1
|
Rambaud J, Broman LM, Chevret S, Visconti F, Leger PL, Guner Y, Butragueño-Laiseca L, Piloquet JE, Di Nardo M. Association between pediatric intensive care mortality and mechanical ventilation settings during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur J Pediatr 2023; 182:4487-4497. [PMID: 37491617 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to describe the current mechanical ventilation (MV) settings during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (P-ARDS) in six European centers. This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in six European centers from January 2009 to December 2019. Children > 1 month to 18 years supported with ECMO for refractory P-ARDS were included. Collected data were as follows: patients' pre-ECMO medical condition, pre-ECMO adjunctive therapies for P-ARDS, pre-ECMO and during ECMO MV settings on day (D) 1, D3, D7, and D14 of ECMO, use of adjunctive therapies during ECMO, duration of ECMO, pediatric intensive care unit length of stay, and survival. A total of 255 patients with P-ARDS were included. The multivariate analysis showed that PEEP on D1 (OR = 1.13, 95% CI [1.03-1.24], p = 0.01); D3 (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.06-1.29], p = 0.001); and D14 (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.05-1.43], p = 0.02) and DP on D7 were significantly associated with higher odds of mortality (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.71-0.92], p = 0.001). Moreover, DP on D1 above 15 cmH2O (OR 2.23, 95% CI (1.09-4.71), p = 0.03) and native lung FiO2 above 60% on D14 (OR 10.36, 95% CI (1.51-116.15), p = 0.03) were significantly associated with higher odds of mortality. Conclusion: MV settings during ECMO for P-ARDS varied among centers; however, use of high PEEP levels during ECMO was associated with higher odds of mortality as well as a DP above 15 cmH2O and a native lung FiO2 above 60% on D14 of ECMO. What is Known: • Invasive ventilation settings are well defined for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome; however, once the children required an extracorporeal respiratory support, there is no recommendation how to set the mechanical ventilator. • Impact of invasive ventilator during extracorporeal respiratory support ad only been during the first days of this support but the effects of these settings later in the assistance are not described. What is New: • It seems to be essential to early decrease FiO2 on native lung once the ECMO flow allows an efficient oxygenation. • Tight control to limit the driving pressure at 15 cmH20 during ECMO run seems to be associated with better survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Rambaud
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | - Lars M Broman
- ECMO Centre Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Federico Visconti
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Pierre-Louis Leger
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Yigit Guner
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Laura Butragueño-Laiseca
- Pediatric Intensive Care Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jean-Eudes Piloquet
- Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Nantes Universitary Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Matteo Di Nardo
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kneyber MCJ, Khemani RG, Bhalla A, Blokpoel RGT, Cruces P, Dahmer MK, Emeriaud G, Grunwell J, Ilia S, Katira BH, Lopez-Fernandez YM, Rajapreyar P, Sanchez-Pinto LN, Rimensberger PC. Understanding clinical and biological heterogeneity to advance precision medicine in paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2023; 11:197-212. [PMID: 36566767 PMCID: PMC10880453 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00483-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome that is associated with high rates of mortality and long-term morbidity. Factors that distinguish PARDS from adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) include changes in developmental stage and lung maturation with age, precipitating factors, and comorbidities. No specific treatment is available for PARDS and management is largely supportive, but methods to identify patients who would benefit from specific ventilation strategies or ancillary treatments, such as prone positioning, are needed. Understanding of the clinical and biological heterogeneity of PARDS, and of differences in clinical features and clinical course, pathobiology, response to treatment, and outcomes between PARDS and adult ARDS, will be key to the development of novel preventive and therapeutic strategies and a precision medicine approach to care. Studies in which clinical, biomarker, and transcriptomic data, as well as informatics, are used to unpack the biological and phenotypic heterogeneity of PARDS, and implementation of methods to better identify patients with PARDS, including methods to rapidly identify subphenotypes and endotypes at the point of care, will drive progress on the path to precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C J Kneyber
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Critical Care, Anaesthesiology, Peri-operative and Emergency Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
| | - Robinder G Khemani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Paediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anoopindar Bhalla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Paediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert G T Blokpoel
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Pablo Cruces
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
| | - Mary K Dahmer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Grunwell
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stavroula Ilia
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Bhushan H Katira
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yolanda M Lopez-Fernandez
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Prakadeshwari Rajapreyar
- Department of Pediatrics (Critical Care), Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
- Department of Pediatrics (Critical Care), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter C Rimensberger
- Division of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nonpulmonary Treatments for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2023; 24:S45-S60. [PMID: 36661435 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an updated review of the literature on nonpulmonary treatments for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) from the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost). STUDY SELECTION Searches were limited to children with PARDS or hypoxic respiratory failure focused on nonpulmonary adjunctive therapies (sedation, delirium management, neuromuscular blockade, nutrition, fluid management, transfusion, sleep management, and rehabilitation). DATA EXTRACTION Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form. DATA SYNTHESIS The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Twenty-five studies were identified for full-text extraction. Five clinical practice recommendations were generated, related to neuromuscular blockade, nutrition, fluid management, and transfusion. Thirteen good practice statements were generated on the use of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, delirium, sleep management, rehabilitation, and additional information on neuromuscular blockade and nutrition. Three research statements were generated to promote further investigation in nonpulmonary therapies for PARDS. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations and statements about nonpulmonary treatments in PARDS are intended to promote optimization and consistency of care for patients with PARDS and identify areas of uncertainty requiring further investigation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Blanchard F, James A, Assefi M, Kapandji N, Constantin JM. Personalized medicine targeting different ARDS phenotypes: The future of pharmacotherapy for ARDS? Expert Rev Respir Med 2023; 17:41-52. [PMID: 36724878 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2176302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) still represents a major challenge with high mortality rates and altered quality of life. Many well-designed studies have failed to improve ARDS outcomes. Heterogeneity of etiologies, mechanisms of lung damage, different lung mechanics, and different treatment approaches may explain these failures. At the era of personalized medicine, ARDS phenotyping is not only a field of research, but a bedside consideration when implementing therapy. ARDS has moved from being a simple syndrome to a more complex area of subgrouping. Intensivists must understand these phenotypes and therapies associated with a better outcome. AREAS COVERED After a brief sum-up of the different type of ARDS phenotypes, we will present some relevant therapy that may be impacted by phenotyping. A focus on pharmacotherapy will be realized before a section on non-pharmaceutical strategies. Eventually, we will highlight the limits of our knowledge of phenotyping and the pitfalls of personalized medicine. EXPERT OPINION Biological and morphological ARDS phenotypes are now well studied. The future of ARDS therapy will go through phenotyping that allows a personalized medication for each patient. However, a better assessment of these phenotypes is required, and clinical trials should be conducted with an ad-hoc phenotyping before randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Blanchard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.,Antimicrobial Stewardship Team GH Paris Centre, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Arthur James
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mona Assefi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Natacha Kapandji
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Constantin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klučka J, Klabusayová E, Vafek V, Musilová T, Kratochvíl M, Kosinová M, Štourač P. Year 2022 in review - Paediatric anesthesia and intensive care. ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNÍ MEDICÍNA 2022. [DOI: 10.36290/aim.2022.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
|
6
|
Carlton EF, Gebremariam A, Maddux AB, McNamara N, Barbaro RP, Cornell TT, Iwashyna TJ, Prosser LA, Zimmerman J, Weiss S, Prescott HC. New and Progressive Medical Conditions After Pediatric Sepsis Hospitalization Requiring Critical Care. JAMA Pediatr 2022; 176:e223554. [PMID: 36215045 PMCID: PMC9552050 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Children commonly experience physical, cognitive, or emotional sequelae after sepsis. However, little is known about the development or progression of medical conditions after pediatric sepsis. Objective To quantify the development and progression of 4 common conditions in the 6 months after sepsis and to assess whether they differed after hospitalization for sepsis vs nonsepsis among critically ill children. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study of 101 511 children (<19 years) with sepsis or nonsepsis hospitalization used a national administrative claims database (January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018). Data management and analysis were conducted from April 1, 2020, to July 7, 2022. Exposures Intensive care unit hospitalization for sepsis vs all-cause intensive care unit hospitalizations, excluding sepsis. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the development of 4 target conditions (chronic respiratory failure, seizure disorder, supplemental nutritional dependence, and chronic kidney disease) within 6 months of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the progression of the 4 target conditions among children with the condition before hospitalization. Outcomes were identified via diagnostic and procedural codes, durable medical equipment codes, and prescription medications. Differences in the development and the progression of conditions between pediatric patients with sepsis and pediatric patients with nonsepsis who survived intensive care unit hospitalization were assessed using logistic regression with matching weights. Results A total of 5150 survivors of pediatric sepsis and 96 361 survivors of nonsepsis intensive care unit hospitalizations were identified; 2593 (50.3%) were female. The median age was 9.5 years (IQR, 3-15 years) in the sepsis cohort and 7 years (IQR, 2-13 years) in the nonsepsis cohort. Of the 5150 sepsis survivors, 670 (13.0%) developed a new target condition, and 385 of 1834 (21.0%) with a preexisting target condition had disease progression. A total of 998 of the 5150 survivors (19.4%) had development and/or progression of at least 1 condition. New conditions were more common among sepsis vs nonsepsis hospitalizations (new chronic respiratory failure: 4.6% vs 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.54 [95% CI, 2.19-2.94]; new supplemental nutritional dependence: 7.9% vs 2.7%; OR, 3.17 [95% CI, 2.80-3.59]; and new chronic kidney disease: 1.1% vs 0.6%; OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.25-2.19]). New seizure disorder was less common (4.6% vs 6.0%; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]). Progressive supplemental nutritional dependence was more common (1.5% vs 0.5%; OR, 2.95 [95% CI, 1.60-5.42]), progressive epilepsy was less common (33.7% vs 40.6%; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.86]), and progressive respiratory failure (4.4% vs 3.3%; OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.89-2.04]) and progressive chronic kidney disease (7.9% vs 9.2%; OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.18-3.91]) were similar among survivors of sepsis vs nonsepsis admitted to an intensive care unit. Conclusions and Relevance In this national cohort of critically ill children who survived sepsis, 1 in 5 developed or had progression of a condition of interest after sepsis hospitalization, suggesting survivors of pediatric sepsis may benefit from structured follow-up to identify and treat new or worsening medical comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F. Carlton
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Acham Gebremariam
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Aline B. Maddux
- Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
| | - Nancy McNamara
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ryan P. Barbaro
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Timothy T. Cornell
- Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lisa A. Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jerry Zimmerman
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Scott Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tsolaki V, Zakynthinos GE, Papadonta ME, Bardaka F, Fotakopoulos G, Pantazopoulos I, Makris D, Zakynthinos E. Neuromuscular Blockade in the Pre- and COVID-19 ARDS Patients. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091538. [PMID: 36143323 PMCID: PMC9504585 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for a quarter of mechanically ventilated patients, while during the pandemic, it overwhelmed the capacity of intensive care units (ICUs). Lung protective ventilation (low tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure titrated to lung mechanics and oxygenation, permissive hypercapnia) is a non-pharmacological approach that is the gold standard of management. Among the pharmacological treatments, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), although extensively studied, has not yet been well clarified. The rationale is to minimize the risk for lung damage progression, in the already-injured pulmonary parenchyma. By abolishing rigorous spontaneous efforts, NMBAs may decrease the generation of high transpulmonary pressures that could aggravate patients’ self-inflicted lung injury. Moreover, NMBAs can harmonize the patient–ventilator interaction. Recent randomized controlled trials reported contradictory results and changed the clinical practice in a bidirectional way. NMBAs have not been documented to improve long-term survival; thus, the current guidance suggests their use only in patients in whom a lung protective ventilation protocol cannot be applied, due to asynchrony or increased respiratory efforts. In the present review, we discuss the published data and additionally the clinical practice in the “war” conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerning NMBA use in the management of patients with ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Tsolaki
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-2413502964
| | - George E. Zakynthinos
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
- Third Department of Cardiology, Sotiria General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria-Eirini Papadonta
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Fotini Bardaka
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - George Fotakopoulos
- Neurosurgical Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Pantazopoulos
- Emergency Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Demosthenes Makris
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Epaminondas Zakynthinos
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|