An update on the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus

Multiple polygenic risk scores can improve the prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

To identify new genetic variants associated with SLE in Taiwan and establish polygenic risk score (PRS) models to improve the early diagnostic accuracy of SLE.

METHODS

The study enrolled 2429 patients with SLE and 48 580 controls from China Medical University Hospital in Taiwan. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) and PRS analyses of SLE and other three SLE markers, namely ANA, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (dsDNA) and anti-Smith antibody (Sm), were conducted.

RESULTS

Genetic variants associated with SLE were identified through GWAS. Some novel genes, which have been previously reported, such as RCC1L and EGLN3, were revealed to be associated with SLE in Taiwan. Multiple PRS models were established, and optimal cut-off points for each PRS were determined using the Youden Index. Combining the PRSs for SLE, ANA, dsDNA and Sm yielded an area under the curve of 0.64 for the optimal cut-off points. An analysis of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes in SLE indicated that individuals with HLA-DQA1*01:01 and HLA-DQB1*05:01 were at a higher risk of being classified into the SLE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PRSs to predict SLE enables the identification of high-risk patients before abnormal laboratory data were obtained or symptoms were manifested. Our findings underscore the potential of using PRSs and GWAS in identifying SLE markers, offering promise for early diagnosis and prediction of SLE.

The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE

The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.

SLE classification criteria: Is "The causality principle" integrated and operative - and do the molecular and genetical network, on which criteria depend on, support the definition of SLE as "a one disease entity" - A theoretical discussion

Molecular and cellular aspects of the autoimmune pathophysiology in SLE is linked to the "The causality principle". SLE Classification Criteria identify per definition disease measures (here: synonymous with classification criteria), but not diagnostic criteria within a classical framework. These two mostly theoretical criteria collections represent a salient conflict between phenomenology and the causality principle - between disease measures and molecular interactions that promote such measures, in other words their cause(s). Essentially, each criterion evolves from immunogenic and inflammatory signals - some are interconnected, some are not. Disparate signals instigated by disparate causes. These may promote clinically heterogenous SLE cohorts with respect to organ affection, autoimmunity, and disease course. There is today no concise measures or arguments that settle whether SLE cohorts evolve from one decisive etiological factor (homogenous cohorts), or if disparate patho-biological factors promote SLE (heterogenous cohorts). Current SLE cohorts are not ideal substrates to serve as study objects if the research aims are to describe etiology, and molecular interactions that cause - and link - primary and secondary pathophysiological events together - events that account for early and progressive SLE. We have to develop SLE criteria allowing us to identify definable categories of SLE in order to describe etiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic criteria of delimitated SLE versions. In this regard, the causality principle is central to define dominant etiologies of individual SLE categories, and subsequent and consequent down-stream diagnostic disease measures. In this sense, we may whether we like it or not identify different SLE categories like "genuine SLE" and "SLE-like non-SLE" syndromes. Many aspects of this problem are thoroughly discussed in this study.

Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Patients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have lupus features but insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some patients with ILE transition to SLE, but most avoid major organ involvement. This study tested whether the milder disease course in ILE is influenced by reduced SLE risk allele genetic load.

METHODS

We calculated the genetic load based on 99 SLE-associated risk alleles in European American patients with SLE (≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria, n=170), patients with ILE (3 ACR 1997 criteria, n=169), a subset of patients with ILE not meeting Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification (ILESLICC, n=119) and healthy controls (n=133). Unweighted genetic loads were calculated as the total sum of risk alleles for each individual, while weighted genetic loads were defined as the sum of risk alleles multiplied by the natural logarithm of the previously published OR of each risk allele for SLE susceptibility.

RESULTS

The median unweighted and weighted SLE risk allele genetic load was significantly greater in patients with ILE (unweighted: 81, p value=0.01; weighted: 16.3, p value=0.001) and patients with SLE (80, p value=0.02; 16.29, p value=0.0006) compared with healthy controls (78, 15.76). Patients with ILESLICC trended towards an increased genetic load, although not statistically significant (unweighted: 80, p value=0.14; weighted: 16.05, p value=0.07). However, the median genetic load did not significantly differ between ILE and SLE, and genetic load did not differentiate patients with ILE and SLE (area under the curve=0.51, p=0.78) by receiver operator characteristic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILE and SLE have comparable genetic loads of SLE risk loci, suggesting similar genetic predispositions between these conditions. Phenotypical differences between SLE and ILE may instead be influenced by ILE-specific variants and gene-environment interactions.

Association of Immune-Related Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations with Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND

The familial clustering phenomenon together with environmental influences indicates the presence of a genetic and epigenetic predisposition to systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Interestingly, regarding lupus nephritis (LN), the worst complication of SLE, mortality, and morbidity were not consistent with SLE in relation to sexuality and ethnicity.

SUMMARY

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in LN include genes and noncoding RNAs that are involved in antigen-presenting, complements, immune cell infiltration, interferon pathways, and so on. Once genetic or epigenetic change occurs alone or simultaneously, they will promote the formation of immune complexes with autoantibodies that target various autoantigens, which results in inflammatory cytokines and autoreactive immune cells colonizing renal tissues and contributing to LN.

KEY MESSAGES

Making additional checks for immunopathology-related heredity and epigenetic factors may lead to a more holistic perspective of LN.

Whole-genome sequencing identifies rare missense variants of WNT16 and ERVW-1 causing the systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, OMIM 152700) is a rare autoimmune disease with high heritability that affects ~0.1% of the population. Previous studies have revealed several common variants with small effects in European and East Asian SLE patients. However, there is still no rare variant study on Chinese SLE patients using the whole-genome sequencing technology (WGS). Here, we designed a family based WGS study to identify novel rare variants with large effects. Based on large-scale allele frequency data from the gnomAD database, we identified rare protein-coding gene variants with disruptive and sequence-altering impacts in SLE patients. We found that the burden of rare variants was significantly higher than that of common variants in patients, suggesting a larger effect of rare variants on the SLE pathogenesis. We identified the pathogenic risk of rare missense variants with significant odds ratios (p < 0.05) in two genes, including WNT16 (NC_000007.14:g.121329757G > C, NP_057171.2:p.(Ala86Pro) and 7 g.121329760G > C, NP_057171.2:p.(Ala87Pro)), which explains five out of seven patients covering all three families but are absent from all controls, and ERVW-1 (NC_000007.14:g.92469882A > G, NP_001124397.1:p.(Leu167Pro), rs74545114; NC_000007.14:g.92469907G > A, NP_001124397.1:p.(Arg159Cys), rs201142302; NC_000007.14:g.92469919G > A, NP_001124397.1:p.(His155Tyr), rs199552228), which explains the other two patients. None of these variants were identified in any of the controls. These associations are supported by known gene expression studies in SLE patients based on literature review. We further tested the wild and mutant types using the luciferase assays and qPCR in cells. We found that WNT16 can activate the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway while the mutant cannot. Additionally, the wild ERVW-1 expression can be significantly up-regulated by cAMP while the mutant cannot. Our study provides the first direct genetic and in vitro evidence for the pathogenic risk of mutant WNT16 and ERVW-1, which may facilitate the design of precision therapy for SLE.

Genetic overlap between type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disease caused by the destruction of pancreatic β cells, which is driven by autoreactive T lymphocytes. It has been described that a high proportion of T1D patients develop other autoimmune diseases (AIDs), such as autoimmune thyroid disease, celiac disease, or vitiligo, which suggests the existence of common etiological factors among these disorders. In this regard, genetic studies have identified a high number of loci consistently associated with T1D that also represent established genetic risk factors for other AIDs. In addition, studies focused on identifying the shared genetic component in autoimmunity have described several common susceptibility loci with a potential role in T1D. Elucidation of this genetic overlap has been useful in identifying key molecular pathways with a pathogenic role in multiple disorders. In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding the shared genetic component between T1D and other AIDs and discuss how the identification of common pathogenic mechanisms can help in the development of new therapeutic approaches as well as in improving the use of existing drugs.

Lupus susceptibility region containing CDKN1B rs34330 mechanistically influences expression and function of multiple target genes, also linked to proliferation and apoptosis

OBJECTIVE

A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) reported a significant genetic association between rs34330 of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B) and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Han Chinese. This study aims to validate the reported association and elucidate the biochemical mechanisms underlying the variant's effect.

METHODS

We performed allelic association with SLE followed by meta-analysis across 11 independent cohorts (n=28,872). We applied in silico bioinformatics and experimental validation in SLE-relevant cell lines to determine the functional consequences of rs34330.

RESULTS

We replicated genetic association between SLE and rs34330 (P_meta =5.29x10^-22 , OR (95% CI)=0.84 (0.81-0.87)). Follow-up bioinformatics and eQTL analysis suggest that rs34330 is located in active chromatin and potentially regulates several target genes. Using luciferase and ChIP-qPCR, we demonstrated substantial allele-specific promoter and enhancer activity, and allele-specific binding of three histone marks (H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K4me1), RNA pol II, CTCF, and a critical immune transcription factor (IRF-1). Chromosome conformation capture (3C) detected long-range chromatin interactions between rs34330 and the promoters of neighboring genes APOLD1 and DDX47, and effects on CDKN1B and the other target genes were directly validated by CRISPR-based genome editing. Finally, CRISPR-dCas9-based epigenetic activation/silencing confirmed these results. Gene-edited cell lines also showed higher levels of proliferation and apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these findings suggest a mechanism whereby the rs34330 risk allele (C) influences the presence of histone marks, RNA pol II, and the IRF-1 transcription factor to regulate expression of several target genes linked to proliferation and apoptosis, which potentially underlie the association of rs34330 with SLE.

Expression of Human Endogenous Retroviruses in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Multiomic Integration With Gene Expression

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies predominantly to nuclear material. Many aspects of disease pathology are mediated by the deposition of nucleic acid containing immune complexes, which also induce the type 1interferon response, a characteristic feature of SLE. Notably, SLE is remarkably heterogeneous, with a variety of organs involved in different individuals, who also show variation in disease severity related to their ancestries. Here, we probed one potential contribution to disease heterogeneity as well as a possible source of immunoreactive nucleic acids by exploring the expression of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs). We investigated the expression of HERVs in SLE and their potential relationship to SLE features and the expression of biochemical pathways, including the interferon gene signature (IGS). Towards this goal, we analyzed available and new RNA-Seq data from two independent whole blood studies using Telescope. We identified 481 locus specific HERV encoding regions that are differentially expressed between case and control individuals with only 14% overlap of differentially expressed HERVs between these two datasets. We identified significant differences between differentially expressed HERVs and non-differentially expressed HERVs between the two datasets. We also characterized the host differentially expressed genes and tested their association with the differentially expressed HERVs. We found that differentially expressed HERVs were significantly more physically proximal to host differentially expressed genes than non-differentially expressed HERVs. Finally, we capitalized on locus specific resolution of HERV mapping to identify key molecular pathways impacted by differential HERV expression in people with SLE.

Association of CD40 Gene Polymorphisms With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Chinese Han Population

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are complex autoimmune diseases. CD40 participates in inflammatory response, and promotes fibroblast proliferation, leading to occurrence and progression of SLE, RA. This study explores CD40 gene polymorphisms in SLE and RA patients from a Chinese Han population. Two hundred SLE patients, 340 RA patients, and 900 healthy controls were enrolled. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood, and six polymorphisms of CD40 gene (rs3765456, rs1569723, rs73115010, rs13040307, rs1883832, and rs4810485) were detected by KASP method. Frequencies of rs1569723 genotypes AA, AC, AA+AC were significantly higher in RA patients as compared to those in healthy controls (P = 0.049, P = 0.024, P = 0.022). Frequencies of genotypes CT, CC+CT of rs1883832, and GT, GG+GT of rs4810485 were significantly higher in RA patients as compared to those in healthy controls (P = 0.012, P = 0.018, P = 0.009, P = 0.015). RA patients carrying rs13040307 C allele and rs73115010 T allele showed increased number of swollen joints. Moreover, frequency of allele T of rs13040307 was lower in SLE patients with positive anti-dsDNA and hematuria as compared to that in patients without these parameters (P = 0.038, P = 0.045). There were increased frequencies of genotype TT, allele T for rs13040307 and lower frequencies of genotype TT, allele T for rs73115010 in lupus patients with myositis (all P<0.05). Interestingly, frequencies of rs1569723 A allele, rs4810485 T allele were higher in SLE patients with myositis, and frequencies of rs3765456 A allele, rs1883832 T allele were lower in SLE patients with myositis (All P<0.05). In conclusion, CD40 gene polymorphisms may associate with susceptibility to SLE and RA.

Genetic aspects of adult and pediatric autoimmune hepatitis: A concise review

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a heterogenous, mostly chronic liver disease that affects people of all age groups, women more often than men. The aim of therapy is to prevent cirrhosis, as it mainly accounts for liver-related mortality in patients with AIH. Rates of remission are high in patients with AIH, but life-long immunosuppressive therapy is required. AIH is hypothesized to originate from immunologic reactivity targeted against mostly unknown self-antigens, potentially triggered by viral infections among other factors. While AIH does not follow a Mendelian inheritance pattern, part of the risk of developing AIH or worse disease course, is attributed to specific genetic risk factors. Major associations for the risk of development of AIH were found for HLA-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 in adult AIH in the only genome-wide association study on AIH. However, other potential risk loci in SH2B3, CARD10 and KIR genes were described. This review covers the current knowledge on genetic risk factors in adult and pediatric AIH.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: The search for the ideal biomarker

During the last decades, there has been an increased interest in the discovery and validation of biomarkers that reliably reflect specific aspects of lupus. Although many biomarkers have been developed, few of them have been validated and used in clinical practice, but with unsatisfactory performances. Thus, there is still a need to rigorously validate many of these novel promising biomarkers in large-scale longitudinal studies and also identify better biomarkers not only for lupus diagnosis but also for monitoring and predicting upcoming flares and response to treatment. Besides serological biomarkers, urinary and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have emerged for assessing both renal and central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively. Also, novel omics techniques help us to understand the molecular basis of the disease and also allow the identification of novel biomarkers which may be potentially useful for guiding new therapeutic targets.

Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis

One cannot discuss anti-dsDNA antibodies and lupus nephritis without discussing the nature of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is insistently described as a prototype autoimmune syndrome, with anti-dsDNA antibodies as a central biomarker and a pathogenic factor. The two entities, “SLE” and “The Anti-dsDNA Antibody,” have been linked in previous and contemporary studies although serious criticism to this mutual linkage have been raised: Anti-dsDNA antibodies were first described in bacterial infections and not in SLE; later in SLE, viral and parasitic infections and in malignancies. An increasing number of studies on classification criteria for SLE have been published in the aftermath of the canonical 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification sets of criteria. Considering these studies, it is surprising to observe a nearby complete absence of fundamental critical/theoretical discussions aimed to explain how and why the classification criteria are linked in context of etiology, pathogenicity, or biology. This study is an attempt to prioritize critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE and of anti-dsDNA antibodies in context of lupus nephritis. Epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and measures of therapy efficacy are implemented as problems in the present discussion. In order to understand whether or not disparate clinical SLE phenotypes are useful to determine its basic biological processes accounting for the syndrome is problematic. A central problem is discussed on whether the clinical role of anti-dsDNA antibodies from principal reasons can be accepted as a biomarker for SLE without clarifying what we define as an anti-dsDNA antibody, and in which biologic contexts the antibodies appear. In sum, this study is an attempt to bring to the forum critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE, lupus nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Four concise hypotheses are suggested for future science at the end of this analytical study.

Leveraging Heterogeneity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus for New Therapies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem, chronic autoimmune disease where treatment varies by patient and disease activity. Strong preclinical results and clinical correlates have motivated development of many drugs, but many of these have failed to achieve efficacy in clinical trials. FDA approval of belimumab in 2011 was the first successful SLE drug in nearly six decades. In this article, we review insights into the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of SLE from transcriptomics studies and detail their potential impact on drug development and clinical practices. We critically examine the pipeline of SLE drugs, including past failures and their associated lessons and current promising approaches. Finally, we identify opportunities for integrating these findings and drug development with new multidisciplinary advances to enhance future SLE treatment.

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association study identifies FBN2 as a novel locus associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in Thai population

BACKGROUND

Differences in the expression of variants across ethnic groups in the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have been well documented. However, the genetic architecture in the Thai population has not been thoroughly examined. In this study, we carried out genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the Thai population.

METHODS

Two GWAS cohorts were independently collected and genotyped: discovery dataset (487 SLE cases and 1606 healthy controls) and replication dataset (405 SLE cases and 1590 unrelated disease controls). Data were imputed to the density of the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3. Association studies were performed based on different genetic models, and pathway enrichment analysis was further examined. In addition, the performance of disease risk estimation for individuals in Thai GWAS was assessed based on the polygenic risk score (PRS) model trained by other Asian populations.

RESULTS

Previous findings on SLE susceptible alleles were well replicated in the two GWAS. The SNPs on HLA class II (rs9270970, A>G, OR = 1.82, p value = 3.61E-26), STAT4 (rs7582694, C>G, OR = 1.57, p value = 8.21E-16), GTF2I (rs73366469, A>G, OR = 1.73, p value = 2.42E-11), and FAM167A-BLK allele (rs13277113, A>G, OR = 0.68, p value = 1.58E-09) were significantly associated with SLE in Thai population. Meta-analysis of the two GWAS identified a novel locus at the FBN2 that was specifically associated with SLE in the Thai population (rs74989671, A>G, OR = 1.54, p value = 1.61E-08). Functional analysis showed that rs74989671 resided in a peak of H3K36me3 derived from CD14+ monocytes and H3K4me1 from T lymphocytes. In addition, we showed that the PRS model trained from the Chinese population could be applied in individuals of Thai ancestry, with the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) achieving 0.76 for this predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the genetic architecture of SLE in the Thai population and identified a novel locus associated with SLE. Also, our study suggested a potential use of the PRS model from the Chinese population to estimate the disease risk for individuals of Thai ancestry.

Contribution of rare and predicted pathogenic gene variants to childhood-onset lupus: a large, genetic panel analysis of British and French cohorts

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare immunological disorder and genetic factors are considered important in its causation. Monogenic lupus has been associated with around 30 genotypes in humans and 60 in mice, while genome-wide association studies have identified more than 90 risk loci. We aimed to analyse the contribution of rare and predicted pathogenic gene variants in a population of unselected cases of childhood-onset SLE.

METHODS

For this genetic panel analysis we designed a next-generation sequencing panel comprising 147 genes, including all known lupus-causing genes in humans, and potentially lupus-causing genes identified through GWAS and animal models. We screened 117 probands fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for SLE, ascertained through British and French cohorts of childhood-onset SLE, and compared these data with those of 791 ethnically matched controls from the 1000 Genomes Project and 574 controls from the FREX Consortium.

FINDINGS

After filtering, mendelian genotypes were confirmed in eight probands, involving variants in C1QA, C1QC, C2, DNASE1L3, and IKZF1. Seven additional patients carried heterozygous variants in complement or type I interferon-associated autosomal recessive genes, with decreased concentrations of the encoded proteins C3 and C9 recorded in two patients. Rare variants that were predicted to be damaging were significantly enriched in the childhood-onset SLE cohort compared with controls; 25% of SLE probands versus 5% of controls were identified to harbour at least one rare, predicted damaging variant (p=2·98 × 10-11). Inborn errors of immunity were estimated to account for 7% of cases of childhood-onset SLE, with defects in innate immunity representing the main monogenic contribution.

INTERPRETATION

An accumulation of rare variants that are predicted to be damaging in SLE-associated genes might contribute to disease expression and clinical heterogeneity.

FUNDING

European Research Council.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: Update on clinical presentation, pathophysiology and treatment options

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) accounts for up to 20% of all SLE patients. Key differences between juvenile- and adult-onset (aSLE) disease include higher disease activity, earlier development of damage, and increased use of immunosuppressive treatment in jSLE suggesting (at least partial) infectivity secondary to variable pathomechanisms. While the exact pathophysiology of jSLE remains unclear, genetic factors, immune complex deposition, complement activation, hormonal factors and immune cell dysregulation are involved to variable extents, promising future patient stratification based on immune phenotypes. Though less effective and potentially toxic, jSLE patients are treated based upon evidence from studies in aSLE cohorts. Here, age-specific clinical features of jSLE, underlying pathomechanisms, treatment options and disease outcomes will be addressed. Future directions to improve the care of jSLE patients, including implementation of the Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) recommendations, biomarkers, treat to target and personalized medicine approaches are discussed.