Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Outcome Measures and Mental Health in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients During Early Recovery

Enhancing the Evaluation of Physical Function Following Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Comparison of PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment

OBJECTIVES

To compare measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (physical function [PF] and pain interference [PI]) computerized adaptive testing to traditional Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) (dysfunction index [DI] and bother index [BI]). To explore factors associated with PROMIS scores.

METHODS

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Isolated upper/lower extremity fracture patients were recruited from the orthopaedic trauma outpatient clinic (October 1, 2021 to January 1, 2023).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlations (Pearson), reliability (standard error [SE] [T score]), efficiency (amount of information per item [1 - SE2/Nitems]), and floor/ceiling effects were assessed. An r > 0.7 represented high correlation, and SE ≤ 2.2 represented sufficient reliability. Factors associated with worse PROMIS scores were also identified.

RESULTS

In total, 202 patients completed PROMs at median 98 days follow-up. Correlations between PROMIS-PF and SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI and SMFA-BI were -0.84 and 0.65. Reliability was very high for both instruments (mean SE 2.0 [PROMIS-PF], SE 2.1 [PROMIS-PI], and SE 1.2 [SMFA-DI], SE 1.8 [SMFA-BI]). Relative efficiency for PROMIS-PF versus SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI versus SMFA-BI was 7.8 (SD 2.5) and 4.1 (SD 1.7), respectively. Neither PROMIS nor SMFA exhibited floor/ceiling effects. In the multivariable regression analyses, elevated levels of depression, among other factors, showed an (independent) association with worse PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI CATs showed a (high and moderate) correlation with SMFA and hence measure a comparable construct of physical function and discomfort. As computerized adaptive tests are much more efficient to administer, they present a compelling alternative to SMFA for evaluating impact of fracture treatment. The relation between symptoms of depression and PROMIS scores emphasizes the importance of psychosocial aspects of health in orthopaedic trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of Postoperative Opioid-Sparing Regimens for Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Multiple interventions have been implemented to reduce opioid prescribing in upper extremity surgery. However, few studies have evaluated pain relief and patient satisfaction as related to failure of these protocols. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of limited and nonopioid ("opioid-sparing") regimens for upper extremity surgery as it pertains to patient satisfaction, pain experienced, and need for additional refills/rescue analgesia.

METHODS

We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of opioid-sparing approaches in upper extremity surgery. An initial search of studies evaluating opioid-sparing regimens after upper extremity surgery from the elbow distal yielded 1,320 studies, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, surgery type, postoperative pain regimen, satisfaction measurements, and number of patients inadequately treated within each study were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials with 1,480 patients were included. Six of nine studies (67%) reported superiority or equivalence of pain relief with nonopioid or limited opioid regimens. However, across all studies, 4.2% to 25% of patients were not adequately treated by the opioid-sparing protocols. This includes four of seven studies (57%) assessing number of medication refills or rescue analgesia reporting increased pill consumption, refills, or rescue dosing with limited/nonopioid regimens. Five of six studies (83%) reporting satisfaction outcomes found no difference in satisfaction with pain control, medication strength, and overall surgical experience using opioid-sparing regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid-sparing regimens provide adequate pain relief for most upper extremity surgery patients. However, a meaningful number of patients on opioid-sparing regimens required greater medication refills and increased use of rescue analgesia. These patients also reported no difference in satisfaction compared with limited/nonopioid regimens.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Using PROM(I)S to measure health-related quality of life in patients with a bone fracture: An observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of patients with fractures is increasing and so is the impact on health care systems and society. To improve patient care, measurement of disabilities and impaired health experiences after traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are important. Next to objective clinical parameters, PROM(I)S can be used to map health domains important to patients. We aimed to objectify different aspects of (health-related) quality of life in fracture patients, including the ability to participate in social roles and activities using PROMIS among other PROMs.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was performed in which health-related quality of life in fracture patients was measured. Patients aged 18 year and older either treated conservatively or surgically between November 2020 and June 2022 were included. Participants were followed for a maximum of one year and completed the following PROMs: PROMIS-CAT physical function, PROMIS-CAT pain interference, PROMIS-CAT ability to participate in social roles and activities and LEFS or QDASH. We applied a univariate linear mixed model to evaluate significance of improvement.

RESULTS

Seven hundred-forty six patients with a mean age of 54.4 years were included. Mean PROMIS scores were structurally inferior in the lower extremity (LE) fracture group in comparison with the upper extremity (UE) fracture group. For "PROMIS physical function", UE fracture patients performed better and showed physical progression earlier. For "PROMIS pain interference", UE fracture patients experienced fewer limitations, but it took longer to experience improvement in this group. For "PROMIS ability to participate in social roles", significant improvement was only seen in the UE fracture group at one year follow up.

CONCLUSION

Upper -and lower extremity fractures can have a significant impact on physical function and social health. Patients with UE fractures tend to have fewer limitations compared to LE fracture patients. Physical function and pain interference is most impaired shortly after the injury in all fracture patients and show significant changes over time, social health improves less over time. Moment of measurement should be based on type of fracture and can differ between individual patients, but when generic measures and outcomes are desirable, PROMIS questionnaires can potentially be used measurement.

Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder following upper versus lower extremity fractures

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic trauma has been linked to major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Post-injury rates of psychiatric diagnoses and their relationship to various injury characteristics are not well characterized. We aimed to determine the association between orthopaedic trauma and MDD, GAD, and PTSD diagnoses at 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

A national insurance claims database was used to create upper extremity fracture (UEF) and lower extremity fracture (LEF) cohorts, with further stratification by isolated versus multiple fractures. Patient undergoing elective upper or lower extremity orthopaedic procedures served as controls. Rates of post-injury psychiatric diagnoses were calculated. Univariate logistic regression was conducted after matching in a 1:1 ratio based on relevant comorbidities such as psychiatric history. All significant variables were included in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 308,578 UEF patients and 360,510 LEF patients were identified. Within the UEF cohort, the diagnosis rates following either isolated or multiple fractures were identified: MDD (25% to 30%), GAD (10% to 11%), and PTSD (4%). LEF cohort rates were as follows: MDD (30% to 38%), GAD (11% to 14%), and PTSD (4% to 7%). Compared to non-injured controls, both the UEF and LEF cohorts were associated with higher rates of all psychiatric diagnoses. In comparing UEF and LEF cohorts, isolated UEF was associated with MDD, GAD, and PTSD; however, multiple UEF was associated with MDD and GAD, whereas multiple LEF was associated with PTSD.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatric pathology is prevalent following orthopaedic trauma. Even after controlling for psychiatric history, orthopaedic trauma is independently associated with post-injury psychiatric diagnoses and may be more predictive of PTSD and GAD than of MDD. Upper extremity fractures may portend higher psychiatric risk. With negative stigma surrounding mental health and the early role of orthopaedic surgeons in providing care, it is imperative to normalize psychiatric care with patients and discuss warning symptoms that may indicate the onset of psychiatric disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level III.

Immersive Virtual Reality Therapy Is Supportive for Orthopedic Rehabilitation among the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to determine the efficacy of VR therapy in mitigating symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among older adults following arthroplasty surgery and to comprehend the influence of psychological improvement on changes in functional outcomes.

METHODS

Utilizing a parallel-group randomized controlled trial design, the study involved 68 osteoarthritis patients who had recently undergone either total hip or knee arthroplasty. Subjects were split into two groups. The experimental group underwent eight VR therapy sessions during their rehabilitation, while the control group was given standard care. Assessments encompassed both psychological and functional outcomes, with tools like the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and the Barthel Index, among others. The experimental group showcased notable enhancements in both psychological and functional areas compared to the control group.

RESULTS

A significant (p value of < 0.001) relationship was found between psychological progress and functional recovery, indicating that psychological factors can serve as predictors for functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings emphasize the promising role of VR therapy as a beneficial addition to the rehabilitation process for older adults' post-hip and knee arthroplasty. The integration of psychological interventions in standard rehabilitation practices appears valuable, but further studies are needed to ascertain the long-term advantages of such an approach.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Orthopaedic Trauma

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements are validated tools developed to quantify self-reported aspects of capability, mindset, and circumstances in a standardized fashion. While PRO measurements have primarily been used in the research realm, a growing body of work now underscores substantial opportunities in applying the data generated by these tools to advance patient-centered musculoskeletal care. Specifically, the insights into a patient's health status derived from these measures can augment the standard biomedical approach to the management of patients with orthopaedic trauma. For instance, PRO measures have demonstrated the high prevalence of psychological distress and social concerns within trauma populations and shown that mindsets and circumstances account for a substantial amount of the variation in levels of symptom intensity and capability in these patients. Such findings support the need for a more integrated, biopsychosocial, and multidisciplinary team-based approach to orthopaedic trauma care that include both technical and nontechnical skillsets. In this chapter, we explore the range of available fixed-scale and computer adaptive PRO measures that can quantify aspects of capability, mindsets, and circumstances of the patient with orthopaedic trauma during their experience of injury, recovery, and rehabilitation. Furthermore, we define human, technical, and system-level challenges within the often complex, dynamic, and clinically intense trauma setting. Finally, we highlight potential opportunities through successfully implementing PRO measurements for clinical decision support, shared decision making, predicting health outcomes, and developing advanced care pathways for patients and populations with orthopaedic trauma.

Anxiety and Depression after Traumatic Open-Globe Injury

Introduction

This cross-sectional interview-based study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of probable anxiety and depression in patients with traumatic open-globe injury and to identify factors associated with anxiety and depression following open-globe injury.

Methods

Two hundred and twenty-five patients with open-globe injury were identified at the UC Davis Medical Center between 2008 and 2019. Prisoners and patients under 18 at the time of recruitment were excluded from the study. One hundred and twenty-four patients provided consent to participate in the study, which involved a phone interview and chart review. The interview consisted of a section on sociodemographic data and potential associations followed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, a standardized 14-question survey that has been validated in previous studies as an excellent predictor of anxiety and depression. A score of 8 for anxiety or depression was considered a positive test, and patients with a positive test in either category were advised to seek further evaluation with their primary care doctors. The prevalence of probable anxiety and depression was calculated, and linear regression was used to identify factors associated with anxiety and depression.

Results

The average age was 50.5 ± 19.2, and 75.8% of patients were male. The anxiety score was positive in 37.9% of patients and the depression score was positive in 28.2%. The mean anxiety and depression scores were 6.3 ± 4.7 and 5.5 ± 4.8, respectively. The P value of the linear regressions for anxiety score and depression score were both < 0.001, with R2 = 0.429 and 0.363, respectively. Younger age (P = 0.002) and unemployment at the time of the interview (P = 0.038) were associated with higher anxiety scores. Patients who were bothered by the appearance of their injured eye had higher anxiety scores (P < 0.001) and depression scores (P < 0.001). Patients without a high school diploma had higher depression scores (P < 0.001). Gender, enucleation status, number of people in support network, use of a prosthetic or scleral shell, final logMAR visual acuity, marital status, months since the initial injury, and presence of an intraocular foreign body were not significantly associated with anxiety or depression scores.

Conclusions

Traumatic open-globe injury is associated with a high prevalence of probable anxiety and depression. Dissatisfaction with the appearance of the injured eye was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores. Younger age and unemployment were associated with increased anxiety scores, and lack of a high school diploma was associated with higher depression scores.

Evaluation of Sleep Quality and Its Relationship With Pain, Mood, and Physical Function After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Sleep disturbances are associated with pain and mental health. We prospectively compared a cohort of patients with orthopaedic trauma with a control group to establish the prevalence and duration of sleep disturbance and associations between sleep disturbance and pain, mood scores, and functional outcome scores.

METHODS

Subjects were patients with orthopaedic trauma undergoing in-patient surgical procedures and healthy control subjects from the community. Questionnaires completed by all subjects included the VAS numerical pain rating scale, the abbreviated profile of mood states, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance. Control subjects completed the surveys once, and subjects with trauma completed them at 2, 6, and 24 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Healthy control subjects (28.6 ± 13.2) were significantly younger than patients with trauma (41.8 ± 18.9) ( P < 0.001). Compared with control subjects, at 2-week follow-up visit, patients with trauma had worse sleep ( P < 0.001) and worse mood ( P = 0.006). Across the study period, patients with trauma showed improvements in physical function ( P < 0.001) and pain (at rest [ P = 0.02], during activity [ P = 0.02], and at night [ P = 0.002]). In patients with trauma, better sleep disturbance scores were associated with better mood and less pain for all pain metrics ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Patients with orthopaedic trauma have worse sleep disturbance scores at 2 weeks postoperatively compared with normal control subjects; this difference attenuated at 6 weeks. Sleep disturbance was found to markedly correlate with pain and mood, with worse sleep quality associated with higher pain and worse mood. Improvement in sleep quality across 24 weeks postoperatively was associated with improvement in mood scores.

CONCLUSION

Patients should be counseled about the likely development of sleep disturbance and the possible association with worse emotional/mental health with worse sleep. Physicians should consider incorporating a multidisciplinary approach to the management of these select patients.

Role of single-dose intravenous iron therapy for the treatment of anaemia after orthopaedic trauma: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic trauma and fracture care commonly cause perioperative anaemia and associated functional iron deficiency due to a systemic inflammatory state. Modern, strict transfusion thresholds leave many patients anaemic; managing this perioperative anaemia is an opportunity to impact outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. The primary outcome of this pilot study is feasibility for a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate intravenous iron therapy (IVIT) to improve patient well-being following orthopaedic injury. Measurements will include rate of participant enrolment, screening failure, follow-up, missing data, adverse events and protocol deviation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This single-centre, pilot, double-blind RCT investigates the use of IVIT for acute blood loss anaemia in traumatically injured orthopaedic patients. Patients are randomised to receive either a single dose infusion of low-molecular weight iron dextran (1000 mg) or placebo (normal saline) postoperatively during their hospital stay for trauma management. Eligible subjects include adult patients admitted for lower extremity or pelvis operative fracture care with a haemoglobin of 7-11 g/dL within 7 days postoperatively during inpatient care. Exclusion criteria include history of intolerance to intravenous iron supplementation, active haemorrhage requiring ongoing blood product resuscitation, multiple planned procedures, pre-existing haematologic disorders or chronic inflammatory states, iron overload on screening or vulnerable populations. We follow patients for 3 months to measure the effect of iron supplementation on clinical outcomes (resolution of anaemia and functional iron deficiency), patient-reported outcomes (fatigue, physical function, depression and quality of life) and translational measures of immune cell function.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has ethics approval (Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board, STUDY00022441). We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05292001; ClinicalTrials.gov.

Understanding patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture: a qualitative systematic review

To systematically review qualitative studies of patients with distal tibia or ankle fracture, and explore their experience of injury and recovery. We undertook a systematic review of qualitative studies. Five databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2022. All titles and abstracts were screened, and a subset were independently assessed. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The GRADE-CERQual checklist was used to assign confidence ratings. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze data with the identification of codes which were drawn together to form subthemes and then themes. From 2,682 records, 15 studies were reviewed in full and four included in the review. A total of 72 patients were included across the four studies (47 female; mean age 50 years (17 to 80)). Methodological quality was high for all studies, and the GRADE-CERQual checklist provided confidence that the findings were an adequate representation of patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture. A central concept of 'being the same but different' conveyed the substantial disruption to patients' self-identity caused by their injury. Patient experience of 'being the same but different' was expressed through three interrelated themes, with seven subthemes: i) being proactive where persistence, doing things differently and keeping busy prevailed; ii) living with change including symptoms, and living differently due to challenges at work and leisure; and iii) striving for normality, adapting while lacking in confidence, and feeling fearful and concerned about the future. Ankle injuries were disruptive, draining, and impacted on patients' wellbeing. Substantial short- and longer-term challenges were experienced during recovery. Rehabilitation and psychosocial treatment strategies may help to ameliorate these challenges. Patients may benefit from clinicians being cognisant of patient experience when assessing, treating, and discussing expectations and outcomes with patients.

Early hip survival after open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fracture

PURPOSE

To estimate survival of acetabular fracture repair by tracking patients across healthcare encounters. We hypothesized that hip survival estimated this way would be lower than reported by single-surgeon or single-center series not capturing censored reoperations.

METHODS

Retrospective health insurance administrative database cohort study. All claimed healthcare encounters for employer-sponsored health insurance beneficiaries aged 18-65 years without pre-existing hip pathology with a newly diagnosed acetabular fracture were identified between October 1, 2015, through December 31, 2018. The intervention was open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fracture during index admission. The primary outcome was survival of the acetabular fracture repair to subsequent reoperation by arthroscopy, arthrotomy for drainage of infection, implant removal, revision acetabular fixation, hip arthroplasty, hip resection, or arthrodesis.

RESULTS

38 reoperation procedures on the fractured acetabulum in 852 patients occurred within 2 years (incidence 4.5%). Total hip arthroplasty (2.5%) and revision internal fixation (1.5%) accounted for most early reoperations. Multivariable Cox regression identified an association between reoperation and increasing patient age (hazard ratio = 1.4 per decade, p < 0.01). The prevalence of any mental health condition was 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-elderly adults with employer-sponsored insurance who sustain acetabular fractures have a greater burden of mental health disease than similarly insured patients without these injuries. Survival of the native acetabulum after fracture fixation exceeded 95% at 2 years and decreased with increasing patient age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prognostic Study.

There are more things in physical function and pain: a systematic review on physical, mental and social health within the orthopedic fracture population using PROMIS

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet, many articles studied heterogeneous groups with chronic orthopedic disorders in which fracture patients were included as well. At this moment, there is no systematic overview of the exact use of PROMIS measures in the orthopedic fracture population. Therefore this review aimed to provide an overview of the PROMIS health domains physical health, mental health and social health in patients suffering an orthopedic fracture.

Methods

This systematic review was documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar in December 2020 using a combination of MeSH terms and specific index terms related to orthopedic fractures and PROMIS questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were available full text articles that were describing the use of any PROMIS questionnaires in both the adult and pediatric extremity fracture population.

Results

We included 51 relevant articles of which most were observational studies (n = 47, 92.2%). A single fracture population was included in 47 studies of which 9 involved ankle fractures (9/51; 17.6%), followed by humeral fractures (8/51; 15.7%), tibia fractures (6/51; 11.8%) and radial -or ulnar fractures (5/51; 9.8%). PROMIS Physical Function (n = 32, 32/51 = 62.7%) and PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 21, 21/51 = 41.2%) were most frequently used questionnaires. PROMIS measures concerning social (n = 5/51 = 9.8%) and mental health (10/51 = 19.6%) were much less often used as outcome measures in the fracture population. A gradually increasing use of PROMIS questionnaires in the orthopedic fracture population was seen since 2017.

Conclusion

Many different PROMIS measures on multiple domains are available and used in previous articles with orthopedic fracture patients. With physical function and pain interference as most popular PROMIS measures, it is important to emphasize that other health-domains such as mental and social health can also be essential to fracture patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3.

Long-Term Post-traumatic Stress Disorder After Orthopaedic Injury: Prevalence and Risk Factors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in individuals who are further removed from injury (up to 3 years) and to identify injury-specific characteristics that are associated with an increased risk for persistent PTSD symptoms.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty-three patients operatively treated for orthopaedic trauma between March 2017 through June 2018.

INTERVENTION

Orthopaedic trauma requiring operative intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was score on the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) survey. A score of 31 or higher was considered concerning for PTSD.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 239 respondents (20.5%) scored positive for PTSD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased risk of PTSD for patients with a history of smoking and those who required delayed reoperation (greater than 90 days postoperative). White race and low-energy mechanisms of injury were associated with decreased risk of PTSD. Fracture locations were not associated with a higher likelihood of PTSD.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PTSD symptoms in patients up to 3 years after surgery remains higher than the estimated prevalence of PTSD in the general US population. It is similar to previously documented rates of PTSD for patients less than 1 year after injury. Long-term complication requiring reoperation was associated with an increased risk of persistent PTSD symptoms. Orthopaedic providers should be mindful of PTSD symptoms not only in the immediate postoperative period but throughout the treatment course particularly for those with identified PTSD risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevalence of depression and anxiety and associated factors among geriatric orthopedic trauma inpatients: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression in geriatric orthopedic trauma patients have received little attention in research.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of emotional disorders among geriatric orthopedic trauma patients and identify demographic, social and clinical risk factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed in geriatric patients (aged ≥ 60 years, both sexes) with orthopedic trauma admitted to a level I trauma center between May 2015 and December 2017. Demographic, social, and clinical characteristics were described. Huaxi Emotional-Distress Index (HEI) was used to evaluate the severity of anxiety and depression status. Differences in continuous variables were tested using the t-test, and differences in categorical variables were assessed using the Pearson χ² test. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with a HEI score > 8.

RESULTS

Among the 966 patients, 487 were male and 479 were female, with a mean age of 70.2 ± 7.1 years. The age ranged from 60 to 90 years. Seventy-five patients had an HEI score > 8, accounting for about 7.8% of all patients. A higher Injury Severity Score (4.17 ± 3.10 vs 7.96 ± 6.68, P < 0.001), higher Visual Analog Score (5.05 ± 1.09 vs 6.89 ±1.23, P < 0.001), number of chronic diseases (P < 0.001), injury type (P = 0.038), and education level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with HEI score > 8. On logistic regression, a higher education level was a protective factor for emotional disorders (P = 0.047), whereas Injury Severity Score (P = 0.024), Visual Analog Score (P < 0.001), two or more chronic diseases (P < 0.001) were the related independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Emotional disorders are common in geriatric patients with orthopedic trauma. Clinicians should remain vigilant of emotional disorders in geriatric patients and screen for anxiety and depression in higher risk groups.

Systematic Review of the Association Between Trauma Severity and Postinjury Symptoms of Depression

BACKGROUND

Greater symptoms of depression are associated with greater symptom intensity during recovery from musculoskeletal injury. It is not clear that more severe trauma is associated with greater symptoms of depression as one might expect. The goal of this study was to systematically review the existing evidence regarding the association of Injury Severity Score (ISS) with symptoms of depression during recovery from musculoskeletal injury.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers used PubMed and Embase to identify studies that measured both ISS and symptoms of depression. Among the 17 studies satisfying inclusion criteria, 5 studies assessed the correlation of symptoms of depression and ISS on their continuum; 3 studies compared the mean of symptoms of depression for people above and below a specific ISS level; five compared mean ISS above and below a threshold level of symptoms of depression; and four compared dichotomized ISS and dichotomized depression. Four of the 17 evaluated factors associated with symptoms of depression in multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

In bivariate analysis, 12 of 17 studies (71%) found no association between ISS level and symptoms of depression. Three studies found a bivariate association that did not persist in multivariable analysis. Two studies reported slight associations in bivariate analysis, but did not perform multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge that symptoms of depression are common during recovery, in combination with the finding of this review that they have little or no relationship with injury severity, directs clinicians to anticipate and address mental health during recovery from physical trauma of any severity.

Check-in Phone Calls Six Weeks and Six Months After Musculoskeletal Specialty Care

Health organizations want to measure patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) longitudinally. Two medical assistants called people selectively at 6 weeks and routinely at 6 months to obtain PROMs as part of routine musculoskeletal specialty care. Only 47% of patients (123 of 263) were reached by phone at 6 weeks and 41% (246 of 594) at 6 months. Spanish speakers were more likely to answer. Eighty-nine percent of people reached at 6 weeks and 76% reached at 6 months were willing to complete PROMs. Speaking Spanish, older age, and fewer symptoms of depression were associated with completing PROMs when reached by phone at 6 weeks. Women and Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to participate at 6 months. The observation that most people do not participate in longitudinal PROM measurement in a system that devotes notable resources in the setting of musculoskeletal specialty care-with some variation by psychosocial factors-suggests that longitudinal PROM measurement may be infeasible. Future work can explore alternative measures of the value of care that account for the large percentage of people that deprioritize care after a single specialty visit.

Mental Health in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

»

Mental health and psychosocial factors play a critical role in clinical outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

»

The biopsychosocial model of disease defines health as a product of physiology, psychology, and social factors and, traditionally, has not been as emphasized in the care of musculoskeletal disease.

»

Improvement in postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction is incumbent upon the screening, recognition, assessment, and possible referral of patients with high-risk psychosocial factors both before and after the surgical procedure.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): Influence of Motor Tasks and Psychosocial Factors on FAAM Scores in Foot and Ankle Trauma Patients

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) are being increasingly used as a quality of care metric. However, the validity and consistency of PROMS remain undefined. The study sought to determine whether Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores improve after patients complete motor tasks evaluated on the survey and to examine the relationship between depression and self-efficacy and FAAM scores or change in scores. We conducted a prospective comparison study of adults with isolated foot, ankle, or distal tibia fractures treated operatively at level I trauma center. Twenty-seven patients completed the FAAM survey at the first clinic visit after being made weightbearing as tolerated (mean 3 months). Patients then completed 6 motor tasks queried on FAAM (standing, walking without shoes, squatting, stairs, up to toes), followed by a repeat FAAM and General Self-Efficacy scale (GSE) and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) instruments. FAAM scores before and after intervention; GSE and PHQ-2 scores compared with baseline FAAM and change in FAAM scores. Performing motor tasks significantly improved postintervention scores for squatting (P = .044) and coming up to toes (P = .012), the 2 most strenuous tasks. No difference was found for the remaining tasks. Higher depression ratings correlated with worse FAAM scores overall (P < .05). Higher self-efficacy ratings correlated with increase in FAAM Sports subscale postintervention (P = .020). FAAM scores are influenced by performing motor tasks. Self-reported depression influences baseline FAAM scores and self-efficacy may influence change in FAAM scores. Context and patient factors (modifiable and nonmodifiable) affect PROM implementation, with implications for clinical care, reimbursement models, and use of quality measure.

The Psychological Effects of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Musculoskeletal injuries comprise a large percentage of hospital admissions for adults and often contribute to persistent daily pain as an illness; opioid dependence; disability; and complaints of increased depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after orthopaedic trauma has been found to be considerably greater than the general adult cohort. Soon after sustaining a fracture, psychological factors can predict pain and disability many months after injury, even after controlling for injury severity. Thus, early in the care of orthopaedic trauma, there exists an opportunity to improve overall health by attending to psychological and social concerns, along with physical health. Recent literature has identified clinically actionable subgroups within the orthopaedic trauma cohort that are at psychological risk after an injury. Improving positive factors such as resilience, social support, and self-efficacy via validated interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness training, and other types of mindset training has helped people return to their daily routine. Raising awareness of the psychological effects of trauma among the orthopaedic community could improve post-treatment planning, increase referrals to appropriate nonmedical professionals, and implement earlier effective interventions.

Anxiety Symptoms After Orthopedic Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Millions of Americans are injured each year, with 75% suffering orthopedic injuries. Those with orthopedic injury often experience postinjury symptoms, such as anxiety, that negatively influence long-term outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate (1) the prevalence of anxiety symptoms chronologically in relation to time of orthopedic injury, (2) the associations of anxiety symptoms with other symptoms in individuals with orthopedic injury, and (3) the associations between anxiety symptoms and functional performance and mental health outcomes in individuals with orthopedic injury.

METHODS

The databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid PsycInfo, Ovid Embase, ProQuest, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on June 25, 2020. Studies were selected for review if (1) participants were 16 years or older, (2) the prevalence of anxiety symptoms was listed, (3) anxiety symptoms were assessed using a validated instrument, (4) the study was published in English, and (5) more than 50% of the participants suffered orthopedic injury to the appendicular skeleton or pelvic ring.

RESULTS

Anxiety symptoms were present in 11.5%-55.9% of individuals up to 10 years after orthopedic injury and often co-occurred with those of depression, pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder to negatively influence functional performance and mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety symptoms post-orthopedic injury are highly prevalent and persistent. Anxiety symptoms are associated with other distressing symptoms and influence long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need to screen for and treat anxiety symptoms following orthopedic injury and may help in designing future self-management interventions.

Prevalence and association of anxiety and depression among orthopaedic trauma inpatients: a retrospective analysis of 1994 cases

Background

Patients with traumatic injuries are often accompanied by emotional disorders, which seriously impede functional gains. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence and risk factors associated with underlying anxiety and depression in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Methods

From July 2015 to December 2017, all orthopaedic trauma patients were included in the retrospective study. Patients with conditions that might affect cognitive impairment were excluded from the study. Basic demographic data were collected. All patients were screened for emotional disorders on admission using a simple questionnaire called “Huaxi Emotional-Distress Index” (HEI). Bivariate analyses and logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with a HEI score of > 8.

Results

One hundred and sixty-two patients (8.1%) had a HEI score of > 8. About 1.0% of enrolled patients had severe emotional disorders (HEI score ≥ 17). The reasons caused by emotional disorders in patients with orthopaedic trauma were a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), a higher visual analogue score (VAS) and type of surgery. On logistic regression, marital status was a protective factor for emotional disorders, while VAS and ISS were the risk factors for emotional disorders.

Conclusions

Although a significantly low percentage of orthopaedic trauma patients in our setting have emotional disorders, traumatic orthopaedic surgeons still need to pay attention to the risk of emotional disorders and integrate effective screening tools into clinical practice to screen for these factors and stratify emotional disorders. Appropriate targeted psychological intervention and treatment should be adopted according to the stratification of emotional disorders.

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemⓇ (PROMISⓇ) is a dynamic system of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. There has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS measures, yet little has been written about the reporting of these measures in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the uptake of PROMIS measures across orthopedics and to identify the type of PROMIS measures and domains that are most commonly used in orthopedic research and practice.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords and database-specific subject headings to capture orthopedic studies reporting PROMIS measures through November 2018. Our inclusion criteria were use of PROMIS measures as an outcome or used to describe a population of patients in an orthopedic setting in patients ≥ 18 years of age. We excluded non-quantitative studies, reviews, and case reports.

RESULTS

Our final search yielded 88 studies published from 2013 through 2018, with 57% (50 studies) published in 2018 alone. By body region, 28% (25 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, hand), 36% (32 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot), 19% (17 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the spine, 10% (9 studies) reported PROMIS measures in trauma patients, and 6% (5 studies) reported PROMIS measures in general orthopedic patients. The majority of studies reported between one and three PROMIS domains (82%, 73 studies). The PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach was most commonly used (81%, 72 studies). The most frequently reported PROMIS domains were physical function (81%, 71 studies) and pain interference (61%, 54 studies).

CONCLUSION

Our review found an increase in the reporting of PROMIS measures over the recent years. Utilization of PROMIS measures in orthopedic populations is clinically appropriate and can facilitate communication of outcomes across different provider types and with reduced respondent burden.

REGISTRATION

The protocol for this systematic review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018088260).

Relation of length of stay and other hospital variables to posttraumatic stress disorder and depression after orthopedic trauma

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are common following orthopedic trauma. This study examined the relationship between injury- and hospital-related variables and PTSD and depression at baseline and 12 months after orthopedic trauma. This longitudinal, prospective cohort study examined adult orthopedic trauma patients admitted ≥24 hours to a level I trauma center. Non-English/Spanish-speaking and cognitively impaired patients were excluded. The Primary Care PTSD screen and PTSD Checklist-Civilian version assessed PTSD, and the Patient Health Questionnaire 8-Item assessed depression. Demographic and hospital-related variables were examined (e.g., hospital length of stay, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale). For 160 participants, PTSD prevalence was 23% at baseline and 21% at 12 months. Depression prevalence was 28% at baseline and 29% at 12 months. Ventilation (P = 0.023, P = 0.006) and prolonged length of stay (P = 0.008, P = 0.003) were correlated with baseline PTSD and depression. Injury etiology (P = 0.008) and Injury Severity Score (P = 0.013) were associated with baseline PTSD. Intensive care unit admission (P = 0.016, P = 0.043) was also correlated with PTSD at baseline and 12 months. Ventilation (P = 0.002, P = 0.040) and prolonged length of stay (P < 0.001, P = 0.001) were correlated with 12-month PTSD and depression. Early and continued screenings with potential interventions could benefit patients' physical and mental rehabilitation after orthopedic injury.

How soon can we identify at-risk patients: examining initial depressive symptomology and opioid use in musculoskeletal trauma survivors?

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the associations between post injury depressive symptomology and opioid use from the initial time of injury in orthopedic trauma patients without pre-existing psychiatric conditions.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This is a prospective study following the development of symptoms after orthopedic trauma injury conducted at a Level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Orthopedic trauma patients (N=96; 43.4±16.5 yrs, 40.6% women) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS METHODS: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) was administered during index hospitalization and at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3- months, and 6-months. In-hospital and out-patient opioid use were tracked. Regression analyses determined the relationship of opioid use and depressive symptoms during follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of patients had moderate depressive symptom levels (BDI 20-28 points) and 11% had severe depressive symptom levels (BDI ≥29) at the time of their index hospitalization. Inpatient BDI-II depressive symptom severity levels were significantly related to depressive symptomology at 2 -weeks, 6 -weeks, and 3 -months. In-hospital or discharge opioid dose was not associated with initial or persistent depressive symptomology. Patients with persistent opioid use at 6 weeks had higher depressive symptoms six months following post-discharge than those who ceased opioid use by 6 -weeks post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that depressive symptomology immediately following musculoskeletal trauma is predictive for persistent depressive symptomology in a subset of our patient population. Inpatient BDI-II depressive symptom severity levels in the hospital were significantly related to BDI-II at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3-months, and persistent opioid use, past 6-weeks, was independently associated with prolonged depressive symptomology as well. Further study into effective treatment and monitoring of mental health disturbances following trauma is needed, particularly in patients with continued need for and use of opioids after discharge.

Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research?

This review describes some of the benefits of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) architecture, determined how frequently PROMIS measures were used in the current orthopaedic trauma literature, and compared the features of PROMIS instruments with other frequently used patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). PROMIS instruments have several unique elements to their architecture, such as item response theory, computerized adaptive testing options, and scaling using T-scores, that differentiate the instruments from many other PROMs. Over the past five years, 108 different PROMs were reported in 319 studies published in high-impact orthopaedic journals. PROMIS measures, including PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Upper Extremity Function, were only used in seven studies (2%). PROMIS measures were found to be comparable to other more common PROMs with respect to respondent burden, administration options, and psychometric assessments specific to fracture patients. Likely, the limited familiarity and interpretability of PROMIS measures in the fracture population remain the most substantial barriers to broader adoption in orthopaedic trauma research.

Psychological factors and recovery from trauma

Recent research has identified a high prevalence of psychological illnesses in patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma. Depressive symptoms in this patient population have been reported to range from 13% to as high as 56%. Moreover, symptoms of depression, catastrophic thinking, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), have been consistently shown to negatively impact patient outcomes following treatment for their traumatic injuries. Specifically, patients with higher levels of psychosocial dysfunction have shown increased levels of pain, disability, and complications throughout their recovery. However, current research in orthopaedic trauma continues to be substantially focused on the physical and technical factors involved in the treatment of orthopaedic injuries. More research which applies the "biopsychosocial model" of health and evaluates the significant impact of psychological and social factors on recovery from trauma is needed. In particular, investigation which evaluates effective screening strategies and interventions to treat psychosocial dysfunction during recovery from trauma is highly desirable. This article reviews the current state of knowledge in this area and suggests future directions for research.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient Activation: What Are Their Roles in Orthopedic Trauma?

The rise of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement across medicine has been swift and now extends to the world of orthopedic trauma. However, PRO measures (PROMs) applied to trauma patients pose special considerations; measuring "episodes of care" is less straightforward, injuries are heterogeneous in their severity, and the patient's initial visit is "postinjury." Obtaining baseline scores and assessing the impact of a traumatic event on mental health are key considerations. Currently, few, if any, trauma registries include PROs; though general and condition-specific PROMs plus the patient empowerment measure of Patient Activation represent meaningful inputs for the clinical decision-making process. To be useful in trauma care, PROMs should be psychometrically sound and validated, be used for capturing function, screen for mental state and substance use, and give the clinician a sense of the patient's "activation" (engagement in their own health). Although the implementation of routine PRO collection can seem daunting, clinicians can use a multitude of electronic resources to access validated measures and simplify the implementation process. Computer-adaptive testing has evolved to help minimize patient burden, and PROM collection must maximize efficiency. Once established as part of your practice, PROs become an important tool to track recovery, identify mental health issues, engage in the prevention of future injury, and enable care of the whole patient.

Mental illness is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after ankle fracture

Objectives

To assess clinical and functional outcomes after ankle fracture in patients with preexisting mental illness.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants

One thousand three hundred seventy-eight adult patients treated for ankle fractures; 228 (17%) had preexisting mental illness.

Intervention

Open reduction internal fixation.

Main outcome measure

Rates of complications and reoperations. Functional outcomes were assessed via Foot Function Index (n = 530) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (n = 530).

Results

Depression was the most common mental illness (63%), followed by anxiety (23%). Mental illness was associated with older age, female sex, and preexisting medical comorbidities, including diabetes and obesity. Mental illness was not associated with specific fracture patterns or open injury. Complications occurred no more often in patients with mental illness, but secondary operations (13% vs 7%) were more likely, particularly implant removals (8% vs 4%), both P < .05. Functional outcomes were worse in mentally ill patients as measured by the Foot Function Index (39 vs 30, P = .006) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Mobility: 45 vs 35, Bothersome: 35 vs 26 and Dysfunction: 35 vs 26, all P < .01.

Conclusion

Secondary operations were nearly 50% more frequent in patients with mental illness, and functional outcome scores were significantly worse, suggesting that mental illness, unrelated to injury and treatment parameters, has major influence on outcomes. In the future, strategies to identify and treat mental illness prior to and after treatment could improve functional outcomes following ankle fracture.