), and report no intake of drugs known to promote AO.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the frequency and distribution of different AO subtypes suspected to be BK-mediated AO (BK-AO) and defined by clinical, history and biological criteria (enzyme activities implicated in BK formation and catabolism).

METHODS

The files of all patients referred to our centre for suspected BK-AO were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The distribution of patients (n = 162) was 16 and 4% with a hereditary deficiency of C1-INH or a gain of factor XII function, respectively, 29% with iatrogenic BK-AO, 21% with non-iatrogenic defective kininase activity and 30% with idiopathic increased kinin formation.

CONCLUSION

BK-AO may be caused by multiple inherited or acquired factors triggering BK accumulation. Therefore, we propose a novel typology for BK-AO based on the imbalance of production/catabolism of BK.

Effectiveness of ecallantide in treating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema (ACEI-AE) is mediated by bradykinin. There remains an unmet treatment need because these patients, when presenting to the emergency department (ED), do not respond to conventional therapies, such as antihistamines and corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the treatment effect of ecallantide, a recombinant plasma kallikrein inhibitor, in ED patients with ACEI-AE in whom conventional therapy fails.

METHODS

This was a triple-blind (patient, physician, and statistician), randomized, controlled, phase 2 study to estimate the magnitude of safety and efficacy signals for designing a definitive phase 3 trial comparing conventional therapy with ecallantide to conventional therapy with placebo. Patients were enrolled from April 1, 2010, through January 31, 2013. The primary efficacy study end point was achieving discharge criteria from the ED within 4 hours after initiating study-related treatment.

RESULTS

Discharge criteria from the ED was met in 4 hours or less for 8 (31%) of 26 patients receiving ecallantide vs 5 of (21%) 24 patients receiving placebo (difference in proportions, 10%; 95% confidence interval, -14% to 34%). Ecallantide was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The results from this preliminary study reveal that ecallantide is safe to use and may increase the proportion of patients who meet early discharge criteria by approximately10%. A larger phase 3 study is necessary to confirm the efficacy and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ecallantide use for ACEI-AE in the ED setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01036659.

Postanesthetic Severe Oral Angioedema in Patient's Taking Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the leading cause of a drug-induced angioedema. This occurrence is frequently underdiagnosed, but its relapse can be life-threatening. The authors' intention in reporting this clinical case is to sound a warning about reviewing attitudes and surveillance to try to improve patient perioperative safety.

Angioedema Related to Angiotensin Inhibitors

Angiotensin inhibitors have been extensively evaluated in clinical trials and have demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality following myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as in patients with heart failure or who are at risk of cardiovascular disease. Further, both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are frequently prescribed for the treatment of hypertension and to preserve renal function in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Angioedema is a known, but rare, adverse effect of ACEIs and ARBs. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to have a thorough understanding of risks and benefits of prescribing these medications, particularly in patients with a history of angioedema. This review describes the literature evaluating the incidence and cross-reactivity of angioedema with ACEIs and ARBs in order to provide guidance for clinical decision making.

Classification, diagnosis, and approach to treatment for angioedema: consensus report from the Hereditary Angioedema International Working Group

Angioedema is defined as localized and self-limiting edema of the subcutaneous and submucosal tissue, due to a temporary increase in vascular permeability caused by the release of vasoactive mediator(s). When angioedema recurs without significant wheals, the patient should be diagnosed to have angioedema as a distinct disease. In the absence of accepted classification, different types of angioedema are not uniquely identified. For this reason, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology gave its patronage to a consensus conference aimed at classifying angioedema. Four types of acquired and three types of hereditary angioedema were identified as separate forms from the analysis of the literature and were presented in detail at the meeting. Here, we summarize the analysis of the data and the resulting classification of angioedema.

Angioedema with normal laboratory values: the next step

When faced with a patient with recurrent swelling, a thorough laboratory evaluation to determine the underlying etiology ensues. When the laboratory work-up is unrevealing, health care practitioners are frequently left in a quandary. This review will attempt to provide up-to-date information on how to approach the diagnosis and management of angioedema in a patient with normal laboratory values. The subtypes that will be reviewed in detail include: hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor (HAE with normal C1INH), drug-induced angioedema, and idiopathic angioedema. We present literature to aid the physician in the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema: Outcomes from an Angioedema Expert Consensus Meeting

Several types of angioedema exist beyond hereditary angioedema (HAE) types I/II; however, the diagnostic and treatment needs of these conditions are not well understood. Noticeably, there are no licensed treatments available for other forms of angioedema beyond HAE types I/II, and similarly they are unresponsive to conventional antihistamine/glucocorticoid treatment. A group of angioedema experts met in Budapest in May 2013 to discuss such issues, presenting their experience, reviewing available literature and identifying unmet diagnostic and treatment needs in three different angioedema types: HAE with normal C1-inhibitor (C1-INH; previously referred to as type III HAE); nonallergic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema (ACEI-AAE), and acquired angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-AAE). The group identified unmet diagnostic and treatment needs in HAE-nC1-INH, C1-INH-AAE and ACEI-AAE, explored remedies and made recommendations on how to diagnose and treat these forms of angioedema. The group discussed the difficulties associated with using diagnostic markers, such as the level and function of C1-INH, C1q and C4 to reliably diagnose the angioedema type, and considered the use of genetic testing to identify mutations in <i>FXII</i> or <i>XPNPEP2 </i>that have been associated with HAE-nC1-INH and ACEI-AAE, respectively. Due to the lack of approved treatments for HAE-nC1-INH, ACEI-AAE and C1-INH-AAE, the group presented several case studies in which therapies approved for treatment of HAE types I/II, such as icatibant, ecallantide and pasteurized, nanofiltered C1-INH, were successful. It was uniformly agreed that further studies are needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of angioedema other than HAE types I/II. i 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel