1
|
Schiff DM, Li WZM, Work EC, Goullaud L, Vazquez J, Paulet T, Dorfman S, Selk S, Hoeppner BB, Wilens T, Bernstein JA, Diop H. Multiple marginalized identities: A qualitative exploration of intersectional perinatal experiences of birthing people of color with substance use disorder in Massachusetts. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 163:209346. [PMID: 38789329 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Racial and ethnic inequities persist in receipt of prenatal care, mental health services, and addiction treatment for pregnant and postpartum individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Further qualitative work is needed to understand the intersectionality of racial and ethnic discrimination, stigma related to substance use, and gender bias on perinatal SUD care from the perspectives of affected individuals. METHODS Peer interviewers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people of color with SUD in Massachusetts to explore the impact of internalized, interpersonal, and structural racism on prenatal, birthing, and postpartum experiences. The study used a thematic analysis to generate the codebook and double coded transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.89. Preliminary themes were triangulated with five participants to inform final theme development. RESULTS The study includes 23 participants of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds: 39% mixed race/ethnicity (including 9% with Native American ancestry), 30% Hispanic or Latinx, 26% Black/African American, 4% Asian. While participants frequently names racial and ethnic discrimination, both interpersonal and structural, as barriers to care, some participants attributed poor experiences to other marginalized identities and experiences, such as having a SUD. Three unique themes emerged from the participants' experiences: 1) Participants of color faced increased scrutiny and mistrust from clinicians and treatment programs; 2) Greater self-advocacy was required from individuals of color to counteract stereotypes and stigma; 3) Experiences related to SUD history and pregnancy status intersected with racism and gender bias to create distinct forms of discrimination. CONCLUSION Pregnant and postpartum people of color affected by perinatal SUD faced pervasive mistrust and unequal standards of care from mostly white healthcare staff and treatment spaces, which negatively impacted their treatment access, addiction medication receipt, postpartum pain management, and ability to retain custody of their children. Key clinical interventions and policy changes identified by participants for antiracist action include personalizing anesthetic plans for adequate peripartum pain control, minimizing reproductive injustices in contraceptive counseling, and addressing misuse of toxicology testing to mitigate inequitable Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and custody loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davida M Schiff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral for Children, 125 Nashua St. Suite 860, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America; Division of Newborn Medicine, MassGeneral for Children, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America.
| | - William Z M Li
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Erin C Work
- University of California, Schools of Public Health and Social Welfare, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Latisha Goullaud
- Institute for Health and Recovery, Watertown, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Tabhata Paulet
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States of America
| | - Sarah Dorfman
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral for Children, 125 Nashua St. Suite 860, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Sabrina Selk
- National Network of Public Health Initiatives, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Bettina B Hoeppner
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Timothy Wilens
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, United States of America
| | - Judith A Bernstein
- Division of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Hafsatou Diop
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02108, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maher EJ, Stoner SA, Gerlinger J, Ferraro AC, Lepper-Pappan H. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Parent-Child Assistance Program: a case management and home visiting program for people using substances during pregnancy. Trials 2024; 25:264. [PMID: 38627843 PMCID: PMC11020811 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08098-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perinatal substance use can have significant adverse effects on maternal and child health and family stability. Few interventions are specifically designed to address this significant public health problem. The Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) is a 3-year case management and home-visiting intervention that seeks to help birthing persons with at-risk substance use during pregnancy to achieve and maintain substance use disorder recovery and avoid exposing future children to substances prenatally. At-risk refers to a level of substance use that creates problems in the individuals' lives or puts them or their children at risk of harm either prenatally or postnatally. Although the program has consistently shown substantial pre- to post-intervention improvements in its participants, PCAP remains to be tested with a rigorous randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial that aims to examine the effectiveness of the intervention compared to services as usual in affecting primary outcomes related to substance use and family planning. Secondary outcomes will concern connection to recovery support services and family preservation. METHODS Using an intent-to-treat design, the study will recruit from two metro areas in Oklahoma and enroll 200 birthing individuals who are pregnant or up to 24 months postpartum with at-risk substance use during their current or most recent pregnancy. Participants will be randomly assigned, stratified by location, to receive either PCAP or services as usual for 3 years. Participants in the PCAP condition will meet with their case manager approximately biweekly over the course of the intervention period, in their local communities or in their own homes whenever possible. Case managers will assist with goal setting and provide practical assistance in support of participants' goals. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 12, 24, and 36 months post-baseline using the Addiction Severity Index interview and a self-administered survey. DISCUSSION Results from this trial will help to gauge the effectiveness of PCAP in improving parent and child well-being. Results will be reviewed by federal clearinghouses on home-visiting and foster care prevention to determine the strength of evidence of effectiveness with implications for federal financing of this program model at the state level. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05534568. Registered on 6/8/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin J Maher
- Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall 311, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
| | - Susan A Stoner
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA
| | - Julie Gerlinger
- Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall 311, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| | - A C Ferraro
- Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall 311, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| | - Heather Lepper-Pappan
- Department of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, Kaufman Hall 311, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landis RK, Stein BD, Griffin BA, Saloner BK, Terplan M, Faherty LJ. Disparities in Perinatal and Emergency Care Receipt Among Women With Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder in Medicaid, 2007 to 2012. J Addict Med 2023; 17:654-661. [PMID: 37934525 PMCID: PMC10759200 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to better understand receipt of perinatal and emergency care among women with perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) and explore variation by race/ethnicity. METHODS We used 2007-2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia to examine 6,823,471 deliveries for women 18 to 44 years old. Logistic regressions modeled the association between (1) OUD status and receipt of perinatal and emergency care, and (2) receipt of perinatal and emergency care and race/ethnicity, conditional on OUD diagnosis and controlling for patient and county characteristics. We used robust SEs, clustered at the individual level, and included state and year fixed effects. RESULTS Women with perinatal OUD were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.46) and attend the postpartum visit (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.45-0.47) and more likely to seek emergency care (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.45-1.51) than women without perinatal OUD. Among women with perinatal OUD, Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaskan Native (AI/AN) women were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.64-0.72]; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.92]; aOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.64-0.79]) and attend the postpartum visit (aOR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.91]; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.93]; aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.94]) relative to non-Hispanic White women. Black and AI/AN women were also more likely to receive emergency care (aOR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.20]; aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.26]). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that women with perinatal OUD, in particular Black, Hispanic, and AI/AN women, may be missing opportunities for preventive care and comprehensive management of their physical and behavioral health during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Landis
- From the RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA (RKL, BAG); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA (BDS); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (BKS); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD (MT); RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (LJF); and Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (LJF)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richelle L, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Roland M, Kacenelenbogen N. Factors influencing medical students' attitudes towards substance use during pregnancy. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:335. [PMID: 35501752 PMCID: PMC9060417 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03394-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with substance use disorder, and pregnant women especially, are subject to a lot of stigmas, which can prevent optimal accessibility and quality of care. In this survey, we investigated attitudes of final year medical students regarding substance use during pregnancy and identified the factors that influence these attitudes. METHOD This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 and 2020 in Belgium using the short version of the "Substance Abuse Attitude Survey" questionnaire. We focused on two items regarding punishment of substance use during pregnancy. We analysed the concordance between these two, their correlation with other items (e.g. stereotyping, morality, forced withdrawal, low treatment optimism) and the association between respondents' opinion on punishment and their sociodemographic data. RESULTS The response rate was 65.2% (370/567 online and face-to face questionnaires). 19.2% of respondents were in favour of punishment for alcohol use (n = 353) and 15.1% for drug use (n = 356) during pregnancy. The agreement analysis between the two items showed that 14.3% of students were in favour of punishing both pregnant women who use drugs and those using alcohol. Respondents tended to be more in favour of punishment if they were male students, older, their mothers' had a lower education level or had no personal or family history of substance use. Attitudes appeared to be more punitive among students with limited contact with people with substance use disorder (i.e. none or limited to hospital). Students intending to specialise in internal medicine were more in favour of punishment of women whereas none of those intending to specialise in psychiatry were in favour. CONCLUSION Our study shows that about 20% of surveyed medical students favoured punishing substance-using pregnant women. Awareness and training work seems to be necessary to ensure adequate care and support for this already vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lou Richelle
- Department of General Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 612 1070, Brussels, CP, Belgium.
| | - Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 591 1070, Brussels, CP, Belgium
| | - Michel Roland
- Department of General Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 612 1070, Brussels, CP, Belgium
| | - Nadine Kacenelenbogen
- Department of General Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 612 1070, Brussels, CP, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dauber S, Beacham A, Hammond C, West A, Thrul J. Adaptive Text Messaging for Postpartum Risky Drinking: Conceptual Model and Protocol for an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e36849. [PMID: 35373778 PMCID: PMC9016512 DOI: 10.2196/36849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Risky drinking is prevalent among women of childbearing age. Although many women reduce their drinking during pregnancy, more than half return to prepregnancy levels during the early postpartum period. Risky drinking in new mothers may be associated with negative child and maternal health outcomes; however, new mothers are unlikely to seek treatment for risky drinking because of stigma and fear of child protective service involvement. SMS text messaging is a promising approach for reaching non–treatment-seeking new mothers at risk because of risky drinking. SMS text messaging interventions (TMIs) are empirically supported for alcohol use, but a tailored intervention for new mothers does not exist. This study aims to fill this gap by developing a just-in-time adaptive TMI for postpartum risky drinking. Objective The objectives of this paper are to present a preliminary conceptual model of postpartum risky drinking and describe the protocol for conducting an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with new mothers to inform the refinement of the conceptual model and development of the TMI. Methods This paper presents a preliminary conceptual model of postpartum risky drinking based on the motivational model of alcohol use, social cognitive theory, and temporal self-regulation theory. The model proposes three primary intervention targets: motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. Theoretical and empirical literature in support of the conceptual model is described. The paper also describes procedures for a study that will collect EMA data from 30 participants recruited via social media and the perinatal Central Intake system of New Jersey. Following the baseline assessment, EMA surveys will be sent 5 times per day for 14 days. The assessment instruments and data analysis procedures are described. Results Recruitment is scheduled to begin in January 2022 and is anticipated to conclude in March 2022. Study results are estimated to be published in July 2022. Conclusions The study findings will enhance our understanding of daily and momentary fluctuations in risk and protective factors for risky drinking during the early postpartum period. The findings will be used to refine the conceptual model and inform the development of the TMI. The next steps for this work include the development of intervention components via an iterative participatory design process and testing of the resulting intervention in a pilot microrandomized trial. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/36849
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Dauber
- Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alexa Beacham
- Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, United States
| | - Cori Hammond
- Partnership to End Addiction, New York, NY, United States
| | - Allison West
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Johannes Thrul
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|