Do PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Correlate to the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Trauma Patients?

Comparison of short term recovery in patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy with varying degrees of kinesiophobia treated with the Silbernagel protocol: A prospective single cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess short term recovery between individuals with Achilles tendinopathy with varying degrees of kinesiophobia when treated with the Silbernagel protocol. Secondarily to investigate short term change in degree of kinesiophobia.

DESIGN

Prospective single cohort analysis.

SETTING

University/Clinical.

PARTICIPANTS

116 participants with midportion Achilles tendinopathy were grouped from their baseline Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) score: Low (≤33), Medium (34-41), and High (≥42).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom severity, Achilles tendon structure, and function were assessed at baseline and 8-weeks following initiation of the Silbernagel protocol. Differences in recovery between TSK groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

No group by time interactions were observed for symptoms, structure, or function. A significant interaction of group by time was observed for TSK score. The Medium (n = 66) and High (n = 28) TSK groups significantly decreased TSK score after 8 weeks by 2.4 and 4.4 points respectively while the Low TSK group (n = 22) did not change.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in short term recovery of symptoms, Achilles tendon structure, and function in individuals with midportion Achilles tendinopathy treated with the Silbernagel protocol regardless of baseline degree of kinesiophobia. Those with moderate and high levels of kinesiophobia at baseline decreased TSK score in the short term.

The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of preoperative VR-12 physical component scores (PCS) on outcomes following cervical disc replacement (CDR).

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective CDR were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of interest included VR-12 PCS/VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS)/9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)/Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS and MCS/Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF)/Visual Analog Scale-Neck Pain (VAS-NP)/VAS-Arm Pain (VAS-AP)/Neck Disability Index (NDI). Baseline up to two-year postoperative scores were obtained (average follow-up: 9.2 ± 6.8months). Two cohorts were created: VR-12 PCS < 35 or VR-12 PCS ≥ 35. Improvements in scores from baseline to six weeks postoperatively and to final follow-up were calculated. Changes in scores were compared to previously reported thresholds to determine rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Of 127 patients, 64 were in the worse VR-12 PCS group. Patients with better VR-12 PCS were more likely to have private insurance (p = 0.034). When accounting for insurance differences, the worse VR-12 PCS group reported inferior NDI/VAS-NP/PHQ-9/PROMIS-PF/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS at six weeks and final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The worse VR-12 PCS group reported greater improvements in VAS-AP and VR-12 PCS by six weeks and in NDI/VR-12 MCS/VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.026, all). Patients with worse VR-12 PCS reported greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.034, both).

CONCLUSION

Following surgery, patients with worse VR-12 PCS report greater improvements in PROs, highlighting the increased relative impact of surgery for patients with worse baseline physical function. These findings can be used to optimize patient experience perioperatively and inform postoperative expectations.

Evaluation of Fluoroscopically Guided Transforaminal Selective Nerve Root Sleeve Injections for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Radiculopathy Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System as an Outcome Measure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections (TFSNRIs) in a specific subset of patients with clinical symptoms and presentation consistent with spinal stenosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic spine center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 176 patients with radicular leg pain with or without low back pain as well as ≥3 clinical features of spinal stenosis and corroborative radiographic features of spinal stenosis on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging without confounding spinal pathology (N=176).

INTERVENTIONS

Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0, Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and PROMIS (D) v1.0 were collected at baseline and post-procedure short term (<3-months) and long-term (6-12 month) follow-up. Statistical analysis comparing baseline and postprocedural PROMIS scores was performed. Differences were compared with previously established minimal clinically important differences in the spine population.

RESULTS

For patients with spinal stenosis treated with TFSNRI, no statistically significant improvement was observed short- and long-term follow-up in PROMIS PF (P=.97, .77) and PROMIS Depression (P=.86, .85) scores. At short-term follow-up, PROMIS PI scores did significantly improve (P=.01) but the average difference of pre- and post-procedure scores did not reach clinical significance. No significant difference in PROMIS PI was noted at long-term follow-up (.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a statistically significant difference was observed for improvement in pain, in this retrospective study, TFSNRI did not provide clinically significant improvement in patients' function, pain, or depression for lumbar spinal stenosis at short- and long-term follow-up.

Worse Pain and Disability at Presentation Predicts Greater Improvement in Pain, Disability, and Mental Health in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of preoperative pain and disability on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Varying preoperative symptom severity in lumbar fusion patients alters perceptions of surgical success.

METHODS

Degenerative spondylolisthesis patients undergoing elective, primary, single-level MI-TLIF were stratified by preoperative symptom severity: Mild (VAS-B<7/ODI<50), Moderate (VAS-B≥7/ODI<50 or VAS-B<7/ODI≥50), and Severe (VAS-B≥7/ODI≥50). PROMs, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), ODI, VAS-B, VAS-Leg (VAS-L), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were compared at baseline, 6 weeks, and final follow-up (μ=16.3±8.8 mo). Postoperative PROMs, magnitudes of improvement, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were compared between cohorts through multivariable regression.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients were included. Acute postoperative pain and narcotic consumption were highest in the severe cohort (P≤0.003). All preoperative PROMs worsened from mild to severe cohorts (P<0.001). All PROMs continued to be significantly different between cohorts at 6 weeks and final follow-up, with the worst scores in the Severe cohort (P≤0.003). At 6 weeks, all cohorts improved in ODI, VAS-B, VAS-L, and PHQ-9 (P≤0.003), with the Moderate cohort also improving in PROMIS-PF (P=0.017). All Cohorts improved across PROMs at the final follow-up (P≤0.044). Magnitudes of improvement in ODI, VAS-B, and PHQ-9 increased with worsening preoperative symptom severity (P≤0.042). The Moderate and Severe cohorts demonstrated higher MCID achievement in ODI, VAS-B, and PHQ-9 rates than the Mild cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preoperative pain and disability severity, patients undergoing MI-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis report significant improvement in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health postoperatively. Patients with increasing symptom severity continued to report worse severity postoperatively compared with those with milder symptoms preoperatively but were more likely to report larger improvements and achieve clinically meaningful improvement in disability, pain, and mental health.

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Spine Oncology: A Narrative Review

Spine tumors, both primary and metastatic, impose significant morbidity and mortality on patients and physicians. Patient-reported outcomes are valuable tools to assess a patient's impression of their health status and enhance communication between physicians and patients. Various spine generic patient-reported outcome tools have traditionally been used but have not been validated in the spine tumor patient population. The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire, which is disease-specific for the metastatic spine patient population, has been shown to have strong validity, even across multiple languages. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, which has recently been developed, employs computerized adaptive testing to assess multiple health domains. It has been shown to capture information in both generic and specific questionnaires and has the potential to be used as a universal tool in the spine oncology patient population. Further long-term studies, as well as, cross-cultural adaptations, are needed to validate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's applicability and effectiveness.

Clinical Improvement After Lumbar Fusion: Using PROMIS to Assess Recovery Kinetics

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a single institution cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify features that predict delayed achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following elective lumbar spine fusion using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative prediction of delayed recovery following lumbar spine fusion surgery is challenging. While many studies have examined factors impacting the achievement of MCID for patient-reported outcomes in similar cohorts, few studies have assessed predictors of early functional improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective one-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on achievement of MCID for each respective PROMIS domain either before six months ("early responders") or after six months ("late responders") following surgical intervention. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine features associated with odds of achieving distribution-based MCID before or after six months follow up.

RESULTS

147 patients were included. The average age was 64.3±13.0 years. At final follow-up, 57.1% of patients attained MCID for PI and 72.8% for PF. However, 42 patients (49.4%) reached MCID for PI by six months, compared to 44 patients (41.1%) for PF. Patients with severe symptoms had the highest probability of attaining MCID for PI (OR 10.3; P =0.001) and PF (OR 10.4; P =0.001) Preoperative PROMIS symptomology did not predict early achievement of MCID for PI or PF. Patients who received concomitant iliac crest autograft during their lumbar fusion had increased odds of achieving MCID for PI (OR 8.56; P =0.001) before six months.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the majority of patients achieved MCID following elective one-level lumbar spine fusion at long-term follow-up, although less than half achieved this clinical benchmark for each PROMIS metric by six months. We also found that preoperative impairment was not associated with when patients would achieve MCID. Further prospective investigations are warranted to characterize the trajectory of clinical improvement and identify the risk factors associated with poor outcomes more accurately.

Developing a shortened spine functional index (SFI-10) for patients with sub-acute/chronic spinal disorders: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Brief whole-spine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide regional solutions and future directions for quantifying functional status, evidence, and effective interventions. The whole-spine regional Spine Functional Index (SFI-25) is used internationally in clinical and scientific contexts to assess general sub-acute/chronic spine populations. However, to improve structural validity and practicality a shortened version is recommended. This study developed a shortened-SFI from the determined optimal number of item questions that: correlated with criteria PROMs being highly with whole-spine, moderately with regional-spine, condition-specific and patient-specific, and moderately-low with general-health and pain; retained one-dimensional structural validity and high internal consistency; and improved practicality to reduce administrative burden.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study (n = 505, age = 18-87 yrs., average = 40.3 ± 10.1 yrs) of sub-acute/chronic spine physiotherapy outpatients from an international sample of convenience. Three shortened versions of the original SFI-25 were developed using 1) qualitative 'content-retention' methodology, 2) quantitative 'factorial' methodology, and 3) quantitative 'Rasch' methodology, with a fourth 'random' version produced as a comparative control. The clinimetric properties were established for structural validity with exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factorial analysis, and Rasch analysis. Criterion validity used the: whole-spine SFI-25 and Functional Rating Index (FRI); regional-spine Neck Disability Index (NDI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), condition-specific Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (WDQ); and patient-specific functional scale (PSFS); and determined floor/ceiling effect. A post-hoc pooled international sub-acute/chronic spine sample (n = 1433, age = 18-91 yrs., average = 42.0 ± 15.7 yrs) clarified the findings and employed the general-health EuroQuol-Index (EQ-5D), and 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) criteria.

RESULTS

A 10-item SFI retained structural validity with optimal practicality requiring no computational aid. The SFI-10 concept-retention-version demonstrated preferred criterion validity with whole-spine criteria (SFI-25 = 0.967, FRI = 0.810) and exceeded cut-off minimums with regional-spine, condition-specific, and patient-specific measures. An unequivocal one-dimensional structure was determined. Internal consistency was satisfactory (α = 0.80) with no floor/ceiling effect. Post-hoc analysis of the international sample confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSION

The SFI-10 qualitative concept-retention version was preferred to quantitative factorial and Rasch versions, demonstrated structural and criterion validity, and preferred correlation with criteria measures. Further longitudinal research is required for reliability, error, and responsiveness, plus an examination of the practical characteristics of readability and administrative burden.

The Oswestry Disability Index is reflective of pain interference and mobility in children

PURPOSE

The 9-item Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a (ODI-9) has never been formally validated in children. Our primary purpose was to evaluate the ODI-9 using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Pain Interference (PI) and Mobility Computer Adapted Test (CAT) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) as anchors to determine concurrent validity in children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes data using a convenience sample of children referred to a tertiary pediatric orthopedic institution for any spine condition from April 2021 to April 2022. The ODI-9, PI, and Mobility were completed at clinic intake in 2,097 children (1453 girls, 644 boys) aged 14.2 ± 2.6 years (range 5-18 years) during the same visit. The ODI-9 was administered when children or caregivers responded "yes" to the presence of back pain. The PCS-C was administered only when pain intensity was rated as "very severe" or "the worst imaginable" on Item 1 of the ODI-9 (n = 51).

RESULTS

Average ODI-9 scores were 18.3% ± 14.8%, indicating minimal disability (ODI-9 ≤ 20%). Moderate, statistically and clinically significant associations were seen between the ODI-9 and PI (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), the ODI-9 and Mobility (r = - 0.68, p < 0.001), and the ODI-9 and PCS-C (r = 0.59, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Worse ODI-9 scores correlate with worse PROMIS PI scores, worse PROMIS Mobility scores, and worse PCS-C scores. The associations were moderate (PROMIS PI [r = 0.68], PROMIS Mobility [r = - 0.68], PCS-C [r = 0.59]).

Neck Disability Index as a Prognostic Factor for Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to elucidate the potential relationship between neck disability index (NDI) and outcomes following cervical disk replacement (CDR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of preoperative disability scores as predictors of outcomes following spine surgery has previously been studied, yet no literature has been published regarding its use in CDR.

METHODS

A retrospective database of a single orthopedic spine surgeon was searched for single-level CDR patients with preoperative NDI scores, excluding those with trauma, infection, or malignancy. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts by NDI score: Mild-Moderately Disabled (MD) (NDI<50) and Severely Disabled (NDI≥50). Patient-reported outcome measures were collected and compared within and between groups up to 1 year postoperatively and included Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score, visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and NDI. MCID achievement rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

All PROM scores significantly improved for both cohorts at one or more postoperative time points compared with preoperative baseline ( P ≤0.049, all), with the exception of SF-12 Mental Component Score, which only significantly improved in the MD cohort at 2 postoperative points ( P ≤0.007, both). Between groups, the MD cohort reported significantly superior scores at one or more time points for all studied patient-reported outcome measures ( P ≤0.047, all). MCID achievement rate did not significantly vary for any outcome at any time between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of preoperative disability, both groups reported improvement in physical function, pain, and disability scores following CDR. While not finding significance, patients with severe disability preoperatively consistently demonstrated higher minimal clinically important difference achievement in NDI. These data do not promote the use of NDI as a prognostic factor for outcomes following CDR. Further study with larger patient populations may be useful to clarify this potential relationship.

Core patient-reported outcome measures for chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation or dorsal root ganglia stimulation

BACKGROUND

Neurostimulation is a highly effective therapy for the treatment of chronic Intractable pain, however, due to the complexity of pain, measuring a subject's long-term response to the therapy remains difficult. Frequent measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to reflect multiple aspects of subjects' pain is a crucial step in determining therapy outcomes. However, collecting full-length PROs is burdensome for both patients and clinicians. The objective of this work is to identify the reduced set of questions from multiple validated PROs that can accurately characterize chronic pain patients' responses to neurostimulation therapies.

METHODS

Validated PROs were used to capture pain, physical function and disability, as well as psychometric, satisfaction, and global health metrics. PROs were collected from 509 patients implanted with Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) or Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG) neurostimulators enrolled in the prospective, international, post-market REALITY study (NCT03876054, Registration Date: March 15, 2019). A combination of linear regression, Pearson's correlation, and factor analysis were used to eliminate highly correlated questions and find the minimal meaningful set of questions within the predefined domains of each scale.

RESULTS

The shortened versions of the questionnaires presented almost identical accuracy for classifying the therapy outcomes as compared to the validated full-length versions. In addition, principal component analysis was performed on all the PROs and showed a robust clustering of pain intensity, psychological factors, physical function, and sleep across multiple PROs. A selected set of questions captured from multiple PROs can provide adequate information for measuring neurostimulation therapy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

PROs are important subjective measures to evaluate the physiological and psychological aspects of pain. However, these measures are cumbersome to collect. These shorter and more targeted PROs could result in better patient engagement, and enhanced and more frequent data collection processes for digital health platforms that minimize patient burden while increasing therapeutic benefits for chronic pain patients.

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the PROMIS Pain Interference Item Bank in Patients Presented in Musculoskeletal Practice

We evaluated the responsiveness of the Patient Reported Outcome Information System Pain Interference item bank in patients with musculoskeletal pain by testing predefined hypotheses about the relationship between the change scores on the item bank, change scores on legacy instruments and Global Ratings of Change (GRoC), and we estimated Minimal Important Change (MIC). Patients answered the full Dutch-Flemish V1.1 item bank. From the responses we derived scores for the standard 8-item short form (SF8a) and a CAT-score was simulated. Correlations between the change scores on the item bank, GRoC and legacy instruments were calculated, together with Effect Sizes, Standardized Response Means, and Area Under the Curve. GRoC were used as an anchor for estimating the MIC with (adjusted) predictive modeling. Of 1,677 patients answering baseline questionnaires 960 completed follow-up questionnaires at 3 months. The item bank correlated moderately high with the GRoC (Spearman's rho 0.63) and with the legacy instruments (Pearson's R ranging from .45 to .68). It showed a high ES (.97) and Standardized Response Means (.71), and could distinguish well between improved and not improved patients based on the GRoC (Area Under the Curve .77). Comparable results were found for the derived SF8a and CAT-scores. The MIC was estimated to be 3.2 (CI 2.6-3.7) T-score points. PERSPECTIVE: Our study supports the responsiveness of the PROMIS-PI item bank in patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Almost all predefined hypotheses were met (94%). The PROMIS-PI item bank correlated well with several legacy instruments which supports generic use of the item bank. MIC for PROMIS-PI was estimated to be 3.2 T-score points.

Pain Interference Influence on Postoperative Clinical Trajectory in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression

OBJECTIVE

Newer Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) may offer benefits over legacy PROs in ease of administration and interpretation. We aim to study the influence of preoperative pain interference (PI) using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar decompression.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion were separated into 2 cohorts: PROMIS-PI < 64 (lesser PI) and PROMIS-PI ≥ 64 (greater PI). PROs included PROMIS physical function, PROMIS anxiety (PROMIS-A), PROMIS sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD), PROMIS-PI, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and were collected at preoperative and postoperative time points. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROs, and Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) were compared among groups through non-parametric inferential statistics.

RESULTS

One-hundred and seven patients were identified. Independent of preoperative PI, patients reported significant postoperative improvement in PROMIS physical function, PROMIS-A, PROMIS-PI, VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI. The greater PI cohort reported significant postoperative improvement in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and PROMIS-SD. The lesser PI cohort reported superior preoperative PROs in all domains. Postoperatively, the lesser PI cohort reported superior 6-week PROMIS-A and PROMIS-SD. MCID achievement rates were higher in the greater PI cohort for PROMIS-PI, VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower preoperative PI reported superior postoperative anxiety and sleep disturbance. Patients with greater preoperative PI had higher MCID achievement rates in PI, pain, and disability. Patients with greater preoperative PI undergoing lumbar decompression may demonstrate higher rates of clinically tangible improvement.

First-Time Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System as a Metric of Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the ability of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to capture the therapeutic effect of first-time medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

DESIGN

Before-after trial.

SETTING

Single academic spine center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent first-time medial branch RFA for lumbar facet joint pain identified by dual comparative medial branch block with ≥80% pain relief between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2019 were identified using procedural billing codes. Charts were reviewed manually to confirm accuracy and strict adherence to the 80% pain relief threshold for each medial branch block. Thirty-nine patients met the criteria and were included in this study (N=39).

INTERVENTIONS

Medial branch RFA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PROMIS score domains of Depression, Pain Interference, and Physical Function collected pre- and post RFA were compared. Pretreatment scores were within 6 weeks prior to the first medial branch block. Posttreatment scores were between 5 weeks and 6 months after RFA. Paired-sample t test analyses were used to calculate responsiveness to treatment, with significance assigned as P<.05 prior to acquiring data. Effect size was calculated using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

PROMIS domains of Pain Interference and Physical Function demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (P=.004 and P=.017, respectively). The PROMIS domain of Depression did not demonstrate a statistically significant change (P=.12). The effect size was medium (d=-0.43) for Pain Interference, small/medium (d=0.31) for Physical Function, and small (d=-0.12) for Depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial branch RFA as a treatment for lumbar facet syndrome is associated with a statistical improvement in PROMIS domains of Physical Function and Pain Interference.

Convergent and Discriminative Validity of the PROMIS Physical Function 4 Questionnaire for Assessing Pain-related Disability in Low Back Pain Patients Seeking Chiropractic Care

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate construct validity by examining the convergent and discriminative validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function 4a (PROMIS-PF4) questionnaire in low back pain (LBP) patients seeking care from Danish chiropractors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is often used to assess physical functioning in LBP. However, it consists of 24 items, which is time consuming to complete in clinical practice. The PROMIS-PF4 questionnaire has only four items and may be more applicable for clinical use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with LBP seeking care from chiropractors in Denmark completed the PROMIS-PF4, RMDQ, Subgroups for Targeted Treatment (STarT) Back screening tool, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in advance of their first appointment with the chiropractor. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients between the PROMIS-PF4 and RMDQ and NPRS, respectively. Discriminative validity of the PROMIS-PF4 was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) when plotting the PROMIS-PF4 t score against a reference case for RMDQ; NPRS; and high and low risk groups using the STarT Back screening tool.

RESULTS

Among 356 patients the PROMIS-PF4 questionnaire had strong convergent validity with the RMDQ ( r =-0.76) and moderate convergent validity with the NPRS ( r =-0.42). The PROMIS-PF4 had good and acceptable discriminative validity for disability (AUC=0.88) and high risk of persisting disability (AUC=0.72), and poor or no discriminative validity for pain intensity (AUC=0.66) and low-risk of persisting disability (AUC=0.26), respectively.

CONCLUSION

As hypothesized, for convergent validity the PROMIS-PF4 has stronger correlation with the RMDQ than the NPRS and good discriminative validity for identifying patients with pain-related disability and at high risk of persisting disability but not for identifying pain intensity or low-risk of persisting disability. Consequently, the PROMIS-PF4 has adequate construct validity for measuring pain-related disability in an LBP population in chiropractic care.

Symptoms of depression and catastrophic thinking attenuate the relationship of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability with fracture severity

OBJECTIVE

The relative association of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability with pathophysiology, accounting for psychological factors, is incompletely understood. Using moderation analysis, we assessed the association of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability (dependent variables) with fracture severity (independent variable) and the influence of symptoms of depression and catastrophic thinking (moderators) at early and later stages of recovery.

METHODS

A cohort of 731 patients recovering from a shoulder, elbow, or wrist fracture, completed self-reported measures of pain intensity, upper extremity capability, symptoms of depression, and catastrophic thinking between 2 and 4 weeks after injury and again between 6 and 9 months after injury. Fracture severity was rated by clinicians, and we used multivariable regression analysis to examine interaction effects of fracture severity, depression, catastrophic thinking, pain intensity, and magnitude of incapability at early and later stages of recovery.

RESULTS

Symptoms of depression and catastrophic thinking attenuate the relationship between pain intensity and fracture severity at earlier and later stages of recovery. Symptoms of depression and catastrophic thinking also attenuate the relationship between the magnitude of incapability and fracture severity, but only at early stages of recovery.

CONCLUSION

The relative divergence of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability from the level of fracture severity due to the moderating effects of unhelpful thinking and distress, signals a benefit to anticipating mental health opportunities during recovery after fracture. Fracture management can incorporate measures of unhelpful thinking and symptoms of distress to better address these opportunities and ensure comprehensive optimization of recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IIc, prognostic.

Dual Role of Neck Disability Index in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Cervical Spine Patients

INTRODUCTION

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a well-established measure for patients with cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy, or myeloradiculopathy. Few studies have examined the relationship between NDI and mental health outcomes after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Our study sets out to determine the possible correlations between NDI and mental health outcome measures after ACDF.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective ACDF procedures from December 2013 to December 2019. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest were NDI, 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Outcomes were collected preoperatively and postoperatively (6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). Postoperative improvement for all outcomes was evaluated using a paired Student t-test. Correlations between NDI and mental health outcomes were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Strength of association was determined using the following criteria: weak (0.1 ≤ |r| < 0.3), moderate (0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5), and strong (|r| ≥ 0.5).

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were included in this study. Most of the patients underwent a single-level procedure and had a spinal pathology of herniated nucleus pulposus. NDI demonstrated significant improvements through 2 years compared with preoperative values (all P < 0.001). Similarly, SF-12 MCS and PHQ-9 significantly improved through 1-year postoperatively (all P ≤ 0.010) but was not maintained at 2 years (P = 0.835; P = 0.128). NDI demonstrated a significant but moderate correlation with SF-12 MCS at the preoperative time point, but a strong correlation was observed at all postoperative time points (all P ≤ 0.001). A significant and strong correlation between NDI and PHQ-9 was demonstrated at all time points (all P ≤ 0.002).

DISCUSSION

NDI demonstrated notable and strong correlations with mental health outcome measures at all postoperative time points. NDI is an effective measure to assess neck disability but may also help capture changes to mental health symptoms after ACDF.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Metastatic Spine Disease: Concurrent Validity of PROMIS with the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression domains in comparison to the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSG-OQ) in patients with metastatic spine disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

While there remains a significant movement toward incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into clinical care, there are few validated PROMs for patients with metastatic spine disease. The SOSG-OQ was designed and validated for metastatic spine tumor patients. However, the use of general symptom-based PROMs, such as PROMIS domains, may reduce both patient and physician burden and improve interdisciplinary care if shown to be concurrently valid.

METHODS

Metastatic spine tumor patients from January 2017 to July 2021 at a single academic medical center were asked to complete PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains and the SOSG-OQ. Spearman correlation (p) coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 103 unique visits, representing 79 patients met our inclusion criteria. A majority were men (59; 57%) and Caucasian (93; 90%), and the average age was 64-years-old (range: 34-87). There were 13 different types of histologies reported, with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer representing 28 (27%), 26 (25%), and 13 (13%), respectively. Additional cancers included renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, colon cancer, thyroid cancer, large B-cell lymphoma, nonHodgkin lymphoma, esophageal cancer, plasmacytoma, metastatic paraganglioma, and metastatic spindle cell sarcoma. SOSG-OQ was strongly correlated with PROMIS PI (ρ = 0.78) and PROMIS PF (ρ = 0.71), and moderately correlated with PROMIS Depression (ρ = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression appear to capture similar clinical insight as the SOSG-OQ. Spine surgeons can consider using these PROMIS domains in lieu of the SOSG-OQ in metastatic spine tumor patients.

Level of Evidence: NA.

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Tritanium Posterolateral Cage (vs. Propensity-Matched Cohort of PEEK Cage)

Introduction

Surgical management of degenerative lumbar spine disorders is effective at improving patient pain, disability, and quality of life; however, obtaining a durable posterolateral fusion after decompression remains a challenge. Interbody fusion technologies are viable means of improving fusion rates in the lumbar spine, specifically various graft materials including autograft, structural allograft, titanium, and polyether ether ketone. This study assesses the effectiveness of Tritanium posterolateral cage in the treatment of degenerative disk disease.

Methods

Nearest-neighbor 1:1 matched control transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with PEEK vs. Tritanium posterior lumbar (PL) cage interbody fusion patients were identified using propensity scoring from patients that underwent elective surgery for degenerative disk diseases. Line graphs were generated to compare the trajectories of improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from baseline to 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The nominal data were compared via the χ² test, while the continuous data were compared via Student's t-test.

Results

The two groups had no difference regarding either the 3- or 12-month Euro-Qol-5D (EQ-5D), numeric rating scale (NRS) leg pain, and NRS back pain; however, the Tritanium interbody cage group had better Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores compared to the control group of the PEEK interbody cage at both 3 and 12 months (p=0.013 and 0.048).

Conclusions

Our results indicate the Tritanium cage is an effective alternative to the previously used PEEK cage in terms of PROs, surgical safety, and radiological parameters of surgical success. The Tritanium cohort showed better ODI scores, higher fusion rates, lower subsidence, and lower indirect costs associated with surgical management, when compared to the propensity-matched PEEK cohort.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preliminary evidence has suggested favorable correlation between National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessments and traditional ("legacy") patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in spine surgery. There has been a significant increase in PROMIS research with regards to spinal conditions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an assessment of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) measures in this patient population.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify published articles that referenced the various PROMIS PF measures. Two authors independently reviewed selected studies. The search returned 1,060 studies, 124 of which were selected for independent review by two authors. Of these, 37 were selected for inclusion. Mixed linear models were performed to assess for differences between legacy PROMs and PROMIS measures.

RESULTS

The combined sample size of all included studies yielded 10,296 total patients. Overall, PROMIS Physical Function (PF) measures demonstrated strong correlations with legacy PROMs when evaluating spine patients (weighted Pearson correlation, 0.589, standard error [SE]=0.023; weighted Spearman correlation, 0.702, SE=0.028). PROMIS questionnaires had significantly fewer questions than did legacy PROMs (4.2±0.30 vs. 9.53±0.82, p=.015). In spine studies, the PROMIS PF forms were completed in significantly less time than legacy PROMs (48.1±2.9 vs. 174.7±12.6 seconds, p<.001). The differences for the reliability measures and the floor and ceiling effects were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PF forms compare favorably with legacy PROMs with regard to correlations, ease of use, and quality criteria in the field of spine surgery. PROMIS PF scores correlate strongly with commonly used legacy PROMs, particularly in spine patients. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PF forms can be administered efficiently and to a broad patient population while remaining highly reliable.

Minimum 2-year outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: how does acute arthroplasty compare with salvage?

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion (ROM), complication rates, and reoperation rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for proximal humeral fractures between patients treated acutely (≤30 days after injury), those treated after initial nonoperative treatment (>30 days after injury), and those treated after failed open reduction-internal fixation. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any patient-, injury-, or surgery-related factors independently associated with our response variables.

METHODS

We identified 576 patients who sustained a proximal humeral fracture treated with primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty between January 2003 and August 2018. The final cohort included 153 patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess whether explanatory variables were associated with our response variables.

RESULTS

Initial nonoperative treatment compared with acute rTSA was associated with worse Shoulder Subjective Value (P = .04), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score (P = .03), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index disability subscale score (P = .03). Only depression was independently associated with worse visual analog scale pain score (P = .04). There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM between the initial treatment groups. Older age was associated with decreased ROM in all planes. Additionally, ipsilateral upper-extremity injury was associated with decreased active abduction (P = .03), and cemented humeral stems were associated with decreased passive abduction (P = .03). Initial nonoperative treatment was associated with increased complication rates (odds ratio, 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-12.01), and male sex was associated with higher rates of reoperation (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo initial periods of nonoperative management have worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates than those who undergo acute rTSA for proximal humeral fractures. Patients who undergo rTSA after failed open reduction-internal fixation show no difference in patient-reported outcomes compared with those who undergo acute rTSA. In addition, male patients are at higher risk of reoperation, whereas older patients are at risk of decreased ROM. Patients with preoperative depression are at risk of increased pain at 2 years after surgery.

Construct Validity and Item Response Theory Analysis of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 in Recipients of Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort design involving measurement property assessment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess construct validity through hypothesis testing and to examine reliability and discrimination of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 using item response theory (IRT) analyses.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29.0 version 2.0 includes 28 questions for the seven domains of Physical function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Social role, and Pain interference, and one item related to pain intensity. To date, the tool has not been tested for construct validity for selected concepts, nor has it been evaluated using IRT in a population of spine surgery recipients.

METHODS

Using the Quality Outcomes Dataset lumbar registry, we evaluated the construct validity of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 against pain intensity measures for back and leg, the Oswestry Disability Index, the EQ5D 3L-visual analog scale (quality of life) and proxy measures of activities, mobility and self-care. IRT was used to test PROMIS-29 v2.0 assumptions and fit.

RESULTS

The sample included 652 surgery recipients (mean age = 60.1, SD = 14.0) who had a high level of baseline disability. Hypothesis testing confirmed direction and magnitude of correlation between the PROMIS and legacy measures in 10 of the 12 hypotheses. IRT identified three misfit items, but otherwise adequate scale reliability and unidimensionality.

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS-29 v2.0 measures several different constructs pertinent to a patient's health and recovery during spine surgery. We feel that the PROMIS-29 v2.0 tool is a useful and effective outcome measure for populations who receive spine surgery.Level of Evidence: 4.

PROMIS Scores Should Not be Used in Isolation to Measure Outcomes in Lumbar Stenosis Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the strength of relationship between the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Adult Depression (AD), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (PI) with the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSSQ) in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In 2009, there were >35,000 surgeries for LSS, which amounted to $1.65 billion in health care cost. By 2021, there will be >2.4 million people in the United States with symptomatic LSS. There is an increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to define value in medicine. Therefore, it would be beneficial to compare PROMIS, a universal PRO, against the SSSQ, the "criterion standard" for assessing LSS.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with LSS completing the PROMIS and SSSQ were enrolled. Per existing institutional protocol, PROMIS AD, PF, and PI were completed at every clinic visit. Linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate how well the SSSQ and PROMIS scores correlated to each other.

RESULTS

When linear regression was performed for pre-treatment values, the R2 value for the SSSQ PF versus PROMIS PF was 0.14 (P = 0.0008), whereas the R2 value for the SSSQ symptom severity versus PROMIS PI was 0.03 (P = 0.13). The R2 value for the combined SSSQ physical function and symptom severity versus PROMIS AD was 0.07 (P = 0.02). When post-treatment SSSQ satisfaction scores were correlated to postoperative PROMIS AD, PI, and PF scores, the R2 values for a good linear fit were 0.13, 0.25, and 0.18 respectively (P values: 0.01, 0.003, and 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment PROMIS scores do not adequately capture the disease-specific impact of spinal stenosis, but postoperative PROMIS scores better reflect outcomes after surgery for LSS. PROMIS scores should not be used in isolation to assess outcomes in patients with LSS.Level of Evidence: 4.

Linking Oswestry Disability Index to the PROMIS pain interference CAT with equipercentile methods

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

When different health care providers use different patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, it is challenging to integrate findings that describe particular patient groups or to establish treatment effectiveness across studies. It is therefore critical to develop accurate ways to convert scores between various instruments for clinicians and researchers to make comparisons across health outcomes.

PURPOSE

To develop a common metric so that scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and scores on the PROMIS Physical Function can be converted interchangeably.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Data were collected from a prospective study. A single-group linking design was used.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study population included 9020 patients presented to an orthopedic spine clinic from November 2013 to March 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients completed the ODI and the PROMIS Pain Interference scale delivered by Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) at the same time prior to their visit with a spine clinician.

METHODS

Equipercentile linking methods based on log-linear smoothing approach and non-smoothing approach were used to establish a common metric across the two measures.

RESULTS

The two measures assess the similar contruct of pain. The correlation between the scores of the ODI and the PROMIS PI was 0.81. The standardized Root Expected Mean Square Difference (REMSD) values for gender, ethnic, and racial groups ranged from 3.55% to 4.81%. Hence, the assumptions for the equipercentile linking method were met. The crosswalk derived linked scores based on the log-linear smoothing method yielded small deviations (Δ = 0.09) from the observed scores. We then identified linked PROMIS-PI scores corresponding to the benchmark ODI scores for the five disability levels and for various categories of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to create crosswalks to interchangeably convert scores between the ODI to the PROMIS-PI in a large population of spine patients using the equipercentile linking method. The results of this study provide confidence in the validity and usefulness of the derived crosswalks based on the equipercentile linking approach. The crosswalks are helpful for comparing new and old studies on the two measures and identifying benchmark scores for various diseases and disability levels.

Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge

OBJECTIVE

To identify spine patients' barriers to appropriate postoperative opioid use, comfort with naloxone, knowledge of safe opioid disposal practices, and associated factors.

METHODS

We preoperatively surveyed 174 spine patients about psychobehavioral barriers to appropriate opioid use, comfort with naloxone, and knowledge about opioid disposal. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with barriers and knowledge (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Common barriers were fear of addiction (71%) and concern about disease progression (43%). Most patients (78%) had neutral/low confidence in the ability of nonopioid medications to control pain; most (57%) felt neutral or uncomfortable with using naloxone; and most (86%) were familiar with safe disposal. Anxiety was associated with fear of distracting the physician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-14) and with lower odds of knowing safe disposal methods (aOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.72). Opioid use during the preceding month was associated with comfort with naloxone (aOR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.1-12). Patients with a higher educational level had lower odds of reporting fear of distracting the physician (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97), and those with previous postoperative opioid use had lower odds of concern about disease progression (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63) and with a belief in tolerating pain (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Many spine patients report barriers to appropriate postoperative opioid use and are neutral or uncomfortable with naloxone. Some are unfamiliar with safe disposal. Associated factors include anxiety, lack of recent opioid use, and no previous postoperative use.

The Presence of Preoperative Depression Symptoms Does Not Hinder Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

The current literature suggests a link between psychosocial factors and poor surgical outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal complaints. However, there remains a limited body of literature examining the effect of depression on outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

The primary purpose of this study was to compare postoperative function patient-reported outcome scores between patients with and patients without preoperative depression symptoms undergoing ACLR. Secondary goals included comparing postoperative pain interference and depression scores between the 2 groups.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, pediatric and adult patients who underwent ACLR were included. The Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression (D) domain scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were collected preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were separated into clinical depression (CD) and no clinical depression (NCD) groups based on their preoperative PROMIS-D score.

Results:

A total of 82 patients undergoing ACLR were included in this study. Of these, 19 (23%) patients met criteria for the CD group. Preoperatively, the CD group reported lower mean PROMIS-PF (33.3 vs 39.7, respectively; P = .001), higher PROMIS-PI (65.7 vs 59.2, respectively; P <.01), and higher PROMIS-D (62.4 vs 45.1, respectively; P < .001) scores than the NCD group. At 12 months postoperatively, the mean PROMIS-PF scores for the CD and NCD groups were 52.1 and 56.7, respectively (P = .12). The mean 12-month postoperative PROMIS-PI scores for the CD and NCD groups were 52.3 and 47.4, respectively (P = .04). At 12 months after ACLR, there was a substantial improvement in PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI scores for both the CD (delta = +18.8 and –13.4, respectively) and NCD (delta = +17.0 and –11.8) groups.

Conclusion:

There was a significant improvement, which exceeded currently accepted minimal clinically important difference values, in PROMIS-PF scores at 12 months after ACLR, regardless of the presence of preoperative depression symptoms. These data suggest that having depression symptoms preoperatively does not significantly hinder a patient’s recovery after ACLR.