The ABMS MOC Part III Examination: Value, Concerns, and Alternative Formats

Obesity medicine as a subspecialty and United States certification - A review

Background

Certification of obesity medicine for physicians in the United States occurs mainly via the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Obesity medicine is not recognized as a subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). This review examines the value of specialization, status of current ABOM Diplomates, governing bodies involved in ABMS/AOA Board Certification, and the advantages and disadvantages of an ABMS/AOA recognized obesity medicine subspecialty.

Methods

Data for this review were derived from PubMed and appliable websites. Content was driven by the expertise, insights, and perspectives of the authors.

Results

The existing ABOM obesity medicine certification process has resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of Obesity Medicine Diplomates. If ABMS/AOA were to recognize obesity medicine as a subspecialty under an existing ABMS Member Board, then Obesity Medicine would achieve a status like other ABMS recognized subspecialities. However, the transition of ABOM Diplomates to ABMS recognized subspecialists may affect the kinds and the number of physicians having an acknowledged focus on obesity medicine care. Among transition issues to consider include: (1) How many ABMS Member Boards would oversee Obesity Medicine as a subspecialty and which physicians would be eligible? (2) Would current ABOM Diplomates be required to complete an Obesity Medicine Fellowship? If not, then what would be the process for a current ABOM Diplomate to transition to an ABMS-recognized Obesity Medicine subspecialist (i.e., "grandfathering criteria")? and (3) According to the ABMS, do enough Obesity Medicine Fellowship programs exist to recognize Obesity Medicine as a subspecialty?

Conclusions

Decisions regarding a transition to an ABMS recognized Obesity Medicine Subspecialty versus retention of the current ABOM Diplomate Certification should consider which best facilitates medical access and care to patients with obesity, and which best helps obesity medicine clinicians be recognized for their expertise.

Maintenance of Certification Pediatrics: Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM): The New Part 3 Maintenance of Certification Assessment Option

ABSTRACT

Starting in 2022, the American Board of Pediatrics will launch the Maintenance of Certification Assessment for Pediatrics: Pediatric Emergency Medicine (MOCA-Peds: PEM) longitudinal assessment, which will provide an at-home alternative to the point-in-time examination. This longitudinal assessment will help engage PEM physicians participating in continuing certification in a more flexible and continuous lifelong, self-directed learning process while still providing a summative assessment of their knowledge. This commentary provides background information on MOCA-Peds and an introduction to MOCA-Peds: PEM and how it gives the PEM physician another option to participate in continuing certification.

The Influence of Relationship-Centered Coaching on Physician Perceptions of Peer Review in the Context of Mandated Regulatory Practices

PURPOSE

Medical regulatory authorities are legally mandated to protect patients by monitoring the practice of medicine. While principally a matter of public safety, many pursue this mission by establishing quality improvement initiatives that prioritize professional development for all rather than identification of substandard performers. Engaging practitioners in directed learning opportunities, however, is rife with challenge given inherent social complexities. This study was run to explore whether relationship-centered coaching could improve physicians' perceptions of the value of engaging with College-mandated peer review.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental analysis was performed on physician ratings of the effectiveness of peer assessor interactions and assessment processes during 3 time periods: (1) an historical control (March 2016-December 2016; n = 296); (2) a period after assessors were trained to deliver feedback using relationship-centered coaching (December 2016-March 2017; n = 96); and (3) after physicians were given more capacity to choose patient records for peer review and engage in discussion about multisource feedback results (March 2017-December 2018; n = 448).

RESULTS

Psychometric analyses supported the aggregation of survey items into assessor interaction and assessment process subscores. Training assessors to engage in relationship-centered coaching was related with higher assessor interaction scores (4.64 vs 4.47; P < .05; d = 0.37). Assessment process scores did not increase until after additional program enhancements were made in period 3 (4.33 vs 4.17, P < .05, d = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite peer interactions being inherently stressful for physicians when they occur in the context of regulatory authority visits, efforts to establish a quality improvement culture that prioritizes learning can improve physicians' perceptions of peer review.

Surgical coaching to achieve the ABMS vision for the future of continuing board certification

In February 2019, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) released the final report of the Continuing Board Certification: Vision for the Future initiative, issuing strong recommendations to replace ineffective, traditional mechanisms for physicians' maintenance of certification with meaningful strategies that strengthen professional self-regulation and simultaneously engender public trust. The Vision report charges ABMS Member Boards, including the American Board of Surgery (ABS), to develop and implement a more formative, less summative approach to continuing certification. To realize the ABMS's Vision in surgery, new programs must support the assessment of surgeons' performance in practice, identification of individualized performance gaps, tailored goals to address those gaps, and execution of personalized action plans with accountability and longitudinal support. Peer surgical coaching, especially when paired with video-based assessment, provides a structured approach that can meet this need. Surgical coaching was one of the approaches to continuing professional development that was discussed at an ABS-sponsored retreat in January 2020; this commentary review provides an overview of that discussion. The professional surgical societies, in partnership with the ABS, are uniquely positioned to implement surgical coaching programs to support the continuing certification of their membership. In this article, we provide historical context for board certification in surgery, interpret how the ABMS's Vision applies to surgical performance, and highlight recent developments in video-based assessment and peer surgical coaching. We propose surgical coaching as a foundational strategy for accomplishing the ABMS's Vision for continuing board certification in surgery.

The Role of Gender in the Experience and Impact of Recertification Exam Preparation: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians

Background: Little is known about how physicians experience preparing for board recertification examinations. As women make up a growing proportion of the primary care physician workforce, we aimed to explore how primary care physicians experience the personal and professional impacts of recertification examination preparation activities, and whether these impacts differ by gender. Materials and Methods: We conducted exploratory qualitative semistructured interviews with 80 primary care physicians, who had recently taken either the American Board of Family Medicine or American Board of Internal Medicine recertification examination and who practice outpatient care. We used an iterative recruitment approach to obtain a representative sample. We applied a team-based constant comparative analytic approach to identify and categorize themes related to how preparing for the recertification examination impacted their personal or professional lives, and then compared these themes by physician gender. Results: We interviewed 41 male and 39 female participants. Physicians most frequently described taking time from personal rather than professional activities to study, but often said this was "no big deal." Physicians described impacts on personal life such as missing out on family or leisure time, conflicts with parenting responsibilities, and an increased reliance on their spouse for domestic and childcare duties. Female physicians more frequently described parenting and leisure time impacts than males did. Conclusions: Recertification examination preparation impacts physicians' personal lives in a variety of ways and are sometimes experienced differently along gendered lines. These findings suggest opportunities for employers, payers, and specialty boards to help physicians ease potential burdens related to maintaining board certification.

Pediatrician Perspectives on Feasibility and Acceptability of the MOCA-Peds 2017 Pilot

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) certifies that general and subspecialty pediatricians meet standards of excellence established by their peers, immediately after training and over the course of their careers (ie, Maintenance of Certification [MOC]). In 2015-2016, the ABP developed the Maintenance of Certification Assessment for Pediatrics (MOCA-Peds) as an alternative assessment to the current proctored, closed-book general pediatrics (GP) MOC examination. This article is 1 of a 2-part series examining results from the MOCA-Peds pilot in 2017.

METHODS

We conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses with 5081 eligible pediatricians who registered to participate in the 2017 pilot; 81.4% (n = 4016) completed a quarter 4 survey and/or end-of-year survey (January 2018) and comprise the analytic sample.

RESULTS

The majority of pediatricians considered the MOCA-Peds to be feasible and acceptable as an alternative to the proctored MOC GP examination. More than 90% of respondents indicated they would participate in the proposed MOCA-Peds model instead of the examination. Participants also offered recommendations to improve the MOCA-Peds (eg, enhanced focus of questions on outpatient GP, references provided before taking questions); the ABP is carefully considering these as the MOCA-Peds is further refined.

CONCLUSIONS

Pilot participant feedback in 2017 suggested that the MOCA-Peds could be implemented for GP starting in January 2019, with all 15 subspecialties launched by 2022. Current and future evaluations will continue to explore feasibility, acceptability, and learning and practice change as well as sustainability of participation.

Association Between Board Certification, Maintenance of Certification, and Surgical Complications in the United States

Physician credentialing processes aim to improve patient safety and quality, but little research has examined their direct relationship with surgical outcomes. Using national Medicare claims for 2009 to 2013, the authors studied the association between board certification and completion of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements and surgeon rates of complications for 8 elective procedures. Exemplar surgeons were defined as those in the lowest decile of complication rates, and outlier surgeons were those in the highest decile. The analysis included 1.9 million procedures performed by 14 598 surgeons (64% orthopedics, 17% general surgery, 11% urology, 7% neurosurgery). Board-certified surgeons were less likely to be outliers (odds ratio 0.79 [0.66-0.94]). However, completion of MOC was not associated with differences in complication rates in orthopedic surgery or urology. Incorporating additional assessment methods into MOC, such as video evaluation of technical skills, retraining on state-of-the-art care, and peer review, may facilitate further improvements in surgical quality.