Mineralocorticoid Dysfunction during Critical Illness: A Review of the Evidence. Anesthesiology. 2020;133:439-457. [PMID: 32501957 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003365]

Dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in human septic shock

Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with mortality rates of up to 40% despite optimal standard-of-care therapy and constitute the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. Circulating biomarkers of septic shock severity may represent a clinically relevant approach to individualize those patients at risk for worse outcomes early in the course of the disease, which may facilitate early and more precise interventions to improve the clinical course. However, currently used septic shock biomarkers, including lactate, may be non-specific and have variable impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is likely an early event in septic shock, and studies suggest that an elevated level of renin, the early and committed step in the RAAS cascade, is a better predictor of worse outcomes in septic shock, including mortality, than the current standard-of-care measure of lactate. Despite a robust increase in renin, other elements of the RAAS, including endogenous levels of Ang II, may fail to sufficiently increase to maintain blood pressure, tissue perfusion, and protective immune responses in septic shock patients. We review the current clinical literature regarding the dysfunction of the RAAS in septic shock and potential therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes.

Glucocorticoids with or without fludrocortisone in septic shock: a narrative review from a biochemical and molecular perspective

Two randomised controlled trials have reported a reduction in mortality when adjunctive hydrocortisone is administered in combination with fludrocortisone compared with placebo in septic shock. A third trial did not support this finding when hydrocortisone administered in combination with fludrocortisone was compared with hydrocortisone alone. The underlying mechanisms for this mortality benefit remain poorly understood. We review the clinical implications and potential mechanisms derived from laboratory and clinical data underlying the beneficial role of adjunctive fludrocortisone with hydrocortisone supplementation in septic shock. Factors including distinct biological effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, tissue-specific and mineralocorticoid receptor-independent effects of mineralocorticoids, and differences in downstream signalling pathways between mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid binding at the mineralocorticoid receptor could contribute to this interaction. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic disparities exist between aldosterone and its synthetic counterpart fludrocortisone, potentially influencing their effects. Pending publication of well-designed, randomised controlled trials, a molecular perspective offers valuable insights and guidance to help inform clinical strategies.

Immunohistochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptors in the human cochlea

In the present study we investigated the localization of glucocorticoid receptors (GCR) in the human inner ear using immunohistochemistry. Celloidin-embedded cochlear sections of patients with normal hearing (n = 5), patients diagnosed with MD (n = 5), and noise induced hearing loss (n = 5) were immunostained using GCR rabbit affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies and secondary fluorescent or HRP labeled antibodies. Digital fluorescent images were acquired using a light sheet laser confocal microscope. In celloidin-embedded sections GCR-IF was present in the cell nuclei of hair cells and supporting cells of the organ of Corti. GCR-IF was detected in cell nuclei of the Reisner's membrane. GCR-IF was seen in cell nuclei of the stria vascularis and the spiral ligament. GCR-IF was found in the spiral ganglia cell nuclei, however, spiral ganglia neurons showed no GCR-IF. Although GCRs were found in most cell nuclei of the cochlea, the intensity of IF was differential among the different cell types being more intense in supporting cells than in sensory hair cells. The differential expression of GCR receptors found in the human cochlea may help to understand the site of action of glucocorticoids in different ear diseases.

Corticotropin-stimulated steroid profiles to predict shock development and mortality in sepsis: From the HYPRESS study

Rationale

Steroid profiles in combination with a corticotropin stimulation test provide information about steroidogenesis and its functional reserves in critically ill patients.

Objectives

We investigated whether steroid profiles before and after corticotropin stimulation can predict the risk of in-hospital death in sepsis.

Methods

An exploratory data analysis of a double blind, randomized trial in sepsis (HYPRESS [HYdrocortisone for PRevention of Septic Shock]) was performed. The trial included adult patients with sepsis who were not in shock and were randomly assigned to placebo or hydrocortisone treatment. Corticotropin tests were performed in patients prior to randomization and in healthy subjects. Cortisol and precursors of glucocorticoids (17-OH-progesterone, 11-desoxycortisol) and mineralocorticoids (11-desoxycorticosterone, corticosterone) were analyzed using the multi-analyte stable isotope dilution method (LC–MS/MS). Measurement results from healthy subjects were used to determine reference ranges, and those from placebo patients to predict in-hospital mortality.

Measurements and main results

Corticotropin tests from 180 patients and 20 volunteers were included. Compared to healthy subjects, patients with sepsis had elevated levels of 11-desoxycorticosterone and 11-desoxycortisol, consistent with activation of both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid pathways. After stimulation with corticotropin, the cortisol response was subnormal in 12% and the corticosterone response in 50% of sepsis patients. In placebo patients (n = 90), a corticotropin-stimulated cortisol-to-corticosterone ratio > 32.2 predicted in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.8 CI 0.70–0.88; sensitivity 83%; and specificity 78%). This ratio also predicted risk of shock development and 90-day mortality.

Conclusions

In this exploratory analysis, we found that in sepsis mineralocorticoid steroidogenesis was more frequently impaired than glucocorticoid steroidogenesis. The corticotropin-stimulated cortisol-to-corticosterone ratio predicts the risk of in-hospital death.

Trial registration Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00670254. Registered 1 May 2008, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00670254.

Renin as a Marker of Tissue Perfusion, Septic Shock and Mortality in Septic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulation of the host’s response to an infection, where the dominant mechanism is tissue hypoperfusion. Currently, the marker used to define tissue disorders is lactate levels, which may be elevated in other disease states as well. Renin is an essential hormone for the proper functioning of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RASS) system. It is secreted in the glomerular apparatus in response to hypoperfusion. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of renin as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion in patients with sepsis and septic shock. A final group of 48 patients treated for sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit was included. Blood samples for renin quantification were collected in the morning as a part of routine blood analysis on the first, third, and fifth days. Sepsis was diagnosed in 19 patients (39.6%), and septic shock was diagnosed in 29 patients (60.4%). There was no significant difference in renin concentration between patients who received and did not receive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on any study day. Therefore, all samples were analyzed together in subsequent analyses. There was a significant difference in renin concentration between sepsis survivors and non-survivors on the third (31.5 and 119.9 pg/mL, respectively) and fifth (18.2 and 106.7 pg/mL, respectively) days. As a survival marker, renin was characterized by 69% and 71% overall accuracy if determined on the third and fifth days, respectively. There was a significant difference in renin concentration between sepsis and septic shock patients on the first (45.8 and 103.4 pg/mL, respectively) and third (24.7 and 102.1 pg/mL, respectively) days. At an optimal cut-off of 87 pg/mL, renin had very good specificity and a positive likelihood ratio. Renin was a strong predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Further, the level of renin in patients with septic shock was significantly higher than in patients with sepsis. In combination with the assessment of lactate concentration, renin seems to be the optimal parameter for monitoring tissue hypoperfusion and could be helpful for septic shock diagnosis, as well as for identifying candidate patients for CRRT.

What Is the Role of Steroids for Septic Shock in 2021?

Corticosteroids have been used for decades in the adjunctive treatment of severe infections in intensive care. The most frequent scenario in intensive care is in septic shock, where low doses of glucocorticoids appear to restore vascular responsiveness to norepinephrine. There is a strong body of evidence suggesting that hydrocortisone reduces time on vasopressor, and may modulate the immune response. In this review, we explore the current evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids in septic shock, its benefits, and potential harms. In addition to landmark clinical trials, we will also describe new frontiers for the use of corticosteroids in septic shock which should be explored in future studies.

Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor expression in critical illness: A narrative review

The glucocorticoid receptor (GCR) and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) are members of the steroid receptor superfamily of hormone-dependent transcription factors. The receptors are structurally and functionally related. They are localized in the cytosol and translocate into the nucleus after ligand binding. GCRs and MRs can be co-expressed within the same cell, and it is believed that the balance in GCR and MR expression is crucial for homeostasis and plays a key role in normal adaptation. In critical illness, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is activated, and as a consequence, serum cortisol concentrations are high. However, a number of patients exhibit relatively low cortisol levels for the degree of illness severity. Glucocorticoid (GC) actions are facilitated by GCR, whose dysfunction leads to GC tissue resistance. The MR is unique in this family in that it binds to both aldosterone and cortisol. Endogenous GCs play a critical role in controlling inflammatory responses in critical illness. Intracellular GC concentrations can differ greatly from blood levels due to the action of the two 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes, type 1 and type 2. 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases interconvert endogenous active cortisol and intrinsically inert cortisone. The degree of expression of the two isozymes has the potential to dramatically influence local GC availability within cells and tissues. In this review, we will explore the clinical studies that aimed to elucidate the role of MR and GCR expression in the inflammatory response seen in critical illness.

Acute bilateral cerebral infarction in the presence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A case report

RATIONALE

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) are inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system; they are characterized by severe optic neuritis and transverse myelitis. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy is an effective treatment that is administered to patients in the acute phase of NMOSD; this therapy has achieved remarkable results in clinical practice. However, there are no reports on NMOSD patients who have experienced an acute bilateral cerebral infarction while undergoing IVMP treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report on a 62-yr-old woman who was undergoing IVMP therapy for the primary diagnosis of NMOSD. Unexpectedly, the patient's existing limb weakness worsened, and she developed motor aphasia on the second day of IVMP treatment. Additionally, brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute bilateral cerebral infarction.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient's clinical manifestations, medical imaging results, and laboratory test results were taken into consideration; the final diagnosis was acute bilateral cerebral infarction in the presence of NMOSD.

INTERVENTIONS

Subsequent to the onset of acute cerebral infarction, the patient was immediately treated with oral aspirin, atorvastatin, and intravenous butylphthalide. The hormone dose was adjusted to an oral 60-mg/d dose for maintenance; this was followed by immunoadsorption plasmapheresis for 3 days, and double-filtration plasmapheresis for 2 days.

OUTCOMES

Following treatment onset, the patient's ocular symptoms significantly improved, and her limb muscle strength gradually recovered. Two months after discharge, the patient's husband reported that she was able to walk with the help of others and take care of herself, and that there was no recurrence.

LESSONS

Medical professionals must be aware of the possibility of NMOSD patients with cerebrovascular risk factors suffering an acute cerebral infarction while undergoing high-dose IVMP therapy, as this therapy can exacerbate existing problems.