Timing and Management of Surgical Site Infections in Patients With Open Fracture Wounds: A Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds Cohort Secondary Analysis

Fracture related infection and sepsis in orthopedic trauma: A review

Trauma is a leading cause of death in the United States for people under 45. Amongst trauma-related injuries, orthopedic injuries represent a significant component of trauma-related morbidity. In addition to the potential morbidity and mortality secondary to the specific traumatic injury or injuries sustained, sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients as well, and infection related to orthopedic trauma can be especially devastating. Therefore, infection prevention and early recognition of infections is crucial to lowering morbidity and mortality in trauma. Risk factors for fracture-related infection include obesity, tobacco use, open fracture, and need for flap coverage, as well as fracture of the tibia and the degree of contamination. Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics for patients presenting with open fractures has been shown to decrease the risk of fracture-related infection, and in patients that do experience sepsis from an orthopedic injury, prompt source control is critical, which may include the removal of implanted hardware in infections that occur more than 6 weeks from operative fixation. Given that orthopedic injury constitutes a significant proportion of traumatic injuries, and will likely continue to increase in number in the future, surgeons caring for patients with orthopedic trauma must be able to promptly recognize and manage sepsis secondary to orthopedic injury.

Infection Rates and Surgical Procedures Associated With Isolated Open Talar Neck and Body Fractures

BACKGROUND

Open fractures of the talar body and neck are uncommon. Previous reports of associated deep infection rates and resulting surgical requirements vary widely. The primary objective of this study is to report the incidence of deep infections for isolated open talar body and neck fractures, and secondarily the incidence and number of total surgeries performed (TSP), secondary salvage procedures (SSPs), and nonsalvage procedures (NSPs).

METHODS

Retrospective case-control study of 32 consecutive isolated open talus fracture patients (22 neck, 10 body) were followed for an average of 39.2 months.

RESULTS

Five (15.6%) fractures developed deep infections. Fifty percent of open body fractures became infected compared with 0% of neck fractures (P < .001). There was no difference between infected group (IG) and uninfected fracture group (UG) with respect to age, sex, body mass index, tobacco, diabetes, vascular disease, open fracture type, wound location, hours to irrigation and debridement, or definitive treatment. The majority (92.6%) of UG fractures used a dual incision with open wound extension. There were more single extensile approaches in the IG group (P = .04). The IG required 5.8 TSP per patient compared with 2.1 in the UG (P = .004). All (100%) of the IG required an SSP compared with 29.6% of the UG (P = .006). All (100%) of the IG required an NSP compared to 40.7% of the UG (P = .043). In the IG, 2.8 NSPs per patient were required after definitive surgery compared with 1.18 in the UG (P = .003). Of those followed 1 year, the incidence of SSP remained higher in the IG (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of deep infection following isolated open talar fractures is high and occurs disproportionally in body fractures. Infected fractures required nearly 6 surgeries, and all required SSP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic.

Analysis of fracture-related infections from Swedish insurance claims between 2011 and 2021

Fracture-related infections (FRI) pose a serious complication with an incidence of 1-2%. This study aimed to analyze compensation claims submitted to The Swedish National Patient Insurance Company (LÖF) because of FRI after closed/open reduction and internal fixation (C/ORIF) in the four most common fracture sites (proximal humerus, distal radius, hip, ankle). Patients registered in the LÖF database with a suspected FRI between 2011 and 2021 were identified by matching International Classification of Diseases and procedural codes indicative of a combination of fractures to the proximal humerus, distal radius, hip and ankle, C/ORIF and infection. Medical records were reviewed for fracture sites, pathogens and complications. Data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) were extracted to estimate the proportion of reported claims to the presumed number of FRI. Of 122 FRI identified in the LÖF database, 34 were after C/ORIF in the proximal humerus, 12 in the distal radius, 28 in the hip and 48 in the ankle. LÖF compensated 111 patients (91%). Median time from C/ORIF to an FRI was 3 weeks (interquartile range 2-6), and 95% of all FRI occurred within 1 year after C/ORIF. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in patients with a distal radius, hip and ankle FRI. In contrast, Cutibacterium spp. were the most common aetiology in FRI of the proximal humerus. The total number of fractures treated with C/ORIF in the four fracture sites registered in the SFR during 2021 was 18,711. Most of the FRI patients were diagnosed within the first year after C/ORIF, and 91% of the patients received compensation. Given an expected FRI incidence of 1-2%, our estimates with extrapolated data from the SFR indicate that < 10% of affected patients applied for compensation.

Open fractures: Current treatment perspective

Severe open fractures present challenges to orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, with increased risks of significant complications. Although different global regions have different resources and systems, there continue to be many consistent approaches to open fracture care. Management of these complex injures continues to evolve in areas ranging from timing of initial operative debridement to the management of critical-sized bone defects. This review, compiled by representative members of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association, focuses on several critical areas of open fracture management, including antibiotic administration, timing of debridement, bone loss, soft tissue management, and areas of need for future investigation.

The management of fracture related infections: What practices can be supported by high-level evidence?

Fracture related infections (FRIs) are a disabling condition causing significant concern within the orthopaedic community. FRIs have a huge societal and economic burden leading to prolonged recovery times and the potential for becoming chronic conditions or being life-threatening. Despite its importance in our field, the surgical community has just recently agreed on a definition which, added to the lack of surgical trials assessing preventive and treatment interventions have limited our understanding and precipitated wide variations in surgeons' practice. This article aims to review the current practices that can be supported with high-quality evidence. Currently, we have a limited body of high-quality evidence on FRI prevention and treatment. A handful of measures have proven effective, such as the use of prophylactic antibiotics, the use of saline and low pressure as the preferred irrigation solution and the safety of delaying initial surgical débridement more than 6 hours without impacting infection rates for open fracture wounds débridement. Future multicentre trials, properly powered, will shed light on current areas of controversy regarding the benefit of different preoperative and perioperative factors for the prevention and treatment of FRIs. Higher quality evidence is needed to guide surgeons to offer an evidence-based approach to prevent FRI occurrence and to treat patients suffering from them.

Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing and External Fixation of Open Tibial Fractures: Three to Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

While surgeons in low and middle-income countries have increasing experience with intramedullary nailing (IMN), external fixation (EF) continues to be commonly used for the management of open tibial fractures. We examined outcomes with extended follow-up of the participants enrolled in a clinical trial comparing these treatments.

METHODS

Adults who were ≥18 years old with acute AO/OTA type-42 open tibial shaft fractures were randomly assigned to statically locked, hand-reamed IMN or uniplanar EF. These participants were reevaluated 3 to 5 years after treatment. The primary outcome was death or reoperation for the treatment of deep infection, nonunion, or malalignment. Unresolved complications such as persistent fracture-related infection, nonunion, or malalignment were collected and analyzed. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score, radiographic alignment, and the modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (mRUST).

RESULTS

Of the originally enrolled 240 participants,126 (67 managed with IMN and 59 managed with EF) died or returned for follow-up at a mean of 4.0 years (range, 2.9 to 5.2 years). Thirty-two composite primary events occurred, with rates of 23.9% and 27.1% in the IMN and EF groups, respectively. Six of these events (3 in the IMN group and 3 in the EF group) were newly detected after the original 1-year follow-up. Unresolved complications in the form of chronic fracture-related infection or nonunion were present at long-term follow-up in 25% of the participants who sustained a primary event. The EQ-5D-3L index scores were similar between the 2 groups and only returned to preinjury levels after 1 year among patients without complications or those whose complications resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study extended follow-up for a clinical trial assessing IMN versus EF for the treatment of open tibial fractures in sub-Saharan Africa. At a mean of 4 years after injury, fracture-related infection and nonunion became chronic conditions in nearly a quarter of the participants who experienced these complications, regardless of reintervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are deep infections that present before and after 90 days from orthopaedic trauma different? An analysis of the validity of the recent change in CDC criteria for infections

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed the time frame for their definition of deep surgical site infection (SSI) from within 1 year to within 90 days of surgery. We hypothesized that a substantial number of infections in patients who have undergone fracture fixation present beyond 90 days and that there are patient or injury factors that can predict who is more likely to present with SSI after 90 days.

METHODS

A retrospective review yielded 452 deep SSI after fracture fixation. These patients were divided into two groups-those infected within 90 days of surgery and those infected beyond 90 days . Data were collected on risk factors for infection. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the two groups. A randomly selected control group was used to build infection prediction models for both outcomes. The two outcomes were then modelled against each other to determine whether differences in predictors for early versus late infection exist.

RESULTS

Of the 452 infections, 144 occurred beyond 90 days (32% [95% CI, 28%-36%]). No statistically significant patient factors were found in multivariable analysis between the early and late infection groups. The need for flap coverage was the only injury characteristic that differed significantly between groups, with patients in the late infection group more likely to have needed a flap. When modelled against the control group and directly comparing the two models, predictors for early infection include male sex and fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, or hip, whereas predictors of late infection include hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

CONCLUSION

Use of the recent CDC definition will underestimate the rate of actual postoperative infections when applied to orthopaedic trauma patients. Hepatitis C and/or HIV and ICU admission are predictors of late infection, whereas male sex and pelvis, acetabulum, or hip fractures are predictors of early infection. Patients who receive flap coverage may be more likely to present with late infection.

Ninety-Day Follow-up Is Inadequate for Diagnosis of Fracture-related Infections in Patients with Open Fractures

BACKGROUND

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a challenging complication in musculoskeletal trauma surgery and often complicates the management of open fractures. The CDC currently advocates a surveillance period of 90 days after fracture fixation, but it is unclear what duration of follow-up constitutes adequate surveillance for FRI. Inadequate follow-up will underestimate infections and, in clinical research, will make any interventions studied appear better than they really are, thereby resulting in misleading conclusions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the timing of FRI onset in patients with open fractures? (2) What is the proportion of FRIs captured when follow-up is limited to 90 days postoperatively versus when follow-up is extended to 1 year?

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of patient data from a previous retrospective cohort study that investigated whether the duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was independently associated with FRI in patients with open fractures. Of the 530 eligible patients in the source study, 3% (14) died. Of the remaining 516 patients, 97% (502) patients with 559 long-bone open fractures had 2 years of follow-up constituted the base cohort. Forty-seven fractures in 46 patients were complicated by FRI and were the focus of this secondary analysis. Medical records were reviewed in detail specifically for the current study. Seventy-eight percent (36 of 46) of patients were male, and the mean ± SD age was 42 ± 16 years. The most common mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle accident (63% [29 of 46] of patients), and the tibia was the most involved site (53% [25 of 47] of fractures). The median (interquartile range) time to debridement was 3.0 hours (IQR 2.0 to 4.0). FRIs developed in 3% (7 of 247) of Type I open fractures, 7% (11 of 164) of Type II, 17% (18 of 107) of Type IIIA, 29% (9 of 31) of Type IIIB, and 20% (2 of 10) of Type IIIC open fractures. Each clinic visit of each patient was reviewed, and data about the time of onset of any symptoms and signs suggesting or confirming an FRI, as reported by patients and/or determined by treating surgeons, were recorded. The proportions of FRIs with onset by specific time periods were determined. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and the FRI event rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) time to the onset of FRI was 52 days (IQR 15 to 153). Follow-up of 90 days captured only 64% (30 of 47) of FRIs, whereas follow-up of 1 year captured 89% (42 of 47) of FRIs. The proportion of FRIs with onset within 1 year increased to 95% (42 of 44) in the presence of an already healed fracture.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of 90 days after the management of an open long-bone fracture is inadequate for postoperative surveillance, especially for research purposes. Clinical research on interventions would report results appearing to be much better than they really are, potentially resulting in misleading conclusions. Follow-up of 1 year is preferable because most FRIs will develop before that time, especially when fracture union has occurred. A small percentage of patients may still develop infections beyond the first year after the management of an open fracture. The risk of missing these infections by not extending follow-up beyond 1 year must be balanced against the additional logistical burden. Future prospective multicenter studies and registries with long-term patient follow-up would help clarify this issue.Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.