Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients report increased pain at five years compared with two years after surgical treatment

AIS patients have improved total SRS-22r self-image and satisfaction scores relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up regardless of Lenke type

PURPOSE

Few studies have investigated quality-of-life (QoL)-related outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients over long-term follow-up. We investigated whether patients with any given Lenke type improved relative to other types and whether selective fusions resulted in better QoL-related outcome measures.

METHODS

We utilized the Harms Study Group database to select patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) scores at minimum 10-year follow-up. Characteristics and SRS-22r were quantified by Lenke type and compared using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictive value of Lenke types on QoL-related outcomes. Sub-group analysis split cohorts into those who underwent selective vs. non-selective fusion(s).

RESULTS

110 patients were available at minimum 10-year follow-up. Types 3, 4, and 6 curves generally demonstrated lower SRS-22r scores both preoperatively and at long-term follow-up. Independent of Lenke type, total SRS-22r, along with self-image and satisfaction, showed consistent improvement relative to pre-op at 10-year follow-up, whereas pain, mental health, and general function showed a slight worsening. Sub-group analyses revealed no significant differences in SRS-22r scores between selective and non-selective fusion groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At 10-year follow-up, total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction scores stayed consistently improved relative to preoperative status over time, while pain, general function, and mental health declined from 2 years onward. Increased age may play a role in enhancing self-image and satisfaction while worsening general function, pain, and mental health. Selectively vs. non-selectively fusing a patient should not hinge on fear of impacting patients' QoL-related measures, as our data suggest improvement in total SRS-22r, self-image, and satisfaction regardless.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Clinical Significance of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is potentially the most nuanced decision a surgeon has to make. This article reviews the literature on the range-of-motion loss related to the LIV, ability to return to sports based on LIV, correlation between LIV and disk degeneration, and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes related to LIV.

The effect of spinal correction surgery on the tractography data of the pain pathway in scoliosis patients: a preliminary report

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

Pain in individuals with opered scoliosis is usually evaluated with a postural analysis or questionnaire. In this study, we evaluated pain in individuals with scoliosis who underwent spinal correction surgery by tractography and compared it with individuals with non-opered scoliosis and healthy individuals.

DESIGN

Fifteen healthy individuals, 15 non-operated scoliosis patients and 15 operated scoliosis patients were included in the study.

METHODS

All female participants in this prospectively planned study used their right hand as the dominant hand. Bilateral tractography analysis of the pain pathways was performed with DSI Studio software using brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the participants. Statistical analysis of the study was performed with IBM SPSS 23.0 and p<0.05 values were considered significant.

RESULTS

It was observed that the tractography values of the operated scoliosis group were similar to the control group (p˃0.05). In the non-operated scoliosis group, tractography findings related to nerve conduction velocity such as fiber count, fiber ratio and axial diffusivity (AD) were found to be higher than the other two groups (p<0.05). Fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the unoperated scoliosis group were significantly different between the pain pathways projected from the right/left side of the body (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The fact that the pain path tractography values of patients with scoliosis who underwent surgery were similar to those of healthy individuals may be evidence of decreased pain sensation reaching the brain. Surgery may be a good choice in the treatment of pain in patients with scoliosis.

Radiological and Pulmonary Results of Surgical Treatment of Severe Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Halo Gravity Traction Compared with Less Invasive Temporary Internal Distraction in Staged Surgery in Adolescents

Background: Severe and rigid scoliosis represents a type of spinal deformity characterized by a Cobb angle exceeding 90° and a flexibility of less than 30%. Halo spinal traction remains the established standard for managing severe scoliosis, although alternative approaches such as temporary internal distraction rods and staged surgical correction exist. The primary objective of this investigation was to compare two cohorts of patients treated using these distinct methods to ascertain any divergences in terms of surgical and radiological outcomes, pulmonary function (PF), and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This study encompassed a total of 62 pediatric patients meeting the specified criteria, which included severe idiopathic scoliosis (major Cobb curve >90) and flexibility <30%. Group 1 (G1) underwent surgical intervention involving preoperative Halo gravity traction (HGT) succeeded by posterior spinal fusion (PSF). On the other hand, Group 2 (G2) underwent a two-stage procedure starting with a less invasive temporary internal distraction technique (LITID) prior to PSF. The radiological outcomes, PF, and QoL were documented and assessed over a monitoring period ranging from 2 to 5 years. Results: The average preoperative major curves (MCs) measured 124° and 122° in G1 and G2, respectively (p < 0.426). Initial flexibility, as observed in preoperative bending films, ranged from 18% in G1 to 21% in G2 (p < 0.001). Following the ultimate surgical intervention, the MCs were corrected to 45° and 37.4° in G1 and G2, respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage correction of the MCs was higher in G2 (63% vs. 70% in G1 and G2, respectively), with significant between-group disparities (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative thoracic kyphoses (TKs) were 96.5° in G1 and 92° in G2 (p = 0.782), which were rectified to 45.8° in G1 and 36.2° in G2 (p < 0.001), equating to correction rates of 55% and 60% in the respective groups. Initially, G2 exhibited lower values for the percentage of predicted lung volume (FVC) and predicted FEV1 compared with G1 (49% and 58% vs. 54.5% and 60.8%; N.S.). Nonetheless, both groups demonstrated enhancements in their FVC and FEV1 values over the follow-up period. Conclusions: The surgical management of severe and untreated spinal curvatures in the pediatric and adolescent population can be considered safe, with a tolerable incidence of minor complications. LITID emerges as a method offering improved QoL and pulmonary function, achieving notably substantial average corrections in deformity by 70% in the coronal plane and 60% in the sagittal plane, alongside a mean increase in trunk height of 10.8 cm. Furthermore, a typical reduction of 76% in rib humps and enhancements in respiratory function, as indicated by improvements in 1 s predicted forced expiratory volume (by 25-56%) and forced vital capacity (by 35-65%), were achieved, leading to a clinically and statistically significant enhancement in QoL when evaluated using SRS-22r, without resorting to more radical, high-risk procedures.

Half of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients may have lumbar adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion: A systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the impact of surgical approaches and other factors on the incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD) following Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases from their inception until March 30, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and evaluated the methodological quality of the studies. A random-effects model was used to calculate the incidence of ASD.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 14 studies involving 651 individuals. The overall incidence of ASD was 47% (95%CI: 0.37, 0.56). Subgroup analyses revealed that the prevalence of ASD increased with postoperative time (53% (95%CI: 0.31, 0.75) versus 48% (95%CI: 0.36, 0.60) versus 39% (95%CI: 0.22, 0.56)). For the number of fused segments, a group with more than 10 segments had a higher prevalence (49% (95%CI: 0.38, 0.60) versus 44% (95%CI: 0.21, 0.69)). In terms of regions, East Asia had the highest prevalence, followed by Occident and West Asia (52% (95%CI: 0.41, 0.62) versus 43% (95%CI: 0.20, 0.68) versus 37% (95%CI: 0.17, 0.59)). However, the surgical approach, male ratio, and the position of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) did not show significant differences between groups. Funnel plots and Egger's test did not reveal any significant publication bias (Egger's test: t = 1.62, p-value = .1274).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that nearly half of AIS patients following spinal fusion surgery experienced ASD. Long-term follow-up, regular screening, and timely interventions are essential to reduce the prevalence of ASD.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Spinal Nonfusion Surgery in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using a Bipolar One-Way Self-Expanding Rod System: Protocol for a Single-Center Clinical Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The current surgical treatment for patients diagnosed with progressive and severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) consists of the correction of the spinal curvature, followed by posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, research has uncovered short- and long-term complications of posterior spinal fusion in patients with AIS. Minimally invasive growing rod techniques have successfully been used to treat patients with early-onset scoliosis and neuromuscular scoliosis. It may be questioned if minimally invasive posterior spinal nonfusion (PSnF) surgery with bipolar instrumentation can be used for the treatment of AIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study will be performed to monitor the efficacy and safety of PSnF surgery by using a commercially available Conformité Européenne-certified spinal implant consisting of bilateral bipolar one-way self-expanding rods (OWSER) for the treatment of patients diagnosed with AIS.

METHODS

In 14 selected patients with AIS with Lenke 1-6 curves, minimally invasive PSnF surgery with the OWSER system is performed after the failure of conservative treatment (curve progression of >5° within 1 year). The patients are over 7 years of age, with a major Cobb angle of ≥30°, sufficient flexibility, and a Risser stage of ≤2. Patients will be followed over time, according to the standard medical care. Efficacy will be measured using radiological and patient satisfaction assessments and safety will be determined by the amount of perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Patient inclusion started on November 17, 2021 and we hope to finalize patient inclusion by the beginning of 2025. The first results will be expected by the beginning of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive PSnF in patients with AIS is presented as a less invasive surgical technique that prevents the progression of the scoliotic curve and that allows minor posture correction of coronal imbalance. This will be the first study to examine whether the PSnF bipolar OWSER instrumentation will be the next generation of surgical instrumentation in AIS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04441411; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04441411.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/47222.

Pain After Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Timing

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative pain following anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Up to 78% of patients with AIS report preoperative pain; it is the greatest patient concern surrounding surgery. Pain significantly decreases following posterior spinal fusion, but pain following AVBT is poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients with a two-year follow-up after AVBT for AIS. We collected demographic, radiographic, and clinical data pertinent to postoperative pain at each time interval of preoperative and postoperative visits (6 wk, 6 mo, 1 y, and annually thereafter).

RESULTS

Within our cohort, 68.1% of patients reported preoperative pain. Older age ( P =0.014) and greater proximal thoracic ( P =0.013) and main thoracic ( P =0.002) coronal curve magnitudes were associated with preoperative pain. Pain at any time point > 6 weeks postoperatively was reported in 41.6% of patients; it was associated with the female sex ( P =0.032), need for revision surgery ( P =0.019), and greater lateral displacement of the apical lumbar vertebrae ( P =0.028). The association between preoperative and postoperative pain trended toward significance ( P =0.07). At 6 months postoperatively, 91.8% had pain resolution; the same number remained pain-free at the time of last follow-up. The presence of a postoperative complication was associated with new-onset postoperative pain that resolved ( P =0.009). Only 8.2% had persistent pain, although no risk factors were found to be associated with persistent pain.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of 279 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after AVBT, 68.1% reported preoperative pain. Nearly 42% reported postoperative pain at any time point, but only 8.2% had persistent pain. Postoperative pain after AVBT was associated with female sex, revision surgery, and Lenke lumbar modifier. AVBT is associated with a significant reduction in pain, and few patients report long-term postoperative pain.

Evaluating the Use of PROMs in Paediatric Orthopaedic Registries

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide structured information on the patient's health experience and facilitate shared clinical decision-making. Registries that collect PROMs generate essential information about the clinical course and efficacy of interventions. Whilst PROMs are increasingly being used in adult orthopaedic registries, their use in paediatric orthopaedic registries is not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the frequency and scope of registries that collect PROMs in paediatric orthopaedic patient groups. In July 2023, six databases were systematically searched to identify studies that collected PROMs using a registry amongst patients aged under 18 years with orthopaedic diagnoses. Of 3190 identified articles, 128 unique registries were identified. Three were exclusively paediatric, 27 were majority paediatric, and the remainder included a minority of paediatric patients. One hundred and twenty-eight registries collected 72 different PROMs, and 58% of these PROMs were not validated for a paediatric population. The largest group of orthopaedic registries collected PROMs on knee ligament injuries (21%). There are few reported dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting PROMs in paediatric populations. The majority of PROMs collected amongst paediatric populations by orthopaedic registries are not validated for patients under the age of 18 years. The use of non-validated PROMs by registries greatly impedes their utility and impact. Dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting paediatric-validated PROMs are needed to increase health knowledge, improve decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, and optimise orthopaedic management.

Back Pain and Quality of Life 10 Years After Segmental Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in surgically managed patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years compared with patients with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and a healthy control group.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws is the standard treatment for AIS, although it remains unclear whether this procedure results in improved long-term HRQoL compared with untreated patients with AIS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients at a minimum follow-up of 10 years, who underwent posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-three (83%) of these patients completed Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 24 questionnaires, clinical examination, and standing spinal radiographs. Pain and HRQoL were compared with age and sex-matched patients with untreated AIS and healthy individuals.

RESULTS

The mean major curve was 57° preoperatively and 15° at the 10-year follow-up. SRS-24 self-image domain score showed a significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years and remained significantly better at the 10-year follow-up ( P < 0.001). Patients fused to L3 or below had lower pain, satisfaction, and total score than patients fused to L2 or above ( P < 0.05), but self-image, function, and activity scores did not differ between groups at 10-year follow-up. Pain, self-image, general activity, and total SRS domains were significantly better at 10-year follow-up in the surgically treated patients as compared with untreated patients (all P < 0.05). Healthy controls had significantly higher total score s than those surgically treated at 10-year follow-ups ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS maintain high-level HRQoL during a 10-year follow-up. Their HRQoL was significantly better than in the untreated patients with AIS, except for the function domain. However, HRQoL remained at a lower level than in healthy controls.

Back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comprehensive review

Purpose

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity that affects millions of children worldwide. A variety of treatment algorithms exist for patients based on radiographic parameters such as the Cobb angle and the Risser stage. However, there has been a growing focus on nonradiographic outcomes such as back pain, which can cause functional disability and reduced quality of life for patients. In spite of this, back pain in AIS is poorly characterized in the literature. We aimed to summarize various factors that may influence back pain in AIS and the impact of different treatment methods on pain reduction.

Methods

A comprehensive systematic review was undertaken using the PubMed and Cochrane database. Keywords that were utilized and combined with "Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis" included, "back pain," "treatment," "biomechanics," "biochemistry," "epidemiology," and "biopsychosocial." The literature was subsequently evaluated and deemed relevant or not relevant for inclusion.

Results

A total of 93 articles were ultimately included in this review. A variety of contradictory literature was present for all sections related to epidemiology, underlying biomechanics and biochemistry, biopsychosocial factors, and treatment methodologies.

Conclusion

Back pain in AIS is common but remains difficult to predict and treat. The literature pertaining to causative factors and treatment options is heterogeneous and inconclusive. Longer-term prospective studies combining biopsychosocial intervention in conjunction with existing curve correction techniques would be meaningful.

The Efficacy of a Posterior Approach to Surgical Correction for Neglected Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Analysis According to Health-Related Quality of Life, Pulmonary Function, Back Pain and Sexual Function

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of severe idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and hypothesized that surgical treatment would have a superior impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pulmonary function (PF), back pain, and sexual function.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 195 consecutive patients with IS classified into severe (SG) and moderate groups (MG) with a minimum follow-up of two years.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative curve was 131° and 60° in the SG and MG, respectively. The mean preoperative flexibility in the bending films averaged between 22% in the SG and 41% in the MG. After definitive surgery, the main curve was corrected to 61° and 18° in the SG and MG, respectively. The mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 83° in the SG and 25° in the MG, which was corrected to 35° in the SG and 25° in the MG. At baseline, the percentage of predicted lung volume (FVC) was significantly lower in the SG than that in the MG (51.2% vs. 83%). The baseline percentage of the predicted FEV1 values was also significantly lower in the SG than in the MG (60.8% vs. 77%). During the two-year follow-up, the percentage of predicted FVC showed significant improvement in the SG (69.9%) (p < 0.001), and the percentage of predicted FEV1 values during the follow-up improved significantly in the SG (76.9%) (p < 0.001) compared with the MG (81%), with no statistical difference observed during the two-year follow-up. The SRS-22r showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in the preoperative results to those of the final follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of severe scoliosis can be safe. It provided a mean correction of the deformity for 59% of patients and significantly improved respiratory function, with the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s improving by 60% and the forced vital capacity improving by 50%, resulting in clinically and statistically significant improvements in the SRS-22r, HRQoL outcome scores, and back pain (reduced from 36% to 8%), as well as improved sexual function. The planned surgical treatment can achieve a very significant deformity correction with a minimal risk of complications. The surgical treatment has a superior impact on the quality of life patients with severe spinal deformities and significantly improves function in every sphere of life.

Elasticity change of the paravertebral fascia and muscle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior selective fusion surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to assess the elasticity change of the paravertebral fascia and muscle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke Type 1, 2, or 3 curves after posterior selective fusion surgery.

METHODS

The shear wave elasticity imaging system was used to assess the elasticity of the thoracic paravertebral muscles and fascia both on the concave and convex sides. Three regions of interest, including the apex, upper end, and lower end of the main curve, were tested.

FINDINGS

Ten female patients, with an average age of 16.6 ± 2.7 years old, were included. The average post-operation follow-up period was 9.0 ± 2.4 months. The Cobb angle was significantly corrected from 63.6 ± 12.0° to 10.7 ± 5.4° (p < 0.05). The length of the trunk increased from 40.4 ± 2.5 cm to 46.0 ± 2.8 cm (p < 0.05). The elasticity of deep fascia didn't show a significant change post-operation (p > 0.05). The elasticity of the paravertebral muscle on the concave side had a significant increase at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The elasticity of the paravertebral muscle on the convex side also increased at the upper end (p < 0.05). The elasticity asymmetry of the deep fascia decreased, but the elasticity asymmetry of the paravertebral muscle increased at the upper end of the curve (p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

The paravertebral muscle on the concave side is stiffer after surgery. Elastic asymmetry of paravertebral muscle increased and elastic asymmetry of the deep fascia decreased at the upper end of the curvature. Further study is needed to elucidate the mechanism by which the paravertebral soft tissue responds after surgery.

Is there an indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities? - A critical appraisal

Background

High-quality evidence exists to support physiotherapy and brace treatment for scoliosis and other spinal deformities. However, according to previous systematic reviews, it seems that no evidence exists for surgery. Nevertheless, the number of research articles focussing on spinal surgery highly exceeds the number of articles focussing on conservative treatment.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to conduct an updated search for systematic reviews providing high-quality evidence for spinal surgery in patients with spinal deformities.

Method

A narrative review including PubMed and the Cochrane database was conducted on April 12, 2020, with the following search terms: (1) spinal deformities, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (2) kyphosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (3) Scheuermann's disease, surgery, systematic review and outcome, and (4) scoliosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome.

Results

No reviews containing prospective controlled or randomised controlled studies were found providing evidence for surgery.

Conclusions

A general indication for spine surgery just based on the Cobb angle is not given. In view of the long-term unknown variables and the possible long-term complications of such treatment, a surgical indication for patients with spinal deformities must be reviewed on an individual basis and considered carefully. A current systematic review appears necessary in order to be able to draw final conclusions on the indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities.

Clinical implications

In view of the increasing number of surgeons with an affiliation to industry, the indication for surgery needs to be given by independent conservative specialists for spinal deformities in order to provide an objective recommendation.

Predictors of persistent postoperative pain after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To identify factors contributing to persistent postoperative pain in patients treated surgically for idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

In total, 280 patients aged ten through 25 years at surgery, were identified in the Swedish Spine registry; all having preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain scores. The patients were divided into a high and low postoperative pain group based on the reported postoperative VAS for back pain scores (by using 45 mm on the 0 mm to 100 mm VAS scale as a cut-off). The patient-reported questionnaire included VAS for back pain, the 3-level version of EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ-5D-3L) instrument, the EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) and the Scoliosis Research Society 22r instrument (SRS-22r). Predictors of postoperative back pain were searched in the preoperative data.

RESULTS

The 67 (24%) patients that reported high postoperative VAS back pain (> 45 mm) also reported lower postoperative EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS and SRS-22r than patients with low postoperative VAS back pain (all p < 0.001). Two preoperative variables were independently associated with postoperative pain; each millimetre increase in preoperative VAS back pain (on the 0 mm to 100 mm scale) was associated with a higher risk of being in the high postoperative back pain group (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.05) and each 1 point decrease on the preoperative SRS-22r mental health (scale from 1 to 5) was associated with a higher risk of being in the high postoperative back pain group (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.73).

CONCLUSION

High preoperative back pain and low preoperative mental health are independent predictors of back pain after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Vitamin D levels and pain outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spine fusion

PURPOSE

Prior research has indicated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients have lower bone mineral density and lower vitamin D levels than healthy peers. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with higher levels of pain. This study investigated whether vitamin D-deficient AIS patients had higher pain before or immediately after posterior spine fusion (PSF) surgery.

METHODS

25-Hydroxy vitamin D levels were tested in all AIS patients at their pre-operative appointment. Patients were grouped by serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level: deficient, < 20 ng/mL; insufficient, 20-29 ng/mL; sufficient, ≥ 30 ng/mL. Primary outcomes included pre-operative Scoliosis Research Society Health-Related Quality of Life (SRS-30) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (0-10) up to 72 h post-operatively, and analyzed using ANOVA and linear mixed modeling, respectively. 176 patients undergoing PSF were included. Intra-operative characteristics by vitamin D status were also assessed. The cohort was 82% female and an average of 15.2 years (range 10.6-25.3 years) at fusion. Average major curve was 60 (range 40-104) degrees pre-operatively.

RESULTS

Forty-five (26%) patients were deficient in vitamin D, 75 (43%) were insufficient, and 56 (32%) were sufficient. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had lower average household income by zip code (p < 0.01) and higher secondhand smoke exposure (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative SRS-30 score, pre- and post-operative major curve angles, or estimated blood loss across vitamin D groups. Trajectories of NRS indicated no differences in pain during the first 72 h after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D deficiency in this population is associated with potential markers of lower socioeconomic status; however, it does not influence AIS PSF patients' experience of pain before or immediately after spine fusion surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Long-term Patient Perception Following Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis if Dissatisfied at 2-year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the rate of patients who report low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores at 2 years following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) improves by 5 years postoperatively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

HRQOL scores are dependent upon a number of factors and even in instances of good surgical correction of a spinal deformity, are not guaranteed to be high postoperatively. Understanding how a low HRQOL score varies over the postoperative period can help surgeons more effectively counsel patients and temper expectations.

METHODS

A multicenter database was reviewed for patients with both 2 and 5-year follow-up after spinal fusion and instrumentation for AIS. From a cohort of 916 patients, 52 patients with low HRQOL scores at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated at 5-year follow-up. A low HRQOL outcome was defined as having SRS-22 domain or total scores less than 2 standard deviations below the mean score. Reoperations were also evaluated to determine if they were associated with HRQOL scores.

RESULTS

Of those patients with low SRS-22 HRQOL scores at 2 years postoperatively, improvements were seen in all SRS-22 domains and total scores at the 5-year time point. The greatest change was seen in the satisfaction category where 41 patients showed improvement. The rate of reoperations during this period did not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a low HRQOL score 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee a low score 5 years after surgery. Promisingly, most patients demonstrate some improvement in all domains for patient-reported SRS-22 scores at 5-year compared to 2-year follow-up. Understanding the longer term postoperative evolution in patient-reported outcomes may help surgeons to effectively manage and counsel patients who are dissatisfied in the short term.Level of Evidence: 3.

Patient-reported Outcomes Following Surgical Intervention for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of patient-reported outcome measures after spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Radiographic correction of scoliosis is extensively reported in the literature but there is a need to study the impact of spinal fusion on patient-reported outcome measures. Prior reviews lacked homogeneity in outcome measures, did not perform quantitative meta-analysis of pooled effect size, or interpret the results in light of minimally clinically important difference thresholds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of medical databases identified all studies that prospectively reported Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire data after spinal fusion for AIS. We screened 2314 studies for eligibility. Studies were included that reported preoperative and postoperative data at 24- or >60-month follow-up. Studies were excluded that failed to report means and SDs which were needed to calculate Cohen d effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals in estimating the magnitude and precision of the effect.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion in quantitative meta-analysis of effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Patients report large improvements in total score, self-image, and satisfaction; and moderate improvements in pain, function and mental health at 2 and 5 years after spinal fusion for AIS. All domains showed statistically significant improvement at all times except function at >60 months. All domains surpassed the minimally clinically important difference at all times except mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate evidence suggests that spinal fusion improves quality of life for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in medium and long-term follow-up. Our results may help inform patient expectations regarding surgery.

OCEMB LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I-systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Back Pain and Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at 5-Year Follow-up: Comparison with Healthy Controls and Patients with Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws is the gold-standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); however, it is unclear whether this procedure results in improved long-term back pain and health-related quality of life compared with patients not surgically treated for AIS. The aim of the present study was to evaluate back pain and quality of life in surgically managed patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years compared with patients with untreated AIS and a healthy control group.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive adolescent patients who underwent posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS by a single orthopaedic surgeon were prospectively enrolled. At a minimum of 5 years postoperatively, 49 patients completed Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-24 questionnaires, and data on reoperation were collected. Pain and quality-of-life parameters were compared with those of 49 age and sex-matched patients with untreated AIS and 49 healthy controls.

RESULTS

The major curve averaged 53° preoperatively and 12° at 2 years postoperatively. One reoperation (pedicle screw removal) was needed because of a new neurological deficit (transient). The SRS-24 pain, function, and total scores improved significantly from preoperatively to 5 years postoperatively (all p ≤ 0.016), with pain scores improving from 4.0 to 4.3 (p = 0.003). There was no association between pain scores and the preoperative major curve, instrumentation below L1, or postoperative rib hump. The surgical treatment group had significantly better pain, activity, and self-image domain scores at 5 years postoperatively compared with the untreated AIS group (all p ≤ 0.014), and similar pain, self-image, and activity domain scores compared with the healthy control group; however, function scores were significantly lower among patients in the surgical treatment group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws experienced improved back pain and health-related quality of life compared with patients with untreated AIS. Patients in the surgical treatment group had similar health-related quality of life to that of the healthy control group, except for function, which was significantly lower.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle - Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner

Background

The Cobb angle is proposed as the “disease process” outcome for scoliosis research because therapies aim to correct or stop curve progression. While the Scoliosis Research Society recommends the Cobb angle as the primary outcome, the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment prioritises, as a general goal, patient related outcomes over Cobb angle progression.

Objective

To determine the threshold of change in the Cobb angle in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who perceive improvement in a 6-months randomized controlled trial comparing a Schroth exercise intervention added to the standard of care to the standard of care alone.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of 50 patients with AIS, with curves ranging from 10° to 45°, with or without a brace. Participants with diagnoses other than AIS, surgical candidates or patients who had scoliosis surgery were excluded. The 6-month interventions consisted of Schroth exercises added to standard-of-care (observation or bracing) with daily home exercises and weekly therapy sessions (Schroth) or standard-of-care alone (Control).

The anchor method for estimating the minimal important difference (MID) in the largest Cobb angles (LC) was used. Patient-reported change in back status over the 6-month treatment period was measured using the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale as anchor varying from − 7 (“great deal worse”) to + 7 (“great deal better”). Participants were divided into two groups based on GRC scores: Improved (GRC ≥2) or Stable/Not Improved (GRC ≤1). MID was defined as the change in the LC that most accurately predicted the GRC classification as per the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

Results

The average age was 13.4 ± 1.6 years and the average LC was 28.5 ± 8.8 °s. The average GRC in the control group was − 0.1 ± 1.6, compared to + 4.4 ± 2.2 in the Schroth group. The correlation between LC and GRC was adequate (r = − 0.34, p < 0.05). The MID for the LC was 1.0 °. The area under the ROC was 0.69 (0.52–0.86), suggesting a 70% chance to properly classify a patient as perceiving No Improvement/Stable or Improvement based on the change in the LC.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing Schroth treatment perceived improved status of their backs even if the Cobb angle did not improve beyond the conventionally accepted threshold of 5°. Standard of care aims to slow/stop progression while Schroth exercises aim to improve postural balance, signs and symptoms of scoliosis. Given the very small MID, perceived improvement in back status is likely due to something other than the Cobb angle. This study warrants investigating alternatives to the Cobb angle that might be more relevant to patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01610908. Retrospectively registered on April 2, 2012 (first posted on June 4, 2012 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/keydates/NCT01610908)

The Influence of Race, Ethnicity and Genetic Variants on Postoperative Pain Intensity: An Integrative Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

Chronic postsurgical pain is pain that develops and persists for at least 3 months after a surgical procedure. The purpose of this review was to discover what evidence exists regarding the influence of race and ethnicity on postoperative pain intensity and what evidence exists regarding the influence of genetic polymorphisms on postoperative pain intensity.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, PsychInfo, SCOPUS, and PubMed/Medline databases were searched for entries within the last 10 years. Sources included primary research investigating the relationship among race, ethnicity, and genetics in postoperative pain outcomes.

REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS

Studies adhered to a strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to evaluate and assess manuscripts for inclusion.

RESULTS

Twelve manuscripts were included for final review. There are significantly higher preoperative and postoperative pain intensity scores reported between African American and Hispanic individuals compared with non-Hispanic whites. Although some studies identified that non-Hispanic whites consumed more opioids and reported increased pain, there were no significant differences in opioid requirements in Hispanic and non-Hispanic individuals. COMT and OPRM1 were the most identified genetic polymorphisms associated with postoperative pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature varies with respect to race, ethnicity, and postoperative pain perception. Perioperative pain intensity has been suggested as a significant predictor of chronic postsurgical pain. COMT and OPRM1 may be associated with higher pain perception after surgical procedures.

A cluster of high psychological and somatic symptoms in children with idiopathic scoliosis predicts persistent pain and analgesic use 1 year after spine fusion

BACKGROUND

Persistent postoperative pain is a significant problem for many children, particularly for those undergoing major surgery such as posterior spine fusion. More than two-thirds report persistent pain after spine fusion, yet factors that may contribute to poorer outcomes remain poorly understood.

AIMS

This prospective, longitudinal study examined how psychologic and somatic symptoms cluster together in children aged 10-17 years with idiopathic scoliosis, and tested the hypothesis that a higher psychological and somatic symptom cluster would predict worse pain outcomes 1 year after fusion.

METHODS

Otherwise healthy children with idiopathic scoliosis completed preoperative surveys measuring recent pain intensity, pain location(s), somatic symptom severity, painDETECT (neuropathic-type pain symptoms), pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Pain outcome data were collected during hospitalization, and at 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-five children completed baseline surveys and a cluster analysis differentiated 28 (30%) with a high symptom profile that included; higher depression, fatigue, pain interference, catastrophizing, and painDETECT scores. High symptom cluster membership independently predicted higher pain interference at 1 year (β 9.92 [95% CI 6.63, 13.2], P < 0.001). Furthermore, children in this high symptom cluster reported significantly higher pain intensity and painDETECT scores, and had a 50% higher probability of continued analgesic use at 1 year compared to those in the Low Symptom Cluster (95% CI 21.3-78.5, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this exploratory study suggest a need to comprehensively assess children with scoliosis for preoperative signs and symptoms that may indicate an underlying vulnerability for persistent pain. This, in turn may help guide a comprehensive perioperative treatment strategy to mitigate the potential for long-term pain trajectories.

Long-term outcome of posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form of idiopathic scoliosis, and surgery is considered as one of the therapeutic options. However, it is associated with a variety of irreversible complications, in spite of the benefits it provides. Here, we evaluated the long-term outcome of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) of AIS to shed more light on the consequences of this surgery.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, a total of 42 AIS patients who underwent PSF surgery were radiographically and clinically inspected for the potential post-operative complications. Radiographic assessments included the device failure, union status, and vertebral tilt below the site of fusion. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

The mean age of the surgery was 14.4 ± 5.1 years. The mean follow-up of the patients was 5.6 ± 3.2 years. Complete union was observed in all patients, and no device failure was noticed. Pre- and post-operative vertebral tilt below the site of fusion were 11.12° ± 7.92° and 6.21° ± 5.73°, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean post-operative ODI was 16.7 ± 9.8. The mean post-operative VAS was 2.1 ± 0.7. ODI value was positively correlated with follow-up periods (p = 0.04, r = 0.471). New degenerative disc disease (DDD) was observed in 6 out of 37 (16%) patients.

Conclusion

In spite of the efficacy and safety of PSF surgery of AIS, it might result in irreversible complications such as DDD. Moreover, the amount of post-operative disability might increase over the time and should be discussed with the patients.

Implant density is not related to patient-reported outcome in the surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

There is little information about the optimum number of implants to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of the curve or the rate of reoperation.

Patients and Methods

A total of 328 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, aged between ten and 20 years at the time of surgery, were identified in the Swedish spine register (Swespine) and had patient reported outcomes including the Scoliosis Research Society 22r instrument (SRS-22r) score, EuroQol 5 dimensions quality of life, 3 level (EQ-5D-3L) score and a Viual Analogue Score (VAS) for back pain, at a mean follow-up of 3.1 years and reoperation data at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. Implant data and the correction of the curve were assessed from radiographs, preoperatively and a mean of 1.9 years postoperatively. The patients were divided into tertiles based on implant density. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, logistic regression or log-rank test. Some analyses were adjusted for gender, age at the time of surgery, the flexibility of the major curve and follow-up.

Results

The mean number of implants per operated vertebra in the low, medium and high-density groups were 1.36 (1.00 to 1.54), 1.65 (1.55 to 1.75) and 1.91 (1.77 to 2.00), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the correction of the curve, the SRS-22r total score, EQ-5D-3L index or number of reoperations between the groups (all p > 0.34). In the SRS-22r domains, self-image was marginally higher in the medium implant density group (p = 0.029) and satisfaction marginally higher in the high implant density group (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that there is no clear advantage in using a high number of implants per operated vertebra in the surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1080–6.

Improvement in Scoliosis Research Society-22R Pain Scores After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether patients with painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis experience pain relief with surgical treatment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was previously thought to be a painless condition, but recent studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients have pain. Little information is available regarding pain relief with surgical treatment for AIS.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in a prospective database of surgically treated AIS were divided into two groups based on their preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22R pain domain score. Patients with a preoperative pain domain score of 4 or more (N = 1005) were classified as nonpainful. If the preoperative pain domain score was less than 4 (N = 505), they were classified as painful. Demographics, SRS total and domain scores, and changes with treatment were compared for the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar demographics and preoperative coronal curve magnitude. Patients with painful scoliosis experienced significant improvement in SRS-22R pain scores, from 3.29 preoperatively to 4.03 postoperatively (P < 0.000). Eighty-one percent of these patients reached the minimum clinically important difference threshold (0.20) for improvement in pain score. Painful scoliosis patients also had greater 2-year improvement in total and all domain scores than the nonpainful scoliosis patients (P < 0.000). Absolute values of SRS-22R total and domain scores were all greater at 2 years in the nonpainful group than the painful group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AIS with substantial back pain can be cautiously counseled to expect significant improvement in pain level with surgical correction of their deformity, even if curve progression is the primary indication for surgery. Although these patients achieve greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with patients with mild or no pain, 2-year SRS-22R scores were still better in patients with mild or no pain preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Factors Leading to Persistent Postsurgical Pain in Adolescents Undergoing Spinal Fusion: An Integrative Literature Review

PROBLEM

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal deformity among children and adolescents and the most frequent reason for corrective spinal fusion (SF). Of the children and adolescents who undergo SF, a significant number will experience persistent postoperative pain (PPP). This integrative literature review was conducted to identify and synthesize perioperative factors that may contribute to risk of developing PPP.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles which addressed PPP within the last 10years and primary research on postoperative pain outcomes in adolescents after SF were selected for review.

SAMPLE

15 articles which met eligibility criteria were included.

RESULTS

Preoperative pain intensity was the most significant factor identified in the development of PPP and increased postoperative pain. Social function and psychological factors also have role in the development of PPP. There were no theoretical models or frameworks for evaluating PPP incidence in adolescent with AIS after SF.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative factors such as, preoperative pain, correction magnitude, pain coping, anxiety and social functioning are vital to understanding a child's risk of PPP following SF. There is a need for theoretically-based studies to assess PPP among children and adolescents with AIS after SF surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

The Biobehavioral Pain Network (BPN) model was proposed, to encompass biological, social and psychological domains which may be responsible for incidence of PPP in children undergoing SF. Such a model can be used to systematically develop and evaluate personalized postoperative pain management strategies for this patient population.

Predicting the pain continuum after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects half a million children annually in the United States, with dire socioeconomic consequences, including long-term disability into adulthood. The few studies of CPSP in children are limited by sample size, follow-up duration, non-homogeneity of surgical procedure and factors evaluated.

METHODS

In a prospective study of 144 adolescents undergoing a single major surgery (spine fusion), we evaluated demographic, perioperative, surgical and psychosocial factors as predictors of a continuum of postsurgical pain: immediate, pain maintenance at 2-3 months (chronic pain/CP) and persistence of pain a year (persistent pain/PP) after surgery.

RESULTS

We found an incidence of 37.8% and 41.8% for CP and PP. CP and acute pain were both significant predictors for developing PP (p-value <0.001 and 0.003). Preoperative pain and higher postoperative opioid requirement was significantly associated with CP (p = 0.015, p = 0.002), while Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index (p = 0.002) and surgical duration (p = 0.014) predicted PP. The final regression models had reasonable predictive accuracy (c-statistic of 0.73 and 0.83 for CP and PP, respectively). Anxiety scores and catastrophizing for child and parent were found to be significantly correlated (p = 0.005, p = 0.013 respectively). Pain trajectories revealed that 65% of patients who developed PP reported CP and high pain trends; however, 33% of those who developed PP could not be identified using solely pain criteria.

CONCLUSION

Persistent postsurgical pain in children is a significant problem. It can be predicted in part by combinations of psychological and clinical variables, which may provide evidence-based measures to prevent development of CPSP in the future.

SIGNIFICANCE

In a homogeneous cohort of adolescents undergoing spine fusion, we report a high incidence of persistent postsurgical pain (41.8%) predicted by child anxiety, perioperative pain, and surgical duration. Our results stress timely preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Développement et validation de la version canadienne-française de l’échelle de Satisfaction des Adolescents de la gestion de la Douleur postopératoire – Scoliose idiopathique (SAD-S)

Background: Spinal fusion for scoliosis generates moderate to severe pain intensity. There are currently no instruments available to measure adolescents’ satisfaction regarding post-spinal fusion pain management.

Aims: To develop and validate a scale on satisfaction of adolescents regarding pain management following spinal fusion for scoliosis.

Methods: A methodological design was used to develop and validate the French-Canadian scale “Satisfaction des Adolescents de la gestion de la Douleur postopératoire – Scoliose idiopathique (SAD-S)”. A modified Delphi method, with seven healthcare professionals and 10 adolescents, was used to establish content validity of the SAD-S. A pre-test of the scale was conducted with 10 adolescents post-spinal fusion. The final version of the scale was validated through a pilot study with 98 adolescents following their surgery.

Results: The SAD-S scale includes a total of 13 items. Principal component analysis yielded a two-factor structure (2 subscales): 1) Pain management education and 2) Education regarding medication. These two factors explained 47,8% of the total variance for satisfaction. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0,84 was obtained for internal consistency.

Conclusion: Validation of the SAD-S scale showed that it has good psychometric properties with this population. Further validation is required with a larger sample to pursue its validation.

Long-Term Effects of Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Review of the Literature

Currently, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is principally regarded as benign, but some researchers have cited serious or extreme effects, including severe pain, cardiopulmonary compromise, social isolation, and even early death. Therefore, exploration of the long-term effects of AIS, the most common type of idiopathic scoliosis, is warranted. The purpose of this review was to examine the long-term studies on the natural history of AIS and/or reviews concerning the long-term effects of untreated AIS. A PubMed search was conducted using the key words idiopathic scoliosis, long-term effects and idiopathic scoliosis, natural history. For further analysis, references cited in those studies were reviewed for additional, related evidence not retrieved in the initial PubMed search. A review of the pertinent bibliography showed that older natural history studies did not distinguish between late-onset scoliosis (referred to in this paper as AIS) and early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The more recent studies offer such important distinction and reach to the general conclusion that untreated AIS does not lead to severe consequences with respect to signs and symptoms of scoliosis. It is possible that earlier studies may have included patient populations with EOS, leading to the perception of untreated scoliosis as having an unusually high morbidity rate. Studies on the long-term effects of AIS that specifically excluded EOS patients conclude that AIS is a benign disorder. This indicates that for research and reporting purposes, it is important to distinguishing between AIS and EOS. This will allow the practitioner and patient and their families to decide on an optimal treatment plan based on the most appropriate prognosis.

Scoliosis bracing and exercise for pain management in adults-a case report

[Purpose] For adult patients with late-onset idiopathic scoliosis, cosmetic concerns and pain are the main reasons for seeking treatment at a physician’s office. The purpose of this paper was to describe the mid-term effect of physical rehabilitation and part-time bracing on an adult scoliosis patient who had been suffering from chronic low back pain for fourteen years. [Subject and Methods] Case description: A 37-year-old female patient with late-onset idiopathic scoliosis presented in the office of the first author in January 2014. She reported having chronic pain (low back pain) since the age of 23 and reported daily pain at a level of 5–7 on average on a Visual Analogue Scale of 0 to 10. She received a short scoliosis-specific Schroth exercise program and was also fitted with a Gensingen brace for part-time wear. [Results] At a 16 month follow-up, the patient no longer suffered from daily low back pain (with heavy lifting only) and was fully active. Additionally, her lumbar Cobb angle and angle of trunk rotation improved. [Conclusion] Patients with late-onset idiopathic scoliosis and pain may benefit from a pattern-specific conservative treatment approach. In this population, surgical intervention should be regarded as the last resort, since there are many long-term unknowns with surgery.

Removal of Infected Posterior Spinal Implants: Be Prepared to Transfuse

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective review of spinal deformity patients undergoing removal of infected posterior spinal fusion implants over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the intraoperative blood loss and perioperative complications of implant removal in posterior spinal fusions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To our knowledge, no studies examine blood loss or complications associated with removal of infected spinal implants in spinal deformity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 28 consecutive cases of infected posterior spinal fusion implant removal from 2003 to 2012 was performed. Exclusion criteria were patients with ≤6 levels of instrumentation, a partial removal of implants or a bleeding disorder.

RESULTS

The average estimated blood loss was 465 mL (range 100-1,505 mL). Average estimated blood volume was 3,814 mL (range 1,840-9,264 mL). The average percentage of estimated blood loss was 14.2% (range 1.9%-43.5%). On postoperative labs obtained at the conclusion of the procedure, there was an average loss in hematocrit of 6.6 from preoperative values. Seventy-one percent of patients (20/28) received a blood transfusion; 39% (11/28) of these received a transfusion intraoperatively and 54% (15/28) received a transfusion postoperatively. Forty-six percent of patients (13/28) experienced an associated medical complication in the postoperative period. Among these 13, there were 16 total complications, with the most common being seizures (4/16), pneumonia (2/16), and sepsis (2/16). Average hospital stay was 14 days (range 4-52).

CONCLUSION

Seventy-one percent of patients undergoing removal of infected spinal implants received a blood transfusion. We recommend having blood products available when removing posterior spinal instrumentation >6 levels. Patients and families should be counseled on the high risk of complications and expected hospital stay in these cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effect of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on the quality of life: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the quality of life (QoL), functionality, and body image of subjects who had undergone surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) 5-12 years previously, and to identify the outcome predictors.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 87 patients for whom follow-up data were available out of a series of 91 patients who had surgery for AIS between 2002 and 2009. We assessed the preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 5-year or more postoperative SF-36 and SRS-23 questionnaire scores. Longitudinal clinical and radiographic data also were evaluated. Changes in the patient-oriented outcomes were compared with age and sex-adjusted normative values. A multiple regression analysis was used to identify possible outcome predictors.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patients had impaired QoL, functionality, and body image compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Surgery led to significant improvement of the SF-36 and SRS scores at the one-year and final control date, but the final scores on SF-36's physical indexes were lower than control subjects' scores. No clinically relevant differences with the normative values were detected in the final SRS scores. The height of the residual rib hump negatively predicted the total SRS and self-image scores; a more caudal level of fusion correlated with more postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent surgery for AIS a minimum of 5 years earlier had impaired self-reported physical QoL compared to control subjects, but they nevertheless performed better than before their surgery. Greater size of the residual hump and greater distal extension of the fusion area are negatively correlated with final self reported outcome.

Anterior or posterior surgery for right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective cohorts' comparison using radiologic and functional outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Prospectively compare patient-reported as well as clinical and radiologic outcomes after anterior or posterior surgery for right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in a single center by the same surgeons.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Anterior and posterior spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis are both well-established treatments of thoracic AIS. The majority of studies comparing the 2 approaches have focused on radiographic outcomes. There remains a paucity of prospectively gathered patient-reported outcomes comparing surgical approaches.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with right thoracic AIS were treated in a single center by one of 2 surgeons with either anterior (n=18) or posterior (n=24) approaches and followed up for over 2 years. Radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes of the Modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument were gathered and analyzed by an independent surgeon.

RESULTS

Patients reported significant improvements in all areas of the Modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument, especially pain and self-image domains. There were no significant differences in the degree of improvement in any domains between the groups. Posterior and anterior surgery corrected rib hump by 53% and 61%, respectively (P=0.4). The Main thoracic curve Cobb angle was corrected from 69 to 26 degrees (62%) by posterior surgery and 61 to 23 degrees (64%) by anterior surgery (P=0.6). Posterior surgery significantly reduced kyphosis and lumbosacral lordosis. Anterior surgery had no overall affect of sagittal alignment but seemed able to correct those hypokyphotic preoperatively. Complications differed and were largely approach-related--intrathoracic in anterior and wound-related in posterior surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with right thoracic AIS of differing curve types but otherwise similar preoperatively demonstrated that anterior and posterior surgery are largely equivalent. Patient-reported outcomes are improved similarly by either approach. Both offer excellent radiographic and trunk deformity correction. Differences in the effect of sagittal alignment, operative time, and complications should be considered when selecting approach.

The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis-an assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: "SOSORT 2015 Award Winner"

Background

In North America, care recommendations for adolescents with small idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves include observation or bracing. Schroth scoliosis-specific exercises have demonstrated promising results on various outcomes in uncontrolled studies. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the effect of Schroth exercises combined with the standard of care on quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and back muscle endurance (BME) compared to standard of care alone in patients with AIS.

Material and Methods

Fifty patients with AIS, aged 10–18 years, with curves 10–45 °, recruited from a scoliosis clinic were randomized to receive standard of care or supervised Schroth exercises plus standard of care for 6 months. Schroth exercises were taught over five sessions in the first two weeks. A daily home program was adjusted during weekly supervised sessions. The assessor and the statistician were blinded. Outcomes included the Biering-Sorensen (BME) test, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) and Spinal Appearance Questionnaires (SAQ) scores. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) linear mixed effects models were analyzed. Because ITT and PP analyses produced similar results, only ITT is reported.

Results

After 3 months, BME in the Schroth group improved by 32.3 s, and in the control by 4.8 s. This 27.5 s difference in change between groups was statically significant (95 % CI 1.1 to 53.8 s, p = 0.04). From 3 to 6 months, the self-image improved in the Schroth group by 0.13 and deteriorated in the control by 0.17 (0.3, 95 % CI 0.01 to 0.59, p = 0.049). A difference between groups for the change in the SRS-22r pain score transformed to its power of four was observed from 3 to 6 months (85.3, 95 % CI 8.1 to 162.5, p = 0.03), where (SRS-22 pain score)⁴ increased by 65.3 in the Schroth and decreased by 20.0 in the control group. Covariates: age, self-efficacy, brace-wear, Schroth classification, and height had significant main effects on some outcomes. Baseline ceiling effects were high: SRS-22r (pain = 18.4 %, function = 28.6 %), and SAQ (prominence = 26.5 %, waist = 29.2 %, chest = 46.9 %, trunk shift = 12.2 % and shoulders = 18.4 %).

Conclusions

Supervised Schroth exercises provided added benefit to the standard of care by improving SRS-22r pain, self-image scores and BME. Given the high prevalence of ceiling effects on SRS-22r and SAQ questionnaires’ domains, we hypothesize that in the AIS population receiving conservative treatments, different QOL questionnaires with adequate responsiveness are needed.

Trial registration

Schroth Exercise Trial for Scoliosis NCT01610908.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13013-015-0048-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictors of postoperative pain trajectories in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the typical trajectory of pain during the first 6 months after spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and the extent to which certain demographic, medical, and psychological variables modify this trajectory.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pain after spinal fusion surgery for AIS may not improve predictably with elapsed healing time, and limited data exist on predictors of the course of pain during the initial months after surgery.

METHODS

Fifty patients ages 11 to 17 (mean = 14.5, standard deviation = 1.9) with AIS and undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery comprised the study sample. Pain outcomes were assessed at 4 time points after surgery (2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month postsurgery). Preoperative predictor variables comprising demographics, baseline Cobb angle, body mass index, baseline pain, and psychological variables (anxiety, negative mood, and confidence in ability to control pain) were assessed 2 weeks before surgery. Perioperative predictor variables comprising pain, pain coping efficacy, negative mood, surgery length, length and lowest level of fusion, and analgesic use were assessed by self-report or record review. Multilevel growth models were used to evaluate hypotheses pertaining to predictors of pain trajectories.

RESULTS

Pain level on average declined predictably with days since surgery (b = -0.14 to -0.19, P < 0.01). For 22% of adolescents, pain was at or above baseline levels through 6 months after surgery. Greater baseline pain and anxiety predicted slower improvement in pain, whereas greater confidence in ability to control pain predicted more rapid declines in pain. None of the demographic or medical variables reliably modified postsurgical pain trajectories.

CONCLUSION

Although pain typically declines predictably with healing time from spinal fusion surgery for AIS, higher preoperative levels of pain and anxiety may be risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain whereas greater pain coping efficacy may help optimize postsurgical pain outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Pain prevalence and trajectories following pediatric spinal fusion surgery

Factors contributing to pain following surgery are poorly understood, with previous research largely focused on adults. With approximately 6 million children undergoing surgery each year, there is a need to study pediatric persistent postsurgical pain. The present study includes patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion surgery enrolled in a prospective, multicentered registry examining postsurgical outcomes. The Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire-Version 30, which includes pain, activity, mental health, and self-image subscales, was administered to 190 patients prior to surgery and at 1 and 2 years postsurgery. A subset (n = 77) completed 5-year postsurgery data. Pain prevalence at each time point and longitudinal trajectories of pain outcomes derived from SAS PROC TRAJ were examined using analyses of variance and post hoc pairwise analyses across groups. Thirty-five percent of patients reported pain in the moderate to severe range presurgery. One year postoperation, 11% reported pain in this range, whereas 15% reported pain at 2 years postsurgery. At 5 years postsurgery, 15% of patients reported pain in the moderate to severe range. Among the 5 empirically derived pain trajectories, there were significant differences on self-image, mental health, and age. Identifying predictors of poor long-term outcomes in children with postsurgical pain may prevent the development of chronic pain into adulthood.

PERSPECTIVE

This investigation explores the prevalence of pediatric pain following surgery, up to 5 years after spinal fusion surgery. Five pain trajectories were identified and were distinguishable on presurgical characteristics of age, mental health, and self-image. This is the largest study to examine longitudinal pediatric pain trajectories after surgery.

Prevalence of postoperative pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the association with preoperative pain

STUDY DESIGN

Review of a prospective database registry of surgical patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of postoperative pain and its impact on patient-reported postoperative outcomes using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 outcomes questionnaire.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although reportedly rare, postoperative pain can be a devastating situation for the patient with AIS. Most recent studies examining outcomes in AIS surgical treatment use the SRS Pain domain score to assess pain in this population.

METHODS

A prospectively enrolled multicenter database was queried. Patients with minimum 2-year follow-up and 2-year SRS scores were included. Postoperative pain after the acute phase of recovery when reported by the patient to the treating surgeon/clinical team in follow-up is recorded as a complication in the database. Patients included in this series were grouped as either reporting pain or not to the surgeon/clinical team postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative SRS scores were then compared between these 2 groups using analysis of variance (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-four patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Sixty-one (11%) reported pain at sometime between 2 weeks and 2 years postoperatively. Thirteen were within the 6-month postoperative period. Of the remaining 48 reporting pain between 6 and 24 months postoperatively, 41 (7% of the total cohort) had no obvious cause for their pain. More than half of these patients (26/41) were referred for further treatment (physical therapy, referral to pain specialist, further imaging). These 41 patients had significantly decreased 2-year SRS scores in the domains of Pain, Self-image, Mental health, and Total score (P < 0.05). The patients with postoperative pain were found to have significantly lower preoperative Pain domain scores (P < 0.001), indicative of greater pain preoperatively, yet there were no other domains effected preoperatively. For this group the pre- to postoperative SRS pain scores did not show significant change (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Unexplained pain after the 6-month postoperative period occurred in 7% of the cohort. The results indicate that patients reporting pain to their surgeons/clinical team postoperatively have lower pain scores on a subjective outcome instrument thus further validating the SRS-22 outcome tool. This reported pain seems to be associated with decreases in other SRS-22 domains. Interestingly, these patients also have lower preoperative pain scores than those without postoperative pain. Study into causes of pain in AIS and whether preoperative education and expectations targeted at this population would positively impact outcomes is warranted, especially because on average patients after AIS surgery have less pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

What is the effect of surgery on the quality of life of the adolescent with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A review and statistical analysis of the literature

STUDY DESIGN

Review and statistical analysis of studies evaluating the effect of surgery on the health-related quality of life of adolescents with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, using Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Apply published minimum clinical important differences (MCID) values for the SRS22r questionnaire to the literature to identify what areas of health-related quality of life are consistently affected by surgery and whether changes are clinically meaningful.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The interpretation of published studies using the SRS outcomes has been limited by the lack of MCID values for the questionnaire domains. The recent publication of these data allows the clinical importance of any changes in these studies to be examined for the first time.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken to locate suitable studies that were then analyzed. Statistically significant differences from baseline to 2 years postoperatively were ascertained by narratively reporting the analyses within included studies. When possible, clinically significant changes were assessed using 95% confidence intervals for the change in mean domain score. If the lower bound of the confidence intervals for the change exceeded the MCID for that domain, the change was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

The numbers of cohorts available for the different analyses varied (5-16). Eighty-one percent and 94% of included cohorts experienced statistically significant improvements in pain and self-image domains. In terms of clinical significance, it was only self-image that regularly improved by more than MCID, doing so in 4 of 5 included cohorts (80%) compared with 1 of 12 cohorts (8%) for pain. No clinically relevant changes occurred in mental health or activity domains.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that surgery can lead to clinically important improvement in patient self-image. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the limited evidence for improvements in domains other than self-image after surgery. Surgical decision-making will also be influenced by the natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Comparison of untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with normal controls: a review and statistical analysis of the literature

STUDY DESIGN

Review and statistical analysis of studies evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To apply normative values and minimum clinical important differences for the SRS-22r to the literature. Identify whether the HRQOL of adolescents with untreated AIS differs from unaffected peers and whether any differences are clinically relevant.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The effect of untreated AIS on adolescent HRQOL is uncertain. The lack of published normative values and minimum clinical important difference for the SRS-22r has so far hindered our interpretation of previous studies. The publication of this background data allows these studies to be re-examined.

METHODS

Using suitable inclusion criteria, a literature search identified studies examining HRQOL in untreated adolescents with AIS. Each cohort was analyzed individually. Statistically significant differences were identified by using 95% confidence intervals for the difference in SRS-22r domain mean scores between the cohorts with AIS and the published data for unaffected adolescents. If the lower bound of the confidence interval was greater than the minimum clinical important difference, the difference was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 21 included patient cohorts, 81% reported statistically worse pain than those unaffected. Yet in only 5% of cohorts was this difference clinically important. Of the 11 cohorts included examining patient self-image, 91% reported statistically worse scores than those unaffected. In 73% of cohorts this difference was clinically significant. Affected cohorts tended to score well in function/activity and mental health domains and differences from those unaffected rarely reached clinically significant values.

CONCLUSION

Pain and self-image tend to be statistically lower among cohorts with AIS than those unaffected. The literature to date suggests that it is only self-image which consistently differs clinically. This should be considered when assessing the possible benefits of surgery.

Instrumentation constructs in pediatric patients undergoing deformity correction correlated with Scoliosis Research Society scores

STUDY DESIGN

Data collected prospectively from the Prospective Pediatric Scoliosis Study (PPSS) were analyzed statistically to address the hypothesis that covered specific aspects of treatment and its outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and contrast Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome scores for patients assigned to one of three types of spinal instrumentation constructs. The study hypothesis was that the instrumentation strategy that provides the best curve correction will be associated with the best SRS scores.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical treatment of scoliosis has evolved over time using implants and surgical techniques; however, quality of life indicators have not typically been analyzed to assess whether surgery and instrumentation will improve quality of life in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Patients were assigned to one of three instrumentation groups depending on the type of construct used. The Scoliosis Research Society's SRS-30 survey was used to measure patient outcomes comparing preoperative results to a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Changes in the SRS Pain, Activity, Appearance, Mental, Satisfaction, and SRS Total domains did not differ significantly among instrumentation groups for any time intervals. However, analysis of SRS Pain did show a significant change over time for all instrumentation patterns. The analysis of SRS Activity showed a significant change over time for all instrumentation patterns preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. Analysis of SRS Appearance showed a significant change over time for all groups but no difference between instrumentation groups. The analysis of SRS Mental based on instrumentation types showed a significant change over time, but only the pedicle screw group's change was statistically significant. Finally, analysis of SRS Satisfaction by instrumentation type showed a statistically significant change over time for all instrumentation patterns.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant baseline differences among the three instrumentation construct groups based on mean scores for the six SRS domains. None of the SRS domains had differences among the instrumentation constructs in change scores or significant differences among the instrumentation constructs.

Prevalence and predictors of pain in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, consecutive clinical series.

OBJECTIVE

To report on back pain and its association with patients' perceptions of appearance in a prospective cohort study of children before and after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Back pain in idiopathic scoliosis has been noted to be reduced after surgery. However, uncertainty over its prevalence before and after operation persists. There is a paucity of data on correlations between patients' perceptions of their appearance and preoperative and postoperative pain.

METHODS

We reviewed 1433 patients entered consecutively into the Prospective Pediatric Scoliosis Study, a database of children (8-22 years) undergoing operation for idiopathic scoliosis who have been followed for 1 and 2 years (n = 295) with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire instruments.

RESULTS

Preoperative pain was reported by 77.9% of patients and 44% of surgeons. More preoperative pain correlated with older age (ρ = -.140, P = 0.000), greater body mass index (ρ = -0.168, P = 0.000), larger proximal thoracic curve ρ = -0.086, P = 0.019), and a higher score on the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire Appearance (greater perception of spinal deformity, ρ = -0.223, P = 0.000) and Appearance Desire scales (stronger desire to change the appearance of their spine, ρ = -0.153, P = 0.000).Pain was reduced at 1 and 2 years after operation (P = 0.0002). Patients who perceived themselves as less deformed (ρ = -0.284, P < 0.01) or had less desire to change their spinal appearance (ρ = -0.183, P < 0.01) experienced a greater reduction in pain 2 years after operation.Preoperative analgesic use for back pain was high (28.8%) and remained high at 2 years after operation (29.5%) (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Back pain affects three-quarters of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and is reduced after posterior fusion. Patients who are overweight, older, and have larger proximal thoracic curve magnitudes report more preoperative pain. Patients who view themselves as more deformed tend to have more absolute pain, and less reduction in pain after operation.

Blood conservation and pain control in scoliosis corrective surgery: an online survey of UK practice

BACKGROUND

Discussion at local meetings led to the realization of the diversity in anaesthetic practice for pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery. This diversity was assessed using an online survey, the aim being to provoke discussion and highlight areas of future research.

METHODS

Of the 24 centers practicing pediatric and adolescent scoliosis surgery, 21 completed questionnaires, a response rate of 88%.

RESULTS

Blood conservation; the area of greatest clinical variability was seen in dosing regimes for Tranexamic acid. Thromboprophylaxis; both mechanical and pharmacological regimes showed wide range in both application and timing. Pain control; eight different types of postoperative pain relief were utilized across the centres, some in isolation but many in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our survey show wide variation nationally and hopefully will provoke discussion and ultimately national multi-centred research to define best practice.

Subjective evaluation of treatment outcomes of instrumentation with pedicle screws or hybrid constructs in Lenke Type 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what happens when judges are blinded to the instrumentation?

Superiority of pedicle screws over hybrid/hook instrumentation or vice versa in the treatment of Lenke Type 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unresolved for moderate curves. Our objective was therefore to compare the assessment of pedicle screw and hybrid/hooks instrumentation with special attention to cosmesis and uninstrumented spine using novel assessment methods. We carried out a retrospective study of radiographs and clinical photos of 40 cases of thoracic AIS between 40 degrees and 70 degrees of Cobb angle Lenke Type 1 and 2, treated with either pedicle screws or hybrid/hooks. The cases were subjectively assessed by four spine surgeons (SRS Travelling Fellows) for radiographic and operative cosmetic result, shoulder balance, trunk shift, rib hump, and waist asymmetry. Instrumentation in the radiographs was obscured with only the non-instrumented part visible, and the surgeons were asked to guess the instrumentation being used. Eighty photographs of patients before and after surgery were assessed for cosmesis by ten non-medical judges for overall cosmetic score, shoulder balance, waist asymmetry, and shoulder blade prominence. Objective assessment of radiographs and clinical photos was performed for Cobb angle of instrumented and non-instrumented spine, global coronal and sagittal balance, number of unfused vertebrae, disc angulation, tilt of last instrumented vertebra, shoulder balance, waist asymmetry, rib prominence, and percent correction. SRS-24 questionnaire was used to measure health-related quality of life in patients. Subjective assessments by surgeons and non-medical judges showed no significant difference by instrumentation (P > or = 0.05) for all variables. Out of the 160 guesses by surgeons of the cases with instrumentation blocked in the radiographs, they were unable to guess the instrumentation in 92% of the cases. Objective assessment of all variables and SRS-24 scores of all five domains showed no significant difference by instrumentation (P > or = 0.05). In this first-ever conducted study in a blinded-fashion, we conclude that there is no significant difference between the pedicle screw and hybrid/hooks instrumentations used to treat AIS for Lenke Type 1 and 2 curves for moderate curves between 40 degrees and 70 degrees .

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - to operate or not? A debate article

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) represents a rare condition with a potentially detrimental impact on young patients. Despite vast clinical research and published treatment guidelines and algorithms, the optimal therapeutic choice for these patients remains highly controversial. While advocates of early surgery emphasize the benefits of surgical deformity correction with regard to physical and psychological outcome, the opponents base their arguments on the high risk of complications and a lack of documented subjective long-term outcome. In the present paper, the authors were invited to debate the opposite positions of "pro" versus "contra" surgical treatment of AIS, based on the currently available evidence and published guidelines.