1
|
Wang X, Zhang J, Zhu G, Cai S, Zhang Q, Duan M, Feng S. Effect of cuff inflation with lidocaine, saline, and air on tracheal tube cuff pressure during laparoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasms: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:216. [PMID: 38956472 PMCID: PMC11218051 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02606-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheal tube cuff pressure will increase after pneumoperitoneum when the cuff is inflated with air, high pressure can cause tracheal mucosal damage. This prospective trial aimed to assess if inflating with normal saline or lidocaine can prevent increase of tracheal tube cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal damage in laparoscopic surgeries with general anesthesia. Whether changes of tracheal tube cuff transverse diameter (CD) can predict changes of tracheal tube cuff pressure. METHODS Ninety patients scheduled for laparoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasms under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to groups air (A), saline (S) or lidocaine (L). Endotracheal tube cuff was inflated with room-temperature air in group A (n = 30), normal saline in group S (n = 30), 2% lidocaine hydrochloride injection in group L (n = 30). After intubation, tracheal tube cuff pressure was monitored by a calibrated pressure transducers, cuff pressure was adjusted to 25 cmH2O (T0.5). Tracheal tube cuff pressure at 15 min after pneumoperitoneum (T1) and 15 min after exsufflation (T2) were accessed. CD were measured by ultrasound at T0.5 and T1, the ability of ΔCD (T1-0.5) to predict cuff pressure was accessed. Tracheal mucous injury at the end of surgery were also recorded. RESULTS Tracheal tube cuff pressure had no significant difference among the three groups at T1 and T2. ΔCD had prediction value (AUC: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.81-1.02]; sensitivity: 0.99; specificity: 0.82) for cuff pressure. Tracheal mucous injury at the end of surgery were 0 (0, 1.0) in group A, 0 (0, 1.0) in group S, 0 (0, 0) in group L (p = 0.02, group L was lower than group A and S, p = 0.03 and p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Compared to inflation with air, normal saline and 2% lidocaine cannot ameliorate the increase of tracheal tube cuff pressure during the pneumoperitoneum period under general anesthesia, but lidocaine can decrease postoperative tracheal mucosa injury. ΔCD measured by ultrasound is a predictor for changes of tracheal tube cuff pressure. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2100054089, Date: 08/12/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's HealthCare Hospital, No.123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
| | - Guangli Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Li Huili Hospital Affiliated to Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
| | - Shenquan Cai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
| | - Qingtong Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
| | - Manlin Duan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing BenQ Medical Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 71 Hexi Avenue, Jianye District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210019, P.R. China.
| | - Shanwu Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's HealthCare Hospital, No.123 Tianfei Lane, Mochou Road, Nanjing, 210011, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anđelić N, Uvelin A, Stokić E, Popović R, Zdravković R, Preveden A, Zornić N. The Effect of Recruitment Maneuver on Static Lung Compliance in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Prospective Clinical Intervention Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:666. [PMID: 38674312 PMCID: PMC11052059 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of an alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) leads to a significant increase in static lung compliance (Cstat) and an improvement in gas exchange in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and Methods: A clinical prospective intervention study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): normal-weight (group I) and pre-obese and obese grade I (group II). Lung mechanics were monitored (Cstat, dynamic compliance-Cdin, peak pressure-Ppeak, plateau pressure-Pplat, driving pressure-DP) alongside gas exchange, and hemodynamic changes (heart rate-HR, mean arterial pressure-MAP) at six time points: T1 (induction of anesthesia), T2 (formation of pneumoperitoneum), T3 (RM with a PEEP of 5 cm H2O), T4 (RM with a PEEP of 7 cm H2O), T5 (desufflation), and T6 (RM at the end). The RM was performed by increasing the peak pressure by +5 cm of H2O at an equal inspiration-to-expiration ratio (I/E = 1:1) and applying a PEEP of 5 and 7 cm of H2O. Results: Out of 96 patients, 33 belonged to group I and 63 to group II. An increase in Cstat values occurred after all three RMs. At each time point, the Cstat value was measured higher in group I than in group II. A higher increase in Cstat was observed in group II after the second and third RM. Cstat values were higher at the end of the surgical procedure compared to values after the induction of anesthesia. The RM led to a significant increase in PaO2 in both groups without changes in HR or MAP. Conclusions: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the application of RM leads to a significant increase in Cstat and an improvement in gas exchange. The prevention of atelectasis during anesthesia should be initiated immediately after the induction of anesthesia, using protective mechanical ventilation and RM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada Anđelić
- Clinic for Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (N.A.); (R.P.)
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia;
| | - Arsen Uvelin
- Clinic for Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (N.A.); (R.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (E.S.); (R.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Edita Stokić
- Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (E.S.); (R.Z.); (A.P.)
- Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Radmila Popović
- Clinic for Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (N.A.); (R.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (E.S.); (R.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Ranko Zdravković
- Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (E.S.); (R.Z.); (A.P.)
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Andrej Preveden
- Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; (E.S.); (R.Z.); (A.P.)
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Nenad Zornić
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia;
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Centre of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xavier TB, Coelho LV, Ferreira DAL, Cota y Raposeiras JM, Duran MS, Silva LA, da Motta-Ribeiro GC, Camilo LM, Carvalho ARS, Silva PL. Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure reduces driving pressure in obese patients during laparoscopic surgery under pneumoperitoneum: a randomized clinical trial. Front Physiol 2024; 15:1383167. [PMID: 38645690 PMCID: PMC11026699 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1383167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction During pneumoperitoneum (PNP), airway driving pressure (ΔPRS) increases due to the stiffness of the chest wall and cephalic shift of the diaphragm, which favors atelectasis. In addition, depending on the mechanical power (MP) formulas, they may lead to different interpretations. Methods Patients >18 years of age with body mass index >35 kg/m2 were included in a single-center randomized controlled trial during their admission for bariatric surgery by abdominal laparoscopy. Intra-abdominal pressure was set at 15 mmHg at the pneumoperitoneum time point (PNP). After the recruitment maneuver, the lowest respiratory system elastance (ERS) was detected during the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) step-wise decrement. Patients were randomized to the 1) CTRL group: ventilated with PEEP of 5 cmH2O and 2) PEEPIND group: ventilated with PEEP value associated with ERS that is 5% higher than its lowest level. Respiratory system mechanics and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed at the PNP, 5 min after randomization (T1), and at the end of the ventilation protocol (T2); arterial blood gas was assessed at PNP and T2. ΔPRS was the primary outcome. Three MP formulas were used: MPA, which computes static PEEP × volume, elastic, and resistive components; MPB, which computes only the elastic component; and MPC, which computes static PEEP × volume, elastic, and resistive components without inspiratory holds. Results Twenty-eight patients were assessed for eligibility: eight were not included and 20 patients were randomized and allocated to CTRL and PEEPIND groups (n = 10/group). The PEEPIND ventilator strategy reduced ΔPRS when compared with the CTRL group (PEEPIND, 13 ± 2 cmH2O; CTRL, 22 ± 4 cmH2O; p < 0.001). Oxygenation improved in the PEEPIND group when compared with the CTRL group (p = 0.029), whereas MAP was comparable between the PEEPIND and CTRL groups. At the end of surgery, MPA and MPB were correlated in both the CTRL (rho = 0.71, p = 0.019) and PEEPIND (rho = 0.84, p = 0.020) groups but showed different bias (CTRL, -1.9 J/min; PEEPIND, +10.0 J/min). At the end of the surgery, MPA and MPC were correlated in both the CTRL (rho = 0.71, p = 0.019) and PEEPIND (rho = 0.84, p = 0.020) groups but showed different bias (CTRL, -1.9 J/min; PEEPIND, +10.0 J/min). Conclusion Individualized PEEP was associated with a reduction in ΔPRS and an improvement in oxygenation with comparable MAP. The MP, which solely computes the elastic component, better reflected the improvement in ΔPRS observed in the individualized PEEP group. Clinical Trial Registration The protocol was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (U1111-1220-7296).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Batista Xavier
- Laboratório de Fisiologia da Respiração, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Instituto de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Leticia Almeida Silva
- Laboratório de Investigação Pulmonar, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Luciana Moisés Camilo
- Instituto de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Pedro Leme Silva
- Laboratório de Investigação Pulmonar, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazzinari G, Rovira L, Albers-Warlé KI, Warlé MC, Argente-Navarro P, Flor B, Diaz-Cambronero O. Underneath Images and Robots, Looking Deeper into the Pneumoperitoneum: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1080. [PMID: 38398395 PMCID: PMC10889570 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy offers numerous advantages over open procedures, minimizing trauma, reducing pain, accelerating recovery, and shortening hospital stays. Despite other technical advancements, pneumoperitoneum insufflation has received little attention, barely evolving since its inception. We explore the impact of pneumoperitoneum on patient outcomes and advocate for a minimally invasive approach that prioritizes peritoneal homeostasis. The nonlinear relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intra-abdominal volume (IAV) is discussed, emphasizing IAP titration to balance physiological effects and surgical workspace. Maintaining IAP below 10 mmHg is generally recommended, but factors such as patient positioning and surgical complexity must be considered. The depth of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is explored as another variable affecting laparoscopic conditions. While deep NMB appears favorable for surgical stillness, achieving a balance between IAP and NMB depth is crucial. Temperature and humidity management during pneumoperitoneum are crucial for patient safety and optical field quality. Despite the debate over the significance of temperature drop, humidification and the warming of insufflated gas offer benefits in peritoneal homeostasis and visual clarity. In conclusion, there is potential for a paradigm shift in pneumoperitoneum management, with dynamic IAP adjustments and careful control of insufflated gas temperature and humidity to preserve peritoneal homeostasis and improve patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Valencia, Calle Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Kim I. Albers-Warlé
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Departments of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Pilar Argente-Navarro
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
| | - Blas Flor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Serrano AB, Díaz-Cambronero Ó, Montiel M, Molina J, Núñez M, Mendía E, Mané MN, Lisa E, Martínez-Botas J, Gómez-Coronado D, Gaetano A, Casarejos MJ, Gómez A, Sanjuanbenito A. Impact of Standard Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Peritoneal Environment in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:1-8. [PMID: 37963307 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High CO 2 pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopy adversely affects the peritoneal environment. This study hypothesized that low pneumoperitoneum pressure may be linked to less peritoneal damage and possibly to better clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized 1:1 to low or to standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. Peritoneal biopsies were performed at baseline time and 1 hour after peritoneum insufflation in all patients. The primary outcome was peritoneal remodeling biomarkers and apoptotic index. Secondary outcomes included biomarker differences at the studied times and some clinical variables such as length of hospital stay, and quality and safety issues related to the procedure. RESULTS Peritoneal IL6 after 1 hour of surgery was significantly higher in the standard than in the low-pressure group (4.26±1.34 vs. 3.24±1.21; P =0.001). On the contrary, levels of connective tissue growth factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-I were higher in the low-pressure group (0.89±0.61 vs. 0.61±0.84; P =0.025, and 0.74±0.89 vs. 0.24±1.15; P =0.028, respectively). Regarding apoptotic index, similar levels were found in both groups and were 44.0±10.9 and 42.5±17.8 in low and standard pressure groups, respectively. None of the secondary outcomes showed differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Peritoneal inflammation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is higher when surgery is performed under standard pressure. Adhesion formation seems to be less in this group. The majority of patients undergoing surgery under low pressure were operated under optimal workspace conditions, regardless of the surgeon's expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Óscar Díaz-Cambronero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- EuroPeriscope: The ESA-IC Onco-Anaesthesiology Research Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Gaetano
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Y, Xu W, Cui Y, Sun Y, Wang C, Wen Z, An K. Effects of driving pressure-guided ventilation by individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Anesth 2023; 37:896-904. [PMID: 37707572 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03251-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) need to be placed in Trendelenburg position, which results in cranial displacement of the diaphragm and decreases functional residual capacity and pulmonary compliance. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can increase ventilation in the dorsal area, reduce the occurrence of atelectasis and improve oxygenation. However, due to individual differences, inappropriate PEEP will cause lung injury and even hemodynamic instability. Therefore, our study is to evaluate the efficacy of individualized PEEP in RALP. METHODS We randomly recruited 48 patients and divided them into driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP group (P group, individualized PEEP) or traditional lung-protective ventilation strategy group (C group, tidal volume 8 mL/kg combined with PEEP of 5cmH2O). The primary outcome was the PaO2/FiO2 before extubation. The secondary outcomes included individualized PEEP values in the P group, the results of arterial blood gas analysis, respiratory mechanics parameters and vital sign parameters. Other measurements included intraoperative vasoactive drug dosage, length of stay, postoperative SpO2, leukocyte count, temperature, serum inflammatory factors and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE). RESULTS Individualized PEEP improved the PaO2/FiO2 before extubation (P = 0.034) and decreased driving pressure (P = 0.011). The PEEP valued in the P group was 14 [10-14] cmH2O. The lung compliance of the P group was significantly higher than that in the C group (P = 0.013). There was no significant difference in other measurements. CONCLUSIONS Individualized PEEP could improve PaO2/FiO2 in patients who underwent RALP and do not increase the dosage of intraoperative vasoactive drug and the release of inflammatory factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.chictr.org.cn (registration no. ChiCTR2100047271).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youpei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenwen Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yingpeng Cui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Zhishuang Wen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Ke An
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim YJ, Kim BR, Kim HW, Jung JY, Cho HY, Seo JH, Kim WH, Kim HS, Hwangbo S, Yoon HK. Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131:955-965. [PMID: 37679285 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves respiratory mechanics. However, whether PEEP reduces postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. We investigated whether driving pressure-guided PEEP reduces PPCs after laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery. METHODS This single-centre, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients at risk for PPCs undergoing laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery. The individualised group received driving pressure-guided PEEP, whereas the comparator group received 5 cm H2O fixed PEEP during surgery. Both groups received a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 ideal body weight. The primary outcome analysed per protocol was a composite of pulmonary complications (defined by pre-specified clinical and radiological criteria) within 7 postoperative days after surgery. RESULTS Some 384 patients (median age: 67 yr [inter-quartile range: 61-73]; 66 [18%] female) were randomised. Mean (standard deviation) PEEP in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (n=178) was 13.6 cm H2O (2.1). Individualised PEEP resulted in lower mean driving pressures (14.7 cm H2O [2.6]), compared with 185 patients randomised to standard PEEP (18.4 cm H2O [3.2]; mean difference: -3.7 cm H2O [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.3 to -3.1 cm H2O]; P<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of pulmonary complications between individualised (25/178 [14.0%]) vs standard PEEP (36/185 [19.5%]; risk ratio [95% CI], 0.72 [0.45-1.15]; P=0.215). Pulmonary complications as a result of desaturation were less frequent in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (8/178 [4.5%], compared with standard PEEP (30/185 [16.2%], risk ratio [95% CI], 0.28 [0.13-0.59]; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Driving pressure-guided PEEP did not decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications within 7 days of laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery, although uncertainty remains given the lower than anticipated event rate for the primary outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION KCT0004888 (http://cris.nih.go.kr, registration date: April 6, 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Jung Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo Rim Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Won Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Yoon Jung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Yeon Cho
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeoung-Hwa Seo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Ho Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee-Soo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suhyun Hwangbo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Kyu Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boesing C, Schaefer L, Schoettler JJ, Quentin A, Beck G, Thiel M, Honeck P, Kowalewski KF, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM, Luecke T, Krebs J. Effects of individualised positive end-expiratory pressure titration on respiratory and haemodynamic parameters during the Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum: A randomised crossover physiologic trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2023; 40:817-825. [PMID: 37649211 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during surgery promotes dorsobasal atelectasis formation, which impairs respiratory mechanics and increases lung stress and strain. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can reduce pulmonary inhomogeneities and preserve end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), resulting in decreased inspiratory strain and improved gas-exchange. The optimal intraoperative PEEP strategy is unclear. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of individualised PEEP titration strategies on set PEEP levels and resulting transpulmonary pressures, respiratory mechanics, gas-exchange and haemodynamics during Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum. DESIGN Prospective, randomised, crossover single-centre physiologic trial. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS Thirty-six patients receiving robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. INTERVENTIONS Randomised sequence of three different PEEP strategies: standard PEEP level of 5 cmH 2 O (PEEP 5 ), PEEP titration targeting a minimal driving pressure (PEEP ΔP ) and oesophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration (PEEP Poeso ) targeting an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure ( PTP ) of 0 cmH 2 O. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was the PEEP level when set according to PEEP ΔP and PEEP Poeso compared with PEEP of 5 cmH 2 O. Secondary endpoints were respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, gas-exchange and haemodynamic parameters. RESULTS PEEP levels differed between PEEP ΔP , PEEP Poeso and PEEP5 (18.0 [16.0 to 18.0] vs. 20.0 [18.0 to 24.0]vs. 5.0 [5.0 to 5.0] cmH 2 O; P < 0.001 each). End-expiratory PTP and lung volume were lower in PEEP ΔP compared with PEEP Poeso ( P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively), but driving pressure, lung stress, as well as respiratory system and dynamic elastic power were minimised using PEEP ΔP ( P < 0.001 each). PEEP ΔP and PEEP Poeso improved gas-exchange, but PEEP Poeso resulted in lower cardiac output compared with PEEP 5 and PEEP ΔP . CONCLUSION PEEP ΔP ameliorated the effects of Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during surgery on end-expiratory PTP and lung volume, decreased driving pressure and dynamic elastic power, as well as improved gas-exchange while preserving cardiac output. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028559, date of registration 2022/04/27). https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00028559.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Boesing
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (CB, LS, JJS, AQ, GB, MT, TL, JK), Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany (PH, KFK), Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa (PP), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care - San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy (PP) and Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (PRMR)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
De Meyer GRA, Morrison SG, Saldien V, Jorens PG, Schepens T. Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Head-Down Tilt: A Physiological Cohort Study. Anesth Analg 2023; 137:841-849. [PMID: 36729514 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy induces atelectasis. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can alleviate atelectasis but may cause hyperinflation. Cyclic opening of collapsed alveoli and hyperinflation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications. We aimed to study the effect of PEEP on atelectasis, lung stress, and hyperinflation during laparoscopy in the head-down (Trendelenburg) position. METHODS An open-label, repeated-measures, interventional, physiological cohort trial was designed. All participants were recruited from a single tertiary Belgian university hospital. Twenty-three nonobese patients scheduled for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position were recruited.We applied a decremental PEEP protocol: 15 (high), 10 and 5 (low) cm H 2 O. Atelectasis was studied with the lung ultrasound score, the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, the arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (P ao2 /Fi o2 ) ratio, and the dynamic respiratory system compliance. Global hyperinflation was evaluated by dead space volume, and regional ventilation was evaluated by lung ultrasound. Lung stress was estimated using the transpulmonary driving pressure and dynamic compliance. Data are reported as medians (25th-75th percentile). RESULTS At 15, 10, and 5 cm H 2 O PEEP, the respective measurements were: lung ultrasound scores (%) 11 (0-22), 27 (11-39), and 53 (42-61) ( P < .001); end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (cm H 2 O) 0.9 (-0.6 to 1.7), -0.3 (-2.0 to 0.7), and -1.9 (-4.6 to -0.9) ( P < .001); P ao2 /Fi o2 ratios (mm Hg) 471 (435-538), 458 (410-537), and 431 (358-492) ( P < .001); dynamic respiratory system compliances (mL/cm H 2 O) 32 (26-36), 30 (25-34), and 27 (22-30) ( P < .001); driving pressures (cm H 2 O) 8.2 (7.5-9.5), 9.3 (8.5-11.1), and 11.0 (10.3-12.2) ( P < .001); and alveolar dead space ventilation fractions (%) 10 (9-12), 10 (9-12), and 9 (8-12) ( P = .23). The lung ultrasound score was similar between apical and basal lung regions at each PEEP level ( P = .76, .37, and .76, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Higher PEEP levels during laparoscopy in the head-down position facilitate lung-protective ventilation. Atelectasis and lung stress are reduced in the absence of global alveolar hyperinflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory R A De Meyer
- From the Department of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Stuart G Morrison
- From the Department of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Vera Saldien
- From the Department of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Philippe G Jorens
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Tom Schepens
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boesing C, Schaefer L, Hammel M, Otto M, Blank S, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM, Luecke T, Krebs J. Individualized Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titration Strategies in Superobese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: Prospective and Nonrandomized Crossover Study. Anesthesiology 2023; 139:249-261. [PMID: 37224406 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Superobesity and laparoscopic surgery promote negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure that causes atelectasis formation and impaired respiratory mechanics. The authors hypothesized that end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure differs between fixed and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies and mediates their effects on respiratory mechanics, end-expiratory lung volume, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters in superobese patients. METHODS In this prospective, nonrandomized crossover study including 40 superobese patients (body mass index 57.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2) undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, PEEP was set according to (1) a fixed level of 8 cm H2O (PEEPEmpirical), (2) the highest respiratory system compliance (PEEPCompliance), or (3) an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure targeting 0 cm H2O (PEEPTranspul) at different surgical positioning. The primary endpoint was end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure at different surgical positioning; secondary endpoints were respiratory mechanics, end-expiratory lung volume, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS Individualized PEEPCompliance compared to fixed PEEPEmpirical resulted in higher PEEP (supine, 17.2 ± 2.4 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; supine with pneumoperitoneum, 21.5 ± 2.5 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; and beach chair with pneumoperitoneum; 15.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; P < 0.001 each) and less negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (supine, -2.9 ± 2.0 vs. -10.6 ± 2.6 cm H2O; supine with pneumoperitoneum, -2.9 ± 2.0 vs. -14.1 ± 3.7 cm H2O; and beach chair with pneumoperitoneum, -2.8 ± 2.2 vs. -9.2 ± 3.7 cm H2O; P < 0.001 each). Titrated PEEP, end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, and lung volume were lower with PEEPCompliance compared to PEEPTranspul (P < 0.001 each). Respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure and mechanical power normalized to respiratory system compliance were reduced using PEEPCompliance compared to PEEPTranspul. CONCLUSIONS In superobese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, individualized PEEPCompliance may provide a feasible compromise regarding end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures compared to PEEPEmpirical and PEEPTranspul, because PEEPCompliance with slightly negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures improved respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and oxygenation while preserving cardiac output. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Boesing
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Laura Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marvin Hammel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mirko Otto
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Susanne Blank
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Anesthesiology and Critical Care - San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patricia R M Rocco
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Ilha do Fundao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Thomas Luecke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Joerg Krebs
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mazzinari G, Zampieri FG, Ball L, Campos NS, Bluth T, Hemmes SN, Ferrando C, Librero J, Soro M, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Schultz MJ, Serpa Neto A. Effect of intraoperative PEEP with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications during general anesthesia--protocol for Bayesian analysis of three randomized clinical trials of intraoperative ventilation. F1000Res 2023; 11:1090. [PMID: 37234075 PMCID: PMC10207960 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.125861.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Using the frequentist approach, a recent meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials in patients undergoing intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery failed to show the benefit of ventilation that uses high positive end-expiratory pressure with recruitment maneuvers when compared to ventilation that uses low positive end-expiratory pressure without recruitment maneuvers. Methods: We designed a protocol for a Bayesian analysis using the pooled dataset. The multilevel Bayesian logistic model will use the individual patient data. Prior distributions will be prespecified to represent a varying level of skepticism for the effect estimate. The primary endpoint will be a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) within the first seven postoperative days, which reflects the primary endpoint of the original studies. We preset a range of practical equivalence to assess the futility of the intervention with an interval of odds ratio (OR) between 0.9 and 1.1 and assess how much of the 95% of highest density interval (HDI) falls between the region of practical equivalence. Ethics and dissemination: The used data derive from approved studies that were published in recent years. The findings of this current analysis will be reported in a new manuscript, drafted by the writing committee on behalf of the three research groups. All investigators listed in the original trials will serve as collaborative authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
| | | | - Lorenzo Ball
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Niklas S. Campos
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thomas Bluth
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sabrine N.T. Hemmes
- Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Ferrando
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julian Librero
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Marina Soro
- INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus J. Schultz
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of tropical medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - PROVHILO investigators
- Perioperative Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Academic Research Organization, Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain
- INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of tropical medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - iPROVE investigators
- Perioperative Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Academic Research Organization, Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain
- INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of tropical medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - PROBESE investigators
- Perioperative Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Academic Research Organization, Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain
- INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of tropical medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - PROVE network investigators
- Perioperative Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain, 46026, Spain
- Academic Research Organization, Albert Einstein Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Surgical sciences and integrated diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cardio pulmonary department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Pulmonary Engineergin group, Anesthesiology and intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location ‘AMC’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER (Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain
- INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of tropical medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olmedilla Arnal LE, Cambronero OD, Mazzinari G, Pérez Peña JM, Zorrilla Ortúzar J, Rodríguez Martín M, Vila Montañes M, Schultz MJ, Rovira L, Argente Navarro MP. An Individualized Low-Pneumoperitoneum-Pressure Strategy May Prevent a Reduction in Liver Perfusion during Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030891. [PMID: 36979870 PMCID: PMC10045598 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
High intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced splanchnic blood flow. It is uncertain whether a low IAP prevents this reduction. We assessed the effect of an individualized low-pneumoperitoneum-pressure strategy on liver perfusion. This was a single-center substudy of the multicenter ‘Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery versus Standard Therapy II study’ (IPPCollapse–II), a randomized clinical trial in which patients received an individualized low-pneumoperitoneum strategy (IPP) or a standard pneumoperitoneum strategy (SPP). Liver perfusion was indirectly assessed by the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG–PDR) and the secondary endpoint was ICG retention rate after 15 min (R15) using pulse spectrophotometry. Multivariable beta regression was used to assess the association between group assignment and ICG–PDR and ICG–R15. All 29 patients from the participating center were included. Median IAP was 8 (25th–75th percentile: 8–10) versus 12 (12,12) mmHg, in IPP and SPP patients, respectively (p < 0.001). ICG–PDR was higher (OR 1.42, 95%-CI 1.10–1.82; p = 0.006) and PDR–R15 was lower in IPP patients compared with SPP patients (OR 0.46, 95%-CI 0.29–0.73; p = 0.001). During laparoscopic colorectal surgery, an individualized low pneumoperitoneum may prevent a reduction in liver perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oscar Diaz Cambronero
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCReN), SCReN-IIS La Fe, PT17/0017/0035, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Correspondence: or (O.D.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain
- Correspondence: or (O.D.C.); (G.M.)
| | - José María Pérez Peña
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Zorrilla Ortúzar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marcos Rodríguez Martín
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Vila Montañes
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Marcus J. Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location ‘AMC’, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Pilar Argente Navarro
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Driving pressure-guided ventilation improves homogeneity in lung gas distribution for gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21687. [PMID: 36522433 PMCID: PMC9755264 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate whether driving pressure-guided ventilation could contribute to a more homogeneous distribution in the lung for gynecological laparoscopy. Chinese patients were randomized, after pneumoperitoneum, to receive either positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O (control group), or individualized PEEP producing the lowest driving pressure (titration group). Ventilation homogeneity is quantified as the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography, with a lower index implying more homogeneous ventilation. The perioperative arterial oxygenation index and respiratory system mechanics were also recorded. Blood samples were collected for lung injury biomarkers including interleukin-10, neutrophil elastase, and Clara Cell protein-16. A total of 48 patients were included for analysis. We observed a significant increase in the GI index immediately after tracheal extubation compared to preinduction in the control group (p = 0.040) but not in the titration group (p = 0.279). Furthermore, the GI index was obviously lower in the titration group than in the control group [0.390 (0.066) vs 0.460 (0.074), p = 0.0012]. The oxygenation index and respiratory compliance were significantly higher in the titration group than in the control group. No significant differences in biomarkers or hemodynamics were detected between the two groups. Driving pressure-guided PEEP led to more homogeneous ventilation, as well as improved gas exchange and respiratory compliance for patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04374162; first registration on 05/05/2020.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang DM, Li J, Bao QT, Wang BB, Zhu SJ, Zou L. Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:12146-12155. [PMID: 36483798 PMCID: PMC9724538 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation can lead to the severe impairment of the metabolic pathway of alveolar surfactants, inactivating alveolar surfactants and significantly reducing lung-chest compliance. The cardiopulmonary function of elderly patients usually reduced to a certain extent, and there are lung complications after surgical anesthesia, just like lung barotrauma caused by mechanical ventilation, atelectasis and postoperative hypoxemia.
AIM To investigate the effects of different positive end expiratory pressures (PEEPs) and tidal volumes (VTs) on respiratory function, the degree of the inflammatory response and hemodynamic indexes in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
METHODS A total of 120 patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia in Xinghua People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were randomly divided into Group A and Group B, with 60 cases in each group. The ventilation mode in Group A was VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (5.0 cmH2O), while that in Group B was VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (8.0 cmH2O). Blood gas parameters, respiratory mechanical parameters, inflammatory response indicators, hemodynamic indicators and related complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS There were no significant differences in PaCO2, PaO2, oxygen or the examined indexes at T0 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured PaO2 value of patients in group A at T3 was higher than that in group B, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure or dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) at T0 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured Ppeak value of patients in group A at T1 was higher than that in group B, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The measured Cdyn value at T1 and T2 was greater than that in group B (P < 0.05). Before surgery, there were no significant differences in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6 or IL-10 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). After 4 h, the measured values of TNF-α and IL-6 in group A were lower than those in group B, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). The IL-10 Level in group A was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05). At T0, there were no significant differences in cardiac output, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI) or mean arterial pressure between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured values of CI and SVI at T2 in patients in group A were higher than those in group B, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION For patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia, the VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (5.0 cmH2O) regimen was more effective than the VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (8.0 cmH2O) regimen in protecting the lung function and ventilatory function of patients, and it had better effects on maintaining hemodynamic stability and reducing inflammatory reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Suzhou High-Tech Zone People's Hospital, Suzhou 215011, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ding-Mu Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jie Li
- Naval Medical Center, Naval Medical University, PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Quan-Tang Bao
- Department of Anesthesia, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Bei-Bei Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shu-Jun Zhu
- Department of Anesthesia, Xinghua City People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Lu Zou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Dong J, Liu H. Effect of electrical impedance-guided PEEP in reducing pulmonary complications after craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:837. [PMID: 36183099 PMCID: PMC9526950 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06751-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study is to explore whether electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications within 1 week following a craniotomy compared with a single PEEP (PEEP = 6 cmH2O) from dura suturing to extubation. Methods A randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochou University. Five hundred forty patients undergoing a craniotomy in the supine position will be randomly allocated into the P6 (PEEP = 6 cmH2O) or Pi (individualized PEEP) group. Both groups of patients will receive a lung recruitment maneuver before suturing the dura. Then, the P6 group will receive 6 cmH2O PEEP, and the Pi group will receive EIT-guided individualized PEEP. The incidence and severity score of pulmonary complications within 1 week following surgery, the lung ultrasound score (LUS), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2), and PaO2/FiO2 before anesthesia (T0), 10 min after extubation (T1), 24 h after extubation (T2), and 72 h after extubation (T3) will be compared between the two groups. The duration of surgery and anesthesia, the level and duration of PEEP during surgery, the volume of liquid intake and output during surgery, and the postoperative ICU and hospital stays will be recorded. The main outcome of this study will be the incidence of pulmonary complications within 1 week after surgery. Discussion The purposes of this study are to determine whether EIT-guided individualized PEEP from the beginning of dura suturing to extubation reduces the incidence of pulmonary complications within 1 week after a craniotomy compared with a single constant PEEP and to evaluate the length of ICU and hospital stays. If our results are positive, this study will show that EIT-guided individualized PEEP is better than a single constant PEEP and can further improve the prognosis of neurosurgical patients and reduce hospitalization costs, which will promote the wide application of individualized PEEP in clinical anesthesia. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry CHiCTR2100051200. Registered on 15 September 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06751-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihao Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lianqin Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiang Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Dong
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hairui Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Methods for Determination of Individual PEEP for Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation Using a Decremental PEEP Trial. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133707. [PMID: 35806990 PMCID: PMC9267263 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Individual PEEP settings (PEEPIND) may improve intraoperative oxygenation and optimize lung mechanics. However, there is uncertainty concerning the optimal procedure to determine PEEPIND. In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial, we compared different methods for PEEPIND determination. (2) Methods: Offline analysis of decremental PEEP trials was performed and PEEPIND was retrospectively determined according to five different methods (EIT-based: RVDI method, Global Inhomogeneity Index [GI], distribution of tidal ventilation [EIT VT]; global dynamic and quasi-static compliance). (3) Results: In the 45 obese and non-obese patients included, PEEPIND using the RVDI method (PEEPRVD) was 16.3 ± 4.5 cm H2O. Determination of PEEPIND using the GI and EIT VT resulted in a mean difference of −2.4 cm H2O (95%CI: −1.2;−3.6 cm H2O, p = 0.01) and −2.3 cm H2O (95% CI: −0.9;3.7 cm H2O, p = 0.01) to PEEPRVD, respectively. PEEPIND selection according to quasi-static compliance showed the highest agreement with PEEPRVD (p = 0.67), with deviations > 4 cm H2O in 3/42 patients. PEEPRVD and PEEPIND according to dynamic compliance also showed a high level of agreement, with deviations > 4 cm H2O in 5/42 patients (p = 0.57). (4) Conclusions: High agreement of PEEPIND determined by the RVDI method and compliance-based methods suggests that, for routine clinical practice, PEEP selection based on best quasi-static or dynamic compliance is favorable.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lagier D, Zeng C, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Melo MFV. Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part II. Clinical Implications. Anesthesiology 2022; 136:206-236. [PMID: 34710217 PMCID: PMC9885487 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The development of pulmonary atelectasis is common in the surgical patient. Pulmonary atelectasis can cause various degrees of gas exchange and respiratory mechanics impairment during and after surgery. In its most serious presentations, lung collapse could contribute to postoperative respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and worse overall clinical outcomes. A specific risk assessment is critical to allow clinicians to optimally choose the anesthetic technique, prepare appropriate monitoring, adapt the perioperative plan, and ensure the patient's safety. Bedside diagnosis and management have benefited from recent imaging advancements such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography, and monitoring such as esophageal manometry. Therapeutic management includes a broad range of interventions aimed at promoting lung recruitment. During general anesthesia, these strategies have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in improving intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Yet these same intraoperative strategies may fail to affect additional postoperative pulmonary outcomes. Specific attention to the postoperative period may be key for such outcome impact of lung expansion. Interventions such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support may be beneficial in specific patients at high risk for pulmonary atelectasis (e.g., obese) or those with clinical presentations consistent with lung collapse (e.g., postoperative hypoxemia after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgeries). Preoperative interventions may open new opportunities to minimize perioperative lung collapse and prevent pulmonary complications. Knowledge of pathophysiologic mechanisms of atelectasis and their consequences in the healthy and diseased lung should provide the basis for current practice and help to stratify and match the intensity of selected interventions to clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Lagier
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Congli Zeng
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Marcos F. Vidal Melo
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fogagnolo A, Montanaro F, Al-Husinat L, Turrini C, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Ragazzi R, Ottaviani I, Cinnella G, Volta CA, Spadaro S. Management of Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation to Prevent Postoperative Complications after General Anesthesia: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10122656. [PMID: 34208699 PMCID: PMC8234365 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is still necessary in many surgical procedures; nonetheless, intraoperative MV is not free from harmful effects. Protective ventilation strategies, which include the combination of low tidal volume and adequate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels, are usually adopted to minimize the ventilation-induced lung injury and to avoid post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Even so, volutrauma and atelectrauma may co-exist at different levels of tidal volume and PEEP, and therefore, the physiological response to the MV settings should be monitored in each patient. A personalized perioperative approach is gaining relevance in the field of intraoperative MV; in particular, many efforts have been made to individualize PEEP, giving more emphasis on physiological and functional status to the whole body. In this review, we summarized the latest findings about the optimization of PEEP and intraoperative MV in different surgical settings. Starting from a physiological point of view, we described how to approach the individualized MV and monitor the effects of MV on lung function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Fogagnolo
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Federica Montanaro
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Lou’i Al-Husinat
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan;
| | - Cecilia Turrini
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Michela Rauseo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (M.R.); (L.M.); (G.C.)
| | - Lucia Mirabella
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (M.R.); (L.M.); (G.C.)
| | - Riccardo Ragazzi
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Irene Ottaviani
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Gilda Cinnella
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (M.R.); (L.M.); (G.C.)
| | - Carlo Alberto Volta
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| | - Savino Spadaro
- Department of Translation Medicine and for Romagna, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (F.M.); (C.T.); (R.R.); (I.O.); (C.A.V.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ishida Y, Nakazawa K, Okada T, Tsuzuki Y, Kobayashi T, Yamada R, Uchino H. Anesthetic management of a morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. JA Clin Rep 2021; 7:30. [PMID: 33821374 PMCID: PMC8021672 DOI: 10.1186/s40981-021-00434-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The number of robot-assisted surgeries being performed has increased in recent years, even in patients with risk factors, such as obesity, owing to advancements in medical technologies. We here report the anesthetic management of a morbidly obese woman who underwent robot-assisted surgery. Case presentation A 44-year-old woman (height, 165 cm; weight, 147 kg; body mass index, 54 kg/m2) was scheduled to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Preoperative weight loss and rehearsal of positioning during induction of anesthesia and surgical procedures greatly contributed to the surgical success. Monitoring of oxygen reserve index in combination with SpO2 was useful for appropriate airway and respiratory management. During anesthesia induction, the ramp position using a special commercially available cushion facilitated manual mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. Lung-protective ventilation using a limited tidal volume with moderate PEEP was applied during the robot-assisted surgical procedure. Conclusion We successfully managed anesthesia without any complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Ishida
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
| | - Koichi Nakazawa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Toshio Okada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Yumi Tsuzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kobayashi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Rikako Yamada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uchino
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mazzinari G, Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SNT, Hedenstierna G, Jaber S, Hiesmayr M, Hollmann MW, Mills GH, Vidal Melo MF, Pearse RM, Putensen C, Schmid W, Severgnini P, Wrigge H, Cambronero OD, Ball L, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. The Association of Intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications in open versus closed abdominal surgery patients - a posthoc propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of the LAS VEGAS study. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:84. [PMID: 33740885 PMCID: PMC7977277 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01268-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether the association of the intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) depends on the surgical approach during abdominal surgery. Our primary objective was to determine and compare the association of time-weighted average ΔP (ΔPTW) with PPCs. We also tested the association of ΔPTW with intraoperative adverse events. METHODS Posthoc retrospective propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery in the 'Local ASsessment of Ventilatory management during General Anaesthesia for Surgery' (LAS VEGAS) study, that included patients in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs. The secondary endpoint was a composite of intraoperative adverse events. RESULTS The analysis included 1128 and 906 patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery, respectively. The PPC rate was 5%. ΔP was lower in open abdominal surgery patients, but ΔPTW was not different between groups. The association of ΔPTW with PPCs was significant in both groups and had a higher risk ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.11 [95%CI 1.10 to 1.20], P < 0.001 versus 1.05 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.05], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.04 to 0.06], P < 0.001). The association of ΔPTW with intraoperative adverse events was also significant in both groups but had higher odds ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.13 [95%CI 1.12- to 1.14], P < 0.001 versus 1.07 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.10], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.030.07], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ΔP is associated with PPC and intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery, both in open and closed abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION LAS VEGAS was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT01601223 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain ,grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- grid.413562.70000 0001 0385 1941Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.11899.380000 0004 1937 0722Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil ,grid.5650.60000000404654431Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabrine N. T. Hemmes
- grid.5650.60000000404654431Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Goran Hedenstierna
- grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Samir Jaber
- grid.121334.60000 0001 2097 0141PhyMedExp, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Michael Hiesmayr
- grid.22937.3d0000 0000 9259 8492Division Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus W. Hollmann
- grid.5650.60000000404654431Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gary H. Mills
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262Operating Services, Critical Care and Anesthesia, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield and University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marcos F. Vidal Melo
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Rupert M. Pearse
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christian Putensen
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Werner Schmid
- grid.22937.3d0000 0000 9259 8492Division Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Severgnini
- grid.18147.3b0000000121724807Department of Biotechnology and Sciences of Life, ASST- Settelaghi Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Hermann Wrigge
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Bergmannstrost Hospital, Halle, Germany
| | - Oscar Diaz Cambronero
- grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain ,grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Policlinico San Martino Hospital – IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy ,grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa Italy, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Policlinico San Martino Hospital – IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy ,grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa Italy, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcus J. Schultz
- grid.5650.60000000404654431Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.10223.320000 0004 1937 0490Mahidol–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand ,grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yoon HK, Kim BR, Yoon S, Jeong YH, Ku JH, Kim WH. The Effect of Ventilation with Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Postoperative Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040850. [PMID: 33669526 PMCID: PMC7922101 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, the pneumoperitoneum with a steep Trendelenburg position could worsen intraoperative respiratory mechanics and result in postoperative atelectasis. We investigated the effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on postoperative atelectasis, evaluated using lung ultrasonography. Sixty patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Individualized groups (n = 30) received individualized PEEP determined by a decremental PEEP trial using 20 to 7 cm H2O, aiming at maximizing respiratory compliance, whereas standardized groups (n = 30) received a standardized PEEP of 7 cm H2O during the pneumoperitoneum. Ultrasound examination was performed on 12 sections of thorax, and the lung ultrasound score was measured as 0–3 by considering the number of B lines and the degree of subpleural consolidation. The primary outcome was the difference between the lung ultrasound scores measured before anesthesia induction and just after extubation in the operating room. An increase in the difference means the development of atelectasis. The optimal PEEP in the individualized group was determined as the median (interquartile range) 14 (12–18) cm H2O. Compared with the standardized group, the difference in the lung ultrasound scores was significantly smaller in the individualized group (−0.5 ± 2.7 vs. 6.0 ± 2.9, mean difference −6.53, 95% confidence interval (−8.00 to −5.07), p < 0.001), which means that individualized PEEP was effective to reduce atelectasis. The lung ultrasound score measured after surgery was significantly lower in the individualized group than the standardized group (8.1 ± 5.7 vs. 12.2 ± 4.2, mean difference −4.13, 95% confidence interval (−6.74 to −1.53), p = 0.002). However, the arterial partial pressure of the oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen levels during the surgery showed no significant time-group interaction between the two groups in repeated-measures analysis of variance (p = 0.145). The incidence of a composite of postoperative respiratory complications was comparable between the two groups. Individualized PEEP determined by maximal respiratory compliance during the pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position significantly reduced postoperative atelectasis, as evaluated using lung ultrasonography. However, the clinical significance of this finding should be evaluated by a larger clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Kyu Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; (H.-K.Y.); (B.R.K.); (S.Y.); (Y.H.J.)
| | - Bo Rim Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; (H.-K.Y.); (B.R.K.); (S.Y.); (Y.H.J.)
| | - Susie Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; (H.-K.Y.); (B.R.K.); (S.Y.); (Y.H.J.)
| | - Young Hyun Jeong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; (H.-K.Y.); (B.R.K.); (S.Y.); (Y.H.J.)
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Won Ho Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea; (H.-K.Y.); (B.R.K.); (S.Y.); (Y.H.J.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mazzinari G, Diaz-Cambronero O, Serpa Neto A, Martínez AC, Rovira L, Argente Navarro MP, Malbrain MLNG, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Hollmann MW, Schultz MJ. Modeling intra-abdominal volume and respiratory driving pressure during pneumoperitoneum insufflation-a patient-level data meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2020; 130:721-728. [PMID: 33357006 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00814.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
During pneumoperitoneum, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is usually kept at 12-14 mmHg. There is no clinical benefit in IAP increments if they do not increase intra-abdominal volume IAV. We aimed to estimate IAV (ΔIAV) and respiratory driving pressure changes (ΔPRS) in relation to changes in IAP (ΔIAP). We carried out a patient-level meta-analysis of 204 adult patients with available data on IAV and ΔPRS during pneumoperitoneum from three trials assessing the effect of IAP on postoperative recovery and airway pressure during laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was ΔIAV, and the secondary endpoint was ΔPRS. The endpoints' response to ΔIAP was modeled using mixed multivariable Bayesian regression to estimate which mathematical function best fitted it. IAP values on the pressure-volume (PV) curve where the endpoint rate of change according to IAP decreased were identified. Abdomino-thoracic transmission (ATT) rate, that is, the rate ΔPRS change to ΔIAP was also estimated. The best-fitting function was sigmoid logistic and linear for IAV and ΔPRS response, respectively. Increments in IAV reached a plateau at 6.0 [95%CI 5.9-6.2] L. ΔIAV for each ΔIAP decreased at IAP ranging from 9.8 [95%CI 9.7-9.9] to 12.2 [12.0-12.3] mmHg. ATT rate was 0.65 [95%CI 0.62-0.68]. One mmHg of IAP raised ΔPRS 0.88 cmH2O. During pneumoperitoneum, IAP has a nonlinear relationship with IAV and a linear one with ΔPRS. IAP should be set below the point where IAV gains diminish.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that intra-abdominal volume changes related to intra-abdominal pressure increase reached a plateau with diminishing gains in commonly used pneumoperitoneum pressure ranges. We also found a linear relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and respiratory driving pressure, a known marker of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
- Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCReN), SCReN-IIS La Fe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Center, location "AMC." Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.,Pulmonary Division, Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Antonio Cañada Martínez
- Data Science, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - María Pilar Argente Navarro
- Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Brussels, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.,International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- San Martino Policlinico Hospital-IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Pulmonary Engineering Group, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Markus W Hollmann
- Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Center, location "AMC." Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location "AMC," Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Center, location "AMC." Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|