1
|
Rossi D, Cartocci G, Inguscio BMS, Capitolino G, Borghini G, Di Flumeri G, Ronca V, Giorgi A, Vozzi A, Capotorto R, Babiloni F, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Marsella P, Leone CA, Grassia R, Galletti F, Ciodaro F, Galletti C, Aricò P. Characterization of Cochlear Implant Artifact and Removal Based on Multi-Channel Wiener Filter in Unilateral Child Patients. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:753. [PMID: 39199711 PMCID: PMC11352012 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CI) allow deaf patients to improve language perception and improving their emotional valence assessment. Electroencephalographic (EEG) measures were employed so far to improve CI programming reliability and to evaluate listening effort in auditory tasks, which are particularly useful in conditions when subjective evaluations are scarcely appliable or reliable. Unfortunately, the presence of CI on the scalp introduces an electrical artifact coupled to EEG signals that masks physiological features recorded by electrodes close to the site of implant. Currently, methods for CI artifact removal have been developed for very specific EEG montages or protocols, while others require many scalp electrodes. In this study, we propose a method based on the Multi-channel Wiener filter (MWF) to overcome those shortcomings. Nine children with unilateral CI and nine age-matched normal hearing children (control) participated in the study. EEG data were acquired on a relatively low number of electrodes (n = 16) during resting condition and during an auditory task. The obtained results obtained allowed to characterize CI artifact on the affected electrode and to significantly reduce, if not remove it through MWF filtering. Moreover, the results indicate, by comparing the two sample populations, that the EEG data loss is minimal in CI users after filtering, and that data maintain EEG physiological characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Rossi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (B.M.S.I.); (G.B.); (G.D.F.)
| | - Giulia Cartocci
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (B.M.S.I.); (G.B.); (G.D.F.)
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
| | - Bianca M. S. Inguscio
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (B.M.S.I.); (G.B.); (G.D.F.)
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
| | - Giulia Capitolino
- Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering “Antonio Ruberti”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Borghini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (B.M.S.I.); (G.B.); (G.D.F.)
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
| | - Gianluca Di Flumeri
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (B.M.S.I.); (G.B.); (G.D.F.)
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Ronca
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
- Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering “Antonio Ruberti”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Andrea Giorgi
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic & Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (R.C.)
| | - Alessia Vozzi
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
| | - Rossella Capotorto
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic & Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (R.C.)
| | - Fabio Babiloni
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “Vittorio Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Department of Computer Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
| | - Alessandro Scorpecci
- Audiology and Otosurgery Unit, “Bambino Gesù” Pediatric Hospital and Research Institute, Piazza di Sant’Onofrio 4, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.S.); (S.G.); (P.M.)
| | - Sara Giannantonio
- Audiology and Otosurgery Unit, “Bambino Gesù” Pediatric Hospital and Research Institute, Piazza di Sant’Onofrio 4, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.S.); (S.G.); (P.M.)
| | - Pasquale Marsella
- Audiology and Otosurgery Unit, “Bambino Gesù” Pediatric Hospital and Research Institute, Piazza di Sant’Onofrio 4, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.S.); (S.G.); (P.M.)
| | - Carlo Antonio Leone
- Department of Otolaringology Head-Neck Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.A.L.); (R.G.)
| | - Rosa Grassia
- Department of Otolaringology Head-Neck Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.A.L.); (R.G.)
| | - Francesco Galletti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy; (F.G.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Francesco Ciodaro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy; (F.G.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Cosimo Galletti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti 1, 98122 Messina, Italy; (F.G.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Pietro Aricò
- BrainSigns srl, Via Tirso 14, 00198 Rome, Italy; (V.R.); (A.V.); (F.B.)
- Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering “Antonio Ruberti”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koyama H, Kashio A, Yamasoba T. Prediction of Cochlear Implant Fitting by Machine Learning Techniques. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:643-650. [PMID: 38769101 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the differences in electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and postoperative mapping current (T) levels between electrode types after cochlear implantation, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting postoperative T levels. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS We reviewed the charts of 124 ears of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS We compared ECAP thresholds and T levels from different electrodes, calculated correlations between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and created five prediction models of T levels at switch-on and 6 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The accuracy of prediction in postoperative mapping current (T) levels. RESULTS The ECAP thresholds of the slim modiolar electrodes were significantly lower than those of the straight electrodes on the apical side. However, there was no significant difference in the neural response telemetry thresholds between the two electrodes on the basal side. Lasso regression achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels at switch-on, and the random forest algorithm achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels 6 months after surgery in this dataset. CONCLUSION Machine learning techniques could be useful for accurately predicting postoperative T levels after cochlear implantation in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Koyama
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rassam R, Chen Q, Gai Y. Competing Visual Cues Revealed by Electroencephalography: Sensitivity to Motion Speed and Direction. Brain Sci 2024; 14:160. [PMID: 38391734 PMCID: PMC10886893 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14020160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Motion speed and direction are two fundamental cues for the mammalian visual system. Neurons in various places of the neocortex show tuning properties in term of firing frequency to both speed and direction. The present study applied a 32-channel electroencephalograph (EEG) system to 13 human subjects while they were observing a single object moving with different speeds in various directions from the center of view to the periphery on a computer monitor. Depending on the experimental condition, the subjects were either required to fix their gaze at the center of the monitor while the object was moving or to track the movement with their gaze; eye-tracking glasses were used to ensure that they followed instructions. In each trial, motion speed and direction varied randomly and independently, forming two competing visual features. EEG signal classification was performed for each cue separately (e.g., 11 speed values or 11 directions), regardless of variations in the other cue. Under the eye-fixed condition, multiple subjects showed distinct preferences to motion direction over speed; however, two outliers showed superb sensitivity to speed. Under the eye-tracking condition, in which the EEG signals presumably contained ocular movement signals, all subjects showed predominantly better classification for motion direction. There was a trend that speed and direction were encoded by different electrode sites. Since EEG is a noninvasive and portable approach suitable for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), this study provides insights on fundamental knowledge of the visual system as well as BCI applications based on visual stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rassam Rassam
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
| | - Qi Chen
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
| | - Yan Gai
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Amaral MSAD, Zamberlan-Amorin NE, Mendes KDS, Bernal SC, Massuda ET, Hyppolito MA, Reis ACMB. The P300 Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users: A Scoping Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27:e518-e527. [PMID: 37564465 PMCID: PMC10411132 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The P300 auditory evoked potential is a long-latency cortical potential evoked with auditory stimulation, which provides information on neural mechanisms underlying the central auditory processing. Objectives To identify and gather scientific evidence regarding the P300 in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Data Synthesis A total of 87 articles, 20 of which were selected for this study, were identified and exported to the Rayyan search software. Those 20 articles did not propose a homogeneous methodology, which made comparison more difficult. Most articles (60%) in this review compare CI users with typical hearing people, showing prolonged P300 latency in CI users. Among the studies, 35% show that CI users present a smaller P300 amplitude. Another variable is the influence of the kind of stimulus used to elicit P300, which was prolonged in 30% of the studies that used pure tone stimuli, 10% of the studies that used pure tone and speech stimuli, and 60% of the studies that used speech stimuli. Conclusion This review has contributed with evidence that shows the importance of applying a controlled P300 protocol to diagnose and monitor CI users. Regardless of the stimuli used to elicit P300, we noticed a pattern in the increase in latency and decrease in amplitude in CI users. The user's experience with the CI speech processor over time and the speech test results seem to be related to the P300 latency and amplitude measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Nelma Ellen Zamberlan-Amorin
- Centro Especializado de Otorrinolaringologia e Fonoaudiologia (CEOF), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karina Dal Sasso Mendes
- Department of General and Specialized Nursing, Faculdade de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sarah Carolina Bernal
- Health Sciences Department, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Tanaka Massuda
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amaral MSAD, Calderaro VG, Pauna HF, Massuda ET, Reis ACMB, Hyppolito MA. Is there a change in P300 evoked potential after 6 months in cochlear implant users? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 88 Suppl 3:S50-S58. [PMID: 34799269 PMCID: PMC9761001 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are few studies on long-latency auditory evoked potential (P300) in people with hearing loss who use a cochlear implant. Central auditory system evaluation with behavioral and electrophysiological tests is believed to help understand the neuroplasticity mechanisms involved in auditory functioning after cochlear implant surgery. This study investigated the electrophysiological processing of cortical level acoustic signals in a group of 21 adult individuals with postlingual bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss who were submitted to cochlear implant surgery. METHODS Data were collected in three phases: pre-cochlear implant surgery, at cochlear implant activation, and 6 months after surgery. P300 measures were also registered during all phases. Tone-burst and speech stimuli were used to elicit P300 and were presented in free field. RESULTS Mean P3 component latency with tone-burst and speech stimuli were 352.9 and 321.9 ms in the pre-cochlear implant phase, 364.9 and 368.7 ms in the activation phase, 336.2 and 343.6 ms 6 months after the surgery. The P3 component mean latency values using tone-burst at activation were significantly different from those 6 months after cochlear implant. They were also significantly different using speech, between pre-cochlear implant and activation phases. Lower P3 component latency occurred 6 months after cochlear implant activation with tone-burst and pre-cochlear implant with speech stimulus. There was a weak correlation between mean P3 component latency with speech stimulus and time of hearing loss. There was no difference in amplitude between phases or in the comparison with the other variables. CONCLUSION There were changes in P3 component latency during the period assessed, for both speech and pure-tone stimuli, with increased latency in the activation phase and similar lower results in the two other phases, Pre-CI and 6 months after CI use. Mean amplitude measures did not vary in the three phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
| | - Victor G Calderaro
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Henrique Furlan Pauna
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo T Massuda
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Ana Cláudia M B Reis
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Callejón-Leblic MA, Barrios-Romero MM, Kontides A, Sánchez-Gómez S, Beynon AJ. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2022:1-9. [PMID: 35477333 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2062578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate electrically evoked auditory cortical responses (eACR) elicited from the stimulation of intracochlear electrodes based on individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant (CI) users. DESIGN An eACR setup based on individual fitting parameters is proposed. A 50-ms alternating biphasic pulse train was used to stimulate apical, medial, and basal electrodes and to evoke auditory cortical potentials (N1-P2 complex). STUDY SAMPLE The eACR setup proposed was validated with 14 adult CI users. RESULTS Individual and grand-average eACR waveforms were obtained. The eACR amplitudes were lower in the basal than in the apical and medial regions. Earlier N1 latencies were found in CI users with lower maximum comfortable loudness levels and shorter phase duration in response to apical stimulation, while medial and basal stimulation resulted in earlier N1 latencies and larger N1-P2 amplitudes in users with longer CI experience. CONCLUSIONS eACR could be elicited by direct intracochlear stimulation using individual fitting parameters with a success rate of 71%. The highest cortical peak-to-peak amplitudes were obtained in response to apical stimulation. Unlike the P2, the N1 component appeared to be a consistent cortical potential to determine eACR and gain knowledge of the auditory processing beyond the cochlea in CI users. HighlightseACR can be elicited through direct stimulation of intracochlear electrodes.Stimulation of apical and medial regions yielded the highest N1-P2 amplitudes.CI users with lower maximum comfortable loudness levels had shorter N1 latencies during apical stimulation.The present dataset of mainly well-performing CI users suggests better cortical processing, that is, higher amplitudes and shorter latencies of N1.The N1 potential appears a more consistent and reliable potential than the P2 to determine eACR responses in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María A Callejón-Leblic
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.,Biomedical Engineering Group, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Alejandra Kontides
- MED-EL Headquarters, Innsbruck, Austria; dDonders Centre for Neurosciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Serafín Sánchez-Gómez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Andy J Beynon
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,ENT Department, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bauernfeind G, Teschner MJ, Wriessnegger S, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Haumann S. Towards single-trial classification of invasively recorded auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35189612 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac572d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE One promising approach towards further improving cochlear implants (CIs) is to use brain signals controlling the device in order to close the auditory loop. Initial electroencephalography (EEG) studies have already shown promising results. However, they are based on noninvasive measurements, whereas implanted electrodes are expected to be more convenient in terms of everyday-life usability. If additional measurement electrodes were implanted during CI surgery, then invasive recordings should be possible. Furthermore, implantation will provide better signal quality, greater robustness to artefacts, and thus enhanced classification accuracy. APPROACH In an initial project, three additional epidural electrodes were temporarily implanted during the surgical procedure. After surgery, different auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded both invasively (epidural) and using surface electrodes, with invasively recorded signals demonstrated as being markedly superior. In this present analysis, cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) signals recorded in seven patients were used for single-trial classification of sounds with different intensities. For classification purposes, we used shrinkage-regularized linear discriminant analysis (sLDA). Clinical speech perception scores were also investigated. MAIN RESULTS Analysis of CERA data from different subjects showed single-trial classification accuracies of up to 99.2% for perceived vs. non-perceived sounds. Accuracies of up to 89.1% were achieved in classification of sounds perceived at different intensities. Highest classification accuracies were achieved by means of epidural recordings. Required loudness differences seemed to correspond to speech perception in noise. Significance: The proposed epidural recording approach showed good classification accuracy into sound perceived and not perceived when the best-performing electrodes were selected. Classifying different levels of sound stimulation accurately proved more challenging. At present, the methods explored in this study would not be sufficiently reliable to allow automated closed-loop control of CI parameters. However, our findings are an important initial contribution towards improving applicability of closed auditory loops and for next-generation automatic fitting approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guenther Bauernfeind
- Independent researcher; Former member of the Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, GERMANY
| | - Magnus Johannes Teschner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, Niedersachsen, 30625, GERMANY
| | - Selina Wriessnegger
- Department of Psychology, Karl Franzens Universitaet Graz, Universitätsplatz 2 / III, A-8010 Graz, Austria, Graz, A-8010, AUSTRIA
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, Hannover, Niedersachsen, 30625, GERMANY
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neubergstr. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany, Hannover, Niedersachsen, 30625, GERMANY
| | - Sabine Haumann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, Hannover, Niedersachsen, 30625, GERMANY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aldag N, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Towards decoding selective attention through cochlear implant electrodes as sensors in subjects with contralateral acoustic hearing. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4de6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: Focusing attention on one speaker in a situation with multiple background speakers or noise is referred to as auditory selective attention. Decoding selective attention is an interesting line of research with respect to future brain-guided hearing aids or cochlear implants (CIs) that are designed to adaptively adjust sound processing through cortical feedback loops. This study investigates the feasibility of using the electrodes and backward telemetry of a CI to record electroencephalography (EEG). Approach: The study population included 6 normal-hearing (NH) listeners and 5 CI users with contralateral acoustic hearing. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) and selective attention were recorded using a state-of-the-art high-density scalp EEG and, in the case of CI users, also using two CI electrodes as sensors in combination with the backward telemetry system of these devices (iEEG). Main results: In the selective attention paradigm with multi-channel scalp EEG the mean decoding accuracy across subjects was 94.8 % and 94.6 % for NH listeners and CI users, respectively. With single-channel scalp EEG the accuracy dropped but was above chance level in 8 to 9 out of 11 subjects, depending on the electrode montage. With the single-channel iEEG, the selective attention decoding accuracy could only be analyzed in 2 out of 5 CI users due to a loss of data in the other 3 subjects. In these 2 CI users, the selective attention decoding accuracy was above chance level. Significance: This study shows that single-channel EEG is suitable for auditory selective attention decoding, even though it reduces the decoding quality compared to a multi-channel approach. CI-based iEEG can be used for the purpose of recording CAEPs and decoding selective attention. However, the study also points out the need for further technical development for the CI backward telemetry regarding long-term recordings and the optimal sensor positions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Beynon AJ, Luijten BM, Mylanus EAM. Intracorporeal Cortical Telemetry as a Step to Automatic Closed-Loop EEG-Based CI Fitting: A Proof of Concept. Audiol Res 2021; 11:691-705. [PMID: 34940020 PMCID: PMC8698912 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11040062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrically evoked auditory potentials have been used to predict auditory thresholds in patients with a cochlear implant (CI). However, with exception of electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP), conventional extracorporeal EEG recording devices are still needed. Until now, built-in (intracorporeal) back-telemetry options are limited to eCAPs. Intracorporeal recording of auditory responses beyond the cochlea is still lacking. This study describes the feasibility of obtaining longer latency cortical responses by concatenating interleaved short recording time windows used for eCAP recordings. Extracochlear reference electrodes were dedicated to record cortical responses, while intracochlear electrodes were used for stimulation, enabling intracorporeal telemetry (i.e., without an EEG device) to assess higher cortical processing in CI recipients. Simultaneous extra- and intra-corporeal recordings showed that it is feasible to obtain intracorporeal slow vertex potentials with a CI similar to those obtained by conventional extracorporeal EEG recordings. Our data demonstrate a proof of concept of closed-loop intracorporeal auditory cortical response telemetry (ICT) with a cochlear implant device. This research breaks new ground for next generation CI devices to assess higher cortical neural processing based on acute or continuous EEG telemetry to enable individualized automatic and/or adaptive CI fitting with only a CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy J. Beynon
- Vestibular & Auditory Evoked Potential Lab, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Bart M. Luijten
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
| | - Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5383. [PMID: 33686155 PMCID: PMC7940426 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84829-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The cochlear implant is one of the most successful medical prostheses, allowing deaf and severely hearing-impaired persons to hear again by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. A trained audiologist adjusts the stimulation settings for good speech understanding, known as "fitting" the implant. This process is based on subjective feedback from the user, making it time-consuming and challenging, especially in paediatric or communication-impaired populations. Furthermore, fittings only happen during infrequent sessions at a clinic, and therefore cannot take into account variable factors that affect the user's hearing, such as physiological changes and different listening environments. Objective audiometry, in which brain responses evoked by auditory stimulation are collected and analysed, removes the need for active patient participation. However, recording of brain responses still requires expensive equipment that is cumbersome to use. An elegant solution is to record the neural signals using the implant itself. We demonstrate for the first time the recording of continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) signals from the implanted intracochlear electrode array in human subjects, using auditory evoked potentials originating from different brain regions. This was done using a temporary recording set-up with a percutaneous connector used for research purposes. Furthermore, we show that the response morphologies and amplitudes depend crucially on the recording electrode configuration. The integration of an EEG system into cochlear implants paves the way towards chronic neuro-monitoring of hearing-impaired patients in their everyday environment, and neuro-steered hearing prostheses, which can autonomously adjust their output based on neural feedback.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang S, Lin M, Sun L, Chen X, Fu X, Yan L, Li C, Zhang X. Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study. Front Neurosci 2021; 14:624484. [PMID: 33633529 PMCID: PMC7901906 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.624484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with severe profound hearing loss could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). However, the neural mechanism of such benefit is still unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the electroencephalogram (EEG) and behavioral indicators of auditory function remodeling in patients with CI. Both indicators were sampled at multiple time points after implantation (1, 90, and 180 days). Methods First, the speech perception ability was evaluated with the recording of a list of Chinese words and sentences in 15 healthy controls (HC group) and 10 patients with CI (CI group). EEG data were collected using an oddball paradigm. Then, the characteristics of event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negative (MMN) were compared between the CI group and the HC group. In addition, we analyzed the phase lag indices (PLI) in the CI group and the HC group and calculated the difference in functional connectivity between the two groups at different stages after implantation. Results The behavioral indicator, speech recognition ability, in CI patients improved as the implantation time increased. The MMN analysis showed that CI patients could recognize the difference between standard and deviation stimuli just like the HCs 90 days after cochlear implantation. Comparing the latencies of N1/P2/MMN between the CI group and the HC group, we found that the latency of N1/P2 in CI patients was longer, while the latency of MMN in CI users was shorter. In addition, PLI-based whole-brain functional connectivity (PLI-FC) showed that the difference between the CI group and the HC group mainly exists in electrode pairs between the bilateral auditory area and the frontal area. Furthermore, all those differences gradually decreased with the increase in implantation time. Conclusion The N1 amplitude, N1/P2/MMN latency, and PLI-FC in the alpha band may reflect the process of auditory function remodeling and could be an objective index for the assessment of speech perception ability and the effect of cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songjian Wang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Lin
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Liwei Sun
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xueqing Chen
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xinxing Fu
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - LiLi Yan
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Chunlin Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haumann S, Bauernfeind G, Teschner MJ, Schierholz I, Bleichner MG, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Epidural recordings in cochlear implant users. J Neural Eng 2019; 16:056008. [PMID: 31042688 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab1e80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the long term it is desirable for CI users to control their device via brain signals. A possible strategy is the use of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Several studies have shown the suitability of auditory paradigms for such an approach. However, these investigations are based on non-invasive recordings. When thinking about everyday life applications, it would be more convenient to use implanted electrodes for signal acquisition. Ideally, the electrodes would be directly integrated into the CI. Further it is to be expected that invasively recorded signals have higher signal quality and are less affected by artifacts. APPROACH In this project we investigated the feasibility of implanting epidural electrodes temporarily during CI surgery and the possibility to record AEPs in the course of several days after implantation. Intraoperatively, auditory brainstem responses were recorded, whereas various kinds of AEPs were recorded postoperatively. After a few days the epidural electrodes were removed. MAIN RESULTS Data sets of ten subjects were obtained. Invasively recorded potentials were compared subjectively and objectively to clinical standard recordings using surface electrodes. Especially the cortical evoked response audiometry depicted clearer N1 waves for the epidural electrodes which were also visible at lower stimulation intensities compared to scalp electrodes. Furthermore the signal was less disturbed by artifacts. The objective quality measure (based on data sets of six patients) showed a significant better signal quality for the epidural compared to the scalp recordings. SIGNIFICANCE Altogether the approach revealed to be feasible and well tolerated by the patients. The epidural recordings showed a clearly better signal quality than the scalp recordings with AEPs being clearer recognizable. The results of the present study suggest that including epidural recording electrodes in future CI systems will improve the everyday life applicability of auditory closed loop systems for CI subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Haumann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', Hannover & Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Denk F, Grzybowski M, Ernst SMA, Kollmeier B, Debener S, Bleichner MG. Event-Related Potentials Measured From In and Around the Ear Electrodes Integrated in a Live Hearing Device for Monitoring Sound Perception. Trends Hear 2019; 22:2331216518788219. [PMID: 30022733 PMCID: PMC6053864 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518788219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Future hearing devices could exploit brain signals of the user derived from electroencephalography (EEG) measurements, for example, for fitting the device or steering signal enhancement algorithms. While previous studies have shown that meaningful brain signals can be obtained from ear-centered EEG electrodes, we here present a feasibility study where ear-EEG is integrated with a live hearing device. Seventeen normal-hearing participants were equipped with an individualized in-the-ear hearing device and an ear-EEG system that included 10 electrodes placed around the ear (cEEGrid) and 3 electrodes spread out in the concha. They performed an auditory discrimination experiment, where they had to detect an audible switch in the signal processing settings of the hearing device between repeated presentations of otherwise identical stimuli. We studied two aspects of the ear-EEG data: First, whether the switches in the hearing device settings can be identified in the brain signals, specifically event-related potentials. Second, we evaluated the signal quality for the individual electrode positions. The EEG analysis revealed significant differences between trials with and without a switch in the device settings in the N100 and P300 range of the event-related potential. The comparison of electrode positions showed that the signal quality is better for around-the-ear electrodes than for in-concha electrodes. These results confirm that meaningful brain signals related to the settings of a hearing device can be acquired from ear-EEG during real-time audio processing, particularly if electrodes around the ear are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Denk
- 1 Medizinische Physik, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany
| | - Marleen Grzybowski
- 1 Medizinische Physik, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany
| | - Stephan M A Ernst
- 1 Medizinische Physik, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany.,3 ENT Clinic, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Germany
| | - Birger Kollmeier
- 1 Medizinische Physik, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany
| | - Stefan Debener
- 2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany.,4 Neuropsychology Lab, University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Martin G Bleichner
- 2 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Germany.,4 Neuropsychology Lab, University of Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lenarz T. Cochlear implant - state of the art. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2018; 16:Doc04. [PMID: 29503669 PMCID: PMC5818683 DOI: 10.3205/cto000143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implants are the treatment of choice for auditory rehabilitation of patients with sensory deafness. They restore the missing function of inner hair cells by transforming the acoustic signal into electrical stimuli for activation of auditory nerve fibers. Due to the very fast technology development, cochlear implants provide open-set speech understanding in the majority of patients including the use of the telephone. Children can achieve a near to normal speech and language development provided their deafness is detected early after onset and implantation is performed quickly thereafter. The diagnostic procedure as well as the surgical technique have been standardized and can be adapted to the individual anatomical and physiological needs both in children and adults. Special cases such as cochlear obliteration might require special measures and re-implantation, which can be done in most cases in a straight forward way. Technology upgrades count for better performance. Future developments will focus on better electrode-nerve interfaces by improving electrode technology. An increased number of electrical contacts as well as the biological treatment with regeneration of the dendrites growing onto the electrode will increase the number of electrical channels. This will give room for improved speech coding strategies in order to create the bionic ear, i.e. to restore the process of natural hearing by means of technology. The robot-assisted surgery will allow for high precision surgery and reliable hearing preservation. Biological therapies will support the bionic ear. Methods are bio-hybrid electrodes, which are coded by stem cells transplanted into the inner ear to enhance auto-production of neurotrophins. Local drug delivery will focus on suppression of trauma reaction and local regeneration. Gene therapy by nanoparticles will hopefully lead to the preservation of residual hearing in patients being affected by genetic hearing loss. Overall the cochlear implant is a very powerful tool to rehabilitate patients with sensory deafness. More than 1 million of candidates in Germany today could benefit from this high technology auditory implant. Only 50,000 are implanted so far. In the future, the procedure can be done under local anesthesia, will be minimally invasive and straight forward. Hearing preservation will be routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Attina V, Mina F, Stahl P, Duroc Y, Veuillet E, Truy E, Thai-Van H. A New Method to Test the Efficiency of Cochlear Implant Artifacts Removal From Auditory Evoked Potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2017; 25:2453-2460. [PMID: 28692981 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2017.2723952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Auditory evoked potentials are of great interest to objectively evaluate the audition in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. However, these measures are impeded by CI stimulation electrical artifacts present in the EEG. In the first part, this paper investigates the use of a hybrid model approximating CI patient data. This model gives access to both uncontaminated and denoised data, thus allowing for the evaluation of CI artifact removal methods. Here the efficiency of independent component analysis (ICA) is evaluated in the context of auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). A dedicated experimental setup was developed to simultaneously record EEG data from a normal hearing (NH) participant and CI artifact data from a phantom equipped with a CI. Hybrid data were obtained as a linear mixture of both sources. Amplitude-modulated continuous tones were used as stimuli to elicit ASSRs. After denoising, the comparison of denoised hybrid data and original NH data showed high correlations between the two datasets, demonstrating the efficiency of ICA. In the second part, the ICA was applied to real clinical CI ASSR data. Results support the usefulness of the methodology as regards the performance evaluation of signal processing methods applied to CI patient data prior to clinical application.
Collapse
|