Tinnitus and 3-Year Change in Audiometric Hearing Thresholds

Advances in acupuncture treatment for tinnitus

Tinnitus is the abnormal perception of sound in the absence of a corresponding external acoustic stimulus, which seriously affects the patients' quality of life, physical and mental health, and the safety of life. There is almost no effective cure for tinnitus, primarily due to its complicated etiopathogenesis and unclear mechanisms. As a major and ancient physical therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine, acupuncture has been widely used in tinnitus because of its simple operation, rapid effect, and low cost. This paper reviews the relevant literature on the treatment of different kinds of tinnitus by acupuncture, and summarizes the therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of acupuncture on tinnitus, which is expected to provide new ideas and research directions for the study of tinnitus treatment by acupuncture. Tinnitus is the abnormal perception of sound in the absence of a corresponding external acoustic stimulus, which seriously affects the patients' quality of life, physical and mental health, and the safety of life. There is almost no effective cure for tinnitus, primarily due to its complicated etiopathogenesis and unclear mechanisms. As a major and ancient physical therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine, acupuncture has been widely used in tinnitus because of its simple operation, rapid effect, and low cost. This paper reviews the relevant literature on the treatment of different kinds of tinnitus by acupuncture, and summarizes the therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of acupuncture on tinnitus, which is expected to provide new ideas and research directions for the study of tinnitus treatment by acupuncture.

Hypothesis Tests for Continuous Audiometric Threshold Data

OBJECTIVES

Hypothesis tests for hearing threshold data may be challenging due to the special structure of the response variable, which consists of the measurements from the participant's two ears at multiple frequencies. The commonly-used methods may have inflated type I error rates for the global test that examines whether exposure-hearing threshold associations exist in at least one of the frequencies. We propose using both-ear methods, including all frequencies in the same model for hypothesis testing.

DESIGN

We compared the both-ear method to commonly used single-ear methods, such as the worse-ear, better-ear, left/right-ear, average-ear methods, and both-ear methods that evaluate individual audiometric frequencies in separate models, through both theoretical consideration and a simulation study. Differences between the methods were illustrated using hypothesis tests for the associations between the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension adherence score and 3-year change in hearing thresholds among participants in the Conservation of Hearing Study.

RESULTS

We found that (1) in the absence of ear-level confounders, the better-ear, worse-ear and left/right-ear methods have less power for frequency-specific tests and for the global test; (2) in the presence of ear-level confounders, the better-ear and worse-ear methods are invalid, and the left/right-ear and average-ear methods have less power, with the power loss in the left/right-ear much greater than the average-ear method, for frequency-specific tests and for the global test; and (3) the both-ear method with separate analyses for individual frequencies is invalid for the global test.

CONCLUSIONS

For hypothesis testing to evaluate whether there are significant associations between an exposure of interest and audiometric hearing threshold measurements, the both-ear method that includes all frequencies in the same model is the recommended analytic approach.

An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data

Propensity score matching is commonly used in observational studies to control for confounding and estimate the causal effects of a treatment or exposure. Frequently, in observational studies data are clustered, which adds to the complexity of using propensity score techniques. In this article, we give an overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data, and highlight how propensity score matching can be used to account for not just measured confounders, but also unmeasured cluster level confounders. We also consider using machine learning methods such as generalized boosted models to estimate the propensity score and show that accounting for clustering when using these methods can greatly reduce the performance, particularly when there are a large number of clusters and a small number of subjects per cluster. In order to get around this we highlight scenarios where it may be possible to control for measured covariates using propensity score matching, while using fixed effects regression in the outcome model to control for cluster level covariates. Using simulation studies we compare the performance of different propensity score matching methods for clustered data across a number of different settings. Finally, as an illustrative example we apply propensity score matching methods for clustered data to study the causal effect of aspirin on hearing deterioration using data from the conservation of hearing study.

Longitudinal Study of Analgesic Use and Risk of Incident Persistent Tinnitus

BACKGROUND

Persistent tinnitus is common, disabling, and difficult to treat. High-dose aspirin may precipitate tinnitus, but longitudinal data on typical dose aspirin and other analgesics are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate independent associations of aspirin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen and risk of incident persistent tinnitus.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Nurses' Health Study II (1995-2017).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 69,455 women, age 31-48 years, without tinnitus at baseline.

MAIN MEASURES

Information on analgesic use and tinnitus obtained by biennial questionnaires.

KEY RESULTS

After 1,120,936 person-years of follow-up, 10,452 cases of incident persistent tinnitus were reported. For low-dose aspirin, the risk of developing persistent tinnitus was not elevated among frequent low-dose aspirin users. For moderate dose aspirin, frequent use was associated with higher risk of tinnitus among women aged < 60 years, but not among older women (p-interactionage = 0.003). Compared with women aged < 60 using moderate-dose aspirin < 1 day/week, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (MVHR, 95% CI) among women using moderate-dose aspirin 6-7 days per week was 1.16 (1.03, 1.32). Among all women, frequent non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or acetaminophen use was associated with higher risk. Compared with women using NSAIDs <1 day/week, the MVHR for use 4-5days/week was 1.17 (1.08, 1.28) and for 6-7days/week was 1.07 (1.00, 1.16) (p-trend=0.001). For acetaminophen, compared with use <1 day/week, the MVHR for use 6-7days/week was 1.18 (1.07, 1.29) (p-trend=0.002).

LIMITATIONS

Information on tinnitus and analgesic use was self-reported. Information on indications for analgesic use was not available. Studies in non-White women and men are needed.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing persistent tinnitus was not elevated among frequent low-dose aspirin users. Among younger women, frequent moderate-dose aspirin use was associated with higher risk. Frequent NSAID use and frequent acetaminophen use were associated with higher risk of incident persistent tinnitus among all women, and the magnitude of the risks tended to be greater with increasing frequency of use. Our results suggest analgesic users are at higher risk for developing tinnitus and may provide insight into the precipitants of this challenging disorder, but additional investigation to determine whether there is a causal association is needed.

Both-Ear Method for the Analysis of Audiometric Data

OBJECTIVE

Single-ear hearing measurements, such as better-ear, worse-ear or left/right ear, are often used as outcomes in auditory research, yet, measurements in the two ears of the same individual are often strongly but not perfectly correlated. We propose a both-ear method using the Generalized Estimating Equation approach for analysis of correlated binary ear data to evaluate determinants of ear-specific outcomes that includes information from both ears of the same individual.

DESIGN

We first theoretically evaluated bias in odds ratio (OR) estimates based on worse-ear and better-ear hearing outcomes. A simulation study was conducted to compare the finite sample performances of single-ear and both-ear methods in logistic regression models. As an illustrative example, the single-ear and both-ear methods were applied to estimate the association of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension adherence scores with hearing threshold elevation among 3135 women, aged 48 to 68 years, in the Nurses' Health Study II.

RESULTS

Based on statistical theories, the worse-ear and better-ear methods could bias the OR estimates. The simulation results led to the same conclusion. In addition, the simulation results showed that the both-ear method had satisfactory finite sample performance and was more efficient than the single-ear method. In the illustrative example, the confidence intervals of the estimated ORs for the association of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension scores and hearing threshold elevation using the both-ear method were narrower, indicating greater precision, than for those obtained using the other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The worse-ear and better-ear methods may lead to biased estimates, and the left/right ear method typically results in less-efficient estimates. In certain settings, the both-ear method using the Generalized Estimating Equation approach for analyses of audiometric data may be preferable to the single-ear methods.

Analytical methods for evaluating reliability and validity of mobile audiometry tools

Statistical approaches that could be used as standardized methodology for evaluating reliability and validity of data obtained using remote audiometry are proposed. Using data from the Nurses' Health Study II (n = 31), the approaches to evaluate the reliability and validity of hearing threshold measurements obtained by a self-administered iPhone-based hearing assessment application (Decibel Therapeutics, Inc., Boston, MA) compared with measurements obtained by clinical (soundbooth) audiometry are described. These approaches use mixed-effects models to account for multilevel correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of single and averaged measurements, and regression techniques with the generalized estimating equations (GEEs) to account for between-ear correlations. Threshold measurements obtained using the iPhone application were moderately reliable. The reliability was improved substantially by averaging repeated measurements; good reliability was achieved by averaging three repeated measurements. In the linear regression analyses that assessed validity, the range of intercepts (2.3-8.4) and range of slopes (0.4-0.7) indicated that the measurements from the application were likely biased from those obtained by clinical audiometry. When evaluating alternative hearing assessment tools, it is recommended to assess reliability through mixed-effects models and use ICCs to determine the number of repeated assessments needed to achieve satisfactory reliability. When evaluating validity, GEE methods are recommended to estimate regression coefficients.

Measures of Subjective Tinnitus: What Does Visual Analog Scale Stand for?

BACKGROUND

Patients with tinnitus may have different severity levels of tinnitus distress. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple method to measure the extent of subjective distress caused by tinnitus. It includes ratings of tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate what led to different distress levels in patients with bilateral tinnitus by analyzing the relationships among all subscales of VAS scores for tinnitus distress and the documented variables.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study was a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY SAMPLE

The medical records of 268 patients who visited a tinnitus clinic between March and December 2020 were reviewed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Epidemiologic characteristics, subjective tinnitus distress factors including tinnitus loudness, awareness, annoyance, and impact of tinnitus on life, questionnaire results including those from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and audiometric profiles were documented. Based on a bivariate analysis between variables and subtypes of subjective tinnitus distress, stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify potential influencing factors for aggravating each subtype.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 122 patients with bilateral tinnitus were collected. The cohort included 77 males and 45 females with a mean age of 51.16 ± 13.50 years. Tinnitus loudness was associated with an accompanying headache (p < 0.001), the BDI score (p = 0.001), and the duration of tinnitus (p = 0.006). A high THI (p < 0.001) and an accompanying headache (p = 0.016) were both associated with tinnitus annoyance. Hearing thresholds at 250 Hz (p = 0.011) and 500 Hz (p = 0.002) on the left side were associated with an impact of tinnitus on life. The hearing threshold at 4 kHz on the left side alone was associated with tinnitus awareness (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Psychologic complaints are mainly associated with tinnitus loudness and annoyance. On the other hand, hearing loss is linked with tinnitus awareness and its impact on life. Thus, an individualized, sequential approach that considers different subtypes of tinnitus severity to assess subjective tinnitus distress is needed.

Symptom dimensions to address heterogeneity in tinnitus

Tinnitus, the auditory phantom percept, is a well-known heterogenous disorder with multiple subtypes. Researchers and clinicians have tried to classify these subtypes according to clinical profiles, aetiologies, and response to treatment with little success. The occurrence of overlapping tinnitus subtypes suggests that the disorder exists along a continuum of severity, with no clear distinct boundaries. In this perspective, we propose a neuro-mechanical framework, viewing tinnitus as a dimensional disorder which is a complex interplay of its behavioural, biological and neurophysiological phenotypes. Moreover, we explore the potential of these dimensions as interacting networks without a common existing cause, giving rise to tinnitus. Considering tinnitus as partially overlapping, dynamically changing, interacting networks, each representing a different aspect of the unified tinnitus percept, suggests that the interaction of these networks determines the phenomenology of the tinnitus, ultimately leading to a dimensional spectrum, rather than a categorical subtyping. A combination of a robust theoretical framework and strong empirical evidence can advance our understanding of the functional mechanisms underlying tinnitus and ultimately, improve treatment strategies.

Construction and Evaluation of a High-Frequency Hearing Loss Screening Tool for Community Residents

Early screening and detection of individuals at high risk of high-frequency hearing loss and identification of risk factors are critical to reduce the prevalence at community level. However, unlike those for individuals facing occupational auditory hazards, a limited number of hearing loss screening models have been developed for community residents. Therefore, this study used lasso regression with 10-fold cross-validation for feature selection and model construction on 38 questionnaire-based variables of 4010 subjects and applied the model to training and testing cohorts to obtain a risk score. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.844 in the model validation stage and individuals’ risk scores were subsequently stratified into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories. A total of 92.79% (1094/1179) of subjects in the high-risk category were confirmed to have hearing loss by audiometry test, which was 3.7 times higher than that in the low-risk group (25.18%, 457/1815). Half of the key indicators were related to modifiable contexts, and they were identified as significantly associated with the incident hearing loss. These results demonstrated that the developed model would be feasible to identify residents at high risk of hearing loss via regular community-level health examinations and detecting individualized risk factors, and eventually provide precision interventions.

Osteoporosis, bisphosphonate use, and risk of moderate or worse hearing loss in women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis and low bone density (LBD) may be associated with higher risk of hearing loss, but findings are inconsistent and longitudinal data are scarce. Bisphosphonates may influence risk, but the relation has not been studied in humans. We longitudinally investigated associations of osteoporosis and LBD, bisphosphonate use, vertebral fracture (VF), hip fracture (HF), and risk of self-reported moderate or worse hearing loss.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) (1982-2016) and Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II) (1995-2017).

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 60,821 NHS women, aged 36-61 years at baseline, and 83,078 NHS II women, aged 31-48 years at baseline (total n = 143,899).

MEASUREMENTS

Information on osteoporosis, LBD, bisphosphonate use, VF, HF, and hearing status was obtained from validated biennial questionnaires. In a subcohort (n = 3749), objective hearing thresholds were obtained by audiometry. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine independent associations between osteoporosis (NHS), osteoporosis/LBD (NHS II), and risk of hearing loss.

RESULTS

The multivariable-adjusted relative risk (MVRR, 95% confidence interval) of moderate or worse hearing loss was higher among women with osteoporosis or LBD in both cohorts. In NHS, compared with women without osteoporosis, the MVRR was 1.14 (1.09, 1.19) among women with osteoporosis; in NHS II, the MVRR was 1.30 (1.21, 1.40) among women with osteoporosis/LBD. The magnitude of the elevated risk was similar among women who did and did not use bisphosphonates. VF was associated with higher risk (NHS: 1.31 [1.16, 1.49]; NHS II: 1.39 [1.13, 1.71]), but HF was not (NHS: 1.00 [0.86, 1.16];NHS II: 1.15 [0.75,1.74]). Among participants with audiometric measurements, compared with women without osteoporosis/LBD, the mean multivariable-adjusted hearing thresholds were higher (i.e., worse) among those with osteoporosis/LBD who used bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis and LBD may be important contributors to aging-related hearing loss. Among women with osteoporosis, the risk of hearing loss was not influenced by bisphosphonate use.