Impact of subsidence on clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review

The Effect of Intraoperative Overdistraction on Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of overdistraction on interbody cage subsidence.

BACKGROUND

Vertebral overdistraction due to the use of large intervertebral cage sizes may increase the risk of postoperative subsidence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion between 2016 and 2021 were included. All measurements were performed using lateral cervical radiographs at 3 time points - preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up >6 months postoperatively. Anterior and posterior distraction were calculated by subtracting the preoperative disc height from the immediate postoperative disc height. Cage subsidence was calculated by subtracting the final follow-up postoperative disc height from the immediate postoperative disc height. Associations between anterior and posterior subsidence and distraction were determined using multivariable linear regression models. The analyses controlled for cage type, cervical level, sex, age, smoking status, and osteopenia.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients and 125 fused levels were included in the study. Of the 68 fusions, 22 were single-level fusions, 35 were 2-level, and 11 were 3-level. The median final follow-up interval was 368 days (range: 181-1257 d). Anterior disc space subsidence was positively associated with anterior distraction (beta = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.38; P = 0.004), and posterior disc space subsidence was positively associated with posterior distraction (beta = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.45; P < 0.001). No significant associations between anterior distraction and posterior subsidence (beta = 0.07; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.20; P = 0.270) or posterior distraction and anterior subsidence (beta = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.27; P = 0.541) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that overdistraction of the disc space was associated with increased postoperative subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Surgeons should consider choosing a smaller cage size to avoid overdistraction and minimize postoperative subsidence.

A novel MRI-based Cervical-Endplate Bone Quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative cage subsidence after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) often has adverse clinical consequences and is closely related to Bone Mineral Density (BMD). Previous studies have shown that cage subsidence can be better predicted by measuring site-specific bone density. MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) scoring effectively predicts cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion. However, there is still a lack of studies on the practical application of EBQ scoring in the cervical spine.

PURPOSE

To create a similar MRI-based scoring system for Cervical-EBQ (C-EBQ) and to assess the correlation of the C-EBQ with endplate Computed Tomography (CT)-Hounsfield Units (HU) and the ability of this scoring system to independently predict cage subsidence after ACDF, comparing the predictive ability of the C-EBQ with the Cervical-Vertebral Bone Quality (C-VBQ) score.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis at our institution from 2012 to 2022 were included. Demographics, procedure-related data, and radiological data were collected, and Pearson correlation test was used to determine the correlation between C-EBQ and endplate HU values. Cage subsidence was defined as fusion segment height loss of ≥ 3 mm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area-under-the-curve values were used to assess the predictive ability of C-EBQ and C-VBQ. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify potential risk factors associated with subsidence.

RESULTS

Cage subsidence was present in 65 (40.4%) of 161 patients. The mean C-EBQ score was 1.81 ± 0.35 in the group without subsidence and 2.59 ± 0.58 in the group with subsidence (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher C-EBQ score was significantly associated with subsidence (OR = 5.700; 95%CI = 3.435-8.193; P < 0.001), was the only independent predictor of cage subsidence after ACDF, had a predictive accuracy of 93.7%, which was superior to the C-VBQ score (89.2%), and was significantly negatively correlated with the endplate HU value (r = -0.58, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher C-EBQ scores were significantly associated with postoperative cage subsidence after ACDF. There was a significant negative correlation between C-EBQ and endplate HU values. The C-EBQ score may be a promising tool for assessing preoperative bone quality and postoperative cage subsidence and is superior to the C-VBQ.

Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the easily measurable radiographic landmarks of screw-to-vertebral body ratio and changes in screw angle to identify if they are associated with early subsidence following an Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing 1-3 level ACDF with allograft or PEEK cages. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure intradiscal height (or distance between 2 vertebral bodies) as an anterior vertebral distance (AVD), middle (MVD), and posterior (PVD), screw angle, screw-to-vertebral body length ratio, and interscrew distance. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

92 patients were included (42 single-level, 32 two-level, and 18 3-level ACDFs). In single-level ACDFs, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with a decrease in AVD (=.001) and MVD (P = .03). A decrease in the PVD was associated with a decrease in segmental lordosis (P < .001). For two-level ACDFs, a higher caudal screw-to-body ratio was associated with a lower MVD (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Six months following an ACDF for degenerative pathology, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with an increase in radiographic subsidence at the antero-medial aspect of the disc space albeit largely subclinical. This suggests that the caudal screw angle change may serve as a reliable radiographic marker for early radiographic subsidence. Furthermore, a greater screw-to-vertebral body ratio may be protective against radiographic subsidence in two-level ACDF procedures.

Assessing Surgical Outcomes for Cage Plate System versus Stand-Alone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical procedure for addressing cervical spine conditions. It involves the utilization of either cage plate system (CPS) or stand-alone cage (SC). The objective of our study is to compare perioperative complications, patient-reported clinical outcomes measures, and radiographic outcomes of SC versus CPS in ACDF.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of science, Medline, and Google Scholar. All studies comparing the outcomes between CPS versus SC in ACDF were included.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies, 33 observational and 8 randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. We found that both devices demonstrated comparable effectiveness in monosegmental ACDF with respect to Japanese Orthopedic Association Score, Neck Disability Index score, visual analog score, and fusion rates. CPS demonstrated superior performance in maintaining disc height, cervical lordosis, and exhibited lower incidence rates of cage subsidence. SC showed significant advantages over CPS in terms of shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter duration of hospitalization, as well as lower incidence rates of early postoperative dysphagia and adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the included studies had monosegmented fusion, and there wasn't enough data to set recommendations for the multisegmented fusions. Larger studies with longer follow-up are necessary to draw more definitive conclusions to provide evidence for clinicians to make clinical decisions.

MRI Vertebral Bone Quality Correlates With Interbody Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate VBQ as a predictor of interbody subsidence and to determine threshold values that portend increased risk of subsidence.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many risk factors have been reported for the subsidence of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). MRI Vertebral Bone Quality (VQB) is a relatively new radiographic parameter that can be easily obtained from preoperative MRI and has been shown to correlate with measurements of bone density such as DXA and CT Hounsfield Units.

METHODS

All patients who underwent 1- to 3-level ACDF using titanium interbodies with anterior plating between the years 2018 and 2020 at our tertiary referral center were included. Subsidence measurements were performed by 2 independent reviewers on CT scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. VBQ was measured on pre-operative sagittal T1 MRI by 2 independent reviewers, and values were averaged.

RESULTS

Eight-five fusion levels in 44 patients were included in the study. There were 32 levels (38%) with moderate subsidence and 12 levels with severe subsidence (14%). The average VBQ score in those patients with severe subsidence was significantly higher than those without subsidence (3.80 vs. 2.40, P<0.01). A threshold value of 3.2 was determined to be optimal for predicting subsidence (AUC=0.99) and had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94.1% in predicting subsidence.

CONCLUSIONS

VBQ strongly correlates with the subsidence of interbody grafts after ACDF. A threshold VBQ score value of 3.2 has excellent sensitivity and specificity for predicting subsidence. Spine surgeons can use VBQ as a readily available screening tool to identify patients at higher risk for subsidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-IV.

Impact of Implant Size and Position on Subsidence Degree after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Radiological and Clinical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Implant subsidence is recognized as a complication of interbody stabilization, although its relevance remains ambiguous, particularly in terms of relating the effect of the position and depth of subsidence on the clinical outcome of the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate how implant positioning and size influence the incidence and degree of subsidence and to examine their implications for clinical outcomes.

METHODS

An observational study of 94 patients (157 levels) who underwent ACDF was conducted. Radiological parameters (implant position, implant height, vertebral body height, segmental height and intervertebral height) were assessed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Subsidence was evaluated in groups according to its degree, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that implant-to-endplate ratio and implant height were significant risk factors associated with the incidence and degree of subsidence. The incidence of subsidence varied as follows: 34 cases (41.5%) exhibited displacement of the implant into the adjacent endplate by 2-3 mm, 32 cases (39%) by 3-4 mm, 16 cases (19.5%) by ≥4 mm and 75 (47.8%) cases exhibited no subsidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore that oversized or undersized implants relative to the disc space or endplate length elevate the risk and severity of subsidence.

The Role of Bone Mineral Density in a Successful Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of osteoporosis is a prime concern, especially in parts of the world where the population is aging, such as Europe or the US. Many new therapy strategies have been described to enhance bone healing. Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a surgical procedure that aims to stabilize the lumbar spine by fusing two or more vertebrae using an interbody cage. LIF is a standard treatment for various spinal conditions, such as degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. However, successful fusion is challenging for patients with osteoporosis due to their reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of cage subsidence, which can lead to implant failure and poor clinical outcomes.

METHODS

 A comprehensive literature search yielded 220 articles, with 16 ultimately included. Keywords included BMD, cage subsidence, osteoporosis, teriparatide, and lumbar interbody fusion.

RESULTS

 This review examines the relationship between BMD and LIF success, emphasizing the importance of adequate bone quality for successful fusion. Preoperative assessment methods for BMD and the impact of low BMD on fusion rates and patient outcomes are discussed. Additionally, techniques to improve fusion success in patients with weakened bone density, such as biological enhancement and BMD-matched interbody cages, are explored. However, consensus on the exact BMD threshold for a successful outcome remains elusive.

CONCLUSION

 While an apparent correlation between BMD and fusion rate in LIF procedures is acknowledged, conclusive evidence regarding the precise BMD threshold indicative of an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes remains elusive. Surgeons are advised to exercise caution in surgical planning and follow-up for patients with lower BMD. Furthermore, future research initiatives, particularly longitudinal studies, are encouraged to prioritize the examination of BMD as a fundamental risk factor, addressing gaps in the literature.

Cervical Sagittal Balance: Impact on Clinical Outcomes and Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Degenerative disease of the cervical spine leads to sagittal imbalance, which may affect treatment results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in selected cervical sagittal balance parameters and their effects on subsidence and clinical outcomes of the procedure. This study encompassed a total of 95 evaluated patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Selected cervical sagittal balance parameters were assessed using lateral projection X-rays: C2-C7 spinal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA), spinocranial angle (SCA), C7 slope, C2-C7 lordosis, and the segmental Cobb angle. Measurements were collected the day before, the day after, and 12 months after surgery. Changes in clinical parameters was assessed using the VAS and NDI scales. Subsidence was defined as a loss of intervertebral height of more than 30% of the baseline value. Among all the assessed parameters, only the C2-C7 SVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the groups with and without subsidence: 26.03 vs. 21.79 [mm], with p = 0.0182, preoperatively and 27.80 vs. 24.94 [mm], with p = 0.0449, on the day after surgery, respectively. We conclude that higher preoperative and postoperative C2-C7 SVA values might contribute to an elevated risk of implant subsidence. Furthermore, both the SCA and C7 slope could conceivably influence the clinical outcome, respectively impacting pain, as assessed by the VAS and the disability, as evaluated through the NDI scale.

Overloaded vertebral body: a unique radiographic phenomenon following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

PURPOSE

Because previous studies have not focused on postoperative cervical collapse, the purpose of the present study was to introduce the overloaded vertebral body (OVB) phenomenon following multilevel zero-profile anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as well as to investigate its effects on radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving patients who underwent ACDF. A total of 55 patients were included in the analysis, including 110 OVB and 110 non-OVB. The evaluated vertebral parameters included the vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), wedge angle (WA), vertebral height [anterior (AH) and posterior (PH)] and anterior-posterior vertebral diameter [upper (UD) and lower (LD)].

RESULTS

The CSA and WA were significantly lower in the OVB group than in the non-OVB group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery as well as at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). The AH of the OVB group was significantly lower at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery as well as at the final follow-up compared to 1 week after surgery (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

OVB, a new phenomenon following multilevel ACDF, is defined as the cervical vertebral body located in the middle of the surgical segments in multilevel anterior cervical spine surgery. Statistical analysis of vertebral parameters, including CSA, WA, AH, PH, UD, and LD, showed that OVB occurs mainly at the anterior edge of the vertebra and that its largest radiographic manifestation is the loss of height at the anterior edge of the vertebra in the early postoperative period.

Effects of Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Inter body spacers have been widely used in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery; however, it is not clear whether one implant shows superior clinical outcomes compared with the other. This systematic review and meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the radiologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Extensive literature searches were conducted on online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Library, until January 2023. The present study adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool were used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, encompassing 8020 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The results indicate that structural allografts show a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.37; P ＝0.03; I2 = 71%). In addition, the structural allograft group also had a lower pseudarthrosis rate (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80; P = 0.009; I2 = 75%) and reoperation rate (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; P = 0.007; I2 = 38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis show that structural allograft has a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. In addition, structural allograft has a lower pseudarthrosis rate and reoperation rate.

Titanium Cervical Cage Subsidence: Postoperative Computed Tomography Analysis Defining Incidence and Associated Risk Factors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Substantial variability in both the measurement and classification of subsidence limits the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from previous studies. The purpose of this study was to precisely characterize patterns of cervical cage subsidence utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans, determine risk factors for cervical cage subsidence, and investigate the impact of subsidence on pseudarthrosis rates.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent one- to three-levels of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing titanium interbodies with anterior plating between the years 2018 and 2020. Subsidence measurements were performed by two independent reviewers on CT scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. Subsidence was then classified as mild if subsidence into the inferior and superior endplate were both ≤2 mm, moderate if the worst subsidence into the inferior or superior endplate was between 2 to 4 mm, or severe if the worst subsidence into the inferior or superior endplate was ≥4 mm.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (100 levels) were included in this study. A total of 48 levels demonstrated mild subsidence (≤2 mm), 38 demonstrated moderate subsidence (2-4 mm), and 14 demonstrated severe subsidence (≥4 mm). Risk factors for severe subsidence included male gender, multilevel constructs, greater mean vertebral height loss, increased cage height, lower Taillard index, and lower screw tip to vertebral body height ratio. Severe subsidence was not associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSION

Following ACDF with titanium cervical cages, subsidence is an anticipated postoperative occurrence and is not associated with an increased risk of pseudarthrosis.

CT Osteoabsorptiometry Assessment of Subchondral Bone Density Predicts Intervertebral Implant Subsidence in a Human ACDF Cadaver Model

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric biomechanics study.

OBJECTIVE

Subchondral bone mineral density (sBMD) reflects the long-term mineralization and distribution of stress on joints. The use of 3-dimensional (3-D) methods to evaluate sBMD, including computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM), enables the assessment of density distribution with emphasis on subchondral bone. This study sought to measure the sBMD of cervical endplates using CT-OAM and correlate it to mechanical implant subsidence in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Fourteen fresh human cadaveric cervical spines were subjected to dynamic testing after single level discectomy and instrumentation using a PEEK interbody spacer. Specimens were imaged with CT 3 times: 1st) whole intact cervical spine, 2nd) after implantation, and 3 rd) after testing. These images were used to assess sBMD distributions using CT-OAM directly underneath the spacer. Subsidence was defined as the displacement of the device into the endplates.

RESULTS

The observed "failure mode" was consistently recorded as subsidence, with a mean of 0.45 ± 0.36 mm and 0.40 ± 0.18 mm for the C4-5 and C6-7 levels, respectively. There were no differences by level. The experimental cyclic test showed that denser endplates experienced less deformation under the same load.

CONCLUSIONS

This study achieved its stated aim of validating the use of CT-OAM as a method to analyze the sBMD of the cervical endplates. Studies such as this are providing new information on available technology such as CT-OAM, providing new tools for clinicians treating spinal conditions in need of augmentation and stabilization via interbody devices.

Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws

BACKGROUND

The combined anterior-posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior-posterior cases.

METHOD

Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December 2020 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the lateral-mass-screw group (LMS) and the pedicle-screw group (PPS). Radiological outcomes were assessed with lateral cervical spine X-rays for evaluating sagittal alignment, subsidence, and bone remodeling.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, the numbers of patients whose C2-C7 cervical lordosis was less than 20 degrees decreased by more in the PPS group (p-value = 0.001). The amount of vertical-length change from immediately to 1 year postsurgery was less in the PPS group than in the LMS group (p-value = 0.030). The mean vertebral-body-width change was larger in the PPS group than in the LMS group during 3 months to 1 year postsurgery (p-value = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In combined anterior-posterior cervical surgery cases, maintenance of cervical lordosis and protection of the vertebral body from subsidence were better with the pedicle-screw fixation. More bone remodeling occurred when using the pedicle-screw fixation method.

Which Radiographic Parameter Can Aid in Deciding Optimal Allograft Height for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative radiographic parameters that can guide optimal allograft height selection for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Allograft height selection for ACDF depends on intraoperative assessment supported by trials; however, there is currently no radiographic reference parameter that could aid in allograft height selection for improved outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients who underwent ACDF using allografts and were followed up for more than 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Fusion rates, subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height were assessed. Segments were divided into 2 groups according to whether the inserted allograft height was within 1 mm from the following 3 reference radiographic parameters: (1) uncinate process height, (2) adjacent disc height, and (3) preoperative disc height +2 mm.

RESULTS

This study included 101 patients with 163 segments. Segments with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm had a significantly higher fusion rate at 1-year follow-up compared with segments with allograft-uncinate height difference of >1 mm [85/107 (79.4%) vs. 35/56 (62.5%); P =0.025]. Subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height did not significantly differ between the groups when segments were divided according to uncinate height. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm and allograft failure were factors associated with fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The uncinate process height can guide optimal allograft height selection for ACDF. Using an allograft with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm resulted in a higher fusion rate. Therefore, the uncinate process height should be checked preoperatively and used in conjunction with intraoperative assessment when selecting allograft height.

A Novel Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

BACKGROUND

Surgeons can preoperatively assess bone quality using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or computed tomography; however, this is not feasible for all patients. Recently, a MRI-based scoring system was used to evaluate the lumbar spine's vertebral bone quality.

OBJECTIVE

To create a similar MRI-based scoring system for the cervical spine (C-VBQ), correlate C-VBQ scores with computed tomography-Hounsfield units (HU), and evaluate the utility of this scoring system to independently predict cage subsidence after single-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Demographic, procedure-related, and radiographic data were collected for patients. Pearson correlation test was used to determine the correlation between C-VBQ and HU. Cage subsidence was defined as ≥3 mm loss of fusion segmental height. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to determine the correlation between potential risk factors for subsidence.

RESULTS

Of 59 patients who underwent single-level ACDF, subsidence was found in 17 (28.8%). Mean C-VBQ scores were 2.22 ± 0.36 for no subsidence levels and 2.83 ± 0.38 ( P < .001) for subsidence levels. On multivariate analysis, a higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with subsidence (odds ratio = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.39-2.46, P < .001) and was the only significant independent predictor of subsidence after ACDF. There was a significant negative correlation between HU and C-VBQ (r 2 = -0.49, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We found that a higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with cage subsidence after ACDF. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between C-VBQ and HU. The C-VBQ score may be a valuable tool for assessing preoperative bone quality and independently predicting cage subsidence after ACDF.

Risk Factors for Allograft Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose this study was to precisely characterize patterns of allograft subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing computed tomography scans, determine risk factors for cervical allograft subsidence, and investigate the impact of subsidence on pseudarthrosis rates.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing 1-to 3-level ACDF utilizing allograft interbodies with anterior plating between 2011 and 2019. Subsidence measurements were performed by 2 independent reviewers on computed tomography scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. Subsidence was then classified as mild if subsidence into the inferior and superior endplates were both ≤2 mm, moderate if the worst subsidence into the inferior- or superior endplate was between 2 and 4 mm, or severe if the worst subsidence into the inferior- or superior endplate was ≥4 mm. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for the development of subsidence.

RESULTS

We identified 98 patients (152 levels) for inclusion. A total of 73 levels demonstrated mild subsidence (≤2 mm), 61 demonstrated moderate subsidence (2-4 mm), and 18 demonstrated severe subsidence (≥4 mm). On multivariate analysis, risk factors for severe subsidence included excessive vertebral endplate resection and lower screw tip to vertebral body height ratio. Severe subsidence was associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis (94.1% vs. 13.6%) without an associated increase in reoperation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Following ACDF with allograft interbodies, 50% of interbodies will subside >2 mm and 10% of interbodies will subside >4 mm. Risk factors for severe subsidence should be mitigated to decrease the risk of pseudarthrosis.

Anterior Plate-Screws and Lower Postoperative T1 Slope Affect Cervical Allospacer Failures in Multi-Level ACDF Surgery: Anterior Versus Posterior Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

In ACDF, graft failure and subsidence are common complications of surgery. Depending on the cervical fixation, different biomechanical characteristics are applied on the grafts. This aims to describe the incidence of cervical spacer failure in patients with cervical degenerative condition according to the cervical fixation method and sagittal balance.

METHOD

From November 2011 to December 2015, 262 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery were enrolled prospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on fixation method: anterior plate/screw (APS), posterior lateral mass screw (LMS), pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Serial X-rays and CT scans were utilized to evaluate radiologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean patient ages were 56.1 years in the APS group, 61.5 years in the LMS group, and 57.6 years in the PPS group (P = 0.002). Allospacer failure was most common in the APS group, compared to the LMS and PPS groups (chi-square, P = 0.038). Longer fusion level was associated with greater allospacer failure (Baseline 2 level surgery; Odds ratio (OR) 3.4 in 3 level, 15.2 in 4 level, P = 0.036,0.013). Higher T1 slope was correlated with less allospacer failure (OR 0.875, P = 0.001). ORs of allospacer failure in the LMS and PPS groups were 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, (P = 0.01, 0.01), compared with the APS group.

CONCLUSION

This study was able to show that allospacer failure in multi-level ACDF surgery is more common with a longer fusion length, less postoperative T1 slope, and an anterior plate-screws technique. Pedicle screws provided the best biomechanical stability among the 3 constructs.

Long-term results comparison after anterior cervical discectomy with BGS-7 spacer (NOVOMAX®-C) and allograft spacer: A prospective observational study

Introduction: In an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), various types of graft materials including autograft, allograft, and synthetic graft have been used to achieve adequate spinal fusion. Allograft spacer is mainly used in cervical fusion, especially in the anterior approach. The synthetic bone graft material BGS-7(CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3, bioactive Glass-Ceramics) can bind with surrounding bone tissue by forming a hydroxyapatite layer bone bridge, leading to faster graft osseointegration. This study was conducted to compare long-term clinical outcome of BGS-7 spacer and allograft spacer for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Materials and Methods: From September 2014 to December 2016, Consecutive anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries using a BGS-7 spacer (N = 18) and Allograft spacer (N = 26) were compared for postoperative clinical outcomes. Radiologic assessments were performed, and Instrumental failure, including breakage, cage migration, subsidence were observed and Fusion status were analyzed. Finite element analysis was performed for simulating mechanical stress between the vertebral body and implant. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using neck VAS, NDI, and JOA on the patient's final follow-up visits. Results: Among the 44 patients who underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery using the BGS-7 spacer and Allograft spacer, there were 30 men and 14 women. The average age at the operation was 47.69 ± 10.49 in allograft spacer and 51.67 ± 11.03 in BGS-7 spacer. The mean follow-up period was 89.18 ± 5.44 months. Twenty three (88.46%) patients in allograft spacer and 20(100%) patients in BGS-7 spacer were demonstrated radiologic evidence of interbody fusion in last OPD, which accounts for fusion grade 4 or 5. Peak stresses were 343.85 MPa in allograft spacer, and 132.55 MPa in BGS-7 spacer. Long-term clinical outcomes including neck VAS, NDI, and JOA didn't show statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse events related to the BGS-7 spacer.10.3389/fbioe.2023.110046. Conclusion: The BGS-7 spacer demonstrated reliability as a spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusionF surgery without instrumental failure. Early stabilization with a bony bridge formation was observed at the intermediate follow-up period, and the long-term clinical outcome was favorable at more than 60 months after surgery without any adverse events. Thus, the BGS-7 spacer is a safe and effective alternative to the allograft spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery.

Reliability and Utility of Various Methods for Evaluation of Bone Union after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Most surgical procedures performed on account of degenerative disease of the cervical spine involve a discectomy and interbody fixation. Bone fusion at the implant placement site is evaluated post-operatively. It is agreed that computed tomography is the best modality for assessing bone union. We evaluated the results obtained with various methods based solely on conventional radiographs in the same group of patients and compared them with results obtained using a method that is a combination of CT and conventional radiography, which we considered the most precise and a reference method. We operated on a total of 170 disc spaces in a group of 104 patients. Fusion was evaluated at 12 months after surgery with five different and popular classifications based on conventional radiographs and then compared with the reference method. Statistical analyses of test accuracy produced the following classification of fusion assessment methods with regard to the degree of consistency with the reference method, in descending order: (1) bone bridging is visible on the anterior and/or posterior edge of the operated disc space on a lateral radiograph; (2) change in the value of Cobb's angle for a motion segment on flexion vs. extension radiographs (threshold for fusion vs. pseudoarthrosis is 2°); (3) change in the interspinous distance between process tips on flexion vs. extension radiographs (threshold of 2 mm); (4) change in the value of Cobb's angle of a motion segment (threshold of 4°); (5) change in the interspinous distance between process bases on flexion vs. extension radiographs (threshold of 2 mm). When bone union is evaluated on the basis on radiographs, without CT evidence, we suggest using the "bone bridging" criterion as the most reliable commonly used approach to assessing bone union.

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Study design

A bibliometric analysis.

Objective

To identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Summary of Background Data

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most routine surgical procedures in spine surgery. Many surgeons and academics have researched ACDF thoroughly and published numerous articles. However, there is no relevant bibliometric analysis. Therefore, our study aims to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in ACDF to identify the research trends.

Methods

We searched the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database with restrictions and identified the top 100 cited publications in ACDF for analysis.

Results

The citation counts of the top 100 cited publications ranged from 37 to 361 (mean 67.42). All studies were published between 2008 and 2019, with 2013 and 2015 the most prolific years. The journals Spine and Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine provided the majority of the articles. Overall, the 100 articles came from 12 countries, with the United States being the top producer, followed by China and South Korea. The most frequent keywords were "spine", "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion", "interbody fusion", 'arthrodesis', "follow-up", "decompression", and "ACDF".

Conclusion

ACDF has been regarded as a classical gold standard in anterior cervical surgery, and the emergence of new surgical procedures has not affected its status. Cervical disc arthroplasty still needs further research and development. As the first bibliometric analysis of ACDF, this bibliometric study is meant to provide guidance for clinicians and scholars to research the development trend of this field.

Influence of subsidence after stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with degenerative cervical disease: A long-term follow-up study

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of subsidence in patients who performed stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by analyzing the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes. This retrospective study enrolled 53 patients with 79 segments with degenerative cervical disease treated with stand-alone ACDF with ≥5 years of follow-up. Segmental angle (SA), cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), subsidence, and fusion were analyzed. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and neck disability index (NDI) were also evaluated. Subsidence occurred in 24 (45.2%) patients and 38 segments (48.1%) at the last follow-up. The mean VAS score and NDI had improved in both the subsidence and non- subsidence groups. The mean SA at the last follow-up had increased to 1.3° ± 8.5° in the subsidence group and to 1.5° ± 5.2° in the non-subsidence group compared with the post-operative SA (P < .001). The overall mean CSA at the last follow-up increased over time in both the groups compared with the post-operative CSA (P = .003). The fusion rate at 1 year after surgery was 86.8% and 82.9% in the subsidence and non-subsidence groups, respectively. However, the differences in the SA, CSA, and fusion rates between the groups were not statistically significant (P = .117, .98, and .682, respectively). Subsidence after stand-alone ACDF occurs to a certain capacity; however, it does not appear to significantly influence the radiological and clinical outcomes if foramen decompression is adequately and sufficiently provided in a long-term follow-up study. In contrast, subsidence appears to positively affect the fusion rate in the short-term follow-up.

Subsidence following cervical discectomy and implant-to-bone ratio

Background

Implant subsidence is an undesirable effect after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We investigated the relation between the rate of implant subsidence and the ratio of the implant surface area to the surface area of the adjacent bone.

Methods

We operated 170 disc spaces in a group of 104 patients. Two types of implants were used: 1) PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages and 2) titanium-coated (TC) PEEK cages. Patients were randomised to receive a specific implant using a randomisation table. All implants had a surface area of 1.61 cm². Based on computed tomography images, bone surface areas were calculated for vertebral bodies immediately adjacent to the interbody implants. The implant-to-bone surface ratio was then calculated for each disc space. Implant subsidence was assessed over 12 months of follow-up, and associations between implant subsidence, the type of implant, and the implant-to-bone surface ratio were investigated.

Results

Twelve months after the surgery, computed tomography was performed on 86 patients (144 disc spaces). Furthermore, in 166 disc spaces and 102 patients, conventional radiographs were obtained.

Subsidence was observed in 21% of the examined intervertebral spaces, and it was more frequently associated with higher values of bone surface area and lower values of the implant-to-bone surface ratio. The type of implant (PEEK vs TC-PEEK cages) did not significantly influence the rate of implant subsidence.

Conclusions

Implant subsidence was significantly related to the value of a coefficient representing the ratio of the implant's surface area to the bone surface area of the adjacent vertebral bodies, with subsidence occurring significantly more rarely for coefficient values ≥ 0.37.

Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To examine clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgeries randomized to receive either polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) or structural bone allografts.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The biomechanical qualities as well as osteoconductive, osteogenic, and osteoinductive properties of various graft materials have been previously evaluated. There remain questions, however, as to whether there are any clinical and/or radiographic outcome differences in the selection of interbody graft types for ACDF.

METHODS

Patients undergoing one- to three-level ACDF with single anterior plate fixation were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive either cortical allograft or PEEK interbody spacers. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with an additional postoperative radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomized. Comparing clinical outcomes, no differences in arm or neck pain scores were noted; however, there was a statistically significant (≤0.041) improvement in SF-36 PCS scores for the allograft group at all follow-up time points and a tendency toward lower disability scores. Overall, evidence of radiographic fusion was achieved in 87 (91.6%) patients: five (10.2%) and three (6.5%) patients had pseudoarthrosis (P = 0.72) in the PEEK and allograft groups, respectively. At 24 months' follow-up time, any cervical or segmental alignment restoration achieved with surgery was lost and no statistically significant changes were detected when all levels of surgery were included. Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for anterior or posterior body height measurements at the 24 months' follow-up. Approximately 20% of patients had anterior and posterior subsidence, all grade 0 regardless of the group assignment.

CONCLUSION

Comparable radiographic outcomes were observed for patients undergoing one- to three-level PEEK versus allograft-assisted ACDF surgeries. Although MCID comparisons suggest that allograft and PEEK-treated patients have similar clinical outcomes, testing that incorporates the magnitude of the change suggests that there may be a statistically significant greater magnitude of improvement for the allograft group patients, but further studies with a larger sample size would be helpful to determine if a true effect exists.

Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF have been reported in the literature. Methods: We performed a comparison between patients who underwent ACDF with either a porous tantalum or a PEEK stand-alone cage, in two spine surgery units for single-level disc herniation. Clinical outcome [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and radiological outcome (lordosis, fusion and subsidence) were measured before surgery and at least one year after surgery in both groups. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent ACDF with a porous tantalum cage, and thirty-one with a PEEK cage. The improvement of NDI and SF-36 was significantly superior in the PEEK group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.049 respectively). Moreover, the variation of the Cobb angle for the cervical spine was significantly higher in the PEEK group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of two groups of patients with at least one year of follow-up, a stand-alone PEEK cage showed superior clinical results, with improved cervical lordosis, compared to a stand-alone porous tantalum cage. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

PEEK versus titanium-coated PEEK cervical cages: fusion rate

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most commonly performed procedures for degenerative cervical disease. The evaluation of fusion status is still not fully standardized, and a variety of measurement methods are used. This study presents our own evaluation of fusion by comparing two types of implants.

METHODS

A total of 170 disc spaces were operated on in 104 patients using PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages and titanium-coated (TC) PEEK cages. Patients were assigned to a specific implant using a randomisation table. Fusion status was evaluated based on functional radiographs and CT scans obtained at 12 months post-surgery. Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression models were performed to assess the association of type of implant with different fusion rates.

RESULTS

At 12 months post-surgery, CT scans were performed in 86 patients (a total of 144 disc spaces) and conventional radiographs were obtained in 102 (a total of 166 disc spaces). Complete fusion was demonstrated in 101 cases (71.1%), partial fusion in 43 cases (29.9%). There were no cases of absence of fusion. A total of 85 PEEK cages (59%) and 59 TC-PEEK cages (41%) were implanted. For PEEK cages, complete fusion was seen in 75 (88.2%) disc spaces, compared to 26 (44.1%) achieved with TC-PEEK cages. A significantly higher proportion of complete fusions (B = 15.58; P < 0.0001) after 12 months was observed with PEEK implants compared to TC-PEEK implants.

CONCLUSION

Complete fusion was noted at 12 months post-surgery significantly more frequently with PEEK implants compared to TC-PEEK implants.

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Allograft and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) radiographic, biomechanical, histological properties have been extensively studied and both spacers have their advantages and shortcomings. There are no comparative randomized or double-blinded spinal fusion clinical trials reported to date.

PURPOSE

The study's primary objective was to prospectively investigate clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusions and randomized to receive either PEEK or structural bone allografts.

STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was initiated at a single center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 138 patients were enrolled, randomized and 121 patients completed the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary clinical outcome parameters were scored from standardized patient-reported questionnaires. The severity of lower back and leg pain was evaluated using the 11-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire was used to evaluate chronic disability and activities of daily living. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes were assessed using Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-36 v2). Two scores within the scoring algorithm were analyzed: Physical Component (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). The primary radiological outcomes included restoration and maintenance of vertebral body height, lumbar sagittal and segmental alignment, and fusion status.

METHODS

All patients were followed for 2 years ± 2 months; radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with an additional follow-up at 3 weeks for radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) were randomized (1:1) to receive either cortical allograft or PEEK interbody lordotic spacers. Although no differences were detected between the allograft and PEEK patient groups at any of the follow-up time points, there was a highly significant (p<.0001) improvement in all clinical outcome measures. Overall, evidence of radiographic fusion was achieved in 118 (97.5%) patients at the 24 months follow-up. Three patients, all in the allograft group, had pseudoarthrosis and underwent revision surgeries. Postoperative improvement of sagittal alignment, anterior (ABH) or posterior body height (PBH) was initially achieved, but it was mainly lost or reduced at the final follow-up and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. At the end of the study, improvement and maintenance of lumbar lordosis were achieved in 43.3% and 49.2% patients and segmental alignment in 38.3% and 36.1% for the allograft and PEEK patient groups, respectively. Similarly, ABH was improved and maintained in 28.3% and 36.1% patients and PBH in 28.3% and 44.3% for the allograft and PEEK groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although allograft-assisted surgeries may have reduced fusion rates, the study findings demonstrated that TLIF surgery with two different types of cages and in conjunction with rhBMP-2 resulted in similar radiological or clinical outcomes and a highly statistically significant improvement in all clinical outcome measures at the end of the study regardless of the randomization group.

Improving the Management of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spinal Fusion: The Need for a Bone Mineral Density-Matched Interbody Cage

With an increasingly aging population globally, a confluence has emerged between the rising prevalence of degenerative spinal disease and osteoporosis. Fusion of the anterior spinal column remains the mainstay surgical intervention for many spinal degenerative disorders. However, decreased vertebral bone mineral density (BMD), quantitatively measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), complicates treatment with surgical interbody fusion as weak underlying bone stock increases the risk of post-operative implant-related adverse events, including cage subsidence. There is a necessity for developing cages with advanced structural designs that incorporate bioengineering and architectural principles to tailor the interbody fusion device directly to the patient’s BMD status. Specifically, lattice-designed cages that mimic the web-like structure of native cancellous bone have demonstrated excellent resistance to post-operative subsidence. This article provides an introductory profile of a spinal interbody implant designed intentionally to simulate the lattice structure of human cancellous bone, with a similar modulus of elasticity, and specialized to match a patient’s bone status across the BMD continuum. The implant incorporates an open pore design where the degree of pore compactness directly corresponds to the patient’s DXA-defined BMD status, including patients with osteoporosis.

A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and Zero-P cage screw constructs

BACKGROUND

Anterior Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) is a common surgery recommended for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease after failed conservative care. There is no consensus on the choice of implants, and it varies between surgeons. This study aims to analyse the early complications following ACDF performed using a standalone cage versus a Zero-P (Cage Screw - (CS)) construct for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

A total of 162 patients underwent an ACDF between August 2016 and July 2018. There were 83 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with standalone cage (SA) and 79 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with cage-screw (CS) fixation. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, and levels of surgery. The follow-up ranged from 2 months to 24 months. Complications, both clinical and radiological, were assessed between the groups.

RESULTS

Both the SA and Zero-P (CS) groups were subdivided into single and multilevel surgery. Complications encountered in the SA group were temporary swallowing problems 10, hoarseness of voice 3, cage migration 1, delayed union 1, Horner's syndrome 1, cage subsidence 2. In the CS group swallowing problems 4, hoarseness of voice 4, CSF leak 1, recurrent symptoms 1. The observed difference in the incidence of complications between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Univariate analysis between the groups did not show any difference in the improvement of cervical sagittal balance, fusion rate, subsidence, and complications encountered. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for complications showed no difference between the groups when assessed for smoking, gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, levels of surgery, fusion status, Odom score, or the type of implant.

CONCLUSION

In this short-term study, the standalone (SA) cages showed no difference in their complication profile in comparison to a cage-screw construct for both single and multilevel ACDF. Standalone cages might be a cost-effective option without increased complication risks. Nevertheless, we propose a longer-term follow-up with a prospective randomized trial for further evaluation of this finding.

Segmental Height Decrease Adversely Affects Foraminal Height and Cervical Lordosis, But Not Clinical Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Allografts

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to elucidate the clinical significance of postoperative segmental height decrease (SHD) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allografts.

METHODS

We reviewed 88 patients who underwent ACDF using allografts as interbody spacers. Cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis, segmental height, foraminal height, fusion, allograft fracture, and resorption were assessed. Significant SHD was defined as that ≥2 mm. Neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, arm pain VAS score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score were also recorded. Significant segmental height decreased (SH-D) segments were compared with segmental height maintained (SH-M) segments.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (36.4%) and 34 segments (23.1%) demonstrated significant SHD. SH-D segments demonstrated significantly lower segmental lordosis (3.7 ± 4.1 vs. 0.9 ± 4.8°; P < 0.01), foraminal height (9.6 ± 1.1 vs. 8.7 ± 0.9 mm; P < 0.01), and fusion rate (88 [77.9%] vs. 20 [58.9%]; P = 0.04) than SH-M segments at the final follow-up, respectively. Furthermore, global lordosis was significantly lower in the SH-D group (18.3 ± 8.5 vs. 13.9 ± 8.9°, respectively; P = 0.02). However, neck and arm pain VAS scores and NDI score did not demonstrate a significant difference between patients with and without significant SHD. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that higher allograft height (P = 0.03), greater allograft anteroposterior length (P = 0.04), and allograft resorption or fracture (P < 0.01) were associated with increased risk of significant SHD. Logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that allograft resorption or fracture (P < 0.01) was associated with risk of nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant SHD was associated with decreased segmental lordosis, global cervical lordosis, and foraminal height. However, significant SHD did not result in worsening of clinical symptoms. Larger allograft size was associated with risk of significant SHD. This study demonstrates provisional results that suggest allograft resorption or fracture may be a factor that adversely affects fusion or SHD.

Clinical impact and imaging results after a modified procedure of ACDF: a prospective case-controlled study based on ninety cases with two-year follow-up

Study design

This is a prospective case-controlled study.

Background

To analyze the postoperative axial pain and cage subsidence of patients presenting with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after a modified procedure of ACDF (mACDF).

Methods

Ninety patients with CSM were prospectively collected from 2014 to 2018. The patients were divided into spread group and non-spread group (48:42 ratio) according to the cage placement with or without releasing the Caspar cervical retractor after decompression. Spread group received conventional ACDF and non-spread group received mACDF. Patients were followed-up for at least 24 months after surgery. Radiologic data, including height of intervertebral space and Cobb Angle, were collected. Nervous system function was obtained using JOA scores, and level of pain was assessed using VAS scores.

Results

A total of 90 patients were enrolled and the patients were divided into spread group (n = 48) and none-spread group(n = 42). Cage subsidence of (spread group vs none-spread group) was (0.82 ± 0.68 vs 0.58 ± 0.81) mm, (0.64 ± 0.77 vs 0.34 ± 0.46) mm, (0.48 ± 0.43 vs 0.25 ± 0.28) mm, and (0.45 ± 0.47 vs 0.17 ± 0.32) mm at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months, respectively. The period exhibiting the most decrease of the height of intervertebral space was 3 months postoperatively. However, there was no statistical difference in the height of intervertebral space, JOA or VAS scores at the final follow-up between the two groups.

Conclusions

The mACDF can avoid excessive distraction by releasing the Caspar Cervical retractor, restore the “natural height” of cervical vertebra, relieve immediate pain after surgery, and prevent rapid Cage subsidence and the loss of cervical curvature.

Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) was previously reported as a technique to decompress spinal canal by translating the vertebral body anteriorly and is indicated for cervical myelopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, little is known about its fusion and subsidence rates.

PURPOSE

To compare the fusion and subsidence rates of VBSO, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent VBSO, ACDF, or ACCF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and were followed-up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion and subsidence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain, neck disability index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were assessed.

METHODS

Results of the VBSO, ACDF, and ACCF groups were compared using Student's t-test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The fusion rate at 1-year postoperatively and the final follow-up for VBSO was 92.9% (37/42). VBSO demonstrated a higher 1-year fusion rate than ACDF (77.9% [74/95], p=0.04) and ACCF (74.2% [23/31], p=0.04). However, the fusion rate at the final follow-up did not demonstrate significant difference. The mean amount of subsidence (ACDF group, 1.5±1.2 mm; VBSO group, 1.5±1.5 mm; p=1.00) and rate of significant subsidence of > 3 mm (ACDF group, 13.7% [13/95]; VBSO group, 14.3% [6/42]; p=1.00) were similar for ACDF and VBSO. Furthermore, the mean amount of subsidence in VBSO was significantly less than that in ACCF (1.5±1.5 mm vs 2.4±2.0 mm; p=0.04). Neck pain VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VBSO demonstrated faster solid union than ACDF and ACCF, although the fusion rates at the final follow-up were similar. VBSO resulted in less subsidence than ACCF at the 1-year follow-up. VBSO could be applied safely when the shape and/or location of the pathologic foci and sagittal alignment favor its application without much concern for pseudarthrosis or subsidence.

Long-term Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes after Three-level Contiguous Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion without Plating: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

 Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been providing good surgical, clinical, and radiologic outcomes in patients suffering from cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD). However, the role of anterior plating is still debated, especially in three-level procedures. This study aimed to investigate long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications after three-level contiguous ACDF without plating for cervical DDD.

METHODS

 Two institutional databases were retrieved (January 2009-December 2014) for patients treated with three-level contiguous ACDF without plating. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 5 years. Demographical data, smoking status, implant types, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, complications, fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), cervical lordosis (CL), and residual segmental mobility were evaluated.

RESULTS

 We enrolled 21 patients. Tantalum and carbon fiber cages were implanted, respectively, in 13 and 8 patients. The mean FU length was 5.76 ± 0.87 years. Mean NDI score was 78.29 ± 9.98% preoperatively and 8.29 ± 1.67% at last FU (p < 0.01), whereas mean VAS score decreased from 7.43 ± 1.14 preoperatively to 0.95 ± 0.95 at last FU (p < 0.01). Complications were one postoperative hematoma, one superficial wound infection, and five cases of postoperative dysphagia (recovered within 3 days). The fusion rate was 90% and ASD was reported in three (14%) cases. The mean CL was 6.33 ± 2.70 degrees preoperatively, 8.19 ± 1.97 degrees 3 months after surgery (p = 0.02), and 7.62 ± 1.96 degrees at latest FU. There was no residual mobility on every operated segment at last FU. The smoking status was an independent risk factor for nonfusion in this case series (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

 Three-level contiguous ACDF without plating seems to be an effective treatment for cervical DDD. Properly designed comparative clinical trials are needed to further investigate this topic.

Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages

AIM

Interbody cages are commonly used to augment interbody fusion. Commonly used materials include titanium (Ti) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), with their inherent differences. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare between the various clinical and radiological outcomes of Ti and PEEK interbody spinal cages.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between Ti and PEEK interbody cages in patients undergoing spinal fusion was performed. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were searched. All studies that compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent Ti and PEEK cages were included. Subgroup analyses was performed to differentiate between patients who had cervical and lumbar interbody fusion.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles were identified, with a total of 743 patients. Spinal fusion rates at final follow-up did not differ between Ti and PEEK cages (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.57-3.94, P = 0.41), although in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, Ti cages demonstrated superior fusion (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.28, P = 0.04). In patients with non-infective etiologies, Ti cages had a higher rate of cage subsidence (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.13-4.16, P = 0.02). Both types of cages had similar operating time, postoperative hematoma formation, neuropathic pain, segmental angle correction and postoperative clinical outcome improvement.

CONCLUSION

In non-infective lumbar spine conditions, Ti cage may be the superior option due to the higher fusion rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft

Background

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and machined allograft interbody spacers are among devices used as fusion adjuncts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Most results are good to excellent but some patients develop pseudarthrosis. We compared the reoperation rates for pseudarthrosis following 1- or 2-level ACDF with PEEK or allograft cages.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed patients who underwent 1- or 2-level ACDF. The rate of subsequent surgery for pseudarthrosis was calculated for cases confirmed by computerized tomography. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at post-index surgery follow-up and post-revision ACDF follow-up. Radiographic parameters were assessed at a minimum of 1-year post-op on all patients.

Results

Two hundred and nine patients were included: 167 received allograft and 42 received PEEK. Subsidence was demonstrated in 31% of allograft and 29% of PEEK patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between allograft and PEEK groups. Clinical outcomes were not adversely affected by subsidence. Reoperation for pseudarthrosis was performed in 8% of allograft patients and 14% of PEEK patients (not statistically different). Improvement in patient-reported outcome was significantly better for patients without symptomatic post-operative pseudarthrosis.

Conclusions

Both allograft and PEEK spacers are acceptable options for ACDF surgery. Similar clinical outcomes and rates of radiographic subsidence were found. Subsidence was not a factor in clinical outcomes. Reoperation for pseudarthrosis was associated with poor outcomes. A higher incidence of revision for symptomatic pseudarthrosis occurred in the PEEK group, but this was not statistically significant.

Biomechanical Analysis of Allograft Spacer Failure as a Function of Cortical-Cancellous Ratio in Anterior Cervical Discectomy/Fusion: Allograft Spacer Alone Model

The design and ratio of the cortico-cancellous composition of allograft spacers are associated with graft-related problems, including subsidence and allograft spacer failure. Methods: The study analyzed stress distribution and risk of subsidence according to three types (cortical only, cortical cancellous, cortical lateral walls with a cancellous center bone) and three lengths (11, 12, 14 mm) of allograft spacers under the condition of hybrid motion control, including flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending,. A detailed finite element model of a previously validated, three-dimensional, intact C3–7 segment, with C5–6 segmental fusion using allograft spacers without fixation, was used in the present study. Findings: Among the three types of cervical allograft spacers evaluated, cortical lateral walls with a cancellous center bone exhibited the highest stress on the cortical bone of spacers, as well as the endplate around the posterior margin of the spacers. The likelihood of allograft spacer failure was highest for 14 mm spacers composed of cortical lateral walls with a cancellous center bone upon flexion (PVMS, 270.0 MPa; 250.2%) and extension (PVMS: 371.40 MPa, 344.2%). The likelihood of allograft spacer subsidence was also highest for the same spacers upon flexion (PVMS, 4.58 MPa; 28.1%) and extension (PVMS: 12.71 MPa, 78.0%). Conclusion: Cervical spacers with a smaller cortical component and of longer length can be risk factors for allograft spacer failure and subsidence, especially in flexion and extension. However, further study of additional fixation methods, such as anterior plates/screws and posterior screws, in an actual clinical setting is necessary.

Structural Allograft Versus PEEK Implants in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to compare reported fusion rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody devices in patients with cervical spine degeneration. Our secondary objectives were to compare differences in rates of subsidence and reoperation and in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups.

METHODS

Through a systematic review of the English-language literature using various databases, we identified 4702 articles. After we applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 articles (7 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective studies, and 3 retrospective studies) reporting fusion rates of structural allograft or PEEK interbody devices were eligible for our analysis. No randomized controlled trials compared outcomes of structural allograft versus PEEK interbody devices. Extracted data included authors, study years, study designs, sample sizes, patient ages, duration of follow-up, types of interbody devices used, fusion rates, definition of fusion, reoperation rates, subsidence rates, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Fusion rates were 82% to 100% for allograft and 88% to 98% for PEEK interbody devices. The reported data were insufficient to perform meta-analysis. Structural allograft had the highest reported rate of reoperation (14%), and PEEK interbody devices had the highest reported subsidence rate (18%). Patient-reported outcomes improved in both groups. There was insufficient high-quality evidence to compare the associations of various PEEK modifications with fusion rates.

CONCLUSION

Fusion rates were similar between structural allograft and PEEK interbody devices when used for ACDF for cervical spine degeneration. Currently, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to assess associations of PEEK modifications with fusion rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of locking stand-alone cage (LSC) compared with anterior plate construct (APC) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared LSC with APC in ACDF. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for assessment of study quality. Data were analyzed with the Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of seven RCTs were included. The results revealed no significant differences between LSC and APC in ACDF regarding the fusion rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analogue scale score, neck disability index score, hospital stay, subsidence rate, cervical lordosis, segmental Cobb angle, and disc height. However, LSC was associated with a significantly shorter operation time, less blood loss, lower overall incidence of dysphagia, and lower adjacent-level ossification (ALO) rate compared with APC.

CONCLUSION

In summary, LSC is not only a safe and effective device for ACDF but also has the advantages of significantly reduced operation time, blood loss, overall incidence of dysphagia, and ALO rate over APC. Therefore, LSC is a better alternative than APC for the patients undergoing ACDF procedures.

Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review

BACKGROUND

Lumbar interbody fusion is among the most common types of spinal surgery performed. Over time, the term has evolved to encompass a number of different approaches to the intervertebral space, as well as differing implant materials. Questions remain over which approaches and materials are best for achieving fusion and restoring disc height.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed the literature on the advantages and disadvantages of various methods and devices used to achieve and augment fusion between the disc spaces in the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Using search terms specific to lumbar interbody fusion, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar and identified 4993 articles. We excluded those that did not report clinical outcomes, involved cervical interbody devices, were animal studies, or were not in English. After exclusions, 68 articles were included for review.

RESULTS

Posterior approaches have advantages, such as providing 360° support through a single incision, but can result in retraction injury and do not always restore lordosis or correct deformity. Anterior approaches allow for the largest implants and good correction of deformities but can result in vascular, urinary, psoas muscle, or lumbar plexus injury and may require a second posterior procedure to supplement fixation. Titanium cages produce improved osteointegration and fusion rates but also increase subsidence caused by the stiffness of titanium relative to bone. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has an elasticity closer to that of bone and shows less subsidence than titanium cages, but as an inert compound PEEK results in lower fusion rates and greater osteolysis. Combination PEEK-titanium coating has not yet achieved better results. Expandable cages were developed to increase disc height and restore lumbar lordosis, but the data on their effectiveness have been inconclusive. Three-dimensionally (3D)-printed cages have shown promise in biomechanical and animal studies at increasing fusion rates and reducing subsidence, but additive manufacturing options are still in their infancy and require more investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the approaches to spinal fusion have plusses and minuses that must be considered when determining which to use, and newer-technology implants, such as PEEK with titanium coating, expandable, and 3D-printed cages, have tried to improve upon the limitations of existing grafts but require further study.

Surgical Reconstruction Using a Flanged Mesh Cage without Plating for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and a Symptomatic Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

OBJECTIVE

We introduce innovative method of cervical column reconstruction and performed the reconstruction with a flanged titanium mesh cage (TMC) instead of a plate after anterior corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and an ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Fifty patients with CSM or OPLL who underwent anterior cervical reconstruction with a flanged TMC were investigated retrospectively. Odom's criteria were used to assess the clinical outcomes. The radiographic evaluation included TMC subsidence, fusion status, and interbody height. Thirty-eight patients underwent single-level and 12 patients underwent two-level corpectomy with a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months.

RESULTS

In all, 19 patients (38%) had excellent outcomes and 25 patients (50%) had good outcomes. Two patients (4%) in whom C5 palsy occurred were categorized as poor. The fusion rate at the last follow-up was 98%, and the severe subsidence rate was 34%. No differences in subsidence were observed among Odom's criteria or between the single-level and two-level corpectomy groups.

CONCLUSION

The satisfactory outcomes in this study indicate that the flanged TMC is an effective graft for cervical reconstruction.

Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a stand-alone interbody cage versus a conventional cage and anterior cervical plate technique.

METHODS

A systematic Medline search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews. Search terms included "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion," "cage," and "bone plates," or variations thereof. Only studies involving a direct comparison of ACDF with a stand-alone cage versus a cage and plate were included. From the selected studies, we extracted data on patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical risk factors, and pre- and postoperative radiographic findings. A meta-analysis was performed on all outcome measures. The quality of each study was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-only technique had significantly lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and adjacent segment disease compared with patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-plate technique. However, patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-plate technique had better radiographic outcomes with significantly less subsidence and better restoration of cervical lordosis. There were no other significant differences in outcomes or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF with a cage-only technique appears to have better clinical outcomes than the cage-plate technique, despite radiographic findings of increased rates of subsidence and less restoration of cervical lordosis. Future randomized controlled trials with longer term follow-up are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

Rigid-Plating and Cortico-Cancellous Allograft Are Effective for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors associated with radiographic changes and clinical outcomes following 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using rigidplate constructs and cortico-cancellous allograft. ACDF has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of multilevel degenerative cervical conditions, but current data exists in small heterogeneous forms.

METHODS

A retrospective review included 98 patients with primary 3-level ACDF surgery at one institution from 2008 to 2013 with minimum 1-year follow-up. Cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), segmental height, fusion, and lordosis radiographs were measured preoperatively and at 2 postoperative periods.

RESULTS

Rates of asymptomatic pseudarthroses and total reoperations were 18% and 4%, respectively. Results demonstrated immediate improvements in cervical lordosis (5.5°, p < 0.01) and segmental height (5.0-mm increase, p < 0.01) with little changes in the cervical SVA (3.2-mm increase, p < 0.01). The segmental height decreased from immediate postoperative period to final follow-up (1.7-mm decrease, p < 0.01). Older age was protective against radiolucent lines (p < 0.05). Patient-reported outcomes significantly improved following surgery (p < 0.01). Current smoking status and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus had no impact on radiographic or clinical outcomes. Risk factors were not identified for the 5 reoperations (4%).

CONCLUSION

Three-level ACDF with rigid-plating and cortico-cancellous allograft is an effective procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine without the application of additional adjuncts or combined anteriorposterior cervical surgeries. Significant improvements in cervical lordosis, segmental height, and segmental alignment can be achieved with little change in cervical SVA and a low rate of reoperations over short-term follow-up. Similarly, patient-reported outcomes show significant improvements.

Placement of Titanium Mesh in Hybrid Decompression Surgery to Avoid Graft Subsidence in Treatment of Three-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Cephalad or Caudal?

Background

Hybrid decompression has been used to treat patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, no published study has investigated the effect of titanium mesh (TM) located cephalad or caudal in hybrid decompression surgery on the graft subsidence in treatment of three-level CSM.

Material/Methods

Forty-eight cases with three-level CSM who underwent the procedure of hybrid decompression from Jan 2014 to Jan 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological outcomes immediately postoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared between cases from group A (TM located cephalad, n=21) and group B (TM located caudal, n=27).

Results

No differences were observed in the 2 groups in terms of number, sex, or duration of follow-up. The average follow-up was 4.38±0.439 months in group A and 4.81±0.509 months in group B (p>0.05). The index loss of anterior (AIBH), middle (MIBH), and posterior interbody height (PIBH) in group A were 0.857±0.448/1.00±0.525/1.33±0.608, respectively, which were all lower than that in group B (P<0.05), as was the occurrence of TM subsidence. However, there was no significance difference in height loss of adjacent intervertebral space between groups. All angles were decreased at the final follow-up in both groups (p<0.05). More decrease of C2–C7 angle occurred in group B (p>0.05), and segmental angle in group A decreased more than in group B (p>0.05).

Conclusions

TM inferior to intervertebral cage (IC) in hybrid decompression has a higher risk for developing subsidence, and when the choice of the position of TM is available in hybrid decompression surgery, TM located cephalad was recommend to alleviate TM subsidence.

Partial Vertebrae Resection Laterally to Harvest Supplemental Autograft Bone for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Technical Note and Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of partial vertebrae resection laterally through intervertebral space to harvest supplemental autograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Patients who accepted 1-segment (n = 19, 38.2 months follow-up) or 2-segment (n = 17, 40.4 months follow-up) ACDF with supplemental autograft bone were included. Cervical lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), anterior segment height (ASH), and posterior segment height (PSH) on neutrally lateral radiography, and intervertebral fusion rate on computed tomography were measured. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, visual analog scale around the neck or arm, Neck Disability Index, and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 86.2 and 115.6 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 41.7 and 79.4 mL in cases with 1-segment and 2-segment ACDF, respectively. At the final visit, the visual analog scale score and Neck Disability Index significantly decreased, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly increased. Significant increases were observed in the ASH, PSH, CL, and SL after 2-segment ACDF. Significant increases were observed in the CL and SL after 1-segment ACDF, but not in the ASH and PSH. All the ASH, PSH, CL, and SL kept unchanged at the final visit. All cases acquired definite intervertebral fusion, and the incidence of cage subsidence was 5.3% after 1-segment and 17.6% after 2-segment ACDF at the final visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial vertebrae resection laterally through the intervertebral space was a safe and effective method to harvest supplemental autograft bone for the ACDF.

Eleven-Year Follow-Up of Two Cohorts of Patients Comparing Stand-Alone Porous Tantalum Cage Versus Autologous Bone Graft and Plating in Anterior Cervical Fusions

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a porous tantalum cage is an accepted method to treat degenerated cervical discs, with good results, similar to those with autologous bone graft and plating at short- and mid-term follow-up. However, to date, long-term follow-up studies have been performed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study to evaluate the outcomes of 2 cohorts from a previous prospective randomized controlled trial comparing stand-alone tantalum cage (group 1, 27 patients) with autologous bone graft and plating (group 2, 30 patients) for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at 11 years of follow-up. The usual clinical and radiological outcomes and "overall success," proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The improvement in clinical outcomes achieved postoperatively was maintained similarly in the 2 cohorts at 11 years of follow-up. In group 1, the cage had subsided 2-3 mm in 12 patients (44%), segmental lordosis was maintained in 16 patients (59%), adjacent segment degeneration had developed or progressed in 27 of the adjacent segments (50%) in 15 patients (56%), and postoperative nonprogressive deformation of the anterior aspect of the cage was observed in 7 (26%) and minor fragmentation in 3 (11%) patients. In group 2, segmental lordosis was maintained in 90% of the patients and adjacent segment degeneration had developed or progressed in 15 patients (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the clinical and radiological outcomes achieved at mid-term follow-up using a tantalum cage for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion will be maintained for 11 years postoperatively, similar to the results with autologous bone graft and plating.

A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages

BACKGROUND

Iliac crest autograft or allograft spacers have been traditionally utilized in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to provide vertebral stabilization and enhanced osteogenesis. However, abiotic cages have largely replaced these allogenic sources due to host-site morbidities and disease transmission risks, respectively. Although devices made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium-alloys (Ti) have gained wide popularity, they lack osteoinductive or conductive capabilities. In contrast, silicon nitride (Si3N4) is a relatively new implant material that also provides structural stability and yet purportedly offers osteopromotive and antimicrobial behavior. This study compared radiographic outcomes at ≥12 months of follow-up for osseous integration, fusion rate, time to fusion, and subsidence in ACDF patients with differing intervertebral spacers.

METHODS

Fifty-eight ACDF patients (108 segments) implanted with Si3N4 cages were compared to thirty-four similar ACDF patients (61 segments) implanted with fibular allograft spacers. Lateral radiographs (normal, flexion, and extension) were obtained at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess osseous integration, the presence of bridging bone, the absence of peri-implant radiolucencies, subsidence, and fusion using both interspinous distance (ISD) and Cobb angle methods.

RESULTS

In patients with ≥12 months of follow-up, fusion for the allograft spacers and Si3N4 cages was 86.84% and 96.83%, respectively (ISD method, P=0.10), and 67.65% and 84.13%, respectively (Cobb angle method P=0.07), while osseointegration was 76.32% and 93.65%, respectively (P=0.02). The time to fusion significantly favored the Si3N4 cages (4.08 vs. 8.64 months (ISD method, P=0.01), and 6.76 vs. 11.74 months (Cobb angle method, P=0.04). The assessed time for full osseointegration was 7.83 and 19.24 months for Si3N4 and allograft, respectively (P=0.00). Average subsidence at 1-year follow-up was 0.51 and 2.71 mm for the Si3N4 and allograft cohorts, respectively (P=0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to fibular allograft spacers, Si3N4 cages showed earlier osseointegration and fusion, higher fusion rates, and less subsidence.

No correlation between radiological and clinical outcome 1 year following cervical arthrodesis

AIM

To correlate clinical and radiological outcome following one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages filled with demineralized bone matrix (DBM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive patient cohort with degenerative disc disease that underwent ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cages filled with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) between 2010 and 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Changes in the operated segments were measured and compared to radiographs directly after surgery. Clinical outcome was evaluated by a physical examination, pain by visual analog scale (VAS) for arm and neck. Health-related quality of life was measured using the EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

Of 282 consecutive cases, follow-up data were obtained from 194 (69%) cases. The median age at presentation was 54 years and 91 patients were male (46%). Ninety-eight and 96 patients had one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Mean VAS pain was reduced from 5.2 ± 3.6 to 2.6 ± 2.4 (p < 0.001) and from 5.8 ± 3.3 to 2.1 ± 2.7 (p < 0.001) in the myelopathy and radiculopathy group, respectively. Fusion was achieved in 79 and 82% of segments in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Cervical alignment was better in 10 and 1%, similar in 68 and 76%, worse in 23 and 23% in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Subsidence was observed in 44 and 34% of segments in one- and two-level surgeries, respectively. Follow-up operations due to symptomatic adjacent disc disease or implant failure were needed in 13 (7%) and 15 (8%) of cases, respectively. Subsidence, adjacent disc disease, and cervical alignment all had no influence on the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcome after ACDF with PEEK cages filled with demineralized bone matrix is highly satisfactory. Radiological signs of non-fusion, subsidence, and cervical alignment have no influence on clinical outcome.

Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using dynamic cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A minimum 5-year follow-up study

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is an effective surgical technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, no data exist regarding long-term outcomes after ACCF with the dynamic cervical plate for CSM. This study aimed to provide minimum 5-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using dynamic cervical plate and titanium mesh cage (TMC) for CSM.Thirty-five patients who underwent single- or 2-level ACCF with dynamic cervical plate and TMC for the treatment of CSM were retrospectively investigated. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to assess the clinical outcome. Radiographic evaluations included TMC subsidence, fusion status, cervical lordosis, segmental angle, and segmental height.Twenty-eight patients underwent single-level and 7 patients underwent 2-level corpectomy with a mean follow-up period of 69.5 months. The average preoperative JOA score was 11.3 ± 3.0 and improved significantly to 14.2 ± 2.0 at the last follow-up (P < .001). Both cervical lordosis (P = .013) and segmental angle (P = .001) were significantly increased toward lordosis at the last follow-up. The TMC subsidence rate was 31.4% (n = 11) at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in JOA recovery rate between subsidence and no subsidence group (P = .43). All patients obtained solid fusion at 1-year follow-up.Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with dynamic cervical plate and TMC might be an effective method for the treatment of CSM at a minimum 5-year follow-up. It can maintain or restore cervical sagittal alignment. Subsidence of the TMC did not influence the clinical outcome.