Syntaxin1A-mediated Resistance and Hypersensitivity to Isoflurane in Drosophila melanogaster

Time to Wake Up! The Ongoing Search for General Anesthetic Reversal Agents

How general anesthetics work remains a topic of ongoing study. A parallel field of research has sought to identify methods to reverse general anesthesia. Reversal agents could shorten patients' recovery time and potentially reduce the risk of postoperative complications. An incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of general anesthesia has hampered the pursuit for reversal agents. Nevertheless, the search for reversal agents has furthered understanding of the mechanisms underlying general anesthesia. The study of potential reversal agents has highlighted the importance of rigorous criteria to assess recovery from general anesthesia in animal models, and has helped identify key arousal systems (e.g., cholinergic, dopaminergic, and orexinergic systems) relevant to emergence from general anesthesia. Furthermore, the effects of reversal agents have been found to be inconsistent across different general anesthetics, revealing differences in mechanisms among these drugs. The presynapse and glia probably also contribute to general anesthesia recovery alongside postsynaptic receptors. The next stage in the search for reversal agents will have to consider alternate mechanisms encompassing the tripartite synapse.

Neural Ensemble Fragmentation in the Anesthetized Drosophila Brain

General anesthetics cause a profound loss of behavioral responsiveness in all animals. In mammals, general anesthesia is induced in part by the potentiation of endogenous sleep-promoting circuits, although "deep" anesthesia is understood to be more similar to coma (Brown et al., 2011). Surgically relevant concentrations of anesthetics, such as isoflurane and propofol, have been shown to impair neural connectivity across the mammalian brain (Mashour and Hudetz, 2017; Yang et al., 2021), which presents one explanation why animals become largely unresponsive when exposed to these drugs. It remains unclear whether general anesthetics affect brain dynamics similarly in all animal brains, or whether simpler animals, such as insects, even display levels of neural connectivity that could be disrupted by these drugs. Here, we used whole-brain calcium imaging in behaving female Drosophila flies to investigate whether isoflurane anesthesia induction activates sleep-promoting neurons, and then inquired how all other neurons across the fly brain behave under sustained anesthesia. We were able to track the activity of hundreds of neurons simultaneously during waking and anesthetized states, for spontaneous conditions as well as in response to visual and mechanical stimuli. We compared whole-brain dynamics and connectivity under isoflurane exposure to optogenetically induced sleep. Neurons in the Drosophila brain remain active during general anesthesia as well as induced sleep, although flies become behaviorally inert under both treatments. We identified surprisingly dynamic neural correlation patterns in the waking fly brain, suggesting ensemble-like behavior. These become more fragmented and less diverse under anesthesia but remain wake-like during induced sleep.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When humans are rendered immobile and unresponsive by sleep or general anesthetics, their brains do not shut off - they just change how they operate. We tracked the activity of hundreds of neurons simultaneously in the brains of fruit flies that were anesthetized by isoflurane or genetically put to sleep, to investigate whether these behaviorally inert states shared similar brain dynamics. We uncovered dynamic patterns of neural activity in the waking fly brain, with stimulus-responsive neurons constantly changing through time. Wake-like neural dynamics persisted during induced sleep but became more fragmented under isoflurane anesthesia. This suggests that, like larger brains, the fly brain might also display ensemble-like behavior, which becomes degraded rather than silenced under general anesthesia.

Functional regulation of syntaxin-1: An underlying mechanism mediating exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells

The fusion of the secretory vesicle with the plasma membrane requires the assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein complexes formed by synaptobrevin, syntaxin-1, and SNAP-25. Within the pathway leading to exocytosis, the transitions between the "open" and "closed" conformations of syntaxin-1 function as a switch for the fusion of vesicles with the plasma membranes; rapid assembly and disassembly of syntaxin-1 clusters on the plasma membrane provide docking and fusion sites for secretory vesicles in neuroendocrine cells; and the fully zippered trans-SNARE complex, which requires the orderly, rapid and accurate binding of syntaxin-1 to other SNARE proteins, play key roles in triggering fusion. All of these reactions that affect exocytosis under physiological conditions are tightly regulated by multiple factors. Here, we review the current evidence for the involvement of syntaxin-1 in the mechanism of neuroendocrine cell exocytosis, discuss the roles of multiple factors such as proteins, lipids, protein kinases, drugs, and toxins in SNARE complex-mediated membrane fusion, and present an overview of syntaxin-1 mutation-associated diseases with a view to developing novel mechanistic therapeutic targets for the treatment of neuroendocrine disorders.

Whole-exome sequencing reveals genetic variations in humans with differential sensitivity to sevoflurane：A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The anesthesia sensitivity is heterogeneous both in animals and humans, while the underlying molecular mechanism has not yet been determined. Here, for the first time, we conducted a prospective observational study to test whether genetic variations contribute to the differential sensitivity to sevoflurane in humans.

METHODS

Five hundred patients who underwent abdominal surgeries were included. The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ET_sevo) was adjusted to maintain Bispectral index (BIS) value between 40 and 60. The mean ET_sevo from 20 min after endotracheal intubation to 2 h after the beginning of surgery was calculated for each patient. These patients were further divided into high sensitivity group (mean - SD, H group) and low sensitivity group (mean + SD, L group) to investigate the genetic variants related to the differential sensitivity to sevoflurane by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and genome-wide association study (GWAS) in karyocyte from peripheral blood.

RESULTS

The mean ET_sevo of these 500 patients was 1.60% ± 0.34%. After pairing, 55 patients from H group and 59 patients from L group were selected for WES (ET_sevo of H group: 1.06% ± 0.13% vs. ET_sevo of L group: 2.17% ± 0.16%, P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, FAT atypical cadherin 2 (FAT2, SNP rs174272, rs174271, and rs174261), acireductone dioxygenase 1 (ADI1, SNP rs117278), NEDD4 E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (NEDD4, SNP rs70048, rs70049, and rs70056), and FAD dependent oxidoreductase domain containing 2 (FOXRED2, SNP rs144281) were found to be associated with sevoflurane sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variations may contribute to the differential sensitivity to sevoflurane among humans.

CHIP Decline Is Associated With Isoflurane-Induced Neurodegeneration in Aged Mice

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) commonly occur in elderly patients, and isoflurane could be a risk factor. During the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration, the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) participates in the process of aging, which affects synaptic plasticity and synaptic function. However, whether UPS is involved in the etiology of PND is unclear. In this study, we examined the expression change of ubiquitin E3 ligase protein carboxyl-terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP) and the function turbulence of UPS in isoflurane-exposed aged mouse to illustrate the role of UPS in PND. Neurodegenerative behavioral changes were shown in isoflurane-exposed aged mice and correlated with neuropathological changes manifested with reduced number of intersections and spine density in the cortex. Ubiquitin function was decreased while the apoptosis was activated, and CHIP protein expression decline altered synapsin expression and phosphorylation associated with the neurodegeneration in isoflurane-induced PND. Aging was the big important factor. And it remained consistent with the synapsin phosphorylation/dephosphorylation level changes in CHIP knock-down N2a cells. Per our observation, the decline in CHIP protein expression and synaptic degeneration might reveal the reason for synaptic degeneration in the underlying pathogenesis of PND caused by isoflurane.

Metabolomics and Whole-Exome Sequencing in Patients with Differential Sensitivity to Sevoflurane: A Protocol for a Prospective Observational Trial

Introduction: Different sensitivity to volatile anesthetics in Drosophila, nematodes and mice is related to mutation of energy metabolism genes. In clinical practice, we find that the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ET_sevo) differs among patients at the same depth of anesthesia, indicating that the sensitivity to sevoflurane varies among patients. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The sensitivity of an anesthetic is associated with the postoperative outcomes of patients and the mechanism of action of volatile anesthetics. We therefore propose this protocol to determine whether differences in metabolite profile and genetic variations contribute to patients' sensitivity to volatile anesthetics. Methods and Analysis: This is a single-centre, prospective observational study. 720 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included. General anesthesia was induced with inhaled sevoflurane, a bolus of sufentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg) and cis-atracurium (0.2-0.3 mg/kg). The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ET_sevo) was adjusted to maintain a BIS (bispectral index) value between 40-60. The mean ET_sevo from 20 min after endotracheal intubation to 2 h after the beginning of surgery (steady state) was calculated for each patient. Patients were further divided into a high-sensitivity group (mean ET_sevo - SD) and a low-sensitivity group (mean ET_sevo + SD) to investigate the sensitivity to sevoflurane. Cases were paired from the high-sensitivity group (group H) and low-sensitivity group (group L) according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA physical status classification, vital signs, BIS, ephedrine use, sufentanildose, and cis-atracurium dose at anesthesia induction and steady state. Differences in metabolite levels, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and protein-coding gene sequence variations between group H and group L will be determined through plasma metabolomics, whole-exome sequencing (WES), genome-wide association study (GWAS), and bioinformatics analyses. These results will be analysed to determine the reasons for the differential sensitivity to sevoflurane in humans. Ethics and Dissemination: This prospective observational study protocol has received ethical approval from the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University on May 19, 2017 (Approval No. 78). Informed consent will be obtained before patient enrolment. The results will be submitted to international peer-review journals. Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR1800014327.

Effects of general anesthetics on synaptic transmission and plasticity

General anesthetics depress excitatory and/or enhance inhibitory synaptic transmission principally by modulating the function of glutamatergic or GABAergic synapses, respectively, with relative anesthetic agent-specific mechanisms. Synaptic signaling proteins, including ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels, are targeted by general anesthetics to modulate various synaptic mechanisms, including presynaptic neurotransmitter release, postsynaptic receptor signaling, and dendritic spine dynamics to produce their characteristic acute neurophysiological effects. As synaptic structure and plasticity mediate higher-order functions such as learning and memory, long-term synaptic dysfunction following anesthesia may lead to undesirable neurocognitive consequences depending on the specific anesthetic agent and the vulnerability of the population. Here we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms of transient and persistent general anesthetic alterations of synaptic transmission and plasticity.

Tracking Single Molecule Dynamics in the Adult Drosophila Brain

Super-resolution microscopy provides valuable insight for understanding the nanoscale organization within living tissue, although this method is typically restricted to cultured or dissociated cells. Here, we develop a method to track the mobility of individual proteins in ex vivo adult Drosophila melanogaster brains, focusing on a key component of the presynaptic release machinery, syntaxin1A (Sx1a). We show that individual Sx1a dynamics can be reliably tracked within neurons in the whole fly brain, and that the mobility of Sx1a molecules increases following conditional neural stimulation. We then apply this preparation to the problem of general anesthesia, to address how different anesthetics might affect single molecule dynamics in intact brain synapses. We find that propofol, etomidate, and isoflurane significantly impair Sx1a mobility, while ketamine and sevoflurane have little effect. Resolving single molecule dynamics in intact fly brains provides a novel approach to link localized molecular effects with systems-level phenomena such as general anesthesia.

Exploiting the Potential of Drosophila Models in Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Pathological Mechanisms and Drug Discovery

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) represent a complex and heterogeneous group of rare genetic diseases due to mutations in genes coding for lysosomal enzymes, membrane proteins or transporters. This leads to the accumulation of undegraded materials within lysosomes and a broad range of severe clinical features, often including the impairment of central nervous system (CNS). When available, enzyme replacement therapy slows the disease progression although it is not curative; also, most recombinant enzymes cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, leaving the CNS untreated. The inefficient degradative capability of the lysosomes has a negative impact on the flux through the endolysosomal and autophagic pathways; therefore, dysregulation of these pathways is increasingly emerging as a relevant disease mechanism in LSDs. In the last twenty years, different LSD Drosophila models have been generated, mainly for diseases presenting with neurological involvement. The fruit fly provides a large selection of tools to investigate lysosomes, autophagy and endocytic pathways in vivo, as well as to analyse neuronal and glial cells. The possibility to use Drosophila in drug repurposing and discovery makes it an attractive model for LSDs lacking effective therapies. Here, ee describe the major cellular pathways implicated in LSDs pathogenesis, the approaches available for their study and the Drosophila models developed for these diseases. Finally, we highlight a possible use of LSDs Drosophila models for drug screening studies.

Proportional Downscaling of Glutamatergic Release Sites by the General Anesthetic Propofol at Drosophila Motor Nerve Terminals

Propofol is the most common general anesthetic used for surgery in humans, yet its complete mechanism of action remains elusive. In addition to potentiating inhibitory synapses in the brain, propofol also impairs excitatory neurotransmission. We use electrophysiological recordings from individual glutamatergic boutons in male and female larval Drosophila melanogaster motor nerve terminals to characterize this effect. We recorded from two bouton types, which have distinct presynaptic physiology and different average numbers of release sites or active zones. We show that a clinically relevant dose of propofol (3 μm) impairs neurotransmitter release similarly at both bouton types by decreasing the number of active release sites by half, without affecting release probability. In contrast, an analog of propofol has no effect on glutamate release. Coexpressing a truncated syntaxin1A protein in presynaptic boutons completely blocked this effect of propofol. Overexpressing wild-type syntaxin1A in boutons also conferred a level of resistance by increasing the number of active release sites to a physiological ceiling set by the number of active zones or T-bars, and in this way counteracting the effect of propofol. These results point to the presynaptic release machinery as a target for the general anesthetic. Proportionally equivalent effects of propofol on the number of active release sites across the different bouton types suggests that glutamatergic circuits that involve smaller boutons with fewer release sites may be more vulnerable to the presynaptic effects of the drug.

Syntaxin1A Neomorphic Mutations Promote Rapid Recovery from Isoflurane Anesthesia in Drosophila melanogaster

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the presynaptic protein syntaxin1A modulate general anesthetic effects in vitro and in vivo. Coexpression of a truncated syntaxin1A protein confers resistance to volatile and intravenous anesthetics, suggesting a target mechanism distinct from postsynaptic inhibitory receptor processes. Hypothesizing that recovery from anesthesia may involve a presynaptic component, the authors tested whether syntaxin1A mutations facilitated recovery from isoflurane anesthesia in Drosophila melanogaster.

METHODS

A truncated syntaxin1A construct was expressed in Drosophila neurons. The authors compared effects on isoflurane induction versus recovery in syntaxin1A mutant animals by probing behavioral responses to mechanical stimuli. The authors also measured synaptic responses from the larval neuromuscular junction using sharp intracellular recordings, and performed Western blots to determine whether the truncated syntaxin1A is associated with presynaptic core complexes.

RESULTS

Drosophila expressing a truncated syntaxin1A (syx, n = 40) were resistant to isoflurane induction for a behavioral responsiveness endpoint (ED50 0.30 ± 0.01% isoflurane, P < 0.001) compared with control (0.240 ± 0.002% isoflurane, n = 40). Recovery from isoflurane anesthesia was also faster, with syx-expressing flies showing greater levels of responsiveness earlier in recovery (reaction proportion 0.66 ± 0.48, P < 0.001, n = 68) than controls (0.22 ± 0.42, n = 68 and 0.33 ± 0.48, n = 66). Measuring excitatory junction potentials of larvae coexpressing the truncated syntaxin1A protein showed a greater recovery of synaptic function, compared with controls (17.39 ± 3.19 mV and 10.29 ± 4.88 mV, P = 0.014, n = 8 for both). The resistance-promoting truncated syntaxin1A was not associated with presynaptic core complexes, in the presence or absence of isoflurane anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The same neomorphic syntaxin1A mutation that confers isoflurane resistance in cell culture and nematodes also produces isoflurane resistance in Drosophila. Resistance in Drosophila is, however, most evident at the level of recovery from anesthesia, suggesting that the syntaxin1A target affects anesthesia maintenance and recovery processes rather than induction. The absence of truncated syntaxin1A from the presynaptic complex suggests that the resistance-promoting effect of this molecule occurs before core complex formation.

The Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission

General anesthetics are a class of drugs that target the central nervous system and are widely used for various medical procedures. General anesthetics produce many behavioral changes required for clinical intervention, including amnesia, hypnosis, analgesia, and immobility; while they may also induce side effects like respiration and cardiovascular depressions. Understanding the mechanism of general anesthesia is essential for the development of selective general anesthetics which can preserve wanted pharmacological actions and exclude the side effects and underlying neural toxicities. However, the exact mechanism of how general anesthetics work is still elusive. Various molecular targets have been identified as specific targets for general anesthetics. Among these molecular targets, ion channels are the most principal category, including ligand-gated ionotropic receptors like γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and acetylcholine receptors, voltage-gated ion channels like voltage-gated sodium channel, calcium channel and potassium channels, and some second massager coupled channels. For neural functions of the central nervous system, synaptic transmission is the main procedure for which information is transmitted between neurons through brain regions, and intact synaptic function is fundamentally important for almost all the nervous functions, including consciousness, memory, and cognition. Therefore, it is important to understand the effects of general anesthetics on synaptic transmission via modulations of specific ion channels and relevant molecular targets, which can lead to the development of safer general anesthetics with selective actions. The present review will summarize the effects of various general anesthetics on synaptic transmissions and plasticity.

SNARE Complex-Associated Proteins and Alcohol

Alcohol addiction causes major health problems throughout the world, causing numerous deaths and incurring a huge economic burden to society. To develop an intervention for alcohol addiction, it is necessary to identify molecular target(s) of alcohol and associated molecular mechanisms of alcohol action. The functions of many central and peripheral synapses are impacted by low concentrations of ethanol (EtOH). While the postsynaptic targets and mechanisms are studied extensively, there are limited studies on the presynaptic targets and mechanisms. This article is an endeavor in this direction, focusing on the effect of EtOH on the presynaptic proteins associated with the neurotransmitter release machinery. Studies on the effects of EtOH at the levels of gene, protein, and behavior are highlighted in this article.

Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Anesthetic Mechanisms of Action: A Decade of Discovery

Significant progress has been made in the 21st century towards a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of action of general anesthetics, coincident with progress in structural biology and molecular, cellular, and systems neuroscience. This review summarizes important new findings that include target identification through structural determination of anesthetic binding sites, details of receptors and ion channels involved in neurotransmission, and the critical roles of neuronal networks in anesthetic effects on memory and consciousness. These recent developments provide a comprehensive basis for conceptualizing pharmacological control of amnesia, unconsciousness, and immobility.

Neonatal anesthesia impairs synapsin 1 and synaptotagmin 1, two key regulators of synaptic vesicle docking and fusion

Early exposure to anesthetics may interfere with synaptic development and lead to cognitive deficits. We previously demonstrated a decrease in vesicles docked at and within 100 nm from the presynaptic membrane in hippocampal nerve terminals of neonatal rats after anesthesia. Hence, we designed this study to assess the effects of neonatal anesthesia on synapsin 1 (Syn1) and synaptotagmin 1 (Syt1), two key regulators of vesicle docking and fusion. To test the link between changes in Syn1 and Syt1 and behavioral deficits observed after neonatal anesthesia, we also assessed retention memory and fear conditioning in adolescent rats after neonatal anesthesia. Pups received a combination of clinical anesthetics, then Syn1 and Syt1 mRNA and protein expression were determined at the peak (postnatal day 8, P8), part-way through (P12) and end of synaptogenesis (P24) in the CA1-subiculum by qPCR and western blotting. Anesthesia decreased Syn1 and Syt1 mRNA expression at P8 (P<0.01 and <0.001) and P12 (P=0.001 and 0.017), but not P24 (P=0.538 and 0.671), and impaired Syn1, p-Syn1, and Syt1 protein levels at P8 (P=0.038, 0.041, and 0.004, respectively), P12 (P<0.001, P=0.001, and P<0.0001), and P24 (P=0.025, 0.031, and 0.001). Anesthetic-challenged rats displayed deficient long-term retention memory (P=0.019) and hippocampus-dependent fear conditioning (P<0.001). These results suggest that anesthetics alter Syn1 and Syt1 during synapse assembly and maturation, raising the possibility that anesthetic interference with Syn1 and Syt1 could initiate changes in synaptic function that contribute to the cognitive deficits observed after neonatal anesthesia.

General Genetic Strategies

It is difficult to study the genetics and molecular mechanisms of anesthesia in humans. Fortunately, the genetic approaches in model organisms can, and have, led to profound insights as to the targets of anesthetics. In turn, the organization of these putative targets into meaningful pathways has begun to elucidate the mechanisms of action of these agents. However, it is important to first appreciate the strengths, and limitations, of genetic approaches to understand the anesthetic action. Here we compare the commonly used genetic model organisms, various anesthetic endpoints, and different modes of genetic screens. Coupled with the more specific data presented in subsequent chapters, this chapter places those results in a framework with which to analyze the discoveries across organisms and eventually extend the resulting models to humans.

Using Drosophila to Understand General Anesthesia: From Synapses to Behavior

Investigating mechanisms of general anesthesia requires access to multiple levels of neuronal function, from effects at individual synapses to responses in behaving animals. Drosophila melanogaster provides an excellent model to test different theories for general anesthesia because it offers robust methods for testing local as well as global target processes, in an animal that is similarly impacted by these diverse drugs as humans. Here, we outline methods to quantify two such endpoints, neurotransmission and behavioral responsiveness, focusing on the intravenous drug propofol.

Common general anesthetic propofol impairs kinesin processivity

Propofol is the most widely used i.v. general anesthetic to induce and maintain anesthesia. It is now recognized that this small molecule influences ligand-gated channels, including the GABA_A receptor and others. Specific propofol binding sites have been mapped using photoaffinity ligands and mutagenesis; however, their precise target interaction profiles fail to provide complete mechanistic underpinnings for the anesthetic state. These results suggest that propofol and other common anesthetics, such as etomidate and ketamine, may target additional protein networks of the CNS to contribute to the desired and undesired anesthesia end points. Some evidence for anesthetic interactions with the cytoskeleton exists, but the molecular motors have received no attention as anesthetic targets. We have recently discovered that propofol inhibits conventional kinesin-1 KIF5B and kinesin-2 KIF3AB and KIF3AC, causing a significant reduction in the distances that these processive kinesins can travel. These microtubule-based motors are highly expressed in the CNS and the major anterograde transporters of cargos, such as mitochondria, synaptic vesicle precursors, neurotransmitter receptors, cell signaling and adhesion molecules, and ciliary intraflagellar transport particles. The single-molecule results presented show that the kinesin processive stepping distance decreases 40-60% with EC₅₀ values <100 nM propofol without an effect on velocity. The lack of a velocity effect suggests that propofol is not binding at the ATP site or allosteric sites that modulate microtubule-activated ATP turnover. Rather, we propose that a transient propofol allosteric site forms when the motor head binds to the microtubule during stepping.

Local Versus Global Effects of Isoflurane Anesthesia on Visual Processing in the Fly Brain

What characteristics of neural activity distinguish the awake and anesthetized brain? Drugs such as isoflurane abolish behavioral responsiveness in all animals, implying evolutionarily conserved mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether this conservation is reflected at the level of neural activity. Studies in humans have shown that anesthesia is characterized by spatially distinct spectral and coherence signatures that have also been implicated in the global impairment of cortical communication. We questioned whether anesthesia has similar effects on global and local neural processing in one of the smallest brains, that of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). Using a recently developed multielectrode technique, we recorded local field potentials from different areas of the fly brain simultaneously, while manipulating the concentration of isoflurane. Flickering visual stimuli (‘frequency tags’) allowed us to track evoked responses in the frequency domain and measure the effects of isoflurane throughout the brain. We found that isoflurane reduced power and coherence at the tagging frequency (13 or 17 Hz) in central brain regions. Unexpectedly, isoflurane increased power and coherence at twice the tag frequency (26 or 34 Hz) in the optic lobes of the fly, but only for specific stimulus configurations. By modeling the periodic responses, we show that the increase in power in peripheral areas can be attributed to local neuroanatomy. We further show that the effects on coherence can be explained by impacted signal-to-noise ratios. Together, our results show that general anesthesia has distinct local and global effects on neuronal processing in the fruit fly brain.

What is unconsciousness in a fly or a worm? A review of general anesthesia in different animal models

All animals are rendered unresponsive by general anesthetics. In humans, this is observed as a succession of endpoints from memory loss to unconsciousness to immobility. Across animals, anesthesia endpoints such as loss of responsiveness or immobility appear to require significantly different drug concentrations. A closer examination in key model organisms such as the mouse, fly, or the worm, uncovers a trend: more complex behaviors, either requiring several sub-behaviors, or multiple neural circuits working together, are more sensitive to volatile general anesthetics. This trend is also evident when measuring neural correlates of general anesthesia. Here, we review this complexity hypothesis in humans and model organisms, and attempt to reconcile these findings with the more recent view that general anesthetics potentiate endogenous sleep pathways in most animals. Finally, we propose a presynaptic mechanism, and thus an explanation for how these drugs might compromise a succession of brain functions of increasing complexity.

Behavioral and electrophysiological analysis of general anesthesia in 3 background strains of Drosophila melanogaster

General anesthetics achieve behavioral unresponsiveness via a mechanism that is incompletely understood. The study of genetic model systems such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is crucial to advancing our understanding of how anesthetic drugs render animals unresponsive. Previous studies have shown that wild-type control strains differ significantly in their sensitivity to general anesthetics, which potentially introduces confounding factors for comparing genetic mutations placed on these wild-type backgrounds. Here, we examined a variety of behavioral and electrophysiological endpoints in Drosophila, in both adult and larval animals. We characterized these endpoints in 3 commonly used fly strains: wild-type Canton Special (CS), and 2 commonly used white-eyed strains, isoCJ1 and w(1118). We found that CS and isoCJ1 show remarkably similar sensitivity to isoflurane across a variety of behavioral and electrophysiological endpoints. In contrast, w(1118) is resistant to isoflurane compared to the other 2 strains at both the adult and larval stages. This resistance is however not reflected at the level of neurotransmitter release at the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ). This suggests that the w(1118) strain harbors another mutation that produces isoflurane resistance, by acting on an arousal pathway that is most likely preserved between larval and adult brains. This mutation probably also affects sleep, as marked differences between isoCJ1 and w(1118) have also recently been found for behavioral responsiveness and sleep intensity measures.